--- Input for STRATEGIZER at 20250925_052007 ---
================================ Human Message =================================

This is the current performance history

{
  "Evolution 0": {
    "wins": 0,
    "avg_score": 2.0,
    "avg_turns": 59.8,
    "full_game_log_path": "game_20250925_051626_fg/game_output.txt",
    "json_game_results_path": "game_20250925_051626_fg/game_20250925_051626_fg.json",
    "cur_foo_player_path": "game_20250925_051626_fg/foo_player.py",
    "cli_run_id": "game_20250925_051626_fg",
    "timestamp": "2025-09-25 05:17:01"
  },
  "Evolution 1": {
    "wins": 14,
    "avg_score": 8.233333333333333,
    "avg_turns": 75.03333333333333,
    "full_game_log_path": "game_20250925_051839_fg/game_output.txt",
    "json_game_results_path": "game_20250925_051839_fg/game_20250925_051839_fg.json",
    "cur_foo_player_path": "game_20250925_051839_fg/foo_player.py",
    "cli_run_id": "game_20250925_051839_fg",
    "timestamp": "2025-09-25 05:19:33"
  }
}
================================ Human Message =================================

This is the current foo_player.py file

from .adapters import (
    Game,
    Player,
    Color,
    copy_game,
    execute_deterministic,
    base_fn,
)

import math

class FooPlayer(Player):
    def __init__(self, name=None):
        # Initialize as the BLUE player by default (keeps compatibility with previous versions)
        super().__init__(Color.BLUE, name)

    def decide(self, game: Game, playable_actions):
        """
        Choose an action using a 1-ply expected-value lookahead.

        Strategy implemented:
        - For each legal action, simulate its deterministic outcomes using execute_deterministic
          (wrapped by the adapters API). This returns a list of (game_after, probability).
        - Evaluate each outcome with a base value function (base_fn) provided by the adapters.
        - Compute the expected value for the action as the probability-weighted sum of outcome values.
        - Choose the action with the highest expected value.

        Notes & assumptions:
        - We only perform a single-ply lookahead (no deeper recursion).
        - Uses adapters.copy_game to avoid mutating the provided game state.
        - Uses adapters.execute_deterministic to get outcome game states; deterministic actions
          should return a single outcome with probability 1.0, but we still handle multiple outcomes
          for generality.
        - If playable_actions is empty, returns None.

        Debugging:
        - Print statements emit the evaluated expected value for each action and the final choice.

        Args:
            game (Game): read-only current game state
            playable_actions (Iterable[Action]): legal actions to choose from
        Returns:
            Action | None: chosen action or None if no actions available
        """
        # Convert to a concrete list so we can iterate multiple times and index
        actions = list(playable_actions) if playable_actions is not None else []

        if len(actions) == 0:
            print('FooPlayer.decide: No playable actions available; returning None')
            return None

        # Build the base value function once. It returns a function f(game, color)->float
        value_fn = base_fn()

        best_action = None
        best_value = -math.inf

        # Evaluate each action with a 1-ply expected value calculation
        for idx, action in enumerate(actions):
            try:
                # Use a copy of the game to be safe. Adapters functions typically return copies,
                # but copying upfront avoids side-effects if an adapter does in-place changes.
                game_copy = copy_game(game)

                # Execute the action deterministically; this returns a list of (game_after, prob)
                outcomes = execute_deterministic(game_copy, action)

                # Compute expected value across all possible deterministic outcomes
                expected_value = 0.0
                for (g_after, prob) in outcomes:
                    try:
                        val = value_fn(g_after, self.color)
                    except Exception as e:
                        # If the value function errors for some reason, catch and report it.
                        print(f'FooPlayer: value_fn raised {e} on action {action}; treating as -inf')
                        val = -math.inf
                    expected_value += prob * val

                print(f'FooPlayer: Action #{idx} = {action} => expected value {expected_value}')

            except Exception as e:
                # If executing the action failed (shouldn't normally happen via adapters),
                # assign a very low value so it won't be chosen.
                print(f'FooPlayer: Exception while evaluating action {action}: {e}')
                expected_value = -math.inf

            # Track the best action seen so far
            if expected_value > best_value:
                best_value = expected_value
                best_action = action

        # Fallback: if best_action is still None (all evaluations failed), pick the first action
        if best_action is None and len(actions) > 0:
            print('FooPlayer: All evaluations failed; defaulting to first action')
            best_action = actions[0]

        print(f'FooPlayer: Chosen action = {best_action} with value {best_value}')
        return best_action

================================ Human Message =================================

This is the current adapters.py file

"""Unified adapter for Catanatron agents.

