Iteration final - PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION
Sequence: 5
Timestamp: 2025-07-27 22:45:53

Prompt:
You are a business analyst creating structured optimization problem documentation.

DATA SOURCES EXPLANATION:
- FINAL OR ANALYSIS: Final converged optimization problem from alternating process (iteration 1), contains business context and schema mapping evaluation
- DATABASE SCHEMA: Current database structure after iterative adjustments  
- DATA DICTIONARY: Business meanings and optimization roles of tables and columns
- CURRENT STORED VALUES: Realistic business data generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
- BUSINESS CONFIGURATION: Scalar parameters and business logic formulas separated from table data

CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS: 
- Ensure problem description naturally leads to LINEAR or MIXED-INTEGER optimization formulation
- Make business context consistent with the intended decision variables and objectives
- Align constraint descriptions with expected mathematical constraints
- Ensure data descriptions map clearly to expected coefficient sources
- Maintain business authenticity while fixing mathematical consistency issues
- Avoid business scenarios that would naturally require nonlinear relationships (variable products, divisions, etc.)

AUTO-EXTRACTED CONTEXT REQUIREMENTS:
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id] for each city_id, continuous
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize sum(CityRatingImprovementCoefficients.coefficient[city_id] * BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id])
- Business configuration includes: Total marketing budget available for allocation (used for Used as a constraint bound in the optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate

FINAL OR ANALYSIS:
{
  "database_id": "restaurants",
  "iteration": 1,
  "business_context": "A restaurant chain wants to optimize the allocation of marketing budget across different cities to maximize the overall rating improvement of its restaurants.",
  "optimization_problem_description": "Allocate a fixed marketing budget across different cities to maximize the sum of expected rating improvements of the restaurants. Each city has a different potential rating improvement per unit of budget spent, and the total budget is limited.",
  "optimization_formulation": {
    "objective": "maximize sum(CityRatingImprovementCoefficients.coefficient[city_id] * BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id])",
    "decision_variables": "BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id] for each city_id, continuous",
    "constraints": [
      "sum(BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id]) <= business_configuration_logic.total_budget",
      "BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id] >= 0 for each city_id"
    ]
  },
  "current_optimization_to_schema_mapping": {
    "objective_coefficients": {
      "CityRatingImprovementCoefficients.coefficient[city_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "CityRatingImprovementCoefficients.coefficient",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Expected rating improvement per unit of budget for each city"
      }
    },
    "constraint_bounds": {
      "total_budget_constraint": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "business_configuration_logic.total_budget",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Total marketing budget available for allocation"
      }
    },
    "decision_variables": {
      "BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id]": {
        "currently_mapped_to": "BudgetAllocations.allocation",
        "mapping_adequacy": "good",
        "description": "Amount of budget allocated to each city",
        "variable_type": "continuous"
      }
    }
  },
  "missing_optimization_requirements": [],
  "iteration_status": {
    "complete": true,
    "confidence": "high",
    "next_focus": "Ready for convergence"
  }
}

FINAL DATABASE SCHEMA:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating tables for decision variables and objective coefficients, and updating business configuration logic for constraint bounds.

CREATE TABLE CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (
  city_id INTEGER,
  coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE BudgetAllocations (
  city_id INTEGER,
  allocation FLOAT
);


```

CURRENT STORED VALUES:
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical marketing budget allocations and expected rating improvements in the restaurant industry, ensuring a balance between potential improvements and budget constraints.

-- Realistic data for CityRatingImprovementCoefficients
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.15);
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.25);
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.1);

-- Realistic data for BudgetAllocations
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (1, 30000);
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (2, 50000);
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (3, 20000);


