Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 22:54:53

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "Optimize the allocation of ships to battles to minimize the total number of deaths caused by ships, considering the constraints on ship availability and battle requirements.",
  "optimization_problem": "The goal is to allocate ships to battles in a way that minimizes the total number of deaths caused by ships. Each ship can be assigned to at most one battle, and each battle has a requirement for a certain number of ships. The number of deaths caused by each ship in a battle is known.",
  "objective": "minimize total_deaths = \u2211(deaths_caused_by_ship_in_battle[i,j] * x[i,j])",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating new tables for decision variables and constraint bounds, modifying existing tables to improve mapping adequacy, and updating business configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Refine the mapping of decision variables and constraints to the existing schema",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for decision variables and constraint bounds, modifying existing tables to improve mapping adequacy, and updating business configuration logic for scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE ship_battle_assignment (
  ship_id INTEGER,
  battle_id INTEGER,
  assignment BOOLEAN
);

CREATE TABLE battle_requirements (
  battle_id INTEGER,
  min_ships INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "ship_battle_assignment": {
      "business_purpose": "Tracks ship assignments to battles",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "ship_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for each ship",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used to identify ships in assignments",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "battle_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for each battle",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used to identify battles in assignments",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "assignment": {
          "data_type": "BOOLEAN",
          "business_meaning": "Indicates if a ship is assigned to a battle",
          "optimization_purpose": "Binary decision variable",
          "sample_values": "true, false"
        }
      }
    },
    "battle_requirements": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores minimum ship requirements for battles",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "battle_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Identifier for each battle",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links to battles for requirement checks",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "min_ships": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Minimum number of ships required for a battle",
          "optimization_purpose": "Constraint bound for ship assignments",
          "sample_values": "3, 5, 7"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "ship_availability_limit": {
    "sample_value": "10",
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "Maximum number of ships available for assignment",
    "optimization_role": "Limits the number of ships that can be assigned",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "total_deaths_formula": {
    "formula_expression": "sum(deaths_caused_by_ship_in_battle[i,j] * x[i,j])",
    "data_type": "STRING",
    "business_meaning": "Calculates the total deaths caused by ship assignments",
    "optimization_role": "Objective function to minimize",
    "configuration_type": "business_logic_formula"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "battle_death",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "battle_death",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Optimize the allocation of ships to battles to minimize the total number of deaths caused by ships, considering the constraints on ship availability and battle requirements.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Allocate ships to battles to minimize total deaths, ensuring each ship is assigned to at most one battle and each battle receives the required number of ships.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "minimize total_deaths = sum(deaths_caused_by_ship_in_battle[i,j] * x[i,j])",
    "decision_variables": "x[i,j] where x[i,j] is a binary variable indicating if ship i is assigned to battle j",
    "constraints": [
      "sum(x[i,j] for all j) <= 1 for each ship i",
      "sum(x[i,j] for all i) >= min_ships[j] for each battle j",
      "sum(x[i,j] for all i, j) <= ship_availability_limit"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "deaths_caused_by_ship_in_battle[i,j]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "missing",
        "description": "Number of deaths caused by ship i in battle j"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "min_ships[j]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "battle_requirements.min_ships",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Minimum number of ships required for battle j"
      },
      "ship_availability_limit": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.ship_availability_limit",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Maximum number of ships available for assignment"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "x[i,j]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "ship_battle_assignment.assignment",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Binary decision variable indicating if ship i is assigned to battle j",
        "variable_type": "binary"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "deaths_caused_by_ship_in_battle[i,j]"
  ],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": false,
    "confidence": "medium",
    "next_focus": "Incorporate deaths_caused_by_ship_in_battle data into schema for complete linear formulation"
  }
}
