Iteration final - PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION
Sequence: 5
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 22:29:24

Prompt:
You are a business analyst creating structured optimization problem documentation.

DATA SOURCES EXPLANATION:
- FINAL OR ANALYSIS: Final converged optimization problem from alternating process (iteration 1), contains business context and schema mapping evaluation
- DATABASE SCHEMA: Current database structure after iterative adjustments  
- DATA DICTIONARY: Business meanings and optimization roles of tables and columns
- CURRENT STORED VALUES: Realistic business data generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
- BUSINESS CONFIGURATION: Scalar parameters and business logic formulas separated from table data

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS: 
- Ensure problem description naturally leads to LINEAR or MIXED-INTEGER optimization formulation
- Make business context consistent with the intended decision variables and objectives
- Align constraint descriptions with expected mathematical constraints
- Ensure data descriptions map clearly to expected coefficient sources
- Maintain business authenticity while fixing mathematical consistency issues
- Avoid business scenarios that would naturally require nonlinear relationships (variable products, divisions, etc.)

AUTO-EXTRACTED CONTEXT REQUIREMENTS:
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: x[technician_id, repair_id] are binary variables indicating if a technician is assigned to a repair
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: minimize sum(value_points[machine_id] * x[technician_id, repair_id])
- Business configuration includes: Maximum number of repairs a technician can handle (used for Used as a constraint bound in optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate

FINAL OR ANALYSIS:
{
  "database_id": "machine_repair",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A company wants to optimize the assignment of technicians to machine repairs to minimize the total value points of machines being repaired, ensuring that each repair is assigned to exactly one technician and each technician can handle a limited number of repairs.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "The goal is to minimize the total value points of machines assigned to technicians for repair, subject to constraints on technician availability and repair requirements.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "minimize sum(value_points[machine_id] * x[technician_id, repair_id])",
    "decision_variables": "x[technician_id, repair_id] are binary variables indicating if a technician is assigned to a repair",
    "constraints": [
      "sum(x[technician_id, repair_id] for all repair_id) <= max_repairs[technician_id] for all technician_id",
      "sum(x[technician_id, repair_id] for all technician_id) = 1 for all repair_id"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "value_points[machine_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "machine.value_points",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Value points of the machine, used as coefficients in the objective function"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "max_repairs[technician_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "constraint_bounds.max_repairs",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of repairs a technician can handle"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "x[technician_id, repair_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "repair_assignment.is_assigned",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Binary variable indicating if a technician is assigned to a repair",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}

FINAL DATABASE SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include adding a new table for constraint bounds, modifying existing tables for better mapping, and updating configuration logic for missing parameters.

CREATE TABLE machine (
  machine_id INTEGER,
  value_points INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE repair_assignment (
  technician_id INTEGER,
  repair_id INTEGER,
  is_assigned BOOLEAN
);

CREATE TABLE constraint_bounds (
  technician_id INTEGER,
  max_repairs INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT STORED VALUES:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical machine repair scenarios, technician workloads, and the need to balance repair assignments with technician capacity.

-- Realistic data for machine
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (1, 15);
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (2, 25);
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (3, 10);

-- Realistic data for repair_assignment
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (1, 101, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (2, 102, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (3, 103, False);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (1, 103, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (2, 101, False);

-- Realistic data for constraint_bounds
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (2, 2);
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (3, 1);


```

DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "machine": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about machines needing repair",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "machine_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each machine",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for value points",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "value_points": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Value points of the machine",
          "optimization_purpose": "Coefficient in objective function",
          "sample_values": "10, 20, 30"
        }
      }
    },
    "repair_assignment": {
      "business_purpose": "Tracks which technician is assigned to which repair",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "technician_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for technician",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for decision variable",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "repair_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for repair task",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for decision variable",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "is_assigned": {
          "data_type": "BOOLEAN",
          "business_meaning": "Indicates if a technician is assigned to a repair",
          "optimization_purpose": "Binary decision variable",
          "sample_values": "true, false"
        }
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores constraint bounds for optimization",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "technician_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for technician",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for constraint",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "max_repairs": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum repairs a technician can handle",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound",
          "sample_values": "5, 5, 5"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:

BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:
{
  "max_repairs_per_technician": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of repairs a technician can handle",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint bound in optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 3,
    "business_justification": "A maximum of 3 repairs per technician is realistic given typical workloads and ensures the optimization model remains feasible."
  }
}

Business Configuration Design: 
Our system separates business logic design from value determination:
- Configuration Logic (business_configuration_logic.json): Templates designed by data engineers with sample_value for scalars and actual formulas for business logic
- Configuration Values (business_configuration.json): Realistic values determined by domain experts for scalar parameters only
- Design Rationale: Ensures business logic consistency while allowing flexible parameter tuning


TASK: Create structured markdown documentation for SECTIONS 1-3 ONLY (Problem Description).

EXACT MARKDOWN STRUCTURE TO FOLLOW:

# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: machine_repair

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
[Regenerate business context that naturally aligns with LINEAR optimization formulation. Ensure:]
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: x[technician_id, repair_id] are binary variables indicating if a technician is assigned to a repair
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: minimize sum(value_points[machine_id] * x[technician_id, repair_id])
- Business configuration includes: Maximum number of repairs a technician can handle (used for Used as a constraint bound in optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate
- CRITICAL: Include ALL business configuration information (scalar parameters AND business logic formulas) in natural business language

### Goals  
[Regenerate goals that clearly lead to LINEAR mathematical objective:]
- Optimization goal: minimize
- Metric to optimize: minimize sum(value_points[machine_id] * x[technician_id, repair_id])
- Success measurement aligned with expected coefficient sources
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear optimization goal
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation

## 2. Constraints    

[Regenerate constraints that directly match expected LINEAR mathematical constraints:]
- Expected constraint: ['sum(x[technician_id, repair_id] for all repair_id) <= max_repairs[technician_id] for all technician_id', 'sum(x[technician_id, repair_id] for all technician_id) = 1 for all repair_id'] (Form: Standard constraint form based on business requirements)

[Each constraint should be described in business terms that naturally lead to LINEAR mathematical forms (no variable products or divisions)]

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include adding a new table for constraint bounds, modifying existing tables for better mapping, and updating configuration logic for missing parameters.

CREATE TABLE machine (
  machine_id INTEGER,
  value_points INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE repair_assignment (
  technician_id INTEGER,
  repair_id INTEGER,
  is_assigned BOOLEAN
);

CREATE TABLE constraint_bounds (
  technician_id INTEGER,
  max_repairs INTEGER
);


