Iteration final - PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION
Sequence: 5
Timestamp: 2025-07-28 00:16:30

Prompt:
You are a business analyst creating structured optimization problem documentation.

DATA SOURCES EXPLANATION:
- FINAL OR ANALYSIS: Final converged optimization problem from alternating process (iteration 1), contains business context and schema mapping evaluation
- DATABASE SCHEMA: Current database structure after iterative adjustments  
- DATA DICTIONARY: Business meanings and optimization roles of tables and columns
- CURRENT STORED VALUES: Realistic business data generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
- BUSINESS CONFIGURATION: Scalar parameters and business logic formulas separated from table data

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS: 
- Ensure problem description naturally leads to LINEAR or MIXED-INTEGER optimization formulation
- Make business context consistent with the intended decision variables and objectives
- Align constraint descriptions with expected mathematical constraints
- Ensure data descriptions map clearly to expected coefficient sources
- Maintain business authenticity while fixing mathematical consistency issues
- Avoid business scenarios that would naturally require nonlinear relationships (variable products, divisions, etc.)

AUTO-EXTRACTED CONTEXT REQUIREMENTS:
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: {'Acceptance.Result[i]': {'currently_mapped_to': 'Acceptance.Result', 'mapping_adequacy': 'good', 'description': 'Indicates if a submission is accepted', 'variable_type': 'binary'}}
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize total_score = ∑(submission.Scores[i] * Acceptance.Result[i])
- Business configuration includes: Minimum number of submissions required per workshop (used for Used as a constraint in the optimization model), Maximum number of submissions that can be accepted in each workshop (used for Used as a constraint in the optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate

FINAL OR ANALYSIS:
{
  "database_id": "workshop_paper",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A conference organizer aims to maximize the total score of accepted submissions across various workshops, ensuring each workshop meets its minimum submission requirement and does not exceed its venue capacity.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Maximize the total score of accepted submissions while respecting venue capacity and ensuring a minimum number of submissions per workshop.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize total_score = \u2211(submission.Scores[i] * Acceptance.Result[i])",
    "decision_variables": {
      "Acceptance.Result[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "Acceptance.Result",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Indicates if a submission is accepted",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    },
    "constraints": {
      "venue_capacity_constraint[workshop_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "VenueCapacity.capacity",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Total accepted submissions for each workshop must not exceed its capacity",
        "constraint": "\u2211(Acceptance.Result[i]) \u2264 VenueCapacity.capacity[workshop_id]"
      },
      "min_submissions_constraint[workshop_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "WorkshopSubmissions.min_submissions",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Each workshop must have at least a minimum number of accepted submissions",
        "constraint": "\u2211(Acceptance.Result[i]) \u2265 WorkshopSubmissions.min_submissions[workshop_id]"
      }
    }
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "Scores[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "submission.Scores",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Quality score of each submission"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "capacity[workshop_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "VenueCapacity.capacity",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of submissions that can be accepted in each workshop"
      },
      "min_submissions[workshop_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "WorkshopSubmissions.min_submissions",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Minimum number of submissions required for each workshop"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "Acceptance.Result[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "Acceptance.Result",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Indicates if a submission is accepted",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}

FINAL DATABASE SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include adding tables for venue capacity and minimum submissions per workshop, modifying existing tables to improve mapping adequacy, and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE submission (
  Scores FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE VenueCapacity (
  workshop_id INTEGER,
  capacity INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE WorkshopSubmissions (
  workshop_id INTEGER,
  min_submissions INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE Acceptance (
  Result BOOLEAN,
  workshop_id INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT STORED VALUES:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical conference workshop sizes and submission quality scores, ensuring a balance between capacity and minimum submission requirements.

