\relax 
\providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
\providecommand\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument{\AtBeginDocument}
\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument{\ifx\hyper@anchor\@undefined
\global\let\oldnewlabel\newlabel
\gdef\newlabel#1#2{\newlabelxx{#1}#2}
\gdef\newlabelxx#1#2#3#4#5#6{\oldnewlabel{#1}{{#2}{#3}}}
\AtEndDocument{\ifx\hyper@anchor\@undefined
\let\newlabel\oldnewlabel
\fi}
\fi}
\global\let\hyper@last\relax 
\gdef\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument#1{#1}
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToFields[1]{}
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToCoFields[2]{}
\providecommand\babel@aux[2]{}
\@nameuse{bbl@beforestart}
\bibstyle{plainnat}
\citation{muggeo2011efficient}
\citation{zhang2017online}
\citation{osanaiye2016change,kurt2018bayesian,polunchenko2012nearly}
\citation{maghakian2019online}
\citation{lavielle2007adaptive}
\citation{yang2006adaptive,gao2018automatic}
\citation{konidaris2010constructing}
\citation{aminikhanghahi2017survey}
\citation{xie2021sequential}
\citation{basseville1993detection,tartakovsky1991sequential,krichevsky1981performance}
\citation{wald1992sequential,page1954continuous,shiryaev2007optimal,lorden1971procedures,pollak1985optimal,ritov1990decision,moustakides1986optimal,tartakovsky1991sequential}
\citation{lai2010sequential,fryzlewicz2014wild,frick2014multiscale,cho2016change}
\citation{padilla2021optimal,madrid2021optimal}
\citation{adams2007bayesian,lai2010sequential,maillard2019sequential,alami2020restarted}
\citation{bhatt2022offline}
\citation{li2021adversarially}
\citation{niu2012screening}
\citation{nair2022fundamentals,loiseau2010investigating,nizam2016attack}
\citation{barnett2016change,hallac2015network,dartmann2019big}
\citation{ruff2021unifying}
\providecommand \oddpage@label [2]{}
\babel@aux{american}{}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}{section.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.1}Main Contributions}{2}{subsection.1.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Problem Setup}{2}{section.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:problem_formulation}{{2}{2}{Problem Setup}{section.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Assumptions}{2}{subsection.2.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{assumption:bounded}{{2.2}{2}{}{theorem.2.2}{}}
\newlabel{assumption_stochastic}{{2.3}{2}{}{theorem.2.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Performance Measures}{2}{subsection.2.2}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{alami2020restarted}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\newlabel{eqn:fpr_definition}{{1}{3}{False Positive Rate (FPR)}{equation.2.1}{}}
\newlabel{eqn:detection_delay_defn}{{2}{3}{Worst-case Detection Delay}{equation.2.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Online Robust Mean Estimation}{3}{section.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:mean_estimation}{{3}{3}{Online Robust Mean Estimation}{section.3}{}}
\newlabel{eqn:sgd_update}{{3}{3}{Online Robust Mean Estimation}{equation.3.3}{}}
\citation{bubeck2015convex}
\citation{gorbunov2020stochastic,tsai2022heavy}
\citation{victor1999general}
\citation{tsai2022heavy}
\citation{tsai2022heavy}
\citation{tsai2022heavy}
\citation{tsai2022heavy}
\citation{tsai2022heavy}
\citation{diakonikolas2020outlier,lugosi2021robust,depersin2022robust,cherapanamjeri2020algorithms,diakonikolas2022streaming}
\citation{devroye2016sub}
\citation{NIPS2011_e1d5be1c,maillard2019sequential,chowdhury2022bregman}
\newlabel{eqn:defn_B}{{5}{4}{}{equation.3.5}{}}
