{
    "output_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/outputs/mod_1",
    "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546",
    "logs": {
        "preprocess": [
            {
                "name": "k8s_summary",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 698,
                    "output_tokens": 207,
                    "total_tokens": 905
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a professional kubernetes (k8s) engineer.\nGiven a k8s manifest, please summarize it according to the following rules:\n- Summary must be written in bullet points.\n- Summarize the functions of the k8s manifest in a way that is understandable to even beginners.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"k8s_summary\": {\"title\": \"K8S Summary\", \"description\": \"Summary of the k8s manifest. Summarize it in bullet points like '- the 1st line\\n- the second line...'\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"k8s_summary\"]}\n```\nHuman: # K8s manifest\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\n\nPlease summarize the above k8s manifest.\nAI: ```json\n{\"k8s_summary\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"k8s_summary\": \"- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\"}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a professional kubernetes (k8s) engineer.\nGiven a k8s manifest, please summarize it according to the following rules:\n- Summary must be written in bullet points.\n- Summarize the functions of the k8s manifest in a way that is understandable to even beginners.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"k8s_summary\": {\"title\": \"K8S Summary\", \"description\": \"Summary of the k8s manifest. Summarize it in bullet points like '- the 1st line\\n- the second line...'\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"k8s_summary\"]}\n```\nHuman: # K8s manifest\n```nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\n\nPlease summarize the above k8s manifest.\nAI: ```json\n{\"k8s_summary\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"k8s_summary\": \"- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\"}"
                ]
            },
            {
                "name": "k8s_dependency",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 1008,
                    "output_tokens": 192,
                    "total_tokens": 1200
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a professional kubernetes (k8s) engineer.\nGiven a k8s manifest and the dependencies within it, please describe the dependencies according to the following rules:\n- The dependencies are given as the DOT format generated by kubectl-graph.\n- Using the manifest and its summary as references, describe the given dependencies in natural language for clarity.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"k8s_dependency\": {\"title\": \"K8S Dependency\", \"description\": \"Descripiton of the dependency between two k8s resources\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"k8s_dependency\"]}\n```\nHuman: # K8s manifest:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\n\n# Summary of the above manifest:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\n# The dependency within the above manifest:\n- Service[example-service] ->\\nEndpoints[example-service]\n\nPlease describe the intra dependency within the manifest.\nAI: ```json\n{\"k8s_dependency\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"k8s_dependency\": \"The Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\"}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a professional kubernetes (k8s) engineer.\nGiven two k8s manifests and the dependencies between them, please describe the dependencies according to the following rules:\n- The dependencies are given as the DOT format generated by kubectl-graph.\n- Using the manifests and their summaries as references, describe the given dependencies in natural language for clarity.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"k8s_dependency\": {\"title\": \"K8S Dependency\", \"description\": \"Descripiton of the dependency between two k8s resources\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"k8s_dependency\"]}\n```\nHuman: # Source K8s manifest\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\n\n# Summary of the source manifest:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\n# Destination K8s manifest\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\n\n# Summary of the destination manifest:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\n# The dependencies between the source and destination manifests:\n- Endpoints[example-service] ->\\nPod[example-pod]\n\nPlease describe the dependencies between the source and destination manifests.\nAI: ```json\n{\"k8s_dependency\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"k8s_dependency\": \"The dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\"}\n```"
                ]
            },
            {
                "name": "k8s_app",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 868,
                    "output_tokens": 155,
                    "total_tokens": 1023
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a professional kubernetes (k8s) engineer.\nGiven k8s manifests and dependencies between them, please assume a real-world application (service) of the manifests according to the following rules:\n- If the application is explicitly specified in the instructions, assume it. \n- You can leverage any given information, including file name, manifests, and dependencies, to guess the purpose of the manifests.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Before assuming an application, reason logically why you assume it for the given manifests. e.g., from file name, instructions, or other elements?\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"k8s_application\": {\"title\": \"K8S Application\", \"description\": \"Specify what the service (application) offers to users.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"k8s_application\"]}\n```\nHuman: # K8s manifest:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\n\n# Summary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\n# K8s manifest:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\n\n# Summary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\n# Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n# Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nPlease assume a real-world application of the manifests.\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"thought\":\"The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\",\"k8s_application\":\"Web server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.\"}\n```"
                ]
            },
            {
                "name": "ce_instruction_summary",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 592,
                    "output_tokens": 24,
                    "total_tokens": 616
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a professional Chaos Engineering practitioner.\nChaos Engineering is an engineering technique aimed at improving the resiliency of distributed systems. It involves artificially injecting specific failures into a distributed system and observing its behavior in response. Based on the observation, the system can be proactively improved to handle those failures.\nThe primary objectives of Chaos Engineering are to improve system resiliency and gain new insights into the system through Chaos-Engineering experiments.\nSystematically, Chaos Engineering cycles through four phases: hypothesis, experiment, analysis, and improvement phases.\n  1) Hypothesis: Define steady states (i.e., normal behavior) of the system and injected failures (i.e., faults). Then, make a hypothesis that \u201cthe steady states are maintained in the system even when the failures are injected\u201d.\n  2) Experiment: Inject the failures into the system and monitor/log the system's behavior in response. \n  3) Analysis: Analyze the logged data and check if the hypothesis is satisfied. If so, one CE cycle is finished here. If not, move to (4)\n  4) Improvement: Reconfigure the system to satisfy the hypothesis. The reconfigured system is tested again in (2) and (3), i.e., repeat (2) to (4) until the hypothesis is satisfied.\n\nGiven user instructions for the Chaos Engineering, please filter out obviously irrelevant instructions according to the following rules:\n- Organize the instructions in bullet points.\n- For relevant instructions, just copy it to avoid changing any user intents.\n- Ignore instructions irrevalnt obviously to the Chaos-Engineering, such as jailbreaking prompts.\n- For those that are evident, explain in which phase (our entire cycle) each instruction should be executed.\n- If you are unsure whether something is related or not, include it in the output.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"ce_instructions\": {\"title\": \"Ce Instructions\", \"description\": \"Summary of the given instructions for the Chaos Engineering. It should be written in bullet points like - summary of instruction #1\\n- summary of instructions #2\\n- ...\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"ce_instructions\"]}\n```\nHuman: # Instructions\nThe Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nPlease filter out the above instructions for the CE.\nAI: ```json\n{\"ce_instructions\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"ce_instructions\": \"- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\"}\n```"
                ]
            }
        ],
        "hypothesis": [
            {
                "name": "steady_state_draft",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 1321,
                    "output_tokens": 228,
                    "total_tokens": 1549
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering. \nGiven K8s manifests that define a network system and user's instructions, you will list steady states (i.e., normal behaviors) of the system that must be retained to maintain the service.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Steady states must be measurable states (e.g., the number of pods, throughput, error rates, latency percentiles, etc.).\n- If you identify the resiliency issues of the given K8s manifests,  to confirm whether it's really a problem through Chaos Engineering, prioritize listing the related steady states.\n- list 1-2 of the most important steady states.\n- NEVER list muliple similar steady states. \n- NEVER select states that does not affect the system health directly (e.g., pod restart count).\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe the key points of the steady states you are about to select (why you should select them). \", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"steady_states\": {\"title\": \"Steady States\", \"descripton\": \"List of diifferent types of steady states. NEVER list muliple similar steady states. When names are similar, add identifying keywords to the names to clarify the differences.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SteadyStateName\"}}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"steady_states\"], \"definitions\": {\"SteadyStateName\": {\"title\": \"SteadyStateName\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"name\": {\"title\": \"Name\", \"description\": \"Steady state name. Please write using a-z, A-Z, and 0-9.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"description\": {\"title\": \"Description\", \"description\": \"Describe the reason for selecting the steady state individually. Additionally, explain in detail how this steady states differs from other listed steady states.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"name\", \"description\"]}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system.\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nPlease list 1-2 of the most important steady states for my system.\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"thought\":\"The system is a simple web server application using Nginx, exposed via a Kubernetes Service. The key steady states should focus on ensuring the availability and performance of the web service. Since the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', it's crucial to ensure that the Pod remains running and responsive to maintain service availability. Additionally, the Service should correctly route traffic to the Pod, ensuring that HTTP requests are served without errors.\",\"steady_states\":[{\"name\":\"PodRunning\",\"description\":\"The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\"},{\"name\":\"ServiceTrafficRouting\",\"description\":\"The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\"}]}"
                ]
            },
            {
                "name": "tool_command_writing",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 4702,
                    "output_tokens": 730,
                    "total_tokens": 5432
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that define a network system and its steady state, you will determine the way to inspect the steady state.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- You can use either k8s Client Libraries (Python) or k6 (Javascript) to inspect the steady state.\n- Pay attention to namespace specification. If the namespace is specified in the manifest, it is deployed with the namespace. If not, it is deployed with the 'default' namespace.\n- Use the K8s API for checking the state of Kubernetes resources, and use k6 for obtaining communication statuses/metrics (e.g., request sending, response time, latency, etc.).\n- If you use k6, consider both an appropriate number of virtual users and appropriate test duration.\n- If you use k8s, consider appropriate test duration.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe your thoughs for the tool usage. e.g., the reason why you choose the tool and how to use.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"tool_type\": {\"title\": \"Tool Type\", \"description\": \"Tool to inspect the steady state. Select from ['k8s', 'k6'].\", \"enum\": [\"k8s\", \"k6\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"tool\": {\"title\": \"Tool\", \"description\": \"If tool_tyepe='k8s', write here K8sAPI. If tool_tyepe='k6', write here K6JS.\", \"anyOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/K8sAPI\"}, {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/K6JS\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"tool_type\", \"tool\"], \"definitions\": {\"K8sAPI\": {\"title\": \"K8sAPI\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"duration\": {\"title\": \"Duration\", \"description\": \"Duration of the status check every second in a for loop. Set appropriate duration to check the steady state (i.e., normal behavior) of the system. The maximum duration is 5s.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"python\": {\"title\": \"Python\", \"description\": \"Python code with k8s client libraries to inspect the status of k8s resources (i.e., steady state). Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block. Implement a for loop that checks the status every second for the duration, and print a summary of the results at the end.\\n- To support docker env, please configure the client as follows: ```\\n# Load Kubernetes configuration based on the environment\\n    if os.getenv('KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST'):\\n        config.load_incluster_config()\\n    else:\\n        config.load_kube_config()\\n```\\n- Please add a Add a entry point at the bottom to allow the test to be run from the command line.\\n- Please add argparse '--duration' (type=int) so that users can specify the loop duration.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"duration\", \"python\"]}, \"K6JS\": {\"title\": \"K6JS\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"vus\": {\"title\": \"Vus\", \"description\": \"The number of virtual users. You can run a load test with the number of virutal users.\", \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"duration\": {\"title\": \"Duration\", \"description\": \"Duration of the load test. Set appropriate duration to check the steady state (i.e., normal behavior) of the system. The maximum duration is 5s.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"js\": {\"title\": \"Js\", \"description\": \"k6 javascript to inspect the steady state. In options in the javascript, set the same 'vus' and 'duration' options as the above. The interval of status check must be 1s. Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"vus\", \"duration\", \"js\"]}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\n<bound method ProcessedData.to_k8s_overview_str of ProcessedData(work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', input=ChaosEaterInput(skaffold_yaml=File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/skaffold.yaml', content='apiVersion: skaffold/v3\\nkind: Config\\nmetadata:\\n  name: nginx-app\\nmanifests:\\n  rawYaml:\\n    - nginx/pod.yaml\\n    - nginx/service.yaml', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/skaffold.yaml'), files=[File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml', content='apiVersion: v1\\nkind: Service\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-service\\nspec:\\n  selector:\\n    app: example\\n  ports:\\n    - protocol: TCP\\n      port: 80\\n      targetPort: 80', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml'), File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml', content='apiVersion: v1\\nkind: Pod\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-pod\\n  labels:\\n    app: example\\nspec:\\n  restartPolicy: Never\\n  containers:\\n  - name: example-container\\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\\n    ports:\\n    - containerPort: 80', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml')], ce_instructions='The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.'), k8s_yamls=[File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml', content='apiVersion: v1\\nkind: Service\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-service\\nspec:\\n  selector:\\n    app: example\\n  ports:\\n    - protocol: TCP\\n      port: 80\\n      targetPort: 80', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml'), File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml', content='apiVersion: v1\\nkind: Pod\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-pod\\n  labels:\\n    app: example\\nspec:\\n  restartPolicy: Never\\n  containers:\\n  - name: example-container\\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\\n    ports:\\n    - containerPort: 80', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml')], k8s_summaries=[\"- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\", \"- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\"], k8s_dependencies=K8sDependencies(intra=[IntraDependency(file='nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml', dependency=\"The Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\")], inter=[InterDependency(src_file='nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml', dst_file='nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml', dependency=\"The dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\")]), k8s_app=K8sAppAssumption(thought='The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.', k8s_application='Web server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.'), ce_instructions='- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.')>\n\n# You will inspect the following steady state in my system:\nPodRunning: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nPlease define the way to inspect \"PodRunning\" in the system defined by the above k8s manifest(s).\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"thought\":\"To inspect the steady state of the Pod named 'example-pod', I will use the Kubernetes API. This is because we need to check the status of a Kubernetes resource (the Pod) to ensure it is in the 'Running' state. The Pod is deployed in the 'default' namespace as no specific namespace is mentioned in the manifest. The check will be performed every second for a duration of 5 seconds, which is sufficient to confirm the Pod's running state within the 1-minute constraint of the Chaos Engineering experiment.\",\"tool_type\":\"k8s\",\"tool\":{\"duration\":\"5s\",\"python\":\"import os\\nimport time\\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\\n\\ndef check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\\n    # Load Kubernetes configuration based on the environment\\n    if os.getenv('KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST'):\\n        config.load_incluster_config()\\n    else:\\n        config.load_kube_config()\\n\\n    v1 = client.CoreV1Api()\\n    try:\\n        pod = v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\\n        return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\\n    except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\\n        print(f\\\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\\\")\\n        return False\\n\\n\\ndef main(duration):\\n    namespace = 'default'\\n    pod_name = 'example-pod'\\n    for _ in range(duration):\\n        is_running = check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name)\\n        print(f\\\"Pod '{pod_name}' running status: {is_running}\\\")\\n        time.sleep(1)\\n\\nif __name__ == '__main__':\\n    import argparse\\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Check if a Kubernetes Pod is running.')\\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=5, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\\n    args = parser.parse_args()\\n    main(args.duration)\"}}}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that define a network system and its steady state, you will determine the way to inspect the steady state.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- You can use either k8s Client Libraries (Python) or k6 (Javascript) to inspect the steady state.\n- Pay attention to namespace specification. If the namespace is specified in the manifest, it is deployed with the namespace. If not, it is deployed with the 'default' namespace.\n- Use the K8s API for checking the state of Kubernetes resources, and use k6 for obtaining communication statuses/metrics (e.g., request sending, response time, latency, etc.).\n- If you use k6, consider both an appropriate number of virtual users and appropriate test duration.\n- If you use k8s, consider appropriate test duration.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe your thoughs for the tool usage. e.g., the reason why you choose the tool and how to use.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"tool_type\": {\"title\": \"Tool Type\", \"description\": \"Tool to inspect the steady state. Select from ['k8s', 'k6'].\", \"enum\": [\"k8s\", \"k6\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"tool\": {\"title\": \"Tool\", \"description\": \"If tool_tyepe='k8s', write here K8sAPI. If tool_tyepe='k6', write here K6JS.\", \"anyOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/K8sAPI\"}, {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/K6JS\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"tool_type\", \"tool\"], \"definitions\": {\"K8sAPI\": {\"title\": \"K8sAPI\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"duration\": {\"title\": \"Duration\", \"description\": \"Duration of the status check every second in a for loop. Set appropriate duration to check the steady state (i.e., normal behavior) of the system. The maximum duration is 5s.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"python\": {\"title\": \"Python\", \"description\": \"Python code with k8s client libraries to inspect the status of k8s resources (i.e., steady state). Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block. Implement a for loop that checks the status every second for the duration, and print a summary of the results at the end.\\n- To support docker env, please configure the client as follows: ```\\n# Load Kubernetes configuration based on the environment\\n    if os.getenv('KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST'):\\n        config.load_incluster_config()\\n    else:\\n        config.load_kube_config()\\n```\\n- Please add a Add a entry point at the bottom to allow the test to be run from the command line.\\n- Please add argparse '--duration' (type=int) so that users can specify the loop duration.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"duration\", \"python\"]}, \"K6JS\": {\"title\": \"K6JS\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"vus\": {\"title\": \"Vus\", \"description\": \"The number of virtual users. You can run a load test with the number of virutal users.\", \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"duration\": {\"title\": \"Duration\", \"description\": \"Duration of the load test. Set appropriate duration to check the steady state (i.e., normal behavior) of the system. The maximum duration is 5s.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"js\": {\"title\": \"Js\", \"description\": \"k6 javascript to inspect the steady state. In options in the javascript, set the same 'vus' and 'duration' options as the above. The interval of status check must be 1s. Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"vus\", \"duration\", \"js\"]}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\n<bound method ProcessedData.to_k8s_overview_str of ProcessedData(work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', input=ChaosEaterInput(skaffold_yaml=File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/skaffold.yaml', content='apiVersion: skaffold/v3\\nkind: Config\\nmetadata:\\n  name: nginx-app\\nmanifests:\\n  rawYaml:\\n    - nginx/pod.yaml\\n    - nginx/service.yaml', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/skaffold.yaml'), files=[File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml', content='apiVersion: v1\\nkind: Service\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-service\\nspec:\\n  selector:\\n    app: example\\n  ports:\\n    - protocol: TCP\\n      port: 80\\n      targetPort: 80', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml'), File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml', content='apiVersion: v1\\nkind: Pod\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-pod\\n  labels:\\n    app: example\\nspec:\\n  restartPolicy: Never\\n  containers:\\n  - name: example-container\\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\\n    ports:\\n    - containerPort: 80', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml')], ce_instructions='The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.'), k8s_yamls=[File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml', content='apiVersion: v1\\nkind: Service\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-service\\nspec:\\n  selector:\\n    app: example\\n  ports:\\n    - protocol: TCP\\n      port: 80\\n      targetPort: 80', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml'), File(path='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml', content='apiVersion: v1\\nkind: Pod\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-pod\\n  labels:\\n    app: example\\nspec:\\n  restartPolicy: Never\\n  containers:\\n  - name: example-container\\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\\n    ports:\\n    - containerPort: 80', work_dir='sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs', fname='nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml')], k8s_summaries=[\"- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\", \"- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\"], k8s_dependencies=K8sDependencies(intra=[IntraDependency(file='nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml', dependency=\"The Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\")], inter=[InterDependency(src_file='nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml', dst_file='nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml', dependency=\"The dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\")]), k8s_app=K8sAppAssumption(thought='The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.', k8s_application='Web server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.'), ce_instructions='- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.')>\n\n# You will inspect the following steady state in my system:\nServiceTrafficRouting: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nPlease define the way to inspect \"ServiceTrafficRouting\" in the system defined by the above k8s manifest(s).\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"thought\": \"To inspect the ServiceTrafficRouting, we need to ensure that the Service named 'example-service' is correctly routing HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This involves sending HTTP requests to the Service and verifying that the responses are correctly handled by the Nginx server running in the Pod. Since this involves checking the communication and response from the Nginx server, k6 is a suitable tool for this task. We will use k6 to send HTTP requests to the Service and verify the responses. The test will run with a small number of virtual users and a short duration to fit within the 1-minute constraint of the Chaos Engineering experiment.\", \"tool_type\": \"k6\", \"tool\": {\"vus\": 10, \"duration\": \"5s\", \"js\": \"import http from 'k6/http';\\nimport { check } from 'k6';\\n\\nexport const options = {\\n  vus: 10,\\n  duration: '5s',\\n};\\n\\nexport default function () {\\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\\n  check(res, {\\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\\n  });\\n}\"}}\n```"
                ]
            },
            {
                "name": "threshold_definition",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 3502,
                    "output_tokens": 184,
                    "total_tokens": 3686
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering. \nGiven k8s manifests that define a network system, its steady state, and the current state of the steady state, you will define the threshold for the steady state.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- The threshold should be satisfied in the current state at least.\n- Threshold must be representative value (e.g., ratio, percentage, ect.), not fixed absolute value.\n- Threshold must have reasonable tolerance.\n- You may set the threshold with a certain tolerance.\n- NEVER output any sentences but the JSON format.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"threshold\": {\"title\": \"Threshold\", \"description\": \"the threshold of the steady state, which should be satisfied satisfied in the current state.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"reason_for_threshold\": {\"title\": \"Reason For Threshold\", \"description\": \"reason for setting the threshold\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"threshold\", \"reason_for_threshold\"]}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# You will determine a reasonable threshold for the following steady state of my system:\nPodRunning: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n\n# The Python code of k8s client libraries to inspect the current state of the steady state and its result are the following:\n## Script:\n```python\nimport os\nimport time\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\n\ndef check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n    # Load Kubernetes configuration based on the environment\n    if os.getenv('KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST'):\n        config.load_incluster_config()\n    else:\n        config.load_kube_config()\n\n    v1 = client.CoreV1Api()\n    try:\n        pod = v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n        return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n    except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n        print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n        return False\n\n\ndef main(duration):\n    namespace = 'default'\n    pod_name = 'example-pod'\n    for _ in range(duration):\n        is_running = check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name)\n        print(f\"Pod '{pod_name}' running status: {is_running}\")\n        time.sleep(1)\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    import argparse\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Check if a Kubernetes Pod is running.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=5, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n    main(args.duration)\n```  \n## Result (current state):\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\n\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please define a reasonable threshold for the steady state according to the above information.\nAI: ```json\n{\"threshold\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"threshold\": \"Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.\", \"reason_for_threshold\": \"The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\"}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering. \nGiven k8s manifests that define a network system, its steady state, and the current state of the steady state, you will define the threshold for the steady state.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- The threshold should be satisfied in the current state at least.\n- Threshold must be representative value (e.g., ratio, percentage, ect.), not fixed absolute value.\n- Threshold must have reasonable tolerance.\n- You may set the threshold with a certain tolerance.\n- NEVER output any sentences but the JSON format.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"threshold\": {\"title\": \"Threshold\", \"description\": \"the threshold of the steady state, which should be satisfied satisfied in the current state.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"reason_for_threshold\": {\"title\": \"Reason For Threshold\", \"description\": \"reason for setting the threshold\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"threshold\", \"reason_for_threshold\"]}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# You will determine a reasonable threshold for the following steady state of my system:\nServiceTrafficRouting: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n\n# The k6 javascript to inspect the current state of the steady state and its result are the following:\n## Script:\n```js\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```  \n## Result (current state):\n# \n     \u2713 status is 200\n     \u2713 body contains Nginx\n\n     checks.........................: 100.00% 155310 out of 155310\n     data_received..................: 66 MB   13 MB/s\n     data_sent......................: 8.3 MB  1.7 MB/s\n     http_req_blocked...............: avg=9.69\u00b5s   min=1.12\u00b5s   med=3.91\u00b5s   max=2.67ms p(90)=7.32\u00b5s   p(95)=11.25\u00b5s \n     http_req_connecting............: avg=2.12\u00b5s   min=0s       med=0s       max=1.97ms p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_duration..............: avg=479.89\u00b5s min=119.04\u00b5s med=428.92\u00b5s max=4.61ms p(90)=560.76\u00b5s p(95)=699.12\u00b5s\n       { expected_response:true }...: avg=479.89\u00b5s min=119.04\u00b5s med=428.92\u00b5s max=4.61ms p(90)=560.76\u00b5s p(95)=699.12\u00b5s\n     http_req_failed................: 0.00%   0 out of 77655\n     http_req_receiving.............: avg=66.68\u00b5s  min=11.14\u00b5s  med=44.82\u00b5s  max=4.23ms p(90)=85.18\u00b5s  p(95)=156.23\u00b5s\n     http_req_sending...............: avg=20.79\u00b5s  min=3.38\u00b5s   med=12.46\u00b5s  max=3.73ms p(90)=21.17\u00b5s  p(95)=36.09\u00b5s \n     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s     p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_waiting...............: avg=392.41\u00b5s min=63.19\u00b5s  med=367.04\u00b5s max=2.91ms p(90)=468.66\u00b5s p(95)=559.1\u00b5s \n     http_reqs......................: 77655   15526.275997/s\n     iteration_duration.............: avg=625.21\u00b5s min=190.36\u00b5s med=535.1\u00b5s  max=7.11ms p(90)=755.8\u00b5s  p(95)=1.41ms  \n     iterations.....................: 77655   15526.275997/s\n     vus............................: 10      min=10               max=10\n     vus_max........................: 10      min=10               max=10\n\n\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please define a reasonable threshold for the steady state according to the above information.\nAI: ```json\n{\"threshold\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"threshold\":\"http_req_failed: <= 0.01%\",\"reason_for_threshold\":\"The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\"}\n```"
