{"original_question": "Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. Among all students who have been taught by Tom, 100 percent of them enrolled in Discrete Math. How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?", "reasoning_path": "Mr. Angstadt has 120 students. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics, so 60 students are enrolled in Statistics. Of those 60 students, 90 percent are seniors, so 54 of the students are seniors enrolled in Statistics. Therefore, 54 of Mr. Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics. The condition Among all students who have been taught by Tom, 100 percent of them enrolled in Discrete Math is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it is not asking about any students who have been taught by Tom.", "numerical_answer": 54, "gold_answer": "54", "instructions": "First, there are 120 students who have been taught by Mr. Angstadt. Of those 120 students, half are enrolled in Statistics, so 60 students. Of those 60 students, 90 percent are seniors, so 54 seniors. Therefore, 54 of Mr. Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics. The condition that Mr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day is relevant to the calculation process because it is the total number of students who have been taught by Mr. Angstadt, which is the starting point for the calculation.\nMr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. This means that there are 60 students enrolled in Statistics. Of these 60 students, 90% are seniors, so 54 of the students are seniors.  This condition is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us to determine the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics. Without this condition, we would not know how many seniors are enrolled in Statistics.\nMr. Angstadt has 120 students.  Half of them are enrolled in Statistics, so 60 students are enrolled in Statistics.  90 percent of those students are seniors, so 54 students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.   The condition Among all students who have been taught by Tom, 100 percent of them enrolled in Discrete Math is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it is not asking about any students who have been taught by Tom.", "equation": "Among all students who have been taught by Tom, 100 percent of them enrolled in Discrete Math.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5140399932861328, 0.565963089466095, 0.6956555247306824, 0.32922133803367615]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Tom bought the tickets for 300 plays. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, so she was the lead actress in 80 plays. That leaves 20 plays in which she was not the lead actress. Tom bought the tickets for 300 plays, but that information does not affect the calculation of how many times Megan was not the lead actress. Therefore, the answer is 20 times.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Megan participated in 100 plays. That means she was the lead actress in 80 of them. That leaves 20 plays where she was not the lead actress.  Tom bought tickets to 300 plays. That means Megan was the lead actress in 240 of them, and she was not the lead actress in 60 of them.  So, the answer is 60 times. The condition She was the lead actress in 80% of her work is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us that 80 out of 100 plays she was the lead actress.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her plays, so she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Since she participated in a total of 100 plays, that means she was not the lead actress in the remaining 20 plays.   The condition that Tom bought tickets for 300 plays is irrelevant to the calculation process.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. That leaves 20 plays in which she was not the lead actress.   Tom bought the tickets for 300 plays, but that information does not affect the calculation of how many times Megan was not the lead actress.", "equation": "Tom bought the tickets for 300 plays.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.13495506346225739]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Jack makes 50 cookies as well; each cookie weighs 10 grams. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "The cake is divided into eight equal parts, so each part is 400/8 = 50 grams. Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, so she ate 50 grams. Pierre ate double of what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams. Jack made 50 cookies, each weighing 10 grams, so he made 500 grams of cookies in total. Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of cake. The condition involving Jack making 50 cookies is irrelevant to the calculation process of Pierre's consumption.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, the cake is divided into eight equal parts, so each part is 400/8 = 50 grams.  Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, so she ate 50 grams.  Pierre ate double of what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.  Jack made 50 cookies, each weighing 10 grams, so he made 500 grams of cookies in total.  Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of cake. The condition A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us that each part of the cake is 400/8 = 50 grams.\nNathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, so she ate 400/8 = 50 grams.   Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.  The condition involving Jack making 50 cookies is irrelevant to the calculation process of Pierre's consumption.", "equation": "Jack makes 50 cookies as well; each cookie weighs 10 grams.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.24526095390319824]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Tom draws 4 more circles than you. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The width of the rectangle is 7 inches. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, the length of the rectangle is 28 inches. The area of the rectangle is the width multiplied by the length, so the area is 7 x 28 = 196 inches^2. The condition Tom draws 4 more circles than you is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The condition You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the width of the rectangle. We can use this information to calculate the area of the rectangle.  The area of the rectangle is 7 x 4 = 28 inches铏. The condition Tom draws 4 more circles than you is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe width of the rectangle is 7 inches. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, the length of the rectangle is 28 inches. The area of the rectangle is the width multiplied by the length, so the area is 7 x 28 = 196 inches^2. The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the length of the rectangle, which is necessary to calculate the area.\nFirst, calculate the area of your rectangle:  Area = 7 inches x 4 inches = 28 inches铏  Second, determine whether the condition Tom draws 4 more circles than you is relevant to the calculation process of the problem:  No, the condition Tom draws 4 more circles than you is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem What is the area of your rectangle?", "equation": "Tom draws 4 more circles than you.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.2879796624183655]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Jack bought 2 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday, so she used 4 pieces of bread on Saturday. On Sunday, Sally ate 1 sandwich, so she used 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Therefore, Sally ate 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition Jack bought 2 more pieces of bread than Sally is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, so she has eaten 4 pieces of bread.  On Sunday, she eats 1 sandwich, so she has eaten 2 more pieces of bread.  Jack bought 2 more pieces of bread than Sally, so Sally has eaten 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   Therefore, the answer is 6 pieces of bread.   The condition of 1 sandwich on Sunday is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many pieces of bread Sally has eaten on Sunday.\nSally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday, so she used 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.  On Sunday, Sally ate 1 sandwich, so she used 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.  Therefore, Sally ate 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition Jack bought 2 more pieces of bread than Sally is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday.", "equation": "Jack bought 2 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.5131243467330933]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Jack is 2 years older than Ellen. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "Ellen is 10 years old now, so Jack is 12 years old now. In six years, Ellen will be 16 years old. Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, so Martha is 32 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Ellen is 10 years old now. Jack is 2 years older than Ellen, so Jack is 12 years old now. In six years, Ellen will be 16 years old. Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, so Martha is 32 years old now.", "equation": "Jack is 2 years older than Ellen.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.4183977246284485]}
{"original_question": "In a field of 500 clovers, 20% have four leaves and one quarter of these are purple clovers. Jack planted 500 clovers out of the field. Assuming these proportions are exactly correct, how many clovers in the field are both purple and four-leaved?", "reasoning_path": "Out of 500 clovers, 20% (100 clovers) have four leaves. Of these 100 clovers, 25% (25 clovers) are purple. Therefore, there are 25 clovers in the field that are both purple and four-leaved. The condition Jack planted 500 clovers out of the field is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "1. Out of 500 clovers, 20% (100 clovers) have four leaves. 2. Of these 100 clovers, 25% (25 clovers) are purple. 3. Therefore, there are 25 clovers in the field that are both purple and four-leaved.  The condition Jack planted 500 clovers out of the field is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack planted 500 clovers out of the field.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.627143383026123, 0.7278595566749573, 0.4945923686027527]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Ada walked 200 meters to the market. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "The original price of the dress was $350 and the sale price was $140. To calculate the percentage off, we need to subtract the sale price from the original price and then divide that number by the original price. $350 - $140 = $210  $210 / $350 = 0.6  The percentage off is 60%. The condition that Ada walked 200 meters to the market is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Find the difference between the original price and sale price of the dress.   Original Price: $350  Sale Price: $140  Difference: $210   Step 2: Find the percentage off.   Percentage Off = (Difference / Original Price) x 100   Percentage Off = (210 / 350) x 100   Percentage Off = 60%  So, Asia got a 60% off on the dress at the sale.   The condition in which Asia bought the dress is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe difference between the two prices is $210. To get the percentage off, divide $210/$350 and then multiply by 100.  So, Asia got a 60% discount on the dress. The condition of the dress is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe original price of the dress was $350.  The sale price of the dress was $140.  To calculate the percentage off, we need to subtract the sale price from the original price and then divide that number by the original price.  $350 - $140 = $210  $210 / $350 = 0.6  The percentage off is 60%.  The condition that Ada walked 200 meters to the market is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada walked 200 meters to the market.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.2823799252510071]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Tom spent 100 dollars on dinner yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total cost of the cherries. Since the cost is $8 per kilogram, we can multiply $8 and the number of kilograms to get the total.  So, if Genevieve bought x kilograms of cherries, the total cost would be 8x.  Now, we have the information that Genevieve was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This means that Genevieve had $1600 and Clarice provided the remaining $400. So, the total cost of the cherries was $2000.  We can now use the equation 8x = 2000 to find out how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.  8x = 2000  x = 2000 / 8  x = 250  Therefore, Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries.  Yes, the condition that Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "1. Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram.  2. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price. 3. Clarice chipped in and Tom spent $100 on dinner.  4. Genevieve had $1600 on her.   Therefore, the total amount of money that Genevieve, Clarice, and Tom had was $1600 + $400 + $100 = $2100.   Now, since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, the total amount of money was enough to buy $2100/$8 = 262.5 kilograms of cherries.   Therefore, Genevieve bought 262.5 kilograms of cherries.   Yes, the condition that Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition is necessary to calculate the total cost of the cherries and the total amount of money Genevieve, Clarice, and Tom had in order to determine how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the cherries. Since the cost is $8 per kilogram, we can multiply $8 and the number of kilograms to get the total.  So, if Genevieve bought x kilograms of cherries, the total cost would be 8x.  Now, we have the information that Genevieve was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This means that Genevieve had $1600 and Clarice provided the remaining $400. So, the total cost of the cherries was $2000.  We can now use the equation 8x = 2000 to find out how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.  8x = 2000  x = 2000 / 8  x = 250  Therefore, Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries.  Yes, the condition When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. is relevant to the calculation process of the problem If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the cherries. If Genevieve was buying $8 per kilogram of cherries, then we can calculate the total cost by multiplying $8 by the number of kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.  So, if the total cost of the cherries was $400, then we can calculate the number of kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought by dividing $400 by $8. This gives us 50 kilograms.  Now, we can calculate how much money Genevieve had at the start by subtracting the $400 she was short from the $1600 she had. This gives us $1200.  Finally, we can calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought with her own money by dividing $1200 by $8. This gives us 150 kilograms.  Therefore, Genevieve bought a total of 200 kilograms of cherries (50 kilograms with Clarice's money and 150 kilograms with her own money).  The condition that Tom spent $100 on dinner is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom spent 100 dollars on dinner yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.17214609682559967]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. Jack leads a team of 390200 people. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people. So, Greenville has 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people.  Now, to calculate the total population of both cities, we need to add the population of Springfield and Greenville.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people.  The condition that Jack leads a team of 390,200 people is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "First, we need to determine the population of Greenville. We know that Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people. So, Greenville has 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people.  Now, to calculate the total population of both cities, we need to add the population of Springfield and Greenville.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people.  Thus, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people.  The condition Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the population of Greenville.\nThe population of Springfield is 482,653.  Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so the population of Greenville is 362,987.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.  The condition that Jack leads a team of 390,200 people is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack leads a team of 390200 people.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.03963804244995117]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. There were 44 friends who visited Tom and liked the buttons. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made (4 + 5*8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. So, Sue made (44/2) = 22 buttons.  Therefore, the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons. The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". Without this condition, we would not know how many buttons Kendra made and, therefore, would not be able to calculate how many buttons Sue made.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. So, Kendra made (4 + 5*8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. So, Sue made (44/2) = 22 buttons.  So, the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". Without this condition, we would not know how many buttons Kendra made and, therefore, would not be able to calculate how many buttons Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made (5 x 4) + 8 = 28 buttons. Sue made half of what Kendra made, so Sue made 28/2 = 14 buttons. That means that the total number of buttons made was 8 + 28 + 14 = 50. Since 44 friends liked the buttons, the remaining 6 buttons were not liked. So, Sue made 14 buttons. The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" was relevant to the calculation process since it was necessary to know how many buttons Mari made in order to calculate the number of buttons made by Kendra and Sue.\nMari made 8 buttons.  Kendra made 5*4 + 8 = 28 buttons.  Sue made half as many as Kendra, so Sue made 28/2 = 14 buttons.   The condition \"There were 44 friends who visited Tom and liked the buttons\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "There were 44 friends who visited Tom and liked the buttons.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.2913155257701874]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Ada planted 20 trees in front of the door. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs to buy 7 * 18 = 126 plants. Then he wants to add 15 additional potato plants. That means he needs to buy 15 more plants. Therefore, he needs to buy 126 + 15 = 141 plants in total. The condition that Ada planted 20 trees in front of the door is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each and wanted to add 15 additional potato plants. To calculate how many plants he needs to buy, we need to add the number of plants in the 7 rows (7 * 18 = 126 plants) and the number of additional plants (15 plants). So the answer would be: 126 + 15 = 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which means there will be 126 potato plants in total. Since he still has some room left, he wants to add 15 additional plants, so he needs to buy 15 more plants. Therefore, Papi Calot has to buy 15 plants.  The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it lets us know how many potato plants Papi Calot had initially planned to plant. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many plants Papi Calot needs to buy.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he already has 126 plants. He is then thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants, so he will need to buy 15 more plants, making it a total of 141 plants. Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy 15 plants.  Yes, the condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?\" because it helps us determine how many additional plants he needs to buy.\nPapi Calot needs to buy plants to complete his garden. He has planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which makes 126 total plants. He is also considering adding 15 additional potato plants, making the total 141 plants.   The condition \"Ada planted 20 trees in front of the door\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not involve plants.   Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants.", "equation": "Ada planted 20 trees in front of the door.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.2528940439224243]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Ada eats 8 pieces of bread every weekday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, which means she eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday. On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, which means she eats 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Therefore, the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 6 pieces of bread. The condition \"Ada eats 8 pieces of bread every weekday\" is not relevant to the calculation process as this condition does not refer to Sally. Therefore, the answer is 6 pieces of bread.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that she eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Therefore, the total amount of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 6 pieces of bread.  Yes, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it gives us the information that Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.\nSally eats two sandwiches on Saturday, which means she eats four pieces of bread on Saturday.  On Sunday, Sally eats one sandwich, which means she eats two pieces of bread on Sunday.   Therefore, the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is six pieces of bread.   The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means she eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.   The condition \"Ada eats 8 pieces of bread every weekday\" is not relevant to the calculation process as this condition does not refer to Sally. Therefore, the answer is 6 pieces of bread.", "equation": "Ada eats 8 pieces of bread every weekday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.3875795006752014]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Tom has 10 bags of potatoes. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags left. She then bought 6 more bags, so she now has 22 bags. Tom has 10 bags of potatoes, but that does not affect the number of bags Abie has. Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end. The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\" because it is the starting point of the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Start with the condition: Abie had 20 bags of chips.   She then gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags left.   She then bought 6 more bags, so she now has 22 bags.   Tom has 10 bags of potatoes, but that does not affect the number of bags Abie has.   Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.   Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\" because it is the starting point of the calculation process.\nAt the start, Abie had 20 bags of chips.  After giving 4 bags to her friend, she had 16 bags of chips.  After buying 6 more bags from the store, she had 22 bags of chips in the end.   So, the condition of giving 4 bags to her friend is relevant to the calculation process, as it reduces the total number of chips from 20 to 16.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  This leaves 16 bags of chips.  She bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.   The condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it increases the number of chips Abie has in the end.\nAbie starts with 20 bags of chips. She gives away 4 bags of chips. She then buys 6 more bags of chips.  So in the end, Abie has 22 bags of chips.  The condition \"Tom has 10 bags of potatoes\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom has 10 bags of potatoes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.3009647727012634]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The basketball field of Tom is 200 sq ft larger than Holden's bathroom. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "Holden's bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. The total sq ft of Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined is 459 sq ft. We need to find a space that is twice as large as Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined. Therefore, the new room will be 2 x 459 sq ft = 918 sq ft. The condition \"The basketball field of Tom is 200 sq ft larger than Holden's bathroom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not involve any calculation involving Holden's bedroom and bathroom.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "The master bedroom is 309 sq ft and the master bathroom is 150 sq ft.  Therefore, the combined area of the bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft.  If this space is to be doubled for the new home office/personal gym, then the new room will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is relevant to the problem, as it is used to determine the combined area of the bedroom and bathroom (459 sq ft). This combined area is then doubled to get the total area of the new room (918 sq ft).\nHolden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. Therefore, the total sq ft of these two rooms combined is 459 sq ft.  Now, if Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, we need to calculate the sq ft of the new room.  To do this, we need to multiply 459 sq ft (the total sq ft of Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined) by 2, which gives us 918 sq ft.  Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is part of the total sq ft of Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined (459 sq ft). Without this condition, we would not have been able to calculate the sq ft of the new room correctly.\nHolden's bedroom is 309 sq ft.  Holden's bathroom is 150 sq ft.  The total sq ft of Holden's bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft.  We need to find a space that is twice as large as Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined.  Therefore, the new room will be 2 x 459 sq ft = 918 sq ft.   The basketball field of Tom is 200 sq ft larger than Holden's bathroom so it is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The basketball field of Tom is 200 sq ft larger than Holden's bathroom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.4734461307525635]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Emma is 5 years older than Ellen. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "Ellen is 10 years old now, so in six years, she will be 16. Since Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, that means Martha is 32 years old now. The condition \"Emma is 5 years older than Ellen\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of this problem since it does not affect the age of Martha.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Ellen is 10 years old now, so in six years, she will be 16. Since Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, that means Martha is 32 years old now.  The condition \"Emma is 5 years older than Ellen\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of this problem since it does not affect the age of Martha.", "equation": "Emma is 5 years older than Ellen.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.4577769935131073]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Emma is 10 years older than Jessica. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the difference in age between Jessica and Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us Claire's age after two years. Jessica will then be 20 + 6 = 26 years old. Emma is 10 years older than Jessica. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the difference in age between Emma and Jessica. Jessica is currently 26 - 10 = 16 years old. Yes, the condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Emma is 10 years older than Jessica is also relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how old Jessica is now. We can do this by using the given information to calculate Jessica's age after two years and then subtracting 10 years from that. So the answer is 16 years old.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "We know that Jessica is 6 years older than Claire. Therefore, Jessica is currently 14 years old.   The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is part of the original information given in the problem. Without this condition, we wouldn't know that Claire was currently 18 years old.   We also know that Emma is 10 years older than Jessica. Therefore, Emma is currently 24 years old.", "equation": "Emma is 10 years older than Jessica.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.6115082502365112]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Tom bought 20 more peaches for Emily. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so if Betty has 12 oranges, Sandra would have 3 x 12, or 36 oranges. Now, Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. This means that if Sandra has 36 oranges, Emily would have 7 x 36, or 252 oranges. The condition that \"Tom bought 20 more peaches for Emily\" is not relevant for calculating how many oranges Emily has. Therefore, the answer is that Emily has 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so if Sandra has 12 oranges, Emily has 84 oranges. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so if Betty has 12 oranges, Sandra has 36 oranges. Therefore, Emily has 84 oranges.  The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" is relevant to the calculation process because it's used to figure out how many oranges Sandra has.\nFirst, we know that Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. This means that if Betty has 12 oranges, Sandra would have 3 x 12, or 36 oranges.  Now, Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. This means that if Sandra has 36 oranges, Emily would have 7 x 36, or 252 oranges.  The condition that \"Tom bought 20 more peaches for Emily\" is not relevant for calculating how many oranges Emily has.  Therefore, the answer is that Emily has 252 oranges.", "equation": "Tom bought 20 more peaches for Emily.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.3378608524799347]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Tom rode a bike to the office for 8 miles. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2. Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, so Michelle paid $2.5 x 4 = $10 for the ride.  Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $2 + $10 = $12 for her ride. The condition \"Tom rode a bike to the office for 8 miles\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we know that Michelle paid a ride fee of $2. This is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because Michelle needs to pay the ride fee of $2 in addition to the cost of her ride, which is a fixed amount.   Second, we know that the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. To calculate Michelle's total cost, we need to multiply the number of miles she rode (4 miles) by the charge per mile ($2.5).  Therefore, Michelle's total cost for her ride is $10 ($2 ride fee + 4 miles x $2.5 = $10).\nStep 1: Calculate the cost of the ride fee. Answer: Michelle paid a ride fee of $2.   Step 2: Calculate the cost of the ride per mile. Answer: The taxi charge per mile is $2.5, so Michelle paid $2.5 x 4 = $10 for the ride.   Step 3: Calculate the total cost.  Answer: Michelle paid a total of $2 + $10 = $12 for her ride.   The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it states the distance Michelle traveled in the taxi, which is used to calculate the cost per mile and the total cost.\nMichelle paid a ride fee of $2 as soon as she got in the taxi, and then she paid $2.5 per mile for the 4 miles. So, the total amount she paid was $2 + (4 miles * $2.5 per mile) = $10.  The condition \"Tom rode a bike to the office for 8 miles\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom rode a bike to the office for 8 miles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.1711094081401825]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. In addition, Mary obtained 10 packets of candies. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "At the start, Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags of chips. She bought an additional 6 bags of chips in the store. Finally, Mary obtained 10 packets of candies. Therefore, Abie has 16 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end. The condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us that Abie obtained an additional 6 bags of chips in the store, which is necessary for us to calculate the total number of bags of chips Abie has in the end.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "First, Abie had 20 bags of chips, then she gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags of chips. Then she bought another 6 bags in the store, so she has 22 bags of chips. Finally, Mary obtained 10 packets of candies, but this does not affect the number of bags of chips Abie has, so she still has 22 bags of chips in the end.  Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the starting point for the calculation. Knowing this information helps us to figure out how many bags of chips Abie has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. After she gave 4 bags to her friend, she had 16 bags of chips. After buying 6 more bags of chips in the store, she had 22 bags of chips in the end. The condition that she gave 4 bags to her friend is relevant to the calculation process since it affects the number of bags of chips Abie has in the end. Without this condition, the answer would be 28 bags of chips.\nAt the start, Abie had 20 bags of chips.   Then, she gave 4 bags of chips to her friend.   Now, she has 20 - 4 = 16 bags of chips.   Next, she bought an additional 6 bags of chips in the store.   Finally, Mary obtained 10 packets of candies.   Therefore, Abie has 16 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end.   The condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us that Abie obtained an additional 6 bags of chips in the store, which is necessary for us to calculate the total number of bags of chips Abie has in the end.\nInitially, Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags of chips. She bought 6 more bags of chips, so she has 22 bags of chips in total.  Therefore, the condition \"In addition, Mary obtained 10 packets of candies\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how many bags of chips Abie has in the end. Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.", "equation": "In addition, Mary obtained 10 packets of candies.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.1831720620393753]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Tom bought a shampoo 5 months ago. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long one bar of soap will last Maria. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Maria spends per bar of soap.  Tom bought a shampoo 5 months ago. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.   If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy 6 bars of soap (12 months / 2 months per bar). This means that she will spend $48.00 in total ($8.00 x 6 bars). So the answer is $48.00. Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Tom bought a shampoo 5 months ago is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Maria will spend on soap to stock up for the entire year. We can calculate this by multiplying the price of one bar of soap with the number of bars of soap needed to stock up for the entire year.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many bars of French soap Maria will need to stock up for the entire year. She buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months, so she will need 6 bars of French soap to cover the entire year.   Next, we need to figure out the total cost for Maria to stock up for the entire year. Each bar of French soap costs $8, so she will spend a total of $48 on soap.   Yes, the condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?\". This information is necessary to calculate the total amount of money Maria will need to spend to stock up for the entire year.\n1. Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. 2. One bar of soap lasts for two months. 3. To stock up for the entire year, Maria needs 6 bars of soap.  Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 to stock up for the entire year. Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMaria spends $8.00 per bar of soap and it lasts her for 2 months. Therefore, she spends $4.00 per month on soap. To stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy 12 bars of soap. So, she will spend 12 x $8.00 = $96.00 for the year.  The condition \"Tom bought a shampoo 5 months ago\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought a shampoo 5 months ago.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.36157160997390747]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Emma has 10 packets of candies. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, so she now has 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"Emma has 10 packets of candies\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\".", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "First, Abie had 20 bags of chips.  Second, she gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags of chips.  Third, she bought another 6 bags of chips in the store, so she now has 22 bags of chips.  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.  Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is the starting point of the problem - without this information, we would not be able to calculate how many bags of chips Abie has in the end.\nAt the beginning, Abie has 20 bags of chips.  Then, she gave 4 bags to her friend.  After that, she bought 6 more bags of chips in the store.   Therefore, in the end, Abie has 22 bags of chips.   The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the total number of bags of chips Abie has in the end.\nAt the start, Abie had 20 bags of chips.  She then gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags of chips.  Finally, she bought another 6 bags of chips in the store, so she now has 22 bags of chips in the end.   Yes, the condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\"\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. This means that Abie has 20-4+6=22 bags of chips in the end.   The condition \"Emma has 10 packets of candies\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\".", "equation": "Emma has 10 packets of candies.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.2868197560310364]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Mary shares 210 Christmas lights with friends. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024.  Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4, since there are 4 people (Jennifer and her 3 friends): 1,024 姊 4 = 256.  Therefore, each of Jennifer and her friends will get 256 sweets each.  The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends.\" is relevant in this problem, as it provides the context of how many people are sharing the sweets. Without this condition, we would not know how to divide the sweets between them. The condition of Mary sharing 210 Christmas lights with friends is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024.  Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4, since there are 4 people (Jennifer and her 3 friends): 1,024 姊 4 = 256.  Therefore, each of Jennifer and her friends will get 256 sweets each.  The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends.\" is relevant in this problem, as it provides the context of how many people are sharing the sweets. Without this condition, we would not know how to divide the sweets between them.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many sweets each person will get. If Jennifer is sharing the sweets between four people, including herself, each person will get an equal number of sweets. Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, so each person will get 212 姊 4 = 53 green sweets, 310 姊 4 = 77 blue sweets, and 502 姊 4 = 125 yellow sweets.  The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many green sweets Jennifer has to share. Knowing this information allows us to calculate how many sweets each person will get.\nFirst, Jennifer will divide the 212 green sweets equally among herself and her 3 friends. This means that each person will get 212/4 = 53 green sweets.  Next, she will divide the 310 blue sweets equally among herself and her 3 friends. This means that each person will get 310/4 = 77.5 blue sweets (rounding up to 78).  Finally, she will divide the 502 yellow sweets equally among herself and her 3 friends. This means that each person will get 502/4 = 125.5 yellow sweets (rounding up to 126).  Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 53 green sweets, 78 blue sweets, and 126 yellow sweets.  The condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how many sweets each person will receive.\nFirst, the condition of Mary sharing 210 Christmas lights with friends is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We need to focus only on the number of sweets Jennifer has.  Second, Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. We can calculate the total number of sweets she has, which is: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024 sweets.  Third, since Jennifer wants to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends, we can divide 1024 by 4 to get the number of sweets each person will get: 1024 / 4 = 256.  Therefore, each person will get 256 sweets.", "equation": "Mary shares 210 Christmas lights with friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.3191378116607666]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The building that Jack lives in is 300 sq ft larger than Holden's home office. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "Holden's current bedroom is 309 sq ft, and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. Therefore, the combined size of the bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft. Since he wants a space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom combined, the new room will have a size of 918 sq ft. The condition regarding the size of the master bath is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "Holden's current bedroom is 309 sq ft, and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. Therefore, the combined size of the bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft. Since he wants a space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom combined, the new room will have a size of 918 sq ft. The condition regarding the size of the master bath is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's bedroom and bathroom:  Bedroom: 309 sq ft Bathroom: 150 sq ft Total: 459 sq ft  Now, if Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, the new room will have twice the total sq ft:  Total: 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft  The condition \"The building that Jack lives in is 300 sq ft larger than Holden's home office.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The building that Jack lives in is 300 sq ft larger than Holden's home office.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.6073710918426514]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Tom pays $200 for each wall. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "We know that there are three walls in the shower, so the total number of tiles should be 3 x (8 x 20), which is 480 tiles. Yes, the condition of \"20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without knowing the number of tiles running the height of the wall, we cannot calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. The condition that Tom pays $200 for each wall is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "The problem is asking for the total number of tiles in the shower, so we need to calculate the number of tiles on each wall and then add them together.   The condition provided says that each wall of the 3-sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall. This is important because we need to know the dimensions of the tiles in order to calculate the total number of tiles.   So, we know that each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. This means that each wall has 8 * 20 = 160 tiles.   Since there are 3 walls, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 * 160 = 480 tiles.   Therefore, there are 480 tiles in the shower.   The condition provided is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the dimensions of the tiles, which are necessary in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nWe know that there are three walls in the shower, so the total number of tiles should be 3 x (8 x 20), which is 480 tiles. Yes, the condition of \"20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without knowing the number of tiles running the height of the wall, we cannot calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe shower is 3 sides, so we need to find the total number of tiles on each side and then multiply by 3. Each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height, so there are 8 x 20 = 160 tiles on each wall. Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 160 x 3 = 480 tiles.   The condition that Tom pays $200 for each wall is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Tom pays $200 for each wall.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.14165230095386505]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. The salary of Mary is $20 more than Libby per month. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of quarters needed to pay for the dress. Since a quarter is worth 25 cents, we need 35/25 = 140 quarters to pay for the dress.  So, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Yes, the condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\" because it tells us how much money Libby has to pay for the dress. This information is necessary to calculate how many quarters she will have left after replacing the dress. The salary of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of quarters needed to pay for the dress. Since a quarter is worth 25 cents, we need 35/25 = 140 quarters to pay for the dress.   So, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.   Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us the original number of quarters Libby had before the transaction.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. This means she will have to use 140 quarters for that. So, after replacing the dress, she will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.  Yes, the condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\" because it tells us how much money Libby has to pay for the dress. This information is necessary to calculate how many quarters she will have left after replacing the dress.\n1. Libby has 160 quarters. 2. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. 3. Each quarter is worth 25 cents, so Libby has to pay 140 quarters to replace her sister's dress. 4. After replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.  The salary of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The salary of Mary is $20 more than Libby per month.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.3150964081287384]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Tom harvested 12 more potatoes yesterday. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "Kelly pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, this means that 234 carrots would weigh 39 pounds. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots. The condition that Tom harvested 12 more potatoes yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" because the problem is asking for the weight of the carrots that Kelly harvested, not the potatoes that Tom harvested.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to add up the total number of carrots Kelly harvested: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to divide that number by 6, since 6 carrots weigh one pound: 234 / 6 = 39.  So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe total number of carrots Kelly harvested from all three beds is 55 + 101 + 78 = 234. Each carrot weighs 1/6 lb, so the total weight of the carrots Kelly harvested is 234/6 = 39 lbs.   The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" because it does not affect the total number of carrots harvested or the weight of each carrot, which are the only elements necessary to calculate the total weight of the carrots.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. To calculate the number of pounds of carrots she harvested, we need to divide the total number of carrots by 6, since 6 carrots equals 1 pound.   Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is necessary to calculate the total number of carrots and therefore is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed and 78 carrots from the third bed, which means she harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested by dividing 234 by 6. The answer is 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the necessary information to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots in the first bed, 101 carrots in the second bed, and 78 carrots in the third bed. This means that Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, this means that 234 carrots would weigh 39 pounds. The condition \"Tom harvested 12 more potatoes yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" because the problem is asking for the weight of the carrots that Kelly harvested, not the potatoes that Tom harvested.", "equation": "Tom harvested 12 more potatoes yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.373145192861557]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Mary would like to have 10 apple trees. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many of the cherry pits sprouted. 25% of 80 is 20. Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition that Kim plants 80 cherry pits is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many pits we are dealing with in the first place. The condition that Mary would like to have 10 apple trees is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many of the cherry pits sprouted. 25% of 80 is 20. Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition that Kim plants 80 cherry pits is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many pits we are dealing with in the first place.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits.  Step 2: 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.  Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  Step 4: Mary would like to have 10 apple trees, so this condition is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits, and 25% of them sprout, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings. Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so Kim has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition of Kim selling 6 of the saplings is relevant, as it affects the calculation of how many cherry saplings Kim has left. Therefore, the answer is that Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings. She then sells 6 of them, so she has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Mary would like to have 10 apple trees\" is not relevant to the calculation process at all.", "equation": "Mary would like to have 10 apple trees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.536467969417572, 0.24044960737228394, 0.46118125319480896, 0.30178892612457275]}
{"original_question": "For football season, Zachary wants to buy a new football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. Emma has bought a basketball for $2 and doesn't wish to sell it. How much more money does Zachary need?", "reasoning_path": "Zachary wants to buy a football ($3.75), a pair of shorts ($2.40) and a pair of football shoes ($11.85). This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each item costs.  Zachary has $10. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Zachary has.  Emma has bought a basketball for $2 and doesn't wish to sell it. This is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding how much money Zachary needs.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much more money Zachary needs. We can calculate this by subtracting the total cost of the items (football + shorts + shoes) from the amount of money Zachary has.  So the answer would be: $10 - ($3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85) = $10 - $18 = -$8  Zachary needs $8 more.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "First, Zachary needs to calculate how much money he needs for the items he wants to buy:  Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85  Total cost: $18.00  Then, Zachary subtracts the money he already has ($10) from the total cost of the items ($18.00):  Total cost: $18.00 Money Zachary has: $10.00  Difference: $8.00  Therefore, Zachary needs $8 more in order to purchase the items.  The condition \"The football costs $3.75\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the cost of the football does not affect how much more money Zachary needs.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the items Zachary wants to buy. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85, so the total cost of the items is $17.00.  Second, we need to calculate how much money Zachary has. Zachary has $10, so that is the amount of money he has available.  Finally, we need to calculate how much more money Zachary needs. We know that the total cost of the items is $17.00, and Zachary has $10. So, Zachary needs $7.00 more money to buy the items he wants.  The condition \"the shorts cost $2.40\" is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.\nFirst, we add up the items that Zachary wants to buy:  Football = $3.75 Shorts = $2.40 Shoes = $11.85  Total cost = $17.00  Next, we subtract the amount of money Zachary has:  $17.00 - $10.00 = $7.00  Therefore, Zachary needs $7.00 more. The condition that the shoes cost $11.85 is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the total cost, which we use to determine how much money Zachary needs.\nZachary needs to buy a football, shorts, and shoes. The cost of the football is $3.75, the cost of the shorts is $2.40, and the cost of the shoes is $11.85.  The total cost for Zachary's items is $17.00 ($3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85).  Zachary has $10, so he needs to find $7.00 more in order to purchase the items.  Therefore, Zachary needs $7.00 more.  The condition \"Zachary has $10\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine how much more money Zachary needs.\nZachary wants to buy a football, shorts, and shoes.   Football = $3.75  Shorts = $2.40  Shoes = $11.85   Total cost = $17.00   Zachary has $10   So, Zachary needs $7 more money.   The condition \"Emma has bought a basketball for $2 and doesn't wish to sell it.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   Therefore, Zachary needs $7 more money.", "equation": "Emma has bought a basketball for $2 and doesn't wish to sell it.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.45576441287994385, 0.14543353021144867, 0.0897449254989624, 0.018721066415309906, 0.5780560970306396, 0.12439577281475067]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. There were 22 friends who visited Emma and liked the buttons. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made (4 + 5 x 8 = 44) buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. So, Sue made (44 姊 2 = 22) buttons.  Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.  Yes, the condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". We need to know how many buttons Kendra made in order to calculate how many buttons Sue made.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 times as many as Mari, which means Kendra made 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many, so she made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44/2 = 22 buttons.  So, Sue made 22 buttons.  Yes, the condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". We need to know how many buttons Kendra made in order to calculate how many buttons Sue made.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. In other words, Kendra made 5 x (8 + 4) = 52 buttons.  Sue made half as many as Kendra. So, Sue made 52/2 = 26 buttons.  The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the starting number used to calculate how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari, so she made (4 + 5 x 8 = 44) buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made (44 姊 2 = 22) buttons.  The condition \"There were 22 friends who visited Emma and liked the buttons\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "There were 22 friends who visited Emma and liked the buttons.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.18094776570796967]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Ada draws 4 more circles than you. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its width by its length. In this case, the width of your rectangle is 7 inches. The length of the rectangle is 4 times the width, so it is 28 inches. So the area of your rectangle is 7 inches * 28 inches = 196 square inches. The condition that \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us the width of the rectangle, which is necessary to calculate the area. The fact that Ada draws 4 more circles than you is not relevant to the calculation process, because the area of the rectangle does not depend on the number of circles.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its width by its length. In this case, the width of your rectangle is 7 inches. The length of the rectangle is 4 times the width, so it is 28 inches. So the area of your rectangle is 7 inches * 28 inches = 196 square inches.   The condition that \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us the width of the rectangle, which is necessary to calculate the area.   The fact that Ada draws 4 more circles than you is not relevant to the calculation process, because the area of the rectangle does not depend on the number of circles.\nThe width of the rectangle is 7 inches.  Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, the length of the rectangle is 28 inches.   The area of the rectangle is the product of its width and length, so the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine the length of the rectangle. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the area of the rectangle.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its length and width. So the area of your rectangle is 7 inches x 28 inches = 196 square inches.  The condition \"Ada draws 4 more circles than you\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It's simply an extra fact that does not affect the answer.", "equation": "Ada draws 4 more circles than you.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.3190930485725403]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Calvin's hair is 10 inches longer than that of Mary. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. This information is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us what Calvin is doing with his hair clippings.  He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. This information is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many haircuts Calvin needs in order to reach his goal.   Therefore, Calvin is 80% towards his goal (8/10).   The condition that Calvin's hair is 10 inches longer than Mary's is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. To calculate the percentage, we need to divide the number of haircuts achieved by the total number of haircuts required. So the answer would be: 8/10 = 80%.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "First, we need to find out how much hair Calvin has saved after 8 haircuts. Assuming that the length of his hair was the same at each haircut, we can calculate this by multiplying the length of his hair by 8 (the number of haircuts). So, if Calvin's hair is 10 inches longer than Mary's, then Calvin's hair is 10 x 8 = 80 inches long.  Next, we need to determine how much more hair Calvin needs to save in order to reach his goal. Assuming that the goal is to make a wig for his dog, then we can assume that Calvin needs enough hair to cover the dog's head. This can vary depending on the size of the dog's head, but let's assume that the goal is to save enough hair for a medium-sized dog, which would require around 40 inches of hair.   Therefore, Calvin needs 40 - 80 = 40 more inches of hair in order to reach his goal.   Finally, we can calculate what percentage Calvin is towards his goal by dividing the amount of hair he has saved (80 inches) by the amount of hair he needs (40 inches). Then, we multiply this by 100 to get the percentage.  So, the percentage of Calvin's goal completed is 80/40 x 100 = 200%.   The condition that Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines the amount of hair that Calvin has saved so far. Without knowing this information, it would be impossible to calculate the percentage of Calvin's goal that he has completed.\nCondition \"and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?\"  We know that Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. This means that Calvin has completed 80% of his goal. Therefore, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.  The fact that Calvin's hair is 10 inches longer than Mary's is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to know how much hair Calvin needs to make the wig for his dog. So, he needs a total of 10 haircuts.   Second, we need to know how many haircuts Calvin has already gotten. We know he has gotten 8 haircuts, so he still needs 2 more haircuts.   Third, we need to calculate the percentage of his progress towards his goal. We can do this by dividing the number of haircuts he has already gotten (8) by the total number of haircuts he needs (10). This gives us 0.8, or 80%.   So, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.   The condition \"Calvin's hair is 10 inches longer than that of Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Calvin's hair is 10 inches longer than that of Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.3484799265861511]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Jack has 3 sisters, where all of them are 20 years old. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "We have to calculate the sum of her brother's ages, which is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24. Then we have to double the sum of her brother's ages, which is 24 x 2 = 48. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old. The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us that the sum of her brother's ages is 24. The condition \"Jack has 3 sisters, where all of them are 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It is simply additional information that does not affect the answer.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "We have to calculate the sum of her brother's ages, which is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24. Then we have to double the sum of her brother's ages, which is 24 x 2 = 48. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old. The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us that the sum of her brother's ages is 24.\nHannah has three brothers, all 8 years old. So the sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  If Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, then Hannah is 24 x 2 = 48 years old.  The condition \"Jack has 3 sisters, where all of them are 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It is simply additional information that does not affect the answer.", "equation": "Jack has 3 sisters, where all of them are 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.4349253177642822]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Tom bought a moisturizer which cost $5. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months and spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Maria spends on each bar of soap.  In order to stock up for the entire year, Maria will need 12 bars of soap (12 months / 2 months per bar of soap). This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many bars of soap Maria will need to buy.  Multiplying 12 bars of soap by $8.00 per bar of soap, Maria will spend $96.00 on soap for the entire year.  Tom bought a moisturizer which cost $5 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months and spends $8.00 per bar of soap. To calculate how much she will spend on soap for the entire year, we need to multiply the number of bars of soap by the cost of each bar of soap. So the answer is $96.00.", "numerical_answer": 96, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Maria buys one large bar of French soap for $8.00 and it lasts her for two months. Therefore, she needs six bars of soap for the entire year. This means she will need to spend $48.00 for the entire year. The condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the necessary information to determine how many bars of soap Maria will need to buy for the year.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many bars of soap Maria needs to stock up for the entire year. Since she buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months, she will need 12 bars of soap to stock up for the entire year (2 months x 6 = 12).  Now, we need to calculate how much it will cost for Maria to stock up for the entire year. Since she spends $8.00 per bar of soap, she will spend $8.00 x 12 = $96.00. Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it tells us how much Maria spends on each bar of soap, which is necessary to calculate the total cost of stocking up for the entire year.\nMaria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months for $8.00. To figure out how much she will spend for the entire year, we need to figure out how many bars of soap she needs to buy in a year.   Since each bar lasts for 2 months, Maria will need 6 bars of soap for a year. Therefore, Maria will need to spend $48.00 for the entire year on soap.   The condition \"Tom bought a moisturizer which cost $5\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought a moisturizer which cost $5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.29872602224349976]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Jack bought 3 packs of blue dices. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That means she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls. So, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls in all.  The condition \"Jack bought 3 packs of blue dices\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many balls Julie bought. To do this, we need to add up the number of balls she bought from each pack:  3 packs of red balls = 19 x 3 = 57 10 packs of yellow balls = 19 x 10 = 190 8 packs of green balls = 19 x 8 = 152  Total number of balls Julie bought = 57 + 190 + 152 = 399  Second, we need to consider the condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls.\" This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem as we already accounted for the number of balls Julie bought from the red balls in the above calculation. Therefore, the condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\"\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That means she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls. So Julie bought a total of 399 balls.  The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, because without knowing the number of packs of yellow balls, we would not have been able to calculate the total number of balls Julie bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, which is 3 x 19 = 57 red balls.  Then she bought 10 packs of yellow balls, which is 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls.  Finally, she bought 8 packs of green balls, which is 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  So Julie bought a total of 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.   The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is part of the calculation for the total number of balls Julie bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That means she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls. So, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls in all.  The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many balls are in each package. Without this condition, we would not know how many balls Julie bought in total.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package.  So, Julie bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.   Therefore, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls in all.   The condition \"Jack bought 3 packs of blue dices\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 3 packs of blue dices.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315247178077698, 0.41100406646728516, 0.43914249539375305, 0.484716534614563, 0.4153919816017151]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Tom is 10 years older than Claire. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Claire is currently 18 years old (since she will be 20 in two years). Tom is 10 years older than Claire, so he is 28 years old. Jessica is 6 years older than Claire, which means she is currently 24 years old. Therefore, the answer is that Jessica is 24 years old. Yes, the condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing that Claire will be 20 in two years, we would not know how old Claire is currently and thus would not be able to calculate how old Jessica is.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Claire is currently 18 years old (since she will be 20 in two years).  Tom is 10 years older than Claire, so he is 28 years old.  Jessica is 6 years older than Claire, which means she is currently 24 years old.   So, the answer is that Jessica is 24 years old.   Yes, the condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing that Claire will be 20 in two years, we would not know how old Claire is currently and thus would not be able to calculate how old Jessica is.\nRight now, Claire is 18 years old.  Since Jessica is six years older, Jessica is currently 24 years old.   The condition \"Tom is 10 years older than Claire\" does not have a direct relation to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not give us any information about Jessica's current age.", "equation": "Tom is 10 years older than Claire.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.32771366834640503]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Mary droved 8 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how much Jed was fined for. We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 per mile per hour over the speed limit. We also know that the posted speed limit is 50 mph, so if Jed was fined $256, he must have been going over the speed limit by 16 mph. Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph). The condition \"Mary drove 8 miles per hour and was not fined in another city\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Mary's speed is not related to Jed's speed or fine.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many miles per hour Jed was traveling over the posted speed limit. We know that the posted speed limit is 50 mph and Jed was fined $256, so we can calculate the speed he was going by dividing the fine by the fine per mile, which is $16.  $256 / $16 = 16 mph  Therefore, Jed was traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).  The condition, \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit,\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much Jed was fined per mile and helps us calculate his speed.\nFirst, we need to figure out how much the fine is for going one mile per hour over the speed limit. In Zeoland, the fine is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. Therefore, for every mile per hour over the speed limit, Jed will be fined $16.  Second, we need to figure out how many miles per hour Jed was over the speed limit. We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph, so we can use this information to calculate how many miles per hour over the speed limit Jed was traveling.  If we divide the fine ($256) by the cost per mile per hour over the speed limit ($16), we get 16 miles per hour. Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit of 50 mph, so Jed was traveling at 66 mph.  The condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition provides us with the necessary information to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling.\nFirst, we need to find out how much Jed was fined for. We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 per mile per hour over the speed limit. We also know that the posted speed limit is 50 mph.  So, we can calculate Jed's fine by multiplying the fine amount of $16 by the number of miles per hour over the speed limit. For example, if Jed was traveling at 60 mph, he would be fined for 10 mph over the speed limit, so his fine would be $160 ($16 x 10 mph).  Therefore, Jed was fined $256 for traveling at 80 mph, which is 30 mph over the speed limit.  The condition \"Mary droved 8 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Mary's speed is not related to Jed's speed or fine.", "equation": "Mary droved 8 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.33473584055900574]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. Emma works at the mall with an hourly salary of $5. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "The original cost of each t-shirt is $20. So, the cost of 6 t-shirts is $120. With the 50% discount, the cost of 6 t-shirts is reduced to $60. Therefore, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts. The condition that Emma works at the mall with an hourly salary of $5 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\". This condition does not have any relation to the amount of money James paid for the t-shirts.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it shows that the t-shirts are discounted.  The original cost of each t-shirt is $20, so the cost of 6 t-shirts is $120.  With the 50% discount, the cost of 6 t-shirts is reduced to $60.  Therefore, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.\nJames buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This means that he is paying 50% of the original price. The original price for each t-shirt is $20, so he will be paying $10 for each t-shirt.  So, James pays a total of $60 for the 6 t-shirts, and the condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to this calculation as it is the original price for each t-shirt.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts at 50% off. This means that the original price was $40 for each t-shirt, but he got it for 50% off, so he paid $20 for each t-shirt. So James paid a total of $120 for the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"Emma works at the mall with an hourly salary of $5\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\". This condition does not have any relation to the amount of money James paid for the t-shirts.", "equation": "Emma works at the mall with an hourly salary of $5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.42930638790130615, 0.1460949182510376, 0.16211389005184174]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. Mary rides 5 kilometers to the shopping center. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This tells us that James is buying the t-shirts at a discounted rate of 50%. We also know that each t-shirt costs $20. So we need to calculate how much James would pay for 6 t-shirts at a discount of 50%. To do this, we need to multiply 6 x 20 (the cost of each t-shirt) and then multiply this result by 0.5 (the discount rate of 50%). This gives us a total of 6 x 20 x 0.5 = $60. Therefore, James pays a total of $60 for the 6 t-shirts. The condition that Mary rides 5 kilometers to the shopping center is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off and that each t-shirt costs $20. So the answer is $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "1. Mary rides 5 kilometers to the shopping center. This condition does not affect the calculation process.  2. James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. Yes, this condition is relevant to the calculation process. Since the t-shirts are 50% off, the original price is $40.   3. They each cost $20. Yes, this condition is relevant to the calculation process. Since each t-shirt costs $20, James pays a total of $120 for all 6 t-shirts.  Therefore, James paid $120 for the 6 t-shirts.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This means that each t-shirt costs $20. So, James paid $20 x 6 = $120.  The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it is used to determine the cost of each t-shirt.  Mary's ride does not affect the calculation of how much James paid for the t-shirts.\nJames buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. That means he pays 50% of the original price for each t-shirt. The original price for each t-shirt was $40. So, James pays $20 for each t-shirt. Multiply the number of t-shirts (6) by the cost of each t-shirt ($20) and you get $120. That is how much James paid.   The condition \"Mary rides 5 kilometers to the shopping center\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\" because it has nothing to do with the cost of the t-shirts or the amount of money that James paid.", "equation": "Mary rides 5 kilometers to the shopping center.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.09453052282333374]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Emma gave Luke 20 dollars. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "Luke needs 85 paper stars to fill a glass jar. Luke already made 33 stars. That means he needs 85 - 33 = 52 stars to fill the glass jar. To fill 4 bottles, he needs to make 4 x 52 = 208 stars. Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 208 - 33 = 175 more stars to fill 4 bottles. The condition that Emma gave Luke 20 dollars is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that 85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar and Luke has already made 33 stars. To calculate how many stars Luke needs to make, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made from the total number of stars he needs. So the answer would be: 208 - 33 = 175 stars.", "numerical_answer": 175, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "Luke needs to fill four bottles, so he needs four times as many stars as it takes to fill a single jar. That means he needs four times 85 stars.   4 x 85 = 340 stars  He already has 33 stars, so he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars.   Yes, the condition that 85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill a glass jar.  Second, Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make (85 - 33) = 52 more stars.  Third, Luke needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make (52 x 4) = 208 stars.   Finally, Emma gave Luke 20 dollars, so Luke needs to make (208 - 20) = 188 more stars.   So, the answer is that Luke needs to make 188 more stars.   The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is needed to subtract 33 stars from the initial amount of 85 stars required to fill a glass jar.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one bottle. He has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars to fill one bottle.  Now he needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make a total of 208 stars.  Therefore, Luke needs to make a total of 175 stars (208 - 33).   The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how many stars Luke needs to make.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 4 bottles worth of stars, so he needs to make 4 x 85 = 340 stars.   Second, Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars.   The condition that \"Emma gave Luke 20 dollars\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it is not needed to solve the problem.", "equation": "Emma gave Luke 20 dollars.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.10357039421796799]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Tom played 100 games. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, and she participated in 100 plays. That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. That also means that she was not the lead actress in 20 plays. Therefore, the answer is that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays. The condition \"Tom played 100 games\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Megan participated in 100 plays. Of these, she was the lead actress in 80%, or 80 plays. Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the information that Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays.\nMegan participated in 100 plays. That means she was the lead actress in 80 of those plays, and not the lead actress in 20 of those plays. So, the answer is 20.  Yes, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\". Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the answer.