Let's first **summarize and compile the relevant quantitative physicochemical properties** available for the candidate bases, then **define groups using those values** according to clear, _quantitative thresholds/criteria_.

---

### **Step 1: Compile Quantitative Properties from Data**

#### **Key Quantitative Properties Available (per substance):**
- **TPSA (Topological Polar Surface Area):** Indicates polarity and potential hydrogen bonding, relevant for solubility and chemical reactivity.
- **H-bond donor and acceptor counts:** Quantifies hydrogen-bonding ability, relevant for identifying protic vs aprotic and intermolecular interaction strength.
- **Molecular weight/structure:** Can be used to infer volatility, sterics, and ionic/covalent character.
- **Charge and covalent unit count:** For distinguishing ionic (inorganic) salts from neutral, covalent (organic) compounds.  

#### **Table of Extracted Values:**

| Substance | TPSA | H-Bond Donor | H-Bond Acceptor | Mol. Wt. | Covalent Unit Count | Notable Structure/Charge         |
|-----------|------|--------------|-----------------|----------|---------------------|----------------------------------|
| KOH       |   1  |      1       |       1         | 56.1     |         2           | Ionic, [OH-].[K+]                |
| nothing*  | 32.3 |      1       |       2         | 234.3    |         1           | Neutral, amide/amine (organic)   |
| Et3N      |  3.2 |      0       |       1         | 101.2    |         1           | Neutral, tertiary amine (organic)|
| K3PO4     | 86.3 |      0       |       4         | 212.3    |         4           | Ionic, [PO4^3-, 3K+]             |
| LiOtBu    | 23.1 |      0       |       1         | 80.1     |         2           | Ionic, [Li+][tBuO-]              |
| CsF       |  ?   |      ?       |      ?          | ?        |         ?           | No data available                |
| NaOH      |   1  |      1       |       1         | 40.0     |         2           | Ionic, [OH-].[Na+]               |
| NaHCO3    | 60.4 |      1       |       3         | 84.0     |         2           | Ionic, [HCO3-].[Na+]             |

\* "nothing" appears to be a local anesthetic molecule, not a base—possibly lidocaine; but classified by data as submitted.

---

### **Step 2: Determine Quantitative Grouping Criteria**

Relevant physicochemical properties suggest the following potential axes for grouping:

1. **Ionic (Inorganic) vs. Covalent (Organic)**
    - Use "covalent unit count" and presence of a metal/nonmetal.
    - Ionic if >1 covalent unit and includes metal counterion; otherwise organic/covalent.

2. **Polarity / Potential H-bonding:**
    - TPSA: 
      - *Low* (< ~10): Weakly polar, limited H-bonding.
      - *Moderate* (10–40): Some polarity, moderate solubility/H-bonding.
      - *High* (>40): Highly polar, strong H-bonding (and/or ionic).

3. **Basicity Category Inference (based on structure and H-bonding):**
    - Strong inorganic base: Hydroxides, phosphates, etc.
    - Weak bases/buffering: Bicarbonate.
    - Organic (non-ionic) bases: Amines/amides.

**Note:** Since the most unambiguous, consistently available quantitative discriminator here is “inorganic ionic vs. organic covalent,” that is prioritized.

---

### **Step 3: Classification**

#### **Group 1: Inorganic, Ionic, Strong Bases**
- Criteria: Covalent unit count >1, includes simple ions as components, TPSA typically 1-86.3, metal counterion present.
  - **[KOH, NaOH, K3PO4, LiOtBu, NaHCO3]**

#### **Group 2: Organic, Covalent, Neutral Bases**
- Criteria: Covalent unit count = 1, no simple ions, moderate-to-low TPSA, hydrocarbon backbone obvious, neutral.
  - **[Et3N, "nothing"]**

#### **Group 3: Insufficient Data or Error**
- Criteria: Lacking all main quantitative database entries.
  - **[CsF]**

---

### **Step 4: Ambiguity/Justification**

- "nothing" is not a typical base; data specifies neutral organic with some H-bonding, classified based on quantitative data only.
- LiOtBu is ionic, but the organic moiety is present; however, by database structure, it's grouped as inorganic due to the ionic [Li+], [tBuO-] pair and covalent unit count.
- NaHCO3 is weaker as a base but its quantitative structure and properties most closely match ionic, so grouped there by available data.

---

## **Final Classification Table**

| Group                                               | Members                      | Key Quantitative Basis                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. **Inorganic/Ionic (Mostly Strong) Bases**        | KOH, NaOH, K3PO4, LiOtBu, NaHCO3 | Covalent unit count >1, metal ion, TPSA high/varied     |
| 2. **Organic, Covalent, Neutral (Amines/Amides)**   | Et3N, "nothing"              | Covalent unit count = 1, neutral, low/mod TPSA, HBA/HBD |
| 3. **No Database Data/Unclassified**                | CsF                          | No property data available                              |

---

### **Summary Table**

| Base        | Group (#) | Reason (Quantitative Criteria)                   |
|-------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------|
| KOH         | 1         | 2 covalent units, ionic, TPSA=1                 |
| NaOH        | 1         | 2 covalent units, ionic, TPSA=1                 |
| K3PO4       | 1         | 4 covalent units, ionic, TPSA=86.3              |
| LiOtBu      | 1         | 2 covalent units, ionic, TPSA=23.1              |
| NaHCO3      | 1         | 2 covalent units, ionic, TPSA=60.4              |
| Et3N        | 2         | 1 covalent unit, neutral, TPSA=3.2              |
| nothing     | 2         | 1 covalent unit, neutral, TPSA=32.3             |
| CsF         | 3         | No database property data                       |

**Explanation:** This grouping is supported strictly by quantitative database entries (not by general knowledge) as required. If more classes are needed or specific property thresholds are requested, detail your preferred criteria.