Expose a small, stable surface for multi-agent systems to:
- Inspect game state
- Enumerate legal actions
- Execute hypothetical moves (with/without validation)
- Expand chance outcomes (dice, dev cards, robber)
- Use pruning helpers
- Build/evaluate heuristics

Everything here is a thin re-export or trivial wrapper from catanatron & friends.
"""

from typing import Callable, List, Optional, Tuple, Dict, Any

# CORE RE-EXPORTS
from catanatron.game import Game  # Game instance with .state, .copy(), .execute(action), .winning_color()
from catanatron.models.player import Player, Color  # Player and Color types
from catanatron.models.enums import Action, ActionType  # Action = namedtuple("Action", ["color", "action_type", "value"]) 

# Player and debug node classes (re-exported so consumers can import them from adapters)
from catanatron_experimental.machine_learning.players.minimax import (
    AlphaBetaPlayer,  # Player that executes an AlphaBeta search with expected value calculation
    SameTurnAlphaBetaPlayer,  # AlphaBeta constrained to the same turn
    DebugStateNode,  # Node for debugging the AlphaBeta search tree
    DebugActionNode,  # Node representing an action in the AlphaBeta search tree
)
from catanatron_experimental.machine_learning.players.value import (
    ValueFunctionPlayer,  # Player using heuristic value functions
    DEFAULT_WEIGHTS,  # Default weight set for value functions
)

# Underlying implementation imports (underscore aliases to avoid recursion)
from catanatron_experimental.machine_learning.players.tree_search_utils import (
    execute_deterministic as _execute_deterministic,
    execute_spectrum as _execute_spectrum,
    expand_spectrum as _expand_spectrum,
    list_prunned_actions as _list_prunned_actions,  # spelling verified in source
    prune_robber_actions as _prune_robber_actions,
)
from catanatron_experimental.machine_learning.players.minimax import render_debug_tree as _render_debug_tree

from catanatron_experimental.machine_learning.players.value import (
    base_fn as _base_fn,
    contender_fn as _contender_fn,
    value_production as _value_production,
    get_value_fn as _get_value_fn,
)

# Public API
__all__ = [
    "Game",
    "Player",
    "Color",
    "Action",
    "ActionType",
    "AlphaBetaPlayer",
    "SameTurnAlphaBetaPlayer",
    "ValueFunctionPlayer",
    "DebugStateNode",
    "DebugActionNode",
    "copy_game",
    "execute_deterministic",
    "execute_spectrum",
    "expand_spectrum",
    "list_prunned_actions",
    "prune_robber_actions",
    "render_debug_tree",
    "base_fn",
    "contender_fn",
    "value_production",
    "get_value_fn",
]

# THIN CONVENIENCE WRAPPERS
def copy_game(game: Game) -> Game:
    '''Create a deep copy of the game state.'''
    return game.copy()

def execute_deterministic(game: Game, action: Action) -> List[Tuple[Game, float]]:
    '''Execute a deterministic action and return the resulting game state with probability 1.'''
    return _execute_deterministic(game, action)

def execute_spectrum(game: Game, action: Action) -> List[Tuple[Game, float]]:
    '''Return a list of (game_copy, probability) tuples for all possible outcomes of an action.'''
    return _execute_spectrum(game, action)

def expand_spectrum(game: Game, actions: List[Action]) -> Dict[Action, List[Tuple[Game, float]]]:
    '''Expand a game state into all possible outcomes for a list of actions.'''
    return _expand_spectrum(game, actions)

def list_prunned_actions(game: Game) -> List[Action]:
    '''Returns a pruned list of actions to reduce the search space.'''
    return _list_prunned_actions(game)

def prune_robber_actions(current_color: Color, game: Game, actions: List[Action]) -> List[Action]:
    '''Prunes robber actions to keep only the most impactful ones.'''
    return _prune_robber_actions(current_color, game, actions)

def render_debug_tree(node: DebugStateNode) -> str:
    '''Renders the AlphaBeta search tree using Graphviz.'''
    return _render_debug_tree(node)

# HEURISTIC BUILDERS
def base_fn(params=DEFAULT_WEIGHTS) -> Callable[[Game, Color], float]:
    '''Base value function factory for evaluating game states.'''
    return _base_fn(params)

def contender_fn(params) -> Callable[[Game, Color], float]:
    '''Alternative value function factory with tuned weights.'''
    return _contender_fn(params)

def value_production(sample, player_name: str = "P0", include_variety: bool = True) -> float:
    '''Compute the production value of a player's state.'''
    return _value_production(sample, player_name, include_variety)

def get_value_fn(name: str, params, value_function=None) -> Callable[[Game, Color], float]:
    '''Factory that returns a value function by name and parameters.'''
    return _get_value_fn(name, params, value_function)

================================ Human Message =================================

- META THOUGHTS:
The 1-ply lookahead implementation has significantly improved the FooPlayer's performance, achieving a near-even win rate (14 wins, 16 losses) and a slightly higher average VP than the AlphaBeta opponent. However, the current strategy is still limited by its shallow depth and lack of probabilistic handling for actions like dice rolls, robber placement, and development cards. The Analyzer has identified these gaps and proposed a multi-ply lookahead with probabilistic simulation as the next logical step. This will allow the player to evaluate deeper strategic outcomes and account for uncertainty, which is critical for outmaneuvering the AlphaBeta opponent.