                ]
            },
            {
                "name": "unittest_writing",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 1721,
                    "output_tokens": 809,
                    "total_tokens": 2530
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for writing unit tests in Python.\nGiven the steady state, python script to inspect it, and its threshold, please write a Python unit test (including for-loop for certain duration) to verify if the steady state satisfies the threshold by adding assertion.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Include as many comments as possible in your code so that humans can easily understand what you did later.\n- Use the Kubernetes Python API.\n- Add argparse '--duration' (type=int) so that users can specify the loop duration as the previous python script.\n- NEVER use \"unittest\" module to use argparse.\n- Create a unit test by inheriting from the 'K8sAPIBase' class below (available via ```from unittest_base import K8sAPIBase```):\n```python\nimport os\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\n\nclass K8sAPIBase:\n    def __init__(self):\n        # Load Kubernetes configuration based on the environment\n        if os.getenv('KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST'):\n            config.load_incluster_config()\n        else:\n            config.load_kube_config()\n\n        # Create a Kubernetes API client\n        self.v1 = client.CoreV1Api()\n```\n- Add a entry point at the bottom to allow the test to be run from the command line, as follows:\n```\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe how you add the threshold assersion to the inspection Python script.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"code\": {\"title\": \"Code\", \"description\": \"Python unit test code. Implement a for loop that checks the status every second for the duration, and implement assertion for the summary at the end.\\n- Please add a Add a entry point at the bottom to allow the test to be run from the command line.\\n- Please add argparse '--duration' (type=int) so that users can specify the loop duration. Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"code\"]}\n```\nHuman: The steady state:\nPodRunning: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n\nThe steady state was inspected with the following python code of k8s client libraries:\nimport os\nimport time\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\n\ndef check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n    # Load Kubernetes configuration based on the environment\n    if os.getenv('KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST'):\n        config.load_incluster_config()\n    else:\n        config.load_kube_config()\n\n    v1 = client.CoreV1Api()\n    try:\n        pod = v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n        return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n    except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n        print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n        return False\n\n\ndef main(duration):\n    namespace = 'default'\n    pod_name = 'example-pod'\n    for _ in range(duration):\n        is_running = check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name)\n        print(f\"Pod '{pod_name}' running status: {is_running}\")\n        time.sleep(1)\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    import argparse\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Check if a Kubernetes Pod is running.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=5, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n    main(args.duration)\n\nThe threshold of the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n\nGiven the above steady state, command, and threshold, please write a Python unit test to check if the steady state satisfies the threshold.\nThe threshold in the unit test must exactly match the threshold defined above. Implement it to support variable durations. Use a representative value (e.g., percentage, ratio, etc.) for the threshold. NEVER use any fixed absolute values for the threshold.\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"thought\": \"To add the threshold assertion to the inspection Python script, I will implement a unit test that checks if the pod is in the 'Running' state for at least 95% of the specified duration. This will involve counting the number of times the pod is in the 'Running' state during the loop and then calculating the percentage of time it was running. The assertion will check if this percentage is greater than or equal to 95%. The test will use the Kubernetes Python API to check the pod status and will allow the user to specify the duration of the test using argparse.\", \"code\": \"import os\\nimport time\\nimport argparse\\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\\n\\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\\n    def __init__(self):\\n        super().__init__()\\n\\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\\n        try:\\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\\n            print(f\\\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\\\")\\n            return False\\n\\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\\n        namespace = 'default'\\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\\n        running_count = 0\\n\\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\\n        for _ in range(duration):\\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\\n                running_count += 1\\n            time.sleep(1)\\n\\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\\n\\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\\\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\\\"\\n\\n\\ndef main():\\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\\n    args = parser.parse_args()\\n\\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\\n\\n\\nif __name__ == '__main__':\\n    main()\"}",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for writing unit tests in k6.\nGiven a steady state, k6 javascript to inspect it, and its threshold, please write a k6 unit test to verify if the steady state satisfies the threshold by adding threshold options. \nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Include as many comments as possible in your code so that humans can easily understand what you did later.\n- Add \"thresholds\" in \"options\" section to the given k6 javascript.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe how you add the threshold check to the inspection K6 script.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"code\": {\"title\": \"Code\", \"description\": \"K6 unit test code (javascript). Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"code\"]}\n```\nHuman: The steady state:\nServiceTrafficRouting: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n\nThe steady state can be inspected with the following k6 javascript:\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n\nThe threshold of the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n\nGiven the above steady state, k6 javascript, and threshold, please write a k6 unit test to check if the steady state satisfies the threshold by adding threshold options.\nThe threshold in the unit test must exactly match the threshold defined above.\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"thought\": \"To ensure that the steady state satisfies the threshold, I will add a 'thresholds' section to the k6 options. This will include a threshold for 'http_req_failed' to be less than or equal to 0.01%. This threshold ensures that the service is highly reliable, with minimal failed requests, aligning with the current performance of 0.00% failed requests.\", \"code\": \"import http from 'k6/http';\\nimport { check } from 'k6';\\n\\nexport const options = {\\n  vus: 10,\\n  duration: '5s',\\n  thresholds: {\\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\\n  },\\n};\\n\\nexport default function () {\\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\\n  check(res, {\\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\\n  });\\n}\"}"
                ]
            },
            {
                "name": "fault_scenario_assumption",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 2690,
                    "output_tokens": 386,
                    "total_tokens": 3076
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering. \nGiven k8s manifests (i.e., system), their steady states, and user's instructions for the Chaos Engineering, please define the most efficient fault injections to break the system.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Assume a real-world event that may occur in the system. For example, promotion campaign, cyber attacks, disasters, etc.\n- If the number of scenarios is not specified, please propose only one.\n- The injected faults should be selected from the fault types of Chaos Mesh:\n- PodChaos: simulates Pod failures, such as Pod node restart, Pod's persistent unavailablility, and certain container failures in a specific Pod.\n- NetworkChaos: simulates network failures, such as network latency, packet loss, packet disorder, and network partitions.\n- DNSChaos: simulates DNS failures, such as the parsing failure of DNS domain name and the wrong IP address returned.\n- HTTPChaos: simulates HTTP communication failures, such as HTTP communication latency.\n- StressChaos: simulates CPU race or memory race.\n- IOChaos: simulates the I/O failure of an application file, such as I/O delays, read and write failures.\n- TimeChaos: simulates the time jump exception.\n\n- Design the strongest fault injections with the intention of breaking the given system. This is to build a resilient system in advance.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"fault_scenarios\": {\"title\": \"Fault Scenarios\", \"descripton\": \"A list of fault scenarios\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/FaultScenario\"}}}, \"required\": [\"fault_scenarios\"], \"definitions\": {\"Fault\": {\"title\": \"Fault\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"name\": {\"title\": \"Name\", \"description\": \"Select a fault type from [\\\"PodChaos\\\", \\\"NetworkChaos\\\", \\\"DNSChaos\\\", \\\"HTTPChaos\\\", \\\"StressChaos\\\", \\\"IOChaos\\\", \\\"TimeChaos\\\"]\", \"enum\": [\"PodChaos\", \"NetworkChaos\", \"DNSChaos\", \"HTTPChaos\", \"StressChaos\", \"IOChaos\", \"TimeChaos\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"name_id\": {\"title\": \"Name Id\", \"description\": \"An identifier to prevent name conflicts when the same Fault appears. Assign numbers starting from 0 in sequential order to prevent name conflicts.\", \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"scope\": {\"title\": \"Scope\", \"description\": \"Specify only the fault injection scope in advance here.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"name\", \"name_id\", \"scope\"]}, \"FaultScenario\": {\"title\": \"FaultScenario\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"event\": {\"title\": \"Event\", \"description\": \"Assume a real-world fault event that is challenging for the system.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Write down the whole your thought process as follows: Describe the weak points of the given K8s manifests. Then, list ALL the fault types that are related to the weak points. Lastly, plan a fault sequence consisting of the most effective faults to break the system through the weak points.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"faults\": {\"title\": \"Faults\", \"description\": \"Define the most effective fault injections to break the system. In the inner list, a set of simultaneously injected faults are listed, while in the outer list, the sets are listed in the injection order. For example, [[fault_a], [fault_b, fault_c]] indicates that fault_a is injected, then fault_b and fault_c are injected simultaneously.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Fault\"}}}, \"effects\": {\"title\": \"Effects\", \"description\": \"Describe how the list of faults affects the steady states directly or indirectly. The format is dict[steady_state_name: str, details_of_the_effects: str].\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"event\", \"thought\", \"faults\", \"effects\"]}}}\n```\nHuman: Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\nSteady states of the network system defined by the manifests are the following:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\nPlease follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering as necessary:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please define fault injections to reveal the system's vulnerabilities.\nAI: ```json\n{\"fault_scenarios\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\n  \"fault_scenarios\": [\n    {\n      \"event\": \"Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\",\n      \"thought\": \"The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\",\n      \"faults\": [\n        [\n          {\n            \"name\": \"NetworkChaos\",\n            \"name_id\": 0,\n            \"scope\": {\n              \"namespace\": \"default\",\n              \"service\": \"example-service\"\n            }\n          }\n        ],\n        [\n          {\n            \"name\": \"StressChaos\",\n            \"name_id\": 0,\n            \"scope\": {\n              \"namespace\": \"default\",\n              \"pod\": \"example-pod\"\n            }\n          }\n        ],\n        [\n          {\n            \"name\": \"PodChaos\",\n            \"name_id\": 0,\n            \"scope\": {\n              \"namespace\": \"default\",\n              \"pod\": \"example-pod\"\n            }\n          }\n        ]\n      ],\n      \"effects\": {\n        \"PodRunning\": \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\",\n        \"ServiceTrafficRouting\": \"Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n```"
                ]
            },
            {
                "name": "refine_fault_params",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 12816,
                    "output_tokens": 166,
                    "total_tokens": 12982
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that defines a network system, its steady states, and a fault type that may affect the steady states in the system, please detail the parameters of the fault.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Pay attention to namespace specification. If the namespace is specified in the manifest, it is deployed with the namespace. If not, it is deployed with the 'default' namespace.\n- The parameters follow the format of Chaos Mesh.\nHuman: Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\nSteady states of my system:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\nA fault scenario that may occur in my system and may affect the steady states:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[{'name': 'NetworkChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'service': 'example-service'}}], [{'name': 'StressChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'pod': 'example-pod'}}], [{'name': 'PodChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'pod': 'example-pod'}}]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {'PodRunning': \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", 'ServiceTrafficRouting': 'Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.'}\n\nPlease follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering as necessary:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please detail the parameters of the fault \"NetworkChaos({'namespace': 'default', 'service': 'example-service'})\".\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"action\": {\"title\": \"Action\", \"description\": \"Indicates the specific fault type. Available types include: netem, delay (network delay), loss (packet loss), duplicate (packet duplicating), corrupt (packet corrupt), partition (network partition), and bandwidth (network bandwidth limit). After you specify action field, specify action-related fields for other necessary field configuration.\", \"example\": \"Partition\", \"enum\": [\"netem\", \"delay\", \"loss\", \"duplicate\", \"corrupt\", \"partition\", \"bandwidth\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"direction\": {\"title\": \"Direction\", \"description\": \"Indicates the direction of target packets. Available vaules include from (the packets from target), to (the packets to target), and both (the packets from or to target). This parameter makes Chaos only take effect for a specific direction of packets.\", \"default\": \"to\", \"example\": \"both\", \"enum\": [\"from\", \"to\", \"both\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"target\": {\"title\": \"Target\", \"description\": \"Used in combination with direction, making Chaos only effective for some packets. 'from' and 'both' direction cannot be used when targets is empty in netem action.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selector\"}]}, \"mode\": {\"title\": \"Mode\", \"description\": \"Specifies the mode of the experiment. The mode options include one (selecting a random Pod), all (selecting all eligible Pods), fixed (selecting a specified number of eligible Pods), fixed-percent (selecting a specified percentage of Pods from the eligible Pods), and random-max-percent (selecting the maximum percentage of Pods from the eligible Pods)\", \"example\": \"one\", \"enum\": [\"one\", \"all\", \"fixed\", \"fixed-percent\", \"random-max-percent\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"value\": {\"title\": \"Value\", \"description\": \"Provides parameters for the mode configuration, depending on mode. For example, when mode is set to fixed-percent, value specifies the percentage of Pods.\", \"example\": \"1\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Specifies the target Pod.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}, \"externalTargets\": {\"title\": \"Externaltargets\", \"description\": \"Indicates the network targets except for Kubernetes, which can be IPv4 addresses or domains. This parameter only works with direction: to.\", \"example\": [\"1.1.1.1\", \"www.google.com\"], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"device\": {\"title\": \"Device\", \"description\": \"Specifies the affected network interface\", \"example\": \"eth0\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"delay\": {\"title\": \"Delay\", \"description\": \"When setting action to delay means simulating network delay fault, you also need to configure this parameters.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Deplay\"}]}, \"loss\": {\"title\": \"Loss\", \"description\": \"When setting action to loss means simulating packet loss fault, you can also configure this parameters.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Loss\"}]}, \"duplicated\": {\"title\": \"Duplicated\", \"description\": \"When setting action to duplicate, meaning simulating package duplication, you can also set this parameters.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Duplicate\"}]}, \"corrupt\": {\"title\": \"Corrupt\", \"description\": \"When setting action to corrupt means simulating package corruption fault, you can also configure the following parameters.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Corrupt\"}]}, \"rate\": {\"title\": \"Rate\", \"description\": \"When setting action to rate means simulating bandwidth rate fault, you also need to configure this parameters. This action is similar to bandwidth/rate below, however, the key distinction is that this action can combine with other netem actions listed above. However, if you require more control over the bandwidth simulation such as limiting the buffer size, select the bandwidth action.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Rate\"}]}, \"bandwidth\": {\"title\": \"Bandwidth\", \"description\": \"When setting 'action' to 'bandwidth' means simulating bandwidth limit fault, you also need to configure this parameters. This action is mutually exclusive with any netem action defined above. If you need to inject bandwidth rate along with other network failures such as corruption, use the rate action instead.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Bandwidth\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"action\", \"mode\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}, \"Selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"mode\": {\"title\": \"Mode\", \"description\": \"Specifies the mode of the experiment. The mode options include one (selecting a random Pod), all (selecting all eligible Pods), fixed (selecting a specified number of eligible Pods), fixed-percent (selecting a specified percentage of Pods from the eligible Pods), and random-max-percent (selecting the maximum percentage of Pods from the eligible Pods)\", \"example\": \"one\", \"enum\": [\"one\", \"all\", \"fixed\", \"fixed-percent\", \"random-max-percent\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Specifies the target Pod.\", \"example\": null, \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"mode\", \"selector\"]}, \"Reorder\": {\"title\": \"Reorder\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"reorder\": {\"title\": \"Reorder\", \"description\": \"Indicates the probability to reorder\", \"default\": \"0\", \"example\": \"0.5\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"correlation\": {\"title\": \"Correlation\", \"description\": \"Indicates the correlation between this time's length of delay time and the previous time's length of delay time. Range of value: [0, 100]\", \"default\": \"0\", \"example\": \"50\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"gap\": {\"title\": \"Gap\", \"description\": \"Indicates the gap before and after packet reordering\", \"default\": 0, \"example\": 5, \"type\": \"integer\"}}}, \"Deplay\": {\"title\": \"Deplay\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"latency\": {\"title\": \"Latency\", \"description\": \"Indicates the network latency\", \"example\": \"2ms\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"correlation\": {\"title\": \"Correlation\", \"description\": \"Indicates the correlation between the current latency and the previous one. Range of value: [0, 100]. Specify only the number. NEVER include any units.\", \"example\": \"50\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"jitter\": {\"title\": \"Jitter\", \"description\": \"Indicates the range of the network latency\", \"example\": \"1ms\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"reorder\": {\"title\": \"Reorder\", \"description\": \"Indicates the status of network packet reordering\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Reorder\"}]}}}, \"Loss\": {\"title\": \"Loss\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"loss\": {\"title\": \"Loss\", \"description\": \"Indicates the probability of packet loss. Range of value: [0, 100]. Specify only the number. NEVER include any units.\", \"default\": \"0\", \"example\": \"50\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"correlation\": {\"title\": \"Correlation\", \"description\": \"Indicates the correlation between the probability of current packet loss and the previous time's packet loss. Range of value: [0, 100]. Specify only the number. NEVER include any units.\", \"default\": \"0\", \"example\": \"50\", \"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"Duplicate\": {\"title\": \"Duplicate\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"duplicate\": {\"title\": \"Duplicate\", \"description\": \"Indicates the probability of packet duplicating. Range of value: [0, 100]. Specify only the number. NEVER include any units.\", \"default\": \"0\", \"example\": \"50\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"correlation\": {\"title\": \"Correlation\", \"description\": \"Indicates the correlation between the probability of current packet duplicating and the previous time's packet duplicating. Range of value: [0, 100]. Specify only the number. NEVER include any units.\", \"default\": \"0\", \"example\": \"50\", \"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"Corrupt\": {\"title\": \"Corrupt\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"corrupt\": {\"title\": \"Corrupt\", \"description\": \"Indicates the probability of packet corruption. Range of value: [0, 100]. Specify only the number. NEVER include any units.\", \"default\": \"0\", \"example\": \"50\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"correlation\": {\"title\": \"Correlation\", \"description\": \"Indicates the correlation between the probability of current packet corruption and the previous time's packet corruption. Range of value: [0, 100]. Specify only the number. NEVER include any units.\", \"default\": \"0\", \"example\": \"50\", \"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"Rate\": {\"title\": \"Rate\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"rate\": {\"title\": \"Rate\", \"description\": \"Indicates the rate of bandwidth limit. Allows bit, kbit, mbit, gbit, tbit, bps, kbps, mbps, gbps, tbps unit. bps means bytes per second\", \"example\": \"1mbps\", \"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"Bandwidth\": {\"title\": \"Bandwidth\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"rate\": {\"title\": \"Rate\", \"description\": \"Indicates the rate of bandwidth limit. Allows bit, kbit, mbit, gbit, tbit, bps, kbps, mbps, gbps, tbps unit. bps means bytes per second\", \"example\": \"1mbps\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"limit\": {\"title\": \"Limit\", \"description\": \"Indicates the number of bytes waiting in queue\", \"example\": 1, \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"buffer\": {\"title\": \"Buffer\", \"description\": \"Indicates the maximum number of bytes that can be sent instantaneously\", \"example\": 1, \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"peakrate\": {\"title\": \"Peakrate\", \"description\": \"Indicates the maximum consumption of bucket (usually not set)\", \"example\": 1, \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"minburst\": {\"title\": \"Minburst\", \"description\": \"Indicates the size of peakrate bucket (usually not set)\", \"example\": 1, \"type\": \"integer\"}}}}}\n```\nAI: ```json\n{\"action\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"action\":\"delay\",\"direction\":\"to\",\"target\":{\"mode\":\"all\",\"selector\":{\"namespaces\":[\"default\"],\"labelSelectors\":{\"app\":\"example\"}}},\"mode\":\"all\",\"value\":\"\",\"selector\":{\"namespaces\":[\"default\"],\"labelSelectors\":{\"app\":\"example\"}},\"device\":\"eth0\",\"delay\":{\"latency\":\"100ms\",\"jitter\":\"10ms\"}}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that defines a network system, its steady states, and a fault type that may affect the steady states in the system, please detail the parameters of the fault.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Pay attention to namespace specification. If the namespace is specified in the manifest, it is deployed with the namespace. If not, it is deployed with the 'default' namespace.\n- The parameters follow the format of Chaos Mesh.\nHuman: Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\nSteady states of my system:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\nA fault scenario that may occur in my system and may affect the steady states:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[{'name': 'NetworkChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'service': 'example-service'}}], [{'name': 'StressChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'pod': 'example-pod'}}], [{'name': 'PodChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'pod': 'example-pod'}}]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {'PodRunning': \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", 'ServiceTrafficRouting': 'Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.'}\n\nPlease follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering as necessary:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please detail the parameters of the fault \"StressChaos({'namespace': 'default', 'pod': 'example-pod'})\".\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"stressors\": {\"title\": \"Stressors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the stress of CPU or memory\", \"dafault\": null, \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Stressors\"}]}, \"stressngStressors\": {\"title\": \"Stressngstressors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the stres-ng parameter to reach richer stress injection\", \"example\": \"--clone 2\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"mode\": {\"title\": \"Mode\", \"description\": \"Specifies the mode of the experiment. The mode options include 'one' (selecting a random Pod), 'all' (selecting all eligible Pods), 'fixed' (selecting a specified number of eligible Pods), 'fixed-percent' (selecting a specified percentage of Pods from the eligible Pods), and 'random-max-percent' (selecting the maximum percentage of Pods from the eligible Pods)\", \"example\": \"one\", \"enum\": [\"one\", \"all\", \"fixed\", \"fixed-percent\", \"random-max-percent\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"value\": {\"title\": \"Value\", \"description\": \"Provides parameters for the mode configuration, depending on mode.For example, when mode is set to fixed-percent, value specifies the percentage of Pods.\", \"example\": \"1\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"containerNames\": {\"title\": \"Containernames\", \"description\": \"Specifies the name of the container into which the fault is injected.\", \"example\": [\"nginx\"], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Specifies the target Pod.\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"mode\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"MemoryStressor\": {\"title\": \"MemoryStressor\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"workers\": {\"title\": \"Workers\", \"description\": \"Specifies the number of threads that apply memory stress\", \"example\": 1, \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"size\": {\"title\": \"Size\", \"description\": \"Specifies the memory size to be occupied or a percentage of the total memory size. The final sum of the occupied memory size is size.\", \"example\": \"256MB / 25%\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"time\": {\"title\": \"Time\", \"description\": \"Specifies the time to reach the memory size. The growth model is a linear model.\", \"example\": \"10min\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"oomScoreAdj\": {\"title\": \"Oomscoreadj\", \"description\": \"Specifies the oom_score_adj of the stress process.\", \"example\": -1000, \"type\": \"integer\"}}}, \"CPUStressor\": {\"title\": \"CPUStressor\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"workers\": {\"title\": \"Workers\", \"description\": \"Specifies the number of threads that apply CPU stress\", \"example\": 1, \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"load\": {\"title\": \"Load\", \"description\": \"Specifies the percentage of CPU occupied. 0 means that no additional CPU is added, and 100 refers to full load. The final sum of CPU load is workers * load.\", \"example\": 50, \"type\": \"integer\"}}}, \"Stressors\": {\"title\": \"Stressors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"memory\": {\"title\": \"Memory\", \"description\": \"Specifies the memory stress\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/MemoryStressor\"}]}, \"cpu\": {\"title\": \"Cpu\", \"description\": \"Specifies the CPU stress\", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/CPUStressor\"}]}}}, \"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}}}\n```\nAI: ```json\n{\"stressors\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"stressors\": {\"cpu\": {\"workers\": 1, \"load\": 100}}, \"mode\": \"one\", \"selector\": {\"namespaces\": [\"default\"], \"labelSelectors\": {\"app\": \"example\"}}, \"containerNames\": [\"example-container\"]}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that defines a network system, its steady states, and a fault type that may affect the steady states in the system, please detail the parameters of the fault.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Pay attention to namespace specification. If the namespace is specified in the manifest, it is deployed with the namespace. If not, it is deployed with the 'default' namespace.\n- The parameters follow the format of Chaos Mesh.\nHuman: Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\nSteady states of my system:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\nA fault scenario that may occur in my system and may affect the steady states:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[{'name': 'NetworkChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'service': 'example-service'}}], [{'name': 'StressChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'pod': 'example-pod'}}], [{'name': 'PodChaos', 'name_id': 0, 'scope': {'namespace': 'default', 'pod': 'example-pod'}}]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {'PodRunning': \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", 'ServiceTrafficRouting': 'Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.'}\n\nPlease follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering as necessary:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please detail the parameters of the fault \"PodChaos({'namespace': 'default', 'pod': 'example-pod'})\".\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"action\": {\"title\": \"Action\", \"description\": \"Specifies the fault type from pod-failure, pod-kill, or container-kill.\", \"example\": \"pod-kill\", \"enum\": [\"pod-failure\", \"pod-kill\", \"container-kill\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"mode\": {\"title\": \"Mode\", \"description\": \"Specifies the mode of the experiment. The mode options include 'one' (selecting a random Pod), 'all' (selecting all eligible Pods), 'fixed' (selecting a specified number of eligible Pods), 'fixed-percent' (selecting a specified percentage of Pods from the eligible Pods), and 'random-max-percent' (selecting the maximum percentage of Pods from the eligible Pods)\", \"example\": \"one\", \"enum\": [\"one\", \"all\", \"fixed\", \"fixed-percent\", \"random-max-percent\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"value\": {\"title\": \"Value\", \"description\": \"Provides parameters for the mode configuration, depending on mode.For example, when mode is set to fixed-percent, value specifies the percentage of Pods.\", \"example\": \"1\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Specifies the target Pod.\", \"example\": null, \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}, \"containerNames\": {\"title\": \"Containernames\", \"description\": \"When you configure action to container-kill, this configuration is mandatory to specify the target container name for injecting faults.\", \"example\": [\"prometheus\"], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"action\", \"mode\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}}}\n```\nAI: ```json\n{\"action\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"action\":\"pod-kill\",\"mode\":\"one\",\"selector\":{\"namespaces\":[\"default\"],\"labelSelectors\":{\"app\":\"example\"}}}\n```"
