Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-25 22:35:26

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "Optimize bike redistribution across stations to minimize the number of unmet trip demands while respecting station dock capacities.",
  "optimization_problem": "The goal is to minimize the total number of unmet trip demands by redistributing bikes across stations. The redistribution must respect the dock capacities of each station and ensure that the number of bikes available at each station meets the expected demand.",
  "objective": "minimize \u2211(unmet_demand[s]) where s is the station index",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating tables for unmet demands and bike movements, adding expected trip demand and cost parameters to business configuration logic, and updating data dictionary to reflect new mappings."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Define expected trip demand per station and incorporate cost of bike redistribution into the objective function.",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating tables for unmet demands and bike movements, adding expected trip demand and cost parameters to business configuration logic, and updating data dictionary to reflect new mappings.

CREATE TABLE unmet_demand (
  station_id INTEGER,
  demand_count INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE bike_movements (
  from_station_id INTEGER,
  to_station_id INTEGER,
  movement_count INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "unmet_demand": {
      "business_purpose": "tracks unmet trip demands at each station",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "station_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "unique identifier for the station",
          "optimization_purpose": "index for unmet_demand[s]",
          "sample_values": [
            1,
            2,
            3
          ]
        },
        "demand_count": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "number of unmet trip demands",
          "optimization_purpose": "value of unmet_demand[s]",
          "sample_values": [
            0,
            1,
            2
          ]
        }
      }
    },
    "bike_movements": {
      "business_purpose": "tracks bike movements between stations",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "from_station_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "station where bikes are moved from",
          "optimization_purpose": "index s1 for x[s1][s2]",
          "sample_values": [
            1,
            2,
            3
          ]
        },
        "to_station_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "station where bikes are moved to",
          "optimization_purpose": "index s2 for x[s1][s2]",
          "sample_values": [
            1,
            2,
            3
          ]
        },
        "movement_count": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "number of bikes moved",
          "optimization_purpose": "value of x[s1][s2]",
          "sample_values": [
            0,
            1,
            2
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "expected_trip_demand": {
    "sample_value": 10,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "expected number of trip demands per station",
    "optimization_role": "used to calculate unmet demands",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "cost_per_bike_movement": {
    "sample_value": 5,
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "cost of moving one bike between stations",
    "optimization_role": "incorporated into the objective function",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "total_cost_formula": {
    "formula_expression": "sum(x[s1][s2] * cost_per_bike_movement for all s1, s2)",
    "data_type": "STRING",
    "business_meaning": "total cost of bike redistribution",
    "optimization_role": "part of the objective function",
    "configuration_type": "business_logic_formula"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "bike_1",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "bike_1",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Optimize bike redistribution across stations to minimize the number of unmet trip demands and the total cost of bike movements while respecting station dock capacities.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Minimize the total number of unmet trip demands and the total cost of bike movements, subject to constraints on station dock capacities and bike availability.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "minimize \u2211(unmet_demand[s] + cost_per_bike_movement * \u2211(x[s1][s2] for all s1, s2)) where s is the station index",
    "decision_variables": {
      "unmet_demand[s]": "integer, number of unmet trip demands at station s",
      "x[s1][s2]": "integer, number of bikes moved from station s1 to station s2"
    },
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(x[s1][s2] for all s2) \u2264 initial_bikes[s1] for all s1",
      "\u2211(x[s1][s2] for all s1) + initial_bikes[s2] - unmet_demand[s2] \u2265 expected_trip_demand for all s2"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "unmet_demand[s]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "unmet_demand.demand_count",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "coefficient for unmet trip demands at station s"
      },
      "cost_per_bike_movement": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.cost_per_bike_movement",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "cost coefficient for bike movements"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "initial_bikes[s1]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "missing",
        "description": "initial number of bikes at station s1"
      },
      "expected_trip_demand": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.expected_trip_demand",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "expected trip demand at station s2"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "unmet_demand[s]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "unmet_demand.demand_count",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "number of unmet trip demands at station s",
        "variable_type": "integer"
      },
      "x[s1][s2]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "bike_movements.movement_count",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "number of bikes moved from station s1 to station s2",
        "variable_type": "integer"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "initial_bikes[s1]"
  ],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": false,
    "confidence": "medium",
    "next_focus": "Define initial_bikes[s1] in the schema or business configuration logic."
  }
}