\newlabel{thm:main_mean_est}{{3.1}{4}{}{equation.3.5}{}}
\newlabel{remark:sub_opt_constants}{{3.5}{4}{}{theorem.3.5}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Uniform over time bound}{4}{subsection.3.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{cor:dim_free}{{3.8}{4}{}{theorem.3.8}{}}
\newlabel{eqn:maillard_them}{{6}{4}{Uniform over time bound}{equation.3.6}{}}
\citation{wainwright2019high,lugosi2019mean}
\citation{wang2022catoni,wang2023huber}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\citation{alami2020restarted}
\citation{lugosi2019mean}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Change-Point Detection Algorithm}{5}{section.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Connections to GLR}{5}{subsection.4.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}False-positive guarantee}{5}{subsection.4.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:fpr_guarantee}{{4.2}{5}{False-positive guarantee}{subsection.4.2}{}}
\newlabel{thm:fpr_main}{{4.1}{5}{False Positives}{theorem.4.1}{}}
\newlabel{lem:fpr_connection}{{4.2}{5}{}{theorem.4.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Worst-case Detection Delay Guarantee}{5}{subsection.4.3}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{alami2020restarted}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\@writefile{loa}{\contentsline {algorithm}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces { Online {\ttfamily  Clipped-SGD} Change Point Detection}\relax }}{6}{algorithm.1}\protected@file@percent }
\providecommand*\caption@xref[2]{\@setref\relax\@undefined{#1}}
\newlabel{algo:learn_model}{{1}{6}{{ Online {\ttfamily Clipped-SGD} Change Point Detection}\relax }{algorithm.1}{}}
\newlabel{fig:heatmap}{{1a}{6}{\relax }{figure.caption.1}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:heatmap}{{a}{6}{\relax }{figure.caption.1}{}}
\newlabel{fig:empirical_heat_map}{{1b}{6}{\relax }{figure.caption.1}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:empirical_heat_map}{{b}{6}{\relax }{figure.caption.1}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Figure $(a)$ plots the heat-map of $\mathcal  {D}(n, \Delta , \delta ')$ from Lemma \ref {lem:detection_delay} for fixed $\delta '=0.1$. The white cells represent infinity. Figure $(b)$ plots the $90$th quantile ($\delta '=0.1$) of the observed delay for Pareto distribution $d=32$ over $30$ runs. As can be seen, the observed detection delay in $(b)$ is much smaller than the worst case delay in $(a)$.\relax }}{6}{figure.caption.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:heatmap_joint}{{1}{6}{Figure $(a)$ plots the heat-map of $\mathcal {D}(n, \Delta , \delta ')$ from Lemma \ref {lem:detection_delay} for fixed $\delta '=0.1$. The white cells represent infinity. Figure $(b)$ plots the $90$th quantile ($\delta '=0.1$) of the observed delay for Pareto distribution $d=32$ over $30$ runs. As can be seen, the observed detection delay in $(b)$ is much smaller than the worst case delay in $(a)$.\relax }{figure.caption.1}{}}
\newlabel{eqn:delay_formula}{{7}{6}{}{equation.4.7}{}}
\newlabel{lem:detection_delay}{{4.3}{6}{}{equation.4.7}{}}
\newlabel{cor:undetectable}{{4.5}{6}{Un-detectable Change}{theorem.4.5}{}}
\citation{lugosi2019mean,vershynin2018high}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\citation{alami2020restarted}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Change-point localization}{7}{subsection.4.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{eqn:defn_mathfrak_B}{{8}{7}{Change-point localization}{equation.4.8}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Experiments}{7}{section.5}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:experiments}{{5}{7}{Experiments}{section.5}{}}