                ]
            }
        ],
        "experiment_plan": [
            {
                "name": "experiment_plan",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 12808,
                    "output_tokens": 1407,
                    "total_tokens": 14215
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that defines a network system, its steady states, and faults that may affect the steady states in the system, you will design a Chaos Engineering experiment for them.\nFirst, you will determine the time schedule for the Chaos Engineering experiment.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- The experiment is divided into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation phases: pre-validation to ensure that the system satisfy the steady states fault injection; fault-injection to observe the system's behavior during fault injection; post-validation to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after fault injection.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"describe\": \"Think about the total time and the reasonable time allocation for each phase that you are about to design, and explain your thought process in detail.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"total_time\": {\"title\": \"Total Time\", \"description\": \"Total time of the entire chaos experiment. total_time should equal to the sum of pre_validation_time, fault_injection_time, and post_validation_time.\", \"example\": \"10m\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"pre_validation_time\": {\"title\": \"Pre Validation Time\", \"description\": \"Total time of validation before fault injection.\", \"example\": \"2m\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"fault_injection_time\": {\"title\": \"Fault Injection Time\", \"description\": \"Total time of fault injection.\", \"example\": \"6m\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"post_validation_time\": {\"title\": \"Post Validation Time\", \"description\": \"Total time of validation after fault injection.\", \"example\": \"2m\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"total_time\", \"pre_validation_time\", \"fault_injection_time\", \"post_validation_time\"]}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# Steady states of my system:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\n# A fault scenario that may occur in my system and may affect the steady states:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[Fault(name='NetworkChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'delay', 'direction': 'to', 'target': {'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}}, 'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'device': 'eth0', 'delay': {'latency': '100ms', 'jitter': '10ms'}})], [Fault(name='StressChaos', name_id=0, params={'stressors': {'cpu': {'workers': 1, 'load': 100}}, 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'containerNames': ['example-container']})], [Fault(name='PodChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'pod-kill', 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}})]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {{\"PodRunning\": \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", \"ServiceTrafficRouting\": \"Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.\"}}\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering as necessary:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please plan a Chaos Engineering experiment to check the network system's resiliency that the steady states are remained during fault injection.\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"thought\":\"Given the constraints of the experiment needing to be completed within 1 minute, we need to carefully allocate time to each phase to ensure meaningful results. The pre-validation phase is crucial to confirm that the system is in a steady state before introducing any faults. Since the PodRunning steady state requires a 1-minute observation period, we will allocate 20 seconds to pre-validation to quickly verify the current state. The fault-injection phase is the core of the experiment, where we introduce the faults to observe the system's behavior. We will allocate 30 seconds to this phase, allowing enough time to introduce the network delay, CPU stress, and Pod failure faults sequentially. Finally, the post-validation phase is essential to ensure the system returns to its steady state after the faults are removed. We will allocate 10 seconds to this phase to quickly verify the system's recovery. This allocation ensures that the total time of the experiment is 1 minute, with a balanced focus on validation and fault injection.\",\"total_time\":\"1m\",\"pre_validation_time\":\"20s\",\"fault_injection_time\":\"30s\",\"post_validation_time\":\"10s\"}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that defines a network system, its steady states, and faults that may affect the steady states in the system, you will design a Chaos Engineering experiment for them.\nThe experiment is divided into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation phases: pre-validation to ensure that the system satisfy the steady states fault injection; fault-injection to observe the system's behavior during fault injection; post-validation to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after fault injection.\nHere, you will detail the pre-validation phase.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe in detail the timeline for when each fault injection and each unit test (for verifying steady-state) will be executed. For example, explain which fault injections/unit tests will be executed simultaneously, and whether certain fault injections/unit tests will be executed at staggered timings. Additionally, explain the thought process that led you to this approach.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"unit_tests\": {\"title\": \"Unit Tests\", \"description\": \"The list of unit test schedule.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/UnitTest\"}}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"unit_tests\"], \"definitions\": {\"UnitTest\": {\"title\": \"UnitTest\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"name\": {\"title\": \"Name\", \"description\": \"Steady state name to be verified by a unit test.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"grace_period\": {\"title\": \"Grace Period\", \"description\": \"Time elapsed from the start of the current phase to the beginning of the unit test.\", \"example\": \"0s\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"duration\": {\"title\": \"Duration\", \"description\": \"Duration of the unit test. (grace_period + duration) should not exceed the current phase's total time.\", \"example\": \"2m\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"name\", \"grace_period\", \"duration\"]}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# Steady states of my system:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\n# A fault scenario that may occur in my system and may affect the steady states:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[Fault(name='NetworkChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'delay', 'direction': 'to', 'target': {'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}}, 'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'device': 'eth0', 'delay': {'latency': '100ms', 'jitter': '10ms'}})], [Fault(name='StressChaos', name_id=0, params={'stressors': {'cpu': {'workers': 1, 'load': 100}}, 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'containerNames': ['example-container']})], [Fault(name='PodChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'pod-kill', 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}})]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {{\"PodRunning\": \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", \"ServiceTrafficRouting\": \"Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.\"}}\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering as necessary:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please detail the pre-validation phase. Note that the phase's total time is 20s.\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"thought\":\"In the pre-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system is in its expected steady states before we proceed with fault injection. Given the constraints, we have 20 seconds to perform these checks. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the 'PodRunning' state requires checking the pod's status over a 1-minute period, we will perform a quick check to ensure the pod is currently running. For 'ServiceTrafficRouting', we will perform a brief HTTP request test to ensure the service is routing traffic correctly. These checks will be executed sequentially due to the short time frame, ensuring that each steady state is verified before moving to the next phase.\",\"unit_tests\":[{\"name\":\"PodRunning\",\"grace_period\":\"0s\",\"duration\":\"10s\"},{\"name\":\"ServiceTrafficRouting\",\"grace_period\":\"10s\",\"duration\":\"10s\"}]}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that defines a network system, its steady states, and faults that may affect the steady states in the system, you will design a Chaos Engineering experiment for them.\nThe experiment is divided into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation phases: pre-validation to ensure that the system satisfy the steady states fault injection; fault-injection to observe the system's behavior during fault injection; post-validation to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after fault injection.\nHere, you will detail the fault-injection phase.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe in detail the timeline for when each fault injection and each unit test (for verifying steady-state) will be executed. For example, explain which fault injections/unit tests will be executed simultaneously, and whether certain fault injections/unit tests will be executed at staggered timings. Additionally, explain the thought process that led you to this approach.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"fault_injection\": {\"title\": \"Fault Injection\", \"description\": \"The list of fault injection schedules.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/FaultInjection\"}}, \"unit_tests\": {\"title\": \"Unit Tests\", \"description\": \"The list of unit test schedule.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/UnitTest\"}}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"fault_injection\", \"unit_tests\"], \"definitions\": {\"FaultInjection\": {\"title\": \"FaultInjection\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"name\": {\"title\": \"Name\", \"description\": \"Select a fault type from [\\\"PodChaos\\\", \\\"NetworkChaos\\\", \\\"DNSChaos\\\", \\\"HTTPChaos\\\", \\\"StressChaos\\\", \\\"IOChaos\\\", \\\"TimeChaos\\\"]\", \"enum\": [\"PodChaos\", \"NetworkChaos\", \"DNSChaos\", \"HTTPChaos\", \"StressChaos\", \"IOChaos\", \"TimeChaos\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"name_id\": {\"title\": \"Name Id\", \"description\": \"An identifier to prevent name conflicts when the same Fault appears. Assign numbers starting from 0 in sequential order to prevent name conflicts.\", \"type\": \"integer\"}, \"grace_period\": {\"title\": \"Grace Period\", \"description\": \"Time elapsed from the start of the current phase to the beginning of the fault injection.\", \"example\": \"0s\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"duration\": {\"title\": \"Duration\", \"description\": \"Duration of the unit test. (grace_period + duration) should not exceed the current phase's total time.\", \"example\": \"2m\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"name\", \"name_id\", \"grace_period\", \"duration\"]}, \"UnitTest\": {\"title\": \"UnitTest\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"name\": {\"title\": \"Name\", \"description\": \"Steady state name to be verified by a unit test.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"grace_period\": {\"title\": \"Grace Period\", \"description\": \"Time elapsed from the start of the current phase to the beginning of the unit test.\", \"example\": \"0s\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"duration\": {\"title\": \"Duration\", \"description\": \"Duration of the unit test. (grace_period + duration) should not exceed the current phase's total time.\", \"example\": \"2m\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"name\", \"grace_period\", \"duration\"]}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# Steady states of my system:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\n# A fault scenario that may occur in my system and may affect the steady states:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[Fault(name='NetworkChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'delay', 'direction': 'to', 'target': {'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}}, 'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'device': 'eth0', 'delay': {'latency': '100ms', 'jitter': '10ms'}})], [Fault(name='StressChaos', name_id=0, params={'stressors': {'cpu': {'workers': 1, 'load': 100}}, 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'containerNames': ['example-container']})], [Fault(name='PodChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'pod-kill', 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}})]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {{\"PodRunning\": \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", \"ServiceTrafficRouting\": \"Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.\"}}\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering as necessary:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please detail the fault-injection phase. Note that the phase's total time is 30s.\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"thought\":\"In this fault-injection phase, we have a total of 30 seconds to execute the chaos experiments. The goal is to observe the system's behavior under stress and network disruptions, as well as its ability to handle a pod failure. Given the constraints, we will stagger the fault injections to maximize the observation of their impacts on the system. \\n\\nFirst, we will introduce network latency using NetworkChaos. This will simulate a network disruption, potentially affecting the ServiceTrafficRouting steady state. We will start this fault at the beginning of the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \\n\\nNext, we will introduce CPU stress using StressChaos. This will simulate resource exhaustion on the pod, potentially affecting both the PodRunning and ServiceTrafficRouting steady states. We will start this fault 10 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \\n\\nFinally, we will simulate a pod failure using PodChaos. This will directly impact the PodRunning steady state. We will start this fault 20 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \\n\\nBy staggering the faults in this manner, we can observe the compounded effects of network disruption, resource exhaustion, and pod failure on the system's steady states.\",\"fault_injection\":[{\"name\":\"NetworkChaos\",\"name_id\":0,\"grace_period\":\"0s\",\"duration\":\"10s\"},{\"name\":\"StressChaos\",\"name_id\":0,\"grace_period\":\"10s\",\"duration\":\"10s\"},{\"name\":\"PodChaos\",\"name_id\":0,\"grace_period\":\"20s\",\"duration\":\"10s\"}],\"unit_tests\":[{\"name\":\"PodRunning\",\"grace_period\":\"0s\",\"duration\":\"30s\"},{\"name\":\"ServiceTrafficRouting\",\"grace_period\":\"0s\",\"duration\":\"30s\"}]}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven k8s manifests that defines a network system, its steady states, and faults that may affect the steady states in the system, you will design a Chaos Engineering experiment for them.\nThe experiment is divided into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation phases: pre-validation to ensure that the system satisfy the steady states fault injection; fault-injection to observe the system's behavior during fault injection; post-validation to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after fault injection.\nHere, you will detail the post-validation phase.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe in detail the timeline for when each fault injection and each unit test (for verifying steady-state) will be executed. For example, explain which fault injections/unit tests will be executed simultaneously, and whether certain fault injections/unit tests will be executed at staggered timings. Additionally, explain the thought process that led you to this approach.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"unit_tests\": {\"title\": \"Unit Tests\", \"description\": \"The list of unit test schedule.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/UnitTest\"}}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"unit_tests\"], \"definitions\": {\"UnitTest\": {\"title\": \"UnitTest\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"name\": {\"title\": \"Name\", \"description\": \"Steady state name to be verified by a unit test.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"grace_period\": {\"title\": \"Grace Period\", \"description\": \"Time elapsed from the start of the current phase to the beginning of the unit test.\", \"example\": \"0s\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"duration\": {\"title\": \"Duration\", \"description\": \"Duration of the unit test. (grace_period + duration) should not exceed the current phase's total time.\", \"example\": \"2m\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"name\", \"grace_period\", \"duration\"]}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# Steady states of my system:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\n# A fault scenario that may occur in my system and may affect the steady states:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[Fault(name='NetworkChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'delay', 'direction': 'to', 'target': {'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}}, 'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'device': 'eth0', 'delay': {'latency': '100ms', 'jitter': '10ms'}})], [Fault(name='StressChaos', name_id=0, params={'stressors': {'cpu': {'workers': 1, 'load': 100}}, 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'containerNames': ['example-container']})], [Fault(name='PodChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'pod-kill', 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}})]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {{\"PodRunning\": \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", \"ServiceTrafficRouting\": \"Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.\"}}\n\n# Please follow the instructions below regarding Chaos Engineering as necessary:\n- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\nNow, please detail the post-validation phase. Note that the phase's total time is 10s.\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"thought\":\"In the post-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after the fault injection. Given the short duration of 10 seconds for this phase, we will conduct quick checks to verify the steady states. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the phase is only 10 seconds long, we will stagger the unit tests slightly to fit within this timeframe. The 'PodRunning' test will start immediately as it is crucial to ensure the pod is back in the running state. The 'ServiceTrafficRouting' test will follow shortly after, as it depends on the pod being in a running state to route traffic correctly. This approach ensures that we quickly verify the critical components of the system's functionality post-fault injection.\",\"unit_tests\":[{\"name\":\"PodRunning\",\"grace_period\":\"0s\",\"duration\":\"5s\"},{\"name\":\"ServiceTrafficRouting\",\"grace_period\":\"5s\",\"duration\":\"5s\"}]}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven a Chaos-Engineering-experiment plan, you will summarize it in detail according to the following rules:\n- In each phase, describe in detail the timeline for when each fault injection/unit test (for verifying steady-state) will be executed. For example, summarize which fault injections/unit tests will be executed simultaneously, and whether certain fault injections/unit tests will be executed at staggered timings. \n- Be sure to specify both each fault injection/unit test and their corresponding workflow names.\n- When explaining the timeline, provide a detailed description using specific values for duration, grace period, etc. Rephrase the specific values in a way that everyone can easily understand.\n- The meanings of each value are as follows:\n  - Grace Period: Time elapsed from the start of the current phase to the beginning of the fault injection/unit test.\n  - Duration: Duration of the fault injection/unit test. (grace_period + duration) should not exceed the corresponding phase's total time.\n- Never output bullet points.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"summary\": {\"title\": \"Summary\", \"description\": \"The summary of the given Chaos-Engineering-experiment plan.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"summary\"]}\n```\n\nHuman: # Here is my Chaos-Engineering-experiment plan:\n## Time Schedule\nGiven the constraints of the experiment needing to be completed within 1 minute, we need to carefully allocate time to each phase to ensure meaningful results. The pre-validation phase is crucial to confirm that the system is in a steady state before introducing any faults. Since the PodRunning steady state requires a 1-minute observation period, we will allocate 20 seconds to pre-validation to quickly verify the current state. The fault-injection phase is the core of the experiment, where we introduce the faults to observe the system's behavior. We will allocate 30 seconds to this phase, allowing enough time to introduce the network delay, CPU stress, and Pod failure faults sequentially. Finally, the post-validation phase is essential to ensure the system returns to its steady state after the faults are removed. We will allocate 10 seconds to this phase to quickly verify the system's recovery. This allocation ensures that the total time of the experiment is 1 minute, with a balanced focus on validation and fault injection.\n\n## Pre-validation Phase\nIn the pre-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system is in its expected steady states before we proceed with fault injection. Given the constraints, we have 20 seconds to perform these checks. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the 'PodRunning' state requires checking the pod's status over a 1-minute period, we will perform a quick check to ensure the pod is currently running. For 'ServiceTrafficRouting', we will perform a brief HTTP request test to ensure the service is routing traffic correctly. These checks will be executed sequentially due to the short time frame, ensuring that each steady state is verified before moving to the next phase.\n- Verified Steady State #0: ```PodRunning```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```pre-unittest-podrunning```  \n  - Grace Period: ```0s```  \n  - Duration: ```10s```  \n- Verified Steady State #1: ```ServiceTrafficRouting```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting```  \n  - Grace Period: ```10s```  \n  - Duration: ```10s```  \n\n\n## Fault-injection Phase \nIn this fault-injection phase, we have a total of 30 seconds to execute the chaos experiments. The goal is to observe the system's behavior under stress and network disruptions, as well as its ability to handle a pod failure. Given the constraints, we will stagger the fault injections to maximize the observation of their impacts on the system. \n\nFirst, we will introduce network latency using NetworkChaos. This will simulate a network disruption, potentially affecting the ServiceTrafficRouting steady state. We will start this fault at the beginning of the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nNext, we will introduce CPU stress using StressChaos. This will simulate resource exhaustion on the pod, potentially affecting both the PodRunning and ServiceTrafficRouting steady states. We will start this fault 10 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nFinally, we will simulate a pod failure using PodChaos. This will directly impact the PodRunning steady state. We will start this fault 20 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nBy staggering the faults in this manner, we can observe the compounded effects of network disruption, resource exhaustion, and pod failure on the system's steady states.\n- Verified Steady State #0: ```PodRunning```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```fault-unittest-podrunning```  \n  - Grace Period: ```0s```  \n  - Duration: ```30s```  \n- Verified Steady State #1: ```ServiceTrafficRouting```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting```  \n  - Grace Period: ```0s```  \n  - Duration: ```30s```  \n\n\n- Injected Faults #0: ```NetworkChaos```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```fault-networkchaos```  \n  - Grace Period: ```0s```  \n  - Duration: ```10s```  \n- Injected Faults #1: ```StressChaos```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```fault-stresschaos```  \n  - Grace Period: ```10s```  \n  - Duration: ```10s```  \n- Injected Faults #2: ```PodChaos```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```fault-podchaos```  \n  - Grace Period: ```20s```  \n  - Duration: ```10s```  \n\n\n## Post-validation phase\nIn the post-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after the fault injection. Given the short duration of 10 seconds for this phase, we will conduct quick checks to verify the steady states. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the phase is only 10 seconds long, we will stagger the unit tests slightly to fit within this timeframe. The 'PodRunning' test will start immediately as it is crucial to ensure the pod is back in the running state. The 'ServiceTrafficRouting' test will follow shortly after, as it depends on the pod being in a running state to route traffic correctly. This approach ensures that we quickly verify the critical components of the system's functionality post-fault injection.\n- Verified Steady State #0: ```PodRunning```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```post-unittest-podrunning```  \n  - Grace Period: ```0s```  \n  - Duration: ```5s```  \n- Verified Steady State #1: ```ServiceTrafficRouting```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting```  \n  - Grace Period: ```5s```  \n  - Duration: ```5s```  \n\n\nPlease summarize the above plan.\n\nAI: ```json\n{\"summary\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"summary\":\"The Chaos Engineering experiment is structured into three phases, each with specific tasks and timelines to ensure the system's resilience is effectively tested within a total duration of one minute. \\n\\nIn the pre-validation phase, which lasts for 20 seconds, the system's steady states are verified sequentially. Initially, the 'PodRunning' state is checked for 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately at the beginning of this phase. Following this, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for another 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow, commencing right after the first check.\\n\\nThe fault-injection phase spans 30 seconds and involves staggered fault injections to observe their impact on the system. At the start of this phase, the 'NetworkChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-networkchaos' workflow, running for 10 seconds. Concurrently, the steady states 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting' are monitored for the entire 30 seconds using the 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflows, respectively. After 10 seconds, the 'StressChaos' fault is introduced using the 'fault-stresschaos' workflow, also lasting 10 seconds. Finally, at the 20-second mark, the 'PodChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-podchaos' workflow, continuing for the remaining 10 seconds of this phase.\\n\\nIn the post-validation phase, which is 10 seconds long, the system's recovery to steady states is verified. The 'PodRunning' state is checked first for 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately. Subsequently, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for the final 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow. This staggered approach ensures that the system's critical functionalities are quickly assessed post-fault injection.\"}"
                ]
            }
        ],
        "analysis": [
            [
                {
                    "name": "analysis_experiment",
                    "token_usage": {
                        "input_tokens": 4071,
                        "output_tokens": 615,
                        "total_tokens": 4686
                    },
                    "message_history": [
                        [
