Iteration final - PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION
Sequence: 5
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 22:50:07

Prompt:
You are a business analyst creating structured optimization problem documentation.

DATA SOURCES EXPLANATION:
- FINAL OR ANALYSIS: Final converged optimization problem from alternating process (iteration 1), contains business context and schema mapping evaluation
- DATABASE SCHEMA: Current database structure after iterative adjustments  
- DATA DICTIONARY: Business meanings and optimization roles of tables and columns
- CURRENT STORED VALUES: Realistic business data generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
- BUSINESS CONFIGURATION: Scalar parameters and business logic formulas separated from table data

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS: 
- Ensure problem description naturally leads to LINEAR or MIXED-INTEGER optimization formulation
- Make business context consistent with the intended decision variables and objectives
- Align constraint descriptions with expected mathematical constraints
- Ensure data descriptions map clearly to expected coefficient sources
- Maintain business authenticity while fixing mathematical consistency issues
- Avoid business scenarios that would naturally require nonlinear relationships (variable products, divisions, etc.)

AUTO-EXTRACTED CONTEXT REQUIREMENTS:
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: staff_allocated[m] for each museum m, where staff_allocated is an integer
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize total_visitor_satisfaction = ∑(satisfaction_coefficient[m] * staff_allocated[m]) - ∑(cost_coefficient[m] * staff_allocated[m])
- Business configuration includes: Total number of staff available for allocation (used for Used as a constraint in optimization model), Minimum staff required for each museum (used for Used as a constraint in optimization model), Maximum staff capacity for each museum (used for Used as a constraint in optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate

FINAL OR ANALYSIS:
{
  "database_id": "museum_visit",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A museum wants to optimize the allocation of its staff across different museums to maximize visitor satisfaction while minimizing operational costs. The number of staff allocated to each museum affects the visitor experience and the operational cost.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Determine the optimal number of staff to allocate to each museum to maximize visitor satisfaction, which is assumed to be proportional to the number of staff, while minimizing the total operational cost. The operational cost is a linear function of the number of staff allocated.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize total_visitor_satisfaction = \u2211(satisfaction_coefficient[m] * staff_allocated[m]) - \u2211(cost_coefficient[m] * staff_allocated[m])",
    "decision_variables": "staff_allocated[m] for each museum m, where staff_allocated is an integer",
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(staff_allocated[m]) <= total_available_staff",
      "minimum_staff_required[m] <= staff_allocated[m] <= maximum_staff_capacity[m] for each museum m"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "satisfaction_coefficient[m]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "museum.satisfaction_coefficient",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Increase in visitor satisfaction per additional staff member"
      },
      "cost_coefficient[m]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "museum.cost_coefficient",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Operational cost per staff member"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "total_available_staff": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.total_available_staff",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Total number of staff available for allocation"
      },
      "minimum_staff_required[m]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "ConstraintBounds.minimum_staff_required",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Minimum staff required for operation"
      },
      "maximum_staff_capacity[m]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "ConstraintBounds.maximum_staff_capacity",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum staff capacity"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "staff_allocated[m]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "museum.Num_of_Staff",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Number of staff allocated to the museum",
        "variable_type": "integer"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}

FINAL DATABASE SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for objective coefficients and constraint bounds, modifying existing tables to address mapping gaps, and updating business configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE museum (
  Num_of_Staff INTEGER,
  satisfaction_coefficient FLOAT,
  cost_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE ObjectiveCoefficients (
  museum_id INTEGER,
  satisfaction_coefficient FLOAT,
  cost_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE ConstraintBounds (
  museum_id INTEGER,
  minimum_staff_required INTEGER,
  maximum_staff_capacity INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT STORED VALUES:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical staffing needs and operational costs for museums of varying sizes, ensuring a balance between visitor satisfaction and cost efficiency.

-- Realistic data for museum
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (8, 1.3, 0.9);
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (12, 1.6, 1.1);
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (6, 1.2, 0.8);

-- Realistic data for ObjectiveCoefficients
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (1, 1.3, 0.9);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (2, 1.6, 1.1);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (3, 1.2, 0.8);

