Iteration final - PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION
Sequence: 5
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 23:05:38

Prompt:
You are a business analyst creating structured optimization problem documentation.

DATA SOURCES EXPLANATION:
- FINAL OR ANALYSIS: Final converged optimization problem from alternating process (iteration 1), contains business context and schema mapping evaluation
- DATABASE SCHEMA: Current database structure after iterative adjustments  
- DATA DICTIONARY: Business meanings and optimization roles of tables and columns
- CURRENT STORED VALUES: Realistic business data generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
- BUSINESS CONFIGURATION: Scalar parameters and business logic formulas separated from table data

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS: 
- Ensure problem description naturally leads to LINEAR or MIXED-INTEGER optimization formulation
- Make business context consistent with the intended decision variables and objectives
- Align constraint descriptions with expected mathematical constraints
- Ensure data descriptions map clearly to expected coefficient sources
- Maintain business authenticity while fixing mathematical consistency issues
- Avoid business scenarios that would naturally require nonlinear relationships (variable products, divisions, etc.)

AUTO-EXTRACTED CONTEXT REQUIREMENTS:
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID] are integer variables representing the number of pieces performed by a member in a performance
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize total_pieces = ∑(Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID])
- Business configuration includes: Maximum number of attendees allowed per performance (used for Used as a constraint bound in optimization model), Maximum number of pieces a member can perform (used for Used as a constraint bound in optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate

FINAL OR ANALYSIS:
{
  "database_id": "performance_attendance",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A theater company is optimizing the allocation of its members to performances to maximize the total number of pieces performed, considering constraints such as member availability and performance attendance limits.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "The goal is to maximize the total number of pieces performed by members across all performances, subject to constraints on member availability and performance attendance limits.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize total_pieces = \u2211(Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID])",
    "decision_variables": "Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID] are integer variables representing the number of pieces performed by a member in a performance",
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID]) \u2264 Attendance[Performance_ID] for each Performance_ID",
      "\u2211(Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID]) \u2264 Availability[Member_ID] for each Member_ID"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "member_attendance.Num_of_Pieces",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Number of pieces performed by a member in a performance"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "Attendance[Performance_ID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "performance.Attendance",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of pieces that can be performed in a performance"
      },
      "Availability[Member_ID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "member_availability.Availability",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of pieces a member is available to perform"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "member_attendance.Num_of_Pieces",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Number of pieces performed by a member in a performance",
        "variable_type": "integer"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}

FINAL DATABASE SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Incorporated member availability data into the schema and moved scalar parameters to configuration logic. Adjusted schema to align with optimization requirements.

CREATE TABLE member_attendance (
  Member_ID INTEGER,
  Performance_ID INTEGER,
  Num_of_Pieces INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE performance (
  Performance_ID INTEGER,
  Attendance INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE member_availability (
  Member_ID INTEGER,
  Availability INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT STORED VALUES:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical theater company operations, considering member availability, performance attendance limits, and realistic performance schedules.

-- Realistic data for member_attendance
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (1, 101, 2);
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (2, 102, 1);
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (3, 103, 3);

-- Realistic data for performance
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (101, 50);
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (102, 60);
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (103, 70);

-- Realistic data for member_availability
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (1, 5);
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (2, 10);
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (3, 15);


```

DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "member_attendance": {
      "business_purpose": "Tracks the number of pieces each member performs in each performance",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "Member_ID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each member",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for decision variables",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "Performance_ID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each performance",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for decision variables",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "Num_of_Pieces": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Number of pieces performed by a member in a performance",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable value",
          "sample_values": "0, 1, 2"
        }
      }
    },
    "performance": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about each performance",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "Performance_ID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each performance",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for constraints",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "Attendance": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum number of pieces that can be performed in a performance",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound",
          "sample_values": "50, 60, 70"
        }
      }
    },
    "member_availability": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores the availability of each member",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "Member_ID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each member",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for constraints",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "Availability": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum number of pieces a member is available to perform",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound",
          "sample_values": "5, 10, 15"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:

BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:
{
  "attendance_limit": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of attendees allowed per performance",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint bound in optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 70,
    "business_justification": "Reflects the maximum capacity for the largest performance venue."
  },
  "availability_threshold": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of pieces a member can perform",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint bound in optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 15,
    "business_justification": "Represents the maximum number of pieces a highly available member can perform."
  }
}

Business Configuration Design: 
Our system separates business logic design from value determination:
- Configuration Logic (business_configuration_logic.json): Templates designed by data engineers with sample_value for scalars and actual formulas for business logic
- Configuration Values (business_configuration.json): Realistic values determined by domain experts for scalar parameters only
- Design Rationale: Ensures business logic consistency while allowing flexible parameter tuning


TASK: Create structured markdown documentation for SECTIONS 1-3 ONLY (Problem Description).

EXACT MARKDOWN STRUCTURE TO FOLLOW:

# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: performance_attendance

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
[Regenerate business context that naturally aligns with LINEAR optimization formulation. Ensure:]
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID] are integer variables representing the number of pieces performed by a member in a performance
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize total_pieces = ∑(Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID])
- Business configuration includes: Maximum number of attendees allowed per performance (used for Used as a constraint bound in optimization model), Maximum number of pieces a member can perform (used for Used as a constraint bound in optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate
- CRITICAL: Include ALL business configuration information (scalar parameters AND business logic formulas) in natural business language

### Goals  
[Regenerate goals that clearly lead to LINEAR mathematical objective:]
- Optimization goal: maximize
- Metric to optimize: maximize total_pieces = ∑(Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID])
- Success measurement aligned with expected coefficient sources
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear optimization goal
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation

## 2. Constraints    

[Regenerate constraints that directly match expected LINEAR mathematical constraints:]
- Expected constraint: ['∑(Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID]) ≤ Attendance[Performance_ID] for each Performance_ID', '∑(Num_of_Pieces[Member_ID, Performance_ID]) ≤ Availability[Member_ID] for each Member_ID'] (Form: Standard constraint form based on business requirements)

[Each constraint should be described in business terms that naturally lead to LINEAR mathematical forms (no variable products or divisions)]

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Incorporated member availability data into the schema and moved scalar parameters to configuration logic. Adjusted schema to align with optimization requirements.

CREATE TABLE member_attendance (
  Member_ID INTEGER,
  Performance_ID INTEGER,
  Num_of_Pieces INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE performance (
  Performance_ID INTEGER,
  Attendance INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE member_availability (
  Member_ID INTEGER,
  Availability INTEGER
);