\nWe know that Megan participated in 100 plays and was the lead actress in 80% of those plays. That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   That also means that she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   Therefore, the answer is that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition that Tom played 100 games is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom played 100 games.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.05903755500912666]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. John spends 2 hours reading books per week. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This means Jackie has 8 + 3 + 8 = 19 hours of activities per day. Since there are 24 hours in a day, Jackie has 24 - 19 = 5 hours of free time per day. John spends 2 hours reading books per week. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is how much time Jackie spends on activities per day. To calculate how much free time Jackie has, we need to subtract the number of hours she spends on activities from the total number of hours in a day. So the answer would be: 24 - 19 = 5 hours of free time per day.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This adds up to 19 hours.  She also spends 2 hours reading books per week. This adds up to 14 hours per week.   Now, subtracting the total hours of work, exercise, sleep and reading from the total hours in a week (7 days x 24 hours = 168 hours), we get:   168 - (19 hours + 14 hours) = 135 hours of free time per week.   The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the activities that takes up her time and needs to be taken into account when calculating her free time.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That adds up to 19 hours per day.   John spends 2 hours reading books per week. That adds up to 0.286 hours per day.  So Jackie has 18.714 hours of free time per day.   The condition \"3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the amount of time Jackie has available for free time.\nJackie spends a total of 19 hours per day on working, exercise, and sleep. Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day. The condition provided about John has no relevance to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "John spends 2 hours reading books per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.2999221980571747]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The car insurance of Ada can cover at most $200 per year. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total cost of the doctor visit. The primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit, so the total cost is $300. Next, we need to calculate the amount of money that James's insurance will cover. Since his insurance covers 80%, they will cover $240 of the total cost. Finally, we can calculate James's out-of-pocket cost for the doctor appointment. This is the amount of money that James will have to pay for the appointment, which is the difference between the total cost of the appointment ($300) and the amount covered by insurance ($240). Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for the doctor appointment is $60. The condition \"The car insurance of Ada can cover at most $200 per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total cost of the doctor visit. The primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit, so the total cost is $300.   Next, we need to calculate the amount of money that James's insurance will cover. Since his insurance covers 80%, they will cover $240 of the total cost.   Finally, we can calculate James's out-of-pocket cost for the doctor appointment. This is the amount of money that James will have to pay for the appointment, which is the difference between the total cost of the appointment ($300) and the amount covered by insurance ($240). Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for the doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine the total cost of the doctor appointment.\nFirst, we need to figure out the amount of money that James's insurance will cover. Since the insurance covers 80% of the visit, it will cover $240. So, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment will be $60 ($300 - $240). The condition that James's insurance covers 80% is indeed relevant to the calculation process.\nJames's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit. James's insurance covers 80% of the cost, so $240 will be covered by insurance. The remaining $60 is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment.  The condition \"The car insurance of Ada can cover at most $200 per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.   Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.", "equation": "The car insurance of Ada can cover at most $200 per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.1939765065908432]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Tom has a duck farm aged 200 years. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMichael's farm is increasing by 150 chickens annually.  So, after 9 years, Michael will have 550 + (150 x 9) = 1,650 chickens on his farm.  The condition \"Tom has a duck farm aged 200 years\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom has a duck farm aged 200 years.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.32448679208755493]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Tom drinks 3 more glasses of juice than Jason does. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "In one week, Jason will consume 3 eggs per day, for a total of 21 eggs.  In two weeks, Jason will consume 6 eggs per day, for a total of 42 eggs. Therefore, the answer is that Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks. The condition that Tom drinks 3 more glasses of juice than Jason does is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "In one week, Jason will consume 3 eggs per day, for a total of 21 eggs.  In two weeks, Jason will consume 6 eggs per day, for a total of 42 eggs.  The condition that Tom drinks 3 more glasses of juice than Jason does is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom drinks 3 more glasses of juice than Jason does.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.3539690375328064]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Ada has 8 more books than Mary. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so she has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Ada has 8 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 鑴 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so she has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Ada has 8 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "equation": "Ada has 8 more books than Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.39521533250808716]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The school of Ada has 390200 students. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 people fewer than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville.  482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987  So, the population of Greenville is 362,987 people.  Now, we can calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville by adding the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (362,987).  482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people.  The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people\" is relevant to the problem, as it tells us the population of Springfield and the population difference between Springfield and Greenville. This information is necessary to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. The condition \"The school of Ada has 390200 students\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?\" since it does not provide any information about the population of Springfield", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 people fewer than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville.   482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987  So, the population of Greenville is 362,987 people.   Now, we can calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville by adding the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (362,987).   482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people.   The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people\" is relevant to the problem, as it tells us the population of Springfield and the population difference between Springfield and Greenville. This information is necessary to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville.\nThe total population of Springfield is 482,653.  Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so the total population of Greenville is 362,987.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.  The condition \"The school of Ada has 390200 students\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?\" since it does not provide any information about the population of Springfield or Greenville.", "equation": "The school of Ada has 390200 students.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.20186661183834076]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. Emma woke up 10 minutes ago. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. We have already used 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and 6 minutes to get to the school building. Therefore, we have 9 minutes left to get to our room, without being late. The condition that Emma woke up 10 minutes ago is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that my brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late and it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. To calculate how much time do we have to get to our room, without being late, we need to subtract the time used to arrive at the school gate and get to the school building from the total time we have to get to school. So the answer is: 30 minutes - 15 minutes - 6 minutes = 9 minutes.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, Emma woke up 10 minutes ago, so she has 20 minutes before she needs to be at school.  Second, it takes 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, so that leaves 5 minutes for the remaining 6 minutes to get to the school building.  Finally, we have 5 minutes to get to our room, without being late.   Yes, the condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it affects how much time we have for the remaining 6 minutes to get to the school building.\nFirst, we need to know how much time we have to get to the school gate. Emma woke up 10 minutes ago, so that leaves us 20 minutes to get to the school gate.   Second, we need to know how much time we have to get to the school building. It takes us 6 minutes to get there, so we have 14 minutes to get from the school gate to the school building.   Finally, we need to know how much time we have to get to our room. Since it takes us 6 minutes to get from the school gate to the school building, that leaves us 8 minutes to get from the school building to our room.   Therefore, we have 8 minutes to get to our room, without being late.   Yes, the condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nWe have 30 minutes to get to school.  It takes us 15 minutes to get to the school gate and 6 minutes to get to the school building.  So, we have 9 minutes left to get to our room.  The condition \"Emma woke up 10 minutes ago\" is not relevant to the calculation process, because it does not affect how long it takes us to get to school.", "equation": "Emma woke up 10 minutes ago.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.1539383977651596]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The hometown of Tom has 390200 people. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987.  Then, we can add the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (362,987) to get the total population of Springfield and Greenville, which is 845,640.  The condition \"The hometown of Tom has 390200 people\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "1. To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, first we need to know the population of Greenville.  2. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987.  3. Then, we can add the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (362,987) to get the total population of Springfield and Greenville, which is 845,640.  The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the population of Springfield and the difference between Springfield and Greenville, which are needed for the calculation.\nStep 1: Calculate the population of Greenville. Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people.  Step 2: Calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people.  The condition \"The hometown of Tom has 390200 people.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The hometown of Tom has 390200 people.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.3199160695075989]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. Emma rides 8 kilometers to the bus station every day. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tickets each ride costs. Jeanne has 5 tickets. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tickets Jeanne has.  We can calculate how many more tickets Jeanne needs by subtracting the total cost of the rides (13 tickets) from the number of tickets Jeanne has (5 tickets). The total cost of the rides is 5 + 4 + 4 = 13 tickets. Therefore, Jeanne needs 13 - 5 = 8 more tickets.  Yes, the conditions \"the Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets.\" and \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" are relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Emma rides 8 kilometers to the bus station every day is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is 8 more tickets.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "No, the condition that the Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Jeanne already has 5 tickets and the Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, so she has enough tickets for the Ferris wheel. Jeanne needs 4 more tickets to ride the roller coaster and the bumper cars. So, the answer is 4 more tickets.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, which is enough to ride the Ferris wheel. That leaves 1 ticket for either the roller coaster or the bumper cars, so she needs to buy 3 more tickets.  The condition that \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.\nIf Jeanne has 5 tickets, then she can ride the Ferris wheel and the bumper cars, but not the roller coaster. So, she needs 4 more tickets to ride the roller coaster.   Therefore, the answer to the question is 4.  Yes, the condition \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since we need to know how many tickets Jeanne has to determine how many more tickets she needs to buy.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. Therefore, Jeanne needs to buy 5 additional tickets to ride all three rides. The condition \"Emma rides 8 kilometers to the bus station every day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma rides 8 kilometers to the bus station every day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.14062590897083282]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Tom is 25 years older than Hannah. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to find the sum of her brother's ages. Since her brothers are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 3 x 8 = 24.  Now, we know that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, so we can calculate her age: 24 x 2 = 48.  Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the sum of her brother's ages. The condition \"Tom is 25 years older than Hannah\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we already know how old Hannah is.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to find the sum of her brother's ages. Since her brothers are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 3 x 8 = 24.  Now, we know that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, so we can calculate her age: 24 x 2 = 48.  Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the sum of her brother's ages.\nThe sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, so Hannah is 24 * 2 = 48 years old.  The condition \"Tom is 25 years older than Hannah\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we already know how old Hannah is.", "equation": "Tom is 25 years older than Hannah.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.5062752366065979]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Tom eats 5 pieces of bread every weekday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Therefore, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition that Tom eats 5 pieces of bread every weekday is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The given information is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. Therefore, Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.   The condition that Tom eats 5 pieces of bread every weekday is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.   The answer is that Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so she eats 4 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"Tom eats 5 pieces of bread every weekday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom eats 5 pieces of bread every weekday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.41261956095695496]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Mary got a score of 2000 in the entrance exam. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James will pay for 20 units. We know that each unit costs $50, so James will pay $1,000 for 20 units.  Next, we need to calculate how much James will pay for two semesters. Since he pays $1,000 for one semester, he will pay $2,000 for two semesters. Therefore, the answer to the problem is that James would pay $2,000 for two semesters. The condition that Mary got a score of 2000 in the entrance exam is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate how much James would pay for 20 units. To do this, we need to know how much each unit costs. The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college.\" does not give us any information about the cost of each unit. Therefore, this condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   We know from the problem that each unit costs $50, so James would pay $1,000 for 20 units.   The next step is to calculate how much James would pay for two semesters. Since we already know that he pays $1,000 for one semester, then he would pay $2,000 for two semesters.   Therefore, the answer to the problem is that James would pay $2,000 for two semesters.\nFirst, let's calculate the cost of one semester: 20 units x $50 = $1,000. Then, we calculate the cost of two semesters: $1,000 x 2 = $2,000.   The condition that Mary got a score of 2000 in the entrance exam is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary got a score of 2000 in the entrance exam.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.15888112783432007]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Tom bought 40 more apple saplings. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings. Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left. Step 3: Tom buys 40 more apple saplings, but this does not affect the number of cherry saplings Kim has left.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of Step 1, which establishes the original number of cherry saplings Kim had before selling some of them and Tom buying more apple saplings.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings.  Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left.  Step 3: Tom buys 40 more apple saplings, but this does not affect the number of cherry saplings Kim has left.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.   The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of Step 1, which establishes the original number of cherry saplings Kim had before selling some of them and Tom buying more apple saplings.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of 80 is 20, so 20 of the cherry pits will sprout. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so there are 14 cherry saplings left. Tom bought 40 more apple saplings, so the total number of saplings Kim has is now 54. Of those 54 saplings, 14 are cherry saplings, so Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us determine the number of cherry saplings that sprout and therefore, the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  Tom bought 40 more apple saplings, but this does not affect the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left.   Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.   The condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 * 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Tom bought 40 more apple saplings.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it only deals with cherry saplings.", "equation": "Tom bought 40 more apple saplings.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.536467969417572, 0.24044960737228394, 0.46118125319480896, 0.2547840178012848]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. Tom goes to the public library 10 times a week. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of words in each stanza. Since each stanza has 10 lines and each line has 8 words, that means each stanza has 80 words.  Next, since there are 20 stanzas in the poem, that means the total number of words in the poem is 20 x 80 = 1600 words.  So, the total number of words in the poem is 1600 words.  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the number of stanzas in the poem, which is necessary to calculate the total number of words. The condition that \"Tom goes to the public library 10 times a week\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of words in each stanza. Since each stanza has 10 lines and each line has 8 words, that means each stanza has 80 words.  Next, since there are 20 stanzas in the poem, that means the total number of words in the poem is 20 x 80 = 1600 words.  So, the total number of words in the poem is 1600 words.  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the number of stanzas in the poem, which is necessary to calculate the total number of words.\nFirst, calculate the number of words in one stanza: 10 lines x 8 words = 80 words.  Second, calculate the total number of words in the poem: 20 stanzas x 80 words = 1,600 words.  The condition of Tom going to the public library is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "Tom goes to the public library 10 times a week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.23045727610588074]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Emma ate 12 more tomatoes than Kelly. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, for a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"Emma ate 12 more tomatoes than Kelly\" has no relevance to the calculation process and is not necessary for solving the problem.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots (55 + 101 + 78). She found that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so 234 carrots would be equal to 39 pounds. The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots,\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect the total number of carrots harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots in the first bed, 101 in the second bed, and 78 in the third bed. That's a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\". This condition is used to determine the total number of carrots harvested, which is then used to calculate the total weight of carrots harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, for a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots. The condition that Emma ate 12 more tomatoes than Kelly is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, for a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is necessary to know how many carrots weigh one pound in order to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots harvested.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots from the three beds. To determine how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, we need to divide the total number of carrots by 6 (since one pound equals 6 carrots).  234 姊 6 = 39   Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"Emma ate 12 more tomatoes than Kelly\" has no relevance to the calculation process and is not necessary for solving the problem.", "equation": "Emma ate 12 more tomatoes than Kelly.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.4135650396347046]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The bench costs $2000, but neither Mary nor Jack is willing to buy it. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought the squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so he paid $250 for the barbell. Since neither Mary nor Jack are willing to buy the bench, Jack did not pay for the bench. So Jack paid $2,750 in total for the squat rack and barbell.  Yes, the condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the total cost that Jack paid for everything.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much of the squat rack, which means it cost $250. The bench costs $2000, but neither Mary nor Jack is willing to buy it.   So, Jack paid $2500 for the squat rack and $250 for the barbell, for a total of $2750. The condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the total cost that Jack paid for everything.\nJack buys a squat rack for $2500.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much. So, the barbell cost $250.  The bench costs $2000, but neither Mary nor Jack is willing to buy it.   So, Jack paid $2500 for the squat rack and $250 for the barbell, which totals to $2750. The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us determine how much Jack paid for the barbell.\nJack bought the squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so he paid $250 for the barbell. Since neither Mary nor Jack are willing to buy the bench, Jack did not pay for the bench. So Jack paid $2,750 in total for the squat rack and barbell. The condition that neither Mary nor Jack is willing to buy the bench is relevant to the calculation process, since this information affects the total amount Jack paid.", "equation": "The bench costs $2000, but neither Mary nor Jack is willing to buy it.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110712051391602, 0.16832032799720764, 0.22513699531555176]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Ideally, Jack would love to sell 50 drawings per weekend. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "First, Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday, so she made $480 (24 x $20). On Sunday, she sold 16 drawings, which comes to $320 (16 x $20). In total, she made $800 (480 + 320).  The condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines the total amount of money Gretchen made. Without this information, we would not know how much money Gretchen made from each drawing. The condition \"Ideally, Jack would love to sell 50 drawings per weekend\" is not relevant to the calculation process since it does not affect the amount of money that Gretchen made. The only thing that matters in this situation is the number of drawings that Gretchen actually sold and the price she charged per drawing.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday; this means she made $480 (24 x $20). On Sunday, she sold 16 drawings, which comes to $320 (16 x $20). In total, she made $800 (480 + 320).  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines the total amount of money Gretchen made. Without this information, we would not know how much money Gretchen made from each drawing.\nTo calculate the money that Gretchen made, you need to multiply the number of drawings sold by the price. For Saturday, she sold 24 drawings, which would equal $480.00. For Sunday, she sold 16 drawings, which would equal $320.00. To get the total, add those two amounts together and you get $800.00.  The condition \"Ideally, Jack would love to sell 50 drawings per weekend\" is not relevant to the calculation process since it does not affect the amount of money that Gretchen made. The only thing that matters in this situation is the number of drawings that Gretchen actually sold and the price she charged per drawing.", "equation": "Ideally, Jack would love to sell 50 drawings per weekend.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.32667088508605957]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Additionally, Ada plants 20 grasses. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many trees James has. Each tree has 20 plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plants each tree has. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many seeds James planted. Therefore, James planted 2 trees x 20 plants x 0.6 seeds = 24 seeds. Additionally, Ada plants 20 grasses. This information is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James has 2 trees and each tree has 20 plants. To calculate how many trees James planted, we need to know how many seeds he planted. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of trees by the number of plants by the percentage of seeds planted. So the answer would be 2 trees. Yes, the condition \"Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James collected all the fruits from his 2 trees, which means that he already had 2 trees. The question is how many trees he planted after that. He planted the seeds from the fruit of those 2 trees, which is 20 plants x 1 seed = 20 seeds, and 60% of those = 12. Additionally, Ada planted 20 grasses. So James planted 12 trees in total. The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines how many seeds James has to plant.\nJames collected all the fruits from his two trees. That means he has two trees to start with.  He then planted 60% of the seeds from the fruits. Since each tree has 20 plants, and each plant has 1 seed, that means he has 40 seeds to start with. 60% of 40 seeds is 24, so he planted 24 seeds.  Ada then planted 20 grasses.  So, in total, James planted two trees and 24 seeds. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the number of plants per tree does not affect the total number of trees that James planted.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants, and he planted 60% of these, so he planted 12 plants from each tree. Additionally, Ada plants 20 grasses.   So, in total, James planted 24 plants (12 from each tree) + 20 grasses planted by Ada = 44 plants were planted in total.   The condition, \"Each plant has 1 seed,\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames collected all the fruits from his two trees, each with 20 plants. Each plant has one seed, and he plants 60% of those. The number of seeds he planted is therefore 2 x 20 x 0.6 = 24. Ada plants 20 grasses. So James planted a total of 24 trees.  The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many seeds James planted. Without it, we would not know how many trees he planted.\nFirst, James collects all the fruits from his two trees. Each tree had 20 plants, so he collected 40 fruits in total.  Then, he plants 60% of those fruits, so he plants 24 fruits.  So, James planted 24 trees.   The condition that Ada plants 20 grasses is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the number of trees planted by James.", "equation": "Additionally, Ada plants 20 grasses.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.21571382880210876]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Jack drinks 7 liters of milk every day. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza has a 5-liter bucket. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the size of the bucket Hamza has. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much water Hamza is transferring from the 5-liter bucket to the 3-liter bucket. The 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters of water, so Hamza would be able to pour 3 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket. She then pours the remainder of the water (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much water Hamza is transferring from the 5-liter bucket to the 6-liter bucket. The 6-liter bucket currently has 2 liters of water in it, so it can hold 4 more liters of water without overflowing. So the answer would be 4 liters.  Yes, the condition \"She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Jack drinks 7", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and then pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket has a capacity of 3 liters, she can pour all 5 liters into it.  Then, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. That means she has put a total of 7 liters into the 6-liter bucket.  Now, Jack drinks 7 liters of milk every day. That means the 6-liter bucket is emptied every day.  Therefore, Hamza can put up to 6 liters more water, in liters, into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.   Yes, the condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition gives us the capacity of each bucket, which is necessary to calculate the amount of water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket with water, so it now contains 5 liters. Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she will pour 2 liters into the 3-liter bucket, leaving 3 liters left in the 5-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that she will pour the 3 liters left in the 5-liter bucket into the 6-liter bucket, leaving it with 6 liters.  Since Jack drinks 7 liters of milk every day, Hamza cannot put any more water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. Therefore, the answer is 0 liters.  Yes, the condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how much water is left in the 5-liter bucket and how much is poured into the 6-liter bucket.\nStep 1: Hamza first fills the 5-liter bucket. Step 2: She then pours the water from the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket, filling it to capacity. Step 3: The remainder of the water in the 5-liter bucket is then poured into the 6-liter bucket.   Since the 3-liter bucket is filled to capacity, the remaining 2 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket are poured into the 6-liter bucket, leaving 4 liters of space for more water (6 liters - 2 liters = 4 liters). Therefore, Hamza can add 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it gives us the information necessary to determine the amount of space available in the 6-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket with water. She then poured as much of the water as she could into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can hold a maximum of 3 liters of water, Hamza would have been able to pour 2 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket. The remaining 3 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket would then be poured into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket currently holds 3 liters of water.  Based on this information, we can calculate that Hamza can put an additional 3 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing. This is because the 6-liter bucket can hold a maximum of 6 liters of water, and it currently holds 3 liters of water.  The condition \"Jack drinks 7 liters of milk every day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack drinks 7 liters of milk every day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.25427931547164917]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Tom walked for 10 miles to see the dentist. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 as soon as she entered the taxi. Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. Michelle rode from her office to her home, which was 4 miles. So, the total charge for the ride will be $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $10. Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $10 for her ride.  Yes, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This means that Michelle has to pay an additional fee of $2 when she enters the taxi. Therefore, the total cost of Michelle's ride is $10 + $2 = $12. The condition \"Tom walked for 10 miles to see the dentist\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Michelle rides a taxi for 4 miles, and the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. This means that Michelle pays $2.5 for every mile she rides. Since she rides 4 miles, the total cost of her ride is $2.5 鑴 4 = $10.  The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process. This means that Michelle has to pay an additional fee of $2 when she enters the taxi. Therefore, the total cost of Michelle's ride is $10 + $2 = $12.\nFirst, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 as soon as she entered the taxi.   Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. Michelle rode from her office to her home, which was 4 miles. So, the total charge for the ride will be $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $10.   Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $10 for her ride.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe first step is to calculate the total number of miles that Michelle rode. So, she rode 4 miles.   The second step is to calculate the cost per mile. So, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5.   The third step is to multiply the total number of miles with the cost per mile. So, the total cost of the ride is $2.5 x 4 = $10.  The fourth step is to add the ride fee of $2 that she paid at the beginning. So, the total cost of the ride is $10 + $2 = $12.  Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride.   The condition \"Tom walked for 10 miles to see the dentist\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom walked for 10 miles to see the dentist.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.22445519268512726]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Mary is 5 years older than Claire. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Right now, Claire is 18 years old.  Jessica is 6 years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old.  In two years, Claire will be 20 years old.  At this point, Jessica will be 26 years old.  So, the answer to the question \"How old is Jessica now?\" is 24 years old. The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it helps us to determine how old Jessica will be in two years. The condition \"Mary is 5 years older than Claire\" is also relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\". Knowing that Mary is 5 years older than Claire helps us to calculate the age of Jessica.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Right now, Claire is 18 years old.  Jessica is 6 years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old.  In two years, Claire will be 20 years old.  At this point, Jessica will be 26 years old.   So, the answer to the question \"How old is Jessica now?\" is 24 years old.   The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it helps us to determine how old Jessica will be in two years.\nClaire is currently 18 years old.  Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old.  Mary is 5 years older than Claire, so Mary is 23 years old.   So, the answer is that Jessica is 24 years old.   Yes, the condition \"Mary is 5 years older than Claire\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\". Knowing that Mary is 5 years older than Claire helps us to calculate the age of Jessica.", "equation": "Mary is 5 years older than Claire.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.35781052708625793]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Emma has 10 fewer easter eggs than Mary. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "Megan has 5 pieces of candy, which means Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so she has a total of 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. Emma has 10 fewer easter eggs than Mary, but this does not affect the calculation of how many pieces of candy Mary has. Therefore, the answer is that Mary has 25 pieces of candy. The condition \"Emma has 10 fewer easter eggs than Mary\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "Megan has 5 pieces of candy.  Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means that Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  Emma has 10 fewer easter eggs than Mary. This is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, who has 5 pieces of candy. That means Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so she has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. Emma has 10 fewer easter eggs than Mary, but this does not affect the calculation of how many pieces of candy Mary has. Therefore, the answer is that Mary has 25 pieces of candy. The condition \"Emma has 10 fewer easter eggs than Mary\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "Emma has 10 fewer easter eggs than Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.45577821135520935]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. Ada bought 5 pears. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, they need to find out how much money Emmy and Gerry have to spend on apples. Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so they have a total of $300 to spend on apples.  Second, they need to figure out how much each apple costs. The fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each.  Third, they need to divide the total money they have by the cost of each apple. $300 divided by $2 is 150, so Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether.  The condition that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used in the first step to calculate how much money they have to spend on apples.  If Emmy and Gerry want to buy apples, then the condition \"Ada bought 5 pears\" is irrelevant to the calculation process because it does not affect the number of apples they can buy. Therefore, the answer is 150 apples.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "Emmy has $200, so she can buy 100 apples. Gerry has $100, so he can buy 50 apples. Ada bought 5 pears, so this does not affect the calculation.  Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples. The condition \"A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it determines how much each apple costs and how many apples each person can buy.\nFirst, they need to find out how much money Emmy and Gerry have to spend on apples. Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so they have a total of $300 to spend on apples.   Second, they need to figure out how much each apple costs. The fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each.   Third, they need to divide the total money they have by the cost of each apple. $300 divided by $2 is 150, so Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether.   The condition that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used in the first step to calculate how much money they have to spend on apples.\nIf Emmy and Gerry want to buy apples, then the condition \"Ada bought 5 pears\" is irrelevant to the calculation process because it does not affect the number of apples they can buy. Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 100 apples altogether since each apple is $2 and they have a combined total of $300. So, the answer is 100 apples.", "equation": "Ada bought 5 pears.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.3735068142414093]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Emma spends 3 minutes cooking per day. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the total amount of time that Jackie spends each day: 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep. That's a total of 19 hours.  Now, we need to subtract the total amount of time that Jackie spends from the total number of hours in a day (24 hours). That leaves us with 5 hours of free time.  Finally, Jackie's 3 minutes of cooking per day would need to be added to the free time. So, Jackie has 5 hours and 3 minutes of free time each day.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the activities that we need to add up to calculate the total amount of time that Jackie spends each day.", "numerical_answer": 5.05, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "First, we need to add up the total amount of time that Jackie spends each day: 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise, and 8 hours of sleep. That's a total of 19 hours.  Now, we need to subtract the total amount of time that Jackie spends from the total number of hours in a day (24 hours). That leaves us with 5 hours of free time.  Finally, Jackie's 3 minutes of cooking per day would need to be added to the free time. So, Jackie has 5 hours and 3 minutes of free time each day.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the activities that we need to add up to calculate the total amount of time that Jackie spends each day.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This takes up 19 hours of her day.  Emma spends 3 minutes cooking per day. This takes up 0.05 hours of her day.   Now that we have accounted for the amount of time Jackie and Emma spend on their respective activities, we can calculate the amount of free time Jackie has.   The total amount of time available in a day is 24 hours. We subtract the 19 hours Jackie spends on work, exercise, and sleep and the 0.05 hours Emma spends cooking from 24 hours to get the amount of free time Jackie has.   Therefore, Jackie has 4.95 hours of free time per day.   The condition \"3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the 19 hours that Jackie spends on work, exercise, and sleep.  Without this condition, the calculation would be inaccurate.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise, and 8 hours of sleep per day. This totals to 19 hours a day.   Emma spends 3 minutes cooking per day. This does not add to the time Jackie spends on her activities.   Therefore, the answer is: Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.   The condition \"Emma spends 3 minutes cooking per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\" since it does not affect Jackie's free time.", "equation": "Emma spends 3 minutes cooking per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.18139396607875824]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Emma wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. We know this because the instructions say so. Second, the meat costs $82 per kilogram. This means the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = $164. Third, Melies has $180 in his wallet. This means he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat. Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the cost of the meat which we need to know in order to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The condition \"Emma wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect the amount of money Melies has left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which cost $82 per kilogram, so the total cost of the meat was $164.  Second, Melies had $180 in his wallet, so after paying for the meat he has $16 left.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the quantity and cost of the meat, which in turn allows us to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, costing him $164 in total. He had $180 in his wallet. Subtracting the $164 from $180 leaves Melies with $16. The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the cost of the meat which we need to know in order to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. So the answer is, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat at $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = $164.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. He pays $164 for the meat, so he has $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how much money Melies has available for the purchase.\nMelies bought 2 kilograms of meat at $82 per kilogram, so the total cost of the meat was $164. Melies had $180 in his wallet, so he has $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition \"Emma wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect the amount of money Melies has left after paying for the meat.", "equation": "Emma wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.2353275716304779]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Jack spent 8 dollars on dinner yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "First, Genevieve picked cherries that cost $8 per kilogram. This condition is relevant because it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries cost. Second, Genevieve realized that she was $400 short of the total price, so she needed Clarice to chip in. This means that the total price of the cherries was $400 more than what Genevieve had. Third, if Genevieve had $1600 on her, that means that the total price of the cherries was $2000. Finally, if the cost of each kilogram of cherries was $8, then Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries. So, if Genevieve had $1600 on her, she bought 250 kilograms of cherries. The condition \"Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries cost. The condition \"Jack spent 8 dollars on dinner yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "First, Genevieve picked cherries that cost $8 per kilogram. This condition is relevant because it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries cost.   Second, Genevieve realized that she was $400 short of the total price, so she needed Clarice to chip in. This means that the total price of the cherries was $400 more than what Genevieve had.   Third, if Genevieve had $1600 on her, that means that the total price of the cherries was $2000.   Finally, if the cost of each kilogram of cherries was $8, then Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries.   So, if Genevieve had $1600 on her, she bought 250 kilograms of cherries. The condition \"Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries cost.\nIf Genevieve had $1600 on her, the total cost of the cherries would be $1600.  Divide $1600 by $8, and you get 200 kilograms of cherries.  However, when Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price, and her friend Clarice chipped in. Therefore, the actual number of kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought is 200 - 400 = -200.  Therefore, the answer to the question is 0 kilograms of cherries. The condition provided is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nGenevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram.  This means that for every kilogram of cherries, Genevieve had to pay $8.  When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.  This means that Genevieve had to pay a total of $1200 for the cherries ($800 from her and $400 from Clarice).  If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?  This means that Genevieve had $1600 in total, which is $400 more than what she had to pay for the cherries.   This means that Genevieve was able to buy $400 / $8 = 50 kilograms of cherries.  Therefore, Genevieve bought 50 kilograms of cherries.  Is condition \"Jack spent 8 dollars on dinner yesterday.\" relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?\"  No, this condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack spent 8 dollars on dinner yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.22080476582050323]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Ada plants 8 more potatoes. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many saplings Kim has planted and how many saplings Kim has sold.  25% of 80 is 20. That means after planting 80 cherry pits, Kim has 20 saplings.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many saplings Kim has sold.  That means Kim has 20 - 6 = 14 saplings left.  Ada plants 8 more potatoes. This is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of saplings Kim has left.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  Yes, the condition \"Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Ada plants 8 more potatoes is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many cherry saplings does Kim have left. We can calculate this by subtracting the number of saplings Kim sold from the total number of saplings Kim had. So the answer is 14 saplings.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. Step 2: 25% of them sprout (80 x 0.25 = 20) Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings (20 - 6 = 14) Step 4: Ada plants 8 more potatoes (14 + 8 = 22)  Answer: Kim has 22 cherry saplings left.  Yes, condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it forms the starting point for Kim's total number of cherry saplings.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout. Therefore, 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits sprout.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  Ada plants 8 more potatoes. This does not affect the number of cherry saplings Kim has, so the answer remains 14.   The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines how many cherry saplings are available to be sold. Without it, we cannot accurately calculate how many saplings Kim has left.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 脳 25% = 20 cherry saplings.  Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  Step 3: Ada plants 8 more potatoes, but this does not affect the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left, so the answer is still 14.  Yes, the condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it reduces the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left.\nKim planted 80 cherry pits, so 25% of 80 is 20. Kim has 20 cherry saplings.  Kim then sold 6 of those saplings, so Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.   The condition that \"Ada plants 8 more potatoes\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how many cherry saplings Kim has left.", "equation": "Ada plants 8 more potatoes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.536467969417572, 0.24044960737228394, 0.46118125319480896, 0.1772545725107193]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Additionally, Tom has a bag that can hold 4 kilograms of iron. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "First, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket will be filled completely, leaving 2 liters of water in the 5-liter bucket.  Then, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket will have 2 liters of water in it.  Therefore, the answer to the question is 4 liters.  The condition \"Additionally, Tom has a bag that can hold 4 kilograms of iron.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. The 3-liter bucket will be filled to capacity (3 liters), so Hamza can pour the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. Therefore, Hamza can put 2 more liters into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it helps us determine the capacity of the buckets that Hamza is using. Without knowing the sizes of the buckets, it would be impossible to calculate how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. So, the 5-liter bucket now has 5 liters of water. Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket now has 3 liters of water, and the 5-liter bucket has 2 liters of water left.   Finally, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now has 8 liters of water.  Therefore, the answer to the question is that Hamza can put 2 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.   The condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how much water is left over to be poured into the 6-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket will be filled completely, leaving 2 liters of water in the 5-liter bucket.  Then, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket will have 2 liters of water in it.  Therefore, the answer to the question is 4 liters.   The condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it specifies how much water is left in the 5-liter bucket after pouring as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Without this condition, we would not know how much water is left in the 5-liter bucket, and therefore would not be able to calculate how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket.\nHamza has 3 buckets: a 3-liter bucket, a 5-liter bucket, and a 6-liter bucket. She first fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This leaves 2 liters in the 5-liter bucket. She then pours the 2 liters into the 6-liter bucket.  This means that Hamza can put another 4 liters into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.  The condition \"Additionally, Tom has a bag that can hold 4 kilograms of iron.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Additionally, Tom has a bag that can hold 4 kilograms of iron.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.24248847365379333]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Tom sold 8 more peaches to the store. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 * 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings sprout.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so Kim has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  Tom sold 8 more peaches to the store, so this is irrelevant to the number of cherry saplings Kim has left. The answer is 14. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used in step 2.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "1. Kim plants 80 cherry pits.  2. 25% of them sprout: 80 * 25% = 20 saplings.  3. Kim sells 6 of the saplings: 20 - 6 = 14 saplings.  4. Tom sold 8 more peaches to the store: This has nothing to do with the question, so it's irrelevant.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used in step 2.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 * 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings sprout.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so Kim has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  Tom sold 8 more peaches to the store, so this is irrelevant to the number of cherry saplings Kim has left. The answer is 14. The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing this condition, we would not know how many cherry saplings sprouted and were available for Kim to sell.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout.  Step 2: 25% of 80 is 20, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings.   Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings.  Step 4: Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.   Tom selling 8 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\n1. Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 2. 25% of them sprout, which is 20 saplings. 3. Kim sells 6 of the saplings. 4. Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Tom sold 8 more peaches to the store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom sold 8 more peaches to the store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.536467969417572, 0.24044960737228394, 0.46118125319480896, 0.2497481107711792]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Ada would like to have 8 apple trees. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout = 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings. Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings = 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  Yes, the condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many saplings sprouted in the first place. Without that information, we wouldn't be able to calculate how many saplings are left.  The condition \"Ada would like to have 8 apple trees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits.  Step 2: 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.  Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  Step 4: Ada would like to have 8 apple trees, so this is not relevant to the calculation process.  Answer: Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits, and 25% of them sprout. That means that 80 x 0.25 = 20 saplings sprout.   Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings. So there are 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many saplings sprouted in the first place. Without that information, we wouldn't be able to calculate how many saplings are left.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout = 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.  Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings = 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  Yes, the condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\". We need to take into account the number of saplings Kim sells in order to calculate the total number of cherry saplings she has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout. That means 25% of 80 is 20. So Kim has 20 cherry saplings. Kim then sells 6 of the saplings, so Kim has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition, \"Ada would like to have 8 apple trees,\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada would like to have 8 apple trees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.536467969417572, 0.24044960737228394, 0.46118125319480896, 0.2885103225708008]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. The height of Mary is 30 feet. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "First, Steve is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches. He grows 6 inches, so his new height is 72 inches. Therefore, Steve's new height is 72 inches. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\".\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\". It tells us the starting height of Steve, which is used to calculate his new height. The condition \"The height of Mary is 30 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it does not provide any additional information about Steve's height.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Steve is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches. He grows 6 inches. So, his new height is 72 inches.  The condition \"Steve is 5'6\".\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\". It tells us the starting height of Steve, which is used to calculate his new height.\nSteve is 5'6\" tall, which is equal to 66 inches.  He grows 6 inches, so his new height is 72 inches.  The height of Mary is irrelevant to the calculation process, so we can ignore it.  Therefore, Steve's new height is 72 inches.\nSteve's initial height is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches.  He then grows 6 inches, making his new height 72 inches.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.  The condition \"The height of Mary is 30 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it does not provide any additional information about Steve's height.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 30 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495516538619995, 0.5135689973831177, 0.21487310528755188]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Ada gave Luke 80 dollars. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "Luke already has 33 stars. He needs to fill 4 bottles. That means he needs 4 x 85 = 340 paper stars in total. He has 33 stars already, so he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles. Yes, the condition \"Ada gave Luke 80 dollars\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that 85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar and Luke has already made 33 stars. To calculate how many more stars must Luke make, we need to subtract the number of stars he has from the total number of stars he needs. So the answer would be: 340 - 33 = 307.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, we need to know how much Luke needs to buy the stars. To do this, we need to calculate how many more stars he needs to make to fill the four bottles.   We can calculate this by subtracting the number of stars he has already made (33) from the number of stars needed to fill a glass jar (85):   85 - 33 = 52  So, Luke needs to make 52 more stars.   Next, we need to calculate how much money Ada gave Luke (80 dollars).   We can then divide the total cost of the stars by the amount of money Ada gave Luke to calculate the cost per star:   80 / 52 = 1.54   Therefore, it costs 1.54 dollars per star.   Finally, we can multiply the cost per star by the number of stars Luke needs to make (52) to find out how much money he needs to buy the stars:   1.54 x 52 = 79.08   So, Luke needs 79.08 dollars to buy the stars.   Therefore, the condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many more stars must Luke make?\", as it was used to calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make.\nLuke needs to make 85 stars to fill the glass jar, and he has already made 33 stars. Therefore, he needs to make 52 more stars. The condition that Luke has already made 33 stars is relevant to the calculation process because it allows us to determine how many more stars Luke must make.\nFirst, we need to determine how many stars Luke needs to make in total. To fill 4 bottles, he needs 4 x 85 = 340 stars.   Second, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33) from the total number of stars he needs (340). This means he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars.   The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us determine the total number of stars Luke needs to make.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 4 jars worth of stars. Each jar requires 85 stars, so Luke needs to make 340 stars total. He has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 307 more stars.  Now, let's consider the condition \"Ada gave Luke 80 dollars.\" This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because the cost of materials is not relevant to the total number of stars required.", "equation": "Ada gave Luke 80 dollars.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.28319573402404785]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Ideally, Mary would love to sell 100 drawings per weekend. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "Gretchen charges $20.00 per drawing. That means on Saturday she made 24 x 20 = $480. On Sunday she sold 16 drawings for 16 x 20 = $320. That means in total Gretchen made $480 + $320 = $800.  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it serves as the basis of how much money Gretchen made from selling her drawings.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, so the total number of drawings she sold is 40. Now, since she charges $20.00 per drawing, she made a total of $800.00  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it serves as the basis of how much money Gretchen made from selling her drawings.\nGretchen charges $20 per drawing, so on Saturday she made 24 x 20 = $480. On Sunday she sold 16 drawings for 16 x 20 = $320. That means in total Gretchen made $480 + $320 = $800. The condition given in the problem is not relevant to calculating the amount of money Gretchen made, as it does not affect the calculation process.", "equation": "Ideally, Mary would love to sell 100 drawings per weekend.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.33853068947792053]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. Mary goes to the gym 500 times per year. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine how much the barbell cost. Since the barbell cost 1/10 of the amount that Jack paid for the squat rack, then the barbell cost $2500/10 = $250.  Next, we need to calculate the total amount that Jack paid for everything. This would be the cost of the squat rack plus the cost of the barbell, which comes to $2500 + $250 = $2750.  So, in total, Jack paid $2750 for everything. The condition that Jack buys a squat rack for $2500 is relevant to the calculation process because it was used to determine how much the barbell cost. The condition \"Mary goes to the gym 500 times per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how much the barbell cost. Since the barbell cost 1/10 of the amount that Jack paid for the squat rack, then the barbell cost $2500/10 = $250.  Next, we need to calculate the total amount that Jack paid for everything. This would be the cost of the squat rack plus the cost of the barbell, which comes to $2500 + $250 = $2750.  So, in total, Jack paid $2750 for everything. The condition that Jack buys a squat rack for $2500 is relevant to the calculation process because it was used to determine how much the barbell cost.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack. So, the barbell cost $2500/10 = $250.  Jack paid for the squat rack ($2500) and the barbell ($250).  So, Jack paid a total of $2500 + $250 = $2750 for everything.   The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to determine the cost of the barbell.\nFirst, Jack bought the squat rack which cost $2500.   Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack so the cost of the barbell is $250.   Third, Jack paid for everything, which is the sum of the cost of the squat rack and the barbell. Therefore, the total cost of everything is $2500 + $250 = $2750.   The condition \"Mary goes to the gym 500 times per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary goes to the gym 500 times per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, 0.015149535611271858]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Jack bought 30 gifts for friends. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Jack will need for wrapping all 30 gifts. This is where the condition \"Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant. We multiply 18 inches by 30 gifts to get 540 inches.  Next, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund has per 3 days. Since he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, he will have 270 inches of gift wrapper for every 3 days (90 inches x 3 days = 270 inches).  Finally, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in 3 days. We divide the amount of gift wrapper Edmund has in 3 days (270 inches) by the amount of gift wrapper needed for each gift box (18 inches) to get 15 gift boxes.  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Jack will need for wrapping all 30 gifts. This is where the condition \"Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant. We multiply 18 inches by 30 gifts to get 540 inches.   Next, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund has per 3 days. Since he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, he will have 270 inches of gift wrapper for every 3 days (90 inches x 3 days = 270 inches).   Finally, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in 3 days. We divide the amount of gift wrapper Edmund has in 3 days (270 inches) by the amount of gift wrapper needed for each gift box (18 inches) to get 15 gift boxes.   Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.\nEdmund can wrap 18 inches per gift box, and he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. Therefore, he can wrap 5 gift boxes (90 inches divided by 18 inches) per day. If he does this every day for 3 days, he can wrap a total of 15 gift boxes (5 gift boxes per day multiplied by 3 days).  The condition that \"Jack bought 30 gifts for friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The number of gifts that Jack bought does not affect the number of gift boxes that Edmund can wrap in 3 days.", "equation": "Jack bought 30 gifts for friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.3416931629180908]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Ada spends 2 hours working per week. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of time Jackie spends on activities other than free time. This includes the time she spends working, exercising and sleeping. So, Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours exercising and 8 hours sleeping, which totals 19 hours.  Next, we need to calculate the amount of free time Jackie has. The amount of free time Jackie has is the total amount of time in a day (24 hours) minus the amount of time Jackie spends working, exercising and sleeping. Therefore, Jackie has 24 hours - 8 hours working - 3 hours exercising - 8 hours sleeping = 5 hours of free time.  The condition \"Ada spends 2 hours working per week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. It is not necessary to consider Ada's work habits in order to answer the question about Jackie's free time.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "The amount of free time Jackie has is the total amount of time in a day (24 hours) minus the amount of time Jackie spends working, exercising and sleeping. Therefore, Jackie has 24 hours - 8 hours working - 3 hours exercising - 8 hours sleeping = 5 hours of free time.   The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it is used to determine the amount of time Jackie has for other activities.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. This amounts to 19 hours per day. Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.  Yes, the condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, we would not know how much time Jackie is spending on activities other than working.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours exercising and 8 hours sleeping. That's a total of 19 hours per day. Jackie has 24 hours in a day, so the amount of free time she has is 5 hours per day.   The condition \"Ada spends 2 hours working per week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. It is not necessary to consider Ada's work habits in order to answer the question about Jackie's free time.", "equation": "Ada spends 2 hours working per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.2819824814796448]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Jack got a score of 2000 in the entrance exam. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the cost of one semester. James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. So, the cost of one semester is 20 x 50 = 1000.  The second step is to calculate the cost of two semesters. The cost of two semesters is 1000 x 2 = 2000.  So, the answer is that James pays 2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of units that James takes per semester, which is used to calculate the cost of one semester and, thus, the cost of two semesters. The condition \"Jack got a score of 2000 in the entrance exam\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the cost of one semester. James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. So, the cost of one semester is 20 x 50 = 1000.   The second step is to calculate the cost of two semesters. The cost of two semesters is 1000 x 2 = 2000.   So, the answer is that James pays 2000 for two semesters.   The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of units that James takes per semester, which is used to calculate the cost of one semester and, thus, the cost of two semesters.\nStep 1: How many units does James take in 2 semesters? Answer: James takes 20 units per semester and 2 semesters. So, he takes 40 units in 2 semesters.   Step 2: How much does each unit cost? Answer: Each unit costs $50.   Step 3: How much does James pay for 2 semesters? Answer: James pays $2000 for 2 semesters ($50 x 40 units).   Therefore, the condition \"Jack got a score of 2000 in the entrance exam\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack got a score of 2000 in the entrance exam.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.13397905230522156]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The two dogs of Jack weigh 9 pounds each. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the weights of all four cats. That would be 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then, we need to divide that total weight by the number of cats, which is 4. That gives us an average weight of 12 pounds per cat. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The two dogs of Jack weigh 9 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because we are only concerned with the weight of Janele's cats.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The first step is to add up the weights of all of Janele's cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  The second step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats. 48 / 4 = 12  So the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us the number of cats we need to factor into the equation.\nStep 1: Add up the weights of all four cats.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48   Step 2: Divide by the number of cats to get the average.  48 / 4 = 12  The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the data we used to calculate the average.\nThe first step is to add up the weights of all of Janele's cats. That would be 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  The second step is to divide the total weight of 48 pounds by the number of cats, which is 4. This gives us an average weight of 12 pounds per cat.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the weights that needs to be included in the calculation of the average weight of the cats.\nFirst, we need to add up the weights of all four cats. That would give us 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then, we need to divide that total weight by the number of cats, which is 4. That gives us 48/4 = 12 pounds. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is important for the calculation process, as it is one of the weights of the cats that is being used to calculate the average.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add up the weights of all of her cats and then divide that sum by the number of cats she has.   The total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. The number of cats is 4.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.   The two dogs of Jack are irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem because we are only concerned with the weight of Janele's cats.", "equation": "The two dogs of Jack weigh 9 pounds each.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.35546284914016724]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Mary cooked 35 tomatoes for lunch. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plants Papi Calot originally planned to plant. That means Papi Calot needs to buy 7 x 18 = 126 plants. But Papi Calot still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many additional plants Papi Calot is thinking about adding. That means Papi Calot needs to buy 15 additional plants.  The total number of plants that Papi Calot needs to buy is 126 + 15 = 141 plants.  Yes, the condition \"so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Mary cooked 35 tomatoes for lunch is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many plants Papi Calot needs to buy. We can calculate this by adding the number of plants originally planned to plant and the number of additional plants he is thinking about adding. So the answer is 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so that's 7 x 18 = 126 potato plants. Then, he has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional plants. So, he needs to buy 15 more plants, bringing the total number of plants to 126 + 15 = 141.   Yes, the condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because the condition tells us how many plants Papi Calot originally planned to plant.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he has 7 x 18 = 126 potato plants.  He still has a bit of room left, so he is thinking of adding 15 additional potato plants. That means he needs to buy 15 more plants, so the total number of plants he needs to buy is 15.  So, to answer the question, Papi Calot has to buy 15 potato plants. The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us understand that Papi Calot needs to buy 15 more plants.\nPapi Calot already has 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he has 126 plants total. Since he wants to add 15 additional plants, he needs to buy 15 more plants.  Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy 15 plants. The condition \"Mary cooked 35 tomatoes for lunch\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary cooked 35 tomatoes for lunch.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.14324013888835907]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Emma spends 3 hours reading books per week. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time Jackie spends on each activity. That means Jackie spends a total of 19 hours on work and exercise and sleep per day (8 + 3 + 8). Emma spends 3 hours reading books per week. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is how much time Jackie spends on each activity. To calculate how much free time Jackie has, we need to subtract the time spent on work and exercise and sleep from 24 hours. So the answer would be 24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours of free time. Yes, the condition \"spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Emma spends 3 hours reading books per week is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how much time Jackie has in a day. We know that Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep, so that's a total of 19 hours per day.  Now, we need to subtract the time that Jackie spends reading books from her daily time. We know that Emma spends 3 hours reading books per week, so we can calculate that Jackie spends 0.43 hours (3 hours 梅 7 days) per day reading books.  So, if we subtract 0.43 hours from Jackie's daily time (19 hours - 0.43 hours = 18.57 hours), we can calculate that Jackie has 18.57 hours of free time per day.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as we need to know how much time Jackie spends working in order to calculate how much free time she has.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise, and 8 hours of sleep per day. So, she spends 19 hours per day doing all these activities combined. Emma spends 3 hours reading books per week. That means she spends 1/7th of an hour (roughly 4 minutes) reading books per day. So, Jackie has 19 hours - 4 minutes or 1144 minutes of free time each day.   Yes, the condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\" because without those details, we would not be able to accurately calculate Jackie's free time.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. This gives us a total of 19 hours per day in which Jackie is not free.   So, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.   The condition \"Emma spends 3 hours reading books per week.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it has nothing to do with Jackie's free time.", "equation": "Emma spends 3 hours reading books per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.2484973669052124]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Tom cooked dinner with the meat at 50 pm. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. That cost him $164 ($82 per kilogram x 2 kg).  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. This means that he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Tom cooked dinner with the meat at 50 pm.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, we need to know how much money Melies spent on the meat. Since the meat costs $82 per kilogram, and Melies bought 2 kg of meat, he spent $164 on the meat ($82 x 2).  Next, we need to know how much money Melies had in his wallet at the start. Since he had $180, he started with $180.  Finally, we subtract the amount Melies spent on the meat from the amount he had in his wallet, to get the amount he has left after paying for the meat. So, Melies has $16 left ($180 - $164).  Therefore, the answer is that Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We need to know how much meat Melies bought in order to calculate how much he spent on it.\nFirst, Melies buys 2 kg of meat at $82 per kilogram, so the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = 164.  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet, so he has 180 - 164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine the total cost of the meat.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat which cost $82 per kg. Therefore, the total cost of the meat was $164.  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. This means that he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it is used to determine how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. That cost him $164.  He had $180 in his wallet.  Therefore, he has $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition \"Tom cooked dinner with the meat at 50 pm.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom cooked dinner with the meat at 50 pm.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.27654945850372314]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Ada put 60 grams of sugar into the food. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how much cream was added to the food in total. We know that he added a half cup of cream, so in total, he added 0.5 cups of cream.   Next, we need to figure out how much fat was added in total. We know that cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so 0.5 cups of cream has 44 grams of fat.   Finally, we need to figure out how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since the recipe serves four people, each serving of food will have 44 grams of fat divided by 4, which is 11 grams of fat per serving of food.  Therefore, the answer is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process because we need to know how much fat is in one cup of cream in order to figure out how much fat was added to each serving of food. The condition \"It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Ada put 60 grams of sugar into the food\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since sugar does not have fat and therefore does not contribute to the fat content of the food.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much cream was added to the food in total. We know that he added a half cup of cream, so in total, he added 0.5 cups of cream.   Next, we need to figure out how much fat was added in total. We know that cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so 0.5 cups of cream has 44 grams of fat.   Finally, we need to figure out how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since the recipe serves four people, each serving of food will have 44 grams of fat divided by 4, which is 11 grams of fat per serving of food.   The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process because we need to know how much fat is in one cup of cream in order to figure out how much fat was added to each serving of food.\nPerry added a half cup of cream, which has 88 grams of fat per cup. So, in total, he added 44 grams of fat.   Since he was serving four people, each serving would get 11 grams of fat (44/4).  The condition \"It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Ada put 60 grams of sugar into the food\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since sugar does not have fat and therefore does not contribute to the fat content of the food.   Therefore, the answer is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.", "equation": "It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Ada put 60 grams of sugar into the food.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.292887806892395, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792152285575867, 0.34929028153419495]}
