The issue focused on by both sides of the debate is that so much of the science for global warming is based on models that have been proven wrong in the past. You will find more information on this issue on this article on GreenMedInfo.org. I don't see how this issue can be resolved by simply arguing about what "model" or "analysis" is used. We need to come to an agreement on what is being measured in the process of temperature measurements. We need to understand what is being measured