\newlabel{eqn:defn_B_simulation}{{9}{7}{Experiments}{equation.5.9}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Synthetic Simulations}{7}{subsection.5.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:synthetic_simulations}{{5.1}{7}{Synthetic Simulations}{subsection.5.1}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.1.1}Setup}{7}{subsubsection.5.1.1}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{subsec:simulation_setup}{{5.1.1}{7}{Setup}{subsubsection.5.1.1}{}}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\citation{alami2020restarted}
\newlabel{fig:ff1}{{2a}{8}{Pareto $\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff1}{{a}{8}{Pareto $\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff2}{{2b}{8}{Pareto $\Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff2}{{b}{8}{Pareto $\Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff3}{{2c}{8}{Pareto $d=32,\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff3}{{c}{8}{Pareto $d=32,\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff4}{{2d}{8}{Pareto $d=32, \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff4}{{d}{8}{Pareto $d=32, \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff5}{{2e}{8}{Normal $\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff5}{{e}{8}{Normal $\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff6}{{2f}{8}{Normal $ \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff6}{{f}{8}{Normal $ \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff7}{{2g}{8}{Normal $d=32$, $\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff7}{{g}{8}{Normal $d=32$, $\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff8}{{2h}{8}{Normal $d=32, \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff8}{{h}{8}{Normal $d=32, \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff9}{{2i}{8}{Pareto $ \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff9}{{i}{8}{Pareto $ \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff10}{{2j}{8}{Pareto $d=32, \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff10}{{j}{8}{Pareto $d=32, \Delta =1$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff11}{{2k}{8}{Bernoulli with $\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff11}{{k}{8}{Bernoulli with $\Delta =0.5$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:ff12}{{2l}{8}{Bernoulli with $\Delta =0.7$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:ff12}{{l}{8}{Bernoulli with $\Delta =0.7$\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Empirical performance of Algorithm \ref {algo:learn_model} in a variety of scenarios. Exact details of each plot in Section \ref {sec:synthetic_simulations}.\relax }}{8}{figure.caption.2}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:all_figs}{{2}{8}{Empirical performance of Algorithm \ref {algo:learn_model} in a variety of scenarios. Exact details of each plot in Section \ref {sec:synthetic_simulations}.\relax }{figure.caption.2}{}}
\newlabel{fig:local1}{{\caption@xref {fig:local1}{ on input line 662}}{8}{Experiments}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:local1}{{}{8}{Experiments}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\newlabel{fig:local2}{{\caption@xref {fig:local2}{ on input line 667}}{8}{Experiments}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:local2}{{a}{8}{Experiments}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\newlabel{fig:local3}{{\caption@xref {fig:local3}{ on input line 672}}{8}{Experiments}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:local3}{{b}{8}{Experiments}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\newlabel{fig:local4}{{\caption@xref {fig:local4}{ on input line 677}}{8}{Experiments}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\newlabel{sub@fig:local4}{{c}{8}{Experiments}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Plots showing that by Algorithm \ref {algo:learn_model_local} can detect and localize change-points across a variety of settings.