{"original_question": "In a field of 500 clovers, 20% have four leaves and one quarter of these are purple clovers. Ada planted 500 clovers out of the field. Assuming these proportions are exactly correct, how many clovers in the field are both purple and four-leaved?", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that 20% of 500 clovers have four leaves. That is 100 clovers.  Then, we know that one quarter of those 100 clovers are purple. That is 25 clovers.  So, the answer is that 25 clovers in the field are both purple and four-leaved.  The condition \"Ada planted 500 clovers out of the field.\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, we know that 20% of 500 clovers have four leaves. That is 100 clovers.   Then, we know that one quarter of those 100 clovers are purple. That is 25 clovers.   So, the answer is that 25 clovers in the field are both purple and four-leaved.   The condition \"Ada planted 500 clovers out of the field.\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Ada planted 500 clovers out of the field.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.627143383026123, 0.7278595566749573, 0.4961605370044708]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Emma bought 30 gifts for friends. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. To do so, we need to know how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund uses per gift box. The given condition tells us that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Therefore, to wrap 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes (90 inches divided by 18 inches per gift box).   Next, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. To do so, we need to multiply the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap per day (5) by 3 (3 days). Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   In conclusion, the condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?\" because it tells us how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund uses per gift box, which is necessary to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. The condition \"Emma bought 30 gifts for friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. To do so, we need to know how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund uses per gift box. The given condition tells us that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.   Therefore, to wrap 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes (90 inches divided by 18 inches per gift box).   Next, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. To do so, we need to multiply the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap per day (5) by 3 (3 days).   Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   In conclusion, the condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?\" because it tells us how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund uses per gift box, which is necessary to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund needs to wrap 30 gift boxes. Each gift box requires 18 inches of gift wrapper, so 30 gift boxes would require 30 x 18 = 540 inches of gift wrapper.   Second, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. 90 inches of gift wrapper divided by 18 inches per gift box equals 5 gift boxes.   Finally, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. 5 gift boxes per day multiplied by 3 days equals a total of 15 gift boxes.   Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.   The condition \"Emma bought 30 gifts for friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma bought 30 gifts for friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.3044992983341217]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Ada rode a bike to the office for 10 miles. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constituted 4 miles. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the distance Michelle rode in the taxi. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Michelle needs to pay for each mile. As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the initial fee Michelle needs to pay for the ride.   So, Michelle needs to pay $2 for the initial fee, plus $2.5 per mile for 4 miles, which makes the total cost of the ride $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $12. Yes, the condition \"the taxi charge per mile is $2.5\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Ada rode a bike to the office for 10 miles is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Michelle needs to pay for her ride. We can do this by adding the initial fee of $2 to the cost of the ride, which is $2.5 multiplied by", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, if we assume that the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation, then Michelle will pay $2 + (4 miles x $2.5) = $10 for her ride. If we assume the condition is not relevant, then Michelle will only pay $4 for her ride (4 miles x $2.5).   So, the condition is relevant to the calculation process. Michelle will pay $10 in total for her ride.\nFirst, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2. This is irrelevant to the distance she traveled.  Next, we need to calculate the amount for the distance. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5, and Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constituted 4 miles. Therefore, the total amount Michelle paid for the ride is $2 + ($2.5 x 4) = $10.   Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $10 for her ride. The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is necessary to know the distance that Michelle traveled in order to calculate the total cost of the ride.\nMichelle paid a ride fee of $2 when she entered the taxi.  The taxi charge per mile is $2.5.  Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.   So, Michelle paid a total of $2 + (4 * $2.5) = $12 for her ride.   The condition that Ada rode a bike to the office for 10 miles is not relevant to the calculation process of Michelle's total ride fee.", "equation": "Ada rode a bike to the office for 10 miles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.2562415599822998]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Ada droved 8 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling. Since the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit, we can calculate the number of miles per hour he was traveling over the speed limit by dividing the fine amount ($256) by the rate ($16).  $256 / $16 = 16 mph Therefore Jed was fined for traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).  Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?\". Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling at. The condition \"Ada droved 8 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city\" is not relevant to this problem.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. We can calculate the speed Jed was traveling at by using the condition given.  Since the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit, we can calculate the number of miles per hour he was traveling over the speed limit by dividing the fine amount ($256) by the rate ($16).  $256 / $16 = 16 mph Therefore Jed was fined for traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).   Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?\". Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling at.\n1) We know that in Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit.  2) We also know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  3) Therefore, we can calculate the speed at which Jed was travelling by taking the fine amount ($256) and dividing it by the fine per mile per hour ($16):  $256 / $16 = 16 mph  Therefore, Jed was travelling at a speed of 16 mph over the posted speed limit of 50 mph. The condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the information we need to calculate the speed at which Jed was travelling.\n1. Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of $256, and the speed limit was 50 mph.  2. According to the fine in Zeoland, for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit, the driver will be fined $16.  3. So, if Jed was fined $256, it means that he was traveling 256/16 = 16 mph over the speed limit.  4. Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph.  The condition \"Ada droved 8 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city\" is not relevant to this problem.", "equation": "Ada droved 8 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.3018297553062439]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. Ada rides 15 kilometers to the shopping center. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that James bought 6 t-shirts with a 50% discount.  They each cost $20. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the cost of each t-shirt.  So the total cost of the 6 t-shirts is 6 x $20 = $120.  With the 50% discount, James pays half of the total cost, which is $60.  Therefore, James pays $60 for the 6 t-shirts.  Yes, the condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Ada rides 15 kilometers to the shopping center is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer this question, we need to calculate how much James pays for the 6 t-shirts. We can calculate this by multiplying the cost of each t-shirt by the number of t-shirts purchased, and then applying the discount, which gives us the answer of $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\" since it tells us that the price of each t-shirt is reduced by 50%.   To solve the problem, we need to calculate the total amount paid by James. The price of each t-shirt is $20, and James bought 6 of them. We can calculate the total amount paid by James by multiplying the price of each t-shirt by the number of t-shirts bought:  Total amount paid by James = $20 x 6 = $120  Therefore, James paid $120 for the 6 t-shirts.   The condition \"Ada rides 15 kilometers to the shopping center\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\" since it does not affect the amount paid by James for the t-shirts.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off of the price, so the price of each t-shirt was half of what it would have normally cost. Since each t-shirt cost $20, James paid $20 x 6 = $120. The condition of each t-shirt costing $20 is relevant to the calculation process since that is what the discounted price was. The condition of Ada riding 15 kilometers to the shopping center is not relevant to the calculation.\nJames paid 50% off of the regular price of the t-shirts, which means he paid half of the regular price. Each t-shirt cost $20, so James paid $20 x 6 = $120 for the t-shirts. The condition of \"Ada rides 15 kilometers to the shopping center\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James paid.", "equation": "Ada rides 15 kilometers to the shopping center.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.04114943742752075]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Emma ate 3 pieces of apples. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how many sandwiches Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday. We can see from the question that Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so the total number of sandwiches she ate was 3.  The second step is to figure out how many pieces of bread are used in each sandwich. The question states that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so the total number of pieces of bread used in the 3 sandwiches would be 6.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?\" is 6.  The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine the total number of sandwiches that Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday, which is then used to figure out the total number of pieces of bread she ate across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition \"Emma ate 3 pieces of apples\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The first step is to figure out how many sandwiches Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday. We can see from the question that Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so the total number of sandwiches she ate was 3.   The second step is to figure out how many pieces of bread are used in each sandwich. The question states that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so the total number of pieces of bread used in the 3 sandwiches would be 6.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?\" is 6.  The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine the total number of sandwiches that Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday, which is then used to figure out the total number of pieces of bread she ate across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday, so that's 4 pieces of bread (2 pieces of bread for each sandwich). On Sunday, Sally ate 1 sandwich, so that's 2 pieces of bread. So, in total Sally ate 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   Yes, the condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without the condition, we would not know how many sandwiches Sally ate on Sunday, and thus, we would not know how many pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so she eats a total of 3 sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday.  Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"Emma ate 3 pieces of apples\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma ate 3 pieces of apples.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.2908315360546112]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. Emma works at the mall with an hourly salary of $10. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "First, James paid 50% off the normal price for the 6 t-shirts, which would normally cost $20 each. This means he paid $10 per t-shirt.  So, James paid $60 total for the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determined the amount that James paid for the 6 t-shirts.  Emma's hourly salary of $10 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, James paid 50% off the normal price for the 6 t-shirts, which would normally cost $20 each. This means he paid $10 per t-shirt.  So, James paid $60 total for the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determined the amount that James paid for the 6 t-shirts.  Emma's hourly salary of $10 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts, so he paid for 6 times $20. Then, he got 50% off, so 50% of $20 is $10, so he paid for 6 times $10. The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the problem, because it tells us how much James paid for each t-shirt. So, the answer is James paid $60.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts at 50% off, which means the t-shirts were 50% cheaper than their original price. This means that each t-shirt cost $20. Multiplying 6 t-shirts by $20, James paid a total of $120 for the 6 t-shirts.   The condition that Emma works at the mall with an hourly salary of $10 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma works at the mall with an hourly salary of $10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.42930638790130615, 0.1460949182510376, 0.15044941008090973]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Emma sells 2 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know how many eggs Jason consumes in one day. The instructions say that Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs, so he consumes 3 eggs per day.  Next, we need to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in one week. Since Jason consumes 3 eggs per day, he will consume 3 eggs x 7 days = 21 eggs per week.  Finally, we need to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks. Since he consumes 3 eggs per day, he will consume 3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs in two weeks.  Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.  The condition that \"Emma sells 2 eggs per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect the number of eggs Jason consumes in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "In one day, Jason consumes 3 eggs.  In one week, Jason consumes 21 eggs (3 eggs per day, for 7 days).  In two weeks, Jason consumes 42 eggs (3 eggs per day, for 14 days).  The condition that \"Emma sells 2 eggs per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma sells 2 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.3649597465991974]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Mary played video games for 20 minutes. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The total length of the TV show was 1.5 hours. We know that there were 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes. That means 30 minutes of the TV show was commercials, leaving 1.2 hours of actual showtime. Mary played video games for 20 minutes. This means that the show itself was 1 hour long (1.2 hours minus 20 minutes). Therefore, the TV show itself was 1 hour long, not counting the commercials.  Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 1, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "The total length of the TV show is 1.5 hours.  We know that there were 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes. That means 30 minutes of the TV show was commercials, leaving 1.2 hours of actual showtime.  Mary played video games for 20 minutes.  This means that the show itself was 1 hour long (1.2 hours minus 20 minutes).   Therefore, the TV show itself was 1 hour long, not counting the commercials.\nThe total time of the TV show was 1.5 hours.  Subtract the time spent on commercials (3 commercials x 10 minutes each = 30 minutes).  Subtract the time spent playing video games (20 minutes).  The remaining time is the TV show itself, not counting commercials: 1.5 hours - 30 minutes - 20 minutes = 1 hour.  So, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1 hour.   Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total time of the commercials. Each commercial was 10 minutes long, so all together there were 30 minutes of commercials.   Now, we subtract the 30 minutes from the 1.5 hours, which gives us 1.2 hours.   This is the answer to the question, so Mary's video game playing does not factor in to the calculation.", "equation": "Mary played video games for 20 minutes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, 0.1922878623008728]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Ada puts 50 candles on the cake. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine the weight of one-eighth of the cake. Since the cake is 400 grams and it is divided into eight equal parts, each part would be 400/8 = 50 grams.  Next, we need to calculate how much Pierre ate. Since he ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.  Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams.  The condition \"Ada puts 50 candles on the cake\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, we need to determine the weight of one-eighth of the cake. Since the cake is 400 grams and it is divided into eight equal parts, each part would be 400/8 = 50 grams.  Next, we need to calculate how much Pierre ate. Since he ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.  Finally, the condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" because it helps us to determine the weight of one-eighth of the cake. Without this information, it would be impossible to answer the question.\nFirst, the total cake is 400 grams.   Second, the cake is divided into eight equal parts. Therefore, each part is 400/8 = 50 grams.   Third, Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, which is 50 grams.   Fourth, Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate, which is 50 x 2 = 100 grams.   Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams.  The condition \"Ada puts 50 candles on the cake\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada puts 50 candles on the cake.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.061922259628772736]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Jack brought 5 pieces of bread on Sunday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "On Saturday, Sally eats 2 sandwiches. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 4 pieces of bread on Saturday. On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread.  The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it determines the total amount of bread that Sally eats on Saturday. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate the total amount of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. The condition that Jack brought 5 pieces of bread on Sunday is not relevant to this calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "On Saturday, Sally eats 2 sandwiches. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.   On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.   Across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread.   The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it determines the total amount of bread that Sally eats on Saturday. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate the total amount of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, so she eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.   On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, so she eats 2 pieces of bread.   So, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition that Jack brought 5 pieces of bread on Sunday is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "Jack brought 5 pieces of bread on Sunday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.490830659866333]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Tom bought a moisturizer which cost $10. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a bar of soap which costs her $8.00 and it lasts her for two months. This means that she needs to buy 6 bars of soap for the entire year. Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will spend $48.00 on soap. The condition \"Tom bought a moisturizer which cost $10\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This means that she will need 6 bars of soap to last her for the entire year. Therefore, she will spend $48.00 on soap for the year. The condition is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us that Maria needs to buy 6 bars of soap for the year.\nMaria buys a bar of soap which costs her $8.00 and it lasts her for two months. This means that she needs to buy 6 bars of soap for the entire year. Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will spend $48.00 on soap.  The condition \"Tom bought a moisturizer which cost $10\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom bought a moisturizer which cost $10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.30028653144836426]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Ada bought the tickets for 400 plays. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how many plays Megan was the lead actress in. Since Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, we can assume that she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  Next, we need to figure out how many plays Megan was not the lead actress in. We can subtract the number of plays Megan was the lead actress in (80) from the total number of plays Megan participated in (100). This means that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without that information, we would not be able to determine how many times Megan was not the lead actress. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many plays Megan was the lead actress in. Since Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, we can assume that she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Next, we need to figure out how many plays Megan was not the lead actress in. We can subtract the number of plays Megan was the lead actress in (80) from the total number of plays Megan participated in (100). This means that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without that information, we would not be able to determine how many times Megan was not the lead actress.   Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many times Megan was the lead actress. We know that she was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  We also know that Megan participated in 100 plays in total. This means that she was not the lead actress in the other 20 plays.  Finally, we can calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress with the information we have. We know that Ada bought the tickets for 400 plays, so if we subtract the 100 plays that Megan participated in, we get 300. This means that Megan was not the lead actress in 300 plays.  Therefore, the answer to the question is that Megan was not the lead actress in 300 plays.   Yes, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it helps us determine how many times Megan was not the lead actress.\n1. Megan participated in 100 plays. 2. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work, so she was the lead actress in 80 plays. 3. Ada bought tickets for 400 plays.  The condition that Ada bought tickets for 400 plays is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the number of times Megan was not the lead actress.  Therefore, the answer is20 times.", "equation": "Ada bought the tickets for 400 plays.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.2570570409297943]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Ada got a score of 100 in the entrance exam. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the cost for one semester. Since James takes 20 units per semester, and each unit costs $50, he would pay $1,000 per semester.  Now, we can calculate the cost for two semesters. Since each semester costs $1,000, the total cost for two semesters would be $2,000.  Therefore, the answer is $2,000.  The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it informs us of how many units James is taking and how much each unit costs. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total cost for two semesters. The condition \"Ada got a score of 100 in the entrance exam\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the cost for one semester. Since James takes 20 units per semester, and each unit costs $50, he would pay $1,000 per semester.  Now, we can calculate the cost for two semesters. Since each semester costs $1,000, the total cost for two semesters would be $2,000.  The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it informs us of how many units James is taking and how much each unit costs. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total cost for two semesters.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much James pays for one semester. This requires us to multiply the number of units James takes (20) by the cost of each unit ($50).  So, James pays $1,000 for one semester.  Second, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. This requires us to multiply the cost of one semester ($1,000) by the number of semesters (2).  So, James pays $2,000 for two semesters.  Therefore, the answer is $2,000.  The condition \"Ada got a score of 100 in the entrance exam\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada got a score of 100 in the entrance exam.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, -0.010927621275186539]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. Tom goes to the gym 2000 times per year. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack which is $250. Therefore, the total cost of everything is $2750 ($2500 for the squat rack + $250 for the barbell).  The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" was relevant to the calculation process, as it helped us determine the cost of the barbell. The condition \"Tom goes to the gym 2000 times per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, the answer is that Jack paid $2750 for everything.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "First, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack which is $250. Third, Tom goes to the gym 2000 times per year. This does not affect the cost of purchasing the squat rack and barbell, so it is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, the total cost of everything is $2750 ($2500 for the squat rack + $250 for the barbell).\nStep 1: Jack bought the squat rack for $2500.  Step 2: The barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack.  Step 3: Therefore, the barbell cost $2500/10 = $250.  Step 4: Jack paid for the squat rack ($2500) and the barbell ($250), so the total cost is $2500 + $250 = $2750.  Step 5: Tom goes to the gym 2000 times per year, but this does not affect the cost of what Jack paid.   Therefore, the answer is that Jack paid $2750 for everything. The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" was relevant to the calculation process, as it helped us determine the cost of the barbell.\nJack buys a squat rack for $2500. This is the first cost. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. This means the barbell cost $250.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.   The condition \"Tom goes to the gym 2000 times per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom goes to the gym 2000 times per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, 0.06925656646490097]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jack pays $2 for each egg. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "In a single week, Jason will consume three eggs every day for seven days, for a total of 21 eggs in one week. In two weeks, then, Jason will consume 42 eggs.  The condition \"Jack pays $2 for each egg\" is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "In a single week, Jason will consume three eggs every day for seven days, for a total of 21 eggs in one week. In two weeks, then, Jason will consume 42 eggs.  The condition \"Jack pays $2 for each egg\" is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.", "equation": "Jack pays $2 for each egg.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.494812935590744]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. The distance between home and the office of Jack is 6 miles. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle pays a ride fee of $2 when she enters the taxi. Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. Michelle's ride was 4 miles, so her total fare is $2.5 x 4 = $10. Third, Michelle's total fare is $12 ($2 + $10). So, the answer is $12. The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many miles Michelle has traveled, which is necessary to calculate the total fare. The condition that the distance between home and the office of Jack is 6 miles is not relevant to Michelle's ride, so it does not affect the calculation. Therefore, the total cost of Michelle's ride is $12.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Michelle's total cost for her ride is the ride fee of $2 plus the cost of 4 miles at $2.5 per mile, which is $10. So Michelle paid $12 in total for her ride.  The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is necessary to include the ride fee of $2 in the total cost for Michelle's ride.\nStep 1: Michelle pays a ride fee of $2 when she enters the taxi.  Step 2: The taxi charge per mile is $2.5. Michelle's ride was 4 miles, so her total fare is $2.5 x 4 = $10.  Step 3: Michelle's total fare is $12 ($2 + $10).  So, the answer is $12. The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many miles Michelle has traveled, which is necessary to calculate the total fare.\nThe first step is to calculate the cost of Michelle's ride from her office to her home. The ride was 4 miles, and the cost per mile is $2.5, so the total cost of Michelle's ride is 4 x $2.5 = $10.   The condition that the distance between home and the office of Jack is 6 miles is not relevant to Michelle's ride, so it does not affect the calculation.   Therefore, the total cost of Michelle's ride is $10.", "equation": "The distance between home and the office of Jack is 6 miles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.34120434522628784]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Ada sells 2 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how many days are in two weeks. There are 7 days in a week, so two weeks is equal to 14 days.  Second, we need to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in 14 days. We know that Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning, so he will consume 3 eggs per day. Therefore, in two weeks, Jason will consume (3 eggs x 14 days) = 42 eggs.  Yes, the condition \"Ada sells 2 eggs per day\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many eggs Jason will be able to consume in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "1. Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. 2. Ada sells 2 eggs per day. 3. Therefore, in two weeks, Jason will consume (3 eggs x 14 days) = 42 eggs.  Yes, the condition \"Ada sells 2 eggs per day\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many eggs Jason will be able to consume in two weeks.", "equation": "Ada sells 2 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.3772476315498352]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Tom cooked 100 tomatoes for lunch. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the initial number of plants Papi Calot was planning to plant. 7 rows of 18 plants each is equal to 7 x 18 = 126 plants.  Papi Calot still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many additional plants Papi Calot is intending to add. The total number of plants Papi Calot has to buy is 126 + 15 = 141 plants. Yes, the condition \"but he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Tom cooked 100 tomatoes for lunch is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many plants Papi Calot has to buy. We can calculate this by adding the initial number of plants Papi Calot was planning to plant (7 rows of 18 plants each = 126 plants) and the additional number of plants Papi Calot wants to add (15 plants). So the answer is 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so that's 7 x 18 = 126 plants. Since he has some room left, he wants to add 15 additional potato plants, meaning he needs to buy 15 more. So the answer is 15 plants.   Yes, the condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it gives us the initial number of plants planned to be planted.\nPapi Calot already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. So he needs 7 x 18 = 126 plants in total. In addition, he wants to plant 15 more. So he needs 126 + 15 = 141 plants in total.  The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nPapi Calot already has 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he already has 126 plants. He's thinking about adding 15 additional plants, so in total he would need to buy 15 more plants. Therefore, the answer is 15 plants.  The condition \"Tom cooked 100 tomatoes for lunch\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom cooked 100 tomatoes for lunch.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.2001183182001114]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. Tom woke up 20 minutes ago. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. That means we have thirty minutes to get to the school building. Tom woke up 20 minutes ago, so we have 10 minutes left to get from the school gate to the school building. Since it takes us 6 minutes to get from the school gate to the school building, we have 4 minutes left to get to our room, without being late. Yes, the condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Tom woke up 20 minutes ago is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time we have left to get to our room, without being late. So the answer is 4 minutes.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "Tom woke up 20 minutes ago, so he has 10 minutes left to get to school. He and his brother have 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate. That means they have 5 minutes left to get to the school building and to their room. So, they have 5 minutes to get to their room without being late.   Yes, the condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without that information, the calculation process would be different.\nFirst, we have to take 15 minutes to get to the school gate. So, we have 20 minutes right now.  Second, we need another 6 minutes to get to the school building. This means we have 14 minutes left.  Finally, we need to get to our room. Let's assume that it takes us 4 minutes to get to our room. So, we have 10 minutes left to get to our room without being late.   Therefore, the condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?\"\nWe have 30 minutes to get to school and not be late. It takes us 15 minutes to get to the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. So, we have 9 minutes (30 minutes - 15 minutes - 6 minutes) to get to our room and not be late. Tom waking up 20 minutes ago is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom woke up 20 minutes ago.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.22982779145240784]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Emma needs 150 eggs to make a cake. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate one-eighth of the cake. 400 grams divided by 8 is equal to 50 grams.  Secondly, we need to calculate double of 50 grams. Double of 50 grams is equal to 100 grams.  So, Pierre ate 100 grams of the cake.   The condition \"Emma needs 150 eggs to make a cake\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is not part of the calculation. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" is 100 grams.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 grams divided by 8, or 50 grams. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, which is 100 grams. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" is 100 grams.  The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it gave us the information we needed to calculate the amount of cake consumed by Nathalie and Pierre.\nFirst, we need to calculate one-eighth of the cake. 400 grams divided by 8 is equal to 50 grams.   Secondly, we need to calculate double of 50 grams. Double of 50 grams is equal to 100 grams.   So, Pierre ate 100 grams of the cake.   The condition \"Emma needs 150 eggs to make a cake\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is not part of the calculation.", "equation": "Emma needs 150 eggs to make a cake.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.2966333031654358]}
{"original_question": "In a field of 500 clovers, 20% have four leaves and one quarter of these are purple clovers. Ada planted 100 clovers out of the field. Assuming these proportions are exactly correct, how many clovers in the field are both purple and four-leaved?", "reasoning_path": "First, of the 500 clovers in the field, 20% have four leaves. That means there are 100 four-leaved clovers in the field.   Next, one quarter of the four-leaved clovers are purple. That means there are 25 purple four-leaved clovers in the field.   Therefore, the answer to the problem is 25 purple four-leaved clovers in the field.  The condition that \"Ada planted 100 clovers out of the field\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, of the 500 clovers in the field, 20% have four leaves. That means there are 100 four-leaved clovers in the field.   Next, one quarter of the four-leaved clovers are purple. That means there are 25 purple four-leaved clovers in the field.   The condition that \"Ada planted 100 clovers out of the field\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, the answer to the problem is 25 purple four-leaved clovers in the field.", "equation": "Ada planted 100 clovers out of the field.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.627143383026123, 0.7278595566749573, 0.47527214884757996]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Based on the counting by Tom, there are 20 stars in the sky tonight. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate how many stars Luke needs to make for the 4 bottles:  4 bottles x 85 stars = 340 stars   Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 307 more stars (340 - 33 = 307).  The condition of 20 stars in the sky is not relevant to the calculation process here, since the question is asking specifically for how many more stars Luke must make.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, let's calculate how many stars Luke needs to make for the 4 bottles:  4 bottles x 85 stars = 340 stars   Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 307 more stars (340 - 33 = 307).  The condition of 85 paper stars being required to fill a glass jar is not relevant to the calculation process here, since the question is asking specifically for how many more stars Luke must make.\n1. Luke needs to fill 4 bottles. Each bottle needs 85 paper stars.  2. Therefore, Luke needs to make 4 x 85 = 340 stars in total.  3. Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars.  4. The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps to determine the number of stars Luke needs to make. Without this condition, we would simply calculate the total number of stars Luke needs to make (i.e. 4 x 85 = 340 stars), without taking into account the fact that Luke has already made some stars.\nLuke has already made 33 stars, so he needs 52 stars to fill the jar. Then, he needs 52 stars for each of the 4 bottles he needs to fill, which is a total of 208 more stars. Therefore, Luke must make a total of 208 more stars.   The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process because it adds an additional requirement to the problem. Without that condition, the answer would have been only 52 more stars.\n1. Luke needs to fill 4 bottles with 85 paper stars. 2. Luke has already made 33 stars. 3. Tom counted 20 stars in the sky tonight.  Therefore, in order to fill the 4 bottles, Luke needs to make 85 stars in total. Since he has already made 33 stars, he needs to make 52 more stars.  The condition \"Based on the counting by Tom, there are 20 stars in the sky tonight.\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Based on the counting by Tom, there are 20 stars in the sky tonight.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3489551544189453, 0.6230339407920837, 0.3254551887512207, 0.21606601774692535]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Ada has 150 lemons. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer has in total. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, so she has a total of 1,024 sweets.  Next, we need to divide this number by 4, since there are 4 people (Jennifer and 3 friends). This gives us 256 sweets each.  Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will get 256 sweets each.  The condition that Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us that Jennifer is sharing the sweets with 3 other people. This is important in order to determine how many sweets each person will get. The question about Ada's lemons is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not directly relate to the number of sweets that Jennifer and her friends will get.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "Step 1: Count the number of sweets that Jennifer has in total: 212 green sweets + 310 blue sweets + 502 yellow sweets = 1024 sweets in total.   Step 2: Divide the total number of sweets by 4, to find out how many sweets each person will get: 1024 / 4 = 256.   Step 3: Each person, including Jennifer, will get 256 sweets each.   The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because without it, we wouldn't know that Jennifer was sharing the sweets with 3 other people. Therefore, it is important in order to determine how many sweets each person will get.   The question about Ada's lemons is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not directly relate to the number of sweets that Jennifer and her friends will get.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer has in total. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets, and 502 yellow sweets, so she has a total of 1,024 sweets.  Next, we need to divide the 1,024 sweets among Jennifer and her three friends. Since there are four people, they will each get 1,024 姊 4 = 256 sweets each.  Finally, Ada has 150 lemons, which is irrelevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the number of sweets that Jennifer and her friends will get.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer has in total. We can do this by adding up the number of green sweets, blue sweets and yellow sweets: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.  Next, we need to divide this number by 4, since there are 4 people (Jennifer and 3 friends). This gives us 256 sweets each.  Finally, we need to subtract 150 from this number, since Ada has 150 lemons. This gives us 106 sweets each.  Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will get 106 sweets each. The condition of 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the total number of sweets Jennifer has.\nThe condition \"Ada has 150 lemons\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\". This condition does not provide any information about the number of sweets each person will receive.  To calculate how many sweets each person will receive, we need to start by adding up the total number of sweets that Jennifer has: 212 green sweets + 310 blue sweets + 502 yellow sweets = 1024 total sweets.  Then, we need to divide this number by the number of people involved (4): 1024/4 = 256.  Therefore, each person will get 256 sweets.", "equation": "Ada has 150 lemons.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.3559337258338928]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Ada sold 100 cakes today. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know how much Nathalie ate. Since Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, we can calculate that she ate 400 grams 姊 8 = 50 grams. Second, we need to know how much Pierre ate. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 50 x 2 = 100 grams. Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of cake. The condition \"Ada sold 100 cakes today\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\". The condition mentioned in the problem only affects the amount of cakes that Ada sold, and does not affect the calculation process of the amount of cake that Pierre ate.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "To calculate how much Pierre ate, we need to know how much Nathalie ate. Since Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, we can calculate that she ate 400 grams 姊 8 = 50 grams. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 50 x 2 = 100 grams.   The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much one-eighth of the cake weighs. Without this information, we would not have been able to calculate the amount of cake eaten by Nathalie and Pierre.\nNathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 grams divided by 8, which is 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, which is 50 grams x 2, which is 100 grams.  So, Pierre ate 100 grams.  The condition \"Ada sold 100 cakes today\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\". The condition mentioned in the problem only affects the amount of cakes that Ada sold, and does not affect the calculation process of the amount of cake that Pierre ate.", "equation": "Ada sold 100 cakes today.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.1457018107175827]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Mary was fined for $20 for speeding in another country. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the speed limit and how much Jed was fined for speeding. The fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the cost of each mile over the speed limit.  Since Jed was fined $256, we can calculate how many miles over the speed limit he was travelling by dividing $256 by $16. This gives us 16 miles over the speed limit.  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).   Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   The condition that Mary was fined for $20 for speeding in another country is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how fast Jed was travelling when he was fined. We can calculate this by dividing the fine amount by the cost per", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "None", "equation": "Mary was fined for $20 for speeding in another country.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.5637581944465637]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Mary has a duck farm aged 50 years. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years. The condition \"Mary has a duck farm aged 50 years\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "In the first year, Michael will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 700. In the second year, he will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 850. In the third year, he will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 1000. In the fourth year, he will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 1150. In the fifth year, he will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 1300. In the sixth year, he will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 1450. In the seventh year, he will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 1600. In the eighth year, he will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 1750. In the ninth year, he will have an additional 150 chickens, so his total number of chickens will be 1900.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of chickens that Michael has after 9 years. To do this, we need to multiply the number of chickens that increase annually (150) by the number of years (9). So the total number of chickens that Michael will have after 9 years is 1350 (150 * 9 = 1350).  Now, we need to add the original number of chickens (550) to the total number of chickens after 9 years (1350). So the total number of chickens that Michael will have after 9 years is 1900 (550 + 1350 = 1900).  The condition \"Mary has a duck farm aged 50 years\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary has a duck farm aged 50 years.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.37532123923301697]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Emma needs 100 eggs to make a cake. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we have to calculate how much Nathalie ate. Since one-eighth of the cake is 400 grams, Nathalie ate 400/8 = 50 grams.  Then, we have to calculate how much Pierre ate. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2*50 = 100 grams.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" is 100 grams.  The condition \"Emma needs 100 eggs to make a cake\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, so that is 400/8 = 50 grams. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams. The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, we have to calculate how much Nathalie ate. Since one-eighth of the cake is 400 grams, Nathalie ate 400/8 = 50 grams.  Then, we have to calculate how much Pierre ate. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2*50 = 100 grams.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" is 100 grams.  The condition \"Emma needs 100 eggs to make a cake\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma needs 100 eggs to make a cake.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.21673016250133514]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Jack bought a shampoo 10 months ago. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many bars of soap Maria needs to stock up for the entire year. Since one bar of soap lasts her for two months, she will need 6 bars of soap to last her for the entire year (6 x 2 = 12 months).  Second, we need to calculate how much she will spend on the soap. We know that she spends $8.00 per bar of soap, so she will spend $8.00 x 6 = $48.00 on the soap.  Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap for the entire year.  Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much she will spend on each bar of soap. The condition \"Jack bought a shampoo 10 months ago\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "1. Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap.  2. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy 6 bars of French soap (since 1 bar lasts her for 2 months, 6 bars will last her for 12 months).   3. Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap if she wants to stock up for the entire year ($8.00 x 6 bars = $48.00).   The condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us that one bar of soap lasts Maria for 2 months. Therefore, in order to stock up for the entire year, she needs to buy 6 bars of soap.\nMaria buys one bar of soap that lasts her for two months. She spends $8.00 on that bar.  Therefore, in order for Maria to stock up for the entire year, she would need to buy six bars of soap.   Since she spends $8.00 per bar of soap, this means that she will spend a total of $48.00 on soap for the year.   Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it tells us how much she will spend on each bar of soap.\nMaria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months, and she spends $8.00 per bar of soap.   So, if she wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need 6 bars of soap (6 x 2 = 12 months).   Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap for the entire year ($8.00 x 6 = $48.00).   The condition \"Jack bought a shampoo 10 months ago\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought a shampoo 10 months ago.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.3548005521297455]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Emma pays $5 for each egg. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "First, let us determine how many eggs Jason will consume in one day. Since Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning, he will consume three eggs each day.  Second, let us determine how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks. Since Jason consumes three eggs each day, he will consume 3 x 14 = 42 eggs in two weeks.  Finally, the condition \"Emma pays $5 for each egg\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it indicates the cost of each egg. This information can be used to calculate the total cost of the 42 eggs consumed by Jason in two weeks: 42 x $5 = $210. Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "First, let us determine how many eggs Jason will consume in one day. Since Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning, he will consume three eggs each day.  Second, let us determine how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks. Since Jason consumes three eggs each day, he will consume 3 x 14 = 42 eggs in two weeks.  Finally, the condition \"Emma pays $5 for each egg\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it indicates the cost of each egg. This information can be used to calculate the total cost of the 42 eggs consumed by Jason in two weeks: 42 x $5 = $210.", "equation": "Emma pays $5 for each egg.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.29720979928970337]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. The height of Ada is 4 feet. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she fills the 3-liter bucket until it is full, which is 3 liters. The remainder of the 5-liter bucket is 2 liters. This 2 liters is then poured into the 6-liter bucket. Therefore, Hamza can put an additional 3 liters into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing. The condition that Ada's height is 4 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the sizes of the buckets and the amount of water that Hamza is transferring. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. We can calculate this by subtracting the amount of water she transferred from the 6-liter bucket from its capacity. So the answer would be 6 - 2 = 3 liters.", "numerical_answer": 3, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Hamza first fills the 5-liter bucket. She then pours as much of the 5 liters into the 3-liter bucket as it can hold. The remainder of the 5 liters is poured into the 6-liter bucket. So, the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it.  The condition that \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information is the amount of water in the 5-liter bucket, the 3-liter bucket, and the 6-liter bucket, which is 3 liters, 2 liters, and 2 liters respectively.  Therefore, Hamza can put up to 4 liters into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, as the 6-liter bucket can hold up to 6 liters of water.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. So, the 5-liter bucket is now full and has 5 liters of water.   Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket only has a capacity of 3 liters, it will be full after Hamza pours the 5 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket.   Finally, Hamza pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket is full, the remainder is the remaining 2 liters of water. Therefore, Hamza can put 2 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.   So, the answer is 2 liters.   Yes, the condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because the amount of water Hamza can pour into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing depends on how much she is able to pour into the 3-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she will pour 2 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket, leaving 3 liters of water in the 5-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder (3 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that Hamza can put 3 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. Therefore, the answer is 3 liters.  Yes, the given condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing how much water is left in the 5-liter bucket, it would not be possible to calculate how much more water can be put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nFirst, Hamza has filled the 5-liter bucket. Now, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. She can pour all 5 liters into the 3-liter bucket. So, the 3-liter bucket now has 5 liters of water.  Now, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket is full, the remainder is 0 liters. So, the 6-liter bucket has 0 liters of water.  Therefore, Hamza can put 6 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 4 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.09775018692016602]}
{"original_question": "Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. Ada has read 60 books in the past year. How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine how many students in total are enrolled in Statistics. Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day, and half of them are enrolled in Statistics. This means that 60 students are enrolled in Statistics. From there, we can determine that 90 percent of these students are seniors, so 54 students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.  Yes, the condition \"Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is the starting point from which we can determine how many students are enrolled in Statistics and, from there, how many seniors are enrolled in Statistics. The condition \"Ada has read 60 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 54, "gold_answer": "54", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how many students in total are enrolled in Statistics. Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day, and half of them are enrolled in Statistics. This means that 60 students are enrolled in Statistics. From there, we can determine that 90 percent of these students are seniors, so 54 students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.  Yes, the condition \"Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is the starting point from which we can determine how many students are enrolled in Statistics and, from there, how many seniors are enrolled in Statistics.\nMr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them (60) are enrolled in Statistics.  Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent (54) are seniors.  Therefore, 54 of Mr. Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.   Yes, the condition \"Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. That means 60 students are enrolled in Statistics.   Of the 60 students in Statistics, 90% are seniors. That means 54 students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.   So the answer is 54.   The condition \"Ada has read 60 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada has read 60 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5140396952629089, 0.5659631490707397, 0.6956555247306824, 0.2828352749347687]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Mary is 7 years old. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The width of the rectangle is 7 inches, and it is 4 times as long as it is wide. This means that the length of the rectangle is 4 x 7 = 28 inches.   Now that we know the width and length of the rectangle, we can calculate the area of the rectangle. The area of the rectangle is width x length, so the area is 7 x 28 = 196 inches squared.   The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the width which is necessary to calculate the area of the rectangle. The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is also relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the value for the length of the rectangle. Mary's age is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The width of the rectangle is 7 inches, and it is 4 times as long as it is wide. This means that the length of the rectangle is 4 x 7 = 28 inches.   Now that we know the width and length of the rectangle, we can calculate the area of the rectangle. The area of the rectangle is width x length, so the area is 7 x 28 = 196 inches squared.   The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the width which is necessary to calculate the area of the rectangle.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its width by its length. In this case, the width is 7 inches and the length is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the value for the length of the rectangle. Without this condition, we would not know how long the rectangle is and therefore would not be able to calculate its area.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its width by its length. The width of the rectangle in the problem is 7 inches. The length is 4 times as long as the width, so the length is 4 x 7 = 28 inches.   Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches squared.   The condition \"Mary is 7 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary is 7 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.04014913737773895]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. The shoe size of Ada is 20. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "We have 30 minutes to get to school without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. That means we have 9 minutes left to get to our room. So the answer is 9 minutes. Yes, the conditions that it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building are relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Ada's shoe size is 20 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much time we have left to get to our room, without being late. We can calculate this by subtracting 15 minutes (time to arrive at the school gate) and 6 minutes (time to get to the school building) from the total time we have, which is 30 minutes. So the answer is 9 minutes.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, we need to subtract the 15 minutes it takes us to arrive at the school gate from the 30 minutes we have. This leaves us with 15 minutes.  Then, we need to subtract the 6 minutes it takes us to get to the school building from the 15 minutes we have. This leaves us with 9 minutes.  Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room, without being late.  The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine how much time we have left to get to our room, without being late.\nWe have 30 minutes to get to school, so that means we have 15 minutes to get from the school gate to the school building and then to our room. Subtracting the 6 minutes it takes to get to the school building leaves us with 9 minutes to get to our room. So we have 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.  The condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it informs us of how much time it takes to get to the school building, which we need to know in order to calculate how much time we have left to get to our room.\nWe have 30 minutes before school starts. We already know that it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. So, we have 9 minutes left to get to our room.  No, the condition \"The shoe size of Ada is 20.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.12202824652194977]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Emma is 50 years old. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "We need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of Emma being 50 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "We need to calculate how muchJames pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters.\nThe condition of Emma being 50 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters.", "equation": "Emma is 50 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.12445814162492752]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. The height of Mary is 10 feet. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of lines in the poem. Since there are 20 stanzas and each stanza has 10 lines, the total number of lines in the poem is 200.  Next, we need to calculate the number of words in each line. Since each line has 8 words, the total number of words in each line is 8.   Finally, we can calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since there are 200 lines and 8 words in each line, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  The condition \"The height of Mary is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "1. Each stanza has 10 lines. 2. Each line has 8 words. 3. There are 20 stanzas.  So, the total number of words in the poem is: 10 lines x 8 words x 20 stanzas = 1600 words  Yes, the condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the information that there are 20 stanzas. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total number of words in the poem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of lines in the poem. Since there are 20 stanzas and each stanza has 10 lines, the total number of lines in the poem is 200.  Next, we need to calculate the number of words in each line. Since each line has 8 words, the total number of words in each line is 8.   Finally, we can calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since there are 200 lines and 8 words in each line, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  The condition \"The height of Mary is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.2696056067943573]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Jack is 15 years old. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "First, James collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. This means he harvested from his 2 existing trees. Second, each tree has 20 plants, so James has 40 plants in total. Third, each plant has 1 seed, so James has 40 seeds. Fourth, James planted 60% of those, so he planted 24 seeds. Finally, James planted 24 trees. So, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 24. The condition \"Jack is 15 years old.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "First, James collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. This means he harvested from his 2 existing trees.   Second, each tree has 20 plants, so James has 40 plants in total.   Third, each plant has 1 seed, so James has 40 seeds.   Fourth, James planted 60% of those, so he planted 24 seeds.   Finally, James planted 24 trees.   So, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 24.   The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees.\" is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, James collected all the fruits from his two trees. Each tree had 20 plants and each plant had 1 seed.  Next, James planted 60% of those seeds. Since 60% of 20 plants is 12 plants, James would have planted 12 plants.  Finally, since Jack is 15 years old, this does not affect the number of trees planted.  Therefore, the answer is two trees. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames collects all the fruits from his two trees. That means he has two trees. So, he plants two trees. The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How many trees did James plant?\" because it does not provide any information about the number of trees that James planted.\nThe statement \"each tree has 20 plants\" means James had two trees. The statement \"each plant has 1 seed\" means James had 40 seeds. The statement \"and he plants 60% of those\" means James planted 24 of those 40 seeds. Therefore, James planted two trees. The statement \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he planted 60% of those.   Step 1: James collected 40 seeds from his 2 trees.  Step 2: He planted 60% of those 40 seeds, which would be 24 seeds.  Step 3: James planted 24 seeds, so he planted 2 trees.   No, the condition \"Jack is 15 years old.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack is 15 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.13631290197372437]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Jack bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. So, Melies paid $164 for the meat.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much meat Melies purchased and how much he paid for it. The condition is necessary for us to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The condition is not relevant to Jack buying 30 tomatoes from the grocery store, since that is not related to Melies' purchase of meat. Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat for $82 per kilogram. The total cost of the meat is 2 kg x $82 = $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat. The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much meat Melies purchased and how much he paid for it. The condition is necessary for us to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The condition is not relevant to Jack buying 30 tomatoes from the grocery store, since that is not related to Melies' purchase of meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. This means Melies spent $164 on the meat.  Melies had $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, Melies has $16 left in his wallet.  The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it helps us determine how much money Melies spent on the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. So, Melies paid $164 for the meat.  Jack bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. This does not affect Melies' calculation.  The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant, because it tells us how much money Melies has to begin with.  So, Melies has $180 in his wallet and he paid $164 for the meat. This means that Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. 2 kg x $82 = $164   Melies has $180 in his wallet. $180 - $164 = $16   Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Jack bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.28034457564353943]}
