getting diagram of initial state
getting diagram of goal state
Expanding nodes at depth 0
Expanding state 0
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 1
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 1
successfully verified the action of new state 1 with the path: The last action `(move_l_down rightl0 f1-0f f2-0f f2-1f f3-0f f3-1f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description and visualization accurately represent the current state, with all objects from the initial state present and correctly positioned.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 1 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 1
Expanding state 1
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 2
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 2
successfully verified the action of new state 2 with the path: The last action `move_two straight1 f0-2f f1-2f f2-2f` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken. The action moves us closer to the goal state by clearing the top rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 2 (1) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 2
Expanding state 2
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 3
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 3
successfully verified the action of new state 3 with the path: The last action `(move_two straight1 f1-2f f2-2f f3-2f)` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken. The action logically progresses towards the goal state by moving pieces downward to clear the top rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 4
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 4
successfully verified the action of new state 4 with the path: The last action `move_two straight0 f0-1f f1-1f f2-1f` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: f2-1f is clear, `straight0` occupies f0-1f and f1-1f, and f1-1f and f2-1f are adjacent. The effects are correctly updated in the current state, with `straight0` now occupying f1-1f and f2-1f, and f0-1f becoming clear. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization accurately reflect these changes, and the action aligns with the goal of clearing the top two rows.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 3 (2) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 3
Expanding state 3
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 5
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 5
successfully verified the action of new state 5 with the path: The last action `move_two straight0 f0-1f f1-1f f2-1f` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The current state's natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken. The action moves us closer to the goal state by clearing the top rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 6
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 6
successfully verified the action of new state 6 with the path: The last action `(move_two straight1 f2-2f f3-2f f3-3f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The natural language description and visualization of the current state accurately reflect the positions and status of all pieces, consistent with the actions taken from the initial state.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Expanding state 4
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 7
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 7
successfully verified the action of new state 7 with the path: The last action `move_two straight1 f1-2f f2-2f f3-2f` is valid as all preconditions are met in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description and visualization of the current state are accurate, with all objects from the initial state present and correctly positioned.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 8
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Diagram test failed: straight1 is not in the correct initial positions for the action.
Reached maximum attempts without a fully valid diagram.
Child state 8 is invalid: straight1 is not in the correct initial positions for the action.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 4 (3) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 4
Expanding state 5
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 9
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 9
successfully verified the action of new state 9 with the path: The last action `(move_two straight1 f2-2f f3-2f f3-3f)` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied in the parent state, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken. The action aligns with the goal of clearing the top two rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 10
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 10
State 10 failed the action path verification test: The last action `move_two straight0 f1-1f f2-1f f2-2f` is invalid because the precondition that f2-2f must be clear is not satisfied; it was occupied by `straight1` in the parent state. Consequently, the current state's natural language description and visualization are inaccurate, as they incorrectly show `straight0` occupying f2-2f.
Expanding state 6
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 11
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 11
State 11 failed the action path verification test: The last action `move_two straight0 f0-1f f1-1f f2-1f` is invalid because the precondition that position f2-1f must be clear is not satisfied. The current state's natural language description and visualization are based on this invalid action, making them inaccurate.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.25)
Getting diagram of state 12
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 12
State 12 failed the action path verification test: The last action `move_two straight0 f0-1f f1-1f f2-1f` is invalid because the precondition that `f2-1f` must be clear is not satisfied in the parent state. However, the current state's natural language description and visualization are accurate given the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 13
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 13
State 13 failed the action path verification test: The last action `move_two straight0 f0-1f f1-1f f2-1f` is invalid because the precondition that `f2-1f` must be clear is not met in the parent state. The current state's natural language description and visualization are accurate, but the action itself is not valid.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.75)
Getting diagram of state 14
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 14
State 14 failed the action path verification test: The last action is invalid because the precondition that position f2-1f must be clear is not satisfied. The current state's natural language description and visualization are accurate, but the action itself is not valid.
Expanding state 7
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 15
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 15
successfully verified the action of new state 15 with the path: The last action `move_two straight1 f2-2f f3-2f f3-3f` is valid because all preconditions are satisfied: f3-3f is clear, `straight1` occupies f2-2f and f3-2f, and f3-2f and f3-3f are adjacent. The effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
created the 2th child state (temp = 0.5)
Getting diagram of state 16
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 16
State 16 failed the action path verification test: The last action `move_two straight0 f1-1f f2-1f f2-2f` is invalid because the precondition that position f2-2f must be clear is not satisfied. The current state's description and visualization are consistent with the invalid action, but since the action itself is not valid, the state is not valid.
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 5 (2) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 5
Expanding state 9
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 17
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 17
successfully verified the action of new state 17 with the path: The last action `move_two straight0 f1-1f f2-1f f2-2f` is valid as all preconditions are met, and the effects are correctly reflected in the current state. The natural language description and visualization accurately represent the current state, and all objects from the initial state are present. The action aligns with the goal of clearing the top two rows.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Expanding state 15
attempt number 1 for getting child states (temp = 0.0)
created the 1th child state (temp = 0.0)
Getting diagram of state 18
[Attempt 1] Generating diagram encoding
Diagram encoding is valid.
[Attempt 2] Generating diagram code
Successfully generated & tested diagram for state 18
successfully verified the action of new state 18 with the path: The last action `move_two straight0 f1-1f f2-1f f2-2f` is valid as all preconditions are satisfied, and the effects are correctly updated in the current state. The natural language description, diagram encoding, and visualization of the current state are accurate and consistent with the sequence of actions taken.
attempt number 2 for getting child states (temp = 0.25)
new action not unique
attempt number 3 for getting child states (temp = 0.5)
new action not unique
attempt number 4 for getting child states (temp = 0.75)
new action not unique
Number of valid nodes at depth 6 (2) ≤ beam width (4), skipping ranking/pruning.
Expanding nodes at depth 6
Found goal!!
['move_l_down rightl0 f1-0f f2-0f f2-1f f3-0f f3-1f', 'move_two straight1 f0-2f f1-2f f2-2f', 'move_two straight1 f1-2f f2-2f f3-2f', 'move_two straight0 f0-1f f1-1f f2-1f', 'move_two straight1 f2-2f f3-2f f3-3f', 'move_two straight0 f1-1f f2-1f f2-2f']
Goal state and path diagrams recorded in <PATH_REMOVED>
(move_l_down f1-0f f2-0f f2-1f f3-0f f3-1f rightl0)
(move_two f0-2f f1-2f f2-2f straight1)
(move_two f1-2f f2-2f f3-2f straight1)
(move_two f0-1f f1-1f f2-1f straight0)
(move_two f2-2f f3-2f f3-3f straight1)
(move_two f1-1f f2-1f f2-2f straight0)
Goal state found.