\relax }}{8}{figure.caption.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:localization}{{3}{8}{Plots showing that by Algorithm \ref {algo:learn_model_local} can detect and localize change-points across a variety of settings.\relax }{figure.caption.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.1.2}Baselines}{8}{subsubsection.5.1.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.1.3}Results}{8}{subsubsection.5.1.3}\protected@file@percent }
\citation{oruanaidh1996numerical}
\citation{cherapanamjeri2022optimal}
\citation{maillard2019sequential}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Quantitative summary of Figure \ref {fig:all_figs} by comparing regret, where lower is better. Our method achieves lower regret across variety of settings of distribution, dimension and change magnitude.\relax }}{9}{table.caption.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:fig_table}{{1}{9}{Quantitative summary of Figure \ref {fig:all_figs} by comparing regret, where lower is better. Our method achieves lower regret across variety of settings of distribution, dimension and change magnitude.\relax }{table.caption.4}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Performance of change-point detection of Algorithm \ref {algo:learn_model} and the {\ttfamily  Improved-GLR} on real data.\relax }}{9}{figure.caption.5}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:real_data}{{4}{9}{Performance of change-point detection of Algorithm \ref {algo:learn_model} and the {\ttfamily Improved-GLR} on real data.\relax }{figure.caption.5}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {5.1.4}Change-point localization}{9}{subsubsection.5.1.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Real-Data}{9}{subsection.5.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Conclusions }{9}{section.6}\protected@file@percent }
\bibdata{change-point-detect}
\bibcite{NIPS2011_e1d5be1c}{{1}{2011}{{Abbasi-yadkori et~al.}}{{Abbasi-yadkori, P\'{a}l, and Szepesv\'{a}ri}}}
\bibcite{adams2007bayesian}{{2}{2007}{{Adams and MacKay}}{{}}}
\bibcite{alami2020restarted}{{3}{2020}{{Alami et~al.}}{{Alami, Maillard, and F{\'e}raud}}}
\bibcite{aminikhanghahi2017survey}{{4}{2017}{{Aminikhanghahi and Cook}}{{}}}
\bibcite{barnett2016change}{{5}{2016}{{Barnett and Onnela}}{{}}}
\bibcite{basseville1993detection}{{6}{1993}{{Basseville et~al.}}{{Basseville, Nikiforov, et~al.}}}
\bibcite{bhatt2022offline}{{7}{2022}{{Bhatt et~al.}}{{Bhatt, Fang, and Li}}}
\bibcite{bubeck2015convex}{{8}{2015}{{Bubeck}}{{}}}
\bibcite{cherapanamjeri2020algorithms}{{9}{2020}{{Cherapanamjeri et~al.}}{{Cherapanamjeri, Hopkins, Kathuria, Raghavendra, and Tripuraneni}}}
\bibcite{cherapanamjeri2022optimal}{{10}{2022}{{Cherapanamjeri et~al.}}{{Cherapanamjeri, Tripuraneni, Bartlett, and Jordan}}}
\bibcite{cho2016change}{{11}{2016}{{Cho}}{{}}}
\bibcite{chowdhury2022bregman}{{12}{2022}{{Chowdhury et~al.}}{{Chowdhury, Saux, Maillard, and Gopalan}}}
\bibcite{dartmann2019big}{{13}{2019}{{Dartmann et~al.}}{{Dartmann, Song, and Schmeink}}}
\bibcite{depersin2022robust}{{14}{2022}{{Depersin and Lecu{\'e}}}{{}}}
\bibcite{devroye2016sub}{{15}{2016}{{Devroye et~al.}}{{Devroye, Lerasle, Lugosi, and Oliveira}}}