-- Realistic data for submission
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (8.5);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (6.0);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (9.2);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (7.3);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (5.5);

-- Realistic data for VenueCapacity
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (1, 50);
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (2, 100);
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (3, 150);

-- Realistic data for WorkshopSubmissions
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (2, 5);
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (3, 7);

-- Realistic data for Acceptance
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 1);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (False, 1);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 2);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 3);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (False, 3);


```

DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "submission": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores information about each submission",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "Scores": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Quality score of each submission",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used to calculate the total score of accepted submissions",
          "sample_values": "0.0 to 10.0"
        }
      }
    },
    "VenueCapacity": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores the maximum capacity for each workshop",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "workshop_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for each workshop",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links capacity to specific workshops",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "capacity": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Maximum number of submissions that can be accepted",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used as a constraint in optimization",
          "sample_values": "50, 100, 150"
        }
      }
    },
    "WorkshopSubmissions": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores the minimum required submissions for each workshop",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "workshop_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for each workshop",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links minimum submissions to specific workshops",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "min_submissions": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Minimum number of submissions required",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used as a constraint in optimization",
          "sample_values": "3, 5, 7"
        }
      }
    },
    "Acceptance": {
      "business_purpose": "Tracks acceptance status of submissions",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "Result": {
          "data_type": "BOOLEAN",
          "business_meaning": "Indicates if a submission is accepted",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable in optimization",
          "sample_values": "true, false"
        },
        "workshop_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for the workshop to which the submission is linked",
          "optimization_purpose": "Associates submissions with specific workshops",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:

BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:
{
  "min_submissions_per_workshop": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Minimum number of submissions required per workshop",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 5,
    "business_justification": "Reflects a realistic minimum for medium-sized workshops."
  },
  "venue_capacity": {
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of submissions that can be accepted in each workshop",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 100,
    "business_justification": "Represents a typical capacity for a medium-sized workshop venue."
  }
}

Business Configuration Design: 
Our system separates business logic design from value determination:
- Configuration Logic (business_configuration_logic.json): Templates designed by data engineers with sample_value for scalars and actual formulas for business logic
- Configuration Values (business_configuration.json): Realistic values determined by domain experts for scalar parameters only
- Design Rationale: Ensures business logic consistency while allowing flexible parameter tuning


TASK: Create structured markdown documentation for SECTIONS 1-3 ONLY (Problem Description).

EXACT MARKDOWN STRUCTURE TO FOLLOW:

# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: workshop_paper

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
[Regenerate business context that naturally aligns with LINEAR optimization formulation. Ensure:]
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: {'Acceptance.Result[i]': {'currently_mapped_to': 'Acceptance.Result', 'mapping_adequacy': 'good', 'description': 'Indicates if a submission is accepted', 'variable_type': 'binary'}}
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize total_score = ∑(submission.Scores[i] * Acceptance.Result[i])
- Business configuration includes: Minimum number of submissions required per workshop (used for Used as a constraint in the optimization model), Maximum number of submissions that can be accepted in each workshop (used for Used as a constraint in the optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate
- CRITICAL: Include ALL business configuration information (scalar parameters AND business logic formulas) in natural business language

### Goals  
[Regenerate goals that clearly lead to LINEAR mathematical objective:]
- Optimization goal: maximize
- Metric to optimize: maximize total_score = ∑(submission.Scores[i] * Acceptance.Result[i])
- Success measurement aligned with expected coefficient sources
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear optimization goal
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation

## 2. Constraints    

[Regenerate constraints that directly match expected LINEAR mathematical constraints:]
- Expected constraint: {'venue_capacity_constraint[workshop_id]': {'currently_mapped_to': 'VenueCapacity.capacity', 'mapping_adequacy': 'good', 'description': 'Total accepted submissions for each workshop must not exceed its capacity', 'constraint': '∑(Acceptance.Result[i]) ≤ VenueCapacity.capacity[workshop_id]'}, 'min_submissions_constraint[workshop_id]': {'currently_mapped_to': 'WorkshopSubmissions.min_submissions', 'mapping_adequacy': 'good', 'description': 'Each workshop must have at least a minimum number of accepted submissions', 'constraint': '∑(Acceptance.Result[i]) ≥ WorkshopSubmissions.min_submissions[workshop_id]'}} (Form: Standard constraint form based on business requirements)

[Each constraint should be described in business terms that naturally lead to LINEAR mathematical forms (no variable products or divisions)]

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include adding tables for venue capacity and minimum submissions per workshop, modifying existing tables to improve mapping adequacy, and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE submission (
  Scores FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE VenueCapacity (
  workshop_id INTEGER,
  capacity INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE WorkshopSubmissions (
  workshop_id INTEGER,
  min_submissions INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE Acceptance (
  Result BOOLEAN,
  workshop_id INTEGER
);


```

### Data Dictionary  
[Create comprehensive business-oriented data dictionary mapping tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles - NOT technical database terms. Base this on the data_dictionary provided but rewrite in business language that clearly connects to the expected linear mathematical formulation]

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical conference workshop sizes and submission quality scores, ensuring a balance between capacity and minimum submission requirements.