{"original_question": "A magazine costs $3 each. Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each. Ada bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jewel bought 10 magazines at $3 each, which adds up to a total cost of $30. Jewel then sold each magazine for $3.50, which adds up to a total of $35. The difference between her total cost of $30 and her total gain of $35 is $5, which is how much Jewel will gain from selling her magazines.  Yes, the condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because it is the cost of the magazines that Jewel bought that is used to calculate her total cost and total gain from selling them. The condition that Ada bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jewel bought 10 magazines at $3 each, which adds up to a total cost of $30.  Jewel sold each magazine for $3.50, which adds up to a total of $35.  The difference between her total cost of $30 and her total gain of $35 is $5, which is how much Jewel will gain from selling her magazines.  Yes, the condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because it is the cost of the magazines that Jewel bought that is used to calculate her total cost and total gain from selling them.\nJewel bought 10 magazines at a cost of $3 each, so her total cost was $30.  She then sold them for $3.50 each, so her total sales were $35.  Therefore, Jewel gained a total of $5 from selling the magazines.   The condition that Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it determines how much Jewel bought the magazines for and how much she sold them for. Without this condition, we would not know how much Jewel paid for the magazines or how much she sold them for, and we would not be able to calculate her gain.\nJewel bought 10 magazines at $3 each, for a total cost of $30. If she sells the 10 magazines at $3.50 each, she will receive a total of $35. Therefore, Jewel will gain a profit of $5 from selling her magazines.  The condition \"Ada bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3614990711212158, 0.6798670291900635, 0.16848894953727722]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The shoe size of Emma is 100. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the amount that James's insurance will cover for his doctor appointment. This amount is 80% of the total cost of the visit, which is $300. So, the amount that James's insurance will cover is $240.   Next, we need to subtract this amount from the total cost of the visit to get James's out-of-pocket cost. So, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60 ($300 - $240 = $60).   The shoe size of Emma is 100 and is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total amount that James's insurance will cover. Since his insurance covers 80%, we can calculate that James's insurance will cover $240.  Next, we need to subtract the amount that James's insurance will cover from the total cost of the visit ($300).  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe doctor's visit costs $300.  James's insurance covers 80%, so the insurance will pay $240.  James's out-of-pocket cost is $60 ($300 - $240 = $60).   The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount that James's insurance will cover for his doctor appointment. This amount is 80% of the total cost of the visit, which is $300. So, the amount that James's insurance will cover is $240.   Next, we need to subtract this amount from the total cost of the visit to get James's out-of-pocket cost. So, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The shoe size of Emma is 100 and is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.14148612320423126]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. The shoe size of Emma is 15. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in a single day with 90 inches of gift wrapper. We know that he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, so we can divide 90 inches by 18 inches to find out how many gift boxes he can wrap in one day: 90 inches / 18 inches = 5 gift boxes.  Now, we have to multiply the number of gift boxes he can wrap in a single day (5 gift boxes) by the number of days (3 days) to get the total number of gift boxes he can wrap in 3 days: 5 gift boxes x 3 days = 15 gift boxes.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition that \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us the amount of gift wrapper Edmund uses for each gift box. Without this information, we would not know how much gift wrapper he needs to wrap a single gift box, and we would not be able to calculate the total number of gift boxes he can wrap. The condition that \"The shoe size of Emma is 15\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in a single day with 90 inches of gift wrapper. We know that he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, so we can divide 90 inches by 18 inches to find out how many gift boxes he can wrap in one day: 90 inches / 18 inches = 5 gift boxes.  Now, we have to multiply the number of gift boxes he can wrap in a single day (5 gift boxes) by the number of days (3 days) to get the total number of gift boxes he can wrap in 3 days: 5 gift boxes x 3 days = 15 gift boxes.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition that \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us the amount of gift wrapper Edmund uses for each gift box. Without this information, we would not know how much gift wrapper he needs to wrap a single gift box, and we would not be able to calculate the total number of gift boxes he can wrap.\nEdmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  This means that he has 270 inches of gift wrapper every 3 days.  We know that he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   The condition \"The shoe size of Emma is 15.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 15.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.15269143879413605]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. The shoe size of Ada is 10. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "First, we have thirty minutes to get to the school gate. Then, it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate. So, we have 15 minutes left to get to the school building and then to our room. Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room, without being late. The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, we have 30 minutes to go to school.  Second, it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate.  Third, it takes us 6 minutes to get to the school building.   Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room, without being late.   The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is part of the total time needed to get to the school. Without this condition, we would not know how much time we have left to get to our room.\nFirst, we have 30 minutes to get to the school gate. Then, it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate. So, we have 15 minutes left to get to the school building and then to our room. Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room, without being late.   The condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The shoe size of Ada does not affect the time needed to get to our room, either.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount of time it takes to get from the school gate to the school building. That is 6 minutes.   Then, we need to calculate how much time we have left after arriving at the school gate. That is 30 minutes - 15 minutes = 15 minutes.   Lastly, we need to subtract the 6 minutes it takes to get from the school gate to the school building from the 15 minutes we have left. That leaves us with 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.   The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.12065736204385757]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. The height of Mary is 200 feet. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many times Megan was the lead actress. We know that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. Now, if we subtract 80 from 100, we get 20. This means that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  Yes, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we need to know how many plays Megan participated in total in order to calculate how many times she was not the lead actress. The condition \"The height of Mary is 200 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead in 80 plays. The remaining 20 plays are what Megan was not the lead actress in. Therefore, the answer is 20. Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many times Megan was the lead actress. We know that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. Now, if we subtract 80 from 100, we get 20. This means that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  Yes, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we need to know how many plays Megan participated in total in order to calculate how many times she was not the lead actress.\nTo answer the first part of the question, we need to calculate how many times Megan was the lead actress: 100 plays x 80% = 80 times.   To answer the second part of the question, we need to subtract the number of times Megan was the lead actress from the total number of plays she participated in: 100 plays - 80 times = 20 times.   The condition \"The height of Mary is 200 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 200 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.02383788302540779]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Mary is 100 years old. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much Nathalie ate: since the cake is divided into 8 equal parts, each part is 400/8 = 50 grams. So Nathalie ate 50 grams.  Now we need to calculate how much Pierre ate: since he ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2*50 = 100 grams.  So the answer is that Pierre ate 100 grams.   The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us that each part of the cake is 400/8 = 50 grams, which is essential information for the calculation. The condition \"Mary is 100 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much Nathalie ate: since the cake is divided into 8 equal parts, each part is 400/8 = 50 grams. So Nathalie ate 50 grams.  Now we need to calculate how much Pierre ate: since he ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2*50 = 100 grams.  So the answer is that Pierre ate 100 grams.   The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us that each part of the cake is 400/8 = 50 grams, which is essential information for the calculation.\nNathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is (400 / 8) = 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate (2 * 50) = 100 grams.  The condition \"Mary is 100 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary is 100 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.020142119377851486]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. The shoe size of Jack is 50. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for one semester. Since each unit costs $50 and James takes 20 units per semester, he pays $50 x 20 = $1000 for one semester.  Second, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. Since he pays $1000 for one semester, he pays $1000 x 2 = $2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"The shoe size of Jack is 50\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, the condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. We need to know how many units James takes per semester in order to calculate how much money he pays for 2 semesters.   Second, we can calculate how much James pays for one semester. Since James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50, James pays $1000 for one semester.   Third, since James takes the same amount of units per semester, he pays the same amount of money for both semesters. Therefore, James pays $2000 for 2 semesters.   The condition \"The shoe size of Jack is 50\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much James pays for one semester. Since each unit costs $50 and James takes 20 units per semester, he pays $50 x 20 = $1000 for one semester.  Second, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. Since he pays $1000 for one semester, he pays $1000 x 2 = $2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"The shoe size of Jack is 50\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 50.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.2710915207862854]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The shoe size of Jack is 12. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the weights of the four cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Next, we need to divide by the number of cats to get the average. 48/4 = 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 lbs.   The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many cats we need to consider in the calculation. Without this information, we wouldn't know how many cats to include in the calculation. The shoe size of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to add up the weights of the four cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Next, we need to divide by the number of cats to get the average. 48/4 = 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 lbs.   The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many cats we need to consider in the calculation. Without this information, we wouldn't know how many cats to include in the calculation.\nFirst, we need to add up the total weight of all four cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 lbs. Then, we need to divide that total by the number of cats, which is 4. 48 姊 4 = 12 lbs. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 lbs.   The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" does not affect the calculation process; it is only relevant to the data given.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, so that is 24 pounds. The third cat weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds. That means the total weight of Janele's cats is 24 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Now, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to divide the total weight (48) by the number of cats (4). 48 / 4 = 12.  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the calculation to determine the total weight of Janele's cats.\nJanele has four cats. We need to calculate the total weight of all four cats and then divide it by 4 to find the average weight.  Total weight = 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 lbs  Average weight = 48 姊 4 = 12 lbs  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 lbs.  The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the weight of the fourth cat which is necessary to calculate the total weight of all cats.\nFirstly, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. We can add the weights of all four cats together to get the total weight.   The total weight is: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Secondly, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we divide the total weight (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4 cats).  The average weight of Janele's cats is: 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  The shoe size of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 12.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.21528202295303345]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. The height of Mary is 15 feet. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much each t-shirt costs. The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" tells us that each t-shirt costs $20, and that James is getting a 50% discount. So, the answer to the question \"How much did James pay?\" is $60. The condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each t-shirt costs and how much of a discount James is getting. The height of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" tells us that each t-shirt costs $20, and that James is getting a 50% discount.   So the answer to the question \"How much did James pay?\" is $60.   The condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each t-shirt costs and how much of a discount James is getting.\nJames buys 6 t-shirts.  The t-shirts each cost $20.  James got a 50% off discount.   So, James paid 6 x $20 x 50% = $60   The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process of \"How much did James pay?\" since it was used to calculate the total amount that James paid.   The height of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe question is \"How much did James pay?\". This means that we need to calculate the total amount of money that James paid for the 6 t-shirts. Since the t-shirts each cost $20, all we need to do is multiply the cost of one t-shirt ($20) by the number of t-shirts (6) to get the total amount. So, James paid $120.   The condition \"The height of Mary is 15 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it does not affect the total amount of money that James paid for the 6 t-shirts.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 15 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.10035630315542221]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Jack has read 10 books in the past year. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many haircuts he has had and how many more he needs.  We can calculate the percentage Calvin is towards his goal by dividing the number of haircuts he has had by the total number of haircuts he needs.   We can calculate this as 8/10 = 80%.   Therefore, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.   The condition that Jack has read 10 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. To calculate what percentage Calvin is towards his goal, we need to divide the number of haircuts he has had by the total number of haircuts he needs. So the answer would be: 8/10 = 80%.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "Calvin needs 10 haircuts in total to reach his goal.  He has already gotten 8 haircuts.   Therefore, he is 80% of the way to his goal.   Yes, the condition that Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts is relevant to the calculation process. We need to know how many haircuts Calvin has already gotten in order to calculate the percentage of how close he is to reaching his goal.\nCalvin has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more, so he has 8 out of 10 haircuts. This means that he is 80% towards his goal. The condition is relevant because it is important to know how many haircuts he needs in order to calculate the percentage.\nCalvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. Therefore, he is 80% of the way there (8 out of 10 haircuts completed).   The condition that Jack has read 10 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of Calvin's goal as it does not have any bearing on the number of haircuts he needs to complete.", "equation": "Jack has read 10 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.09552277624607086]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The height of Jack is 10 feet. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to add all the weights together. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. The second step is to divide the total sum by the number of cats. 48/4 = 12 pounds. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many cats there are, and how many weights we need to add together. The height of Jack is 10 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The first step is to add all the weights together. 12+12+14.7+9.3 = 48 pounds  The second step is to divide the total sum by the number of cats. 48/4 = 12 pounds  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many cats there are, and how many weights we need to add together.\nThe first step is to add up the weights of the cats. We have 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  Now, we need to divide that total by the number of cats. 48 / 4 = 12.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it was already included in the calculation.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of the weights of all four cats divided by the total number of cats. That means we need to add up the weights of all four cats and then divide that number by 4.  In this case, the sum of the weights of all four cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides us with the weight of one of the cats, which is necessary for us to calculate the average weight of all the cats.\nThe first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, so the total weight of the first two cats is 12 + 12 = 24. The third cat weighs 14.7 pounds, so the total weight of the first three cats is 24 + 14.7 = 38.7. The fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds, so the total weight of all four cats is 38.7 + 9.3 = 48. The average weight of Janele's cats is 48 divided by 4, which is 12.  Yes, the condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\" because it tells us the weight of the fourth cat, which is necessary to calculate the total weight of all four cats and the average weight of Janele's cats.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is calculated by adding the weight of all her cats and dividing that number by the total number of cats. The answer is 11.15 pounds. The height of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.1437002271413803]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. The height of Ada is 5 feet. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate how many bars of soap Maria needs to buy to last a year.  Since each bar lasts Maria for 2 months, she will need to buy 6 bars of soap to last for a year.  Step 2: Calculate how much Maria will spend on soap for the year.  Since each bar costs $8.00, Maria will need to spend $48.00 on soap for the year.  Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to spend $48.00 on soap.  The condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it is the information that lets us know how many bars of soap Maria needs to buy.  The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate how many bars of soap Maria needs to buy to last a year.  Since each bar lasts Maria for 2 months, she will need to buy 6 bars of soap to last for a year.  Step 2: Calculate how much Maria will spend on soap for the year.  Since each bar costs $8.00, Maria will need to spend $48.00 on soap for the year.  Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to spend $48.00 on soap. The condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it is the information that lets us know how many bars of soap Maria needs to buy.\nMaria buys a bar of French soap and spends $8.00 per bar. She uses the bar of soap for 2 months. Therefore, if she wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy 6 bars of French soap. Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap for the entire year. The condition that she spends $8.00 per bar of soap is relevant to the calculation process as it is the amount of money that Maria will spend on each bar of soap.\nMaria buys one large bar of French soap for $8.00, and it lasts her for two months. Therefore, she will need to buy 6 bars of soap to stock up for the entire year, which will cost her a total of $48.00.   The condition \"The height of Ada is 5 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not provide any information related to the cost of the soap.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 5 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.039372023195028305]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much Emmy and Gerry have to spend on apples. Emmy has $200 to spend, and Gerry has $100 to spend. This means that they have a total of $300 to spend on apples.   Second, we need to calculate how many apples they can buy with this amount. Since each apple costs $2, we can divide $300 by $2 to get 150 apples.   Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples. The condition \"A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it states the cost of each apple. The condition \"Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, the total number of apples they can buy together is 150 apples.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much Emmy and Gerry have to spend on apples. Emmy has $200 to spend, and Gerry has $100 to spend. This means that they have a total of $300 to spend on apples.   Second, we need to calculate how many apples they can buy with this amount. Since each apple costs $2, we can divide $300 by $2 to get 150 apples.   Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples. The condition \"A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it states the cost of each apple.\nFirst, we need to find out the total amount of money that Emmy and Gerry have altogether.   Since Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, the total amount that they have is $300.   Since each apple costs $2, we can calculate that they can buy 150 apples altogether.   Therefore, the answer is that Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether.   The condition \"Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us how much money each person has and we need to know the total amount of money that they have in order to calculate how many apples they can buy.\nEmmy has $200 and Gerry has $100. Emmy can buy 100 apples with her money and Gerry can buy 50 apples with his money. The total number of apples they can buy together is 150 apples. The condition \"Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, the total number of apples they can buy together is 150 apples.", "equation": "Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.3547515273094177]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. The height of Ada is 10 feet. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags of chips left. She then bought another 6 bags of chips in the store, so in the end she has 22 bags of chips.  The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is the first step in the calculation process. The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie originally had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. She bought 6 more bags in the store.  Therefore, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it is the starting point for the calculation. Without knowing how many bags of chips Abie originally had, it would not be possible to calculate how many she has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She then gave 4 bags to her friend, which means she now has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 bags of chips in the store, which means she now has 22 bags of chips.   So, the answer is that Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.   The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is the first step in the calculation process.\nAbie started with 20 bags of chips. She then gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags of chips left. She then bought another 6 bags of chips in the store, so in the end she has 22 bags of chips. The condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many bags of chips she has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. So, Abie has 20 - 4 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"The height of Ada is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.1420106589794159]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The shoe size of Tom is 8. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up all of the weights of the cats. 12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds  Next, we need to divide the sum of the weights by the number of cats. 48 pounds 姊 4 cats = 12 pounds  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of cats that Janele has, which we need to use to calculate the average. The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is also relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much the first two cats weigh, which is necessary for us to calculate the sum of the weights of all four cats. The shoe size of Tom is 8 is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to add up all of the weights of the cats.   12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds  Next, we need to divide the sum of the weights by the number of cats.   48 pounds 姊 4 cats = 12 pounds  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of cats that Janele has, which we need to use to calculate the average.\nThe condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process. To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weights of all her cats and divide the sum by the total number of cats. In this case, we can calculate the average weight by adding 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 and then dividing the sum by 4 (the total number of cats). The average weight of Janele's cats is 11.575 pounds.\nTo calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to calculate the sum of the weights of all four cats, and then divide that sum by the number of cats.  In this case, the sum of the weights of the four cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  Then, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48 divided by 4, which is 12.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much the third cat weighs, which is necessary for us to calculate the sum of the weights of all four cats.\nJanele has 4 cats. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The shoe size of Tom is 8.   Yes, the fourth cat's weight is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weights of the four cats and divide the total by 4 (the number of cats).  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 11.675 pounds.   12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  48 姊 4 = 11.675\nStep 1: Calculate the total weight of all four cats.  12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds   Step 2: Calculate the average weight by dividing the total weight (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4 cats).  48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds   Answer: The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The shoe size of Tom is 8. is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 8.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.16499045491218567]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Emma bought 60 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much cream was added to the recipe. We know that Perry added a half cup of cream, so the total amount of cream added was 0.5 cups.  Next, we need to calculate how much fat was in the cream that was added. We know that cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so 0.5 cups of cream would have 44 grams of fat.  Finally, we need to calculate how much fat was added to each serving of food. We know that the recipe serves four people, so each serving would get 11 grams of fat (44 grams / 4 servings).  So, the answer is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" was relevant to the calculation process, as it was necessary to know how much fat was in each cup of cream in order to calculate the total amount of fat in the recipe. The condition of \"Emma bought 60 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The number of tomatoes Emma bought has no bearing on the amount of fat added to each serving of food.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much cream was added to the recipe. We know that Perry added a half cup of cream, so the total amount of cream added was 0.5 cups.   Next, we need to calculate how much fat was in the cream that was added. We know that cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so 0.5 cups of cream would have 44 grams of fat.   Finally, we need to calculate how much fat was added to each serving of food. We know that the recipe serves four people, so each serving would get 11 grams of fat (44 grams / 4 servings).   So, the answer is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.   The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" was relevant to the calculation process, as it was necessary to know how much fat was in each cup of cream in order to calculate the total amount of fat in the recipe.\nThe question asks us to calculate the number of grams of fat added to each serving of food. To do this, we need to know how much cream Perry added. He added a half cup of cream, which has 88 grams of fat per cup. Therefore, he added 44 grams of fat to each serving of food.  The condition of \"Emma bought 60 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The number of tomatoes Emma bought has no bearing on the amount of fat added to each serving of food.", "equation": "Emma bought 60 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, 0.16911134123802185]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. The height of Jack is 3 feet. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "If Ellen is 10 years old now, that means she will be 16 years old in 6 years. Since Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, that means Martha is 32 years old now.  The condition \"The height of Jack is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Step 1: If Ellen is 10 years old now, that means she will be 16 years old in 6 years.  Step 2: Since Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, that means Martha is 32 years old now.  The condition \"The height of Jack is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.0437651202082634]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Tom has read 5 books in the past year. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many haircuts Calvin needs to reach his goal.  To calculate what percentage Calvin is towards his goal, we need to divide the number of haircuts he has already gotten by the total number of haircuts he needs to reach his goal.  That means Calvin is 8/10 or 80% towards his goal.  The condition that Tom has read 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate what percentage Calvin is towards his goal. We can calculate this by dividing the number of haircuts he has already gotten by the total number of haircuts he needs to reach his goal. So the answer is 80%.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "Calvin needs 2 more haircuts to reach his goal.  This means that he needs a total of 10 haircuts.   The percentage is then calculated as follows:   Percentage = (8/10) x 100 = 80%   Yes, the condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the percentage.\nCalvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal, so he is 80% of the way towards his goal. The condition \"and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal\" is relevant, as it helps us calculate how far Calvin has gone towards his goal.\nCalvin has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. So, he is 80% (8/10) towards his goal.  The condition \"Tom has read 5 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom has read 5 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.09708084911108017]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Emma bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Betty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 times that, because the given sentence says Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. That means Sandra has 12 鑴 3 = 36 oranges. Then, Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 鑴 36 = 252 oranges. The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The given sentence about the tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, the answer is 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "Betty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  The condition \"Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra\" is relevant to the calculation process because it allows us to calculate how many oranges Emily has. Without this condition, it would not be possible to determine the answer.\nIf Betty has 12 oranges, Sandra has 3 times that, because the given sentence says Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. That means Sandra has 12 鑴 3 = 36 oranges. Then, Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 鑴 36 = 252 oranges. The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The given sentence about the tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process.\nBetty has 12 oranges.  Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so she has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges.  Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so she has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.   The condition \"Emma bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so the answer is 252 oranges.", "equation": "Emma bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.24036625027656555]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. The height of Tom is 15 feet. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. So, Abie has 16 bags of chips. She bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the starting point for the calculation. Without this initial condition, it would not be possible to determine how many bags of chips Abie has in the end. The condition \"The height of Tom is 15 feet\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "1. Abie had 20 bags of chips. 2. She gave 4 bags to her friend. 3. She bought 6 more bags.  Therefore, Abie has 20 bags + 6 bags = 26 bags of chips in the end.  Yes, condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the starting point for the calculation. Without this initial condition, it would not be possible to determine how many bags of chips Abie has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, which means she had 16 bags of chips. She bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, which means she has 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process because it reduces the number of bags that Abie originally had.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. So, Abie has 16 bags of chips. She bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is necessary to include the number of bags of chips that Abie bought in the store in order to calculate the total number of bags of chips that Abie has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips, so she gave 4 bags to her friend. That leaves 16 bags. Then she bought 6 bags of chips in the store. That means she has a total of 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"The height of Tom is 15 feet\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 15 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.020790012553334236]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Emma bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that each kilogram of cherries costs $8. This is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries costs. Next, we need to calculate how much Genevieve spent on the cherries. She had $1600, and her friend chipped in $400, so the total amount spent on the cherries was $2000.  Finally, we can calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. We know each kilogram cost $8, so we divide the total amount spent ($2000) by the cost per kilogram ($8) to get the number of kilograms purchased:   $2000 / $8 = 250 kilograms of cherries.  So, Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries if she had $1600 on her.  Yes, the condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, we would not know how much Genevieve had to spend on the cherries. The condition that Emma bought 8 tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "Genevieve picked some cherries and the cost per kilogram is $8. This condition is relevant because it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries costs.  Next, we need to calculate how much Genevieve spent on the cherries. She had $1600, and her friend chipped in $400, so the total amount spent on the cherries was $2000.  Finally, we can calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. We know each kilogram cost $8, so we divide the total amount spent ($2000) by the cost per kilogram ($8) to get the number of kilograms purchased:   $2000 / $8 = 250 kilograms of cherries.  So, Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries if she had $1600 on her.\nGenevieve bought 8 kg of cherries at the supermarket, and the cost of each kilogram was $8. So, the total cost of the cherries was 8 x 8 = 64.   If Genevieve had $1600 on her, she could have paid for the cherries without any help from her friend Clarice. Therefore, the condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   The answer is 8 kg of cherries.\nGenevieve picked some cherries that cost $8 per kilogram. If she had $1600, then she would have been able to buy a total of 200 kilograms of cherries. The condition that Emma bought 8 tomatoes is irrelevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.4790908396244049]}
{"original_question": "Billy's family likes to keep their bicycles stored in the garage when they're not being used. They own a total of 4 bicycles. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. Ada bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many spokes are inside the garage?", "reasoning_path": "First, the relevant information to answer this question is that Billy's family owns a total of 4 bicycles, and each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many spokes each bicycle wheel has.  To calculate the total number of spokes in the garage, we need to multiply the number of bicycles by the number of spokes per bicycle wheel. That means there are a total of 4 bicycles x 10 spokes per wheel = 40 spokes in the garage.  Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Ada bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many spokes are inside the garage. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of bicycles by the number of spokes per bicycle wheel. So the answer is 40 spokes.", "numerical_answer": 40, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the number of spokes on all 4 bicycles. This is where the fact that each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes is relevant. We can multiply 10 spokes by 4 bicycles, which gives us a total of 40 spokes.   The second step is to not include the tomatoes into the calculation as they are not relevant to the question.   The final step is to add the 40 spokes from the bicycles to the answer, giving us a total of 40 spokes inside the garage.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of wheels inside the garage. Since there are 4 bicycles, and each bicycle has two wheels, the total number of wheels inside the garage is 8.  Second, we need to calculate the total number of spokes inside the garage. Since each wheel has 10 spokes, and there are 8 wheels, the total number of spokes inside the garage is 80.  Therefore, the answer is 80 spokes.  Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\". This is because we need to know how many spokes each wheel has in order to calculate the total number of spokes inside the garage.\nThe first step in the calculation process is to determine how many bicycles are in the garage. Since the family owns a total of 4 bicycles, we can conclude that 4 bicycles are in the garage.   The second step is to determine how many spokes each bicycle wheel has. The problem states that each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes.   The third step is to calculate the total number of spokes in the garage. Since there are 4 bicycles with 10 spokes each, the total number of spokes in the garage is 40.   Therefore, the answer to the problem \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\" is 40.   The condition \"Ada bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3732944130897522, 0.22472992539405823, 0.38099128007888794, 0.09051623940467834]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Mary is 3 years old. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The TV show aired for 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the TV show aired for. There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many commercials were aired and how long each commercial lasted. That means the total time of commercials is 3 x 10 minutes = 30 minutes. The TV show itself lasted for 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours. Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Mary is 3 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how long the TV show itself lasted, not counting commercials. We can do this by subtracting the time of the commercials (3 x 10 minutes = 30 minutes) from the total time of the TV show (1.5 hours). So the answer is 1.2 hours.", "numerical_answer": 1.2, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "First, we need to subtract the 10 minutes of each commercial from the 1.5 hours. This means that the total time for commercials is 30 minutes (10 minutes x 3 commercials).  Therefore, the actual show time is 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.  So, the answer is 1.2 hours.  The condition that Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours is relevant to the calculation process because it is the starting point for the calculation. The 1.5 hours is the total amount of time that Michael was watching the TV show, and we need to subtract the commercial time in order to calculate the actual show time.\n1. Michael was watching a TV show for 1.5 hours.   2. During this time, there were 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes.  3. We need to calculate how long the TV show itself was, not counting commercials.   To solve this, we need to subtract the time spent on commercials from the total time.   1.5 hours - (3 commercials x 10 minutes each) = 1.2 hours   Therefore, the TV show itself lasted 1.2 hours, not counting commercials.\nThe total length of the TV show was 1.5 hours. There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. So the total time of the commercials was 30 minutes (10 minutes x 3).   Therefore, the length of the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1.2 hours (1.5 hours - 30 minutes). The condition \"Mary is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 3 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, -0.07901351153850555]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. The height of Mary is 10 feet. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "If Ellen is 10 years old now, then in 6 years she will be 16 years old. Therefore, Martha must be twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, so she must be 32 years old now.  The condition \"The height of Mary is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "If Ellen is 10 years old now, then in 6 years she will be 16 years old.  Therefore, Martha must be twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, so she must be 32 years old now.  The condition \"The height of Mary is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.3793002963066101]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Mary bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. This means he has 40 seeds in total. Then, he plants 60% of those, which means he plants 24 seeds. So, the answer to the question is that James planted 24 trees. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" and \"Each plant has 1 seed\" are relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it tells us how many seeds James has and how many he planted. Mary buying 15 tomatoes from the grocery store has nothing to do with how many trees James planted, so it is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "1. James collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. 2. Each tree had 20 plants. 3. Each plant had 1 seed. 4. James planted 60% of those (20 * 60% = 12 seeds per tree). 5. Therefore, James planted 24 seeds in total (12 seeds per tree * 2 trees).  So, the answer to the question is that James planted 2 trees. The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it shows how many seeds were collected and planted by James.\nJames collected 40 fruits from his two trees, which means he had 40 seeds. He planted 60% of those, which is 24 seeds. Mary bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store, but this has nothing to do with how many trees James planted. So, James planted 24 seeds, which would result in 12 trees. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames collected 40 fruits from his two trees (20 plants x 2 trees).  He planted 60% of those, which is 24 fruits.  Mary bought 15 tomatoes.   So the total number of trees planted by James is 39 (24 + 15).   The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\" as the number of seeds does not affect the total number of trees planted.\nJames collects fruits from 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed. Therefore, James has 40 seeds.   Next, he plants 60% of those. This means he plants 24 seeds (60% of 40).   The question does not mention anything about Mary, so we can ignore the information about her buying tomatoes from the grocery store.   Therefore, the answer is that James planted 24 trees. The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it tells us how many trees James planted.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees, which means he has 40 seeds in total. He then planted 60% of those, which means he planted 24 seeds. So the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 0 trees. The condition \"Mary bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.13426530361175537]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. Jack is 500 years old. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the combined square footage of Holden's current master bedroom and bathroom, which equals 459 sq ft (309 + 150). Second, we need to multiply this combined square footage by 2, which equals 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room Holden wants to add will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process, as we need to know the square footage of Holden's current master bedroom and bathroom in order to calculate the square footage of the new room. Jack's age is not relevant to this problem, as it does not affect the calculation.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the combined square footage of Holden's current master bedroom and bathroom, which equals 459 sq ft (309 + 150).  Second, we need to multiply this combined square footage by 2, which equals 918 sq ft.  Therefore, the new room Holden wants to add will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process, as we need to know the square footage of Holden's current master bedroom and bathroom in order to calculate the square footage of the new room.\nWe need to calculate the combined square footage of Holden's master bedroom and master bath, which is 309 + 150 = 459 sq ft. Then, we need to double this value to calculate the size of the home office/personal gym divided space, which is 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is necessary to calculate the combined square footage of Holden's master bedroom and master bath in order to calculate the size of the home office/personal gym divided space.   Jack's age is not relevant to this problem, as it does not affect the calculation.\nFirst, add up the total sq ft of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom:  309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft  Next, multiply the total sq ft of Holden's bedroom and bathroom by two to find out how much sq ft the new room will have:  459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft. The condition \"Jack is 500 years old\" is not relevant to this calculation, as it does not affect the size of the room.", "equation": "Jack is 500 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.05414367467164993]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. The shoe size of Mary is 50. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine how much James pays for 1 semester: 20 units x $50 = $1,000. Second, we need to determine how much James pays for 2 semesters: $1,000 x 2 = $2,000. Therefore, the answer is $2,000. The condition \"The shoe size of Mary is 50\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. We only need to consider the number of units taken per semester and the cost of each unit.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, determine how much James pays for one semester: 20 units x $50 = $1,000  Second, determine how much James pays for two semesters: $1,000 x 2 = $2,000  Therefore, the answer is $2,000.  The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much James pays for one semester. To do this, we can multiply the number of units he takes per semester (20) by the cost of each unit ($50). This gives us a total of $1,000 for one semester.   Second, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. To do this, we can multiply the total for one semester ($1,000) by the number of semesters (2). This gives us a total of $2,000 for two semesters.   The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to this calculation process. We only need to consider the number of units taken per semester and the cost of each unit.   Therefore, if each unit costs $50, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 50.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.24754221737384796]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Mary is 44 years old. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari, so she made 4 + (5 * 8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 22 buttons. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.  Yes, the condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many did Sue make?\" as it provides the information that Kendra made 44 buttons, which is used to calculate the number of buttons Sue made. The condition of Mary being 44 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. So Kendra made 5 * 8 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, which is 44 / 2 = 22 buttons. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.  Yes, the condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many did Sue make?\" as it provides the information that Kendra made 44 buttons, which is used to calculate the number of buttons Sue made.\nKendra made 5 times as many buttons as Mari (5 x 8 = 40).  Sue made half as many as Kendra (40 / 2 = 20).  So, Sue made 20 decorated buttons.  The condition that Mari made 8 buttons is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine the number of buttons Kendra made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari, so she made 4 + (5 * 8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Mary is 44 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\"", "equation": "Mary is 44 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.3214494585990906]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Emma bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "First, the condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. If the rectangle is 7 inches wide, then we can calculate the length of the rectangle by multiplying the width by 4. The length of the rectangle will be 28 inches.   Next, we can calculate the area of the rectangle by multiplying the length by the width. The area of the rectangle will be 7 x 28 = 196 inches.   Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 196 inches. The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The question about Emma buying 2 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "First of all, the condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. If the rectangle is 7 inches wide, then we can calculate the length of the rectangle by multiplying the width by 4. The length of the rectangle will be 28 inches.   Next, we can calculate the area of the rectangle by multiplying the length by the width. The area of the rectangle will be 7 x 28 = 196 inches.   Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 196 inches. The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   The question about Emma buying 2 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe rectangle is 7 inches wide. If it is 4 times as long as it is wide, then the length is 28 inches (7 x 4 = 28). The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the length and width, so the area of the rectangle is 196 square inches (7 x 28 = 196).  The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the information needed to calculate the length of the rectangle, which is required to calculate the area.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the length and width. In this case, the width is 7 inches and the length is 4 times the width, so the length is 28 inches. To calculate the area, we multiply 7 inches by 28 inches, which gives us 196 inches squared.   The condition that \"Emma bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, -0.08621281385421753]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Jack bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza has filled the 5-liter bucket, and poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. The 3-liter bucket can hold 3 liters of water at most, so any additional water will overflow the bucket. Therefore, Hamza has poured 2 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket, and has 3 liters of water left in the 5-liter bucket. She then pours the remainder, 3 liters, into the 6-liter bucket. This means the 6-liter bucket now has 3 liters of water in it.  The 6-liter bucket can hold 6 liters of water at most, so any additional water will overflow the bucket. Therefore, Hamza can put 3 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing it.  The condition that Jack bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the size of the buckets and the amount of water Hamza has already poured into them. To calculate how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket, we need to calculate how much water is already in the bucket and then subtract this from the total capacity of the bucket. So", "numerical_answer": 3, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Hamza has filled the 5-liter bucket with water and then poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters of water, the remaining 2 liters of water must be poured into the 6-liter bucket. This leaves 4 liters of space in the 6-liter bucket.   The condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because the size of the buckets does not affect the amount of water that can be poured into the 6-liter bucket. The only relevant factor is how much water is left in the 5-liter bucket.   Therefore, the answer to the problem is that Hamza can put 4 liters more water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing. The amount of 8 tomatoes purchased from the grocery store is not relevant to this problem.\nHamza has a 5-liter bucket filled with water.  She pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This would be 3 liters of water.  The remaining 2 liters of water are poured into the 6-liter bucket.   Therefore, the 6-liter bucket has 2 liters of water in it. To determine how much more water can be added to the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, we need to subtract 2 liters from the 6-liter bucket's capacity.   The answer is 4 liters.   Yes, the condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Knowing how much water was poured into the 3-liter bucket (3 liters), allows us to determine how much water was left over (2 liters) to be poured into the 6-liter bucket.\nHamza filled the 5-liter bucket and poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket is now full (3 liters). The remaining 2 liters were then poured into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now contains 2 liters of water.   Therefore, Hamza can put an additional 4 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides information about the amount of water that is already in the 6-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket with water and then poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 5-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it, and the 3-liter bucket has 3 liters of water in it.  Then, Hamza poured the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now has 4 liters of water in it.  So, the answer is that Hamza can put 2 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, for a total of 6 liters.  The condition \"Jack bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.04786061868071556]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. The height of Mary is 9 feet. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she can pour 3 liters into the 3-liter bucket, since it is the smaller of the two buckets.  Then, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it.  So, Hamza can put 3 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing (2 liters + 3 liters = 5 liters).  The condition that Mary's height is 9 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The relevant information to answer this question is the size of the buckets (3, 5, and 6 liters) and the amount of water poured into each. To calculate how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket, we need to calculate how much water was already poured into the 6-liter bucket (2 liters) and subtract this from the capacity of the 6-liter bucket (6 liters). So the answer would be: 6 liters - 2 liters = 3 liters.", "numerical_answer": 3, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. This means she has 5 liters of water.   Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can only hold up to 3 liters of water, Hamza can only pour 3 liters into it.   Therefore, she has 2 liters of water left. She then pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means she has now poured a total of 5 liters into the 6-liter bucket.   Since the 6-liter bucket can hold up to 6 liters of water, Hamza can put 1 more liter of water into it without overflowing.   Therefore, the answer to the question is 1 liter.   The condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Since the problem involves the sizes of the buckets, it is important to know how much each bucket can hold in order to calculate how much more water can be added without overflowing.\nHamza fills the 5-liter bucket.  She has 5 liters of water.  She pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket.  This leaves 2 liters in the 5-liter bucket.  She pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket.  This leaves 4 liters of space in the 6-liter bucket.   Therefore, Hamza can put 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   The condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines how much water is left in the 5-liter bucket to be poured into the 6-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket. Then, she poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. That means she can put up to 3 liters in the 3-liter bucket. The remaining 2 liters will be poured into the 6-liter bucket.   So, the 6-liter bucket can take 3 more liters, without overflowing. That means, the answer to the question is 3 liters.   The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it explains how much water Hamza can pour into the 6-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. So, the 5-liter bucket has 5 liters of water.  Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket has 3 liters of water.  Finally, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket is full, the 6-liter bucket has 2 liters of water.  Therefore, the answer to the question is that Hamza can put 2 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.  The height of Mary is 9 feet is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 9 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.06731371581554413]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. The height of Jack is 60 feet. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "First, Papi Calot needs to buy 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs to buy 7 x 18 = 126 plants.   Then, he needs to buy 15 additional potato plants. That means he needs to buy 15 more plants.   Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy 126 + 15 = 141 plants in total.   The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it is used to calculate the initial number of plants he needs to buy (126 plants). The height of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "First, Papi Calot needs to buy 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs to buy 7 x 18 = 126 plants.   Then, he needs to buy 15 additional potato plants. That means he needs to buy 15 more plants.   Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy 126 + 15 = 141 plants in total.   The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it is used to calculate the initial number of plants he needs to buy (126 plants).\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he already needs to buy 126 plants. In addition, he is thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy a total of 141 plants.  The height of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, Papi Calot needs to buy enough plants to fill 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs to buy 126 plants.  Next, he wants to add 15 additional potato plants. This means he needs to buy an additional 15 plants, for a total of 141 plants.  The height of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 60 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.031487107276916504]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Tom bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, Luke needs to make 4 bottles full. So he needs to make 85 stars per bottle. Therefore, Luke needs to make a total of 340 stars (85 stars x 4 bottles). Since he has already made 33 stars, he needs to make 307 more stars (340 stars - 33 stars).  So in answer to the question, Luke needs to make 307 more stars. The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many stars Luke needs to make per bottle. The condition \"Tom bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "Firstly, Luke needs to make 4 bottles full. So he needs to make 85 stars per bottle. Therefore, Luke needs to make a total of 340 stars (85 stars x 4 bottles). Since he has already made 33 stars, he needs to make 307 more stars (340 stars - 33 stars).  So in answer to the question, Luke needs to make 307 more stars. The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many stars Luke needs to make per bottle.\nThe first step is to calculate how many stars are required to fill the one glass jar. We know 85 stars are required, so we can subtract 33 stars that Luke has already made from that total to calculate how many more stars he needs. This means Luke needs 52 stars to fill the jar.  Now, we can multiply 52 stars by 4 (the number of bottles Luke needs to fill) to calculate how many more stars he needs in total. This comes to a total of 208 stars.  So, Luke needs to make a total of 208 stars.   The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it is necessary to subtract 33 stars from the total number of stars required to fill the jar in order to calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make.\nFirst, calculate the total number of stars Luke needs to make: 85 stars (to fill the glass jar) + 40 stars (to fill the 4 bottles) = 125 stars.  Now, calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make: 125 stars - 33 stars (the number of stars Luke has already made) = 92 more stars.  So, Luke needs to make 92 more stars in order to fill the glass jar and the 4 bottles.  The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us that Luke needs to make extra stars to fill the bottles.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill 4 bottles. To do this, we can multiply 4 (number of bottles) by 85 (number of stars needed to fill one bottle). This gives us a total of 340 stars.  Now, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33) from the total number of stars needed (340). This gives us a final answer of 307 stars.  Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles.  The condition \"Tom bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.13345006108283997]}
{"original_question": "A magazine costs $3 each. Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each. The shoe size of Mary is 2. How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Jewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each, which is $30. Step 2: Jewel is selling the magazines for $3.50 each, which is $35. Step 3: Calculate the gain. Gain = Total Revenue - Total Cost. Gain = $35 - $30 = $5. The answer is Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.  The condition that a magazine costs $3 each is relevant to the calculation process because it was used in Step 1 to determine how much Jewel had spent on her magazines. The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Step 1: Jewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each, which is $30.  Step 2: Jewel is selling the magazines for $3.50 each, which is $35.  Step 3: Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.   The condition that a magazine costs $3 each is relevant to the calculation process because it was used in Step 1 to determine how much Jewel had spent on her magazines.\nIn order to answer the question of how much Jewel will gain from selling her magazines, we need to know the amount she paid for them. Since she bought 10 magazines at a cost of $3 each, she paid a total of $30. Then, we need to know how much she will be selling them for. Since she is selling them for $3.50 each, she will make a total of $35 from the sale. Therefore, she will make a gain of $5 from selling her magazines.   The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nStep 1: Jewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each.   Total cost = 10 x 3 = $30   Step 2: Jewel sold 10 magazines for $3.50 each.   Total revenue = 10 x 3.50 = $35  Step 3: Calculate the gain   Gain = Total Revenue - Total Cost   Gain = $35 - $30 = $5   The answer is Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.   The condition \"The shoe size of Mary is 2\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 2.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3614990711212158, 0.6798670291900635, 0.07924893498420715]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. The shoe size of Emma is 200. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of tiles in each wall. Since each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, the total number of tiles in each wall is 8*20 = 160.  Next, since there are three walls in the shower, we can multiply the number of tiles in each wall (160) by 3 to get the total number of tiles in the shower: 160 * 3 = 480.  Finally, the shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process, so the answer is 480.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of tiles in each wall. Since each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, the total number of tiles in each wall is 8*20 = 160.  Next, since there are three walls in the shower, we can multiply the number of tiles in each wall (160) by 3 to get the total number of tiles in the shower: 160 * 3 = 480.  Finally, the shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process, so the answer is 480.\nThe first step is to calculate the number of tiles running the width of the shower. The three walls each have 8 tiles running the width of the wall, so 8 x 3 = 24 tiles running the width of the shower.   The second step is to calculate the number of tiles running the height of the shower. Each wall has 20 tiles running the height of the wall, so 20 x 3 = 60 tiles running the height of the shower.  The third step is to add the number of tiles running the width and the height of the shower to get the total number of tiles. 24 + 60 = 84 tiles in the shower.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to calculate the number of tiles running the height of the shower.\nFirst, let's calculate the number of tiles in one wall. 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall would give us 8 x 20 = 160 tiles in a single wall. Since there are 3 walls in the shower, the total number of tiles in the shower would be 160 x 3 = 480.  The shoe size of Emma is 200 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 200.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.04586557298898697]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Mary is 10 years old. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James has 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the total number of plants that James has. Each plant has 1 seed. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the total number of seeds that James has. He plants 60% of those. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the percentage of seeds that James plants. That means James plants 60% of 40 seeds (2 trees x 20 plants = 40 seeds).  60% of 40 seeds is 24 seeds.  Therefore, James plants 24 seeds.  The condition that Mary is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many trees did James plant. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of plants in each tree by the percentage of seeds that James plants. So the answer would be: 2 trees x 60% = 24 seeds.", "numerical_answer": 2, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James collected all the fruits from his two trees, so we know he already started with two trees. Mary is 10 years old, and this information doesn't have any relevance to the number of trees James planted. Therefore, James planted two trees.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.  This means that James has a total of 40 plants.   Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.  This means that James has planted 24 seeds (60% of 40).   Mary is 10 years old.  This information is not relevant to the calculation process.   So, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 0 trees.  The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as the question does not ask how many plants James has planted, but rather how many trees.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.   This means that James has a total of 40 plants.   Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.   This means that James plants 24 (60% of 40) of the seeds.   Mary is 10 years old.   This doesn't seem relevant to the calculation process of how many trees James planted.   So, the answer is James planted 24 trees. The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames has two trees with 20 plants each. Each plant has one seed, so he has 40 seeds in total. Since he is planting 60% of those, he will have 24 seeds in total.  Since each seed can be used to plant a tree, James planted 24 trees in total.  Yes, the condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it determines how many seeds James has available to plant trees.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees, which means he has 2 trees.  Each tree has 20 plants, and each plant has 1 seed.  He planted 60% of those, so he planted 60% of 20 plants, which is 12 plants.  Since he had 2 trees, he planted 12 plants in each tree, for a total of 24 plants.   The condition \"Mary is 10 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.07862118631601334]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Mary has read 8 books in the past year. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the cost per mile. It is given that the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. The second step is to calculate the total cost of the ride. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Therefore, the total cost of the ride is $2.5 x 4 = $10. The third step is to add the ride fee of $2 to the total cost of the ride. Therefore, the total amount Michelle paid in total for her ride is $10 + $2 = $12. Yes, the condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition is necessary to calculate the total cost of the ride. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate the total amount paid by Michelle for her ride. The condition of Mary having read 8 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The ride fee is $2, plus $2.5 per mile for 4 miles. That would mean Michelle paid a total of $10 for her ride. Yes, the condition that you have to pay a ride fee of $2 is relevant to the calculation process, as it is part of the total amount Michelle paid for her ride.\nThe first step is to calculate the cost per mile. It is given that the taxi charge per mile is $2.5.   The second step is to calculate the total cost of the ride. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Therefore, the total cost of the ride is $2.5 x 4 = $10.  The third step is to add the ride fee of $2 to the total cost of the ride. Therefore, the total amount Michelle paid in total for her ride is $10 + $2 = $12.  Yes, the condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition is necessary to calculate the total cost of the ride. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate the total amount paid by Michelle for her ride.\nFirst, Michelle pays a ride fee of $2 as soon as she enters the taxi. Then, she takes a 4-mile ride and the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. Therefore, Michelle has to pay a total of $10.5.   The condition \"Mary has read 8 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. It is a separate fact that has no bearing on the calculation.", "equation": "Mary has read 8 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.015590602532029152]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. The shoe size of Tom is 5. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli (4 x 2 = 8 scoops). Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it helps us determine how many scoops of ice cream Victoria has compared to Oli. The shoe size of Tom is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli (4 x 2 = 8 scoops).  Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it helps us determine how many scoops of ice cream Victoria has compared to Oli. The shoe size of Tom is not relevant to the calculation process.\n1. Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream. 2. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's.  Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  3. Tom's shoe size is 5.  Therefore, the shoe size of Tom is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?\".", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.016646983101963997]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. The shoe size of Tom is 10. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, which would be 15 pieces of candy. Then Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, making the total 25 pieces of candy.  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.  The shoe size of Tom does not factor into the calculation process. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, which would be 15 pieces of candy. Then Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, making the total 25 pieces of candy. The shoe size of Tom does not factor into the calculation process. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.\nIf Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 15 pieces of candy (3 times as much as Megan).  Since Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, she now has 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it tells us that Mary has 10 more pieces of candy than previously calculated.  Therefore, if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.  The shoe size of Tom does not affect the calculation of how many pieces of candy Mary has.\nWe know that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  We also know that Mary added 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.   The shoe size of Tom is 10, but this is not relevant to the calculation process. Tom's shoe size has nothing to do with the amount of candy Mary and Megan have.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.09665665030479431]}
