The issue focused by journalists this week has been whether UK judges should have to justify why they decide cases by virtue of Britishness or ethnicity.They've decided by virtue of Britishness or ethnicity but only after lawyers argued it over what English lawyers called "British versus Asian characteristics".Is this fair? Does it serve our interests in court and should we continue with this procedure?David Walsh thinks so."All courts should respect our independence," he says."No court should operate without allowing individuals and organisations to exercise their constitutional rights