Based on the initial inspection of the dataset, here are the potential issues related to unexpected numerical values:

### Issue 1
**Issue**: "NaN values for time5 and time6 columns in dataset"
- **Evidence**: The columns `time5` and `time6` contain NaN (Not a Number) values for the race timing. For example, in the first few rows observed, all values under `time5` and `time6` are NaN.
- **Description**: According to the dataset, most races are expected to have timing split data across different segments (`time1` to `time4`, followed possibly by `time5` and `time6`). However, `time5` and `time6` columns contain NaN values for at least the first few entries, which might indicate missing data or that these segments do not apply to all races. It's essential to determine whether these are indeed expected to be NaN for certain races based on their lengths or if there is an inconsistency or oversight in data collection or recording.

### Issue 2
**Issue**: "Unexpected numerical value format for `finish_time`"
- **Evidence**: The `finish_time` values such as `83.92`, `83.56`, `83.40`, `83.62`, and `83.24` suggest that the time format might not be in a standard minute:second or hour:minute format.
- **Description**: The `finish_time` column values are inconsistent with typical time formats used to represent race timings, which could lead to misinterpretation. Typically, race finish times are expected to be in formats that reflect minutes and seconds (MM:SS.ss) or even hours, minutes, and seconds (HH:MM:SS.ss) for longer races. The current numerical values should be clarified and possibly standardized to ensure accurate analysis and reporting of race results.

To further validate these issues, a comprehensive analysis across the entire dataset is advisable, particularly examining `time5` and `time6` across different races and a deeper inspection into the `finish_time` values to understand their format correctly.