Iteration final - PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION
Sequence: 5
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 21:45:57

Prompt:
You are a business analyst creating structured optimization problem documentation.

DATA SOURCES EXPLANATION:
- FINAL OR ANALYSIS: Final converged optimization problem from alternating process (iteration 1), contains business context and schema mapping evaluation
- DATABASE SCHEMA: Current database structure after iterative adjustments  
- DATA DICTIONARY: Business meanings and optimization roles of tables and columns
- CURRENT STORED VALUES: Realistic business data generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
- BUSINESS CONFIGURATION: Scalar parameters and business logic formulas separated from table data

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS: 
- Ensure problem description naturally leads to LINEAR or MIXED-INTEGER optimization formulation
- Make business context consistent with the intended decision variables and objectives
- Align constraint descriptions with expected mathematical constraints
- Ensure data descriptions map clearly to expected coefficient sources
- Maintain business authenticity while fixing mathematical consistency issues
- Avoid business scenarios that would naturally require nonlinear relationships (variable products, divisions, etc.)

AUTO-EXTRACTED CONTEXT REQUIREMENTS:
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: resource_allocation[i] for each county i, continuous
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize sum(ObjectiveCoefficients.votes_coefficient[i] * DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i])
- Business configuration includes: Total budget available for resource allocation (used for Used as an upper bound constraint in the optimization model), Minimum amount of resources that must be allocated to each county (used for Used as a lower bound constraint in the optimization model), Maximum amount of resources that can be allocated to each county (used for Used as an upper bound constraint in the optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate

FINAL OR ANALYSIS:
{
  "database_id": "election",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Optimize the allocation of campaign resources across counties to maximize the number of votes for a political party in an upcoming election, considering budget constraints and minimum/maximum resource allocation per county.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Determine the optimal allocation of campaign resources to different counties to maximize the expected number of votes, subject to budget limits and resource allocation constraints.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize sum(ObjectiveCoefficients.votes_coefficient[i] * DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i])",
    "decision_variables": "resource_allocation[i] for each county i, continuous",
    "constraints": [
      "sum(DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i]) <= business_configuration_logic.total_budget",
      "DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i] >= business_configuration_logic.min_allocation for each county i",
      "DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i] <= business_configuration_logic.max_allocation for each county i"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "votes_coefficient[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "ObjectiveCoefficients.votes_coefficient",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Expected votes gained per unit of resource for county i"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "total_budget": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.total_budget",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Total budget available for resource allocation"
      },
      "min_allocation[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.min_allocation",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Minimum amount of resources that must be allocated to each county i"
      },
      "max_allocation[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.max_allocation",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum amount of resources that can be allocated to each county i"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "resource_allocation[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "DecisionVariables.resource_allocation",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Amount of resources allocated to county i",
        "variable_type": "continuous"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}

FINAL DATABASE SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for objective coefficients, constraint bounds, and decision variables. Business configuration logic is updated to include scalar parameters and formulas for optimization constraints and objectives.

CREATE TABLE ObjectiveCoefficients (
  county_id INTEGER,
  votes_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE DecisionVariables (
  county_id INTEGER,
  resource_allocation FLOAT
);


```

CURRENT STORED VALUES:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical campaign resource allocation scenarios, ensuring that the budget and allocation constraints are realistic and align with common political campaign strategies.

-- Realistic data for ObjectiveCoefficients
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (2, 1.5);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.9);

-- Realistic data for DecisionVariables
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (1, 800);
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (2, 1500);
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (3, 700);


```

DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "ObjectiveCoefficients": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores coefficients for the objective function related to votes gained per resource unit",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "county_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each county",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links coefficients to specific counties",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "votes_coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Expected votes gained per unit of resource",
          "optimization_purpose": "Coefficient in the objective function",
          "sample_values": "0.5, 1.2, 0.8"
        }
      }
    },
    "DecisionVariables": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores decision variables for resource allocation to counties",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "county_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each county",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links decision variables to specific counties",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "resource_allocation": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Amount of resources allocated to the county",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable in the optimization model",
          "sample_values": "500, 1000, 750"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:

BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:
{
  "total_budget": {
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "Total budget available for resource allocation",
    "optimization_role": "Used as an upper bound constraint in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 3000,
    "business_justification": "The total budget is set to ensure that the sum of allocations across counties is feasible and allows for strategic distribution."
  },
  "min_allocation": {
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "Minimum amount of resources that must be allocated to each county",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a lower bound constraint in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 500,
    "business_justification": "Minimum allocation ensures that each county receives enough resources to make a meaningful impact."
  },
  "max_allocation": {
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum amount of resources that can be allocated to each county",
    "optimization_role": "Used as an upper bound constraint in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 2000,
    "business_justification": "Maximum allocation prevents over-investment in any single county, promoting balanced resource distribution."
  }
}

Business Configuration Design: 
Our system separates business logic design from value determination:
- Configuration Logic (business_configuration_logic.json): Templates designed by data engineers with sample_value for scalars and actual formulas for business logic
- Configuration Values (business_configuration.json): Realistic values determined by domain experts for scalar parameters only
- Design Rationale: Ensures business logic consistency while allowing flexible parameter tuning


TASK: Create structured markdown documentation for SECTIONS 1-3 ONLY (Problem Description).

