Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-28 00:19:24

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "Optimize the allocation of weddings to churches to maximize the number of weddings held while respecting church availability and gender balance.",
  "optimization_problem": "The goal is to maximize the number of weddings held in available churches, ensuring that each wedding has one male and one female participant, and that each church can host a limited number of weddings per year.",
  "objective": "maximize total_weddings = \u2211(wedding_allocation[church_id, male_id, female_id])",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating new tables for church capacities and participant constraints, modifying existing tables to improve mapping adequacy, and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Gather missing data on church capacities and ensure unique participation of individuals in weddings",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for church capacities and participant constraints, modifying existing tables to improve mapping adequacy, and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE wedding (
  Church_ID INTEGER,
  Male_ID INTEGER,
  Female_ID INTEGER,
  total_weddings INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE ChurchCapacity (
  church_id INTEGER,
  capacity INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE ParticipantConstraints (
  participant_id INTEGER,
  constraint_type STRING
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "wedding": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about weddings held at churches",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "Church_ID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the church",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used to allocate weddings to churches",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "Male_ID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the male participant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used to ensure unique male participation",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "Female_ID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the female participant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used to ensure unique female participation",
          "sample_values": "201, 202, 203"
        },
        "total_weddings": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Total number of weddings held",
          "optimization_purpose": "Objective coefficient for maximizing weddings",
          "sample_values": "10, 15, 20"
        }
      }
    },
    "ChurchCapacity": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores capacity limits for each church",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "church_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the church",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links to church capacity constraints",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "capacity": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum number of weddings a church can host",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound for church capacity",
          "sample_values": "100, 150, 200"
        }
      }
    },
    "ParticipantConstraints": {
      "business_purpose": "Ensures unique participation of individuals in weddings",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "participant_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the participant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Ensures unique participation",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 201"
        },
        "constraint_type": {
          "data_type": "STRING",
          "business_meaning": "Type of participation constraint",
          "optimization_purpose": "Defines the constraint logic",
          "sample_values": "male, female"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "church_capacity": {
    "sample_value": "100",
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of weddings a church can host per year",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint bound in optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "unique_participation_formula": {
    "formula_expression": "SUM(wedding_allocation[church_id, male_id, female_id]) <= 1",
    "data_type": "STRING",
    "business_meaning": "Ensures each participant is involved in at most one wedding",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint in optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "business_logic_formula"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "wedding",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "wedding",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Optimize the allocation of weddings to churches to maximize the number of weddings held while respecting church availability and ensuring each participant is involved in at most one wedding.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Maximize the number of weddings held in available churches, ensuring that each wedding has one male and one female participant, each participant is involved in at most one wedding, and each church can host a limited number of weddings per year.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize total_weddings = \u2211(wedding_allocation[Church_ID, Male_ID, Female_ID])",
    "decision_variables": "wedding_allocation[Church_ID, Male_ID, Female_ID] (binary)",
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(wedding_allocation[Church_ID, Male_ID, Female_ID]) <= ChurchCapacity.capacity for each Church_ID",
      "\u2211(wedding_allocation[Church_ID, Male_ID, Female_ID]) <= 1 for each Male_ID",
      "\u2211(wedding_allocation[Church_ID, Male_ID, Female_ID]) <= 1 for each Female_ID"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "total_weddings": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "wedding.total_weddings",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Represents the total number of weddings to be maximized"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "church_capacity[Church_ID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "ChurchCapacity.capacity",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of weddings a church can host"
      },
      "unique_male_participation[Male_ID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "ParticipantConstraints.constraint_type",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Ensures each male participant is involved in at most one wedding"
      },
      "unique_female_participation[Female_ID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "ParticipantConstraints.constraint_type",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Ensures each female participant is involved in at most one wedding"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "wedding_allocation[Church_ID, Male_ID, Female_ID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "wedding.Church_ID, wedding.Male_ID, wedding.Female_ID",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Binary variable indicating if a wedding is allocated to a church with specific participants",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
