There is the data: atp_tennis containing the following columns: ['Tournament', 'Date', 'Series', 'Court', 'Surface', 'Round', 'Best of', 'Player_1', 'Player_2', 'Winner', 'Rank_1', 'Rank_2', 'Pts_1', 'Pts_2', 'Odd_1', 'Odd_2', 'score'].  
--- The description for each column this data is:
Tournament: Name of the tennis tournament (Brisbane International, Chennai Open, Qatar Exxon Mobil Open ...etc)
Date: Date the match was played (year-month-day)
Series: Category or level of the tennis tournament (ATP250, ATP500, Masters1000 and Grand Slams offer 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 ranking points to the winner seperately.)
Court: Place the match was held (Indoors or Outdoors)
Surface: Type of court surface (Hard, Grass and Clay)
Round: Stage of the tournament (1st Round, 2nd Round, Quarterfinals, Semifinal and The Final)
Best of: Tourament systems ("best of 3" or "best of 5")
Player_1: Name of the first competitor in each match
Player_2: Name of the second competitor in each match
Winner: Name of the Player_1 or Player_2 who won the match 
Rank_1: World rankings of the Player_1 at the time of the match
Rank_2: World rankings of the Player_2 at the time of the match
Pts_1: Ranking points held by Player_1 before the match (accumulated over the season and higher points typically indicate a more successful player)
Pts_2: Ranking points held by Player_2 before the match
Odd_1: Betting odds for Player_1 (reflecting their perceived chances of winning)
Odd_2: Betting odds for Player_2 
Score: Final score of the match ("score of Player_1" - "score of Player_2")
---
Considering contents from the dataset and requirements from user. Please note DO NOT CHANGE FILE AND VARIABLE NAMES THAT I HAVE SET!
Interactions begin:
[USER (data scientist)]: Hi, let's start by assessing the data quality of the atp_tennis dataset. To achieve this, we'll create a Data Quality Report DataFrame that covers two main aspects: a list of columns along with the number of missing values in each column, A list of unique values for each categorical column, such as Tournament, Series, Court, Surface, and Round.

[YOU (AI assistant)]: Sure, let's create a Data Quality Report Dataframe for the atp_tennis dataset. Here's the code to generate the report :
'''
import pandas as pd
import pickle

atp_tennis = pd.read_csv('atp_tennis.csv')

# Data Quality Report
missing_values = atp_tennis.isnull().sum()
unique_values = atp_tennis[['Tournament', 'Series', 'Court', 'Surface', 'Round']].nunique()

data_quality_report = pd.DataFrame({'Missing Values': missing_values, 'Unique Values': unique_values})

print(data_quality_report)

'''

[USER (data scientist)]: We aim to examine the primary statistics and distributions of player rankings, win/loss ratios, and surface types in the atp_tennis dataset, spanning various tournaments and time periods. To achieve this, we will generate a Descriptive Statistics Table and Visualizations, such as histograms, bar charts, and box plots. In relation to this, could you please answer my question: In the atp_tennis dataset, above which rank do fewer players obviously have rankings?  

A. 100
B. 200
C. 300
D. 500
E. None of above

[YOU (AI assistant)]: 