Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-25 22:29:47

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "A sports league aims to minimize the total number of injuries across all games while ensuring that stadiums operate within their capacity limits and maintain a minimum average attendance.",
  "optimization_problem": "The league wants to minimize the total number of injuries across all games by optimizing the scheduling of games across stadiums, ensuring that stadiums do not exceed their capacity and maintain a minimum average attendance.",
  "objective": "minimize \u2211(Injury_Risk[g] \u00d7 Game_Scheduled[g]) where Injury_Risk[g] is the risk of injury in game g and Game_Scheduled[g] is a binary decision variable indicating if game g is scheduled.",
  "table_count": 3,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating tables for injury risk, game scheduling, and stadium usage. Configuration logic updates include scalar parameters for stadium capacity and minimum average attendance, and formulas for injury risk calculation."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Refine the mapping of injury risk data and ensure all constraints are accurately represented.",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating tables for injury risk, game scheduling, and stadium usage. Configuration logic updates include scalar parameters for stadium capacity and minimum average attendance, and formulas for injury risk calculation.

CREATE TABLE injury_risk (
  game_id INTEGER,
  risk_value FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE game_scheduling (
  game_id INTEGER,
  is_scheduled BOOLEAN
);

CREATE TABLE stadium_usage (
  stadium_id INTEGER,
  usage_percentage FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE stadium (
  stadium_id INTEGER,
  capacity_percentage FLOAT,
  average_attendance INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "injury_risk": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores injury risk data for each game",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "game_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each game",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for injury risk data",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "risk_value": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Risk of injury for the game",
          "optimization_purpose": "Coefficient in the objective function",
          "sample_values": "0.1, 0.2, 0.3"
        }
      }
    },
    "game_scheduling": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores scheduling decisions for each game",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "game_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each game",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for scheduling decisions",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "is_scheduled": {
          "data_type": "BOOLEAN",
          "business_meaning": "Indicates if the game is scheduled",
          "optimization_purpose": "Binary decision variable",
          "sample_values": "true, false"
        }
      }
    },
    "stadium_usage": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores capacity usage for each stadium",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "stadium_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each stadium",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for stadium usage",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "usage_percentage": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Percentage of capacity used in the stadium",
          "optimization_purpose": "Continuous decision variable",
          "sample_values": "0.5, 0.6, 0.7"
        }
      }
    },
    "stadium": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores stadium capacity and attendance data",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "stadium_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each stadium",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for stadium data",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "capacity_percentage": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum capacity percentage for the stadium",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound for capacity",
          "sample_values": "0.8, 0.85, 0.9"
        },
        "average_attendance": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Average attendance for the stadium",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound for attendance",
          "sample_values": "5000, 6000, 7000"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "Stadium_Capacity": {
    "sample_value": 0.85,
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum capacity percentage for each stadium",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound for stadium capacity",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "Minimum_Average_Attendance": {
    "sample_value": 5000,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Minimum average attendance required for each stadium",
    "optimization_role": "Constraint bound for minimum attendance",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "Injury_Risk_Formula": {
    "formula_expression": "Historical_Injuries / Total_Games",
    "data_type": "STRING",
    "business_meaning": "Calculation of injury risk based on historical data",
    "optimization_role": "Objective coefficient for injury risk",
    "configuration_type": "business_logic_formula"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "game_injury",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "game_injury",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A sports league aims to minimize the total number of injuries across all games while ensuring that stadiums operate within their capacity limits and maintain a minimum average attendance.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Minimize the total injury risk across all scheduled games, subject to constraints on stadium capacity and minimum average attendance.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "minimize \u2211(Injury_Risk[g] \u00d7 Game_Scheduled[g]) where Injury_Risk[g] is the risk of injury in game g and Game_Scheduled[g] is a binary decision variable indicating if game g is scheduled.",
    "decision_variables": {
      "Game_Scheduled[g]": "Binary decision variable indicating if game g is scheduled",
      "Stadium_Usage[s]": "Continuous decision variable representing the usage percentage of stadium s"
    },
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(Game_Scheduled[g] \u00d7 Stadium_Capacity[s]) \u2264 Stadium_Capacity[s] for each stadium s",
      "\u2211(Game_Scheduled[g] \u00d7 Average_Attendance[s]) \u2265 Minimum_Average_Attendance for each stadium s"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "Injury_Risk[g]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "injury_risk.risk_value",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Risk of injury for game g"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "Stadium_Capacity[s]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "stadium.capacity_percentage",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum capacity percentage for stadium s"
      },
      "Minimum_Average_Attendance": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.Minimum_Average_Attendance",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Minimum average attendance required for each stadium"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "Game_Scheduled[g]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "game_scheduling.is_scheduled",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Binary decision variable indicating if game g is scheduled",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      },
      "Stadium_Usage[s]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "stadium_usage.usage_percentage",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Continuous decision variable representing the usage percentage of stadium s",
        "variable_type": "continuous"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
