\begin{table*}
\begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
    \centering
     \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{
     \begin{small}
        \begin{tabular}{
            l@{  }  r@{ }r@{ }r@{ } r@{ }r@{ }r@{ } r@{ }r@{ }r@{ } r r@{ }r@{ }r@{ } r@{ }r@{ }r@{ } r@{ }r@{ }r 
        }
        \toprule
        & \multicolumn{9}{c}{ \cellcolor{lblue} \textbf{\texttt{LOC}}}  &  & \multicolumn{9}{c}{\cellcolor{lblue}\texttt{StressID}} \\ 
        & \textbf{ACC} & $+\Delta$ & & \textbf{TNR} & $+\Delta$ & & \textbf{TPR} &  $+\Delta$ & &
        % stress
        & \textbf{ACC} & $+\Delta$ & & \textbf{TNR} & $+\Delta$ & & \textbf{TPR} & $+\Delta$ & 
        % & \textbf{ACC} & $+\Delta$ & \textbf{TNR} & $+\Delta$ & \textbf{TPR} & $+\Delta$ 
        \\
        \midrule
         & 66.2(3.3) & & & 64.4(5.9) &  & & 68.0(4.2) & & & 
        % stress - 2 classes
        & 69.5(2.9) & & & 61.9(6.9) & & & 77.1(6.3) & &
        \\
        \textit{real-life} &
        62.0(3.2) & 4.2 & & 60.8(1.0) & 3.6 & & 68.5(4.3) & -0.5 & &
        % stress - 2 classes
        & 60.0(4.8) & 9.5 & & 66.9(9.5) & -5.0 & & 53.1(7.9) & 24 &
        \\
        \textit{no video} &  
        % loc - 2 classes
        67.1(2.2) & -1.1 & & 66.2(3.9) & -1.8 & & 68.0(2.0) & 0.0 & &
        % stress - 2 classes
        & 61.2(4.6) & 8.3 & & 53.7(10.1) & 8.5 & & 68.8(7.1) & 8.3 &
        \\
        \textit{no audio}
        % loc 2 classes
        &  69.5(5.4) & -3.3 & & 63.0(12.0) & 1.4 & & 76.1(4.9) & -8.1 & &
        % stress - 2 classes
        & 68.3(2.9) & 1.2 & & 65.8(6.8) & -4.0 & & 70.7(7.4) &6.4 &
        \\
        \bottomrule
        \end{tabular}
        \end{small}
    }
    \captionsetup{font=footnotesize}
    \caption{\textbf{Evaluation of ADAPT on three modality scenarios on  $X_{\text{test}}$.} 
   For each scenario, we remove one or two modalities from the test samples. We report mean and standard deviation for ACC, TNR, and TPR, and the differences ($\Delta$) compared to tests without removed modality (first row).
    }
    \label{tab:scenarios}
    \end{minipage}
    \\
    \begin{minipage}{0.49\textwidth}
       \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{
            \begin{tabular}{
           c@{ } @{ }l@{ }l@{ } l@{ }l@{ } @{ }l@{ } l@{ }l@{ }l
        }
        \toprule
        \multicolumn{2}{c}{Anchor} & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{ \cellcolor{lblue} \texttt{LOC}} & 
        & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\cellcolor{lblue} \texttt{StressID}} \\ 
        \textbf{Audio} &  \textbf{Video} & & \textbf{ACC} & \textbf{F1}  &
        & \textbf{ACC} & \textbf{F1}   \\
        \midrule
        %%%%% NO ANCHOR %%%%%
        \xmark & \xmark &
         % loc - 2 class
        & 54.6(1.0) & 78.4(4.1) &
        % stress - 2 class
        & 65.8 (1.8) & 65.9 (1.7) \\
         %%%%% AUDIO %%%%%
         \cmark &  \xmark &
         % loc
         & 54.0(2.1) & \textbf{78.5 (1.4) }&
         % stress
         & 63.6(4.8) & 63.3(5.0) 
         \\
        %%%%% VIDEO %%%%%
        \xmark & \cmark & 
         % loc - 2 class
        &\textbf{66.2(3.3)} & 78.0(4.3) &
        % stress - 2 class
        & \textbf{69.5(2.9)}& \textbf{69.6(3.1)} \\
        \arrayrulecolor{black}\bottomrule
        \end{tabular}
    }
    \captionsetup{font=footnotesize}
    \caption{\textbf{Ablation study of \emph{anchoring} on $X_{\text{test}}$.} We report the results with anchoring prior fusion (considering the audio or the video as the anchor) and without.
    \textbf{Bold} indicates the top \textbf{1} performing. \iffalse \vicc{instead of dot I would put a hyphen; the dot is not very clear}\fi}
    \label{tab:variant-adapt}
    \end{minipage}
    \hfill
    \begin{minipage}{0.49\textwidth}
   \centering
    \resizebox{0.90\linewidth}{!}{
    \begin{tabular}{
        c@{ }c@{  }c@{  }l@{  }l@{  }  %% l@{ }l@{ }l@{ }l  l@{ }l@{ }l@{ }l@{ }l
    }
    \toprule
    % \multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{Components}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\cellcolor{lblue} \texttt{StressID}} \\ 
    \textbf{Features} & \textbf{Anchoring} & \textbf{Fusion} & \textbf{ACC} & \textbf{F1}  \\
    \midrule
    %%%%% HANDCRAFTED
     \multirowcell{3}[0pt][l]{\textsuperscript{\textdaggerdbl}handcrafted \\ features} 
     & \multirow{2}{*}{\xmark} & \textsuperscript{\textdagger}Feature level &
     61(3)\textsuperscript{*}  &  66(4)\textsuperscript{*} \\
    & &  \textsuperscript{\textdagger}Decision level 
    & 65(5)\textsuperscript{*} &  72(5)\textsuperscript{*}  \\
     & \cmark & ADAPT & 
    51.5(2.3) & 60.2(4.7)  \\
    \arrayrulecolor{black!50}\midrule
     %%%%% ADAPT
    \multirow{3}{*}{ADAPT} & \multirow{3}{*}{\cmark} 
    & \textsuperscript{\textdagger}Feature level 
    & 65.2(7.2) & 71.2(10)  \\
    & & \textsuperscript{\textdagger}Decision level
    & \textbf{70.7(3.3)} &\textbf{78.8(2.9)}   \\
     &  & ADAPT 
    & \underline{69.5(3.7)} & \underline{75.9(4.3)}
    \\
    \arrayrulecolor{black}\bottomrule
    \end{tabular}   
    }
    \captionsetup{font=footnotesize}
    \caption{\textbf{Study of ADAPT components with  SOTA for \texttt{StressID} on $X_{\text{test}}^{*}$.}
     \textsuperscript{\textdaggerdbl}Handcrafted features, \textsuperscript{\textdagger}Methods, \textsuperscript{*}Results from~\citet{chaptoukaev2023stressid}.
     \textbf{Bold} and \underline{underlined} indicates the top \textbf{1}, \underline{2}. }
    \label{tab:stress-adapt-sota}
    \end{minipage}
    \label{tab:twotables_minipage}
\end{table*}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
