Iteration final - PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION
Sequence: 5
Timestamp: 2025-07-28 00:09:17

Prompt:
You are a business analyst creating structured optimization problem documentation.

DATA SOURCES EXPLANATION:
- FINAL OR ANALYSIS: Final converged optimization problem from alternating process (iteration 1), contains business context and schema mapping evaluation
- DATABASE SCHEMA: Current database structure after iterative adjustments  
- DATA DICTIONARY: Business meanings and optimization roles of tables and columns
- CURRENT STORED VALUES: Realistic business data generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
- BUSINESS CONFIGURATION: Scalar parameters and business logic formulas separated from table data

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS: 
- Ensure problem description naturally leads to LINEAR or MIXED-INTEGER optimization formulation
- Make business context consistent with the intended decision variables and objectives
- Align constraint descriptions with expected mathematical constraints
- Ensure data descriptions map clearly to expected coefficient sources
- Maintain business authenticity while fixing mathematical consistency issues
- Avoid business scenarios that would naturally require nonlinear relationships (variable products, divisions, etc.)

AUTO-EXTRACTED CONTEXT REQUIREMENTS:
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: x[i] is a binary variable indicating whether user i receives the promotional tweet
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize ∑(engagement_coefficient[i] * x[i])
- Business configuration includes: Maximum number of promotional tweets a user can receive (used for Constraint bound), Minimum engagement score required for a user to receive the promotional tweet (used for Constraint bound), Total number of followers that can be targeted with promotional tweets (used for Constraint bound)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate

FINAL OR ANALYSIS:
{
  "database_id": "twitter_1",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Optimize the allocation of promotional tweets to maximize user engagement while respecting user preferences and platform constraints.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Maximize the total engagement score by selecting users to receive promotional tweets, subject to user-specific and platform-wide constraints.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize \u2211(engagement_coefficient[i] * x[i])",
    "decision_variables": "x[i] is a binary variable indicating whether user i receives the promotional tweet",
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(x[i]) <= total_followers_limit",
      "x[i] * engagement_coefficient[i] >= min_engagement_threshold for all i",
      "x[i] is binary for all i"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "engagement_coefficient[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "user_profiles.engagement_coefficient",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Expected engagement score if user receives the promotional tweet"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "total_followers_limit": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.total_followers_limit",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Total number of followers that can be targeted with promotional tweets"
      },
      "min_engagement_threshold": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.min_engagement_threshold",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Minimum engagement score required for a user to receive the promotional tweet"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "x[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "user_profiles.uid",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Binary decision variable indicating if user i receives the tweet",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}

FINAL DATABASE SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for missing optimization data and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE user_profiles (
  uid INTEGER,
  engagement_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE engagement_coefficients (
  user_id INTEGER,
  coefficient FLOAT
);


```

CURRENT STORED VALUES:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical user engagement metrics and platform constraints to ensure a realistic and solvable optimization problem.

-- Realistic data for user_profiles
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.8);
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.4);

-- Realistic data for engagement_coefficients
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.8);
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.4);


```

DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "user_profiles": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores user information and engagement coefficients",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables/objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "uid": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each user",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable index",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "engagement_coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Expected engagement score if user receives the promotional tweet",
          "optimization_purpose": "Objective coefficient",
          "sample_values": "0.5, 0.7, 0.9"
        }
      }
    },
    "engagement_coefficients": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores engagement coefficients for each user",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "user_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "User identifier",
          "optimization_purpose": "Link to decision variable",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Engagement coefficient for user",
          "optimization_purpose": "Objective coefficient",
          "sample_values": "0.5, 0.7, 0.9"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:

BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:
{
  "max_tweets_per_user": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of promotional tweets a user can receive",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 3,
    "business_justification": "Limiting to 3 tweets per user prevents over-saturation and respects user preferences."
  },
  "min_engagement_threshold": {
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "Minimum engagement score required for a user to receive the promotional tweet",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 0.5,
    "business_justification": "A threshold of 0.5 ensures that only users with a reasonable likelihood of engagement are targeted."
  },
  "total_followers_limit": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Total number of followers that can be targeted with promotional tweets",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 500000,
    "business_justification": "A limit of 500,000 followers balances reach with platform constraints."
  }
}

Business Configuration Design: 
Our system separates business logic design from value determination:
- Configuration Logic (business_configuration_logic.json): Templates designed by data engineers with sample_value for scalars and actual formulas for business logic
- Configuration Values (business_configuration.json): Realistic values determined by domain experts for scalar parameters only
- Design Rationale: Ensures business logic consistency while allowing flexible parameter tuning


TASK: Create structured markdown documentation for SECTIONS 1-3 ONLY (Problem Description).

