Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 23:02:51

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "A company wants to optimize the allocation of its office spaces across different buildings to maximize its market value while considering constraints like available stories in buildings and the company's sales performance.",
  "optimization_problem": "The goal is to maximize the total market value of companies by optimally allocating office spaces in various buildings, subject to constraints on the number of stories available in each building and the sales performance of each company.",
  "objective": "maximize total_market_value = \u2211(market_value_coefficient[i] * x[i])",
  "table_count": 1,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating a new table for decision variables, modifying existing tables to fill mapping gaps, and moving scalar parameters to configuration logic. Business configuration logic updated to include minimum sales requirement as a scalar parameter."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Refine the mapping of decision variables and ensure all necessary parameters are available",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "partially_adequate"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating a new table for decision variables, modifying existing tables to fill mapping gaps, and moving scalar parameters to configuration logic. Business configuration logic updated to include minimum sales requirement as a scalar parameter.

CREATE TABLE Companies (
  Market_Value_billion FLOAT,
  Sales_billion FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE buildings (
  Stories INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE Office_Allocations (
  building_id INTEGER,
  company_id INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "Companies": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about companies including market value and sales",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients/business_data",
      "columns": {
        "Market_Value_billion": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Market value contribution of the company",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used in objective function",
          "sample_values": "10.5, 20.0, 15.3"
        },
        "Sales_billion": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Sales performance of the company",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used in sales-based constraints",
          "sample_values": "5.0, 7.5, 6.0"
        }
      }
    },
    "buildings": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about buildings including available stories",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "Stories": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum number of stories available in the building",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used in story-based constraints",
          "sample_values": "10, 15, 20"
        }
      }
    },
    "Office_Allocations": {
      "business_purpose": "Represents allocation of office spaces to companies in buildings",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "building_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the building",
          "optimization_purpose": "Part of decision variable mapping",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "company_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the company",
          "optimization_purpose": "Part of decision variable mapping",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "minimum_sales_requirement": {
    "sample_value": "100",
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "Represents the minimum total sales required for the allocation",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "company_office",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "company_office",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "The company aims to optimize the allocation of office spaces across different buildings to maximize its market value, considering constraints like available stories in buildings and the company's sales performance.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Maximize the total market value of companies by optimally allocating office spaces in various buildings, subject to constraints on the number of stories available in each building and the minimum sales performance required for allocation.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize total_market_value = \u2211(Market_Value_billion[i] * x[i])",
    "decision_variables": "x[i] represents the allocation of office space to company i in a building, where x[i] is a binary variable indicating whether the company is allocated space in the building (1) or not (0)",
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(x[i]) <= Stories[j] for each building j",
      "\u2211(Sales_billion[i] * x[i]) >= minimum_sales_requirement"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "Market_Value_billion[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "Companies.Market_Value_billion",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Represents the market value contribution of each company"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "Stories[j]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "buildings.Stories",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Represents the maximum number of stories available in each building"
      },
      "minimum_sales_requirement": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.minimum_sales_requirement",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Represents the minimum total sales required for the allocation"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "x[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "Office_Allocations.building_id, Office_Allocations.company_id",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Represents the allocation of office space to a company in a building",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
