The issue focused on the use of the word "sexually explicit" in the text of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said.

The court did not directly address whether or not the Constitution was constitutional.

In 2012, a lower Court had ruled that a provision that allows a person to make explicit sexual advances on someone they know to be a sex worker violated the freedom to privacy of that person.

That decision has not changed.

On Wednesday, the court said it was aware of the