-- Realistic data for ConstraintBounds
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (1, 5, 15);
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (2, 7, 20);
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (3, 4, 10);


```

DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "museum": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about each museum including staff allocation and coefficients",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables/objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "Num_of_Staff": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Number of staff allocated to the museum",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable for staff allocation",
          "sample_values": "5, 10, 15"
        },
        "satisfaction_coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Increase in visitor satisfaction per additional staff member",
          "optimization_purpose": "Objective coefficient for satisfaction",
          "sample_values": "1.2, 1.5, 1.8"
        },
        "cost_coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Operational cost per staff member",
          "optimization_purpose": "Objective coefficient for cost",
          "sample_values": "0.8, 1.0, 1.2"
        }
      }
    },
    "ObjectiveCoefficients": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores coefficients for optimization objectives",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "museum_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for each museum",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links coefficients to specific museums",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "satisfaction_coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Coefficient for visitor satisfaction",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used in objective function",
          "sample_values": "1.2, 1.5, 1.8"
        },
        "cost_coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Coefficient for operational cost",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used in objective function",
          "sample_values": "0.8, 1.0, 1.2"
        }
      }
    },
    "ConstraintBounds": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores bounds for staff allocation constraints",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "museum_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for each museum",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links constraints to specific museums",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "minimum_staff_required": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Minimum staff required for operation",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint lower bound",
          "sample_values": "5, 6, 7"
        },
        "maximum_staff_capacity": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum staff capacity",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint upper bound",
          "sample_values": "15, 20, 25"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:

BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:
{
  "total_available_staff": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Total number of staff available for allocation",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint in optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 30,
    "business_justification": "Reflects the total staffing resources available across all museums, allowing for flexible allocation."
  },
  "minimum_staff_required": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Minimum staff required for each museum",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint in optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 5,
    "business_justification": "Ensures each museum has enough staff to operate effectively, based on industry standards."
  },
  "maximum_staff_capacity": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum staff capacity for each museum",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint in optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 20,
    "business_justification": "Prevents overstaffing, ensuring operational efficiency and cost control."
  }
}

Business Configuration Design: 
Our system separates business logic design from value determination:
- Configuration Logic (business_configuration_logic.json): Templates designed by data engineers with sample_value for scalars and actual formulas for business logic
- Configuration Values (business_configuration.json): Realistic values determined by domain experts for scalar parameters only
- Design Rationale: Ensures business logic consistency while allowing flexible parameter tuning


TASK: Create structured markdown documentation for SECTIONS 1-3 ONLY (Problem Description).

EXACT MARKDOWN STRUCTURE TO FOLLOW:

# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: museum_visit

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
[Regenerate business context that naturally aligns with LINEAR optimization formulation. Ensure:]
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: staff_allocated[m] for each museum m, where staff_allocated is an integer
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize total_visitor_satisfaction = ∑(satisfaction_coefficient[m] * staff_allocated[m]) - ∑(cost_coefficient[m] * staff_allocated[m])
- Business configuration includes: Total number of staff available for allocation (used for Used as a constraint in optimization model), Minimum staff required for each museum (used for Used as a constraint in optimization model), Maximum staff capacity for each museum (used for Used as a constraint in optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate
- CRITICAL: Include ALL business configuration information (scalar parameters AND business logic formulas) in natural business language

### Goals  
[Regenerate goals that clearly lead to LINEAR mathematical objective:]
- Optimization goal: maximize
- Metric to optimize: maximize total_visitor_satisfaction = ∑(satisfaction_coefficient[m] * staff_allocated[m]) - ∑(cost_coefficient[m] * staff_allocated[m])
- Success measurement aligned with expected coefficient sources
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear optimization goal
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation

## 2. Constraints    

[Regenerate constraints that directly match expected LINEAR mathematical constraints:]
- Expected constraint: ['∑(staff_allocated[m]) <= total_available_staff', 'minimum_staff_required[m] <= staff_allocated[m] <= maximum_staff_capacity[m] for each museum m'] (Form: Standard constraint form based on business requirements)

[Each constraint should be described in business terms that naturally lead to LINEAR mathematical forms (no variable products or divisions)]

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for objective coefficients and constraint bounds, modifying existing tables to address mapping gaps, and updating business configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE museum (
  Num_of_Staff INTEGER,
  satisfaction_coefficient FLOAT,
  cost_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE ObjectiveCoefficients (
  museum_id INTEGER,
  satisfaction_coefficient FLOAT,
  cost_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE ConstraintBounds (
  museum_id INTEGER,
  minimum_staff_required INTEGER,
  maximum_staff_capacity INTEGER
);


```

### Data Dictionary  
[Create comprehensive business-oriented data dictionary mapping tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles - NOT technical database terms. Base this on the data_dictionary provided but rewrite in business language that clearly connects to the expected linear mathematical formulation]

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical staffing needs and operational costs for museums of varying sizes, ensuring a balance between visitor satisfaction and cost efficiency.

