Certainly! To classify these ligands, I’ll adhere to your requirements by relying on **quantitative physicochemical data**—specifically, the kinds typically reported in ligand and organophosphorus chemistry (e.g., steric parameters such as %V<sub>bur</sub> (buried volume), cone angle, and electronic parameters such as Tolman Electronic Parameter (TEP), pK<sub>a</sub> of basicity, and perhaps quantifiable H-bond donor/acceptor counts, number of aryl rings, etc.).

Let’s start by listing out **the most relevant and quantifiable physicochemical properties** for this class (phosphine ligands):

---

### [Specified_physicochemical_Properties]
**1. Steric Bulk:**  
- Measured by the **Tolman cone angle** or **%V<sub>bur</sub>** (buried volume).  
- Quantifies how much space the ligand occupies around the metal center; higher values = bulkier.

**2. Electronic Properties:**  
- Quantified by the **Tolman Electronic Parameter (TEP)** or the **pK<sub>a</sub>** of the phosphine.  
- Lower TEP = more electron-rich ligand; Higher pK<sub>a</sub> = stronger base.

**3. Solubility/Polarity:**  
- Roughly estimated by the number of methoxy groups (hydrophilicity), number of isopropyl or bulky groups (hydrophobicity), and logP, if available.

-----

## Compiled Data (Based on Structure–Quantifiable Indicators):

| Ligand                                                                                                 | Major Substituents                                               | Methoxy? | Alkyl Bulk                   | Est. Cone Angle (°) | Est. %V<sub>bur</sub> | Expected pK<sub>a</sub> | Expected TEP (cm<sup>-1</sup>) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------|
| bis(1-adamantyl)-[3,6-dimethoxy-2-[2,4,6-tri(propan-2-yl)phenyl]phenyl]phosphane                      | 2x Adamantyl, 3,6-dimethoxy, tri(isopropyl)phenyl                | Yes      | Very High (Adamantyl, i-Pr) | Very High (~180+)    | Very High             | High (bulky)             | Likely lower (e-rich)         |
| dicyclohexyl-[2-[2,4,6-tri(propan-2-yl)phenyl]phenyl]phosphane                                        | 2x Cyclohexyl, tri(isopropyl)phenyl                              | No       | High (Cyclohexyl, i-Pr)     | High (~170+)         | High                  | High                     | Lower (e-rich)                |
| ditert-butyl-[2-[2,4,6-tri(propan-2-yl)phenyl]phenyl]phosphane                                        | 2x tert-butyl, tri(isopropyl)phenyl                              | No       | High (tBu, i-Pr)            | High (~165–170)      | High                  | High                     | Lower (e-rich)                |
| ditert-butyl-[3,6-dimethoxy-2-[2,4,6-tri(propan-2-yl)phenyl]phenyl]phosphane                          | 2x tert-butyl, 3,6-dimethoxy, tri(isopropyl)phenyl               | Yes      | High (tBu, i-Pr)            | High (~165–170)      | High                  | High                     | Lower (e-rich)                |

**References for typical values:**
- Adamantyl, tert-butyl, and cyclohexyl substituents are among the bulkiest known for phosphines, with cone angles often reported in the 160–180° or %V<sub>bur</sub> ~45–55% range.
- Methoxy at 3,6 add some polarity but do not significantly lower bulk.

---

## **Quantitative Classification**

### **Step 1: Steric Bulk (Primary Quantitative Criterion)**
- **All four ligands** have extremely high cone angles/%V<sub>bur</sub> due to 2x(adamantyl/tBu/cyclohexyl) and the triisopropylphenyl group.
- In typical classification:  
  - **Small**: <130°  
  - **Medium**: 130–150°  
  - **Large/Bulky**: >150°
- **All candidates are "Large/Bulky"** steric ligands.

### **Step 2: Electronic Properties**
- All carry strong electron-donating groups (alkyls > aryls), but **methoxy substituents** can increase electron density slightly more.
- pK<sub>a</sub> typically increases in order: aryl < cyclohexyl < tBu < adamantyl.
  - So expected order (most basic): adamantyl > cyclohexyl ≈ tBu.
- TEP will be **low** for all (electron-rich), but ligands with methoxy (the first and last) are likely to be **the most electron-donating**.

### **Step 3: Solubility/Polarity**
- Methoxy ligands are mildly more polar but not substantially so due to the overwhelming bulk of hydrophobic groups.  
- All four are **hydrophobic**.

---

## **Grouping Results**

### **Option 1: One Group (Justification)**
- **All four** ligands are *very bulky, electron-rich, and hydrophobic phosphines*.  
- Their major quantitative properties (%V<sub>bur</sub>, Cone Angle, TEP, pK<sub>a</sub> for PR<sub>2</sub> types) would put them in **the same class** under all three most relevant physicochemical property axes.

### **Option 2: Two Groups (Subtlety based on Measurables)**

If allowed a finer split based ONLY on presence of methoxy (which raises electron donation and slightly affects polarity), you *might* split into:

- **Group 1: Methoxy-substituted, ultra-electron-rich, ultra-bulky phosphines**  
  - `'bis(1-adamantyl)-[3,6-dimethoxy-2-[2,4,6-tri(propan-2-yl)phenyl]phenyl]phosphane'`  
  - `'ditert-butyl-[3,6-dimethoxy-2-[2,4,6-tri(propan-2-yl)phenyl]phenyl]phosphane'`  
- **Group 2: Non-methoxy, ultra-bulky, electron-rich phosphines**  
  - The other two

However, **the difference is marginal** based on typical quantitative data (e.g., TEP shifts by 2–3 cm<sup>-1</sup>), so the methoxy doesn't introduce a major property class change.

---

## **Conclusion (Recommended Output):**

**Given your instruction to prefer *unified grouping if justified by data*, ALL CANDIDATE LIGANDS BELONG IN A SINGLE CLASS:**

---

### **Physicochemical Class:**  
**Ultra-bulky, electron-rich phosphines**  
- **Steric bulk**: Cone angle >160°, %V<sub>bur</sub> ~50%  
- **Electronic**: TEP = very low (electron-rich), pK<sub>a</sub> ≈ very high (strong bases)  
- **Polarity**: Predominantly hydrophobic, minor differences due to methoxy presence

---

**If you have a property axis where you need a distinct grouping, please specify—it would require substantially larger quantitative differences than present here.**