{"original_question": "For football season, Zachary wants to buy a new football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. Jack is 3 years old. How much more money does Zachary need?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate the total cost of all of the items Zachary wants to buy. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. So, the total cost is 3.75 + 2.40 + 11.85 = 18.00.  Now, we need to subtract the amount of money Zachary has ($10) from the total cost ($18.00). This gives us 18.00 - 10.00 = 8.00.  Therefore, Zachary needs $8.00 more in order to buy all of the items.  The condition \"the shorts cost $2.40\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the amount needed to add to the total cost. Without this information, we would not know how much more money Zachary needs. The condition that Jack is 3 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "Zachary wants to buy a football, shorts, and shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. The total cost of all the items Zachary wants to buy is $17.00. Zachary has $10, so he needs $7.00 more money to buy the items.   Yes, the condition \"The football costs $3.75\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the items that Zachary needs to buy and it contributes to the total cost of all the items he wants to buy.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of all of the items Zachary wants to buy. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. So, the total cost is 3.75 + 2.40 + 11.85 = 18.00.  Now, we need to subtract the amount of money Zachary has ($10) from the total cost ($18.00). This gives us 18.00 - 10.00 = 8.00.  Therefore, Zachary needs $8.00 more in order to buy all of the items.  The condition \"the shorts cost $2.40\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the amount needed to add to the total cost. Without this information, we would not know how much more money Zachary needs.\n1. First, calculate the total cost of all items Zachary wants to buy:  Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85  Total Cost = $3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85 = $18.00  2. Next, subtract Zachary's available money from the total cost:  Available Money = $10.00 Total Cost = $18.00  Difference = $18.00 - $10.00 = $8.00  3. Finally, Zachary needs $8.00 more money to buy the football, shorts, and shoes.  Yes, the condition \"and the shoes cost $11.85\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is part of the total cost of all items Zachary wants to buy. Without knowing the cost of the shoes, we would not be able to calculate the total cost, or the difference between Zachary's available money and the total cost.\nZachary needs to buy a football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10, so he will need to find the difference between the cost of the items and the amount of money he has.  The total cost of the items is $17.00 ($3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85). Since Zachary has $10, he will need to find the difference between $17.00 and $10.00, which is $7.00.  Therefore, Zachary needs $7.00 more money in order to purchase the items he needs for football season. The condition that Zachary has $10 is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to find the difference between the cost of the items and the amount of money Zachary has.\nFirst, let's calculate the total cost of Zachary's items:  Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85  Total cost = 3.75 + 2.40 + 11.85 = 18.00  Second, let's calculate how much more money Zachary needs to buy his items:  Total cost = 18.00 Money Zachary has = 10.00  Difference = 18.00 - 10.00 = 8.00  So, Zachary needs $8.00 more to buy his items.   The condition \"Jack is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack is 3 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.45576441287994385, 0.14543353021144867, 0.0897449254989624, 0.018721066415309906, 0.5780560970306396, 0.07804296165704727]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Mary has read 200 books in the past year. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. Second, she needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since there are four quarters in a dollar, Libby will need 140 quarters to pay for the dress.  Third, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left in her piggy bank.  Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left in her piggy bank.  Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\" since it is required to calculate the number of quarters that Libby has left after replacing the dress. The condition of Mary having read 200 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "First, Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  Second, she needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Since there are four quarters in a dollar, Libby will need 140 quarters to pay for the dress.  Third, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left in her piggy bank.  Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left in her piggy bank.   Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\" since it is required to calculate the number of quarters that Libby has left after replacing the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters to start with, and she has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since a quarter is worth 0.25, we can multiply 35 by 4 to get 140. That means Libby will have 160-140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process as it states the amount Libby has to pay, which is used to determine the number of quarters she will have left.\n1. Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. 2. She needs to pay $35, which is 140 quarters. 3. After replacing the dress, she will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.  The condition that Mary has read 200 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary has read 200 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.09413762390613556]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. The shoe size of John is 5. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much time Jackie spends in total each day. We can do this by adding up the time she spends working (8 hours), exercising (3 hours), and sleeping (8 hours). This equals 19 hours.  Therefore, Jackie has 24 - 19 = 5 hours of free time each day.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is one of the activities that contribute to the total amount of time Jackie spends each day. The shoe size of John is 5 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "The question is asking for the amount of free time Jackie has. To calculate this, we need to know how many hours Jackie spends in total each day. We can do this by adding up the time she spends working (8 hours), exercising (3 hours), and sleeping (8 hours). This equals 19 hours.  Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time each day.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is one of the activities that contribute to the total amount of time Jackie spends each day.\n1. Jackie spends 8 hours working. 2. Jackie spends 3 hours of exercise. 3. Jackie spends 8 hours of sleep.  This means that Jackie has 8 + 3 + 8 = 19 hours of activities per day.  Therefore, Jackie has 24 - 19 = 5 hours of free time per day.  The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how much time Jackie has spent on activities.\nStep 1: Calculate how much time Jackie spends per day:  8 hours working + 3 hours of exercise + 8 hours of sleep = 19 hours per day  Step 2: Calculate how much free time Jackie has:  24 hours (in a day) - 19 hours (what Jackie spends per day) = 5 hours of free time  Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.  The shoe size of John is 5 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of John is 5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.09235884249210358]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. The height of Mary is 10 feet. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "We have 30 minutes to get to school without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. That means we have 9 minutes left to get to our room without being late. The condition regarding the height of Mary is not relevant to this calculation. Yes, the condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without that information, the calculation process would be different.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "You and your brother have 30 minutes to get to school. It takes 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and 6 minutes to get to the school building. That means you have 9 minutes left to get to your room without being late. The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the total time you have to get to school and to your room.\nWe have 30 minutes to get to school without being late.  It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building.  That means we have 9 minutes left to get to our room without being late.   The condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building\" is relevant to the calculation process because it reduces the amount of time we have to get to our room.\nYou and your brother have 30 minutes to arrive at school without being late. It takes you 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and then 6 minutes to get to the school building - so that adds up to 21 minutes. That leaves you with 9 minutes to get to your room. The condition regarding the height of Mary is not relevant to this calculation.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.1363617479801178]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The height of Jack is 20 feet. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Jed was fined $256 and the speed limit was 50 mph. We also know that in Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour over the speed limit. So, we can say that Jed was fined for traveling 16 mph over the speed limit, or 66 mph. The condition is relevant because it is necessary to know the fine rate for each mile per hour over the speed limit in order to calculate Jed's speed. The height of Jack is 20 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of problem Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "We know that Jed was fined $256 and the speed limit was 50 mph.  We also know that in Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour over the speed limit.   So, we can say that Jed was fined for traveling 16 mph over the speed limit, or 66 mph.  The condition is relevant because it is necessary to know the fine rate for each mile per hour over the speed limit in order to calculate Jed's speed.\nWe know that in Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit.  We also know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.   Therefore, we can calculate the speed that Jed was traveling at by rearranging the equation.   $256 = 16 x (Speed - 50)  Therefore, Speed = 56 mph.   Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 56 mph in miles per hour.   The condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it provides us the information necessary to solve the problem. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the speed that Jed was traveling at.\nFirst, we need to determine the speed at which Jed was traveling. We know that the fine for speeding is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit. We also know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding.  To calculate Jed's speed, we can set up an equation using the information we have. We know that the speed limit is 50 mph, so we can set the equation up as follows:  50 + x = 256/16  Where x is the number of miles per hour over the speed limit that Jed was traveling.  Solving for x, we get x = 60 mph.  Therefore, Jed was traveling at 60 mph when he was fined for speeding.  The height of Jack is 20 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of problem Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "equation": "The height of Jack is 20 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.12417054176330566]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. The shoe size of Jack is 20. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "There are 3 walls in the shower, so we need to multiply the number of tiles on one wall by 3.  There are 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, so the total number of tiles on one wall is 8 x 20 = 160.  To get the total number of tiles in the shower, we need to multiply the number of tiles on one wall (160) by 3: 3 x 160 = 480 tiles. Therefore, there are 480 tiles in the shower.  The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it gives us the total number of tiles on one wall (160), which we need to multiply by 3 to get the total number of tiles in the shower (480). The shoe size of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall,\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\" because it tells us how many tiles are on each wall of the shower. Since there are 3 walls, and 8 tiles on each wall, that means there are 24 tiles running the width of the shower.   Now, the problem states that there are 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, there are 20 x 24 = 480 tiles in the shower. So, the answer is 480 tiles.   The shoe size of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThere are 3 walls in the shower, so we need to multiply the number of tiles on one wall by 3.  There are 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, so the total number of tiles on one wall is 8 x 20 = 160.  To get the total number of tiles in the shower, we need to multiply the number of tiles on one wall (160) by 3: 3 x 160 = 480 tiles.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it gives us the total number of tiles on one wall (160), which we need to multiply by 3 to get the total number of tiles in the shower (480).\nThe number of tiles in a 3 sided shower is determined by counting the number of tiles in each wall.  Each wall of the shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, the number of tiles in each wall is 8 x 20 = 160.  Since there are 3 walls in the shower, the total number of tiles in the shower is 160 x 3 = 480.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many tiles are in the shower?\" is 480.  The shoe size of Jack is 20, which is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, -0.053336143493652344]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Jack bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much money Gretchen made for each day. She sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday. Multiplying 24 by $20.00, we get $480.00 for Saturday. Multiplying 16 by $20.00, we get $320.00 for Sunday.  The condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to this calculation process because it tells us how much money Gretchen makes for each drawing. Without this condition, we would not know how much money she makes for each drawing and would not be able to calculate her total earnings. Therefore, the total money Gretchen made in the weekend was $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00. The condition of Jack buying 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much money Gretchen made for each day. She sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday. Multiplying 24 by $20.00, we get $480.00 for Saturday. Multiplying 16 by $20.00, we get $320.00 for Sunday.   The condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to this calculation process because it tells us how much money Gretchen makes for each drawing. Without this condition, we would not know how much money she makes for each drawing and would not be able to calculate her total earnings.  Therefore, the total money Gretchen made in the weekend was $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00.\nGretchen charges $20.00 per drawing, so she made $20.00 x (24 + 16) = $640.00.  The condition \"Jack bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.20936672389507294]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Emma has read 10 books in the past year. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.  Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  Yes, the condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\". Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate how many cherry saplings Kim has left.  Emma having read 10 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits.  Step 2: 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.  Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  Yes, the condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\". Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate how many cherry saplings Kim has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so that's 80 x 25% = 20. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so that's 20 - 6 = 14. Emma has read 10 books in the past year; this does not affect the calculation process of the problem of how many cherry saplings Kim has left, so the answer is 14.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout. This means that 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits have sprouted.  Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings. So, Kim has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is necessary to calculate the number of cherry saplings Kim has left.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings sprout.  Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so the remaining number of saplings is 20 - 6 = 14.  Answer: Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  No, the condition \"Emma has read 10 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma has read 10 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364680886268616, 0.24044959247112274, 0.4611811935901642, 0.07761750370264053]}
{"original_question": "Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. The shoe size of Tom is 20. How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know how many of Mr.Angstadt's students are enrolled in Statistics. Since half of the students are enrolled in Statistics, there must be 60 students enrolled in Statistics. Of those students, 90 percent, or 54, are seniors. Therefore, the answer to the question is 54. The condition that Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the starting point for the calculation. Without knowing how many students Mr.Angstadt has, we would not be able to determine how many of them are seniors enrolled in Statistics. The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 20\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 54, "gold_answer": "54", "instructions": "First, we need to know how many of Mr.Angstadt's students are enrolled in Statistics. Since half of the students are enrolled in Statistics, there must be 60 students enrolled in Statistics. Of those students, 90 percent, or 54, are seniors. Therefore, the answer to the question is 54.   The condition that Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the starting point for the calculation. Without knowing how many students Mr.Angstadt has, we would not be able to determine how many of them are seniors enrolled in Statistics.\nFirst, let's calculate the total number of students enrolled in Statistics. Since half of Mr.Angstadt's students (120/2) are enrolled in Statistics, then there must be 60 students enrolled in Statistics.   Then, let's calculate the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics. Since 90% of the students in Statistics are seniors, then 90% of 60 students (60 * 0.9) must be seniors, which is 54.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?\" is 54.   The condition \"Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, the answer would be different.\nFirst, Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics (60 students).   Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors (54 seniors).  Therefore, there are 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics in Mr.Angstadt's school.  The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 20\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5140396952629089, 0.5659631490707397, 0.6956555247306824, 0.0885104089975357]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. Emma bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "First, we have 30 minutes to get to school. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and 6 minutes to get to the school building. So, we have 9 minutes left to get to our room without being late. The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, the calculation process would be different.  The condition of Emma buying 30 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, we have 30 minutes to get to school without being late, so we have 24 minutes left to get to our room.  Second, it takes us 15 minutes to get to the school gate and 6 minutes to get to the school building, which makes 21 minutes.  Therefore, we have 3 minutes left to get to our room without being late.   The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process because it reduces the amount of time we have to get to our room.\nStep 1: We have 30 minutes to get to school.   Step 2: It takes us 15 minutes to get to the school gate.   Step 3: We then have 15 minutes left to get to our room.   Step 4: It takes another 6 minutes to get to the school building.   Step 5: We now have 9 minutes left to get to our room.   Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room, without being late.   The condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building\" is relevant to the calculation process as it helps us to determine the amount of time left to get to our room.\nWe have 30 minutes to get to school. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and 6 minutes to get to the school building. So, we have 9 minutes left to get to our room without being late.  The condition \"Emma bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, -0.04306323453783989]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. The shoe size of Jack is 10. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle has to pay the ride fee of $2 as soon as she enters the taxi. Then, the taxi charges $2.5 per mile. Since Michelle's ride was 4 miles, she will have to pay 4 x $2.5 = $10. Therefore, the total amount of money Michelle has to pay is $2 + $10 = $12.  The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it tells us the amount of miles that Michelle has traveled in the taxi, which is necessary to calculate the total amount of money she has to pay. The shoe size of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of Michelle's ride, so this part of the question can be ignored.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Michelle pays the ride fee of $2. This is relevant to the calculation process.  Second, Michelle rides a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. So, the total cost for the ride is $2 + (4 * $2.5) = $11.  Therefore, Michelle paid $11 in total for her ride. The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Michelle has to pay the ride fee of $2 as soon as she enters the taxi. Then, the taxi charges $2.5 per mile. Since Michelle's ride was 4 miles, she will have to pay 4 x $2.5 = $10. Therefore, the total amount of money Michelle has to pay is $2 + $10 = $12.  The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it tells us the amount of miles that Michelle has traveled in the taxi, which is necessary to calculate the total amount of money she has to pay.\nThe first thing to know is that Michelle paid a ride fee of $2. The shoe size of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process of Michelle's ride, so this part of the question can be ignored.  Next, we need to calculate the cost per mile. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5. Since Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles, we can calculate the total cost of her ride by multiplying the cost per mile by the number of miles traveled.  Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $10 ($2.5 x 4 miles) for her ride.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.08605646342039108]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Tom bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "The sum of the three brothers' ages is 24. If Hannah is twice as old, that means she is 48 years old. Therefore, the answer is Hannah is 48 years old. We know that Hannah has three brothers, all 8 years old. 8 x 3 = 24. Therefore, the sum of her brother's ages is 24. Since Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, her age is twice 24, or 48. The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is the starting point for the calculation. Without this information, we would not be able to find the sum of her brother's ages and therefore would not be able to calculate Hannah's age. The condition \"Tom bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "The sum of the three brothers' ages is 24.   If Hannah is twice as old, that means she is 48 years old.   The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is the starting point for the calculation. Without this information, we would not be able to find the sum of her brother's ages and therefore would not be able to calculate Hannah's age.   Therefore, the answer is Hannah is 48 years old.\nWe know that Hannah has three brothers, all 8 years old. 8 x 3 = 24. Therefore, the sum of her brother's ages is 24. Since Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, her age is twice 24, or 48.  The condition \"Tom bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, -0.021977193653583527]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. Tom bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine how much Maria paid for the pen. Since the pencil cost her $8, and the pen cost half the price of the pencil, then we can deduce that the pen cost Maria $4. Therefore, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, making the total price she paid for both items $12.  Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it provides the information we need to calculate how much Maria paid for the pen. The condition of Tom buying 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how much Maria paid for the pen. Since the pencil cost her $8, and the pen cost half the price of the pencil, then we can deduce that the pen cost Maria $4. Therefore, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, making the total price she paid for both items $12.   Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it provides the information we need to calculate how much Maria paid for the pen.\nMaria purchased a pencil for $8. The pen cost her half the price of the pencil. So the pen cost her $4. Therefore, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, making a total of $12.   The condition of Tom buying 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.08284403383731842]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The height of Emma is 8 feet. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to add up the weights of all four cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. The next step is to divide this sum by the number of cats: 48 姊 4 = 12. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to calculate the total weight of the cats. The condition of Emma's height being 8 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not provide any information about the weights of the cats.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weights of all four cats and then divide the sum by the number of cats. In this case, the number of cats is 4.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) / 4 = 10.825 pounds.  The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process since we need to know how many cats there are in order to calculate the average weight.\nStep 1: Add up the weights of all four cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  Step 2: Divide the total weight by the number of cats: 48 / 4 = 12  Answer: The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to calculate the total weight of the cats.\nThe first step is to add up the weights of all four cats:  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  The next step is to divide this sum by the total number of cats:  48 姊 4 = 12.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds,\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is one of the weights that was used to calculate the average.\nFirst, we need to add all the weights of the cats together. That would be 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. The next step is to divide this total by the number of cats. In this case, that is 4. Thus, 48 / 4 = 12. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The fourth cat's weight of 9.3 pounds is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it was used in the calculation of the average weight.\nThe first step is to add up the weights of Janele's cats to get the total weight. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  The second step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats. 48 / 4 = 12.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The height of Emma is 8 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not provide any information about the weights of the cats.", "equation": "The height of Emma is 8 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.22746525704860687]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. Jack has read 5 books in the past year. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "The pencil cost $8, so if the pen was half the price, it would cost $4. So, Maria paid a total of $8 + $4 = $12 for the pen and pencil. Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it informs us of the cost of the pencil and allows us to calculate the cost of the pen. The condition of Jack having read 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The pencil cost $8, so if the pen was half the price, it would cost $4. So, Maria paid a total of $8 + $4 = $12 for the pen and pencil. Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it informs us of the cost of the pencil and allows us to calculate the cost of the pen.\nMaria paid $8 for the pencil and half the price for the pen, which is $4. So, she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.  The condition of Jack having read 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack has read 5 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.09033972024917603]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Tom bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price.  Original Price: $350 Sale Price: $140  Difference: $350 - $140 = $210  Now, we can find the percentage off.  Percentage Off = (Difference / Original Price) x 100  Percentage Off = ($210 / $350) x 100  Percentage Off = 60%  Yes, the condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price. The condition of Tom buying 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, to answer the question, we need to calculate the percentage off that Asia got at the sale. To do this, we need to know the original price of the dress and the sale price.   We know that the original price of the dress was $350 and the sale price was $140. We need to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price, which is $210.   Next, we need to calculate the percentage off. To do this, we need to divide the difference ($210) by the original price ($350). This gives us a percentage of 60%, which means that Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition that Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140 is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the sale price of the dress, which is needed to calculate the percentage off.\nFirst, we need to find out the difference between the original price and the sale price.  Original Price: $350 Sale Price: $140  Difference: $350 - $140 = $210  Now, we can find the percentage off.  Percentage Off = (Difference / Original Price) x 100  Percentage Off = ($210 / $350) x 100  Percentage Off = 60%  Yes, the condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount of money saved by Asia:  $350 - $140 = $210  Next, we need to calculate the percentage of the discount:  $210 / $350 = 0.6  Finally, we need to convert the decimal to a percentage:  0.6 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got a 60% off discount at the sale.  The condition \"Tom bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.17082086205482483]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Tom bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of the cats. 12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds. Then, we need to divide the total by the number of cats to get the average. 48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us the weight of one of Janele's cats, which we need to include in our calculation. The condition Tom bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of the weights of all her cats divided by the number of cats she has. The condition that she has 4 cats is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that the number of cats to be taken into account for the calculation is 4.   So, the average weight of Janele's cats is: (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) / 4 = 11.425 pounds.  Tom's tomatoes are not relevant to the calculation process of Janele's cats.\nFirst, we have to add up the weight of all the cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then, we need to divide that by the number of cats. 48 divided by 4 = 12. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since all the weights were already given.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of the cats. 12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds. Then, we need to divide the total by the number of cats to get the average. 48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us the weight of one of Janele's cats, which we need to include in our calculation.\nJanele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds.   In order to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weights of all 4 cats, and then divide the total by the number of cats.  The total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   The average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know the weight of the fourth cat, and would not be able to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats.\nTo calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add the weights of all 4 cats together and divide that sum by the total number of cats. This has nothing to do with Tom buying 10 tomatoes from the grocery store. So, the condition Tom bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The average weight of Janele's cats is 11.45 pounds.", "equation": "Tom bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.10485704243183136]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Tom is 30 years old. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since all her brothers are 8 years old, then we just need to multiply 8 by 3 (number of brothers). So, the sum of her brother's ages is 24. Now, we can calculate how old Hannah is. Since she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, then we need to multiply 24 by 2. So, Hannah is 48 years old.  Yes, the condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it determines the sum of her brother's ages which is used in the calculation. The condition \"Tom is 30 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since all her brothers are 8 years old, then we just need to multiply 8 by 3 (number of brothers). So, the sum of her brother's ages is 24.  Now, we can calculate how old Hannah is. Since she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, then we need to multiply 24 by 2. So, Hannah is 48 years old.   Yes, the condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it determines the sum of her brother's ages which is used in the calculation.\nFirst, we need to calculate the sum of the ages of Hannah's three brothers. Since all three are 8 years old, the total sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Now that we know the total age of Hannah's three brothers, we can calculate how old Hannah is. Since she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, her age is 24 x 2 = 48 years old.  Therefore, the answer to the question is that Hannah is 48 years old.   The condition \"Tom is 30 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom is 30 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.15808820724487305]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Jack is 5 years old. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to understand how many seeds James has in total. James has 2 trees with 20 plants each, so he has 40 plants in total. Each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds in total.  Second, we need to understand how many seeds he plants. He plants 60% of those, so he plants 24 seeds.  Finally, we need to understand how many trees James planted. Since he planted 24 seeds, he has planted 24 trees.  Yes, the condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate how many trees James planted. The condition \"Jack is 5 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James begins with 2 trees with 20 plants each. He collects all the fruits from them. This means that James has a total of 40 plants.   He then plants 60% of those plants, which is 24 plants.  Therefore, James planted 24 trees.  The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. This condition only states that James had 2 trees to begin with and that he collected all the fruits from them, which is not necessary for the calculation of how many trees he planted.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. This means that there are 40 plants in total.  Each plant has 1 seed, so James has 40 seeds in total.  He plants 60% of those, so James plants 24 seeds.  Jack is 5 years old, so this is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, the answer is that James planted 24 trees. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.  So, James has 40 plants in total.   Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.  This means that James has planted 24 seeds (40 plants x 60% = 24 seeds).   Jack is 5 years old.  Jack's age is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   How many trees did James plant?  Since James has planted 24 seeds, he has planted 24 trees.   Is condition \"Each plant has 1 seed,\" relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many trees did James plant?\" Yes, this condition is relevant. Since each plant has 1 seed, we can calculate the number of trees planted by James by multiplying the number of plants by the percentage of plants he planted.\nJames collected all the fruits from two trees, which means he has two trees. Each tree had 20 plants with one seed each, which adds up to 40 seeds. James planted 60% of those seeds, which would be 24 seeds. Since he had two trees, he planted 24 seeds in each tree. So this means he planted two trees.  The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, James would have planted 40 seeds instead of 24.\nFirst, James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants, so he collects 40 fruits.   Second, each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds.   Third, he plants 60% of those, so he plants 24 seeds.   Therefore, James has planted 2 trees.   The condition that \"Jack is 5 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack is 5 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.25969240069389343]}
{"original_question": "A magazine costs $3 each. Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each. Emma bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much Jewel paid for the 10 magazines. Jewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each, so she spent $30.  Second, we need to calculate how much Jewel will receive for selling her magazines. She will receive $3.50 for each magazine, so she will earn $35.  Finally, we can calculate how much Jewel will gain from selling her magazines. She will gain a total of $35 - $30 = $5 from selling her magazines.  Yes, the condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us how much Jewel paid for the magazines in the first place. The condition of Emma buying 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "We need to calculate how much Jewel paid for the 10 magazines and then subtract that from the total amount she will receive from selling them.   Jewel paid $30 for 10 magazines. She will receive $35 for selling them.   So, she will gain a total of $5 from selling the magazines.  Yes, the condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us how much Jewel paid for the magazines in the first place.\nJewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each, so she spent $30.  She then sold them at $3.50 each, so she earned $35.  Therefore, Jewel will gain a total of $5 from selling her magazines.   Yes, the condition \"Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how much Jewel paid for the magazines or how much she sold them for, so we would not be able to calculate how much she gained from selling them.\n1. Jewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each = $30 2. Jewel sold 10 magazines for $3.50 each = $35  So, Jewel's gain from selling her magazines is $35 - $30 = $5.  The condition \"Emma bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3614990711212158, 0.6798670291900635, 0.15534737706184387]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Max bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. So, Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.  Yes, the condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. Max buying 15 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "Megan has 5 pieces of candy. Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has (3 x 5 = 15) pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary has (15 + 10 = 25) pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  Max bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store. This information is not relevant to the calculation process.  If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total? Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.  Yes, the condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?\".\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.  Max buying 15 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Max bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.15767012536525726]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Emma bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of Emma buying 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?\" because it tells us that James is taking a total of 40 units for two semesters.   To calculate the cost, we need to multiply the cost per unit ($50) by the total number of units (40).   Therefore, the answer is $2,000.\nThe condition that \"Emma bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  We know that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate how much he pays for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the number of units by the cost of each unit.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters of college.", "equation": "Emma bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.09954661875963211]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The height of Ada is 24 feet. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "The fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. So if Jed was fined $256 for speeding, it means he was driving at a speed of 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. Since the posted speed limit on the road was 50 mph, this means Jed was driving at a speed of 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph). The condition that Ada's height is 24 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the fine for speeding in Zeoland and the posted speed limit on the road where Jed was fined for speeding. We can calculate the speed at which Jed was driving by adding the posted speed limit (50 mph) and the speed over the posted speed limit (16 mph). So the answer would be: 50 mph + 16 mph = 66 mph.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much speed Jed was traveling over the posted speed limit. We know that the posted speed limit was 50 mph, so to calculate how much speed Jed was traveling over the posted speed limit, we need to subtract 50 from the speed Jed was traveling.   Second, we need to calculate how much Jed was fined for speeding. We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. We also know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding.   From the two pieces of information, we can calculate that Jed was traveling at a speed of 80 mph (256/16 = 16, 16 x 50 = 800).   The condition provided is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us the fine for speeding in Zeoland and how it is calculated. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate how much speed Jed was traveling at.\nIn Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. So, if Jed was fined $256, then he must have been traveling at $256/16 = 16 mph over the posted speed limit of 50 mph. Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 66 mph. The condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the speed limit (50 mph) and the amount of the fine ($256), which is used to calculate Jed's speed (66 mph).\nFirst, let's focus on the problem. We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph, so we can conclude that Jed was traveling at a speed above 50 mph. We also know that the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. We can use this information to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling by dividing the fine amount ($256) by the fine amount for each mile per hour ($16). So, Jed was traveling at a speed of 16 mph over the posted speed limit. This means that Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph.   The condition \"The height of Ada is 24 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 24 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.02659595012664795]}
{"original_question": "A magazine costs $3 each. Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each. Tom bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?", "reasoning_path": "Jewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each, so she spent a total of $30. She then sold them for $3.50 each, so she earned a total of $35 from selling her magazines. Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines. The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it allows us to calculate the amount of money Jewel spent on buying the magazines and the amount of money she earned from selling them. The condition \"Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each\" is also relevant to the calculation process. Without the condition, we would not know how much Jewel bought the magazines for or how much she is selling them for. So, to calculate how much Jewel will gain from selling her magazines, we can use the following equation: Gain = (Selling Price - Buying Price) * Quantity. In this case, the equation would be: Gain = (3.50 - 3.00) * 10 = $5. Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines. The condition of Tom buying 2 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?\"", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each, so she spent a total of $30.  She then sold them for $3.50 each, so she earned a total of $35 from selling her magazines.   Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.   The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it allows us to calculate the amount of money Jewel spent on buying the magazines and the amount of money she earned from selling them.\nThe condition \"Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without the condition, we would not know how much Jewel bought the magazines for or how much she is selling them for.   So, to calculate how much Jewel will gain from selling her magazines, we can use the following equation:   Gain = (Selling Price - Buying Price) * Quantity   In this case, the equation would be:   Gain = (3.50 - 3.00) * 10 = $5  Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.\nJewel buys 10 magazines at $3 each, which is $30. She then sells the 10 magazines at $3.50 each, which is $35. So, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.  The condition \"Tom bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?\"", "equation": "Tom bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3614990711212158, 0.6798670291900635, -0.02972261793911457]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. The height of Tom is 5 feet. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This tells us that James has 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. This tells us that James has 40 plants. Each plant has 1 seed. This tells us that James has 40 seeds. He plants 60% of those. This tells us that James will plant 24 (40 x 0.6) of those seeds. Therefore, James planted 24 trees. The condition that Tom's height is 5 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James has 2 trees, each tree has 20 plants and each plant has 1 seed. The relevant calculation is that James plants 60% of those seeds. So the answer would be: 24 trees.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "First, James collected all the fruits from his two trees. This means that he had two trees before he started collecting the fruits.  Second, each tree had 20 plants. Each plant had 1 seed, and James planted 60% of those (12 seeds).  Third, the height of Tom has no relevance to the calculation process.  Therefore, James planted two trees.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.  This means that James had a total of 40 plants.   Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.  This means that James planted 24 seeds (60% of 40).   The height of Tom is 5 feet.  This is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not provide any information about the number of trees that James planted.   Therefore, the answer is that James planted 24 trees. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not provide any information about the number of trees that James planted.\nFirst, James collected all the fruits from his two trees. So we know he has two trees.   Second, we know that each tree has 20 plants and each plant has one seed. This means that James has a total of 40 seeds from his two trees.   Third, we know he planted 60% of the seeds, which means he planted 24 seeds.   Finally, since we know that James has two trees and he planted 24 seeds, James planted 12 trees.   The condition \"each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\" because it does not affect the final answer.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees.  Each tree has 20 plants.  Each plant has 1 seed.  He plants 60% of those.   Therefore, James planted 60% of 40 (2 trees x 20 plants = 40 seeds).  60% of 40 is 24.   So, James planted 24 trees.   The height of Tom is 5 feet is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This means that he has planted 12 plants (60% of 20 plants) from each tree. This means that James has planted 24 plants in total. Therefore, the answer to \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 0. The condition \"The height of Tom is 5 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 5 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.12613391876220703]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Tom is 33 years old. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. This means that Kendra made 5 times as many as Mari plus 4 more. So if Mari made 8 buttons, then Kendra made (5 x 8) + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. So Sue made (44 / 2) = 22 buttons. The condition that Tom is 33 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons; therefore, Kendra made 5 x 8 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half of 44, so she made 22 buttons. The condition given in the question is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many buttons Kendra made, which is necessary to calculate how many buttons Sue made.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.   This means that Kendra made 5 times as many as Mari plus 4 more.  So if Mari made 8 buttons, then Kendra made (5 x 8) + 4 = 44 buttons.   Sue made half as many as Kendra.   So Sue made (44 / 2) = 22 buttons.   The condition that Tom is 33 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.\nMari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 40 buttons (5 times 8). Therefore, Sue made 20 buttons (half of 40). The condition that Tom is 33 years old does not affect the calculation process.", "equation": "Tom is 33 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.08144086599349976]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. The shoe size of Mary is 50. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "Lucy had $65 in the bank before she made the $15 deposit. After the deposit, her balance was $80. Then she made a $4 withdrawal, so her balance is now $76. So the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76. The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process, as this is the action that changed Lucy's bank balance. The shoe size of Mary is not relevant and does not affect the calculation.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "The starting point is that Lucy has $65 in the bank.   The next step is that she made a $15 deposit, so her balance is now $80.   She then followed with a $4 withdrawal, so her balance is now $76.   Therefore, the answer to \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.   The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is not relevant to the calculation process. It is only a starting point.\nLucy had $65 in the bank before she made the $15 deposit. After the deposit, her balance was $80. Then she made a $4 withdrawal, so her balance is now $76.   So the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.   The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process, as this is the action that changed Lucy's bank balance. The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process.\nLucy had $65 in the bank. After making a $15 deposit, her balance would be $80. After the $4 withdrawal, her balance would be $76. Thus, Lucy's bank balance is $76.  The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it affects the end result of Lucy's bank balance. The shoe size of Mary is not relevant and does not affect the calculation.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. That means she has a total of $76 after the deposit, and then a total of $72 after the withdrawal. So the answer is Lucy's bank balance is $72.  The condition \"The shoe size of Mary is 50\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 50.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637164354324341, 0.30860891938209534, 0.2903803884983063, 0.11719164252281189]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. Mary bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment will be equal to the total cost of the appointment ($300) minus the amount covered by his insurance (80% of $300, or $240). Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the basis for the amount that James has to pay out-of-pocket. Without knowing this information, it would be impossible to determine what James's out-of-pocket cost is. Mary buying 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment will be equal to the total cost of the appointment ($300) minus the amount covered by his insurance (80% of $300, or $240). Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the basis for the amount that James has to pay out-of-pocket. Without knowing this information, it would be impossible to determine what James's out-of-pocket cost is. Mary buying 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, let's calculate how much James's insurance will cover. Since his insurance covers 80%, then 80% of $300 is $240. That means that his insurance will cover $240 of the $300 visit.  Now, let's calculate his out-of-pocket cost. If his insurance covers $240, then his out-of-pocket cost is the remaining $60. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   Yes, the condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is needed to calculate how much his insurance will cover of the cost of the visit.\n1. James's primary care doctor charged $300 for the visit. 2. James's insurance covers 80% of the visit. 3. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"Mary bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.10802390426397324]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Ada has read 1000 books in the past year. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens. In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens. In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens. In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens. In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens. In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens. In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens. In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens. In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens. Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens. The condition that Ada has read 1000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 +", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "The number of chickens Michael has now is 550. If the chickens increase by 150 each year, then in one year, Michael will have 700 chickens (550 + 150 = 700). If Michael continues to increase his chickens by 150 each year, then after 9 years, Michael will have a total of 2250 chickens (700 + 150 = 850; 850 + 150 = 1000; 1000 + 150 = 1150; 1150 + 150 = 1300; 1300 + 150 = 1450; 1450 + 150 = 1600; 1600 + 150 = 1750; 1750 + 150 = 1900; 1900 + 150 = 2050; 2050 + 150 = 2250). Yes, the condition given is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMichael's farm has 550 chickens now.  If each year he increases the number by 150, then after 9 years the number of chickens will be:  550 + (150 * 9) = 1550 chickens.   The condition \"Ada has read 1000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Ada has read 1000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.0773722380399704]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Jack bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle would have to pay the ride fee of $2, since that is stated in the condition.  Second, Michelle would then have to pay the taxi charge per mile of $2.5 for the 4 miles she traveled. That would be $2.5 x 4 = $10.   Therefore, Michelle would pay a total of $2 + $10 = $12 for her ride.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it adds an extra fee that must be included in the total cost of the ride. The condition of Jack buying 6 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles and the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. To calculate the cost for the ride, we need to add the ride fee of $2 and the taxi charge per mile multiplied by the number of miles traveled. So the answer would be: $2 + 4 x $2.5 = $12. Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Michelle would have to pay the ride fee of $2, since that is stated in the condition.  Second, Michelle would then have to pay the taxi charge per mile of $2.5 for the 4 miles she traveled. That would be $2.5 x 4 = $10.   Therefore, Michelle would pay a total of $2 + $10 = $12 for her ride.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it adds an extra fee that must be included in the total cost of the ride.\nFirst, Michelle must pay the ride fee of $2. This is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Michelle paid for her ride.   Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. This is relevant to the calculation process of how much Michelle paid for her ride.   Third, Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. This is also relevant to the calculation process, since we must know how many miles Michelle traveled in order to calculate her total fare.   In conclusion, Michelle paid a total of $12.50 ($2 + 4 x $2.5) for her ride. The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMichelle paid a ride fee of $2 when she entered the taxi. This is the fixed cost for her ride. Then, the taxi charged her $2.5 * 4 = $10 for the miles. So, the total amount that Michelle paid for her ride is $2 + $10 = $12.   The condition \"Jack bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?\".", "equation": "Jack bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.18040120601654053]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The shoe size of Emma is 623721. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: The population of Springfield is 482,653 people.  Step 2: Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. That means Greenville has 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people.  Step 3: The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people.   Yes, the condition \"Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Emma's shoe size is 623721 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. We can calculate this by adding the population of Springfield and Greenville. So the answer would be: 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "1. We are given the population of Springfield, which is 482,653.  2. We are also given that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. To calculate Greenville's population, we need to subtract 119,666 from 482,653.  3. Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + (482,653 - 119,666) = 602,319.  4. The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, let's calculate the population of Greenville. We know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so it has 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people.  Now we can calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. We know that Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 362,987 people, so the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people.  The shoe size of Emma is 623721 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 623721.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.18696725368499756]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Mary is 20 years old. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how many tiles there are in each wall. To do this, we can multiply the number of tiles running the width of the wall by the number of tiles running the height of the wall. In this case, each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, so each wall has 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.  Now, since there are three walls in the shower, we can multiply the number of tiles in each wall by 3 to get the total number of tiles in the shower. So, in this case, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480 tiles.  Yes, the condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition provides us with the information needed to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. No, the condition \"Mary is 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many tiles there are in each wall. To do this, we can multiply the number of tiles running the width of the wall by the number of tiles running the height of the wall. In this case, each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, so each wall has 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.  Now, since there are three walls in the shower, we can multiply the number of tiles in each wall by 3 to get the total number of tiles in the shower. So, in this case, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480 tiles.  Yes, the condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition provides us with the information needed to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe first step is to calculate the number of tiles running along the width of the 3 walls. There are 8 tiles running along the width of each wall, so the total number of tiles running along the width is 8 x 3 = 24.  The second step is to calculate the number of tiles running along the height of the 3 walls. There are 20 tiles running along the height of each wall, so the total number of tiles running along the height is 20 x 3 = 60.  Finally, the total number of tiles in the shower is the sum of the tiles running along the width and the tiles running along the height: 24 + 60 = 84 tiles.   Yes, the condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process since we need to know how many tiles are running along the height of the walls in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nIn order to calculate the number of tiles in the shower, we need to know the number of tiles running the width of the wall and the number of tiles running the height of the wall. We know that each wall of the 3-sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480.  No, the condition \"Mary is 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary is 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, -0.1010340005159378]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The height of Emma is 2000 feet. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. This is relevant to the calculation process because it is the first part of the problem. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. This is also relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much the barbell costs. The height of Emma is 2000 feet. This is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide information on the cost of anything.  So, to answer the question of how much Jack paid for everything, we need to add the cost of the squat rack ($2500) with the cost of the barbell (1/10 of $2500, which is $250).   The total cost is therefore $2750.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Condition: Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. -> This is relevant to the calculation process because it is the first part of the problem. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. -> This is also relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much the barbell costs. The height of Emma is 2000 feet. -> This is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide information on the cost of anything.  So, to answer the question of how much Jack paid for everything, we need to add the cost of the squat rack ($2500) with the cost of the barbell (1/10 of $2500, which is $250).   The total cost is therefore $2750.\nThe squat rack costs $2500, so Jack paid $2500 for that. The barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, so it cost $250. The height of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  So, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.\nJack paid $2500 for the squat rack.  He paid 1/10 of that for the barbell, which is $250.  So, Jack paid a total of $2750 for the squat rack and the barbell.   The condition about the height of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Emma is 2000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, -0.009138310328125954]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Ada is 10 years old. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. That means he has to pay for 2 kg of meat. So, he has to pay $164 (2 kg x $82 per kg).  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.   Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Ada is 10 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much money Melies has to pay for the meat. Since he bought 2 kg of meat and it costs $82 per kilogram, it means he needs to pay $164 (2 x 82 = 164). Now, he has $180 in his wallet, so he will have $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.   Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it tells us how much meat Melies bought and helps us to calculate how much money he needs to pay for it.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. That means he has to pay for 2 kg of meat. So, he has to pay $164 (2 kg x $82 per kg).  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.   Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it is used to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nStep 1: Melies bought 2 kg of meat.  Step 2: The meat costs $82 per kilogram.  Step 3: Melies has $180 in his wallet.   So, we can calculate the total cost of the meat as follows:   Total cost = 2 kg x $82 = $164   Now, to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat, we can subtract the total cost of the meat from the amount of money Melies has in his wallet:   Money left = $180 - $164 = $16   Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much money Melies has to start with, which is necessary to calculate how much money he has left after paying for the meat.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. So, Melies has to pay $164 for the meat.  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Ada is 10 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, -0.011660667136311531]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of time that Jackie spends on activities that are not free time. This includes working, exercise, and sleep. 8 hours working + 3 hours exercise + 8 hours sleep = 19 hours.   The second step is to subtract the total amount of time from the total number of hours in a day. 24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours.   Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time.   The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working,\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the activities that takes away from Jackie's free time. However, the condition \"Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not relate to the amount of free time that Jackie has.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the total amount of time that Jackie spends on activities that are not free time. This includes working, exercise, and sleep. 8 hours working + 3 hours exercise + 8 hours sleep = 19 hours.   The second step is to subtract the total amount of time from the total number of hours in a day. 24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours.   Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time.   The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working,\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the activities that takes away from Jackie's free time. However, the condition \"Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not relate to the amount of free time that Jackie has.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This means that she has 19 hours of activities (8 + 3 + 8). Subtracting 19 from 24 gives her 5 hours of free time. The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is an essential part of the calculation process. The condition helps us to understand how much time Jackie has spent on activities and how much free time she has.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day, which is a total of 19 hours. This leaves 5 hours of free time. The condition \"Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.02717984840273857]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Ada is 15 years old. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Betty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so she has 3x12=36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so she has 7x36=252 oranges. Therefore, Emily has 252 oranges. The condition \"Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition \"Ada is 15 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it is not necessary to consider it in the answer.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "If Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, which is 3 鑴 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, which is 7 鑴 36 = 252 oranges. Therefore, Emily has 252 oranges. The condition \"Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nBetty has 12 oranges.  Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so she has 3x12=36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so she has 7x36=252 oranges.  The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to figure out how many oranges Sandra has so that we can calculate how many oranges Emily has.\nIf Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, which is 3 x 12 = 36 oranges.  If Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, then Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.   Therefore, the answer is that Emily has 252 oranges.  The condition \"Ada is 15 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it is not necessary to consider it in the answer.", "equation": "Ada is 15 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.20115280151367188]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Jack is 15 years old. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in one day. To do this, we need to divide 90 inches of gift wrap by 18 inches, which equals 5 gift boxes per day.   Next, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in three days. To do this, we need to multiply 5 gift boxes per day by 3 days, which equals 15 gift boxes in three days.   So, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes in three days if he has 90 inches of gift wrap per day. The condition that Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop and he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box is relevant to the calculation process, since it states how much gift wrap Edmund needs for each gift box. The condition \"Jack is 15 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in one day. To do this, we need to divide 90 inches of gift wrap by 18 inches, which equals 5 gift boxes per day.   Next, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in three days. To do this, we need to multiply 5 gift boxes per day by 3 days, which equals 15 gift boxes in three days.   So, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes in three days if he has 90 inches of gift wrap per day. The condition that Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop and he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box is relevant to the calculation process, since it states how much gift wrap Edmund needs for each gift box.\nWe know that Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. We also know that he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. To work out how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days, we need to divide 90 (inches of gift wrapper) by 18 (inches of gift wrapper needed per gift box).  90 姊 18 = 5  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 5 gift boxes every 3 days.  The condition \"Jack is 15 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack is 15 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.0770440623164177]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. The shoe size of Ada is 5. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The shoe size of Ada is 5, but this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, the answer is 25 pieces of candy.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, or 15 pieces of candy.   If Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, she will have 25 pieces of candy in total.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?\" is 25 pieces of candy.   The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is used to determine how many pieces of candy Mary has in the first place.\nStep 1: We know that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Step 2: Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.  Answer: Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many pieces of candy Mary has in total.\nFirst, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means that Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The shoe size of Ada is 5, but this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, the answer is 25 pieces of candy.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.34292876720428467]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. So, it is 2 x 82 = 164 dollars. Melies had 180 dollars in his wallet. So, Melies has 180 - 164 = 16 dollars left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much meat Melies bought and how much he needs to pay for it. The condition is essential in calculating how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The fact that Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store has no relevance to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs 82 dollars per kilogram. So, it is 2 x 82 = 164 dollars. Melies had 180 dollars in his wallet. So, Melies has 180 - 164 = 16 dollars left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much meat Melies bought and how much he needs to pay for it. The condition is essential in calculating how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The fact that Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store has no relevance to the calculation process.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = 164.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. Therefore, Melies has 180 - 164 = 16 dollars left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to this calculation process because it tells us how much Melies had to pay for the meat. Without this condition, we would not know how much Melies had to pay for the meat and therefore would not be able to calculate how much money he has left after paying for it.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. So, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = $164.  Now, we have to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. We know that Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, the amount of money left after paying for the meat is 180 - 164 = $16.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine the amount of money Melies has left after paying for the meat. Without this condition, we would not know how much money Melies has left.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. So, he has to pay $164 for the meat. He has $180 in his wallet, so he has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?\" since it has nothing to do with Melies' purchase or his budget.", "equation": "Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.19275987148284912]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. The height of Emma is 80 feet. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many grams of cream were added to the recipe. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so if Perry added a half cup of cream, then he added 44 grams of fat.  Next, we need to figure out how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since there are four people, each serving of the food will get one fourth of the total amount of fat added, or 11 grams of fat. So, to answer the question, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it provides information on the amount of fat that is in one cup of cream. Without that knowledge, it wouldn't be possible to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. The condition \"The height of Emma is 80 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many grams of cream were added to the recipe. To do this, we need to know how much cream was added, which is a half cup. We also need to know how many grams of fat are in one cup of cream, which is 88 grams. Therefore, the total amount of fat added to the recipe is 44 grams (half of 88). Since the recipe serves four people, each serving of food will have 11 grams of fat (44 divided by four).  The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it provides information on the amount of fat that is in one cup of cream. Without that knowledge, it wouldn't be possible to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many grams of cream were added to the recipe. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so if Perry added a half cup of cream, then he added 44 grams of fat.  Next, we need to figure out how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since there are four people, each serving of the food will get one fourth of the total amount of fat added, or 11 grams of fat.   So, to answer the question, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.   The condition \"The height of Emma is 80 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Emma is 80 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, 0.03916049003601074]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Tom has read 20 books in the past year. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know how much $35 is in quarters. $35 is equal to 140 quarters. Therefore, Libby will have to pay 140 quarters for her sister's dress. Second, we need to know how many quarters Libby has. Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many quarters Libby has before replacing her sister's dress.  Finally, we can calculate how many quarters Libby will have left by subtracting the amount she has to pay (140 quarters) from the amount she has (160 quarters). Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left. Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\" because it provides the starting point for the calculation. The condition of Tom having read 20 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.   To calculate how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress, we need to know how much $35 is in quarters.   $35 is equal to 140 quarters.   Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.   Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\" because it provides the starting point for the calculation.\nLibby has 160 quarters. She has to pay $35, which is 140 quarters. Therefore, Libby will have 20 quarters left.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process because it is the reason why Libby has to pay $35 and lose 140 quarters.\nLibby has 160 quarters before replacing her sister's dress. To replace the dress, she'll need to pay $35. Since 1 quarter is equal to $0.25, Libby needs to pay $35 with 140 quarters. Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left.   The condition \"Tom has read 20 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom has read 20 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.015187857672572136]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Tom is 2000 years old. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of Tom being 2000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" tells us that James will take 20 units over two semesters.  The next step is to calculate how much it will cost James for two semesters.  We know that each unit costs $50, so to calculate the cost for two semesters, we need to multiply the number of units (20) by the cost per unit ($50) and then multiply that by the number of semesters (2).   Therefore, James will pay $2,000 for two semesters.  Yes, the condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\n1. We know that James takes 20 units per semester at the community college.  2. We also know that each unit costs $50.  3. Therefore, James pays $50 x 20 units = $1000 for one semester.  4. For two semesters, James pays $1000 x 2 = $2000.   The condition \"Tom is 2000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom is 2000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.10685446858406067]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The shoe size of Mary is 8. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the total weight of all four cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.0 Step 2: Divide the total weight of all four cats by the number of cats (4). 48.0 / 4 = 12.0 Answer: The average weight of Janele's cats is 12.0 pounds. The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many cats there are in order to calculate the average weight. The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is also relevant to the calculation process, as it is one of the weights that we need to add together to calculate the total weight of the cats. The shoe size of Mary is 8 and is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the total weight of all four cats.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.0  Step 2: Divide the total weight of all four cats by the number of cats (4).  48.0 / 4 = 12.0  Answer: The average weight of Janele's cats is 12.0 pounds.  The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many cats there are in order to calculate the average weight.\nStep 1: Add up the weights of all of the cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  Step 2: Divide the total by the number of cats. 48 / 4 = 12  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It is simply providing information about the weight of two of the cats.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of all 4 cats. We can do this by adding up the weights of each cat: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  Next, we need to calculate the average weight. To do this, we divide the total weight (48) by the number of cats (4). The average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  The third condition (The third weighs 14.7 pounds) is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is one of the weights that we need to add together to calculate the total weight of the cats.\nFirst, Janele needs to add up all the weights of her cats.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48   Next, she needs to divide this total by the number of cats.  48 / 4 = 12   This means that the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJanele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them and we need to add up the weight of all four cats and divide it by 4 to get the average weight.  The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each (12 + 12 = 24).  The third cat weighs 14.7 pounds (24 + 14.7 = 38.7).  The fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds (38.7 + 9.3 = 48).  The average weight of all four cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.  The shoe size of Mary is 8. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 8.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.1919010728597641]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. The shoe size of Tom is 15. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips and she gave 4 bags to her friend. That means she has 16 bags of chips left. Then she bought 6 bags of chips in the store. So in the end, Abie has 22 bags of chips.  Yes, the condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the number of bags of chips Abie has in the end. Without that condition, she would have 20 bags of chips in the end. The shoe size of Tom is 15, which is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie started with 20 bags of chips. She then gave away 4 bags and bought 6 more in the store. So she now has 20 - 4 + 6 = 22 bags of chips.  The shoe size of Tom is not relevant to this calculation process.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips and she gave 4 bags to her friend. That means she has 16 bags of chips left. Then she bought 6 bags of chips in the store. So in the end, Abie has 22 bags of chips.  The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the number of bags of chips Abie has in the end. Without that condition, she would have 20 bags of chips in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend.  So, Abie has 16 bags of chips at this stage.   And then she bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.  So, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.   The shoe size of Tom is 15. This is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. So, in the end, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips. The shoe size of Tom is 15, which is not related to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 15.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.0821194276213646]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Jack has read 6 books in the past year. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many miles Michelle rode in the taxi. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much the taxi charges for each mile. That means Michelle pays $2.5 x 4 = $10 for her ride. As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that there is an additional fee of $2 to enter the taxi. So in total, Michelle pays $12 for her ride ($10 + $2). Yes, the condition \"taxi charge per mile is $2.5\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Jack has read 6 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Michelle pays for her ride. We can calculate this by adding the ride fee of $2 with the taxi charge per mile multiplied by the number of miles Michelle rode in the taxi. So the answer is $12.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Michelle pays the ride fee of $2. Then, she pays the taxi charge of $2.5 per mile for 4 miles. So, the total amount of money Michelle pays is $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $12.50. Yes, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Michelle has to pay a ride fee of $2. This is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Second, we need to calculate the total cost for the ride. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5 and Michelle's ride constitutes 4 miles. Therefore, the total cost for the ride is $2.5 x 4 = $10.  Therefore, Michelle has to pay a total of $12 ($2 + $10) for her ride.\nMichelle paid a ride fee of $2 as soon as she entered the taxi. As the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, Michelle paid a total of $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $12 for her ride from office to home. The condition \"Jack has read 6 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?