EXACT MARKDOWN STRUCTURE TO FOLLOW:

# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: election

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
[Regenerate business context that naturally aligns with LINEAR optimization formulation. Ensure:]
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: resource_allocation[i] for each county i, continuous
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize sum(ObjectiveCoefficients.votes_coefficient[i] * DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i])
- Business configuration includes: Total budget available for resource allocation (used for Used as an upper bound constraint in the optimization model), Minimum amount of resources that must be allocated to each county (used for Used as a lower bound constraint in the optimization model), Maximum amount of resources that can be allocated to each county (used for Used as an upper bound constraint in the optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate
- CRITICAL: Include ALL business configuration information (scalar parameters AND business logic formulas) in natural business language

### Goals  
[Regenerate goals that clearly lead to LINEAR mathematical objective:]
- Optimization goal: maximize
- Metric to optimize: maximize sum(ObjectiveCoefficients.votes_coefficient[i] * DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i])
- Success measurement aligned with expected coefficient sources
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear optimization goal
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation

## 2. Constraints    

[Regenerate constraints that directly match expected LINEAR mathematical constraints:]
- Expected constraint: ['sum(DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i]) <= business_configuration_logic.total_budget', 'DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i] >= business_configuration_logic.min_allocation for each county i', 'DecisionVariables.resource_allocation[i] <= business_configuration_logic.max_allocation for each county i'] (Form: Standard constraint form based on business requirements)

[Each constraint should be described in business terms that naturally lead to LINEAR mathematical forms (no variable products or divisions)]

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for objective coefficients, constraint bounds, and decision variables. Business configuration logic is updated to include scalar parameters and formulas for optimization constraints and objectives.

CREATE TABLE ObjectiveCoefficients (
  county_id INTEGER,
  votes_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE DecisionVariables (
  county_id INTEGER,
  resource_allocation FLOAT
);


```

### Data Dictionary  
[Create comprehensive business-oriented data dictionary mapping tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles - NOT technical database terms. Base this on the data_dictionary provided but rewrite in business language that clearly connects to the expected linear mathematical formulation]

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical campaign resource allocation scenarios, ensuring that the budget and allocation constraints are realistic and align with common political campaign strategies.

-- Realistic data for ObjectiveCoefficients
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (2, 1.5);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.9);

-- Realistic data for DecisionVariables
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (1, 800);
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (2, 1500);
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (3, 700);


```

STOP HERE - Do not include section 4 (Mathematical Optimization Formulation).

Response:
# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: election

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
In the context of an upcoming election, the political party aims to strategically allocate campaign resources across various counties to maximize the number of votes received. The decision-making process involves determining the amount of resources to allocate to each county, represented by the decision variable `resource_allocation[i]`, which is continuous for each county `i`. The objective is to maximize the expected votes, which is a linear function of the resources allocated, weighted by the expected votes gained per unit of resource for each county.

The operational parameters guiding this allocation include a total budget constraint, ensuring that the sum of resources allocated does not exceed the available budget. Additionally, there are minimum and maximum resource allocation constraints for each county to ensure a balanced and effective distribution of resources. The total budget available for resource allocation acts as an upper bound, while the minimum and maximum allocations per county serve as lower and upper bounds, respectively. These constraints are designed to maintain a strategic and feasible allocation of resources across all counties.

### Goals  
The primary goal of this optimization problem is to maximize the total expected votes for the political party. This is achieved by optimizing the allocation of resources across counties, where the metric to optimize is the sum of the product of the expected votes per resource unit and the resources allocated to each county. The success of this optimization is measured by the alignment of resource allocation with the expected vote coefficients, ensuring that resources are distributed in a manner that maximizes the overall vote count. The optimization goal is clearly defined in linear terms, focusing on maximizing the linear combination of resource allocations and vote coefficients.

## 2. Constraints    

The optimization problem is subject to several linear constraints that ensure the feasibility and strategic distribution of resources:

- The total resources allocated across all counties must not exceed the total budget available. This constraint ensures that the allocation remains within the financial limits set for the campaign.
- Each county must receive a minimum amount of resources, ensuring that every county has enough resources to make a meaningful impact on the election outcome.
- The resources allocated to each county must not exceed a specified maximum, preventing over-investment in any single county and promoting a balanced distribution of resources.

These constraints are expressed in business terms that naturally lead to linear mathematical forms, ensuring that the optimization problem remains linear and solvable using standard linear optimization techniques.

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for objective coefficients, constraint bounds, and decision variables. Business configuration logic is updated to include scalar parameters and formulas for optimization constraints and objectives.

CREATE TABLE ObjectiveCoefficients (
  county_id INTEGER,
  votes_coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE DecisionVariables (
  county_id INTEGER,
  resource_allocation FLOAT
);
```

### Data Dictionary  
The data used in this optimization problem is organized into tables that serve specific business purposes and optimization roles:

- **ObjectiveCoefficients Table**: This table stores the coefficients used in the objective function, representing the expected votes gained per unit of resource for each county. The `county_id` column uniquely identifies each county, linking the coefficients to specific counties. The `votes_coefficient` column provides the expected votes per resource unit, serving as a key component in the objective function.

- **DecisionVariables Table**: This table contains the decision variables representing the amount of resources allocated to each county. The `county_id` column uniquely identifies each county, linking the decision variables to specific counties. The `resource_allocation` column indicates the amount of resources allocated, serving as the decision variable in the optimization model.

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical campaign resource allocation scenarios, ensuring that the budget and allocation constraints are realistic and align with common political campaign strategies.

-- Realistic data for ObjectiveCoefficients
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.6);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (2, 1.5);
INSERT INTO ObjectiveCoefficients (county_id, votes_coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.9);

-- Realistic data for DecisionVariables
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (1, 800);
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (2, 1500);
INSERT INTO DecisionVariables (county_id, resource_allocation) VALUES (3, 700);
```
