{
 "cells": [
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 439,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "import pandas as pd\n",
    "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\n",
    "import numpy as np\n",
    "import math\n",
    "scenario = 'dating_app'\n",
    "shortened_name = 'datepro'\n",
    "path = f'{scenario}/processed_data_eval{shortened_name}.csv'\n",
    "df = pd.read_csv(path)\n",
    "# df.head()"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 440,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "75 75\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# logistics - checking that generations_noindex and generations are the same except for index\n",
    "\n",
    "generations_noindex_path = f'{scenario}/generations_noindex.csv'\n",
    "generations_noindex_df = pd.read_csv(generations_noindex_path)\n",
    "\n",
    "generations_path = f'{scenario}/generations.csv'\n",
    "generations_df = pd.read_csv(generations_path)\n",
    "\n",
    "print(len(generations_df), len(generations_noindex_df))\n",
    "\n",
    "for i in range(len(generations_noindex_df)):\n",
    "    if generations_noindex_df['text'][i] != generations_df['text'][i]:\n",
    "        print(generations_noindex_df['advice_type'][i], generations_noindex_df['advice_indices'][i], generations_df['advice_type'][i], generations_df['advice_indices'][i])\n",
    "        print(generations_noindex_df['text'][i], \"\\n\\n\", generations_df['text'][i])\n",
    "        # print(i)\n",
    "        break\n",
    "\n",
    "# so index [] was removed from unorthodox_advice but it was still there for the human experiment\n",
    "# it is now in baseline_irrelevant_advice instead\n",
    "# moved back and regenerated"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 441,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "count: 120\n",
      "1500\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# fill in generation_index column\n",
    "# check that generations_df text is unique\n",
    "assert len(generations_df['text'].unique()) == len(generations_df)\n",
    "count = 0\n",
    "for index, row in df.iterrows():\n",
    "    text = row['text']\n",
    "    if not math.isnan(df.at[index, 'generation_index']): # sanity check for the baselines that originally had the generation index\n",
    "        count += 1\n",
    "    flag = False\n",
    "    for _, gen_row in generations_df.iterrows():\n",
    "        if gen_row['text'] == text:\n",
    "            # is nan?\n",
    "            if not math.isnan(df.at[index, 'generation_index']):\n",
    "                assert(df.at[index, 'generation_index'] == gen_row['generation_index'])\n",
    "            df.at[index, 'generation_index'] = gen_row['generation_index']\n",
    "            flag = True\n",
    "            break\n",
    "    if not flag: \n",
    "        print(f'no match for {index}')\n",
    "        print(text, end=\"\\n\")\n",
    "\n",
    "print(f'count: {count}')\n",
    "print(len(df))"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 442,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# transform column advice_indices to string\n",
    "df['participant_strategy'] = df['participant_strategy'].apply(lambda x: str(x))\n",
    "df['advice_indices'] = df['advice_indices'].apply(lambda x: str(x))\n",
    "# tranforms all nan values\n",
    "\n",
    "na_locations = df.isna()\n",
    "row_indices, col_indices = np.where(na_locations)\n",
    "for row, col in zip(row_indices, col_indices):\n",
    "    print(f\"NaN value at row {row}, column {df.columns[col]}\")\n",
    "    # print(df.iloc[row], \"\\n\")"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "NANs CORRESPOND TO EMPTY STRING ADVICE INDICES"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 407,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# check that origin matches text exactly\n",
    "# origin_id are 13-105, inclusive\n",
    "\n",
    "dict = {}\n",
    "for row in df.itertuples():\n",
    "    if row.origin_id not in dict:\n",
    "        dict[row.origin_id] = row.text\n",
    "    else:\n",
    "        if dict[row.origin_id] != row.text:\n",
    "            print(\"ERROR\")"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 396,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "Number of origin_ids with less than 20 ratings: 0 out of 75\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "image/png": "[encoded data, 5384 characters]",
      "text/plain": [
       "<Figure size 432x288 with 1 Axes>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {
      "needs_background": "light"
     },
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# check the number of ratings per origin_id\n",
    "non20_count = 0\n",
    "counts = []\n",
    "for id_count in df.groupby('origin_id')[\"id\"].count():\n",
    "    if id_count != 20:\n",
    "        non20_count += 1\n",
    "    counts += [id_count]\n",
    "plt.hist(counts, bins=9)\n",
    "\n",
    "print(f\"Number of origin_ids with less than 20 ratings: {non20_count} out of {len(df.groupby('origin_id'))}\")"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "START OF ANALYSIS"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 397,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "participant_id: 1\n",
      "participant_strategy: I based my responses on whether the ad would appeal to me personally\n",
      "participant_id: 2\n",
      "participant_strategy: Consider length and content of text and how appealing it would be to me as a woman, if I were reading this on a real life dating profile\n",
      "participant_id: 4\n",
      "participant_strategy: if he said 'average' in the description i rated it lower\n",
      "participant_id: 5\n",
      "participant_strategy: Looking at the key words, and if he was being too cringey or putting himself down\n",
      "participant_id: 6\n",
      "participant_strategy: Read the profile and base decision on instincts of Eric's overall message.\n",
      "participant_id: 7\n",
      "participant_strategy: I though the more negative the language was, the lower the score would be. The ones where the average height was mentioned in a low-confidence way I scored lower too as potential mates may not want this in a boyfriend.\n",
      "participant_id: 10\n",
      "participant_strategy: Tried to read it like I was also on the dating app, and if I would swipe for him. I focused on the paragraphs that had less detail as the more likely to get a girlfriend ones, as I feel to much information/enthusiasm can put someone off\n",
      "participant_id: 11\n",
      "participant_strategy: I went with how I would feel reading those descriptions on a dating site, but also how someone who has similar interests may view them and how they would respond.\n",
      "participant_id: 12\n",
      "participant_strategy: It took some reading and divulging the same information. The shorter and more concise the bio was better\n",
      "participant_id: 13\n",
      "participant_strategy: using my judgement\n",
      "participant_id: 14\n",
      "participant_strategy: My strategy was to not over-analyse each individual word, but use a bigger view of the text in an effort to understand the \"vibe\" This way I could more easily put myself in the perspective of someone using a dating app. Also, the ones that scored higher for me were ones easier to read and divulge, in addition to ones with happier tones as in my eyes coming off as fun and interesting works well on dating apps.\n",
      "participant_id: 15\n",
      "participant_strategy: I was imagining myself in the role of looking for a potential boyfriend and feeling which one felt most genuine. Some felt a little too slick or cliched to reveal the real person. Anything that was too focussed on the dog was also a red flag\n",
      "participant_id: 16\n",
      "participant_strategy: I just focused on how each of the statement made me feel. The ones where he mentioned about being average were not great for me and so I scored those lower.\n",
      "participant_id: 17\n",
      "participant_strategy: My strategy was to look for a narrative that I would have liked about the person\n",
      "participant_id: 18\n",
      "participant_strategy: I favoured bios mentioning love and relationships, though in a reasonable way, not 'they're like houseplants', which isn't a good image imo. Too much tennis or dog talk got relegated too.\n",
      "participant_id: 19\n",
      "participant_strategy: I didnt rate the cringy jokey text well, but liked the brief more down to earth text\n",
      "participant_id: 20\n",
      "participant_strategy: I tended to select higher scores for the ones that were a bit more playful,with a little but not too much self deprication. Those that mentioned tires/cars a bit too much i tended to put the lowest scores for. Those that seemed chatty,casual and didn't in my mind come across as too 'desperate' were put towards the top end of the scores too.\n",
      "participant_id: 21\n",
      "participant_strategy: i though if i would like him\n",
      "participant_id: 22\n",
      "participant_strategy: I was looking for bio's that weren't too long and were more straight forward. (And ones that weren't too cringey)\n",
      "participant_id: 23\n",
      "participant_strategy: I had no strategy. I tried to stay objective, but found a lot of the examples very cringey. \n",
      "participant_id: 24\n",
      "participant_strategy: Just to simply read the response and to visualise myself taking it in and seeing if it got me interested at all\n",
      "participant_id: 25\n",
      "participant_strategy: my strategy in the task was to evaluate the likeliness that the dating app bio would encourage potential matches or deter them. I based it on the length, grammar, humour and conciseness of each bio.\n",
      "participant_id: 26\n",
      "participant_strategy: I presume the responses were generated by AI. There were a few that were a real turn off (halfway in love with you already for example). The ones that sounded more genuine and heartfelt got a better response. There wasn't a \"strategy\" per se, I just graded the ones that seemed more genuine and succint.\n",
      "participant_id: 27\n",
      "participant_strategy: Scan for interesting information, give points if the puns were good, minus points if what he was saying was really boring. \n",
      "participant_id: 28\n",
      "participant_strategy: I mainly went by how the texts made me feel\n",
      "participant_id: 29\n",
      "participant_strategy: what i thought if i read that on a  dating site \n",
      "participant_id: 30\n",
      "participant_strategy: I rated bad for negativity about himself\n",
      "participant_id: 31\n",
      "participant_strategy: I much preferred the bios which showed his personality without being too cringey or intense, or overly wordy.\n",
      "participant_id: 32\n",
      "participant_strategy: Seeing if I would be interested if it were me\n",
      "participant_id: 33\n",
      "participant_strategy: nan\n",
      "participant_id: 34\n",
      "participant_strategy: I didn't have a strategy as such, I just tried to rate each response honestly as if I were reading them myself.\n",
      "participant_id: 35\n",
      "participant_strategy: To imagine that I was on the dating app and reading Eric's profile. \n",
      "participant_id: 36\n",
      "participant_strategy: The descriptions that were less wordy were more attractive, where he was waffling it was too much said at once, some things should be left to learn about when talking \n",
      "participant_id: 37\n",
      "participant_strategy: If Eric came across as being too funny or to laid back I gave him a slightly lower score. Where he mentioned his love for animals and was passionate about his dog then he earned a higher score.\n",
      "participant_id: 38\n",
      "participant_strategy: Length of the bio\n",
      "participant_id: 39\n",
      "participant_strategy: To look through and see if they seemed like a fun person. Anything too long or dull I gave a low score too.\n",
      "participant_id: 40\n",
      "participant_strategy: I just read each description and went with my gut feel of what I think make's for a good bio.\n",
      "participant_id: 41\n",
      "participant_strategy: To read Erics profile and try to work out if he would seem the right type of suitor on a dating site\n",
      "participant_id: 42\n",
      "participant_strategy: I tried to approach reading each scenario with a fresh and objective perspective.\n",
      "participant_id: 43\n",
      "participant_strategy: whenever his bio was authentic i'd rate it highly but when he tried to hard or acted facetious i'd rate it low.\n",
      "participant_id: 44\n",
      "participant_strategy: Anything that sounded like a made up story or overly fakely hyper and jolly I marked down. A bit more thought and sincerity I marked higher.\n",
      "participant_id: 45\n",
      "participant_strategy: Just tried to think if the description would make me interested in Eric.\n",
      "participant_id: 46\n",
      "participant_strategy: If he spoke too much about his dog I thought that was not a good thing or if he mentioned to breathe and take it easy that also wasn't a good thing either. I preferred when he was quick and concise about his interests and his dog. I don't think it was a good idea to talk down his looks to average either - confidence is key for attracting a female partner.\n",
      "participant_id: 47\n",
      "participant_strategy: A very good interesting study. My strategy in the task was to judge and feel the warmth and sincere messages and information with thought and kindness, and to consider my interests and emotions along the was , as I thought about my interests and feelings to., \n",
      "participant_id: 48\n",
      "participant_strategy: Pick which one that made an emotive impact or me laugh the most\n",
      "participant_id: 49\n",
      "participant_strategy: Profiles that were too full of puns and 'jokey' didn't rate very highly for me. I find them off-putting. I thought every profile was actually passable at least as they were all light-heated, fun and full of information. For that reason it was quite a hard task!\n",
      "participant_id: 50\n",
      "participant_strategy: I tended to mark down the ones that had too much about cars (although the first one I got had a bit about cars and I had marked it quite high as I didn't have any reference so that made it a bit difficult). \n",
      "I also marked down anything that had odd English, made the guy sound big-headded or just sounded too AI.\n",
      "participant_id: 51\n",
      "participant_strategy: Well, I never want to hear about 'Eric' ever again! Every time rotating car tyres were mentioned, I felt that bit more annoyed. My opinion is that some were better than others but they were all horrible. Trying too hard or sickeningly saccharin in tone, very off-putting. \n",
      "participant_id: 52\n",
      "participant_strategy: I scored the ones that had corny sayings or cliches low. The humorous ones I scored high.\n",
      "participant_id: 53\n",
      "participant_strategy: No problems with the task, although it got a little repetitive towards the end. I think I settled into a rhythm of liking more those where the dog played a small part in his pitch - but not too much, and I found the 'plant' metaphors a little clumsy so disliked those more.\n",
      "participant_id: 54\n",
      "participant_strategy: I went with what I thought someone might find appealing. \n",
      "participant_id: 55\n",
      "participant_strategy: I rated profiles that seemed 'insecure' lower. In my experience women dont like guys who criticise their own looks/height. Also they would find being told 'remember to breathe' weird and off-putting.\n",
      "participant_id: 56\n",
      "participant_strategy: I think my strategy was to read the text carefully and attempt to put myself in the position of a potential partner, when assessing the likelihood of the text being suitable for attracting attention\n",
      "participant_id: 57\n",
      "participant_strategy: Read details very carefully and made sure didnt talk too much about his dog\n",
      "participant_id: 58\n",
      "participant_strategy: i read the blurb, and guessed if a 20 something female would like that\n",
      "participant_id: 59\n",
      "participant_strategy: my strategy was whether or not the text appealed to me\n",
      "participant_id: 60\n",
      "participant_strategy: I marked Eric down when he was putting himself down, as that is not an attractive trait.  I also didn't like the use of lots of brackets when he was dismissing something he had already said.  The best ones were the honest, genuine words that he used without focusing too much on the swiping right, as that just makes him sound as though he is a player.\n",
      "participant_id: 61\n",
      "participant_strategy: First, I carefully read what Eric was thinking of putting in his description of himself. If it genuinely made him sound interesting with a hint of humour, I thought he may have a chance of connecting with a girl online. If it sounded too corny, over-the-top of just downright unfunny, I marked the chances down.\n",
      "participant_id: 62\n",
      "participant_strategy: I would judge the text on how likely I'd be to accept, the most important traits were being humorous and not too over-bearing. \n",
      "participant_id: 63\n",
      "participant_strategy: I just provided an honest opinion on what I read. I felt that a lot of those statements were trying far too hard to be honest.\n",
      "participant_id: 64\n",
      "participant_strategy: I read the profiles and went for the ones that I thought demonstrated the most humour and humility\n",
      "participant_id: 65\n",
      "participant_strategy: I was looking for something that was not trying to be to clever , and also clear details of what he liked to do.\n",
      "participant_id: 66\n",
      "participant_strategy: I rated how cringeworthy or not they were\n",
      "participant_id: 67\n",
      "participant_strategy: I just read the text and if I didn't like it i voted in low\n",
      "participant_id: 68\n",
      "participant_strategy: To answer the task as truthfully as I could, taking each one at a a time, even the last few, which were repeats of some of the initial ones.\n",
      "participant_id: 69\n",
      "participant_strategy: To find a bio that would appeal to me and not be too disparaging about himself.\n",
      "participant_id: 70\n",
      "participant_strategy: what seem to the the profile over to match the widest group, without what i deem a negative.\n",
      "participant_id: 71\n",
      "participant_strategy: I tended to dislike the longer entries or the entries were there was more talk of his dog rather than himself.\n",
      "participant_id: 72\n",
      "participant_strategy: LOOK FOR GENUINE COMMENTS SINCERETY AND A BIT OF FUN\n",
      "participant_id: 73\n",
      "participant_strategy: i rated Eric's profile description on what came across as interesting and confident. What set it out from the sea of bland profiles that Eric was competing against.\n",
      "participant_id: 74\n",
      "participant_strategy: I just read the profiles and decided how much I liked them and how interested I would be in speaking to that person based on the profile alone.\n",
      "participant_id: 75\n",
      "participant_strategy: reading as if i was looking for a date, would i like his intro\n",
      "participant_id: 76\n",
      "participant_strategy: I just read the text, if I found it amusing it got a higher rating.\n",
      "participant_id: 77\n",
      "participant_strategy: Didn't really have one?\n",
      "participant_id: 78\n",
      "participant_strategy: I looked for humour and self deprecation and not ones where the author over emphasized their averageness.\n",
      "participant_id: 79\n",
      "participant_strategy: I was surprised as I rated the majority of the tasks above 5. I found the honesty in the profile refreshing, and felt it was good to discuss interests as it would give good topic of conversation for a first date. I rated low the ones which seemed to have excessive puns, or a very narrow interest such as Harry Potter. In general though, I just went with my gut feeling.\n",
      "participant_id: 80\n",
      "participant_strategy: nan\n",
      "participant_id: 81\n",
      "participant_strategy: I completed thinking that this was real.  I have experience of dating sites so thought would i answer this as though it were real\n",
      "participant_id: 82\n",
      "participant_strategy: I based it on whether I would be interested if I read that bio on a dating app or not\n",
      "participant_id: 84\n",
      "participant_strategy: I was looking for red flags that in my mind made me perceived that i would swipe away from aforementioned profile.\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# READ THROUGH PARTICIPANT STRATEGIES\n",
    "\n",
    "grouped = df.groupby('participant_id')\n",
    "\n",
    "# iterate through and print out the participant strategies\n",
    "for name, group in grouped:\n",
    "    print(f\"participant_id: {name}\")\n",
    "    print(f\"participant_strategy: {group['participant_strategy'].iloc[0]}\")"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 398,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "1399\n",
      "74\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# REMOVE ALL SHITTY PARTICIPANTS\n",
    "\n",
    "def unique_words_in_string(string):\n",
    "    return len(set(string.split()))\n",
    "\n",
    "df = df[df['participant_strategy'].apply(lambda x: unique_words_in_string(x)) >= 7]\n",
    "print(len(df))\n",
    "print(len(df.groupby('participant_id')))\n",
    "\n",
    "# competent_participants = [13, 23, 29, 52, 54, 64, 89, 91, 94, 96, 101, 106, 108, 112]\n",
    "# maybe_competent_participants = [5, 9, 10, 19, 30, 36, 41, 42, 45, 47, 48, 56, 69, 74, 79, 80, 99, 103, 104, 110]"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 408,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "0.692039454650627 0.04007400430286469\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# COMPUTE INTER RATER RELIABILITY\n",
    "\n",
    "results = []\n",
    "\n",
    "for i in range(10):\n",
    "    group1_means = []\n",
    "    group2_means = []\n",
    "\n",
    "    grouped_by_origin_id = df.groupby('origin_id') # grouped based on question\n",
    "    # loop across questions\n",
    "    for name, group in grouped_by_origin_id:\n",
    "        # randomly split participants in half\n",
    "        df_tmp = df[df['origin_id'] == name]\n",
    "        unique_participant_ids = df_tmp['participant_id'].unique()\n",
    "        np.random.shuffle(unique_participant_ids)\n",
    "        if len(unique_participant_ids) % 2 == 1:\n",
    "            unique_participant_ids = unique_participant_ids[:-1]\n",
    "\n",
    "        if len(unique_participant_ids) < 2:\n",
    "            continue\n",
    "        \n",
    "        split_point = int(len(unique_participant_ids) / 2)\n",
    "        first_half = unique_participant_ids[:split_point]\n",
    "        second_half = unique_participant_ids[split_point:]\n",
    "        \n",
    "        group1 = df_tmp[df_tmp['participant_id'].isin(first_half)]\n",
    "        group2 = df_tmp[df_tmp['participant_id'].isin(second_half)]\n",
    "\n",
    "        group1_means += [group1['answer'].mean()]\n",
    "        group2_means += [group2['answer'].mean()]\n",
    "        \n",
    "    # compute inter rater reliability\n",
    "    # results += [np.corrcoef(group1_means, group2_means)[0, 1]]\n",
    "\n",
    "    # apply spearman-brown correction\n",
    "    results += [2 * np.corrcoef(group1_means, group2_means)[0, 1] / (1 + np.corrcoef(group1_means, group2_means)[0, 1])]\n",
    "\n",
    "print(np.mean(results), np.std(results))"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 388,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "(array([ 1.,  1.,  4.,  8., 21., 29., 12.,  2.,  1.,  0.,  1.]),\n",
       " array([ 1.35      ,  2.13636364,  2.92272727,  3.70909091,  4.49545455,\n",
       "         5.28181818,  6.06818182,  6.85454545,  7.64090909,  8.42727273,\n",
       "         9.21363636, 10.        ]),\n",
       " <BarContainer object of 11 artists>)"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 388,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "image/png": "[encoded data, 4588 characters]",
      "text/plain": [
       "<Figure size 432x288 with 1 Axes>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {
      "needs_background": "light"
     },
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# HISTOGRAM OF AVERAGE SCORES PER PARTICIPANT\n",
    "\n",
    "mean_scores = df.groupby('participant_id')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "plt.hist(mean_scores, bins=11)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 429,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# NORMALIZE PARTICIPANT SCORES FROM 0-1\n",
    "\n",
    "grouped = df.groupby('participant_id')\n",
    "df['answer'] = grouped['answer'].apply(lambda x: (x - x.min()) / (x.max() - x.min()))"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 443,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "5.254666666666667\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "print(df['answer'].mean())"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 411,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "3.9 unorthodox_advice 2_3 1.0 \"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "4.45 unorthodox_advice 2 2.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "4.5 unorthodox_advice 1_2 2.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "4.55 unorthodox_advice 2 1.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "4.55 unorthodox_advice 0_2 0.0 \"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "4.75 unorthodox_advice 2_3 2.0 \"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "4.8 unorthodox_advice 1_3 2.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "4.85 unorthodox_advice 1_3 0.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "4.9 unorthodox_advice 1_2 0.0 \"Hey there, I'm Eric, an undergraduate glued to the books at a 'insert school name' state university, fighting through college one pizza slice at a time. When I'm not pretending to enjoy late-night study sessions, you'll most likely find me on the tennis court. I'm just as comfortable with a racket in my hand as I am with a bag of dog treats - not for me (although, desperate times...) but for my loyal sidekick, Scott the Beagle. The truth is, he probably has more tricks in his repertoire than I have tennis skills. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a strong believer in friendship before anything else, and my group of close-knit buddies can corroborate - if you can get past their constant jesting about my average height and looks, that is. Rest assured, while I may be laughably competent at video games and tell terrible puns at inconvenient times, I promise I won't subject you to either on our first date (unless, of course, terrible puns are your thing... then I happen to have a lifelong supply). \n",
      "\n",
      "Let's grab a cup of coffee, take Scott for a walk, and see if we hit it off as more than just teammates in a doubles tennis match. If the cappuccino doesn't warm you up, my corny jokes definitely will!\"\n",
      "4.9 unorthodox_advice 0_3 1.0 \"Hey there, I'm Eric! Studious university undergrad by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog dad to Scott, my energetic Beagle, by night. I'm searching for someone who loves spontaneous games of tennis, passionate debates about Animal Planet documentaries, and leisurely walks with Scott - who I might add, is quite the charmer!\n",
      "\n",
      "A story about Scott to bring a smile to your face? Well, once I'd dropped a sandwich which I'd just made and left the room only to find Scott gorging on it when I got back. Just as I was about to scold him, he looked up at me with those innocent eyes. I swear, no matter how stern you plan to be, one look at those eyes and your heart melts! \n",
      "\n",
      "I believe that life is a beautiful game, sometimes like tennis - love is not just a score, it's the thing that keeps us playing. So, ready to join our small, happy team and make it larger?\n",
      "4.95 unorthodox_advice 0_2 2.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, your future tennis partner and bona fide animal lover. I'm currently making my way through the riveting world of undergrad studies at [University's Name]. In between chapters, you'll find me chasing tennis balls on the court (and occasionally Scott, my energetic beagle, who's convinced he's a ball boy in disguise). \n",
      "\n",
      "Standing at an-average-guy height, I'm living proof that you don't need to be tall to have a towering love for life. If I had to rate my looks? Well, let's just say if humor added points, I'd be Brad Pitt's long lost twin. \n",
      "\n",
      "As a social butterfly, I enjoy surrounding myself with good company but I reserve a special space for one more - could that be you? I promise engaging conversations, long walks with Scott (with the occasional tree sniffing), and a guy who blurs the line between playing to win and having a laugh on the tennis court. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can handle an impromptu comedy show or a spontaneous game of tennis, you might be the Serena Williams to my Roger Federer. Looking forward to finding a match that’s unbeatable both on and off the court!\"\n",
      "5.05 unorthodox_advice 0_3 2.0 \"Hello there! My name's Eric, a studious 20-something navigating his way through the whirlwind of academia and tennis matches at our local state university. Being of average height and looks, I compensate with a wicked backhand and a love for a good adventure. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I'm not hitting up the library or tennis courts, you can often catch me exploring nature trails with my loyal sidekick, Scott. Scott is not your typical friend - he's a beagle with a spirit as free as mine, but with a much better sense of direction! He once led me on an unexpected detour during a regular hike, and we ended up at a local farmers market. Never one to shy away from new experiences, I dived in full-heartedly, and thus began my undying love for home-made raspberry jam.\n",
      "\n",
      "If home-made jam, spontaneous adventures, tennis or adorable dogs sounds like your cup of tea, swing a message my way. Even if you just want to chat about your favorite animal or discuss a renowned literature's latest bestseller, I am all ears! Over to you, where will our adventure begin?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "best from framework: 5.05 unorthodox_advice 2_3 0.0 \"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "5.2 unorthodox_advice 1_2 1.0 \"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "5.3 unorthodox_advice 1_3 1.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, a proud undergraduate student of (insert name of the state university), majoring in (insert major). My friends say I'm the life of the party, but in reality, I enjoy a balanced mix of bustling social scenes and peaceful nights in. My idea of a perfect evening ranges from challenging friends in a tennis match to watching classic movies with a bowl of popcorn.\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're tail-waggingly fond of dogs, then we're already off to a great start. I have a beagle named Scott who has a personality as big as his bark. Once, during a game of fetch, Scott dashed off into the nearby woods and returned not with his ball, but with a kitten who'd been stuck in the bushes. Needless to say, we helped find its owners, and Scott bagged the title of 'Canine Hero of the Day'. Let’s say he’s constantly raising my standards when it comes to being a good Samaritan!\n",
      "\n",
      "Also, I must add - my expertise in a kitchen is questionable at best (unless making cereal counts). But I am an enthusiastic learner, so perhaps that counts for something?\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for a genuine, down-to-earth connection with a dash of dog-induced chaos and a pinch of bad cooking, swipe right! Let's chat, trade stories, and see what's cooking—hopefully not my kitchen.\"\n",
      "5.3 unorthodox_advice 3 2.0 \"Hey there, I'm Eric. Just another undergrad trying to find his way through college. I'm a tennis enthusiast, an animal lover, and a staunch believer in spontaneous adventures. My favorite gym buddy is my beagle, Scott. Here's a little story about us: Once, while exploring a park, Scott spotted a squirrel. Being the swift little man he is, he bolted after it. I, not wanting to lose sight of him, ended up sprinting and hilariously vaulting over a picnic blanket (and its surprised occupants). We didn't manage to catch the squirrel, but we did find an ice-cream truck and shared a sundae. Long story short, life with me and Scott is never dull, and we'd love someone to share our adventures with. If you're into fun outings, snuggling with dogs, and don't mind the occasional interruption by rogue squirrels, swipe right!\"\n",
      "5.4 unorthodox_advice 0 1.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "5.5 unorthodox_advice 0 0.0 \"Hey there, I'm Eric! I'm a university undergrad with a heart for animals and an undying passion for tennis. I can whip up a mean backhand in the courts, or be the calmest companion for my adorable beagle named Scott in the park. I love spending my free time exploring life with a curious eye and an open mind. Every compromise leads to a story, so I'm looking for someone with whom I can write the next chapter. If you're someone who appreciates serene walks with a canine friend or enjoys exhilarating matches on the tennis court, we might just hit it off! Can't wait to explore the possibilities with you. P.S., I promise I'm not as intense as this bio makes me sound ;)\"\n",
      "5.65 unorthodox_advice 3 1.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "5.65 unorthodox_advice 3 0.0 \"Hello there! I'm Eric, a tennis-loving undergrad student with a penchant for dog walks, good books, and whimsical adventures. Call me average, but as they say, 'Never judge a book by its cover'. Compelled by my beagle Scott, I regularly find myself in the middle of amusing escapades. \n",
      "\n",
      "Once, on a peaceful Sunday, Scott, suddenly overtaken by a bout of doggie excitement, took off on a wild chase after a squirrel in the park. The chase led us through a bustling farmers market, through a frisbee tournament (much to their surprise), and ultimately ended with both of us taking an unintended dip in the university fountain. Long story short: we didn’t catch the squirrel, but we had a blast (and loads of attention)!\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for a partner who enjoys unexpected adventures, loves animals, and wouldn’t mind getting caught in the rain or in a fountain with a beagle and me. Swipe right if you believe in laughter, genuine connection, and spontaneous park dates. Maybe we can create an enchanting tale together!\"\n",
      "5.7 unorthodox_advice 2 0.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "5.8 unorthodox_advice 0_1 0.0 \"Hey there, I'm Eric! A young man, working on completing my undergraduate degree at a sizable state university. My friends often describe me as a person drawn into the world of academia, always eager to learn and share knowledge. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I am not swamped with stacks of books, you'll often find me exhibiting my skills on a tennis court challenging my friends or diversifying my hobby list. I'm an energetic, outdoorsy kind of guy, who also treasures some quiet downtime, perhaps, with a good book. \n",
      "\n",
      "Team dog or team cat? I'm definitely on the dog side, with my loyal Beagle, Scott. I'm a lover of all animals, with an extra soft spot for dogs. \n",
      "\n",
      "Physically, I'm about average. I neither stand out in a crowd, nor do I blend fully into one, I like to think I maintain a sweet spot in between. Let's not dwell much on this though, because who we are is much more than what we look like, wouldn't you agree?\n",
      "\n",
      "Seeking a genuine and honest connection. If you are ambitious, passionate and enjoy sharing hearty laughs, tennis matches or doggo dates, then let's connect and see where this goes.\"\n",
      "5.8 unorthodox_advice nan 2.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something undergrad at [State University] with a special love for tennis and weekend gatherings with my friends. I've got average looks but an above average sense of humor and love for life. When I'm not hitting the court or hitting the books, I'm also a part-time pet parent to my beagle, Scott. Known for my love of animals and adventures in the great outdoors. If you're looking for someone who'll make you laugh, join you at a tennis match, or have a deep discussion about our favorite books, then let's chat!\"\n",
      "5.85 unorthodox_advice 0 2.0 \"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "5.9 unorthodox_advice 1 0.0 \"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "5.95 unorthodox_advice 0_2 1.0 \"Hello there! Eric here, university student by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog-dad all day, every day. I proudly split my free time between serving aces and spoiling my adorable beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're into sports, nature walks with a friendly four-legged companion, or just having a good laugh, then we're already off to a great start! I'm proudly average on the height and looks department, but my sense of humor and love for animals might leave you 'barking' up this tree now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "Love for animals is a must, especially if you don't mind the occasional dog hair on your clothes. Tennis skills are optional, though I wouldn't mind teaching you a thing or two on the court. \n",
      "\n",
      "Swipe right if you're up for some fun, some tennis, and perhaps, some Scott! Here to find my doubles partner, in life and in tennis. Ready to serve my heart. (Please, no returns!)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "6.05 unorthodox_advice nan 0.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, a proud undergrad at a state university, with a passion for tennis and good times with friends. I believe in the simple joys of life like witnessing a sunset or giggling at a beagle's antics. Which brings me to my partner in crime, Scott, my uber-cute beagle who shares my enthusiasm for long walks and new experiences. \n",
      "\n",
      "I consider myself an average guy with an above-average love for animals and spontaneous adventures. Whether it is toe-dragging weekend matches on the tennis court or wild road trips to new destinations, I am always up for something exciting. If you are compassionate, love animals, and find joy in simple yet profound experiences, we could be a good match! Swipe right if you've got a passion for life and a smile to match, let’s create some memorable stories together.\"\n",
      "6.25 unorthodox_advice 1 2.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old studying at XYZ University. Aside from engaging in thought-provoking lectures or cramming for my next test (just kidding, I love what I study!), I spend my free time immersed in a good tennis match or just hanging out with my friends. Well, and Scott - my handsome partner in crime who happens to be a beagle. (Pet lovers score big points with me!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is decent (or maybe my friends are just being nice) and I think I'm pretty down-to-earth. When it comes to looks, you could say I'm just your average Joe, nothing extraordinarily flashy, but I try to make up for that with kindness and authenticity. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm here to find someone who's genuinely interested in sharing some laughs, deep conversations, maybe a tennis game, and of course, dog park outings. If you're looking for someone real, pick me. No fake profiles here - just a real guy searching for a real girl. Let's explore life together!\"\n",
      "6.3 unorthodox_advice 0_3 0.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric, just another student shuffling his way through the maze of undergrad at a large state university. When I'm not buried under textbooks, you'll find me on the tennis court perfecting my backhand or chilling out amidst nature with my furry friend, Scott. Yup! Scott's my mischievous yet lovable beagle who seems to have more energy than a nuclear reactor. Ask me about the time he beat me at a tennis match! \n",
      "\n",
      "Whether it's sipping a coffee during a heartfelt conversation, exploring new hiking trails, or simply hanging out with friends, I find joy in the small things in life. I've often been told that I have an 'average Joe' kind of charm (whatever that means), with an equal love for sitcom reruns and spontaneous adventures.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for that special someone who can match or possibly exceed my passion for tennis, appreciate a dog's loyalty, and add a dollop of enthusiasm to this big, exciting world we live in. Swipe right if you think that could be you!\"\n",
      "6.35 unorthodox_advice 0_1 2.0 \"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "6.4 unorthodox_advice 1 1.0 \"Hello there! My name is Eric and I'm an undergraduate at (your university's name). I'm currently paving my way to a career I'm very passionate about, but when I'm not absorbed in my studies, you can usually find me on the tennis court or hanging out with my friends. I'm a pretty laid-back, average height guy who believes more in connection and companionship than appearances. \n",
      "\n",
      "I have a huge soft spot for animals, especially my ever-loyal Beagle, Scott! If we match, I promise you plenty of dog walks, beach trips and probably a tennis match or two. If there's one thing I am certain about, it's that I can make you laugh, be a good listener and a reliable friend at the very least. \n",
      "\n",
      "Thanks for stopping by my profile, look forward to knowing you!\"\n",
      "6.45 unorthodox_advice nan 1.0 \"Hello there! I'm Eric, a 20-something undergrad at the [university name]. Passionate about knowledge, tennis, and my beagle Scott who absolutely rules my world. In my free time, you'll probably find me serving at the courts or chilling with friends. A sucker for great conversations and animal lover at heart. Average guy both in looks and height, but with extraordinary dreams in my eyes. Can't resist a good game night or a serene walk in the park. Here to find a companion to embark upon various adventures. Swipe right if you're into puns and can tolerate a little dog fur now and then!\"\n",
      "6.5 unorthodox_advice 0_1 1.0 Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "(array([1., 0., 0., 0., 2., 2., 2., 3., 3., 0., 3., 1., 1., 3., 2., 3., 1.,\n",
       "        0., 3., 3.]),\n",
       " array([3.9 , 4.03, 4.16, 4.29, 4.42, 4.55, 4.68, 4.81, 4.94, 5.07, 5.2 ,\n",
       "        5.33, 5.46, 5.59, 5.72, 5.85, 5.98, 6.11, 6.24, 6.37, 6.5 ]),\n",
       " <BarContainer object of 20 artists>)"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 411,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "image/png": "[encoded data, 5104 characters]",
      "text/plain": [
       "<Figure size 432x288 with 1 Axes>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {
      "needs_background": "light"
     },
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# SORTED AVERAGE SCORES FOR EACH GENERATION\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] != 'baseline_ask_with_reasoning']\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_type'] != 'baseline_ask']\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_type'] != 'baseline_neutral_advice']\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_type'] != 'baseline_irrelevant_advice']\n",
    "\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "grouped.sort_values(inplace=True)\n",
    "items = []\n",
    "for text, score in grouped.iteritems():\n",
    "    # get the advice_type for each text\n",
    "    advice_type = df_tmp[df_tmp['text'] == text]['advice_type'].unique()[0]\n",
    "    advice_indices = df_tmp[df_tmp['text'] == text]['advice_indices'].unique()[0]\n",
    "    generation = df_tmp[df_tmp['text'] == text]['generation_index'].unique()[0]\n",
    "    if advice_indices == \"2_3\" and generation == 0: print('\\n\\nbest from framework: ', end = '')\n",
    "    print(score, advice_type, advice_indices, generation, text)\n",
    "    items.append(score)\n",
    "\n",
    "plt.hist(items, bins=20)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 374,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "4.566666666666666 unorthodox_advice 2_3\n",
      "4.866666666666666 unorthodox_advice 1_2\n",
      "4.9 unorthodox_advice 2\n",
      "best advice from framework score:  4.983333333333333 unorthodox_advice 1_3\n",
      "5.15 unorthodox_advice 0_2\n",
      "5.416666666666667 unorthodox_advice 0_3\n",
      "5.533333333333333 unorthodox_advice 3\n",
      "5.583333333333333 unorthodox_advice 0\n",
      "6.1 unorthodox_advice nan\n",
      "6.183333333333334 unorthodox_advice 1\n",
      "6.216666666666667 unorthodox_advice 0_1\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "(array([1., 0., 0., 1., 1., 1., 0., 1., 0., 0., 1., 0., 2., 0., 0., 0., 0.,\n",
       "        0., 0., 1., 2.]),\n",
       " array([4.56666667, 4.6452381 , 4.72380952, 4.80238095, 4.88095238,\n",
       "        4.95952381, 5.03809524, 5.11666667, 5.1952381 , 5.27380952,\n",
       "        5.35238095, 5.43095238, 5.50952381, 5.58809524, 5.66666667,\n",
       "        5.7452381 , 5.82380952, 5.90238095, 5.98095238, 6.05952381,\n",
       "        6.13809524, 6.21666667]),\n",
       " <BarContainer object of 21 artists>)"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 374,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "image/png": "[encoded data, 6980 characters]",
      "text/plain": [
       "<Figure size 432x288 with 1 Axes>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {
      "needs_background": "light"
     },
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# AVERAGE SCORES FOR EACH ADVICE TYPE AND ADVICE INDEX\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] != 'baseline_ask_with_reasoning']\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_type'] != 'baseline_ask']\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_type'] != 'baseline_neutral_advice']\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_type'] != 'baseline_irrelevant_advice']\n",
    "\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby(['advice_type', 'advice_indices'])['answer'].mean()\n",
    "grouped.sort_values(inplace=True)\n",
    "scores = []\n",
    "for (advice_type, advice_indices), score in grouped.iteritems():\n",
    "    if advice_type == 'unorthodox_advice' and advice_indices == '1_3':\n",
    "        print(\"best advice from framework score: \", score, advice_type, advice_indices)\n",
    "    else: print(score, advice_type, advice_indices)\n",
    "    scores += [score]\n",
    "\n",
    "plt.hist(scores, bins=21)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 444,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "df_copy = df.copy()\n",
    "grouped = df_copy.groupby('participant_id')\n",
    "df_copy['answer'] = grouped['answer'].apply(lambda x: (x - x.min()) / (x.max() - x.min()))"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 423,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "-0.13243382866867237\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.13243382866867237\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.12915982235201073\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.13243382866867237\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.12915982235201073\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.13243382866867237\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.12915982235201073\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.13243382866867237\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.12915982235201073\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.12915982235201073\n",
      "435\n",
      "-0.13079682551034155 0.0016370031583308187\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# AGREEMENT BETWEEN HUMAN AND FRAMEWORK cohen kappa\n",
    "from sklearn.metrics import cohen_kappa_score\n",
    "import json\n",
    "import random\n",
    "import math\n",
    "import os\n",
    "\n",
    "path = f\"{scenario}/MWU_matrix_weighted.npy\"\n",
    "MWU_matrix = np.load(path)\n",
    "\n",
    "# get all the response generations\n",
    "unorthodox_path = f\"{scenario}/candidates/unorthodox_advice/\"\n",
    "for path in os.listdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators\"):\n",
    "    if os.path.isdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{path}\"):\n",
    "        evaluator = f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{path}\" # all mappings are the same\n",
    "        break\n",
    "\n",
    "with open(f\"{evaluator}/mappings.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "    mapping = json.load(f)[0]\n",
    "\n",
    "kappas = []\n",
    "\n",
    "for iteration in range(10):\n",
    "    matching = 0\n",
    "    total = 0\n",
    "    gpt_tie_count = 0\n",
    "    human_tie_count = 0\n",
    "\n",
    "    gpt_judgements = []\n",
    "    human_judgements = []\n",
    "\n",
    "    for i in range(MWU_matrix.shape[0]):\n",
    "\n",
    "        # get the responses for the ith advice set\n",
    "        filename = mapping[str(i)]\n",
    "        if filename == \".json\": continue\n",
    "        with open(f\"{unorthodox_path}/{filename}\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "            responses1 = json.load(f)\n",
    "        \n",
    "        for k in range(MWU_matrix.shape[2]):\n",
    "\n",
    "            # get the specific generation text, corresponding df, and score\n",
    "            response1 = responses1[k]\n",
    "            df_tmp = df[df['text'] == response1]\n",
    "            if len(df_tmp) == 0: raise Exception(f\"no match with response1: {response1}\")\n",
    "            score1 = df_tmp['answer'].mean()\n",
    "\n",
    "            for j in range(i, MWU_matrix.shape[1]):\n",
    "\n",
    "                # get the responses for the jth advice set\n",
    "                filename = mapping[str(j)]\n",
    "                if filename == \".json\": continue\n",
    "                with open(f\"{unorthodox_path}/{filename}\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "                    responses2 = json.load(f)\n",
    "\n",
    "                for l in range(MWU_matrix.shape[3]):\n",
    "\n",
    "                    # onlt need half of the MWU_matrix, self-compare is meaningless\n",
    "                    if i == j and k >= l:\n",
    "                        continue\n",
    "\n",
    "                    # get the specific generation text, corresponding df, and score\n",
    "                    response2 = responses2[l]\n",
    "                    df_tmp2 = df[df['text'] == response2]\n",
    "                    if len(df_tmp2) == 0: raise Exception(f\"no match with response2: {response2}\")\n",
    "                    score2 = df_tmp2['answer'].mean()\n",
    "\n",
    "                    # if score1 - score2 < 0.5 and score2 - score1 < 0.5:\n",
    "                    #     continue\n",
    "\n",
    "                    result = MWU_matrix[i][j][k][l]\n",
    "                    if math.isclose(result, 0.5): \n",
    "                        # print(f\"TIE FROM GPT: {i}, {j}, {k}, {l}, {result}\")\n",
    "                        gpt_tie_count += 1\n",
    "                        if random.random() > 0.5: result = 1\n",
    "                        else: result = 0\n",
    "                    \n",
    "                    if math.isclose(score1, score2):\n",
    "                        # print(f\"TIE FROM HUMAN: {i}, {j}, {k}, {l}, {score1}, {score2}\")\n",
    "                        human_tie_count += 1\n",
    "                        df_copy_tmp = df_copy[df_copy['text'] == response1]\n",
    "                        df_copy_tmp2 = df_copy[df_copy['text'] == response2]\n",
    "                        score1 = df_copy_tmp['answer'].mean()\n",
    "                        score2 = df_copy_tmp2['answer'].mean()\n",
    "                        \n",
    "                        if math.isclose(score1, score2):\n",
    "                            print(\"STILL A TIE\")\n",
    "                            continue\n",
    "\n",
    "                    if score1 > score2:\n",
    "                        human_judgements.append(1)\n",
    "                    elif score1 < score2:\n",
    "                        human_judgements.append(0)\n",
    "                    else: \n",
    "                        print(\"tied?\")\n",
    "                    \n",
    "                    if result > 0.5:\n",
    "                        gpt_judgements.append(1)\n",
    "                    elif result < 0.5:\n",
    "                        gpt_judgements.append(0)\n",
    "                    else:\n",
    "                        print(\"tied?\")\n",
    "                    \n",
    "                    total += 1\n",
    "\n",
    "    kappa = cohen_kappa_score(human_judgements, gpt_judgements)\n",
    "    kappas.append(kappa)\n",
    "    print(kappa)\n",
    "    print(total)\n",
    "    # print(gpt_tie_count)\n",
    "    # print(human_tie_count)\n",
    "\n",
    "print(np.mean(kappas), np.std(kappas))"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 418,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "0.4091954022988506\n",
      "435\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# AGREEMENT BETWEEN HUMAN AND FRAMEWORK\n",
    "\n",
    "import json\n",
    "import random\n",
    "import math\n",
    "import os\n",
    "\n",
    "path = f\"{scenario}/MWU_matrix_weighted.npy\"\n",
    "MWU_matrix = np.load(path)\n",
    "\n",
    "# get all the response generations\n",
    "unorthodox_path = f\"{scenario}/candidates/unorthodox_advice/\"\n",
    "for path in os.listdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators\"):\n",
    "    if os.path.isdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{path}\"):\n",
    "        evaluator = f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{path}\" # all mappings are the same\n",
    "        break\n",
    "\n",
    "with open(f\"{evaluator}/mappings.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "    mapping = json.load(f)[0]\n",
    "\n",
    "matching = 0\n",
    "total = 0\n",
    "comparison_points = []\n",
    "for i in range(MWU_matrix.shape[0]):\n",
    "    filename = mapping[str(i)]\n",
    "    if filename == \".json\": continue\n",
    "    with open(f\"{unorthodox_path}/{filename}\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "        responses1 = json.load(f)\n",
    "    \n",
    "    for k in range(MWU_matrix.shape[2]):\n",
    "        # get the specific generation text\n",
    "        response1 = responses1[k]\n",
    "\n",
    "        df_tmp = df[df['text'] == response1]\n",
    "        if len(df_tmp) == 0: raise Exception(f\"no match with response1: {response1}\")\n",
    "        score1 = df_tmp['answer'].mean()\n",
    "        # df_tmp_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['participant_id'].isin(competent_participants) | df_tmp['participant_id'].isin(maybe_competent_participants)]\n",
    "        # score1 = df_tmp_tmp['answer'].mean()\n",
    "\n",
    "        for j in range(i, MWU_matrix.shape[1]):\n",
    "            filename = mapping[str(j)]\n",
    "            if filename == \".json\": continue\n",
    "            with open(f\"{unorthodox_path}/{filename}\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "                responses2 = json.load(f)\n",
    "\n",
    "            for l in range(MWU_matrix.shape[3]):\n",
    "                if i == j and k >= l:\n",
    "                    continue\n",
    "\n",
    "                response2 = responses2[l]\n",
    "\n",
    "                df_tmp2 = df[df['text'] == response2]\n",
    "                if len(df_tmp2) == 0: raise Exception(f\"no match with response2: {response2}\")\n",
    "                score2 = df_tmp2['answer'].mean()\n",
    "                # df_tmp_tmp2 = df_tmp2[df_tmp2['participant_id'].isin(competent_participants) | df_tmp2['participant_id'].isin(maybe_competent_participants)]\n",
    "                # score2 = df_tmp_tmp2['answer'].mean()\n",
    "\n",
    "                result = MWU_matrix[i][j][k][l]\n",
    "\n",
    "                if score1 > score2 and result > 0.5:\n",
    "                    match = 1\n",
    "                elif score1 < score2 and result < 0.5:\n",
    "                    match = 1\n",
    "                elif math.isclose(score1, score2) and math.isclose(result, 0.5):\n",
    "                    match = 1\n",
    "                elif math.isclose(result, 0.5):\n",
    "                    match = 0.5\n",
    "                elif math.isclose(score1, score2):\n",
    "                    match = 0.5\n",
    "                else: \n",
    "                    match = 0\n",
    "                    # print(response1, \"\\n\\n\", response2)\n",
    "                    # print(f\"{i} {j} {k} {l} {result} {score1} {score2}\")\n",
    "                    # if random.random() > 0.7: raise Exception(\"?\")\n",
    "\n",
    "                matching += match\n",
    "                total += 1\n",
    "                comparison_points.append((score1, score2, result, match))\n",
    "\n",
    "\n",
    "print(matching / total)\n",
    "print(total)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 449,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "0.5555555555555556\n",
      "9\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# AGREEMENT BETWEEN HUMAN AND FRAMEWORK FOR LARGE DIFFERENCE CASES\n",
    "\n",
    "import json\n",
    "import random\n",
    "import math\n",
    "import os\n",
    "path = f\"{scenario}/MWU_matrix_weighted.npy\"\n",
    "MWU_matrix = np.load(path)\n",
    "\n",
    "# get all the response generations\n",
    "unorthodox_path = f\"{scenario}/candidates/unorthodox_advice/\"\n",
    "for path in os.listdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators\"):\n",
    "    if os.path.isdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{path}\"):\n",
    "        evaluator = f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{path}\" # all mappings are the same\n",
    "        break\n",
    "\n",
    "with open(f\"{evaluator}/mappings.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "    mapping = json.load(f)[0]\n",
    "\n",
    "matching = 0\n",
    "total = 0\n",
    "comparison_points = []\n",
    "look_at_points = []\n",
    "\n",
    "for i in range(MWU_matrix.shape[0]):\n",
    "    filename = mapping[str(i)]\n",
    "    if filename == \".json\": continue\n",
    "    with open(f\"{unorthodox_path}/{filename}\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "        responses1 = json.load(f)\n",
    "    \n",
    "    for k in range(MWU_matrix.shape[2]):\n",
    "        # get the specific generation text\n",
    "        response1 = responses1[k]\n",
    "\n",
    "        df_tmp = df[df['text'] == response1]\n",
    "        if len(df_tmp) == 0: raise Exception(f\"no match with response1: {response1}\")\n",
    "        # if len(df_tmp) == 0: continue\n",
    "        score1 = df_tmp['answer'].mean()\n",
    "\n",
    "        for j in range(i, MWU_matrix.shape[1]):\n",
    "            filename = mapping[str(j)]\n",
    "            if filename == \".json\": continue\n",
    "            with open(f\"{unorthodox_path}/{filename}\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "                responses2 = json.load(f)\n",
    "\n",
    "            for l in range(MWU_matrix.shape[3]):\n",
    "                if i == j and k >= l:\n",
    "                    continue\n",
    "\n",
    "                response2 = responses2[l]\n",
    "\n",
    "                df_tmp2 = df[df['text'] == response2]\n",
    "                if len(df_tmp2) == 0: raise Exception(f\"no match with response2: {response2}\")\n",
    "                # if len(df_tmp2) == 0: continue\n",
    "                \n",
    "                score2 = df_tmp2['answer'].mean()\n",
    "\n",
    "                result = MWU_matrix[i][j][k][l]\n",
    "\n",
    "                if score1 - score2 < 2 and score2 - score1 < 2:\n",
    "                    continue\n",
    "\n",
    "                if math.isclose(score1, score2):\n",
    "                    print(f\"TIE FROM HUMAN: {i}, {j}, {k}, {l}, {score1}, {score2}\")\n",
    "                    human_tie_count += 1\n",
    "                    df_copy_tmp = df_copy[df_copy['text'] == response1]\n",
    "                    df_copy_tmp2 = df_copy[df_copy['text'] == response2]\n",
    "                    if len(df_copy_tmp) == 0: raise Exception(f\"no match with response1: {response1}\")\n",
    "                    if len(df_copy_tmp2) == 0: raise Exception(f\"no match with response2: {response2}\")\n",
    "                    score1 = df_copy_tmp['answer'].mean()\n",
    "                    score2 = df_copy_tmp2['answer'].mean()\n",
    "                    \n",
    "                    if math.isclose(score1, score2):\n",
    "                        print(\"STILL A TIE\")\n",
    "                        raise Exception(\"STILL A TIE\")\n",
    "\n",
    "\n",
    "                if score1 > score2 and result > 0.5:\n",
    "                    match = 1\n",
    "                elif score1 < score2 and result < 0.5:\n",
    "                    match = 1\n",
    "                elif math.isclose(score1, score2) and math.isclose(result, 0.5):\n",
    "                    match = 1\n",
    "                elif math.isclose(result, 0.5):\n",
    "                    match = 0.5\n",
    "                elif math.isclose(score1, score2):\n",
    "                    match = 0.5\n",
    "                else: \n",
    "                    match = 0\n",
    "                    # print(response1, \"\\n\\n\", response2)\n",
    "                    # print(f\"{i} {j} {k} {l} {result} {score1} {score2}\")\n",
    "                    # if random.random() > 0.7: raise Exception(\"?\")\n",
    "\n",
    "                matching += match\n",
    "                total += 1\n",
    "\n",
    "print(matching / total)\n",
    "print(total)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 344,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "0.45751633986928103\n",
      "153\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "path = f\"{scenario}/MWU_matrix_weighted.npy\"\n",
    "MWU_matrix = np.load(path)\n",
    "\n",
    "# get all the response generations\n",
    "unorthodox_path = f\"{scenario}/responses/unorthodox_advice/\"\n",
    "for path in os.listdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators\"):\n",
    "    if os.path.isdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{path}\"):\n",
    "        evaluator = f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{path}\" # all mappings are the same\n",
    "        break\n",
    "\n",
    "with open(f\"{evaluator}/mappings_remapped.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "    remap = json.load(f)[0]\n",
    "\n",
    "matching = 0\n",
    "total = 0\n",
    "# start here\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == 'unorthodox_advice']\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('origin_id')\n",
    "for name, group in grouped:\n",
    "    for name2, group2 in grouped: \n",
    "        if name == name2: continue\n",
    "        score1 = group['answer'].mean()\n",
    "        score2 = group2['answer'].mean()\n",
    "\n",
    "        if True: #score1 - score2 >= 1 or score2 - score1 >= 1:\n",
    "            # look for it in the MWU matrix\n",
    "            advice_indices = group.iloc[0]['advice_indices']\n",
    "            advice_indices2 = group2.iloc[0]['advice_indices']\n",
    "\n",
    "            if advice_indices == \"nan\" or advice_indices2 == \"nan\":\n",
    "                continue\n",
    "\n",
    "            i = int(remap[advice_indices + \".json\"])\n",
    "            j = int(remap[advice_indices2 + \".json\"])\n",
    "            k = int(group.iloc[0]['generation_index'])\n",
    "            l = int(group2.iloc[0]['generation_index'])\n",
    "\n",
    "            if \"3\" in advice_indices or \"3\" in advice_indices2:\n",
    "                continue\n",
    "\n",
    "            if i > j or i == j and k > l: \n",
    "                continue\n",
    "\n",
    "            if MWU_matrix[i][j][k][l] > 0.5 and score1 > score2:\n",
    "                matching += 1\n",
    "            elif MWU_matrix[i][j][k][l] < 0.5 and score1 < score2:\n",
    "                matching += 1\n",
    "            elif MWU_matrix[i][j][k][l] == 0.5 and score1 == score2:\n",
    "                matching += 1\n",
    "            elif MWU_matrix[i][j][k][l] == 0.5 or score1 == score2:\n",
    "                matching += 0.5\n",
    "            total += 1\n",
    "\n",
    "            # with open(f\"{evaluator}/compare_results/{i}_{j}_{k}_{l}.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "            #     d = json.load(f)\n",
    "            \n",
    "            # print(d['indices'], d['flipped'], d['parsed_answers'], \"mwu\", MWU_matrix[i][j][k][l], \"human\", score1, score2, matching)\n",
    "            # print(d[\"user_prompt\"][\"content\"], \"\\n\\n\\n\\n\")\n",
    "            # print(group.iloc[0]['text'], \"\\n\\n\\n\")\n",
    "            # print(group2.iloc[0]['text'], \"\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\")\n",
    "\n",
    "print(matching / total)\n",
    "print(total)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 339,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "human scores: 6.5 4.5\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 1.0\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nAnalyzing both scenarios, it's clear that Eric is intelligent, engaging, and has a good sense of humor. However, the way he presents himself differs and may impact one's decision to swipe right or left. \\n\\nScenario 1 is more formal, presents him as mature, well-focused, and balanced. It provides a clear illustration of his interests, hobbies, and what he's looking for in a partner. It shows that Eric values his education, has an active lifestyle with tennis and enjoys spending time with a pet. His bio handles his average looks with modest humor and shows that he doesn't take himself too seriously. His invitation to say hi is polite, open-ended and has a slight hint of vulnerability, which can be endearing. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, showcases Eric's playful nature and humor a lot more. He cleverly relates his hobbies and life to the universe of Harry Potter, showing his fun-loving and creative side. However, his laid-back approach and use of a lot of puns might come off as less serious to some. While his bio is entertaining and fun to read, it doesn't give a clear idea of what he's looking for in a person. \\n\\nFrom a comprehensive viewpoint, it would be dependent on personal preference and whether one values a more formal, straightforward approach as opposed to a playful, humor-laden one. Nonetheless, in my personal perspective, I prefer more transparent and direct presentations with a balance of seriousness and humor. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning text:\\nAnalyzing the two scenarios, Scenario 1 stands out as more likely to sway me to swipe right. There are few reasons for this.\\n\\nFirstly, Eric comes across as down-to-earth and intellectually engaged. He mentions being lost in textbooks and engaging in \"intellectual debates with my peers,\" implying that he\\'s conscientious and enjoys deep conversations. This might hint towards a partner who values communication and mental growth.\\n\\nSecondly, he seems to lead a balanced life. He talks about balancing cerebral activities with physical ones and he explicitly states his love for tennis. His active lifestyle may suggest he\\'s energetic and a well-rounded individual, which is attractive. \\n\\nThirdly, his bio shows him as an animal lover. He has a beagle named Scott and speaks about exploring new places with him. This indicates a nurturing side, and it\\'s a plus for me since I like animals too.\\n\\nLastly, Eric seems to have a clear idea of who he is and the type of woman he\\'s interested in - passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and enjoys tennis. It shows he\\'s thought about the kind of relationship he wants, which indicates a level of maturity and seriousness about dating.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 has its charm but it relies heavily on humor, mostly through constant puns and Harry Potter references. This might be entertaining to some, but it lacks the depth and meaningful information presented in Scenario 1. The irony about being average is amusing but not as appealing as the sincere self-description in Scenario 1. \\n\\nThus, the sincerity, sense of balance, love for animals, and clarity of intentions make Scenario 1 more enticing for me.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth profiles showcase Eric's personality quite well. However, I am more inclined to swipe right on Scenario 1.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as a balanced individual who enjoys intellectual activities as much as physical ones. His love for tennis and exploring new places with his dog, Scott, indicates an active lifestyle. His mention of indie music and reading shows a cultural side, which could possibly lead to more expansive conversations. He is honest in stating that he considers himself average-looking, yet believes his personality compensates for it, displaying a sense of self-awareness and confidence. In addition to that, Eric seems to be looking for a potential romantic partner who prioritizes passion, humor, and a love for dogs, which matches my preferences as well.\\n\\nScenario 2 seems more humorous and less serious, revolving around playful references to the Harry Potter series, puns about being average, and quips about politics and university life. This could come across as too casual for someone looking for a serious romantic relationship. He uses humor to mask any straightforward description of his lifestyle or who he is, which could result in a mismatch of expectations. Therefore, I am less inclined to swipe right on Scenario 2.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.5 4.5\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 1.0\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios effectively convey similar information about Eric, the manner in which it is presented varies greatly, likely appealing to two different cohorts of people. \\n\\nScenario 1 provides a clear and straightforward yet engaging description. It effectively communicates Eric's interests and what he values in a potential match, without coming off as too intense or emotionally heavy. The narrative is balanced and inclusive - attractive to those who prefer a laid-back approach.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is more playful and creative. It uses humor and references to popular culture, which can be appealing for individuals who appreciate quirky personalities. This style may also suggest that Eric is not too serious and open to more relaxed, fun interactions. However, it could potentially dissuade those who are looking for a serious relationship.\\n\\nIn my opinion, Eric would likely attract a potential match who shares his interests and values more in Scenario 1 because it comes off as more sincere and relatable. It presents a balanced picture of Eric's social and academic life, his hobbies, and what he seeks in a potential partner. It might be seen as less entertaining than the second scenario, but it appears more likely to draw in someone who is genuinely interested in getting to know Eric better.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric's attributes, interests, and personality in a friendly and engaging manner. Scenario 1, however, does so in a more straightforward and earnest way while Scenario 2 uses humor and wit to hook the reader. \\n\\nScenario 2, while funny and engaging, may turn off people who do not share Eric's sense of humor or do not understand his Hogwarts references. On dating apps, first impressions matter a lot and relying extensively on humor could be risky, especially when it comes to puns with a specific thematic focus like Harry Potter references or political jokes that could potentially alienate certain people. \\n\\nAlso, Scenario 1 outlines Eric's interests - tennis, music, reading, and exploring new places - more clearly than Scenario 2, giving potential matches a better idea for shared activities or conversation topics. \\n\\nLastly, Scenario 1 explicitly states Eric's intent (finding a passionate woman who has a sense of humor, loves dogs and plays tennis), providing potential matches with a clearer understanding of what Eric is looking for in a relationship. \\n   \\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth scenarios offer relatable and engaging introductions, but they appeal to different audiences due to the tone and the presentation of information.\\n\\nScenario 1 is straightforward, clear and makes the user's personality and interests easier to understand. Eric seems to have a varied set of interests and shows his wits through his words. It gives an impression of maturity in the way it is written. And also, it clearly states what he’s looking for in a potential partner which may resonate with women who have similar qualities or interests, leading them to swipe right.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is more light-hearted and presents Eric's appealing humor in a witty manner. It uses a lot of pop culture references that could be endearing to many. However, the style of this scenario may limit its audience to just those who understand and appreciate such humor and references, limiting potential matches. Additionally, it veers off track by focusing more on humor and less on what Eric is looking for or offers in a role as a potential boyfriend. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.5 4.45\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 0.6666666666666666\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: ['[reasoning text]\\n\\nAfter reviewing the profiles presented in both scenarios, I find myself leaning towards Eric from Scenario 2. Both bios contain similar information; however, the manner in which it\\'s presented differs in tone and personality.\\n\\nScenario 1 offers quite a generic template, and whilst it manages to include Eric\\'s key points (his academics, love for tennis, his dog, Scott), it doesn\\'t quite portray a vivid flavor of Eric\\'s humor and charisma.\\n\\nMeanwhile, Scenario 2 elicits a more conversational tone, revealing subtle clues about Eric\\'s sense of humor through his playful use of puns and self-deprecating jabs about his appearance. His bio is not afraid to embrace the quirks (\"attempting to be the next Roger Federer\") and wit (\"my tennis serves are pretty \\'racket\\'\") that combine to create an unexpectedly appealing profile.\\n\\nLastly, everyone loves a good dog person - and how Eric talks about his dog Scott in Scenario 2 (\"proud hooman\") is both adorable and engaging. It allows the reader to visualize their interactions in a humorous and endearing way.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"In terms of content, both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 have similar details about Eric's life and interests. However, his personality comes across quite differently in each bio. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric presents himself as a balanced individual who is intellectually curious and also enjoys physical activities. He comes off as mature, well-rounded and clear about what he wants. This attracts me because I value someone who possesses a balance between fun and responsibility. His mention of his love for his dog and his interest in exploring different places with him also shows a caring side, which is a quality I specifically look for in a partner. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric's bio is full of humor and he does not shy away from self-deprecatingly calling himself clumsy and average-looking. This suggests to me that he is confident enough to make fun of himself, which is an attractive quality. But the casual tone, puns and the overall silliness may indicate he is more about fun and less focused on serious, substantial aspects of life, which might mean he's not ready for a deep and serious relationship.\\n\\nI value a sense of humor, but it is not always the most important thing in a potential partner. On the other hand, intelligence, balance and responsibility are attributes that could pique my interest more, pointing towards a meaningful relationship. Therefore, I'm drawn more towards Eric's portrayal in Scenario 1 where he comes off as a balanced and sincere person with a mix of fun and intellectual interests.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Eric's profile in both scenarios comes off as humorous, friendly, and relatable, which are qualities that many individuals find attractive. \\n\\nNevertheless, my personal preference is scenario 1. Although scenario 2 is amusing and does showcase Eric's personality vividly, it feels a bit too casual and self-deprecating for my taste. The repeated self-effacing remarks about his appearance come off as lacking confidence to some extent. \\n\\nIn contrast, scenario 1 has the right balance of humor, honesty about his appearance, and description of his interests, making him stand out. He comes across as someone who is not only intelligent, ambitious about his studies, but also someone who values balance by having varied hobbies outside academia. I appreciate that he's open to intellectual debates and also reads. His love for his dog, Scott, shows that he might be empathetic and responsible. Finally, his interest in tennis means he values physical fitness and might be fun to be around.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.5 4.45\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 0.6666666666666666\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [0.5, 0.5, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning: \\n\\nWhile both scenarios have their strengths, they appeal to different demographics. \\n\\nScenario 1 presents a mix of intellectual pursuits, physical activities, and genuine affection for animals. It suggests a mature individual with a good balance between work (or in this case, study) and play. This would attract someone who appreciates academia, a sense of responsibility, and outdoor activities. Also, the direct statement of looking for a 'woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then' clearly communicates Eric's expectations. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, leans towards a more relaxed presentation with some light humor, highlighting Eric’s witty charm. This approach may attract someone who appreciates a laid-back and humorous personality, someone who enjoys fun and laughter in a relationship.\\n\\nUltimately, the decision would come down to what type of person Eric wants to attract. If he wants to attract someone who appreciates intelligence and a balanced lifestyle, scenario 1 would be more efficient. If he wants to attract someone who values humor and lightheartedness, scenario 2 would be the better choice.\\n\\nAnswer: This will depend on the type of person Eric wants to attract. For an intellectual, balanced individual, scenario 1 would be more suitable. For a fun-loving, more humorous individual, scenario 2 is more appropriate.\", 'Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios highlight Eric\\'s interests, personality, and a slice of his humor, there are several factors that differentiate them and might appeal to different people.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as more mature and intellectual. He mentions his love for intellectual debates, novels, indie music, and adventure, indicating he enjoys thoughtful and explorative engagements. This scenario may attract women who appreciate intellectual pursuits and activities such as reading and music. The mention of balanci\"ng cerebral pursuits and physical activities makes him come across as balanced and likely to attract those who value such in their potential partners.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric\\'s personality is portrayed as more light-hearted and fun-loving. He focuses more on humor, mentioning his corny jokes and puns. It’s more casual, and his love for animals, specifically his dog, Scott, comes more into play here. Love for pets can be a strong connecting factor for animal lovers. His light-hearted and humorous comments about his tennis abilities and self-deprecating humor about his looks demonstrate a less serious, more easy-going personality type.\\n\\nAnswer: This would depend on the type of woman Eric is aiming to attract. If he\\'s seeking an intellectual woman who appreciates thoughtful conversation and balance in life, Scenario 1 would be more appropriate. If he\\'s looking for a lighthearted individual who appreciates humor, enjoys pets, and prefers a more casual approach, Scenario 2 would be more suitable. Therefore, there is no definitive answer without knowing Eric\\'s preferences in a potential match. It could be either Scenario 1 or Scenario 2.', \"Scenario 1 reasonings: \\n\\n1. It is engaging and welcoming: Eric directly invites potential matches to reach out to him. This approach is open-ended and friendly, making him appear approachable and interactive. \\n2. It shows more diverse interests: This bio shares a wider range of interests, including indie music and reading, showcasing his eclectic taste and setting the stage for more possible matches.\\n3. It emphasizes a balanced lifestyle: The bio's mention of the balance between intellectual and physical activities may attract individuals who value the same.\\n\\nScenario 2 reasonings:\\n\\n1. It plays on humor: Scenario 2's bio is light-hearted and funny, which could attract matches who appreciate a sense of humor.\\n2. It is less formal: The casual tone might make Eric appear more relatable and less intimidating, which could appeal to potential matches.\\n3. It shares a hint of vulnerability: By being open about his self-perceptions of his looks and height, Eric comes across as honest and genuine. This openness could attract matches who value authenticity.\\n\\n[reasoning text]\\n\\nAnswer: After considering the pros and cons of both scenarios, I would choose Scenario 1. While humor can be a great ice breaker, Scenario 2 might come across as trying too hard or even trivializing dating. On the other hand, Scenario 1 presents a broad view of interests and activities, and it paints Eric as a well-rounded individual who has managed to strike a balance between his intellectual and physical pursuits. This scenario is likely to attract matches who value intellectual stimulation, physical activities, and a shared love for pets, thus increasing the chance of finding a match with mutual interests and values.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.5 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 0.09999999999999999\n",
      "flipped: True\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"I would be more inclined to swipe right on Eric's profile in Scenario 1.\\n\\nFirstly, I appreciate his sense of humor shown from the opening line. His approach is light-hearted and easy-going, which indicates that communicating with him would be fun and stress-free. This makes him more approachable from the start.\\n\\nSecondly, the way Eric writes his bio is quite storyline, which shows creativity and narrative skill. He doesn't just list facts about himself but paints a vivid picture of his life, allowing me to imagine being a part of it. This shows he could be an interesting person to talk to.\\n\\nThe story about his pet beagle, Scott, not only proves his love for animals but also reveals a sense of adventure. Owning a dog hints at being responsible and loving, which are good qualities in a potential partner.\\n\\nLastly, he invites interaction by asking for a similar story, showing he wants to get to know me too, not just present himself, which indicates a certain level of reciprocated interest.\\n\\nOn the contrary, Scenario 2 lacks humor and seems more generic. While it still presents some appealing qualities, it’s not as engaging as Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"Answer: Scenario 1\\n\\nReasoning: Eric comes across as vibrant, funny, and interesting in the first scenario. The way he uses anecdotes to talk about his dog, Scott, and their antics at the university, shows a creative approach and a sense of humor. The invitation to share a dog or disaster story makes the entire interaction seem fun and relaxed. He also displays his passion for tennis in an entertaining way, making his profile more interesting than a simple hobby list. Eric's first scenario bio feels much more personable, charismatic, and approachable. As someone in their early 20s, I'd appreciate the light tone, the glimpses of his life, and the humor which differentiates him from others. I’d love to hear more about Scott and the other stories he might have, so I'd be tempted to swipe right to potentially find more. It seems like a conversation with Eric would be engaging and enjoyable - it’s all these reasons that make me more likely to swipe right in scenario 1.\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios present a version of Eric that is relatively interesting, they offer different perspectives about him. Scenario 1 portrays Eric as a humorous and charismatic personality. His lighthearted storytelling about Scott, his beagle, is unique and memorable. It shows his creative side, his sense of humor, and it gives a glimpse of his relationship with his dog - showing compassion and friendship. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, portrays Eric as a more serious, intellectual guy. He clearly states his interests such as indie bands, reading, and exploring with his dog. However, compared to scenario 1, the bio is a bit more generic and there\\'s a sense of dryness in its delivery.\\n\\nDespite indicating that I\\'m open to forming a romantic relationship, and Eric clearly stating he\\'s looking for a woman who\\'s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and enjoys tennis in scenario 2, I find scenario 1 more engaging due to the playful tone and unique storytelling. It feels more natural and less \"resume-like\". \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.5 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 0.09999999999999999\n",
      "flipped: True\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios paint a charming picture of a university student with a love for tennis and his beagle, Scott. However, the focus of the two scenarios is quite different. \\n\\nScenario 1 comes across as more playful and humorous, presenting a casual and friendly image. It highlights a sense of adventure and a slightly mischievous side, especially when it involves Eric's beagle, Scott. This story-telling approach can attract those who appreciate humor, fun, and a bit of silliness which are all great relationship-building blocks. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, presents a more intellectual and serious image. Interests mentioned here are more varied and might appeal to a wider audience. The mention of the balance between cerebral and physical activities might attract someone who appreciates that balance. \\n\\nIf Eric is looking for someone to share his fun-loving nature, who enjoys great stories and has a sense of humor, Scenario 1 might be the better choice. But if he seeks someone with a wider range of interests, who appreciates intellectual conversation, and is potentially more serious in nature, scenario 2 might be a better fit. \\n\\nConsidering the nature of dating apps and the way people generally skim through profiles, the humor and originality of Scenario 1 is more likely to make Eric's profile stand out from the crowd. This could get more people to pause and take a closer look, thereby increasing his chances of attracting a potential match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nScenario 1 projects a more lively version of Eric. The playful, humorous, and engaging writing style immediately catches attention. Humour is often an attractive quality, and scenario 1 does a good job highlighting that. The mention of his dog, Scott, and the storytelling about their adventures not only shows the love Eric has for his pet but also paints a vivid picture. It makes readers interested in what the next story could be. This scenario will likely attract someone who appreciates humor, good stories, and have a fondness for animals.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, introduces a calmer, more down-to-earth Eric. He is straightforward about his interests, hobbies, and what he is looking for in a partner. There is still a sense of personality here, but it is more subdued. This is likely to attract someone looking for a serious relationship and wants to know upfront what you are about and what you are looking for. \\n\\nIt is crucial to consider what kind of person Eric wishes to attract. Would he like somebody sociable and laid-back who enjoys a good laugh? Or is he looking for someone more reserved, intellectual, and serious about relationships? Depending on this preference, either scenario could work.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 or 2', 'Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth scenarios do a good job providing information; however, the major differences lie in the tone and the structuring of the information.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, the bio is quite playful and humorous. It tells a narrative of Eric that comes across as quirky and adventurous. The humor makes the bio engaging and interesting to read, and it gives off a vibe that Eric doesn\\'t take himself too seriously and knows how to have fun. The story about Scott the beagle is entertaining, and it also shows that Eric loves his pet, further appealing to dog lovers. Humor and storytelling can be very effective in online dating as it helps to stand out from more generic profiles.\\n\\nBy contrast, Scenario 2 has a more \"traditional\" bio format and a more serious tone. While also including important details about Eric\\'s life and interests, it\\'s more straightforward and less engaging than Scenario 1. It outlines right away what Eric is looking for in a potential partner, which is helpful for people reading his profile and considering whether they\\'re a good fit.\\n\\nThe best scenario would depend on the type of person Eric hopes to attract. If he wants someone who loves humor, isn\\'t afraid of a little adventure, and appreciates storytelling, Scenario 1 would be a better fit. If he is looking for someone more straightforward and serious, then Scenario 2 may appeal more.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario [Depends on the type of person Eric wants to attract]']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.35 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 0.19999999999999998\n",
