Based on the examination of the `datacard.md` and a sample of the `diamonds.csv`, here are the issues identified related to the hint for missing license information in documentation:

---

{
    "issue": "Missing license information in datacard",
    "evidence": "## About Dataset\n\n### Context\n\nThis classic dataset contains the prices and other attributes of almost 54,000 diamonds. It's a great dataset for beginners learning to work with data analysis and visualization.\n\n### Content\n\n**price** price in US dollars ($326--$18,823)\n\n**carat** weight of the diamond (0.2--5.01)\n\n**cut** quality of the cut (Fair, Good, Very Good, Premium, Ideal)\n\n**color** diamond colour, from J (worst) to D (best)\n\n**clarity** a measurement of how clear the diamond is (I1 (worst), SI2, SI1, VS2, VS1, VVS2, VVS1, IF (best))\n\n**x** length in mm (0--10.74)\n\n**y** width in mm (0--58.9)\n\n**z** depth in mm (0--31.8)\n\n**depth** total depth... total depth percentage = z / mean(x, y) = 2 \\* z / (x + y) (43--79)\n\n**table** width of top of diamond relative to widest point (43--95)",
    "description": "The `datacard.md` file does not contain any license information regarding the use, distribution, or modification of the dataset. According to the hint provided, it's critical for dataset documentation to include clear licensing details to inform users about their rights and limitations in using the dataset."
},

---

No further issues related to missing license information can be identified from the `diamonds.csv` sample directly since license information typically does not appear within the data file itself but within accompanying documentation or metadata files.