The issue focused on whether Orrick would have been entitled to possession of the electronic devices if he had signed the consent forms that led to his arrest. This court noted that many employees were familiar with this policy and did not object to Orrick using their electronic devices for personal purposes. To avoid confusion, this court declared that Orrick had taken steps to secure his electronic devices at all times and had entered into an agreement with those employees that they would use them only for personal purposes. As part of this agreement, Or