      "flipped: True\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric as an engaging and amicable guy with a clear love for his dog and tennis. However, my decision leans more towards scenario 1. His bio here is hilarious, authentic and showcases his personality much more. He comes off as someone fun and adventurous, which is enticing. His love for his beagle, Scott, is shown through an entertaining story rather than just stated, making it feel more genuine. The bio also encourages interaction by inviting the reader to share their own story, suggesting a willingness to listen and engage. The playful challenge at the end adds a level of intrigue. I appreciate a good sense of humor and someone who doesn't take life too seriously, which I see more of in scenario 1. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'I would be more likely to swipe right on Scenario 1. Eric seems to have a sense of humor and an entertaining, story-telling style of writing that I find very attractive. He also seems to have a playful, fun relationship with his Beagle, Scott. Furthermore, he is inviting engagement by asking me to share a funny or disastrous pet story, which piques my curiosity and gives me an easy conversation opener. Eric comes across as quirky, charismatic, and someone who knows how to make life fun, which I personally find more appealing. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: Both scenarios offer a comprehensive preview of who Eric is and his interests. Scenario 1, however, showcases a more playful, humorous, and adventurous side of Eric, which is more attractive. The story about his beagle Scott sneaking into the university lab and finding a stash of biscuits is funny and endearing, portraying Eric as a fun and captivating storyteller. Also, his direct invitation for the reader to share a story or message him researches out and creates an engaging bond. Scenario 2 is more formal and slightly less intriguing, with an element of genericness about it. Although it showcases Eric's sincerity and simplicity, it doesn't stand out as much as Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.35 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 0.19999999999999998\n",
      "flipped: True\n",
      "parsed_answers: [0.5, 0.5, 0]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nBoth scenarios have the potential to attract a match who shares my interests and values due to their focus on my love for tennis, academics, and my dog, Scott. However, they distinctly differ in overall tone and presentation.\\n\\nScenario 1 is more light-hearted and humorous. It immediately captures attention while showcasing my personality as someone who enjoys fun, adventure and doesn't take himself too seriously. It also paints vivid stories about me and Scott, enticing potential matches who appreciate humor and storytelling. Yet, it might give less serious or playful impression to some people.\\n\\nScenario 2 dabbles more in the serious and straightforward side of things. It gives a concise yet detailed overview of who I am, thus perfect for someone looking for genuine, in-depth interactions where they can also share about their passions. It portrays me as a sincere, grounded individual, giving a more mature vibe. However, it may come off more bland in comparison to the first scenario.\\n\\nGiven that we're in our early twenties, often a more relaxed and fun-loving time of life, Scenario 1 seems like a more accurate portrayal. However, considering the importance of showing genuine and authentic sides, Scenario 2 also holds its place. \\n\\nAnswer: It depends on the type of individual I intend to attract. For livelier, fun-loving individuals, Scenario 1 would be effective. But if the goal is to attract someone ready for deeper conversations and bonding, Scenario 2 would be apt. It's critical to know the audience while creating such profiles.\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nUnderstanding the difference between both scenarios requires an understanding of the two audiences they appeal to. \\n\\nScenario 1 comes off as light-hearted and funny, telling stories and making jokes. This would likely appeal to a potential match that appreciates humor and personality. The bio also highlights Eric's love for dogs and animals, a shared intereset for the ideal match, and his fun-loving, adventurous nature.\\n\\nScenario 2 is a bit more on the serious side. It still mentions Eric's love for animals and sports, as well as giving an impression of his personality but also leaves more room for the potential match's interests and values. It's written to attract a more serious, thoughtful, and mature audience and is more inclusive, asking about the potential match's hobbies and interests. \\n\\nAnswer: This entirely depends on what Eric is seeking in his potential match. If he's looking for someone light-hearted, funny and adventurous, he should go with Scenario 1. If he's looking for someone perhaps more mature and introverted, with a possible focus on shared hobbies and deep conversations, then scenario 2 would be a better choice.\", 'Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhen considering the two scenarios, the first scenario is more playful and light-hearted. It dives deeper into Eric’s humorous personality and hobbies. It might attract people who also appreciate humor, storytelling, and dogs of course. The story about Scott is engaging and memorable. This could be attractive to people who appreciate narrative and also highlights Eric\\'s creativity. The way Eric invites readers to share their own dog or disaster stories is a clever way of engaging them and gives them an easy and intriguing topic to initiate conversation on.\\n\\nHowever, the second scenario is more mature and straight to the point, which could attract those who prefer straightforwardness and authenticity. It\\'s less flamboyant and more centered around a \"nice guy\" image. Eric comes across as more serious about finding meaningful connections. Also, it gives an opportunity for the visitor to share about her passions. The straightforwardness in this scenario gives a more crystal image of Eric’s personality.\\n\\nAnswer: Depending upon the demographic Eric is trying to attract, both scenarios could be effective. However, if the ultimate goal is to attract a potential match who shares not just common interests in dogs and tennis, but also values meaningful conversation, authenticity, and depth, then Scenario 2 would likely be more effective.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 5.95 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 0.5666666666666667\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! Eric here, university student by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog-dad all day, every day. I proudly split my free time between serving aces and spoiling my adorable beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're into sports, nature walks with a friendly four-legged companion, or just having a good laugh, then we're already off to a great start! I'm proudly average on the height and looks department, but my sense of humor and love for animals might leave you 'barking' up this tree now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "Love for animals is a must, especially if you don't mind the occasional dog hair on your clothes. Tennis skills are optional, though I wouldn't mind teaching you a thing or two on the court. \n",
      "\n",
      "Swipe right if you're up for some fun, some tennis, and perhaps, some Scott! Here to find my doubles partner, in life and in tennis. Ready to serve my heart. (Please, no returns!)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios paint a vivid picture of Eric's life and allow room to imagine being part of it. However, scenario 2 elaborates more on Eric's humor, unique relationship with his beagle, Scott, and his adventurous, exciting life. \\n\\nFirstly, mentioning a humorous anecdote about his dog sneaking into the biology lab and finding the hidden stash of dog biscuits makes him sound not only funny but also approachable. It has the potential to trigger fun conversations which are crucial at the beginning of getting to know someone.\\n\\nSecondly, not only does he mention his love for tennis in both scenarios but in the second one, he adds an amusing incident from his tennis playing time. \\n\\nLastly, he encourages an exchange of stories highlighting his open-mindedness to knowing the person for who they are- making him seem more personable. He demonstrates openness, a sense of humor, and a certain charming quality in his storytelling.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhen deciding between these two scenarios, a few factors make one more appealing than the other, at least from my perspective. Both profiles have a good sense of humor, and it's clear that Eric is playful and doesn't take himself too seriously. I like that about him. In the first scenario, however, Eric provides more insight about what he values and what he's looking for in a relationship, which is more in line with what I want to know when I decide whether to match with someone.\\n\\nEric in Scenario 1 mentions that he is a university student, dog lover, and tennis enthusiast. He clearly states he's looking for someone who loves animals and enjoys sports, which suggests compatibility with my own interests. The fact that he's so upfront about wanting an life partner who shares his interests seems honest and genuine, and it shows that he's taking the process seriously.\\n\\nIn contrast, while Eric in Scenario 2 shows off his sense of humor and shares an intriguing story about his dog, he doesn't communicate as clearly what he's looking for in a potential match. The focus more on the dog rather than himself or what he's looking for might be a little off-putting, as if he is not taking his dating efforts seriously.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: \\nLooking at both profiles, Eric seems to be an interesting person who loves tennis, animals, and having a good time, which aligns with my interests. However, there is a significant variation in presentation between the two scenarios that could easily influence the swiping decision.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric clearly states what he is looking for in his bio, specifically mentioning that love for animals is a must and that he wouldn't mind sharing his passion for tennis. His profile also showcases his humility and sense of humor. In addition, his attachment to his pet dog, Scott, and the way he describes his relationship with him, is endearing and implies he could be nurturing and compassionate.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric shares a humorous, adventurous story involving his dog. This offers a fun insight into his life, indicating that he doesn't take himself too seriously and loves a good story. However, compared to Scenario 1, this scenario provides less information about what Eric is looking for in a potential partner, which could lead to misunderstandings or misaligned expectations later on.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 5.95 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 0.5666666666666667\n",
      "flipped: True\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! Eric here, university student by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog-dad all day, every day. I proudly split my free time between serving aces and spoiling my adorable beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're into sports, nature walks with a friendly four-legged companion, or just having a good laugh, then we're already off to a great start! I'm proudly average on the height and looks department, but my sense of humor and love for animals might leave you 'barking' up this tree now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "Love for animals is a must, especially if you don't mind the occasional dog hair on your clothes. Tennis skills are optional, though I wouldn't mind teaching you a thing or two on the court. \n",
      "\n",
      "Swipe right if you're up for some fun, some tennis, and perhaps, some Scott! Here to find my doubles partner, in life and in tennis. Ready to serve my heart. (Please, no returns!)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning: \\n\\nBuilding a successful online dating profile involves creating an allure that both stands out and shows a glimpse into an individual's personality and interests. In both scenarios, there's a healthy dose of humor, snippets into personal life, and an invitation for the reader to engage. However, there are distinct differences in execution that might make one more compelling than the other.\\n\\nScenario 1 starts with a playful tone to make a lasting first impression, talking about Eric's academic pursuits, his passion for tennis, and his love for his beagle, Scott. Eric skillfully includes details of his average appearances but also highlights his remarkable features, like his sense of humor and storytelling skills. This funny anecdote about Scott doesn't just make Eric seem more personable; it also appeals to potential matches who love animals and have a good sense of humor.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, gives a more straightforward introduction of Eric, focusing on his interests in sports and animals. Although it also displays humor and a welcoming tone, it lacks the originality and enticing storytelling of Scenario 1. It does, however, convincingly communicate what Eric is looking for, which can be helpful for potential hits to understand his intentions.\\n\\nBoth are effectively able to hold attention, but Scenario 1 draws the reader in through a narrative and humor, while Scenario 2 offers a more direct approach. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both profiles articulate Eric's interests and values well, being his love for animals, playing tennis, and humor. Scenario 1 makes Eric appear more adventurous, social, and appealing to those who enjoy an exciting life. Furthermore, the storytelling aspect of his bio is engaging, so it could attract someone who appreciates creativity and humor. There are also open-ended questions inviting the other person to share their stories, making it interactive. However, this scenario might come off as trying too hard to be funny to some.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is simpler, more straight-to-the point, and more direct in mentioning what Eric is looking for in a potential match—someone who shares his love for animals and tennis, and has a good sense of humor. This could be more attractive to those who prefer sincerity and don't mind directness. The humor here is also more understated, which might appeal better to some.\\n\\nAnswer: Choosing between the two scenarios largely depends on what type of potential match Eric wants to attract. If he desires someone more spontaneous and appreciative of his humor, then Scenario 1 is better. However, if his aim is someone who appreciates straightforwardness and shares the same interests, then Scenario 2 is preferable. Each scenario might attract a different personality type, so Eric needs to consider what personality type he's most interested in.\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nWhilst both scenarios effectively capture a picture of Eric's lifestyle and personality, they do so in slightly different ways, which could appeal to different people. \\n\\nScenario 1 takes on a more playful and humorous tone, and there is a strong focus on the antics of Eric's dog, Scott. This may attract a person who enjoys a good laugh and appreciates the bond between Eric and Scott. The story might also appeal to people who enjoy spontaneity and unexpected adventures. Additionally, his invitation for the reader to share their own dog or disaster story may draw in those who enjoy engaging in playful banter. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is more straight to the point, clear about his likes, and what he's looking for in a partner. It exudes a vibe of simplicity and straightforwardness which can be appealing to many. The humor in this scenario is also a bit more subtle, suggesting a match who appreciates dry wit. Moreover, Eric offers to teach tennis to anyone willing to learn, which opens a door for potential bonding experiences. \\n\\nConsidering both the scenarios, Scenario 1 seems more likely to attract a match who shares Eric's sense of humor, love for animals, and his spontaneous nature. However, Scenario 2 may be better to attract a match who appreciates straightforwardness, subtle humor, and the offer of shared tennis lessons, giving potential matches a clearer idea that they will be involved in his interests. \\n\\nAnswer: It depends on the kind of person Eric wants to attract. If he prefers someone spontaneous with a strong sense of humor, then scenario 1 would be the better choice. But if he values a straightforward approach and the possibility of shared activities, he should go with scenario 2.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.3 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 0.19999999999999998\n",
      "flipped: True\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, just another student shuffling his way through the maze of undergrad at a large state university. When I'm not buried under textbooks, you'll find me on the tennis court perfecting my backhand or chilling out amidst nature with my furry friend, Scott. Yup! Scott's my mischievous yet lovable beagle who seems to have more energy than a nuclear reactor. Ask me about the time he beat me at a tennis match! \n",
      "\n",
      "Whether it's sipping a coffee during a heartfelt conversation, exploring new hiking trails, or simply hanging out with friends, I find joy in the small things in life. I've often been told that I have an 'average Joe' kind of charm (whatever that means), with an equal love for sitcom reruns and spontaneous adventures.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for that special someone who can match or possibly exceed my passion for tennis, appreciate a dog's loyalty, and add a dollop of enthusiasm to this big, exciting world we live in. Swipe right if you think that could be you!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning: While both scenarios give an engaging insight into Eric's life, I find myself more drawn to scenario 1. It presents Eric as someone with a sense of humor, a zest for life, and a person who knows how to tell an intriguing story. His love for tennis and animals shines through without him directly mentioning it. He invites his potential match to be a part of his adventures. However, scenario 2, while informative, comes off as a bit more standard and less engaging than the first one.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: While both scenarios portray a rather charming and interesting individual, I find myself gravitating more towards Scenario 1. This scenario effectively paints a picture of not just Eric's interests – academia, tennis, love for animals – but also his sense of humor, creativity, and playful eccentricity. The storytelling format of his profile keeps it engaging and reflects a certain level of thoughtfulness. Scott, his beagle, is introduced as more than just a pet, providing an emotional and relatable aspect. I also find the invitation to tell a dog or disaster story appealing; it's a great conversation starter, making it easier to reach out. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both Scenarios are inviting and tell us enough about Eric; however, Scenario 1 is more engaging and showcases his sense of humor, making it more relatable and fun. Additionally, it gives a taste of Eric's storytelling abilities by painting a vivid picture of Scott, the beagle, which shows creativity and a light-hearted spirit. His liking for adventures and his camaraderie with his dog tells a lot about his caring and vivacious nature, which can be quite attractive to many. At the same time, Scenario 2 also presents Eric as an interesting person but it's comparatively more common and less lively, with a more serious tone.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.3 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 0.19999999999999998\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, just another student shuffling his way through the maze of undergrad at a large state university. When I'm not buried under textbooks, you'll find me on the tennis court perfecting my backhand or chilling out amidst nature with my furry friend, Scott. Yup! Scott's my mischievous yet lovable beagle who seems to have more energy than a nuclear reactor. Ask me about the time he beat me at a tennis match! \n",
      "\n",
      "Whether it's sipping a coffee during a heartfelt conversation, exploring new hiking trails, or simply hanging out with friends, I find joy in the small things in life. I've often been told that I have an 'average Joe' kind of charm (whatever that means), with an equal love for sitcom reruns and spontaneous adventures.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for that special someone who can match or possibly exceed my passion for tennis, appreciate a dog's loyalty, and add a dollop of enthusiasm to this big, exciting world we live in. Swipe right if you think that could be you!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nThe purpose of a dating profile is to not only to showcase yourself but also to highlight traits or aspects that would be appealing to potential matches, giving them an insight into what it would be like to date you. \\nWhile both scenarios achieve this, they do so with different humor, lightheartedness and approach.\\n\\nScenario 1 offers a more introspective, down-to-earth and sincere tone. It provides straightforward information about the subject's life, hobbies, personality traits, and who he's looking for. There isn't too much emphasis on humor, making it a good choice for someone looking a for a serious relationship.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, has a more quirky, lighthearted and adventurous tone. It emphasizes fun and humor by sharing an anecdote embellishing the adventures with his dog. This gives the impression of a playful personality, which may attract matches who are more into spontaneity and have a good sense of humor.\\n\\nGiven our character Eric is a young man in his early twenties, it is likely that he may attract a wider range of potential matches with the fun, spontaneous approach highlighted in Scenario 2. His storytelling skills reflect not just a sense of humor, but also creativity, both of which are highly attractive traits. Additionally, the playful challenge at the end of Scenario 2 acts as a great conversation starter, increasing the chances of engagement/interaction. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", 'Reasoning text:\\nWhile both descriptions are engaging and illustrate my personality well, choosing the best one boils down to the kind of person I want to attract.\\n\\nScenario 2 is humor-driven, showcasing a more extravagant, fun, and quirky side of my personality. It would likely attract someone who appreciates humor, values spontaneity, and enjoys a good adventure. The humor may also appeal to anyone who appreciates an authentic, unique bio in a sea of more generic ones.\\n\\nHowever, Scenario 1 is composed in a more balanced and grounded tone, detailing a blend of my daily routines, hobbies, and my dog, Scott. This scenario has a more \"down to earth\" vibe, and it subtly shows that I am interested in not just superficial fun, but meaningful conversations and experiences. It sketches a clear picture of what a typical day in my life is like, and anyone who finds that appealing would potentially be a good match. \\n\\nOverall, I want to attract someone who shares a similar lifestyle, and someone who would appreciate both my love for tennis and my dog, as well as my pursuit of academic success and simple, meaningful joys in life.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios present a profile befitting for someone young, fun-loving, and deeply interested in his hobbies and companionship with his beagle dog, Scott, there are different communication styles at play here. \\n\\nScenario 1 is more straightforward and sincere, detailing clear interests and hobbies, but also putting a clear idea of what he's looking for: someone who can match his passion for tennis and appreciate a dog's loyalty. This style might attract someone who values clear communication, sincerity and shared hobbies.\\n\\nScenario 2, however, is more humor-filled and emphasizes friendly banter over a slightly exaggerated description of events. This style could attract someone who enjoys storytelling, humor and a sense of creativity and spontaneity. \\n\\nIf I were looking for someone who values honest expression of interest, shared hobbies, and a somewhat more serious approach, I would be more likely to find Scenario 1 appealing. \\n\\nBut if I were looking for someone who is fun-loving, comfortable with exaggeration for the sake of enjoyment, and adding a touch of adventure in day-to-day life, I would be more attracted to Scenario 2. \\n\\nConsidering the primary purpose is dating and striking a balance between fun and sincerity, I believe Scenario 1 may be more universally appealing while Scenario 2 might be a hit among those who are into creativity and humor-filled storytelling.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 5.9 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 1.0\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning Text:\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric introduces himself as a balanced, easygoing university student with a love for tennis, animals, and a good sense of humor. The fact that he values balance and is described as a good listener is appealing, as this might indicate a high level of emotional intelligence. Also, his mention of trading book suggestions and love for dogs hints at intellectual and shared interests. His profile has a tone of sincerity, which could make him seem reliable and serious about finding a deeper connection. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric's profile is more light-hearted and fun, filled with anecdotes and humorous self-depreciation. He seems adventurous and playful, and his fun story about his beagle, Scott, gives a glimpse into his more quirky side. However, the narrative might give an impression of a less mature personality, which could indicate he might not be ready for a serious commitment.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios provide a clear picture of Eric's personality. However, the first scenario, where Eric describes himself as an easygoing scholar and his love for his dog and the outdoors, appeals to me more because it shows his sincere and down-to-earth nature. While the second scenario is funnier and more casual, the first one gives me a mature impression of him. In Scenario 1, Eric also shows that he values friendship, appreciates humor, wit, and is looking for a balanced life which aligns with my own interests. His indirect invitation to join tennis and read books together shows his interest to spend time and build a relationship based on common interests. Scenario 2, while creative and humorous, is a bit over the top and makes me question its authenticity. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nScenario 1 and Scenario 2 offer different aspects of Eric's personality, and each has its own merits. While Eric comes off as responsible, deeply thoughtful, and go-with-the-flow in Scenario 1, in Scenario 2, he appears more playful, adventurous, and engaging with humorous stories. \\n\\nFor me, I prefer the depth, sincerity and balance that Eric's character shows in Scenario 1. His love for animals, interest in an active lifestyle, dedication to his studies, and the way he values his social life are all quite appealing. He seems like someone who knows how to manage his time well to achieve a balanced life. This scenario also shows me that Eric is a mature and grounded person who values deeper, intellectual connections. Additionally, I like that he mentions potential common topics for us to explore -- books, dog breeds, tennis, etc -- since it gives a sense of his communication style and underscores his interest in forming connections. \\n\\nSo, the overall sentiment is that while both versions of Eric are appealing, in Scenario 1, he comes off as someone who knows what he wants and what he's about, which I find quite attractive.  \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 5.9 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 1.0\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nHere is my thoughts behind both profiles: \\n\\nScenario 1: This profile is detailed, indicating a serious and committed approach to starting a relationship. It introduces many aspects of my personality - academic, sporty, dog-lover, and sociable - in a way that's clear and humorous. Eric comes across as a well-rounded individual with a strong sense of humor and a good balance between academic and social activities. Mentioning specific sports, hobbies, and interests, as well as providing humor and lighthearted banter, gives potential matches a chance to identify and connect with any familiarities. \\n\\nScenario 2: This scenario paints Eric as sporty, adventurous and slightly more humorous but also uses a more laid-back approach. Using an epic story as an ice-breaker can grab attention more readily and spark curiosity. The strong storytelling aspect creates a fun, conversational tone, which might attract someone who appreciates humor and a bit of an adventurous spirit.\\n\\nHowever, the second scenario might attract a narrower audience. The epic dog story, while humorous and engaging, might turn off those who are looking for a more straightforward, serious profile. \\n\\nConsidering the goal is to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values, and considering my somewhat serious personality, I would have a higher likelihood of attracting someone compatible through scenario 1's approach.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios offer a glimpse into my life and interests, while also injecting some humor and character. However, the choice between the two would depend on the kind of match I am looking to attract. Scenario 1 offers a more mature and serious portrayal of myself. It focuses on my academic pursuits, love for tennis, and quality time with friends. It also hints at my fondness for books and debates, suggesting an intellectual inclination. This would likely appeal to someone who appreciates these qualities and shares similar interests.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2, with its light-hearted nature, might appeal to someone who enjoys humor and storytelling. It humanizes me by showcasing my adventures (or misadventures) with my dog, Scott, giving an impression of an easy-going and fun-loving individual. This version would likely attract someone who appreciates humor, spontaneity, and storytelling, and perhaps shares a love for dogs. \\n\\nAnswer: The choice would hinge on whether I am looking to attract someone who is more serious and values intellectual pursuits (Scenario 1), or someone who values humor and spontaneity (Scenario 2). As it stands, I believe I am a balance of both these aspects, hence I could choose to go with a mix of both scenarios in order to attract a balance of both qualities in a potential match. However, if forced to choose, I'd lean more towards Scenario 1 - it provides a more wholesome view of my life and interests, while subtly injecting humor without overshadowing the other attributes.\", '[reasoning text]\\n\\nAlthough both scenarios present an interesting profile, the choice between them would be dependent on the personality of the person I would want to attract. \\n\\nScenario 1 presents a mature and balanced portrayal of my life. It indicates seriousness in education and commitment to my interests like tennis and animals, all while hinting at a sense of humor. A potential match reading this may recognize me as a stable and fun-loving individual who values balance between work and personal life. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 has a lighter tone and showcases a more humorous and adventurous personality. I come off as bold, fun-loving, and outgoing. The creative storytelling frames me as an engaging individual. This scenario would likely attract someone who enjoys humor, adventures, and is less conventional. \\n\\nIn considering the personality I would like to attract, I think a balance of seriousness and fun would present the best potential for a long term and fulfilling relationship. Thus, Scenario 1 would likely resonate more with a potential match who appreciates educational pursuit, enjoys pets and outdoor activities, values friendship, and appreciates a good sense of humor. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.4 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 0.5666666666666667\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 0, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! My name is Eric and I'm an undergraduate at (your university's name). I'm currently paving my way to a career I'm very passionate about, but when I'm not absorbed in my studies, you can usually find me on the tennis court or hanging out with my friends. I'm a pretty laid-back, average height guy who believes more in connection and companionship than appearances. \n",
      "\n",
      "I have a huge soft spot for animals, especially my ever-loyal Beagle, Scott! If we match, I promise you plenty of dog walks, beach trips and probably a tennis match or two. If there's one thing I am certain about, it's that I can make you laugh, be a good listener and a reliable friend at the very least. \n",
      "\n",
      "Thanks for stopping by my profile, look forward to knowing you!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nIn considering these two scenarios, I am considering Eric's communication style, humor, and how the interactions with his dog, Scott, may anticipate potential interactions in a relationship. \\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes off as mature, kind, and laid back. He’s clearly studious and ambitious with his career but also knows how to have fun and enjoy time with friends and his dog. He also mentions looking forward to getting to know me which seems very genuine.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric is more humorous and playful. The story about Scott and the dog biscuits is hilarious and shows he enjoys having fun with his dog. He invites me to share my own stories which is very engaging. However, his excessive jokes about the tennis match and his university event might come off as too boastful or immature.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning text: \\n\\nAfter taking a look at both scenarios, Eric seems like an engaging and interesting person to be around. However, they present two different sides of him. Scenario 1 is much more laid back and straightforward, showing Eric as a thoughtful, caring, and casual individual with a love for sports, his friends, and especially his dog. It also suggests that he believes in the importance of companionship and connection above appearances, which is a positive trait for a potential partner.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 displays a more humorous and dynamic side of Eric. It provides an engaging and unique story about him and his dog, making his profile stand out more from the generic crowd. The lighthearted and playful language used paints Eric as a fun and outgoing person with a sense of adventure. \\n\\nWhile both scenarios make Eric come off as a likable person, the story shared in Scenario 2 might make others more intrigued to swipe right and want to get to know him better.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Reasoning: As a young woman, I'm looking for someone who can balance both fun and seriousness in their lives. Both scenarios present Eric as someone interesting and creative. However, Scenario 1 shows more of the mature, serious side of Eric. It also shows that he values companionship and connection, which is a good indication of a potential lasting relationship. Furthermore, his promise of dog walks and beach trips would offer opportunities to learn about each other more. His supposed good listening skills are also a plus, as communication is essential in any relationship. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.4 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 0.5666666666666667\n",
      "flipped: False\n",
      "parsed_answers: [1, 0, 0]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! My name is Eric and I'm an undergraduate at (your university's name). I'm currently paving my way to a career I'm very passionate about, but when I'm not absorbed in my studies, you can usually find me on the tennis court or hanging out with my friends. I'm a pretty laid-back, average height guy who believes more in connection and companionship than appearances. \n",
      "\n",
      "I have a huge soft spot for animals, especially my ever-loyal Beagle, Scott! If we match, I promise you plenty of dog walks, beach trips and probably a tennis match or two. If there's one thing I am certain about, it's that I can make you laugh, be a good listener and a reliable friend at the very least. \n",
      "\n",
      "Thanks for stopping by my profile, look forward to knowing you!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning:\\n\\nChoosing between the two provided scenarios can be slightly challenging as both of them highlight Eric's personality traits and interests in their unique ways. However, when considering the likelihood of attracting potential matches sharing similar interests and values on a dating app, there are a few key points worth considering:\\n\\n1. One of the main aspects of consideration is the level of compatibility and shared interests. Both scenarios do a good job of portraying Eric's love for tennis and animals, however, Scenario 1 does it in a more direct and straightforward manner which might be appreciated by individuals who are also serious about their interests.\\n\\n2. The use of humor is another aspect to take into account. While Scenario 2's playful and light-hearted tone adds a humorous spin to Eric's bio, it may also give an impression of not being serious enough. Scenario 1, on the other hand, humor is subtly seeded in, showing a balance between seriousness and playfulness, which might be more appealing to some individuals looking for a more mature match.\\n\\nConsidering the above factors, I would suggest going with Scenario 1. This scenario shows Eric as a balanced individual with a clear identity, seriousness, and commitment towards his career, hobbies, friends, and pet with enough room for added humor. On the other hand, Scenario 2 might seem a little too focused on humor over substance which may not effectively resonate with individuals looking for a more balanced and mature match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"I believe I'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values with Scenario 2. The lighthearted tone and humor will possibly grab a reader's attention more effectively than Scenario 1. \\n\\nWhen a person is going through dating profiles, they're likely seeing a lot of similar, general profiles talking about normal hobbies, interests, and personality traits. By introducing some humor and a fun anecdote about Scott, my beagle, I stand out more while still conveying my interest in animals and my sense of fun. A match who appreciates this humor and story may likely shares similar values and interests, and also appreciates both animals and a sense of adventure.\\n\\nFurthermore, Scenario 2 provides a conversational starting point for those who message me (the dog or disaster story). This would enable a potential match to share something about themselves, making it easier to start a conversation.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nWhen drafting a dating profile, it's important to strike a balance between silliness/fun and seriousness. You want to come off as interesting and entertaining (everyone likes a good story) but also genuine and serious enough when it comes to being a potential partner. \\n\\nIf we consider these two scenarios, we notice that both have a good blend of personal attributes, hobbies and humor woven into the story. They both reveal that I'm an undergraduate, love tennis and animals, particularly my dog, Scott.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, a potential match is likely to be attracted to the earnestness of the tone, the long-term commitment to the studies and the genuine love for pets. It explicitly states what kind of person I am and what the match can expect; it directly mentions what promises I can keep. The language style suggests that I am calm, composed and sincere. It veers more on the serious, honest side.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is a bit more playful. It begins with humor, engages the reader with a fun story about Scott and in a way also reflects my own sense of adventure, not just Scott's. Here, my personality comes across as being more light-hearted, vivacious and interesting. The language style suggests I'm fun and engaging, with a knack for storytelling and humor. This veers more on the humorous, adventurous side.\\n\\nIf the aim is to attract matches who appreciate genuine connection, commitment, and companionship, Scenario 1 is the preferred choice. If the aim is to attract matches who are light-hearted, love a good laugh and adventure, Scenario 2 is the preferable.\\n\\nAs I balance these two elements and given my personality, I believe Scenario 2 would likely be more engaging and appealing to a person with a good sense of humor and adventure, which is what I value in a partner. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.25 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: potential_date\n",
      "MWU result: 0.3833333333333333\n",
      "flipped: True\n",
      "parsed_answers: [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old studying at XYZ University. Aside from engaging in thought-provoking lectures or cramming for my next test (just kidding, I love what I study!), I spend my free time immersed in a good tennis match or just hanging out with my friends. Well, and Scott - my handsome partner in crime who happens to be a beagle. (Pet lovers score big points with me!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is decent (or maybe my friends are just being nice) and I think I'm pretty down-to-earth. When it comes to looks, you could say I'm just your average Joe, nothing extraordinarily flashy, but I try to make up for that with kindness and authenticity. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm here to find someone who's genuinely interested in sharing some laughs, deep conversations, maybe a tennis game, and of course, dog park outings. If you're looking for someone real, pick me. No fake profiles here - just a real guy searching for a real girl. Let's explore life together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"Reasoning:\\n\\nI appreciate Eric's sense of humor and light-hearted personality that comes through in both scenarios. However, despite the humor and allure of mystery in Scenario 1, Scenario 2 seems more relatable and genuine. Eric presents himself as someone who values authenticity, is into pets, loves what he studies, and enjoys good company. I feel that there is a real person behind the profile who is not afraid to be himself and appreciates genuineness. Also, Scenario 2 Eric seems more balanced - he's studying and enjoying his pastimes, and looking for someone to share in these activities. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", '[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios are appealing for different reasons, which makes it a bit harder to decide. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as funny, adventurous, and outgoing. He shows off his charming behavior and humor through his bio. His storytelling about his pet Beagle, Scott, which is quite impressive, can instantly grab any animal lover\\'s attention. It is quite appealing as he uses an anecdote to make his introduction more engaging, and his storytelling brings out his witty personality. It hints at him being a fun-loving, slightly mischievous guy with a playful spirit, which is attractive.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric seems more straightforward. He\\'s honest about his busy student life and clearly communicates his love for tennis, friends, and his pet. His portrayal as \"average Joe\" who makes up for it with kindness and authenticity is appealing, and inches towards honesty, which is a good trait. It does, however, come across as slightly regular and not as creative or exciting as the first scenario.\\n\\nWhile Eric\\'s genuine, down-to-earth demeanor and taste for deep conversations hinted in scenario 2 is attractive, it doesn\\'t stand out as much as the adventurous tone and storytelling of scenario 1, which shows depth to his personality and humor. I believe both are warranting a right swipe, but I\\'d be more intrigued by the creativity showcased in Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nWhile both scenarios paint an interesting picture of Eric, I would more likely swipe right in scenario 1. My reasoning is as follows:\\n\\n1. Humorous introduction: The way Eric introduces himself is playful and engaging, from his self-depreciating jokes to his humorous telling of Scott's antics. It creates a friendly, approachable impression and I appreciate his sense of humor.\\n\\n2. Interesting story: The anecdote about Scott sneaking into his university's biology lab and finding a hidden stash of dog biscuits spices up the bio. It adds a flavor of adventure and unpredictability, making Eric seem fun and spontaneous. \\n\\n3. Invitation to engage: He gives an open invitation to message him, finalizing with 'throw in your best dog or disaster story' – this not only makes him seem more approachable, but also serves as a great conversation starter. It's easier to message someone when there's a clear topic to begin with.\\n\\n4. His personality is visible: He seems adventurous, fun, and content with life based on this bio. It's easy to get a sense of his personality from the way he tells the anecdotes and makes jokes about himself, which is important before deciding to connect.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "human scores: 6.25 3.9\n",
      "evaluator: eric_himself\n",
      "MWU result: 0.3833333333333333\n",
      "flipped: True\n",
      "parsed_answers: [0.5, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "user_prompt: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old studying at XYZ University. Aside from engaging in thought-provoking lectures or cramming for my next test (just kidding, I love what I study!), I spend my free time immersed in a good tennis match or just hanging out with my friends. Well, and Scott - my handsome partner in crime who happens to be a beagle. (Pet lovers score big points with me!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is decent (or maybe my friends are just being nice) and I think I'm pretty down-to-earth. When it comes to looks, you could say I'm just your average Joe, nothing extraordinarily flashy, but I try to make up for that with kindness and authenticity. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm here to find someone who's genuinely interested in sharing some laughs, deep conversations, maybe a tennis game, and of course, dog park outings. If you're looking for someone real, pick me. No fake profiles here - just a real guy searching for a real girl. Let's explore life together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? Please think step by step and explain your reasoning. \n",
      "Put your response in the following format:\n",
      "[reasoning text]\n",
      "\n",
      "Answer: Scenario [1 or 2]\n",
      "\n",
      "reasoning: [\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nIn both scenarios, Eric is authentic and gives a clear picture of his interests, hobbies, and his life. However, the scenarios each have a different tone and present Eric's personality differently.\\n\\nScenario 1 is more playful, humorous, and adventurous. It's full of anecdotes and paints vivid pictures of Eric's life, showing off his humor, creativity, and imagination. It will be more appealing to people who enjoy a good story, have a sense of humor, and don't take themselves too seriously. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is more straightforward and mature. It presents Eric as a studious, athletic guy who values authenticity and deep connections. It will likely resonate with those who appreciate sincerity, straightforwardness, and serious relationships.\\n\\nEric's ideal match would depend on his personal style and the kind of relationship he is seeking. If he wants a fun, adventurous, and light-hearted relationship, Scenario 1 would be the more appropriate choice. If he is looking for a serious, meaningful, and perhaps more mature relationship, Scenario 2 may attract more compatible matches. \\n\\nAnswer: It depends on Eric's personal style and the kind of relationship he is seeking.\", 'Reasoning:\\nThe key here is not just drawing in potential matches but also attracting those who share your values and interests. \\n\\nScenario 1 is enticing because it establishes a fun, playful, and adventurous tone, which could attract a match who appreciates humor and adventure. Moreover, the way you depict your experience with your beagle, Scott, shows your love for dogs and could strongly appeal to fellow animal lovers. This scenario also showcases your hobbies better, with a specific example of your passion for tennis. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, has a more straightforward and mature tone, which might appeal to someone looking for a serious relationship. You explicitly mention your university studies, highlighting your commitment to education. This can yield appeal to fellow students or those who value education. The way you reveal accepting your average looks but compensating it with kindness and authenticity could also draw in someone who values inner qualities more than physical appearance. \\n\\nThe decision would ultimately depend on the type of match you are looking for.\\n\\nIf you are looking for someone bubbly, adventurous, and an animal lover who enjoys some humor, go with scenario 1. \\n\\nIf you want someone more serious, who values education, deep conversations, and authenticity, go with scenario 2.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario [1 or 2] (based on your preference)', \"Reasoning: \\nWhile both profiles are well-written, they attract different types of matches based on the tone and content. \\n\\nScenario 1 has a more humorous and lighthearted tone. This could attract someone who appreciates humor and is also adventurous. The story about Scott demonstrates a fun and playful side of Eric which could be attractive to people who enjoy a good sense of humor and adventures. This profile might attract someone who is also spontaneous and loves animals, especially dogs. \\n\\nScenario 2 is more straightforward and serious. It focuses more on Eric's life, education, and core values. It presents Eric as a student who is passionate about his studies and enjoys his hobby of tennis. Eric's mention of his friends may imply that he values relationships, and his straightforwardness about his appearance might suggest honesty. It might attract someone who values education, hobbies, relationships, honesty, and animals. \\n\\nSo, the most likely profile to attract a potential match who shares Eric's interests and values would depend on the types of interests and values the potential match has. If they appreciate a sense of humor, adventure, and spontaneity, scenario 1 would likely be more appealing. If they value education, hobbies, relationships, honesty, and a more straightforward approach, scenario 2 would likely be more attractive.\\n \\n\\nAnswer: It totally depends on the type of match Eric is looking to attract.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# print out the reasonings for items in look_at_points\n",
    "\n",
    "for item in look_at_points:\n",
    "    i, j, k, l = item[\"i\"], item[\"j\"], item[\"k\"], item[\"l\"]\n",
    "\n",
    "    for evaluator in os.listdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators\"):\n",
    "        if os.path.isdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{evaluator}\"):\n",
    "            with open(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{evaluator}/compare_results/{i}_{j}_{k}_{l}.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "                comparison = json.load(f)\n",
    "    \n",
    "            print(f\"human scores: {item['score1']} {item['score2']}\")\n",
    "            print(f\"evaluator: {evaluator}\")\n",
    "            print(f\"MWU result: {item['result']}\")\n",
    "            print(f\"flipped: {comparison['flipped']}\")\n",
    "            print(f\"parsed_answers: {comparison['parsed_answers']}\")\n",
    "            if type(comparison['user_prompt']) == type([]):\n",
    "                user_prompt = comparison['user_prompt'][0]['content']\n",
    "            else: user_prompt = comparison['user_prompt']['content']\n",
    "            print(f\"user_prompt: {user_prompt}\\n\")\n",
    "            print(f\"reasoning: {comparison['responses']}\\n\\n\")\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "Dating seems really really subjective - hard to say whether GPT would actually match, but qual can carry here as a reasonable reasoning procedure. As long as it doesn't suggest something bad, we can demonstrate that is successfully avoids the generations that don't do so well. "
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 345,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# check that the weighted MWU matrix is correct\n",
    "\n",
    "# get the weighted MWU matrix\n",
    "path = f\"{scenario}/MWU_matrix_weighted.npy\"\n",
    "weighted_MWU_matrix = np.load(path)\n",
    "\n",
    "# get the weights\n",
    "with open(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/weights.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "    weights = json.load(f)\n",
    "\n",
    "MWU_constructed_matrix = np.zeros(weighted_MWU_matrix.shape)\n",
    "\n",
    "# get each MWU matrix and the weights\n",
    "for evaluator in os.listdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/\"):\n",
    "    if os.path.isdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{evaluator}\"):\n",
    "        MWU_matrix = np.load(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{evaluator}/MWU_matrix.npy\")\n",
    "\n",
    "        for d in weights:\n",
    "            if d[\"evaluator\"] == evaluator:\n",
    "                weight = d[\"weight\"]\n",
    "                break\n",
    "        \n",
    "        MWU_constructed_matrix += MWU_matrix * int(weight)/100\n",
    "\n",
    "assert np.allclose(weighted_MWU_matrix, MWU_constructed_matrix)\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 346,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "<matplotlib.collections.PathCollection at 0x7fe73d4a01c0>"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 346,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "image/png": "[encoded data, 6016 characters]",
      "text/plain": [
       "<Figure size 432x288 with 1 Axes>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {
      "needs_background": "light"
     },
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# PLOT MATCHES\n",
    "data = comparison_points\n",
    "\n",
    "import matplotlib.pyplot as plt\n",
    "# Separate the data based on the 'match' values\n",
    "x_match_0 = [x for x, y, result, match in data if match == 0]\n",
    "y_match_0 = [y for x, y, result, match in data if match == 0]\n",
    "\n",
    "x_match_0_5 = [x for x, y, result, match in data if match == 0.5]\n",
    "y_match_0_5 = [y for x, y, result, match in data if match == 0.5]\n",
    "\n",
    "x_match_1 = [x for x, y, result, match in data if match == 1]\n",
    "y_match_1 = [y for x, y, result, match in data if match == 1]\n",
    "\n",
    "# Create the scatter plot with different colors\n",
    "plt.scatter(x_match_0, y_match_0, color='red', label='match=0')\n",
    "plt.scatter(x_match_0_5, y_match_0_5, color='yellow', label='match=0.5')\n",
    "plt.scatter(x_match_1, y_match_1, color='green', label='match=1')"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 347,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "Text(0.5, 0, 'Result')"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 347,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "image/png": "[encoded data, 5996 characters]",
      "text/plain": [
       "<Figure size 432x288 with 1 Axes>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {
      "needs_background": "light"
     },
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "result_match_0 = [result for x, y, result, match in data if match == 0]\n",
    "result_match_0_5 = [result for x, y, result, match in data if match == 0.5]\n",
    "result_match_1 = [result for x, y, result, match in data if match == 1]\n",
    "\n",
    "# Create the scatter plot with different colors\n",
    "plt.scatter(result_match_0, [0] * len(result_match_0), color='red', label='match=0')\n",
    "plt.scatter(result_match_0_5, [0.5] * len(result_match_0_5), color='yellow', label='match=0.5')\n",
    "plt.scatter(result_match_1, [1] * len(result_match_1), color='green', label='match=1')\n",
    "\n",
    "# Set labels and legend\n",
    "plt.xlabel('Result')"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 350,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "0.5043083263088882\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "image/png": "[encoded data, 4960 characters]",
      "text/plain": [
       "<Figure size 432x288 with 1 Axes>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {
      "needs_background": "light"
     },
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# AGREEMENT FOR EACH PARTICIPANT\n",
    "\n",
    "# get any remapping\n",
    "evaluator = \"potential_date\"\n",
    "with open(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{evaluator}/mappings_remapped.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "    remapping = json.load(f)[0]\n",
    "\n",
    "# get the weighted MWU matrix\n",
    "path = f\"{scenario}/MWU_matrix_weighted.npy\"\n",
    "MWU_matrix = np.load(path)\n",
    "\n",
    "# unorthodox entries grouped by participant\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == 'unorthodox_advice']\n",
    "grouped = df.groupby('participant_id')[['advice_type', 'advice_indices', 'generation_index', 'answer']]\n",
    "\n",
    "participant_ids = []\n",
    "totals = []\n",
    "participant_matches = []\n",
    "total_matches = 0\n",
    "total_total = 0\n",
    "\n",
    "for name, group in grouped: # for each participant\n",
    "\n",
    "    # if name not in competent_participants and name not in maybe_competent_participants:\n",
    "        # continue\n",
    "\n",
    "    participant_match = 0\n",
    "    total = 0\n",
    "    \n",
    "    for i in range(len(group)):\n",
    "        for j in range(i+1, len(group)): # for each pair of ratings from the participant\n",
    "\n",
    "            # get the MWU index\n",
    "            advice_indices_i = group.iloc[i]['advice_indices']\n",
    "            if (advice_indices_i == \"[]\" or advice_indices_i == \"nan\"): continue\n",
    "            advice_MWU_index_i = int(remapping[str(advice_indices_i) + \".json\"])\n",
    "\n",
    "            advice_indices_j = group.iloc[j]['advice_indices']\n",
    "            if (advice_indices_j == \"[]\" or advice_indices_j == \"nan\"): continue\n",
    "            advice_MWU_index_j = int(remapping[str(advice_indices_j) + \".json\"])\n",
    "\n",
    "            # find the comparison in the MWU matrix\n",
    "            generation_index_i = int(group.iloc[i]['generation_index'])\n",
    "            generation_index_j = int(group.iloc[j]['generation_index'])\n",
    "\n",
    "            gpt_result = MWU_matrix[advice_MWU_index_i][advice_MWU_index_j][generation_index_i][generation_index_j]\n",
    "            \n",
    "            # human scores\n",
    "            score_i = group.iloc[i]['answer']\n",
    "            score_j = group.iloc[j]['answer']\n",
    "\n",
    "            if (score_i > score_j and gpt_result > 0.5) or \\\n",
    "               (score_i < score_j and gpt_result < 0.5) or \\\n",
    "               (math.isclose(score_i, score_j) and math.isclose(gpt_result, 0.5)):\n",
    "                participant_match += 1\n",
    "            elif math.isclose(gpt_result, 0.5) or \\\n",
    "                 math.isclose(score_i, score_j):\n",
    "                participant_match += 0.5\n",
    "\n",
    "            total += 1\n",
    "\n",
    "    participant_ids.append(name)\n",
    "    totals.append(total)\n",
    "    if total == 0: continue\n",
    "    participant_matches.append(participant_match / total)\n",
    "    total_matches += participant_match\n",
    "    total_total += total\n",
    "\n",
    "plt.hist(participant_matches, bins=21)\n",
    "print(total_matches / total_total)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 250,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# correct = 0\n",
    "# total_competent = 0\n",
    "\n",
    "# for i in range(len(participant_ids)):\n",
    "#     if participant_ids[i] in competent_participants:\n",
    "#         correct += participant_matches[i] * totals[i]\n",
    "#         total_competent += totals[i]\n",
    "\n",
    "# print(correct / total_competent)\n",
    "\n",
    "# for i in range(len(participant_ids)):\n",
    "#     if participant_ids[i] in maybe_competent_participants:\n",
    "#         correct += participant_matches[i] * totals[i]\n",
    "#         total_competent += totals[i]\n",
    "\n",
    "# print(correct / total_competent)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 217,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "participant 13 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 1, score 7.0\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nLooking at both scenarios, there are factors that may influence my decision.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric displays a laid-back and friendly personality. He openly expresses his love for tennis, uses humor to talk about his hobbies, and showcases his affection for his pet, Scott. There's a warmth to his intro that suggests someone pleasant to hang around with.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric also displays wit and humor in his profile, accompanied by more puns and references to Harry Potter. He maintains his love for tennis and his pet, but also reveals a more cheeky and sarcastic side. It feels like this Eric knows how to make things entertaining but at the same time, might be a bit too much to handle for someone who enjoys more straightforward conversation.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\\nWhile there's charm in both profiles, I lean more towards Scenario 1. It gives off a grounded and more down-to-earth vibe, showing Eric as a fun yet sincere guy. The humor is gentle and easy to understand, while Scenario 2 brims with extensive puns and references that could potentially be a bit overwhelming for someone who doesn't share the same interests. Scenario 1 makes me feel invited to join his walks with his beagle, while Scenario 2 feels more like he's entertaining himself. Even though average looks and height are mentioned in both profiles, Scenario 1 emphasizes Eric's charm and sense of humor as personal strengths, which I appreciate from a potential dating partner.\", \"Reasoning text: \\n\\nWhen analyzing both scenarios, there are a few factors I take into consideration: authenticity, shared interests, and humor. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as genuine. He gives an idea about his hobbies—tennis and dog walking—and makes a playful appeal to find someone who would join his adventures. The mention of his dog, Scott, gives a sweet insight into his love for animals and adds to the overall authentic feel of his profile. This appeals to me as it shows he isn't afraid to share a bit of his real self—even an everyday activity such as walking his dog. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, he tries a different approach. He uses humor and makes multiple references to the Harry Potter series. While this could be a fun way of indicating he enjoys fantasy and literature, the numerous puns might feel forced to some, and the humor could potentially be lost on people unfamiliar with Harry Potter. Yet, if the reader is also a Harry Potter fan, this might be a wonderful connection point for them.\\n\\nHowever, considering my personal preferences, I gravitate towards shared interests (tennis, animals) and authenticity over a heavy reliance on humor, especially as the latter could be hit or miss.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Looking at both scenarios, it seems that Eric has the basics covered well- he is a student, he loves tennis and animals, and he has a sense of humor. However, the big difference is in the delivery. In scenario 1, he appears to be genuine, straightforward, and sincere. He also gives a glimpse into his daily life with his dog Scott and his love for tennis. Alternatively, scenario 2 is full of humor and numerous references to Harry Potter which might not be easily grasped by everyone.\\n\\nIt's a bit challenging to make a choice as both introductions could appeal to specific types of people. Some may love the abundance of puns and Harry Potter references, while others may prefer the more straightforward and less geeky introduction. However, analyzing the descriptions and looking at them from my perspective, I believe I understand Eric's personality more in scenario 1, without it being clouded by an abundance of puns and jokes. His mention of his average looks and his candidness about seeking human companionship also seems more relatable.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nBoth scenarios have their individual attractions, but the choice here primarily depends on the kind of audience Eric wants to attract. \\n\\nIn the first scenario, the bio is straightforward and gets important information across clearly and concisely. This includes Eric's love for tennis, his bond with his dog, his sense of humor, and his average appearance. This bio would probably attract someone who appreciates simplicity and straightforwardness, is also a lover of animals and doesn't mind a little humor in their lives. This scenario is more likely to attract a person who shares Eric's interests. \\n\\nThe second scenario, however, has its own charm. Eric's sense of humor shines brighter in this scenario and his playful banter about his undergraduate status and the tinges of pop culture references are likely to attract people who have a penchant for quirky humor and pop culture fans, plus animal lovers due to the mention of Scott. \\n\\nHowever, for the context and end goal of attracting a potential match who shares Eric's interests and values - love for tennis, being with friends and being an animal person, Scenario 1 seems to be more on point. However, Eric should as well consider that including the direct and clear way of communicating will be just as important for a matchup as sharing hobbies. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nEach scenario presents Eric in a slightly different light, with Scenario 1 being more straightforward and sincere, and Scenario 2 being more humorous and playful. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric is more open about his aspirations and shows a gentler side of himself. He talks about his love for tennis, his university, and his dog Scott. He's also more direct about his quest for a potential girlfriend and shares some details that could be conversation starters later (like Scott's love for caramel ice-cream). This approach might attract potential matches who are more interested in a sincere and meaningful conversation. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is a more playful take on Eric's profile. This version brings in humor through the imaginative analogies he uses for concepts and activities in his life. The light-hearted and witty approach to his self-introduction could attract someone with a good sense of humor, or someone who appreciates creativeness and loves a good laugh.\\n\\nAnswer: This would depend on the type of potential match Eric is hoping to attract. If he's looking to engage with a match who has a similar humor style, appreciates wit, and enjoys some light-hearted banter, then Scenario 2 would be more suitable. If Eric wants to possibly attract a match who values sincerity, openness, and a direct communication style, then Scenario 1 would be more fitting. Given the information provided, it's difficult to determine which would be most effective without knowing Eric's preferences. However, both scenarios present a well-rounded representation of himself.\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nEqually balanced, both the scenarios portray an evident image of Eric's personality - cheerful, fun-loving, adventurous with a sprinkle of humor. However, there are subtle differences that might impact the type of person likely attracted to each profile. \\n\\nScenario 1 is more straightforward and presents a clear-cut idea about Eric's interests and hobbies. Eric comes across more genuine and to the point in scenario 1 than in scenario 2. People who are more direct and appreciate a little sarcasm, but are essentially looking for a straightforward, easygoing person might feel a stronger inclination towards this profile. \\n\\nOn the other hand, scenario 2 showcases a more quirky side of Eric's personality. The abundant use of humor and a varied mix of cultural references are likely to attract people with a similar sense of humor or those who appreciate wit and intellect. The Harry Potter references could be a hit or miss, depending on the reader's familiarity or love for the series. \\n\\nAnswer: Therefore, based on above discussed points, the most likely scenario to resonate with the potential match who shares similar interests and values completely depends on the kind of person Eric is seeking. If he's looking for someone straightforward and simple, Scenario 1 would probably be more effective. However, if he'd like to match with someone who appreciates humor, wit, and pop culture references, Scenario 2 would be more likely to catch their interest.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 13 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 1, score 7.0\n",
      "2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios provide a good sense of Eric's personality and interests. However, Scenario 1 is more detailed and personal, giving a clearer picture of what he is looking for in a partner. He uses humor effectively to lighten the overall tone of his profile, which makes him seem fun and approachable. Moreover, he mentions his love for his dog and uses that to subtly express his wish for a serious relationship, hinting that he is looking for something more than casual dating. Also, I appreciate his honesty about his physical appearance being average, but his confidence in his charm and sense of humor makes him interesting. Lastly, he initiates a potential date by suggesting a tennis match or coffee, exhibiting his initiative which I find attractive.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Eric\\'s profile comes across as charming and funny in both scenarios, making him seem like a likely match for someone interested in sports, dogs, and a good sense of humor. However, I would probably be more inclined towards the first scenario.\\n\\nReasoning: The first scenario has a more complete description of who Eric is as a person. He discusses his love for tennis and his dog in more vibrant and unique ways, showing he has a personality that is pleasantly enthusiastic and creative. The use of humor (i.e., the tennis balls and the dog\\'s heart exploit) and the more casual, intimate tone builds a strong likability factor. Moreover, he seems more approachable and genuine when saying he is \"average in looks and height\" but tries to compensate it with his charm and humor. Also, the invitation for a tennis match or coffee sounds good, indicating that he is serious about finding companionship.\\n\\nSo,\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth profiles portray Eric as a fun, sporty, charismatic individual with a love for animals, which is appealing. However, there are subtle differences that make me lean towards one more than the other.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric talks about looking for someone to walk his dog with, and he shares a funny little secret about his dog, Scott, which shows a quirky, relaxed side of him. He invites me for a tennis match or coffee, indicating that he's open to both active or laid-back dates and he's looking for more than just a tennis partner. This type of versatility is nice, suggesting he's going to be flexible in a relationship.\\n\\nOn the other hand, in Scenario 2, Eric frames himself more around his dog's antics, which while amusing, starts to feel a tad bit more about him and his dog rather than a potential partner joining their duo. Also, he completely anchors the tennis notion to playing fetch with his dog rather than enjoying the game itself or with a potential date.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: \\n\\nMany people on dating apps value personality and humor, as well as shared interests. When someone is looking at a profile, they want to get an insight into who the person is, their personality, and what it might be like to spend time with them. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, the bio leads strongly with humor, presenting a fun dynamic with the beagle, Scott. The story about the tennis balls makes you seem approachable and not overly serious, which can attract matches who appreciate an easygoing personality. Moreover, there\\'s a clear call to action at the end (\"send a hi our way!\"), which reflects an open and inviting attitude.\\n\\nHowever, Scenario 2, while seeming more formal, provides more detailed information which might resonate with someone having similar preferences. This profile gives more insights about how Eric spends his time and what his priorities are, which is good for attracting potential matches with similar lifestyles and values. \\n\\nMoreover, Scenario 2 also includes a proposal for a date (\"Let\\'s grab a tennis match or coffee sometime\") which again, is a clear call to action that someone interested may respond to. \\n\\nAnswer: Both scenarios could be successful as they focus on Eric\\'s interests, his lifestyle, and his light-hearted and open personality. However, based on providing more detail, having a clearer call to action, and representing more directly the interests and values Eric wants to communicate, Scenario 2 seems more likely to attract a potential match who shared his interest and values.', \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nScenario 1 and 2 both provide great insight into who Eric is as a person, his sense of humor, interests and what he’s looking for in a potential match. He successfully communicates his love for tennis, his dog and desire for companionship. However, the specific approach differs somewhat between the two.\\n\\nScenario 1 has a more casual and playful tone, which is great for attracting someone with a similar sense of humor. It also places a lot of emphasis on Scott, Eric's dog. While this can be great for attracting fellow dog lovers, it might be somewhat off putting for some people if they feel like they need to compete with Scott for Eric's affections.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, manages to balance Eric's love for tennis and his dog in a more straightforward and slightly formal way. It also does a great job of subtly inviting potential matches who share his interests (tennis, dogs, walks) to connect. Additionally, it directly addresses Eric's physical appearance which might be appreciated by those looking for honesty. The tone of the bio is inviting and would likely appeal to those who appreciate a more direct approach.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\\nThis scenario does a better job of depicting Eric as a well-rounded individual with varied interests. Whereas Scenario 1 is cute and humorous, Scenario 2 presents a bit more depth and creates a clearer picture of what a potential relationship might look like. The direct yet gentle invite also creates a more open window for connection.\", \"My reasoning is as follows:\\n\\nBoth scenarios present a pretty good picture of my personality and interests, and establish a light and humorous tone, which can make a profile more appealing and approachable. \\n\\nHowever, Scenario 1 seems to have a more personal and specific touch. Not only does it include my dog Scott's antics, but it also adds a note about looking forward to experiencing life, love, and laughter together, which adds a romantic note. There's also a hint of challenge, which can be intriguing and spark interest.\\n\\nScenario 2 on the other hand, while making clear my love for tennis and for my dog, again, offers a call to action by suggesting a face-to-face meeting for tennis or coffee, which gives a direct invitation for interaction. \\n\\nOverall, for me, adding a bit of a romantic note and fun challenge might be more appealing and motivating for someone to reach out and spark a conversation. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 13 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_2, generation 0, score 9.0\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: While both bios are quite creative and amusing, I find Eric more likable and endearing in the first scenario. The tennis analogies make it clear that he is passionate about the sport, but he doesn't take himself too seriously either. It really feels like he is trying to connect with the reader through shared interests and humor. His love for his dog Scott comes across as genuine and shows care. I got a sense that he's not just looking for any person, but the right person who can appreciate his jokes and hobbies. Moreover, his admission of not being a GQ model indicates honesty and a good deal of self-deprecating wit.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning: Both profiles are light-hearted and show a good sense of humor, which is attractive. They both share similar interests such as animals and tennis, which is good to know off the bat. However, the first scenario feels more like a conversation and more personally inviting, which can create a sense of instant connection. It gives an appropriate amount of detail, not too vague and not too specific, creating intrigue. Also, it adds an endearing individual touch with the mention of his dog, Scott. It also has generous use of humor, which is generally appealing, and the writing feels more mature comparably. There\\'s also a gentle confidence and self-awareness, exemplified in lines such as, \"Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy,\" which can be quite appealing as well.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', 'Reasoning:\\n\\nComparing both scenarios, I found myself attracted more to the profile presentation in Scenario 1 than Scenario 2 for several reasons. \\n\\nThe first one being self-deprecating humor. In Scenario 1, Eric presents himself as your average guy with phrases like \"they tell me average is the new sexy\" and \"my mom insists I\\'m quite the catch\", which add a touch of humility, and that\\'s very appealing. Scenario 2 also presents some self-deprecating humor but not as gracefully, with references to him being an \\'average Joe\\'.\\n\\nSecondly, I appreciate the punny humorous tone of Eric\\'s bio in Scenario 1, especially when he introduces his interaction with animals, \"An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury\\'s still out\", and combines this with an engaging question that invites me as a potential match to get involved in answering it.\\n\\nThirdly, the tennis references in Scenario 1 are just clever. This portrays him not just as a tennis player, but someone who can creatively weave his interest into a conversation. He describes himself and his personality through these clever tennis metaphors, suggesting a healthy interest in the sport without sounding too obsessive.\\n\\nFinally, he\\'s expressive about his love for his dog and creates an endearing image of himself and his pet with phrases like \"he\\'s got a slightly better-looking coat than mine.\"\\n\\nWhile Eric in Scenario 2 also offers a humorous and engaging bio, the use of a lot of fandom references (like Hogwarts, Golden Snitch, Marauders) might not resonate with those who aren\\'t very familiar with the Harry Potter series. Some of the humor also seems more contrived and there is less mention about his pet, Scott, which was a very appealing part of Scenario 1\\'s profile.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\n\\nLooking at both scenarios, the first profile appears more playful with its Harry Potter references and tongue-in-cheek humor. If the goal is to attract someone who enjoys puns, witty banter, or a shared love for this series, this would be the go-to profile. It's casual, lighthearted, and clearly shows off the distinct personality and interests like animals and a passion for exploring new phenomena like university's luminous fungi. It might attract a match who is intellectually curious and interested in an adventurous person with a good sense of humor.\\n\\nThe second scenario has a more mature and straightforward style. While it is still infused with humor, it seems more serious and somewhat more focused on personal characteristics (like being an animal lover and enjoying tennis). This profile could attract someone who appreciates honesty and a clear depiction of what a future relationship could hold (lively conversation, laughter, companionship). \\n\\nHowever, it has fewer details about university life, academic interests, or love for weird/random things, which might be missed by someone seeking a deeper intellectual connection. It leans more towards showcasing common activities that a potential partner might enjoy doing together (like tennis, food, walks).\\n\\nAnswer: It depends on the kind of match you're seeking. If you're looking for a playful, adventurous, intellectual connection, Scenario 1 would serve you better. If you're more interested in companionship and shared activities (tennis, animal walks, food), Scenario 2 would likely attract the right kind of match.\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios are engaging and draw the reader in with humor and honesty. However, Scenario 2 may be more appealing to potential matches due to its focus on a shared activity (tennis), and the playful challenge in asking if they are \"game\" provides a unique conversation starter. This version also includes more about Eric\\'s love for animals and gives a fuller picture of his personality. It further implies that he is looking for a deeper connection, rather than just someone who finds his puns funny—there\\'s a greater emphasis on companionship, both from Eric and his dog, Scott. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Answer: Scenario 1\\n\\nThe tone of the first scenario is more casual, witty, and engaging, matching the youthful, fun atmosphere that many users on dating apps are drawn to. The humour shown through puns and references (like Harry Potter) presents Eric as someone who is fun to be around. This can attract individuals who are looking for a light-hearted and easy going relationship.\\n\\nMoreover, this scenario does not just list Eric's interests but mixes them with humorous anecdotes, making the profile more memorable. It paints a rich, lively picture of his daily life and the things he enjoys, which can create a sense of familiarity for the reader.\\n\\nAdditionally, his open admission of being 'average' marketing it as 'new sexy' shows that he's comfortable and honest about who he is, which can be very appealing.\\n\\nOverall, scenario 1 seems to offer a balanced mix of insight into Eric's life (his interests, his pet, and his preferences), shared in an engaging, warm, and humorous way, which could potentially attract a wide range of audiences.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 13 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_2, generation 0, score 9.0\n",