```

DATA DICTIONARY:
{
  "tables": {
    "CityRatingImprovementCoefficients": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores expected rating improvement per unit of budget spent in each city",
      "optimization_role": "objective_coefficients",
      "columns": {
        "city_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each city",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for city-specific coefficients",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "coefficient": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Expected rating improvement per unit of budget",
          "optimization_purpose": "Coefficient in the objective function",
          "sample_values": "0.1, 0.2, 0.3"
        }
      }
    },
    "BudgetAllocations": {
      "business_purpose": "Stores the amount of budget allocated to each city",
      "optimization_role": "decision_variables",
      "columns": {
        "city_id": {
          "data_type": "INTEGER",
          "business_meaning": "Unique identifier for each city",
          "optimization_purpose": "Index for budget allocation",
          "sample_values": "1, 2, 3"
        },
        "allocation": {
          "data_type": "FLOAT",
          "business_meaning": "Amount of budget allocated to the city",
          "optimization_purpose": "Decision variable in the optimization model",
          "sample_values": "1000, 2000, 3000"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}


BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:

BUSINESS CONFIGURATION:
{
  "total_budget": {
    "data_type": "FLOAT",
    "business_meaning": "Total marketing budget available for allocation",
    "optimization_role": "Used as a constraint bound in the optimization model",
    "configuration_type": "scalar_parameter",
    "value": 100000,
    "business_justification": "A total budget of 100,000 is realistic for a mid-sized restaurant chain's marketing efforts across multiple cities."
  }
}

Business Configuration Design: 
Our system separates business logic design from value determination:
- Configuration Logic (business_configuration_logic.json): Templates designed by data engineers with sample_value for scalars and actual formulas for business logic
- Configuration Values (business_configuration.json): Realistic values determined by domain experts for scalar parameters only
- Design Rationale: Ensures business logic consistency while allowing flexible parameter tuning


TASK: Create structured markdown documentation for SECTIONS 1-3 ONLY (Problem Description).

EXACT MARKDOWN STRUCTURE TO FOLLOW:

# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: restaurants

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
[Regenerate business context that naturally aligns with LINEAR optimization formulation. Ensure:]
- Business decisions match expected decision variables: BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id] for each city_id, continuous
- Operational parameters align with expected linear objective: maximize sum(CityRatingImprovementCoefficients.coefficient[city_id] * BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id])
- Business configuration includes: Total marketing budget available for allocation (used for Used as a constraint bound in the optimization model)
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear mathematical relationships
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation
- Present data as current operational information
- Focus on precise operational decision-making that leads to linear formulations
- Resource limitations match expected linear constraints
- Avoid scenarios requiring variable products, divisions, or other nonlinear relationships
- Include specific operational parameters that map to expected coefficient sources
- Reference business configuration parameters where appropriate
- CRITICAL: Include ALL business configuration information (scalar parameters AND business logic formulas) in natural business language

### Goals  
[Regenerate goals that clearly lead to LINEAR mathematical objective:]
- Optimization goal: maximize
- Metric to optimize: maximize sum(CityRatingImprovementCoefficients.coefficient[city_id] * BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id])
- Success measurement aligned with expected coefficient sources
- Use natural language to precisely describe linear optimization goal
- NO mathematical formulas, equations, or symbolic notation

## 2. Constraints    

[Regenerate constraints that directly match expected LINEAR mathematical constraints:]
- Expected constraint: ['sum(BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id]) <= business_configuration_logic.total_budget', 'BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id] >= 0 for each city_id'] (Form: Standard constraint form based on business requirements)

[Each constraint should be described in business terms that naturally lead to LINEAR mathematical forms (no variable products or divisions)]

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating tables for decision variables and objective coefficients, and updating business configuration logic for constraint bounds.

CREATE TABLE CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (
  city_id INTEGER,
  coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE BudgetAllocations (
  city_id INTEGER,
  allocation FLOAT
);


```

### Data Dictionary  
[Create comprehensive business-oriented data dictionary mapping tables and columns to their business purposes and optimization roles - NOT technical database terms. Base this on the data_dictionary provided but rewrite in business language that clearly connects to the expected linear mathematical formulation]

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical marketing budget allocations and expected rating improvements in the restaurant industry, ensuring a balance between potential improvements and budget constraints.

-- Realistic data for CityRatingImprovementCoefficients
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.15);
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.25);
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.1);

-- Realistic data for BudgetAllocations
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (1, 30000);
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (2, 50000);
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (3, 20000);


```

STOP HERE - Do not include section 4 (Mathematical Optimization Formulation).