-- Realistic data for submission
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (8.5);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (6.0);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (9.2);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (7.3);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (5.5);

-- Realistic data for VenueCapacity
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (1, 50);
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (2, 100);
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (3, 150);

-- Realistic data for WorkshopSubmissions
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (2, 5);
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (3, 7);

-- Realistic data for Acceptance
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 1);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (False, 1);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 2);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 3);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (False, 3);


```

STOP HERE - Do not include section 4 (Mathematical Optimization Formulation).

Response:
# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: workshop_paper

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
The conference organizer is tasked with selecting submissions for various workshops, aiming to maximize the overall quality of accepted submissions. Each submission is evaluated based on a quality score, and the decision to accept a submission is represented by a binary variable indicating acceptance status. The organizer must ensure that each workshop meets a minimum number of accepted submissions while not exceeding the venue's capacity. The operational parameters include the minimum number of submissions required per workshop and the maximum number of submissions that can be accepted in each workshop. These parameters are critical in guiding the decision-making process and ensuring that the optimization problem remains linear. The business configuration includes scalar parameters that define these constraints, ensuring that the optimization aligns with the operational realities of the conference.

### Goals  
The primary goal of the optimization is to maximize the total score of accepted submissions. This involves selecting submissions that contribute the highest quality scores while adhering to the constraints of venue capacity and minimum submission requirements. The success of this optimization is measured by the total score achieved, which is calculated by summing the quality scores of all accepted submissions. The objective is clearly defined in linear terms, focusing on maximizing the sum of scores associated with accepted submissions.

## 2. Constraints    

The optimization problem is subject to several constraints that ensure the feasibility of the solution:

- Each workshop has a maximum capacity, which means the total number of accepted submissions for any workshop must not exceed its designated capacity. This constraint ensures that the venue's limitations are respected.
  
- Additionally, each workshop must have a minimum number of accepted submissions to ensure that the workshop is viable and meets the expectations of attendees. This constraint guarantees that workshops are sufficiently populated.

These constraints are expressed in business terms that naturally lead to linear mathematical forms, ensuring that the optimization problem remains tractable and aligned with the operational goals of the conference.

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include adding tables for venue capacity and minimum submissions per workshop, modifying existing tables to improve mapping adequacy, and updating configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE submission (
  Scores FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE VenueCapacity (
  workshop_id INTEGER,
  capacity INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE WorkshopSubmissions (
  workshop_id INTEGER,
  min_submissions INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE Acceptance (
  Result BOOLEAN,
  workshop_id INTEGER
);
```

### Data Dictionary  
The data dictionary provides a comprehensive mapping of tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles:

- **Submission Table**: This table stores information about each submission, specifically the quality score, which is used to calculate the total score of accepted submissions. The scores range from 0.0 to 10.0, reflecting the quality of each submission.

- **VenueCapacity Table**: This table records the maximum capacity for each workshop, linking the capacity to specific workshops. The capacity represents the maximum number of submissions that can be accepted, ensuring that the venue's limitations are respected.

- **WorkshopSubmissions Table**: This table captures the minimum required submissions for each workshop, linking these requirements to specific workshops. The minimum submissions ensure that each workshop is viable and meets the expectations of attendees.

- **Acceptance Table**: This table tracks the acceptance status of submissions, indicating whether a submission is accepted. The acceptance status is a binary decision variable in the optimization process, associating submissions with specific workshops.

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical conference workshop sizes and submission quality scores, ensuring a balance between capacity and minimum submission requirements.

-- Realistic data for submission
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (8.5);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (6.0);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (9.2);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (7.3);
INSERT INTO submission (Scores) VALUES (5.5);

-- Realistic data for VenueCapacity
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (1, 50);
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (2, 100);
INSERT INTO VenueCapacity (workshop_id, capacity) VALUES (3, 150);

-- Realistic data for WorkshopSubmissions
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (2, 5);
INSERT INTO WorkshopSubmissions (workshop_id, min_submissions) VALUES (3, 7);

-- Realistic data for Acceptance
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 1);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (False, 1);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 2);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (True, 3);
INSERT INTO Acceptance (Result, workshop_id) VALUES (False, 3);
```