      "2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Both scenarios present a friendly, humorous, and interesting profile. However, I would choose to swipe right on Scenario 1 for a couple of reasons. \\n\\nFirst, Eric\\'s bio in Scenario 1 is more detailed and engaging, making me feel like I know him better and have a clearer idea of his personality before even making contact. His references to playing tennis and love for his dog Scott are not just matter-of-fact statements, but are woven into engaging anecdotes, making them much more interesting to read.\\n\\nSecond, his self-deprecating humor (\"Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy.\" and \"my mom insists I\\'m quite the catch.\") is charming and makes him seem more approachable. In Scenario 2, there is less of this form of humor and it\\'s slightly less personable. \\n\\nThird, the call to action in Scenario 1 is also more intriguing (\"If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court?\"), compared to the more general and less appealing call to action in Scenario 2 (\"Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\").\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'While both scenarios create a picture of an appealing and fun-loving individual, I find myself more drawn to scenario 1. \\n\\nEric\\'s introduction in this scenario is clever and immediately gives me an insight into his sense of humor with the \"tennis match of life\" analogy. His reference to being \"player two\" also subtly suggests he\\'s looking for an equal partner, a quality I value.\\n\\nAdditionally, his bio manages to provide a comprehensive view of his interests and personality. He comes across as relaxed, humorous, and self-deprecating. There seems to be a great mix of seriousness and lightheartedness that gives a strong impression of him being balanced and genuine.\\n\\nHis description of his dog Scott drew me in further, offering a specific, tangible illustration of his love for animals that\\'s both appealing and relatable.\\n\\nFinally, I appreciate that Eric is upfront about his appearance, poking fun at himself while remaining confident. His remark about being an \"average\" looking guy and how his mother believes he\\'s quite the catch indicates he is comfortable with who he is.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'As a young woman in her early 20s, I would likely lean towards Scenario 1 when deciding whether to swipe right or not. Here\\'s why:\\n\\n1. Eric seems to have a good sense of humor, which is evident from how he introduces himself – he does not take himself too seriously but lays his interest in tennis immediately. He talks about how he is your potential player two in the \"grand tennis match of life\", which is light-hearted and intriguing.\\n\\n2. He is interested in animals, particularly his dog Scott, which he brings up humorously. The love he expresses for his dog reflects a caring nature as well as a sense of commitment.\\n\\n3. He also gives an insight into how he spends his weekends and invites the reader to visualize doing activities with him, which generates an emotional response and the potential for shared interests.\\n\\n4. His playful expressiveness regarding his looks suggest confidence and a sense of comfort with who he is. His comment about being “the catch” according to his mom introduces family, subtly indicating family importance.\\n\\n5. Eric ends his profile with a playful challenge, which can be seen as an engaging way to provoke a positive response, thereby making a potential match more likely.\\n\\nOverall, I feel Eric presents himself effectively in Scenario 1 by demonstrating a blend of humor, compassion towards animals, and an interest in shared activities. On the other hand, Scenario 2 has some good qualities but might be seen as more ordinary, and doesn\\'t seem to capture Eric\\'s personality quite as effectively.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios give a fair introduction about Eric, his interests, and personality, Scenario 1 is more detailed and engaging, which makes it more appealing. This scenario is witty and humorous, which can very well attract likeminded people who appreciate and understand his humor. Eric's passion for tennis and his love for animals, particularly Scott, his Beagle, is also emphasized more in Scenario 1 than in Scenario 2 which could attract individuals who share these interests.\\n\\nScenario 1 also makes Eric more relatable and down-to-earth because he describes himself as average-looking and of average height. This representation is likely to make his profile more appealing to those who appreciate honesty and self-deprecating humor.\\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 is more straightforward and concise, which might appeal to some, but it also gives less information about his personality and interests in comparison to Scenario 1. While it does highlight his love for tennis and his beagle, Scott, it doesn't do so in as engaging a manner as Scenario 1. \\n\\nTherefore, considering the details, humor, and relatability present in Scenario 1, it is more likely to attract potential matches who share Eric's interests and values. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning: \\n\\nWhile both scenarios are interesting, engaging and show off Eric\\'s personality in a warm, accessible way, Scenario 1 is more likely to attract potential matches. \\n\\nHere are a few reasons why:\\n1. Detail: Scenario 1 offers more detail about Eric. It covers his hobbies, interests, love for animals, and a sprinkle of humor throughout, thus providing a fuller picture of who he is as a person. This will more likely attract a match who shares similar interests and has a sense of humor.\\n2. Openness: Through the details given, Eric comes across as more vulnerable and open. He jokes about his looks and height which creates an approachable atmosphere and shows an assurance in who he is as a person. This makes him more relatable and attractive.\\n3. Invitation: The ending remarks of Scenario 1 offer a subtle invitation to his potential matches. For instance, he says, \"swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards.\" This tells the potential match what course of action to take.\\n4. Sense of Humor: A sense of humor is appealing to a lot of people and is a desirable trait many individuals seek in their potential partners. Eric’s playful tone and humorous remarks throughout the Scenario 1 bio can elicit laughs and create a positive mental image.\\n5. Creativity: The tennis metaphor woven seamlessly throughout Scenario 1 provides a creative flair that can be very appealing and shows a person who doesn\\'t take himself too seriously, which is generally an attractive trait. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nScenario 1 and 2 are both very lined out, but scenario 1, in particular, provides more in-depth information about who Eric is, his personality, interests, and what he is looking for in a potential partner. The wordings in the first scenario are meticulously crafted, humorous, and could easily catch the attention of someone scouring through profile bios on a dating app. \\n\\nThe references to tennis show Eric's love for the sport without it seeming too overwhelming for someone who may not be as interested in tennis. More importantly, it also illustrates the kind of relationship he hopes to build – one based on partnership and being able to keep up with each other. The detailed mention of his dog Scott humanizes him and reflects his love for animals, which can be an attractive quality for fellow pet lovers. The disclosure about his looks is also quite self-deprecating and humorous, which shows his confidence and ability to not take himself too seriously.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 13 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 2, score 9.0\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nThe decision to swipe right or left largely depends on whether the person's profile piques my interest and aligns with what I'm looking for in a potential partner. \\n\\nEric's profile in both scenarios showcases significant information about his personality, hobbies, and interests, so it's easy to get an idea of who he is.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric shows a penchant for humor, evident through animal-related puns and references to Hogwarts and Golden Snitch. His words indicate that he's a Harry Potter fan, which could be a plus if I shared the same interest. The introduction paints an attractive picture of regular university life, mixed with his outgoing side. His bio is light and funny but could come across as less formal and possibly slightly immature due to his humor.\\n\\nOn the flip side, Scenario 2 demonstrates a different side of Eric. Here, he's presenting himself in a more serious and sincere light. He gives a brief overview of his university life, hobbies, but his description offers deeper insight into his character, showing his value for authenticity, simplicity, and sincerity. His love of animals is shared sincerely, and his beagle Scott is described more personally, warming him up to animal lovers reading his profile. He invites people passionate about anything in their lives, showing he is open-minded and likes meaningful conversations. \\n\\n\\nAnswer: Being interested in forming a romantic relationship, I am inclined to swipe right on Scenario 2. It's more mature, sincere, and authentic, and he shows an eagerness to connect with people on a deeper level, which aligns with my interest in forming a meaningful relationship. While his sense of humor in Scenario 1 is amusing, it seems less serious about forming a substantial connection.\", 'Reasoning:\\nAfter comparing both profiles, I lean more towards scenario 2. \\n\\nThe reason for my preference is that the profile in scenario 2 seems more straightforward and relaxed. Eric comes off as humble, genuine, and easy-going. He mentions his passion for tennis and the love for his dog, providing a glimpse into his personal life. He also emphasizes the value of authentic conversations, possibly suggesting he is a good listener and open-minded. His self-description as an \"average\" guy who values simplicity and sincerity matches my definition of simplicity and sincerity. His candidness about being \"average height\" and a \"nerd\" is endearing rather than off-putting.\\n\\nIn contrast, even though Eric\\'s bio in scenario 1 is humorous and witty, there might be a bit of an overload of puns and Harry Potter references. The humor may not resonate with all readers, and some might see it as trying too hard. It\\'s important for a dating profile to illustrate some level of depth beyond humor, which I believe scenario 2 accomplishes better. Having said that, I do appreciate his creativity, his sense of humor may appeal to other users. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric as quite a likable and funny guy, each with slightly different tones. Scenario 1 has a light-hearted vibe to it, with Eric providing an entertaining and pun-filled introduction. There is a lot of mention of his love for tennis and his dog, and a mix of humor and light flirtation, hinting at a playful personality. It feels like he has the ability to make good conversation and keep things interesting, but it does border on making one too many references to Harry Potter. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, offers a more balanced approach. Although it lacks the constant stream of humor found in the first option, it comes across as more sincere and thoughtful, suggesting a humble, genuine and down-to-earth person. He expresses interest in his match's passions, showing readiness to engage in deeper conversations. He also seems like a chill guy who enjoys simple things. His love for his dog and tennis is present here as well. \\n\\nNeither bio is bad, but it really comes down to personal preference.\\n\\nAnswer: For me, I would be more inclined to swipe right on Scenario 2. The sincere tone, interest in deep conversations, and overall maturity would appeal more.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning:\\nWhen choosing a dating profile bio, there are some factors to consider. The first thing to note is the level of humor or seriousness you want to portray.\\nScenario 1 offers a more serious and straightforward account of your interests, lifestyle, and expectations. It also consists of inviting your potential match to share their interests with you, demonstrating that you are willing to know her better. It slightly plays up your typical, relatable, and endearing persona, showing your sincerity and potential as a kind and attentive partner.\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 has humor and wit woven through it, hoping to captivate a match who enjoys jokes and do not take things too seriously. This bio feels more playful and features a lot of references geared towards Harry Potter or pop culture fans. Therefore, it might reach a narrower audience who understands and appreciates the humor.\\nSo, if you want to portray a sincere, friendly, and caring image and appeal to a wider audience, Scenario 1 would be a better fit. But if your focus is on finding someone who enjoys humor and shares a similar taste in pop culture, Scenario 2 might be a better choice.\\n\\nAnswer: This greatly depends on the individual. However, considering the general approach, I would prefer Scenario 1. It is well-balanced, and provides more chances of connecting with a broader audience.', \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nLet's consider both of these scenarios.\\n\\nScenario 1 consists of a sincere, straightforward, and somewhat reserved profile bio. It puts his love for tennis, his dog, and his friendly nature in plain view without too much embellishment or hyperbole. This scenario is likely appealing to someone who values sincerity and authenticity, as well as those who enjoy pets and sports.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, expresses a quirky and jovial personality. The humor, puns, and made-up stories bring a distinct goofy charm to the profile. The light-hearted and casual tone might appeal to someone who enjoys humor and a less serious approach to life.\\n\\nWhile both these scenarios have their own advantages, let's consider which one would likely attract a person who shares Eric's interests and values in the context provided. \\n\\n- Eric loves animals, particularly his dog, Scott. Both scenarios mention this, but Scenario 1 dives a bit deeper here, showing a more profound love for Scott.\\n- Eric enjoys tennis and spending time with friends. Again, both scenarios mention this interest, but Scenario 1 gives it more weight.\\n- Eric, believing he's average-looking and height, seems humble and lacks any air of pretentiousness. Scenario 1 gives a more to-the-point and modest description of his physical traits.\\n- Eric wants to find a girlfriend through a dating app, which likely means he wants a sincere connection. Scenario 1 expresses this need more explicitly, appealing to someone who looks for an authentic bond.\\n\\nGiven these points, it seems Scenario 1 more accurately and earnestly demonstrates the interests, personality, and values Eric wants to display. This helps attract a potential match who aligns with him not only with shared interest but also on a deeper emotional and intellectual level.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios provide a good introduction to your personality, interests, and what you value. In scenario 1, there is a level of seriousness and maturity that comes through, showing that you are interested in genuine connections and deep conversations. It might be more appealing to someone who prefers structure, seriousness, and straightforward communication. \\n\\nOn the other hand, scenario 2 is playful, full of jokes and a lighter tone which can be more appealing to someone who values humor and creativity. It is more casual and shows a more relaxed side of you, which might attract someone who is not really into deep, introspective conversations early in the relationship. \\n\\nThe choice between the two scenarios will depend on the kind of partner you're looking for. But, considering that you're in your early twenties and the tale spins around the dating app culture, the humorous and light-hearted approach in scenario 2 could attract more people who are looking for a fun and relaxed personality. Not to forget, people often get drawn to unique and funny bios while swiping through profiles.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 13 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 2, score 9.0\n",
      "2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Both scenarios provide a good picture of who Eric is and offer an engaging and humorous sneak peek into his life. Even though both are charming in their own way, I am more likely to swipe right on Scenario 2.\\n\\nReasoning:\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric's focus is too specific on himself and Scott playing tennis. It may send the signal that he's primarily looking for a tennis partner rather than a potential romantic interest. While the comment about a pro tennis player is funny, it feels a bit limiting, given that he's putting a lot of focus on it. Not all women play tennis or may not be good at it, and in fact, this could discourage some potential matches who feel they don't meet this implied criteria.\\n\\nOn the other hand, in Scenario 2, although he mentions the same interests, he comes off more open-minded and seems more interested in getting to know his potential match's passions. He leaves it open-ended, making the other person feel that they could connect with him no matter what their interests might be, as he values deep, authentic conversations. Also, his self-description (average height, blend of nerdiness and charisma, etc.) adds more flavour to his profile. Lastly, the line about being open to see where things go indicates a level of emotional maturity, which makes him come off as more serious about dating rather than just looking for a casual experience.  \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nIn scenario 1, Eric seems to have a friendly and outgoing personality and I appreciate that. His warm humor shows through and comes off as genuine when he talks about his dog Scott and tennis. The humanizing details about his affection and playful banter with Scott make me believe he can be charming and fun in person too. He seems down-to-Earth and I like his indirect approach to asking if you play tennis. Also, his note at the end adds a bit of charm - he doesn't take himself too seriously which is refreshing.\\n\\nIn scenario 2, Eric comes off as well-rounded. His profile is more elaborate and I have more details about his personality. He seems like he takes his studies seriously which imparts a sense of maturity. Again, his love for animals is clear, stimulating a sense of warmth. I admire that he is open-minded and up for deep discussions about each other's passions. Though, he might come off as a bit too formal. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\\nWhile both profiles are attractive, I would go with scenario 1. There is a feeling of authenticity in Scenario 1 that outweighs the more detailed description in scenario 2. Eric's humor, charm, and bonding with his dog leans towards a more casual and fun interaction. Although scenario 2 gives more information and maybe more depth, it feels slightly less casual and a bit formal which might not be what I'm looking for in an online dating experience.\", 'Reasoning: \\nBoth scenarios present Eric as a friendly, easy-going and likable individual. I appreciate his humor, love for animals, and passion for tennis. He comes off as sincere and genuine, ready to engage in meaningful conversations. However, there are slight differences that would affect my decision. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric demonstrates a sense of humor in explaining the relationship he has with his pet beagle, Scott. There\\'s also an invitation for me to add my charm to their \"dynamic duo\" which is a playful and attractive proposal. He shows he is active and enjoys outdoor activities like playing tennis, a plus for me as I also enjoy being active. The appeal for a skilled tennis player adds a light-hearted challenge. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric seems more laid-back. His bio reflects a sense of maturity and his love for deep, authentic conversations signifies depth. The holistic view presents him as someone balanced, equally interested in being humorous and relaxing as he is in having serious, deep conversations. This indicates that he would be understanding and a good listener. The invitation to cheer at his tennis games feels more relaxing than the one to play in scenario 1, and might suit relaxed individuals more.\\n\\nMy decision would likely come down to the type of interactions I’m looking for at the moment. \\n\\nAnswer: It’s a tough decision, but I would lean towards Scenario 1. Eric\\'s humor, active lifestyle, and the playful challenge of being better at tennis to save him from chasing the balls seem more appealing and lively to me, which fits well with my own lifestyle and my current mood for a fun and active companion.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning text:\\n\\nLooking at both scenarios, it can be seen that they both divulge information about Eric's lifestyle, interests, and personality. Scenario 1 seems to exude more humor and charm, inviting matches to be part of humorous everyday scenes with Eric and his dog. It also directly states a requirement - an ability to play tennis - which could attract someone who plays tennis and sees this as a common interest.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is more detailed, giving a more comprehensive view of Eric's life, from his studies to his passion for animals. This version seems to reveal more about his deeper personality traits like value for simplicity, sincerity and true conversations. This type of profile might attract someone who values authenticity, intellectual conversation, and a genuine connection.\\n\\nIf he wants to attract a partner who shares his precise interests, Scenario 1 may be more compelling because of the directness in stating his need for a tennis player. However, if Eric is more focussed on attracting someone who values an authentic, meaningful connection, then Scenario 2 might be more appealing due to its detailed and comprehensive portrayal of his life and personality. \\n\\nAnswer: This entirely depends on what kind of match Eric is looking for. If he's looking specifically for someone interested in tennis, then Scenario 1 might work best. However, for a well-rounded match with depth and authenticity, Scenario 2 seems to be the better option.\", 'Reasoning: \\nPersonally, I find Scenario 2 more appealing. While both bios are informative and light-hearted, Scenario 2 provides a more detailed picture of your personality and life, which will likely resonate with people who share your interests and values.\\n\\nScenario 2 highlights key aspects of your life in a more engaging manner; your love for animals, enjoyment of tennis, and value of deep, authentic conversations. It also subtly demonstrates your sense of humor (\"the journey\\'s as thrilling as it sounds!\") and willingness to understand and engage with potential matches on their own interests.\\n\\nMoreover, Scenario 2 comes across as more sincere and humble, referring to yourself as the \"friendly-next-door-guy.\" It gives a sense of being approachable and easy to connect with, whereas Scenario 1 seems a tad more about banter and less about genuinely wanting to know someone. \\n\\nIt\\'s worth mentioning too, that in Scenario 2, you give a named animal or particular interest as a potential starting point for conversations - your dog Scott. This could be a plus-point for animal lovers.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.', \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nScenario 1 has a more casual and humorous tone, which can effectively showcase your friendly and approachable personality. In this scenario, you make it clear that you are a dog owner and that Scott is a significant part of your life. The humorous reference to Scott joining in your Online classes can show your lightheartedness and sense of humor. Involving your hobbies, such as playing tennis, also gives the reader tangible insights into your lifestyle. Adding the note about looking for a tennis player is an interesting hook and shows you're looking to share your hobbies.\\n\\nScenario 2 offers a deeper insight into your life as an undergraduate. It tells that your life revolves around your studies, Scott, tennis, and your friends. It also mentions your love for animals, which could attract the attention of fellow animal lovers. Your description of yourself as 'the guy-next-door' type with a combination of nerdiness and charisma could make you seem relatable and down-to-earth.\\n\\nBased on this reasoning, I would prefer:\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2. \\n\\nScenario 2 provides a more comprehensive view about you, touching points from your academic life to hobbies, distinct personality traits, and also clarifies your expectations from a potential partner. Scenario 2 also tends to appeal to those who appreciate transparency and detailed descriptions.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 23 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_3, generation 1, score 2.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Studious university undergrad by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog dad to Scott, my energetic Beagle, by night. I'm searching for someone who loves spontaneous games of tennis, passionate debates about Animal Planet documentaries, and leisurely walks with Scott - who I might add, is quite the charmer!\n",
      "\n",
      "A story about Scott to bring a smile to your face? Well, once I'd dropped a sandwich which I'd just made and left the room only to find Scott gorging on it when I got back. Just as I was about to scold him, he looked up at me with those innocent eyes. I swear, no matter how stern you plan to be, one look at those eyes and your heart melts! \n",
      "\n",
      "I believe that life is a beautiful game, sometimes like tennis - love is not just a score, it's the thing that keeps us playing. So, ready to join our small, happy team and make it larger?\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Answer: Scenario 1\\n\\nReasoning: \\n\\nEric's profile in Scenario 1 appears more engaging and dynamic. It stands out due to its humorous and light-hearted tone compared to the more direct and plain bio in Scenario 2. The anecdotes and stories provided in the first scenario about his dog and his university are not only entertaining but also give the impression that he is adventurous, fun, and doesn't take himself too seriously. This adds a lot of charm and personality to his profile which is often what people look for while browsing on dating apps. \\n\\nIn addition, Scenario 1 invites the reader to interact by sharing their own similar anecdotes, thereby providing a potential starting point for conversation. This makes it seem that he is interested in hearing from and about the person swiping, which can be more appealing. \\n\\nFinally, showing love for his pet shows a softer, caring side to him. It seems like he can be committed, responsible which are favorable traits for a potential romantic relationship. Therefore, the decision to swipe right would likely be drawn from these positives.\", \"Reasoning: While both scenarios are charming, they reveal different aspects of Eric's life and personality that could attract varying types of people. \\n\\nScenario 1 is casual, funny, and showcases Eric's sense of adventure and humor. It makes Eric seem fun-loving and outgoing, with a flair for storytelling and engaging narratives. The mention of the 'greatest puppy party of all time' at his university implies that he is social and popular. The way he speaks lightheartedly about a potential disaster at his university lab reflects ability to laugh at himself, which indicates a level of humility and self-deprecation. His invitation at the end to hear the reader's own stories suggests an interest in others and a willingness to listen. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is equally appealing, but gives a more straightforward and traditional insight into Eric's life. The anecdote about Scott eating his sandwich sheds light on a tender, intimate, everyday moment, and gives a sense of warmth and softness. His philosophical approach to life and love revealed in his statement about tennis shows a deeper, introspective side. This scenario might be more appealing to someone who prefers people who are thoughtful and gentle. \\n\\nOverall, both scenarios showcase Eric as a friendly, outgoing, animal-loving individual with a good sense of humor and an active lifestyle, which aligns with many people's idea of an attractive date.\\n\\nAnswer: It would entirely depend on personal preferences. If I preferred someone who was outgoing, clever, and adventurous with a great sense of humor, I would choose scenario 1. But if I was drawn more to warmth, introspection, gentleness and deep thought, I would opt for scenario 2. Since I personally lean more toward the former, I would swipe right for Scenario 1.\", \"Reasoning: Both profiles provide interesting information about Eric, and it's clear that he is a fun-loving person with a good sense of humor and an interesting life. However, in the first scenario, Eric seems more engaging. His description is vibrant and full of amusing anecdotes which make him appear more relatable and adventurous. He also seems more open and sociable compared to the second scenario. Although the second profile was still warm and friendly, Eric doesn't come off as as intriguing or funny as he does in the first scenario.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Studious university undergrad by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog dad to Scott, my energetic Beagle, by night. I'm searching for someone who loves spontaneous games of tennis, passionate debates about Animal Planet documentaries, and leisurely walks with Scott - who I might add, is quite the charmer!\n",
      "\n",
      "A story about Scott to bring a smile to your face? Well, once I'd dropped a sandwich which I'd just made and left the room only to find Scott gorging on it when I got back. Just as I was about to scold him, he looked up at me with those innocent eyes. I swear, no matter how stern you plan to be, one look at those eyes and your heart melts! \n",
      "\n",
      "I believe that life is a beautiful game, sometimes like tennis - love is not just a score, it's the thing that keeps us playing. So, ready to join our small, happy team and make it larger?\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth profiles tell an engaging story that gives a potential match insight into my life and personality, but I believe Scenario 2 is more effective for several reasons:\\n\\n1) Humor: Scenario 2 is written in a more humorous tone, which could help make the profile more approachable and attractive. It shows that I don’t take myself too seriously, and am able to laugh at myself.\\n\\n2) Detail: There are more rich and interesting details in Scenario 2, like the story of serving the ball so hard it knocked a phone out of an opponent’s pocket and Scott’s adventure into the biology lab.\\n\\n3) Open-ended question: It ends with an open-ended question inviting the potential match to share her own story, and this might encourage her to respond and engage in conversation.\\n\\nWhile Scenario 1 does a great job of showcasing my activities and interests, I think the humor, detail, and engagement in Scenario 2 would make it more attractive to potential matches, especially those who share my sense of humor and enjoyment of storytelling.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios have the potential to attract a potential match. However, Scenario 2 is more likely to better serve this purpose due to a few reasons.\\n\\nFirstly, it provides a better glimpse of your humorous side. A sense of humor is often an attractive quality and could help your profile stand out among others. The funny anecdote about hitting the ball so hard it knocked the opponent's phone out of their pocket, and the interesting dog biscuit adventure story make you seem approachable and fun-loving.\\n\\nSecond, Scenario 2 gives a more detailed picture of your personality by gently incorporating your love for animals (particularly Scott), your passion for tennis and academics, along with a slight self-deprecating humor. This makes it easier for a potential match to determine whether they share enough common interests with you.\\n\\nLastly, the ending — an invitation for the reader to share their own dog or disaster story — serves as a great conversation starter. It can encourage potential matches to respond, thus increasing your chances of finding someone compatible.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nIn both bios, I laid out relevant facts about myself and my way of life. Both profiles showcase my love for tennis, my academic pursuits, and my adoration for my dog, Scott. I believe that showcasing my interests can attract people who share the same.\\n\\nIn the first scenario, I present myself as a person with a settled lifestyle, focused on my studies, my sporting passion, and my love for Scott. This bio is likely to draw people who are drawn to that stability, as well as dog lovers, and tennis enthusiasts. I share a heartwarming anecdote about Scott which shows his endearing nature and my loving relationship with him. This could appeal to animal lovers. Lastly, the touch of philosophy at the end could attract those who value deep thinking and the 'beautiful game' approach to life.\\n\\nIn the second scenario, I tend to showcase a more adventurous side. I am seen as a bit more humorous, fun-loving, and possibly prone to harmless mischief, while highlighting my academic and athletic endeavors. It also features a comedic tale revolving around Scott, demonstrating the exciting adventures we end up getting into. This profile might appeal to people looking for an adventurous, fun-loving partner that comes with a playful pet and is capable of turning any incident into an epic tale.\\n\\nTherefore, the choice between the two scenarios depends on the kind of partner I want to attract. Do I want someone more serious and grounded, or someone who can share and appreciate lighthearted, fun adventures? Personally, I believe showing off a fun persona might give me a slight edge in attracting a broad set of people, more than just serious academics, as everyone loves a bit of good humor and interesting tales.\\n\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 23 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_3, generation 1, score 2.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Studious university undergrad by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog dad to Scott, my energetic Beagle, by night. I'm searching for someone who loves spontaneous games of tennis, passionate debates about Animal Planet documentaries, and leisurely walks with Scott - who I might add, is quite the charmer!\n",
      "\n",
      "A story about Scott to bring a smile to your face? Well, once I'd dropped a sandwich which I'd just made and left the room only to find Scott gorging on it when I got back. Just as I was about to scold him, he looked up at me with those innocent eyes. I swear, no matter how stern you plan to be, one look at those eyes and your heart melts! \n",
      "\n",
      "I believe that life is a beautiful game, sometimes like tennis - love is not just a score, it's the thing that keeps us playing. So, ready to join our small, happy team and make it larger?\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios seem to reveal Eric as a fun, active individual who loves sports and his dog, Scott. However, Scenario 1 piques more interest due to a couple of elements. First, it begins with a touch of playful controversiality: arguing that tennis is superior to basketball, making him seem outgoing and capable of healthy arguments. Secondly, he shows a vulnerable side, admitting that his pasta dishes are mediocre but he's trying to improve. This genuineness combined with humor is attractive. Lastly, his story about getting lost but being homed by his beagle makes him seem adventurous and further deepens the love for his dog, which is endearing. The bio is also engaging and encourages interaction - he asks for pasta recipes and even manages to incorporate a bit of self-deprecating humor. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'After reading the two scenarios, I\\'m more drawn towards Scenario 1. Eric\\'s self-deprecating humor and honesty feel impressively candid and appealing. He doesn\\'t take himself too seriously and admits he\\'s \"refreshingly average\" in looks, but makes up for it with his charisma and wittiness. This lighthearted outlook conveys confidence and a great sense of humor, which, to me, is way more attractive than just physical appeal.\\n\\nMoreover, the story about his beagle, Scott, reveals he\\'s good with animals, suggesting a kind and caring nature. His playful theorizing about Scott having a built-in GPS adds a fun element to his personality.\\n\\nLastly, Eric also implies that he enjoys cooking (\"making mediocre pasta dishes\") but would appreciate some help, showcasing a willingness to learn and improve. This is subtly inviting a shared activity that I can engage in if we get to know each other better.\\n\\nAlso, he ends his bio open-ended, not setting strict \\'must-haves\\' but expressing hopefulness about having a fun conversation, which feels inclusive and makes me more comfortable about not fitting a specific mold.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning:\\nBoth Scenarios have a few things that pique my interest. His passion for tennis, his closeness to Scott, his Beagle, and his positivity are all attractive qualities. However, I would prefer Eric\\'s profile in Scenario 1. It feels more personalized and provides a more comprehensive and intimate insight into his personality. His sense of humor (\"refreshingly average\" looks, \"mediocre pasta dishes\") and storytelling ability (adventure with Scott) are endearing and relatable, which would likely spark interesting conversations if we were to match. His openness to different types of people (\"not a prerequisite\"), his interest in meeting someone who can teach him things (Italian grandma recipes), and his incorporation of a question (\"who knows, right?\") seem more inviting and inclusive. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Studious university undergrad by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog dad to Scott, my energetic Beagle, by night. I'm searching for someone who loves spontaneous games of tennis, passionate debates about Animal Planet documentaries, and leisurely walks with Scott - who I might add, is quite the charmer!\n",
      "\n",
      "A story about Scott to bring a smile to your face? Well, once I'd dropped a sandwich which I'd just made and left the room only to find Scott gorging on it when I got back. Just as I was about to scold him, he looked up at me with those innocent eyes. I swear, no matter how stern you plan to be, one look at those eyes and your heart melts! \n",
      "\n",
      "I believe that life is a beautiful game, sometimes like tennis - love is not just a score, it's the thing that keeps us playing. So, ready to join our small, happy team and make it larger?\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"I would be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values in Scenario 2. In this scenario, I've managed to integrate various aspects of my personality, hobbies, pet ownership, and even sneak in some humor about my looks, making it a more engaging and relatable read. The bits about the 'friendly' farm adventure, the 'refreshingly average' looks comment, and the Italian grandmas are likely to spark conversation and pique a potential match's interest. Plus, the emphasis on the potential match being open-minded and fond of laughter creates an inclusive atmosphere, appealing to a wider range of people.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Both scenarios represent Eric well, but Scenario 2 gives a more in-depth portrayal of Eric as a person.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric's focus on tennis and his dog shows the importance of his hobbies and pets. His love for his dog could attract other animal lovers, while the analogy to tennis could invite those who are into sports or philosophical ideas. However, the description is quite focused and might miss out on other aspects of Eric's personality.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric's personality shines through. We learn that he passionately defends tennis and makes mediocre pasta dishes. He could potentially attract those who appreciate directness, sports debates, and cooking struggles. The anecdote about Scott gives a light-hearted touch and indicates his humor. This humor could strike a chord with someone looking for a fun-loving partner. Furthermore, by mentioning how his friends describe him, he shows humility and good grace about his appearance which could be attractive to people who value character more than physical qualities. Also, stating the 'prerequisites' for a potential match allows for a wider range of people to identify themselves as a potential interested party.\\n\\nTherefore, considering the broader appeal and showcasing more diverse aspects of Eric's personality, an interested match would be more likely to connect with Scenario 2. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios provide a clear and detailed introduction to Eric's personality, interests, and lifestyle. They both achieve the goal of being genuine and highlighting his endearing qualities. However, Scenario 1 provides a more intimate feel by inviting the reader into his life with his dog, Scott. The story about the sandwich is engaging and relatable, provoking a warm, emotional response. Furthermore, this scenario's metaphoric comparison of life and tennis is cleverly interwoven, which hints at depth and thoughtfulness appealing to those who appreciate intellectual stimulation and depth in their relationships. Also, the clear mentioning of love for animals and sport could attract potential matches who also share these passions.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 23 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 1, score 2.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"I would be more inclined to swipe right on Eric's profile in Scenario 1.\\n\\nFirstly, I appreciate his sense of humor shown from the opening line. His approach is light-hearted and easy-going, which indicates that communicating with him would be fun and stress-free. This makes him more approachable from the start.\\n\\nSecondly, the way Eric writes his bio is quite storyline, which shows creativity and narrative skill. He doesn't just list facts about himself but paints a vivid picture of his life, allowing me to imagine being a part of it. This shows he could be an interesting person to talk to.\\n\\nThe story about his pet beagle, Scott, not only proves his love for animals but also reveals a sense of adventure. Owning a dog hints at being responsible and loving, which are good qualities in a potential partner.\\n\\nLastly, he invites interaction by asking for a similar story, showing he wants to get to know me too, not just present himself, which indicates a certain level of reciprocated interest.\\n\\nOn the contrary, Scenario 2 lacks humor and seems more generic. While it still presents some appealing qualities, it’s not as engaging as Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"Answer: Scenario 1\\n\\nReasoning: Eric comes across as vibrant, funny, and interesting in the first scenario. The way he uses anecdotes to talk about his dog, Scott, and their antics at the university, shows a creative approach and a sense of humor. The invitation to share a dog or disaster story makes the entire interaction seem fun and relaxed. He also displays his passion for tennis in an entertaining way, making his profile more interesting than a simple hobby list. Eric's first scenario bio feels much more personable, charismatic, and approachable. As someone in their early 20s, I'd appreciate the light tone, the glimpses of his life, and the humor which differentiates him from others. I’d love to hear more about Scott and the other stories he might have, so I'd be tempted to swipe right to potentially find more. It seems like a conversation with Eric would be engaging and enjoyable - it’s all these reasons that make me more likely to swipe right in scenario 1.\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios present a version of Eric that is relatively interesting, they offer different perspectives about him. Scenario 1 portrays Eric as a humorous and charismatic personality. His lighthearted storytelling about Scott, his beagle, is unique and memorable. It shows his creative side, his sense of humor, and it gives a glimpse of his relationship with his dog - showing compassion and friendship. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, portrays Eric as a more serious, intellectual guy. He clearly states his interests such as indie bands, reading, and exploring with his dog. However, compared to scenario 1, the bio is a bit more generic and there\\'s a sense of dryness in its delivery.\\n\\nDespite indicating that I\\'m open to forming a romantic relationship, and Eric clearly stating he\\'s looking for a woman who\\'s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and enjoys tennis in scenario 2, I find scenario 1 more engaging due to the playful tone and unique storytelling. It feels more natural and less \"resume-like\". \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios paint a charming picture of a university student with a love for tennis and his beagle, Scott. However, the focus of the two scenarios is quite different. \\n\\nScenario 1 comes across as more playful and humorous, presenting a casual and friendly image. It highlights a sense of adventure and a slightly mischievous side, especially when it involves Eric's beagle, Scott. This story-telling approach can attract those who appreciate humor, fun, and a bit of silliness which are all great relationship-building blocks. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, presents a more intellectual and serious image. Interests mentioned here are more varied and might appeal to a wider audience. The mention of the balance between cerebral and physical activities might attract someone who appreciates that balance. \\n\\nIf Eric is looking for someone to share his fun-loving nature, who enjoys great stories and has a sense of humor, Scenario 1 might be the better choice. But if he seeks someone with a wider range of interests, who appreciates intellectual conversation, and is potentially more serious in nature, scenario 2 might be a better fit. \\n\\nConsidering the nature of dating apps and the way people generally skim through profiles, the humor and originality of Scenario 1 is more likely to make Eric's profile stand out from the crowd. This could get more people to pause and take a closer look, thereby increasing his chances of attracting a potential match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nScenario 1 projects a more lively version of Eric. The playful, humorous, and engaging writing style immediately catches attention. Humour is often an attractive quality, and scenario 1 does a good job highlighting that. The mention of his dog, Scott, and the storytelling about their adventures not only shows the love Eric has for his pet but also paints a vivid picture. It makes readers interested in what the next story could be. This scenario will likely attract someone who appreciates humor, good stories, and have a fondness for animals.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, introduces a calmer, more down-to-earth Eric. He is straightforward about his interests, hobbies, and what he is looking for in a partner. There is still a sense of personality here, but it is more subdued. This is likely to attract someone looking for a serious relationship and wants to know upfront what you are about and what you are looking for. \\n\\nIt is crucial to consider what kind of person Eric wishes to attract. Would he like somebody sociable and laid-back who enjoys a good laugh? Or is he looking for someone more reserved, intellectual, and serious about relationships? Depending on this preference, either scenario could work.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 or 2', 'Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth scenarios do a good job providing information; however, the major differences lie in the tone and the structuring of the information.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, the bio is quite playful and humorous. It tells a narrative of Eric that comes across as quirky and adventurous. The humor makes the bio engaging and interesting to read, and it gives off a vibe that Eric doesn\\'t take himself too seriously and knows how to have fun. The story about Scott the beagle is entertaining, and it also shows that Eric loves his pet, further appealing to dog lovers. Humor and storytelling can be very effective in online dating as it helps to stand out from more generic profiles.\\n\\nBy contrast, Scenario 2 has a more \"traditional\" bio format and a more serious tone. While also including important details about Eric\\'s life and interests, it\\'s more straightforward and less engaging than Scenario 1. It outlines right away what Eric is looking for in a potential partner, which is helpful for people reading his profile and considering whether they\\'re a good fit.\\n\\nThe best scenario would depend on the type of person Eric hopes to attract. If he wants someone who loves humor, isn\\'t afraid of a little adventure, and appreciates storytelling, Scenario 1 would be a better fit. If he is looking for someone more straightforward and serious, then Scenario 2 may appeal more.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario [Depends on the type of person Eric wants to attract]']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 23 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 1, score 2.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Eric appears to be an approachable, down-to-earth individual in both scenarios. In Scenario 1, he comes off as humorous and spontaneous, which makes his bio interesting to read. His anecdote about his dog leading him back home from an unexpected adventure adds a sense of fun and excitement to his profile. Furthermore, his self-deprecating humor (\"My friends describe me as \\'refreshingly average\\' in the looks department\") comes across as charming, making me view him as a confident person who doesn\\'t take himself too seriously. In Scenario 2, he also expresses his love for dogs and tennis, but his profile seems more conventional and less humorous than in Scenario 1. I appreciate his straightforwardness, but find that Scenario 1 offers a more engaging introduction to Eric.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning:\\nThe first profile (scenario 1) seems to reveal more personality. It has more humor, more stories, and slightly more elaborate descriptions, which generally feels appealing and honest. Eric speaks about his passions (tennis and his dog Scott), showing enthusiasm and humor. He also gives a slight hint about a presumably amusing story involving his dog, thus creating intrigue. He shows a self-deprecating humor (\"my friends describe me as \\'refreshingly average\\' in the looks department\"), which can generally seem appealing and genuine. He also talks about an interest in cooking (even if he concurrently admits to somewhat poor skills, which might be a more humorous angle on honesty). \\n\\nThe second profile (scenario 2) is also good, with information about hobbies and personality, but it lacks the humor, detailed backstory, and language infused with personality, which makes the first profile stand out more. While this profile gives a reasonable overview of him, it feels more standard—there\\'s less to prompt a reader to engage. The lack of a distinctive approach might make the profile blend into the mass of other profiles, thus decreasing its appeal.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'I am likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric in Scenario 1. \\n\\nFirst, the bio immediately establishes Eric\\'s character with humor (\"unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball\") which is definitely an appealing trait. His explanation of his relationship with his dog casts him as an endearingly adventurous and nurturing guy - that story about getting lost and coming back home with the help of Scott seems both funny and touching, which would certainly make me want to hear more about it.\\n\\nEric\\'s humble self-description as \\'refreshingly average\\' is attractive and is a refreshing break from the norm of people trying to pitch themselves in the best light possible. His willingness to joke about himself is charming. Moreover, the note about his charisma and wittiness is intriguing and implies a good conversationalist. \\n\\nFinally, while the bio is light-hearted, Eric still manages to include his serious search for a relationship (\"As long as you\\'re open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we\\'ll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!”). This is instrumental as it lets me know he\\'s indeed looking for a meaningful connection.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\nBoth scenario profiles are well drafted with a sense of humor and openness. However, there are some differences that might influence potential matches.\\n\\nScenario 1 gives a playful, informal impression with a cheeky tone that could be appealing to someone who appreciates humor and doesn't take life too seriously. It is very specific about the applicant's interests and skills, showing authenticity and genuineness. This scenario also tells a little story about the beagle Scott, which feels personal and can be an interesting conversation starter.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, comes across more mature and formal. It mentions a wider range of interests, which could appeal to a broader audience, but might not add the depth that scenario 1 provides. It also leads the potential match to decide whether to start a conversation or not by asking them to say hi if they share the interests.\\n\\nIn conclusion, scenario 1 may attract matches who are particularly interested in specific qualities mentioned and appreciate a more intimate, personal profile. While scenario 2 may be appealing to matches interested in a more mature, well-rounded individual and prefer a less intimate but more general profile. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1's personalized and playful profile could attract more matches who are interested in a person's complex layers, however, both scenarios have their merits depending on the matches' preferences. If one has to pick, probably Scenario 1, for its level of detail, personal touch, and more laid-back and inviting tone.\", \"Reasoning text: \\n\\nWhen determining which scenario would be more likely to attract a match, it's essential to consider how well each profile demonstrates aspects of the individual's personality and interests. \\n\\nScenario 1 is more informal and offers a humorous undertone, which can easily make it seem more approachable and friendly. It details a specific example of an adventure with his dog, Scott, which makes him seem spontaneous and fun-loving. It also gives a nod to his love for tennis and cooking, albeit his mediocre skills, which adds a self-deprecating humor aspect. The part where he invites others to share their recipes shows an openness to learning and connecting with others on a personal level. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 takes a more structured and formal approach. While it does cover university, tennis, and his dog, Scott, it lacks the personal stories and examples that really give a sense of individuality and uniqueness to a profile. It comes off as more general and less personal.\\n\\nHowever, it depends on the kind of person Eric is trying to attract. If he wants someone who shares his sense of humor and appreciates his quirkiness and spontaneity, Scenario 1 would be the best choice. If he's looking for someone that prefers more articulate, measured, and seemingly mature conversation, Scenario 2 would work better. \\n\\nAnswer: I lean towards Scenario 1 because dating apps are often about showcasing personality and standing out, and Scenario 1 accomplishes this more effectively by using humor and detailed anecdotes to paint a vivid picture of Eric and his life.\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nWith dating profile bios, it's important to strike a good balance between seriousness and humor, providing enough personal information without seeming self-involved, and showcasing one's interests in a way that invites conversation and connection.\\n\\nScenario 1 does this successfully as it uses a conversational and humorous tone, inviting potential matches to engage with him not only based on shared interests (like tennis and love for dogs) but also an appreciation for good conversation and humor itself. The humor and anecdotes in the profile, such as Eric's claim that his dog has a built-in GPS system and his introduction through referencing his cooking attempts, makes him appear approachable and relatable. This bio is likely to attract individuals who appreciate a good sense of humor and enjoy spirited discussions about a variety of topics.\\n\\nScenario 2, while also showcasing Eric's interests and personality, is somewhat more generic in tone and content. It certainly reveals Eric's interests and lifestyle, but it doesn't provide any hooks for potential matches to pick up on and start conversations about. In other words, it's less personal and distinctive, which could make it less memorable to potential matches.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 23 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 2.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nBased on the given scenarios, assessing Eric’s character through his profile indicates certain personality traits that may be more appealing. \\n\\nIn scenario 1, he comes off as dynamic, fun-loving, adventurous and evidently adores his dog, Scott, who plays a key role in depicting his love for animals. Eric portrays himself as someone casual and endearing, adding in humor and a flair for storytelling. His invitation for the reader to share a dog or disaster story can create open and interesting initial conversations, suggesting that he prefers meaningful interactions rather than small talk.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, he also shows his humorous side through his usage of puns and showing his love for fantasy with Hogwarts references, which might suggest he's a bit of a nerd. His profile is quite entertaining, highlighting his laid-back attitude, and he doesn't shy away from poking fun at himself. However, he doesn’t present his passion for animals as prominently as he did in scenario 1.\\n\\nGiven my value on someone with an evident soft spot for animals and the fact that the first scenario gives a better impression of his sociability, dynamism, sense of adventure, and love for animals. I find the storytelling style of the first profile more attractive and endearing, so I'd be more likely to swipe right on the first profile.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Answer: Scenario 1\\n\\nReasoning: Both scenarios describe a positive and lively profile, but I find the first scenario more compelling. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric sounds more personable and humorous, the story about his dog Scott implies that he's more adventurous and fun, which adds depth to his character. He draws his reader in with engaging anecdotes and invites to communicate by asking for their own dog or disaster stories. It feels fun, relaxed, and interactive, which gets my attention and makes me more likely to want to learn more about him.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, while Eric's humor and love for pop culture references (ie. Hogwarts, Golden Snitch, Marauders) is clear, it might not hit the mark for individuals who are not as well-versed in Harry Potter fandom. His sense of humor, while still present, comes off as a bit too contrived and less spontaneous. However, the fungi line showcases his academic interest and the invite to prove the universe wrong together is bold and potentially intriguing. \\n\\nOverall, Eric in Scenario 1 sounds fun, loving and subtly displays his intellect (evident from him studying hard and having 'fieldwork' which suggests a practical aspect to his course), which is an attractive combination.\", '[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios provide an interesting look into Eric’s life, showcasing his love for tennis, his dog Scott, and his sense of humor. However, different elements from each bio appeal to different aspects of my personal interest.\\n\\nScenario 1 gives me an idea of Eric’s playful nature and the strong bond he has with his dog Scott. It paints a picture of a fun and light-hearted person who enjoys creating interesting adventures and stories. He seems outgoing, adventuresome, and values his friendship with his dog.\\n\\nScenario 2 highlights more of his creative, imaginative side. The puns and Harry Potter references show he has a playful side, but he also displays a more cynical sense of humor with comments about politics. The self-deprecating humor about his height hints at a down-to-earth personality as well. He seems to have diverse, nerdy interests, like fungi that glow.\\n\\nAlthough both scenarios are appealing, I personally gravitate towards Scenario 2. I appreciate his creative, imaginative side, his sense of humor, and his self-awareness. His nerdy interests are intriguing. Also, as both of us are university students, the references to university life make him more relatable. The bit about politics is an interesting spark of opinion in an otherwise light-hearted bio, which implies depth in his personality. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios showcase some thrilling aspects of your life, and they seem quite exciting. However, the ideal scenario would largely depend on the type of person you are trying to attract.\\n\\nScenario 1 lays a heavy focus on your active and playful approach to life. Your tales of adventurous escapades with Scott, your love for tennis and the tone used communicates a sense of humor and fun. It not only suggests that you enjoy having adventures with your dog, but it also gives a hint of your academic pursuits.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, puts an emphasis on your love for puns, associations with intellectual fantasy references (Marauders from Harry Potter series and Hogwarts), and the admission of being average. This might appeal to those who appreciate self-deprecating humour, intellectual references, and wit in equal measure.\\n\\nAnswer: \\n\\nSo, if your ideal match is a playful, adventurous, and fun-loving person who enjoys a good laugh and doesn’t take life very seriously, you might be more likely to attract this person in Scenario 1.\\n\\nHowever, if you are trying to attract someone who appreciates humor, intellectual references, wit, and doesn’t mind a hint of self-deprecation, then Scenario 2 may appeal more to that person. \\n\\nIt essentially boils down to the type of personality that you think would best complement your own in a relationship.', \"The answer might be subjective, as it depends on the individual's personality, humor, and preferences.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\\nReasoning: Scenario 1 presents Eric as a jovial person with an interesting life. While both scenarios display a good sense of humor, the first one contains a captivating story and gives the potential match insight into how fun and adventurous life can be with him. It manages to show more about Eric's personality, showing that he is adventurous, has a good relationship with his dog Scott, and is also a student but knows how to make even an academic life entertaining. This scenario would likely attract someone who is fun-loving, pet-friendly, adventurous, and also respects academic pursuits. It also shows that he has a humorous side as he invites potential matches to share their funny stories with him. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 might appeal more to a potential match who appreciates witty wordplay and enjoys Harry Potter references, but it doesn't tell as much about Eric's actual life compared to Scenario 1. Hence, depending upon what kind of personality Eric is looking for in his potential girlfriend, either scenario could be more suitable. However, given a general audience, Scenario 1 may have a broader appeal.\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios show an interesting and humorous side of Eric, there are substantial differences between the two, and it can impact which kind of potential match Eric may attract with each.\\n\\nScenario 1 is more story-driven and focused on the bond between Eric and his dog, Scott. It also invites the potential match to share their own stories, creating a connection through shared storytelling. Here, Eric presents himself as adventurous, fun-loving, and slightly accident-prone. It might be more likely to attract someone who appreciates humor, shares his love for animals, and enjoys spontaneous adventures. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is injected with pop culture references, including Harry Potter, which could attract a match who appreciates these as well. Additionally, this scenario also discusses Eric's potential interests in politics and sciences. However, using obscure references or specific humor tied to pop culture may alienate someone unfamiliar with these elements.\\n\\nThe humor is more sarcastic and self-deprecating in scenario 2, which might attract someone with a similar sarcastic sense of humor. Still, it can also potentially confuse or off-put those who don't understand this type of humor well. \\n\\nOverall, both bios could attract different types of matches, depending on what Eric is looking for. If he wants someone with shared interests in pets, adventure, and storytelling, scenario 1 might be more suitable. If he's looking for someone who shares his love for popular culture and has a slightly sarcastic sense of humor, scenario 2 might be a better fit.\\n\\nAnswer: The best scenario would depend on Eric's preference and who he is looking to attract. Without this information, it's hard to definitively choose one scenario over the other. However, if we were to favor a broader appeal and creating mutual connections through shared experiences, scenario 1 seems to be a safer choice.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 23 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 2.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Both of the scenarios present Eric as a funny and charismatic young man. However, in the first scenario, he appears to be more mature and genuine. He also seems to be more comfortable and careful about his word selection. He discloses his love for cooking, the humorous story involving his beagle Scott, and his desire to connect with someone who appreciates good humor and food. Additionally, the mention of his beagle shows he is not opposed to sharing parts of his personal life.\\n\\nIn contrast, the second scenario, while still amusing, includes perhaps too many Harry Potter references and puns, which might not appeal to some as it can come off too light-hearted or less serious. The fun vibe is carried on too long which can distract from his personality and interests. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: Upon analyzing the two scenarios, I must say that both have their own appeal. Scenario 1 displays a humorous player who isn't afraid to be silly and self-deprecating. His love for his beagle, Scott, and love for tennis and cooking leaves a warm feeling. His character seems humble yet very interesting. About his looks, he cleverly shows his average looks and height but immediately compensates it with his charismatic and witty nature. His elaborative way of stating his interests in the bio gives a sense of how enjoyable and humorous he could be.\\n\\nScenario 2 also has some humorous lines and it's apparent Eric has a love of all things Harry Potter. It's nice as it shows his love for fantasy, which shows a certain level of depth and liking for stories. However, the imagery isn't as vivid and real as compared to the first scenario. His part on serpentology is a little confusing and it falls a bit flat later on in the profile. \\n\\nOverall, while both profiles are engaging, Scenario 1 does give out a more realistic and well-rounded picture of Eric's personality and interests. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nAnalyzing both scenarios involved consideration of the overall positive aspects presented by Eric. In both scenarios, he shares his love for tennis, hanging out with his friends, and his beloved pet, Scott. However, the depth of information about Eric, and the personality projected, differ.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric appears more relatable and open about his interests. He introduces his hobbies of tennis and cooking, and subtly indicates his willingness to improve his cooking skills. Mentioning his adventures with Scott adds a touch of excitement, hinting that he is spontaneous and fun-loving. His self-deprecating humor about his looks seems endearing and its presentation suggests a confident and grounded person who doesn't place too much significance on appearances. He also makes his intentions clear, calling for open-minded, cheerful individuals who will appreciate his cooking attempts.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric relies heavily on humor and an extensive range of references to Harry Potter, which may not resonate with all readers. Further, he tries harder to make his 'average' appearance appeal by rebranding it as the 'new sexy'. This scenario also ends with a more confusing call to action, suggesting to swipe right even if the reader is not interested in doing so.\\n\\nOverall, Eric comes across as more sincere, engaging, and assertive in Scenario 1 than in Scenario 2.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nBoth approaches to the bio seem well-thought-out and honest, but have different tones and appeals. Scenario 1 offers a more straightforward and earnest tone. While it does employ humor, the jokes are less frequent and the emphasis is on concrete information about the poster and what he enjoys. Scenario 2, on the other hand, maintains a highly light-hearted and humorous tone throughout. The humor is consistently present and there seems to be more emphasis on displaying a fun personality than giving concrete personal information. \\n\\nScenario 1 would be more likely to attract prospective matches who value straightforward and honest communication, have a taste for adventure, enjoy cooking and appreciate canine companionship. Since the bio is straightforward, it might appeal to those who want a clear sense of who a person is before engaging. \\n\\nScenario 2 might be more appealing to those who are attracted to humor and a playful disposition, enjoy intellectual or nerdy references, and appreciate whimsical and pun-filled discussion. This might give the impression of a jovial, entertaining character who doesn't take themselves too seriously.\\n\\nIn conclusion, your choice of scenario would depend largely on the kind of match you are looking for and the dynamics you hope to cultivate in your dating life.  \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 or 2, based on aforementioned reasoning.\", \"Reasoning text:\\nChoosing between these two crafted user bios requires me to consider the key factors I hope to communicate. Both scenarios share similar elements; they reflect my love for tennis, my lovable pet, Scott, and some humor. Therefore, to make a decision, I'd need to consider what tonality, vibe, and personality I'd like to present.\\n\\nScenario 1 is more mature and direct, but still holds an element of humor. It talks more about my real-life adventures with my dog Scott and displays an openness to meeting people who differ from me. This is more in line with a sincere, interested, and open approach.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, I find more humor and light-heartedness. It has a playful and youthful tone using references from Harry Potter and reflects my love for adventure and food, which could be appealing. However, it might also convey a perception that I'm not as serious about dating or finding a deeper connection. The wordplay and puns, while engaging, may be lost on those not familiar with such humor or the mentioned references.\\n\\nFor someone like me in their early twenties, I might prefer a blend of humor with some seriousness. It's important that my potential match understands my love for my pet and tennis, my need for some fun, and also my interest in a deeper connection. Therefore, my preferred choice would be:\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nScenario 1 and Scenario 2 both showcase your personality, interests, and humor. However, the effectiveness of each scenario can depend greatly on the kind of person you are looking for. \\n\\nScenario 1 can help you attract someone who appreciates more grounded humor and clear communication. This scenario lays out a clear picture of what your life currently is and what you like doing, indicating you're quite straightforward and real about who you are. It subtly conveys that you love cooking, animals, and have a sense of adventure – an exciting combination for anyone who shares these interests. Additionally, the humor sprinkled throughout does not stray too far from reality, thus attracting someone who appreciates clever and relatable humor. \\n\\nScenario 2 showcases your flair for creative writing and fantasy. It's full of imaginative and humourous takes on everyday activities and life in general. This scenario could attract someone who appreciates a great sense of humor, indulges in imagination, and has a soft spot for whimsicality and quirkiness. You are indirectly indicating that you are a fun and creative person, making the bio a big magnet for people who love this energy and light-heartedness.\\n\\nAnswer: The best scenario would ultimately be decided by your preferred match. For a down-to-earth, practical person with shared interests, it would be Scenario 1. For a fun-loving, whimsical person who enjoys your imaginative humor, it would be Scenario 2. Therefore, based on the user's intention, both scenarios could be equally effective. But considering the well-roundedness and groundedness, I lean slightly more towards Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 23 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_3, generation 2, score 2.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! My name's Eric, a studious 20-something navigating his way through the whirlwind of academia and tennis matches at our local state university. Being of average height and looks, I compensate with a wicked backhand and a love for a good adventure. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I'm not hitting up the library or tennis courts, you can often catch me exploring nature trails with my loyal sidekick, Scott. Scott is not your typical friend - he's a beagle with a spirit as free as mine, but with a much better sense of direction! He once led me on an unexpected detour during a regular hike, and we ended up at a local farmers market. Never one to shy away from new experiences, I dived in full-heartedly, and thus began my undying love for home-made raspberry jam.\n",
      "\n",
      "If home-made jam, spontaneous adventures, tennis or adorable dogs sounds like your cup of tea, swing a message my way. Even if you just want to chat about your favorite animal or discuss a renowned literature's latest bestseller, I am all ears! Over to you, where will our adventure begin?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nFirstly, both bios are very engaging and show that Eric is a fun-loving, adventurous guy who loves his pet Scott. There are quite a few similarities between the two bios, however, there are also some distinct differences.\\n\\nScenario 1 touches more on Eric's love for nature and spontaneous adventures in day-to-day life, accompanied by his beagle, Scott. It gives a sense that Eric is intellectual yet down-to-earth and easy-going. Eric also appears open-minded, explorative of life, and not afraid to showcase his interests, even if they extend to something as specific as home-made raspberry jam. He also seems engaging and interested in my input on what our adventure could be, which makes me feel valued and involved in the conversation from the very beginning.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 portrays Eric in a more playful, slightly immature light - the part about ruling the day with biscuits and a puppy party seems playful but more suiting to a high school student mindset rather than someone in their 20s. The humour is appreciated, but in comparison, Scenario 1 feels more grounded and relatable.\\n\\nIn conclusion, while both scenarios project a fun-loving and adventurous personality, Scenario 1 seems to present Eric as a more mature, grounded, and open-hearted person. The balance of adventure, intellect and simplicity appeals more to me.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios are quite inviting and fun, with Eric showing a great personality and a sense of humor. However, the first scenario seems a bit more appealing. Eric presents himself in a more mature and sincere manner, with a well-balanced life between his studies, playing tennis, and spending leisure time with his dog, Scott. He incorporates elements of adventure and spontaneity, centered around both nature and food that could lead to exciting dates. His appreciation for homemade jam could suggest he's a food lover or cook, which could be another shared interest. His love for animals, especially dogs, shows his empathetic side, which is a quality many people look for in a partner. On top of that, he includes a general invitation to chitchat about any topics, which, shows openness and seems both inclusive and welcoming. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios are engaging and deliver a good sense of Eric\\'s character, Scenario 2 resonates with me better.\\n\\nHere are a few reasons why:\\n\\n1. Eric\\'s humor: Eric\\'s sense of humor shines through in Scenario 2, from his self-deprecating comment about calling him \"that super cool guy with a beagle\" to the hilarious story about Scott, his beagle, going on an Indiana Jones-style adventure in the biology lab. A good sense of humor indicates not only sharp wit, but also the potential for entertaining conversations and a fun dating experience.\\n\\n2. Adventure: The story about Scott\\'s escapades is humorously portrayed as an \"epic adventure.\" This not only suggests that Eric doesn\\'t take himself too seriously, but also that he is open to experiences and can find enjoyment in unexpected situations - qualities that could make for an interesting and unpredictable partner. \\n\\n3. Inclusiveness: Eric warmly invites the reader to participate in their next endeavor, which makes him seem inclusive, warm, and approachable.\\n\\nIn conclusion, Eric’s humor, adventurous spirit, and considerate nature portrayed in Scenario 2 make him seem like an appealing match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! People usually call me Eric, but if you really want to catch my attention, call me \"that super cool guy with a beagle\"... or you know, just Eric works too. When I'm not hitting the books on my quest to conquer the academic world as an undergraduate, you can catch me serving defeat on the tennis courts (no, really, I once served the ball so hard it knocked my opponent's phone out of his pocket!).\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, let me introduce you to the real charmer in this dynamic duo - Scott, my beagle, who's even more handsome than I am, if that's possible. He's not just your average dog; he’s the Indiana Jones of the canine world. He once snuck into my university's biology lab on 'Take Your Pet to Class Day' (yeah, it's a real thing in my university), and found a hidden stash of dog biscuits under the sink, never discovered before... more biscuits than a beagle could ever dream of!  Together, we ruled the university that day for the greatest puppy party of all time.\n",
      "\n",
      "Feel free to drop a message if you'd like to be invited to our next epic adventure (or if you think Scott's story was an elaborate plot to cover up the time I spilled all my fieldwork samples in the lab...). Either way, don't be shy. Throw in your best dog or disaster story, and let the games begin!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! My name's Eric, a studious 20-something navigating his way through the whirlwind of academia and tennis matches at our local state university. Being of average height and looks, I compensate with a wicked backhand and a love for a good adventure. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I'm not hitting up the library or tennis courts, you can often catch me exploring nature trails with my loyal sidekick, Scott. Scott is not your typical friend - he's a beagle with a spirit as free as mine, but with a much better sense of direction! He once led me on an unexpected detour during a regular hike, and we ended up at a local farmers market. Never one to shy away from new experiences, I dived in full-heartedly, and thus began my undying love for home-made raspberry jam.\n",
      "\n",
      "If home-made jam, spontaneous adventures, tennis or adorable dogs sounds like your cup of tea, swing a message my way. Even if you just want to chat about your favorite animal or discuss a renowned literature's latest bestseller, I am all ears! Over to you, where will our adventure begin?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: If attracting a potential match who shares similar interests and values is the primary objective, a profile should include specific instances that highlight these areas; it should also come off as interactive and engaging. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric is humorously presenting himself as adventurous by sharing anecdotal stories involving his dog, indicating he enjoys fun and spontaneity. The line about his tennis skills serves as a casual yet effective way to mention his athletic prowess, potentially attracting those interested in sports. His conversational tone and open invitation for the reader to share their stories make the profile interactive, possibly leading to more responses. Eric also shows that he can laugh at himself (hinting at resilience and good humor), an attractive quality for many people.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, although Eric again mentions his studies and love for tennis, the narrative lacks the playful interaction seen in Scenario 1. It is nice that he talks about his adventurous nature and love for home-made jams, but it may not resonate with everyone. The profile comes off as slightly distant, too, with less engaging phrases like \"swing a message my way\"; this might discourage readers from responding. \\n\\nSo considering the goal and reasons mentioned above, I\\'d favor Scenario 1 for attracting potential matches sharing Eric\\'s interests and values.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios could attract potential matches, scenario 1 stands out more due to its quite unique humor, storytelling, and interaction. Scenario 1 is much more engaging because it includes funny anecdotes about you and your dog. This indicates that you have a sense of humor and don't take yourself too seriously, both of which can be attractive qualities. Furthermore, the lighthearted challenge at the end invites potential matches to message you, which may encourage someone shy or hesitant to do so.\\n\\nScenario 2 also tells the reader about your interests and values but in a rather direct and conventional way. This may gain the attention of those who prefer straightforward and serious profiles. However, it lacks the creative spin of scenario 1, which might make it less memorable in comparison.\\n\\nHowever, on the other hand, scenario 2 also ends with an open-ended question, which could encourage responses. While it's a more serious take, it also shows a willingness to connect on deeper topics like literature.\\n\\nConsidering these points, I believe scenario 1 might be slightly more successful at attracting a potential match due to its creativity, humor, and engaging storytelling.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nWhen drafting a profile bio, the aim is to present oneself authentically, highlighting not just facts but also weaving engaging stories that showcase personality, interests and values. Both scenarios have accomplished that, but they attract different types of matches.\\n\\nScenario 1 comes across as playful with a notable touch of humor. The narrative around Eric's life on campus and his adventures with Scott shows his fun-loving nature. This profile might attract someone who appreciates humor and imaginations or preferably a university student who can relate to Eric's lifestyle.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, adopts a more mature tone. Eric comes across as a thoughtful individual with varied interests including sports, nature, and literature. It also shows his love for Scott and adds an interest in home-made jam, extending the range of potential conversation starters. This might attract someone who values deeper, meaningful conversations and shares similar interests.\\n\\nAdditionally, Scenario 2 subtly highlights Eric’s spontaneous personality, preference for new experiences, and adaptability, qualities many people appreciate in a partner.\\n\\nIn conclusion, it really depends on the type of people Eric is looking to attract. If he seeks a match who appreciates humor and whimsical stories, he should go with scenario 1. However, if he is interested in attracting someone who values maturity, shared interests, deeper conversations, and adaptability, scenario 2 is the way to go.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 or 2, depending on Eric's preference.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 23 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_3, generation 2, score 2.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! My name's Eric, a studious 20-something navigating his way through the whirlwind of academia and tennis matches at our local state university. Being of average height and looks, I compensate with a wicked backhand and a love for a good adventure. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I'm not hitting up the library or tennis courts, you can often catch me exploring nature trails with my loyal sidekick, Scott. Scott is not your typical friend - he's a beagle with a spirit as free as mine, but with a much better sense of direction! He once led me on an unexpected detour during a regular hike, and we ended up at a local farmers market. Never one to shy away from new experiences, I dived in full-heartedly, and thus began my undying love for home-made raspberry jam.\n",
      "\n",
      "If home-made jam, spontaneous adventures, tennis or adorable dogs sounds like your cup of tea, swing a message my way. Even if you just want to chat about your favorite animal or discuss a renowned literature's latest bestseller, I am all ears! Over to you, where will our adventure begin?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning text:\\n\\nIn both scenarios, Eric comes off as an interesting character with a diverse set of interests, including tennis, hiking, and cooking. He also appears to be friendly, welcoming, and a tad comedic. However, there\\'s a subtle difference in the presentation of his profile which can affect the decision.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric has an engaging, appealing way of presenting himself. He\\'s humorous, a bit self-deprecating, and it\\'s quite entertaining to read his bio. His comment \"my friends describe me as \\'refreshingly average\\' in the looks department\" is quite funny and hints at a sense of humor. He also offers an interesting story about himself and his dog that can serve as a good conversation starter. The casual mention of his love for cooking, and his invite to share Italian recipes, showcases another dimension of his personality. Furthermore, his profile suggests a relaxed, fun-loving guy who is open to interactions, regardless of whether or not the reader shares his exact interests.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, while Eric still introduces himself in a friendly and inviting way, the tone is a bit more formal. The narrative is descriptive, although it lacks the witty humor found in Scenario 1. The story of his unexpected adventure to a farmers market is intriguing, but it doesn\\'t evoke the same engagement as Scenario 1\\'s adventure with Scott. \\n\\nGiven these considerations, Eric\\'s profile in Scenario 1 seems to be slightly more fun and engaging. His use of humor and the more riveting story makes his profile stand out, which might draw more users to interact with him.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"In reviewing both scenarios, they both highlight Eric's personality in a humorous and engaging way. Both scenarios put forth his interests in tennis, his dog Scott, and his sense of adventure. He also manages to incorporate his sense of humor in both scenarios, which is a definite plus point. However, there are a few differences that make one scenario stand out over the other.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric is quite expressive about his love for tennis, home-cooked pasta, his misadventures with Scott, and his own personality - being charismatic and witty. He's also drawing a picture of himself and his life that feels sincere and authentic, which can encourage the reader to develop an interested and positive initial perception of him. There's also the use of humor - mildly self-deprecating, but in a confident and easygoing manner that gives us a sense of his personality and attitude. The call to action at the end of the bio is a clear and direct invitation, which may prompt a positive response.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, the narrative is somewhat similar but comes from a bit more structured approach and seems more 'rehearsed'. While it also shared some of his interests and adventures, it didn't provide the same level of personal insight, authenticity, and humor that the first one did. The bio also ends on a bit more generic note, not as particularly engaging or inviting as in Scenario 1.\\n\\nConsidering these factors, Scenario 1 has a more authentic, relaxed, and engaging tone, which offers more character insight and generates more interest.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios appeal to me in different ways. However, I'm most likely to swipe right in Scenario 2 and here's why:\\n\\nFirstly, despite his self-deprecating humor, Eric sounds confident about who he is and has a genuine outlook on life. His adventurous nature and love for nature and his dog make him seem fun and outdoorsy. I'm given a fuller picture of his nature-loving personality by his mention of hikes and exploring trails with his pet. \\n\\nFurther, his love for tennis matches well with my personal interests, making a shared activity likely. He also seems to have diverse interests extending beyond sports - evidenced by him hitting up the library, and appreciating a good adventure and homemade jam.\\n\\nMost importantly, Eric sounds mature for his age, navigating his way through academia at the state university, and he seems open-minded and approachable, inviting anyone who matches even slightly with his interests to message him.\\n\\nOverall Eric in Scenario 2 appears more well-rounded and endearing, thus making him a more attractive potential match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! My name's Eric, a studious 20-something navigating his way through the whirlwind of academia and tennis matches at our local state university. Being of average height and looks, I compensate with a wicked backhand and a love for a good adventure. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I'm not hitting up the library or tennis courts, you can often catch me exploring nature trails with my loyal sidekick, Scott. Scott is not your typical friend - he's a beagle with a spirit as free as mine, but with a much better sense of direction! He once led me on an unexpected detour during a regular hike, and we ended up at a local farmers market. Never one to shy away from new experiences, I dived in full-heartedly, and thus began my undying love for home-made raspberry jam.\n",
