Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 23:14:45

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "Optimize the allocation of student visits to restaurants to maximize the total satisfaction score based on restaurant ratings, while considering budget constraints.",
  "optimization_problem": "The goal is to determine the optimal number of visits each student should make to each restaurant to maximize the total satisfaction score, which is a function of the restaurant ratings, subject to a budget constraint on the total amount spent by each student.",
  "objective": "maximize total_satisfaction = \u2211(Rating[ResID] \u00d7 Visits[StuID, ResID])",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include adding tables for budget constraints and cost per visit, modifying existing tables to include necessary columns, and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Incorporate budget constraints and cost per visit data into the model",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include adding tables for budget constraints and cost per visit, modifying existing tables to include necessary columns, and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE Restaurant (
  ResID INTEGER,
  Rating FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE Student_Budget (
  StuID INTEGER,
  Budget INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE Cost_Per_Visit (
  StuID INTEGER,
  ResID INTEGER,
  Cost FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE Visits_Restaurant (
  StuID INTEGER,
  ResID INTEGER,
  Visits INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "Restaurant": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores restaurant information including ratings",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "ResID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each restaurant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for restaurant ratings",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "Rating": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Satisfaction score contribution from visiting a restaurant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Coefficient in the objective function",
          "sample_values": "4.5, 3.8, 5.0"
        }
      }
    },
    "Student_Budget": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores budget constraints for each student",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "StuID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each student",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for budget constraints",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "Budget": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Budget constraint for each student",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound in the optimization model",
          "sample_values": "100, 150, 200"
        }
      }
    },
    "Cost_Per_Visit": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores cost per visit for each student-restaurant pair",
      "optimization_role": "business_data",
      "columns": {
        "StuID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each student",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for cost data",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "ResID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each restaurant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for cost data",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "Cost": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Cost per visit for a student at a restaurant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used in cost calculations for constraints",
          "sample_values": "10.0, 15.0, 20.0"
        }
      }
    },
    "Visits_Restaurant": {
      "business_purpose": "Tracks the number of visits each student makes to each restaurant",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "StuID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each student",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for decision variables",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "ResID": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each restaurant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for decision variables",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "Visits": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Number of visits a student makes to a restaurant",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable in the optimization model",
          "sample_values": "2, 3, 1"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "Budget[StuID]": {
    "sample_value": "100",
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "The budget constraint for each student",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint bound in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "Cost_Per_Visit_Formula": {
    "formula_expression": "Spent[StuID, ResID] = Cost_Per_Visit[StuID, ResID] * Visits[StuID, ResID]",
    "data_type": "STRING",
    "business_meaning": "Calculates the total spent by a student at a restaurant",
    "optimization_role": "Used to calculate total spending in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "business_logic_formula"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "restaurant_1",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "restaurant_1",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Optimize the allocation of student visits to restaurants to maximize the total satisfaction score based on restaurant ratings, while considering budget constraints.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Determine the optimal number of visits each student should make to each restaurant to maximize the total satisfaction score, subject to budget constraints on the total amount spent by each student.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize total_satisfaction = \u2211(Rating[ResID] \u00d7 Visits[StuID, ResID])",
    "decision_variables": "Visits[StuID, ResID] - number of visits each student makes to each restaurant (integer)",
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(Cost_Per_Visit[StuID, ResID] \u00d7 Visits[StuID, ResID]) \u2264 Budget[StuID] for all StuID",
      "Visits[StuID, ResID] \u2265 0 for all StuID, ResID"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "Rating[ResID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "Restaurant.Rating",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Satisfaction score contribution from visiting a restaurant"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "Budget[StuID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "Student_Budget.Budget",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Budget constraint for each student"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "Visits[StuID, ResID]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "Visits_Restaurant.Visits",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Number of visits a student makes to a restaurant",
        "variable_type": "integer"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
