Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-25 22:26:34

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "A school district aims to allocate its budget across multiple schools to maximize the total educational impact while staying within the total budget and ensuring a minimum investment in each school.",
  "optimization_problem": "The district needs to decide how much to invest in each school to maximize the total educational impact, measured by the sum of weighted investments, while ensuring that the total investment does not exceed the total budget and that each school receives a minimum investment.",
  "objective": "maximize \u2211(weight_school_i \u00d7 investment_school_i)",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating tables for school weights and minimum investments, updating the budget table, and adding configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Define weights for educational impact and minimum investment requirements for each school",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating tables for school weights and minimum investments, updating the budget table, and adding configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE school_weights (
  school_id INTEGER,
  weight FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE school_minimum_investments (
  school_id INTEGER,
  minimum_investment FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE budget (
  school_id INTEGER,
  Invested FLOAT,
  total_budget FLOAT
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "school_weights": {
      "business_purpose": "weights for educational impact per dollar invested in each school",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "school_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "unique identifier for each school",
          "optimization_purpose": "index for school weights",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "weight": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "weight representing the educational impact per dollar invested in the school",
          "optimization_purpose": "coefficient in the objective function",
          "sample_values": "0.5, 0.7, 0.9"
        }
      }
    },
    "school_minimum_investments": {
      "business_purpose": "minimum investment required for each school",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "school_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "unique identifier for each school",
          "optimization_purpose": "index for minimum investments",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "minimum_investment": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "minimum investment required for the school",
          "optimization_purpose": "lower bound for investment per school constraint",
          "sample_values": "50000, 60000, 70000"
        }
      }
    },
    "budget": {
      "business_purpose": "budget allocation for schools",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "school_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "unique identifier for each school",
          "optimization_purpose": "index for investment decisions",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "Invested": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "amount invested in the school",
          "optimization_purpose": "decision variable in the optimization model",
          "sample_values": "100000, 150000, 200000"
        },
        "total_budget": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "total budget available for investment across all schools",
          "optimization_purpose": "upper bound for total investment constraint",
          "sample_values": "1000000"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "total_budget": {
    "sample_value": 1000000,
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "total budget available for investment across all schools",
    "optimization_role": "upper bound for total investment constraint",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "minimum_investment_school_i": {
    "sample_value": 50000,
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "minimum investment required for each school",
    "optimization_role": "lower bound for investment per school constraint",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "school_finance",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "school_finance",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A school district aims to allocate its budget across multiple schools to maximize the total educational impact, measured by the sum of weighted investments, while ensuring that the total investment does not exceed the total budget and that each school receives a minimum investment.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Maximize the total educational impact by allocating investments across schools, subject to a total budget constraint and minimum investment requirements for each school.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize \u2211(weight_school_i \u00d7 investment_school_i)",
    "decision_variables": "investment_school_i: continuous variable representing the amount invested in school i",
    "constraints": "\u2211(investment_school_i) \u2264 total_budget; investment_school_i \u2265 minimum_investment_school_i for all i"
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "weight_school_i[school_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "school_weights.weight",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "weight representing the educational impact per dollar invested in school i"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "total_budget": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "budget.total_budget",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "upper bound for total investment across all schools"
      },
      "minimum_investment_school_i[school_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "school_minimum_investments.minimum_investment",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "lower bound for investment in school i"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "investment_school_i[school_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "budget.Invested",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "amount invested in school i",
        "variable_type": "continuous"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
