Based on the analysis of rows in "runs.csv" where the `lengths_behind` column value is 999, indicating special race outcomes, I have identified potential issues related to this special encoding.

**Issue 1**:
{
    “issue”: “Special outcome encoding not documented”, 
    “evidence”: “rows where the 'lengths_behind' column has a value of 999, indicating special race outcomes such as race_id=0 and horse_no=10 with 999 lengths_behind”, 
    “description”: “The dataset contains rows where the ‘lengths_behind’ field is set to 999, which implies a special outcome in the race, such as a horse not finishing the race, being disqualified, or other irregular situations. However, there is no accompanying documentation or notes within the provided dataset or file descriptions explicitly explaining the significance of the value 999. Without proper documentation, understanding and analyzing these special cases accurately becomes challenging, potentially leading to misinterpretation of the data.”
},

**Issue 2**:
{
    “issue”: “Inconsistency in 'finish_time' with special outcomes”, 
    “evidence”: “race_id=0, horse_no=10, lengths_behind=999, finish_time=92.20”, 
    “description”: “For rows indicating special outcomes with ‘lengths_behind’ set to 999, there seems to be an inconsistency in how 'finish_time' is reported. For example, a horse with a lengths_behind value of 999, suggesting that it did not finish the race in a standard manner, still has a ‘finish_time’ recorded (e.g., 92.20 seconds for race_id=0, horse_no=10). This inconsistency raises questions about the criteria used for recording or computing ‘finish_time’ for horses not completing the race under normal conditions, complicating the data analysis process.”
},

These issues emphasize the need for clear documentation and consistent data handling practices, especially when special cases or encoding strategies are involved in the dataset.