Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-25 22:30:59

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "Maximize the reach of tweets by selecting a subset of users to tweet, considering their follower count and ensuring that no user is overloaded with tweets.",
  "optimization_problem": "The goal is to maximize the total reach of tweets by selecting a subset of users to tweet, where the reach is defined as the sum of followers of the selected users. The selection is constrained by the maximum number of tweets each user can post and the total number of tweets allowed.",
  "objective": "maximize \u2211(followers[i] * x[i]) where x[i] is a binary decision variable indicating whether user i is selected to tweet.",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating new tables for decision variables and constraint bounds, and updating business configuration logic to include scalar parameters and formulas for optimization constraints."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Refine constraints and ensure all necessary parameters are available for the optimization model.",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for decision variables and constraint bounds, and updating business configuration logic to include scalar parameters and formulas for optimization constraints.

CREATE TABLE user_profiles (
  user_id INTEGER,
  followers INTEGER,
  max_tweets_per_user INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE tweet_selection (
  user_id INTEGER,
  is_selected BOOLEAN
);

CREATE TABLE user_tweet_limits (
  user_id INTEGER,
  max_tweets INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "user_profiles": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores user profile information including follower count.",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "user_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each user.",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for decision variables and constraints.",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "followers": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Number of followers of the user.",
          "optimization_purpose": "Coefficient in the objective function.",
          "sample_values": "1000, 2000, 3000"
        },
        "max_tweets_per_user": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum number of tweets allowed per user.",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound for tweets per user.",
          "sample_values": "5, 5, 5"
        }
      }
    },
    "tweet_selection": {
      "business_purpose": "Binary decision variable indicating whether user i is selected to tweet.",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "user_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each user.",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for decision variables.",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "is_selected": {
          "data_type": "BOOLEAN",
          "business_meaning": "Whether the user is selected to tweet.",
          "optimization_purpose": "Binary decision variable in the optimization model.",
          "sample_values": "true, false, true"
        }
      }
    },
    "user_tweet_limits": {
      "business_purpose": "Maximum number of tweets allowed per user.",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "user_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each user.",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for constraint bounds.",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "max_tweets": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum number of tweets allowed per user.",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound for tweets per user.",
          "sample_values": "5, 5, 5"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "total_tweets_allowed": {
    "sample_value": 100,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum total number of tweets allowed.",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound for total number of tweets.",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "max_tweets_per_user": {
    "sample_value": 5,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of tweets allowed per user.",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound for tweets per user.",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "twitter_1",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "twitter_1",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Maximize the reach of tweets by selecting a subset of users to tweet, considering their follower count and ensuring that no user is overloaded with tweets, while adhering to a total tweet limit.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Maximize the total reach of tweets by selecting a subset of users to tweet, where the reach is defined as the sum of followers of the selected users. The selection is constrained by the maximum number of tweets each user can post and the total number of tweets allowed.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize \u2211(followers[i] * x[i]) where x[i] is a binary decision variable indicating whether user i is selected to tweet.",
    "decision_variables": "x[i] \u2208 {0, 1} for each user i, indicating whether the user is selected to tweet.",
    "constraints": "\u2211(x[i]) \u2264 total_tweets_allowed, x[i] \u2264 max_tweets_per_user[i] for each user i"
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "followers[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "user_profiles.followers",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Number of followers of user i, used as the coefficient in the objective function."
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "total_tweets_allowed": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.total_tweets_allowed",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum total number of tweets allowed."
      },
      "max_tweets_per_user[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "user_profiles.max_tweets_per_user",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of tweets allowed per user i."
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "x[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "tweet_selection.is_selected",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Binary decision variable indicating whether user i is selected to tweet.",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