EXACT MARKDOWN STRUCTURE TO FOLLOW:

# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: twitter_1

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
[Regenerate business context that naturally aligns with LINEAR optimization formulation. Ensure:]
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: x[i] is a binary variable indicating whether user i receives the promotional tweet
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize ∑(engagement_coefficient[i] * x[i])
- Business configuration includes: Maximum number of promotional tweets a user can receive (used for Constraint bound), Minimum engagement score required for a user to receive the promotional tweet (used for Constraint bound), Total number of followers that can be targeted with promotional tweets (used for Constraint bound)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate
- CRITICAL: Include ALL business configuration information (scalar parameters AND business logic formulas) in natural business language

### Goals  
[Regenerate goals that clearly lead to LINEAR mathematical objective:]
- Optimization goal: maximize
- Metric to optimize: maximize ∑(engagement_coefficient[i] * x[i])
- Success measurement aligned with expected coefficient sources
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear optimization goal
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation

## 2. Constraints    

[Regenerate constraints that directly match expected LINEAR mathematical constraints:]
- Expected constraint: ['∑(x[i]) <= total_followers_limit', 'x[i] * engagement_coefficient[i] >= min_engagement_threshold for all i', 'x[i] is binary for all i'] (Form: Standard constraint form based on business requirements)

[Each constraint should be described in business terms that naturally lead to LINEAR mathematical forms (no variable products or divisions)]

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for missing optimization data and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE user_profiles (
  uid INTEGER,
  engagement_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE engagement_coefficients (
  user_id INTEGER,
  coefficient FLOAT
);


```

### Data Dictionary  
[Create comprehensive business-oriented data dictionary mapping tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles - NOT technical database terms. Base this on the data_dictionary provided but rewrite in business language that clearly connects to the expected linear mathematical formulation]

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical user engagement metrics and platform constraints to ensure a realistic and solvable optimization problem.

-- Realistic data for user_profiles
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.8);
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.4);

-- Realistic data for engagement_coefficients
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.8);
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.4);


```

STOP HERE - Do not include section 4 (Mathematical Optimization Formulation).

Response:
# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: twitter_1

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
The business objective is to optimize the allocation of promotional tweets to users in a way that maximizes overall user engagement. Each user is considered for receiving a promotional tweet, and the decision is represented by a binary variable indicating whether a user receives the tweet. The goal is to maximize the sum of engagement scores, where each score is associated with a user and reflects the expected engagement if the user receives the tweet.

Operational parameters include:
- A maximum limit on the number of promotional tweets a user can receive, ensuring users are not overwhelmed with promotions.
- A minimum engagement score threshold that a user must meet to be eligible for receiving a promotional tweet, ensuring that only users with a reasonable likelihood of engagement are targeted.
- A total cap on the number of followers that can be targeted with promotional tweets, balancing reach with platform constraints.

These parameters are derived from business configuration settings, which are designed to maintain user satisfaction and platform efficiency. The problem is structured to ensure that all decisions and constraints align with linear optimization principles, avoiding any nonlinear relationships.

### Goals  
The primary goal of this optimization problem is to maximize the total engagement score across all users. This is achieved by selecting users to receive promotional tweets based on their engagement coefficients. The success of this optimization is measured by the total engagement score, which is the sum of the engagement coefficients for all users who receive the promotional tweet. The objective is clearly defined in linear terms, focusing on maximizing the sum of engagement scores.

## 2. Constraints    

The optimization problem is subject to several constraints that ensure the solution is feasible and aligns with business objectives:

- The total number of users receiving promotional tweets must not exceed the platform's follower limit. This ensures that the promotional reach is within the platform's capacity.
- Each user selected to receive a promotional tweet must have an engagement score that meets or exceeds the minimum engagement threshold. This ensures that only users with a high likelihood of engagement are targeted.
- The decision variable for each user is binary, indicating whether the user receives the promotional tweet or not. This constraint ensures that each user is either selected or not, with no partial selections.

These constraints are expressed in business terms that naturally lead to linear mathematical forms, ensuring the problem remains within the scope of linear optimization.

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for missing optimization data and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE user_profiles (
  uid INTEGER,
  engagement_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE engagement_coefficients (
  user_id INTEGER,
  coefficient FLOAT
);
```

### Data Dictionary  
The data dictionary provides a comprehensive mapping of tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles:

- **User Profiles Table**: This table stores information about each user, including their unique identifier and engagement coefficient. The engagement coefficient represents the expected engagement score if the user receives a promotional tweet. This table plays a dual role in the optimization process, serving as both the source of decision variables and objective coefficients.

  - **User ID (uid)**: A unique identifier for each user, used as the index for decision variables.
  - **Engagement Coefficient**: Represents the expected engagement score for a user if they receive the promotional tweet, serving as the objective coefficient in the optimization problem.

- **Engagement Coefficients Table**: This table stores engagement coefficients for each user, linking user identifiers to their respective engagement scores. It serves as a source of objective coefficients in the optimization process.

  - **User ID**: Links to the decision variable, ensuring that each engagement coefficient is associated with the correct user.
  - **Coefficient**: Represents the engagement coefficient for each user, used as the objective coefficient in the optimization problem.

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical user engagement metrics and platform constraints to ensure a realistic and solvable optimization problem.

-- Realistic data for user_profiles
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.8);
INSERT INTO user_profiles (uid, engagement_coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.4);

-- Realistic data for engagement_coefficients
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.8);
INSERT INTO engagement_coefficients (user_id, coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.4);
```
