{
  "index": "1984-A-2",
  "type": "ANA",
  "tag": [
    "ANA",
    "ALG"
  ],
  "difficulty": "",
  "question": "Problem A-2\nExpress \\( \\sum_{k-1}^{\\infty}\\left(6^{k} /\\left(3^{h+1}-2^{h+1}\\right)\\left(3^{h}-2^{k}\\right)\\right) \\) as a rational number.",
  "solution": "A-2.\nLet \\( S(n) \\) denote the \\( n \\)th partial sum of the given series. Then\n\\[\nS(n)=\\sum_{k=1}^{n}\\left[\\frac{3^{k}}{3^{k}-2^{k}}-\\frac{3^{k+1}}{3^{k+1}-2^{k+1}}\\right]=3-\\frac{3^{n+1}}{3^{n+1}-2^{n+1}}\n\\]\nand the series converges to \\( \\lim _{n \\rightarrow \\infty} S(n)=2 \\).",
  "vars": [
    "k",
    "n"
  ],
  "params": [
    "h",
    "S"
  ],
  "sci_consts": [],
  "variants": {
    "descriptive_long": {
      "map": {
        "k": "idxvar",
        "n": "uplimit",
        "h": "paramh",
        "S": "partsum"
      },
      "question": "Problem A-2\nExpress \\( \\sum_{idxvar-1}^{\\infty}\\left(6^{idxvar} /\\left(3^{paramh+1}-2^{paramh+1}\\right)\\left(3^{paramh}-2^{idxvar}\\right)\\right) \\) as a rational number.",
      "solution": "A-2.\nLet \\( partsum(uplimit) \\) denote the \\( uplimit \\)th partial sum of the given series. Then\n\\[\npartsum(uplimit)=\\sum_{idxvar=1}^{uplimit}\\left[\\frac{3^{idxvar}}{3^{idxvar}-2^{idxvar}}-\\frac{3^{idxvar+1}}{3^{idxvar+1}-2^{idxvar+1}}\\right]=3-\\frac{3^{uplimit+1}}{3^{uplimit+1}-2^{uplimit+1}}\n\\]\nand the series converges to \\( \\lim _{uplimit \\rightarrow \\infty} partsum(uplimit)=2 \\)."
    },
    "descriptive_long_confusing": {
      "map": {
        "k": "windstorm",
        "n": "harvestmoon",
        "h": "blueguitar",
        "S": "riversong"
      },
      "question": "Problem A-2\nExpress \\( \\sum_{windstorm-1}^{\\infty}\\left(6^{windstorm} /\\left(3^{blueguitar+1}-2^{blueguitar+1}\\right)\\left(3^{blueguitar}-2^{windstorm}\\right)\\right) \\) as a rational number.",
      "solution": "A-2.\nLet \\( riversong(harvestmoon) \\) denote the \\( harvestmoon \\)th partial sum of the given series. Then\n\\[\nriversong(harvestmoon)=\\sum_{windstorm=1}^{harvestmoon}\\left[\\frac{3^{windstorm}}{3^{windstorm}-2^{windstorm}}-\\frac{3^{windstorm+1}}{3^{windstorm+1}-2^{windstorm+1}}\\right]=3-\\frac{3^{harvestmoon+1}}{3^{harvestmoon+1}-2^{harvestmoon+1}}\n\\]\nand the series converges to \\( \\lim _{harvestmoon \\rightarrow \\infty} riversong(harvestmoon)=2 \\)."
    },
    "descriptive_long_misleading": {
      "map": {
        "k": "continuum",
        "n": "infinite",
        "h": "foundation",
        "S": "difference"
      },
      "question": "Problem A-2\nExpress \\( \\sum_{continuum-1}^{\\infty}\\left(6^{continuum} /\\left(3^{foundation+1}-2^{foundation+1}\\right)\\left(3^{foundation}-2^{continuum}\\right)\\right) \\) as a rational number.",
      "solution": "A-2.\nLet \\( difference(infinite) \\) denote the \\( infinite \\)th partial sum of the given series. Then\n\\[\ndifference(infinite)=\\sum_{continuum=1}^{infinite}\\left[\\frac{3^{continuum}}{3^{continuum}-2^{continuum}}-\\frac{3^{continuum+1}}{3^{continuum+1}-2^{continuum+1}}\\right]=3-\\frac{3^{infinite+1}}{3^{infinite+1}-2^{infinite+1}}\n\\]\nand the series converges to \\( \\lim _{infinite \\rightarrow \\infty} difference(infinite)=2 \\)."
