Based on the initial inspection of the uploaded CSV files, we can observe their contents as follows:

- The individual stock data file seems to contain information about a single stock (MMM) over a period from 2012-08-10 to at least 2012-08-16. The columns include `Date`, `Open`, `High`, `Low`, `Close`, `Volume`, and `Name`.
  
- The 1-year stock data file contains similar columns (`Date`, `Open`, `High`, `Low`, `Close`, `Volume`, and `Name`) but for a different time frame, starting from 2016-08-10 onwards. The stock name (MMM) and structure of data suggest that it aligns with the structure of the first file but covers a different time span.
  
- The 5-year stock data file again displays similar columns but for a different stock indicated as 'A', starting from the same date as in the individual stock data (2012-08-10).

From the argument provided in the hint about a **data uniformity issue**, we can suspect several areas to focus on:
1. **Consistency in Data Fields** across all datasets, regardless of the time span or stock.
2. **Data Formatting**, especially concerning date formats, stock names (tickers), and numerical types for prices and volumes.
3. **Completeness and Accuracy** of data within the same timeframe across different datasets.

Given the above findings, we should further investigate these areas:
- Ensure that the date formats are consistent and correctly formatted across files.
- Check that the numbers (prices, volumes) are properly formatted and do not contain anomalies such as strings in numerical columns.
- Verify if the stock tickers (`Name`) are uniformly presented without errors or mismatches.

Let's dive deeper into each dataset to identify potential data uniformity issues according to the hints and observations:It seems there was a technical issue preventing the completion of the analysis. Due to the encountered limitations in processing the full content of the datasets directly in one step, I'll adjust the approach to investigate for potential data uniformity issues in segments that can be analyzed within our system's capabilities.

Let's start by loading each file in full again but this time focusing on different aspects of the data piece by piece. We'll examine the `Date` formats, numeric fields, and `Name` consistency in smaller, manageable chunks to identify any discrepancies. We'll begin with a more detailed look at the date column and numeric column formats across each dataset.It appears that the system encountered another internal issue while attempting to analyze date format uniformity across datasets. Given this limitation, I'll proceed with a different strategy to isolate and identify data uniformity issues without extensive iteration or processing that may trigger system limitations.

Let's perform an inspection on a limited scope within each dataset, focusing specifically on inspecting various columns for uniformity issues such as date formats, numeric field formatting, and stock ticker consistency, within individually manageable pieces. I will start by examining a sample of rows from one of the datasets for any apparent uniformity issues related to the hint given.It appears that my previous approach to define and analyze variables has been reset, causing a NameError due to the variables being undefined in this context. This issue prevents me from proceeding as intended. 

Given the constraints encountered, let's refocus and take an alternate path that adheres to the capabilities available. I'll adapt my strategy to assess the data without relying on previous attempts or the need to retain large datasets in memory for extended operations. 

I will now re-load each dataset, but instead of conducting comprehensive checks across the entire dataset at once, I'll inspect sample slices directly for potential uniformity issues relating to the hint provided, such as inconsistency in date formats, errors in numeric fields, or inconsistency in the stock ticker column (`Name`). Let's proceed with this refined approach.After reloading and inspecting a small sample from each dataset, the data appears to be formatted consistently in terms of the columns presented (`Date`, `Open`, `High`, `Low`, `Close`, `Volume`, and `Name`). Here are the observations from the small samples inspected:

- **individual_sample_head**: This sample from the supposed "individual_stocks_5yr" data shows stock MMM's data starting from 2012-08-10, with columns for date, open, high, low, close prices, volume, and the stock name. There doesn't appear to be an immediate uniformity issue within this sample.

- **all_1yr_sample_head**: This sample of 1-year stock data, starting from 2016-08-10, similarly includes columns for date, open, high, low, close prices, volume, and stock name (MMM). The structure matches that of the individual stock data sample.

- **all_5yr_sample_head**: The sample of 5-year stock data, beginning on 2012-08-10, shows a structure akin to the other samples but with stock name 'A', indicating data for another stock while keeping the column structure the same.

Given the **hint** about a potential data uniformity issue specifically in a CSV file, these inspections focus on obvious signs of uniformity such as column consistency, date formatting, and numeric data formatting across samples. No direct evidence of uniformity issues, such as inconsistent date formats or non-numeric types for expected numeric fields, was immediately observable within these small samples.

However, potential issues not immediately evident in these samples may exist, such as:

1. **Inconsistency across entire datasets**: Issues like varying date formats or incorrect numeric formats may only occur in portions of the dataset not covered by these samples.
2. **Uniformity in stock tickers ('Name')**: The hint suggested assessing data uniformity, which could imply issues when integrating these datasets. A visible concern could involve how stock tickers are represented or inconsistencies in their application across datasets (e.g., if some datasets include more detailed identifiers for stocks than others).

To fully ascertain the presence of data uniformity issues, a more comprehensive analysis of the entire datasets would be necessary, unfortunately constrained by the limitations encountered in this environment.