\bibcite{diakonikolas2020outlier}{{16}{2020}{{Diakonikolas et~al.}}{{Diakonikolas, Kane, and Pensia}}}
\bibcite{diakonikolas2022streaming}{{17}{2022}{{Diakonikolas et~al.}}{{Diakonikolas, Kane, Pensia, and Pittas}}}
\bibcite{frick2014multiscale}{{18}{2014}{{Frick et~al.}}{{Frick, Munk, and Sieling}}}
\bibcite{fryzlewicz2014wild}{{19}{2014}{{Fryzlewicz}}{{}}}
\bibcite{gao2018automatic}{{20}{2018}{{Gao et~al.}}{{Gao, Lu, Yan, Lyu, Li, Shang, Xie, and Zhang}}}
\bibcite{gorbunov2020stochastic}{{21}{2020}{{Gorbunov et~al.}}{{Gorbunov, Danilova, and Gasnikov}}}
\bibcite{hallac2015network}{{22}{2015}{{Hallac et~al.}}{{Hallac, Leskovec, and Boyd}}}
\bibcite{konidaris2010constructing}{{23}{2010}{{Konidaris et~al.}}{{Konidaris, Kuindersma, Grupen, and Barto}}}
\bibcite{krichevsky1981performance}{{24}{1981}{{Krichevsky and Trofimov}}{{}}}
\bibcite{kurt2018bayesian}{{25}{2018}{{Kurt et~al.}}{{Kurt, Y{\i }ld{\i }z, Ceritli, Sankur, and Cemgil}}}
\bibcite{lai2010sequential}{{26}{2010}{{Lai and Xing}}{{}}}
\bibcite{lavielle2007adaptive}{{27}{2007}{{Lavielle and Teyssiere}}{{}}}
\bibcite{li2021adversarially}{{28}{2021}{{Li and Yu}}{{}}}
\bibcite{loiseau2010investigating}{{29}{2010}{{Loiseau et~al.}}{{Loiseau, Gon{\c {c}}alves, Dewaele, Borgnat, Abry, and Primet}}}
\bibcite{lorden1971procedures}{{30}{1971}{{Lorden}}{{}}}
\bibcite{lugosi2019mean}{{31}{2019}{{Lugosi and Mendelson}}{{}}}
\bibcite{lugosi2021robust}{{32}{2021}{{Lugosi and Mendelson}}{{}}}
\bibcite{madrid2021optimal}{{33}{2021}{{Madrid~Padilla et~al.}}{{Madrid~Padilla, Yu, Wang, and Rinaldo}}}
\bibcite{maghakian2019online}{{34}{2019}{{Maghakian et~al.}}{{Maghakian, Comden, and Liu}}}
\bibcite{maillard2019sequential}{{35}{2019}{{Maillard}}{{}}}
\bibcite{moustakides1986optimal}{{36}{1986}{{Moustakides}}{{}}}
\bibcite{muggeo2011efficient}{{37}{2011}{{Muggeo and Adelfio}}{{}}}
\bibcite{nair2022fundamentals}{{38}{2022}{{Nair et~al.}}{{Nair, Wierman, and Zwart}}}
\bibcite{niu2012screening}{{39}{2012}{{Niu and Zhang}}{{}}}
\bibcite{nizam2016attack}{{40}{2016}{{Nizam et~al.}}{{Nizam, Chaki, Al~Mamun, Kaiser, et~al.}}}
\bibcite{oruanaidh1996numerical}{{41}{1996}{{{\'O Ruanaidh} and Fitzgerald}}{{}}}
\bibcite{osanaiye2016change}{{42}{2016}{{Osanaiye et~al.}}{{Osanaiye, Choo, and Dlodlo}}}
\bibcite{padilla2021optimal}{{43}{2021}{{Padilla et~al.}}{{Padilla, Yu, Wang, and Rinaldo}}}
\bibcite{page1954continuous}{{44}{1954}{{Page}}{{}}}
\bibcite{pollak1985optimal}{{45}{1985}{{Pollak}}{{}}}
\bibcite{polunchenko2012nearly}{{46}{2012}{{Polunchenko et~al.}}{{Polunchenko, Tartakovsky, and Mukhopadhyay}}}
\bibcite{ritov1990decision}{{47}{1990}{{Ritov}}{{}}}
\bibcite{ruff2021unifying}{{48}{2021}{{Ruff et~al.}}{{Ruff, Kauffmann, Vandermeulen, Montavon, Samek, Kloft, Dietterich, and M{\"u}ller}}}
\bibcite{shiryaev2007optimal}{{49}{2007}{{Shiryaev}}{{}}}
\bibcite{tartakovsky1991sequential}{{50}{1991}{{Tartakovsky}}{{}}}
\bibcite{tsai2022heavy}{{51}{2022}{{Tsai et~al.}}{{Tsai, Prasad, Balakrishnan, and Ravikumar}}}
\bibcite{vershynin2018high}{{52}{2018}{{Vershynin}}{{}}}
\bibcite{victor1999general}{{53}{1999}{{Victor}}{{}}}
\bibcite{wainwright2019high}{{54}{2019}{{Wainwright}}{{}}}
\bibcite{wald1992sequential}{{55}{1992}{{Wald}}{{}}}
\bibcite{wang2022catoni}{{56}{2022}{{Wang and Ramdas}}{{}}}
\bibcite{wang2023huber}{{57}{2023}{{Wang and Ramdas}}{{}}}
\bibcite{xie2021sequential}{{58}{2021}{{Xie et~al.}}{{Xie, Zou, Xie, and Veeravalli}}}
\bibcite{yang2006adaptive}{{59}{2006}{{Yang et~al.}}{{Yang, Dumont, and Ansermino}}}
\bibcite{zhang2017online}{{60}{2017}{{Zhang et~al.}}{{Zhang, Wei, Yan, Zhou, and Pani}}}
\newlabel{LastPage}{{}{12}{}{page.12}{}}
\xdef\lastpage@lastpage{12}
\xdef\lastpage@lastpageHy{12}
\gdef \@abspage@last{12}
