Based on the hint provided and a thorough review of the content of the markdown file, the following issues have been identified:

1. **Issue**: Missing Information About Dataset Source in README
   - **Evidence**: "The dataset contains seven major variables that will be having an impact on whether someone has coronavirus disease or not, the description of each variable are as follows,"
   - **Description**: The README lacks specific details on the source of the dataset. It mentions the variables and their descriptions but does not provide information on where the dataset was obtained from or if it was self-collected. This information is crucial for users to assess the reliability and applicability of the dataset.

2. **Issue**: Missing Information on Data Quality and Limitations
   - **Evidence**: "***Disclaimer: The results or analysis of these data should be taken as medical advice.\\***"
   - **Description**: The README includes a disclaimer advising not to take the analysis as medical advice but fails to discuss the quality of the data and its limitations. It's essential to inform users about the data collection methods, any biases, inaccuracies, or limitations that may affect the analysis and interpretation of the dataset.

3. **Issue**: Lack of Information on Dataset Update and Maintenance
   - **Evidence**: "Future Work:\n\n1. Getting more guidelines from WHO to elaborate more data\n2. Applying Reinforcement Learning in the data"
   - **Description**: The "Future Work" section hints at the dataset's potential evolution but does not provide clear information on how or when the dataset is updated and maintained. Users should be informed about the dataset's version control and update frequency to ensure they are working with the most accurate and current data.

These issues highlight gaps that could affect the usability and credibility of the dataset. Addressing them would enhance transparency, reliability, and the overall utility of the dataset for its intended analysis and applications.