\".", "equation": "Jack has read 6 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.06769358366727829]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Jack has read 50 books in the past year. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens. In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens. In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens. In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens. In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens. In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens. In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens. In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens. In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens. Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens. The condition that Jack has read 50 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 +", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "Michael has 550 chickens now.   After one year, he will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  After two years, he will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  After three years, he will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.   In general, after n years, he will have 550 + 150 脳 n chickens.  So after 9 years, he will have 550 + 150 脳 9 = 1450 chickens.  Yes, the condition is relevant and needed to calculate the answer.\nFirst, let's calculate the number of chickens Michael will have after 9 years. Assuming he starts with 550 chickens, he will have a total of 550 + (150 x 9) = 1950 chickens after 9 years.  Now, let's consider the condition \"Jack has read 50 books in the past year.\" This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not directly affect the number of chickens Michael will have after 9 years.", "equation": "Jack has read 50 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.24464765191078186]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Tom bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. This means she needs to spend 140 quarters (35 x 4 = 140). So after replacing the dress, she will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left. Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Tom buying 20 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.   She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.   This means she needs to spend 140 quarters (35 x 4 = 140).   So after replacing the dress, she will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.   Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process. To calculate how many quarters Libby will have left, we need to know how much the dress costs.  To calculate how many quarters Libby will have left, we need to first calculate how many quarters she will need to pay for the dress. Since a quarter is worth 25 cents, she will need to pay 140 quarters to replace the dress.  Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress. Tom buying 20 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.\nLibby has 160 quarters to start. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress, which equals 140 quarters. After replacing the dress, she will have 20 quarters left. The condition that Tom bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "Tom bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.08205432444810867]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. The shoe size of Ada is 50. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "Lucy had $65 in the bank before making the deposits and withdrawals. So, the equation for Lucy's new balance is 65 + 15 - 4 = $76. Since the shoe size of Ada is irrelevant to the problem, the answer is still $76.  Yes, the condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is needed to calculate the final bank balance. The shoe size of Ada is 50 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Since Lucy had $65 in the bank before making the deposits and withdrawals, the equation for Lucy's new balance is 65 + 15 - 4 = $76. Since the shoe size of Ada is irrelevant to the problem, the answer is still $76.\nThe initial bank balance of Lucy was $65. After making a $15 deposit, the bank balance of Lucy was $80. After making a $4 withdrawal, the bank balance of Lucy was $76.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.  The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is needed to calculate the final bank balance.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit. That means her new balance is $80. She then followed by a $4 withdrawal. That means her bank balance is now $76. So, the answer is Lucy's bank balance is $76.  Yes, the condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" because it affects the final bank balance.\nLucy's initial bank balance is $65. After the $15 deposit, her balance is $80. After the $4 withdrawal, her balance is $76. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.  The shoe size of Ada is 50 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 50.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637164354324341, 0.30860891938209534, 0.2903803884983063, 0.14622336626052856]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys one bar of French soap for $8.00 and it lasts her two months. In one year, Maria would need 6 bars of soap ($8.00 x 6 = $48.00). The condition that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how long one bar of soap will last her, which is important information to solve this problem. First, we need to calculate how many bars of soap Maria needs in a year. Since one bar lasts her for two months, Maria needs 6 bars of soap per year.   Now, we need to calculate how much money Maria will spend on soap for the entire year. Since she spends $8.00 per bar, Maria will spend $48.00 for 6 bars of soap.   Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will spend $48.00 on soap.   Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition of Mary buying 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Maria buys one bar of French soap for $8.00 and it lasts her two months. In one year, Maria would need 6 bars of soap ($8.00 x 6 = $48.00). The condition that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how long one bar of soap will last her, which is important information to solve this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many bars of soap Maria needs in a year. Since one bar lasts her for two months, Maria needs 6 bars of soap per year.   Now, we need to calculate how much money Maria will spend on soap for the entire year. Since she spends $8.00 per bar, Maria will spend $48.00 for 6 bars of soap.   Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will spend $48.00 on soap.   Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMaria buys one bar of soap for $8.00. She has two months' worth of soap with that bar. Therefore, she needs to buy 6 bars of soap in one year to last her the entire year.   So, she will spend $48.00 on soap to stock up for the entire year.   The condition that Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.2981894910335541]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. The shoe size of Ada is 200. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: 80% of 100 plays is 80. This means Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays.  Step 2: 100 plays minus 80 plays equals 20 plays. This means Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the percentage of plays that Megan was the lead actress in.  The condition \"The shoe size of Ada is 200\" is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" Therefore, we can ignore this condition and focus on the first two conditions.  To answer the question, we can calculate how many plays Megan was the lead actress in and subtract this number from the total number of plays.  Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, so she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  100 plays (total number of plays) - 80 plays (number of plays Megan was the lead actress in) = 20 plays  Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Step 1: 80% of 100 plays is 80. This means Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Step 2: 100 plays minus 80 plays equals 20 plays. This means Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the percentage of plays that Megan was the lead actress in.\nThe first question is \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\"   We know that, in total, Megan participated in 100 plays. We also know that she was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means that in 80 of the 100 plays, she was the lead actress. Therefore, she was not the lead actress in the remaining 20 plays.   So, the answer to the question is 20.   The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us to determine how many times Megan was not the lead actress. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately answer the question.\n1. Megan participated in 100 plays. 2. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. 3. The shoe size of Ada is 200.  The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" Therefore, we can ignore this condition and focus on the first two conditions.  To answer the question, we can calculate how many plays Megan was the lead actress in and subtract this number from the total number of plays.  Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, so she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  100 plays (total number of plays) - 80 plays (number of plays Megan was the lead actress in) = 20 plays  Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 200.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.13690076768398285]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Jack bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That means she bought a total of 21 packs of balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so she bought a total of 21 x 19 = 399 balls. Therefore, Julie bought 399 balls in all. The condition \"Jack bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\". Without this condition, we can still calculate the total number of balls Julie bought.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many balls Julia bought in each color. She bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. So she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Now, we need to add up the total number of balls that Julia bought. 57 + 190 + 152 = 399.  So, Julia bought 399 balls in all.  The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many packs of red balls Julia bought, which we need to calculate the total number of balls she bought in all.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That means she bought a total of 21 packs of balls.  Each pack contains 19 balls, so she bought a total of 21 x 19 = 399 balls.  The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is relevant for the calculation process, as it indicates how many packs of yellow balls Julie bought. Without this condition, we would not be able to determine how many balls Julie bought in total.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That means she bought 3 x 19 red balls, 10 x 19 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 green balls.  The total number of balls Julie bought is 3 x 19 + 10 x 19 + 8 x 19 = 567.  The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many green balls Julie bought. Without it, we wouldn't know how many green balls Julie bought and would not be able to calculate the total number of balls she bought.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. So the number of balls she bought is 3 x 19 + 10 x 19 + 8 x 19 = 595.  Yes, the condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\". Without that condition, we could not calculate the number of balls she bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package.  So, Julie bought:  Red balls = 3 x 19 = 57 Yellow balls = 10 x 19 = 190 Green balls = 8 x 19 = 152  Total number of balls Julie bought = 57 + 190 + 152 = 399  Therefore, Julie bought 399 balls in all.  The condition \"Jack bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\"", "equation": "Jack bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315247178077698, 0.41100406646728516, 0.43914249539375305, 0.484716534614563, 0.23930110037326813]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. The shoe size of Ada is 40. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, meaning 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits sprout. Next, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, meaning he has (20-6) = 14 cherry saplings left.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"The shoe size of Ada is 40\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" The relevant information to answer this question is that Kim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so the number of saplings left can be calculated by subtracting 6 from the number of sprouted pits (20-6 = 14). Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. Step 2: 25% of 80 = 20 cherry pits sprout.  Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings, leaving 20 - 6 = 14 saplings left.   So, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.   The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the starting point for the calculations. Without knowing this, it would not be possible to determine how many saplings Kim has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, meaning 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits sprout.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings, meaning he has (20-6) = 14 cherry saplings left.  The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\"\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, which means that 20 of the pits sprout (25% of 80 = 20).  Next, Kim sells 6 of the saplings. So now Kim has 14 cherry saplings left (20 - 6 = 14).  The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to this problem, so it does not need to be included in the calculation process.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings. Then Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"The shoe size of Ada is 40.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\"", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 40.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.536467969417572, 0.24044960737228394, 0.46118125319480896, 0.06452750414609909]}
{"original_question": "Rose is an aspiring artist. She wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings. Rose already has $7.10. Mary has read 5 books in the past year. How much more money does Rose need?", "reasoning_path": "First, Rose needs to buy a paintbrush ($2.40), a set of paints ($9.20), and an easel ($6.50). That adds up to $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10. Second, we need to subtract the amount of money Rose already has ($7.10). That leaves us with $18.10 - $7.10 = $11.00. Therefore, Rose needs an additional $11.00 to purchase the items she wants.  Yes, the condition \"a paintbrush that costs $2.40\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is one of the items that Rose needs to purchase. No, the condition of Mary having read 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Rose wants a paintbrush, a set of paints, and an easel. She already has $7.10.  To calculate how much more money Rose needs, we need to add up the cost of the items that she wants: $2.40 (paintbrush) + $9.20 (set of paints) + $6.50 (easel) = $18.10.  Since Rose has $7.10, she needs an additional $11.00 to purchase the items.  The condition that the paintbrush costs $2.40 is relevant to the calculation process, as it is one of the items that Rose needs to purchase. However, it is not the only factor that must be taken into account. We also need to consider the cost of the set of paints and the easel.\nRose needs $2.40 for the paintbrush, $9.20 for the set of paints, and $6.50 for the easel. That adds up to $18.10. She already has $7.10, which means she needs $11 more.  Yes, the condition \"a set of paints that costs $9.20\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Rose needs to have $9.20 for the set of paints included in her total amount of money needed.\nRose needs a paintbrush ($2.40), a set of paints ($9.20), and an easel ($6.50).  Total cost of these items = $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10  Rose already has $7.10, so she needs $18.10 - $7.10 = $11.00 more.  Yes, the condition \"and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is one of the items that Rose needs to purchase in order to do her paintings.\nPaintbrush: $2.40 Paints: $9.20 Easel: $6.50  Total cost: $18.10  Rose already has $7.10, so she needs $11 more. So, yes, the condition of Rose having $7.10 is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nRose needs a paintbrush costing $2.40, a set of paints costing $9.20, and an easel costing $6.50. She already has $7.10. So to get all the items, she needs a total of $14.20. Subtracting her current amount of $7.10 from the total amount of $14.20, we can calculate that Rose needs $7.10 more to get all the items.   No, the condition \"Mary has read 5 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary has read 5 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4616824686527252, 0.3893391489982605, 0.17714686691761017, 0.24710991978645325, 0.43306344747543335, 0.07385997474193573]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Mary has read 2 books in the past year. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "First, Ellen is 10 years old now. Second, Martha realized she is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years. This means, Martha's age = 2 * (Ellen's age + 6). Therefore, Martha's age now = 2 * (10 + 6) = 32. The condition \"Mary has read 2 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years and Ellen is 10 years old now. To calculate Martha's age now, we need to multiply Ellen's age after 6 years by 2. So the answer would be: 2 x (10 + 6) = 32. Therefore, Martha's age now is 32.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Since Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, the equation is:   Martha's age = 2 * (Ellen's age + 6).   Therefore, Martha's age now = 2 * (10 + 6) = 32.   The condition \"Mary has read 2 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary has read 2 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.3082747161388397]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Emma is 20 years old. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "Lucy initially had $65 in the bank. She then made a $15 deposit, which means her new balance was $80. After that, she made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance was now $76. So, the answer to the question is $76.   Yes, the condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\". Without that condition, the problem would not be able to be solved. The condition of Emma being 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of what is Lucy's bank balance.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Lucy has $65 in the bank: Yes, the condition is relevant as this is the starting point of the calculation process.   She made a $15 deposit: $65 + $15 = $80   Followed by a $4 withdrawal: $80 - $4 = $76   So, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   Yes, the condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" was relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\".\n1) Lucy has $65 in the bank:  Balance = $65   2) She made a $15 deposit:  Balance = $65 + $15 = $80   3) She followed by a $4 withdrawal:  Balance = $80 - $4 = $76   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\". Without that condition, the problem would not be able to be solved.\nLucy initially had $65 in the bank. She then made a $15 deposit, which means her new balance was $80. After that, she made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance was now $76. So, the answer to the question is $76.   Yes, the condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it affects the final bank balance.\nLucy's bank balance is $65 before she made the two transactions. After she made the $15 deposit, her bank balance is $65 + $15 = $80. After she made the $4 withdrawal, her bank balance is $80 - $4 = $76. So, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"Emma is 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\".", "equation": "Emma is 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637164354324341, 0.30860891938209534, 0.2903803884983063, 0.18225602805614471]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. The height of Tom is 5 feet. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of scoops of ice cream that Victoria has. According to the condition, Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. So, if Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, then Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  Now, we can compare the number of scoops of ice cream that Oli has with the number of scoops of ice cream that Victoria has. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  Yes, the condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?\". Without the condition, we would not have been able to answer the question. The condition of Tom's height being 5 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of how many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli. The relevant information to answer this question is that Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream and Victoria has twice more scoops of ice", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of scoops of ice cream that Victoria has. According to the condition, Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. So, if Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, then Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.   Now, we can compare the number of scoops of ice cream that Oli has with the number of scoops of ice cream that Victoria has. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  Yes, the condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?\". Without the condition, we would not have been able to answer the question.\nOli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  So, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  The height of Tom is 5 feet. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it does not provide any information to help in the calculation.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 5 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, -0.05419253185391426]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The fact that Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The fact that Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday. Each sandwich requires 2 pieces of bread, so she eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.   On Sunday, she eats 1 sandwich, which requires 2 pieces of bread.   So in total, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats. If she ate 2 sandwiches on Sunday, then she would have eaten 8 pieces of bread.\nTo answer the question, we only need to know how many sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. Since Sally eats two sandwiches on Saturday and one sandwich on Sunday, we can say that Sally eats a total of three sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday.  Now, since each sandwich uses two pieces of bread, we can simply multiply the number of sandwiches that Sally eats (three) by the number of pieces of bread used in each sandwich (two). This gives us a total of six pieces of bread.  Therefore, Sally eats six pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition that Mary bought five tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not provide any information that is pertinent to the calculation.", "equation": "Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.21062308549880981]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Jack is 60 years old. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he would need to buy 126 plants. Since he still has a bit of room left and he wants to add 15 additional plants, he would need to buy a total of 141 plants (126 + 15). The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the original number of plants Papi Calot was planning to buy. The condition of Jack being 60 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect the number of plants that Papi Calot needs to buy.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he would need to buy 126 plants. Since he still has a bit of room left and he wants to add 15 additional plants, he would need to buy a total of 141 plants. The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the original number of plants Papi Calot was planning to buy.\nPapi Calot is planning to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. So in total he will need to buy 126 plants (7x18). But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. So in total he will have to buy 141 plants (126+15). The condition is relevant to the calculation process.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. So, he has to buy 7 x 18 = 126 plants.  Then, he is thinking of adding 15 additional plants. So, he needs to buy 15 more plants.  Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy a total of 126 + 15 = 141 plants.  The condition \"Jack is 60 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect the number of plants that Papi Calot needs to buy.", "equation": "Jack is 60 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.04863429069519043]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Ada bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. So if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. So now Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the calculation process because without this condition, the answer would have been 15 instead of 25.  Ada's tomatoes are not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?\" is 25.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "Megan has 5 pieces of candy. Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the problem, since it is used to calculate how many pieces of candy Mary has in total. Ada's tomatoes are not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nStep 1: Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. So if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 15 pieces of candy.   Step 2: Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. So now Mary has 25 pieces of candy.   Step 3: Ada bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store. This does not affect the amount of candy that Mary has, so Mary still has 25 pieces of candy.   So, the answer to the question \"If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?\" is 25.  The condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection\" is relevant to the calculation process because without this condition, the answer would have been 15 instead of 25.\nWe know that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. So, if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 5 x 3 = 15 pieces of candy.   Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. So, Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.   The condition \"Ada bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so it can be ignored.  Therefore, the answer is Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "equation": "Ada bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.2390991598367691]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. The height of Ada is 5 feet. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. Therefore, Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread.  The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is how we know Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The problem wants to know how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.   We know that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, and that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday.   Therefore, Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is how we know Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. Therefore, Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread.  The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process as it indicates how many sandwiches Sally eats on Sunday, which is necessary to calculate the number of pieces of bread she eats across Saturday and Sunday. The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, let's answer how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday? In this case, Sally eats 4 pieces of bread (2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread = 4 pieces of bread).  The condition \"The height of Ada is 5 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it has nothing to do with the number of pieces of bread Sally eats.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 5 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.052309758961200714]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Tom bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. That means James collects fruits from 40 plants. Each plant has 1 seed, so James has 40 seeds. He plants 60% of those, so he plants 24 seeds. The condition that Tom bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James collects fruits from 2 trees, each tree has 20 plants, each plant has 1 seed, and he plants 60% of those. To calculate how many trees James planted, we need to divide the number of seeds he planted by the number of plants in each tree. So the answer would be 24 / 20 = 1.2 trees.", "numerical_answer": 1.2, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This means that James has 40 fruits. Each tree has 20 plants. This means that James has 40 plants in total. Each plant has 1 seed, so James has 40 seeds in total. He plants 60% of those. This means he plants 24 seeds. Tom bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. This has no relevance to the calculation process.  Therefore, James planted 2 trees, since he collected all the fruits from his 2 trees.\nStep 1: James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees, so that's 2 trees.  Step 2: Each tree has 20 plants, so that's 40 plants in total.  Step 3: Each plant has 1 seed, so that's 40 seeds in total.  Step 4: He plants 60% of those, so that's 24 seeds.  Step 5: Tom bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store, so that's irrelevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, the answer is 2 trees. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\".\nJames has two trees with 20 plants each. He collects all the fruits from these two trees, which gives him 40 seeds. He then plants 60% of those seeds, which is 24 seeds. This means he planted 24 trees (each from one seed).  The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is relevant to the problem since it is the basis for the calculation. Without that condition, we would not know how many seeds he had to plant or how many trees he planted.\nJames has two trees with 20 plants each. That means he has 40 plants in total. Each plant has 1 seed, so that means he has 40 seeds in total. If he plants 60% of those (24 seeds), then he would have planted 2 trees.  So the answer is 2 trees. The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. That means he collected 40 plants in total.  Each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds.  He plants 60% of those, which is 24.  Therefore, James planted 24 trees.  The condition \"Tom bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.22561617195606232]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Mary is 150 years old. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024.  Therefore, she can share 1,024 sweets between herself and her 3 friends, so each person will get 1,024 姊 4 = 256 sweets each.  The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is needed to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has. The condition \"Mary is 150 years old.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets. 212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow = 1024 sweets. Then, we need to divide the total by 4, so each person will get 256 sweets. The condition is relevant because it tells us that there are 4 people sharing the sweets.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024.  Therefore, she can share 1,024 sweets between herself and her 3 friends, so each person will get 1,024 姊 4 = 256 sweets each.  The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is not needed to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has.\nFirst, calculate the total number of sweets: 212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow = 1024.  Next, divide this number by 4 (Jennifer and her 3 friends): 1024 / 4 = 256.  This means that each person (including Jennifer) will get 256 sweets.  The condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets.\" does not affect the calculation process, as it is not relevant to how many sweets each person will get.\nFirst, the condition \"Mary is 150 years old.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  Second, Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, so she has a total of 1,024 sweets.  Third, if she wants to share them equally between herself and her 3 friends, each person will get 1,024 / 4 = 256 sweets.  Fourth, of the 256 sweets each person will get, Jennifer will get 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, while each of her friends will get 104 green sweets, 156 blue sweets and 252 yellow sweets.  So, the answer is that Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets, with Jennifer getting 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, and each of her friends getting 104 green sweets, 156 blue sweets and 252 yellow sweets.", "equation": "Mary is 150 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.09731398522853851]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Jack is 6 years old. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "In the given condition, Michelle has to pay a ride fee of $2 as soon as she enters the taxi. Then, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. So, Michelle will have to pay $2.5 for each mile. Since she has ridden 4 miles, she will have to pay 4 x $2.5 = $10 in total. Adding the ride fee of $2, her total amount to be paid will be $2 + $10 = $12. So, Michelle paid $12 in total for her ride. Yes, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition of Jack being 6 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "In the given condition, Michelle has to pay a ride fee of $2 as soon as she enters the taxi. Then, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. So, Michelle will have to pay $2.5 for each mile. Since she has ridden 4 miles, she will have to pay 4 x $2.5 = $10 in total. Adding the ride fee of $2, her total amount to be paid will be $2 + $10 = $12. So, Michelle paid $12 in total for her ride. Yes, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 when she entered the taxi.   Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. As she rode 4 miles, the cost of the ride would be 4 x $2.5 = $10.   Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $2 + $10 = $12 for her ride.   The condition that Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the number of miles she traveled that determines the cost of her ride.\nThe taxi charge per mile is $2.5 and Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $10 ($2.5 per mile x 4 miles) for her ride. The condition \"Jack is 6 years old\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack is 6 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.06758717447519302]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Mary has read 200 books in the past year. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.   Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Mary has read 200 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "The number of chickens on his farm now is 550.  After 1 year, the number of chickens will be 550 + 150 = 700.  After 2 years, the number of chickens will be 700 + 150 = 850.  After 3 years, the number of chickens will be 850 + 150 = 1000.  After 4 years, the number of chickens will be 1000 + 150 = 1150.  After 5 years, the number of chickens will be 1150 + 150 = 1300.  After 6 years, the number of chickens will be 1300 + 150 = 1450.  After 7 years, the number of chickens will be 1450 + 150 = 1600.  After 8 years, the number of chickens will be 1600 + 150 = 1750.  After 9 years, the number of chickens will be 1750 + 150 = 1900.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing that the chickens increase by 150 each year, it would be impossible to calculate the number of chickens after 9 years.\nThe number of chickens on Michael's farm now is 550. He increases the number of chickens by 150 annually.  If we add 150 chickens every year, that means after 9 years, the total number of chickens will be 550 + (9 x 150) = 1650.   Therefore, Michael will have 1650 chickens after 9 years.  The condition that Mary has read 200 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary has read 200 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.042966652661561966]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The height of Jack is 234546 feet. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. To do this, we need to subtract 119,666 from the population of Springfield, which is 482,653. This gives us a population of Greenville of 362,987 people.  Next, we need to calculate the total population of both cities. We can do this by adding the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (362,987). This gives us a total population of 845,640 people.  The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the population of Springfield and Greenville, which we used to calculate the total population of both cities. The condition \"The height of Jack is 234546 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process and can be ignored.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "The population of Springfield is 482,653 people.  Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so its population is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people.   The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people.   The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the population of Springfield and Greenville, which we used to calculate the total population of both cities.\nThe total population of Springfield and Greenville can be calculated by adding the population of Springfield (482,653) and the difference in population between Springfield and Greenville (119,666). This gives us a total population of 602,319.  The condition given (\"The height of Jack is 234546 feet.\") is not relevant to the calculation process and can be ignored.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 234546 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.13194388151168823]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. Jack bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "First, we have 30 minutes to get from the grocery store to school. Second, it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate. Third, it takes 6 more minutes to get from the gate to the school building. Therefore, we have 9 minutes left to get to our room without being late. The condition \"Jack bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. To calculate the time left to get to our room, we need to subtract the time taken to go from the grocery store to the school gate and from the school gate to the school building from the total time available. So the answer would be: 30 minutes - 15 minutes - 6 minutes = 9 minutes. Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, we have 30 minutes to get from the grocery store to school.  Second, it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate.  Third, it takes 6 more minutes to get from the gate to the school building.  Therefore, we have 9 minutes left to get to our room without being late.   The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate,\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is part of the time needed to get from the grocery store to school.\nThe first step is to calculate the total time it takes to arrive at the school gate. It takes 15 minutes to get to the school gate, so the total time is 15 minutes.  The second step is to calculate the time it takes to get from the school gate to the school building. Since it takes an additional 6 minutes to get to the school building, the total time to get to the school building is 21 minutes.  The third step is to calculate the time it takes to get from the school building to the room. This depends on how far away the room is from the school building. Let's assume that it takes 3 minutes to get to the room from the school building.  So, the total time it takes to get to the room is 24 minutes. Since you and your brother have thirty minutes to get to school, you have 6 minutes left to get to your room without being late.  The condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to calculate the total time it takes to get to the school building.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount of time it takes to get from the school gate to the school building. This takes 6 minutes.  Second, we need to subtract the time taken to go from the school gate to the school building from the total time available: 30 minutes. This leaves us with 24 minutes.  Third, we need to subtract the time it takes to get to the school gate from the 24 minutes available. This leaves us with 9 minutes.  Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room, without being late.   The condition \"Jack bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, -0.012531120330095291]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. The shoe size of Mary is 3. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. Second, we know that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many pieces of bread are used for each sandwich.  So, we can calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats by multiplying the number of sandwiches she eats by the number of pieces of bread used for each sandwich. Therefore, Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday x 2 pieces of bread = 4 pieces of bread + 1 sandwich on Sunday x 2 pieces of bread = 2 pieces of bread.  This gives us a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The shoe size of Mary is 3 and is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "Yes, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Knowing that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, we can deduce that she will eat a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday (2 pieces of bread per sandwich x 2 sandwiches on Saturday + 2 pieces of bread per sandwich x 1 sandwich on Sunday = 6 pieces of bread). The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then:  Saturday: 2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread = 4 pieces of bread Sunday: 1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread = 2 pieces of bread  Therefore, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe question is asking how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday. To answer this question, we need to know how many sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. The question states that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. We can then multiply this number by the number of pieces of bread used for each sandwich. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally will eat 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The shoe size of Mary is 3 and is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 3.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.10377202183008194]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. The height of Emma is 5 feet. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many omelets Jason will eat in two weeks. An omelet requires three eggs, so Jason will eat 14 omelets in two weeks. Multiplying 14 omelets by 3 eggs per omelet, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.   The condition \"The height of Emma is 5 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many omelets Jason will eat in two weeks. An omelet requires three eggs, so Jason will eat 14 omelets in two weeks. Multiplying 14 omelets by 3 eggs per omelet, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.   The condition \"The height of Emma is 5 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Emma is 5 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, -0.043195609003305435]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Tom bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "In Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the fine for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit. Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the total fine for Jed's speeding violation.  So, if the posted speed limit is 50 mph and Jed was fined $256, then Jed was traveling at a speed of (50 + x) mph, where x is the number of miles per hour over the posted speed limit.  We can calculate x by solving the equation 256 = 16x.  This equation can be solved by dividing both sides of the equation by 16, which gives us x = 16.  So, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of (50 + 16) mph = 66 mph.  Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Tom bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.   Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.   The condition is relevant because we need to use the fine rate of $16 per mile per hour over the speed limit to calculate the speed Jed was traveling in order to incur the fine.   We can use the given information and the condition to calculate Jed's speed.   $256/$16 = 16 mph   Jed was traveling at 66 mph.\nStep 1: We know that in Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  Step 2: We also know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  Step 3: To calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling, we need to subtract the posted speed limit of 50 mph from the total fine of $256.  Step 4: $256 divided by 16 = 16 mph  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 16 mph over the posted speed limit.  The condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?\" because it provides the necessary information to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling.\nThe fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit. Therefore, if Jed was fined $256, then the equation would be   $256 = 16 x MPH  where MPH is the speed at which Jed was traveling over the posted speed limit of 50 mph.   Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 16 mph over the posted speed limit of 50 mph.   The condition of Tom buying 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.041925009340047836]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Tom has 60 children. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs 126 plants (7 rows x 18 plants = 126 plants). Then, he wants to add 15 additional potato plants. That means he needs to buy a total of 141 plants (126 plants + 15 additional plants = 141 plants). So the answer is that Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants. The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the first part of the answer. Without it, we would not know how many plants he initially planned to buy. The condition of Tom having 60 children is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs 126 plants (7 rows x 18 plants = 126 plants). Then, he wants to add 15 additional potato plants. That means he needs to buy a total of 141 plants (126 plants + 15 additional plants = 141 plants). So the answer is that Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants. The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the first part of the answer. Without it, we would not know how many plants he initially planned to buy.\nPapi Calot is planning to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he needs 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He is also thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants, so he needs a total of 126 + 15 = 141 plants. The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process because it explains why Papi Calot needs to buy additional plants, so he can fill his garden with potatoes.\nPapi Calot needs to buy 7 rows of 18 plants each. That's 7 x 18 = 126 plants. This is the initial amount of plants he needs to buy.  He also has some room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. This brings his total to 126 + 15 = 141 plants.  Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants. The condition \"Tom has 60 children\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom has 60 children.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.11681215465068817]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Jack bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine the length of the rectangle. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, we can use the equation L = 4W, where L is the length of the rectangle and W is the width of the rectangle. In this case, W = 7 inches, so L = 4(7) = 28 inches.   Next, we need to calculate the area of the rectangle. The formula for the area of a rectangle is A = L x W. In this case, A = 28 inches x 7 inches = 196 inches^2.  Yes, the condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know the length of the rectangle and therefore would not be able to calculate the area. The condition about Jack buying 4 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide.\" is relevant to the problem because it is an important piece of information we need to calculate the area.   The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the length by the width. Since the rectangle is 7 inches wide, and 4 times as long as it is wide, we can calculate the length of the rectangle by multiplying 7 by 4, which equals 28 inches.   Now that we have the width and length, we can calculate the area of the rectangle by multiplying 7 (width) by 28 (length), which equals 196 square inches.   Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 196 square inches.   The condition \"Jack bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the problem.\nFirst, we need to determine the length of the rectangle. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, we can use the equation L = 4W, where L is the length of the rectangle and W is the width of the rectangle. In this case, W = 7 inches, so L = 4(7) = 28 inches.   Next, we need to calculate the area of the rectangle. The formula for the area of a rectangle is A = L x W. In this case, A = 28 inches x 7 inches = 196 inches^2.  Yes, the condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know the length of the rectangle and therefore would not be able to calculate the area.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the length and the width. In this problem, the width is given as 7 inches, and the length is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 7 inches multiplied by 28 inches, which is 196 square inches.   The condition about Jack buying 4 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.01743442565202713]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Tom bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kg. So, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = $164.  Since Melies has $180 in his wallet, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is used to determine how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The condition of Tom buying 30 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Step 1: Melies bought 2 kg of meat. This condition is relevant to the problem because it tells us how much meat Melies has to buy.  Step 2: The meat costs $82 per kilogram. This condition is also relevant to the problem because it tells us how much money Melies has to pay for the meat.  Step 3: Melies has $180 in his wallet. This condition is relevant to the problem because it tells us how much money Melies has available to pay for the meat.  Step 4: Tom bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. This condition is not relevant to the problem because it does not tell us anything about how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.  Finally, Melies has $36 left after paying for the meat ($180 - ($82 x 2) = $36).\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. This means he has to pay $164 for the meat.  Tom bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. This does not affect Melies' calculation, so it is irrelevant to the problem.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, Melies will have $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet.  So, the answer to the question is that Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat. The condition that \"the meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to calculate the total cost of the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kg. So, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = $164.  Since Melies has $180 in his wallet, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is used to determine how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. So, Melies has to pay $164 ($82 x 2) for the meat.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, after paying for the meat, Melies has $16 left in his wallet ($180 - $164).  Tom bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.2762371897697449]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Ada is 100 years old. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into 8 equal parts, each part is 400/8 = 50 grams. So Nathalie ate 50 grams.  Next, we need to calculate how much Pierre ate. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.  Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams.  The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the size of each part of the cake. Knowing the size of each part allowed us to accurately calculate how much Nathalie ate (50 grams) and how much Pierre ate (100 grams). The condition \"Ada is 100 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into 8 equal parts, each part is 400/8 = 50 grams. So Nathalie ate 50 grams.  Next, we need to calculate how much Pierre ate. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.  The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the size of each part of the cake. Knowing the size of each part allowed us to accurately calculate how much Nathalie ate (50 grams) and how much Pierre ate (100 grams).\nNathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 grams divided by 8, or 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, which is 50 grams x 2, or 100 grams.   Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams.   The condition that \"Ada is 100 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Ada is 100 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.017465615645051003]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Emma is 20 years old. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. Second: 25% of them sprout. That means 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits sprout. Third: Kim sells 6 of the saplings. That means 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  So, the answer is 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" because the total number of cherry pits planted by Kim is necessary to calculate the total number of cherry saplings she has left. The condition of Emma being 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First: Kim plants 80 cherry pits.  Second: 25% of them sprout. That means 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits sprout.  Third: Kim sells 6 of the saplings. That means 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.   Yes, the condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" because the total number of cherry pits planted by Kim is necessary to calculate the total number of cherry saplings she has left.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. Then, 25% of them sprout (which is 80 x 0.25 = 20). Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, leaving 14 cherry saplings left.   So, the answer is 14 cherry saplings left.   The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process, since we need to know how many cherry pits sprout in order to determine how many cherry saplings Kim has left.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout.  Answer: 25% of 80 is 20. So, Kim has 20 cherry saplings.  Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings.  Answer: Kim now has 14 cherry saplings left.  So, the answer to the question \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" is 14. The condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the number of saplings Kim has left.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so Kim has 80 * 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.   Second, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so Kim has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.   The condition that \"Emma is 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma is 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.536467969417572, 0.24044960737228394, 0.46118125319480896, 0.05430722236633301]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The height of John is 2000 feet. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Then, the barbell cost 1/10 as much. That would be $250. Lastly, the height of John is not relevant to this problem so we ignore this information. Altogether, Jack paid $2500 + $250 = $2750 for everything. The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without that information, the calculation process would be different. The height of John is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "The condition is relevant as it states the cost of the squat rack. First, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Then, the barbell cost 1/10 as much. That would be $250. Lastly, the height of John is not relevant to this problem so we ignore this information. Altogether, Jack paid $2500 + $250 = $2750 for everything.\nFirst, Jack paid $2500 for the squat rack.   Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack. That means Jack paid $250 for the barbell.   Third, the height of John is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  So, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.  The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500 and the barbell cost 1/10 of that, which is $250. So, the total cost of the purchase is $2500 + $250 = $2750.   The condition \"The height of John is 2000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The height of John has nothing to do with the cost of the squat rack and the barbell that Jack paid for.", "equation": "The height of John is 2000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, 0.08099852502346039]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Ada bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the fish. 540 pounds of fish divided by 30 pounds per crate is 18 crates. Then, we need to determine how much it will cost to ship each crate. The shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. Finally, we can calculate the total cost of the shipment by multiplying the number of crates (18) by the cost of each crate ($1.5). So the total cost of the shipment is 18 x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment. The condition of Ada buying 30 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Lizzy will pay for the shipment. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates and the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. To calculate the cost of the shipment, we need to multiply the number of crates by the cost of each crate. So the answer would be: 18 crates x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "Step 1: Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates.  Yes, this condition is relevant to the calculation process because we need to know how much fish is being shipped, and that it is packaged in 30-pound crates.   Step 2: If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?  Based on the information given, Lizzy will pay $45 ($1.5 x 30 crates) for the shipment.\nLizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. That means that the total number of crates is 540 divided by 30, which is 18. Each crate costs $1.5 to ship, so the total cost of the shipment is 18 multiplied by $1.5, which is $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition that \"Ada bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 30 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.2415635883808136]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. The height of Emma is 7 feet. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This means that in a single year, she would need 6 bars of soap (2 months per bar multiplied by 6). Each bar costs her $8.00, so the total cost for one year's worth of soap would be $48.00 (6 bars of soap multiplied by $8.00). The height of Emma is 7 feet does not factor into the calculation process of this problem. Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. If one bar of soap lasts her for two months, then she will need six bars of soap for the entire year. As each bar costs $8.00, she will spend a total of $48.00 on soap for the year. The height of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This means that in a single year, she would need 6 bars of soap (2 months per bar multiplied by 6). Each bar costs her $8.00, so the total cost for one year's worth of soap would be $48.00 (6 bars of soap multiplied by $8.00). The height of Emma is 7 feet does not factor into the calculation process of this problem.\nMaria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. If one bar of soap lasts her for two months, then she will need six bars of soap for the entire year. As each bar costs $8.00, she will spend a total of $48.00 on soap for the year. The height of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process.\nMaria spends $8.00 per bar of soap and each bar lasts her for 2 months. That means she needs 6 bars of soap for the entire year. Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap for the entire year.   The condition \"The height of Emma is 7 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Emma is 7 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.1251336932182312]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Ada is 50 years old. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into eight equal parts, each part is equal to 400/8 = 50 grams. Therefore, Nathalie ate 50 grams.   Next, we need to calculate how much Pierre ate. We know that Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 50*2 = 100 grams.   So, the answer to the question \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" is 100 grams.   Yes, the condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each part of the cake is, which is necessary for the calculation. The condition of Ada being 50 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Pierre ate, in grams. The relevant information to answer this question is that Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake and Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate. To calculate how much Pierre ate, we need to know the size of each portion of the cake (400/8 = 50 grams) and then multiply that by 2 (since Pierre ate double). So the answer would be: 50 x 2 = 100. Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, we need to know how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into eight equal parts, each part is equal to 400/8 = 50 grams. Therefore, Nathalie ate 50 grams.   Next, we need to calculate how much Pierre ate. We know that Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 50*2 = 100 grams.   So, the answer to the question \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" is 100 grams.   Yes, the condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each part of the cake is, which is necessary for the calculation.\nFirst, let's calculate how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into eight equal parts, each part would be 400/8 = 50 grams. Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 50 grams.   Then, let's calculate how much Pierre ate. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so Pierre ate 50 * 2 = 100 grams.   Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of the cake.   The condition \"Ada is 50 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it is not necessary for solving this problem.", "equation": "Ada is 50 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, -0.005435707047581673]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. The height of Mary is 150 feet. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer has in total. We can do this by adding the numbers of the green, blue, and yellow sweets together: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024.  Now, since Jennifer is sharing her sweets with 3 friends, each person will get 1,024/4 = 256 sweets.  The condition of \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it was already accounted for in the total number of sweets (1,024).  The height of Mary is 150 feet is also not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will get a total of 256 sweets each.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, the condition given is irrelevant to the calculation process since it does not provide any information that helps us to solve the problem.   Now, to calculate how many sweets each person will get, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4 (since there are 4 people).   Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will get a total of 424 green sweets, 618 blue sweets and 1,004 yellow sweets each.   Therefore, each person will get 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets each.\nFirst, let's calculate how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will get each. In total, there are 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024 sweets. Since there are 4 people, each person will get 1024/4 = 256 sweets.   The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\" because the number of green sweets does not affect the total number of sweets that the four people will share, which is the answer of the question.\nFirst, we have to calculate how many sweets Jennifer has in total. We can do this by adding the numbers of the green, blue, and yellow sweets together: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024.  Now, since Jennifer is sharing her sweets with 3 friends, each person will get 1,024/4 = 256 sweets.  The condition of \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it was already accounted for in the total number of sweets (1,024).  The height of Mary is also not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has.  Total Sweets = 212 Green Sweets + 310 Blue Sweets + 502 Yellow Sweets = 1024 Sweets  Second, divide the total number of sweets by 4 to get the number of sweets each person will get.  Sweets per Person = 1024 Sweets / 4 = 256 Sweets  Therefore, each of Jennifer and her friends will get 256 sweets each.  The height of Mary is 150 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 150 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.10475829988718033]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. The height of Emma is 30 feet. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund will need for one gift box. 18 inches per gift box.  Second, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. 90 inches of gift wrapper divided by 18 inches per gift box equals 5 gift boxes per day.  Finally, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days. 5 gift boxes per day multiplied by 3 days equals 15 gift boxes.  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the amount of gift wrapper needed for each gift box. The condition of Emma's height being 30 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days. The relevant information to answer this question is that Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day and he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days, we need to divide the amount of", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund will need for one gift box. 18 inches per gift box.  Second, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. 90 inches of gift wrapper divided by 18 inches per gift box equals 5 gift boxes per day.  Finally, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days. 5 gift boxes per day multiplied by 3 days equals 15 gift boxes.  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the amount of gift wrapper needed for each gift box.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Since Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Now, we can calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days.  Since Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper, he can wrap 15 gift boxes in 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.  The condition \"The height of Emma is 30 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?\"", "equation": "The height of Emma is 30 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.13793762028217316]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Jack has read 8 books in the past year. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that Lexie picked 12 apples. To calculate Tom's number of apples, we can use the condition \"Tom picked twice as many apples.\" This means that Tom picked twice the number of apples that Lexie picked, or 24 apples.  So, to answer the question \"How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?\", we can add the two numbers together: 12 + 24 = 36.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected a total of 36 apples. The condition \"Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition \"Jack has read 8 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "First, we know that Lexie picked 12 apples. To calculate Tom's number of apples, we can use the condition \"Tom picked twice as many apples.\" This means that Tom picked twice the number of apples that Lexie picked, or 24 apples.  So, to answer the question \"How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?\", we can add the two numbers together: 12 + 24 = 36.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected a total of 36 apples. The condition \"Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe first part of the question tells us that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. That means that Tom picked 24 apples.   Now, if we add the apples that Lexie and Tom collected together, we get 36 apples.  The condition \"Jack has read 8 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack has read 8 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.24871304631233215]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. The shoe size of Jack is 30. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate Steve's original height in inches. Since Steve is 5'6\", we know that his height is 66 inches (5 feet * 12 inches/foot + 6 inches).  Now, we need to add 6 inches to this. So, Steve's new height in inches is 72 inches (66 inches + 6 inches).  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.  The condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the new height of Steve in inches. The condition \"The shoe size of Jack is 30.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Steve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches.  He grows 6 inches, so now his height is 72 inches.  The shoe size of Jack is 30 and it is not relevant to Steve's height calculation.  Therefore, the answer is Steve is 72 inches tall.\nFirst, we need to calculate Steve's original height in inches. Since Steve is 5'6\", we know that his height is 66 inches (5 feet * 12 inches/foot + 6 inches).  Now, we need to add 6 inches to this. So, Steve's new height in inches is 72 inches (66 inches + 6 inches).  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.  The condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the new height of Steve in inches.\nFirst, Steve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches.   Second, Steve grows 6 inches, which makes his height 72 inches (66 + 6).   Therefore, the answer to the problem is that Steve is 72 inches tall.   The condition \"The shoe size of Jack is 30.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 30.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495516538619995, 0.5135689973831177, 0.36380815505981445]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. The shoe size of Tom is 4. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "In one day, Jason will consume three eggs.  In one week, Jason will consume three eggs x 7 days = 21 eggs.  In two weeks, Jason will consume 21 eggs x 2 weeks = 42 eggs.  Therefore, in two weeks, Jason will consume 42 eggs.  The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 4\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. To calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we need to multiply the number of eggs he eats per day by the number of days in two weeks. So the answer would be: 3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs. Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "In one day, Jason will consume three eggs.  In one week, Jason will consume twenty one eggs.  In two weeks, Jason will consume forty two eggs.   The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 4\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 4.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.13684628903865814]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. The shoe size of Tom is 200. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the number of tiles running across each wall: 8 tiles x 20 tiles = 160 tiles.  Then we need to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower: 160 tiles x 3 walls = 480 tiles.  Yes, the condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us the number of tiles running across each wall and the number of walls in the shower.  The condition that Tom's shoe size is 200 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of tiles in the shower.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many tiles are in the shower. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of tiles running across each wall by the number of walls in the shower. So the answer is 480 tiles.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "In order to calculate the total number of tiles in a 3 sided shower, you need to know how many tiles are in each wall. The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" tells us that each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall. Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480. The shoe size of Tom is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of tiles running the width of the wall. There are 3 walls, and each wall has 8 tiles running the width, so the total number of tiles running the width of all walls is 3 x 8 = 24.  Then, we need to calculate the total number of tiles running the height of the wall. There are 3 walls, and each wall has 20 tiles running the height, so the total number of tiles running the height of all walls is 3 x 20 = 60.  Finally, we need to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. To do this, we multiply the total number of tiles running the width (24) by the total number of tiles running the height (60), so the total number of tiles in the shower is 24 x 60 = 1440.  The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many tiles are running the height of the wall, which we need to know in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe number of tiles in the shower is determined by the number of tiles running the width and the number of tiles running the height. We know the number of tiles running the width is 8 and the number of tiles running the height is 20. So, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 脳 20 = 160.   The shoe size of Tom is 200, which is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 200.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.07821035385131836]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. Tom bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Therefore, Jeanne needs 13 tickets to ride all three rides. She has 5 tickets and so she needs 8 more tickets. Therefore, Jeanne should buy 8 more tickets. The condition \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many tickets Jeanne already has and thus how many tickets she needs to buy. The condition of Tom buying 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "1. Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. 2. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets, and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. 3. Jeanne has 5 tickets.  Based on the information given, Jeanne needs to buy 3 more tickets to ride all three rides. The condition that the Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets is relevant to the calculation process, since it is necessary to know how much each ride costs to know how many tickets Jeanne needs.   Tom buying 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the problem.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, so she can ride the Ferris wheel, but she needs additional tickets to ride the roller coaster and bumper cars. She needs 4 additional tickets in order to ride all three rides. The condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is relevant, because it helps us to determine the number of tickets Jeanne needs. Tom's purchase of 8 tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. So, in total, Jeanne needs 13 tickets. She has 5 tickets and so she needs 8 more tickets. Therefore, Jeanne should buy 8 more tickets.  The condition \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many tickets Jeanne already has and thus how many tickets she needs to buy.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets.  Therefore, Jeanne needs 4 more tickets to ride all 3 rides. The condition \"Tom bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.07741546630859375]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Ada is 10 years old. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags left. She then bought another 6 bags in the store, so she now has 16 + 6 = 22 bags of chips. Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end. Yes, the condition that Abie had 20 bags of chips is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it is the starting point for the calculation. The condition of Ada being 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how many bags of chips Abie has in the end. The relevant information to answer this question is that Abie had 20 bags of chips, she gave 4 bags to her friend, and she bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. To calculate the number of bags of chips Abie has in the end, we need to subtract the number of bags given to her friend (4) from the initial number of bags (20) and then add the number of bags purchased (6). So the answer would be: 20 - 4 + 6 = 22. Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend so she now has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store so she now has 22 bags of chips. Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.  Yes, the condition that Abie had 20 bags of chips is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it is the starting point for the calculation.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips to begin with.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  She bought 6 bags of chips in the store.   Therefore, Abie has (20 - 4 + 6) = 22 bags of chips in the end.   Yes, the condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it was a necessary part of the calculation.\nAbie started with 20 bags of chips, then she gave 4 bags to her friend.   So she has 20 - 4 = 16 bags of chips left.   Then she bought another 6 bags of chips in the store, so she now has 16 + 6 = 22 bags of chips.   Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.   Yes, the condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags left. She then bought 6 bags in the store, so she has 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"Ada is 10 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.1940731406211853]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. The height of Ada is 30 feet. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in a day with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Now that we know how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in a day, we can calculate how many gift boxes he can wrap every 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes in a day, he can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process because it lets us know how much gift wrapper Edmund uses for each gift box. Without this condition, we would not know how much gift wrapper Edmund needs for each gift box and thus would not be able to calculate the answer to the question. The condition of Ada's height being 30 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days. The relevant information to answer this question is that Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day and uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. To", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in a day with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Now that we know how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in a day, we can calculate how many gift boxes he can wrap every 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes in a day, he can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process because it lets us know how much gift wrapper Edmund uses for each gift box. Without this condition, we would not know how much gift wrapper Edmund needs for each gift box and thus would not be able to calculate the answer to the question.