    },
    "garbled_string": {
      "map": {
        "k": "qzxwvtnp",
        "n": "hjgrksla",
        "h": "mfldzqwe",
        "S": "pskjrtua"
      },
      "question": "Problem A-2\nExpress \\( \\sum_{qzxwvtnp-1}^{\\infty}\\left(6^{qzxwvtnp} /\\left(3^{mfldzqwe+1}-2^{mfldzqwe+1}\\right)\\left(3^{mfldzqwe}-2^{qzxwvtnp}\\right)\\right) \\) as a rational number.",
      "solution": "A-2.\nLet \\( pskjrtua(hjgrksla) \\) denote the \\( hjgrksla \\)th partial sum of the given series. Then\n\\[\npskjrtua(hjgrksla)=\\sum_{qzxwvtnp=1}^{hjgrksla}\\left[\\frac{3^{qzxwvtnp}}{3^{qzxwvtnp}-2^{qzxwvtnp}}-\\frac{3^{qzxwvtnp+1}}{3^{qzxwvtnp+1}-2^{qzxwvtnp+1}}\\right]=3-\\frac{3^{hjgrksla+1}}{3^{hjgrksla+1}-2^{hjgrksla+1}}\n\\]\nand the series converges to \\( \\lim _{hjgrksla \\rightarrow \\infty} pskjrtua(hjgrksla)=2 \\)."
    },
    "kernel_variant": {
      "question": "Evaluate the infinite series  \n\\[\n\\boxed{\\displaystyle \nS=\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty}\n\\frac{12^{\\,k}\\bigl(4^{\\,k+1}+3^{\\,k+1}\\bigr)}\n      {\\bigl(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2}\\bigr)\n       \\bigl(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1}\\bigr)\n       \\bigl(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}\\bigr)} }.\n\\]\nExpress the result as a rational number.\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------",
      "solution": "Step 1.  Introduce an auxiliary sequence.  \nDefine\n\\[\nG_k=\\frac{3^{\\,k}}{\\,4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}},\\qquad k\\ge 1 .\n\\]\n\nStep 2.  Compute the first finite difference.  \n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\Delta G_k\n&:=G_k-G_{k+1}\n      =\\frac{3^{\\,k}}{4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}}-\n        \\frac{3^{\\,k+1}}{4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1}}  \\\\[2mm]\n&=\\frac{3^{\\,k}4^{\\,k}(4-3)}\n        {(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})}     \\\\[2mm]\n&=\\frac{12^{\\,k}}\n        {(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\tag{1}\n\\]\n\nStep 3.  Compute the second finite difference.  \n\\[\n\\Delta^{2}G_k:=\\Delta G_k-\\Delta G_{k+1}\n              =G_k-2G_{k+1}+G_{k+2}.\n\\]\nUsing (1),\n\\[\n\\Delta^{2}G_k=\n\\frac{12^{\\,k}}\n     {(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})}\\;\n-\\;\n\\frac{12^{\\,k+1}}\n     {(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2})(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})}.\n\\tag{2}\n\\]\n\nStep 4.  Combine the two fractions in (2).  \nTake the common denominator  \n\\(D_k=(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2})(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})\\):\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\Delta^{2}G_k\n&=\\frac{12^{\\,k}\\bigl(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2}\\bigr)\n      -12^{\\,k+1}\\bigl(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}\\bigr)}\n     {D_k} \\\\[2mm]\n&=\\frac{12^{\\,k}\\!\\left[(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2})\n        -12\\bigl(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}\\bigr)\\right]}\n        {D_k}.          \\\\[2mm]\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\n\nNow factor \\(4^{\\,k}\\) and \\(3^{\\,k}\\) from the bracketed terms:\n\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n4^{\\,k+2}-12\\cdot4^{\\,k}&=4^{\\,k}\\bigl(16-12\\bigr)=4^{\\,k}\\cdot4=4^{\\,k+1},\\\\\n-3^{\\,k+2}+12\\cdot3^{\\,k}&=3^{\\,k}\\bigl(-9+12\\bigr)=3^{\\,k}\\cdot3=3^{\\,k+1}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\n\nHence the numerator becomes  \n\\(12^{\\,k}\\bigl(4^{\\,k+1}+3^{\\,k+1}\\bigr)\\), so\n\n\\[\n\\boxed{\\;\n\\Delta^{2}G_k\n=\\frac{12^{\\,k}\\bigl(4^{\\,k+1}+3^{\\,k+1}\\bigr)}\n       {(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2})(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})}\n= T_k \\; }.