      "\n",
      "If home-made jam, spontaneous adventures, tennis or adorable dogs sounds like your cup of tea, swing a message my way. Even if you just want to chat about your favorite animal or discuss a renowned literature's latest bestseller, I am all ears! Over to you, where will our adventure begin?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Both scenario 1 and 2 do a good job in portraying my personality, interests, and humor/grit. However, each is slightly different and might appeal to different personalities. \\n\\nScenario 1 has a casual and humorous tone which might appeal more to someone who likes light-hearted, funny individuals who don’t take themselves too seriously. The reference to the term 'refreshingly average' is humorous and shows a level of self-deprecation that many might find endearing. The mention of an Italian grandma's recipe shows an appreciation for authenticity and culture and thus, could potentially draw in someone who values wit, authenticity, and culture.\\n\\nScenario 2 might appeal more to individuals who are adventurous and value personal growth. Giving the spotlight to Scott's misadventure paints a wholesome picture and shows my appreciation for spontaneity, adventure, and open-mindedness. The phrase 'navigating his way through the whirlwind of academia and tennis matches at our local state university' sounds appealing and could draw in intellectual, sporty individuals with a sense of adventure.\\n\\nIn terms of showcasing shared interests, both scenarios do a decent job but scenario 1 explicitly mentions the potential match's preference towards dogs and tennis. \\n\\nIt's a tough call but based on the above deductions, I believe scenario 1 might have a slightly better chance of attracting someone who shares my interests and values. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios provide a pretty wholesome picture of Eric as a person. However, Scenario 1 presents a more easy-going, humorous version of Eric that seems more approachable. He teases himself about his average looks and his mediocre cooking skills, which is a good sign of someone being humble and having a sense of humor.\\n\\nIn addition, Scenario 1 also gives more information about him being open to receive messages (with the mention about anyone with Italian grandma-approved recipes being welcome to slide in) which indicates his openness to engage in conversation. It sets the tone for an engaging, fun conversation that doesn't necessarily need to revolve around shared interests only.\\n\\nOn the other hand, while Scenario 2 is also open and inviting, the language used seems a bit more formal and a touch less personable than Scenario 1. This might make Eric come across as a bit more serious and less approachable to some. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 is more likely to attract a potential match who shares Eric's interests and values.\", \"Reasoning:\\nWhen considering these two options, it's important to consider who you're trying to attract. Both scenarios provide sufficient information about Eric's personality, interests, and his relationship with his dog, Scott.\\n\\nScenario 1 is more humorous, playful, and inviting. The use of humor can help Eric appear more approachable, which could encourage more people to message him. It also showcases Eric's love for tennis and cooking, traits which some may find particularly attractive. Furthermore, this scenario encourages interaction, asking for Italian 'nonna' recipes which may seem more engaging to readers.\\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 is a bit more descriptive and serious. It provides more detailed information on Eric's intellectual pursuits and love for nature. This scenario also opens up the confer for broader discussion topics like favorite animals or literature, suggesting that Eric is open-minded and willing to engage in intellectual discourse.\\n\\nHowever, Scenario 1 seems to provide more balance, versatility, and approachability. It also subtly suggests that Eric is looking for someone with a good sense of humor and adventure, who enjoys pets, sports, and culinary experiences. Therefore, it is more likely to attract individuals who share these same values and interests.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 29 has a large difference:\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 3.0\n",
      "1_2, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: In both Erica's profiles, he comes off as a well-rounded and caring individual who values his education, activities, and pet. However, there are some differences in tone and presentation between the two scenarios which might influence my choice. \\n\\nIn scenario 1, Eric seems very straightforward, genuine and his writing is most conversational and immersive. I appreciate that he directly communicates his lifestyle, and explicitly mentions that he is down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener. His sense of humor (specifically his jest about the average height and aesthetic) shows his light-heartedness and ability to not take himself too seriously. The personal details regarding his dog, Scott, and how having a love for outdoors would be ideal also point towards compatibility and shared interests.\\n\\nOn the other hand, scenario 2 certainly presents Eric as somebody with a great sense of humor and a somewhat dramatic flair. Although his humor and charm are attractive, I find his profile less grounded. I'm impressed by his creativity but I'm a bit unsure about his self-deprecating humor especially about his math grades; it might imply a lack of seriousness towards studies. Moreover, he talks less about his weekend activities and the attributes he values in a partner.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Answer: Scenario 1\\n\\nThe biggest deciding factor for most people when using a dating app is how relatable or attractive a person’s profile seems to be. In this specific case, I resonated more with Scenario 1\\'s bio because it felt more genuine and engaging.\\n\\nReasoning:\\n\\n1. Casual and Conversational Tone: Eric comes across as humble, interesting, and smart with a good balance in life from Scenario 1. The language in his bio is casual, straightforward, and it sounds natural and easy to read. \\n\\n2. Unique and Detailed Description: The specific references to his dog Scott, and his explicit love for Beagles and tennis make his bio quite unique and shows that he is passionate about these aspects in his life. \\n\\n3. Friend Evaluations: Knowing what his friends think of him is insightful and adds depth to the kind of person he might be, i.e., loyal and a good listener, which are positive attributes that anyone might seek.\\n\\n4. Balanced Lifestyle: His bio shows a balance between being studious and having an outdoorsy fun side. It also subtly gives a hint about his likings – books, movies, and food. \\n\\n5. Use of Humor: His joke about the \"pedestrian visual ranking system\" subtly and humorously references his average looks. This showcases his pleasant, self-deprecating humor.\\n\\nLastly, the invite to trade book suggestions and debate dog breeds is an excellent conversation starter. This makes Scenario 1 seem like a potential match who can carry a fun and cogent conversation forward. \\n\\nScenario 2, though equally interesting, can come across as a bit too scripted and less personal. The language has a formal tone, and although it’s creative and exciting, in this context it can feel a bit less relatable.', '[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios presented Eric as an undergraduate student who likes tennis, hanging out with friends, and has a soft spot for animals. However, the manner in which he presents himself creates a different vibe in each.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric started by giving a quick introduction about who he is and what he\\'s doing. He then proceeds to share about his lifestyle and interests, which included reading, playing tennis, and spending time with his beagle. He also mentioned the qualities he values in others and what he\\'s looking for in a partner. He ended by extending an invitation to potentially share life’s enthusiasm, learning, and tennis. His approach here seems sincere and straightforward, suggesting that he\\'s serious about wanting to connect with someone on a deeper level.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric again introduces himself, but in a more playful, cheeky style. He uses humor to talk about his studies, physical appearance, and pet ownership, and he paints a picture of wanting to be the \"good guy\" in a rom-com, rather than merely wanting a relationship. While still communicating his interests and what he\\'s looking for, he does so in a more lighthearted and less direct way. \\n\\nIn summary, both scenarios display important parts of Eric\\'s personality, but depended on what I\\'d be looking for in a match, I\\'d lean one way or the other. \\n\\nGiven that I\\'m open to a potential romantic relationship, I might appreciate the sincerity of Scenario 1 over the playful style of Scenario 2. Scenario 1 paints a picture of a balanced, thoughtful individual who seems interested in finding someone to share meaningful experiences with. Therefore, judging from the bio, I feel that this person, Eric, might be more aligned with what I\\'m looking for in a relationship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth these scenarios offer a clear and genuine portrayal of Eric. However, Scenario 1 tends to delve into more personal details and directly mentions desired traits in a potential partner - qualities like being a dog-person, appreciating humor and wit, enjoying the outdoors, learning, and a willingness to play tennis. Seeing this, people who identify with these traits may feel more inclined to respond. The bio also invites potential matches to engage in playful banter about book suggestions and dog breeds which can spark  conversations. \\n\\nScenario 2, While more playful and creative in terms of metaphors and language, which may attract people who appreciate such humor, doesn't provide as clear a picture of specific desirable attributes in a potential partner. It allows more ambiguity and could attract a wider variety of responses but may not necessarily hone in on matches with shared interests and values as efficiently as Scenario 1. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"While both scenarios present appealing aspects of your personality and interests, Scenario 1 might more effectively attract a potential match who shares your interests and values. \\n\\nThis is due to several reasons. \\n\\nFirst, Scenario 1 outlines your interests, activities, and attributes in a more cohesive and concise manner. This clarity in self-expression could make it easier for potential matches to assess whether they share your lifestyle, interests, and values. \\n\\nSecond, Scenario 1 establishes not only a clear picture of what you enjoy individually but also what you value in social settings (tennis match with friends, movie nights). It also explicitly mentions qualities you appreciate in others (down-to-earth, loyal, good listener), offering potential matches more insight into what traits you value in relationships. \\n\\nThird, your love and care for your dog Scott does not only show that you're responsible and caring but also that you have a soft spot for animals-- an attractive quality for fellow pet lovers or animal-friendly individuals. \\n\\nAnd lastly, the wit and humor in scenario 1 are playful and subtle, making you appear approachable and light-hearted. Not to mention your open invitation to trade book suggestions and debate dog breeds, which opens up a fun and easy starting point for conversations. \\n\\nSo the answer is: \\nScenario 1\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nLooking at Scenario 1, it appears that Eric has put forward a sincere, approachable bio. This profile lays out my interests, hobbies and a snapshot of my personality. It\\'s casual, friendly, humorous, and authentic without trying too hard. My love for my dog, tennis and friends are all mentioned. While important, it does not overly focus on my physical appearance, instead highlighting my qualities, leaving space for potential matches to focus on personality rather than looks alone. The witty reference to the \"pedestrian visual ranking system\" comfortably acknowledges my regular looks and humorously suggests that I value inner qualities over superficial ones.\\n\\nScenario 2, however, appears to be more flamboyant and amusing. It again emphasizes my love for my dog, tennis, and studies. The bio is engaging and therefore likely to stand out more in a crowded dating app. However, it might come off as trying too hard for some people and perhaps portrays a less genuine image.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\\nWhile Scenario 2 might be more inventive, it seems more contrived. I am looking for a genuine connection with someone who shares my interests. I would therefore choose Scenario 1 as it presents a down-to-earth, sincere, and approachable character which is in line with my personality.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 29 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 2, score 8.0\n",
      "1_2, generation 1, score 3.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\n\\nLooking at the two scenarios, my preference would go to Scenario 1. The reason being that Eric seems more genuine and straightforward in this scenario. He talks about his lifestyle, interests, and what he's looking for in a potential match quite clearly, without being too ostentatious or trying too hard to be funny. He comes off as someone who can balance his life well, managing both his studies and leisure.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, although Eric attempts to be humorous and light-hearted, it seems like he's also trying to establish an image of being witty and smart, which leans more towards the showing-off side. His bio is also a bit more complex and ambiguous, which could make it harder for someone who's looking for clear information about a person to decide whether they would like to know him better.\\n\\nBoth bios conveys that he's fun, caring, and has a lot of diverse interests, but Scenario 1 seems to be more honest and down-to-earth, which resonates more with what I am looking for in a potential romantic partner.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning:\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric presents himself as a friendly, down-to-earth guy who loves animals and enjoys outdoor activities. His bio reveals his obvious love for his dog Scott, his interest in tennis, and his passion for education which reflects overall balanced personality. His way of explaining things reveals that he has a calm and soothing personality which is the characteristic of an ideal partner.\\n\\nHowever, in Scenario 2, Eric comes off as a bit more humorous and creative, showing off his wit and intelligence while bringing a light-hearted touch to his profile. He speaks about his life as a rom-com and this metaphoric representation is quite intriguing and amusing. This might appeal to a potential match who is looking for someone clever and amusing.\\n\\nBoth scenarios present Eric as someone determined, committed to learning, and as a dog lover, but Scenario 2 adds a layer of humor and warmth that makes the profile stand out more. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Reasoning: Eric appears to be quite an engaging character in both scenarios, with each biography highlighting his interests, academic pursuits, and personality. His love for tennis, his studies, hanging out with friends, and his pet beagle, Scott, are well emphasized. However, the choice would boil down to the personal preference of my own style of communication and interests.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric presents himself as a more laid-back, easy-going, and outdoorsy person, whose love for animals shines through. He sounds focused, with a love for competition but also relaxation. His enthusiastic approach towards life and wishes for a companion who would share a similar enthusiasm and love for animals comes across as positively charming. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 paints Eric as a humorous, self-deprecating, and more academically focused individual. Although his love for tennis and animals is still present, the emphasis has moved towards his academic pursuits with a touch of whimsy. The humor might be attractive, yet some could interpret the self-deprecation as lacking confidence.\\n\\nHaving a a preference for clear-cut communication style as well as a shared love for animals, I'd be prone to swipe right for Eric in Scenario 1. The direct approach of showing what he likes and what he's looking for in a partner is refreshing and straight to the point, and his relaxed and enthusiastic demeanor is more appealing to me.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0.5, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios outline the identity, hobbies, and lifestyle of Eric well, but they deliver this information in different tones and context. \\n\\nScenario 1 has a more straightforward and friendly tone, presenting Eric as a down-to-earth, outdoorsy, pet-friendly, and sociable individual. This scenario appeals to those who prefer simpler, more relational, and adventure-seeking interactions. It suggests that Eric is looking for a partner who values companionship and a shared enjoyment of hobbies and lifestyle, in this case, love for dogs and tennis. \\n\\nScenario 2, however, presents Eric in a more humorous and nuanced light. This scenario gives off thoughtful, introspective, yet witty vibes and relies on humor and intelligence. It's not just about sharing specific hobbies or lifestyle choices but also about enjoying intellectual conversations, appreciating humor, and partaking in a lively, mentally stimulating relationship. \\n\\nAnswer: \\n\\nChoosing between Scenario 1 or 2 really depends on the kind of match Eric is looking for. If he is looking for someone who primarily shares his lifestyle and hobbies, Scenario 1 is more suitable. However, if he values intellectual conversation and humor in a potential partner, Scenario 2 serves better. Either way, both scenarios have their own unique charm and present Eric as an intriguing individual.\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nBoth scenarios provide an approachable yet engaging introduction to who Eric is as a person, effectively showcasing his interests, pursuits and personality. \\n\\nHowever, there are subtle differences between the two that could possibly impact their drawing potential. \\n\\nScenario 1 adopts a casual and straightforward style, directly indicating Eric's preferences and the type of partner he is looking for. This could potentially be more appealing to someone who appreciates directness and simplicity, and is clearly looking for someone who values education, outdoor activities, and has a love for animals.\\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 is written in a more flamboyant and playful tone, combined with a dash of humor and theatrical flair. This scenario doesn't explicitly state what type of person Eric is looking for, but the creative writing and humor throughout his bio hints that he's probably seeking someone who enjoys witty exchanges and appreciates creativity and humor.\\n\\nThus, while both scenarios are fairly effective in showcasing various aspects of Eric's personality and interests, the final selection would depend on the type of person Eric is looking to attract.\\n\\nAnswer: This will depend on the individual perspective. Someone who appreciates a fun and flamboyant tone might be more attracted to Scenario 2, while someone who prefers a more straightforward and casual approach might be more attracted to Scenario 1.\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios are well-written and provide enough information about Eric\\'s life, values, and interests. They both represent a balanced mix of info, humor, and a hint of self-depreciation, which keeps the tone light and approachable. \\n\\nScenario 1 portrays Eric more as a relaxed, outdoorsy person who loves spending time with his dog and playing tennis. The sentence, \"Being quite the animal lover, I\\'d rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city\\'s hustle-and-bustle...\" gives a clue that he prefers a quieter life rather than big parties and crowded events. This could attract someone who shares the same affection for pets and outdoor activities, making it a good match. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, emphasizes Eric\\'s humor, academic interests, and spontaneity. It is less about his hobbies and more about his persona. This approach may attract someone who is looking for a balance between serious academics and fun, and someone who appreciates good humor. The statement, \"I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\" leaves room for excitement and mystery. \\n\\nIt\\'s a tough call, but if I had to choose one, I would probably go with Scenario 1. This is because it spells out Eric\\'s lifestyle a bit more clearly and would attract someone who is genuinely interested in those activities and relaxed lifestyle.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 29 has a large difference:\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 3.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 0, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios portray Eric as an interesting individual with a good sense of humor and strong love for his pet. However, the approach is slightly different.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric's personality comes across as quirky and outgoing. He's candid about not being the most handsome or tallest guy out there, but he sparks interest with his funny anecdotes and apparent willingness to poke fun of himself. He manages to make his bio entertaining with an amusing narrative about his peculiar adventures with Scott, his Beagle. Here, humor is a dominant factor, and that can be very attractive.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric still maintains his humor but in a somewhat more restrained way. More focus is given to his personality traits and life outside his relationship with Scott. This bio is more rounded, highlighting academic and social aspects, though it's somewhat less entertaining than the first one.\\n\\nAs much as both profiles have their own appeal, as a young woman open to the possibility of forming a romantic relationship, I value a balanced representation. Although there's not much to go on besides attractiveness and a brief bio, both of these can provide good insights into a person's character and interests.\\n\\nNotwithstanding, I would opt for Scenario 2- it gives off a more relatable vibe. Eric seems down-to-earth and not too absorbed in his humor. I appreciate the added details about his academic life, dedicating time for friends, and involved interest in books. It gives off the impression that he's well-rounded, which could imply compatibility in multiple areas of life, including intellectual and social ones.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"The main factors that I consider while reviewing profiles typically range from the tone of the bio and shared interests to the overall approach they seem to have towards life, conveyed through their personal descriptions and humor.\\n\\nScenario 1: The details in this scenario give off a relaxed, humorous, and playful vibe, which I find attractive. Eric's approach of including Scott in his bio is creative and endearing and it gives a glimpse of his personality, without making it feel like he's trying too hard. His acknowledgement of being 'average-looking' along with his humour shows humility and self-awareness, which are qualities I value. The concept of 'dog-filled fun and laughter' is inviting and paints a positive image of what it might be like to spend time around him and Scott. \\n\\nScenario 2: This scenario is a more subdued and traditional dating bio. Eric describes his habits, hobbies, physical traits and personality in an objective manner. His love for Scott, his friends, and his interests are all mentioned here, but it lacks the personal touch and humor which I find engaging in the first scenario. Moreover, there's less detail and depth into his life with Scott, which was something I really connected with in the first scenario.\\n\\nAfter comparing both scenarios, I feel more drawn to the bio where Eric's persona, lifestyle, and humor are conveyed in a more personal and engaging manner - Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: While both scenarios have their charm, I am more drawn to Eric's first scenario. Here, Eric illustrates his personality and provides insightful, funny details about his interests, life with his dog Scott, and even his tennis skills. He comes across as approachable and humorous, with a pinch of self-deprecating humor which shows that he doesn't take himself too seriously. His narration of his daily sock skirmishes with his beagle, Scott, is both endearing and paints a vivid picture of a dog lover's everyday life. He also mentions his interest in gourmet food and his ability to make people laugh, which suggests shared activities to look forward to. He subtly mentions his values, such as sharing and having fun. While the second scenario also paints an attractive picture, it's a bit more formal and less vivid than the first, making it slightly less compelling for me.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning:\\nBoth bios successfully give a sense of Eric\\'s personality, his interests, and his values. However, they each have a slightly different tone and focus.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as humorous, playful, and casual. His references to his dog Scott and the \"sock skirmishes\" paint a fun picture of his home life, revealing his love for animals and his sense of humor. Additionally, by mentioning his love for tennis and the significance of his friendships, a potential match would quickly learn that he values recreational activities and his social life alongside his studies. It might attract someone who enjoys funny, lighthearted dates and adventures alongside their partner.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric portrays a more mature, thoughtful side of himself. Although the same core themes - such as his love for his pet, his interest in tennis, and his focus on friendships - are covered, they\\'re done so in a somewhat more serious and introspective manner. His discussions about the balance in life, nature walks with Scott, and debate about the best dog breed may attract someone who is more of a thinker, someone who enjoys deep conversations and shared quiet moments.\\n\\nAnswer: This depends on the type of person Eric is trying to attract. If he\\'s interested in a fun-loving, adventurous girl who appreciates playful banter, Scenario 1 could be more successful. But if he\\'s hoping to find a thoughtful, mature woman who enjoys deep conversations and quiet moments, Scenario 2 might be a better choice.', \"Reasoning: Both scenarios offer a good reflection of myself and my lifestyle. However, there are key differences that could influence the type of matches each would attract. \\nScenario 1 presents a more informal, humorous tone, showcasing my playful nature and introducing potential matches to my dog Scott right away. This might appeal to someone who appreciates humor and doesn't mind a little chaos, given Scott's playful antics.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, has a more serious tone. It provides a more detailed outline of my life, including my academic pursuits and my social activities, hinting at a relatively balanced life. It conveys a sense of maturity and might attract someone who values academia, socializing, and has a mutual love for dogs.\\n\\nAnswer: It truly depends on the type of person I'm hoping to attract. If I want someone who values humor and a little bit of fun chaos, I would go with Scenario 1. If I'm aiming to attract someone a bit more serious, possibly older or more mature, and who appreciates a balance in life, I'd choose Scenario 2. So, there's no clear-cut answer; it depends on what I perceive as my ideal match.\", \"Reasoning text: \\n\\nIn determining which scenario is more likely to attract a potential match, it's important to consider the presentation of the profile as it relates to appealing to shared interests and values. \\n\\n1. Language and Humor: In Scenario 1, Eric showcases his playful and humorous side, making light of his interactions with Scott, his beagle. This personal touch could be more appealing to potential matches who enjoy humor and can appreciate his unique relationship with his dog. \\n\\n2. Emotional Depth and Balance: Scenario 2 presents Eric as a more balanced and emotionally grounded individual. He comes across as passionate about his friendships, studies, and hobbies. He also presents his personality traits, giving the reader a more mixed view of his character. A potential match looking for a serious, well-rounded companion may find this more appealing.\\n\\n3. Communication of Shared Interests: Scenario 1 actively invites potential matches to join in Eric's adventures, implying a desire for someone willing to engage in similar activities. On the other hand, Scenario 2 does this more subtly, hinting at his preferences.\\n\\n4. Life Approach: Scenario 1 projects a light-hearted and fun approach to life. Scenario 2, however, reflects a more thoughtful, structured way of living. \\n\\nBased on these considerations, both scenarios have the potential to attract a match, but it all depends on what the potential match values in their partner.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 is likely to attract someone who appreciates light-hearted humor, playful interaction, and active participation in shared activities. \\n\\nScenario 2 would likely appeal more to someone who values emotional depth, balance, and a mixture of active and passive interactions.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 29 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 2, score 8.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 0, score 3.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth scenarios have their charming points, however, Scenario 1 has a slightly more interesting and relatable tone. Eric's creativity and humor are shown through his charming presentation of his life with Scott, his beagle. He successfully makes a story out of mundane activities, turning them into engaging accounts that intrigue and entertain the reader. The jovial, light-hearted vibe of scenario one could convey a dynamic and fun-loving personality that is desirable on a dating app.\\n\\nFurthermore, Eric's admission of being 'average' in looks but having other attributes such as humor and a knack for making people smile portray his honesty and self-awareness. This humbleness along with a realistic view of himself can be seen as an attractive trait, especially to those weary of boastful or superficial profiles.\\n\\nAlso, his love for his pet adds a certain softness to his persona, showing Eric as a compassionate and caring individual. This, paired with subtle remarks about sharing adventures, indicates that he is genuinely interested in finding a so-mate to enjoy life with him.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Eric seems like a fun and light-hearted person based on his bio, he has a great sense of humor and a love for animals, which I find really attractive. He is also academically driven, which is important to me.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric's bio feels more personal and engaging. His anecdotes about his playful disputes with his beagle, Scott, are charming and tell me that he isn't too serious and knows how to have fun. He also seems self-aware about his looks and height, which shows that he's confident. I like that he demonstrates a love for adventure and that he is open to sharing this affection with a potential match. In this scenario, he also expresses an interest in food, indicating that he might enjoy cooking or trying new restaurants. It's clear that he appreciates humor, which is something that I value too. It's a bonus that he loves dad jokes because so do I! \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, although he still mentions his love for tennis and his dog, he doesn't seem as exciting or compelling as in Scenario 1. The description of him being 'buried in books' might imply that he doesn't have much time for social activities. The tone is a bit more serious and less engaging compared to Scenario 1. \\n\\nGiven my reasoning, I would be more likely to swipe right on Scenario 1. Eric seems more like a vibrant and humorous person with a love for life, animals, and good food, which aligns more with what I'm looking for in a potential partner.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both profiles are compelling in that they showcase Eric's humor, his love for his pet, his passion for tennis, and his commitment to his studies. However, Scenario 1 communicates these aspects in an engaging storytelling manner. It reveals more aspects of Eric's personality, such as his sense of humor and his ability to make light of competitive situations (such as his 'battles' with his beagle over socks). These stories and anecdotes make his profile more relatable and humorous. Scenario 1 also gives an idea of what a relationship or potential date with Eric might look like - sharing adventures and laughter, perhaps spending time with his dog. In contrast, Scenario 2 provides similar information about Eric, but in a more straightforward and less personalized manner. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning text: Both scenarios depict a humorous and charming personality, which can be attractive to many individuals. The first scenario more professionally and clearly displays Eric\\'s passion for animals, outdoors, education, and the importance of a potential partner who shares these interests. It\\'s also more emotionally appealing, painting a more vivid picture of his daily life. \\n\\nThe second scenario is more deliberate in its humor and playfulness, describing \"sock skirmishes\" and being outsmarted by Scott. It\\'s more personal, casual and makes Eric sound like a fun-loving, not always strictly serious guy. It puts emphasis on a partner who enjoys fun, humor, and isn\\'t afraid to be a little silly. \\n\\nHowever, the second scenario is a bit longer, which may not hold people\\'s attention as well as the first. Dating profiles often benefit from being concise and to the point. For these reasons, the first scenario might be more likely to attract a match who shares Eric\\'s interests and values.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhile both the bios share essential details about Eric, his love for his dog, interest in tennis, and student life, the way these details are shared affect the appeal of the profile.\\n\\nScenario 1 is more structured and serious. It clearly and directly mentions what Eric is seeking in a partner, starting with shared interests such as affection for animals and outdoor activities, a value for education, and maintaining a zest for life. This helps users who don't resonate with these values self-filter out, making it easier to attract matches sharing Eric's priorities. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, takes a more humorous and laid-back approach. Engaging the reader with slight self-depreciation, humor, and a playful peek into Eric's life with Scott makes it more fun and adds a sense of personality to the bio. However, this scenario doesn't explicitly mention desirable partner qualities, which would mean Eric might attract a broader range of people, but possibly fewer matches that share his specific interests.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario preference would depend on the kind of person Eric wants to attract. If he wants someone who shares his specific values and interests, Scenario 1 would be more compatible. If he wants to attract a broader, more fun-loving audience, Scenario 2 would work better. Since the goal is to find a match who shares Eric's interests and values, I would recommend Scenario 1.\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios provide an excellent picture of who Eric is as an individual. They showcase his love for his dog Scott, his passion for tennis, and his dedication to his studies. However, the tone and style of the two descriptions might appeal to different demographics of potential matches.\\n\\nScenario 1 comes off as a slightly more mature and down-to-earth, focusing on shared interests and a common love for dogs. This may attract someone who is also looking for a stable, calm relationship and prefers a more straightforward approach.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is more humorous and light-hearted, potentially appealing to a more fun-loving, adventurous potential partner who enjoys humor and spontaneity.\\n\\nTherefore, the choice between the two scenarios should depend on the type of partner Eric is seeking. If he prefers a mature, steady relationship with a shared interest in pets and leisure activities, then Scenario 1 might be the best fit for him. However, if he's looking for someone lively, spontaneous, and with a great sense of humor, Scenario 2 may be the better option. \\n\\nAnswer: This will be subjective based on Eric's individual preferences.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 29 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 2, score 8.0\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 3.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"As both scenarios are richly descriptive and charming, they make Eric seem like an appealing and well-rounded person. Yet, I would lean more towards Scenario 2 for the following reasons:\\n\\n1. Writing Style: Scenario 2 has a more casual, friendly, and playful tone, which seems endearing and relatable. This contrasts with the slightly formal register in Scenario 1 that could feel less approachable. \\n\\n2. Balance Between Life Aspects: While both bios showcase Eric's life, Scenario 2 does a better job of describing various aspects of his life (studies, love for animals, sports) in a balanced, appealing way that isn't dominated by one aspect. \\n\\n3. Interaction Appeal: The last part of his bio in Scenario 2 plays on curiosity to meet him and his dog, which is a clever addition and quite engaging to read. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric as an engaging and likeable person with a good sense of humor and a love for the outdoors and animals - all positive characteristics. However, in Scenario 1, Eric takes the time to mention his interest in a balanced lifestyle which includes spending time with friends, and he comes across as being more social. He also expresses a strong desire to connect on a personal level, is clear about what he values, his expectations, and his vision for the relationship, making him more appealing. In Scenario 2, the description seems more self-centered and lacks the depth and warmth in Eric's self-presentation compared to Scenario 1. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: In going through the two profiles, I appreciate the honest and genuine feeling from both scenarios. Eric seems like an interactive and engaging person who values a good sense of humor, education, outdoor activities, and has a love for animals which are qualities that I am looking for in a potential partner. \\n\\nHowever, when comparing the two scenarios, I particularly resonate more with the second one. The tone in scenario 2 appears more casual and playful, which gives off a more approachable and relaxed energy. I find this attractive as it shows Eric's personality and style in an easy and light manner. His playful comment about seeing if he's as cute as his dog also stands out as a sweet and funny remark that gives a slight hint of flirtation which makes the profile seem more engaging and potentially makes me more interested in him.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios offer a detailed and personalized account of Eric's personality and interests. However, the kind of person attracted to each would slightly be different. Scenario 1 seems more informal, energetic, and more about adventure and fun--great for attracting people who are into spontaneity and light-heartedness. The playful, humorous tone might be attractive to people who appreciate humour and a laid-back personality. It also directly mentions the wish to meet someone who appreciates the same things.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, presents a more intellectual, composed, yet friendly and approachable character. The humour is still present, but more subdued. It also includes additional information about enjoying time with friends, valuing loyalty, and being down-to-earth which might attract people who value social connections, loyalty, and simplicity. \\n\\nSince Eric is looking for a potential girlfriend who shares his interests and more quiet way of living, balancing both his love for outdoor activities, his pet, and intellectual pursuits. Scenario 2 offers a more comprehensive perspective of his characteristics and what he values in others, therefore making it more likely to attract a person who is interested in these specific qualities.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nI believe that Scenario 1 would be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values. This is because it paints a very vivid picture of the kind of person I am, using a more casual and fun tone that makes it easy to visualize what a day in my life looks like. \\n\\nThe scenario includes specific examples of what I enjoy doing, such as playing tennis and taking walks with my dog, directly addressing the potential match's compatibility in participating in these activities. Furthermore, I explicitly state that I am looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and affection for animals, which clearly communicates the qualities I value in a partner. \\n\\nWhile I mention my average looks and height, I immediately balance it out with my intellectual interests and outdoorsy hobbies. This shows I am self-aware yet confident – a combination that is attractive to many people.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 feels more rigid and formal in tone, which can be less engaging for potential matches. It does not paint as vibrant a picture of my hobbies and personality, appearing less enthusiastic and filled with clichés about balance and enthusiasm that are common in many dating profiles. By veering away from clichés, Scenario 1 feels more original and authentic.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nPersonally, I would prefer scenario 1 and here's why:\\n\\n1. Language: While both scenarios are detailed and present a clear image of who I am, Scenario 1 uses more relaxed, adventurous, and playful language. It portrays me as someone excited about life and its surprises, and this positive energy is likely to attract a potential match.\\n\\n2. Details: Scenario 1 equals Scenario 2 in detailing my love for animals, outdoor activities, and education. However, it also hints that real life is just as important to me as the world within the books, making me appear more rounded.\\n\\n3. Engagement: The direct question at the end of Scenario 1 can make the reader become more engaged and invest more personal interest, possibly increasing my chances of receiving a response.\\n\\nWhile Scenario 2 is more traditional and formal, which might appeal to some, Scenario 1 in my opinion expresses more personality and makes the reader feel like they were part of my story.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 54 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 0, score 5.0\n",
      "0_1, generation 2, score 10.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! I'm a university undergrad with a heart for animals and an undying passion for tennis. I can whip up a mean backhand in the courts, or be the calmest companion for my adorable beagle named Scott in the park. I love spending my free time exploring life with a curious eye and an open mind. Every compromise leads to a story, so I'm looking for someone with whom I can write the next chapter. If you're someone who appreciates serene walks with a canine friend or enjoys exhilarating matches on the tennis court, we might just hit it off! Can't wait to explore the possibilities with you. P.S., I promise I'm not as intense as this bio makes me sound ;)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios present Eric as a likable guy with hobbies and passions which make him seem outgoing, friendly, and easy-going. However, the first scenario creates a better picture of Eric's personality and lifestyle.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric not only talks about his love for tennis and animals but also dives deeper into his personality. His description of himself as average height with nerdiness and charisma seems relatable and unpretentious. The fact that he states he enjoys deep authentic conversations shows he is open to getting to know someone beyond the surface level. Also, he clearly defines himself as more of a friendly-next-door-guy than a Hollywood movie knight, which might reduce potential pressure or expectations.\\n\\nFurthermore, his statement about valuing simplicity and sincerity indicates he's not interested in playing games or becoming involved in drama, which is a positive trait for a potential romantic partner. His reference to the possibility of being a potential plus-one to a tennis match or a dog walk contributes to an idea of a shared experience, which can be appealing. \\n\\nOn the other hand, scenario 2, though expressing a similar sentiment, feels a bit condensed and lacks the personal touch that Eric includes in his first bio. His personality doesn't shine through quite as well, and the end statement about him not being as intense as the bio makes him sound might have the opposite effect and make him seem intense after all.\\n\\nThe choice, therefore, leans toward Eric's first profile because of its authenticity, comprehensive personal details, and the clear indication of his expectations and openness toward prospective matches.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios present Eric in a positive light and provide interesting elements about him. Both share his love for animals, tennis, and spending time with his friends.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric proves more detailed in his self-description. He gives you a glimpse into his university life, his interests, and his personality. Furthermore, he invites you to share your passions and subtly exhibits his willingness to listen and engage in meaningful conversations. His authentic and approachable demeanor is sure to appeal to anyone looking for a sincere and genuine partner. He also introduces his pet, adding more charm to his personality and showing a responsible side. More importantly, he places emphasis on connecting with 'genuine spirits', which hints at his valuing authenticity in a relationship.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 seems a little intense and less personal. While it displays wit and includes his love for animals and tennis, it's lacking the personal warmth that's present in Scenario 1. A biographical sketch of his character is missing, making it harder to perceive his personality through the words. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'reasoning text\\n\\nAs a young woman looking for a potentially meaningful relationship on a dating app, having a candid insight into Eric\\'s personality is crucial in determining if we might have a connection. \\n\\nNo doubt in both scenarios, Eric appears as a genuine, outgoing guy, but the approach in each scenario elicits different impressions. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, he not only tells about his interests and his life, but also adds a few things about how he interacts with his interests and even his dog Scott. I like how he describes himself in terms of how he fits into a room - \"average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma\". It adds depth to him and gives a vivid image of his personality. He also communicates his desire for deep, authentic conversations, which hints at emotional intelligence, something that could lead to a stronger and more fulfilling connection in the long term. \\n\\nScenario 2, while concise and still paints Eric as an interesting character, it lacks a bit of the detail that is seen the first scenario, making it come off somewhat generic.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! I'm a university undergrad with a heart for animals and an undying passion for tennis. I can whip up a mean backhand in the courts, or be the calmest companion for my adorable beagle named Scott in the park. I love spending my free time exploring life with a curious eye and an open mind. Every compromise leads to a story, so I'm looking for someone with whom I can write the next chapter. If you're someone who appreciates serene walks with a canine friend or enjoys exhilarating matches on the tennis court, we might just hit it off! Can't wait to explore the possibilities with you. P.S., I promise I'm not as intense as this bio makes me sound ;)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Scenario 1 would potentially attract a more suitable match for Eric. This bio hasn\\'t just listed what Eric enjoys, but it speaks about why he feels the way he does towards his hobbies. Mentioning his deep love for animals is bound to attract a person who shares the same outlook and his enthusiasm for his dog Scott not only presents him as a loving pet owner but also as capable of commitment and affection. His representation of himself as a down-to-earth, genuine guy, interested in \"deep, authentic conversations\" will attract someone who values sincerity. Also, his invitation to connect based on passions and shared interests and see where things can lead seems to promise a relaxed, non-pressurizing approach which many would find refreshing in the dating world.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nDating profiles provide a crucial first impression, and they should be carefully constructed to reflect one's personality and showcase their values and interests in an appealing way. Both scenarios presented have their own merits, however, there are a few determinants which tilt towards one of them. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, a detailed and friendly narrative about who you are is provided. The language is simple, but rich in creating a vivid representation of what life looks like around you. It is more personal, providing details about you and what you enjoy doing. Specifically mentioning your love for tennis and your dog Scott builds a clearer picture of your lifestyle. Plus, the invitation for the reader to share about their passion might elicit responses from those who appreciate deep conversations. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is direct and concise while maintaining the underlying theme of humor. It puts the focus on the activity and animal loving aspects, setting a fun tone. While still engaging, it gives less insight into your personality than Scenario 1.\\n\\nGiven these points, the ultimate deciding factor would be if the profile bio seems to create a genuine connection and spark interest. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios present a bit about Eric's life, interests, and personality, however, the way they're written can appeal to different kinds of people. Context-wise, both scenarios appeal to those who love animals or have an interest in tennis, but the tonality differs.\\n\\nScenario 1 comes off as more personal, engaging, friendly, and warm. It details more aspects of his life and personality – it mentions Eric's love for deep conversations, his love for his beagle, Scott, his interest in hearing about other people's passions, and portrays a good balance of his intellectual side still raising his charisma and sense of humor which could be appealing for people looking to have more meaningful connections. \\n\\nIn comparison, Scenario 2 feels slightly more intense, straightforward, and focuses more on Eric's interests and activities. It seems more to the point and less personal in terms of revealing his nature and traits, which some people might find attractive.\\n\\nThus the decision of which scenario will be more likely to attract a potential match that shares Eric's interests and values depends on what the potential match values in a bio - deeper personal insight shared in a friendly conversational tone (Scenario 1) or the more direct showcasing of interests (Scenario 2).\\n\\nAnswer: It depends on the nature of the potential match.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 54 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 0, score 5.0\n",
      "0_2, generation 1, score 10.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! Eric here, university student by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog-dad all day, every day. I proudly split my free time between serving aces and spoiling my adorable beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're into sports, nature walks with a friendly four-legged companion, or just having a good laugh, then we're already off to a great start! I'm proudly average on the height and looks department, but my sense of humor and love for animals might leave you 'barking' up this tree now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "Love for animals is a must, especially if you don't mind the occasional dog hair on your clothes. Tennis skills are optional, though I wouldn't mind teaching you a thing or two on the court. \n",
      "\n",
      "Swipe right if you're up for some fun, some tennis, and perhaps, some Scott! Here to find my doubles partner, in life and in tennis. Ready to serve my heart. (Please, no returns!)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! I'm a university undergrad with a heart for animals and an undying passion for tennis. I can whip up a mean backhand in the courts, or be the calmest companion for my adorable beagle named Scott in the park. I love spending my free time exploring life with a curious eye and an open mind. Every compromise leads to a story, so I'm looking for someone with whom I can write the next chapter. If you're someone who appreciates serene walks with a canine friend or enjoys exhilarating matches on the tennis court, we might just hit it off! Can't wait to explore the possibilities with you. P.S., I promise I'm not as intense as this bio makes me sound ;)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['The first scenario, the bio is more light-hearted and personable. He comes across as playful, setting a relaxed tone with quips and jokes, and his love for his dog, Scott, is quite endearing. The mention of \"barking\" up the tree might indicate he even has a slightly silly, self-deprecating sense of humor. His equivalence of looking for a \"doubles partner\" in tennis and in life adds a sweet touch and does a good job of tying his interests back into what he\\'s looking for from a potential partner. All these factors make this profile quite approachable.\\n\\nMeanwhile, the second scenario, while still detailing Eric\\'s primary interests, takes a more serious tone overall. Phrases like \"exploring life with a curious eye and an open mind\" and \"every compromise leads a a story\" do paint him to be thoughtful and flexible. Yet he maybe comes across as a bit intense in this bio, even though he tries to offset this with his postscript note.\\n\\nConsidering these points, I would be more likely to swipe right on Scenario 1. It\\'s certainly the first scenario which gives us the impression of a fun, relaxed person with a sense of humour and a strong love for pets, which is something to be appreciated. He is looking for someone to have fun with whether it is playing tennis or spending time with his dog, Scott.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"Reasoning: \\nBetween scenario 1 and scenario 2, I would be more likely to swipe right on Eric in scenario 1. Here are my reasons:\\n\\nIn scenario 1, Eric's humor and candidness come through much stronger. He's not afraid to be slightly self-deprecating about his looks and height, which is endearing and a sign of confidence. His tone is warm and approachable, and the little touches of humor sprinkled throughout the bio ('barking up this tree', 'ready to serve my heart') bring out his personality more vividly.\\n\\nThe mention of his beloved pet Scott is also more detailed and fun in scenario 1. You can tell he loves his pet and values companionship, which is a sweet and attractive trait. \\n\\nAlso, the fact that he mentions he enjoys teaching tennis is a great talking point and allows for potential fun dates in the future. It's clear in this scenario that he's a person who loves interacting with others and doesn't take himself too seriously, which are both very attractive traits in a partner.\\n\\nIn contrast, scenario 2 came across as just a bit too formal and less personal for a dating app bio.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", 'As a young woman, I am more inclined to swipe right on Eric\\'s profile in scenario 1. The reason being that his personality shines through his bio more vividly. In this scenario, he has portrayed himself as a fun-loving, jovial individual with a good sense of humor by making light comments about himself and his dog. His love for his pet also suggests a nurturing and empathetic side. Moreover, he clearly states what he expects from the potential match, which showcases his honesty and directness.\\n\\nHis offer to teach tennis also indicates patience and his interest in sharing his passions with someone else. Even though he mentioned that he\\'s \"average\" in height and looks, his confident ownership of that fact, coupled with highlighting his humor and kind-heartedness, indicates a good sense of self-esteem and a healthy level of self-acceptance, which is quite attractive.\\n\\nLastly, the whimsical way he ended his bio, suggesting a fun and coming across as kind-hearted, gave me a positive impression and has piqued my curiosity to know him better as it sounds like he wants something serious but at the same time enjoyable.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! Eric here, university student by day, tennis enthusiast by evening, and dog-dad all day, every day. I proudly split my free time between serving aces and spoiling my adorable beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're into sports, nature walks with a friendly four-legged companion, or just having a good laugh, then we're already off to a great start! I'm proudly average on the height and looks department, but my sense of humor and love for animals might leave you 'barking' up this tree now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "Love for animals is a must, especially if you don't mind the occasional dog hair on your clothes. Tennis skills are optional, though I wouldn't mind teaching you a thing or two on the court. \n",
      "\n",
      "Swipe right if you're up for some fun, some tennis, and perhaps, some Scott! Here to find my doubles partner, in life and in tennis. Ready to serve my heart. (Please, no returns!)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! I'm a university undergrad with a heart for animals and an undying passion for tennis. I can whip up a mean backhand in the courts, or be the calmest companion for my adorable beagle named Scott in the park. I love spending my free time exploring life with a curious eye and an open mind. Every compromise leads to a story, so I'm looking for someone with whom I can write the next chapter. If you're someone who appreciates serene walks with a canine friend or enjoys exhilarating matches on the tennis court, we might just hit it off! Can't wait to explore the possibilities with you. P.S., I promise I'm not as intense as this bio makes me sound ;)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning:\\n\\nLooking at the two bio options, both provide a good amount of information about my interests, lifestyle, and personality. However, there are subtle differences in tone and delivery that might impact how a reader perceives me.\\n\\nScenario 1 has a more playful tone and evokes a fun-loving and casual persona. This version gives off a less serious vibe by making light-hearted statements, like referring to myself as \"dog-dad\" or making puns about tennis and dogs. This tone might connect well with people who appreciate humor and casual conversation. \\n\\nOn another note, this version emphasizes the importance of loving animals, which is something that is important to me. And yet, it still handles the topic in a light-hearted and charming way. This might attract matches who are animal lovers and also have a sense of humor. This bio also mentions tennis several times, underlining this passion and setting an expectation that this interest is something that would be part of a potential relationship.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is more serious and formal. This version focuses more on tennis and less on animals, only mentioning my dog Scott once. There are also broader statements about exploring life and looking for someone to share the next chapter of life, which suggests a slightly more serious intent in dating. This might appeal more to those looking for a thoughtful and mature relationship.\\n\\nAnswer: Taking all this into account, my choice would lean toward Scenario 1. It does a better job of highlighting both my important interests – tennis and animals – all while keeping a fun and casual tone. It aligns better with the casual, fun-loving relationship I am looking for while ensuring that my key interests are emphasized to attract matches who share them.', '[reasoning text]\\n\\nScenario 1 appears more informal, fun and vibrant to me, which can draw in those who like a light-hearted and humor-filled bio. It effectively emphasizes Eric\\'s love for his dog, Scott, and his enthusiasm for tennis. This explicit display could be appealing for potentials who have a particular love for those same interests. Furthermore, incorporating humor and easygoing language can create a more approachable impression, making users feel comfortable swiping right.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 appears more introspective and profound. This may attract users that prefer thought-provoking and meaningful bios. The serious tone might attract potentials who appreciate depth and introspection. Also, it hints a more emotional side of him with phrases like \"I can write the next chapter,\" which suggests Eric might be looking to develop a deeper emotional relationship rather than just casual dating.\\n\\nHowever, a tennis enthusiast might be attracted to both profiles. Eric\\'s humor, straightforward love for animals, and enthusiasm for tennis in Scenario 1 might be appealing to some, while others might be attracted to the philosophical nature and emotional depth of Scenario 2.\\n\\nTo answer the main question, both scenarios may attract people who share Eric\\'s love for animals, tennis, and perhaps sense of humor or introspective nature. However, it ultimately would come down to the kind of personality or disposition a potential match might have - whether they\\'d prefer a fun, lively connection or a deep, thoughtful one.\\n\\nAnswer: It depends on the personal preference of the potential match.', \"Reasoning:   \\nIn both scenarios, Eric has clearly communicated his love for tennis and animals which are central parts of his life. However, the tone and presentation vary between the two scenarios. In Scenario 1, Eric adopts a light-hearted and humorous tone. He interacts directly with the reader at several points, using a touch of humor to create a friendly and relatable first impression. In comparison, Scenario 2 is slightly more intense in tone and paints Eric as a bit more serious and introspective, but still engaging. \\n\\nIn terms of content, the first scenario is more suitable for attracting someone who values a good sense of humor and might be interested in learning tennis. In addition, the playful mention of his dog Scott might appeal to fellow dog lovers. Comparatively, the second scenario correlates with someone who appreciates a more intellectual conversation and might already have an interest in tennis. The intensity of the bio suggests a person with strong passions who, while still valuing humor, may appreciate more serious or deep conversation. \\n\\nLastly, both scenarios balance the fun and serious aspects of Eric's character, but by attracting slightly different audiences. \\n\\nAnswer: The best scenario would depend on the type of person Eric wants to attract. If he wants to appeal to someone who appreciates humor and a more laid-back meeting with slight curiosity towards tennis, Scenario 1 might be more suitable. If he prefers someone who is already interested in tennis and appreciates a more serious tone, Scenario 2 could work better.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 54 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 2, score 9.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 0, score 4.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth scenarios have their charming points, however, Scenario 1 has a slightly more interesting and relatable tone. Eric's creativity and humor are shown through his charming presentation of his life with Scott, his beagle. He successfully makes a story out of mundane activities, turning them into engaging accounts that intrigue and entertain the reader. The jovial, light-hearted vibe of scenario one could convey a dynamic and fun-loving personality that is desirable on a dating app.\\n\\nFurthermore, Eric's admission of being 'average' in looks but having other attributes such as humor and a knack for making people smile portray his honesty and self-awareness. This humbleness along with a realistic view of himself can be seen as an attractive trait, especially to those weary of boastful or superficial profiles.\\n\\nAlso, his love for his pet adds a certain softness to his persona, showing Eric as a compassionate and caring individual. This, paired with subtle remarks about sharing adventures, indicates that he is genuinely interested in finding a so-mate to enjoy life with him.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Eric seems like a fun and light-hearted person based on his bio, he has a great sense of humor and a love for animals, which I find really attractive. He is also academically driven, which is important to me.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric's bio feels more personal and engaging. His anecdotes about his playful disputes with his beagle, Scott, are charming and tell me that he isn't too serious and knows how to have fun. He also seems self-aware about his looks and height, which shows that he's confident. I like that he demonstrates a love for adventure and that he is open to sharing this affection with a potential match. In this scenario, he also expresses an interest in food, indicating that he might enjoy cooking or trying new restaurants. It's clear that he appreciates humor, which is something that I value too. It's a bonus that he loves dad jokes because so do I! \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, although he still mentions his love for tennis and his dog, he doesn't seem as exciting or compelling as in Scenario 1. The description of him being 'buried in books' might imply that he doesn't have much time for social activities. The tone is a bit more serious and less engaging compared to Scenario 1. \\n\\nGiven my reasoning, I would be more likely to swipe right on Scenario 1. Eric seems more like a vibrant and humorous person with a love for life, animals, and good food, which aligns more with what I'm looking for in a potential partner.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both profiles are compelling in that they showcase Eric's humor, his love for his pet, his passion for tennis, and his commitment to his studies. However, Scenario 1 communicates these aspects in an engaging storytelling manner. It reveals more aspects of Eric's personality, such as his sense of humor and his ability to make light of competitive situations (such as his 'battles' with his beagle over socks). These stories and anecdotes make his profile more relatable and humorous. Scenario 1 also gives an idea of what a relationship or potential date with Eric might look like - sharing adventures and laughter, perhaps spending time with his dog. In contrast, Scenario 2 provides similar information about Eric, but in a more straightforward and less personalized manner. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning text: Both scenarios depict a humorous and charming personality, which can be attractive to many individuals. The first scenario more professionally and clearly displays Eric\\'s passion for animals, outdoors, education, and the importance of a potential partner who shares these interests. It\\'s also more emotionally appealing, painting a more vivid picture of his daily life. \\n\\nThe second scenario is more deliberate in its humor and playfulness, describing \"sock skirmishes\" and being outsmarted by Scott. It\\'s more personal, casual and makes Eric sound like a fun-loving, not always strictly serious guy. It puts emphasis on a partner who enjoys fun, humor, and isn\\'t afraid to be a little silly. \\n\\nHowever, the second scenario is a bit longer, which may not hold people\\'s attention as well as the first. Dating profiles often benefit from being concise and to the point. For these reasons, the first scenario might be more likely to attract a match who shares Eric\\'s interests and values.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhile both the bios share essential details about Eric, his love for his dog, interest in tennis, and student life, the way these details are shared affect the appeal of the profile.\\n\\nScenario 1 is more structured and serious. It clearly and directly mentions what Eric is seeking in a partner, starting with shared interests such as affection for animals and outdoor activities, a value for education, and maintaining a zest for life. This helps users who don't resonate with these values self-filter out, making it easier to attract matches sharing Eric's priorities. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, takes a more humorous and laid-back approach. Engaging the reader with slight self-depreciation, humor, and a playful peek into Eric's life with Scott makes it more fun and adds a sense of personality to the bio. However, this scenario doesn't explicitly mention desirable partner qualities, which would mean Eric might attract a broader range of people, but possibly fewer matches that share his specific interests.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario preference would depend on the kind of person Eric wants to attract. If he wants someone who shares his specific values and interests, Scenario 1 would be more compatible. If he wants to attract a broader, more fun-loving audience, Scenario 2 would work better. Since the goal is to find a match who shares Eric's interests and values, I would recommend Scenario 1.\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios provide an excellent picture of who Eric is as an individual. They showcase his love for his dog Scott, his passion for tennis, and his dedication to his studies. However, the tone and style of the two descriptions might appeal to different demographics of potential matches.\\n\\nScenario 1 comes off as a slightly more mature and down-to-earth, focusing on shared interests and a common love for dogs. This may attract someone who is also looking for a stable, calm relationship and prefers a more straightforward approach.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is more humorous and light-hearted, potentially appealing to a more fun-loving, adventurous potential partner who enjoys humor and spontaneity.\\n\\nTherefore, the choice between the two scenarios should depend on the type of partner Eric is seeking. If he prefers a mature, steady relationship with a shared interest in pets and leisure activities, then Scenario 1 might be the best fit for him. However, if he's looking for someone lively, spontaneous, and with a great sense of humor, Scenario 2 may be the better option. \\n\\nAnswer: This will be subjective based on Eric's individual preferences.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 54 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_3, generation 0, score 9.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 0, score 4.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Both scenarios present interesting aspects of Eric's personality; however, I would be more inclined to swipe right on Scenario 1.\\n\\nReasoning:\\nScenario 1 paints a more balanced picture of Eric. He presents himself as a down-to-earth person who enjoys his studies, sports, and friends but can also appreciate the unexpected fun that can come from a lighter moment, like being invaded by his dog during a tennis match. The genuine love for his dog, Scott, is heartfelt and the humor he incorporates into the story of Scott's tennis court incident makes him seem approachable and funny.\\n\\nThe fact that he spends his free time both with his friends and his dog implies that he values socialization, but also has a nurturing side. His mentioning of intellectual conversations suggests he values intelligence and communication in a potential match, and his humorous, light-hearted tone throughout the bio makes him seem easy-going.\\n\\nWhile Scenario 2 also shows Eric's sense of humor and love for his dog, it contains less balanced information about his life and interests. The constant mentioning of the dog might indicate that he centers his life too much around his pet. Furthermore, his self-deprecating jokes about his looks and height could be interpreted as insecurity, which might not be attractive to some.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Answer: Scenario 2\\n\\nReasoning: Eric's bio in Scenario 2 is much more engaging and humorous, which is appealing. His description is amusing and personal, painting a vivid picture of his life that includes Scott, the beagle. The dynamic between him and his dog Scott shows not only his love for animals but also a great deal of humor and humility, which are attractive qualities. He seems self-aware and doesn't take himself too seriously, admitting that he isn't the epitome of physical perfection but compensates with his comedic side and genial nature. Another appealing factor is his informal and easy-going writing style, which makes him seem more approachable and relatable. The humor integrated throughout the scenario makes his profile stand out, suggesting a shared good time, laughter, and fun experiences, especially for someone who also loves animals. Additionally, Eric's playful challenge to join him and Scott in their adventures could be quite tempting for anyone looking for a fun-loving, authentic partner.\", 'After reading through both scenarios, I am more likely to swipe right on Eric\\'s profile in Scenario 1.\\n\\nReasoning:\\n\\nFirst off, Eric describes himself as a \"down-to-earth\" guy, and immediately shares his passions and balance in his life which includes academics and physical health. This shows a great combination of seriousness and fun, which is attractive. \\n\\nSecondly, Eric’s introduction of his adored pet, Scott, and relating it back to his own hobbies, is not only hilarious but also adorable. This scenario not only shows his sense of humor, which I find very attractive, but also his sweet spot for animals. Having a soft spot for animals suggests empathy and kindness, which are valuable qualities in a partner.\\n\\nNext, in discussing that even though he lost a match due to his dog\\'s unexpected participation, he gained a great story, indicates that he doesn’t mind laughing at himself and knows how to have fun. This is attractive as it presents him as someone light-hearted and jovial.\\n\\nFinally, Eric\\'s note at the end hinting at intellectual conversations also appeals to me as I value deep and meaningful conversations.\\n\\nIn contrast, while Scenario 2 is equally humorous, it lacks the depth I found in Scenario 1. It feels a bit too casual and doesn\\'t give off indicators of deeper qualities like empathy and intellectual values as showcased in Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning:\\n\\nI considered the language, tone, fellow interests, and personality of the profile while making a decision. While both the scenarios are positive, expressive, and engaging, they each have a different appeal.\\n\\nScenario 1 is laid-back, funny, and sounds more like a casual conversation. It presents a vivid outline of daily life with Scott and a good balance of my love for tennis and friends. The bio endorses my average looks as a fun fact rather than a deterrence, which showcases my humor and humility. This scenario will likely attract matches who appreciate humor, fun, and those who are animal lovers.\\n\\nScenario 2 is more straightforward and sticks to facts more than storytelling. It underpins my nature as a student, my active love for tennis, and the significance of my dog Scott in my life. The charm here is in showing the fun but slightly restrained side of me. It may attract the attention of those who appreciate a balance of sports, academia, and love for animals.\\n\\nGiven the eccentricity and humor creates a strong impression, indicating uniqueness and genuineness, I think scenario 1 would most likely attract a potential match as it feels more individualistic and engaging.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Scenario 1 will be a likely choice for a potential girlfriend who values humor and light-heartedness. It has a casual, fun-loving tone and portrays me as someone who doesn\\'t take himself too seriously, which may appeal to many people looking for a genuine and enjoyable relationship. The mention of my dog Scott participating actively in daily activities can also attract animal lovers. Moreover, it appears more engaging because of the fun details about the \"sock wars\" and the self-deprecating humor about my looks and height. People might find this openness about my perceived flaws endearing and authentic, thus making them more likely to swipe right.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, could appeal to those who prefer a bit more serious and thoughtful presentation. Although it also discusses my dog Scott and my love for tennis, it does so in a more formal way. This could potentially attract someone who values intellect and meaningful conversation. However, it may also come off as slightly less engaging due to its toned-down humor and lack of vivacious details compared to Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios have their unique appeals but making this decision would require a consideration of the following factors:\\n\\n1. Target audience: The tone of the write-up should have a resonance with the kind of person I want to attract. If I'm hoping to attract a light-hearted, easy-going person who enjoys humor and casual banter, then Scenario 1 would be more suitable. On the other hand, if I want someone more serious and traditional, then Scenario 2 could work better.\\n\\n2. Personal Style: It is essential to stay true to one's personality. If I'm a naturally humorous and quirky person, Scenario 1 would be more reflective of who I am. In contrast, if I am more formal and straightforward, Scenario 2 would represent me better.\\n\\n3. Sincerity: Scenario 2 seems more genuine and down-to-earth which could appeal more to someone who values authenticity.\\n\\nConsidering all these factors, if I am a fun-loving person looking to attract a similar personality while being genuine and not taking myself too seriously, then Scenario 1 would work better for me. It contains more of my personality and my unique attributes, a balance of humor, and sincerity which can make my profile more relatable and approachable.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 54 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 2, score 10.0\n",
      "2, generation 1, score 5.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Both scenarios present Eric as a genuine, fun-loving, and outgoing individual, which are all qualities I appreciate. However, I feel more drawn towards Scenario 1.\\n\\nReasoning: Scenario 1 feels more vivid and engaging. The sense of humor shines through the text easily, giving it a light-hearted, casual, and comfortable vibe which I deeply prefer. The way he teases about his tennis abilities and dog Scott instantly paints a picture of a fun individual who doesn't take himself too seriously and yet values companionship of his loved ones (including his dog). This scenario does a great job at showcasing Eric's funny side, which is attractive to me.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'I\\'m more likely to swipe right on Scenario 1. \\n\\nEric’s personality feels more approachable and he presents himself with more humor and light-heartedness. Statements like \"just your slightly-above-average guy\" and \"he might steal your heart from me\" suggest a charming self-deprecating sense of humor. Eric also does a nice job of including potential conversation starters in his bio, like the reference to Roland Garros-level forehands in tennis and his beagle, Scott. He implies he\\'s not great at keeping up with his dog, inviting further questions and chats.\\n\\nHe also maintains some ambiguity which prompts intrigue, encouraging the reader to want to know more. For instance, when he says \"a connoisseur of all things Netflix,\" it makes me wonder what shows he likes, and the use of \\'median\\' instead of average hints he might be studying something related to maths or statistics.\\n\\nSo Eric in Scenario 1 seems more laid-back, witty, and engaging, which could be attractive to people navigating the often tense world of online dating. In comparison, in Scenario 2, Eric is slightly more conventional and straightforward, which might seem less engaging to some.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nAs I examine both profiles, I'm considering a few factors: the presentation of their personality, similar interests, and the overall tone the profile sets. \\n\\nScenario 1:\\nIn this scenario, Eric comes across as very outgoing with a playful spirit. His use of humor and lightheartedness is expressed in a way that makes it seem like he likes having fun and doesn't take himself too seriously. He mentions indulging in Netflix which is a shared interest as I love a good series too. His love for tennis and his dog hints at an active lifestyle, something I can appreciate and be part of. This could be a fun and some good times. \\n\\nScenario 2:\\nThis scenario makes Eric appear to be more down-to-earth. His tones are more balanced leaning on sincerity and authenticity. This scenario shows Eric values deep, meaningful conversations, something that should form the core of a romantic relationship. He also mentions his love for tennis and his pet, and a university life, similar to scenario 1. This profile can be seen as more looking for those who are serious about starting a meaningful connection. \\n\\nAnswer: As someone who values deep connections and appreciates authenticity, I resonate more with the sincerity and gentleness of Scenario 2. While a sense of humor and playfulness are indeed charming, for the purposes of a potential romantic relationship, I would feel more drawn to the earnestness, correct balance, and depth presented in the profile of Scenario 2. Therefore, I would more likely swipe right on Scenario 2.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0.5, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios present nice, sincere introductions that could attract potential matches; however, the choice depends on the kind of relationship and person you're looking for. \\n\\nScenario 1 represents a more serious and mature approach. It shows you're looking for deep, authentic conversations and value sincerity. It gives a good introduction to who you are and your interests. It's also comprehensive about your lifestyle and your love for animals. The tennis part is mentioned quickly, but your pet gets a lot of attention, which may attract animal lovers.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, has a more casual and humorous take. This can attract someone who prefers a light-hearted and fun approach. It is equally well written as the first, but the jokes could make you seem more approachable and less serious. The love for animals is still there, but tennis gets a more elaborate part, meaning it might attract fellow tennis enthusiasts more. It's not as focused on deep, authentic conversations or sincerity, but more on having a good laugh together.\\n\\nAnswer: Preference will depend on what you're looking for. For a more serious, sincere relationship, Scenario 1 would be more suitable. For a potential match who enjoys humour and doesn't mind a casually formulated bio, Scenario 2 would be a better choice.\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nIn both scenarios, your personality shines through and your major interests are clearly touched upon - your university life, love for tennis, and your dog Scott. However, based on the share of content in each description, you could potentially attract different types of matches.\\n\\nScenario 1: Here, you indicate that you value deep and authentic conversations and the chance to learn about your match's passions. You highlight your love for animals and tennis, and mention that you're a friendly and simple individual who prefers sincerity over superficiality. If you are looking for someone who shares a passion for intellectual and meaningful discussions, the description in this scenario could be more appealing. \\n\\nScenario 2: In this scenario, you put more emphasis on your sense of humor and a more casual approach. You also appear very open, lighthearted, and less serious about things (you even laugh at your own jokes). The tone in scenario 2 is more fun, inviting matches who love to have a good laugh, take life with a grain of salt, and value fun experiences over deep intellectual ones.\\n\\nAnswer: So the decision of choosing Scenario 1 or Scenario 2 greatly depends on the type of person you're looking forward to meeting on this dating app and the type of relationship you aim to build. If you prefer meaningful conversations and a more serious tone, then go for Scenario 1. However, if you are more into a fun, easy-going, humorous relationship, then Scenario 2 could be your best bet. It is all about aligning your own personality and desires with your potential match's.\\n\", 'Scenario 1 seems to more effectively convey who I am and what I am looking for in a dating relationship. \\n\\nFirstly, the intro is a good mix of humor and information about my current situation in life, which makes it an inviting read for anyone skimming through profiles. Secondly, it contains specific details about my interests and my pet, Scott, which can serve as conversation starters. \\n\\nAdditionally, this bio comes off as genuine and open, which is more likely to attract someone who values honesty and authenticity. It also invites the reader to share about her own interests or passions, indicating that I am not just interested in talking about me, but I am also genuinely interested in getting to know her, suggesting that I value communication in a relationship.\\n\\nLastly, I describe myself in a simple and humble way, further creating an image of authenticity and approachability. This gives the potential match an idea that I might not be the most jacked or tallest guy out there, but I have other qualities that she might find attractive.\\n\\nHence, my choice is: \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 64 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 1, score 1.0\n",