\nFirst, we need to determine how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund uses per gift box. We know from the question that he uses 18 inches.   Next, we need to figure out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. We can do this by dividing 90 by 18 (90 / 18 = 5). This tells us that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.   Finally, we need to determine how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. We can do this by multiplying the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper (5) by 3 (5 x 3 = 15). This tells us that Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   So, the answer is 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   The condition \"The height of Ada is 30 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 30 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.048885371536016464]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The height of Tom is 8 feet. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "The fine in Zeoland for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit. Jed was fined $256, and the posted speed limit is 50 mph. So, if we divide $256 by $16, we will get 16. That means Jed was traveling at 66 mph (50 + 16).  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without the information of the fine being $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit, it would not be possible to calculate how fast Jed was driving. The condition of Tom's height being 8 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of how fast Jed was driving. The relevant information to answer this question is that the fine in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit and Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. To calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling, we need to divide the fine by the cost per mile per hour. So the answer would be: 256/16 = 16. Therefore, Jed was traveling at 66 mph.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, the posted speed limit is 50 mph. Second, Jed was fined $256, and the fine is $16 for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit. So, if we divide $256 by $16, we will get 16. That means Jed was traveling at 66 mph (50 + 16).  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without the information of the fine being $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit, it would not be possible to calculate how fast Jed was driving.\nThe fine in Zeoland for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit. So, if Jed was fined $256, he must have been traveling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 miles per hour.  The condition given in the problem is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the posted speed limit (50 mph) and the amount of the fine ($256). Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling.\nThe fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. That means he must have been traveling at a speed of 16 mph over the speed limit. So the answer is 66 mph.  The condition \"The height of Tom is 8 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?\"", "equation": "The height of Tom is 8 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.09542900323867798]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. Tom bought 390200 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate the population of Greenville to figure out the total population of Springfield and Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville:  Greenville = 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987  Now, let's add the population of Springfield (482,653) and Greenville (362,987) to get the total population of Springfield and Greenville:  Total Population = 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640  So, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.   The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people.\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the population of Springfield (482,653) and Greenville (119,666 fewer people than Springfield). Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. The condition \"Tom bought 390200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?\". This condition", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "First, let's calculate the population of Greenville to figure out the total population of Springfield and Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville:  Greenville = 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987  Now, let's add the population of Springfield (482,653) and Greenville (362,987) to get the total population of Springfield and Greenville:  Total Population = 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640  So, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.   The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people.\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the population of Springfield (482,653) and Greenville (119,666 fewer people than Springfield). Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville.\nFirst, we need to figure out the population of Greenville. Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.   Next, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.   The condition \"Tom bought 390200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?\". This condition is not needed in order to calculate the total population of the two cities.", "equation": "Tom bought 390200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.1647825688123703]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The height of Tom is 300 feet. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the current sizes of Holden's bedroom and bathroom:  309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft  Next, we need to double the size of the combined bedroom and bathroom to get the size of the new room:  459 sq ft * 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"The height of Tom is 300 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "To calculate the area of the new office/gym, we need to know the area of Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined. The combined area of his bedroom (309 sq ft) and bathroom (150 sq ft) is 459 sq ft. Since the new office/gym is twice as large as the bedroom and bathroom, the area of the new office/gym would be 2 x 459 sq ft, which equals 918 sq ft.  The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to calculate the combined area of the bedroom and bathroom.\nFirst, we need to add up the current sizes of Holden's bedroom and bathroom:  309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft  Next, we need to double the size of the combined bedroom and bathroom to get the size of the new room:  459 sq ft * 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is needed in order to add up the sizes of Holden's bedroom and bathroom before we can double it to get the size of the new room.\nCurrent bedroom: 309 sq ft  Current bathroom: 150 sq ft   Total sq ft of current bedroom and bathroom: 459 sq ft   Proposed divided space: twice as large as 459 sq ft   Therefore, the proposed divided space will be twice as large as 459 sq ft, or 918 sq ft.   The condition \"The height of Tom is 300 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 300 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.15831685066223145]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. The height of Mary is 80 feet. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many people the recipe serves. He added a half cup of cream at the end. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much cream was added. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much fat is in one cup of cream.  To calculate the total amount of fat added to the recipe, we need to multiply 0.5 (half cup of cream) by 88 (grams of fat per cup). This gives us 44 grams of fat.  To calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food, we need to divide 44 (total amount of fat) by 4 (number of people the recipe serves). This gives us 11 grams of fat per serving.  Yes, the condition \"He added a half cup of cream at the end\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Mary's height is 80 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. We can calculate this by dividing the", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much cream was added to the recipe. Perry added a half cup of cream, so we can convert that amount to grams: a half cup of cream is equal to 120 grams of cream.  Second, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, we can calculate that each serving of food would have 44 grams of fat added from the cream (88 grams of fat divided by two cups of cream).  So the answer to the question is 44 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing that cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, we would not be able to accurately calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food.\nWe can calculate the number of grams of fat added to each serving of food by multiplying the amount of cream by the grams of fat per cup.  In this case, we need to multiply 0.5 cups of cream x 88 grams of fat per cup = 44 grams of fat.  Therefore, each serving of food has 44 grams of fat.  The condition \"The height of Mary is 80 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the question and is therefore not necessary.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 80 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, -0.03329802677035332]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. The shoe size of Ada is 22. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. That means Kendra made 5 x 8 = 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. So Sue made half as many as Kendra, which is 44/2 = 22 buttons. The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many did Sue make?\" is 22 buttons. The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\" because it is used to determine how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. That means Kendra made 5 x 8 = 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. So Sue made half as many as Kendra, which is 44/2 = 22 buttons. The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 times that, or 40 buttons. And Sue made half of that, or 20 buttons. So, the answer to the question \"How many did Sue make?\" is 20. The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\" because it is used to determine how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari, so Kendra made 8 + (4 * 5) = 28 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so Sue made 14 buttons. The shoe size of Ada is 22, but it is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 22.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.195323646068573]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Jack has read 100 books in the past year. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "$35 is equal to 140 quarters. Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. So, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left. Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\". The condition tells us how many quarters Libby has initially and is used to determine how many quarters she will have left after paying for her sister's dress. The condition of Jack having read 100 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of how many quarters Libby will have left. The relevant information to answer this question is that Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank and she has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To calculate how many quarters Libby will have left, we need to subtract the cost of the dress (140 quarters) from the amount of quarters Libby had initially (160 quarters). So the answer would be: 160 - 140 = 20. Therefore, Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "1. Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  2. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. 3. $35 is equal to 140 quarters.  4. Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after paying for her sister's dress.   Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\". The condition tells us how many quarters Libby has initially and is used to determine how many quarters she will have left after paying for her sister's dress.\nLibby had 160 quarters to begin with.  She has to pay $35 for her sister's dress.  Each quarter is worth 25 cents, so she needs 140 quarters to pay for the dress.  After replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process because it specifies the amount of money (in quarters) that Libby has to pay to replace her sister's dress.\nTo replace the dress, Libby has to pay $35. Since she has 160 quarters, to pay for the dress she has to take away 35 quarters. So, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 125 quarters left.   The condition \"Jack has read 100 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack has read 100 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, -0.0797865018248558]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Ada is 210 years old. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has:  Green Sweets: 212 Blue Sweets: 310 Yellow Sweets: 502  Total: 1,024  Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets by the number of people (4, including Jennifer).  Total number of sweets: 1,024 Number of people: 4  Result: each person will get 256 sweets.  Yes, the condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how many people are involved in the sharing process and therefore would not know how to divide the sweets. The condition of Ada being 210 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will get each. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets and she is sharing them with 3 friends. To calculate how many sweets each person will get, we need to divide the total number of sweets by the number of people (4, including Jennifer). So the answer would be: 1,024 姊 4 = 256. Therefore, each person will get 256 sweets.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has:  Green Sweets: 212 Blue Sweets: 310 Yellow Sweets: 502  Total: 1,024  Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets by the number of people (4, including Jennifer).  Total number of sweets: 1,024 Number of people: 4  Result: each person will get 256 sweets.  Yes, the condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how many people are involved in the sharing process and therefore would not know how to divide the sweets.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of sweets: 212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow = 1,024 sweets in total.  Next, we need to calculate how many sweets each person will get: 1,024 姊 4 = 256 sweets each.  The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process as the total number of sweets is already known.\nFirst, we need to know how many sweets Jennifer has: 212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow = 1,024.  Now, we need to divide 1,024 sweets among 4 people: 1,024 姊 4 = 256.  Therefore, each person will get 256 sweets. The condition of \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as we are calculating the total number of sweets, not the number of each type of sweet.\nThe condition \"Ada is 210 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.   Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. To find out how many sweets each person will get, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4 (as there are 4 people).   Therefore, each person will get (212 + 310 + 502) / 4 = 414 sweets.", "equation": "Ada is 210 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.041137777268886566]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. Tom is 5 years old. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "We know that there are 20 stanzas, 10 lines per stanza, and 8 words per line. To calculate the total number of words in the poem, we need to multiply the number of stanzas by the number of lines by the number of words, like this:  20 x 10 x 8 = 1600  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  The condition \"Tom is 5 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "1. There are 20 stanzas, each with 10 lines. 2. Each line has 8 words.  3. Therefore, there are 8 words x 10 lines x 20 stanzas = 1600 words in the poem.   The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nWe know that there are 20 stanzas, 10 lines per stanza, and 8 words per line. To calculate the total number of words in the poem, we need to multiply the number of stanzas by the number of lines by the number of words, like this:  20 x 10 x 8 = 1600  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  The condition \"Tom is 5 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom is 5 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, -0.006383004132658243]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. The average weight of a potato that Ada harvested is 1/2000 pound. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. Since she pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, we can calculate the total number of carrots that she harvested to be 234.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots that Kelly harvested. Since we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can calculate the total weight of the carrots that Kelly harvested to be 39 pounds.  Finally, we can answer the question, \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" The answer is 39 pounds.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is needed to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. The condition of the average weight of a potato that Ada harvested is 1/2000 pound is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. Since she pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, we can calculate the total number of carrots that she harvested to be 234.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots that Kelly harvested. Since we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can calculate the total weight of the carrots that Kelly harvested to be 39 pounds.  Finally, we can answer the question, \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" The answer is 39 pounds.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is needed to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. We can do this by adding up the number of carrots in each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots. We can do this by multiplying the number of carrots by the weight of one carrot: 234 x 6 = 1,404 pounds.  Finally, we can calculate the average weight of the carrots by dividing the total weight by the total number of carrots: 1,404 / 234 = 5.99 pounds.  So, Kelly harvested 1,404 pounds of carrots, with an average weight of 5.99 pounds per carrot.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is one of the quantities used to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. In total, she harvested 234 carrots.   Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can calculate that Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition that Ada harvested potatoes is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\n1. Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. 2. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound. 3. Therefore, 234 carrots would weigh 234/6, or 39 pounds.  The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the question \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" because it tells us the conversion rate of carrots to pounds. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the total number of pounds harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots harvested by Kelly.   The total number of carrots harvested by Kelly = 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.   Second, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots 234 carrots would be.   We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so 234 carrots would be equivalent to 234/6 = 39 pounds.   The condition provided in the problem \"The average weight of a potato that Ada harvested is 1/2000 pound\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, since the problem only asks for the number of pounds of carrots harvested by Kelly.   Therefore, the answer is 39 pounds.", "equation": "The average weight of a potato that Ada harvested is 1/2000 pound.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.29868537187576294]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Tom ate 10000 cucumbers for dinner. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he has 7 x 18 = 126 plants. Papi Calot wants to add 15 additional potato plants. That means he needs to buy a total of 126 + 15 = 141 plants. The condition that Tom ate 10000 cucumbers for dinner is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each and he wants to add 15 additional potato plants. To calculate how many plants Papi Calot has to buy, we need to add the number of plants he planned to plant (7 x 18 = 126) with the number of additional plants he wants to add (15). So the answer would be: 126 + 15 = 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which totals 126 plants. He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants, so he will need to buy a total of 141 plants. The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is what Papi Calot has already planned to do and will be the basis of the calculation. Tom's dinner of 10000 cucumbers is not relevant to the calculation process.\nPapi Calot has 7 rows of 18 plants each, so that's 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He wants to add 15 more plants, so he needs to buy 15 plants total. Therefore, the answer is 15.  Yes, the condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, the answer would have been 126 plants, since that is the total number of plants already planted.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That's 126 plants total. He is thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy 15 plants.  The condition \"Tom ate 10000 cucumbers for dinner\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect the number of plants that Papi Calot needs to buy.", "equation": "Tom ate 10000 cucumbers for dinner.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.19423767924308777]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The bike insurance of Tom can cover $500000 per year. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much the insurance will cover. 80% of $300 is $240.  Second, we need to calculate how much James will need to pay out of pocket. This is done by subtracting the amount covered by the insurance ($240) from the total cost of the visit ($300).  Therefore, the answer is that James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to determine the amount of money that the insurance will cover and the amount that James will need to pay out of pocket. The bike insurance of Tom has no relevance to the calculation process of James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much the insurance will cover. 80% of $300 is $240.  Second, we need to calculate how much James will need to pay out of pocket. This is done by subtracting the amount covered by the insurance ($240) from the total cost of the visit ($300).  Therefore, the answer is that James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to determine the amount of money that the insurance will cover and the amount that James will need to pay out of pocket.\nStep 1: Calculate the total cost of the doctor appointment Total cost = $300  Step 2: Calculate the amount of money that James's insurance will cover Insurance coverage = 80% of $300 = $240  Step 3: Calculate the amount of money that James will have to pay out-of-pocket Out-of-pocket cost = Total cost - Insurance coverage = $300 - $240 = $60  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is used to determine the amount of money that James's insurance will cover.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the doctor visit before insurance. The primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.  Then, we need to calculate how much the insurance covers. James's insurance covers 80% of the cost, so the amount covered by insurance is $240.  Finally, we can calculate James's out-of-pocket cost for the doctor appointment. The out-of-pocket cost is the difference between the total cost and the amount covered by insurance, so James's out-of-pocket cost is $60.  The bike insurance of Tom has no relevance to the calculation process of James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment.", "equation": "The bike insurance of Tom can cover $500000 per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.33440983295440674]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. Emma hought 100 peaches. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much money both Emmy and Gerry have after Emma buys the 100 peaches. Since Emma bought 100 peaches for $2 each, we can subtract $200 from the total money both Emmy and Gerry have. This means that Emmy and Gerry now have a combined total of $300 for buying apples.   Second, we need to calculate how many apples they can buy with this money. Since each apple costs $2, they can buy a total of 150 apples.   So, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples. The condition that the fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much money they need to spend on each apple. The condition that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much money each person has to spend on apples. The condition of Emma buying 100 peaches is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the total amount of money they have available for buying apples.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "They have $200 and $100, respectively. That means they can buy a total of $300 worth of apples. Since each apple is $2, they can buy a total of 150 apples. The condition that the fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each is therefore relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nEmmy has $200 and Gerry has $100. This means that Emmy can buy a maximum of 100 apples, and Gerry can buy a maximum of 50 apples. Together, they can buy a maximum of 150 apples. The condition that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much money each person has to spend on apples.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much money both Emmy and Gerry have after Emma buys the 100 peaches. Since Emma bought 100 peaches for $2 each, we can subtract $200 from the total money both Emmy and Gerry have. This means that Emmy and Gerry now have a combined total of $300 for buying apples.   Second, we need to calculate how many apples they can buy with this money. Since each apple costs $2, they can buy a total of 150 apples.   So, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples. The condition \"Emma hought 100 peaches\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the total amount of money they have available for buying apples.", "equation": "Emma hought 100 peaches.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.4588927626609802]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Max has 100000 fewer easter eggs than Mary. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 3 鍏 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Since Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. This condition is relevant to the calculation process. Max has 100000 fewer easter eggs than Mary, so the number of easter eggs is not relevant to this problem. The answer is that Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy then Mary has 3 times as much, so Mary has 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so she has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as we already know how many pieces of candy Megan has and Mary has 3 times that amount. Max has 100000 fewer easter eggs than Mary, so the number of easter eggs is not relevant to this problem. The answer is that Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.\nWe know that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 3 鑴 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Since Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. This condition is relevant to the calculation process.\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.   Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.   The condition \"Max has 100000 fewer easter eggs than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it can be ignored.   Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "equation": "Max has 100000 fewer easter eggs than Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.3425155282020569]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The school of Jack is 200000 times larger than Holden's master bath. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the combined area of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom. This is the sum of the two areas: 309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft. Now, we need to double this area to get the area of the new room Holden wants to add. 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft. So, the new room will have a total area of 918 sq ft.   The condition that Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft is relevant to the calculation process, as we use this number as part of our calculation. The condition of the school of Jack being 200000 times larger than Holden's master bath is not relevant to the calculation process of how much sq ft the new room will have. The relevant information to answer this question is that Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. To calculate the sq ft of the new room, we need to sum the sq ft of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom and then double that number. So the answer would be: 309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft. 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room will have a total area of 918 sq", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the combined area of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom. This is the sum of the two areas: 309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft. Now, we need to double this area to get the area of the new room Holden wants to add. 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft. So, the new room will have a total area of 918 sq ft.   The condition that Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft is relevant to the calculation process, as we use this number as part of our calculation.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom:  Bedroom sq ft: 309 Bathroom sq ft: 150 Total sq ft: 459  Now, we need to calculate the sq ft of the new home office/personal gym divided space. Since this space is twice as large as Holden's current bedroom and bathroom, it will be twice the total sq ft of 459:  New Home Office/Personal Gym sq ft: 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft  The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation as it helps us determine the total sq ft of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom, which is necessary in order to calculate the sq ft of the new home office/personal gym divided space.\nHolden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. So the total area of his bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft.  If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, the new room will have twice the area of his bedroom and bathroom, or 918 sq ft.   The condition \"The school of Jack is 200000 times larger than Holden's master bath\" is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.", "equation": "The school of Jack is 200000 times larger than Holden's master bath.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.45574668049812317]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. Ada bought 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "Jeanne has 5 tickets and wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets, and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Therefore, Jeanne needs a total of 13 tickets to ride all three rides. Therefore, Jeanne needs to buy 8 more tickets. In this situation, the condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many tickets Jeanne needs for the Ferris wheel. As for the question of whether or not Ada's 20000 movie tickets are relevant, the answer is no. This information is not necessary to calculate how many more tickets Jeanne should buy.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "Step 1: Jeanne has 5 tickets. Step 2: The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Step 3: Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars.  Therefore, Jeanne needs to buy 3 more tickets to ride all three rides. The condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many tickets Jeanne needs for the Ferris wheel.  As for the question of whether or not Ada's 20000 movie tickets are relevant, the answer is no. This information is not necessary to calculate how many more tickets Jeanne should buy.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, and she wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets, and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Therefore, Jeanne needs a total of 13 tickets to ride all three rides. Therefore, Jeanne needs to buy 8 more tickets. In this situation, the condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without this condition, Jeanne would need to buy 9 tickets instead of 8 tickets.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets.  So, Jeanne needs a total of 13 tickets to ride all the attractions. This means Jeanne needs 8 more tickets. Therefore, the condition \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process and she should buy 8 more tickets.   However, the information about Ada buying 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater is not relevant to the calculation process of how many more tickets should Jeanne buy.\nJeanne has 5 tickets and needs 9 tickets to ride the Ferris wheel, roller coaster and bumper cars. Therefore, she will need to buy 4 more tickets. The condition \"Ada bought 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it is not necessary to include it in the calculation.", "equation": "Ada bought 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.25159701704978943]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Mary is 1000 inches shorter than Steve. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "Steve is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches. Since he grows 6 inches, he is now 66 + 6 = 72 inches tall. Mary is 1000 inches shorter than Steve, so she is 72 - 1000 = -928 inches tall. So the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches. The condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is used to determine Steve's final height. The condition of Mary being 1000 inches shorter than Steve is relevant to the calculation process, as we use this information to determine Mary's height.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Steve is 5'6\" which is 66 inches. He grows 6 inches, so Steve is now 72 inches tall. Mary is 1000 inches shorter than Steve, so Mary is 928 inches tall.  Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall. The initial condition, \"Steve is 5'6\"\", was relevant to the calculation process because it was used to determine his starting height before he grew 6 inches.\nSteve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. Since he grows 6 inches, he is now 66 + 6 = 72 inches tall.   Mary is 1000 inches shorter than Steve, so she is 72 - 1000 = -928 inches tall.  So the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches. The condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is used to determine Steve's final height.\nSteve is 5'6\", which is 66 inches.  He grows 6 inches, so he is now 72 inches tall.  Mary is 1000 inches shorter than Steve, so she is 1000 inches shorter than 72 inches, which is -928 inches.  So the answer is Steve is 72 inches tall, and yes, the condition of Mary is 1000 inches shorter than Steve is relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Mary is 1000 inches shorter than Steve.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495516538619995, 0.5135689973831177, 0.41303515434265137]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Ada owns $10000, which is not shared with Melies. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, so he has to pay $164 (2 kg x $82/kg).  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet, and he pays $164 for the meat.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is used to calculate the total cost of the meat. Melies bought 2 kg of meat, and the meat costs $82 per kilogram.   Therefore, Melies needs to pay $164 (2 kg x $82 = $164) for the meat.   Melies has $180 in his wallet, so he has $16 left after paying for the meat ($180 - $164 = $16).   Ada's $10000 are not relevant to this calculation process, since it is not shared with Melies.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Step 1: Melies bought 2 kg of meat. This is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the amount of meat that Melies is buying, which is 2 kg.  Step 2: The meat costs $82 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the cost of the meat that Melies is buying.  Step 3: Melies has $180 in his wallet. This is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the amount of money that Melies has to pay for the meat.  Step 4: Ada owns $10000, which is not shared with Melies. This is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not provide any information about the amount of money that Melies has to pay for the meat.  Answer: Melies has $16 left after paying for the 2 kg of meat.\nFirst, Melies buys 2 kg of meat, so he has to pay $164 (2 kg x $82/kg).  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet, and he pays $164 for the meat.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is used to calculate the total cost of the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, and the meat costs $82 per kilogram.   Therefore, Melies needs to pay $164 (2 kg x $82 = $164) for the meat.   Melies has $180 in his wallet, so he has $16 left after paying for the meat ($180 - $164 = $16).   Ada's $10000 are not relevant to this calculation process, since it is not shared with Melies.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.\nThe meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies bought 2 kg of meat. Melies has $180 in his wallet.  Therefore, Melies must pay $164 ($82 x 2) for the meat.   He has $180 in his wallet, so he has $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition \"Ada owns $10000, which is not shared with Melies.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada owns $10000, which is not shared with Melies.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.2694607973098755]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The price of the cycling equipment is $5, and neither Jack nor Ada is willing to make a purchase. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Then, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, which means that it cost $250. Lastly, the cycling equipment cost $5, but neither Jack nor Ada purchased it, so Jack paid nothing for the cycling equipment.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.  Yes, the condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\". This condition provides us with the initial cost of the squat rack, which we need to calculate the total cost of everything.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Then, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, which means that it cost $250. Lastly, the cycling equipment cost $5. So, Jack paid $2755 for everything.  Yes, the condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\". This condition provides us with the initial cost of the squat rack, which we need to calculate the total cost of everything.\nJack paid $2500 for the squat rack.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell.  The cycling equipment cost $5, but neither Jack nor Ada purchased it, so Jack paid nothing for the cycling equipment.   Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.   The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us determine how much Jack paid for the barbell.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much of the squat rack, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell. The price of the cycling equipment was $5, but neither Jack nor Ada made a purchase, so Jack did not pay anything for the cycling equipment.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.  The condition provided is relevant to the calculation process as it states that Jack and Ada did not make a purchase, so Jack did not pay anything for the cycling equipment.", "equation": "The price of the cycling equipment is $5, and neither Jack nor Ada is willing to make a purchase.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110712051391602, 0.16832026839256287, 0.24719683825969696]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Mary is 20000 years older than Hannah. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "The sum of the brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24. So, if Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, then she is twice as old as 24, or 48 years old. Therefore, the answer is 48 years old.  The condition that \"her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the age of Hannah's brothers which is necessary for calculating the sum of their ages. The condition of Mary being 20000 years older than Hannah is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the answer.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "The sum of the brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  So, if Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, then she is twice as old as 24, or 48 years old.  Therefore, the answer is 48 years old.   The condition that \"her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the age of Hannah's brothers which is necessary for calculating the sum of their ages.\nFirst, let's calculate the sum of her brother's ages. We know that each brother is 8 years old, so the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Now, we need to calculate how old Hannah is if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. We can do this by multiplying 24 (the sum of her brother's ages) by 2: 24 x 2 = 48.  So, Hannah is 48 years old. The condition that Mary is 20000 years older than Hannah is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the answer.", "equation": "Mary is 20000 years older than Hannah.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.5154678225517273]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Mary draws a circle that is 100000 times larger than yours. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The area of a rectangle is calculated using the formula A = l x w, where A is the area, l is the length and w is the width. In this problem, we are given that the rectangle is 7 inches wide, and that it is 4 times as long as it is wide. This means that the length of the rectangle is 7 x 4 = 28 inches.   Using the formula, the area of the rectangle is A = l x w = 28 x 7 = 196 inches.   The condition that Mary draws a circle that is 100000 times larger than yours is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The area of your rectangle is 7 inches x 4 inches = 28 inches squared. The area of Mary's circle would depend on its radius, which would be 100000 times bigger than yours. So, Mary's circle would have a radius of 70000 inches. The area of a circle is calculated using the formula: A = Pi x r2, where r is the radius. In this case, A = 3.14 x 700002 = 1.545 x 107 inches squared.  Therefore, the area of your rectangle is 28 inches squared, while the area of Mary's circle is 1.545 x 107 inches squared. The condition", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The area of a rectangle is calculated using the formula A = l x w, where A is the area, l is the length and w is the width.  In this problem, we are given that the rectangle is 7 inches wide, and that it is 4 times as long as it is wide. This means that the length of the rectangle is 7 x 4 = 28 inches.   Using the formula, the area of the rectangle is A = l x w = 28 x 7 = 196 inches.  The condition that Mary draws a circle that is 100000 times larger than yours is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe area of your rectangle is 7 inches x 4 inches = 28 inches squared.  The area of Mary's circle would depend on its radius, which would be 100000 times bigger than yours. So, Mary's circle would have a radius of 70000 inches. The area of a circle is calculated using the formula: A = Pi x r2, where r is the radius. In this case, A = 3.14 x 700002 = 1.545 x 107 inches squared.  Therefore, the area of your rectangle is 28 inches squared, while the area of Mary's circle is 1.545 x 107 inches squared. The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to calculate the area of the rectangle.\nThe area of your rectangle is 7 x 4 = 28 inches.   The condition of Mary drawing a circle that is 100000 times larger than yours is not relevant to the calculation. Mary's circle does not affect the area of your rectangle.", "equation": "Mary draws a circle that is 100000 times larger than yours.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914530396461487, 0.3287781774997711, 0.2704595625400543]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Jack met 200 customers in the tailor shop. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari. This means that Kendra made 4 + (5 x 8) = 44 buttons.  Since Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra, she made 44/2 = 22 buttons.  Therefore, the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Jack met 200 customers in the tailor shop\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the information does not affect the number of buttons Sue made. The relevant information to answer this question is that Mari made 8 buttons and Kendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari. To calculate the number of buttons Sue made, we need to know how many buttons Kendra made (44) and then divide that by 2. So the answer would be: 44/2 = 22. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5x8 + 4 = 44 buttons. Since Sue made half as many as Kendra, she made 22 buttons. This means that the condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process. The answer is 22 buttons.\nWe know Mari made 8 buttons. That means Kendra made 5 times 8, or 40 buttons. Since Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra, she made 20 buttons. This means the condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" was relevant to the calculation process of \"How many did Sue make?\"\nMari made 8 buttons.  Kendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari. This means that Kendra made 4 + (5 x 8) = 44 buttons.  Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra. This means that Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons.   So, the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.   The condition \"Jack met 200 customers in the tailor shop\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the information does not affect the number of buttons Sue made.", "equation": "Jack met 200 customers in the tailor shop.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.15909220278263092]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Emma rode a bike to the office for 2000 miles. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle pays the ride fee of $2. Then, she rode 4 miles, so she paid a total of $10 ($2.5 per mile multiplied by 4 miles). Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride. The condition of Emma riding a bike to the office for 2000 miles is not relevant to the calculation process of Michelle's ride fee. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles and the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. To calculate the cost for Michelle's ride, we need to multiply the distance travelled (4 miles) by the taxi charge per mile ($2.5). So the answer would be: 4 miles x $2.5 = $10. Therefore, Michelle will pay a total of $12 for her ride.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5.  Therefore, Michelle will pay a total of $10 for her ride. This includes the ride fee of $2, as well as the fare of $8 calculated by multiplying the distance travelled (4 miles) by the taxi charge per mile ($2.5).  The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is a fee that is added to the total fare for Michelle's ride.\nFirst, Michelle pays the ride fee of $2.   Second, since the taxi charge per mile is $2.5 and Michelle rode the taxi for 4 miles, the total cost of her ride is 4 x $2.5 = $10.   Therefore, Michelle pays a total of $12 for her ride.   Yes, the condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, the total cost of her ride cannot be calculated properly.\nFirst, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2. Then, she rode 4 miles, so she paid a total of $10 ($2.5 per mile multiplied by 4 miles). Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride.  The condition of \"Emma rode a bike to the office for 2000 miles\" is not relevant to the calculation process of Michelle's ride fee.", "equation": "Emma rode a bike to the office for 2000 miles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.2905815839767456]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. As part of employment benefit, Emma is freely enrolled in the gym membership that is worth 100000 dollars. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell. The gym membership is worth $100,000, but Emma got it for free, so Jack does not need to pay for this. Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything. The condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because the cost of the barbell is determined by the cost of the squat rack. Therefore, the condition is necessary for the calculation process. The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is also relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it indicates how much Jack paid for the barbell. The condition of Emma being enrolled in the gym membership for free is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Jack paid for everything. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jack bought a squat rack for $2500 and the barbell cost 1/10 as much. To calculate the total cost, we need to add the cost of the squat rack and the cost of the barbell. So the answer would be: $2500 + $250 = $2750. Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much. Therefore, the barbell cost $250.  Emma is freely enrolled in the gym membership that is worth $100,000.   Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2,750 for everything.   Yes, the condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because the cost of the barbell is determined by the cost of the squat rack. Therefore, the condition is necessary for the calculation process.\nJack paid $2500 for the squat rack.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell.  The gym membership is worth $100,000, but Emma got it for free, so Jack does not need to pay for this.   Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything.   The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it indicates how much Jack paid for the barbell.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500, and the barbell cost 1/10 as much. That means the barbell cost $250. So, the total cost for Jack is $2500 + $250 = $2750.   The condition \"As part of employment benefit, Emma is freely enrolled in the gym membership that is worth 100000 dollars\" is not relevant to the problem. The calculation process only requires the cost of the squat rack and barbell.", "equation": "As part of employment benefit, Emma is freely enrolled in the gym membership that is worth 100000 dollars.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110712051391602, 0.16832026839256287, 0.09586319327354431]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The company that Jack works for has 50 employees. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to understand the condition given in the problem. Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. This means that Greenville has 362,987 people.   Next, we need to add the populations of Springfield and Greenville to get the total population of both cities.   So the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.   The condition given in the problem is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the population of Greenville, which we need to add to the population of Springfield to get the total population of both cities. The condition \"The company that Jack works for has 50 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "First, we need to understand the condition given in the problem. Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. This means that Greenville has 362,987 people.   Next, we need to add the populations of Springfield and Greenville to get the total population of both cities.   So the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.   The condition given in the problem is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the population of Greenville, which we need to add to the population of Springfield to get the total population of both cities.\nThe total population of Springfield is 482,653 people, and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people. So the population of Greenville is 362,987 people.  To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to add the population of Springfield and Greenville together. So the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people.  The condition \"The company that Jack works for has 50 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The company that Jack works for has 50 employees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.12308287620544434]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Emma is 100000 inches shorter than Steve. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "The condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\". We know that there are 12 inches in a foot, so 5'6\" is equal to 66 inches.   Now, we know that Steve grows 6 inches, so he is now 72 inches tall. Emma is 100000 inches shorter than Steve, so she is -99,928 inches tall.   Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.  The condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it affects the final answer.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "The condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\". We know that there are 12 inches in a foot, so 5'6\" is equal to 66 inches.   Now, we know that Steve grows 6 inches, so he is now 72 inches tall. Emma is 100000 inches shorter than Steve, so she is -99,928 inches tall.   Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.\nSteve is 5'6\", which is equivalent to 66 inches. He grows 6 inches, which means his new height is 72 inches. Emma is 100000 inches shorter than Steve, which means her height is -99,928 inches.  Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall. The condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it affects the final answer.\nSteve is 5'6\" or 66 inches tall.  He grows 6 inches, so now he is 72 inches tall.  Emma is 100000 inches shorter than Steve, so she is 72 - 100000 inches tall.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.  The condition \"Emma is 100000 inches shorter than Steve\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma is 100000 inches shorter than Steve.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495515942573547, 0.513569176197052, 0.3880316913127899]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Mary picked 1000 more pears than Tom. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples. Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so Tom picked 24 apples. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 12 + 24 = 36 apples together.  The condition of Mary picking 1000 more pears than Tom is not relevant to the calculation process of how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. To calculate the total number of apples collected, we need to add the number of apples Lexie picked with the number of apples Tom picked. So the answer would be: 12 + 24 = 36. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples together.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "None", "equation": "Mary picked 1000 more pears than Tom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.5032950043678284]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Jack is 2000 years older than Claire. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "We know that in two years, Claire will be 20 years old. This means that, right now, Claire is 18 years old. Since Jessica is six years older than Claire, Jessica is currently 24 years old. The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it allows us to deduce Claire's current age, which we need to calculate Jessica's current age. The condition \"Jack is 2000 years older than Claire\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\" since it has nothing to do with Jessica's age. Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "First, since Claire will be 20 in two years, we can deduce that she is currently 18 years old.   Second, since Jessica is six years older than Claire, we can then say that she is currently 24 years old.   Finally, since Jack is 2000 years older than Claire, he is currently 2018 years old.   Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old now.   The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it allows us to deduce Claire's current age, which we need to calculate Jessica's current age.\nIn two years, Claire will be 20 years old. This means that, right now, Claire is 18 years old. Since Jessica is six years older than Claire, Jessica is currently 24 years old.  The condition \"Jack is 2000 years older than Claire\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\" since it has nothing to do with Jessica's age.", "equation": "Jack is 2000 years older than Claire.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.3223579227924347]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Jack raised 50000 more ducks than Michael. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Jack raised 50000 more ducks than Michael is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "Michael's chickens increase by 150 each year, so if he has 550 chickens now, he will have 700 chickens after one year, 850 after two years, and so on. After 9 years, Michael will have a total of 1350 chickens. The condition that Jack raised 50000 more ducks than Michael is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack raised 50000 more ducks than Michael.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.4352463483810425]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Emma would like to have 100000 apple trees. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 saplings sprout.  Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she is left with 20 - 6 = 14 saplings.  This has nothing to do with the number of apple trees that Emma would like to have, so the answer to the question \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" is 14. The condition of Emma wanting to have 100000 apple trees is not relevant to the calculation process of how many cherry saplings Kim has left. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kim planted 80 cherry pits, 25% of them sprout, and Kim sold 6 of the saplings. To calculate how many cherry saplings Kim has left, we need to subtract the number of saplings sold from the total number of saplings that sprouted. So the answer would be: 20 - 6 = 14. Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 saplings sprout.  Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she is left with 20 - 6 = 14 saplings.  This has nothing to do with the number of apple trees that Emma would like to have, so the answer to the question \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" is 14.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout.  Therefore, 25% of 80 = 20 cherry saplings sprout.   Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings.  Therefore, Kim has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.   No, the condition \"25% of them sprout\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" since we already know that 25% of the 80 cherry pits sprouted, and we do not need to calculate this again.\nFirst, Kim planted 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so there are 20 cherry saplings.  Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left.   Yes, the condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it reduces the total number of cherry saplings from 20 to 14.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits.   Step 2: 25% of them sprout (i.e. 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings).  Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings (i.e. 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left).  So, the answer is 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Emma would like to have 100000 apple trees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\".", "equation": "Emma would like to have 100000 apple trees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364680886268616, 0.24044959247112274, 0.4611811935901642, 0.2588421404361725]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Mary sells 500 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Jason eats one omelet per day, so for two weeks, he will consume 14 omelets. Each omelet requires 3 eggs, so the total number of eggs Jason will consume in two weeks is 14 x 3 = 42 eggs. The condition that Mary sells 500 eggs per day is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jason eats one omelet per day and each omelet requires 3 eggs. To calculate the total number of eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we need to multiply the number of omelets he will eat (14) by the number of eggs per omelet (3). So the answer would be: 14 x 3 = 42. Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Jason eats one omelet per day, so for two weeks, he will consume 14 omelets. Each omelet requires 3 eggs, so the total number of eggs Jason will consume in two weeks is 14 x 3 = 42 eggs.  The condition that Mary sells 500 eggs per day is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary sells 500 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.2645649313926697]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. The distance between home and the office of Ada is 2000 miles. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "Michelle pays a ride fee of $2 when she enters the taxi. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5. Since the distance between her home and the office of Ada is 2000 miles, this is not relevant to the calculation. Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $2 + (4 miles x $2.5) = $12 for her ride. The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as this fee must be added to the total cost of the ride. The condition of the distance between home and the office of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of Michelle's total ride cost.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Michelle took the taxi from her office to her home. That is a distance of 4 miles. Therefore, the taxi charge for 4 miles is $2.5 x 4 = $10. Since the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant, Michelle paid a total of $10 + $2 = $12 for her ride.  The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as this fee must be added to the total cost of the ride.\nFirst, Michelle pays a ride fee of $2.  Second, she pays $2.5 per mile for her ride, which is 4 miles.  Therefore, the total amount she pays for her ride is $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $10.   The condition that the distance between home and the office of Ada is 2000 miles is not relevant to the calculation process of Michelle's total ride cost.\n1. Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 when she entered the taxi. 2. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5. 3. The distance between her home and the office of Ada is 2000 miles; this is not relevant to the calculation.  Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $2 + (4 miles x $2.5) = $12 for her ride. The distance between home and the office of Ada is not relevant to the calculation.", "equation": "The distance between home and the office of Ada is 2000 miles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.2657020390033722]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Mary had 2 2000-minute calls with friends. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. Each commercial lasted 10 minutes. Therefore, the total time of the commercials was 30 minutes. Therefore, the TV show itself lasted 1.5 - 0.5 = 1 hour. So, the answer to the question is 1 hour. Yes, the condition \"Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it provides the total runtime of the TV show, including commercials. The condition of Mary having 2 2000-minute calls with friends is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the length of the TV show itself.", "numerical_answer": 1, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. Each commercial lasted 10 minutes.  Therefore, the total time of the commercials was 30 minutes.   Therefore, the TV show itself lasted 1.5 - 0.5 = 1 hour.   So, the answer to the question is 1 hour.   Yes, the condition \"Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it provides the total runtime of the TV show, including commercials.\nThe TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. Mary had 2 2000-minute calls with friends. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each.  To calculate the length of the TV show itself, we have to subtract the time of the commercials and the phone calls from the original 1.5 hours.  So, the length of the TV show itself, not counting commercials, would be 1.5 - (3 x 10) - (2 x 2000) = -3880 minutes = -64.67 hours.  Therefore, the answer is -64.67 hours.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe TV show was aired for 1.5 hours.  There were 3 commercials, lasting 10 minutes each.  Therefore, the TV show itself (not counting commercials) was 1.5 hours - (3 x 10 minutes) = 1.2 hours.   The condition \"Mary had 2 2000-minute calls with friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the length of the TV show itself.", "equation": "Mary had 2 2000-minute calls with friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, 0.10004101693630219]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Jack spends 2000 dollars on groceries each week. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to subtract $35 from Libby's 160 quarters. Since each quarter is worth 25 cents, we multiply 35 by 4 to find out how many quarters she needs to pay for the dress:  $35 x 4 = 140 quarters  So, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left:  160 quarters - 140 quarters = 20 quarters  The condition \"Jack spends 2000 dollars on groceries each week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect how many quarters Libby has left after replacing the dress.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  $35 is equal to 140 quarters.  So if Libby pays $35, she will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.   Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\". Without knowing how many quarters Libby has in her piggy bank, it would be impossible to calculate how many quarters she will have left after replacing the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters.  She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.   $35 is equivalent to 140 quarters (1 quarter = 0.25$).   Therefore, Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress:   160 - 140 = 20.   The condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the amount of money she has to pay affects the number of quarters she will have left.\nFirst, we need to subtract $35 from Libby's 160 quarters. Since each quarter is worth 25 cents, we multiply 35 by 4 to find out how many quarters she needs to pay for the dress:  $35 x 4 = 140 quarters  So, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left:  160 quarters - 140 quarters = 20 quarters  The condition \"Jack spends 2000 dollars on groceries each week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect how many quarters Libby has left after replacing the dress.", "equation": "Jack spends 2000 dollars on groceries each week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.04635836184024811]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Emma cooked dinner with the meat at 2000 pm. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate how much Melies has to pay for the meat. 2 kg x $82 = $164  Step 2: Subtract the cost of the meat from $180.  $180 - $164 = $16  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how much meat Melies has to pay for and therefore how much money he has left after paying for the meat. The condition \"Emma cooked dinner with the meat at 2000 pm\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Melies bought 2 kg of meat and the meat costs $82 per kilogram. To calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat, we need to subtract the cost of the meat from the initial amount of money Melies had in his wallet. So the answer would be: $180 - $164 = $16. Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate how much Melies has to pay for the meat.   2 kg x $82 = $164  Step 2: Subtract the cost of the meat from $180.   $180 - $164 = $16  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how much meat Melies has to pay for and therefore how much money he has left after paying for the meat.\nFirst, Melies needs to pay for the two kilograms of meat. Two kilograms of meat costs $164 ($82*2). If Melies has $180 in his wallet, he has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing the cost per kilogram, it is not possible to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\n1. Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. 2. Melies has $180 in his wallet. 3. The total cost of the meat is 2 kg x $82 = $164. 4. Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the initial amount of money which Melies had in his wallet, which is used to calculate the amount of money he has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. So, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Therefore, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left. The condition \"Emma cooked dinner with the meat at 2000 pm\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma cooked dinner with the meat at 2000 pm.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.2895702123641968]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Additionally, Emma plants 50 grasses. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many trees James has. Each tree has 20 plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plants each tree has. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many seeds James plants. So, James plants 60% of 20 plants, which is 12 plants (20 x 0.6 = 12). Additionally, Emma plants 50 grasses. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it does not provide any additional information regarding how many trees James planted. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many trees James planted. We can calculate this by counting the number of trees James has (2 trees). So the answer is 2 trees. Yes, the condition \"Each tree has 20 plants.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 2, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James has 2 trees with 20 plants each, so he has 40 plants in total. He plants 60% of those, which is 24 plants. Emma plants 50 grasses. James plants 2 trees with 20 plants each, and 24 additional plants, so James planted a total of 46 plants. The answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is two trees. The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees\" is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, James collected 40 fruits from the two trees. Then, he planted 60% of those, so he planted 24 trees. Emma planted 50 grasses. So, James planted 24 trees. The condition that each tree has 20 plants is not relevant to the calculation process of how many trees James planted.\nFirst, James collects all the fruits from his two trees. Each tree has 20 plants, and each plant has 1 seed. So, James has 40 seeds from his two trees.  Next, he plants 60% of those (40 x 0.6 = 24). So, James plants 24 trees.  Then, Emma plants 50 grasses. So, James and Emma now have a total of 74 trees.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 24.  The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines how many seeds James has to plant. Without this information, it would be impossible to determine how many trees James has planted.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This means he has 2 trees.  Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed. This means James has 40 seeds in total.  He plants 60% of those. This means he plants 24 seeds.  Additionally, Emma plants 50 grasses. This is irrelevant to the calculation process of how many trees James planted.  Therefore, the answer is James planted 2 trees.\nFirst, James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants, and each plant has 1 seed. This means James has 40 seeds total.   Then, James plants 60% of those, which means he planted 24 seeds.   This means that James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"Additionally, Emma plants 50 grasses\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not provide any information about James planting trees.", "equation": "Additionally, Emma plants 50 grasses.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.24729418754577637]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Based on the counting by Emma, there are 5000 stars in the sky tonight. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to make in order to fill 4 bottles: 4 bottles = 4 x 85 paper stars = 340 stars.  Then, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the number of stars he needs to make (340 stars) to get the total number of stars he still needs to make: 340 stars - 33 stars = 307 stars.  So, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles.  The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it helps us to calculate the number of stars Luke needs to make in order to fill 4 bottles (340 stars). The condition \"Based on the counting by Emma, there are 5000 stars in the sky tonight\" is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not impact the number of stars Luke needs to make. Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to make in order to fill 4 bottles:  4 bottles = 4 x 85 paper stars = 340 stars   Then, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the number of stars he needs to make (340 stars) to get the total number of stars he still needs to make:  340 stars - 33 stars = 307 stars   So, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles.   The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it helps us to calculate the number of stars Luke needs to make in order to fill 4 bottles (340 stars).\nFirst, Luke needs to fill 4 bottles with 85 paper stars each. That means he needs to make 340 stars in total.  Second, he has already made 33 stars. So he needs to make 307 stars more.  Third, the condition of Emma counting 5000 stars in the sky tonight is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not impact the number of stars Luke needs to make.  Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles.\nFirst, since Luke has already made 33 stars, he must make 85 - 33 = 52 more stars to fill the glass jar.   Then, since he needs to fill 4 bottles, he must make an additional 4 x 85 = 340 stars.   Therefore, Luke must make a total of 52 + 340 = 392 more stars to fill the 4 bottles.   Yes, the condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   Finally, since Emma counted 5000 stars in the sky tonight, Luke will need to make 392 more stars from other materials.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 4 bottles worth of stars (85 stars each). This means he needs to make a total of 340 stars (4 x 85 = 340).  Second, Luke has already made 33 stars. This means he still needs to make 307 stars (340 - 33 = 307).  Finally, the condition \"Based on the counting by Emma, there are 5000 stars in the sky tonight\" is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not affect the number of stars Luke needs to make. The number of stars in the sky is irrelevant to the problem.  Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars.", "equation": "Based on the counting by Emma, there are 5000 stars in the sky tonight.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3489551544189453, 0.6230339407920837, 0.3254551887512207, 0.28633204102516174]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The two dogs of Tom weigh 200 pounds each. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Therefore, the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  The second step is to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we must divide the total weight of Janele's cats (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4). Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The two dogs of Tom weigh 200 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\" The relevant information to answer this question is that Janele has 4 cats. The first two weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up all of the weights of her cats and then divide by the number of cats. So the answer would be: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. 48 / 4 = 12.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the total weight of Janele's cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds  Step 2: Divide the total weight by the number of cats: 48 姊 4 = 12 pounds  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant because it tells us how many cats Janele has, which is necessary for calculating the average weight. Without knowing how many cats she has, we wouldn't be able to calculate the average weight.\nFirst, we need to add up the weights of Janele's cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Then, we need to divide the total weight of the cats by the number of cats. 48 divided by 4 = 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem since the weights of all cats are already given in the problem.\nThe first step is to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats by adding up the weights of each cat: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  The second step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats (4) to get the average weight: 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  The third weighs 14.7 pounds condition is relevant to the calculation process as it is used to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. Without this condition, we would not have the accurate total weight to divide by the number of cats.\nJanele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 cats. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds.  To calculate the average weight of her cats, we need to add up all of the weights of her cats and then divide by the number of cats.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  48 / 4 = 12  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  Yes, the condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the weight of the fourth cat which is needed to correctly calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.\nThe first step is to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Therefore, the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  The second step is to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we must divide the total weight of Janele's cats (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4). Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The two dogs of Tom weigh 200 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\"", "equation": "The two dogs of Tom weigh 200 pounds each.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.2752784490585327]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Mary has bought 1000 potatoes with the goal of buying 5 fruits. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. We can calculate what percentage he is towards his goal by dividing 8 by 10. 8/10 is the same as 80%, so Calvin is 80% towards his goal. The condition \"Mary has bought 1000 potatoes with the goal of buying 5 fruits\" is not relevant to the calculation process of what percentage Calvin is towards his goal. The relevant information to answer this question is that Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. To calculate the percentage, we need to divide the number of haircuts he has gotten by the total number of haircuts required. So the answer would be: 8/10 = 80%. Therefore, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.", "numerical_answer": 80, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts. He needs 2 more haircuts to reach his goal. So, he is 8/10 or 80% towards his goal.  The condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the basis for our calculation. Without knowing that Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts, we would not be able to calculate what percentage he is towards his goal.\nCalvin has 8 haircuts out of the 10 haircuts he needs to make a wig for his dog. That means he is 80% towards his goal.   The condition \"and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal\" is relevant because it provides the total number of haircuts required to reach his goal. Without that information, it is not possible to calculate the percentage.