\n\\]\n\nThus each summand of the target series is a second finite difference of \\(G_k\\).\n\nStep 5.  Telescope the second differences.  \nFor second differences the identity  \n\\[\n\\sum_{k=1}^{n}\\Delta^{2}G_k\n   =G_1-G_2-G_{n+1}+G_{n+2}\n\\]\nholds.  Let \\(n\\to\\infty\\); since \\(G_m\\sim(3/4)^{m}\\to0\\),\n\\[\n\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty}\\Delta^{2}G_k=G_1-G_2.\n\\]\n\nStep 6.  Evaluate \\(G_1-G_2\\).  \n\\[\nG_1=\\frac{3}{4-3}=3,\\qquad\nG_2=\\frac{9}{16-9}=\\frac97.\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\[\nS=\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty}T_k=3-\\frac97=\\frac{12}{7}.\n\\]\n\nAnswer:  \n\\[\n\\boxed{\\displaystyle S=\\frac{12}{7}}.\n\\]\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------",
      "metadata": {
        "replaced_from": "harder_variant",
        "replacement_date": "2025-07-14T19:09:31.673298",
        "was_fixed": false,
        "difficulty_analysis": "• Denominator depth:  the original series involves two consecutive factors,\n  while the enhanced series has three, forcing a second-order (rather than first-order)\n  telescoping argument.\n\n• Extra algebraic layer: one must identify and manipulate\n  the composite numerator \\(12^{k}(4^{k+1}+3^{k+1})\\); it is not an obvious\n  multiple of a single geometric power and does not emerge from simple pattern\n  matching.\n\n• Higher-order finite differences: solving the problem requires constructing\n  and summing a second finite difference, a step beyond the elementary\n  first-difference telescoping used in the original kernel variant.\n\n• Conceptual leap: the solver must (i) invent an auxiliary sequence,\n  (ii) recognize first-difference telescoping, (iii) iterate the process to a\n  second difference, and (iv) control the tail terms—all of which demand\n  deeper insight and more steps than the original problem.\n\nIn sum, the triple denominator, the composite numerator, and the second-order\ntelescoping combine to make this variant substantially more intricate and\ntechnically sophisticated than the original."
      }
    },
    "original_kernel_variant": {
      "question": "Evaluate the infinite series  \n\\[\n\\boxed{\\displaystyle \nS=\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty}\n\\frac{12^{\\,k}\\bigl(4^{\\,k+1}+3^{\\,k+1}\\bigr)}\n      {\\bigl(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2}\\bigr)\n       \\bigl(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1}\\bigr)\n       \\bigl(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}\\bigr)} }.\n\\]\nExpress the result as a rational number.\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------",
      "solution": "Step 1.  Introduce an auxiliary sequence.  \nDefine\n\\[\nG_k=\\frac{3^{\\,k}}{\\,4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}},\\qquad k\\ge 1 .\n\\]\n\nStep 2.  Compute the first finite difference.  \n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\Delta G_k\n&:=G_k-G_{k+1}\n      =\\frac{3^{\\,k}}{4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}}-\n        \\frac{3^{\\,k+1}}{4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1}}  \\\\[2mm]\n&=\\frac{3^{\\,k}4^{\\,k}(4-3)}\n        {(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})}     \\\\[2mm]\n&=\\frac{12^{\\,k}}\n        {(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\tag{1}\n\\]\n\nStep 3.  Compute the second finite difference.  \n\\[\n\\Delta^{2}G_k:=\\Delta G_k-\\Delta G_{k+1}\n              =G_k-2G_{k+1}+G_{k+2}.