\begin{table}[!h]
\centering
\setlength\tabcolsep{4pt}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.9}

\newcommand{\rot}[1]{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{\textbf{#1}}}

\begin{tabular*}{\textwidth}{@{\extracolsep{\fill}} c l ccc }
\toprule
& \textbf{Setting} 
& \textbf{AUC} $\uparrow$ 
& \textbf{F1$_m$} $\uparrow$ 
& \textbf{Bal. Acc} $\uparrow$ \\
\midrule

% ---------- Correlation Threshold ----------
\multirow{4}{*}{\rot{$\xi$}}
& 0.95 \textit{(aggressive pruning)} & \textbf{55.5} (3.37) & \underline{17.4} (3.67) & 24.6 (0.78) \\
& 0.99 & \underline{55.1} (3.64) & \textbf{23.9} (5.10) & \textbf{28.3} (3.41) \\
& 1.00 \textit{(no pruning)} & 54.7 (5.17) & 13.9 (0.86) & \underline{26.0} (0.65) \\
\midrule

% ---------- Group Similarity ----------
\multirow{6}{*}{\rot{$\tau$}}
& 0.5 \textit{(coarse regions)} & \textbf{55.7} (2.29) & 17.2 (0.43) & \underline{25.3} (0.51) \\
& 0.8  & 53.9 (4.66) & 14.7 (2.71) & \textbf{28.3} (3.64) \\
& 0.9  & 52.4 (3.52) & \underline{19.5} (1.07) & 22.9 (0.94) \\
& 0.95  & 54.0 (5.15) & 19.0 (0.00) & 25.0 (0.00) \\
& 1.0 \textit{(highest granularity)} & \underline{54.1} (4.99) & \textbf{19.9} (1.34) & 25.2 (0.78) \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular*}

\caption{
Combined ablation studies for TCGA-UCEC.  
Sections (\(\xi\): correlation threshold, \(\tau\): group similarity. Bold marks the best in each category.}
\label{tab:ablation_ucec}
\end{table}
