Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 22:55:08

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "An architectural firm wants to optimize the allocation of architects to bridge and mill projects to maximize the total length of bridges and the number of mills designed, considering constraints on the number of projects an architect can handle.",
  "optimization_problem": "The firm aims to maximize the total length of bridges and the number of mills designed by allocating architects to projects, subject to constraints on the maximum number of projects an architect can handle and ensuring each project is assigned to exactly one architect.",
  "objective": "maximize total_length_of_bridges + total_number_of_mills",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating new tables for missing mappings and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Gather missing data on project handling capacity and mill indicators",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for missing mappings and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE bridge (
  bridge_id INTEGER,
  length_meters FLOAT,
  architect_id INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE architect_assignments (
  architect_id INTEGER,
  bridge_id INTEGER,
  mill_id INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE mills (
  mill_id INTEGER,
  designed BOOLEAN
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "bridge": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about bridges including their length and assigned architect",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "bridge_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each bridge",
          "optimization_purpose": "Identifies bridge in optimization model",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "length_meters": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Length of the bridge in meters",
          "optimization_purpose": "Coefficient in objective function",
          "sample_values": "100.0, 200.0, 300.0"
        },
        "architect_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the architect assigned to the bridge",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable mapping for x_ij",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        }
      }
    },
    "architect_assignments": {
      "business_purpose": "Tracks assignments of architects to projects",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "architect_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each architect",
          "optimization_purpose": "Identifies architect in decision variables",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "bridge_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the bridge assigned to the architect",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable x_ij",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "mill_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the mill assigned to the architect",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable y_ik",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        }
      }
    },
    "mills": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about mills being designed",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "mill_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each mill",
          "optimization_purpose": "Identifies mill in optimization model",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "designed": {
          "data_type": "BOOLEAN",
          "business_meaning": "Indicator if the mill is designed",
          "optimization_purpose": "Objective coefficient for mill design",
          "sample_values": "true, false"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "max_projects_per_architect": {
    "sample_value": 5,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of projects an architect can handle",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound for architect project capacity",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "number_of_mills": {
    "sample_value": 10,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Total number of mills being designed",
    "optimization_role": "Objective coefficient for mill design",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "architecture",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "architecture",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "An architectural firm is optimizing the allocation of architects to bridge and mill projects to maximize the total length of bridges and the number of mills designed, considering constraints on the number of projects an architect can handle.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "The firm aims to maximize the total length of bridges and the number of mills designed by allocating architects to projects, subject to constraints on the maximum number of projects an architect can handle and ensuring each project is assigned to exactly one architect.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize sum(length_meters * x_ij) + sum(designed * y_ik)",
    "decision_variables": "x_ij: binary, y_ik: binary",
    "constraints": [
      "sum(x_ij) + sum(y_ik) <= max_projects_per_architect for each architect",
      "sum(x_ij for each bridge) = 1",
      "sum(y_ik for each mill) = 1"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "length_meters[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "bridge.length_meters",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Length of each bridge in meters"
      },
      "designed[k]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "mills.designed",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Indicator if the mill is designed"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "max_projects_per_architect": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.max_projects_per_architect",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of projects an architect can handle"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "x_ij": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "architect_assignments.bridge_id",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Assignment of architect to bridge",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      },
      "y_ik": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "architect_assignments.mill_id",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Assignment of architect to mill",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