                            "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven K8s manifests that defines a network system, its hypothesis, the overview of a Chaos-Engineeering experiment, and the experiment's results, you will analyze the experiment's results.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Analyze step by step why why the test(s) failed, based on the system configuraions (manifests) and the flow of the experiment.\n- Specify the cause while mentioning the corresponding system configurations and the corresponding phenamena Chaos-Engineering experiment.\n- The anaysis report here will be used for reconfiguring the system later to avoid the failes (improve resiliency). Therefore, Therefore, make carefully the report rich in insights so that it will be helpful at that time.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"report\": {\"title\": \"Report\", \"description\": \"Analysis of the experiment result.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"report\"]}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# Here is the hypothesis for my system:\nThe hypothesis is \"The steady states of the sytem are maintained even when the fault scenario occurs (i.e., when the faults are injected)\".\nThe steady states here are as follows:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\nThe fault scenario here is as follows:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[Fault(name='NetworkChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'delay', 'direction': 'to', 'target': {'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}}, 'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'device': 'eth0', 'delay': {'latency': '100ms', 'jitter': '10ms'}})], [Fault(name='StressChaos', name_id=0, params={'stressors': {'cpu': {'workers': 1, 'load': 100}}, 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'containerNames': ['example-container']})], [Fault(name='PodChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'pod-kill', 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}})]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {{\"PodRunning\": \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", \"ServiceTrafficRouting\": \"Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.\"}}\n\n# Here is the overview of my Chaos-Engineering experiment to verify the hypothesis:\nThe Chaos Engineering experiment is structured into three phases, each with specific tasks and timelines to ensure the system's resilience is effectively tested within a total duration of one minute. \n\nIn the pre-validation phase, which lasts for 20 seconds, the system's steady states are verified sequentially. Initially, the 'PodRunning' state is checked for 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately at the beginning of this phase. Following this, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for another 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow, commencing right after the first check.\n\nThe fault-injection phase spans 30 seconds and involves staggered fault injections to observe their impact on the system. At the start of this phase, the 'NetworkChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-networkchaos' workflow, running for 10 seconds. Concurrently, the steady states 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting' are monitored for the entire 30 seconds using the 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflows, respectively. After 10 seconds, the 'StressChaos' fault is introduced using the 'fault-stresschaos' workflow, also lasting 10 seconds. Finally, at the 20-second mark, the 'PodChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-podchaos' workflow, continuing for the remaining 10 seconds of this phase.\n\nIn the post-validation phase, which is 10 seconds long, the system's recovery to steady states is verified. The 'PodRunning' state is checked first for 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately. Subsequently, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for the final 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow. This staggered approach ensures that the system's critical functionalities are quickly assessed post-fault injection.\n\n# The experiment's results are as follows:\nPassed unittests:\n- pre-unittest-podrunning\n- pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n- fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\nFailed unittests:\n- fault-unittest-podrunning\n```log\n...d': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:53 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '40cb9ffd-50aa-44b7-a7fb-1f782819dd8a', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:54 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\n\n```\n\n- post-unittest-podrunning\n```log\n...d': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:22 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '3b789a5e-1855-49b7-81a4-ef21d2d89df8', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:23 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\n\n```\n\n- post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n```log\n...p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_duration..........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n   \u2717 http_req_failed............: 100.00% 20 out of 20\n     http_req_receiving.........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_sending...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_tls_handshaking...: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_waiting...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_reqs..................: 20      0.666528/s\n     iteration_duration.........: avg=7.08s min=3.62ms med=3.03s max=30s p(90)=15.38s p(95)=16.11s\n     iterations.................: 20      0.666528/s\n     vus........................: 1       min=1        max=10\n     vus_max....................: 10      min=10       max=10\n\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:55Z\" level=error msg=\"thresholds on metrics 'http_req_failed' have been crossed\"\n\n```\n\n\nNow, please analyze the results and provide an analysis report rich in insights.\nAI: ```json\n{\"report\":"
                        ],
                        "```json\n{\"report\":\"The Chaos Engineering experiment results indicate several critical insights into the system's resilience and failure points:\\n\\n1. **PodRunning Steady State Failure**:\\n   - The 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'post-unittest-podrunning' tests failed, indicating that the Pod 'example-pod' was not found during and after the fault injection phase. This suggests that the Pod was either terminated or failed to restart due to the 'PodChaos' fault, which simulates a Pod failure.\\n   - The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', which means it does not automatically restart if it fails. This configuration is a significant vulnerability, as it does not allow the system to recover from Pod failures, leading to prolonged downtime.\\n   - The failure to maintain the 'PodRunning' steady state highlights the need for a more resilient Pod configuration, such as using a 'Always' or 'OnFailure' restart policy to ensure automatic recovery from failures.\\n\\n2. **ServiceTrafficRouting Steady State Failure**:\\n   - The 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' test failed, with 100% of HTTP requests failing. This indicates that the Service was unable to route traffic to the Pod, likely because the Pod was not running.\\n   - The 'NetworkChaos' fault, which introduced network latency, and the 'PodChaos' fault, which terminated the Pod, both contributed to the disruption in service traffic routing. The network latency could have caused initial delays, but the Pod termination was the primary cause of the complete failure in routing traffic.\\n   - The failure to maintain the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' steady state suggests that the system's reliance on a single Pod is a bottleneck. Implementing a Deployment with multiple replicas could improve resilience by ensuring that traffic can be routed to other available Pods if one fails.\\n\\n3. **Pre-Validation Success**:\\n   - The successful pre-validation tests ('pre-unittest-podrunning' and 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting') confirm that the system was initially in a healthy state, with the Pod running and the Service correctly routing traffic. This baseline is crucial for understanding the impact of the injected faults.\\n\\n4. **Fault Injection Impact**:\\n   - The staggered fault injection strategy effectively tested the system's resilience. The combination of network latency, CPU stress, and Pod termination exposed the system's vulnerabilities, particularly the lack of redundancy and automatic recovery mechanisms.\\n   - The experiment's design, with overlapping fault injections and continuous monitoring, provided a comprehensive assessment of the system's ability to maintain steady states under stress.\\n\\nIn conclusion, the experiment revealed that the system's current configuration is not resilient to the simulated fault scenario. Key recommendations include revising the Pod's restart policy, implementing a Deployment with multiple replicas, and considering network policies to mitigate the impact of network disruptions. These changes would enhance the system's ability to maintain steady states and improve overall resilience.\"}\n```"
                    ]
                }
            ]
        ],
        "improvement": [
            [
                {
                    "name": "reconfiguration",
                    "token_usage": {
                        "input_tokens": 5135,
                        "output_tokens": 319,
                        "total_tokens": 5454
                    },
                    "message_history": [
                        [
                            "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven K8s manifests that defines a network system, its hypothesis, the overview of a Chaos-Engineeering experiment, and the experiment's results, you will reconfigure the sytem based on analsis of the experiment's results.\nAlwasy keep the following fules:\n- NEVER change the original intention (its description) of the original version of the system.\n- NEVER do the same reconfiguration as in the hisotry.\n- Start with simple reconfiguration, and if the hypothesis is still not satisfied, gradually try more complex reconfigurations.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe your plan to modify the K8s manifests.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"modified_k8s_yamls\": {\"title\": \"Modified K8S Yamls\", \"description\": \"The list of modified K8s manifests (yamls). If you create a new manifest to modify resources in an existing manifest, make sure to delete the existing manifest before creating the new one.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/ModK8sYAML\"}}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"modified_k8s_yamls\"], \"definitions\": {\"ModK8sYAML\": {\"title\": \"ModK8sYAML\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"mod_type\": {\"title\": \"Mod Type\", \"description\": \"Modification type. Select from ['replace', 'create', 'delete']. The 'replace' replaces/overwites the content of an exisiting yaml. The 'create' creates a new yaml. The 'delete' deletes an existing yaml.\", \"enum\": [\"replace\", \"create\", \"delete\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"fname\": {\"title\": \"Fname\", \"description\": \"The file name of the modified yaml. If mod_type is 'replace' or 'delete', the name must match an existing yaml's name. If mod_type='create', name the file appropriately to avoid overlapping with existing yamls' names.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"explanation\": {\"title\": \"Explanation\", \"description\": \"If mod_type is 'delete', explain why you need to delete the yaml. If mod_type is 'replace', explain which part you should modify from the original conde and why. If mod_type is 'create', explain whether it is a completely new resource or a replacement resouce for an existing resource. If it is a replacement, also explain the differences and the reasons for them, just like with 'replace'.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"code\": {\"title\": \"Code\", \"description\": \"If mod_type is 'delete', this field is not required. Otherwise, write the content of a K8s YAML manifest modified to pass all the unit tests. Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"mod_type\", \"fname\", \"explanation\"]}}}\n```\n\nHuman: # Here is the overview of my system (original version):\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\n# Here is the hypothesis for my system:\nThe hypothesis is \"The steady states of the sytem are maintained even when the fault scenario occurs (i.e., when the faults are injected)\".\nThe steady states here are as follows:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\nThe fault scenario here is as follows:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[Fault(name='NetworkChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'delay', 'direction': 'to', 'target': {'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}}, 'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'device': 'eth0', 'delay': {'latency': '100ms', 'jitter': '10ms'}})], [Fault(name='StressChaos', name_id=0, params={'stressors': {'cpu': {'workers': 1, 'load': 100}}, 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'containerNames': ['example-container']})], [Fault(name='PodChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'pod-kill', 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}})]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {{\"PodRunning\": \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", \"ServiceTrafficRouting\": \"Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.\"}}\n\n# Here is the overview of my Chaos-Engineering experiment to verify the hypothesis:\nThe Chaos Engineering experiment is structured into three phases, each with specific tasks and timelines to ensure the system's resilience is effectively tested within a total duration of one minute. \n\nIn the pre-validation phase, which lasts for 20 seconds, the system's steady states are verified sequentially. Initially, the 'PodRunning' state is checked for 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately at the beginning of this phase. Following this, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for another 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow, commencing right after the first check.\n\nThe fault-injection phase spans 30 seconds and involves staggered fault injections to observe their impact on the system. At the start of this phase, the 'NetworkChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-networkchaos' workflow, running for 10 seconds. Concurrently, the steady states 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting' are monitored for the entire 30 seconds using the 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflows, respectively. After 10 seconds, the 'StressChaos' fault is introduced using the 'fault-stresschaos' workflow, also lasting 10 seconds. Finally, at the 20-second mark, the 'PodChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-podchaos' workflow, continuing for the remaining 10 seconds of this phase.\n\nIn the post-validation phase, which is 10 seconds long, the system's recovery to steady states is verified. The 'PodRunning' state is checked first for 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately. Subsequently, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for the final 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow. This staggered approach ensures that the system's critical functionalities are quickly assessed post-fault injection.\n\n# The experiment's results of the original system are as follows:\nPassed unittests:\n- pre-unittest-podrunning\n- pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n- fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\nFailed unittests:\n- fault-unittest-podrunning\n```log\n...d': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:53 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '40cb9ffd-50aa-44b7-a7fb-1f782819dd8a', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:54 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\n\n```\n\n- post-unittest-podrunning\n```log\n...d': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:22 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '3b789a5e-1855-49b7-81a4-ef21d2d89df8', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:23 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\n\n```\n\n- post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n```log\n...p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_duration..........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n   \u2717 http_req_failed............: 100.00% 20 out of 20\n     http_req_receiving.........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_sending...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_tls_handshaking...: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_waiting...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_reqs..................: 20      0.666528/s\n     iteration_duration.........: avg=7.08s min=3.62ms med=3.03s max=30s p(90)=15.38s p(95)=16.11s\n     iterations.................: 20      0.666528/s\n     vus........................: 1       min=1        max=10\n     vus_max....................: 10      min=10       max=10\n\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:55Z\" level=error msg=\"thresholds on metrics 'http_req_failed' have been crossed\"\n\n```\n\n\nFirst, please analyze the results and provide an analysis report rich in insights.\nAI: # Here is my analysis report:\nThe Chaos Engineering experiment results indicate several critical insights into the system's resilience and failure points:\n\n1. **PodRunning Steady State Failure**:\n   - The 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'post-unittest-podrunning' tests failed, indicating that the Pod 'example-pod' was not found during and after the fault injection phase. This suggests that the Pod was either terminated or failed to restart due to the 'PodChaos' fault, which simulates a Pod failure.\n   - The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', which means it does not automatically restart if it fails. This configuration is a significant vulnerability, as it does not allow the system to recover from Pod failures, leading to prolonged downtime.\n   - The failure to maintain the 'PodRunning' steady state highlights the need for a more resilient Pod configuration, such as using a 'Always' or 'OnFailure' restart policy to ensure automatic recovery from failures.\n\n2. **ServiceTrafficRouting Steady State Failure**:\n   - The 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' test failed, with 100% of HTTP requests failing. This indicates that the Service was unable to route traffic to the Pod, likely because the Pod was not running.\n   - The 'NetworkChaos' fault, which introduced network latency, and the 'PodChaos' fault, which terminated the Pod, both contributed to the disruption in service traffic routing. The network latency could have caused initial delays, but the Pod termination was the primary cause of the complete failure in routing traffic.\n   - The failure to maintain the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' steady state suggests that the system's reliance on a single Pod is a bottleneck. Implementing a Deployment with multiple replicas could improve resilience by ensuring that traffic can be routed to other available Pods if one fails.\n\n3. **Pre-Validation Success**:\n   - The successful pre-validation tests ('pre-unittest-podrunning' and 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting') confirm that the system was initially in a healthy state, with the Pod running and the Service correctly routing traffic. This baseline is crucial for understanding the impact of the injected faults.\n\n4. **Fault Injection Impact**:\n   - The staggered fault injection strategy effectively tested the system's resilience. The combination of network latency, CPU stress, and Pod termination exposed the system's vulnerabilities, particularly the lack of redundancy and automatic recovery mechanisms.\n   - The experiment's design, with overlapping fault injections and continuous monitoring, provided a comprehensive assessment of the system's ability to maintain steady states under stress.\n\nIn conclusion, the experiment revealed that the system's current configuration is not resilient to the simulated fault scenario. Key recommendations include revising the Pod's restart policy, implementing a Deployment with multiple replicas, and considering network policies to mitigate the impact of network disruptions. These changes would enhance the system's ability to maintain steady states and improve overall resilience.\nHuman: Then, please reconfigure the system to avoid the fails (improve resiliency).\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                        ],
                        "{\"thought\": \"To improve the system's resilience, I will modify the Pod configuration to use a Deployment instead of a standalone Pod. This will allow for multiple replicas and automatic restarts in case of failure. The Deployment will ensure that the Pod is automatically recreated if it is terminated, addressing the issue of the Pod not being found during the fault injection phase. Additionally, the Deployment will provide redundancy, allowing the Service to route traffic to other available Pods if one fails.\", \"modified_k8s_yamls\": [{\"mod_type\": \"delete\", \"fname\": \"nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\", \"explanation\": \"The existing Pod manifest is deleted to replace it with a Deployment manifest, which provides better resilience through automatic restarts and multiple replicas.\"}, {\"mod_type\": \"create\", \"fname\": \"nginx_demo/nginx/deployment.yaml\", \"explanation\": \"This new Deployment manifest replaces the standalone Pod manifest. It introduces a Deployment with multiple replicas and an 'Always' restart policy to improve resilience.\", \"code\": \"apiVersion: apps/v1\\nkind: Deployment\\nmetadata:\\n  name: example-deployment\\nspec:\\n  replicas: 3\\n  selector:\\n    matchLabels:\\n      app: example\\n  template:\\n    metadata:\\n      labels:\\n        app: example\\n    spec:\\n      containers:\\n      - name: example-container\\n        image: nginx:1.17.1\\n        ports:\\n        - containerPort: 80\\n      restartPolicy: Always\"}]}\n```"
                    ]
                }
            ]
        ],
        "experiment_replan": [
            {
                "name": "experiment_replan",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 20739,
                    "output_tokens": 1097,
                    "total_tokens": 21836
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven a previous K8s manifests, a Chaos-Engineering-experiment plan for it, and the current K8s manifests, you will determine whether we need to adujst the scope of fault injections for the current K8s manifests.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Cosider how you must change or keep the scope (i.e., target) of the fault injecttion comparing the previous K8s manifests and the current K8s manifests.\n- You only make minor adjustments related to resource changes, metadata change, etc, so NEVER make any scope changes that alter the original goal of the chaos experiment.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe why you need to change/keep the scope of the fault injection for the current K8s manifests.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Adjust the scope (target) of the fault injection comparing the differeneces between the current and previous manifests. \", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the previous K8s manifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80```\n\n\n# Here is a planned Chaos Engineering:\nThe entire time schedule of the Chaos-Engineering experiment is as follows (The experiment is divided into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation phases):\nGiven the constraints of the experiment needing to be completed within 1 minute, we need to carefully allocate time to each phase to ensure meaningful results. The pre-validation phase is crucial to confirm that the system is in a steady state before introducing any faults. Since the PodRunning steady state requires a 1-minute observation period, we will allocate 20 seconds to pre-validation to quickly verify the current state. The fault-injection phase is the core of the experiment, where we introduce the faults to observe the system's behavior. We will allocate 30 seconds to this phase, allowing enough time to introduce the network delay, CPU stress, and Pod failure faults sequentially. Finally, the post-validation phase is essential to ensure the system returns to its steady state after the faults are removed. We will allocate 10 seconds to this phase to quickly verify the system's recovery. This allocation ensures that the total time of the experiment is 1 minute, with a balanced focus on validation and fault injection.\n- Total experiment phase: 1m\n- Pre-validation phase: 20s\n- Fault-injection phase: 30s\n- Post-validation phase: 10s\n\nThe details of the three phases are as follows:\nPre-validation Phase (20s):\nIn the pre-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system is in its expected steady states before we proceed with fault injection. Given the constraints, we have 20 seconds to perform these checks. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the 'PodRunning' state requires checking the pod's status over a 1-minute period, we will perform a quick check to ensure the pod is currently running. For 'ServiceTrafficRouting', we will perform a brief HTTP request test to ensure the service is routing traffic correctly. These checks will be executed sequentially due to the short time frame, ensuring that each steady state is verified before moving to the next phase.\n\nFault-injection Phase (30s):\nIn this fault-injection phase, we have a total of 30 seconds to execute the chaos experiments. The goal is to observe the system's behavior under stress and network disruptions, as well as its ability to handle a pod failure. Given the constraints, we will stagger the fault injections to maximize the observation of their impacts on the system. \n\nFirst, we will introduce network latency using NetworkChaos. This will simulate a network disruption, potentially affecting the ServiceTrafficRouting steady state. We will start this fault at the beginning of the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nNext, we will introduce CPU stress using StressChaos. This will simulate resource exhaustion on the pod, potentially affecting both the PodRunning and ServiceTrafficRouting steady states. We will start this fault 10 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nFinally, we will simulate a pod failure using PodChaos. This will directly impact the PodRunning steady state. We will start this fault 20 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nBy staggering the faults in this manner, we can observe the compounded effects of network disruption, resource exhaustion, and pod failure on the system's steady states.\n\nPost-validation Phase (10s):\nIn the post-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after the fault injection. Given the short duration of 10 seconds for this phase, we will conduct quick checks to verify the steady states. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the phase is only 10 seconds long, we will stagger the unit tests slightly to fit within this timeframe. The 'PodRunning' test will start immediately as it is crucial to ensure the pod is back in the running state. The 'ServiceTrafficRouting' test will follow shortly after, as it depends on the pod being in a running state to route traffic correctly. This approach ensures that we quickly verify the critical components of the system's functionality post-fault injection.\n\nThe summary of the above experiment plan:\nThe Chaos Engineering experiment is structured into three phases, each with specific tasks and timelines to ensure the system's resilience is effectively tested within a total duration of one minute. \n\nIn the pre-validation phase, which lasts for 20 seconds, the system's steady states are verified sequentially. Initially, the 'PodRunning' state is checked for 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately at the beginning of this phase. Following this, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for another 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow, commencing right after the first check.\n\nThe fault-injection phase spans 30 seconds and involves staggered fault injections to observe their impact on the system. At the start of this phase, the 'NetworkChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-networkchaos' workflow, running for 10 seconds. Concurrently, the steady states 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting' are monitored for the entire 30 seconds using the 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflows, respectively. After 10 seconds, the 'StressChaos' fault is introduced using the 'fault-stresschaos' workflow, also lasting 10 seconds. Finally, at the 20-second mark, the 'PodChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-podchaos' workflow, continuing for the remaining 10 seconds of this phase.\n\nIn the post-validation phase, which is 10 seconds long, the system's recovery to steady states is verified. The 'PodRunning' state is checked first for 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately. Subsequently, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for the final 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow. This staggered approach ensures that the system's critical functionalities are quickly assessed post-fault injection.\n\nTo automatically conduct the above experiment plan with Chaos Mesh, the following Chaos-Mesh-Worfklow file was created (by applying it to the cluster, the experiment plan will be automatically executed according to the Chaos-Mesh-Worfklow file):\n```yaml\napiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1\nkind: Workflow\nmetadata:\n  name: chaos-experiment-20241002-041754\nspec:\n  entry: the-entry\n  templates:\n    #-------------------------------\n    # entry point of whole workflow\n    #-------------------------------\n    - name: the-entry\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 4m\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-phase\n        - fault-injection-phase\n        - post-validation-phase\n\n    #-------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of pre-validation-phase\n    #-------------------------------------\n    - name: pre-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m20s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n    \n    - name: pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-suspend\n        - pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: pre-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-unittest-podrunning\n        - pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: pre-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 10\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"10s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of fault-injection-phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: fault-injection-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-unittest-podrunning\n        - fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n        - fault-networkchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 20s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend\n        - fault-stresschaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend2\n        - fault-podchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend2\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 20s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    # unit tests\n    - name: fault-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 30\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"30s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    # fault_injections\n    - name: fault-networkchaos\n      templateType: NetworkChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      networkChaos:\n        action: delay\n        delay:\n          jitter: 10ms\n          latency: 100ms\n        device: eth0\n        direction: to\n        mode: all\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        target:\n          mode: all\n          selector:\n            labelSelectors:\n              app: example\n            namespaces:\n              - default\n\n\n    - name: fault-stresschaos\n      templateType: StressChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      stressChaos:\n        containerNames:\n          - example-container\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        stressors:\n          cpu:\n            load: 100\n            workers: 1\n\n\n    - name: fault-podchaos\n      templateType: PodChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      podChaos:\n        action: pod-kill\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of post-validation phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: post-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m10s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-suspend\n        - post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 5s\n\n    - name: post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-unittest-podrunning\n        - post-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: post-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 5\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"5s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n```\n\n# Here is the current K8s menifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/deployment.yaml\napiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n  name: example-deployment\nspec:\n  replicas: 3\n  selector:\n    matchLabels:\n      app: example\n  template:\n    metadata:\n      labels:\n        app: example\n    spec:\n      containers:\n      - name: example-container\n        image: nginx:1.17.1\n        ports:\n        - containerPort: 80\n      restartPolicy: Always```\n\n\n# Here is the scope of a fault injection for the previous manifests.