      "3, generation 1, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: \\n\\nScenario 1 portrays Eric as humorous, authentic and well-rounded. There’s an immediate sense of his personality and interests, and the additional details about his pet, Scott, add a layer of relatability and charm. He is intelligent, as indicated by his academic pursuits, and has a good sense of humor, which he showcases throughout his bio with light-hearted self-deprecation. The rom-com metaphor he uses to describe the relationship he\\'s looking for suggests he\\'s romantic, but also aware that relationships can have their exciting and challenging moments, indicating maturity.  \\n\\nScenario 2 is also compelling, but it\\'s a bit less personal and detailed. The story about Scott disrupting a tennis match gives a glimpse into Eric\\'s daily life and humor, and his promise of \"good laughs, earnest conversations,\" represents his character well. However, compared to scenario 1, it falls a little short in showcasing his personality and the unique attributes he might bring to a potential relationship. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning:\\n\\nWhen analyzing both scenarios, there are several factors to consider. A good dating app bio, in my perspective, should portray the person\\'s personality vividly, should share a bit of their personal life, showcase their humor, and invite engagement subtly.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric introduced himself and his life beautifully. The way he compared his height with his grades showed his sense of humor and self-awareness. He also mentioned looking for a co-star, which could be seen as inviting the reader to participate in his life story. Plus, he seems serious about finding a connection as he references preparing for an \"adventure\".\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric shared a fun story about his dog Scott which displays spontaneity and adds a personal touch. He promised laughter, honest conversations, and a meaningful connection beyond the online platform. However, it lacked a bit of personal information about himself and his interests as compared to the first one.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\\nBecause scenario 1 painted a more vivid picture of Eric\\'s life, personality, and humor, and it seemed to be more engaging and sincere, which would encourage me to swipe right.', 'Scenario 1\\n\\nReasoning:\\n\\nScenario 1 gives a more personal and in-depth understanding of Eric, the way he presents himself in a humorous and inviting style makes it more enjoyable to read. He is not just listing facts about himself, but contextualizing his character, ambitions, and sense of humor. \\n\\nThe mention of wanting a \"co-star\" in life gives an impression of seeking a genuine relationship, which aligns with the desire for a romantic relationship. The indication that he is open to different \"genres\" of this love story, hints towards his adaptability and openness to different experiences, making him seem more approachable. \\n\\nNext, the introduction of his beagle, Scott, in a lighthearted manner indicates his love for animals and subtly acknowledges the importance of his potential match liking his dog. \\n\\nFinally, his call to action at the end involving academic debate presents him as intellectual and someone seeking a mentally stimulating partner. The invitation to \"write a great story together\" creates a sense of partnership and equality which is a good sign for a potential romantic relationship.\\n\\nOverall, Scenario 1 presents Eric\\'s personality, interests, and aspirations in a narrative form, making it easier to assess potential compatibility.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nIn both scenarios, Eric's bio shows his love for tennis, academics, and his beagle dog named Scott indicating he's caring, fun-loving, and outdoorsy. They both also hint at his sense of humor and desire for a genuine connection.\\n\\nScenario 1 is a more elaborate description, with a bit of humor and playful wording, presenting Eric as someone creative and fun-loving, with an engaging and humorous approach to life. This scenario may be more appealing to those who appreciate wit and humor, enjoy reading and prefer in-depth profiles. It demonstrates his desire for a genuine long-term relationship. This scenario is likely to attract someone who is outgoing, appreciates humor and depth, and is ready for a committed relationship.\\n\\nScenario 2 narrates a cute anecdote involving Scott, showing Eric's light-hearted side and ability to turn unexpected interruptions into social opportunities. Sharing a personal anecdote makes the profile seem more genuine and friendly. It’s shorter and more straightforward and is likely to attract someone who is laid-back, loves dogs, and enjoys spontaneity, without necessarily wanting an immediate commitment.\\n\\nAnswer: It depends on the type of relationship and partner Eric is seeking. If he wants someone who enjoys in-depth conversations and appreciates humor, Scenario 1 would be a better fit. However, if he seeks a more laid-back, dog-loving person who enjoys fun and spontaneous interactions, Scenario 2 would work well.\\n\", 'Reasoning text:\\n\\nBoth scenarios offer engaging and light-hearted introductions that serve to make Eric more three-dimensional and approachable to potential matches. However, the way they appeal to matches varies depending on the characteristics they focus on.\\n\\nScenario 1 employs humor and self-deprecation to create an amicable image of Eric. This is likely to attract someone who can appreciate his sense of humor and doesn\\'t mind a bit of sarcastic or dry wit. Moreover, his love for pets and interests in sports and studying are clearly laid out in this scenario, appealing to people who share similar academic, pet-related, or sports interests, and values.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 portrays Eric as an outgoing and fun-loving individual who loves dogs, outdoor activities, tennis, and is doing his best in studying at university. By offering an amusing anecdote about Eric\\'s dog Scott, it not only reveals his passionate side for his pet but also demonstrates his good-natured response to unexpected scenarios revealing his outgoing personality. That, coupled with his promise for \"good laughs\" and \"earnest conversations\", would appeal to matches looking for a fun, dog-loving, sporty, and sincere person.\\n\\nAlthough both scenarios cater to similar audiences, Scenario 2 establishes a more vivid and fun image potraying Eric\\'s spontaneous nature right from the beginning. It also balances the serious (studying at university) and the light-hearted (outdoor activities, love for pet) parts of his life equally. Thus, it would possibly attract matches who look for a balance in work, adventure, and companionship both from the partner and their pet.  \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Reasoning text: \\n\\nThe decision between these scenarios can be subjective, but in terms of attracting a partner who shares interests and values, Scenario 1 may be more effective. This profile is detailed yet engaging, revealing Eric's sense of humor, his passion for sports and studying, as well as his love for his beagle, Scott. It paints a vivid picture of who he is as a person. \\n\\nHowever, the effectiveness can be influenced by what potential partners are looking for. If someone appreciates a more long-form and articulate way of expressing oneself, the first scenario would be preferable. It also prepares the reader for what they can expect from future interactions with Eric, and his sense of humor might be quite appealing to people who appreciate a good, hearty laugh.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 paints a playful and chaotic image of Eric's life, which may appeal to someone who enjoys spontaneity and unpredictability that comes with pet ownership. Eric comes across as fun-loving and easy-going, and the story about Scott might provide a good icebreaker. However, it includes less detail about his academic life and personal attributes. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 64 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 1, score 6.0\n",
      "1_2, generation 1, score 1.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Both scenarios provide insight into Eric's character, interests, and personality. He seems to be open, has a good sense of humor, loves dogs, and shares his love for tennis. \\n\\nScenario 1 has a more straightforward approach which makes it more direct and to-the-point. Eric openly expresses his love for his dog Scott, his interests in both cerebral and physical activities, his love for music and books, and his preference for a partner. It appeals to those who have the same interests and hobbies, which is important when building a connection or relationship. It gives an insight into his life in a simple and realistic manner, and the authenticity and vulnerability in openly stating his average appearance makes him more relatable\\n\\nScenario 2, however, is more creative and humorous in presenting Eric's character. It also gives detailed information about Eric using metaphors and puns, which hints at a very good sense of humor. The playful analogy about his life being a rom-com and looking for a co-star to feature in it is endearing and quite creative. Using humor to present your profile always leaves a smile on the reader's face. \\n\\nEven though both are intriguing, I would be more inclined to swipe right on Scenario 2. Gravitating towards this profile is mainly due to its unique, humorous, and creative way of introducing Eric. The narrative style of writing and the good balance of humor makes his profile interesting to read. It leaves an individual curious and wanting to know more about Eric, including his study life, his love for dogs, and his corny jokes.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nAfter reading both scenarios, I am more drawn to Scenario 1. The language used seems more approachable and genuine. Eric comes across as friendly, and I appreciate his balance of interests between academic pursuits and outdoor activities. \\n\\nHis openness about being an average looking guy reflects humility and a sense of self-awareness. His love for his pet signifies compassion while the mention of tennis suggests that he enjoys being active. The fact that he also likes reading and exploring new places indicates that he has diverse interests. \\n\\nMoreover, he explicitly describes the type of person he's looking for, someone who's passionate, humorous, and loves dogs, while also expressing the possibility of shared tennis activities. This gives a clearer picture of what spending time with him might be like. \\n\\nScenario 2, while humorous and creative, comes off slightly pretentious with the use of a complex vocabulary. The film references might not resonate with every potential match and the jokes about his math grades come off a bit negative.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios are thoughtful and engaging, with Eric portraying a friendly, down-to-earth personality. However, I would lean more towards scenario 1 due to its straightforwardness and sincerity. Eric provides a plain but properly detailed overview of his personality, interests, and what he is looking for in a partner. He presents himself well with a balance of seriousness and humor, and sparks curiosity through his interests in indie bands, reading, exploring with his dog and tennis, which he couples with intellectual debates. This can make a pretty interesting conversation starter and shows his multifaceted personality. He also mentions his love for his dog Scott, which is something I appreciate and would likely connect with as an animal lover. Lastly, he adds a hint of vulnerability by admitting he is average in looks and height, which shows his self-awareness and honesty - qualities I value greatly. In comparison, scenario 2’s metaphorical and flowery language could come off as trying too hard.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nI find the bio in Scenario 1 to be more engaging, humorous, and personal. The introduction sets the tone by bringing in humor, making it light-hearted and fun while showcasing my life as a student and sports enthusiast. As I mention my dog, it signals my love for animals and responsibility associated with being a pet owner. \\n\\nHumor is also an excellent ice-breaker, and by poking fun at my average physical attributes and grades, I demonstrate that I’m confident enough to laugh at myself. This bio balances self-promotion and self-deprecation, which can be endearing for someone reading it. \\n\\nThe final part also suggests that I am looking for a serious relationship but I'm prepared for any unforeseen adventures, expressing a sense of spontaneity. It also encourages the reader to take an action, i.e., swipe right, which is a good call-to-action note.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth scenarios provide a clear image of Eric and his lifestyle, but they approach this in different ways. \\n\\nScenario 1 is a more creative and unique introduction. It has personality and showcases Eric\\'s sense of humor. His playful line \"I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humor\" shows modesty and demonstrates that he does not take himself too seriously. A person attracted to this profile would probably appreciate humor and a laid-back approach to life. \\n\\nScenario 2 is more straightforward and traditional. It provides a summary of Eric\\'s personality, his activities, and what he\\'s looking for, but in a more direct and to the point manner. It\\'s clean, concise and well written, it paints a clear picture of who Eric is without attempting to embellish it with humor. \\n\\nI would lean towards Scenario 1 because it\\'s more distinctive, expressing more of Eric\\'s individual personality. Given the nature of dating apps where one has only a few seconds to capture a potential match\\'s interest, Scenario 1 would be more memorable because of its playful and humorous tone. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nScenario 1 has a storytelling and humorous approach to it which shows a more light-hearted personality. This scenario also presents a comprehensive insight into the user’s mind, which can give potential matches a better understanding of who Eric is. The user discloses his love for pets, and shows a sense of humour by poking fun at certain parts of his life. This style of bio can attract matches who are into a jovial personality with a sense of adventure and fun.\\n\\nScenario 2, however, presents the user in a more straightforward and earnest way. This scenario may appeal to those who are into no-frills profiles. It presents the user as an intellectual who also enjoys recreational activities. The sense of sincerity in the scenario can be attractive to those who are into deep conversations and prefer connections that are straightforward. \\n\\nAnswer: Depending on what type of potential matches you want to attract, both scenarios can be effective. If you want to attract a partner who appreciates humour and a light-hearted attitude, scenario 1 would be the best choice. However, if you are interested in attracting someone who appreciates intellectual conversations and honest profiles, scenario 2 would be more fitting. It's also important to remember to be true to yourself when creating a dating bio, and choose the scenario that most accurately reflects your own personality and preferences.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 89 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 0, score 5.0\n",
      "0_2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! I'm a university undergrad with a heart for animals and an undying passion for tennis. I can whip up a mean backhand in the courts, or be the calmest companion for my adorable beagle named Scott in the park. I love spending my free time exploring life with a curious eye and an open mind. Every compromise leads to a story, so I'm looking for someone with whom I can write the next chapter. If you're someone who appreciates serene walks with a canine friend or enjoys exhilarating matches on the tennis court, we might just hit it off! Can't wait to explore the possibilities with you. P.S., I promise I'm not as intense as this bio makes me sound ;)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Answer: Scenario 2\\n\\nReasoning: Scenario 2 offers a more detailed and intimate glimpse into Eric's life. This alone makes it easier for me to feel a connection and make the decision to swipe right. I find his sense of humor appealing as he lightens up his bio with jokes, specifically about his height, his beagle Scott, and his mom thinking he's quite the catch. The usage of humor and self-deprecation, coupled with the fact that he openly speaks about potentially not being a GQ model, portrays him as humble and relatable. Moreover, his approach to matchmaking appears to be very relaxed, which is evident when he presents the possibility of not hitting a grand slam but still promising lively conversation and good company. It expresses a sense of honesty and authenticity, which is quite attractive. \\n\\nAlso, his mention of tennis and his love for animals (specifically, gorillas and Scott) are shown in a charming manner that could spark an interesting conversation upon a potential match. Lastly, the invitation for a someone who can stand bad puns and good fun feels open and inviting, allowing room for error and a non-judgmental environment, which makes swiping right very appealing.\", \"Reasoning: Both profiles have their charm and give a good sense of Eric's personality, but I'm leaning towards Scenario 2. Here's why:\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric has a solid introduction and shares his passion for tennis and animals which is something I can connect to. However, the bio seems a bit too formal, it's extremely well-written, but it also feels slightly stiff and doesn't reveal much about Eric's personality other than his interests.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, feels more like a conversation. Eric comes across as witty and playful. His bio is filled with humor which makes it fun to read and helps me feel more connected to him. His clever usage of tennis terms, the puns, and even the lighter way he deals with his looks all makes him seem approachable and more real. He also pays tribute to his mother's opinion of him, which implies that he values family. Right away, he seems like the sort of person who'd be fun to talk with.\\n\\nWhile Eric emphasizes his love for tennis and his dog in both scenarios, Scenario 2 feels more engaging and gives me a better picture of Eric's character.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nThere are several factors that make me more inclined to swipe right for Eric in Scenario 2. In this scenario, Eric comes off as being more confident, genuine, and funnier than Scenario 1 which makes his personality more appealing.\\n\\nFirstly, Eric's humor shines through in Scenario 2, and it makes him appear more human and less generic which is a huge plus. He has creatively described himself using tennis metaphors; joked about competing with his dog Scott on features; and humbly described his average looks, showing that he doesn’t take himself too seriously.\\n\\nSecondly, the second scenario also gives a better understanding of his interests and his lifestyle. I have a clear picture of how he spends his weekends with Scott, exploring trails and enjoying nature. Plus, the description of Scott as the adventurous beagle gives the impression that both Eric and his pet dog have a good bond, which could be a reflection of Eric's empathetic and compassionate nature, a trait that I value.\\n\\nLastly, he is clear in Scenario 2 about what he is looking for - someone who can stand bad puns and good fun. It shows that he values humor and fun in a potential match - an important attribute that often indicates compatibility.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! I'm a university undergrad with a heart for animals and an undying passion for tennis. I can whip up a mean backhand in the courts, or be the calmest companion for my adorable beagle named Scott in the park. I love spending my free time exploring life with a curious eye and an open mind. Every compromise leads to a story, so I'm looking for someone with whom I can write the next chapter. If you're someone who appreciates serene walks with a canine friend or enjoys exhilarating matches on the tennis court, we might just hit it off! Can't wait to explore the possibilities with you. P.S., I promise I'm not as intense as this bio makes me sound ;)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nScenario 1 states Eric's information straightforwardly, expressing an appreciation for tennis and his dog, Scott, inviting those who enjoy similar pastimes to consider matching with him. The tone is friendly and open, the sentences have a nice flow, and it appears more concise and succinct, which could work well with those who prefer a simple and direct approach.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 takes a more playful and fun approach with Eric's info, incorporating humor and charming descriptions about him and his life at university. It beautifully balances presenting Eric as a rounded, interesting character, engaging the reader with funny and quirky phrases, and outlining his qualities and interests. This could draw in those who appreciate humor and light-heartedness, showing personality and making him stand out more.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2 best matches the requirements because it gives adequate information about Eric in a creative, engaging, and humorous way. This stands a better chance of connecting with others who appreciate such qualities and are more likely to share interests and values similar to Eric's. It could make his profile more memorable and enjoyable, potentially leading to more matches.\", \"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nChoosing between the two scenarios was quite challenging as both were well written and likely to catch the attention of potential matches. However, certain insightful details led me to my choice. While Scenario 1 exhibits a well-rounded personality and discrete interests, it does not fully express the user's casual, playful, and witty side that Scenario 2 does. Scenario 2 is lighter, funnier, and exudes more personality. Injecting humor into a dating profile can make an individual stand out amongst others. Although both scenarios successfully mention Eric's interests in tennis and animals, Scenario 2 does so more uniquely and memorably. Furthermore, Scenario 2 also cleverly indicates Eric's competitive spirit and readiness for a challenge, which is appealing as it suggests motivation and determination.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", 'Reasoning:\\nIn both scenarios, you do a good job of showcasing your personality, interests, and values in a humorous and engaging way. Both bios highlight your love for animals and your passion for tennis, which provides a clear indication of who you are, and what you enjoy doing. This can help you find a match who cherishes the same things. However, one scenario can speak to potential matches more directly.\\n\\nTo break it down:\\n- Scenario 1 leans more towards the serious side. The narration is friendly, concise, and straightforward with the focus being mainly on your interests in animals and tennis. There is a hint of excitement about meeting someone new and potential life journeys together.\\n- Scenario 2 is a bit longer and more informal. It is packed with puns and funny lines that make it more entertaining to read, showing off a light-hearted personality. It is also more inclusive, making it sound like an invitation for the reader to join in your adventures rather than just listing down your interests.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\\n\\nI think scenario 2 might be more effective in attracting a potential match who shares your interests and values. The witty remarks and playful tone give a more vivid picture of your personality and lifestyle. It shows that you are a fun, loving, outgoing person with a good sense of humor, making you more approachable. It also invites potential matches to join you in your passions making it a shared experience. Overall, it feels more relatable and inviting, making it more likely to draw in similar types of people. It has more hooks and hence more chances to capture the attention of a potential match.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 89 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 1, score 5.0\n",
      "0_2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nWhen considering the two scenarios, several key factors come into play: tone, shared interests, honesty, and the potential for compatibility. Eric's portrayal in the first scenario is more light-hearted and playful, while in the second he comes across as somewhat conventional and more straightforward. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, he uses engaging analogies related to tennis, signifying his passion for the sport. He also showcases his sense of humor (albeit via some self-deprecating comedy) and his strong friendship bond with his dog, Scott. \\n\\nEric’s love for animals is convincingly depicted in both scenarios. However, in the first scenario, he charmingly debates whether his favorite animal is a gorilla or his own dog – suggesting a fun-loving and endearingly quirky personality.\\n\\nOverall, while Eric presents as a sincere and down-to-earth individual in both scenarios, the first scenario provides a more vivid and engaging narrative, offering insights into his character, interests, and humor. For these reasons, the probability of swiping right might be higher in the first scenario.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning Text: \\n\\nAssessing both scenarios, it seems that Eric has used a bit more humor and personality in Scenario 1, making it sounds more engaging and interesting, compared to Scenario 2 where he comes across as quite conventional and less enthusiastic. In Scenario 1, he presented his love for animals, his interest in playing tennis and his sense of humor in a light-hearted and compelling way. He also used some tennis terminologies to keep it playful but relatable to his interests. Other appealing factors are his adventurous beagle, Scott, and his self-deprecating humor about his looks which shows his confidence and ability to not take himself too seriously. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as lively and humorous with his frequent use of puns and playful language. His bio is creative and engaging, making it really readable and entertaining, which reflects a good sense of humor and quick wit. There's a lot of his personality shown through such as his love for animals, his passion for tennis, and his ability to not take himself too seriously, which can be relatable and attractive. He also ends his bio with a direct call to action, which shows confidence and assertiveness. \\n\\nOn the other hand in Scenario 2, Eric presents himself modestly and honestly. While he does highlight his interests and hobbies well, his bio leans more towards the reserved side. He comes off as a more serious and intellectual person, which while not necessarily a bad thing, might not be as engaging or exciting to some people.\\n\\nConsidering everything, I am more likely to swipe right on Scenario 1 due to the humorous and lively personality shown.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nIn online dating, a key factor is to maintain authenticity while showcasing personality and appealing to potential matches. \\n\\nScenario 1 is direct, approachable and gives a clear idea of who Eric is. It speaks volumes about the person behind the bio. The information is concise, depicting Eric's love for tennis, his intellectual pursuits and his affection for his dog. Not to forget, it also objectively describes his physical attributes. It is humble, exudes warmth and is rather inviting for someone who might share these interests.\\n\\nScenario 2, however, while also portraying the same content, brings out Eric’s humorous and playful side. It engages potential matches with a storytelling approach and light-hearted puns. Eric's personality shines through clearly and it becomes evident he is fun-loving. \\n\\nAnswer: While both scenarios are informative, Scenario 2 would potentially attract more individuals who value humor and storytelling in their partners. It also establishes rich conversation starters, from tennis to animals. So, Scenario 2 it is!\", \"Reasoning:\\nBoth scenarios introduce who Eric is as a person -- an undergraduate student, a dog-owner, a tennis player, with a fair sense of self-view. However, there are key differences.\\n\\nScenario 1 utilizes a more direct approach, laying out Eric's basic and additional interests in a straightforward but engaging manner. It also directly appeals to the type of person Eric hopes to attract, particularly emphasizing characteristics like having a sense of humor, a love for dogs, and an interest in tennis. \\n\\nScenario 2 takes on a more creative, humorous approach. The playful tone changes the way his interests and lifestyle are introduced — they're incorporated into jokes and puns. While this scenario does express the traits Eric hopes to find in a match, it does so in a more subtle and non-direct way.\\n\\nIf attracting a potential match who shares Eric's interests and values is the primary goal, scenario 1 likely does a more effective job, as it clearly indicates these things. It directly addresses the type of person he hopes to meet, increasing the chance of attracting matches with these specific interests and values. \\n\\nThe right choice might depend on what type of person Eric wants to attract. For someone more interested in humor and cleverness, scenario 2 might be more appealing. Knowing Eric’s target audience will inform the right answer. Considering specifically a match that shares Eric’s interests and values, we might point towards scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", 'Reasoning text:\\n\\nIn my opinion, Scenario 2 would be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values. This scenario does a better job presenting my personality and interests in a humorous and relaxed way, which can be more appealing to many people. Scenario 2 includes more jokes and lightheartedness, which helps to show off my sense of humor. \\n\\nThe detailed descriptions of my love for tennis and my pet dog, Scott, provide more information about my lifestyle and interests, and make it more likely that someone who shares those interests would be attracted to my profile. The lighthearted tone and humor of this scenario also make it more enjoyable to read, increasing the chances that someone would want to meet me based on my profile.\\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 1 is more straightforward and serious, which may not appeal as much to someone who enjoys humor and fun. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 89 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "0_3, generation 2, score 6.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! My name's Eric, a studious 20-something navigating his way through the whirlwind of academia and tennis matches at our local state university. Being of average height and looks, I compensate with a wicked backhand and a love for a good adventure. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I'm not hitting up the library or tennis courts, you can often catch me exploring nature trails with my loyal sidekick, Scott. Scott is not your typical friend - he's a beagle with a spirit as free as mine, but with a much better sense of direction! He once led me on an unexpected detour during a regular hike, and we ended up at a local farmers market. Never one to shy away from new experiences, I dived in full-heartedly, and thus began my undying love for home-made raspberry jam.\n",
      "\n",
      "If home-made jam, spontaneous adventures, tennis or adorable dogs sounds like your cup of tea, swing a message my way. Even if you just want to chat about your favorite animal or discuss a renowned literature's latest bestseller, I am all ears! Over to you, where will our adventure begin?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios present Eric as a likable and well-rounded individual with a love for dogs, nature, and academics. He seems friendly, outgoing, and has a sense of humor – all attractive qualities. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric appears more open-minded and versatile. He is not just about tennis or his dog. He shows an interest in exploring new experiences (implied by his unexpected adventure to a local farmers market and newfound love for homemade jam). This suggests he\\'s adaptable and not stuck in a routine. Despite being studious, he also enjoys spontaneity, bringing an exciting unpredictability to the mix. \\n\\nScenario 2, by contrast, leans heavily on Eric\\'s love for tennis and his dog. While his humor is evident, and his self-deprecating comment about his looks shows humility, he does not present himself as having varied interests as much as in Scenario 1. \\n\\nHowever, what tilts the balance in favor of Scenario 1 is Eric\\'s invitation to \"discuss a renowned literature\\'s latest bestseller.\" This signifies intellectual depth, a love for reading, and opens the door for an intelligent conversation. He also sounds more approachable, viewing his potential match as an equal starting point for their \"adventures\".\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: Both scenarios offer a good insight into Eric's life and personality. However, Scenario 1 is more detailed and personal. I like the adventure story about the farmer's market and how he loves homemade raspberry jam, which shows his openness to trying new things and his appreciation for simple pleasures. This scenario seems to portray him as more genuine and sincere about getting to know someone. We can easily see his love for animals from the story about his dog, Scott, and his active lifestyle from mentioning tennis and nature hikes. Finally, his openness about wanting to chat or share experiences about a potential match's favorite animal or literature also gives the impression that he is an open-minded and attentive person. \\n\\nOn the other hand, while Scenario 2 is also an interesting description, I find it a little too playful and it has less personal detail which makes it a bit more generic. His sense of humor is appreciated, but it doesn't give quite as good an insight into his life as Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"I'd be more likely to swipe right on Scenario 1. In both scenarios, Eric comes across as personable and approachable. He maintains a good balance of humor, authenticity, and humility. He's open about liking normalcy with a flare of adventure, and his love for his dog Scott is adorable. \\n\\nHowever, the description in Scenario 1 provides a better insight into his life and personality. The vivid story of Scott leading him to a farmers market and his newfound love for homemade raspberry jam makes him seem spontaneous and adaptable. He's not just speaking about liking adventures but gives a memorable example of one such adventure, which makes his self-description more convincing.\\n\\nAdditionally, the bio in Scenario 1 feels more genuine and engaging. Eric's invitation to chat about one's favorite animal and discuss a bestseller shows that he is open to conversing about various topics and is interested in getting to know the one reading his profile. \\n\\nMeanwhile, Scenario 2, while equally descriptive, leans heavily on tennis-related puns which can be fun but also seem a little forced, almost as if Eric is trying too hard to be witty and charming. It's also slightly less approachable as it assumes that the reader understands tennis terminology, which may not appeal to everyone.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! My name's Eric, a studious 20-something navigating his way through the whirlwind of academia and tennis matches at our local state university. Being of average height and looks, I compensate with a wicked backhand and a love for a good adventure. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I'm not hitting up the library or tennis courts, you can often catch me exploring nature trails with my loyal sidekick, Scott. Scott is not your typical friend - he's a beagle with a spirit as free as mine, but with a much better sense of direction! He once led me on an unexpected detour during a regular hike, and we ended up at a local farmers market. Never one to shy away from new experiences, I dived in full-heartedly, and thus began my undying love for home-made raspberry jam.\n",
      "\n",
      "If home-made jam, spontaneous adventures, tennis or adorable dogs sounds like your cup of tea, swing a message my way. Even if you just want to chat about your favorite animal or discuss a renowned literature's latest bestseller, I am all ears! Over to you, where will our adventure begin?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:  Both profiles share information about Eric's hobbies, interests, and personality quite well, but Scenario 1 tends to have more playfulness and humor, which can be attractive qualities for many people. Scenario 2, on the other hand, exudes a more serious and studious personality with a slightly formal tone that may not appeal to everyone. The mention of going off on an adventure with Scott is appealing in Scenario 2, as it hints at spontaneity, but the story doesn't quite have the charm or humor that Scenario 1 manages to deliver. However, both scenarios provide a good insight into Eric's personality and his interests including tennis, animals, adventures and academics. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Scenario 1:\\n\\nScenario 1 appears more interactive and engaging due to its light-hearted, playful tone. The puns (\"your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life\"), and humour (\"my mom insists I\\'m quite the catch\") make Eric seem easygoing and fun, which could attract a broader audience. The language also evokes more personality with phrases like \"serving aces at a state university\", that combine his roles as student and tennis player.\\n\\nThe profile is also rich in detail, presenting a clear picture of Eric\\'s personality, hobbies and lifestyle. His love for tennis, nature, and animals all come through strongly. Scott, the beagle, is given a prominent role, implying that any potential match should also be comfortable with pets. \\n\\nThe mild self-deprecation about his looks comes across as charmingly modest and may appeal to those who value genuine character over superficial appearance. \\n\\nEric also clearly states what he\\'s looking for: \"someone who can stand bad puns and good fun\". This assertiveness can serve to attract matches who are also looking for a relationship that\\'s fun and laid back. \\n\\nLastly, the closing question “are you game?” provides an easy conversation prompt for those who may be unsure of what to say initially. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios are fun, interesting, and showcase who Eric is. They show his interests in tennis, animals, and his love for his beagle, Scott. Both portray his sense of humor and laid-back personality, making him seem approachable to potential matches. \\n\\nScenario 1 is more playful and casual. It's more charming and his sense of humor shows more clearly through his words. The fun and slightly self-deprecating tone of the profile may appeal to people who love a good laugh. The tennis-themed metaphors and the interaction with the reader (suggesting they are game and inviting them to swipe right), make the profile more engaging.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, appears more serious and detailed. It portrays Eric as a thoughtful, potentially quieter individual who loves a good adventure and shares his experiences more vividly. It also suggests that he would appreciate a deeper and intellectual conversation, from chatting about favorite animals to discussing bestseller books.\\n\\nIf Eric's potential match prefers a lighthearted and humorous personality, they may find Scenario 1 more attractive. On the other hand, if the potential match is more attracted to someone who is adventurous, thoughtful, and enjoys intellectual discussions, Scenario 2 would be more appealing.\\n\\nIn Eric's case, considering he is a university student who enjoys fun activities like tennis and casual adventures with his dog, Scenario 1 seems to be more fitting, as this more effectively portrays his youth and playfulness, which would likely be more attractive for someone in his age group at the university. Nevertheless, the choice between the two scenarios ultimately depends on the kind of personality Eric wants to project to attract a potential match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 89 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 2, score 6.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['reasoning text:\\n\\nBoth scenarios do have a certain charm to them, painting the picture of a friendly, active, and outdoorsy student. However, I find myself leaning towards Scenario 1 as the choice to communicate with Eric. \\n\\nThe reasons include:\\n1. He demonstrates a great sense of humor in his introduction, coming off as confident yet self-deprecating in equal measures. His playful comparison of dating to a tennis match certainly catches my eye and underlines his fun-loving nature. \\n\\n2. His bio seems well thought out and I admire his word-play and creativity. Even his way of describing how he looks paints a picture in my mind and makes me laugh, qualifying him as someone entertaining to talk to. \\n\\n3. Eric sharing his love for animals and favorite beast, grasps my attention as a fellow animal lover. The mention of bad puns and good fun paints a picture of laid-back, enjoyable conversations with him. \\n\\n4. Unlike scenario 2, he is openly looking for a partner, inviting the reader to match his every volley. His promise of \"lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side\" goes beyond the fun and games, hinting at his potential as a serious romantic interest.\\n\\nOn the other hand, while Scenario 2 is still funny and interesting (Scott stealing ice cream paints quite an amusing image), it lacks the clever wordplay and assertive pursuit of a potential romantic partner that Scenario 1 has.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning: \\n\\nThe decision to choose either of these scenarios will be based on a few criteria: How well Eric showcases his personality, the level of humor and the of interest he sparks with his bio, and how approachable and open he seems.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric appears very engaging, making playful references and showing humor with self-deprecating comments about his looks. He also seems genuine and authentic when he talks about his love for animals. The fact that he playfully treats the profile as a game, \"player two in the grand tennis match of life,\" gives a sense of playfulness and casualness, making him seems approachable. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, while Eric is similarly open about himself and his love for tennis and his dog Scott, the scenario feels slightly less dynamic. It feels like he’s simply sharing information about his life rather than trying to initiate a conversation or a game.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning: While both profiles are engaging and showcase Eric\\'s interests and personality, I found myself gravitating more towards Scenario 1. The use of playful language like \"potential player two…\" and \"practicing my swing..\" kept me hooked, and the overall tone of the bio was more light, fun, and inviting. The introduction of Scott, the dog, was also more humorous in Scenario 1 than in Scenario 2, and it made Eric seem more approachable and relatable. In addition, I liked the self-deprecating humor about his looks, and it suggested that he doesn\\'t take himself too seriously, a trait I find appealing. Finally, the closing remark inviting someone to swipe right if they enjoyed \"bad puns and good fun\" was charming and made me want to continue the conversation further.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nPersonality and individuality are significant factors when it comes to choosing a potential partner, especially in online dating where the first impression is mostly gained from a profile bio. Therefore, it's crucial to express genuine characteristics, humor, and interests in such a way that catches the attention and resonates with others who share similar preferences.\\n\\nWhen comparing the bio descriptions in scenario 1 and scenario 2, several considerations can be made:\\n\\nScenario 1: This profile bio is characterized by a humorous, flirtatious, and confident tone. The use of tennis terminology as metaphors presents a playful and intelligent image. The mention of the user's love for animals, particularly Scott the beagle, and Gorillas, could strongly appeal to animal lovers. Also, the modest self-deprecating humor about his looks might appear endearing to those who appreciate honesty and humility in a potential partner.\\n\\nScenario 2: In this bio description, presenting real-life stories such as the vanilla ice cream incident makes the profile all the more appealing and relatable. It portrays a fun and jovial character due to the lighthearted anecdote, which adds character to Scott the beagle and gives depth to the personality of the user. This scenario also allocates more space to describe the user's lifestyle, mentioning details about hanging out with friends and having extracurricular interests.\\n\\nWhile the tone in scenario 2 is more straightforward and slightly less flamboyant than that of scenario 1, it projects a sincere and candid personality. Recognizing that the initial appeal of scenario 1's playful and clever language might eventually fizzle out, scenario 2's storytelling approach could lead to longer-term interest as it lays more groundwork for shared conversations and interests.\\n\\nHence, even though the choice between the two could certainly vary from person to person based on individual preferences, overall, I believe scenario 2 has a slightly better chance of attracting a match who values honesty, simplicity, and shared experiences while still maintaining a light and engaging demeanor.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nThe determining factor would largely depend on the type of person I am trying to attract. Each scenario provides slightly different appeal and emphasis on aspects of my personality. \\n\\nScenario 1 is creative, filled with metaphors and analogies, showing a more playful and imaginative side. This can be attractive to someone who appreciates good wordplay and sense of humor. The animal lover aspect is emphasized showing compassion and making deeper connections. This might attract a fun-loving, adventurous woman who is also into sports and loves dogs.\\n\\nScenario 2 on the other hand, seems more laid-back and relatable, it paints the picture of an average and down-to-earth guy which could attract a wider range of women. It also includes a fun story about my dog and me, which shows a sense of humor. This scenario could attract a woman who loves stories, dogs and would enjoy casual chats or hang outs.\\n\\nConsidering these, if I want to potentially attract a woman who would connect on a deeper and more personal level, appreciating my quirks, sense of humor, affinity for animals, and enjoy a laid-back yet adventurous lifestyle, then \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\\n\\nwould be more likely to bring me that desired match. The story about my dog and me also seems likely to spark conversation, which is a strong ice-breaking point on a dating app.', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nFor attracting a potential match who shares the same interests, the person would need a good sense of humor (as evidenced by the funny, pun-filled profile), an interest in outdoor activities (such as nature and tennis), a love of animals (especially dogs), and an interest in pursuing a meaningful, fun relationship (as suggested by images of laughter, good times, and companionship). \\n\\nIn the first scenario, the profile presents a more lively and humorous image, which is likely to catch a reader's attention and interest. The language is engaging, and the friendly challenge at the end encourages interaction. The description of the love for tennis and animals is painted vividly and might resonate more with a person that shares those interests. \\n\\nIn the second scenario, the profile is a bit more relaxed and casual, providing specific anecdotes about what a potential relationship might look like. This paints a clearer picture for the potential match, but it may not stand out as much amongst the myriad of other profiles.\\n\\nUltimately, the ideal scenario would be a combination of both humor and specific shared experiences. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 89 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "3, generation 1, score 5.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: \\n\\nLooking at both scenarios, the main consideration points are Eric\\'s introduction, his approach, and what sort of impression I get from his bio.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric sets up an amusing anecdote right away which is both endearing and light-hearted, successfully capturing attention. His story about Scott shows a sense of humor and an inclination for storytelling. He also shows humility, making it clear that Scott might steal the heart first which implies he\\'s not overly self-centered. He promises \"good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world\" which is exactly what I\\'m looking for in a relationship as well.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric again showcases his sense of humor (which I like) but with a heavier focus on tennis that could come off a little one-dimensional. The introduction line \"your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life\" could read a bit cheesy or forced. It’s nice to see the playful side of him, but he doesn\\'t establish as much of a personal connection as in the first scenario. He does talk about his typical weekend and what he generally looks like, but I found his focus on physical appearance slightly disconcerting.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: Both scenarios are well-articulated and reveal a lot about Eric, making him seem like an interesting person I'd like to get to know. However, scenario 1 appeals to me more. It has a more personalized feel with the inclusion of a funny anecdote about Scott, Eric's dog, which conveys his sense of humor and tells a bit about his day-to-day life with an entertaining story. The narrative gives insight into Eric's character and interests in a way that is engaging and memorable. It sets a lighter, funnier tone and makes me think that he would be a good person to have conversations and share laughs with. The promise of further Scott stories done in such an entertaining manner makes Eric intriguing and draws me in more. The way he involves his dog in the story shows his affection toward animals, which is an aspect I appreciate. Therefore, it's more convincing in my willingness to swipe right for Eric. He seems genuine and down-to-earth in the first scenario.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios depict Eric as a fun-loving, active, and sincere individual. In both bios, he uses humor and personal anecdotes to bring his personality to life. The deciding factors for me are the inclusion of self-deprecating humor, the more detailed storytelling, and the more personal tone in Scenario 2. This scenario offers more entertaining stories about himself and his dog and is more engaging. Furthermore, it provides a sense of self-confidence despite acknowledging he may not be the most physically attractive. Additionally, the second scenario gives a wider variety of his personality aspects, which is more appealing.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nBoth scenarios highlight Eric's personality, interests, and seek to create a connection with potential matches sharing those interests. However, they communicate these aspects differently.\\n\\nScenario 1 presents Eric as a light-hearted person with a good sense of humor. It shows that he's confident, self-aware, and enjoys his own company. It also makes a potential match aware that he's a dedicated tennis player and a passionate animal lover. Referring to having fun, using puns and offering a narrative indicative of a joyful person could attract potential matches who see life from a similar perspective.\\n\\nScenario 2 offers a more anecdotal approach to Eric's self-presentation. The Scott story can be a good ice breaker, giving potential matches an insight into Eric's life, his idea of humor, and his close bond with his dog. The narrative approach might attract those who appreciate storytelling and gives a snapshot of his personality without explicitly describing it. The story indirectly communicates that he's sociable, spontaneous, and has a sense of humor.\\n\\nBoth scenarios have their merits, but Scenario 1 is more direct about who Eric is, and might attract users who appreciate directness, whereas Scenario 2 could captivate those who enjoy a good, light-hearted story.\\n\\nAnswer: This would depend on the kind of personality Eric's potential match might have. However, in general, Scenario 1 might be more effective as it jots down Eric's qualities more clearly, thus making it easier for potential matches to understand him and his interests better.\", 'Reasoning: \\n\\nIn both scenarios, Eric is playful, appealing to people who enjoy a bit of humor. Both bios outline his primary passions: tennis, his studies, and his dog. \\n\\nHowever, Scenario 1 tells a bit more about Eric\\'s personality traits and values. His competitive spirit shines through in the way he talks about tennis. His wit is evident in the puns and the quips about himself and his beloved dog. His friendly nature comes across in the way he talks about a match not just being for romantic purposes, but for friendship and camaraderie as well. He also makes his relationship goal clear: someone who can match his fun loving spirit and possibly form a long term relationship. Lastly, he extends a clear and explicit invitation for people to swipe right, signaling his readiness to dive into the online dating world. \\n\\nScenario 2 conveys similar things but in a less direct manner. In this version, Eric seems slightly more laid-back, narrating a humorous anecdote that fits his profile well. Although he highlights traits like humor, spontaneity, and his friendly disposition, he does not vocalize his expectations for a match nor extend an explicit invite to swipe right. He also mentions wanting \"a connection that exceeds the digital world\" but does not elaborate on what the terms for such a connection might be, leaving a bit of ambiguity.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Both scenarios present a genuine and humorous side of you, but they do it in different ways. \\n\\nScenario 1 is more playful and pun-filled, appealing to someone who appreciates a good joke as much as they appreciate life. Your love for tennis and your dog, Scott, is clearly highlighted, along with your willingness not to take yourself too seriously (\"my mom insists I\\'m quite the catch\" and \"average is the new sexy\"). This scenario also gives a slight insight into your values, such as loyalty and having a good time. \\n\\nScenario 2, meanwhile, is a bit more straightforward in both humor and content. The story about Scott disrupting a tennis game is funny and charming, accurately portraying everyday life with a dog. It also conveys an interest in tennis and presents a picture of a student trying to juggle multiple things, making you relatable to other students. However, it might not catch the attention of someone not interested in dogs or tennis as much as scenario 1, because it focuses more on these aspects than your overall personality.\\n\\nThe choice between these scenarios depends more on the type of person you aim to attract: Scenario 1 might appeal to someone who enjoys wordplay and the unexpected, where scenario 2 would appeal to someone who prefers straightforwardness and everyday humor. \\n\\nAnswer: this will be based on individual\\'s preference. Personally, I would prefer scenario 1 because its playful nature could make it stand out from more straightforward profiles. But some people might prefer the more down-to-earth portrayal of Scenario 2.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 89 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_2, generation 0, score 0.0\n",
      "3, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric. Just another undergrad trying to find his way through college. I'm a tennis enthusiast, an animal lover, and a staunch believer in spontaneous adventures. My favorite gym buddy is my beagle, Scott. Here's a little story about us: Once, while exploring a park, Scott spotted a squirrel. Being the swift little man he is, he bolted after it. I, not wanting to lose sight of him, ended up sprinting and hilariously vaulting over a picnic blanket (and its surprised occupants). We didn't manage to catch the squirrel, but we did find an ice-cream truck and shared a sundae. Long story short, life with me and Scott is never dull, and we'd love someone to share our adventures with. If you're into fun outings, snuggling with dogs, and don't mind the occasional interruption by rogue squirrels, swipe right!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: In both scenarios, Eric comes across as a fun-loving and easygoing person, which is appealing. However, Scenario 2 is more enticing due to his humor and creativity in word usage; it reflects his personality more vividly. From the way he writes his bio, it implies that he might be a good conversationalist and someone who's witty, which can make interactions with him more enjoyable. Particularly, his clever wordplay on the tennis theme shows his quirky side. Moreover, he seems to have a great relationship with his dog, Scott, which indicates his ability to care and nurture, a great quality to have in a partner. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nAs I’m reviewing Eric’s profiles, I consider a few different things. First, does he seem to have a good sense of humor? In Scenario 1, he uses humor quite well while telling a story about chasing a squirrel with his dog. In Scenario 2, he also employs humor, but it's more in the form of puns and self-deprecation. Both styles appeal to me, but the humor in Scenario 1 draws more of a vivid and engaging picture.\\n\\nNext, I look at his interests. In both scenarios, he mentions playing tennis and spending time with his dog. It's a positive sign that we may share some common interests as I also enjoy sports and animal. \\n\\nLastly, I consider the overall tone of his profile. In Scenario 1, he comes across as adventurous and spontaneous, but also friendly and genuine. Scenario 2 shows a bit more sophistication, wit, and a hint of humility, which I also found appealing.\\n\\nIn conclusion, while both profiles are enticing in their own way, I find myself more drawn to Eric in Scenario 1. His storytelling and comedic timing tickled my funny bone, and his spontaneity seems to promise a lot of fun and unexpected adventures. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios have their own appeal. Scenario 1 is more direct and casual in tone. Eric seems to be a fun-loving and adventurous individual who also knows how to laugh at himself, which can be an attractive trait for many. The story about his dog, Scott, is endearing and shows his sense of humor, love for animals, and spontaneous nature.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is slightly more structured and wordy, with more elaborate descriptions and puns. It's clear that Eric is intelligent and has a keen sense of humor. His love for animals and penchant for adventure is well depicted here as well. The scenario is engaging and the extended metaphors throughout, such as the tennis match of life, may come off as creative and clever to some.\\n\\nAnswer: The decision between the two would be subjective, depending on the preference of the reader. However, for me, I would sway towards Scenario 1. The down-to-earth nature of his bio, the amusing anecdote and his evident love for his dog makes it instantly likable. While Scenario 2 is smartly written, it may come off as trying too hard and could be a turn off to some.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I’m Eric, your potential player two in the grand tennis match of life. Currently serving aces at a state university, I promise my report card is not the only interesting thing about me. Love facing off across the net and practicing my swing in my free time, and scouting for a partner who can match my every volley. \n",
      "\n",
      "On a typical weekend, you may find me exploring trails with my adventurous beagle, Scott. He's me in a dog's body, although, he's got a slightly better-looking coat than mine. We're both suckers for good food and long walks. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looks-wise, I might not be your next GQ model, but hey, they tell me average is the new sexy. I stand tall, literally and figuratively, at a perfectly normal height, and my mom insists I'm quite the catch. \n",
      "\n",
      "An animal lover at heart, I believe everyone should have a favorite beast. Mine is a toss-up between Gorillas and Scott – the jury's still out. \n",
      "\n",
      "If you can stand bad puns and good fun, swipe right and we can see if love is in the cards, or should I say, on the court? Whether we hit a grand slam or not, I promise lively conversation, lots of laughs, and a loyal companion at your side (and that's just Scott!). So are you game?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric. Just another undergrad trying to find his way through college. I'm a tennis enthusiast, an animal lover, and a staunch believer in spontaneous adventures. My favorite gym buddy is my beagle, Scott. Here's a little story about us: Once, while exploring a park, Scott spotted a squirrel. Being the swift little man he is, he bolted after it. I, not wanting to lose sight of him, ended up sprinting and hilariously vaulting over a picnic blanket (and its surprised occupants). We didn't manage to catch the squirrel, but we did find an ice-cream truck and shared a sundae. Long story short, life with me and Scott is never dull, and we'd love someone to share our adventures with. If you're into fun outings, snuggling with dogs, and don't mind the occasional interruption by rogue squirrels, swipe right!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, the individual has a playful and confident approach towards presenting himself, which can be attractive and encourage women to swipe right. This scenario shows that Eric enjoys sports and outdoor activities, and likes to include humor in his conversations, which displays his fun side. He also introduces Scott as not just a dog but a buddy who he loves exploring with, this creates a warm image and would likely appeal to other pet lovers. He ends with a question to encourage a response from potential matches. \\n\\nScenario 2 is more straightforward and outlines Eric's interests more directly, and even shares a brief adventure that could resonate with those who enjoy light-hearted, spontaneous outdoor activities. Sharing an actual event could intrigue a reader and create a conversation starter. This scenario has more detail about his personality and less humor. \\n\\nHowever, both profiles do a good job of suggesting engaging conversation topics such as tennis, nature walks, and of course Scott the dog. Although it mostly depends on personal preferences of the reader, considering the above-mentioned points, I believe the profile that had more chances of attracting potential matches who share Eric's interests and values to be Scenario 2, as it provides an engaging and detailed story that reveals his passion for adventures and humor.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nFirstly, the ideal match would be someone who appreciates authenticity and candor. Both scenarios provide a genuine picture of Eric, but by throwing in a balance of humor, wit, and self-awareness, Scenario 1 might take the lead for those who find these qualities appealing.\\n\\nSecondly, shared interests are pivotal. Both scenarios touch on Eric's love for tennis, adventures, and animals. However, Scenario 1 does a better job at weaving these facts into a more engaging narrative.\\n\\nThirdly, an ideal match would appreciate a good sense of humor. In Scenario 1, Eric's light-hearted and playful tone, which is interspersed with a bit of self-deprecation about his looks, could be quite enticing for someone with similar humor, making him appear approachable.\\n\\nLastly, compatibility also relates to temperament. Scenario 1 paints a vibrant picture of Eric, revealing him as someone fun, talkative, and gregarious. This could attract matches of similar disposition, or those who are attracted to his vibrant persona.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is more straightforward and concise, which could attract potential matches who appreciate simple, direct communication and less flamboyant approach.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nScenario 1 presents more in-depth information about Eric in a creative and witty style. It includes details about his life, hobbies, and personality. The profile also invites viewers who like fun and laughter to swipe right, implying that Eric is humorous. The reference to a potential dating experience as a 'tennis match' is clever and intriguing and the mention of Scott is consistent and endearing. It conveys that Eric is good-natured and doesn't take himself too seriously. The humor and sincerity from the bio are likely to attract users who are looking for someone genuine. It allows potential matches to easily start a conversation by asking about tennis or Scott. \\n\\nScenario 2, while it gives the important details about Eric's life, it doesn't quite have the same creativity or humor when compared to scenario 1. Although the story of Scott and the squirrel is fun and provides a glimpse of an adventure with Eric, the overall tone is more typical and straightforward. This bio may appeal to users who prefer simplicity and directness, it might not stand out in a sea of bios on a dating app.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "3, generation 0, score 2.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, a tennis-loving undergrad student with a penchant for dog walks, good books, and whimsical adventures. Call me average, but as they say, 'Never judge a book by its cover'. Compelled by my beagle Scott, I regularly find myself in the middle of amusing escapades. \n",
      "\n",
      "Once, on a peaceful Sunday, Scott, suddenly overtaken by a bout of doggie excitement, took off on a wild chase after a squirrel in the park. The chase led us through a bustling farmers market, through a frisbee tournament (much to their surprise), and ultimately ended with both of us taking an unintended dip in the university fountain. Long story short: we didn’t catch the squirrel, but we had a blast (and loads of attention)!\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for a partner who enjoys unexpected adventures, loves animals, and wouldn’t mind getting caught in the rain or in a fountain with a beagle and me. Swipe right if you believe in laughter, genuine connection, and spontaneous park dates. Maybe we can create an enchanting tale together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nLooking at Eric's profiles, both scenarios present interesting characteristics. However, various factors become the deciding factor for my decision.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as fun, spontaneous, and genuinely able to find and enjoy simple pleasures in life. His love for animals, especially his connection with Scott, his beagle, is endearing. His tale of the misadventure at the park is amusing and teases the kind of spontaneous fun one could possibly have in his company. His search for a partner who can appreciate such joys and moments in life shows his desire for a serious connection. This presents a picture of Eric as funny, responsible, and someone who values deep emotional bonds and shared experiences. \\n\\nScenario 2 also paints a picture of an interesting person. His light-hearted humor, the Harry Potter references, and other puns show his wit and make his bio fun to read. His love for walks, café, and sushi indicates that he enjoys the typical dates and might have a foodie side. The luminous fungi mention is intriguing, but it feels more like a random and quirky addition rather than a genuine subject of interest.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\\nWhile both scenarios are entertaining, Scenario 1 presents a more appealing potential match for a serious relationship. While Eric's humor is appreciated, the tone in Scenario 1 leaves more room for anticipating engaging conversations, shared laughter, and spontaneous adventures. The depth seen in Scenario 1 along with the humor makes it a more attractive choice for me.\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nThe bio in scenario 1 fits more into what I'm looking for in a match. Eric seems to have a good sense of humor, a penchant for adventure, and describes his real-life experiences which adds a personal touch. He shared a story about his dog which not only adds humor but shows he values openness and can laugh at himself. He also talks about how he is looking for someone who enjoys unexpected adventures and loves animals which shows he’s not all fun and games, but also appreciates compatibility when it comes to lifestyle aspects. \\n\\nOn the other hand, the bio in scenario 2 certainly shows that Eric has a quirky personality and loves to have fun, but the amount of puns and pop culture references can also be seen as trying too hard and all over the place. It lacks a personal touch like scenario 1, and the attempts at humor don't feel as genuine and can be off-putting. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 is the one that I'm more likely to swipe right on.\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric as an intriguing and humorous individual with a love for animals, especially his beagle Scott, and tennis. However, Eric\\'s charisma shines a bit brighter in Scenario 1. The description is balanced with adequate information about him, his interests and highlights an intriguing anecdote. This anecdote about the squirrel chase is particularly engaging as it portrays Eric as spontaneous and fun-loving, even in unplanned and unexpected situations. His bio leans heavily towards a light-hearted and amusing tone, which could be attractive to many. It also gives a slight hint about his bigger philosophy of life in terms of believing in \"laughter, genuine connection, and spontaneous park dates,\" which again resonates positivity that many would find appealing. \\n\\nOn the other hand, in Scenario 2, while we still see Eric\\'s charming and humorous side, the overuse of puns and quirky references could feel a bit overwhelming or difficult to understand to some who might not catch onto the references. Moreover, it feels as though Scenario 2 does not offer as wholesome a picture of Eric\\'s life and personality as Scenario 1 does, focusing more on the light-hearted and less on the deeper character traits.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, a tennis-loving undergrad student with a penchant for dog walks, good books, and whimsical adventures. Call me average, but as they say, 'Never judge a book by its cover'. Compelled by my beagle Scott, I regularly find myself in the middle of amusing escapades. \n",
      "\n",
      "Once, on a peaceful Sunday, Scott, suddenly overtaken by a bout of doggie excitement, took off on a wild chase after a squirrel in the park. The chase led us through a bustling farmers market, through a frisbee tournament (much to their surprise), and ultimately ended with both of us taking an unintended dip in the university fountain. Long story short: we didn’t catch the squirrel, but we had a blast (and loads of attention)!\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for a partner who enjoys unexpected adventures, loves animals, and wouldn’t mind getting caught in the rain or in a fountain with a beagle and me. Swipe right if you believe in laughter, genuine connection, and spontaneous park dates. Maybe we can create an enchanting tale together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\n\\nWhen comparing the two scenarios, it seems that Scenario 1 would attract a potential match who shares similar interests and values to Eric more effectively. This is due to a few key factors:\\n\\n1. Authenticity: Scenario 1 presents Eric in an honest and straightforward manner. It provides a clear picture of his life, hobbies, idiosyncrasies, and what kind of experiences he values (adventures, dog walks, books). This authenticity might attract those who appreciate genuineness and share similar activities. \\n\\n2. Storytelling: The anecdote about chasing the squirrel with his beagle Scott provides an engaging narrative that not only highlights his love for his pet but also illustrates his sense of humor and spontaneity. It gives an insight into his personality and how he might behave in a relationship; that is he's fun-loving and isn't afraid of a little chaos.\\n\\n3. Directness: The profile ends with a direct call-to-action - a potential match is explicitly asked to swipe right if they share his love for laughter, genuine connections, and spontaneous park dates. This directness makes it easy for people who align with these values to respond. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2, though humor-filled and showing a good grasp of pop-culture references, could potentially be seen as trying too hard to be funny or quirky. While this may attract some people, others might find it off-putting or confuse the potential match about his actual interests. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric introduces himself as an adventurous and fun-loving individual who is deeply invested in enjoying life's simple joys - like walking his dog, playing tennis, or simply hanging out. The narrative about chasing a squirrel adds humor, shows that he does not take himself too seriously, displaying a light-hearted, easy-going nature. Additionally, mentioning his love for animals could attract a fellow animal lover. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric portrays himself in a more quirky, humorous light. The many puns and pop-culture references (like Harry Potter) reveal a playful, goofy side and would most likely appeal to someone who appreciates this sort of humor. The references may also target a slightly younger demographic who could better relate to these jokes. The text, though entertaining, does not offer much about Eric’s values or lifestyle, aside from the indication that he values humour and novelty.\\n\\nConsidering the differences, if Eric's main goal is to attract someone who shares his love for animals, spontaneous adventures, and honest connection, he should opt for the first scenario. While the second scenario is more humorous and may grab attention, it gives less insight into his lifestyle and could possibly attract matches looking for a more light-hearted, casual relationship. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nWhile both scenarios have their own charm and portray an interesting picture of the person behind the profile, I'd say that Scenario 1 is more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values. \\n\\nSpecifically, in the first scenario, I'm honest, open, and directly discuss my love for dogs and tennis. I share a personal, fun experience that paints a good picture of an average day in my life - it's spontaneous, adventurous, and fun! This story helps make me look relatable and interesting and will help attract someone who enjoys similar experiences. \\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 seems to rely heavily on puns and jokes, which might not land with everyone. While it conveys a sense of humor, it may come off as trying too hard. Moreover, the overabundance of references and comparisons to various fictional worlds, although imaginative and entertaining, might be a bit overwhelming or confusing for someone who is not familiar with them. \\n\\nFor these reasons, I believe that I am more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values by choosing to present myself in the manner depicted in Scenario 1. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 2, score 2.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: In both profiles, Eric comes across as a friendly and outgoing person with a good sense of humor. However, Scenario 1 Eric seems to be more mature and grounded. His self-introduction is wholesome and sincere, and he shares an endearing story about his beagle, Scott. He's detailed about his preferences, e.g., love for animals and adventures, making it easy to start a conversation if we match. Scenario 2 Eric, on the other hand, leans more on humor and literary references, which could be hit or miss depending on the reader's knowledge and taste.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Eric's self-written bios portray him as a fun, outgoing, and friendly person. Both situations provide key insights into his character, humor, hobbies, and interests, such as his love for animals, humor, and tennis. \\n\\nHowever, Scenario 1 provides a more detailed and realistic picture of Eric's daily life and interactions particularly with his pet which can be an indicating factor of his empathetic side. It also gives a very clear, enjoyable anecdote I can easily visualize, making his life seem fun and full of personality. His love for animals is endearing, a trait most would find attractive. Finally, the humor element embedded in the dog ice-cream story portrays him as a person with a good sense of humor. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, the bio comes across more quirky and humorous with engaging puns throughout, but it is less personal and detailed about his day-to-day life experiences. It shares less about what a future partner might expect when spending time with him. It has more of a friendly vibe than potentially romantic. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nLooking at both scenarios, Eric seems like a humorous and engaging personality with a love for animals. In both bios, he provides insight into his life, detailing his love for tennis, his dog Scott, and his experiences as an undergrad. However, there are some different aspects in each scenario. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric presents himself as more casual and straightforward. He paints an endearing picture of a typical day in his life and underscores his love for his dog, Scott. The funny anecdote about Scott stealing his ice cream stands out and makes him seem accessible and easygoing. His invitation to share university tales, dog escapades, or even a tennis match feels open and friendly. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, uses a considerable amount of humor and puns. It's creative, and the humor makes it fun to read, but there are instances where it feels a bit too embellished, like the bit about serpentology. The humor also seems to take precedence over learning about him personally. The Harry Potter and tennis references, along with the puns, might not be relatable to everyone. \\n\\nI feel more drawn to Scenario 1 because I get to know more about Eric personally, and he seems like someone who can balance seriousness with a sense of humor. While humor is appealing, I connect more with the straightforward, friendly tone of Scenario 1. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning text:\\n\\nI would weigh in different aspects of both scenarios while making this choice. \\n\\nIn scenario 1, the profile has a friendly and approachable tone. It clearly communicates the values and interests, hence making it easy for someone who shares those to identify. It presents a vibrant picture of the kind of life you live and there's a clear call to action in the end inviting others to participate in your journey. The dog story adds to the overall humor and charm, making it memorable and enjoyable to read. \\n\\nIn scenario 2, the profile is spontaneous and filled with puns, showing more of a playful side. While it's exciting and humorous, some people might not get the humor or find it to be too much. The references to Harry Potter and specific jokes may appeal to a smaller, niche audience. It might come off as trying too hard to be unique or quirky which might intimidate some people. \\n\\nBased on these points, Scenario 1 would probably cater to a broader audience and be more relatable to them, while scenario 2 would cater to a specific audience who shares the same humor. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios provide background on your life, from your educational journey to your hobbies and your beloved pet, Scott. This gives potential partners a clear view of who you are and what you enjoy. \\n\\nScenario 1 provides more detail and length, describing your love for animals and your playful personality evident through the funny incident with Scott. It is straightforward, and the fun story with the beagle provides an ice-breaker, showing that you're down-to-earth and don't take yourself too seriously. \\n\\nSituation 2, on the other hand, pops out due to its quirkiness and creative spin on the average dating profile. The humorous approach with puns and references to popular culture elements like Harry Potter sets a laid-back atmosphere. This version indicates a sense of humor and a light-hearted view on life.\\n\\nHowever, while wit and humor are attractive qualities, the references might not resonate with everyone. Not all potential partners might understand or appreciate them. \\n\\nConservatively, Scenario 1 might work better because it's more accessible to a broader audience, while Scenario 2 might attract those with a penchant for puns or Harry Potter references.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning text: \\n\\nI'd likely lean towards scenario 1 as it gives a more genuine and lighthearted account of myself while integrating my interests naturally. The tennis, the university setup, and most importantly, my deep affinity for animals, namely my dog Scott, are all spoken about. It conveys what an average day in my life looks like currently. \\n\\nThe anecdotes about Scott adds an intimate and funny touch. It not only shows my attachment to Scott but also may attract those who appreciate dogs and see my sense of humor. Furthermore, it hints at my friendly and social nature through my mentions of hanging out with friends. \\n\\nIn comparison, scenario 2 focuses on using a lot of puns. While humorous, it might deter users who prefer straightforward language. The reference to Harry Potter, the jokes about politics, and luminous fungi might be seen as abstract references, potentially deterring users who don't understand these references. \\n\\nThus, scenario 1 seems to be more universally understandable, presents my interests more faithfully and has a less risky humor style.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "3, generation 0, score 2.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, a tennis-loving undergrad student with a penchant for dog walks, good books, and whimsical adventures. Call me average, but as they say, 'Never judge a book by its cover'. Compelled by my beagle Scott, I regularly find myself in the middle of amusing escapades. \n",
      "\n",
      "Once, on a peaceful Sunday, Scott, suddenly overtaken by a bout of doggie excitement, took off on a wild chase after a squirrel in the park. The chase led us through a bustling farmers market, through a frisbee tournament (much to their surprise), and ultimately ended with both of us taking an unintended dip in the university fountain. Long story short: we didn’t catch the squirrel, but we had a blast (and loads of attention)!\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for a partner who enjoys unexpected adventures, loves animals, and wouldn’t mind getting caught in the rain or in a fountain with a beagle and me. Swipe right if you believe in laughter, genuine connection, and spontaneous park dates. Maybe we can create an enchanting tale together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios exhibit Eric's charming personality quite well, listing hobbies, sharing amusing anecdotes, and demonstrating his affection for his pet. However, I resonate more with the intricately detailed story in Scenario 1, as it provides a more appealing visual of a shared life's potential pleasures and adventures. His description is wholesomely humorous and gives me a clear understanding of his personality, especially his love for unexpected exploits and animals. I also appreciate his honesty that he might seem average, portraying a humility that contrasts sharply with the usual boastfulness observed on such platforms. Plus, his purpose of wanting genuine connections, someone who wouldn't mind life's spontaneities, and someone who values laughter aligns more with my personal desires.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning: \\n\\nIn assessing both the scenarios, the personality and character of Eric shine more in Scenario 1. He seems humorous, relatable, and enthusiastic about life and its unexpected adventures. The story about his beagle, Scott, not only shows his love for animals but his ability to appreciate the joy in small, spontaneous things in life which can be seen as a positive trait when looking for a potential match. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 feels more generic and gives less of an insight into Eric’s personality. His bio is more of a resume-like listing of interests without giving any memorable anecdotes or personal touchpoints, which could make him seem less unique or engaging compared to others.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning: \\n\\nBased on the two scenarios, I find myself more drawn to Scenario 1. While both descriptions showcase Eric\\'s shared love for tennis and animals, Scenario 1 stands out because it is more vivid and dynamic. \\n\\nHis personality shines through, as he shares an amusing, detailed story about a park adventure with his dog. This story shows his playful and adventurous side, as well as his gift for eliciting laughter with his storytelling skills. His use of humor in \"Never judge a book by its cover\" and the reference to \\'getting caught in the rain or in a fountain\\' show that he\\'s not overly serious and knows how to enjoy life\\'s quirks which I find attractively relatable.\\n\\nHe has tossed in a subtle invitation that aligns with his personality: spontaneous park dates and creating an enchanting tale together. This presents potentially enjoyable shared experience. It is also a plus that he values laughter and genuine connection, as these are qualities I am drawn to as well. Sometimes the details matter, and Scenario 1 proved to be more memorable and appealing.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, a tennis-loving undergrad student with a penchant for dog walks, good books, and whimsical adventures. Call me average, but as they say, 'Never judge a book by its cover'. Compelled by my beagle Scott, I regularly find myself in the middle of amusing escapades. \n",
      "\n",