Response:
# Complete Optimization Problem and Solution: restaurants

## 1. Problem Context and Goals

### Context  
A restaurant chain is aiming to strategically allocate its marketing budget across various cities to enhance the overall ratings of its restaurants. The decision involves determining the amount of budget to allocate to each city, represented by the decision variable `BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id]`, which is continuous. The primary objective is to maximize the expected improvement in restaurant ratings, which is directly influenced by the budget allocated to each city. Each city has a specific potential for rating improvement per unit of budget spent, captured by `CityRatingImprovementCoefficients.coefficient[city_id]`. The total marketing budget available for allocation is a fixed amount, serving as a constraint in the optimization model. This budget constraint ensures that the sum of all allocations does not exceed the total budget. The business configuration includes this total budget as a scalar parameter, ensuring that the allocation decisions are made within the available financial resources. The focus is on making precise operational decisions that align with linear optimization principles, avoiding any nonlinear relationships such as variable products or divisions.

### Goals  
The optimization goal is to maximize the overall improvement in restaurant ratings across all cities. This is achieved by optimizing the sum of the expected rating improvements, which is calculated by multiplying the potential rating improvement per unit of budget (`CityRatingImprovementCoefficients.coefficient[city_id]`) by the budget allocated to each city (`BudgetAllocations.allocation[city_id]`). Success is measured by the extent to which the total expected rating improvement is maximized, aligning with the linear optimization objective. The goal is clearly defined in natural language, focusing on the linear relationship between budget allocation and rating improvement.

## 2. Constraints    

The optimization problem is subject to specific constraints that ensure the solution is feasible within the business context. The primary constraint is that the total budget allocated across all cities must not exceed the total marketing budget available. This is expressed as the sum of all budget allocations being less than or equal to the total budget. Additionally, each city's budget allocation must be non-negative, ensuring that no city receives a negative budget. These constraints are described in business terms, naturally leading to linear mathematical forms without involving any nonlinear relationships.

## 3. Available Data  

### Database Schema  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Database Schema
-- Objective: Schema changes include creating tables for decision variables and objective coefficients, and updating business configuration logic for constraint bounds.

CREATE TABLE CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (
  city_id INTEGER,
  coefficient FLOAT
);

CREATE TABLE BudgetAllocations (
  city_id INTEGER,
  allocation FLOAT
);
```

### Data Dictionary  
The data dictionary provides a comprehensive mapping of tables and columns to their business purposes and roles in the optimization process:

- **CityRatingImprovementCoefficients**: This table stores the expected rating improvement per unit of budget spent in each city. It plays a crucial role in the optimization as it provides the coefficients for the objective function.
  - **city_id**: A unique identifier for each city, used to index city-specific coefficients.
  - **coefficient**: Represents the expected rating improvement per unit of budget, serving as a coefficient in the objective function.

- **BudgetAllocations**: This table records the amount of budget allocated to each city, representing the decision variables in the optimization model.
  - **city_id**: A unique identifier for each city, used to index budget allocations.
  - **allocation**: The amount of budget allocated to the city, serving as a decision variable in the optimization model.

### Current Stored Values  
```sql
-- Iteration 1 Realistic Data
-- Generated by triple expert (business + data + optimization)
-- Values were determined based on typical marketing budget allocations and expected rating improvements in the restaurant industry, ensuring a balance between potential improvements and budget constraints.

-- Realistic data for CityRatingImprovementCoefficients
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (1, 0.15);
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (2, 0.25);
INSERT INTO CityRatingImprovementCoefficients (city_id, coefficient) VALUES (3, 0.1);

-- Realistic data for BudgetAllocations
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (1, 30000);
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (2, 50000);
INSERT INTO BudgetAllocations (city_id, allocation) VALUES (3, 20000);
```