-- Realistic data for museum
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (8, 1.3, 0.9);
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (12, 1.6, 1.1);
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (6, 1.2, 0.8);

-- Realistic data for ObjectiveCoefficients
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (1, 1.3, 0.9);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (2, 1.6, 1.1);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (3, 1.2, 0.8);

-- Realistic data for ConstraintBounds
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (1, 5, 15);
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (2, 7, 20);
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (3, 4, 10);


```

STOP HERE - Do not include section 4 (Mathematical Optimization Formulation).

Response:
# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: museum_visit

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
The museum network aims to optimize the allocation of its staff across various museums to enhance visitor satisfaction while controlling operational costs. The decision involves determining the number of staff members to allocate to each museum, where the number of staff is an integer. The operational parameters are designed to align with a linear objective: maximizing total visitor satisfaction, which is directly proportional to the number of staff allocated, while minimizing the total operational cost, which is also a linear function of the staff allocation.

The business configuration includes several key parameters:
- The total number of staff available for allocation across all museums, which serves as a constraint in the optimization model.
- The minimum number of staff required for each museum to ensure effective operation, also used as a constraint.
- The maximum staff capacity for each museum to prevent overstaffing and ensure operational efficiency.

These parameters are crucial for maintaining a balance between resource allocation and operational efficiency. The current operational information reflects these constraints and objectives, ensuring that the decision-making process is precise and leads to a linear formulation. The resource limitations are clearly defined to match the expected linear constraints, avoiding any scenarios that would require nonlinear relationships. The specific operational parameters are mapped to the expected coefficient sources, ensuring consistency and clarity in the optimization process.

### Goals  
The primary goal of this optimization problem is to maximize the total visitor satisfaction across all museums. This is achieved by strategically allocating staff to each museum, where the satisfaction is assumed to increase linearly with the number of staff members. The optimization metric is to maximize the total visitor satisfaction, which is calculated as the sum of the satisfaction coefficients multiplied by the staff allocated to each museum, minus the sum of the cost coefficients multiplied by the staff allocated. Success in this optimization is measured by the alignment with the expected coefficient sources, ensuring that the linear optimization goal is clearly defined and achievable.

## 2. Constraints    

The optimization problem is subject to several constraints that are directly aligned with linear mathematical forms:
- The total number of staff allocated across all museums must not exceed the total available staff. This ensures that the allocation does not surpass the staffing resources available.
- Each museum must have a number of staff allocated that is at least the minimum required for effective operation and does not exceed the maximum capacity. This constraint ensures that each museum operates efficiently without overstaffing.

These constraints are described in business terms that naturally lead to linear mathematical forms, ensuring that the optimization problem remains within the realm of linear programming.

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for objective coefficients and constraint bounds, modifying existing tables to address mapping gaps, and updating business configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE museum (
  Num_of_Staff INTEGER,
  satisfaction_coefficient FLOAT,
  cost_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE ObjectiveCoefficients (
  museum_id INTEGER,
  satisfaction_coefficient FLOAT,
  cost_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE ConstraintBounds (
  museum_id INTEGER,
  minimum_staff_required INTEGER,
  maximum_staff_capacity INTEGER
);
```

### Data Dictionary  
The data dictionary provides a comprehensive mapping of tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles:

- **Museum Table**: This table stores information about each museum, including the number of staff allocated and the coefficients related to visitor satisfaction and operational cost. The number of staff allocated is a decision variable, while the satisfaction and cost coefficients are used in the objective function.

- **ObjectiveCoefficients Table**: This table contains the coefficients used in the optimization objectives. Each entry links a museum to its respective satisfaction and cost coefficients, which are crucial for calculating the optimization goal.

- **ConstraintBounds Table**: This table defines the bounds for staff allocation constraints. It specifies the minimum and maximum number of staff required for each museum, ensuring that the allocation adheres to operational requirements.

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical staffing needs and operational costs for museums of varying sizes, ensuring a balance between visitor satisfaction and cost efficiency.

-- Realistic data for museum
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (8, 1.3, 0.9);
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (12, 1.6, 1.1);
INSERT INTO museum (Num_of_Staff, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (6, 1.2, 0.8);

-- Realistic data for ObjectiveCoefficients
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (1, 1.3, 0.9);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (2, 1.6, 1.1);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (museum_id, satisfaction_coefficient, cost_coefficient) VALUES (3, 1.2, 0.8);

-- Realistic data for ConstraintBounds
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (1, 5, 15);
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (2, 7, 20);
INSERT INTO ConstraintBounds (museum_id, minimum_staff_required, maximum_staff_capacity) VALUES (3, 4, 10);
```