\n- Injected Faults #0: ```NetworkChaos```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```fault-networkchaos```  \n  - Grace Period: ```0s```  \n  - Duration: ```10s```  \n\nParameters\n{{\"action\": \"delay\", \"direction\": \"to\", \"target\": {{\"mode\": \"all\", \"selector\": {{\"namespaces\": [\"default\"], \"labelSelectors\": {{\"app\": \"example\"}}}}}}, \"mode\": \"all\", \"selector\": {{\"namespaces\": [\"default\"], \"labelSelectors\": {{\"app\": \"example\"}}}}, \"device\": \"eth0\", \"delay\": {{\"latency\": \"100ms\", \"jitter\": \"10ms\"}}}}\n\nNow, please adjust the scope of the fault injection for the current manifests. Note that you here focus on the 'selector' parameter (i.e., scope).\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe why you need to change/keep the scope of the fault injection for the current K8s manifests.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Adjust the scope (target) of the fault injection comparing the differeneces between the current and previous manifests. \", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}}}\n```\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"thought\": \"The previous K8s manifests had a single pod with the label 'app: example'. The current manifests have been updated to use a Deployment with 3 replicas, all of which have the same label 'app: example'. The original fault injection targeted all pods with this label in the 'default' namespace. Since the label and namespace remain unchanged, the scope of the fault injection should remain the same, targeting all pods with the label 'app: example' in the 'default' namespace. This ensures that the fault injection will now affect all replicas of the deployment, maintaining the original goal of the chaos experiment.\", \"selector\": {\"namespaces\": [\"default\"], \"labelSelectors\": {\"app\": \"example\"}}}\n",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven a previous K8s manifests, a Chaos-Engineering-experiment plan for it, and the current K8s manifests, you will determine whether we need to adujst the scope of fault injections for the current K8s manifests.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Cosider how you must change or keep the scope (i.e., target) of the fault injecttion comparing the previous K8s manifests and the current K8s manifests.\n- You only make minor adjustments related to resource changes, metadata change, etc, so NEVER make any scope changes that alter the original goal of the chaos experiment.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe why you need to change/keep the scope of the fault injection for the current K8s manifests.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Adjust the scope (target) of the fault injection comparing the differeneces between the current and previous manifests. \", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the previous K8s manifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80```\n\n\n# Here is a planned Chaos Engineering:\nThe entire time schedule of the Chaos-Engineering experiment is as follows (The experiment is divided into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation phases):\nGiven the constraints of the experiment needing to be completed within 1 minute, we need to carefully allocate time to each phase to ensure meaningful results. The pre-validation phase is crucial to confirm that the system is in a steady state before introducing any faults. Since the PodRunning steady state requires a 1-minute observation period, we will allocate 20 seconds to pre-validation to quickly verify the current state. The fault-injection phase is the core of the experiment, where we introduce the faults to observe the system's behavior. We will allocate 30 seconds to this phase, allowing enough time to introduce the network delay, CPU stress, and Pod failure faults sequentially. Finally, the post-validation phase is essential to ensure the system returns to its steady state after the faults are removed. We will allocate 10 seconds to this phase to quickly verify the system's recovery. This allocation ensures that the total time of the experiment is 1 minute, with a balanced focus on validation and fault injection.\n- Total experiment phase: 1m\n- Pre-validation phase: 20s\n- Fault-injection phase: 30s\n- Post-validation phase: 10s\n\nThe details of the three phases are as follows:\nPre-validation Phase (20s):\nIn the pre-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system is in its expected steady states before we proceed with fault injection. Given the constraints, we have 20 seconds to perform these checks. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the 'PodRunning' state requires checking the pod's status over a 1-minute period, we will perform a quick check to ensure the pod is currently running. For 'ServiceTrafficRouting', we will perform a brief HTTP request test to ensure the service is routing traffic correctly. These checks will be executed sequentially due to the short time frame, ensuring that each steady state is verified before moving to the next phase.\n\nFault-injection Phase (30s):\nIn this fault-injection phase, we have a total of 30 seconds to execute the chaos experiments. The goal is to observe the system's behavior under stress and network disruptions, as well as its ability to handle a pod failure. Given the constraints, we will stagger the fault injections to maximize the observation of their impacts on the system. \n\nFirst, we will introduce network latency using NetworkChaos. This will simulate a network disruption, potentially affecting the ServiceTrafficRouting steady state. We will start this fault at the beginning of the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nNext, we will introduce CPU stress using StressChaos. This will simulate resource exhaustion on the pod, potentially affecting both the PodRunning and ServiceTrafficRouting steady states. We will start this fault 10 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nFinally, we will simulate a pod failure using PodChaos. This will directly impact the PodRunning steady state. We will start this fault 20 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nBy staggering the faults in this manner, we can observe the compounded effects of network disruption, resource exhaustion, and pod failure on the system's steady states.\n\nPost-validation Phase (10s):\nIn the post-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after the fault injection. Given the short duration of 10 seconds for this phase, we will conduct quick checks to verify the steady states. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the phase is only 10 seconds long, we will stagger the unit tests slightly to fit within this timeframe. The 'PodRunning' test will start immediately as it is crucial to ensure the pod is back in the running state. The 'ServiceTrafficRouting' test will follow shortly after, as it depends on the pod being in a running state to route traffic correctly. This approach ensures that we quickly verify the critical components of the system's functionality post-fault injection.\n\nThe summary of the above experiment plan:\nThe Chaos Engineering experiment is structured into three phases, each with specific tasks and timelines to ensure the system's resilience is effectively tested within a total duration of one minute. \n\nIn the pre-validation phase, which lasts for 20 seconds, the system's steady states are verified sequentially. Initially, the 'PodRunning' state is checked for 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately at the beginning of this phase. Following this, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for another 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow, commencing right after the first check.\n\nThe fault-injection phase spans 30 seconds and involves staggered fault injections to observe their impact on the system. At the start of this phase, the 'NetworkChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-networkchaos' workflow, running for 10 seconds. Concurrently, the steady states 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting' are monitored for the entire 30 seconds using the 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflows, respectively. After 10 seconds, the 'StressChaos' fault is introduced using the 'fault-stresschaos' workflow, also lasting 10 seconds. Finally, at the 20-second mark, the 'PodChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-podchaos' workflow, continuing for the remaining 10 seconds of this phase.\n\nIn the post-validation phase, which is 10 seconds long, the system's recovery to steady states is verified. The 'PodRunning' state is checked first for 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately. Subsequently, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for the final 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow. This staggered approach ensures that the system's critical functionalities are quickly assessed post-fault injection.\n\nTo automatically conduct the above experiment plan with Chaos Mesh, the following Chaos-Mesh-Worfklow file was created (by applying it to the cluster, the experiment plan will be automatically executed according to the Chaos-Mesh-Worfklow file):\n```yaml\napiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1\nkind: Workflow\nmetadata:\n  name: chaos-experiment-20241002-041754\nspec:\n  entry: the-entry\n  templates:\n    #-------------------------------\n    # entry point of whole workflow\n    #-------------------------------\n    - name: the-entry\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 4m\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-phase\n        - fault-injection-phase\n        - post-validation-phase\n\n    #-------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of pre-validation-phase\n    #-------------------------------------\n    - name: pre-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m20s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n    \n    - name: pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-suspend\n        - pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: pre-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-unittest-podrunning\n        - pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: pre-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 10\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"10s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of fault-injection-phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: fault-injection-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-unittest-podrunning\n        - fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n        - fault-networkchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 20s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend\n        - fault-stresschaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend2\n        - fault-podchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend2\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 20s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    # unit tests\n    - name: fault-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 30\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"30s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    # fault_injections\n    - name: fault-networkchaos\n      templateType: NetworkChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      networkChaos:\n        action: delay\n        delay:\n          jitter: 10ms\n          latency: 100ms\n        device: eth0\n        direction: to\n        mode: all\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        target:\n          mode: all\n          selector:\n            labelSelectors:\n              app: example\n            namespaces:\n              - default\n\n\n    - name: fault-stresschaos\n      templateType: StressChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      stressChaos:\n        containerNames:\n          - example-container\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        stressors:\n          cpu:\n            load: 100\n            workers: 1\n\n\n    - name: fault-podchaos\n      templateType: PodChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      podChaos:\n        action: pod-kill\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of post-validation phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: post-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m10s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-suspend\n        - post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 5s\n\n    - name: post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-unittest-podrunning\n        - post-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: post-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 5\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"5s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n```\n\n# Here is the current K8s menifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/deployment.yaml\napiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n  name: example-deployment\nspec:\n  replicas: 3\n  selector:\n    matchLabels:\n      app: example\n  template:\n    metadata:\n      labels:\n        app: example\n    spec:\n      containers:\n      - name: example-container\n        image: nginx:1.17.1\n        ports:\n        - containerPort: 80\n      restartPolicy: Always```\n\n\n# Here is the scope of a fault injection for the previous manifests.\n- Injected Faults #0: ```StressChaos```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```fault-stresschaos```  \n  - Grace Period: ```10s```  \n  - Duration: ```10s```  \n\nParameters\n{{\"stressors\": {{\"cpu\": {{\"workers\": 1, \"load\": 100}}}}, \"mode\": \"one\", \"selector\": {{\"namespaces\": [\"default\"], \"labelSelectors\": {{\"app\": \"example\"}}}}, \"containerNames\": [\"example-container\"]}}\n\nNow, please adjust the scope of the fault injection for the current manifests. Note that you here focus on the 'selector' parameter (i.e., scope).\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe why you need to change/keep the scope of the fault injection for the current K8s manifests.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Adjust the scope (target) of the fault injection comparing the differeneces between the current and previous manifests. \", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}}}\n```\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"thought\": \"The previous K8s manifests targeted a single pod with the label 'app: example'. The current manifests have been updated to use a Deployment with 3 replicas, all of which have the same label 'app: example'. The original goal of the chaos experiment was to test the system's resilience by applying stress to a pod with this label. To maintain the original goal while accommodating the changes in the manifests, we should adjust the scope to target one of the pods in the deployment. The 'mode: one' setting in the StressChaos configuration already ensures that only one pod will be targeted, so no changes are needed to the selector itself.\", \"selector\": {\"namespaces\": [\"default\"], \"labelSelectors\": {\"app\": \"example\"}}}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven a previous K8s manifests, a Chaos-Engineering-experiment plan for it, and the current K8s manifests, you will determine whether we need to adujst the scope of fault injections for the current K8s manifests.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Cosider how you must change or keep the scope (i.e., target) of the fault injecttion comparing the previous K8s manifests and the current K8s manifests.\n- You only make minor adjustments related to resource changes, metadata change, etc, so NEVER make any scope changes that alter the original goal of the chaos experiment.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe why you need to change/keep the scope of the fault injection for the current K8s manifests.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Adjust the scope (target) of the fault injection comparing the differeneces between the current and previous manifests. \", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}}}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the previous K8s manifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80```\n\n\n# Here is a planned Chaos Engineering:\nThe entire time schedule of the Chaos-Engineering experiment is as follows (The experiment is divided into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation phases):\nGiven the constraints of the experiment needing to be completed within 1 minute, we need to carefully allocate time to each phase to ensure meaningful results. The pre-validation phase is crucial to confirm that the system is in a steady state before introducing any faults. Since the PodRunning steady state requires a 1-minute observation period, we will allocate 20 seconds to pre-validation to quickly verify the current state. The fault-injection phase is the core of the experiment, where we introduce the faults to observe the system's behavior. We will allocate 30 seconds to this phase, allowing enough time to introduce the network delay, CPU stress, and Pod failure faults sequentially. Finally, the post-validation phase is essential to ensure the system returns to its steady state after the faults are removed. We will allocate 10 seconds to this phase to quickly verify the system's recovery. This allocation ensures that the total time of the experiment is 1 minute, with a balanced focus on validation and fault injection.\n- Total experiment phase: 1m\n- Pre-validation phase: 20s\n- Fault-injection phase: 30s\n- Post-validation phase: 10s\n\nThe details of the three phases are as follows:\nPre-validation Phase (20s):\nIn the pre-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system is in its expected steady states before we proceed with fault injection. Given the constraints, we have 20 seconds to perform these checks. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the 'PodRunning' state requires checking the pod's status over a 1-minute period, we will perform a quick check to ensure the pod is currently running. For 'ServiceTrafficRouting', we will perform a brief HTTP request test to ensure the service is routing traffic correctly. These checks will be executed sequentially due to the short time frame, ensuring that each steady state is verified before moving to the next phase.\n\nFault-injection Phase (30s):\nIn this fault-injection phase, we have a total of 30 seconds to execute the chaos experiments. The goal is to observe the system's behavior under stress and network disruptions, as well as its ability to handle a pod failure. Given the constraints, we will stagger the fault injections to maximize the observation of their impacts on the system. \n\nFirst, we will introduce network latency using NetworkChaos. This will simulate a network disruption, potentially affecting the ServiceTrafficRouting steady state. We will start this fault at the beginning of the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nNext, we will introduce CPU stress using StressChaos. This will simulate resource exhaustion on the pod, potentially affecting both the PodRunning and ServiceTrafficRouting steady states. We will start this fault 10 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nFinally, we will simulate a pod failure using PodChaos. This will directly impact the PodRunning steady state. We will start this fault 20 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nBy staggering the faults in this manner, we can observe the compounded effects of network disruption, resource exhaustion, and pod failure on the system's steady states.\n\nPost-validation Phase (10s):\nIn the post-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after the fault injection. Given the short duration of 10 seconds for this phase, we will conduct quick checks to verify the steady states. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the phase is only 10 seconds long, we will stagger the unit tests slightly to fit within this timeframe. The 'PodRunning' test will start immediately as it is crucial to ensure the pod is back in the running state. The 'ServiceTrafficRouting' test will follow shortly after, as it depends on the pod being in a running state to route traffic correctly. This approach ensures that we quickly verify the critical components of the system's functionality post-fault injection.\n\nThe summary of the above experiment plan:\nThe Chaos Engineering experiment is structured into three phases, each with specific tasks and timelines to ensure the system's resilience is effectively tested within a total duration of one minute. \n\nIn the pre-validation phase, which lasts for 20 seconds, the system's steady states are verified sequentially. Initially, the 'PodRunning' state is checked for 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately at the beginning of this phase. Following this, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for another 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow, commencing right after the first check.\n\nThe fault-injection phase spans 30 seconds and involves staggered fault injections to observe their impact on the system. At the start of this phase, the 'NetworkChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-networkchaos' workflow, running for 10 seconds. Concurrently, the steady states 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting' are monitored for the entire 30 seconds using the 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflows, respectively. After 10 seconds, the 'StressChaos' fault is introduced using the 'fault-stresschaos' workflow, also lasting 10 seconds. Finally, at the 20-second mark, the 'PodChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-podchaos' workflow, continuing for the remaining 10 seconds of this phase.\n\nIn the post-validation phase, which is 10 seconds long, the system's recovery to steady states is verified. The 'PodRunning' state is checked first for 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately. Subsequently, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for the final 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow. This staggered approach ensures that the system's critical functionalities are quickly assessed post-fault injection.\n\nTo automatically conduct the above experiment plan with Chaos Mesh, the following Chaos-Mesh-Worfklow file was created (by applying it to the cluster, the experiment plan will be automatically executed according to the Chaos-Mesh-Worfklow file):\n```yaml\napiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1\nkind: Workflow\nmetadata:\n  name: chaos-experiment-20241002-041754\nspec:\n  entry: the-entry\n  templates:\n    #-------------------------------\n    # entry point of whole workflow\n    #-------------------------------\n    - name: the-entry\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 4m\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-phase\n        - fault-injection-phase\n        - post-validation-phase\n\n    #-------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of pre-validation-phase\n    #-------------------------------------\n    - name: pre-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m20s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n    \n    - name: pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-suspend\n        - pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: pre-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-unittest-podrunning\n        - pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: pre-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 10\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"10s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of fault-injection-phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: fault-injection-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-unittest-podrunning\n        - fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n        - fault-networkchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 20s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend\n        - fault-stresschaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend2\n        - fault-podchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend2\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 20s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    # unit tests\n    - name: fault-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 30\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"30s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    # fault_injections\n    - name: fault-networkchaos\n      templateType: NetworkChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      networkChaos:\n        action: delay\n        delay:\n          jitter: 10ms\n          latency: 100ms\n        device: eth0\n        direction: to\n        mode: all\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        target:\n          mode: all\n          selector:\n            labelSelectors:\n              app: example\n            namespaces:\n              - default\n\n\n    - name: fault-stresschaos\n      templateType: StressChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      stressChaos:\n        containerNames:\n          - example-container\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        stressors:\n          cpu:\n            load: 100\n            workers: 1\n\n\n    - name: fault-podchaos\n      templateType: PodChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      podChaos:\n        action: pod-kill\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of post-validation phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: post-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m10s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-suspend\n        - post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 5s\n\n    - name: post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-unittest-podrunning\n        - post-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: post-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 5\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"5s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n```\n\n# Here is the current K8s menifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/deployment.yaml\napiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n  name: example-deployment\nspec:\n  replicas: 3\n  selector:\n    matchLabels:\n      app: example\n  template:\n    metadata:\n      labels:\n        app: example\n    spec:\n      containers:\n      - name: example-container\n        image: nginx:1.17.1\n        ports:\n        - containerPort: 80\n      restartPolicy: Always```\n\n\n# Here is the scope of a fault injection for the previous manifests.\n- Injected Faults #0: ```PodChaos```  \n  - Workflow Name: ```fault-podchaos```  \n  - Grace Period: ```20s```  \n  - Duration: ```10s```  \n\nParameters\n{{\"action\": \"pod-kill\", \"mode\": \"one\", \"selector\": {{\"namespaces\": [\"default\"], \"labelSelectors\": {{\"app\": \"example\"}}}}}}\n\nNow, please adjust the scope of the fault injection for the current manifests. Note that you here focus on the 'selector' parameter (i.e., scope).\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe why you need to change/keep the scope of the fault injection for the current K8s manifests.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"selector\": {\"title\": \"Selector\", \"description\": \"Adjust the scope (target) of the fault injection comparing the differeneces between the current and previous manifests. \", \"allOf\": [{\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/Selectors\"}]}}, \"required\": [\"thought\", \"selector\"], \"definitions\": {\"SetBasedRequirements\": {\"title\": \"SetBasedRequirements\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"key\": {\"title\": \"Key\", \"description\": \"Label key\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"operator\": {\"title\": \"Operator\", \"description\": \"Select an operator.\", \"enum\": [\"In\", \"NotIn\", \"Exists\", \"DoesNotExist\"], \"type\": \"string\"}, \"values\": {\"title\": \"Values\", \"description\": \"Label values. The values set must be non-empty in the case of In and NotIn.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"key\", \"operator\", \"values\"]}, \"Selectors\": {\"title\": \"Selectors\", \"type\": \"object\", \"properties\": {\"namespaces\": {\"title\": \"Namespaces\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespace of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, Chaos Mesh will set it to the namespace of the current Chaos experiment.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"labelSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Labelselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the label-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple labels are specified, the experiment target must have all the labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"expressionSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Expressionselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies a set of expressions that define the label's rules to specifiy the experiment's target Pod.\", \"example\": [{\"key\": \"tier\", \"operator\": \"In\", \"values\": [\"cache\"]}, {\"key\": \"environment\", \"operator\": \"NotIn\", \"values\": [\"dev\"]}], \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"$ref\": \"#/definitions/SetBasedRequirements\"}}, \"annotationSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Annotationselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the annotation-key/value pairs that the experiment's target Pod must have. If multiple annotations are specified, the experiment target must have all annotations specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"fieldSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Fieldselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the field-key/value pairs of the experiment's target Pod. If multiple fields are specified, the experiment target must have all fields set by this selector.\", \"example\": {\"metadata.name\": \"my-pod\", \"metadata.namespace\": \"dafault\"}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"podPhaseSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Podphaseselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the phase of the experiment's target Pod. If this selector is None, the target Pod's phase is not limited.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"enum\": [\"Pending\", \"Running\", \"Succeeded\", \"Failed\", \"Unknown\"], \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodeSelectors\": {\"title\": \"Nodeselectors\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node-label-key/value pairs to which the experiment's target Pod belongs.\", \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"nodes\": {\"title\": \"Nodes\", \"description\": \"Specifies the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs. The target Pod can only belong to one node in the configured node list. If multiple node labels are specified, the node to which the experiment's target Pod belongs must have all labels specified by this selector.\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}, \"pods\": {\"title\": \"Pods\", \"description\": \"Specifies the namespaces and list of the experiment's target Pods. If you have specified this selector, Chaos Mesh ignores other configured selectors.\", \"example\": {\"default\": [\"pod-0\", \"pod-2\"]}, \"type\": \"object\", \"additionalProperties\": {\"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}}}}}\n```\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "{\"thought\": \"The previous K8s manifests had a single pod labeled with 'app: example'. The current manifests have been updated to use a Deployment with 3 replicas, all labeled with 'app: example'. The original chaos experiment targeted a single pod with this label. To maintain the original goal of the chaos experiment, which is to test the system's resilience to a pod failure, we should adjust the scope to target one of the pods in the deployment. The 'mode: one' in the PodChaos configuration already ensures that only one pod will be affected, which aligns with the original experiment's intent. Therefore, the selector remains the same, targeting pods with the label 'app: example' in the 'default' namespace.\", \"selector\": {\"namespaces\": [\"default\"], \"labelSelectors\": {\"app\": \"example\"}}}\n",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven a previous K8s manifests, a previous unittest to verify whether the steady state satisfy the threshold, a Chaos-Engineering-experiment plan for the manifests, and the current K8s manifests, you will determine whether we need to adujst the inspection way for the current K8s manifests.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Cosider how you must change or keep the request target comparing the previous K8s manifests and the current K8s manifests.\n- You only make minor adjustments of API/HTTP/DNS request target according to resource changes, metadata change, etc.\n- NEVER make any changes but the API/HTTP/DNS request target from the original unit test.\n- NEVER change the threshold or other parameters.\n- If you try to change only the class/function name, you can keep the original name.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe how you modify the inspection target according to the differences between the previous and current manifests. If the modification is not required, describe the reason.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"code\": {\"title\": \"Code\", \"description\": \"If the modification is required, write a unit test code with the inspection target modified. Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block. If not, this field is not required.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"thought\"]}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the previous K8s manifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80```\n\n\n# Here is the current K8s menifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/deployment.yaml\napiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n  name: example-deployment\nspec:\n  replicas: 3\n  selector:\n    matchLabels:\n      app: example\n  template:\n    metadata:\n      labels:\n        app: example\n    spec:\n      containers:\n      - name: example-container\n        image: nginx:1.17.1\n        ports:\n        - containerPort: 80\n      restartPolicy: Always```\n\n\n# Here is the unit test for the previous manifests.\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n\nNow, please adjust inspection targets in the unittest for the current manifests.\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe how you modify the inspection target according to the differences between the previous and current manifests. If the modification is not required, describe the reason.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"code\": {\"title\": \"Code\", \"description\": \"If the modification is required, write a unit test code with the inspection target modified. Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block. If not, this field is not required.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"thought\"]}\n```\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"thought\":\"The previous manifests defined a single Pod, while the current manifests define a Deployment with multiple replicas. The unit test should be adjusted to check the status of the Pods created by the Deployment instead of a single Pod. This involves listing the Pods with the label 'app: example' and checking if all of them are in the 'Running' state for the specified duration.\",\"code\":\"import os\\nimport time\\nimport argparse\\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\\n\\nclass TestDeploymentRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\\n    def __init__(self):\\n        super().__init__()\\n\\n    def check_deployment_running_status(self, namespace, label_selector):\\n        try:\\n            pods = self.v1.list_namespaced_pod(namespace=namespace, label_selector=label_selector)\\n            running_pods = [pod for pod in pods.items if pod.status.phase == 'Running']\\n            return len(running_pods) == len(pods.items)\\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\\n            print(f\\\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->list_namespaced_pod: {e}\\\")\\n            return False\\n\\n    def test_deployment_running_state(self, duration):\\n        namespace = 'default'\\n        label_selector = 'app=example'\\n        running_count = 0\\n\\n        # Check the deployment status for the specified duration\\n        for _ in range(duration):\\n            if self.check_deployment_running_status(namespace, label_selector):\\n                running_count += 1\\n            time.sleep(1)\\n\\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the deployment was running\\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\\n\\n        # Assert that the deployment was running for at least 95% of the time\\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\\\"Deployment with label '{label_selector}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\\\"\\n\\n\\ndef main():\\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Deployment is running for at least 95% of the time.')\\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the deployment status in seconds')\\n    args = parser.parse_args()\\n\\n    test = TestDeploymentRunningState()\\n    test.test_deployment_running_state(args.duration)\\n\\n\\nif __name__ == '__main__':\\n    main()\"}\n```",