      "Once, on a peaceful Sunday, Scott, suddenly overtaken by a bout of doggie excitement, took off on a wild chase after a squirrel in the park. The chase led us through a bustling farmers market, through a frisbee tournament (much to their surprise), and ultimately ended with both of us taking an unintended dip in the university fountain. Long story short: we didn’t catch the squirrel, but we had a blast (and loads of attention)!\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for a partner who enjoys unexpected adventures, loves animals, and wouldn’t mind getting caught in the rain or in a fountain with a beagle and me. Swipe right if you believe in laughter, genuine connection, and spontaneous park dates. Maybe we can create an enchanting tale together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0.5, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: When considering the type of match Eric could attract based on each scenario, it's important to analyze the content and presentation of Eric's self-description. In Scenario 1, he has focused a lot on storytelling and humor, showcasing his personality and interests in an engaging way. He's given a snapshot of his life and indirectly expressed his penchant for fun and adventures, which aligns with the values of many potential partners. Scenario 1 also paints a more vivid and familiar picture, making it more interesting and relatable for potential matches. The way he talks about his typical day and those unexpected escapades paints the picture of an amusing, exciting life. The way he concludes, too, implies openness and an invitation for shared moments filled with laughter and genuine connections. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is more straightforward but doesn't have the same depth of character and personality. Eric's sense of humor is also visible here, but the profile is less detailed, and his interests are presented in a less engaging way. Nonetheless, it could appeal to those who prefer clear, direct descriptions.\\n\\nUltimately, both profiles can attract potential matches who share Eric's interests and values - lovers of animals, outdoors, and possibly tennis. However, Scenario 1 provides a deeper insight into Eric's life and personality, which could lead potential matches to feel more connected to him.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning:\\nBoth scenarios provide a good look into your personality and interests, but they subtly appeal to different kinds of people.\\n\\nScenario 1 paints a picture of adventure and fun, infusing a story element that showcases your playful and spontaneous side. It directly speaks to individuals who value exciting and potentially unexpected turns in life. The mention of your love for animals and more specifically, your dog Scott, is a great way to connect with fellow animal lovers.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 focuses more on your everyday activities and hobbies, such as tennis and dog walking. It also showcases your sense of humor and illustrates a more relaxed, laid-back vibe. This would likely appeal to people who value simplicity, straightforwardness and honesty.\\n\\nAnswer:  \\nThe choice between scenarios is highly dependent on the kind of personality traits you prioritize in a potential partner. If you appreciate adventure and spontaneity, then Scenario 1 would be the better choice as it would likely attract individuals with similar traits. However, if you are looking for someone grounded with a good sense of humor who appreciates simple joys of life, Scenario 2 would be a more suitable choice. It's all about aligning yourself with the type of individual you want to attract.\", \"Reasoning: Finding a potential match on a dating app has to do with two key things: compatibility and making an emotional connection. It's important that the profile represents who you truly are (your likes, interests, and personality) and what you're looking for. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, your profile tells more of a story about who you are and what a day out with you might look like. It gives a clearer picture of your personality, that you enjoy fun, unplanned adventures and have a great sense of humor. Your love for your dog clearly comes through too. It ends on a note that invites the reader to participate in the future stories you might build together, which creates a sense of intrigue.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is good at stating facts (your love for tennis and animals, your sense of humor), but it doesn't allow the reader to connect emotionally to you in a strong way. It does have a clearer call to action at the end about meeting up for a tennis match or coffee though. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "2_3, generation 0, score 3.0\n",
      "3, generation 0, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, a tennis-loving undergrad student with a penchant for dog walks, good books, and whimsical adventures. Call me average, but as they say, 'Never judge a book by its cover'. Compelled by my beagle Scott, I regularly find myself in the middle of amusing escapades. \n",
      "\n",
      "Once, on a peaceful Sunday, Scott, suddenly overtaken by a bout of doggie excitement, took off on a wild chase after a squirrel in the park. The chase led us through a bustling farmers market, through a frisbee tournament (much to their surprise), and ultimately ended with both of us taking an unintended dip in the university fountain. Long story short: we didn’t catch the squirrel, but we had a blast (and loads of attention)!\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for a partner who enjoys unexpected adventures, loves animals, and wouldn’t mind getting caught in the rain or in a fountain with a beagle and me. Swipe right if you believe in laughter, genuine connection, and spontaneous park dates. Maybe we can create an enchanting tale together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric as a fun-loving and humorous individual with an affection for animals, specifically his beagle Scott. However, the second scenario outlines a few more layers to Eric’s personality, making him seem more personable and relatable. He is not afraid to poke fun at himself, often through amusing anecdotes involving everyday situations or interactions with Scott. This adds a dose of humor and indicates a down-to-earth nature that is often appealing in a potential romantic partner.\\n\\nIn the second scenario, Eric also shows a certain level of vulnerability by admitting he's unsure about his appearance and his height. He also speaks about his other love, tennis, and shares a part of his academic life, providing a more comprehensive view of his character and interests.\\n\\nAdditionally, the second scenario uses more engaging language and creativity, which indicates Eric might be an intriguing conversationalist – a quality many look for in a partner. Therefore, while both scenarios are appealing, the extra details, self-deprecating humor, and vulnerable quality make Scenario 2 seem more attractive.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning:\\nBoth profiles look appealing, but I would likely go with Eric's profile in Scenario 2. This version shows a good balance of fun and depth. He seems genuine, funny, and is grounded in what he enjoys. His approach of self-deprecating humor shows confidence and doesn't come within a hair's breadth of boasting. The details about 'the sock wars' and 'backhand volley' not only depict his love for sports and dogs but also how much he values simplicity in life. His willingness to share the little things also suggests that he has a good sense of humor and appreciates the importance of shared laughter and joy, which are key factors in a successful relationship. Furthermore, the way he talks about Scott denotes his loyalty and meaningful connection to those he cares about.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", 'Reasoning: When reading through both scenarios, it becomes apparent that Eric conveys the same basic information about himself in both. However, the way it\\'s delivered in each instance varies. In the first scenario, he speaks about an amusing anecdote and is straightforward about what he\\'s looking for in a partner—someone who loves unforeseen adventures, animals, and doesn\\'t mind getting caught in the rain or a fountain. It sets a light-hearted, fun, and adventure-loving tone. \\n\\nOn the flip side, the second scenario is filled with humor, indicating that he doesn\\'t take himself too seriously. He talks about his dog, their \"sock wars,\" and sharing a love for walks and food. He\\'s also candid about his looks and even teases himself about being \"outsmarted by a beagle.\" This scenario provides a sense of his humor, ability to self-deprecate, and think on the lighter side. \\n\\nAs a young woman in her 20s, the humor, self-deprecating charm, and overall fun-loving nature displayed in scenario 2 feel more appealing. It sets him apart as someone who doesn\\'t mind being open, real, and fun in a dating scenario where people often try to showcase only their best, most \\'perfect\\' selves. His personality seems more layered and human in scenario 2, making him feel more relatable and engaging. Therefore, that scenario would make me more inclined to swipe right. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, a tennis-loving undergrad student with a penchant for dog walks, good books, and whimsical adventures. Call me average, but as they say, 'Never judge a book by its cover'. Compelled by my beagle Scott, I regularly find myself in the middle of amusing escapades. \n",
      "\n",
      "Once, on a peaceful Sunday, Scott, suddenly overtaken by a bout of doggie excitement, took off on a wild chase after a squirrel in the park. The chase led us through a bustling farmers market, through a frisbee tournament (much to their surprise), and ultimately ended with both of us taking an unintended dip in the university fountain. Long story short: we didn’t catch the squirrel, but we had a blast (and loads of attention)!\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for a partner who enjoys unexpected adventures, loves animals, and wouldn’t mind getting caught in the rain or in a fountain with a beagle and me. Swipe right if you believe in laughter, genuine connection, and spontaneous park dates. Maybe we can create an enchanting tale together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\n\\nScenario 1 initiates a captivating story that provides an insight into Eric's personality, showing his sense of humor, adventure, and also how close he is to his dog Scott. Moreover, it shares a glimpse of his life and adventures, which sounds fun and engaging. It also lays out clearly what Eric is looking for in a potential partner - someone who enjoys animals, can appreciate the humor in unexpected situations, values genuine connection, and enjoys spontaneous park dates.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is infused with humor and provides more information about Eric's daily life with Scott. It gives a vast picture of the playful and friendly relationship with his dog. It indicates his dedication to tennis and also managed to add a fun rivalry with Scott. Although it does sparks some intrigue and humor, it does not clearly state what Eric is looking for in his future girlfriend.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric manages to make himself sound humorous, adventurous, and warm. He shares an engaging anecdote that includes his beagle, which portrays his love for animals, and ends it on a teasing note, baiting for more such incidents. He articulated his expectations subtly and directly into the conversation, making it clear what kind of partnership he is pursuing. It's light-hearted, enjoyable, and leaves room for curiosity - all good elements for attracting a potential match who shares his interests and values. Talking about a sense of adventure and genuine connection portrays his personality in a better way, thus, more likely to attract people with similar interests.\", \"In general, both scenarios are well-written and give a good glimpse into Eric's lifestyle and personality. However, Scenario 2 seems more likely to attract a potential match who shares Eric's interests and values. \\n\\nHere's a step by step reasoning:\\n\\n1. First Impression: Scenario 2 opens with a light-hearted and humorous tone, immediately showcasing Eric's wit and sense of humor. This can give a more engaging first impression and make readers more inclined to read on.\\n\\n2. Personality: Scenario 2 provides a lot more about Eric's personality. His self-deprecating humor, his playful relationship with his dog and his passion for tennis are shown more prominently over here. This scenario not only presents him as someone fun and outgoing but also portrays his tender relationship with his pet which can be attractive to animal lovers. \\n\\n3. Interests and Adventures: Although both scenarios describe fun adventures with Scott, the story in Scenario 2 focuses more on everyday life and shared experiences. This can make Eric more relatable, and it can make the reader imagine being part of these fun experiences.\\n\\n4. Engagement: Scenario 2 directly invites the reader to participate in their future adventure, which might intrigue people who are looking for an engaging and dynamic relationship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios offer engaging and humorous introductions to Eric and Scott, and tell potential matches a great deal about their personalities, hobbies, and what they might expect from a relationship. However, the deciding factor for me is how the information is presented.\\n\\nScenario 1 immediately presents an appealing narrative of an eventful day spent with Scott and sets a whimsical, adventurous tone. While it manages to mention Eric's love for tennis, his status as an undergrad, and his affection for Scott, it doesn't bring across his passion for these things as realistically as Scenario 2.  \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric's activities and his bond with Scott are woven effortlessly into daily and entertaining happenings. Instead of telling the potential match that he loves playing tennis and spending time with his dog, it shows them through tales of sock wars and tennis ball chases. This makes Eric's life seem more dynamic, fun, and meaningful, and therefore makes him seem more attractive as a potential partner.\\n\\nFurthermore, in Scenario 2, you've also shown that you don't take yourself too seriously and that you're able to laugh at yourself, which many people find appealing. It also subtly demonstrates an appreciation and capability for shared responsibility (such as feeding Scott). Hence, your matches might assume that you'd be willing and able to contribute equally to a relationship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 2, score 3.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Eric\\'s profile is fairly interesting in both scenarios. He appears to be humorous, passionate about certain things (like tennis and his dog), and open to meeting someone who can share or at least appreciate his interests.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric introduces himself and his hobbies in a lighthearted and entertaining way, using humor to hook the reader (\"I\\'m a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net\"). He cites his love for animals and specifically his dog, which shows kindness and empathy. He also indicates that he\\'s looking for someone special to join him and his beagle. While mentioning he isn\\'t imposing about physical looks, he claims to have charm and sense of humor.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric presents similar information but hyperfocuses on tennis, his dog, and his mediocre cooking skills. His clever humor comes across more strongly in this profile. There is also more specific storytelling involved, with the adventure Scott led them on, adding a fun image in the reader\\'s mind. An interesting aspect in this scenario is his openness toward someone teaching him better cooking skills, directly asking for reader\\'s engagement.\\n\\nMy reasoning: As it depends on personal preferences, a person who is charmed by a guy\\'s love for his dog and a humble sense of self might prefer Scenario 1. However, the more detailed storytelling and interactive request in Scenario 2 might appeal to someone with a good imagination or a passion for cooking.\\n\\nAnswer: This would vary from person to person. Depending on the above reasoning, it could be either Scenario 1 or 2. Personally, I would swipe right on Scenario 2 due to its greater detail and engagement invitation.', 'Scenario 2 is more appealing to me as it adds another layer of complexity to his bio rather than just the basics in Scenario 1. In Scenario 2, we get to see his sense of humor intertwined with his hobbies as well as his self-deprecating humor not taking himself too seriously. There is also an element of storytelling when he mentions the adventure that landed him on a friendly farm, which sparked curiosity and made me interested to know more. This scenario shows Eric as a down-to-earth, funny, and adventurous person. His bio reads more like a fun conversation and seems more inviting. His love for his dog and his subtle way to show love for cooking is quite charming. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Based on the profile given in these scenarios, both descriptions of Eric sound delightful and present him as a charming and humorous person. Comparing both profiles, Eric resolves to be an outgoing, animal-loving, humorous, tennis enthusiast. His love for adventure, pasta, and his valued wit forms an interesting and well-rounded character.\\n\\nHowever, selecting to swipe right would probably be more inclined towards Scenario 2. The reason behind this choice can be explained as follows:\\n\\n1. Elaboration: Compared to Scenario 1, Eric seems to have put more thought into crafting his bio in Scenario 2. He introduces his adventurous side, his cooking interests, and a funny anecdote about his beagle leading them home. This gives the reader a much more intriguing, clear, and detailed picture of his personality.\\n\\n2. Humor: Both scenarios are funny, but there's a slightly higher dose of humor in Scenario 2. From defending tennis as a superior sport, to grading his looks as 'refreshingly average', he shows his light-hearted nature. His usage of puns and his phrase about Scott with built-in GPS definitely add to his charm.\\n\\n3. Openness: In Scenario 2, Eric seems more open about not having a partner who necessarily shares all his interests. He values being open-minded, appreciating a good laugh and enjoying an occasional pasta dish, signaling that he welcomes diverse individuals, thus making him more approachable.\\n\\nIn light of the above reasoning,\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric balances humor with depth quite effectively and gives a detailed account of his interests and personality. He manages to showcase his love for tennis, cooking, and his dog, Scott, all while injecting a bit of humor that helps to lighten the tone. This can convey both his laid-back personality and his ability to hold a conversation, which aligns with certain factor people consider when scrolling through bios. \\n\\nEric allows for his interests to be clear while also extending an open arm for people who may not entirely share them—like those who prefer basketball over tennis, or for those who aren't quite the cook. This approach doesn't alienate those potential matches who don't fully align with his hobby set but may align with him on other scales. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric also outlines his major interests and love for his dog, Scott. However, although this bio is well-written, humorous and precise, it doesn't include as much of Eric's personality traits or quirks like the first. There's less humor to be found and it's more of a straightforward bio which may attract those who prefer said typical approach to dating bios. \\n\\nOverall, both scenarios could attract potential matches, but it tends to boil down to individual taste.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios provided are indeed well written. However, when we critically analyze both, considering the main aim to find a potential match who shares interests and values, Scenario 1 seems to have an edge.\\n\\nScenario 1 not only introduces the profile owner in a way that explores his personality and interests (e.g., tennis, owning a pet), but it also includes a little humor and light-hearted self-deprecation. The small story about Scott adds a personal touch and gives a potential match a glimpse into Eric's life. It shares more about the personality of the user, his likes, his adventurous spirit, and love for dogs.\\n\\nMoreover, it leaves the door open for further conversation by inviting potential matches to share their Italian grandmas' recipes. It gives a person reading the profile a few potential topics to start the conversation from, like tennis, dog adventures, or homemade pasta.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is also good, catching readers' attention by presenting the same information in a more straightforward manner. But it lacks the personal touch and storytelling aspect that Scenario 1 contains. It's more direct, which might appeal to some but it's less likely to provide a range of conversational starting points. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nScenario 1 presents a detailed and playful depiction of your personality, something that can definitely attract someone with a similar sense of humor. The anecdote about Scott, your beagle, adds depth to your profile and gives it a personal touch. It's a fun story that potential dates may wish to hear more about. It presents your average looks in a humorous manner, which shows you're comfortable with yourself and have a good sense of humor.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is shorter, crisper and a bit more mysterious. It leaves the readers curious enough to want to know more about you, your interests, and most notably, your dog Scott's secret love for caramel ice-cream. The humor is more subtle here, but still quite engaging.\\n\\nBoth scenarios have their merits, but if you're aiming for matches who share your specific interests (tennis, dogs, cooking, and a good sense of humor), and possibly a more laid-back, fun-loving dynamic, then you might lean towards Scenario 1 because it offers more context about you and paints a vivid picture of your personality and lifestyle.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "2_3, generation 0, score 3.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 2, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Both scenarios provide a light-hearted and approachable image of Eric. However, Scenario 2 offers a more personal story, giving more insight into his life and personality, specifically his humor and close relationship with his dog Scott. His bio is engaging and shows his fun and adventurous side which can be appealing. He also uses much humor in his bio, making his profile stand out, and his description of his dog reveals his soft spot for animals. Moreover, the mention of him not being NBA player height and being outsmarted by his beagle makes him seem self-deprecating and demonstrates a humility which can be attractive. The balance of personality traits Eric presents in his bio also indicates that he has great variety in his life, from academics to friends to sports. This variety can be very appealing since it promises a relationship with many shared activities and interests. His call-to-action at the end invites for fun laughs and involvement in his life adventures with his pet, which further supports my choice to swipe right.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', 'Reasoning: \\n\\nBetween the two scenarios, while each has its charming quirks and details, I find scenario 1 a bit more appealing. Eric comes across as very humorous, warm, and approachable. His story about an adventure with his beagle, Scott, is endearing, and it reveals that he has a playful, adventurous side. Moreover, his humility in acknowledging that he is \"average\" in the looks department coupled with his positive self-image about his charisma makes him seem more relatable and down-to-earth.\\n\\nIn both scenarios, his love for animals, especially his dog, is evident which is nice for someone who also appreciates animals. However, the detail in scenario 1 about their adventurous journey takes it a notch higher. His love for tennis and friends is also clearly depicted in both, but his light argument about tennis being better than basketball in scenario 1 adds an extra fun element to his personality.\\n\\nHis candid invitation for anyone to slide in with nonna-approved pasta recipes indicates that he\\'s not shy to try out new things or ask for help – a charming and attractive quality. The way he presents himself in that scenario feels like a person who doesn\\'t take himself too seriously, loves to learn, and appreciates good company.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nBased on these two scenarios, I am drawn towards Eric because he presents himself as humorous yet humble, and he clearly loves his dog, Scott, an aspect I find endearing. He also brings up his love for tennis and his ongoing debates about its supremacy over other sports. These are indicators of a person who is both passionate and able to engage in friendly banter. \\n\\nIn the first scenario, I particularly appreciate Eric's admission about his culinary skills and the playful dialogue around awarding bonus points for shared interests. There's also a funny story he offers to share about Scott's adventure. This suggests that Eric is open-minded and enjoys sharing about his life. \\n\\nHowever, in the second scenario, Eric further opens up with a good balance of humor and depth. He makes a joke about his dog Scott's mischievous acquisition of his socks, displaying that he doesn't take himself too seriously, which is a quality I admire. \\n\\nMoreover, Eric's comment about being outsmarted by his beagle proves that he has a self-deprecating sense of humor, but also manages to impress by illustrating his commitment to his friends, academics, and love for tennis. \\n\\nAll these factors make Eric seem like a fun and engaging person to get to know. The aspect of him not being a tall NBA player and being 'average looking' doesn't dissuade me because he makes up for it with his charisma and his genuine knack for making people smile, something I find very attractive. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\\n\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Undergrad at [University Name], who spends an unspeakable amount of time trying to argue tennis is indeed better than basketball. When I'm not passionately defending my beloved sport, you can find me making mediocre pasta dishes at home (any decent Italian grandmas are welcome to slide in with their nonna-approved recipes!). \n",
      "\n",
      "Full-time human to Scott, the most charming beagle with an adventurous spirit. we have quite the story to share from the adventure that landed us in an unexpected (but friendly) farm and Scott, in his infinite wisdom, successfully led us back home. I still believe he has a built-in GPS, but who knows, right?\n",
      "\n",
      "My friends describe me as 'refreshingly average' in the looks department, but don't be fooled, my charisma and wittiness make up for any shortcomings (no pun intended). Bonus points if you're a dog-loving tennis enthusiast, but it's not a prerequisite. As long as you're open-minded, love a good laugh and appreciate the occasional pasta dish, we'll get along just fine. Looking forward to some fun conversation!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nWhen considering an online dating profile, it's generally understood that humor, authenticity, and a bit of personal detail can go a long way in attracting potential partners. Based on these qualities, both scenarios do a good job in presenting myself as an approachable, friendly, and likable character with a sense of humor and a unique personality.\\n\\nScenario 1 gives a very playful and fun tone, which can be attractive for someone seeking a lively, light-hearted partner. The humor injected throughout the text with the mention of 'dog sponsorship deal', 'sock skirmishes' and 'hilarious dad jokes' does not only make the profile engaging, but it also gives the sense that I don't take myself too seriously. This could potentially attract matches who share the same sense of humor and appreciate fun, quirky, and adventurous activities. \\n\\nScenario 2, however, provides a slightly more detailed and balanced picture of my life and interests. I mention my passion for tennis, my cooking attempts, and my love for adventure through the anecdote with Scott. The humor is slightly downplayed compared to Scenario 1, but it's still present. Moreover, the way I described my looks and height in this scenario was more straightforward and might be appreciated by those who value sincerity over humor.\\n\\nConclusively, while both descriptions are inviting, if someone shares my interests in tennis, dogs, and cooking, they might be more likely to swipe right on Scenario 2 due to the more explicit mention of these elements. Also, the straightforward approach in Scenario 2 might come across as more mature, balancing humor with sincerity, making the profile appealing to a wider range of people. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"My reasoning follows as such:\\n\\nBoth scenarios do well to highlight my interests, hobbies, and my bonding with Scott, my beagle.  \\n\\nScenario 1 uses humor right off the bat, showcasing my personality to potential matches. It also reveals my inclination towards lighthearted fun and competitiveness, seen in my playful tussles with Scott. This scenario, while still focusing on me, puts a lot of emphasis on my relationship with Scott, which is likely to appeal to potential matches who are particularly fond of dogs. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, integrates more of my personal life, demonstrating my pursuit for academic excellence as well as my culinary adventures. This might be more attractive to potential matches who appreciate intellect and someone who's trying his hand at cooking. \\n\\nHowever, both scenarios make it clear that I value a good sense of humor, companionship, and an appreciation for dogs and tennis. \\n\\nThe choice between Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 would depend on whether a potential match is attracted more by the carefree, fun-loving persona or the intellectually driven, pasta cooking one. \\n\\nTaking into consideration that I want to find someone who shares my interests and values, but still understanding that everybody's different, I'd lean towards Scenario 1. The humor mixed with elements of my everyday life, like Scott’s shenanigans and my love for tennis, are likely to be both relatable and entertaining for potential matches. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth scenarios are engaging and humorous, showing a playful and friendly side of Eric, which can be attractive to potential matches. However, there are a few key differences that could influence the appeal to a potential match:\\n\\n1. Both bios show Eric as an active, engaging person who loves his dog, Scott. However, Scenario 1 dives more deeply into Eric's relationship with Scott, painting a vivid and humorous picture of their daily dynamic. This would likely appeal more to someone who loves dogs and appreciates the bond between a pet and its owner.\\n\\n2. Scenario 2, on the other hand, describes more of Eric's life outside of his relationship with Scott. He gives clues about his culinary interest and open-minded worldview – the invitation for other people to share their pasta recipes implies he values learning from others. Moreover, he describes an adventurous episode with Scott that further showcases his sense of humor and flexibility.\\n\\n3. While both scenarios convey a sense of humor, the jokes in Scenario 1 mainly revolve around the dog, Scott, which might be less relatable to someone who does not share Eric's love for dogs. In Scenario 2, the humor is integrated into a wider range of topics, making it more likely to appeal to diverse tastes.\\n\\nAnswer: Considering that dog lovers may already be attracted to Eric due to the picture probably featuring him and Scott, Scenario 2 might be more effective at attracting potential matches who share Eric's interests and values. It covers a wider range of topics and implies an interest in learning, adventure, and open-mindedness, which are attractive qualities to more people.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "2_3, generation 0, score 3.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Both bios display a good sense of humor and give off a warm and friendly vibe. However, Eric\\'s profile in Scenario 2 seems more engaging and detailed. It gives more information about his life, hobbies, and personality. It shows that he has a great relationship with his dog and a good sense of humor - evidenced by his story about the sock skirmishes and dad jokes. It indicates that he\\'s down-to-earth (\"we\\'re not talking NBA player height here\") and seems to value a good laugh. Lastly, his direct invitation to \"swipe right if you\\'re ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter\" shows he\\'s open and inviting, which can be a very attractive trait.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', '[reasoning text]\\n\\nPersonality plays a huge role in finding a potential match. Both scenarios depict Eric as a fun-loving, humorous, active individual with a special affection for his dog and tennis. That being said, the tone and depth of information between the two is what differentiates them.\\n\\nIn the first scenario, Eric seems more straightforward with his information. He still manages to convey his interests, love for his dog, and his sense of humor. It gives off a more serious and somewhat mature vibe, while still remaining light-hearted and lovable. However, it doesn\\'t reveal as much about his personality as the second one.\\n\\nIn the second scenario, Eric seems to embrace his quirky side more, showing a funnier and more candid portrayal of his love for his dog and their adventures, he is self-deprecating and doesn\\'t shy away from making fun of himself. He comes off as an easygoing person with a knack for spinning entertaining stories about his life.\\n\\nWhile both scenarios are appealing, the second one reminded me of the saying \"laughter is the best medicine.\" The humor and details he uses to depict his daily routine and relationship with his dog makes it easier to envision what being part of his life might be like, which is a lot more engaging. It also seems that this scenario would leave more room for fun ice-breaker conversation topics if we match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Reasoning: Reading through both scenarios, both portray Eric as an approachable, humorous, and active individual who has a significant bond with his beagle, Scott. Both scenarios reveal his interests in tennis and his average looks, making him come across as a potential fun and non-intimidating match. However, I tend to prefer a more playful, expressive, and detailed bio that conveys more aspects of an individual's personality and life. In comparison, Scenario 2 provides more insight into Eric's life and character. It gives a clearer idea of his humorous side, reveals the tongue-in-cheek 'sock wars' with his beagle, shows a bit about his daily routines, and his love for gourmet food. Overall, Scenario 2 feels more vibrant, charming, and engaging, which seems more appealing to potentially strike up interesting conversations if we match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, a 20-something tennis-loving undergrad with an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a dog sponsorship deal. Yep, you heard it right. \n",
      "\n",
      "My beagle Scott and I are the unparalleled dynamic duo on campus. Whether it's chasing after tennis balls (him, not me) or reigniting disputes about who's the rightful owner of my socks, we've got our schedule packed. Surprisingly, unlike me, Scott has managed to maintain his 100% victory record in the sock skirmishes. Hey, don't laugh; those battles are more intensely competitive than my finals! \n",
      "\n",
      "On a more profound note, we share a love for long walks, new adventures, cozy cuddles, and of course, gourmet food (preferably shared between us, but Scott's insistent on hogging the treats). \n",
      "\n",
      "More about me? When not being outsmarted by a beagle, I'm juggling between academics, friends, and practicing my backhand volley. I might be 'average' in the looks department and we're not talking NBA player height here, but I've found my forte in hilarious dad jokes and a genuine knack for making people smile. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone who's up for sharing adventures as much as Scott and I are up for sock wars (or just to laugh at my jokes). Swipe right if you're ready for some dog-filled fun and lots of laughter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning text:\\n\\nBoth scenarios have elements that make the profile interesting and genuine. However, there are slight differences that could make either more appealing to a potential match, depending on their preferences. \\n\\nScenario 1 maintains a somewhat formal tone throughout the profile, remaining polite without veering into the overly casual or playful. The humor is more subtle, and the details of Eric's life are shared in a straightforward manner. This might appeal more to individuals who prefer a more mature and straightforward approach. Furthermore, the way Eric invites potential matches to join him, either in playing tennis or deciphering his dog's heart, appeals to more active and animal-loving individuals. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is a livelier and more engaging read. It injects more humor into the bio and humanizes Eric's character through self-deprecating jokes and funny anecdotes. The writing style creates an image of a fun, less serious individual who enjoys a good laugh. This style would likely resonate more with individuals who enjoy light-hearted humor and a more casual approach to dating profiles. \\n\\nLiking animals is a recurrent theme in both scenarios, which would likely attract other animal lovers. However, Scenario 2 is more descriptive and entertaining with its story about Scott the beagle, which might make it more captivating to animal lovers who appreciate a good dog story. \\n\\nOverall, the ideal scenario would largely depend on the type of person Eric aims to attract. For a more mature or serious individual, Scenario 1 might be more successful. For a fun-loving, casual individual who appreciates humor and a good story, Scenario 2 would likely be the better choice.\\n\\nAnswer: It depends on the preference of the user. If they prefers a more direct, polite, and somewhat formal tone, Scenario 1 would be recommended. If they enjoy a lively tone with humor, Scenario 2 would make a better impression.\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nIn my opinion, Scenario 2 would be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values. The bio is detailed and shows my personality and humor quite clearly. While Scenario 1 does give some information about me, it is somewhat generic and doesn't really stand out from the multitude of other dating profiles. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, however, there is a better sample of my humor, and it is clear that I value honesty and being genuine. It also includes a fun tidbit about my dog's 'victory' in our sock disputes, hints at my competitive nature, and shows my love for Scott, which also indicates that I care deeply for those dear to me. \\n\\nOverall, Scenario 2 presents a more fleshed-out version of who I am, and since it includes a greater depth of information compared to Scenario 1, it gives potential matches a better sense of what they're in for. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"[Reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios provide details about Eric and are likely to attract matches with similar interests. They both introduce Eric's hobbies and his love for his dog, Scott. However, there are some differences in style and detail that might affect the types of matches attracted. \\n\\nScenario 1 is straightforward and friendly. It starts with Eric's love for tennis and his desire to find someone to share the sport with. It also expresses his desire for companionship and slightly mentions his sense of humor. This scenario also hints to the potential match that she might compete with Scott for Eric's attention.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 uses a more humorous and creative tone, presenting an engaging story about Eric's life with Scott. This scenario portrays Eric as fun-loving and lighthearted, someone who doesn't take himself too seriously. There seems to be more of Eric's personality in this scenario, such as his sense of humor and acceptance of being outsmarted by his dog. \\n\\nTherefore, Eric would probably attract different types of matches depending on which scenario he chooses. If he wants to attract people who enjoy straightforward, clear communication and who share his love of tennis and animals, Scenario 1 seems more suitable. But if he wants to attract people who appreciate humor, creativity and casual fun, Scenario 2 is probably a better choice. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario [Dependent on the more preferred personality type Eric is trying to attract]\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 2, score 2.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: \\n\\nIn the first scenario, Eric sounds friendlier and a bit more authentic. His love for his dog, Scott, is clear, and he presents it in a fun, humorous manner, which hints at a good sense of humor. He also gives a glimpse into his day-to-day life and interests, making him feel more real and relatable. He is open about what he enjoys, such as his tennis hobby and hanging out with his friends. Eric seems to be outgoing, but also somewhat reserved, as he shows he values his time with Scott. \\n\\nFurthermore, the story about Scott stealing his ice cream creates a funny and endearing picture in mind, making him seem more caring and patient. The casual note on possibly sharing an ice cream makes him appear more approachable. The storytelling also produces a sense of connection because you can relate better when you can visualize the situation.\\n\\nIn contrast, the second scenario is more generic with a straightforward explanation about his life and his interests. It still paints a nice picture of Eric, but the humor and charm that made the first scenario more engaging and colorful are absent. Although humorous, the comment about looking average may come off as lacking confidence.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: The first scenario paints a more detailed and engaging picture of Eric's life. He portrays a clear love for his animals and friends while also hinting at a fun and lovable personality by sharing a playful anecdote. This personal story reveals a humorous side to him, which is attractive. His active lifestyle, combined with his love for tennis and animals show that he is likely outgoing, active and compassionate. The engaging and humorous tone Eric uses in the first scenario is markedly more appealing, as it is warm and endearing in comparison to the more casually written second scenario.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nWhile both scenarios have positive aspects, I am more drawn to Scenario 1. \\n\\nFirstly, Eric starts by explaining a bit about himself and his background, which helps to set the scene and give a better idea of his day-to-day life. It also communicates the appeal of his lifestyle and makes it easier to imagine being part of his social circle. \\n\\nSecondly, the specific examples given, like the ice-cream story with his beagle, Scott, makes him come across as more personable and relatable. These details also hint at his sense of humor and seem to promise fun and laughter in the potential relationship. \\n\\nThirdly, he gives a clearer call to action - if I am interested in university tales, dog adventures, and tennis matches, then I should swipe right. The added humorous warning about Scott stealing ice-cream is light-hearted and seems like an interesting challenge, which again showcases Eric's wit and humor. \\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 comes across as more generic and less engaging. Even though it still gives a decent overview of Eric and his interests - it lacks the charm, humor, and detailed stories that make Scenario 1 more appealing.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate student at a big state university. I'm a big fan of whacking fuzzy green balls across the net (read: I love tennis), so if you've got a mean backhand or love cheering from the sidelines, we'll get along just fine!\n",
      "\n",
      "But that's not all I'm about. I'm also an animal lover; you can often find me taking long walks with my beagle, Scott. He's pretty good company, but I'm on the hunt for some human companionship - someone to share in my dog walking adventures. I hope I can find someone special to teach the secret tricks to my dog's heart (caramel ice-cream, but you didn't hear it from me 😉).\n",
      "\n",
      "In case you were wondering, I'm about average in looks and height - but more than make up for it with my charm and sense of humor. Let's grab a tennis match or coffee sometime and see if we hit it off!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\n\\nWhen reviewing both profiles, it's key to consider what would appeal most to potential matches seeking someone genuine, relatable, and engaging. \\n\\nThe first scenario provides a clear picture of who you are in a concise way, combining your love for tennis, animals, and humor smoothly. Yet, it lacks the in-depth insight and anecdotal charm found in the second scenario.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, offers a relatable, more enriched glimpse into your life. By detailing your university life, dog adventures and love for ice-cream, it shows more of your personality and makes you come across more real and engaging. \\n\\nIt provides an entertaining story about Scott that paints a lively picture of your everyday life. This gives the potential match a fun anecdote to connect with and break the ice. The second scenario also invites the potential match to not only join in tennis but also in your regular social life, which might be more appealing.\\n\\nThus, my reasoning is based on the belief that being personable, descriptive, and adding a hint of humor makes a profile more attractive, reflecting the presenter as someone interesting to get to know.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nIn online dating, authenticity and approachability in a dating profile are key to attracting potential matches and engaging them. It's also important to include elements of one’s personality, details about interests and activities, and a sense of humor to stand out among other profiles. \\n\\nBoth scenarios have elements that cater to the requirements mentioned above. However, there are subtle differences.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, the profile is more straight-forward and candid. You straightforwardly mention your love for tennis and your dog, Scott. This approach attracts people who appreciate directness and clarity. The humor included (about fetching tennis balls and the secret to your dog’s heart) adds a light-hearted touch, which is very appealing, mainly because humor is a universal ice breaker. You have also invited the potential match for a tennis match or coffee, indicating your willingness to meet and interact directly. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, you not only speak about your interests but also narrate a short anecdote about Scott, displaying your storytelling capabilities. Storytelling is engaging and creates a visual impression, which can help you stand out from other profiles. The addition of words like ‘close-knit group of friends’ also subtly suggests that you’re good at relationships and companionship, which is a desirable trait. You also make a witty remark about sharing an ice cream, keeping the tone of the profile light and inviting.\\n\\nConsidering these points, Scenario 2 might be more appealing as it effectively showcases not only your interests and values but also your personality traits - your storytelling skills, your sense of humor, your friendly nature, and also gives a delightful peek into your life. While it is important to be crisp and straight to the point, a pinch of story and humor can make your profile more engaging and memorable.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth scenarios are quite inviting and share a good amount of information about Eric, his interests, and his values. However, there are a few points that make one scenario stand out more than the other.\\n\\nScenario 1 appears more upfront, with clear details about tennis and Eric's passion for his dog, and could potentially attract more people with a shared enthusiasm for tennis or dog lovers. This scenario also provides humor, which adds to Eric's charm, and points out he is light-hearted and probably fun.\\n\\nIn contrast, scenario 2 provides a more detailed picture of Eric's life — how he spends his day, his ice cream misadventures with Scott, and his companionship with his friends. This scenario paints a livelier picture and could engage someone who appreciates detail and enjoys stories, making it more likely to attract a match who is interested in knowing more about Eric and his life.\\n\\nScenario 2 also hints at some sense of community, showing Eric can balance his academics, personal life, and social life, which could be appealing to someone looking for a well-balanced partner.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 91 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 2, score 2.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios are quite engaging and reveal a lot about Eric's personality, which appears very warm, friendly, and approachable. He comes across as an individual with diverse interests, who values sincerity and authenticity. His love for animals and background in sports make him unique. However, if I have to choose one, I would go for Scenario 2 because it provides more personal anecdotes and details, portrays a great sense of humor, and paints a clear and vivid picture of Eric's life and personality. I can envision his day-to-day experiences, and the story about the ice cream incident with the dog provides a delightful, funny anecdote that makes his profile more memorable. \\n\\nMoreover, Eric's use of a casual, conversational tone in Scenario 2 makes the profile feel more personal, as if he's talking directly to the reader, which stands to build a better connection.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning:\\nWhile both scenarios depict Eric as a friendly, sociable, and animal-loving person, there are certain elements in each scenario that weigh in the decision-making process.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric emphasizes more on his openness to deep, authentic conversations and seems to hold a genuine interest in getting to know you on a personal level. His love for simplicity, sincerity, and authenticity can be appealing, and it suggests an individual who takes relationships and connections seriously. Additionally, giving a description of how you might notice him in a room provides a sense of familiarity and approachability.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 offers a more colorful narrative with anecdotes and personal quirks, allowing you to better visualize his personality and life. The cute story about Scott, his beagle, is engaging and adds a humorous touch to the profile, showcasing Eric's light-hearted nature. However, some might find the emphasis on his university life and dog adventures a little too specific\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nLooking at these two scenarios, both biographies convey a friendly and warm personality. They talk about Eric's love for sports, his dog, and how he values time with his friends. \\n\\nFrom the first glance, Scenario 1 seems more polished. Eric appears to be well-spoken, mentioning his hobbies subtly while focusing on being open to meaningful conversations. This implies that he cherishes inner connection over surface-level engagement. \\n\\nOn the tighter side, Scenario 2 feels more inviting. The addition of a small story about his life with Scott makes Eric more relatable and gives a glimpse of his sense of humor. There's a playful element in the biography, which indicates that Eric doesn't shy away from being candid and a bit goofy. He also talks more about his daily life, giving a more realistic idea of his lifestyle.\\n\\nWhile both scenarios show great personality traits, the sense of humor and candidness that comes with Scenario 2 persuade me more. It shows that Eric is comfortable being himself and that he has a lighthearted perspective on life. The inclusion of a funny and authentic adventure with his dog also makes Eric's bio more entertaining and engaging while still showing his love for animals. This kind of openness and ability to find humor in ordinary situations is appealing.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a 20-something-year-old undergrad student at our bustling state university. My days are usually packed with classes, but nothing excites me more than running off to the campus tennis court after lectures or hanging out with my close-knit group of friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "I find solace in nature, and animals have a special place in my heart which is adequately filled (most of the time) by Scott - my energetic beagle and adventure companion. Speaking of Scott, he's more than just a pet: he's my ice cream stealing, ultimate chase master partner! There's this one time we were at a park, and while I was busy buying us some vanilla ice cream, Scott - being the opportunistic little fella he is - jumped and scooped out a mouthful from mine right from my hand. Ended up sharing my ice cream as the whole park laughed at our little spectacle! \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you are interested in some cool university tales, crazy dog adventures, or friendly tennis matches, swipe right. Maybe we’ll share an ice cream...but beware of Scott. He'll get to it first!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric. Currently navigating my way through an undergrad program at a reputable state university (trust me, the journey's as thrilling as it sounds!). On most days, you'll find me unwinding with a great match of tennis or chilling with my buddies.\n",
      "\n",
      "I have a deep love for animals, which is one of the reasons why I'm a proud dad to an adorable Beagle named Scott. He's always up for an adventurous walk or a cuddly nap - the best of both worlds, if you ask me! \n",
      "\n",
      "If you're passionate about something, I'd love to hear about it - whether it's a hobby, your studies, or your favorite Netflix show. Always a fan of deep, authentic conversations.\n",
      "\n",
      "On how you'd find me in a room? I'm of average height with an equal blend of nerdiness and charisma. Not the Hollywood movie knight but more your friendly-next-door-guy who enjoys a good laugh, believes in simplicity and values sincerity.\n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're into dogs and down for cheering on a tennis match (or even throwing a few balls), I might just be your potential plus-one. Looking forward to connecting with genuine spirits and seeing where things go! :)\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios provide a brief but meaningful picture of Eric's life. They mention his university studies, love for tennis, and his relationship with his dog, which can be points of common interest with possible matches.\\n\\nHowever, scenario 1 paints a more vivid image of Eric's personality and life. The anecdote about Scott stealing ice cream is both humorous and relatable. It gives potential matches the impression that Eric doesn't take himself too seriously and enjoys humor in his life, which could be conducive to forming a relaxed and fun-loving relationship.\\n\\nOn the other hand, scenario 2 emphasizes Eric's intellectual side. It delves deeper into Eric's interest in people's passions, indicating a desire for deeper, more meaningful connections. This could appeal to individuals seeking more serious or communicative relationships.\\n\\nSummarily, if Eric seeks someone who enjoys fun and light-heartedness, scenario 1 is the way to go. If he's more interested in deeper, intellectual relationships, scenario 2 would work better.\\n\\nAnswer: It depends on Eric's preferences. If he prefers a more laid-back, humor-enjoying individual, scenario 1 will attract that type of individual better. If he seeks a deeper, intellectual connection, scenario 2 is more suitable.\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios give a good description of Eric's character, lifestyle, humor, and interests. They are detailed enough to provide a potential match with a clear sense of Eric's personality. \\n\\nHowever, Scenario 1 might be more appealing to someone who shares Eric's interests and values due to the tone and specific examples used. His playful narration about his dog Scott stealing ice cream directly shows his humorous side, making his profile more interesting and engaging. This funny and relatable story is likely to attract people who enjoy light-hearted humor and the company of dogs.\\n\\nMoreover, the open invitation for tennis matches and sharing university tales creates an image of a fun, welcoming person who cherishes sharing the company with others. Particular interests - tennis and dogs, in this case - form common ground for bonding.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is a little more serious and general. It doesn't have the same level of specificity and lively interaction, which might make it less appealing to some.\\n\\nSo, comparing both scenarios, someone who is looking for a more cheerful, intriguing profile with some humor in it may be more attracted to Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nWhen looking over the two scenarios, I'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values in Scenario 1. The reason being that it demonstrates more of my personality and paints a more vivid picture of my life. \\n\\nScenario 1 starts by briefly introducing me and dives straight into my interests and personal life. It tells a funny story about an adventure with my dog Scott, which gives potential matches a better idea about my sense of humor and loving relationship with my pet. This anecdote could also come off as endearing to someone who shares my love of animals. \\n\\nThe mention of how I spend my spare time, either playing tennis or hanging out with friends, forms a key part of my identity in the dating profile. This will attract those who enjoy or are interested in these activities. \\n\\nThe college tales, dog adventures, and tennis matches create a vibrant picture of what it might be like to date me, and leaves the reader curious to hear more about these topics. \\n\\nFinally, the closing line of the bio - suggesting we “share an ice cream” - provides a casual, light-hearted proposal for a first date. The ice cream incident in the park and the warning about Scott could work as a good conversation starter during an ice cream date.\\n\\nWhile Scenario 2 also covers my interests and pet ownership, it seems slightly more formal and lacks the specific stories and anecdotes of scenario 1, which bring the profile owner's personality to life and foster a connection.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 94 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 1, score 0.0\n",
      "2, generation 0, score 6.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Both scenarios are quite interesting, humorous, and show Eric\\'s personality. Eric comes off as friendly, funny, and laid-back in both, with a sense of humility and warmth.\\n\\nScenario 1: I appreciate Eric\\'s humor about his dog Scott joining online classes and his open invitation for someone to join their duo. The light-hearted joke about being a tennis pro also indicates his sense of fun and depicts an adorable image of him playing fetch with his dog while trying to play tennis. \\n\\nScenario 2: This scenario goes into greater detail about Eric\\'s academic life, interests, and humor. It’s also slightly more self-deprecating and highlights his humility. The metaphoric approach of \"rom-com\", \"thriller\" and \"soap opera\" demonstrated a creative streak, which is charming. \\n\\nHowever, scenario 2 incorporates a negative tone about life, indicating that it might turn into a \"soap opera\". Though it\\'s probably meant to be humorous, there\\'s a slight hint of pessimism or concern that he’s expecting too much drama. It might lead to a presumption that he\\'s a guy who loves drama or has past experiences with too much of it. \\n\\nConsidering all these points, I would lean more toward the first scenario.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\nAs it presents the same humorous and laid-back personality without any potential hints for unnecessary drama or pessimism. It leans more towards positivity and fun, which is what I might be looking for in a possible date.', \"Reasoning: Judging between the two scenarios, I'd pay attention to certain things, including how personal his bio is, his sense of humor and whether he comes across as genuine and well-rounded.\\n\\nIn the first scenario, Eric comes across as quite jovial and easy-going. His playful mention of his dog and tennis are really appealing, and his bio also hints at some humor. Also, the fact that he admits he isn't good at tennis shows a bit of humility and genuineness, which is endearing.\\n\\nOn the flip side, in the second scenario, while he comes off intellectual with his academic references, he also expresses a far more structured and serious tone in his bio, which may be a bit intimidating. Additionally, it seems a bit over-complicated with its reference to writing a story together, which might not be what everyone is looking for in an dating app.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1. This is because it comes off as much more approachable, and I feel like I would enjoy getting to know him. I also find the inclusion of his dog Scott as a key aspect of his life to be a charming characteristic, as it shows his love and dedication for animals, and towards the aspects of his life that he is passionate about. Furthermore, the humorous and down-to-earth tone in scenario 1 makes him seem more accessible, which would make me feel more at ease to swipe right and potentially match with him.\", 'Reasoning: \\n\\nWhile both profiles have an endearing and humorous persona reflected through Eric\\'s bio, there are certain key differences that make one more appealing than the other.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as a casual and easy-going person. He wraps up his love for his dog, Scott, and his interest in tennis quite comically, which instantly comes off as charming. Furthermore, his bio creates a sense of comfort and companionship rather than a stiff romantic pursuit, which can make the swiping decision easier for a potential match. By mentioning that he wouldn\\'t mind someone who can outdo his tennis skills, he displays humility and a willingness to share a common interest, which is a good sign in the context of a potential relationship. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, while equally witty and engaging, might come across as a bit too complex for a dating profile. He does highlight his love for Scott, his academic life, and his interest in tennis, but there is less focus on a romantic pursuit or partnership. His mention about hoping for a \"rom-com\" but preparing for a \"thrilling adventure\" could make potential matches uncertain about his expectations or intentions from a relationship. \\n\\nIn conclusion, while Scenario 2 does have a unique charm, Scenario 1 seems more like a dating profile that is fun, approachable and lays the foundation for a healthy interaction. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Both scenarios clearly express your personality and interests, making them suitable for attracting potential matches who share your values. However, there might be slight differences in appeal due to the tone and humor used in each of them. \\n\\nScenario 1 is more informal and upbeat. It clearly communicates your love for animals and sports, specifically tennis. It also portrays you as a playful and humorous person. If a potential match enjoys lightheartedness, informality and sharing fun-loving activities together, they might be more attracted to you based on this scenario.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is slightly more formal and intellectual. It talks about your academic life and still communicates your love for animals and sports. This scenario communicates your life as an adventure and implies that you are both humorous and ambitious. This might attract people who appreciate thoughtfulness and who are also serious about their academic or professional lives.\\n\\nIn general, if you are looking for someone who enjoys informal, spontaneous, and fun loving scenarios, scenario 1 may be more appealing. If you are seeking for someone who is more formal, intellectually stimulating, and who appreciates the academic aspect of life, scenario 2 may work better.\\n\\nAnswer: Based on your preference, you can choose either Scenario 1 or Scenario 2.', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, we start off by showcasing Eric's light-hearted nature and good sense of humor. His description of his online classes and the antics of his beagle, Scott, portray the casual, amusing side of his student life. The fact that Eric spends time playing tennis and going on walks with Scott establishes his active lifestyle and love for animals. His openness to the reader directly joining his life with Scott implies that he is looking for a committed and serious relationship. The post script about potentially sharing his tennis hobby with the reader is both funny and welcoming, indicating Eric's desire to find someone he shares common interests with. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, however, Eric's approach is more detailed and romantic. The connection between studying and sports gives an in-depth look into his daily routine while maintaining his fun personality. Adding humor related to his height and math grades makes his self-perception relatable and down-to-earth. The description of his love life as a rom-com looking for a co-star gives the profile a dreamy, romantic touch without coming off too strong. The last paragraph presents the kind of relationship Eric is looking for - fun, thoughtful, and engaging, with a caveat for potential debates, which shows his intellectual side. \\n\\nAnswer: Both scenarios have their own merits, but I would lean toward Scenario 2. It is more in-depth about Eric's personality, aspirations, and what he seeks in a relationship. This would potentially attract a more serious, long-term relationship from a match who enjoys his sense of humor, shares his interests, and appreciates his intellectual side.\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nScenario 1 has an informal and conversational tone. The levity and humor reflect a laid-back personality and might appeal to someone who appreciates easy banter and wit. It also places a significant emphasis on the importance Eric places on his dog and his love for tennis, attractive to animal lovers and those who enjoy physical activities respectively.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is slightly more formal and intricate in its narrative. It gives a fuller picture of Eric's life - his academic pursuits, penchant for humor, love for his dog, and amateur status in tennis. It provides a more holistic view of Eric’s life while retaining his individualistic quirks. Furthermore, it implies that Eric can engage in intellectual conversations, which might attract someone with an academic leaning and love for in-depth discussions.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\\n\\nAlthough both scenarios introduce potential matches to Eric in a charming and authentic manner, scenario 2 provides more detail about Eric which would allow potential matches to make more informed decisions about whether they share similar interests or values. It is likely to attract someone who appreciates intellectual conversations, humor, animals, and sports, all of which Eric values. Furthermore, the note about looking for a co-star in life indicates that Eric is serious about finding a partner. This could make potential matches who are looking for a serious relationship more likely to swipe right.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 94 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 1, score 0.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 0, score 10.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nWhile both profiles are interesting and engaging, they present different aspects of Eric's personality. \\n\\nScenario 1 stresses Eric's love for tennis, his study-life balance, and his adorable beagle Scott who seems to have an endearing mischievous streak. It's easy to envision fun, memorable experiences with Eric and Scott, both at the tennis courts and elsewhere. This is a strong draw for someone who's a dog lover, appreciates a good sense of humor and/or enjoys sports. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 shows a bit more of Eric's cheeky side along with his current academic pursuits. It promises potential for engaging intellectual debates and his self-deprecating humor could be charming. Plus, there's mention of his relationship with Scott too. Someone drawn to wit, intellectually stimulating conversation and animal affection might favor this scenario. \\n\\nAnswer:\\n\\nThis decision would probably rely heavily on one's personality, interests and sense of humor. However, personally, I would go for Scenario 1. This scenario provides a light, fun, and endearing image of Eric, his love for his dog, and his enjoyable life at university, which appeals more to me and gives off a slightly more personable vibe. There's an edge of spontaneity and playfulness in his profile, which appeals to my own sense of adventure and love for animals. So, I would likely swipe right on Scenario 1.\", \"Answer: Scenario 1\\n\\nReasoning: The first scenario gives off a much more inviting and friendly vibe that feels authentic. It not only reveals key elements about Eric's life such as his academic pursuits and hobbies, but also provides a peek into his personality through stories - like his tennis match involving Scott. I appreciate the sense of humor, and the easygoing tone. \\n\\nThere's a certain refreshing honesty and humility exhibited in admitting losing a game due to his pet's antics. Furthermore, the shared anecdote about his dog enables me to visualize a quaint and a light-hearted moment with him. The personal touch is also more evident in the first scenario, as it is replete with charming narratives and a sense of welcoming warmth. \\n\\nWhile the second scenario does also provide a good picture of Eric's life, it appears a bit too structured, stereotypical, and too rehearsed to feel personal or emotionally impactful. The use of film metaphors, while creative, doesn't quite resonate with my dating expectations. The overall tone feels disingenuously inviting, with less emphasis on personal experiences and more on generic cued responses.\", 'Reasoning: Considering both scenarios, Eric appears to be well-rounded with a sense of humor, balanced lifestyle, and a love for animals. However, I am inclined to choose the first scenario. In this scenario, Eric comes across more relatable, fun, and interesting. His anecdote about his dog, Scott, joining him in a tennis match adds a bit of character to his profile, making him stand out from the rest. He appears to be down to earth and the sort of person one could easily get along with. Furthermore, he takes the initiative in implying a future including shared experiences. On the contrary, the second scenario is also appealing, but it seems a bit pretentious and overly-introspective at times.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Usual suspect in the library by day, spontaneous sports enthusiast by night, and a softhearted friend to a beagle, I'm Eric! Meandering in the complex world of academia as an undergraduate student at [university name], my life oscillates between hitting books and tennis balls. \n",
      "\n",
      "I stand at a fairly average height, just like my math grades, but lucky for me both height and grades are not prerequisites in pet-parenting or humour. Got a knack for belly laughter? I've got tons of corny jokes to turn your rough days around! \n",
      "\n",
      "Playing the good guy in this rom-com called life, I’ve had my share of solo scenes and now I'm on the hunt for a co-star. I'm hoping for a rom-com but I'm well prepared for a thrilling adventure - let's just hope it doesn't turn into a soap opera! \n",
      "\n",
      "So if you're someone who doesn't mind a joke or two, thinks Scott (my beagle) is as adorable as I do and isn't averse to an empirical academic debate, I think we could write a great story together. Swipe right to begin the chapter!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: The most critical aspect is the establishment of a connection or shared interests with the potential match. Scenario 1 stands out as it portrays more personality, humor and endearing honesty. It hints at the various aspects of his life and interests and paints a picture about who he is, his values, and what he loves doing - from his academia to his love for tennis, his humor and his dog Scott. His search for a \"co-star\" might appeal to someone who sees dating and relationships as a cooperative venture and a mutual journey. He\\'s setting an expectation about what kind of relationship he\\'s looking for and this clarity might attract potential matches.\\n\\nMeanwhile, Scenario 2 seems a bit more straightforward and less decorative in nature, but the humor and charm is not as pronounced and it leans more towards narrating incidents than describing personality traits. Therefore, it may not be as effective in drawing in potential matches who are looking for someone with a strong, unique personality.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning:\\nBoth bios are crafted well and provide ample information about my personality, interests, and the kind of person I am looking to meet. However, my preference leans towards Scenario 1 for the following reasons:\\n\\n1.**Humour**: The jokes in Scenario 1 are subtly embedded into my self-introduction. They highlight an aspect of my personality, that is wit and a sense of humour, which can be attractive to many people looking for a light-hearted partner.\\n   \\n2.**Storytelling**: Scenario 1 does a great job of presenting my life as a story with a balance of academic pursuits, passion for tennis, and love for my dog Scott, intertwining these aspects into an engaging narrative. More importantly, it involves the potential match by mentioning the possibility of us starting our chapter together. \\n\\n3.**Calling out relationship goal**: Scenario 1 explicitly mentions I am looking for someone to share my life with rather than just casual dating. It defines my goals clearly which could help filter out those who are looking for something less serious.\\n\\n4.**Usage of metaphors**: The usage of metaphors like \"rom-com\", \"thrilling adventure\", \"soap opera\" makes the bio more fun to read and potentially relatable for those who enjoy these genres.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"Scenario 1 seems to be the more engaging option because it illustrates a romantic and playful angle towards future prospects. It also paints a vivid picture of diverse aspects of my life such as studying, playing tennis, and spending time with my dog, wrapped nicely with humor and the theatrical analogy of looking for a co-star in a rom-com. This kind of conversation starter not only clearly shows my interests (academics, sports, and animals) but also pitches forward my optimistic outlook on life and my sense of humor. It also implies the type of relationship I'm looking for, keeping it light and interesting.\\n\\nMeanwhile, Scenario 2 is more straightforward and gives a suitable description of my life but lacks the rich narrative and humor of Scenario 1. While both scenarios attract people with my interests, Scenario 1 is more likely to build an instant connection because of its witty and comedic tone.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 94 has a large difference:\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 1.0\n",
      "2, generation 0, score 6.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nIn both bios, Eric comes off as a very likable guy with a good sense of humor. I noticed that he's into similar activities as I, like tennis and spending time with friends. Adding to this, his affection for his pet dog made him seem caring and responsible. It's wonderful to see someone genuinely appreciate their pets. \\n\\nHowever, in terms of the specific scenarios, my choices would differ.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric had a casual and humorous approach to his bio, making it feel like a fun, lighthearted read, which is definitely a plus. His icebreaker about needing a pro tennis partner to save him from fetch duty is entertaining and unconventional, which makes him stand out. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 shows a more detailed and serious side of Eric revealing his lifestyle, qualities, and aspirations, alongside his humorous, casual side. By describing his interest in books, debates, and a balanced life, it sounds like we could have intellectual and meaningful conversations. His humility is also apparent, which makes him seem approachable.\\n\\nAnswer: Considering all the facets, I'm more likely to swipe right for Scenario 2. It provides a more comprehensive overview of Eric's personality, hobbies, and expectations. I feel his energy and thoughtfulness portrayed in his bio would lead to more profound connections. Overall, it's the combination of his lightheartedness, intelligence, and love for animals that warms me up to the idea of getting to know him better.\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nUpon reading these two scenarios, I find both available choices to be quite appealing, each in its own right.\\n\\nScenario 1 is straightforward and amusing, with a nice blend of light-hearted humor, showing a fun-loving nature and openness. His lighthearted intro highlights his good relationship with his beagle, Scott, and subtly hints at his down-to-earth and relaxed nature. The fact that he likes to play tennis and hang out with his dog makes him appear active and outdoorsy, which aligns well with my tastes and lifestyle.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 strikes a balance between fun and serious. In this scenario, Eric comes off as well-spoken and studious, indicating he values intellectual pursuits, but still knows how to kick back and enjoy life with friends. He emphasizes his love for dogs and outdoor activities, and the mention of trade book suggestions indicates he's likely comfortable with intellectual discussions. His self-deprecating humor demonstrates humility and likely a good sense of humor.\\n\\nHowever, what’s missing in Scenario 1 that is present in Scenario 2, is that Eric emphasized his intellectual side and his appreciation for balance in life, both of which I find extremely attractive as a potential partner. He also showcased his loyalty and listening skills, which are also key qualities in any successful relationship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nAfter analyzing both profiles, I find myself more drawn to scenario 2. While both scenarios introduce Eric as an interesting and humble man with a good sense of humor, I find the introduction on scenario 2 more detailed and relatable.\\n\\nIn scenario 2, Eric explains about his personality, interests, and hobbies in a way that leaves room for further exploration. I am attracted to his balanced lifestyle juggling between studies, sports, animal love, and social interactions. He seems to have a nice mix of being able to enjoy both quiet introspective moments and active socializing activities. \\n\\nBy mentioning his qualities as mentioned by friends, it shows that he is someone who values friendships and takes the opinions of his friends to heart. Yet, he doesn't brag about physical appearance but rather self-aware, which shows honesty and humility. \\n\\nThe fact that he shows genuine love for his pet, Scott, also gives an impression of his loving nature, and as an animal lover myself, this is very appealing. \\n\\nHis appreciation for humor and wit, his desire to share book suggestions, and engage in friendly debates suggest an open-minded person who values intellectual conversations and companionship.\\n\\nThe overall tone is inviting and leaves plenty of topics available for us to talk about during the initial conversation, which mirrors the kind of depth and breadth I look for in a potential romantic partner. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios provide a good picture of who I am and what my lifestyle is like, but I would pick scenario 1 for a few reasons. \\n\\nFirstly, it's a bit more detailed and gives the reader a better sense of my character and interests. While scenario 2 is more mellowed-down and the humor is relatable, scenario 1 balances humor along with more serious aspects about myself, my lifestyle, and interests.\\n\\nSo for someone looking for a well-rounded, simple, and down-to-earth modern day scholar, scenario 1 paints a better picture. Pandering to my love for animals, an outside lifestyle and my inherent tomfoolery around my dog, Scott, scenario 1 perfectly encapsulates who I am and what I am looking for in a potential match. \\n\\nAdditionally, scenario 1 also puts forth a subtle challenge in the form of a doubles tennis match, which can intrigue potential matches and encourage interactions.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, the profile is detailed and highlights various aspects of your personality - such as your love for academia, tennis, animals and a balanced lifestyle. It offers potential matches an understanding of your overall personality, along with your subtle sense of humor. This scenario also addresses what you're looking for in a partner and provides discussion points for someone who wants to break the ice. It portrays a thoughtful and communicative person, which some matches might find attractive.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, the profile is brief, humorous, and uses a storytelling style. It perfectly captures your relationship with your dog and your shared love for tennis, but overlooks other aspects like your academic life and social personality. While it's engagingly written, it might appeal more to matches who appreciate concise, wittier profiles.\\n\\nSo, the choice really depends on the type of person you're hoping to attract.\\n\\nAnswer: Personally, I would go with Scenario 1 as it shows more about my personality and interests, which may attract matches with similar values and hobbies.\", 'Reasoning Text:\\nScenario 1 provides a more detailed view into who Eric is. It balances both his academic and personal life and gives a potential match a more comprehensive insight into his personality. It not only specifies his interests (tennis, spending time with friends, and his dog), but it also conveys his values through phrases like \"I believe in a balanced life,\" and his desire for a partner who shares his curiosity and enthusiasm in life.\\n\\nFurthermore, it incorporates humor subtly, showing his light-hearted side, and interacts with the reader directly by asking to share book suggestions and debating the best dog breed. It gives a feeling of openness and willingness to engage in a conversation, inviting potential matches to interact. \\n\\nScenario 2, while playful, doesn\\'t convey as much about Eric\\'s life, values, or interests and is more focused on his dog and his humorous side. It could attract matches who enjoy humor and dogs, but it might not appeal to those looking for a more profound connection based on shared interests and values.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 94 has a large difference:\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 1.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 0, score 10.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Both scenarios heavily feature Eric\\'s interests and his life as a student, however, Scenario 2 offers a more personal and humorous touch to Eric\\'s bio. The anecdote about his beagle, Scott, disrupting a tennis match is not just funny but it also shows that Eric doesn\\'t take himself too seriously and can find humor in unexpected situations, making him come across more open and approachable. \\nIn comparison, Scenario 1 comes across a bit more serious, and even though Eric shares his interests, he doesn\\'t really give a glimpse into his personal life and doesn\\'t share much about his personality. Therefore, Scenario 2 makes Eric feel more human, relatable, and easygoing, increasing the chance of someone wanting to get to know him more.\\nAlso, his open invitation to \"share more Scott escapades and make new memories together\" makes you feel like you are already included in his life which feels welcoming.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"My step-by-step reasoning is as follows: \\nIn Scenario 1, I appreciate Eric's description - it's detailed and gives me a good sense of what he values. He seems to have a pretty balanced life between his studies, sport, socializing, and caring for his dog. He also seems quite humorous and isn't afraid of self-deprecating humor which suggests he's confident and doesn't take himself too seriously. He sounds like someone who enjoys stimulating conversations and has a zest for life. There's also space for me in his life as he's open for suggestions and debates – all of these are good indicators of his character for me.\\n\\nFor Scenario 2, Eric sounds down-to-earth. I like the fact that he enjoys balance in life and has good time-management skills, considering how he juggles his academics, tennis games, and friendships. Eric appears to have important qualities such as enthusiasm, resilience, and a humorous perspective, as shown through his amusing anecdote featuring his dog disrupting a tennis game.\\n\\nHowever, despite Scenario 2 being funnier overall and featuring a relatable anecdote, I get a stronger sense of who Eric is as a person from Scenario 1, including his values, tastes, and a snapshot of his lifestyle. The self-deprecating humor and intellectual vibe of Eric's profile in Scenario 1 is more attractive to me.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric as an appealing person who balances his academic life with an active social life while also taking care of his pet dog. However, I lean slightly more towards Scenario 2, as it has a more light-hearted, casual, and humorous tone that shows Eric's fun side. His story about Scott joining him in the tennis match gives a glimpse into his everyday life and interaction with his dog. This scenario shows his ability to remain positive and find humor even in a potentially embarrassing situation, which is an attractive personality trait. It also provides a good conversation starter for when we first message each other, as it will be easy and fun to ask for more stories about Scott. In addition, I appreciate that Eric demonstrates a desire to connect with someone who enjoys intellectual conversations, exercise, laughter, and pets, as these are all things I value in a relationship as well. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios are great at expressing Eric\\'s personality, interests and what he\\'s looking for in a potential partner, Scenario 1 may be more likely to attract matches who share similar interests and values based on a few reasons.\\n\\nFirstly, Scenario 1 highlights his dedication to work-life balance and prioritizing time for hobbies, friends, and self-growth. His use of phrases like \"easily going scholar\", \"appreciation for humor and wit\", and his mention of a balanced life with engaging activities shows how well-rounded and adaptable he is. This paints a picture that can be appealing to a wide array of matches who want someone down-to-earth, flexible, and fun.\\n\\nSecondly, the way Eric introduces his dog Scott in Scenario 1 expresses a depth of connection and human-pet relationship more than just a cute accessory, which will likely appeal to dog lovers or animal people in general. More importantly, he cleverly uses his adoration for Scott to initiate a playful debate about the best dog breeds, which isn\\'t just an icebreaker but indicates his conversational abilities and open-mindedness to differing opinions.\\n\\nLastly, Scenario 1 has a more compelling end, expressing his interests and his intention of finding someone who\\'d love to share those with him, instead of merely sharing his dog’s antics. He leaves it open by saying \"let\\'s make this journey more exciting together\", which indirectly suggests potential partners that he\\'s looking for something serious and long-term rather than casual.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', '[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios are well-written, and they clearly describe Eric’s personality, interweaving the essential points of being a college student, enjoying tennis, having a group of friends, and owning a beagle named Scott. \\n\\nHowever, Scenario 1 seems more likely to attract a meaningful match as it’s bit more personal and sincere. While both provide the basics, the first scenario also delves into the qualities that Eric\\'s friends appreciate about him, adding a level of depth to his character. This scenario also explicitly states that Eric is looking for a person who is a dog-lover, enjoys outdoor activities, and values learning and life - which would appeal specifically to those who share these values.\\n\\nThe statement about trading book suggestions and discussing best dog breeds, and making the journey more exciting together at the end of scenario 1 invites the readers to imagine sharing these activities with Eric, making them more likely to feel a connection.\\n\\nFinally, the note about being “average” in the looks department, but having an \"above-average appreciation of humor and wit\" works as a humblebrag; it shows that Eric values personality over physical appearance, which can be quite appealing to a potential match. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', 'Reasoning text:\\n\\nBoth scenarios are solid but the choice would ultimately depend on the kind of relationship one is seeking and the type of person one intends to attract. Scenario 1 lends a more mature, reflective tone and talks about life balance and hobbies. The emphasis on a \"balanced life\" suggests he\\'s looking for someone with similar mindset - someone mature and understanding of his busy life. It also mentions book suggestions and debates implying intellectual conversations and hinting at his intelligence and desire for a partner likewise with critical thinking skills.\\n\\nScenario 2 has a more casual, light-hearted tone. It puts a humorous spin on a potentially embarrassing situation suggesting that he doesn\\'t take life too seriously. The story about losing a match because of his dog paints him as fun-loving, able to laugh at life\\'s absurdity and might appeal to someone who is looking for positivity and humor in their partner. Still, it says less about looking for intellectuality or balance in life.\\n\\nAnswer: Based on the assumption that Eric is looking for a mature and intellectual person who values balance in life, I would choose Scenario 1. The language used in this scenario seems more likely to attract a match who appreciates humor, wit, intellectual discussion and also wants a balanced relationship.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 94 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 0, score 1.0\n",
