Iteration 3 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 7
Timestamp: 2025-07-25 22:35:24

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 3 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.


CONVERGENCE PRESSURE (Iteration 3/5):
- Focus on finalizing the linear optimization model
- Set complete=true if formulation is mathematically sound and linear
- Minimize further schema change requests


CURRENT STATE (iteration 2):
{
  "iteration": 3,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "A construction company aims to minimize the total length of bridges and mills built by architects while ensuring each architect is assigned to at least one project and no architect is overburdened with more than three projects.",
  "optimization_problem": "Minimize the total length of bridges and mills built by architects, subject to constraints on the number of projects each architect can handle and ensuring each architect is assigned to at least one project.",
  "objective": "minimize \u2211(length_meters[i] * x[i] + length_feet[j] * y[j]) where x[i] and y[j] are binary decision variables indicating whether bridge i or mill j is built",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include adding tables for decision variables and constraint bounds, updating the data dictionary, and refining business configuration logic to include scalar parameters for minimum and maximum projects per architect."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Refine constraint bounds and decision variables for linear optimization",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 3 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include adding tables for decision variables and constraint bounds, updating the data dictionary, and refining business configuration logic to include scalar parameters for minimum and maximum projects per architect.

CREATE TABLE bridge_lengths (
  bridge_id INTEGER,
  length_meters INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE mill_lengths (
  mill_id INTEGER,
  length_feet INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE architect_project_assignments (
  architect_id INTEGER,
  bridge_assignment BOOLEAN,
  mill_assignment BOOLEAN
);

CREATE TABLE architect_constraints (
  architect_id INTEGER,
  min_projects INTEGER,
  max_projects INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "bridge_lengths": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores the length of each bridge in meters for optimization",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "bridge_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each bridge",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links bridges to their lengths",
          "sample_values": [
            1,
            2,
            3
          ]
        },
        "length_meters": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Length of the bridge in meters",
          "optimization_purpose": "Objective coefficient for bridge length",
          "sample_values": [
            100,
            150,
            200
          ]
        }
      }
    },
    "mill_lengths": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores the length of each mill in feet for optimization",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "mill_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each mill",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links mills to their lengths",
          "sample_values": [
            1,
            2,
            3
          ]
        },
        "length_feet": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Length of the mill in feet",
          "optimization_purpose": "Objective coefficient for mill length",
          "sample_values": [
            328,
            400,
            500
          ]
        }
      }
    },
    "architect_project_assignments": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores the assignment of architects to projects, indicating whether a bridge or mill is built",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "architect_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each architect",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links architects to their project assignments",
          "sample_values": [
            1,
            2,
            3
          ]
        },
        "bridge_assignment": {
          "data_type": "BOOLEAN",
          "business_meaning": "Indicates whether the architect is assigned to build a bridge",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable for bridge assignment",
          "sample_values": [
            true,
            false,
            true
          ]
        },
        "mill_assignment": {
          "data_type": "BOOLEAN",
          "business_meaning": "Indicates whether the architect is assigned to build a mill",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable for mill assignment",
          "sample_values": [
            false,
            true,
            false
          ]
        }
      }
    },
    "architect_constraints": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores the minimum and maximum number of projects each architect can handle",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "architect_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each architect",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links architects to their project constraints",
          "sample_values": [
            1,
            2,
            3
          ]
        },
        "min_projects": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Minimum number of projects the architect must be assigned to",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound for minimum projects per architect",
          "sample_values": [
            1,
            1,
            1
          ]
        },
        "max_projects": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum number of projects the architect can be assigned to",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound for maximum projects per architect",
          "sample_values": [
            3,
            3,
            3
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "min_projects_per_architect": {
    "sample_value": 1,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Minimum number of projects each architect must be assigned to",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound for minimum projects per architect",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "max_projects_per_architect": {
    "sample_value": 3,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of projects each architect can be assigned to",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound for maximum projects per architect",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "architecture",
  "iteration": 3,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "architecture",
  "iteration": 3,
  "business_context": "A construction company aims to minimize the total length of bridges and mills built by architects while ensuring each architect is assigned to at least one project and no architect is overburdened with more than three projects.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Minimize the total length of bridges and mills built by architects, subject to constraints on the number of projects each architect can handle and ensuring each architect is assigned to at least one project.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "minimize \u2211(length_meters[i] * x[i] + length_feet[j] * y[j]) where x[i] and y[j] are binary decision variables indicating whether bridge i or mill j is built",
    "decision_variables": "x[i] (binary): 1 if bridge i is built, 0 otherwise; y[j] (binary): 1 if mill j is built, 0 otherwise",
    "constraints": "\u2211(x[i] + y[j]) >= min_projects[k] for each architect k; \u2211(x[i] + y[j]) <= max_projects[k] for each architect k"
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "length_meters[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "bridge_lengths.length_meters",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Length of bridge i in meters"
      },
      "length_feet[j]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "mill_lengths.length_feet",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Length of mill j in feet"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "min_projects[k]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.min_projects_per_architect",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Minimum number of projects architect k must be assigned to"
      },
      "max_projects[k]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.max_projects_per_architect",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of projects architect k can be assigned to"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "x[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "architect_project_assignments.bridge_assignment",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Binary decision variable indicating whether bridge i is built",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      },
      "y[j]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "architect_project_assignments.mill_assignment",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Binary decision variable indicating whether mill j is built",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
