The attempt to directly identify the "datacard.md" file by its contents was unsuccessful due to errors reading most of the files or not identifying distinct contents to confirm which one is "datacard.md". Given that, I will adjust my approach to read the contents of the files that were successfully opened and appeared to possibly contain textual information relevant to examining for the provided hint.

Let's focus on reading and examining the contents of `/mnt/data/file-eah7v0Ay71mwu3MRf93XZjiZ`, as its preview appears to be descriptive of a dataset, possibly resembling a datacard or documentation.The content from the file `/mnt/data/file-eah7v0Ay71mwu3MRf93XZjiZ` provides details that suggest it is, indeed, the datacard for the dataset. Analyzing the content in relation to the provided hint about mismatches between described licenses in the text and the license section, an issue can be identified:

**Issue**: Mismatch between described licenses in text and the license section in datacard.

**Evidence**: The source section describes the license as "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/" while the License section states "CC0: public domain".

**Description**: The datacard mentions two different licenses for the dataset – the source section suggests that the census data and data compiled by The Washington Post are under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license, but the license section at the end of the datacard claims the dataset is under CC0, meaning it has been dedicated to the public domain. This discrepancy can lead to confusion regarding how the dataset can be used, especially since CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 has restrictions that do not align with the public domain status.

This issue has implications for users of the dataset regarding copyright and usage rights, potentially limiting its use without further clarification.