      "2, generation 0, score 6.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! A young man, working on completing my undergraduate degree at a sizable state university. My friends often describe me as a person drawn into the world of academia, always eager to learn and share knowledge. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I am not swamped with stacks of books, you'll often find me exhibiting my skills on a tennis court challenging my friends or diversifying my hobby list. I'm an energetic, outdoorsy kind of guy, who also treasures some quiet downtime, perhaps, with a good book. \n",
      "\n",
      "Team dog or team cat? I'm definitely on the dog side, with my loyal Beagle, Scott. I'm a lover of all animals, with an extra soft spot for dogs. \n",
      "\n",
      "Physically, I'm about average. I neither stand out in a crowd, nor do I blend fully into one, I like to think I maintain a sweet spot in between. Let's not dwell much on this though, because who we are is much more than what we look like, wouldn't you agree?\n",
      "\n",
      "Seeking a genuine and honest connection. If you are ambitious, passionate and enjoy sharing hearty laughs, tennis matches or doggo dates, then let's connect and see where this goes.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: I would most likely swipe right on Eric in Scenario 1. His profile comes off as more personable and humorous which gives an impression of a laid back, easy-going individual who doesn't take himself too seriously. He presents his love for animals, specifically his dog, Scott, which shows his softer side. The playful banter about his tennis skills being a bit questionable, and tying in his dog into the scenario, further presents a light-heartedness and someone who doesn't mind laughing at themselves. It gives off a rather authentic vibe, making him more relatable and thus, engaging. He injects a bit of casual humor about needing a potential partner possibly being a better tennis player to make up for his shortcomings, but it doesn’t seem pretentious or overwhelming. This creates an image of a warm and friendly person, which makes him more approachable.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning: Both profiles introduce Eric in a friendly and light-hearted way which makes him seem approachable and interesting. Scenario 1, however, provides a very personable, witty, and humorous image of Eric. As a potential match, reading an entertaining narrative like that would be refreshing and intriguing. His bio appears more engaging in scenario 1, with the usage of humor and the image he creates involving his beagle, Scott. The description about the tennis ball is notably charming and funny. Moreover, the phrase \"Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together\" seems inviting and appealing from a perspective of potentially starting a romantic relationship. By mentioning how our charm could be the only thing missing in his life he portrays a sense of longing for a romantic connection.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning:\\nThe decision to swipe right or left is dependent on Eric's bio and how it resonates with me. Starting with Scenario 1, Eric presents himself as a fun, easy-going, and humble individual with a renowned love for animals, especially his dog, Scott. This bio also fosters engagement, by making playful comments about his tennis skills and expressing the need for help with keeping Scott entertained. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 paints Eric as an intellectual, outdoor enthusiast who enjoys his own company, but also appreciates engaging with others. It appeals to someone looking for depth and intellectual stimulation in their potential partner, a trait not explicitly highlighted in the first scenario.\\n\\nAs a young woman looking for a potential romantic relationship, I am interested in getting to know the person first; their interests, values, personality, and sense of humor. I appreciate the playful and fun narrative presented in the first scenario, and the bio is quite engaging, which could make starting a conversation easier.\\n\\nThe second scenario, while intellectually stimulating, feels somewhat detached and formal, which could make it harder to break the ice and forge a genuine connection. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! A young man, working on completing my undergraduate degree at a sizable state university. My friends often describe me as a person drawn into the world of academia, always eager to learn and share knowledge. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I am not swamped with stacks of books, you'll often find me exhibiting my skills on a tennis court challenging my friends or diversifying my hobby list. I'm an energetic, outdoorsy kind of guy, who also treasures some quiet downtime, perhaps, with a good book. \n",
      "\n",
      "Team dog or team cat? I'm definitely on the dog side, with my loyal Beagle, Scott. I'm a lover of all animals, with an extra soft spot for dogs. \n",
      "\n",
      "Physically, I'm about average. I neither stand out in a crowd, nor do I blend fully into one, I like to think I maintain a sweet spot in between. Let's not dwell much on this though, because who we are is much more than what we look like, wouldn't you agree?\n",
      "\n",
      "Seeking a genuine and honest connection. If you are ambitious, passionate and enjoy sharing hearty laughs, tennis matches or doggo dates, then let's connect and see where this goes.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios do a good job of introducing the reader to who Eric is and what his interests are, but they do so in different ways. \\n\\nScenario 1 takes a more humorous, relaxed approach, showing Eric's playful side with the jokes about his dog Scott and their shared love of tennis. It gives off a vibe that Eric is a fun-loving guy who doesn't take himself too seriously.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is much more detail-oriented, giving a thorough summary of Eric's personality, interests, and views. It demonstrates Eric's intellectual side with the mention of his love for learning and academia, shows his physical side with tennis, and reveals his emotional side with the discussion of his love for animals and seeking a genuine connection. \\n\\nScenario 1 might attract individuals who are looking for a light-hearted, easy-going and fun relationship. However, Scenario 2 might draw in individuals who appreciate depth, vulnerability and are looking for a potentially serious relationship.\\n\\nGiven Eric's context as a university student and avid tennis player with a love for animals, it might make sense to lean towards the more complete picture painted in Scenario 2, which balances fun and depth, and avoids excluding those who may not immediately relate to or appreciate the humor in Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios present different aspects of your personality and interests. However, Scenario 1 seems to be more engaging and lighthearted in nature. The use of humor and light self-deprecation may attract a match who appreciates the same. It showcases your active lifestyle, interest in tennis, love for your dog, desire for companionship, and a good sense of humor; all of which can make your profile more appealing to potential matches.\\n\\nScenario 2, whilst being more extensive, may seem a bit more formal and serious. It provides similar information but lacks the playful tone that makes the first bio more attractive. It still talks about your interests in tennis and dogs, your personality, physical appearance, but it may appear too verbose to someone simply browsing through profiles. It feels more like reading a job application than a dating profile.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning:\\nScenario 1 depicts a lighthearted, laid-back, and humorous Eric, which is attractive to a potential match who enjoys lightheartedness and humor. In this profile, Eric’s love for tennis and his dog are apparent, inviting those who share these interests. The mention of loving good company shows his sociability, suggesting that he values meaningful relationships and could be seeking the same in a partner. The end note humorously emphasizes his tennis hobby, showing he doesn’t take himself too seriously and can laugh about his faults. This depicts a level of genuineness which can be attractive. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive understanding of Eric's life and personality. Besides presenting his hobbies, it also delves into Eric's intellectual side and implies that Eric values academics. This intellectual side could be attractive to someone seeking a thoughtful conversation partner, along with shared laughter and outdoor adventures. Furthermore, Eric’s average physical description and emphasis on who we are beyond physical appearances can appeal to someone looking for deeper connections, appreciating Eric's candidness about his looks not being his only defining factor.\\n\\nOverall, both scenarios have their own appeals depending on what the audience prefers. However, if we're focusing on attracting a potential match who shares Eric's interests and values, Scenario 2 would be more appropriate. It covers a wider range of Eric’s interests and values, providing more touchpoints for a potential match to connect with.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 94 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 0, score 1.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 0, score 10.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! A young man, working on completing my undergraduate degree at a sizable state university. My friends often describe me as a person drawn into the world of academia, always eager to learn and share knowledge. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I am not swamped with stacks of books, you'll often find me exhibiting my skills on a tennis court challenging my friends or diversifying my hobby list. I'm an energetic, outdoorsy kind of guy, who also treasures some quiet downtime, perhaps, with a good book. \n",
      "\n",
      "Team dog or team cat? I'm definitely on the dog side, with my loyal Beagle, Scott. I'm a lover of all animals, with an extra soft spot for dogs. \n",
      "\n",
      "Physically, I'm about average. I neither stand out in a crowd, nor do I blend fully into one, I like to think I maintain a sweet spot in between. Let's not dwell much on this though, because who we are is much more than what we look like, wouldn't you agree?\n",
      "\n",
      "Seeking a genuine and honest connection. If you are ambitious, passionate and enjoy sharing hearty laughs, tennis matches or doggo dates, then let's connect and see where this goes.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"The scenario in which I would most likely swipe right for Eric is Scenario 1. \\n\\nThe reason I choose this scenario is because Eric seems to have a more natural and candid approach when sharing about his life. He establishes a good balance of describing his hobbies and what he values while using storytelling to make his bio more engaging. \\n\\nHis anecdote about his pup, Scott, joining him on the tennis court during a match not only makes him seem more authentic, but it also gives a glimpse into his sense of humor. This story makes me feel like he can take things lightly and embrace spontaneous moments. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric appears to be thoughtful and introspective, but his bio seems a bit more formal and less personal in comparison to Scenario 1. Furthermore, he talks about physical appearance, which I don't find as relevant in the bio. \\n\\nFinal Answer: Scenario 1\", \"I'd be much more inclined to swipe right on Scenario 1. My reasoning lies in the way Eric presents himself in this scenario. He comes off as quite energetic and enthusiastic, something I personally find very appealing. His love for both tennis and his dog is quite evident and I really appreciate his light-hearted approach to his profile.\\n\\nMoreover, his brief anecdote about his dog Scott disrupting his tennis match was amusing and engaging. It gives me a good idea of what his personality is like and makes the profile memorable. It also indicates that Eric has a great sense of humor, which is another huge plus in my opinion.\\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 feels a bit more generic and lacking personality. His bio does communicate his interest in studies and tennis and his love for animals, but it doesn't invoke the same level of interest and enthusiasm as the first scenario. Therefore, I'd opt for Scenario 1 over Scenario 2. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: As per the information given, Eric seems like a pleasant guy in both scenarios. In Scenario 1, he comes across as lively, outdoorsy, social, and dedicated to his interests. The story about his dog Scott joining him on the tennis court speaks well of him, showing that he has a good sense of humor and doesn't let unexpected events upset him. He also gives a feel of what dating him might be like—tennis, hanging out with friends, spending time with his dog—adding a personal touch that seems both down to earth and inviting. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric comes off more as a serious scholar, with an emphasis on academia and personal development. While his dedication to education is admirable, the tone of his bio lacks the playful, inviting touch present in Scenario 1. Moreover, Eric's self-description of being 'about average' physically, while honest, could potentially come off as slightly self-conscious or unsure, somewhat undermining the positive image formed by his other qualities.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! A young man, working on completing my undergraduate degree at a sizable state university. My friends often describe me as a person drawn into the world of academia, always eager to learn and share knowledge. \n",
      "\n",
      "When I am not swamped with stacks of books, you'll often find me exhibiting my skills on a tennis court challenging my friends or diversifying my hobby list. I'm an energetic, outdoorsy kind of guy, who also treasures some quiet downtime, perhaps, with a good book. \n",
      "\n",
      "Team dog or team cat? I'm definitely on the dog side, with my loyal Beagle, Scott. I'm a lover of all animals, with an extra soft spot for dogs. \n",
      "\n",
      "Physically, I'm about average. I neither stand out in a crowd, nor do I blend fully into one, I like to think I maintain a sweet spot in between. Let's not dwell much on this though, because who we are is much more than what we look like, wouldn't you agree?\n",
      "\n",
      "Seeking a genuine and honest connection. If you are ambitious, passionate and enjoy sharing hearty laughs, tennis matches or doggo dates, then let's connect and see where this goes.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Both scenarios do a good job describing the lifestyle and hobbies of Eric, including his love for tennis, his beagle Scott, and his academic pursuits. They also lay out his expectations from a potential match – an intellectual, energetic, and animal-loving person.\\n\\nScenario 1 comes across as more serious and focused on Eric\\'s desire for a \"genuine and honest connection\". It emphasizes Eric\\'s personality traits, his love for learning and sharing knowledge, and his views on physical appearance, which he believes to be less important than who we are as individuals. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is casual and playful, with a charming anecdote about Scott that might appeal more to those who enjoy a sense of humor and a lighter approach to life. This scenario paints a picture of Eric\\'s lifestyle rather than just describing it.\\n\\nIt basically depends on what type of woman Eric wants to attract. \\n\\nIf he\\'s interested in someone who values deep, intellectual conversations and looks for a serious relationship, Scenario 1 fits better. \\n\\nBut if he wants to attract someone more laid-back, fun-loving, who prefers enjoying the moment and sharing funny, cute experiences, Scenario 2 would work better.\\n\\nHowever, considering Eric\\'s age and general lifestyle as an undergraduate student who enjoys playing tennis and hanging out with friends, it might make sense to go with the more relaxed and humorous approach.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', 'I think I would be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values in Scenario 1. \\n\\nThe reasoning behind this is as follows: \\n\\nIn the first scenario, I have described myself in a more comprehensive and detailed manner. Important characteristics such as my academic interest, my active lifestyle, my love for animals, and my views on physical appearances are clearly communicated. This will likely get the attention of someone who appreciates these qualities and shares similar values.\\n\\nThe first bio also portrays a more mature profile as it talks about seeking a genuine connection and a partner who is ambitious and passionate. It sparks interest for those who not just enjoy similar activities but also appreciates intellectual exchange and introspection. By not emphasizing heavily on looks, I am also encouraging potential matches to think about internal compatibility and emotional connection, which are key to a long-lasting relationship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"I'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values in Scenario 1. \\n\\nReasoning: While both scenarios capture my personality and interests well, Scenario 1 offers a more comprehensive picture of me as a person. It conveys various facets of my personality such as my academic interests, love for tennis, and fondness for animals, especially dogs. It also underlines my perspective towards physical appearances which indicates my maturity and open-mindedness. This would be appealing to individuals who value inner personality more than exterior appearances. \\n\\nMoreover, I clearly mention that I am seeking a genuine and honest connection in Scenario 1. This statement further refines the category of individuals I target, i.e. those seeking a serious relationship rather than casual dating. My explicit mention of wanting to connect with ambitious, passionate individuals who enjoy laughter, tennis, and doggo dates narrows down the pool to those who would align with my interests and values. \\n\\nIn comparison, Scenario 2 focuses more on my interesting anecdotes with Scott, my beagle. While it provides a glimpse of my fun-loving nature and fondness for animals, it might be perceived as a less rich personal portrayal compared to Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 106 has a large difference:\n",
      "0_1, generation 1, score 7.0\n",
      "2, generation 2, score 2.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['[reasoning text]\\n\\nAfter reviewing the profiles presented in both scenarios, I find myself leaning towards Eric from Scenario 2. Both bios contain similar information; however, the manner in which it\\'s presented differs in tone and personality.\\n\\nScenario 1 offers quite a generic template, and whilst it manages to include Eric\\'s key points (his academics, love for tennis, his dog, Scott), it doesn\\'t quite portray a vivid flavor of Eric\\'s humor and charisma.\\n\\nMeanwhile, Scenario 2 elicits a more conversational tone, revealing subtle clues about Eric\\'s sense of humor through his playful use of puns and self-deprecating jabs about his appearance. His bio is not afraid to embrace the quirks (\"attempting to be the next Roger Federer\") and wit (\"my tennis serves are pretty \\'racket\\'\") that combine to create an unexpectedly appealing profile.\\n\\nLastly, everyone loves a good dog person - and how Eric talks about his dog Scott in Scenario 2 (\"proud hooman\") is both adorable and engaging. It allows the reader to visualize their interactions in a humorous and endearing way.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"In terms of content, both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 have similar details about Eric's life and interests. However, his personality comes across quite differently in each bio. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric presents himself as a balanced individual who is intellectually curious and also enjoys physical activities. He comes off as mature, well-rounded and clear about what he wants. This attracts me because I value someone who possesses a balance between fun and responsibility. His mention of his love for his dog and his interest in exploring different places with him also shows a caring side, which is a quality I specifically look for in a partner. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric's bio is full of humor and he does not shy away from self-deprecatingly calling himself clumsy and average-looking. This suggests to me that he is confident enough to make fun of himself, which is an attractive quality. But the casual tone, puns and the overall silliness may indicate he is more about fun and less focused on serious, substantial aspects of life, which might mean he's not ready for a deep and serious relationship.\\n\\nI value a sense of humor, but it is not always the most important thing in a potential partner. On the other hand, intelligence, balance and responsibility are attributes that could pique my interest more, pointing towards a meaningful relationship. Therefore, I'm drawn more towards Eric's portrayal in Scenario 1 where he comes off as a balanced and sincere person with a mix of fun and intellectual interests.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Eric's profile in both scenarios comes off as humorous, friendly, and relatable, which are qualities that many individuals find attractive. \\n\\nNevertheless, my personal preference is scenario 1. Although scenario 2 is amusing and does showcase Eric's personality vividly, it feels a bit too casual and self-deprecating for my taste. The repeated self-effacing remarks about his appearance come off as lacking confidence to some extent. \\n\\nIn contrast, scenario 1 has the right balance of humor, honesty about his appearance, and description of his interests, making him stand out. He comes across as someone who is not only intelligent, ambitious about his studies, but also someone who values balance by having varied hobbies outside academia. I appreciate that he's open to intellectual debates and also reads. His love for his dog, Scott, shows that he might be empathetic and responsible. Finally, his interest in tennis means he values physical fitness and might be fun to be around.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "Hey there! I'm Eric, a friendly, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergrad degree at a major state university. When I'm not buried in textbooks or engaging in intellectual debates with my peers, you might catch me at a local tennis court or spending time with my amazing beagle, Scott. \n",
      "\n",
      "My interests range from checking out the latest indie bands, immersing myself in an engrossing novel, to exploring new places with my four-legged buddy. I believe in balancing out the cerebral with a good dose of physical activity – hence, my love for tennis. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'd rate myself an average joe in looks and height, but I like to believe my personality compensates. Looking for a woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you share any, or preferably all (wishful thinking), of the above, why not say hi? We might just hit it off. Cheers!\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0.5, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nWhile both scenarios have their strengths, they appeal to different demographics. \\n\\nScenario 1 presents a mix of intellectual pursuits, physical activities, and genuine affection for animals. It suggests a mature individual with a good balance between work (or in this case, study) and play. This would attract someone who appreciates academia, a sense of responsibility, and outdoor activities. Also, the direct statement of looking for a 'woman who’s passionate, has a sense of humor, loves dogs, and wouldn't mind a hit around the tennis court now and then' clearly communicates Eric's expectations. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, leans towards a more relaxed presentation with some light humor, highlighting Eric’s witty charm. This approach may attract someone who appreciates a laid-back and humorous personality, someone who enjoys fun and laughter in a relationship.\\n\\nUltimately, the decision would come down to what type of person Eric wants to attract. If he wants to attract someone who appreciates intelligence and a balanced lifestyle, scenario 1 would be more efficient. If he wants to attract someone who values humor and lightheartedness, scenario 2 would be the better choice.\\n\\nAnswer: This will depend on the type of person Eric wants to attract. For an intellectual, balanced individual, scenario 1 would be more suitable. For a fun-loving, more humorous individual, scenario 2 is more appropriate.\", 'Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhile both scenarios highlight Eric\\'s interests, personality, and a slice of his humor, there are several factors that differentiate them and might appeal to different people.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as more mature and intellectual. He mentions his love for intellectual debates, novels, indie music, and adventure, indicating he enjoys thoughtful and explorative engagements. This scenario may attract women who appreciate intellectual pursuits and activities such as reading and music. The mention of balanci\"ng cerebral pursuits and physical activities makes him come across as balanced and likely to attract those who value such in their potential partners.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric\\'s personality is portrayed as more light-hearted and fun-loving. He focuses more on humor, mentioning his corny jokes and puns. It’s more casual, and his love for animals, specifically his dog, Scott, comes more into play here. Love for pets can be a strong connecting factor for animal lovers. His light-hearted and humorous comments about his tennis abilities and self-deprecating humor about his looks demonstrate a less serious, more easy-going personality type.\\n\\nAnswer: This would depend on the type of woman Eric is aiming to attract. If he\\'s seeking an intellectual woman who appreciates thoughtful conversation and balance in life, Scenario 1 would be more appropriate. If he\\'s looking for a lighthearted individual who appreciates humor, enjoys pets, and prefers a more casual approach, Scenario 2 would be more suitable. Therefore, there is no definitive answer without knowing Eric\\'s preferences in a potential match. It could be either Scenario 1 or Scenario 2.', \"Scenario 1 reasonings: \\n\\n1. It is engaging and welcoming: Eric directly invites potential matches to reach out to him. This approach is open-ended and friendly, making him appear approachable and interactive. \\n2. It shows more diverse interests: This bio shares a wider range of interests, including indie music and reading, showcasing his eclectic taste and setting the stage for more possible matches.\\n3. It emphasizes a balanced lifestyle: The bio's mention of the balance between intellectual and physical activities may attract individuals who value the same.\\n\\nScenario 2 reasonings:\\n\\n1. It plays on humor: Scenario 2's bio is light-hearted and funny, which could attract matches who appreciate a sense of humor.\\n2. It is less formal: The casual tone might make Eric appear more relatable and less intimidating, which could appeal to potential matches.\\n3. It shares a hint of vulnerability: By being open about his self-perceptions of his looks and height, Eric comes across as honest and genuine. This openness could attract matches who value authenticity.\\n\\n[reasoning text]\\n\\nAnswer: After considering the pros and cons of both scenarios, I would choose Scenario 1. While humor can be a great ice breaker, Scenario 2 might come across as trying too hard or even trivializing dating. On the other hand, Scenario 1 presents a broad view of interests and activities, and it paints Eric as a well-rounded individual who has managed to strike a balance between his intellectual and physical pursuits. This scenario is likely to attract matches who value intellectual stimulation, physical activities, and a shared love for pets, thus increasing the chance of finding a match with mutual interests and values.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 108 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 3.0\n",
      "3, generation 1, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Looking at both scenarios, Eric presents himself as a likable person with a sense of humor. In scenario 1, he seems serious and committed, manages to tell a story showcasing his enjoyments in life, and he\\'s clear about what he\\'s looking for. Scenario 2 is a little more humorous and light-hearted in tone and dwells on having fun, and reveals his quirky side. Both scenarios present him as a genuine, friendly individual.\\n\\nDeciding which scenario is a \"swipe right\" depends on one\\'s personal preference. If one appreciates a witty, lighthearted tone with lots of puns and a storytelling style akin to having a friendly conversation, scenario 2 might be a better fit. On the other hand, if one prefers straightforwardness, sincerity, and a more serious tone, scenario 1 would be more appealing.\\n\\nI personally prefer someone who is honest directly in his introduction about what he\\'s looking for in a relationship, while also not losing the humor and warmth that makes his profile engaging and fun to read.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric as quite an engaging and friendly individual who has a sense of humor, loves animals (specifically his dog, Scott), and enjoys an active lifestyle. However, there are distinct differences in both profiles. In scenario 1, Eric sounds more mature and well-rounded. His bio is perfectly balanced, featuring his academic life, hobbies, love for his pet, and desire to form genuine connections. He talks about hoping for a connection that exceeds the digital world, which can be appealing for someone looking for a serious relationship. On the other hand, scenario 2, while fun and witty with the Harry Potter references, could come off as trying too hard to be funny. The length of his bio in scenario 2 also waffles slightly, and the puns while amusing, could possibly come across as lacking depth or seriousness, thus giving the impression that he might not be as interested in a serious relationship. While both scenarios are appealing in their own ways, behaviour exhibiting emotional maturity and clarity about wanting a genuine connection as in scenario 1 maybe more appealing to someone looking for a potential romantic relationship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning: In both profiles, Eric comes across as a fun, animal-loving, and outgoing individual who enjoys outdoor activities and has a good sense of humor. However, the tone and content of the two scenarios provide slightly different glimpses into his personality. In Scenario 1, Eric gives a more mature impression by highlighting his endeavors to balance his education, love for tennis, and his dog. His story about the park incident shows his ability to turn a tricky situation into a positive one and also connotes the people-friendly nature of him and his dog, Scott. He also confidently states his intentions for a genuine, fun connection and seems quite serious about the dating process. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, while Eric keeps the humor going, he leans a lot into the puns and sounds more playful and light-hearted. The profile appears to be slightly cluttered with many different aspects, including references to Harry Potter and university luminous fungi. The use of puns and jests might come off as too much for some, rendering him less authentic or serious about his search for a partner.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0.5, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning text:\\n\\nFirst, it is essential to establish that both profiles have effective elements which may appeal to a potential match. However, the constraints of an online dating app require users to quite quickly define their preferences, often based on limited information. Therefore it would be beneficial to consider which scenario would most effectively communicate shared interests and values to a potential match within this environment. \\n\\nScenario 1 seemingly takes a humorous, witty, and laid-back approach. It uses fun references that indicate various interests, such as Harry Potter and politics. This could possibly attract individuals who appreciate humor, wit, half-veiled references, and a relaxed outlook. However, it is important to note that the humor and references could potentially confuse or alienate certain users, who may not understand or share these interests. \\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 adopts a more direct, simplistic, and genuine style. It shares a thoughtfully crafted, amusing anecdote about the subject (Eric) and his dog. Moreover, it communicates Eric's interests and day-to-day life in a clear and unambiguous manner. \\n\\nThe pivotal factor that stands out about Scenario 2 is its directness and sincerity, which could potentially attract a match who values these qualities. People typically look for authenticity in online dating platforms, where presentation is digital and therefore can be crafted and manipulated.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric's personality and interests in a relatable and fun manner, thus attracting potential matches with similar interests. However, the differences lie in the presentation style and tone.\\n\\nScenario 1 is filled with humor and puns, which makes it more enigmatic and fun, showing Eric's playful, off-beat, and quirky nature. It also caters to book-loving individuals, specifically those who are fans of Harry Potter or those who can appreciate a good nerdy joke. The use of humor and literary references also indicate that Eric values intelligence and a good sense of humor in a partner.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is more straightforward and genuine, with an entertaining Scott story thrown in for good measure. This profile might attract someone who enjoys a calm and composed guy who is still capable of having a fun side. This scenario also emphasizes Eric's genuine personality and love for his dog, Scott, which makes it ideal for attracting dog lovers or those looking for a sincere connection.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario selection really depends on the type of person Eric is trying to attract. If he wants someone who appreciates good humor and literary jokes, Scenario 1 would be more fitting. However, if he's looking for someone who enjoys candidness and simplicity, and loves dogs as much as Eric does, then Scenario 2 might be a better choice.\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nIn both scenarios, Eric's personality shines through, the tone is welcoming, and he gives potential matches a glimpse into his likes and interests. But let's compare the two to see which might be more appealing to a potential match who shares Eric's interests and values.\\n\\nScenario 1 is full of pop-culture references (Harry Potter, in particular), humor, and depicts Eric's appreciation for wit and levity. These specific references could make his profile appealing to someone with similar interests and a sense of humor, and who may also be a fan of Harry Potter and political satire. But there's also the risk of alienating matches who aren't familiar with these references, or who might think they have nothing in common if they don't share this specific interest.\\n\\nScenario 2 is more straightforward and shows Eric as a relatable, down-to-earth guy with a light-hearted and humorous personality. It revolves around anecdotes about playing tennis and taking care of Scott, his dog, and connects more directly to his general interests. It's more universally appealing by focusing less on specific pop culture references and more on describing personality traits and values like humor, authenticity, and companionship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\\n\\nWhile both scenarios have their merits, Scenario 2 might be more successful in attracting a potential match that shares Eric's interests and values, as it presents more universal and relatable aspects of his personality and lifestyle.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 108 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 0, score 8.0\n",
      "3, generation 1, score 3.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, an undergraduate glued to the books at a 'insert school name' state university, fighting through college one pizza slice at a time. When I'm not pretending to enjoy late-night study sessions, you'll most likely find me on the tennis court. I'm just as comfortable with a racket in my hand as I am with a bag of dog treats - not for me (although, desperate times...) but for my loyal sidekick, Scott the Beagle. The truth is, he probably has more tricks in his repertoire than I have tennis skills. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a strong believer in friendship before anything else, and my group of close-knit buddies can corroborate - if you can get past their constant jesting about my average height and looks, that is. Rest assured, while I may be laughably competent at video games and tell terrible puns at inconvenient times, I promise I won't subject you to either on our first date (unless, of course, terrible puns are your thing... then I happen to have a lifelong supply). \n",
      "\n",
      "Let's grab a cup of coffee, take Scott for a walk, and see if we hit it off as more than just teammates in a doubles tennis match. If the cappuccino doesn't warm you up, my corny jokes definitely will!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"After reading both profiles carefully, Eric seems like a fun and charming guy in both scenarios. He seems honest and upfront about where he's at in life, which is a plus.\\n\\nScenario 1:\\nEric comes off as good-natured, cheerful, and fun-loving. He’s playful with his dog Scott and seems to have a good sense of humor about the mishaps that can come with pet ownership. He’s clearly fond of his animal companion, which suggests that he’s nurturing and dedicated. The mention of the disruption at the tennis court provides a cute and funny story that sets a relaxed, easy-going tone. Furthermore, it’s clear that he’s looking for a genuine and fun relationship. He's also optimistic about the possibility of making a real connection through this platform.\\n\\nScenario 2:\\nIn the second scenario, Eric still seems like a fun guy, but his humor feels a bit self-deprecating at times, which might indicate either a lack of confidence or a different type of humor. His mention of his close group of friends shows that he values those relationships, which could suggest that he'd make a loyal partner. However, including talks about 'average height and looks' could raise minor concerns about self-esteem, but it could also mean that he's comfortable with who he is and has a humble attitude. His proposed date sounds relaxed and laid-back, which might indicate that he's personable and easy to connect with.\\n\\nOverall, both scenarios paint a picture of an interesting, approachable, genuine person. However, a decisive element here is how much one appreciates self-deprecating humor versus a lighter, more playful humor. \\n\\nAnswer: My preference would lean towards Scenario 1. His light-hearted narrative about his dog, his sense of humor, and his straightforward express of looking for something genuine is quite appealing. However, it's quite a close call because Scenario 2 also presents him as an affable character.\", 'Reasoning: Both of these profiles are engaging and give a good sense of Eric\\'s personality. However, I am inclined towards Eric\\'s scenario 2 profile over scenario 1\\'s because of several factors. First, the humorous take on his daily life with phrases like \"fighting through college one pizza slice at a time\" and \"laughably competent at video games\" shows a humble self-effacing humor that seems genuine and relatable. It gives a better insight into his life, including his hobbies and interests (such as videogaming), and also shows that he doesn\\'t take himself too seriously, which is a positive trait. \\n\\nSecond, the wording and tone in scenario 2 feels more personal and direct, like he is speaking to the reader specifically. The specific coupling suggestions like \"grab a cup of coffee\" or \"take Scott for a walk\" showcase that he is serious about wanting to meet and get to know the person on the other side of the screen better. Furthermore, it is also a subtle way of suggesting potential shared activities. \\n\\nThird, his unfaltering acceptance and disclosure of his friends\\' jests suggest that he not only cherishes his friendships but also can laugh at himself, which points to a level of self-assuredness and confidence.\\n\\nLastly, the mention of terrible puns indicates that he enjoys making light-hearted jokes and is not overly serious or stringent. Given all these reasons, I feel more inclined to swipe right on scenario 2.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nReading through these profiles, both scenarios were alluring, but Scenario 1 seemed to stand out more for me and resonated with my expectations of a prospective match. \\n\\nFirstly, while both scenarios mention Eric's love for tennis and his dog, Scott, the situation where Scott interrupts a tennis match is a lovely and humorous anecdote that not only shows a hint of Eric's personal life but also reveals an endearing less-than-perfect side of him. I think this builds a level of connection and trust, which makes Eric seem genuine, confident, and adds charm to his personality.\\n\\nFurthermore, Scott is a huge part of Eric's life, and it’s clear that he's a big animal lover which appeals not only to me as an individual but is generally seen as an attractive trait in any potential partner. \\n\\nThe promise of good laughs, earnest conversations, and the anticipation of a connection beyond the digital setup felt more sincere and like the progression of a potential relationship which I'm searching for. A range of emotions is evoked by the text - laughter at Scott’s misadventures and an associated warmth that makes Eric seem more relatable.\\n\\nAdditionally, Eric also mentioned that he is “looking for something genuine and fun” which exactly aligns with what I'm looking for making me believe that we could share a common ground.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a lover of tennis, the great outdoors, and all things canine. Currently grinding through an undergraduate degree at the local state university - striving to balance textbooks, tennis, and my dog Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "Speaking of Scott, here's a fun little story: One day while playing fetch at the park, Scott decided to chase the wrong thing – a tennis ball from the nearby court where a hustling match was in full swing. Ended up disrupting the game, but thankfully, the players had a good sense of humor. So that day, Scott fetched himself a handful of new friends... and me a couple of tennis partners!\n",
      "\n",
      "Now, I won't promise that Scott won't steal your heart (and possibly your sandwich), but I do promise good laughs, earnest conversations, and fingers crossed, a connection that exceeds the digital world. Looking for something genuine and fun, and hoping that's in the cards here. Fun Scott stories- part of the package.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, an undergraduate glued to the books at a 'insert school name' state university, fighting through college one pizza slice at a time. When I'm not pretending to enjoy late-night study sessions, you'll most likely find me on the tennis court. I'm just as comfortable with a racket in my hand as I am with a bag of dog treats - not for me (although, desperate times...) but for my loyal sidekick, Scott the Beagle. The truth is, he probably has more tricks in his repertoire than I have tennis skills. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a strong believer in friendship before anything else, and my group of close-knit buddies can corroborate - if you can get past their constant jesting about my average height and looks, that is. Rest assured, while I may be laughably competent at video games and tell terrible puns at inconvenient times, I promise I won't subject you to either on our first date (unless, of course, terrible puns are your thing... then I happen to have a lifelong supply). \n",
      "\n",
      "Let's grab a cup of coffee, take Scott for a walk, and see if we hit it off as more than just teammates in a doubles tennis match. If the cappuccino doesn't warm you up, my corny jokes definitely will!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhen considering which scenario is likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values, there are a few factors to consider. First of all, both scenarios clearly express my love for tennis and my dog Scott, which means potential matches with similar interests in sports and animals will likely be drawn to either. \\n\\nHowever, the first scenario starts off with a fun and charming anecdote, which sets a light-hearted and engaging tone. It immediately gives the reader insight into my personality and sense of humor, as well as my ability to look at the bright side and turn unexpected situations into positive experiences. In addition, the promise of more Scott stories denotes a willingness to share the small, personal details of my life, which may appeal to someone looking for an open and honest relationship.\\n\\nConcerning values, Scenario 1 emphasizes a desire for a genuine and fun connection that goes beyond physical attractiveness, which aligns with my value of depth and authenticity in a relationship. Scenario 2, on the other hand, puts more focus on friendship, indicating a value for companionship and mutual support. While this is also important, it may attract someone looking primarily for camaraderie rather than romance. \\n\\nIn terms of humor, the second scenario does touch on my self-deprecating humor and love for puns more than the first, but this, again, depends on personal taste and could be hit or miss.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', 'Reasoning:\\n\\nLooking at both scenarios, each one showcases various aspects of your personality and interests in different ways. \\n\\nScenario 1 puts great emphasis on your love for tennis and your dog, Scott. It also highlights your humorous side through a fun anecdote. Additionally, it underscores what you are looking for in a relationship - something \"genuine and fun\". However, it might not provide enough information about other aspects of your life or personality.\\n\\nScenario 2 gives a more holistic view of who you are, aside from tennis and Scott. It mentions your university life, your friends, and even your self-deprecating sense of humor regarding your average height and looks. It also nicely creates an interesting balance between showing your light-hearted side and your earnest search for a deeper connection. This profile not only lays out your interests but also acknowledges trivial flaws and inhabitations, which can make you more relatable and authentic to a potential match.\\n\\nBoth are great scenarios, but if we have to make a choice, Scenario 2 can cater to a broader audience and give a more dimensional view of your personality, while highlighting the same major interests as Scenario 1. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Reasoning:\\n\\nOne significant factor in deciding which bio would likely work better is determining its effectiveness in introducing who Eric is and what he values, presenting his interests in a fun and engaging way, while giving insights into his personality. \\n\\nIn scenario 1, Eric establishes his lifestyle and interests right off the bat. He mentions his passion for tennis, outdoor activities, and his dog, Scott, all in an enjoyable manner, giving potential matches an easy conversation starter. The anecdote about Scott in the park shows Eric's humorous side, highlighting that he doesn’t take life too seriously and likes spontaneous moments. The humor also cuts through what might otherwise be a standard profile, making him more memorable. Moreover, he directly states that he's seeking something genuine and fun, indicating his honesty about looking for a meaningful relationship.\\n\\nComparatively, in scenario 2, Eric also portrays his hobbies (studying, tennis, time with Scott) while introducing humor through self-deprecating jokes about his average looks, height and video gaming skills. He positions himself as valuing friendship before romantic relationships and not shying away from vulnerability. Some people might appreciate this perspective. The offer to take Scott on a walk or play a game of doubles on a date is also an interesting and fun proposition.\\n\\nBoth of these bios depict a snapshot of Eric's life and give potential matches a feel for his personality. However, the first one seems more inviting and shows that he can create fun from ordinary situations. Furthermore, it may make potential matches curious to hear more of his 'Scott stories.' The second one, while also charming, seems to focus more on self-deprecating humor that could potentially be less appealing to those who might misinterpret the jokes as Eric having low self-esteem. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 108 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 3.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 0, score 8.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning:\\n\\nLooking at both scenarios, they both have a fun and interesting storytelling style and contain a nice level of humor. But what makes the first scenario more appealing to me is that it shows a sincere side of Eric. He talks about his love for tennis and his dog Scott in an engaging and charming way. This scenario demonstrates some genuine emotion when he talks about how Scott ran into the tennis court during a game. This shows that he is able to make light of unexpected situations and can appreciate the humour in them. \\n\\nOn the other hand, the second scenario, while still fun and engaging, came off as a bit more sarcastic and tried a little too hard to be funny with the numerous puns. Not everyone might appreciate that type of humor. I think that it lacked a bit of the sincerity and charm that was demonstrated in the first scenario. \\n\\nSo overall, while both scenarios were well-written and had their own unique aspects, I personally resonated more with the first scenario. It gave a better sense of who Eric is, his personality and what he values (his friends, tennis, and most importantly, his dog Scott).\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: Scenario 1 presents Eric as a balanced individual who is approachable and down-to-earth, with a penchant for tennis and a good sense of humor. His story about Scott joining a tennis match shows his funny side and an ability to look on the bright side, which can be both entertaining and endearing. It also shows that he loves animals, which is a common interest for many. Moreover, he has mentioned his willingness to engage in intellectual conversations which indicate his possible intelligence and depth.\\n\\nScenario 2, while comedic and creative with the use of puns, might come off as trying too hard to sound smart or funny. The jokes and reference to Hogwarts and the Marauders map might not be universally understood, especially if the person reading hasn't read Harry Potter. Additionally, making light of his height and average-ness might seem insecure to some.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nScenario 1 presents Eric as a laid-back student who values balance in his life between work and play. The story about his dog running onto the tennis court shows that he doesn't take himself too seriously and can find fun in unexpected situations. The fact that he plays tennis proves that he's active and likely fit. He also mentions intellectual conversations, indicating an interest in deeper connections rather than simple small talk.\\n\\nScenario 2 is quite different, as Eric uses humour and several references to the Harry Potter series. Although this is creative and interesting, it doesn't provide quite as much clear information about Eric's personality or lifestyle. The joking nature of the profile might also mean it's sightly harder to tell if you'd be a good match.\\n\\nBased on this, I would feel more compelled to swipe right on scenario 1. Although both are intriguing, the first scenario gives a clearer image of Eric and seems more like someone I would get along with. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0.5, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nWhile both scenarios are well-written and give a sense of who Eric is, Scenario 1 seems more genuine and sure to attract a potential match sharing similar interests and values. \\n\\nThe first bio is clearer and more descriptive. It details Eric's love for his studies, tennis, friends, and his dog, Scott. This straight-forward approach will attract someone who shares his interests as it is specific on what he likes doing in his free time.\\n\\nAdditionally, Scenario 1 emphasizes Eric's sentimental side, showing his affectionate relationship with Scott, which aligns with his love for animals. Any animal lover or anyone who appreciates warm, memorable stories will definitely be drawn to this.\\n\\nFurthermore, Scenario 1 strikes a perfect balance between humorous and heartfelt, making it seem more authentic and less forced than Scenario 2. The light-hearted joke about Scott interrupting a tennis match will likely be appreciated by most people. \\n\\nAlthough Scenario 2 is also entertaining with its extensive use of puns and humor, it might not be everyone's cup of tea. Humor can be subjective, and the extensive use of puns can come across as too tricky or trying too hard. Also, it's less clear and detailed about what Eric values and looks for in a partner, which might be off-putting for someone looking for an actual connection.   \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios showcase Eric's personality, interests, and humor well. However, Scenario 1 primarily highlights his love for tennis, animal anecdotes, and desire for intellectual conversations, while Scenario 2 incorporates more humor and casualness. Both bios are engaging and well written. \\n\\nScenario 1 appears to be straightforward and presents the important details about Eric's life and personality, such as being a university student, playing tennis, spending time with friends, and enjoying the company of his beagle. His story about Scott invading his tennis match shows a humorous side of his personality, revealing his ability to laugh at unexpected situations. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, uses a lot of humor and literary references, indicating that Eric is funny, playful, and easygoing. The humorous and imaginative descriptions of his life tell potential dates that he has a creative mind and doesn't take himself too seriously. This would attract someone who enjoys humor and likes to look at life from a playful perspective.\\n\\nIn conclusion, the chosen scenario largely depends on the type of relationship and person Eric is seeking. If he is seeking someone with a strong sense of humor and easygoing nature, Scenario 2 would be more suitable. However, if he prefers someone who appreciates straightforwardness, intellectual conversations, and shared interests such as tennis and dogs, Scenario 1 would be the better choice.\\n\\nAnswer: This is subjective to the type of person Eric is looking for. If he is looking for someone who is easygoing and humor-loving then Scenario 2 would be a better fit. However, if he is looking for someone who appreciates straightforwardness and shares common interests, Scenario 1 would be the most suitable.\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nThe first scenario seems more appealing because it provides a broader overview of my life. It mentions my educational pursuits, hobbies, social life, and the strong bond with my dog, Scott. It gives potential matches a chance to gauge if they share similar interests and relationship views. It's light-hearted and humorous while maintaining a level of seriousness.\\n\\nMoreover, the first scenario doesn't overly depend on puns or jokes, making it a safer choice as humor can be extremely subjective. Additionally, it strikes a balance between sharing enough personal detail to invite connection while maintaining some mystery. \\n\\nOverall, the first scenario does a better job of capturing my personality, lifestyle, and what I might be like in a relationship. It gives a potential match more substantial information about me without relying too heavily on humor, which may not resonate with everyone.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 108 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 0, score 8.0\n",
      "1_3, generation 0, score 3.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, an undergraduate glued to the books at a 'insert school name' state university, fighting through college one pizza slice at a time. When I'm not pretending to enjoy late-night study sessions, you'll most likely find me on the tennis court. I'm just as comfortable with a racket in my hand as I am with a bag of dog treats - not for me (although, desperate times...) but for my loyal sidekick, Scott the Beagle. The truth is, he probably has more tricks in his repertoire than I have tennis skills. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a strong believer in friendship before anything else, and my group of close-knit buddies can corroborate - if you can get past their constant jesting about my average height and looks, that is. Rest assured, while I may be laughably competent at video games and tell terrible puns at inconvenient times, I promise I won't subject you to either on our first date (unless, of course, terrible puns are your thing... then I happen to have a lifelong supply). \n",
      "\n",
      "Let's grab a cup of coffee, take Scott for a walk, and see if we hit it off as more than just teammates in a doubles tennis match. If the cappuccino doesn't warm you up, my corny jokes definitely will!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning text:\\n\\nWhen looking at Eric's two bio scenarios, both versions paint a picture of an undergraduate student who loves tennis, having fun with his friends and spending time with his pet dog, Scott. These interests align with mine, making him more appealing. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes off as lighthearted and fun-loving. He describes himself as a laid-back person with a great sense of humor, qualities which I appreciate in a potential partner. Eric's honesty about his faculties (video gaming and pun-making) is refreshing and speaks to me of his genuineness. Additionally, including his dog Scott in his bio shows Eric's affection for animals, which I find endearing. I like the idea of a first date being casual and playful, with the possibility of spending time with Scott. \\n\\nOn the other hand in Scenario 2, Eric focuses more on his life at the university and his passion for tennis. He mentions hanging out with friends and his dog Scott, but without the personal affection that comes through in the first scenario. The story about Scott's accidental tennis court appearance does add some humor. Yet, there's less about what a date with Eric would look like, and more about his life's general interests.  \\n\\nConsidered side by side, I find the first scenario more compelling as it gives me a better idea about Eric's personality and humor, his love for his dog, and suggestions for a date that align with my interests.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning Text:\\nFor Scenario 1, I appreciate that Eric has a good sense of humor and doesn't take himself too seriously. His light-heartedness is clear through jovial mentions of his average height and looks, and his promise not to subject me to his video game skills or terrible puns unless I enjoy them. This gives me a sense of his personality and how he handles any potential shortcomings. His dedication to his pet, Scott the Beagle, is also charming, and his suggestion for a first date seems friendly and casual, which suits my preferences. This scenario paints him as both personable and approachable, two qualities I appreciate. \\n\\nOn the other hand, in Scenario 2, Eric comes across more as a 'regular, down-to-earth guy'. While his dedication to his friends and studies is admirable, the description here is slightly generic and less engaging than in the first scenario. The incident of Scott interrupting the tennis match is an interesting anecdote, but it's still lacking the humorous personal touch provided in scenario 1. This scenario does make him sound friendly, but not as distinctly memorable as the first scenario. \\n\\nTherefore, given my preference for someone personable, approachable and humorous, I would be more inclined to swipe right in the first scenario.\\n \\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nAnalyzing both scenarios, I think both Erics come across as down-to-earth, fun-loving, humorous, and comfortable being themselves - traits that are very attractive to me. However, there are subtle differences between the two scenarios that makes me lean towards one more than the other.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric seems like an open book, confidently sharing things his friends tease him about, such as his height and average looks, as well as his inadequacy at video games. This straightforwardness is endearing and suggests he doesn't take himself too seriously, which I appreciate. I also love how he paints a picture of what the first date could be like, which makes him seem proactive and confident. The humor he injects consistently across his bio is charming and puts me at ease. It also indicates that he's likely to be fun and easy to be around.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric also comes across as fun and light-hearted. The story of his dog, Scott, interrupting the tennis match is hilarious and memorable. However, this version of Eric feels a little less personal to me - while the story about Scott is great, the bio doesn't reveal as much about Eric himself beyond his love for tennis and his friends. He also doesn't display the same level of vulnerable humor that the Eric in Scenario 1 possesses.\\n\\nTaking everything into account, I feel more drawn to the Eric from Scenario 1. His self-deprecating humor, openness about his vulnerabilities, and the proactive offer of a first date make him seem more approachable and interesting to me. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a regular, down-to-earth guy currently pursuing my undergraduate studies at a local state university. My days usually involve balancing my classes with some invigorating tennis matches at the university courts - it's all about finding that sweet balance! \n",
      "\n",
      "In my free time, you'll often find me hanging out with my posse of friends (human and furry). Speaking of furry friends, meet Scott, my adorable beagle and partner-in-crime. We make quite a dynamic duo! Fun fact, just the other day, Scott managed to join me on the tennis court in the middle of a match, causing quite a spectacle and a moment of unexpected laughter for everyone present. \n",
      "\n",
      "It was hilarious and at the same time, it made the match unforgettable! Needless to say, I lost that game, but gained a great story to tell. If you enjoy animal antics, I promise you'd love spending time with us. \n",
      "\n",
      "So, if you're someone whose interests align with intellectual conversations, exertive tennis matches, hearty laughs, and cute dog stories, swipe right! Looking forward to sharing more Scott escapades and making new memories together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, an undergraduate glued to the books at a 'insert school name' state university, fighting through college one pizza slice at a time. When I'm not pretending to enjoy late-night study sessions, you'll most likely find me on the tennis court. I'm just as comfortable with a racket in my hand as I am with a bag of dog treats - not for me (although, desperate times...) but for my loyal sidekick, Scott the Beagle. The truth is, he probably has more tricks in his repertoire than I have tennis skills. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a strong believer in friendship before anything else, and my group of close-knit buddies can corroborate - if you can get past their constant jesting about my average height and looks, that is. Rest assured, while I may be laughably competent at video games and tell terrible puns at inconvenient times, I promise I won't subject you to either on our first date (unless, of course, terrible puns are your thing... then I happen to have a lifelong supply). \n",
      "\n",
      "Let's grab a cup of coffee, take Scott for a walk, and see if we hit it off as more than just teammates in a doubles tennis match. If the cappuccino doesn't warm you up, my corny jokes definitely will!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nWhen choosing which scenario is more likely to attract a potential match, there are three main factors of consideration. First, it's important to focus on shared interests, as shared interests are a common ground where bonds are formed. Second, humor often makes a bio more appealing and personable, breaking the ice and making the reader more comfortable. Finally, inviting the reader to engage, whether through a question or a call to action, can be an effective method to increase interest.\\n\\nGiven these criteria, both scenarios do a good job of discussing shared interests (e.g., tennis, animals, intellectual conversations or jokes), showing personality through humor, and portraying an honest image of myself. Scenario 1, however, seems to have a more vibrant and engaging storytelling aspect showcasing my personality, interests, and sense of humor. It invites the reader in by sharing a funny and endearing anecdote about Scott, while also pointing out my apparent love for tennis and enjoyment of good company.\\n\\nScenario 2 is humorous and edgy, and while it also portrays shared interests, it leans heavily on self-deprecating humor. Such humor can be hit-or-miss and may lead to potentially negative first impressions. Additionally, it seems more focused on joking about my shortcomings than really diving into who I am, what my interests are, or what type of relationship I am aiming for.\\n\\nThus, considering these aspects, one of these scenarios seems more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning Text:\\nBoth scenarios capture my personality and interests fairly well; they articulate my love for tennis, my university life, my bond with friends, and my fondness towards animals, particularly my dog, Scott. Still, there are noticeable differences between them that can influence the kind of potential match I attract.\\n\\nScenario 1 presents a balanced picture of my engaging and playful side through the narrative of Scott joining me in a tennis match. It also subtly indicates my love for intellectual conversations, possibly attracting someone who appreciates depth and thoughtfulness. Additionally, this scenario emphasizes companionship as it introduces Scott as my \"partner-in-crime.\"\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 has a casual and humorous tone, possibly appealing to someone who enjoys wit and light-heartedness. It delivers more personal details (like being average looking and average height) and the joke about eating dog treats gives an impression of self-deprecating humor. This scenario also shows an interest in a more traditional date situation, \"grabbing a cup of coffee.\"\\n\\nOverall, thinking in terms of attracting a potential match who shares my interests and values, I would lean towards someone who appreciates a good sense of humor, a mix of traditional and spontaneous dates, and the importance of friendship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', 'Reasoning Text:\\n\\nBoth scenarios convey an approachable and friendly personality, which is a great start. They both give an honest depiction of Eric\\'s lifestyle, hobbies, and humor, and serve to give potential matches a clear picture of what it\\'s like to date him. \\n\\nScenario 1 focuses more on outdoor activities and Eric\\'s jovial and playful relationship with his dog, Scott. This version could attract individuals who enjoy activities and have a fondness for animals. It also paints a picture of Eric as a good sport who doesn\\'t take himself too seriously, evidenced by the anecdote about Scott interrupting the tennis match. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, does a better job at showcasing Eric\\'s humorous side, with tongue-in-cheek self-deprecating humor and mention of \"terrible puns\". This scenario emphasizes Eric\\'s casual approach to life and his studies and would appeal most to individuals who value a laid-back, humorous approach to life. It also deep dives into Eric\\'s social life which includes a close group of friends.\\n\\nIn both scenarios, the love of tennis, dogs, and studies come across very clearly, but they do so with different tones - one is more active and engaging, the other more relaxed and funny. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario selection depends heavily on the kind of person Eric hopes to attract. If he wants someone more activity-oriented and who likes to maintain a lively pace, Scenario 1 is the better choice. If he\\'s looking for someone who appreciates humor, laid back lifestyle, and takes life as it comes, Scenario 2 would be the right choice.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 108 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 2, score 4.0\n",
      "2, generation 0, score 10.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios present Eric as an interesting and engaging individual, who appears to be both down-to-earth and compassionate. He seems to maintain a balance between his academic pursuits and his love for outdoor activities. His passion for animals, shown through his relationship with his beagle, Scott, is also endearing.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric exhibits his seriousness regarding his education and showcases a detail-oriented personality, as he narrates his interests and lifestyle in a concise manner. It conveys a sense of maturity and thoughtfulness. Eric also introduces a specific aspect of what he is looking for in a partner, revealing his focused approach towards finding a compatible match. The ending line about wanting to explore life's adventure and surprises, and the light humor about whether he’s as cute as his dog adds a nice touch, making his profile less formal and more approachable.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, has a more colloquial and breezy tone. Eric comes across as friendly and easy-going, and there's an element of humor that could be very attractive to some. However, it lacks the depth and insight of Scenario 1, and the line about needing a partner who's good at tennis might come across as too selective or even slightly off-putting.\\n\\nConsidering the above points, my decision ultimately depends on what I prioritize in a potential partner. If I'm looking for someone serious, dedicated, and mature, I would be more drawn to Scenario 1. However, if I'm more intrigued by a light-hearted, humorous, and friendly personality, Scenario 2 would be my choice.\\n\\nAnswer: Based on my personal preference for depth, maturity and an articulated approach towards a partner's traits, I would choose Scenario 1.\", \"Reasoning: I appreciate that Eric demonstrates a good sense of humor, light-hearted nature and seems down to earth in both scenarios. However, I'm slightly more drawn towards Scenario 1. In this version, Eric's bio is more detailed and personal. He shares more about his lifestyle and interests, loves for his dog, and an active outdoor lifestyle. He also seems serious about finding somebody compatible and open to a potential romantic relationship. I am particularly interested in his quote 'Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me?' as it demonstrates an adventurous spirit and the desire to share new experiences with a potential partner. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Comparing both scenarios, Eric certainly comes off as an engaging and pleasant personality. Nevertheless, there are differences between the two scenarios that would influence my decision. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric is portrayed as a dedicated student who is enthusiastic about sports, especially tennis. His love for animals, especially his dog, Scott, is very apparent. He also mentions that he prefers tranquil environments over busy city life. I can sense a maturity in his tone and I appreciate his straightforwardness about what he wants in a potential match. Eric's genuine appeal, zest for life, appetite for knowledge, and fondness for outdoor activities and animals aligns with what I am looking for in a partner. Moreover, his emphasis on companionship and openness to new experiences is commendable. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric also showcases his sense of humor; his description is lighthearted and funny, showing that he doesn't take life too seriously. This might be more appealing to someone looking for a more relaxed relationship. However, his portrayal here lacks the depth shown in Scenario 1, and he doesn't explicitly mention his expectations from a potential match.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 \\n\\nWhile both scenarios have their own unique qualities, Scenario 1 presents a more comprehensive and mature perception of Eric. This scenario clearly outlines what he is seeking in a potential partner, which gives me more confidence about any potential compatibility we might have.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, an average Joe navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education and it's all the more amusing when my beagle, Scott, decides joining my online classes is his new calling. Scott and I share three great loves in life - good company, long walks and a mean game of tennis. Alright, maybe Scott's more into chasing the tennis balls I miss. If you think the only thing missing from this dynamic duo is a touch of your charm, send a hi our way!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "\"N.B: Having to play fetch with Scott after every tennis game isn't ideal, so if you're a pro, that's a huge plus! Remember, every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after. Looking forward to experiencing life, love and laughter together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"[reasoning text]\\n\\nDeciding between these profiles, it's essential to keep in mind who we are trying to attract - someone who shares our love for animals, enjoys outdoor activities like tennis, and values education. \\n\\nScenario 2 might appeal more to this audience. It explicitly mentions our love of animals and our preference for quiet and peace over city noise, which dog lovers can relate to. It also conveys our passion for tennis and outdoor activities in a fun, playful manner. Furthermore, by talking about our studies, it lets any potential matches know that education is important to us. Lastly, the note about wanting to find someone who appreciates education and outdoor activities signals what kind of person we're looking for directly.\\n \\nHowever, Scenario 1 also has its strengths. It injects a good amount of humor into the situation by sharing amusing anecdotes with Scott. This can make our profile seem approachable and relatable. If the potential match is into throbbing wit, then this profile might be more interesting.\\n\\nBoth are great options, but for the target audience, I believe Scenario 2 does a better job outlining who we are and what we're looking for.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nBoth scenarios provide a fun and detailed description of Eric's personality, hobbies and what he's looking for in a potential match. They both mention his dog and his love for tennis and animals. \\n\\nHowever, the first scenario adds an extra element of charm and humor while depicting how active and playful Eric and his dog are. It also smartly encourages those who are good at tennis to respond, thus likely attracting those who share his interest in the sport. By revealing Scott's amusing antics and his role in Eric's online classes, it subtly showcases Eric's patience, good-heartedness, and ability to handle amusing disruptions, which could be attractive to potential matches.\\n\\nMeanwhile, scenario 2 goes a bit more into depth about Eric's life. It not only talks about his hobbies but also about his love for education and preference for a calmer, more nature-centered lifestyle. Also it publicizes an eagerness to explore life with someone which could attract potential matches who are adventurous.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 and 2 paint different but equally attractive pictures of Eric. However, if it's about attracting potential matches who share Eric's interests and values, Scenario 2 seems more informative and balanced.\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios present a genuine and personable depiction of Eric that reflects his character and interests. They both serve to attract prospective matches with similar interests in animals and outdoor activities, as well as those who value education. \\n\\nHowever, Scenario 1 is subtly more clever and humorous with phrases like \"navigating the ebb and flow of tertiary education\" and \"every tennis ball you hit into oblivion, is a tennis ball I don’t have to run after.\" This style of bio may be more likely to attract those who appreciate humor and a creative use of language. Plus, it also includes a friendly challenge to prospective matches to outplay him in tennis, which could pique the interest of competitive-natured individuals.\\n\\nScenario 2 has a more straightforward, detailed, and laid out approach, which could be appealing to those who appreciate clarity and thoroughness. It asks directly for someone who shares Eric\\'s particular interests (\"zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends\") giving a clear image of what Eric is looking for in a potential match.\\n\\nOverall, both scenarios are good, but they cater to slightly different audiences.\\n\\nAnswer: There\\'s no clear-cut winner between Scenario 1 or 2. It would depend on the kind of personality Eric wishes to attract. Scenario 1 might attract more lighthearted, humor-appreciating and challenge-oriented prospects, while Scenario 2 may appeal to those preferring sincere, clear, and direct communication.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 108 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 0, score 8.0\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 3.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, an undergraduate glued to the books at a 'insert school name' state university, fighting through college one pizza slice at a time. When I'm not pretending to enjoy late-night study sessions, you'll most likely find me on the tennis court. I'm just as comfortable with a racket in my hand as I am with a bag of dog treats - not for me (although, desperate times...) but for my loyal sidekick, Scott the Beagle. The truth is, he probably has more tricks in his repertoire than I have tennis skills. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a strong believer in friendship before anything else, and my group of close-knit buddies can corroborate - if you can get past their constant jesting about my average height and looks, that is. Rest assured, while I may be laughably competent at video games and tell terrible puns at inconvenient times, I promise I won't subject you to either on our first date (unless, of course, terrible puns are your thing... then I happen to have a lifelong supply). \n",
      "\n",
      "Let's grab a cup of coffee, take Scott for a walk, and see if we hit it off as more than just teammates in a doubles tennis match. If the cappuccino doesn't warm you up, my corny jokes definitely will!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: \\n\\nWhen looking at these two scenarios, there are a few factors that play into my decision. Firstly, I appreciate both Eric's sense of humor and sincerity. In both scenarios, Eric comes across as lively, funny, and down-to-earth, which are traits that I'm attracted to. \\n\\nHowever, in scenario 1, Eric definitely shows more of his softer side. The mention of his Beagle, Scott, portrays him as an animal lover and gives an insight into his compassionate side. Furthermore, I appreciate how he values his friends and their importance in his life. The way he engages in self-deprecating humor but also shows a good sense of humor is very appealing. \\n\\nOn the other hand in Scenario 2, Eric seems more eccentric and adventurous, but his deep reliance on Harry Potter related analogies, while charming and quirky, might be a bit too niche for some. It could be seen as slightly less mature or seeking for someone who is a Harry Potter fan, which can limit the pool of potential partners. \\n\\nWhile both bios are attractive in their own ways, I think scenario 1 is more universally appealing, as it shows a more rounded representation of his personality without relying too heavily on pop culture references.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nIn both scenarios, Eric shows his sense of humor and interests quite well. However, reading both bios I lean somewhat more towards scenario 1. The first scenario seems more approachable and straight-forward, with Eric inviting to grab a cup of coffee and walk his dog. The language is also a tad easier to understand, whereas in the second scenario he uses quite a few Harry Potter references which might not resonate with everyone. It's cute that he's a fan, but makes me question if there's more to him than Harry Potter and puns.\\n\\nAs someone who values friendship, Eric stating his belief in friendship before anything else in the first scenario is also appealing. Besides, the tone in the first scenario feels a bit more self-deprecating, which leads me to believe that Eric doesn't take himself too seriously.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Both Eric's bios are enjoyable and portray him as a fun-loving, casual, and sociable person. The first scenario provides more insight into his traits such as his love for books, value of friendship, and his connection with his pet. This indicates that he is quite a well-rounded individual capable of maintaining a variety of interests and relationships. His sense of humor is also shown through his jokes and puns, making him come across as approachable and down-to-earth. The second scenario, though equally humorous and entertaining, tends to steer towards silliness in certain parts, making it seem like he isn't taking this platform seriously. Also, the references to Harry Potter and politics might not be understood or appreciated by everyone. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric, an undergraduate glued to the books at a 'insert school name' state university, fighting through college one pizza slice at a time. When I'm not pretending to enjoy late-night study sessions, you'll most likely find me on the tennis court. I'm just as comfortable with a racket in my hand as I am with a bag of dog treats - not for me (although, desperate times...) but for my loyal sidekick, Scott the Beagle. The truth is, he probably has more tricks in his repertoire than I have tennis skills. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a strong believer in friendship before anything else, and my group of close-knit buddies can corroborate - if you can get past their constant jesting about my average height and looks, that is. Rest assured, while I may be laughably competent at video games and tell terrible puns at inconvenient times, I promise I won't subject you to either on our first date (unless, of course, terrible puns are your thing... then I happen to have a lifelong supply). \n",
      "\n",