```

### Data Dictionary  
[Create comprehensive business-oriented data dictionary mapping tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles - NOT technical database terms. Base this on the data_dictionary provided but rewrite in business language that clearly connects to the expected linear mathematical formulation]

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical theater company operations, considering member availability, performance attendance limits, and realistic performance schedules.

-- Realistic data for member_attendance
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (1, 101, 2);
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (2, 102, 1);
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (3, 103, 3);

-- Realistic data for performance
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (101, 50);
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (102, 60);
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (103, 70);

-- Realistic data for member_availability
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (1, 5);
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (2, 10);
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (3, 15);


```

STOP HERE - Do not include section 4 (Mathematical Optimization Formulation).

Response:
# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: performance_attendance

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
The theater company is focused on optimizing the allocation of its members to various performances. The primary decision involves determining the number of pieces each member will perform in each performance. This decision is represented by integer variables, where each variable corresponds to the number of pieces performed by a specific member in a specific performance. The operational goal is to maximize the total number of pieces performed across all performances. This objective aligns with the company's aim to enhance performance quality and audience satisfaction.

The business configuration includes key parameters such as the maximum number of attendees allowed per performance, which serves as a constraint bound in the optimization model. Additionally, there is a limit on the maximum number of pieces a member can perform, ensuring that member workload is manageable and sustainable. These parameters are critical in shaping the linear relationships that guide the optimization process.

The data presented reflects current operational realities, focusing on precise decision-making that naturally leads to linear formulations. Resource limitations, such as venue capacity and member availability, are considered to ensure that the optimization model remains realistic and applicable. The business configuration parameters are integral to the model, providing the necessary bounds and constraints to guide the optimization process effectively.

### Goals  
The primary goal of the optimization process is to maximize the total number of pieces performed by the theater company's members across all scheduled performances. This goal is achieved by strategically allocating members to performances in a way that maximizes the total output, measured by the sum of pieces performed. Success in this optimization effort is determined by the ability to reach or approach the maximum possible total of performed pieces, given the constraints of member availability and performance attendance limits. The optimization goal is articulated in straightforward business language, emphasizing the linear nature of the objective without resorting to mathematical notation.

## 2. Constraints    

The optimization model is subject to several constraints that ensure the solution is feasible and aligns with business realities:

- The total number of pieces performed in any given performance cannot exceed the maximum attendance capacity for that performance. This constraint ensures that the number of pieces aligns with the venue's capacity to accommodate attendees, maintaining a balance between performance quality and audience experience.

- Each member has a limit on the number of pieces they can perform, based on their availability. This constraint ensures that members are not overburdened and can perform at their best, contributing to the overall success of the performances.

These constraints are described in business terms that naturally lead to linear mathematical forms, avoiding complex relationships such as variable products or divisions.

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Incorporated member availability data into the schema and moved scalar parameters to configuration logic. Adjusted schema to align with optimization requirements.

CREATE TABLE member_attendance (
  Member_ID INTEGER,
  Performance_ID INTEGER,
  Num_of_Pieces INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE performance (
  Performance_ID INTEGER,
  Attendance INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE member_availability (
  Member_ID INTEGER,
  Availability INTEGER
);
```

### Data Dictionary  
The data dictionary provides a comprehensive mapping of tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles:

- **Member Attendance Table**: This table tracks the number of pieces each member performs in each performance. It plays a crucial role in the optimization process as it represents the decision variables. The columns include:
  - **Member_ID**: A unique identifier for each member, serving as an index for decision variables.
  - **Performance_ID**: A unique identifier for each performance, also serving as an index for decision variables.
  - **Num_of_Pieces**: The number of pieces performed by a member in a performance, representing the decision variable value.

- **Performance Table**: This table stores information about each performance, specifically the maximum number of pieces that can be performed. It serves as a constraint bound in the optimization model. The columns include:
  - **Performance_ID**: A unique identifier for each performance, serving as an index for constraints.
  - **Attendance**: The maximum number of pieces that can be performed in a performance, acting as a constraint bound.

- **Member Availability Table**: This table stores the availability of each member, which is used as a constraint bound in the optimization model. The columns include:
  - **Member_ID**: A unique identifier for each member, serving as an index for constraints.
  - **Availability**: The maximum number of pieces a member is available to perform, acting as a constraint bound.

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical theater company operations, considering member availability, performance attendance limits, and realistic performance schedules.

-- Realistic data for member_attendance
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (1, 101, 2);
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (2, 102, 1);
INSERT INTO member_attendance (Member_ID, Performance_ID, Num_of_Pieces) VALUES (3, 103, 3);

-- Realistic data for performance
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (101, 50);
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (102, 60);
INSERT INTO performance (Performance_ID, Attendance) VALUES (103, 70);

-- Realistic data for member_availability
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (1, 5);
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (2, 10);
INSERT INTO member_availability (Member_ID, Availability) VALUES (3, 15);
```