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven a previous K8s manifests, a previous unittest to verify whether the steady state satisfy the threshold, a Chaos-Engineering-experiment plan for the manifests, and the current K8s manifests, you will determine whether we need to adujst the inspection way for the current K8s manifests.\nAlways keep the following rules:\n- Cosider how you must change or keep the request target comparing the previous K8s manifests and the current K8s manifests.\n- You only make minor adjustments of API/HTTP/DNS request target according to resource changes, metadata change, etc.\n- NEVER make any changes but the API/HTTP/DNS request target from the original unit test.\n- NEVER change the threshold or other parameters.\n- If you try to change only the class/function name, you can keep the original name.\n- The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe how you modify the inspection target according to the differences between the previous and current manifests. If the modification is not required, describe the reason.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"code\": {\"title\": \"Code\", \"description\": \"If the modification is required, write a unit test code with the inspection target modified. Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block. If not, this field is not required.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"thought\"]}\n```\nHuman: # Here is the previous K8s manifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80```\n\n\n# Here is the current K8s menifests of my system:\n```nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80```\n```nginx_demo/nginx/deployment.yaml\napiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n  name: example-deployment\nspec:\n  replicas: 3\n  selector:\n    matchLabels:\n      app: example\n  template:\n    metadata:\n      labels:\n        app: example\n    spec:\n      containers:\n      - name: example-container\n        image: nginx:1.17.1\n        ports:\n        - containerPort: 80\n      restartPolicy: Always```\n\n\n# Here is the unit test for the previous manifests.\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n\nNow, please adjust inspection targets in the unittest for the current manifests.\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"thought\": {\"title\": \"Thought\", \"description\": \"Describe how you modify the inspection target according to the differences between the previous and current manifests. If the modification is not required, describe the reason.\", \"type\": \"string\"}, \"code\": {\"title\": \"Code\", \"description\": \"If the modification is required, write a unit test code with the inspection target modified. Write only the content of the code without enclosing it in a code block. If not, this field is not required.\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"thought\"]}\n```\nAI: ```json\n{\"thought\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"thought\":\"The current manifests have changed from using a Pod to a Deployment with replicas. However, the Service configuration remains the same, and the Service is still targeting the same application label 'app: example'. The endpoint for the HTTP request in the unit test does not need to change because the Service name and namespace have not changed. Therefore, no modification to the inspection target in the unit test is required.\"}\n```"
                ]
            }
        ],
        "summary": [
            {
                "name": "overall_summary",
                "token_usage": {
                    "input_tokens": 7765,
                    "output_tokens": 350,
                    "total_tokens": 8115
                },
                "message_history": [
                    [
                        "System: You are a helpful AI assistant for Chaos Engineering.\nGiven a summary of a Chaos Engineering cycle, please elaborate the summary.\nThe output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the JSON schema below.\n\nAs an example, for the schema {\"properties\": {\"foo\": {\"title\": \"Foo\", \"description\": \"a list of strings\", \"type\": \"array\", \"items\": {\"type\": \"string\"}}}, \"required\": [\"foo\"]}\nthe object {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]} is a well-formatted instance of the schema. The object {\"properties\": {\"foo\": [\"bar\", \"baz\"]}} is not well-formatted.\n\nHere is the output schema:\n```\n{\"properties\": {\"summary\": {\"title\": \"Summary\", \"type\": \"string\"}}, \"required\": [\"summary\"]}\n```\nHuman: Here is the overview of a Chaos Engineering Cycle:\n# Here is a Chaos Engineering cycle\n## Step 0. User-input understanding\n### Here is the overview of user inputs:\nThe system consists of the following K8s manifest(s):K8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.\n\nK8s manifest: nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml\n```yaml\napiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80\n```\nSummary of nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\n- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic.\n\nThe intra/inter dependencies of the above K8s manifests are as follows:- Dependencies within nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml:\nThe Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods.\n\n- Dependencies from nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml to nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml:\nThe dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods.\n\nThe expected type of application on the system (i.e., K8s manfests):\nWeb server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic.; The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.\n\nChaos-Engineering instructions for the system are as follows: - The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute.\n\n## Step 1. Hypothesis definition\n### Here is the overview of the hypothesis for the system:\nThe hypothesis is \"The steady states of the sytem are maintained even when the fault scenario occurs (i.e., when the faults are injected)\".\nThe steady states here are as follows:\n2 steady states are defined.\n1st steady states:\n- Name: PodRunning\n- Description: The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.\n- Threshold for the steady state: Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.; The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following Python script with K8s API:\n```\nimport os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()\n```2nd steady states:\n- Name: ServiceTrafficRouting\n- Description: The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.\n- Threshold for the steady state: http_req_failed: <= 0.01%; The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance.\n- Whether the steady state meets the threshold is determined by the following K6 Javascript:\n```\nimport http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}\n```\n\nThe fault scenario here is as follows:\n\nAn assumed fault scenario is as follows:\n- Event: Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion\n- Used Chaos Engineering tool: Chaos Mesh\n- Faults to simulate the event: [[Fault(name='NetworkChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'delay', 'direction': 'to', 'target': {'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}}, 'mode': 'all', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'device': 'eth0', 'delay': {'latency': '100ms', 'jitter': '10ms'}})], [Fault(name='StressChaos', name_id=0, params={'stressors': {'cpu': {'workers': 1, 'load': 100}}, 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}, 'containerNames': ['example-container']})], [Fault(name='PodChaos', name_id=0, params={'action': 'pod-kill', 'mode': 'one', 'selector': {'namespaces': ['default'], 'labelSelectors': {'app': 'example'}}})]]\n- Description: The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.\n- The expected faults' impacts on the steady states: {{\"PodRunning\": \"The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.\", \"ServiceTrafficRouting\": \"Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability.\"}}\n\n## Step 2.1. Chaos-Engineering experiment\n### Here is the overview of my Chaos-Engineering experiment to verify the hypothesis:\nThe entire time schedule of the Chaos-Engineering experiment is as follows (The experiment is divided into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation phases):\nGiven the constraints of the experiment needing to be completed within 1 minute, we need to carefully allocate time to each phase to ensure meaningful results. The pre-validation phase is crucial to confirm that the system is in a steady state before introducing any faults. Since the PodRunning steady state requires a 1-minute observation period, we will allocate 20 seconds to pre-validation to quickly verify the current state. The fault-injection phase is the core of the experiment, where we introduce the faults to observe the system's behavior. We will allocate 30 seconds to this phase, allowing enough time to introduce the network delay, CPU stress, and Pod failure faults sequentially. Finally, the post-validation phase is essential to ensure the system returns to its steady state after the faults are removed. We will allocate 10 seconds to this phase to quickly verify the system's recovery. This allocation ensures that the total time of the experiment is 1 minute, with a balanced focus on validation and fault injection.\n- Total experiment phase: 1m\n- Pre-validation phase: 20s\n- Fault-injection phase: 30s\n- Post-validation phase: 10s\n\nThe details of the three phases are as follows:\nPre-validation Phase (20s):\nIn the pre-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system is in its expected steady states before we proceed with fault injection. Given the constraints, we have 20 seconds to perform these checks. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the 'PodRunning' state requires checking the pod's status over a 1-minute period, we will perform a quick check to ensure the pod is currently running. For 'ServiceTrafficRouting', we will perform a brief HTTP request test to ensure the service is routing traffic correctly. These checks will be executed sequentially due to the short time frame, ensuring that each steady state is verified before moving to the next phase.\n\nFault-injection Phase (30s):\nIn this fault-injection phase, we have a total of 30 seconds to execute the chaos experiments. The goal is to observe the system's behavior under stress and network disruptions, as well as its ability to handle a pod failure. Given the constraints, we will stagger the fault injections to maximize the observation of their impacts on the system. \n\nFirst, we will introduce network latency using NetworkChaos. This will simulate a network disruption, potentially affecting the ServiceTrafficRouting steady state. We will start this fault at the beginning of the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nNext, we will introduce CPU stress using StressChaos. This will simulate resource exhaustion on the pod, potentially affecting both the PodRunning and ServiceTrafficRouting steady states. We will start this fault 10 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nFinally, we will simulate a pod failure using PodChaos. This will directly impact the PodRunning steady state. We will start this fault 20 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nBy staggering the faults in this manner, we can observe the compounded effects of network disruption, resource exhaustion, and pod failure on the system's steady states.\n\nPost-validation Phase (10s):\nIn the post-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after the fault injection. Given the short duration of 10 seconds for this phase, we will conduct quick checks to verify the steady states. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the phase is only 10 seconds long, we will stagger the unit tests slightly to fit within this timeframe. The 'PodRunning' test will start immediately as it is crucial to ensure the pod is back in the running state. The 'ServiceTrafficRouting' test will follow shortly after, as it depends on the pod being in a running state to route traffic correctly. This approach ensures that we quickly verify the critical components of the system's functionality post-fault injection.\n\nThe summary of the above experiment plan:\nThe Chaos Engineering experiment is structured into three phases, each with specific tasks and timelines to ensure the system's resilience is effectively tested within a total duration of one minute. \n\nIn the pre-validation phase, which lasts for 20 seconds, the system's steady states are verified sequentially. Initially, the 'PodRunning' state is checked for 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately at the beginning of this phase. Following this, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for another 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow, commencing right after the first check.\n\nThe fault-injection phase spans 30 seconds and involves staggered fault injections to observe their impact on the system. At the start of this phase, the 'NetworkChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-networkchaos' workflow, running for 10 seconds. Concurrently, the steady states 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting' are monitored for the entire 30 seconds using the 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflows, respectively. After 10 seconds, the 'StressChaos' fault is introduced using the 'fault-stresschaos' workflow, also lasting 10 seconds. Finally, at the 20-second mark, the 'PodChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-podchaos' workflow, continuing for the remaining 10 seconds of this phase.\n\nIn the post-validation phase, which is 10 seconds long, the system's recovery to steady states is verified. The 'PodRunning' state is checked first for 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately. Subsequently, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for the final 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow. This staggered approach ensures that the system's critical functionalities are quickly assessed post-fault injection.\n\nTo automatically conduct the above experiment plan with Chaos Mesh, the following Chaos-Mesh-Worfklow file was created (by applying it to the cluster, the experiment plan will be automatically executed according to the Chaos-Mesh-Worfklow file):\n```yaml\napiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1\nkind: Workflow\nmetadata:\n  name: chaos-experiment-20241002-042120\nspec:\n  entry: the-entry\n  templates:\n    #-------------------------------\n    # entry point of whole workflow\n    #-------------------------------\n    - name: the-entry\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 4m\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-phase\n        - fault-injection-phase\n        - post-validation-phase\n\n    #-------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of pre-validation-phase\n    #-------------------------------------\n    - name: pre-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m20s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n    \n    - name: pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-suspend\n        - pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: pre-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-unittest-podrunning\n        - pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: pre-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 10\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"10s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of fault-injection-phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: fault-injection-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-unittest-podrunning\n        - fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n        - fault-networkchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 20s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend\n        - fault-stresschaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend2\n        - fault-podchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend2\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 20s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    # unit tests\n    - name: fault-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 30\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"30s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    # fault_injections\n    - name: fault-networkchaos\n      templateType: NetworkChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      networkChaos:\n        action: delay\n        delay:\n          jitter: 10ms\n          latency: 100ms\n        device: eth0\n        direction: to\n        mode: all\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        target:\n          mode: all\n          selector:\n            labelSelectors:\n              app: example\n            namespaces:\n              - default\n\n\n    - name: fault-stresschaos\n      templateType: StressChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      stressChaos:\n        containerNames:\n          - example-container\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        stressors:\n          cpu:\n            load: 100\n            workers: 1\n\n\n    - name: fault-podchaos\n      templateType: PodChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      podChaos:\n        action: pod-kill\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of post-validation phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: post-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m10s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-suspend\n        - post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 5s\n\n    - name: post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-unittest-podrunning\n        - post-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: post-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 5\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"5s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n```\n\n## Step 2.2, 3, 4. Experiment execution, analysis and improvement (reconfiguring the system to satisfy the hypothesis)\n### Here is the improvement history:\n### Experiment result (1st try)\nPassed unittests:\n- pre-unittest-podrunning\n- pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n- fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\nFailed unittests:\n- fault-unittest-podrunning\n```log\n...d': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:53 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '40cb9ffd-50aa-44b7-a7fb-1f782819dd8a', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:54 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\n\n```\n\n- post-unittest-podrunning\n```log\n...d': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:22 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '3b789a5e-1855-49b7-81a4-ef21d2d89df8', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:23 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\n\n```\n\n- post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n```log\n...p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_duration..........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n   \u2717 http_req_failed............: 100.00% 20 out of 20\n     http_req_receiving.........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_sending...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_tls_handshaking...: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_waiting...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_reqs..................: 20      0.666528/s\n     iteration_duration.........: avg=7.08s min=3.62ms med=3.03s max=30s p(90)=15.38s p(95)=16.11s\n     iterations.................: 20      0.666528/s\n     vus........................: 1       min=1        max=10\n     vus_max....................: 10      min=10       max=10\n\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:55Z\" level=error msg=\"thresholds on metrics 'http_req_failed' have been crossed\"\n\n```\n\n\n\n### Analysis report (1st try)\nThe Chaos Engineering experiment results indicate several critical insights into the system's resilience and failure points:\n\n1. **PodRunning Steady State Failure**:\n   - The 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'post-unittest-podrunning' tests failed, indicating that the Pod 'example-pod' was not found during and after the fault injection phase. This suggests that the Pod was either terminated or failed to restart due to the 'PodChaos' fault, which simulates a Pod failure.\n   - The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', which means it does not automatically restart if it fails. This configuration is a significant vulnerability, as it does not allow the system to recover from Pod failures, leading to prolonged downtime.\n   - The failure to maintain the 'PodRunning' steady state highlights the need for a more resilient Pod configuration, such as using a 'Always' or 'OnFailure' restart policy to ensure automatic recovery from failures.\n\n2. **ServiceTrafficRouting Steady State Failure**:\n   - The 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' test failed, with 100% of HTTP requests failing. This indicates that the Service was unable to route traffic to the Pod, likely because the Pod was not running.\n   - The 'NetworkChaos' fault, which introduced network latency, and the 'PodChaos' fault, which terminated the Pod, both contributed to the disruption in service traffic routing. The network latency could have caused initial delays, but the Pod termination was the primary cause of the complete failure in routing traffic.\n   - The failure to maintain the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' steady state suggests that the system's reliance on a single Pod is a bottleneck. Implementing a Deployment with multiple replicas could improve resilience by ensuring that traffic can be routed to other available Pods if one fails.\n\n3. **Pre-Validation Success**:\n   - The successful pre-validation tests ('pre-unittest-podrunning' and 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting') confirm that the system was initially in a healthy state, with the Pod running and the Service correctly routing traffic. This baseline is crucial for understanding the impact of the injected faults.\n\n4. **Fault Injection Impact**:\n   - The staggered fault injection strategy effectively tested the system's resilience. The combination of network latency, CPU stress, and Pod termination exposed the system's vulnerabilities, particularly the lack of redundancy and automatic recovery mechanisms.\n   - The experiment's design, with overlapping fault injections and continuous monitoring, provided a comprehensive assessment of the system's ability to maintain steady states under stress.\n\nIn conclusion, the experiment revealed that the system's current configuration is not resilient to the simulated fault scenario. Key recommendations include revising the Pod's restart policy, implementing a Deployment with multiple replicas, and considering network policies to mitigate the impact of network disruptions. These changes would enhance the system's ability to maintain steady states and improve overall resilience.\n\n### Improvement result (1st try)\n2 K8s manifests are modified:\n- The K8s manifest 'nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml' has been deleted.\nThe existing Pod manifest is deleted to replace it with a Deployment manifest, which provides better resilience through automatic restarts and multiple replicas.\n\n- The K8s manifest 'nginx_demo/nginx/deployment.yaml' was created.\nThis new Deployment manifest replaces the standalone Pod manifest. It introduces a Deployment with multiple replicas and an 'Always' restart policy to improve resilience.\n```yaml\napiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n  name: example-deployment\nspec:\n  replicas: 3\n  selector:\n    matchLabels:\n      app: example\n  template:\n    metadata:\n      labels:\n        app: example\n    spec:\n      containers:\n      - name: example-container\n        image: nginx:1.17.1\n        ports:\n        - containerPort: 80\n      restartPolicy: Always\n```\n\n\n\n### Experiment result (2nd try)\nPassed unittests:\n- pre-unittest-podrunning\n- pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n- fault-unittest-podrunning\n- fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n- post-unittest-podrunning\n- post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\nFailed unittests:\n\n\nPlease elaborate the above summary of a Chaos Engineering Cycle.\nAI: ```json\n{\"summary\":"
                    ],
                    "```json\n{\"summary\":\"The Chaos Engineering cycle involved testing a Kubernetes-based web server application using Nginx to ensure its resilience under fault conditions. The system was initially set up with a Kubernetes Service and a Pod, where the Service routed HTTP traffic to the Pod running an Nginx container. The experiment aimed to test the hypothesis that the system's steady states would be maintained even when faults were injected.\\n\\nThe steady states defined were 'PodRunning', ensuring the Pod was in a running state 95% of the time, and 'ServiceTrafficRouting', ensuring HTTP request failures were less than or equal to 0.01%. The fault scenario simulated a cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion using Chaos Mesh, with faults like NetworkChaos, StressChaos, and PodChaos.\\n\\nThe experiment was structured into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation, all within a 1-minute timeframe. Pre-validation confirmed the system's initial steady states. During fault-injection, network latency, CPU stress, and Pod failure were introduced sequentially. Post-validation checked the system's recovery to steady states.\\n\\nThe first experiment revealed vulnerabilities: the Pod's 'Never' restart policy led to failures in maintaining the 'PodRunning' state, and the single Pod setup caused 100% HTTP request failures, indicating a need for redundancy. The analysis recommended using a Deployment with multiple replicas and an 'Always' restart policy.\\n\\nImprovements were made by deleting the Pod manifest and creating a Deployment manifest with three replicas and an 'Always' restart policy. The second experiment, with these changes, passed all unit tests, confirming the system's improved resilience and ability to maintain steady states under fault conditions.\"}\n```"
                ]
            }
        ]
    },
    "run_time": {
        "preprocess": 11.738348007202148,
        "hypothesis": 91.65161204338074,
        "experiment_plan": 23.237932920455933,
        "analysis": [
            18.30042600631714
        ],
        "improvement": [
            11.100784301757812
        ],
        "experiment_execution": [
            133.02608156204224,
            91.58023953437805
        ],
        "experiment_replan": 39.10140943527222,
        "summary": 6.274290084838867,
        "cycle": 431.1117990016937
    },
    "ce_cycle": {
        "processed_data": {
            "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs",
            "input": {
                "skaffold_yaml": {
                    "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/skaffold.yaml",
                    "content": "apiVersion: skaffold/v3\nkind: Config\nmetadata:\n  name: nginx-app\nmanifests:\n  rawYaml:\n    - nginx/pod.yaml\n    - nginx/service.yaml",
                    "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs",
                    "fname": "nginx_demo/skaffold.yaml"
                },
                "files": [
                    {
                        "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml",
                        "content": "apiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80",
                        "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs",
                        "fname": "nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml"
                    },
                    {
                        "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml",
                        "content": "apiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80",
                        "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs",
                        "fname": "nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml"
                    }
                ],
                "ce_instructions": "The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute."