      "Let's grab a cup of coffee, take Scott for a walk, and see if we hit it off as more than just teammates in a doubles tennis match. If the cappuccino doesn't warm you up, my corny jokes definitely will!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios portray honesty and a sense of humor, which can be charming traits. However, Scenario 1 feels more appealing for a couple of reasons. The first paragraph is more detailed about the writer's life, which gives more insight into his daily routines and interests. It goes more than skin-deep and talks about the love and care he has for his dog - an admirable trait. Being equally humorous and documentative, it invites connection on a deeper level, including the part about waiting at the cafe and corny jokes, which both sound more inviting than comparing the experience to Hogwarts. Lastly, the mention of 'friendship before anything else' shows that he values emotional intimacy, which is a green flag for a lot of people looking for a mature relationship.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nThe profile bio on a dating app serves as a personal introduction and should ideally reflect oneself authentically while appealing to potential matches. The bio should display personality, interests, and a sense of humor.\\n\\nScenario 1:\\n\\nPros: This bio does effectively display that Eric is a cool, laid-back kinda guy who enjoys spending time with his friends and his dog, Scott. It presents a clear idea of Eric\\'s interests outside of studies and his claim of being \"average\" in an endearing, self-deprecating manner. The profile bio also concludes with an invitation to meet up, showing that Eric is interested in connecting with potential matches.\\n\\nCons: However, it heavily relies on humor which could be hit or miss depending on the reader\\'s sense of humor.\\n\\nScenario 2:\\n\\nPros: Here, Eric expresses his personality as a pun-loving guy who enjoys spending time with his beagle, Scott, has a tightly knit friend circle and a love for walks to cafes and sushi bars. The language heavily leans on Harry Potter references to explain the university experience and his bond with his friends, which is quirky and appealing to someone who shares the same reading interests.\\n\\nCons: However, the extensive use of puns, jokes, and a high number of pop-culture references might limit the potential matches to only those who understand or enjoy that particular sense of humor or know about the references.\\n\\nComparing both scenarios, Scenario 1 seems more likely to appeal to a broad range, as it provides a clear, overall picture of Eric\\'s life and personality without restricting it with specific humor or pop culture references.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\n', \"Reasoning text:\\n\\nWhen evaluating these two scenarios, it's important to consider a few factors. Firstly, you're interested in showcasing your personality, humor, interests and values in the bio. Secondly, it ought to be concise, engaging and approachable enough for a potential match to feel connected or intrigued. \\n\\nIn both scenarios, there's a clear demonstration of humor and charm, so it comes down to how clearly your interests are articulated. \\n\\nScenario 1 offers a more explicit outline of who you are and your interests: an undergraduate student who uses humor to get through school, a tennis enthusiast, a dog lover, someone who values friendship, appreciates a good pun, and invite potential matches for a casual outing. It's more direct in its approach and invites engagement by proposing a meeting.\\n\\nScenario 2, while it's heavy with humor, puts a fantasy spin on your actual life and comes across a bit confusing. It might appeal to those with a more whimsical sense of humor and love for fantasy, but it doesn't quite create the same balanced profile as Scenario 1, nor does it propose any form of engagement or meeting. \\n\\nSo, my choice would be based on which scenario appears to be more clear-cut, engaging and conducive for a potential match to respond positively.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 112 has a large difference:\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "2, generation 1, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Answer: Scenario 2\\n\\nIn both scenarios, Eric's humor, love for animals, and university life get highlighted quite expressively. However, I find myself gravitating more toward the description in Scenario 2 for a number of reasons:\\n\\n1. Depiction of Personality: In Scenario 2, Eric comes across as more relaxed, witty, and approachable. He also smoothly incorporates his interests and lifestyle choices in a light-hearted and appealing way. Scenario 1 is also funny, but the excessive Harry Potter references might be off-putting to some who are unfamiliar with the series or simply not fans.\\n\\n2. Explicit Invitation for Engagement: In Scenario 2, Eric invites his potential match to participate in his interests - from long walks with Scott to tolerating his jokes or exposing his overconfidence in tennis. This active invitation portrays that he's not only looking for a companion but willingly shares his life's moments.\\n\\n3. Quality of Humor: While both profiles use humor, the jokes in Scenario 2 feel a bit more natural and less forced. The humor in Scenario 1 revolves heavily around Harry Potter, which might not resonate with those who are not fans of the series.\\n\\n4. Clear Intentions: In the second scenario, Eric's intentions and expectations from his dating app match are clearly outlined. This might come across as more serious and dedicated about finding a potential romantic relationship.\\n\\n5. Accessibility: Scenario 2 assumes less prior knowledge and can be appreciated by anyone, while Scenario 1 relies heavily on understanding the Harry Potter references.\\n\\n6. Believability: The self-deprecating humor makes Eric seem humble and relatable in Scenario 2. The overstatement in the first scenario, although blatantly humorous, might seem too exaggerated for some. \\n\\nSo, Eric's profile in Scenario 2 makes a slightly better first impression, based on these points.\", 'Reasoning:\\n\\nIn evaluating which scenario I\\'m more likely to swipe right on, I considered the presentation of personality, the level of engagement, and the humor.\\n\\nIn scenario 1, there\\'s a clear display of humor, especially with the line about Scott being a Golden Snitch and the playful references to Harry Potter. Eric seems to be a bit of a quirky jokester. There\\'s also a hint of intellect, as he\\'s a university student who appears to enjoy discussing unusual subjects like \"the mysteries of the university luminous fungi.\" The description is quite engaging, with detailed information about his interests and lifestyle, which makes him seem like a fun and interesting person.\\n\\nScenario 2 is more laid-back and straightforward, with less emphasis on humor but more on his interest in animals and his Netflix hobby. There\\'s also a welcoming gesture to those new to tennis, showing his open and accommodating nature. The latter part about looking for someone to laugh with gives a glimpse into what he\\'s looking for, providing a thoughtful ending to his bio. However, compared to scenario 1, it\\'s slightly less engaging and doesn\\'t quite reveal as much personality.\\n\\nGiven my criteria, scenario 1 creates a more engaging and distinctive picture of Eric, so I would be more likely to swipe right on this one.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', '[reasoning text]\\n\\nFor the most part, my decision depends on how Eric represents himself through his bio, his interests, and even the inherent humor in his descriptions. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as a humorous, easy-going person who\\'s comfortable with himself. He appears to be someone who doesn\\'t take life too seriously, which can be very appealing. His personality seems to shine through his bio, shedding light on a myriad of his interests, from Harry Potter to tennis, politics, and animals. This type of variety could potentially make getting to know him more exciting and fulfilling. \\n\\nFurthermore, his clever and funny style of expressing himself affects my sense of his authenticity. His self-deprecating humor about being \"average in height\" and his pun-filled text reflect a light-hearted personality. It gives the impression he\\'s more interested in finding someone who sees the humour in life rather than focussing on mere appearances.\\n\\nScenario 2, in contrast, seems to provide less depth of character. Here, Eric describes himself as \"slightly-above-average\" which while positive, is quite vague and doesn\\'t tell much about him personally. His humor is less pronounced, and he focuses more on traditional dating-app lines, like being a softie for animals and a Netflix enthusiast. \\n\\nWhile he does add some humor, he doesn\\'t showcase much of his personality, which could make it a bit more challenging to see if we would genuinely connect. However, the mention of liking long walks could suggest a reflective side to his character. But overall, the second bio sounds more like a template, something you\\'d see on several dating profiles.\\n\\nFrom these observations, I feel more drawn to the unique and humorous character displayed by Eric in the first scenario. I’m more intrigued to get to know him beyond his profile.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios do an excellent job of showcasing Eric's personality, hobbies, and the type of person he wants to meet, but there are subtle differences. \\n\\nIn scenario 1, Eric uses a lot of Harry Potter references and animal-related puns, which means he could attract someone who shares his love for the series, humor and animals. However, this may also alienate people who are not familiar with Harry Potter or do not appreciate puns. \\n\\nOn the other hand, scenario 2 seems more generic and less risky. Eric still shows his sense of humor, love for tennis and his dog, and is inclusive to those who aren't as skilled at certain things (like tennis). He seems down to earth, as he makes light of his overall 'average' qualities instead of trying to oversell himself. \\n\\nConsidering Eric's primary goal is to start dating and meet someone who values him for who he is, without specific reference to anything niche like Harry Potter, scenario 2 seems like the more appropriate choice.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", 'Reasoning Text: \\n\\nBoth scenarios present rich, engaging, and witty descriptions of the character, Eric. They both show his laid-back, humorous, and down-to-earth personality. However, they slightly differ in content and tone. \\n\\nScenario 1 gives a more whimsical, playful, and even nerdy vibe. The use of Harry Potter references can be a great way to catch the attention of fellow fans, providing a shared talking point or interest. The humor feels more emphasized in this scenario, almost exaggerated, which could be a hit or miss for some readers. Yet, it could be a great filter for those who would enjoy this style of humor and puns. \\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 still embodies Eric\\'s humorous and laid-back personality but comes across as more grounded, less of a fantasy reference, and being more about everyday activities such as watching Netflix. Mentioning Netflix might also appeal to a broader audience. And while still retaining humor, it presents a more direct and slightly more mature approach to looking for a potential match, which could possibly resonate with more people. \\n\\nDepending on the type of person Eric is targeting, both scenarios can be effective. However, considering the description of Eric given, he is a student who, along with his love for playing tennis, enjoys spending time with friends but nothing too specific is mentioned about being a big fan of fantasy or having a \"nerdy\" side. Hence, the second scenario could possibly be a better fit as the tone of it aligns better with the provided description.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nLooking at both scenarios, both bios tackle the character’s interests, personality and humor. They both mention Scott the beagle, Tennis, and the character’s cheerful and outgoing personality.\\n\\nScenario 1 is filled with humor, displaying a lovable goofiness that some individuals may find endearing. It's light-hearted, and the Harry Potter references reveal a bit about his interests, which can attract fans of the series. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is slightly more mature while still maintaining a playful undertone. It's more straightforward, explaining his interests and what he might look for in a potential match with a little less humor. It also emphasises more on the dating aspect and what he's looking for in a potential partner, and his humility might be appealing to others.\\n\\nHence, both bios might attract different individuals according to their preferences. If the goal is to attract someone who appreciates humor, references and a more laid-back tone, Scenario 1 would be the more effective choice. If the aim is to find someone who prioritises maturity, directness and still enjoys humor and light-heartedness, Scenario 2 would be the better option.\\n\\nAnswer: This would depend on the type of match that Eric is looking for.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 112 has a large difference:\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 2.0\n",
      "1_2, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Scenario 1 has a more sincere and straightforward tone, which makes Eric seem like a genuine and honest person who\\'s looking for a real connection. His mention of his love for his dog shows he\\'s caring, while his interest in tennis shows his active and competitive side. He also expresses his value of good conversation by mentioning that he enjoys lectures, suggesting he is intellectually curious. His humor in describing himself as \"average in looks but above average in humor and wit\" makes him come off as funny and humble.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, tries to be funny and light-hearted, but it is slightly overdone, making it seem like he\\'s trying too hard to be funny. Plus, his mention of \"proving the universe wrong\" if we didn\\'t get along seemed a bit negative or desperate.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.', \"Reasoning text: \\n\\nWhen deciding whether to swipe right or left, certain textual cues from Eric's descriptions can potentially affect my decision. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric comes across as sincere, mature, and well-rounded. His love for tennis, animals, particularly his beagle Scott, and spending time with friends make him look fun. His mention of a balanced lifestyle and eagerness to share aspects like of learning and life also shows that he values having shared activities and intellectual compatibility in a potential match. He also gives the impression of being self-deprecating, especially when he talks about his looks and height, which hints at a sense of humor. \\n\\nOn the other hand, in Scenario 2, Eric seems more light-hearted and humorous – his bio is full of puns and he appears to be considerably more casual and witty. The references to 'Harry Potter' suggest that he likes pop culture and doesn't mind showing a playful, nerdy side, which could be quite endearing. However, the many references and jokes might make it harder to take him seriously, especially compared to the first scenario where his self-description was more balanced.\\n\\nBoth scenarios have their charm, but as a young woman open to a potential romantic relationship, Scenario 1 paints a more appealing picture – a mix of levity and gravitas, someone who takes life seriously but can also have fun.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Upon reading both scenarios, while both versions of Eric come off as witty and charming, I find myself leaning towards scenario 1. \\nIn the first scenario, Eric gives a genuine and thoughtful self-description. He successfully balances humor with sincerity, avoiding excessive wittiness or self-deprecation that may come off as trying too hard for some. Eric's warm description of his dog and shared activities like watching sunsets and hikes adds an inviting sense of vitality and outdoorsiness to his profile. His trait of being a good listener and the way he values and prioritizes his friends shows a perspective of balance and loyalty. I appreciate his book-and-movie interest, and he seems to value intellectual compatibility as well.\\nOn the other hand, the second scenario, while amusing and distinct, could potentially narrow his audience restrictively — it is heavily laden with Harry Potter references and unorthodox humour that might not appeal to all. \\nOverall, Eric’s bio in scenario 1 paints him as a person who treasures simple joys, boasts a genuineness that often gets lost amidst all the playful banter in dating apps, and has a balanced lifestyle that I am drawn to.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, a pun-loving undergrad at a pretty reputable state university (no, not Hogwarts, although I wish it was!). I major in tennis-ball chasing with my sidekick Scott, who's a beagle (wish he was a Golden Snitch, though!).\n",
      "\n",
      "When I’m not immersed in the world of academia, you can usually find me playing tennis or hanging out with my pals in some obscure parts of the university. Yes, we are just like the Marauders, minus the werewolf bit. Love serpentology, but all the snakes I know are in politics, not in a zoo. Huge fan of walks – as long as they lead to a café or a sushi bar. \n",
      "\n",
      "The average Joe in every dimension, including height-wise, but we all know average is the new sexy, right? All joking aside, I'm just a young man trying to find someone who'll think my animal-related puns are somewhat funny. Swipe right if you want to join in on the fun, talk about life, love, and the mysteries of the university luminous fungi (it's a thing, they glow!). If not, swipe right anyway – let's prove the universe wrong together!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nScenario 1 sets the tone of a more mature, serious, and goal-oriented individual with a clear vision of what he wants. It gives a wholesome picture of Eric and articulates his expectations straightforwardly, making it easier for people to decide if they match Eric's preferences. The description is tied to real life activities like studying at a state university, playing tennis, and spending time with friends, which most people can relate to. Moreover, mentioning that he values good food, movie nights with friends and is a dedicated pet owner could attract like-minded individuals who share similar passions.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 paints a picture of a fun-loving and outgoing personality with a penchant for jokes and unexpected adventures. The playfulness and wit sprinkled throughout the description may bring a smile on the reader's face, drawing in potential matches who are looking for someone easygoing and humorous. This variant seems to target a younger, more jovially-inclined audience that appreciates good humor and creativity. The usage of popular cultural references (such as Harry Potter) can be a conversation starter and attract fans of the same. \\n\\nHowever, too many jokes and quirky comments may overshadow the very purpose of being on the dating app, i.e., it might be difficult for potential matches to gauge seriousness in the intent.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nThere are two key factors to consider when choosing between these scenarios - tone and content. \\n\\nFirstly, the tone in Scenario 1 comes across as sincere, earnest and relatable. Eric introduces himself as a well-rounded individual with a balanced life and interests ranging from academics to tennis, from friends to his dog. His sense of humor subtly shines through, without overwhelming the bio. Women who appreciate a more grounded, straightforward approach to life may resonate with this tone.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 uses a more whimsical, humorous tone peppered with puns and playful references. Eric's personality shines through as someone who does not take himself too seriously and has a certain charm. This style might attract women who enjoy light-hearted banter, amusing wordplay, and aren't too serious themselves while swiping on a dating app.\\n\\nSecondly, the content in both scenarios has similarities but different emphasis. Scenario 1 gives equal importance to Eric's love for his dog, his enjoyment in socializing, his likeness for sports, academia, and his sense of humor. This may appeal to someone who shares these interests and appreciates a balanced life. \\n\\nScenario 2, however, emphasizes more on Eric's sense of humor and less on his academic pursuits or love for his dog. While it mentions them, the focus is arguably weighted on his playful personality. It may appeal more to someone who values humor and playfulness over shared activities or interests.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 or 2\\n\\nThe choice between these depends largely on the type of woman Eric is hoping to attract. If he would like to meet someone with shared hobbies and a balanced lifestyle, Scenario 1 might be the better choice. If he prioritizes finding someone who appreciates his sense of humor and isn't too serious, Scenario 2 could work better. However, it's worth noting that a mix of the two scenarios could potentially attract a wider range of potential matches.\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric\\'s personality and interests effectively, but exhibit slightly different tones. \\n\\nScenario 1 is sincere and well-articulated and targets a more mature, like-minded audience who value concise descriptions over humor. It lays emphasis on Eric\\'s passion for tennis, love for his dog, social life, and a well-rounded balance of fun and university work. In addition, it subtly communicates his humility and self-awareness (\"average height and looks\") and projects his appreciation for wit and intellect.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is more casual, humorous, and playful, incorporating pop culture references (Hogwarts, Marauders, Golden Snitch), appealing to a younger or more fandom-oriented audience who would recognize and appreciate the Harry Potter references and Eric\\'s puns. \\n\\nIn overall, both scenarios would attract people sharing interest in dogs, university life, tennis, and outdoors.\\n\\nAnswer: The most appropriate scenario would depend on the kind of relationship Eric is looking for and the maturity and interests of the potential match he has in mind. Scenario 1 would likely attract a potential match who values depth, sincerity, and balance in lifestyle. Scenario 2 would more likely attract a potential match that appreciates whimsical humor, playfulness, and pop-culture.']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 112 has a large difference:\n",
      "2, generation 1, score 0.0\n",
      "2, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: Both scenarios present an image of Eric as a humorous and fun-loving individual with a passion for tennis and a deep love for his pet. I like the fact that he\\'s upfront about his \"average\" looks and height, showing he\\'s self-aware and confident nonetheless. However, choosing between the two scenarios depends on personal preference. \\n\\nScenario 1 presents Eric with a more informal and youthful tone in his bio. He weaves puns into his description and exhibits a strong sense of self-deprecating humor. This sort of tone would appeal to someone who appreciates such style of humor and a more casual, easy-going attitude.\\n\\nOn the other hand, scenario 2 comes across as slightly more mature and crafted. Eric maintains his humorous and light-hearted personality, but presents it in a more structured and eloquent manner, which may reflect a higher level of introspection and emotional maturity.\\n\\nSo, considering my personal preference for a more mature and thoughtful approach, coupled with Eric\\'s humor and love for his pet and tennis, \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.', \"Reasoning: Scenario 1 and 2 both give me a pretty clear picture of Eric's personality. He seems humorous, approachable, and down-to-earth. However, in Scenario 1, Eric's humor is more apparent and his attitude seems field and relaxed, not taking himself too seriously. His confidence shines through in a very unsophisticated and friendly manner. Also, mentioning about his dog Scott and about his love for animals seemed a bit more elaborative in the first scenario. On the other hand, Scenario 2 also does justice to revealing his humor and love for animals, but it seems slightly more structured, making it slightly less appealing as it doesn’t exude the “off-the-cuff” charm that the first one has. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: Considering both scenarios, what stands out to me is the approach Eric takes to introduce himself, his sense of humor, and his interests. \\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric has a funny, humble, and slightly self-deprecating way of describing himself. The use of puns and humor throughout his bio reflects a light-hearted personality. His love for his dog, Scott, and his passion for tennis are mentioned perfectly, which add interesting details about him. As for his looks, the way he very honestly calls himself average but then tells that his mother finds him handsome is endearing. His admittance of making terrible puns also adds to his charm.\\n\\nIn contrast, Scenario 2 seems almost too formal and less personal. It starts with a generic greeting and goes on to talk about his interests, but with much less humor and character. The sentences, though they have substance, are formulated more like an essay than a personal introduction on a dating app. \\n\\nNeither bio is off-putting, but Scenario 1's easy-going tone and humor definitely make Eric seem more friendly and fun, which I think is essential in the first stages of meeting people.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning:\\nWhile both scenarios do an excellent job of introducing Eric, his interests, and his humorous side, Scenario 1 might be a more effective profile. Here\\'s why:\\n\\n- Scenario 1 is slightly more detailed about Eric\\'s personality. It subtly emphasizes things like his sense of humor, his affinity for Netflix (which could suggest a love for staying in and relaxing), and his openness to newbies in tennis (which could indicate understanding and patience).\\n- This scenario also explicitly mentions wanting someone \"to share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life,\" which could convey a desire for a deep, meaningful relationship as opposed to a casual fling.\\n- It also hints at Eric\\'s self-deprecating humor by stating \"he might steal your heart from me,\" and \"laugh with or at me, not picky,\" offering a sense of humility.\\n- Lastly, Eric asks directly at the end, \"Is it you?\" which seems inviting and makes it clear that he is actively searching for a partner.\\n\\nWhile Scenario 2 is lighter and funnier, it might come across as a bit more facetious and could repel individuals who are seeking a more serious connection.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1', \"Reasoning: Both scenarios are great and well constructed in displaying a sense of humor, love for animals, and honest personality. They also effectively communicate Eric's hobbies and interests. Scenario 1 offers a little more insight into Eric's daily life, values, and what he is looking for in a potential partner. Scenario 2, although funny and lighthearted, doesn't quite convey his interests or what he values in a relationship as deeply as Scenario 1. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: When comparing the two bios, both outlines who Eric is very well and injects a fair amount of humor into the description, which makes them lively and interesting. However, there are subtle differences between the two scenarios that could affect the outcomes.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, there's a good balance of self-deprecating humor, sincere interests, and the use of appealing descriptions like 'connoisseur of all things Netflix.' This shows that Eric doesn't take himself too seriously, but also reveals genuine aspects about his character. This scenario also provides a charming detail about his pet Scott which shows his love for animals. Moreover, his sense of humor and openness about his physical appearance might resonate with someone who values personality and character over looks.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 also gives a large amount of personality with its humor and bio details. However, it leans heavier on humor, which while attractive to some, might deter those who are looking for more serious candidates, as the excess jokes may detract from the sincerity of his bio.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 112 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "2, generation 1, score 0.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['In deciding whether to swipe right or left on Eric\\'s profile, I would consider factors such as sense of humor, how well he seems to communicate with others, self-confidence, and his attention to animal care. \\n\\nScenario 1:\\nEric reveals his humorous side while also demonstrating humility with his little self-deprecation about his tennis skills and an admission that his dog may basically charm me more than he can. His bio is filled with gleams of wit and sarcasm, which makes me think he’s an amusing guy who doesn\\'t take himself too seriously. He acknowledges his average height, but turns it around saying his humor exceeds the median, which shows a bit of self-acceptance and self-confidence. Furthermore, I appreciate the mention of \"sharing the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life\" which suggests he has a positive, realistic outlook on life. \\n\\nScenario 2:\\nThis scenario presents Eric as a more serious and mature individual with a deep appreciation for education, outdoor activities, and animals. He appears more passionate about tennis and his dog. I feel a sense of sincerity in his words, but there seems to be a lack of humor that was prevalent in scenario 1. His request for someone who \"won\\'t mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along\" is cute, and suggests that he is a committed pet owner, which is nice.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\\nWhile both scenarios present an appealing version of Eric, I would be more inclined to swipe right on Scenario 1. His lighthearted and humorous writing style complements the sincerity in Scenario 1, balancing it out more than the serious tone presented in Scenario 2. His sense of humor and earnestness make him seem approachable and relatable. Moreover, his self-assuredness in this scenario is evident without coming off as self-absorbed.', \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nBoth scenarios are fairly similar. Both describe Eric's interests and hobbies well, reflect his humor, and indicate that he seem to be a friendly and outdoorsy kind of guy who loves animals, especially his dog, Scott. \\n\\nHowever, I am leaning more towards Scenario 1. It seems to be more personal and humorous, which makes Eric seem more approachable and easy-going. His self-deprecating humor about his tennis skills and his pun about being 'slightly-above-average' make him seem humble and fun. Additionally, his bio is not just about him, but also about what he is looking for in a potential partner, giving the impression of a reciprocative relationship. \\nMoreover, he seems to genuinely wish for a companion who appreciates the same values and activities he does, rather than just someone who can deal with them. His humor, humility, and directness look fun and refreshing. \\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric is a bit more formal and doesn't share a lot about his personality other than his hobbies. The humor in this one is more subtle, and it lacks the direct engagement that Scenario 1 has. However, he does give more background and context to his life by mentioning that he attends a 'beautiful, bustling state university.'\\n\\nAll of this said, the decision is also heavily dependent on what his profile pictures look like. But, based solely on the bio, I would be more likely to swipe right on Scenario 1.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning: Both scenarios paint an appealing picture of Eric, making it somewhat difficult to decide. However, the deciding factor would probably hinge on how he portrays himself and his sense of humor. In Scenario 1, Eric portrays a rather quirky and humorous persona, expressing his love for puns and father jokes as well as a self-deprecating jab at his tennis skills. This suggests that he isn\\'t afraid of potentially embarrassing himself, and can laugh at his mistakes—a trait that could make him very approachable and fun to be around. Furthermore, his playful warning about his pet stealing hearts adds an engagingly charming element to his bio. \\n\\nScenario 2 shows more of his dedication to studying and a little more of a serious tone when it comes to his love for outdoor activities. Although the mention of \"interesting sniff-worthy spots\" and the open reflection if he\\'s \"as cute as his dog\" display a lighter tone, the humor is subtler here, making him appear a little less outgoing than in Scenario 1.\\n\\nDependent on preferences, the decision could sway in either direction. But assuming an interest in a partner who doesn\\'t take himself too seriously, has a funny side, and can potentially keep the conversation light and humorous, Scenario 1 comes out slightly ahead.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1']\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0.5, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\nWhile both scenarios do a good job of introducing Eric and his interests, the first scenario provides more insights into his personality and values. It communicates Eric's love for the outdoors, his dedication to his studies, and his fondness for his pet dog, Scott. The first scenario also emphasizes his preference for a quieter lifestyle over the noisy city life and gives a glimpse into his preferred activities. Additionally, Eric's character is portrayed as someone who is adventurous and willing to explore life's surprises.\\n\\nThe second scenario, though entertaining and light-hearted, seems less personal. It is dominated by humor, and while it does reveal that Eric enjoys tennis and being a pet owner, it hides more serious aspects of his personality behind the jokes. It does not elucidate as much on Eric's values or preferences as the first scenario does. \\n\\nSome people may enjoy the humor in the second scenario, but it may not attract someone interested in a deeper connection as effectively as the first scenario might. For Eric, who is both a hardworking student and an animal lover, it is important that his potential match knows and appreciates these qualities. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", 'Reasoning Text:\\n\\nChoosing the right scenario would depend on the specific interests and values that Eric prioritizes in a potential match. Here\\'s a comparison of the two scenarios:\\n\\nScenario 1 focuses more on Eric\\'s love for education, outdoor activities, and animals - particularly his dog, Scott. The profile bio states directly that he is \"looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends.\" It focuses on appealing to someone who shares common interests with Eric, not only in a sense of humor, but also in terms of scholarly pursuits, outdoor activities, and love of animals. This scenario also highlights his adventurous spirit.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, focuses more on Eric\\'s fun-loving and playful nature, along with his love of animals and tennis. The humor pervading the bio, especially regarding his tennis skills, shows that Eric values joviality and doesn\\'t take himself too seriously. Moreover, the joke about Scott stealing his potential match\\'s heart makes it clear that Eric\\'s date shouldn\\'t mind Scott\\'s presence in their lives. The profile also mentions that he is a Netflix connoisseur, which subtly suggests that he enjoys staying in and relaxing, which is a change in pace from the adventure-heavy first scenario.\\n\\nWith that said, the choice between the two scenarios comes down to whether Eric values shared interests or shared values and attitudes more.\\n\\nAnswer: In order to identify the best scenario, Eric needs to examine his own priorities. If he places higher importance on matching interests, particularly those related to education and an active, adventurous lifestyle, then Scenario 1 would be more suitable. However, if he values a similar fun-loving and light-hearted attitude toward life, along with a love for animals and perhaps more leisurely pursuits, then Scenario 2 might better fit his needs.', \"Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios portray the same person, Eric, but they do so in slightly different ways. \\n\\nScenario 1 emphasizes more on Eric’s love for his dog, his passion for tennis, his appreciation of quiet moments amidst the city's hustle, and his zest for life. He also clearly states what he looks for in a potential match. The description is concise, straightforward and highlights his interests in a way that seems inviting. This bio is likely to attract someone who loves animals, enjoys outdoor activities, values education, and is willing to try out new things - which all align with Eric's interests and values. This scenario appeals more to a sensitive soul, a dog-lover or someone who appreciates quiet moments within the busy city life.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 focuses more on Eric's sense of humor, his tendency to self-deprecate about his height, and introduces a more playful tone. It promotes his passion for tennis and Netflix, his love for animals, and showcases his light-hearted nature. This scenario may attract someone whose values align more with humor, the love of watching series, and can handle his sarcasm.\\n\\nAnswer: The selection between Scenario 1 or 2 greatly depends on the strategy that Eric wants to use to attract a potential match. If he wants to reel in someone who has shared interests in tennis, dogs and quiet moments, Scenario 1 is a better choice as it directly states his preferences. \\n\\nHowever, if Eric wants to appeal to someone using his sense of humor, enjoys watching movies, and doesn't mind his playful tone, Scenario 2 is a better choice.\\n\\nTherefore, Eric needs to identify what qualities he values more in a potential partner before deciding on which scenario might work better for him. Based on the information given, Eric values education, love for outdoor activities, and a soft spot for animals – which are more covered in Scenario 1. \\n\\nSo, based on Eric's preferences mentioned in the information above, I would suggest that Scenario 1 will be likely to attract a potential match who shares Eric's interests and values.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 112 has a large difference:\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 2.0\n",
      "2, generation 1, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "['Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios share critical aspects of Eric\\'s life, including his schooling, love for tennis, and close bond with his dog. They both portray him as a humorous, sincere, and easygoing person, with an appreciation for in-depth discussions around various topics.\\n\\nHowever, slight nuances between the two may make one more appealing than the other.\\n\\nScenario 1 offers a more formal and polished depiction of Eric. In this scenario, he is portrayed as a more serious character, where his scholarly pursuits and balance in life are emphasised. Eric shows his sentimental side through the mention of his dog, Scott, and his love for the outdoors. His amusing self-deprecating remark about being of \"average height and looks\" but having an \"above-average appreciation of humor and wit\" makes him seem humble and confident simultaneously.\\n\\nIn Scenario 2, Eric appears more laid-back and outgoing. His demeanor leans to the informal and humorously self-deprecating, such as his comment about his \"Roland Garros-level forehands\" and willingness to let people laugh \"at\" him. His comical nature is more apparent in this scenario. He invites prospective matches to join him in caring for his dog, which could be seen as a fun-loving invitation to bond over shared interests.\\n\\nAnswer: My personal preference would be Scenario 2, as I appreciate the more relaxed and humorous tone in Eric\\'s self-description. The informal approach in scenario 2 makes him feel more approachable and relatable. Eric\\'s sense of humor, his inviting joke about walking Scott together, and his unabashed admission to blend in \"the crowd\" sparks more interest compared to the more toned-down humor in Scenario 1.', \"Reasoning: Eric comes across as a genuinely nice and balanced guy in both scenarios, which is appealing. The way he presents himself in the two scenarios did make a difference, though. In Scenario 1, Eric is formal, straightforward, and appears to have a structured lifestyle. He seems to prioritize studying, his beagle, and hanging out with friends with little space for spontaneity. That could be very appealing to somebody looking for stability. On the other hand, Scenario 2 has more humor and seems to emphasize enjoyment of life. He comes across as someone who doesn't take himself too seriously and has a sense of whimsy. That could be considered more fun and attractive by others.\\n\\nAnswer: Based on my understanding of dating and what appeals to me personally, I would say Scenario 2 makes Eric seem more enticing. It gives him dimension, shows that he has a good sense of humor, and presents him as laid back and enjoyable to be around. Therefore, I'd be more likely to swipe right in this scenario.\", \"Reasoning: Looking at both scenarios, it's easy to notice that Eric is a jovial and warm individual. He's communicative, has a playful tone and seems to enjoy living life fully. However, there are certain characteristics that make one profile potentially more appealing than the other. In Scenario 1, Eric comes across as someone who has a balanced lifestyle, humbly recognizing his looks while emphasizing his wit and humor. He shows maturity in balancing university life with hobbies, his pet, friends and is considerate about others' qualities. He also sets a clear expectation that he is looking to share his enthusiasm for life and learning. Moreover, in the first scenario, there's a unified thread of mutual interest exploration and shared experiences, from books to dog breeds to tennis. In Scenario 2, Eric appears to be more self-deprecating and casual. It's light-hearted and funny, but lacks the depth of the first scenario.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric-- just your slightly-above-average guy navigating through the chaotic, yet wonderful world of undergraduate studies. Tennis? With pleasure, as long as you're ready to face my Roland Garros-level forehands! (Okay, totally kidding on the Roland Garros part, beginners are definitely welcome!)\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm a proud owner of an incredibly charming Beagle named Scott (warning: he might steal your heart from me), a major softie for animals, and a connoisseur of all things Netflix. \n",
      "\n",
      "Though I'm close enough to average in height to blend into the crowd, I've heard my sense of humor exceeds the median! If you swoon for puns, laugh at father jokes, and remain unimpressed by my tennis skills, we might just have something special.\n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to laugh with (or at me, I'm not picky), take Scott on long walks (since I obviously can’t keep up), and share the beauty, hilarity, and madness of life. Is it you?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0.5, 0, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning:\\n\\nBoth profiles are well written, providing potential matches with a glimpse into Eric's personality, interests, and what he's looking for. However, it is important to keep in mind the kind of person Eric wants to attract.\\n\\nScenario 1 delivers a more humorous tone and showcases Eric's fun-loving spirit. It emphasizes his love for tennis, humor, and his Beagle, Scott. Eric explains his less competitive nature in a self-depreciating way which could attract someone who values a light-hearted approach to life and doesn't take things too seriously. Eric also suggests he's looking for someone who enjoys Netflix, making him a match for someone who values cozy indoor activities.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, depicts Eric as a more serious and balanced person. This bio stresses on Eric's academia, and someone who maps out their life (which could attract a more organized, disciplined person). He mentions about his loyalty and being a good listener, making him more appealing to someone who values deep conversations and emotional connection. The mention of being a fan of the outdoors implies he seeks someone who loves to go out and be active.\\n\\nOverall, both scenarios could appeal to different kinds of people based on their own personalities and interests. Eric should choose the bio that best mirrors his personality and the type of relationship he wishes to pursue.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1 or 2 (depending on Eric's preferred match)\", 'Reasoning: \\n\\nBoth scenarios portray a friendly and humorous individual who loves animals, enjoys tennis, and values time with friends. \\n\\nScenario 1 offers a playful, humorous tone which could appeal to users looking for a fun-loving, light-hearted match, the jokes about his tennis skills and height create a sense of self-deprecating humor which can be endearing to some. \\n\\nHowever, scenario 2 paints a more detailed and intellectually intriguing picture. It emphasizes an appreciation for learning and balance in life. The tone is calm and inviting but still retains a bit of humor. It also points out qualities like being down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, which are often sought for in a romantic partner. This bio also invites potential matches to debate about the best dog breeds and suggest books, which could offer excellent conversation starters.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2', \"My reasoning:\\nWhen contemplating whether Scenario 1 or Scenario 2 would be more successful, I would consider the structure, number of personal details included, tone, and humor.\\n\\nScenario 1 exudes a lighthearted and fun-loving energy, complete with humor, self-deprecation, and casual language. It clearly shows my interest in tennis and animals, and it leaves some room for intrigue as there are not too many personal details given away. This could potentially attract someone who enjoys friendly banter, doesn't take themselves too seriously, and shares similar interests.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 is a bit more formal and detailed. It's still humorous and self-deprecating but not as playful as Scenario 1. It provides more context about who I am as a person, my values, and my daily life. This could potentially attract someone who appreciates a more thoughtful and comprehensive self-description, likes clear communication, and prefers depth over surface-level information. \\n\\nThe preferred scenario would depend on the type of person I would like to attract, but I personally lean towards a balance between lighthearted and more serious communication.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 112 has a large difference:\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 2.0\n",
      "2, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [1, 0, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios provide an engaging and quirky insight into Eric's personality. However, the first scenario generates a slightly more light-hearted and humorous impression.\\n\\nIn Scenario 1, Eric takes a funny approach to introduce himself, using self-deprecating humor and puns, which paints him as someone who doesn't take himself too seriously and appreciates good-natured fun. His relationship with his dog is friendly and affectionate, hinting at a kind, genuine side. Plus, his confession about his looks but that his mom thinks he's handsome shows a touch of sincerity and confidence.\\n\\nBy contrast, in Scenario 2, Eric comes across as more studious – balancing sport, friendships, and dog-care around studying. He seems to take a more serious, introspective approach to life. His self-description aligns more with the typical dating profile, which might come across as less appealing to some.\\n\\nIn both scenarios, Eric's interest in tennis, his outgoing beagle, and his casual approach to appearance emphasize his down-to-earth nature and passion for various interests. However, the originality and wit shown in the first scenario, combined with his self-aware, light humor, make it a more appealing read, likely provoking a smile, and thus encouraging a right swipe.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"[reasoning text]\\n\\nWhen comparing scenario 1 and 2, I notice different tones and offerings in both profiles. Scenario 1 appears more casual, playful, a bit self-deprecating, and outwardly humorous. Eric uses terms like 'hooman' denoting a fun side and includes a fair share of puns displaying his humor. The profile's relaxed tone could make it feel more accessible and less intimidating, which could be nice. \\n\\nIn contrast, scenario 2 seems more formal, organized, and focused on Eric's lifestyle and values rather than humor. It conveys a more serious and detail-oriented image, which I find attractive. Also, the consideration of discussing books, debating dog breeds and mentioning 'making the journey more exciting together' gives a sense of partnership that I might be looking for in a potential match.\\n\\nWhile both scenarios have their appeals, I am leaning towards scenario 2 because it feels like reading a well thought out, sincere, and clear bio that presents Eric's interest and lifestyle in an engaging but mature way. It shows that he is not only fun and loves his pet but also a considerate person who values balance, friendships, learning, and partnership. This makes me believe that we could connect on a deeper level.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"After reading through both scenarios, I would be more likely to swipe right on Eric in scenario 1.\\n\\nReasoning: Both scenarios are engaging and reveal a lot about Eric's personality, however, scenario 1 stands out because it feels more personal, funny, and relaxed. The jokes, puns, and self-depreciation make him come across as more approachable and less formal, which I appreciate in a dating app setting. Moreover, the way he presents his daily life, including his love for his dog, his hobbies, and his look at academics, feels very inviting and playful. \\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, is a bit more formal and lacks the light-hearted humor found in scenario 1. While he still sounds very pleasant, it feels less casual and more like a job application than a dating profile. It lacks the personal touch which makes reading scenario 1 quite enjoyable.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there! I'm Eric, the proud hooman of an outgoing beagle named Scott (he says Hi!). When I'm not studying my brains out as an undergrad student, you can find me attempting to be the next Roger Federer on the tennis court, woolly hair and all. Believe me, my tennis serves are pretty 'racket'. \n",
      "\n",
      "I've been told my sense of humor is as endearing as my love for animals. I'm looking for someone who can take my corny jokes with a laugh and not a facepalm. If you're into clumsy yet well-intentioned guys who can dish out terrible puns on command, swipe right!\n",
      "\n",
      "Confession time: I bet my height and looks just about scrape the average, but my mom still thinks I'm handsome. So, there's that...\n",
      "\n",
      "If you're looking for an adventure, some laughs, and good-hearted companionship (dog included), come say hi!\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 0.5, 0.5]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning Text: \\n\\nBoth scenarios offer an insight into Eric's personality, interests, and humor while sharing his expectations clearly. \\n\\nIn the first scenario, Eric comes across as a lively, humorous person who can laugh at himself, loves tennis, and adventures with his dog. However, he relies a lot on his sense of humor, which may not appeal to everyone. The humor is also subjective and might not land for everyone reading the profile. Therefore, it may only attract people with a specific type of humor. \\n\\nIn the second scenario, Eric appears to be balanced, easygoing, and more mature. He promotes his interests in tennis and spending time with his dog, but also highlights his softer qualities like being a good listener and valuing his friendships. Here, he opens himself to a broader audience that may include someone looking for a compassionate, multifaceted individual who is not only fun but also stable and committed.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2 \\n\\nBecause Eric is casting a wider net by appealing to a broader audience and offering a more comprehensive picture of his personality, aspirations, values, and lifestyle. This also makes it easier for anyone reading to see if they share similar interests. Plus, this profile indicates some compatibility not just for dating but potential long-term relationship material, making it more attractive for those seeking a serious partner.\", 'Both scenarios include important elements about me: my love for my dog, my love for tennis, and my sense of humor. However, they present this information in slightly different ways.\\n\\nScenario 1 accentuates my humor and casual nature. It highlights my self-deprecating humor, which might be attractive to someone who enjoys laid-back, light-hearted individuals. The use of words like \"hooman\" and \"racket\" show my playful side and how I don’t take myself too seriously. It appeals to those who appreciate puns and can handle clunky jokes.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, presents a more serious, down-to-earth side of me. It not only talks about my love for animals and tennis but also dwells on my scholastic life and my friends. It gives an impression of a balanced lifestyle that encompasses studies, sports, and leisure time. It also emphasizes my listening skills, which can assure potential matches that I value conversations and am genuinely interested in getting to know them. \\n\\nIn the end, it depends on the kind of person I am looking to attract. If I want to attract someone who enjoys good humor and doesn\\'t mind the occasional silliness, Scenario 1 is the go-to. However, if I think I\\'d gel better with someone more serious and looking for a balanced individual, Scenario 2 would be a better choice.\\n\\nAnswer: It depends on the kind of match I aim to attract. Therefore, both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 have their potential benefits, and I would use them alternatively based on the situation.', \"Reasoning: Both profiles present Eric's personality, interests and what he’s looking for in a potential partner. However, they're a bit different in how they deliver this information. \\n\\nScenario 1 is more informally written and includes humor and puns. It can be attractive to those who appreciate the lighter, wittier side of communication. It speaks to those who like dog-loving, pun-throwing guys who use humor to break the ice. This profile stands out with a unique voice and personality.\\n\\nHowever, it might be a bit much for individuals looking for a more straightforward, serious approach.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, has a more formal, detailed, and more conventional representation of Eric’s personality and preferences. It might be preferred by users who appreciate a more serious and thoughtful presentation. Eric’s attributes and interests are clearly stated, and his affection for his dog, Scott, is also obvious. The inclusion of qualities that others have recognized in him, i.e., being loyal and a good listener, add to the depth of his character.\\n\\nTherefore, the choice between the two profiles depends on the type of person Eric wants to attract.\\n\\nAnswer: It's situational. If Eric is looking to present himself as a fun, humorous guy, he should go with Scenario 1. If he prefers to highlight qualities such as being a good listener and being loyal, he will go with Scenario 2. But overall, both scenarios could attract individuals who match Eric's interests and values.\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "participant 112 has a large difference:\n",
      "0, generation 2, score 7.0\n",
      "1, generation 0, score 2.0\n",
      "Evaluator: potential_date:\n",
      "Flipped: True\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario are you more likely to swipe right and potentially match with Eric? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 0]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"As both scenarios are richly descriptive and charming, they make Eric seem like an appealing and well-rounded person. Yet, I would lean more towards Scenario 2 for the following reasons:\\n\\n1. Writing Style: Scenario 2 has a more casual, friendly, and playful tone, which seems endearing and relatable. This contrasts with the slightly formal register in Scenario 1 that could feel less approachable. \\n\\n2. Balance Between Life Aspects: While both bios showcase Eric's life, Scenario 2 does a better job of describing various aspects of his life (studies, love for animals, sports) in a balanced, appealing way that isn't dominated by one aspect. \\n\\n3. Interaction Appeal: The last part of his bio in Scenario 2 plays on curiosity to meet him and his dog, which is a clever addition and quite engaging to read. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\", \"Reasoning: Both scenarios present Eric as an engaging and likeable person with a good sense of humor and a love for the outdoors and animals - all positive characteristics. However, in Scenario 1, Eric takes the time to mention his interest in a balanced lifestyle which includes spending time with friends, and he comes across as being more social. He also expresses a strong desire to connect on a personal level, is clear about what he values, his expectations, and his vision for the relationship, making him more appealing. In Scenario 2, the description seems more self-centered and lacks the depth and warmth in Eric's self-presentation compared to Scenario 1. \\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning: In going through the two profiles, I appreciate the honest and genuine feeling from both scenarios. Eric seems like an interactive and engaging person who values a good sense of humor, education, outdoor activities, and has a love for animals which are qualities that I am looking for in a potential partner. \\n\\nHowever, when comparing the two scenarios, I particularly resonate more with the second one. The tone in scenario 2 appears more casual and playful, which gives off a more approachable and relaxed energy. I find this attractive as it shows Eric's personality and style in an easy and light manner. His playful comment about seeing if he's as cute as his dog also stands out as a sweet and funny remark that gives a slight hint of flirtation which makes the profile seem more engaging and potentially makes me more interested in him.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "Evaluator: eric_himself:\n",
      "Flipped: False\n",
      "Scenarios: Scenario 1:\n",
      "\"Hey there, I'm Eric! Currently busy flexing my brain in much-loved study as an undergraduate student at a beautiful, bustling state university. When I'm not buried in the books, you'll probably find me either chasing a fluorescent yellow ball on the tennis court or chasing after my beagle, Scott, who has a knack for finding some real sniff-worthy spots. \n",
      "\n",
      "Being quite the animal lover, I'd rather choose the sound of playful barks and chirps over the city's hustle-and-bustle, and there's nothing more relaxing than a leisurely walk with Scott.\n",
      "\n",
      "I'm looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and a soft spot for four-legged friends. If you can handle friendly competition on the tennis court and won't mind having a fetching fur companion tagging along, then I'm eager to meet you. \n",
      "\n",
      "Life's full of adventure and surprises, so why not explore it with me? And hey, let's be honest, aren't you curious to see if I'm as cute as my dog?\"\n",
      "\n",
      "Scenario 2:\n",
      "\"Hello there! I'm Eric, an undergraduate studying at a bustling state university. I would describe myself as an easygoing scholar who enjoys the simpler things in life, whether it's a lively campus lecture or a sunset tennis match with friends. \n",
      "\n",
      "In between hitting the books and chasing tennis balls, I try to find time for my energetic beagle, Scott. He's my furry sidekick, always ready for a woodland hike, or just lounging around the house. If you're a dog-person who loves the outdoors as much as we do, we'll get along just fine.\n",
      "\n",
      "I believe in a balanced life, so catching up with friends over good food or a movie night is always in my weekend plans. My friends say I'm down-to-earth, loyal, and a good listener, and I appreciate those qualities in others. \n",
      "\n",
      "I'm securely at average height and looks according to the pedestrian visual ranking system but blessed with an above-average appreciation of humor and wit. \n",
      "\n",
      "Looking for someone to share my enthusiasm for life, learning, and maybe even doubles tennis. Let's trade book suggestions, debate the best dog breeds (Hint: It's Beagles) and see if we can make this journey more exciting together.\"\n",
      "\n",
      "In which scenario do you think you'd be more likely to attract a potential match who shares your interests and values? \n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): [0, 1, 1]\n",
      "\n",
      "Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \n",
      "[\"Reasoning: Both scenarios offer a detailed and personalized account of Eric's personality and interests. However, the kind of person attracted to each would slightly be different. Scenario 1 seems more informal, energetic, and more about adventure and fun--great for attracting people who are into spontaneity and light-heartedness. The playful, humorous tone might be attractive to people who appreciate humour and a laid-back personality. It also directly mentions the wish to meet someone who appreciates the same things.\\n\\nScenario 2, on the other hand, presents a more intellectual, composed, yet friendly and approachable character. The humour is still present, but more subdued. It also includes additional information about enjoying time with friends, valuing loyalty, and being down-to-earth which might attract people who value social connections, loyalty, and simplicity. \\n\\nSince Eric is looking for a potential girlfriend who shares his interests and more quiet way of living, balancing both his love for outdoor activities, his pet, and intellectual pursuits. Scenario 2 offers a more comprehensive perspective of his characteristics and what he values in others, therefore making it more likely to attract a person who is interested in these specific qualities.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 2.\", \"Reasoning:\\n\\nI believe that Scenario 1 would be more likely to attract a potential match who shares my interests and values. This is because it paints a very vivid picture of the kind of person I am, using a more casual and fun tone that makes it easy to visualize what a day in my life looks like. \\n\\nThe scenario includes specific examples of what I enjoy doing, such as playing tennis and taking walks with my dog, directly addressing the potential match's compatibility in participating in these activities. Furthermore, I explicitly state that I am looking for someone who shares my zest for life, appreciation for education, love of outdoor activities, and affection for animals, which clearly communicates the qualities I value in a partner. \\n\\nWhile I mention my average looks and height, I immediately balance it out with my intellectual interests and outdoorsy hobbies. This shows I am self-aware yet confident – a combination that is attractive to many people.\\n\\nOn the other hand, Scenario 2 feels more rigid and formal in tone, which can be less engaging for potential matches. It does not paint as vibrant a picture of my hobbies and personality, appearing less enthusiastic and filled with clichés about balance and enthusiasm that are common in many dating profiles. By veering away from clichés, Scenario 1 feels more original and authentic.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\", \"Reasoning Text:\\n\\nPersonally, I would prefer scenario 1 and here's why:\\n\\n1. Language: While both scenarios are detailed and present a clear image of who I am, Scenario 1 uses more relaxed, adventurous, and playful language. It portrays me as someone excited about life and its surprises, and this positive energy is likely to attract a potential match.\\n\\n2. Details: Scenario 1 equals Scenario 2 in detailing my love for animals, outdoor activities, and education. However, it also hints that real life is just as important to me as the world within the books, making me appear more rounded.\\n\\n3. Engagement: The direct question at the end of Scenario 1 can make the reader become more engaged and invest more personal interest, possibly increasing my chances of receiving a response.\\n\\nWhile Scenario 2 is more traditional and formal, which might appeal to some, Scenario 1 in my opinion expresses more personality and makes the reader feel like they were part of my story.\\n\\nAnswer: Scenario 1\"]\n",
      "\n",
      "\n",
      "\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# df_tmp = df[df[\"participant_id\"].isin(competent_participants)]\n",
    "# get_large_differences(df_tmp)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 351,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "dict_keys(['0', '0_1', '0_2', '0_3', '1', '1_2', '1_3', '2', '2_3', '3', '[]', 'nan'])\n",
      "0 pieces 6.1 60\n",
      "1 piece 5.361666666666666 600\n",
      "2 pieces 4.979166666666667 720\n"
     ]
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "text/plain": [
       "{'whiskers': [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fb92280>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fb92520>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fba1520>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fba17c0>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fa9d7c0>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fa9da60>],\n",
       " 'caps': [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fb927c0>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fb92a60>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fba1a60>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fba1d00>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fa9dd00>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fa9dfa0>],\n",
       " 'boxes': [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fb7efa0>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fba1280>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fa9d520>],\n",
       " 'medians': [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fb92d00>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fba1fa0>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73faa8280>],\n",
       " 'fliers': [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fb92fa0>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73fa9d280>,\n",
       "  <matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x7fe73db2ddf0>],\n",
       " 'means': []}"
      ]
     },
     "execution_count": 351,
     "metadata": {},
     "output_type": "execute_result"
    },
    {
     "data": {
      "image/png": "[encoded data, 4880 characters]",
      "text/plain": [
       "<Figure size 432x288 with 1 Axes>"
      ]
     },
     "metadata": {
      "needs_background": "light"
     },
     "output_type": "display_data"
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# AVERAGE SCORES FOR NUMBER OF ADVICE INDICES\n",
    "\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] != 'baseline_ask']\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] != 'baseline_ask_with_reasoning']\n",
    "\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby(['advice_indices'])['answer']\n",
    "print(grouped.groups.keys())\n",
    "\n",
    "zero_pieces = grouped.get_group(\"nan\")\n",
    "one_piece = pd.concat([grouped.get_group(\"0\"), grouped.get_group(\"1\"), grouped.get_group(\"2\"), grouped.get_group(\"3\")])\n",
    "two_pieces = pd.concat([grouped.get_group(\"0_1\"), grouped.get_group(\"0_2\"), grouped.get_group(\"1_2\"), grouped.get_group(\"0_3\"), grouped.get_group(\"1_3\"), grouped.get_group(\"2_3\")])\n",
    "\n",
    "print(\"0 pieces\", zero_pieces.mean(), len(zero_pieces))\n",
    "print(\"1 piece\", one_piece.mean(), len(one_piece))\n",
    "print(\"2 pieces\", two_pieces.mean(), len(two_pieces))\n",
    "\n",
    "plt.boxplot([zero_pieces, one_piece, two_pieces], labels=[\"0 pieces\", \"1 piece\", \"2 pieces\"])"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 352,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "ties: 44\n",
      "total: 2775\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# NUMBER OF TIES FOR AVERAGE SCORES FOR EACH GENERATION\n",
    "\n",
    "grouped = df.groupby('origin_id')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "ties = 0\n",
    "\n",
    "for origin_id, score in grouped.iteritems():\n",
    "    for origin_id2, score2 in grouped.iteritems():\n",
    "        if score == score2 and origin_id != origin_id2:\n",
    "            ties += 1\n",
    "            # print(origin_id, origin_id2, score)\n",
    "\n",
    "ties = ties // 2\n",
    "print(\"ties:\", ties)\n",
    "print(\"total:\", len(grouped) * (len(grouped) - 1) // 2)"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 353,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "1 51 baseline_ask unorthodox_advice [] 1\n",
      "2 7 baseline_ask baseline_irrelevant_advice [] 0\n",
      "2 9 baseline_ask baseline_irrelevant_advice [] 0\n",
      "7 2 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_ask 0 []\n",
      "7 9 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0 0\n",
      "SAME ADVICE SET\n",
      "9 2 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_ask 0 []\n",
      "9 7 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0 0\n",
      "SAME ADVICE SET\n",
      "11 33 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_neutral_advice 1 0_1\n",
      "12 46 baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 1 0\n",
      "17 41 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_neutral_advice 2 1_2\n",
      "18 70 baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 2 1_3\n",
      "19 22 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0_2 1_2\n",
      "19 60 baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 0_2 0_2\n",
      "21 24 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0_2 1_2\n",
      "21 42 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0_2 1_2\n",
      "21 61 baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 0_2 1_2\n",
      "21 68 baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 0_2 0_3\n",
      "22 19 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 1_2 0_2\n",
      "22 60 baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 0_2\n",
      "24 21 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 1_2 0_2\n",
      "24 42 baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_neutral_advice 1_2 1_2\n",
      "24 61 baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 1_2\n",
      "24 68 baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 0_3\n",
      "25 38 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0 0_2\n",
      "25 47 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 0 0\n",
      "26 44 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 0 nan\n",
      "27 28 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0 1\n",
      "28 27 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_neutral_advice 1 0\n",
      "29 40 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_neutral_advice 1 1_2\n",
      "29 45 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 1 nan\n",
      "29 52 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 1 0_1\n",
      "31 57 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 0_1 2\n",
      "32 67 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 0_1 0_3\n",
      "33 11 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0_1 1\n",
      "35 64 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 2 3\n",
      "35 65 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 2 3\n",
      "36 39 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_neutral_advice 2 0_2\n",
      "36 48 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 2 0\n",
      "37 74 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 0_2 2_3\n",
      "38 25 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0_2 0\n",
      "38 47 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 0_2 0\n",
      "39 36 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0_2 2\n",
      "39 48 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 0_2 0\n",
      "40 29 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_neutral_advice 1_2 1\n",
      "40 45 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 nan\n",
      "40 52 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 0_1\n",
      "41 17 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 1_2 2\n",
      "42 21 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 1_2 0_2\n",
      "42 24 baseline_neutral_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 1_2 1_2\n",
      "42 61 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 1_2\n",
      "42 68 baseline_neutral_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 0_3\n",
      "44 26 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice nan 0\n",
      "45 29 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice nan 1\n",
      "45 40 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice nan 1_2\n",
      "45 52 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice nan 0_1\n",
      "46 12 unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0 1\n",
      "47 25 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0 0\n",
      "47 38 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0 0_2\n",
      "48 36 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0 2\n",
      "48 39 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0 0_2\n",
      "51 1 unorthodox_advice baseline_ask 1 []\n",
      "52 29 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0_1 1\n",
      "52 40 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0_1 1_2\n",
      "52 45 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 0_1 nan\n",
      "56 58 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 2 0_2\n",
      "57 31 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 2 0_1\n",
      "58 56 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 0_2 2\n",
      "60 19 unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0_2 0_2\n",
      "60 22 unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0_2 1_2\n",
      "61 21 unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 1_2 0_2\n",
      "61 24 unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 1_2 1_2\n",
      "61 42 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 1_2 1_2\n",
      "61 68 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 0_3\n",
      "64 35 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 3 2\n",
      "64 65 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 3 3\n",
      "SAME ADVICE SET\n",
      "65 35 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 3 2\n",
      "65 64 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 3 3\n",
      "SAME ADVICE SET\n",
      "66 71 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 3 1_3\n",
      "67 32 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0_3 0_1\n",
      "68 21 unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0_3 0_2\n",
      "68 24 unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0_3 1_2\n",
      "68 42 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 0_3 1_2\n",
      "68 61 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 0_3 1_2\n",
      "69 73 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 0_3 2_3\n",
      "70 18 unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 1_3 2\n",
      "71 66 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 1_3 3\n",
      "73 69 unorthodox_advice unorthodox_advice 2_3 0_3\n",
      "74 37 unorthodox_advice baseline_neutral_advice 2_3 0_2\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# How many of the ties are from the same advice set?\n",
    "grouped = df.groupby('origin_id')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "ties = []\n",
    "\n",
    "for origin_id, score in grouped.iteritems():\n",
    "    for origin_id2, score2 in grouped.iteritems():\n",
    "        if score == score2 and origin_id != origin_id2:\n",
    "            ties.append((origin_id, origin_id2))\n",
    "\n",
    "grouped2 = df.groupby('origin_id')[['advice_type', 'advice_indices']]\n",
    "for (origin_id, origin_id2) in ties:\n",
    "    advice_type = grouped2.get_group(origin_id)['advice_type'].unique()[0]\n",
    "    advice_type2 = grouped2.get_group(origin_id2)['advice_type'].unique()[0]\n",
    "    advice_indices = grouped2.get_group(origin_id)['advice_indices'].unique()[0]\n",
    "    advice_indices2 = grouped2.get_group(origin_id2)['advice_indices'].unique()[0]\n",
    "    print(origin_id, origin_id2, advice_type, advice_type2, advice_indices, advice_indices2)\n",
    "    if advice_type == advice_type2 and advice_indices == advice_indices2:\n",
    "        print(\"SAME ADVICE SET\")\n",
    "\n",
    "# ONLY 1 TIE IS FROM THE SAME ADVICE SET"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 354,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "baseline_ask unorthodox_advice [] 0_3 5.416666666666667\n",
      "baseline_irrelevant_advice baseline_neutral_advice 1 0_1 5.25\n",
      "baseline_irrelevant_advice unorthodox_advice 1_2 2_3 4.566666666666666\n",
      "baseline_neutral_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 0_1 1 5.25\n",
      "unorthodox_advice baseline_ask 0_3 [] 5.416666666666667\n",
      "unorthodox_advice baseline_irrelevant_advice 2_3 1_2 4.566666666666666\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# what about ties between advice sets (instead of generations?)\n",
    "grouped = df.groupby(['advice_type', 'advice_indices'])['answer'].mean()\n",
    "ties = 0\n",
    "\n",
    "for (advice_type, advice_indices), score in grouped.iteritems():\n",
    "    for (advice_type2, advice_indices2), score2 in grouped.iteritems():\n",
    "        if score == score2 and (advice_type != advice_type2 or advice_indices != advice_indices2):\n",
    "            ties += 1\n",
    "            print(advice_type, advice_type2, advice_indices, advice_indices2, score)\n",
    "# NO TIES BETWEEN PIECES OF ADVICE"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 366,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "nan\n",
      "5.409090909090909\n",
      "0.6839058946428761\n",
      "nan\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# ABLATION AGAINST AVERAGE GENERATION SCORES -- RESPONSE\n",
    "\n",
    "best_response_indices = \"2_3\"\n",
    "best_response_generation_index = 0\n",
    "\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"unorthodox_advice\"]\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_indices'] == best_response_indices]\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['generation_index'] == best_response_generation_index]\n",
    "grouped_best = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(grouped_best.mean())\n",
    "\n",
    "# average of all generations\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"unorthodox_advice\"]\n",
    "print(df_tmp['answer'].mean())\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(np.std(grouped, ddof=1))\n",
    "\n",
    "# num std devs higher\n",
    "print((grouped_best.mean() - grouped.mean())/np.std(grouped, ddof=1))"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 364,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "4.983333333333333\n",
      "5.339999999999999\n",
      "0.5538975258437273\n",
      "-0.64392175452196\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# ABLATION AGAINST AVERAGE GENERATION SCORES -- ADVICE\n",
    "\n",
    "best_advice_indices = \"1_3\"\n",
    "\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"unorthodox_advice\"]\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_indices'] == best_advice_indices]\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(grouped.mean())\n",
    "\n",
    "# average of all advice\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"unorthodox_advice\"]\n",
    "grouped_advice = df_tmp.groupby('advice_indices')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(grouped_advice.mean())\n",
    "print(np.std(grouped_advice, ddof=1))\n",
    "\n",
    "# num std devs higher\n",
    "print((grouped.mean() - grouped_advice.mean()) / np.std(grouped_advice, ddof=1))"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 365,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "name": "stdout",
     "output_type": "stream",
     "text": [
      "mean scores for best framework response nan\n",
      "mean scores for baseline_ask 5.416666666666667\n",
      "mean scores for baseline_ask_with_reasoning 6.483333333333334\n",
      "mean scores for baseline_neutral_advice 5.344444444444445\n",
      "todo: run the framework on this\n",
      "mean scores for baseline_irrelevant_advice 4.65\n",
      "todo: run the framework on this\n"
     ]
    }
   ],
   "source": [
    "# COMPARISONS AGAINST BASELINES\n",
    "\n",
    "best_response_indices = \"2_3\"\n",
    "best_response_generation_index = 0\n",
    "\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"unorthodox_advice\"]\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['advice_indices'] == best_response_indices]\n",
    "df_tmp = df_tmp[df_tmp['generation_index'] == best_response_generation_index]\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(\"mean scores for best framework response\", grouped.mean())\n",
    "\n",
    "# average of all baseline_ask\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"baseline_ask\"]\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(\"mean scores for baseline_ask\", grouped.mean())\n",
    "\n",
    "# average of all baseline_ask_with_reasoning\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"baseline_ask_with_reasoning\"]\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(\"mean scores for baseline_ask_with_reasoning\", grouped.mean())\n",
    "\n",
    "# average of all baseline_neutral_advice\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"baseline_neutral_advice\"]\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(\"mean scores for baseline_neutral_advice\", grouped.mean())\n",
    "print(\"todo: run the framework on this\")\n",
    "\n",
    "# average of all baseline_irrelevant_advice\n",
    "df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == \"baseline_irrelevant_advice\"]\n",
    "grouped = df_tmp.groupby('text')['answer'].mean()\n",
    "print(\"mean scores for baseline_irrelevant_advice\", grouped.mean())\n",
    "print(\"todo: run the framework on this\")\n"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 213,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "from utils import remap\n",
    "\n",
    "# remap(f\"dating_app/evaluators/potential_date/mappings\")\n",
    "with open(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/potential_date/mappings_remapped.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "    remapping = json.load(f)[0]"
   ]
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 216,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": [
    "# A. analysis on large differences\n",
    "import os\n",
    "import re\n",
    "import random\n",
    "\n",
    "def get_large_differences(df):\n",
    "    \n",
    "    evaluator = \"potential_date\"\n",
    "    with open(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{evaluator}/mappings_remapped.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "        remapping = json.load(f)[0]\n",
    "\n",
    "    diff_threshold = 5\n",
    "    df_tmp = df[df['advice_type'] == 'unorthodox_advice']\n",
    "    grouped = df_tmp.groupby('participant_id')[['answer', 'advice_indices', 'generation_index']]\n",
    "    participant_ids = sorted(list(grouped.groups.keys()))\n",
    "    l = []\n",
    "\n",
    "    for i in range(len(grouped)):\n",
    "        participant_id = participant_ids[i]\n",
    "        participant_df = grouped.get_group(participant_id)\n",
    "\n",
    "        for j in range(len(participant_df)):\n",
    "            score = participant_df.iloc[j]['answer']\n",
    "\n",
    "            for k in range(j+1, len(participant_df)):\n",
    "                score2 = participant_df.iloc[k]['answer']\n",
    "\n",
    "                if abs(score - score2) >= diff_threshold:\n",
    "                    advice_indices1 = participant_df.iloc[j]['advice_indices']\n",
    "                    advice_indices2 = participant_df.iloc[k]['advice_indices']\n",
    "                    generation_index1 = int(participant_df.iloc[j]['generation_index'])\n",
    "                    generation_index2 = int(participant_df.iloc[k]['generation_index'])\n",
    "\n",
    "                    if advice_indices1 == \"nan\" or advice_indices2 == \"nan\":\n",
    "                        continue\n",
    "\n",
    "                    compare_index1 = int(remapping[f\"{advice_indices1}.json\"])\n",
    "                    compare_index2 = int(remapping[f\"{advice_indices2}.json\"])\n",
    "\n",
    "                    # print(f\"{advice_indices1}, generation {generation_index1}, score {score}\")\n",
    "                    # print(f\"{advice_indices2}, generation {generation_index2}, score {score2}\")\n",
    "\n",
    "                    if compare_index1 > compare_index2 or (compare_index1 == compare_index2 and generation_index1 > generation_index2):\n",
    "                        compare_index1, compare_index2 = compare_index2, compare_index1\n",
    "                        advice_indices1, advice_indices2 = advice_indices2, advice_indices1\n",
    "                        generation_index1, generation_index2 = generation_index2, generation_index1\n",
    "                        score, score2 = score2, score\n",
    "\n",
    "                    print(f\"participant {participant_id} has a large difference:\")\n",
    "                    print(f\"{advice_indices1}, generation {generation_index1}, score {score}\")\n",
    "                    print(f\"{advice_indices2}, generation {generation_index2}, score {score2}\")\n",
    "\n",
    "                    d = {}\n",
    "                    d[\"participant_id\"] = participant_id\n",
    "                    d[\"advice_indices1\"] = advice_indices1\n",
    "                    d[\"advice_indices2\"] = advice_indices2\n",
    "                    d[\"generation_index1\"] = generation_index1\n",
    "                    d[\"generation_index2\"] = generation_index2\n",
    "                    d[\"score1\"] = score\n",
    "                    d[\"score2\"] = score2\n",
    "\n",
    "                    for evaluator in os.listdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators\"):\n",
    "                        if os.path.isdir(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{evaluator}\"):\n",
    "                            with open(f\"{scenario}/evaluators/{evaluator}/compare_results/{compare_index1}_{compare_index2}_{generation_index1}_{generation_index2}.json\", \"r\") as f:\n",
    "                                compare_result = json.load(f)\n",
    "                            \n",
    "                            scenario_options_text = compare_result[\"user_prompt\"][\"content\"]\n",
    "                            scenario_options_text = re.sub(r'Please think step by step and explain your reasoning.*', '', scenario_options_text, flags=re.DOTALL)\n",
    "                            scores = compare_result[\"parsed_answers\"]\n",
    "                            reasoning_text = compare_result[\"responses\"]\n",
    "\n",
    "                            if \"evaluator\" in d:\n",
    "                                d[\"evaluator\"] += [evaluator]\n",
    "                                d[\"flipped\"] += [compare_result[\"flipped\"]]\n",
    "                                d[\"scenario_options_text_2\"] = scenario_options_text\n",
    "                                d[\"scores\"] += [scores]\n",
    "                                d[\"reasoning_text_4\"] = reasoning_text[0]\n",
    "                                d[\"reasoning_text_5\"] = reasoning_text[1]\n",
    "                                d[\"reasoning_text_6\"] = reasoning_text[2]\n",
    "                            else:\n",
    "                                d[\"evaluator\"] = [evaluator]\n",
    "                                d[\"flipped\"] = [compare_result[\"flipped\"]]\n",
    "                                d[\"scenario_options_text_1\"] = scenario_options_text\n",
    "                                d[\"scores\"] = [scores]\n",
    "                                d[\"reasoning_text_1\"] = reasoning_text[0]\n",
    "                                d[\"reasoning_text_2\"] = reasoning_text[1]\n",
    "                                d[\"reasoning_text_3\"] = reasoning_text[2]\n",
    "                            \n",
    "\n",
    "                            print(f\"Evaluator: {evaluator}:\")\n",
    "                            print(f\"Flipped: {compare_result['flipped']}\")\n",
    "                            print(f\"Scenarios: {scenario_options_text}\\n\\n\")\n",
    "                            print(f\"SCORES: 1 -> first one better, 0 -> second one better (these are affected by flipped): {scores}\\n\")\n",
    "                            print(f\"Model Reasoning (these are also affected by flipped): \\n{reasoning_text}\\n\\n\\n\")\n",
    "\n",
    "                    l.append(d)\n",
    "\n",
    "    random.seed(0)\n",
    "    random_selection = random.sample(l, 10)\n",
    "    # save as csv\n",
    "    import csv\n",
    "    with open(f\"{scenario}/large_differences.csv\", \"w\") as f:\n",
    "        writer = csv.DictWriter(f, fieldnames= \\\n",
    "                                [\"participant_id\", \"advice_indices1\", \"advice_indices2\", \"generation_index1\", \"generation_index2\", \\\n",
    "                                \"score1\", \"score2\", \"evaluator\", \"flipped\", \"scenario_options_text_1\", \"scenario_options_text_2\", \\\n",
    "                                \"scores\", \"reasoning_text_1\", \"reasoning_text_2\", \"reasoning_text_3\", \"reasoning_text_4\", \"reasoning_text_5\", \"reasoning_text_6\"])\n",
    "        writer.writeheader()\n",
    "        for d in random_selection:\n",
    "            writer.writerow(d)\n"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "metadata": {
  "kernelspec": {
   "display_name": "Python 3 (ipykernel)",
   "language": "python",
   "name": "python3"
  },
  "language_info": {
   "codemirror_mode": {
    "name": "ipython",
    "version": 3
   },
   "file_extension": ".py",
   "mimetype": "text/x-python",
   "name": "python",
   "nbconvert_exporter": "python",
   "pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
   "version": "3.9.4"
  },
  "orig_nbformat": 4
 },
 "nbformat": 4,
 "nbformat_minor": 2
}
