Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-25 22:31:33

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "A retail chain aims to optimize the allocation of products across its stores to maximize total sales while respecting store capacities and product availability.",
  "optimization_problem": "The objective is to maximize the total sales revenue by deciding how many units of each product to allocate to each store, considering store capacities, product availability, and sales potential.",
  "objective": "maximize \u2211(sales_potential[store_id, product_id] \u00d7 allocation[store_id, product_id])",
  "table_count": 3,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating tables for sales potential, product availability, and store capacity. Business configuration logic updated with scalar parameters and formulas."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Identify and map missing data sources for sales potential, product availability, and store capacity.",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating tables for sales potential, product availability, and store capacity. Business configuration logic updated with scalar parameters and formulas.

CREATE TABLE sales_potential (
  store_id INTEGER,
  product_id INTEGER,
  sales_potential_value FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE product_availability (
  product_id INTEGER,
  available_units INTEGER
);

CREATE TABLE store_capacity (
  store_id INTEGER,
  capacity INTEGER
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "sales_potential": {
      "business_purpose": "represents the sales potential of a product in a specific store",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "store_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "unique identifier for the store",
          "optimization_purpose": "index for store in optimization model",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "product_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "unique identifier for the product",
          "optimization_purpose": "index for product in optimization model",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "sales_potential_value": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "sales potential of the product in the store",
          "optimization_purpose": "coefficient in the objective function",
          "sample_values": "50.0, 75.0, 100.0"
        }
      }
    },
    "product_availability": {
      "business_purpose": "represents the total available units of a product",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "product_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "unique identifier for the product",
          "optimization_purpose": "index for product in optimization model",
          "sample_values": "101, 102, 103"
        },
        "available_units": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "total available units of the product",
          "optimization_purpose": "upper bound in the constraint",
          "sample_values": "500, 750, 1000"
        }
      }
    },
    "store_capacity": {
      "business_purpose": "represents the maximum number of units a store can handle",
      "optimization_role": "constraint_bounds",
      "columns": {
        "store_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "unique identifier for the store",
          "optimization_purpose": "index for store in optimization model",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "capacity": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "maximum number of units the store can handle",
          "optimization_purpose": "upper bound in the constraint",
          "sample_values": "1000, 1500, 2000"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "min_allocation_threshold": {
    "sample_value": 10,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "minimum number of units to allocate to a store",
    "optimization_role": "constraint lower bound",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "max_allocation_threshold": {
    "sample_value": 100,
    "data_type": "INTEGER",
    "business_meaning": "maximum number of units to allocate to a store",
    "optimization_role": "constraint upper bound",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "sales_performance_metric": {
    "formula_expression": "sum(sales_potential[store_id, product_id] * allocation[store_id, product_id])",
    "data_type": "STRING",
    "business_meaning": "total sales revenue",
    "optimization_role": "objective function",
    "configuration_type": "business_logic_formula"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "store_product",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "store_product",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A retail chain aims to optimize the allocation of products across its stores to maximize total sales while respecting store capacities and product availability.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Maximize total sales revenue by deciding how many units of each product to allocate to each store, considering store capacities, product availability, and sales potential.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize \u2211(sales_potential[store_id, product_id] \u00d7 allocation[store_id, product_id])",
    "decision_variables": "allocation[store_id, product_id] = number of units of product_id allocated to store_id (integer)",
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(allocation[store_id, product_id] for all product_id) \u2264 store_capacity[store_id] for all store_id",
      "\u2211(allocation[store_id, product_id] for all store_id) \u2264 product_availability[product_id] for all product_id",
      "min_allocation_threshold \u2264 allocation[store_id, product_id] \u2264 max_allocation_threshold for all store_id, product_id"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "sales_potential[store_id, product_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "sales_potential.sales_potential_value",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "sales potential of the product in the store"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "store_capacity[store_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "store_capacity.capacity",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "maximum number of units the store can handle"
      },
      "product_availability[product_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "product_availability.available_units",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "total available units of the product"
      },
      "min_allocation_threshold": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.min_allocation_threshold",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "minimum number of units to allocate to a store"
      },
      "max_allocation_threshold": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.max_allocation_threshold",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "maximum number of units to allocate to a store"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "allocation[store_id, product_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "missing",
        "description": "number of units of product_id allocated to store_id",
        "variable_type": "integer"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "allocation[store_id, product_id]"
  ],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": false,
    "confidence": "medium",
    "next_focus": "Identify and map missing data source for allocation decision variable."
  }
}