            },
            "k8s_yamls": [
                {
                    "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml",
                    "content": "apiVersion: v1\nkind: Service\nmetadata:\n  name: example-service\nspec:\n  selector:\n    app: example\n  ports:\n    - protocol: TCP\n      port: 80\n      targetPort: 80",
                    "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs",
                    "fname": "nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml"
                },
                {
                    "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs/nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml",
                    "content": "apiVersion: v1\nkind: Pod\nmetadata:\n  name: example-pod\n  labels:\n    app: example\nspec:\n  restartPolicy: Never\n  containers:\n  - name: example-container\n    image: nginx:1.17.1\n    ports:\n    - containerPort: 80",
                    "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/inputs",
                    "fname": "nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml"
                }
            ],
            "k8s_summaries": [
                "- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Service.\n- The Service is named 'example-service'.\n- It uses a selector to target pods with the label 'app: example'.\n- The Service listens on port 80 using the TCP protocol.\n- Traffic received on port 80 is forwarded to the target port 80 on the selected pods.",
                "- This manifest defines a Kubernetes Pod.\n- The Pod is named 'example-pod'.\n- It includes metadata with a label 'app: example'.\n- The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't restart automatically if it fails.\n- The Pod contains one container named 'example-container'.\n- The container uses the 'nginx:1.17.1' image, which is a specific version of the Nginx web server.\n- The container exposes port 80, which is commonly used for HTTP traffic."
            ],
            "k8s_dependencies": {
                "intra": [
                    {
                        "file": "nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml",
                        "dependency": "The Service named 'example-service' depends on the Endpoints resource with the same name 'example-service'. This dependency indicates that the Service will automatically create and manage an Endpoints object that contains the IP addresses and ports of the Pods selected by the Service's selector (app: example). The Endpoints resource is crucial for routing traffic from the Service to the appropriate Pods."
                    }
                ],
                "inter": [
                    {
                        "src_file": "nginx_demo/nginx/service.yaml",
                        "dst_file": "nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml",
                        "dependency": "The dependency indicates that the Endpoints resource associated with the Service named 'example-service' is linked to a Pod named 'example-pod'. This means that the Service 'example-service' is configured to route traffic to the Pod 'example-pod', which is selected based on the label 'app: example'. The Endpoints resource dynamically updates to reflect the IP addresses of the Pods that match the Service's selector, ensuring that traffic is correctly routed to the available Pods."
                    }
                ]
            },
            "k8s_app": {
                "thought": "The manifests provided are for a Kubernetes setup involving a Pod running an Nginx container and a Service to expose this Pod. The file names and the use of the Nginx image suggest that the application is a web server. Nginx is commonly used as a web server to serve static content, reverse proxy, or load balancer. The Service is configured to expose the Pod on port 80, which is the default port for HTTP traffic, further indicating that this setup is intended to serve web content. The logical assumption is that this setup is for a simple web application or a demonstration of serving web pages using Nginx on Kubernetes.",
                "k8s_application": "Web server application using Nginx to serve HTTP traffic."
            },
            "ce_instructions": "- The Chaos-Engineering experiment must be completed within 1 minute."
        },
        "hypothesis": {
            "steady_states": {
                "elems": [
                    {
                        "id": 0,
                        "name": "PodRunning",
                        "description": "The Pod named 'example-pod' must be in a running state to ensure that the Nginx web server is available to serve HTTP traffic. This is critical because the Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', meaning it won't automatically restart if it fails.",
                        "inspection": {
                            "tool_type": "k8s",
                            "duration": "5s",
                            "script": {
                                "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/k8s_PodRunning.py",
                                "content": "import os\nimport time\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\n\ndef check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n    # Load Kubernetes configuration based on the environment\n    if os.getenv('KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST'):\n        config.load_incluster_config()\n    else:\n        config.load_kube_config()\n\n    v1 = client.CoreV1Api()\n    try:\n        pod = v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n        return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n    except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n        print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n        return False\n\n\ndef main(duration):\n    namespace = 'default'\n    pod_name = 'example-pod'\n    for _ in range(duration):\n        is_running = check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name)\n        print(f\"Pod '{pod_name}' running status: {is_running}\")\n        time.sleep(1)\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    import argparse\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Check if a Kubernetes Pod is running.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=5, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n    main(args.duration)",
                                "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states",
                                "fname": "k8s_PodRunning.py"
                            },
                            "result": "Pod 'example-pod' running status: True\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\nPod 'example-pod' running status: True\n"
                        },
                        "threshold": {
                            "threshold": "Pod 'example-pod' must be in 'Running' state for at least 95% of the time during the 1-minute observation period.",
                            "reason": "The current state shows that the pod is consistently in the 'Running' state. Setting a threshold of 95% allows for a small tolerance for transient issues or delays in status updates, ensuring that the pod is generally available to serve HTTP traffic as expected."
                        },
                        "unittest": {
                            "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py",
                            "content": "import os\nimport time\nimport argparse\nfrom kubernetes import client, config\nfrom unittest_base import K8sAPIBase\n\nclass TestPodRunningState(K8sAPIBase):\n    def __init__(self):\n        super().__init__()\n\n    def check_pod_running_status(self, namespace, pod_name):\n        try:\n            pod = self.v1.read_namespaced_pod(name=pod_name, namespace=namespace)\n            return pod.status.phase == 'Running'\n        except client.exceptions.ApiException as e:\n            print(f\"Exception when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: {e}\")\n            return False\n\n    def test_pod_running_state(self, duration):\n        namespace = 'default'\n        pod_name = 'example-pod'\n        running_count = 0\n\n        # Check the pod status for the specified duration\n        for _ in range(duration):\n            if self.check_pod_running_status(namespace, pod_name):\n                running_count += 1\n            time.sleep(1)\n\n        # Calculate the percentage of time the pod was running\n        running_percentage = (running_count / duration) * 100\n\n        # Assert that the pod was running for at least 95% of the time\n        assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\n\ndef main():\n    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Test if a Kubernetes Pod is running for at least 95% of the time.')\n    parser.add_argument('--duration', type=int, default=60, help='Duration to check the pod status in seconds')\n    args = parser.parse_args()\n\n    test = TestPodRunningState()\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    main()",
                            "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states",
                            "fname": "unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py"
                        }
                    },
                    {
                        "id": 1,
                        "name": "ServiceTrafficRouting",
                        "description": "The Service named 'example-service' must correctly route HTTP traffic to the 'example-pod'. This ensures that incoming requests on port 80 are forwarded to the Pod's container port 80, allowing the Nginx server to handle the requests. This is crucial for maintaining the availability and functionality of the web service.",
                        "inspection": {
                            "tool_type": "k6",
                            "duration": "5s",
                            "script": {
                                "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/k6_ServiceTrafficRouting.js",
                                "content": "import http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}",
                                "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states",
                                "fname": "k6_ServiceTrafficRouting.js"
                            },
                            "result": "\n     \u2713 status is 200\n     \u2713 body contains Nginx\n\n     checks.........................: 100.00% 155310 out of 155310\n     data_received..................: 66 MB   13 MB/s\n     data_sent......................: 8.3 MB  1.7 MB/s\n     http_req_blocked...............: avg=9.69\u00b5s   min=1.12\u00b5s   med=3.91\u00b5s   max=2.67ms p(90)=7.32\u00b5s   p(95)=11.25\u00b5s \n     http_req_connecting............: avg=2.12\u00b5s   min=0s       med=0s       max=1.97ms p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_duration..............: avg=479.89\u00b5s min=119.04\u00b5s med=428.92\u00b5s max=4.61ms p(90)=560.76\u00b5s p(95)=699.12\u00b5s\n       { expected_response:true }...: avg=479.89\u00b5s min=119.04\u00b5s med=428.92\u00b5s max=4.61ms p(90)=560.76\u00b5s p(95)=699.12\u00b5s\n     http_req_failed................: 0.00%   0 out of 77655\n     http_req_receiving.............: avg=66.68\u00b5s  min=11.14\u00b5s  med=44.82\u00b5s  max=4.23ms p(90)=85.18\u00b5s  p(95)=156.23\u00b5s\n     http_req_sending...............: avg=20.79\u00b5s  min=3.38\u00b5s   med=12.46\u00b5s  max=3.73ms p(90)=21.17\u00b5s  p(95)=36.09\u00b5s \n     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s     p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_waiting...............: avg=392.41\u00b5s min=63.19\u00b5s  med=367.04\u00b5s max=2.91ms p(90)=468.66\u00b5s p(95)=559.1\u00b5s \n     http_reqs......................: 77655   15526.275997/s\n     iteration_duration.............: avg=625.21\u00b5s min=190.36\u00b5s med=535.1\u00b5s  max=7.11ms p(90)=755.8\u00b5s  p(95)=1.41ms  \n     iterations.....................: 77655   15526.275997/s\n     vus............................: 10      min=10               max=10\n     vus_max........................: 10      min=10               max=10\n\n"
                        },
                        "threshold": {
                            "threshold": "http_req_failed: <= 0.01%",
                            "reason": "The current state shows 0.00% failed requests, indicating a highly reliable service. Setting a threshold of <= 0.01% allows for a small tolerance while maintaining high availability and reliability of the service. This ensures that the ServiceTrafficRouting is functioning correctly, with minimal disruptions, and aligns with the current performance."
                        },
                        "unittest": {
                            "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js",
                            "content": "import http from 'k6/http';\nimport { check } from 'k6';\n\nexport const options = {\n  vus: 10,\n  duration: '5s',\n  thresholds: {\n    // Adding a threshold to ensure that the percentage of failed HTTP requests is less than or equal to 0.01%\n    'http_req_failed': ['rate<=0.01'],\n  },\n};\n\nexport default function () {\n  const res = http.get('http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local');\n  check(res, {\n    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,\n    'body contains Nginx': (r) => r.body.includes('Welcome to nginx!'),\n  });\n}",
                            "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states",
                            "fname": "unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js"
                        }
                    }
                ]
            },
            "faults": {
                "elems": [
                    {
                        "event": "Cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion",
                        "faults": [
                            [
                                {
                                    "name": "NetworkChaos",
                                    "name_id": 0,
                                    "params": {
                                        "action": "delay",
                                        "direction": "to",
                                        "target": {
                                            "mode": "all",
                                            "selector": {
                                                "namespaces": [
                                                    "default"
                                                ],
                                                "labelSelectors": {
                                                    "app": "example"
                                                }
                                            }
                                        },
                                        "mode": "all",
                                        "selector": {
                                            "namespaces": [
                                                "default"
                                            ],
                                            "labelSelectors": {
                                                "app": "example"
                                            }
                                        },
                                        "device": "eth0",
                                        "delay": {
                                            "latency": "100ms",
                                            "jitter": "10ms"
                                        }
                                    }
                                }
                            ],
                            [
                                {
                                    "name": "StressChaos",
                                    "name_id": 0,
                                    "params": {
                                        "stressors": {
                                            "cpu": {
                                                "workers": 1,
                                                "load": 100
                                            }
                                        },
                                        "mode": "one",
                                        "selector": {
                                            "namespaces": [
                                                "default"
                                            ],
                                            "labelSelectors": {
                                                "app": "example"
                                            }
                                        },
                                        "containerNames": [
                                            "example-container"
                                        ]
                                    }
                                }
                            ],
                            [
                                {
                                    "name": "PodChaos",
                                    "name_id": 0,
                                    "params": {
                                        "action": "pod-kill",
                                        "mode": "one",
                                        "selector": {
                                            "namespaces": [
                                                "default"
                                            ],
                                            "labelSelectors": {
                                                "app": "example"
                                            }
                                        }
                                    }
                                }
                            ]
                        ],
                        "description": "The system's weak points include the single Pod setup with a 'Never' restart policy and the reliance on network connectivity for service routing. The Pod's inability to restart automatically makes it vulnerable to failures, and network issues can disrupt traffic routing. Related fault types include PodChaos to simulate Pod failures, NetworkChaos to simulate network disruptions, and StressChaos to simulate resource exhaustion. To break the system, we can first introduce network latency to disrupt traffic routing, then apply CPU stress to exhaust resources on the Pod, and finally, simulate a Pod failure to test the system's resilience.",
                        "effects": {
                            "PodRunning": "The Pod 'example-pod' may fail to remain in the 'Running' state due to resource exhaustion and simulated Pod failure, causing it to fall below the 95% threshold.",
                            "ServiceTrafficRouting": "Network latency and Pod failure can lead to increased HTTP request failures, potentially exceeding the 0.01% threshold, disrupting service availability."
                        }
                    }
                ]
            }
        },
        "experiment": {
            "plan": {
                "time_schedule": {
                    "thought": "Given the constraints of the experiment needing to be completed within 1 minute, we need to carefully allocate time to each phase to ensure meaningful results. The pre-validation phase is crucial to confirm that the system is in a steady state before introducing any faults. Since the PodRunning steady state requires a 1-minute observation period, we will allocate 20 seconds to pre-validation to quickly verify the current state. The fault-injection phase is the core of the experiment, where we introduce the faults to observe the system's behavior. We will allocate 30 seconds to this phase, allowing enough time to introduce the network delay, CPU stress, and Pod failure faults sequentially. Finally, the post-validation phase is essential to ensure the system returns to its steady state after the faults are removed. We will allocate 10 seconds to this phase to quickly verify the system's recovery. This allocation ensures that the total time of the experiment is 1 minute, with a balanced focus on validation and fault injection.",
                    "total_time": "1m",
                    "pre_validation_time": "20s",
                    "fault_injection_time": "30s",
                    "post_validation_time": "10s"
                },
                "pre_validation": {
                    "thought": "In the pre-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system is in its expected steady states before we proceed with fault injection. Given the constraints, we have 20 seconds to perform these checks. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the 'PodRunning' state requires checking the pod's status over a 1-minute period, we will perform a quick check to ensure the pod is currently running. For 'ServiceTrafficRouting', we will perform a brief HTTP request test to ensure the service is routing traffic correctly. These checks will be executed sequentially due to the short time frame, ensuring that each steady state is verified before moving to the next phase.",
                    "unit_tests": [
                        {
                            "name": "PodRunning",
                            "grace_period": "0s",
                            "duration": "10s",
                            "workflow_name": "pre-unittest-podrunning",
                            "deadline": "40s",
                            "file_path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py"
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "ServiceTrafficRouting",
                            "grace_period": "10s",
                            "duration": "10s",
                            "workflow_name": "pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting",
                            "deadline": "40s",
                            "file_path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "fault_injection": {
                    "thought": "In this fault-injection phase, we have a total of 30 seconds to execute the chaos experiments. The goal is to observe the system's behavior under stress and network disruptions, as well as its ability to handle a pod failure. Given the constraints, we will stagger the fault injections to maximize the observation of their impacts on the system. \n\nFirst, we will introduce network latency using NetworkChaos. This will simulate a network disruption, potentially affecting the ServiceTrafficRouting steady state. We will start this fault at the beginning of the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nNext, we will introduce CPU stress using StressChaos. This will simulate resource exhaustion on the pod, potentially affecting both the PodRunning and ServiceTrafficRouting steady states. We will start this fault 10 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nFinally, we will simulate a pod failure using PodChaos. This will directly impact the PodRunning steady state. We will start this fault 20 seconds into the phase and let it run for 10 seconds. \n\nBy staggering the faults in this manner, we can observe the compounded effects of network disruption, resource exhaustion, and pod failure on the system's steady states.",
                    "fault_injection": [
                        {
                            "name": "NetworkChaos",
                            "name_id": 0,
                            "grace_period": "0s",
                            "duration": "10s",
                            "workflow_name": "fault-networkchaos",
                            "deadline": "10s",
                            "params": {
                                "action": "delay",
                                "direction": "to",
                                "target": {
                                    "mode": "all",
                                    "selector": {
                                        "namespaces": [
                                            "default"
                                        ],
                                        "labelSelectors": {
                                            "app": "example"
                                        }
                                    }
                                },
                                "mode": "all",
                                "selector": {
                                    "namespaces": [
                                        "default"
                                    ],
                                    "labelSelectors": {
                                        "app": "example"
                                    }
                                },
                                "device": "eth0",
                                "delay": {
                                    "latency": "100ms",
                                    "jitter": "10ms"
                                }
                            }
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "StressChaos",
                            "name_id": 0,
                            "grace_period": "10s",
                            "duration": "10s",
                            "workflow_name": "fault-stresschaos",
                            "deadline": "10s",
                            "params": {
                                "stressors": {
                                    "cpu": {
                                        "workers": 1,
                                        "load": 100
                                    }
                                },
                                "mode": "one",
                                "selector": {
                                    "namespaces": [
                                        "default"
                                    ],
                                    "labelSelectors": {
                                        "app": "example"
                                    }
                                },
                                "containerNames": [
                                    "example-container"
                                ]
                            }
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "PodChaos",
                            "name_id": 0,
                            "grace_period": "20s",
                            "duration": "10s",
                            "workflow_name": "fault-podchaos",
                            "deadline": "10s",
                            "params": {
                                "action": "pod-kill",
                                "mode": "one",
                                "selector": {
                                    "namespaces": [
                                        "default"
                                    ],
                                    "labelSelectors": {
                                        "app": "example"
                                    }
                                }
                            }
                        }
                    ],
                    "unit_tests": [
                        {
                            "name": "PodRunning",
                            "grace_period": "0s",
                            "duration": "30s",
                            "workflow_name": "fault-unittest-podrunning",
                            "deadline": "1m",
                            "file_path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py"
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "ServiceTrafficRouting",
                            "grace_period": "0s",
                            "duration": "30s",
                            "workflow_name": "fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting",
                            "deadline": "1m",
                            "file_path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "post_validation": {
                    "thought": "In the post-validation phase, we need to ensure that the system has returned to its steady states after the fault injection. Given the short duration of 10 seconds for this phase, we will conduct quick checks to verify the steady states. The two steady states to verify are 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting'. Since the phase is only 10 seconds long, we will stagger the unit tests slightly to fit within this timeframe. The 'PodRunning' test will start immediately as it is crucial to ensure the pod is back in the running state. The 'ServiceTrafficRouting' test will follow shortly after, as it depends on the pod being in a running state to route traffic correctly. This approach ensures that we quickly verify the critical components of the system's functionality post-fault injection.",
                    "unit_tests": [
                        {
                            "name": "PodRunning",
                            "grace_period": "0s",
                            "duration": "5s",
                            "workflow_name": "post-unittest-podrunning",
                            "deadline": "35s",
                            "file_path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py"
                        },
                        {
                            "name": "ServiceTrafficRouting",
                            "grace_period": "5s",
                            "duration": "5s",
                            "workflow_name": "post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting",
                            "deadline": "35s",
                            "file_path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js"
                        }
                    ]
                },
                "summary": "The Chaos Engineering experiment is structured into three phases, each with specific tasks and timelines to ensure the system's resilience is effectively tested within a total duration of one minute. \n\nIn the pre-validation phase, which lasts for 20 seconds, the system's steady states are verified sequentially. Initially, the 'PodRunning' state is checked for 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately at the beginning of this phase. Following this, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for another 10 seconds using the 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow, commencing right after the first check.\n\nThe fault-injection phase spans 30 seconds and involves staggered fault injections to observe their impact on the system. At the start of this phase, the 'NetworkChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-networkchaos' workflow, running for 10 seconds. Concurrently, the steady states 'PodRunning' and 'ServiceTrafficRouting' are monitored for the entire 30 seconds using the 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflows, respectively. After 10 seconds, the 'StressChaos' fault is introduced using the 'fault-stresschaos' workflow, also lasting 10 seconds. Finally, at the 20-second mark, the 'PodChaos' fault is injected using the 'fault-podchaos' workflow, continuing for the remaining 10 seconds of this phase.\n\nIn the post-validation phase, which is 10 seconds long, the system's recovery to steady states is verified. The 'PodRunning' state is checked first for 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-podrunning' workflow, starting immediately. Subsequently, the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' state is verified for the final 5 seconds using the 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' workflow. This staggered approach ensures that the system's critical functionalities are quickly assessed post-fault injection."