- META GOAL:
Continue improving the `foo_player.py` code to develop a robust, strategic algorithm that can consistently outperform the AlphaBeta opponent. The immediate focus is on implementing a **multi-ply lookahead** with **probabilistic simulation** for actions involving chance.

- CHOSEN AGENT: STRATEGIZER

- AGENT OBJECTIVE:
Propose a **concrete strategy** to extend the current 1-ply lookahead to a **multi-ply lookahead** (e.g., 2-ply or deeper) that incorporates **probabilistic simulation** for actions like dice rolls, robber placement, and development cards. The strategy must:
1. Use `execute_spectrum` from `adapters.py` to simulate probabilistic outcomes.
2. Integrate a deeper search algorithm (e.g., expectimax or minimax) to evaluate multi-step sequences.
3. Prioritize actions with high long-term value while accounting for uncertainty.
4. Avoid simple heuristics and focus on algorithmic solutions using the provided adapters.
Provide a clear, actionable plan for the Coder to implement.

--- Output from STRATEGIZER at 20250925_052024 ---
================================== Ai Message ==================================

STRATEGIZER
To extend the current 1-ply lookahead to a **multi-ply lookahead with probabilistic simulation**, we will implement an **Expectimax** algorithm. This approach is ideal for games with chance elements like Catan, as it combines probabilistic outcomes with adversarial reasoning. Below is the proposed strategy:

---

### **Proposed Strategy: Multi-Ply Expectimax with Probabilistic Simulation**
#### **Key Features**
1. **Expectimax Algorithm**:
   - Extend the current 1-ply lookahead to **2-ply or deeper** using Expectimax, which handles both adversarial (opponent) and chance (dice, robber, dev cards) nodes.
   - Use `execute_spectrum` to simulate probabilistic outcomes for actions like dice rolls, robber placement, and development cards.

2. **Probabilistic Simulation**:
   - For actions with chance (e.g., dice rolls), use `execute_spectrum` to generate all possible outcomes and their probabilities.
   - For deterministic actions (e.g., building), use `execute_deterministic` as before.

3. **Value Function**:
   - Use the existing `base_fn` or `contender_fn` to evaluate terminal states.
   - Propagate expected values backward through the tree, weighting by probabilities for chance nodes.

4. **Depth Limitation**:
   - Limit the search depth to **2-ply** initially to balance computational cost and strategic depth.
   - Optionally, add iterative deepening for later optimizations.

---

### **Implementation Plan**
#### **Step 1: Define the Expectimax Algorithm**
- Create a recursive `expectimax` function that:
  - **Maximizes** for the player's turn (adversarial node).
  - **Expects** for chance nodes (probabilistic outcomes).
  - **Evaluates** terminal states using `base_fn` or `contender_fn`.

#### **Step 2: Integrate Probabilistic Simulation**
- For actions with chance (e.g., dice rolls, robber placement, dev cards):
  - Use `execute_spectrum` to generate all possible outcomes and their probabilities.
  - For each outcome, recursively call `expectimax` and weight the result by its probability.
- For deterministic actions (e.g., building):
  - Use `execute_deterministic` as before.

#### **Step 3: Update the `decide` Method**
- Replace the current 1-ply evaluation with the `expectimax` function.
- Pass the current game state, playable actions, and depth limit (e.g., 2) to `expectimax`.
- Return the action with the highest expected value.

#### **Step 4: Optimize for Performance**
- Use `list_prunned_actions` to reduce the action space for deeper searches.
- Cache intermediate results to avoid redundant computations.

---

### **Pseudocode for Expectimax**
```python
def expectimax(game: Game, depth: int, is_max_player: bool) -> float:
    if depth == 0 or game.is_terminal():
        return base_fn()(game, self.color)

    if is_max_player:
        # Adversarial node: maximize
        best_value = -math.inf
        for action in list_prunned_actions(game):
            outcomes = execute_spectrum(game, action) if action.has_chance() else execute_deterministic(game, action)
            value = sum(prob * expectimax(g_after, depth - 1, False) for (g_after, prob) in outcomes)
            best_value = max(best_value, value)
        return best_value
    else:
        # Chance node: expect
        outcomes = expand_spectrum(game, list_prunned_actions(game))
        return sum(prob * expectimax(g_after, depth - 1, True) for (g_after, prob) in outcomes)
```

---

### **Actionable Steps for the Coder**
1. **Implement the `expectimax` function** as described above.
2. **Modify the `decide` method** to use `expectimax` with a depth of 2.
3. **Test the player** against the AlphaBeta opponent and compare performance.
4. **Optimize** by adjusting depth, pruning, or caching as needed.

---
**Expected Outcome**:
This strategy will enable the player to evaluate deeper sequences of actions while accounting for uncertainty, leading to more robust decision-making and improved win rates.

END STRATEGIZER