\n\\]\nUsing (1),\n\\[\n\\Delta^{2}G_k=\n\\frac{12^{\\,k}}\n     {(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})}\\;\n-\\;\n\\frac{12^{\\,k+1}}\n     {(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2})(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})}.\n\\tag{2}\n\\]\n\nStep 4.  Combine the two fractions in (2).  \nTake the common denominator  \n\\(D_k=(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2})(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})\\):\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\Delta^{2}G_k\n&=\\frac{12^{\\,k}\\bigl(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2}\\bigr)\n      -12^{\\,k+1}\\bigl(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}\\bigr)}\n     {D_k} \\\\[2mm]\n&=\\frac{12^{\\,k}\\!\\left[(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2})\n        -12\\bigl(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k}\\bigr)\\right]}\n        {D_k}.          \\\\[2mm]\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\n\nNow factor \\(4^{\\,k}\\) and \\(3^{\\,k}\\) from the bracketed terms:\n\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n4^{\\,k+2}-12\\cdot4^{\\,k}&=4^{\\,k}\\bigl(16-12\\bigr)=4^{\\,k}\\cdot4=4^{\\,k+1},\\\\\n-3^{\\,k+2}+12\\cdot3^{\\,k}&=3^{\\,k}\\bigl(-9+12\\bigr)=3^{\\,k}\\cdot3=3^{\\,k+1}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\n\nHence the numerator becomes  \n\\(12^{\\,k}\\bigl(4^{\\,k+1}+3^{\\,k+1}\\bigr)\\), so\n\n\\[\n\\boxed{\\;\n\\Delta^{2}G_k\n=\\frac{12^{\\,k}\\bigl(4^{\\,k+1}+3^{\\,k+1}\\bigr)}\n       {(4^{\\,k+2}-3^{\\,k+2})(4^{\\,k+1}-3^{\\,k+1})(4^{\\,k}-3^{\\,k})}\n= T_k \\; }.\n\\]\n\nThus each summand of the target series is a second finite difference of \\(G_k\\).\n\nStep 5.  Telescope the second differences.  \nFor second differences the identity  \n\\[\n\\sum_{k=1}^{n}\\Delta^{2}G_k\n   =G_1-G_2-G_{n+1}+G_{n+2}\n\\]\nholds.  Let \\(n\\to\\infty\\); since \\(G_m\\sim(3/4)^{m}\\to0\\),\n\\[\n\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty}\\Delta^{2}G_k=G_1-G_2.\n\\]\n\nStep 6.  Evaluate \\(G_1-G_2\\).  \n\\[\nG_1=\\frac{3}{4-3}=3,\\qquad\nG_2=\\frac{9}{16-9}=\\frac97.\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\[\nS=\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty}T_k=3-\\frac97=\\frac{12}{7}.\n\\]\n\nAnswer:  \n\\[\n\\boxed{\\displaystyle S=\\frac{12}{7}}.\n\\]\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------",
      "metadata": {
        "replaced_from": "harder_variant",
        "replacement_date": "2025-07-14T01:37:45.528360",
        "was_fixed": false,
        "difficulty_analysis": "• Denominator depth:  the original series involves two consecutive factors,\n  while the enhanced series has three, forcing a second-order (rather than first-order)\n  telescoping argument.\n\n• Extra algebraic layer: one must identify and manipulate\n  the composite numerator \\(12^{k}(4^{k+1}+3^{k+1})\\); it is not an obvious\n  multiple of a single geometric power and does not emerge from simple pattern\n  matching.\n\n• Higher-order finite differences: solving the problem requires constructing\n  and summing a second finite difference, a step beyond the elementary\n  first-difference telescoping used in the original kernel variant.\n\n• Conceptual leap: the solver must (i) invent an auxiliary sequence,\n  (ii) recognize first-difference telescoping, (iii) iterate the process to a\n  second difference, and (iv) control the tail terms—all of which demand\n  deeper insight and more steps than the original problem.\n\nIn sum, the triple denominator, the composite numerator, and the second-order\ntelescoping combine to make this variant substantially more intricate and\ntechnically sophisticated than the original."
      }
    }
  },
  "checked": true,
  "problem_type": "calculation"
}