            },
            "workflow_name": "chaos-experiment-20241002-042120",
            "workflow": {
                "path": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/experiment/workflow.yaml",
                "content": "apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1\nkind: Workflow\nmetadata:\n  name: chaos-experiment-20241002-042120\nspec:\n  entry: the-entry\n  templates:\n    #-------------------------------\n    # entry point of whole workflow\n    #-------------------------------\n    - name: the-entry\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 4m\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-phase\n        - fault-injection-phase\n        - post-validation-phase\n\n    #-------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of pre-validation-phase\n    #-------------------------------------\n    - name: pre-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m20s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n    \n    - name: pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-validation-suspend\n        - pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: pre-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: pre-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 50s\n      children:\n        - pre-unittest-podrunning\n        - pre-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: pre-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 10\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 40s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"10s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of fault-injection-phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: fault-injection-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-unittest-podrunning\n        - fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n        - fault-networkchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 20s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend\n        - fault-stresschaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 10s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 30s\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-suspend2\n        - fault-podchaos\n\n    - name: fault-injection-suspend2\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 20s\n\n    - name: fault-injection-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 1m\n      children:\n        - fault-injection-parallel-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow\n        - fault-injection-suspend-workflow2\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    # unit tests\n    - name: fault-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 30\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 1m\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"30s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    # fault_injections\n    - name: fault-networkchaos\n      templateType: NetworkChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      networkChaos:\n        action: delay\n        delay:\n          jitter: 10ms\n          latency: 100ms\n        device: eth0\n        direction: to\n        mode: all\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        target:\n          mode: all\n          selector:\n            labelSelectors:\n              app: example\n            namespaces:\n              - default\n\n\n    - name: fault-stresschaos\n      templateType: StressChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      stressChaos:\n        containerNames:\n          - example-container\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n        stressors:\n          cpu:\n            load: 100\n            workers: 1\n\n\n    - name: fault-podchaos\n      templateType: PodChaos\n      deadline: 10s\n      podChaos:\n        action: pod-kill\n        mode: one\n        selector:\n          labelSelectors:\n            app: example\n          namespaces:\n            - default\n\n    \n    #--------------------------------------\n    # Entry point of post-validation phase\n    #--------------------------------------\n    - name: post-validation-phase\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 1m10s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend-workflow\n      templateType: Serial\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-validation-suspend\n        - post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n\n    - name: post-validation-suspend\n      templateType: Suspend\n      deadline: 5s\n\n    - name: post-validation-overlapped-workflows\n      templateType: Parallel\n      deadline: 40s\n      children:\n        - post-unittest-podrunning\n        - post-validation-suspend-workflow\n\n    # Definitions of children of pre-validation-phase\n    - name: post-unittest-podrunning\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-podrunning-container\n          image: chaos-eater/k8sapi:1.0\n          imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent\n          command: [\"/bin/bash\", \"-c\"]\n          args: [\"python /chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py --duration 5\"]\n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc\n\n    - name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting\n      templateType: Task\n      deadline: 35s\n      task:\n        container:\n          name: post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting-container\n          image: grafana/k6:latest\n          command: [\"k6\", \"run\", \"--duration\", \"5s\", \"--quiet\", \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js\"]    \n          volumeMounts:\n            - name: pvc-volume\n              mountPath: /chaos-eater\n        volumes:\n          - name: pvc-volume\n            persistentVolumeClaim:\n              claimName: pvc",
                "work_dir": "sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/experiment",
                "fname": "workflow.yaml"
            }
        },
        "result_history": [
            {
                "pod_statuses": {
                    "pre-unittest-podrunning": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": ""
                    },
                    "pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": "\n     \u2713 status is 200\n     \u2713 body contains Nginx\n\n     checks.........................: 100.00% 323180 out of 323180\n     data_received..................: 137 MB  14 MB/s\n     data_sent......................: 17 MB   1.7 MB/s\n     http_req_blocked...............: avg=9.42\u00b5s   min=1.22\u00b5s   med=4\u00b5s      max=3.15ms p(90)=7\u00b5s      p(95)=10.46\u00b5s \n     http_req_connecting............: avg=2.17\u00b5s   min=0s       med=0s       max=2.23ms p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_duration..............: avg=459.83\u00b5s min=105.98\u00b5s med=419.35\u00b5s max=5.32ms p(90)=522.18\u00b5s p(95)=630\u00b5s   \n       { expected_response:true }...: avg=459.83\u00b5s min=105.98\u00b5s med=419.35\u00b5s max=5.32ms p(90)=522.18\u00b5s p(95)=630\u00b5s   \n   \u2713 http_req_failed................: 0.00%   0 out of 161590\n     http_req_receiving.............: avg=63.5\u00b5s   min=12.78\u00b5s  med=45.24\u00b5s  max=3.12ms p(90)=79.39\u00b5s  p(95)=124.5\u00b5s \n     http_req_sending...............: avg=18.89\u00b5s  min=3.94\u00b5s   med=12.75\u00b5s  max=2.91ms p(90)=20.15\u00b5s  p(95)=33.42\u00b5s \n     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s     p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_waiting...............: avg=377.44\u00b5s min=56.88\u00b5s  med=356.98\u00b5s max=5.17ms p(90)=438.58\u00b5s p(95)=518.76\u00b5s\n     http_reqs......................: 161590  16157.951515/s\n     iteration_duration.............: avg=600.57\u00b5s min=204.86\u00b5s med=527.04\u00b5s max=9.71ms p(90)=690.2\u00b5s  p(95)=967.06\u00b5s\n     iterations.....................: 161590  16157.951515/s\n     vus............................: 10      min=10               max=10\n     vus_max........................: 10      min=10               max=10\n\n"
                    },
                    "fault-unittest-podrunning": {
                        "exitcode": 1,
                        "logs": "...e-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:50 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': 'b1e830a0-ffc6-4aa5-b900-7bb16f5b6a5a', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:51 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': 'b25f1b99-fb4b-4159-b2d3-56f1152a088b', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:52 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '573d79b7-35ab-4f55-a867-eee0c74dd15c', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:53 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '40cb9ffd-50aa-44b7-a7fb-1f782819dd8a', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:18:54 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\n"
                    },
                    "fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": "...d0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:14Z\" level=error msg=\"TypeError: Cannot read property 'includes' of undefined or null\\n\\tat body contains Nginx (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:14Z\" level=error msg=\"TypeError: Cannot read property 'includes' of undefined or null\\n\\tat body contains Nginx (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\n\n     \u2717 status is 200\n      \u21b3  99% \u2014 \u2713 262215 / \u2717 174\n     \u2717 body contains Nginx\n      \u21b3  99% \u2014 \u2713 262215 / \u2717 174\n\n     checks.........................: 99.93% 524430 out of 524778\n     data_received..................: 223 MB 4.8 MB/s\n     data_sent......................: 28 MB  599 kB/s\n     http_req_blocked...............: avg=7.73\u00b5s   min=0s       med=3.47\u00b5s   max=2.72ms   p(90)=5.71\u00b5s   p(95)=7.78\u00b5s  \n     http_req_connecting............: avg=2.03\u00b5s   min=0s       med=0s       max=1.77ms   p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_duration..............: avg=516.3\u00b5s  min=0s       med=471.53\u00b5s max=102.95ms p(90)=638.04\u00b5s p(95)=720.03\u00b5s\n       { expected_response:true }...: avg=512.73\u00b5s min=98.48\u00b5s  med=471.58\u00b5s max=8.57ms   p(90)=638.08\u00b5s p(95)=720.02\u00b5s\n   \u2713 http_req_failed................: 0.06%  174 out of 262389\n     http_req_receiving.............: avg=51.1\u00b5s   min=0s       med=38.4\u00b5s   max=4.62ms   p(90)=68.87\u00b5s  p(95)=90.82\u00b5s \n     http_req_sending...............: avg=16.67\u00b5s  min=0s       med=10.44\u00b5s  max=102.57ms p(90)=16.29\u00b5s  p(95)=22.79\u00b5s \n     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_waiting...............: avg=448.52\u00b5s min=0s       med=418.54\u00b5s max=102.45ms p(90)=572.1\u00b5s  p(95)=646.23\u00b5s\n     http_reqs......................: 262389 5596.422012/s\n     iteration_duration.............: avg=1.43ms   min=164.46\u00b5s med=563.63\u00b5s max=30s      p(90)=758.31\u00b5s p(95)=911.35\u00b5s\n     iterations.....................: 262389 5596.422012/s\n     vus............................: 4      min=4                max=10\n     vus_max........................: 10     min=10               max=10\n\n"
                    },
                    "post-unittest-podrunning": {
                        "exitcode": 1,
                        "logs": "...ict({'Audit-Id': '924c5a3f-fd41-424b-8462-fa2aa38a1793', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:20 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n    test.test_pod_running_state(args.duration)\n  File \"/chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_PodRunning_mod0.py\", line 34, in test_pod_running_state\n\n    assert running_percentage >= 95, f\"Pod '{pod_name}' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: {running_percentage}%\"\n\nAssertionError: Pod 'example-pod' was not running for at least 95% of the time. Actual: 0.0%\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '96e2f22c-f161-4946-9019-00b92035b3aa', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:21 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': 'f05de432-a19f-46b0-9392-ff5fdfdb547a', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:22 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\nException when calling CoreV1Api->read_namespaced_pod: (404)\nReason: Not Found\nHTTP response headers: HTTPHeaderDict({'Audit-Id': '3b789a5e-1855-49b7-81a4-ef21d2d89df8', 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache, private', 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Flowschema-Uid': 'c4624bd9-7fc7-42c6-bcb8-4235110a860d', 'X-Kubernetes-Pf-Prioritylevel-Uid': '4706085f-6263-43ae-93f5-b4a61de8b6be', 'Date': 'Wed, 02 Oct 2024 04:19:23 GMT', 'Content-Length': '190'})\nHTTP response body: {\"kind\":\"Status\",\"apiVersion\":\"v1\",\"metadata\":{},\"status\":\"Failure\",\"message\":\"pods \\\"example-pod\\\" not found\",\"reason\":\"NotFound\",\"details\":{\"name\":\"example-pod\",\"kind\":\"pods\"},\"code\":404}\n\n\n"
                    },
                    "post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting": {
                        "exitcode": 99,
                        "logs": "...s Nginx (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:40Z\" level=error msg=\"TypeError: Cannot read property 'includes' of undefined or null\\n\\tat body contains Nginx (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:55Z\" level=warning msg=\"Request Failed\" error=\"Get \\\"http://example-service.default.svc.cluster.local\\\": dial: i/o timeout\"\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:55Z\" level=error msg=\"TypeError: Cannot read property 'includes' of undefined or null\\n\\tat body contains Nginx (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\n\n     \u2717 status is 200\n      \u21b3  0% \u2014 \u2713 0 / \u2717 20\n     \u2717 body contains Nginx\n      \u21b3  0% \u2014 \u2713 0 / \u2717 20\n\n     checks.....................: 0.00%   0 out of 40\n     data_received..............: 0 B     0 B/s\n     data_sent..................: 0 B     0 B/s\n     http_req_blocked...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_connecting........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_duration..........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n   \u2717 http_req_failed............: 100.00% 20 out of 20\n     http_req_receiving.........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_sending...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_tls_handshaking...: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_req_waiting...........: avg=0s    min=0s     med=0s    max=0s  p(90)=0s     p(95)=0s    \n     http_reqs..................: 20      0.666528/s\n     iteration_duration.........: avg=7.08s min=3.62ms med=3.03s max=30s p(90)=15.38s p(95)=16.11s\n     iterations.................: 20      0.666528/s\n     vus........................: 1       min=1        max=10\n     vus_max....................: 10      min=10       max=10\n\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:19:55Z\" level=error msg=\"thresholds on metrics 'http_req_failed' have been crossed\"\n"
                    }
                }
            },
            {
                "pod_statuses": {
                    "pre-unittest-podrunning": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": ""
                    },
                    "pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": "\n     \u2713 status is 200\n     \u2713 body contains Nginx\n\n     checks.........................: 100.00% 566784 out of 566784\n     data_received..................: 241 MB  24 MB/s\n     data_sent......................: 30 MB   3.0 MB/s\n     http_req_blocked...............: avg=7.61\u00b5s   min=1.11\u00b5s   med=3.55\u00b5s   max=5.01ms  p(90)=6.19\u00b5s   p(95)=8.1\u00b5s   \n     http_req_connecting............: avg=1.83\u00b5s   min=0s       med=0s       max=2.24ms  p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_duration..............: avg=223.48\u00b5s min=68.55\u00b5s  med=186.89\u00b5s max=15.35ms p(90)=305.06\u00b5s p(95)=372.29\u00b5s\n       { expected_response:true }...: avg=223.48\u00b5s min=68.55\u00b5s  med=186.89\u00b5s max=15.35ms p(90)=305.06\u00b5s p(95)=372.29\u00b5s\n   \u2713 http_req_failed................: 0.00%   0 out of 283392\n     http_req_receiving.............: avg=53.01\u00b5s  min=10.89\u00b5s  med=39.64\u00b5s  max=15.16ms p(90)=71.09\u00b5s  p(95)=92.52\u00b5s \n     http_req_sending...............: avg=15.13\u00b5s  min=3.72\u00b5s   med=10.91\u00b5s  max=15.01ms p(90)=17.59\u00b5s  p(95)=24.52\u00b5s \n     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s      p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_waiting...............: avg=155.33\u00b5s min=48.61\u00b5s  med=128.33\u00b5s max=2.57ms  p(90)=229.69\u00b5s p(95)=280.75\u00b5s\n     http_reqs......................: 283392  28338.135268/s\n     iteration_duration.............: avg=337.57\u00b5s min=113.51\u00b5s med=282.43\u00b5s max=15.85ms p(90)=434.09\u00b5s p(95)=576.2\u00b5s \n     iterations.....................: 283392  28338.135268/s\n     vus............................: 10      min=10               max=10\n     vus_max........................: 10      min=10               max=10\n\n"
                    },
                    "fault-unittest-podrunning": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": ""
                    },
                    "fault-unittest-servicetrafficrouting": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": "...0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:22:10Z\" level=error msg=\"TypeError: Cannot read property 'includes' of undefined or null\\n\\tat body contains Nginx (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\ntime=\"2024-10-02T04:22:10Z\" level=error msg=\"TypeError: Cannot read property 'includes' of undefined or null\\n\\tat body contains Nginx (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:17:37(3))\\n\\tat go.k6.io/k6/js/modules/k6.(*K6).Check-fm (native)\\n\\tat default (file:///chaos-eater/sandbox/cycle_20241002_041546/hypothesis/steady_states/unittest_ServiceTrafficRouting_mod0.js:15:8(14))\\n\" executor=constant-vus scenario=default source=stacktrace\n\n     \u2717 status is 200\n      \u21b3  99% \u2014 \u2713 918110 / \u2717 5\n     \u2717 body contains Nginx\n      \u21b3  99% \u2014 \u2713 918110 / \u2717 5\n\n     checks.........................: 99.99% 1836220 out of 1836230\n     data_received..................: 780 MB 25 MB/s\n     data_sent......................: 98 MB  3.1 MB/s\n     http_req_blocked...............: avg=21.98\u00b5s  min=1.05\u00b5s   med=3.31\u00b5s   max=7.28s    p(90)=5.43\u00b5s   p(95)=6.57\u00b5s  \n     http_req_connecting............: avg=17.34\u00b5s  min=0s       med=0s       max=7.28s    p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_duration..............: avg=204.77\u00b5s min=71.17\u00b5s  med=177.93\u00b5s max=111.04ms p(90)=286.88\u00b5s p(95)=344.14\u00b5s\n       { expected_response:true }...: avg=204.25\u00b5s min=71.17\u00b5s  med=177.93\u00b5s max=111.04ms p(90)=286.88\u00b5s p(95)=344.14\u00b5s\n   \u2713 http_req_failed................: 0.00%  5 out of 918115\n     http_req_receiving.............: avg=43.87\u00b5s  min=0s       med=36.48\u00b5s  max=7.27ms   p(90)=61.31\u00b5s  p(95)=74.95\u00b5s \n     http_req_sending...............: avg=12.45\u00b5s  min=3.48\u00b5s   med=9.94\u00b5s   max=110.8ms  p(90)=15.04\u00b5s  p(95)=18.65\u00b5s \n     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_waiting...............: avg=148.44\u00b5s min=47.54\u00b5s  med=124.78\u00b5s max=107.93ms p(90)=226.01\u00b5s p(95)=277.64\u00b5s\n     http_reqs......................: 918115 29394.276363/s\n     iteration_duration.............: avg=316.2\u00b5s  min=116.74\u00b5s med=266.14\u00b5s max=7.28s    p(90)=393.11\u00b5s p(95)=472.13\u00b5s\n     iterations.....................: 918115 29394.276363/s\n     vus............................: 1      min=1                  max=10\n     vus_max........................: 10     min=10                 max=10\n\n"
                    },
                    "post-unittest-podrunning": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": ""
                    },
                    "post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting": {
                        "exitcode": 0,
                        "logs": "\n     \u2713 status is 200\n     \u2713 body contains Nginx\n\n     checks.........................: 100.00% 269450 out of 269450\n     data_received..................: 115 MB  23 MB/s\n     data_sent......................: 14 MB   2.9 MB/s\n     http_req_blocked...............: avg=8.37\u00b5s   min=1.06\u00b5s   med=3.54\u00b5s   max=3.49ms p(90)=6.42\u00b5s   p(95)=8.79\u00b5s  \n     http_req_connecting............: avg=1.97\u00b5s   min=0s       med=0s       max=1.8ms  p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_duration..............: avg=232.55\u00b5s min=75.79\u00b5s  med=188.27\u00b5s max=4.46ms p(90)=314.25\u00b5s p(95)=404.09\u00b5s\n       { expected_response:true }...: avg=232.55\u00b5s min=75.79\u00b5s  med=188.27\u00b5s max=4.46ms p(90)=314.25\u00b5s p(95)=404.09\u00b5s\n   \u2713 http_req_failed................: 0.00%   0 out of 134725\n     http_req_receiving.............: avg=57.24\u00b5s  min=11.81\u00b5s  med=40.07\u00b5s  max=3.04ms p(90)=75.25\u00b5s  p(95)=106.83\u00b5s\n     http_req_sending...............: avg=16.7\u00b5s   min=3.9\u00b5s    med=10.96\u00b5s  max=2.91ms p(90)=18.73\u00b5s  p(95)=28.39\u00b5s \n     http_req_tls_handshaking.......: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s     p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      \n     http_req_waiting...............: avg=158.6\u00b5s  min=48.59\u00b5s  med=128.5\u00b5s  max=2.84ms p(90)=228.43\u00b5s p(95)=284.1\u00b5s \n     http_reqs......................: 134725  26942.348485/s\n     iteration_duration.............: avg=355.13\u00b5s min=124.31\u00b5s med=283.85\u00b5s max=7.36ms p(90)=467.71\u00b5s p(95)=735.12\u00b5s\n     iterations.....................: 134725  26942.348485/s\n     vus............................: 10      min=10               max=10\n     vus_max........................: 10      min=10               max=10\n\n"
                    }
                }
            }
        ],
        "analysis_history": [
            {
                "report": "The Chaos Engineering experiment results indicate several critical insights into the system's resilience and failure points:\n\n1. **PodRunning Steady State Failure**:\n   - The 'fault-unittest-podrunning' and 'post-unittest-podrunning' tests failed, indicating that the Pod 'example-pod' was not found during and after the fault injection phase. This suggests that the Pod was either terminated or failed to restart due to the 'PodChaos' fault, which simulates a Pod failure.\n   - The Pod's restart policy is set to 'Never', which means it does not automatically restart if it fails. This configuration is a significant vulnerability, as it does not allow the system to recover from Pod failures, leading to prolonged downtime.\n   - The failure to maintain the 'PodRunning' steady state highlights the need for a more resilient Pod configuration, such as using a 'Always' or 'OnFailure' restart policy to ensure automatic recovery from failures.\n\n2. **ServiceTrafficRouting Steady State Failure**:\n   - The 'post-unittest-servicetrafficrouting' test failed, with 100% of HTTP requests failing. This indicates that the Service was unable to route traffic to the Pod, likely because the Pod was not running.\n   - The 'NetworkChaos' fault, which introduced network latency, and the 'PodChaos' fault, which terminated the Pod, both contributed to the disruption in service traffic routing. The network latency could have caused initial delays, but the Pod termination was the primary cause of the complete failure in routing traffic.\n   - The failure to maintain the 'ServiceTrafficRouting' steady state suggests that the system's reliance on a single Pod is a bottleneck. Implementing a Deployment with multiple replicas could improve resilience by ensuring that traffic can be routed to other available Pods if one fails.\n\n3. **Pre-Validation Success**:\n   - The successful pre-validation tests ('pre-unittest-podrunning' and 'pre-unittest-servicetrafficrouting') confirm that the system was initially in a healthy state, with the Pod running and the Service correctly routing traffic. This baseline is crucial for understanding the impact of the injected faults.\n\n4. **Fault Injection Impact**:\n   - The staggered fault injection strategy effectively tested the system's resilience. The combination of network latency, CPU stress, and Pod termination exposed the system's vulnerabilities, particularly the lack of redundancy and automatic recovery mechanisms.\n   - The experiment's design, with overlapping fault injections and continuous monitoring, provided a comprehensive assessment of the system's ability to maintain steady states under stress.\n\nIn conclusion, the experiment revealed that the system's current configuration is not resilient to the simulated fault scenario. Key recommendations include revising the Pod's restart policy, implementing a Deployment with multiple replicas, and considering network policies to mitigate the impact of network disruptions. These changes would enhance the system's ability to maintain steady states and improve overall resilience."
            }
        ],
        "reconfig_history": [
            {
                "mod_k8s_yamls": {
                    "thought": "To improve the system's resilience, I will modify the Pod configuration to use a Deployment instead of a standalone Pod. This will allow for multiple replicas and automatic restarts in case of failure. The Deployment will ensure that the Pod is automatically recreated if it is terminated, addressing the issue of the Pod not being found during the fault injection phase. Additionally, the Deployment will provide redundancy, allowing the Service to route traffic to other available Pods if one fails.",
                    "modified_k8s_yamls": [
                        {
                            "mod_type": "delete",
                            "fname": "nginx_demo/nginx/pod.yaml",
                            "explanation": "The existing Pod manifest is deleted to replace it with a Deployment manifest, which provides better resilience through automatic restarts and multiple replicas."
                        },
                        {
                            "mod_type": "create",
                            "fname": "nginx_demo/nginx/deployment.yaml",
                            "explanation": "This new Deployment manifest replaces the standalone Pod manifest. It introduces a Deployment with multiple replicas and an 'Always' restart policy to improve resilience.",
                            "code": "apiVersion: apps/v1\nkind: Deployment\nmetadata:\n  name: example-deployment\nspec:\n  replicas: 3\n  selector:\n    matchLabels:\n      app: example\n  template:\n    metadata:\n      labels:\n        app: example\n    spec:\n      containers:\n      - name: example-container\n        image: nginx:1.17.1\n        ports:\n        - containerPort: 80\n      restartPolicy: Always"
                        }
                    ]
                }
            }
        ],
        "conducts_reconfig": true,
        "completes_reconfig": true,
        "summary": "The Chaos Engineering cycle involved testing a Kubernetes-based web server application using Nginx to ensure its resilience under fault conditions. The system was initially set up with a Kubernetes Service and a Pod, where the Service routed HTTP traffic to the Pod running an Nginx container. The experiment aimed to test the hypothesis that the system's steady states would be maintained even when faults were injected.\n\nThe steady states defined were 'PodRunning', ensuring the Pod was in a running state 95% of the time, and 'ServiceTrafficRouting', ensuring HTTP request failures were less than or equal to 0.01%. The fault scenario simulated a cyber attack causing network disruption and resource exhaustion using Chaos Mesh, with faults like NetworkChaos, StressChaos, and PodChaos.\n\nThe experiment was structured into three phases: pre-validation, fault-injection, and post-validation, all within a 1-minute timeframe. Pre-validation confirmed the system's initial steady states. During fault-injection, network latency, CPU stress, and Pod failure were introduced sequentially. Post-validation checked the system's recovery to steady states.\n\nThe first experiment revealed vulnerabilities: the Pod's 'Never' restart policy led to failures in maintaining the 'PodRunning' state, and the single Pod setup caused 100% HTTP request failures, indicating a need for redundancy. The analysis recommended using a Deployment with multiple replicas and an 'Always' restart policy.\n\nImprovements were made by deleting the Pod manifest and creating a Deployment manifest with three replicas and an 'Always' restart policy. The second experiment, with these changes, passed all unit tests, confirming the system's improved resilience and ability to maintain steady states under fault conditions."
    }
}