```

### Data Dictionary  
[Create comprehensive business-oriented data dictionary mapping tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles - NOT technical database terms. Base this on the data_dictionary provided but rewrite in business language that clearly connects to the expected linear mathematical formulation]

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical machine repair scenarios, technician workloads, and the need to balance repair assignments with technician capacity.

-- Realistic data for machine
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (1, 15);
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (2, 25);
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (3, 10);

-- Realistic data for repair_assignment
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (1, 101, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (2, 102, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (3, 103, False);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (1, 103, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (2, 101, False);

-- Realistic data for constraint_bounds
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (2, 2);
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (3, 1);


```

STOP HERE - Do not include section 4 (Mathematical Optimization Formulation).

Response:
# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: machine_repair

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
The company is focused on optimizing the assignment of technicians to machine repairs. The primary decision involves determining whether a technician is assigned to a specific repair task. This decision is represented by binary variables, where each variable indicates if a technician is assigned to a repair. The operational objective is to minimize the total value points associated with the machines being repaired. This involves assigning technicians in a way that reduces the overall value points, which are indicative of the machine's importance or urgency. The business configuration includes a critical parameter: the maximum number of repairs a technician can handle. This parameter is used as a constraint in the optimization model to ensure that no technician is overburdened. The data reflects current operational realities, focusing on precise decision-making that aligns with linear optimization principles. Resource limitations are expressed through linear constraints, ensuring that each repair is assigned to exactly one technician and that technicians do not exceed their repair capacity. The business configuration, including scalar parameters and logic, is integral to maintaining consistency and feasibility in the optimization model.

### Goals  
The primary goal of the optimization is to minimize the total value points of machines assigned to technicians for repair. This involves strategically assigning technicians to repairs in a manner that reduces the cumulative value points, thereby optimizing resource allocation and operational efficiency. Success is measured by the reduction in total value points, which directly correlates with the effectiveness of the repair assignments. The optimization goal is articulated in natural language, focusing on minimizing the sum of value points associated with the repair assignments, without resorting to mathematical notation.

## 2. Constraints    

The optimization model is subject to several constraints that ensure practical and efficient technician assignments. Each technician can only be assigned to a limited number of repairs, as dictated by the maximum repair capacity parameter. This constraint ensures that technicians are not overloaded and can perform their tasks effectively. Additionally, each repair must be assigned to exactly one technician, ensuring that all repair tasks are covered without duplication or omission. These constraints are expressed in business terms, naturally leading to linear mathematical forms that align with the operational requirements and resource limitations.

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include adding a new table for constraint bounds, modifying existing tables for better mapping, and updating configuration logic for missing parameters.

CREATE TABLE machine (
  machine_id INTEGER,
  value_points INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE repair_assignment (
  technician_id INTEGER,
  repair_id INTEGER,
  is_assigned BOOLEAN
);

CREATE TABLE constraint_bounds (
  technician_id INTEGER,
  max_repairs INTEGER
);
```

### Data Dictionary  
The data dictionary provides a comprehensive mapping of tables and columns to their business purposes and roles in the optimization process:

- **Machine Table**: This table stores information about the machines that require repairs. Each machine is identified by a unique ID and has associated value points, which serve as coefficients in the optimization objective. The value points reflect the importance or urgency of repairing the machine.

- **Repair Assignment Table**: This table tracks the assignment of technicians to repair tasks. It includes identifiers for both technicians and repair tasks, along with a binary indicator showing whether a technician is assigned to a specific repair. This table plays a crucial role in defining the decision variables for the optimization model.

- **Constraint Bounds Table**: This table contains information about the maximum number of repairs each technician can handle. It ensures that the optimization model respects the capacity constraints of each technician, preventing over-assignment and maintaining operational feasibility.

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical machine repair scenarios, technician workloads, and the need to balance repair assignments with technician capacity.

-- Realistic data for machine
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (1, 15);
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (2, 25);
INSERT INTO machine (machine_id, value_points) VALUES (3, 10);

-- Realistic data for repair_assignment
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (1, 101, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (2, 102, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (3, 103, False);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (1, 103, True);
INSERT INTO repair_assignment (technician_id, repair_id, is_assigned) VALUES (2, 101, False);

-- Realistic data for constraint_bounds
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (2, 2);
INSERT INTO constraint_bounds (technician_id, max_repairs) VALUES (3, 1);
```
