Iteration 1 - OR_EXPERT_REFINEMENT
Sequence: 3
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 23:38:38

Prompt:
You are an Operations Research (OR) expert in iteration 1 of an alternating optimization process. The algorithm alternates between OR expert analysis and data engineering implementation until convergence.

CRITICAL MATHEMATICAL CONSTRAINTS FOR LINEAR/MIXED-INTEGER PROGRAMMING:
- The optimization problem MUST remain Linear Programming (LP) or Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP)
- Objective function MUST be linear: minimize/maximize ∑(coefficient × variable)
- All constraints MUST be linear: ∑(coefficient × variable) ≤/≥/= constant
- Decision variables can be continuous (LP) or mixed continuous/integer (MIP)
- NO variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- If previous iteration introduced nonlinear elements, redesign as linear formulation
- Maintain between 2 and 20 constraints for optimization feasibility

YOUR SCOPE: Focus exclusively on optimization modeling and mapping analysis. Do NOT propose database changes.
ROW COUNT AWARENESS: Understand that data engineer applies 3-row minimum rule - insufficient table data gets moved to business_configuration_logic.json.


DATA AVAILABILITY CHECK: 
Before listing missing requirements, verify:
- Check current schema for required data columns
- Check business configuration logic for required parameters  
- Only list as "missing" if data is truly unavailable
- If all mappings are "good", missing_requirements should be []

CONSISTENCY RULES:
- IF all mapping_adequacy == "good" THEN missing_optimization_requirements = []
- IF missing_optimization_requirements = [] THEN complete CAN be true
- IF complete == true THEN confidence should be "high"

SELF-CHECK: Before responding, verify:
1. Does current schema contain the data I claim is missing?
2. Are my mapping assessments consistent with missing requirements?
3. Is my complete status consistent with missing requirements?

MAPPING COMPLETENESS CHECK: Ensure logical consistency between:
- All objective coefficients mapped with adequacy evaluation
- All constraint bounds mapped with adequacy evaluation  
- All decision variables mapped with adequacy evaluation
- Missing requirements list matches inadequate mappings only


CRITICAL: Respond with ONLY a valid JSON object. No explanations, no markdown, no extra text.



CURRENT STATE (iteration 0):
{
  "iteration": 1,
  "converged": false,
  "business_context": "A poker tournament organizer wants to optimize the allocation of prize money to players based on their performance metrics to maximize the overall satisfaction of players while staying within a budget.",
  "optimization_problem": "The goal is to maximize the total satisfaction of players by allocating prize money based on their performance metrics such as Final_Table_Made, Best_Finish, and Money_Rank, while ensuring the total prize money does not exceed the budget.",
  "objective": "maximize total_satisfaction = \u2211(satisfaction_coefficient[i] * prize_money[i])",
  "table_count": 2,
  "key_changes": [
    "Schema changes include creating new tables for decision variables and constraint bounds, and moving scalar parameters to configuration logic. This addresses the OR expert's mapping gaps and missing requirements."
  ],
  "math_consistency": "high",
  "next_iteration_focus": "Determine satisfaction coefficients and budget constraints for a complete model",
  "mapping_adequacy_summary": "needs_improvement"
}

CURRENT SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating new tables for decision variables and constraint bounds, and moving scalar parameters to configuration logic. This addresses the OR expert's mapping gaps and missing requirements.

CREATE TABLE PlayerSatisfactionCoefficients (
  player_id INTEGER,
  coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE PrizeMoneyAllocation (
  player_id INTEGER,
  prize_money FLOAT
);


```

CURRENT DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "PlayerSatisfactionCoefficients": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores satisfaction coefficients for each player",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "player_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each player",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links satisfaction coefficients to players",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Satisfaction coefficient for the player",
          "optimization_purpose": "Used in the objective function to calculate total satisfaction",
          "sample_values": "0.8, 1.2, 1.0"
        }
      }
    },
    "PrizeMoneyAllocation": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores prize money allocation for each player",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "player_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each player",
          "optimization_purpose": "Links prize money to players",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "prize_money": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Prize money allocated to the player",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable in the optimization model",
          "sample_values": "5000, 7000, 6000"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


CURRENT BUSINESS CONFIGURATION LOGIC:
{
  "total_budget": {
    "sample_value": "100000",
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "The total budget available for prize money allocation",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint bound in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  },
  "max_prize_limit": {
    "sample_value": "10000",
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "The maximum prize money that can be allocated to any single player",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint bound in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter"
  }
}


TASK: Refine the optimization problem formulation by analyzing current data schema mapping and identifying requirements while maintaining LINEAR structure.

JSON STRUCTURE REQUIRED:

{
  "database_id": "poker_player",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "Updated realistic business scenario description that supports linear optimization",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Refined description of LINEAR optimization problem", 
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "refined linear minimize/maximize with mathematical precision (sum of weighted variables only)",
    "decision_variables": "clearly defined controllable linear variables (continuous or integer)",
    "constraints": "mathematically precise LINEAR constraint definitions (no variable products or divisions) - maintain 2 to 20 constraints"
  },
  
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "coefficient_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this coefficient represents in the optimization model"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "constraint_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate", 
        "description": "what this constraint bound represents"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "variable_name[indices]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "table.column OR business_configuration_logic.key OR missing",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good/missing/redundant/partial/inaccurate",
        "description": "what this decision variable represents",
        "variable_type": "continuous/integer/binary"
      }
    }
  },
  
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [
    "List what data/parameters are still needed for linear formulation (should be [] if all mappings are good)"
  ],
  
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true/false based on linear formulation completeness,
    "confidence": "updated confidence level",
    "next_focus": "What needs refinement for linear optimization OR 'Ready for convergence'"
  }
}

Response:
{
  "database_id": "poker_player",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A poker tournament organizer wants to optimize the allocation of prize money to players based on their performance metrics to maximize the overall satisfaction of players while staying within a budget.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "The goal is to maximize the total satisfaction of players by allocating prize money based on their performance metrics such as Final_Table_Made, Best_Finish, and Money_Rank, while ensuring the total prize money does not exceed the budget.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize total_satisfaction = \u2211(PlayerSatisfactionCoefficients.coefficient[i] * PrizeMoneyAllocation.prize_money[i])",
    "decision_variables": "PrizeMoneyAllocation.prize_money[i] for each player i, continuous",
    "constraints": [
      "\u2211(PrizeMoneyAllocation.prize_money[i]) <= business_configuration_logic.total_budget",
      "PrizeMoneyAllocation.prize_money[i] <= business_configuration_logic.max_prize_limit for each player i"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "satisfaction_coefficient[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "PlayerSatisfactionCoefficients.coefficient",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Satisfaction coefficient for each player used in the objective function"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "total_budget": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.total_budget",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "The total budget available for prize money allocation"
      },
      "max_prize_limit": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.max_prize_limit",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "The maximum prize money that can be allocated to any single player"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "prize_money[i]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "PrizeMoneyAllocation.prize_money",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Prize money allocated to each player",
        "variable_type": "continuous"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}