\nCalvin has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more. He has already completed 8/10 of the haircuts, so his percentage towards his goal is 80%.  The condition given about Mary has nothing to do with Calvin's goal, so it is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Mary has bought 1000 potatoes with the goal of buying 5 fruits.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.10648930072784424]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Emma gave Luke 3 dollars. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 85 - 33 = 52 stars to fill the glass jar. He needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make 52 x 4 = 208 stars in total. Emma gave Luke 3 dollars, but this does not help with the calculation, so it is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is Luke needs to make 208 more stars.", "numerical_answer": 208, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill each of the four bottles. Since 85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar, Luke will need 85 stars to fill each bottle.   Second, we need to subtract the 33 stars Luke has already made from the total number of stars he needs to make (85 stars per bottle). Therefore, Luke will need to make (85-33) = 52 more stars.   Finally, we need to consider the 3 dollars Emma gave Luke. Since paper stars cost money to make, this money will be used to purchase the additional stars Luke needs. However, since we do not know how much each star costs, we cannot determine if the 3 dollars Emma gave Luke is enough to cover the cost of the additional stars.   Therefore, the condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is not relevant to the calculation process for the problem \"How many more stars must Luke make?\"\nLuke has already made 33 stars, so he needs 52 more stars to fill 4 bottles. The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used in the calculation to determine how many stars Luke needs to make.\nFirst, Luke already made 33 stars. That means he needs to make 52 stars to fill the glass jar (85 - 33 = 52).  Second, he needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make an additional 48 stars (4 x 12 = 48).   Therefore, Luke must make a total of 100 stars (52 + 48 = 100).   The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process since Luke must make additional stars to fill the bottles.\nFirst, Luke must make 85 paper stars to fill one glass jar. Since he already has 33 stars, he needs to make 52 more stars for one jar. Then, since he needs to fill 4 bottles, he needs to make a total of 208 stars (52 stars x 4 jars = 208 stars). Finally, the condition \"Emma gave Luke 3 dollars\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since this money does not change the number of stars needed to fill the jars.", "equation": "Emma gave Luke 3 dollars.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.15617918968200684]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Tom raised 200000 more ducks than Michael. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  Yes, the condition \"Tom raised 200000 more ducks than Michael.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many ducks are on Tom's farm. This is necessary for us to calculate the total number of chickens on both farms.", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "Since the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, the number of ducks on Tom's farm is 200000 + 550 = 200,550.  Then, the number of chickens on Michael's farm after 9 years will be 550 + (150 x 9) = 1,950.  Yes, the condition \"Tom raised 200000 more ducks than Michael.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many ducks are on Tom's farm.", "equation": "Tom raised 200000 more ducks than Michael.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.3634653389453888]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Ada uses 10000 pencils for each drawing. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday. We multiply the number of drawings for each day by the amount she charges for each drawing: 24 x $20 = $480 and 16 x $20 = $320. Adding the two amounts together gives us the total amount of money Gretchen made: $480 + $320 = $800.  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing how much money Gretchen charges per drawing, it would be impossible to calculate how much money she made. The condition \"Ada uses 10000 pencils for each drawing\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday. We multiply the number of drawings for each day by the amount she charges for each drawing: 24 x $20 = $480 and 16 x $20 = $320. Adding the two amounts together gives us the total amount of money Gretchen made: $480 + $320 = $800.   Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing how much money Gretchen charges per drawing, it would be impossible to calculate how much money she made.\nGretchen sold 24 caricatures on Saturday, so she made $480. She sold 16 caricatures on Sunday, so she made $320. Therefore, Gretchen made a total of $800 from her caricatures on Saturday and Sunday.  The condition \"Ada uses 10000 pencils for each drawing.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada uses 10000 pencils for each drawing.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.12120629847049713]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Emma has 3 lemons. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we want to find out how many sweets each person will get. We can do this by dividing the total number of sweets by the number of people.  Jennifer has a total of 1014 sweets (212 green, 310 blue, and 502 yellow). So, if we divide 1014 by 4 (Jennifer and her 3 friends), each person will get 253.5 sweets.  However, Emma has 3 lemons and not sweets, so her portion will be slightly different. Jennifer will need to adjust the portion so that Emma will get 3 lemons instead of sweets. To do this, Jennifer will need to give Emma her portion of sweets (253.5 sweets) and then add 3 lemons. This means that Emma will get a total of 256.5 sweets.  Therefore, the answer is that Jennifer and her friends will get 253.5 sweets each, except for Emma who will get 256.5 sweets.  So yes, the condition of Jennifer deciding to share her sweets is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 256.5, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we want to find out how many sweets each person will get. We can do this by dividing the total number of sweets by the number of people.  Jennifer has a total of 1014 sweets (212 green, 310 blue, and 502 yellow). So, if we divide 1014 by 4 (Jennifer and her 3 friends), each person will get 253.5 sweets.  However, Emma has 3 lemons and not sweets, so her portion will be slightly different. Jennifer will need to adjust the portion so that Emma will get 3 lemons instead of sweets. To do this, Jennifer will need to give Emma her portion of sweets (253.5 sweets) and then add 3 lemons. This means that Emma will get a total of 256.5 sweets.  Therefore, the answer is that Jennifer and her friends will get 253.5 sweets each, except for Emma who will get 256.5 sweets.  So yes, the condition of Jennifer deciding to share her sweets is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nStep 1: This condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that Jennifer has 212 green sweets and we need to use this information to calculate how many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each.   Step 2: Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets.   Step 3: We need to divide the total number of sweets (212 + 310 + 502 = 1024) by 4, since Jennifer and her friends will be sharing the sweets.   Step 4: 1024 姊 4 = 256.   Step 5: Each person will get 256 sweets. Emma will not get any sweets since she has 3 lemons.   Therefore, Jennifer and her 3 friends will get 256 sweets each.\nFirst, Jennifer will need to divide the 212 green sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She can evenly divide this amount by giving 54 green sweets to each person.   Next, she will need to divide the 310 blue sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She can evenly divide this amount by giving 103 blue sweets to each person.   Finally, she will need to divide the 502 yellow sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She can evenly divide this amount by giving 170 yellow sweets to each person.   In total, Jennifer and her friends will each get 54 green sweets, 103 blue sweets and 170 yellow sweets.   The condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many blue and yellow sweets Jennifer has to divide between herself and her friends.\nFirst, let's calculate the total number of sweets: Total = 212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow = 1024 sweets  Now, let's divide the total number of sweets by 4 (since there are 4 friends): Each friend will get = 1024/4 = 256 sweets  So, each of Jennifer and her 3 friends will get 256 sweets each.  The condition \"Emma has 3 lemons\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since the number of lemons does not affect the number of sweets each person will get.", "equation": "Emma has 3 lemons.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.329317569732666]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Jack paid $1000 for a traffic ticket. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Jed was fined $256, and that the posted speed limit was 50 mph. We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit. We can then calculate how many miles per hour Jed was travelling over the speed limit by dividing the fine by the rate per mile per hour ($256 / $16 = 16 mph). We can then calculate the speed that Jed was travelling by adding the speed limit (50 mph) and the amount he was travelling over the speed limit (16 mph). This gives us a total of 66 mph. Therefore, Jed was travelling at 66 mph when he was fined $256. The condition \"Jack paid $1000 for a traffic ticket\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "Step 1: We know that Jed was fined $256, and that the posted speed limit was 50 mph.  Step 2: We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit.  Step 3: We can then calculate how many miles per hour Jed was travelling over the speed limit by dividing the fine by the rate per mile per hour ($256 / $16 = 16 mph).  Step 4: We can then calculate the speed that Jed was travelling by adding the speed limit (50 mph) and the amount he was travelling over the speed limit (16 mph). This gives us a total of 66 mph.  Therefore, Jed was travelling at 66 mph when he was fined $256.  The condition \"Jack paid $1000 for a traffic ticket\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack paid $1000 for a traffic ticket.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.5072460174560547]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Jack sold 3 gift boxes yesterday. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "Edmund needs 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much gift wrapper Edmund needs for each gift box. Jack sold 3 gift boxes yesterday. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many gift boxes Edmund needs to wrap. Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much gift wrapper Edmund has for each day. So, Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes every day (90 inches/18 inches = 5 gift boxes). Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days (5 gift boxes x 3 days = 15 gift boxes). Yes, the condition \"he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Jack sold 3 gift boxes yesterday is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many gift boxes Edmund needs to wrap. The answer is 15 gift boxes every 3 days.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund needs to wrap one gift box. That is 18 inches.   Second, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund needs to wrap three gift boxes. That is 18 x 3 = 54 inches.   Third, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund has per day. That is 90 inches.   Fourth, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper every three days. That is 90 / 54 = 1.67 gift boxes.   So Edmund will be able to wrap 1.67 gift boxes every three days.   The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how much gift wrapper Edmund needs for each gift box.\n1. Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. 2. He has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. 3. Jack sold 3 gift boxes yesterday.  Based on the information given, we can calculate the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days:  1. 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box x 5 gift boxes = 90 inches of gift wrapper per day 2. 90 inches of gift wrapper per day x 3 days = 270 inches of gift wrapper every 3 days 3. 270 inches of gift wrapper every 3 days / 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box = 15 gift boxes every 3 days  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  The condition \"Jack sold 3 gift boxes yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not provide any information regarding Edmund's supplies or the number of gift boxes he can wrap.", "equation": "Jack sold 3 gift boxes yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.3789040446281433]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The turtle of Jack weighs 100 pounds. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the weights of all of Janele's cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. Now, we need to divide the total weight of the cats by the number of cats. Since Janele has 4 cats, we divide 48 by 4: 48/4 = 12. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. The condition that \"The turtle of Jack weighs 100 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Janele has four cats and the weight of each cat. To calculate the average weight, we need to add up the weights of all the cats and then divide the total weight by the number of cats. So the answer would be: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 / 4 = 12. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Step 1: Add up the weights of all the cats:  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  Step 2: Divide the sum of the weights by the number of cats:  48 / 4 = 12  This means that the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many cats to include in the calculation. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the average weight.\nFirst, we need to add up the weights of all of Janele's cats:  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  Now, we need to divide the total weight of the cats by the number of cats. Since Janele has 4 cats, we divide 48 by 4:  48 / 4 = 12  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. The condition that \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. We can do this by adding up the weights of each cat: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. The next step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats to get the average weight. In this case, there are 4 cats, so the average weight is 48/4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides one of the weights that is necessary to add up the total weight and calculate the average. Without this information, Janele would not be able to accurately calculate the average weight of her cats. The fact that the turtle of Jack weighs 100 pounds is not relevant to the calculation process since Janele is only looking to calculate the average weight of her cats.\nJanele has four cats, and the total weight of the cats is (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) = 47 pounds. The average weight of the four cats is 47/4 = 11.75 pounds. The turtle of Jack weighs 100 pounds, but it is not one of Janele's cats, so it is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\n1) We need to calculate the total weight of all Janele's cats. This is the sum of the weight of each cat: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 lbs.  2) We then need to divide the total weight by the number of cats. 48 lbs divided by 4 cats = 12 lbs.  3) The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 lbs.  The condition \"The turtle of Jack weighs 100 pounds.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it does not pertain to Janele's cats.", "equation": "The turtle of Jack weighs 100 pounds.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.28929370641708374]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Tom bought 10000 kilograms of strawberries yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much the cherries cost per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that Genevieve needed $400 from Clarice to pay for the cherries. So if Genevieve had $1600 on her, she would have needed $400 from Clarice, meaning the total cost of the cherries was $2000 ($1600 + $400). Since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, that means that Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries ($2000 / 8).  Yes, the condition that Genevieve had $1600 on her is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Tom bought 10000 kilograms of strawberries yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. We can calculate this by dividing the total cost of the cherries by the cost per kilogram. So the answer would be", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram.  This condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries costs.   If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?  We can use the condition to calculate the answer to this question. Since each kilogram of cherries costs $8, Genevieve can buy 200 kilograms of cherries with $1600. Therefore, the answer to the question is 200 kilograms of cherries.\nIf Genevieve had $1600 on her, she would have been able to buy $1600 梅 $8 = 200 kilograms of cherries.   However, the condition that when she reached the checkout counter she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in is relevant to the calculation process because it means that she was only able to buy 200 - 400 = 200 - 4 = 196 kilograms of cherries.   Therefore, if Genevieve had $1600 on her, she would have bought 196 kilograms of cherries.\nIf Genevieve had $1600 on her, she could buy $1600 / $8 = 200 kilograms of cherries. Since she was $400 short of the total price, she must have bought 200 - 400 = -200 kilograms of cherries. This means she did not buy any cherries and Clarice paid the entire price.  The condition \"Tom bought 10000 kilograms of strawberries yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it does not provide any information that is necessary to calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.", "equation": "Tom bought 10000 kilograms of strawberries yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.4037618935108185]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Each button costs 3 grams of iron from the shop owned by Ada. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. And Kendra made 4 more than this, so she made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Finally, Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44 / 2 = 22 buttons. The condition given is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many buttons Kendra made compared to Mari.  Without the information about Mari making 8 buttons, it would be impossible to calculate the number of buttons Kendra made, and subsequently, the number of buttons Sue made. The condition of each button costing 3 grams of iron from the shop owned by Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect the number of buttons that Sue made. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many did Sue make?\" is 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. And Kendra made 4 more than this, so she made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons.  Finally, Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44 / 2 = 22 buttons.  The condition given is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many buttons Kendra made compared to Mari.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. This means Kendra made 5 x 8 + 4 = 44 buttons.   Sue made half as many as Kendra. This means Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons.  The condition Mari made 8 buttons is relevant to the calculation process, because it is what the initial statement used to calculate the number of buttons Kendra made. Without the information about Mari making 8 buttons, it would be impossible to calculate the number of buttons Kendra made, and subsequently, the number of buttons Sue made.\nFirst, Mari made 8 buttons. Then, Kendra made 5 x 4 = 20 buttons. That means, Sue made half of 20 = 10 buttons.   The condition \"Each button costs 3 grams of iron from the shop owned by Ada\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect the number of buttons that Sue made.", "equation": "Each button costs 3 grams of iron from the shop owned by Ada.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.1808769404888153]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Tom pays $1000 for each egg. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. This means he will eat three eggs every day. Multiply that by 14 days (for two weeks) and you get 42 eggs. The condition of Tom paying $1000 for each egg is not relevant to the calculation process, since it does not affect the amount of eggs that Jason will consume in two weeks. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?\" is 42 eggs.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. So, he will eat three eggs every day. Multiply that by 14 days (for two weeks) and you get 42 eggs. The condition of Tom paying $1000 for each egg is not relevant to the calculation process, since it does not affect the amount of eggs that Jason will consume in two weeks.", "equation": "Tom pays $1000 for each egg.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.30651429295539856]}
{"original_question": "Billy's family likes to keep their bicycles stored in the garage when they're not being used. They own a total of 4 bicycles. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. Ada put 10000 wheels out of the garage. How many spokes are inside the garage?", "reasoning_path": "The family owns a total of 4 bicycles. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many bicycles the family owns. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many spokes each wheel has. That means there are 40 spokes in total (4 bicycles x 10 spokes). Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Ada put 10000 wheels out of the garage is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many spokes are inside the garage. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of bicycles with the number of spokes each wheel has. So the answer would be 40 spokes.", "numerical_answer": 40, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "1. We have 4 bicycles, so there are 4 sets of wheels, each set with 10 spokes.  2. Each set of wheels has 10 spokes, so a total of 40 spokes are inside the garage.  Yes, the condition that they own a total of 4 bicycles is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us determine the total number of spokes inside the garage. Without this information, it would be impossible to answer the question.\n1. Billy's family has 4 bicycles. 2. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. 3. Ada put 10000 wheels out of the garage.  Therefore, the number of spokes inside the garage is 40,000 (4 x 10 x 10).  Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is necessary to know the number of spokes per wheel in order to calculate the total number of spokes inside the garage.\n1. Each bicycle has 4 wheels and 10 spokes per wheel.  2. Therefore, each bicycle has 40 spokes.  3. There are 4 bicycles in the garage, so there are a total of 160 spokes in the garage.  4. The condition \"Ada put 10000 wheels out of the garage\" is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not tell you how many bicycles were taken out. To answer the question, you would need to know how many bicycles were taken out.", "equation": "Ada put 10000 wheels out of the garage.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3732944130897522, 0.22472992539405823, 0.38099128007888794, 0.3521127700805664]}
{"original_question": "Rose is an aspiring artist. She wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings. Rose already has $7.10. Ada bought a chair at the price of $2000. How much more money does Rose need?", "reasoning_path": "Rose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. So, the total cost of all of these items is $18.10. Rose already has $7.10, so she needs an extra $11.00 to buy all the things she needs. The condition \"Ada bought a chair at the price of $2000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much more money does Rose need?\". This condition does not affect the amount of money Rose needs to buy the items she needs to pursue her art.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Rose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10. So, Rose needs $10.20 more to buy these items.   Yes, the condition of the paintbrush costing $2.40 is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is part of the items Rose needs and it affects the total amount she needs.\nRose needs a paintbrush ($2.40), a set of paints ($9.20), and an easel ($6.50). She already has $7.10, so she needs to get the remaining $14.60 to buy all of these items.  The condition \"a set of paints that costs $9.20\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because the cost of the set of paints has already been taken into consideration. The cost of the set of paints is already used to calculate the total amount of money Rose needs.\nRose needs $2.40 for the paintbrush, $9.20 for the set of paints, and $6.50 for the easel.   So, the total amount Rose needs is $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10.   Rose has $7.10, so she needs $18.10 - $7.10 = $11.00 more money.   The condition \"and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it affects the total amount of money Rose needs.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the items Rose wants. So we add together $2.40, $9.20, and $6.50, which gives us a total cost of $18.10. Now, we subtract the amount of money Rose already has, which is $7.10. This gives us the final amount of money Rose needs, which is $11.00.   Yes, the condition \"Rose already has $7.10\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much more money does Rose need?\" Without this information, we would not have been able to subtract this amount from the total cost of the items Rose wants, and would have ended up with an incorrect answer.\nRose needs to buy a paintbrush ($2.40), a set of paints ($9.20), and an easel ($6.50). So, the total cost of all of these items is $18.10. Rose already has $7.10, so she needs an extra $11.00 to buy all the things she needs.  The condition \"Ada bought a chair at the price of $2000.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much more money does Rose need?\". This condition does not affect the amount of money Rose needs to buy the items she needs to pursue her art.", "equation": "Ada bought a chair at the price of $2000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4616824686527252, 0.3893391489982605, 0.17714686691761017, 0.24710991978645325, 0.43306344747543335, 0.30786269903182983]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Mary sold 500 more bananas than Tom. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples. Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so Tom picked 24 apples. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether. The condition \"Mary sold 500 more bananas than Tom\" does not have any effect on the calculation process, so it is not relevant to the problem of how many apples Lexie and Tom collected.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "Lexie picked 12 apples.  Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so Tom picked 24 apples.   Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.   The condition \"Mary sold 500 more bananas than Tom\" does not have any effect on the calculation process, so it is not relevant to the problem of how many apples Lexie and Tom collected.", "equation": "Mary sold 500 more bananas than Tom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.3606627583503723]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. The average weight of a potato that Emma harvested is 1/1000 pound. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. To do this, we add up the number of carrots she pulled from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots. Since each carrot weighs 1/6 of a pound, we can multiply 234 (the total number of carrots) by 1/6 to get the total weight: 234 * 1/6 = 39 pounds.  So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"The average weight of a potato that Emma harvested is 1/1000 pound\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, and each carrot weighs 1/6 of a pound. To calculate the total weight of the carrots, we need to add up the number of carrots from each bed and then multiply that number by 1/6. So the answer would be: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234. 234 x 1/6 = 39. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. To do this, we add up the number of carrots she pulled from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots. Since each carrot weighs 1/6 of a pound, we can multiply 234 (the total number of carrots) by 1/6 to get the total weight: 234 * 1/6 = 39 pounds.  So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process because we do not need to know the number of carrots from each bed in order to calculate the total weight of the carrots.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots.   We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so 234 carrots would weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds.   The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The answer is 39 pounds.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, so 234 carrots would weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds. The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots.  6 carrots weigh 1 pound, so 234 carrots will weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds.  The condition of \"The average weight of a potato that Emma harvested is 1/1000 pound\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The average weight of a potato that Emma harvested is 1/1000 pound.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.3459640443325043]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Emma droved 2000 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much Jed was fined. Since the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit, we can use the equation $16*x = 256, where x is the number of mph Jed was traveling over the posted speed limit. We can solve this equation to get x = 16. Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph = 66 mph).   The condition \"Emma droved 2000 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city.\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not provide any information related to Jed's speed.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much Jed was fined. Since the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit, we can use the equation $16*x = 256, where x is the number of mph Jed was traveling over the posted speed limit. We can solve this equation to get x = 16. Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph = 66 mph).   The condition \"Emma droved 2000 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city.\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not provide any information related to Jed's speed.", "equation": "Emma droved 2000 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.26832783222198486]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Mary ate 1000 pieces of apples. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means she eats a total of 3 sandwiches. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the total number of sandwiches that Sally eats. Without this condition, the answer would be 4 instead of 6. The condition of Mary eating 1000 pieces of apples is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide information about Sally's eating habits.  Therefore, Sally ate 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday (2 pieces of bread per sandwich x 3 sandwiches = 6 pieces of bread).", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "In order to calculate the number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday, we need to know how many sandwiches she eats across Saturday and Sunday. So yes, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process.  In total, Sally eats 3 sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday. As each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. Mary's consumption of 1000 pieces of apples is not relevant to the calculation process.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means she eats a total of 3 sandwiches. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the total number of sandwiches that Sally eats. Without this condition, the answer would be 4 instead of 6.\nThe question is asking you to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"Mary ate 1000 pieces of apples\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide information about Sally's eating habits.  Therefore, Sally ate 4 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday (2 pieces of bread per sandwich x 2 sandwiches on Saturday + 1 sandwich on Sunday = 4 pieces of bread).", "equation": "Mary ate 1000 pieces of apples.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.24966558814048767]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Mary bought 50000 kilograms of banana yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve had $1600 on her. The cost of cherries was $8 per kilogram. To calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought, we need to divide $1600 by 8. That means Genevieve bought 1600/8 = 200 kilograms of cherries. Yes, the condition \"Genevieve had $1600 on her\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Mary bought 50000 kilograms of banana yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Genevieve had $1600 on her and the cost of cherries was $8 per kilogram. To calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought, we need to divide $1600 by 8. So the answer would be: 1600/8 = 200 kilograms of cherries.", "numerical_answer": 200, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "First, Genevieve had $1600. Then, she picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. Since she was $400 short of the total price, we can assume that the total price of the cherries she bought was $1600. Now, we can calculate the number of kilograms of cherries she bought.  $1600 梅 $8 = 200 kilograms  So, Genevieve bought 200 kilograms of cherries with her $1600. The condition \"Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it provides us with the cost of the cherries per kilogram, which we need to calculate the number of kilograms of cherries she bought.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much it would cost for Genevieve to buy the cherries. Since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, we can use the equation:   Cost = 8 x Kilograms   Therefore, if Genevieve had $1600 on her, then she could buy 200 kilograms of cherries.   Now, let's look at the condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.\" This condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us that Genevieve didn't have enough money to buy the full amount of cherries. Therefore, we can assume that she only bought a fraction of the 200 kilograms of cherries that she could have bought with her $1600.   Without any further information, we cannot calculate exactly how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.\nFirst, we need to figure out how much Genevieve's cherries cost. If each kilogram costs $8, then the total cost of Genevieve's cherries is $8 脳 x (where x is the number of kilograms).  Second, we know that Genevieve had $1600 on her, and her friend Clarice chipped in $400, so the total amount available is $2000.  Third, we need to solve for x. We can do this by setting the total cost of Genevieve's cherries equal to the total available amount. We can write this as:  $8x = $2000  Finally, we can solve for x by dividing both sides by 8.  $x = $2000 梅 8  Therefore, Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries.  The condition \"Mary bought 50000 kilograms of banana yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary bought 50000 kilograms of banana yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.4337961971759796]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Emma walked 20000 meters to the market. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the percentage off. To do this, we need to know the original price and the sale price. We know the original price is $350 and the sale price is $140, so the percentage off is:  (Original Price - Sale Price) / Original Price * 100  = (350 - 140) / 350 * 100  = 60%  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Emma walked 20000 meters to the market\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that the original price of the dress is $350 and the sale price is $140. To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the amount saved by the original price, and then multiply by 100.  So, Asia saved $210 on the dress. Dividing this by the original price ($350), we get 0.6. Multiplying this by 100 gives us 60%, so Asia got 60% off at the sale.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, let's calculate the percentage off. To do this, we need to know the original price and the sale price. We know the original price is $350 and the sale price is $140, so the percentage off is:  (Original Price - Sale Price) / Original Price * 100  =(350 - 140) / 350 * 100  =60%  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since we already know the sale price in the problem.\nFirst, we need to find out what the percentage off is. To do this, we need to divide the amount saved by the original price, and then multiply by 100.  So, Asia saved $210 on the dress. Dividing this by the original price ($350), we get 0.6. Multiplying this by 100 gives us 60%, so Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the original price of the dress which is necessary to calculate the percentage off.\nIn order to calculate the percentage off that Asia got at the sale, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price of the dress.   Original price = $350 Sale price = $140  Calculating the difference: 350 - 140 = 210  Now, to calculate the percentage off, we divide the difference of 210 by the original price of 350 and then multiply by 100.   210/350 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition \"Emma walked 20000 meters to the market\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma walked 20000 meters to the market.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.20631852746009827]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Emma is 50000 inches taller than Steve. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "Steve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. If Steve grows 6 inches, then his new height is 72 inches. If Emma is 50000 inches taller than Steve, then her height is 50000 + 72 = 50072 inches. Therefore, Steve's height in inches is 72 inches. Yes, the condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Before Steve grows 6 inches, he is 5'6\" or 66 inches tall. After Steve grows 6 inches, he is 5'12\" or 72 inches tall. Emma is 50,000 inches taller than Steve, so she is 50,000 + 72 = 50,072 inches tall. So, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches. Yes, the condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Steve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. If Steve grows 6 inches, then his new height is 72 inches. If Emma is 50000 inches taller than Steve, then her height is 50000 + 72 = 50072 inches. Therefore, Steve's height in inches is 72 inches. Yes, the condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nBefore Steve grows 6 inches, he is 5'6\" or 66 inches tall.  After Steve grows 6 inches, he is 5'12\" or 72 inches tall.  Emma is 50,000 inches taller than Steve, so she is 50,000 + 72 = 50,072 inches tall.  So, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.   Yes, the condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nSteve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches.  He grows 6 inches, so now he is 72 inches tall.   Emma is 50000 inches taller than Steve, so she is 57072 inches tall.  Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.  The condition \"Emma is 50000 inches taller than Steve\" is relevant to the calculation process, since we use it to calculate how tall Emma is and then use that number to calculate how tall Steve is.", "equation": "Emma is 50000 inches taller than Steve.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495515942573547, 0.513569176197052, 0.43704766035079956]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. John spends 60 hours sleeping per week. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That adds up to 19 hours. Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day. Since John spends 60 hours sleeping per week, it is not relevant to the calculation of Jackie's free time. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. To calculate how much free time Jackie has, we need to know how many hours she spends on activities other than sleeping. So the answer would be: 8 hours + 3 hours + 8 hours = 19 hours. Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "John spends 60 hours sleeping per week. That means he sleeps 8.5 hours per day (60 hours 姊 7 days).  Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That means she has 3 hours of free time per day (8 hours + 3 hours + 8 hours = 19 hours 姊 7 days = 2.71 hours 閳 3 hours).  So, Jackie has 3 hours of free time per day.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working,\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\" since it is part of the equation used to calculate the amount of free time Jackie has.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours exercising, and 8 hours sleeping per day. That adds up to 19 hours. Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day. Since John spends 60 hours sleeping per week, it is not relevant to the calculation of Jackie's free time.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep, which totals 19 hours. That means she has 5 hours of free time per day.  The condition \"John spends 60 hours sleeping per week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "John spends 60 hours sleeping per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.3462089002132416]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Calvin's hair is 1000 inches longer than that of Jack. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "First, to calculate what percentage Calvin is towards his goal, we need to know how many haircuts he needs to reach his goal. Since he has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more, the total number of haircuts he needs is 10.  Therefore, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.  The condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is necessary to know how many haircuts Calvin has already gotten in order to calculate how many more he needs to reach his goal. The condition \"Calvin's hair is 1000 inches longer than that of Jack\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "First, to calculate what percentage Calvin is towards his goal, we need to know how many haircuts he needs to reach his goal. Since he has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more, the total number of haircuts he needs is 10.  Therefore, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.  The condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is necessary to know how many haircuts Calvin has already gotten in order to calculate how many more he needs to reach his goal.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of haircuts that Calvin would need to make a wig for his dog. We know that he has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more, so he needs 10 haircuts in total.  Now, let's calculate the percentage of haircuts that Calvin has completed. He has completed 8 out of 10 haircuts, so the percentage is 80%.  The condition \"and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal\" is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, calculate the total amount of hair clippings Calvin needs to collect to make the wig for his dog: 8 haircuts x amount of clippings per haircut = total amount of hair clippings.  Second, calculate the amount of hair clippings Calvin has already collected: 8 haircuts x amount of clippings per haircut = amount of clippings already collected.  Third, calculate the percentage of Calvin's progress towards his goal: (amount of clippings already collected / total amount of hair clippings) x 100 = percentage of Calvin's progress towards his goal.  The condition \"Calvin's hair is 1000 inches longer than that of Jack\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Calvin's hair is 1000 inches longer than that of Jack.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.3550828993320465]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The basketball field of Mary is 3 sq ft larger than Holden's bathroom. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total sq ft for Holden's bedroom and bathroom, which is 309 + 150 = 459 sq ft.  Next, we need to determine the size of the new room by multiplying 459 by 2, which is 918 sq ft.  Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"The basketball field of Mary is 3 sq ft larger than Holden's bathroom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total sq ft for Holden's bedroom and bathroom, which is 309 + 150 = 459 sq ft.  Next, we need to determine the size of the new room by multiplying 459 by 2, which is 918 sq ft.  Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, let's add up the total sq ft of Holden's current master bedroom and bathroom:  309 sq ft (master bedroom) + 150 sq ft (master bathroom) = 459 sq ft  Second, let's double this number to calculate the sq ft of the new room:  459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new room will have a total of 918 sq ft.  The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process as it helps us to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's current master bedroom and bathroom.\nHolden's current bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. The total for his bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft.  Since he wants a room that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"The basketball field of Mary is 3 sq ft larger than Holden's bathroom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The basketball field of Mary is 3 sq ft larger than Holden's bathroom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.5083844065666199]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. Emma goes to the public library 10000 times a week. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "Each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words. So, each stanza has 80 words.   Since there are 20 stanzas, the total number of words in the poem is 20 x 80 = 1600 words.   The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the total number of words in the poem. The condition \"Emma goes to the public library 10000 times a week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "Each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words. So, each stanza has 80 words.   Since there are 20 stanzas, the total number of words in the poem is 20 x 80 = 1600 words.   The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThere are 20 stanzas in the poem. Each stanza has 10 lines. Each line has 8 words.  So, the total number of words in the poem is 20 x 10 x 8 = 1600 words.  The condition \"Emma goes to the public library 10000 times a week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma goes to the public library 10000 times a week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.1998707354068756]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Tom has a duck farm aged 200000 years. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years. The condition \"Tom has a duck farm aged 200000 years\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "The condition is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the information we need to calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years. Since his chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually, we can use this information to calculate the number of chickens he will have after 9 years.  To calculate this, we can use simple multiplication: (550 + 150 x 9) = 1950 chickens. So, after 9 years, Michael will have 1950 chickens on his farm.\nMichael's chicken farm increases by 150 chickens a year. So if the number of chickens on his farm is 550, after 9 years it will be 550 + (150*9) = 1950 chickens.   The condition \"Tom has a duck farm aged 200000 years\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom has a duck farm aged 200000 years.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.3538416624069214]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Ada spends 20000 minutes per drawing. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "First, Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday. So that means she made 24 x $20.00 = $480.00 on Saturday. Then, Gretchen sold 16 drawings on Sunday. That means she made 16 x $20.00 = $320.00 on Sunday.  So, Gretchen made a total of $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00.  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without it, we would not know how much Gretchen was charging for each drawing and therefore would not be able to calculate how much money she made. The condition \"Ada spends 20000 minutes per drawing\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "First, Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday. So that means she made 24 x $20.00 = $480.00 on Saturday. Then, Gretchen sold 16 drawings on Sunday. That means she made 16 x $20.00 = $320.00 on Sunday.  So, Gretchen made a total of $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00.  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without it, we would not know how much Gretchen was charging for each drawing and therefore would not be able to calculate how much money she made.\n1. How much money did Gretchen make on Saturday? Answer: Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday, so she made $480.00 (24 x $20.00 = $480.00).  2. How much money did Gretchen make on Sunday? Answer: Gretchen sold 16 drawings on Sunday, so she made $320.00 (16 x $20.00 = $320.00).  3. How much money did Gretchen make in total? Answer: Gretchen made a total of $800.00 ($480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00).  The condition \"Ada spends 20000 minutes per drawing\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada spends 20000 minutes per drawing.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.16481438279151917]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Emma has 400 packets of candies. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips to start with. She gave 4 bags to her friend. She bought 6 bags of chips in the store.  Therefore, Abie has 20 - 4 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is the starting point for the calculation. Without this condition, we would not know how many bags of chips Abie had to start with. The condition \"Emma has 400 packets of candies\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie had 20 bags of chips to start with. She gave 4 bags to her friend. She bought 6 bags of chips in the store.  Therefore, Abie has 20 - 4 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is the starting point for the calculation. Without this condition, we would not know how many bags of chips Abie had to start with.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags. She then purchased 6 bags in the store, bringing her total to 22 bags of chips. The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because without that information, we would not have known that Abie started with 20 bags of chips and ended up with 22 bags of chips. Emma's 400 packets of candies is not relevant to the calculation process.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags of chips. Then she bought another 6 bags of chips in the store, so she now has 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells you that Abie had 20 bags initially, gave 4 bags to her friend, and then bought another 6 bags in the store, resulting in her having 22 bags in the end. Emma's number of packets of candy is not relevant to the calculation process.\nAt the start, Abie had 20 bags of chips.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  She bought 6 more bags of chips.   Therefore, Abie has a total of 20 + 6 = 26 bags of chips.   The condition \"Emma has 400 packets of candies\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma has 400 packets of candies.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.277523398399353]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Jack bought 10000 kilograms of banana yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much the cherries cost. Genevieve realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that Genevieve was able to purchase the cherries for $1600. To calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought, we need to divide the total price ($1600) by the price per kilogram ($8). Therefore, Genevieve bought 1600 / 8 = 200 kilograms of cherries.  Yes, the condition \"Genevieve had $1600 on her\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Jack bought 10000 kilograms of banana yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. We can calculate this by dividing the total price ($1600) by the price per kilogram ($8). So the answer is 200 kilograms of cherries.", "numerical_answer": 200, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total cost of the cherries. If the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, then Genevieve would have to pay $8 x 10000 = $80,000 for 10000 kilograms of cherries.  Next, we need to calculate how much money Genevieve had left after paying for the cherries. If she had $1600 on her, then she would have $1600 - $80,000 = $78,400 left.  Finally, we can calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. If each kilogram of cherries cost $8, then Genevieve could have bought 78,400/8 = 9850 kilograms of cherries.  Therefore, the answer to the question is 9850 kilograms. The condition \"Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nIf Genevieve had $1600 on her, she could buy $1600 / 8 = 200 kg of cherries. Since Genevieve realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in, she could buy 200 kg of cherries for a total of $1600 + $400 = $2000. Therefore, Genevieve bought 200 kg of cherries. The condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nGenevieve picked some cherries that cost $8 per kilogram.  If she had $1600 on her, she could buy 200 kilograms of cherries ($1600 / 8 = 200).  However, she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.  Therefore, Genevieve bought a total of 200 kilograms of cherries ($1600 + $400 = $2000).  The condition \"Jack bought 10000 kilograms of banana yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 10000 kilograms of banana yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.3364602327346802]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Mary met 2 customers in the tailor shop. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 4 more than 5 times 8. That is 44 buttons. Since Sue made half as many as Kendra, she made 22 buttons. The condition that Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us figure out how many buttons Kendra made, which we then used to calculate how many buttons Sue made. The condition \"Mary met 2 customers in the tailor shop\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so the answer is 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 4 more than 5 times 8. That is 44 buttons. Since Sue made half as many as Kendra, she made 22 buttons. The condition that Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us figure out how many buttons Kendra made, which we then used to calculate how many buttons Sue made.  The answer to the question \"How many did Sue make?\" is 22 buttons.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 8 x 5 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so Sue made 44 / 2 = 22 buttons.  The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to determine how many buttons Kendra made. It is not necessary to answer the question of \"How many did Sue make?\".\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made (8x5)+4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44/2 = 22 buttons.  The condition \"Mary met 2 customers in the tailor shop\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so the answer is 22 buttons.", "equation": "Mary met 2 customers in the tailor shop.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.26306992769241333]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The company that Tom works for has 100 employees. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "The population of Springfield is given as 482,653. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, its population can be calculated by subtracting 119,666 from 482,653. Therefore, the population of Greenville is 362,987. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is the sum of the two populations, which is 845,640. The condition given is relevant to the calculation process because it gives the population of Springfield and the difference in population between Springfield and Greenville, both of which are necessary for calculating the total population of the two cities. The condition \"The company that Tom works for has 100 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "The population of Springfield is given as 482,653.   Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, its population can be calculated by subtracting 119,666 from 482,653.   Therefore, the population of Greenville is 362,987.   The total population of Springfield and Greenville is the sum of the two populations, which is 845,640.   The condition given is relevant to the calculation process because it gives the population of Springfield and the difference in population between Springfield and Greenville, both of which are necessary for calculating the total population of the two cities.\nThe population of Springfield is 482,653 people. The population of Greenville is 119,666 less than the population of Springfield, so the population of Greenville is 362,987 people. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people. The condition \"The company that Tom works for has 100 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The company that Tom works for has 100 employees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.14897720515727997]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Mary pays $100 for each egg. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning.  Step 2: There are 14 mornings in two weeks.   Step 3: Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.   Step 4: The condition \"Mary pays $100 for each egg\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   Therefore, the answer is 42 eggs.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Step 1: Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning.  Step 2: There are 14 mornings in two weeks.   Step 3: Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.   Step 4: The condition \"Mary pays $100 for each egg\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   Therefore, the answer is 42 eggs.", "equation": "Mary pays $100 for each egg.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.2611337900161743]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. There were 200 friends who visited Emma and liked the buttons. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Therefore, Kendra made 4 more than (5 x 8) = 40 buttons. This means that Kendra made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. This means that Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons.  Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.  Yes, the condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Emma had 200 friends who visited her and liked the buttons is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding how many buttons Sue made. So the answer is 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "We know Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 5 x 8, or 40, buttons. Then Sue made half as many, or 20, buttons. Therefore, Sue made 20 buttons.   The condition that Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". We already know how many buttons Mari and Kendra made, and we can calculate how many buttons Sue made from that.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made (4+5*8) = 44 buttons.   Sue made half as many as Kendra. So Sue made half of 44, which is 22 buttons.   The condition Mari made 8 buttons is not relevant to the calculation process of problem How many did Sue make?   Therefore, the answer is 22 buttons.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 5 times Mari's number, which is 8 x 5 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, which is 44 / 2 = 22 buttons. So, Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"There were 200 friends who visited Emma and liked the buttons.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "There were 200 friends who visited Emma and liked the buttons.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.14408861100673676]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Mary ate 100 pieces of apples. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means she eats 3 sandwiches in total. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is also relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the total number of sandwiches that Sally ate. Mary's consumption of 100 pieces of apples is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. If Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, that means she eats 3 sandwiches in total. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   Mary's consumption of 100 pieces of apples is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many sandwiches Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday.  We know that Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so the total number of sandwiches that Sally ate is 3.  Now, we can calculate how many pieces of bread Sally ate. We know that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so the total number of pieces of bread that Sally ate is 6.  Therefore, the condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it affects the total number of sandwiches that Sally ate.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday. This means she eats 4 pieces of bread.  Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means she eats 2 pieces of bread.   Therefore, the total amount of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 6 pieces.   The condition \"Mary ate 100 pieces of apples\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary ate 100 pieces of apples.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.2741784453392029]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Ada bought a T-shirt and sold it at the price of $10000. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate what percentage off Asia got at the sale. The calculation process is as follows: (Original price - Sale price) / Original Price = Percent Off  So, for Asia's dress:  (350 - 140) / 350 = 60% off  The condition that Asia bought a homecoming dress is relevant to the calculation process because it is the item which we are calculating the percentage off for. Without the condition, we would not know what item to calculate the percentage off for. Asia got the dress for $140, so she saved $210.  The condition of the dress being originally priced at $350 is relevant to the calculation.  To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the amount saved ($210) by the original price of the dress ($350) and multiply the result by 100. Therefore, the percentage off that Asia got at the sale is 60%. The condition of Ada buying a T-shirt and selling it at the price of $10000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, let's calculate what percentage off Asia got at the sale. The calculation process is as follows:  (Original price - Sale price) / Original Price = Percent Off  So, for Asia's dress:  (350 - 140) / 350 = 60% off  The condition that Asia bought a homecoming dress is relevant to the calculation process because it is the item which we are calculating the percentage off for. Without the condition, we would not know what item to calculate the percentage off for.\nAsia got the dress for $140, so she saved $210.  The condition of the dress being originally priced at $350 is relevant to the calculation.  To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the amount saved ($210) by the original price of the dress ($350) and multiply the result by 100.   So the percentage off that Asia got at the sale is 60%.  As for Ada, she bought a T-shirt and sold it for $10,000, so she made a profit of $9,860. This calculation does not involve the condition of the T-shirt being originally priced at a certain amount.\nFirst, calculate the percentage off Asia got at the sale:  $350 - $140 = $210  $210 / $350 = 0.6 (or 60%)  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Ada bought a T-shirt and sold it at the price of $10000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada bought a T-shirt and sold it at the price of $10000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877838134766, 0.3318527340888977, 0.3979475796222687]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Tom sold 100000 blue cubes. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "Julie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Therefore, she bought 3 鑴 19 = 57 red balls, 10 鑴 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 鑴 19 = 152 green balls.  In total, she bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"Tom sold 100000 blue cubes\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\"", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of balls Julie bought in total. She bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls and 8 packs of green balls. Each pack had 19 balls.   Therefore, the total number of balls Julie bought is: 3 * 19 + 10 * 19 + 8 * 19 = 583.   The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem as the number of red balls is already accounted for in the total number of balls, so it is not necessary to consider it.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package.  Therefore, Julie bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Altogether, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.   The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is relevant to the calculation process since it was used to determine the number of yellow balls Julie bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, so she bought 3 鑴 19 = 57 red balls.  Julie bought 10 packs of yellow balls, so she bought 10 鑴 19 = 190 yellow balls.  Julie bought 8 packs of green balls, so she bought 8 鑴 19 = 152 green balls.  So, in total, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us to calculate how many green balls Julie bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls.  Therefore, she bought 3 鑴 19 = 57 red balls, 10 鑴 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 鑴 19 = 152 green balls.  In total, she bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all\" because it provides the information needed to calculate the number of balls Julie bought in total.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package.   This means that Julie bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.   Adding all these together, we get 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls in total.   The condition \"Tom sold 100000 blue cubes\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\"", "equation": "Tom sold 100000 blue cubes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315247178077698, 0.41100406646728516, 0.43914249539375305, 0.484716534614563, 0.24528111517429352]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Emma drinks 200 liters of milk every day. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that Hamza can fill the 3-liter bucket with 3 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket.  Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that Hamza can fill the 6-liter bucket with 2 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket.  So, the total amount of water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket is 3+2 = 5 liters.  Yes, the condition \"She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Emma drinks 200 liters of milk every day is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. We can calculate this by adding the amount of water that can be poured into the 3-liter bucket and the amount of water that can be poured into the 6-liter bucket, which is", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and then pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she pours 3 liters into the 3-liter bucket, leaving 2 liters in the 5-liter bucket. She then pours the remaining 2 liters into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now contains 8 liters of water.   Since Emma drinks 200 liters of milk every day, the 6-liter bucket will be empty after 8 days. Therefore, Hamza can put 2 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  Yes, the condition given is relevant to the calculation process because it states the size of the buckets, which is important to know when calculating how much water can be put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\n1. Hamza has a 5 liter bucket and it is full of water, and she wants to transfer the water to the 3 liter and 6 liter buckets.  2. She transfers as much as she can to the 3 liter bucket and then pours the remainder to the 6 liter bucket.  3. Since the 3 liter bucket can hold only 3 liters of water, the remainder she has poured in the 6 liter bucket is 2 liters.  4. Therefore, the 6 liter bucket now holds 8 liters of water (6 + 2).  5. Since Emma is drinking 200 liters of milk every day, she needs 200 liters of water to complete her daily requirement.  6. Therefore, the 6 liter bucket can hold another 192 liters of water without overflowing (200 - 8).  So, the answer to the question is 192 liters.  Yes, the condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, the amount of water that can be poured in the 6-liter bucket will be different.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she can pour 3 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket.  Then, she pours the remainder (which is 2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. So, the 6-liter bucket now contains 2 liters of water.  Therefore, Hamza can put 4 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, as the 6-liter bucket has a capacity of 6 liters and it already contains 2 liters of water.  The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much water is already in the 6-liter bucket and therefore how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket with water. This means that she has 5 liters of water in the 5-liter bucket.  Next, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she will be able to fill the 3-liter bucket to its maximum capacity, which is 3 liters.  Finally, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Since she has 2 liters of water left after filling the 3-liter bucket, she can pour 2 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  Therefore, Hamza can put 2 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.  The condition \"Emma drinks 200 liters of milk every day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma drinks 200 liters of milk every day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.19697318971157074]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Another kind of cream has 2000 grams of fat in it, but neither Ada nor Perry decided to use it. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate how much cream was added. Perry added a half cup of cream. That is equal to 0.5 cups.  Step 2: Calculate how much fat was added. Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, 0.5 cups of cream would equal 44 grams of fat.  Step 3: Calculate how much fat was added to each serving. Since the recipe serves four people, each serving would get 11 grams of fat (44 divided by 4).  So, the answer to the question is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine how much fat was added to the recipe. The condition \"Another kind of cream has 2000 grams of fat in it, but neither Ada nor Perry decided to use it\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition simply states that another kind of cream with higher fat content than the cream used by Perry is available, but neither he nor Ada decided to use it. This does not impact the number of grams of fat added to each serving of food.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate how much cream was added.  Perry added a half cup of cream. That is equal to 0.5 cups.   Step 2: Calculate how much fat was added.  Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, 0.5 cups of cream would equal 44 grams of fat.   Step 3: Calculate how much fat was added to each serving.  Since the recipe serves four people, each serving would get 11 grams of fat (44 divided by 4).   So, the answer to the question is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.   The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine how much fat was added to the recipe.\nPerry added a half cup of cream, which has 88 grams of fat per cup. Therefore, each serving of food has 44 grams of fat added to it.   The condition that \"Another kind of cream has 2000 grams of fat in it, but neither Ada nor Perry decided to use it\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition simply states that another kind of cream with higher fat content than the cream used by Perry is available, but neither he nor Ada decided to use it. This does not impact the number of grams of fat added to each serving of food.", "equation": "Another kind of cream has 2000 grams of fat in it, but neither Ada nor Perry decided to use it.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.292887806892395, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792152285575867, 0.3592369258403778]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Jack is expected to have dinner in 2000 hours. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours.   There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. 10 minutes is 1/6 of an hour, so 3 commercials would be 3/6 of an hour or 0.5 hours.   Therefore, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1.5 hours - 0.5 hours = 1 hour.   The condition that Jack is expected to have dinner in 2000 hours is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.   To answer this question, we need to calculate how long the TV show was, not counting commercials. We can calculate this by subtracting the total time of commercials (0.5 hours) from the total time of the TV show (1.5 hours). So the answer would be 1 hour.", "numerical_answer": 1, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Therefore, the total time of commercials was 30 minutes.  Subtracting the time of commercials from the total time of 1.5 hours, we get 1.2 hours.  Therefore, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1.2 hours.\n1. The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. 2. There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. 3. Jack is expected to have dinner in 2000 hours.  So, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1.5 hours minus 30 minutes (3 commercials x 10 minutes each) = 1.2 hours.  Jack is expected to have dinner in 2000 hours. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as the duration of the TV show itself is the only thing that matters in this situation.\nFirst, let's calculate the total time that the TV show and commercials took together.  Total time = 1.5 hours + (3 x 10 minutes) = 1.5 hours + 30 minutes = 1 hour and 80 minutes = 1.8 hours  Now, we need to subtract the time taken by the commercials (30 minutes) from the total time (1.8 hours) to get the time taken by the TV show alone.  Time taken by the TV show = 1.8 hours - 30 minutes = 1.5 hours  Therefore, the TV show itself lasted 1.5 hours, not counting the commercials.  The condition \"Jack is expected to have dinner in 2000 hours\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack is expected to have dinner in 2000 hours.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, 0.1334286630153656]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Jack earns 5000 dollars each week. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  Step 2: Libby has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  Step 3: Since 1 quarter is worth 25 cents, Libby will need 140 quarters to pay for the dress.   Step 4: Subtracting 140 quarters from 160 quarters, Libby will have 20 quarters left.  Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how much money Libby needs to pay for the dress. The condition \"Jack earns 5000 dollars each week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "1. Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. This is the starting point of the problem, so it is relevant to the calculation process.  2. Libby has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. This means she needs 140 quarters ($35 x 4 = 140).  3. After replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.  Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left.\nStep 1: Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  Step 2: Libby has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  Step 3: Since 1 quarter is worth 25 cents, Libby will need 140 quarters to pay for the dress.   Step 4: Subtracting 140 quarters from 160 quarters, Libby will have 20 quarters left.  Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how much money Libby needs to pay for the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She needs to pay $35, so that means she needs to pay with 140 quarters (35 x 4 quarters = 140 quarters). So, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.   The condition \"Jack earns 5000 dollars each week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack earns 5000 dollars each week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.04142264276742935]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Jack cooked dinner with the meat at 2000 pm. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The cost per kilogram is $82, so 2 kg of meat costs 2 x 82 = $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet, so after paying for the meat, he has 180 - 164 = $16 left. The condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much meat Melies bought, which is necessary to calculate the cost of the meat. The time of the day when Jack cooked dinner is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The cost per kilogram is $82, so 2 kg of meat costs 2 x 82 = $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet, so after paying for the meat, he has 180 - 164 = $16 left. The condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much meat Melies bought, which is necessary to calculate the cost of the meat. The time of the day when Jack cooked dinner is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The cost of the meat was $82 per kilogram, so the total amount of money Melies spent on the meat was 2 x $82 = $164. Melies had $180 in his wallet, so he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without knowing the cost of the meat, it would not be possible to calculate how much money Melies had left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat and the cost of the meat is $82 per kilogram. That means Melies spent $164 for the meat. He had $180 in his wallet before paying for the meat, so he has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without this condition, we would not know how much money Melies had to begin with, and thus we would not be able to calculate how much money he has left after paying for the meat.\nFirst, we need to calculate the cost of the meat. Melies bought 2 kg of meat, and each kilogram costs $82, so the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = $164.  Now, we need to subtract the cost of the meat from Melies' wallet. He has $180 in his wallet, and the cost of the meat is $164, so the amount of money Melies has left after paying for the meat is $180 - $164 = $16.  The condition \"Jack cooked dinner with the meat at 2000 pm\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack cooked dinner with the meat at 2000 pm.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.2513122260570526]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Tom owns 3 gift shops in the city. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. To do this, we need to know how much gift wrapper Edmund uses per gift box. This is where the condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant. Using the given condition, we know that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. This means he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper (90 inches/18 inches = 5 gift boxes).  Now, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days. To do this, we need to multiply the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper by 3 (5 gift boxes x 3 = 15 gift boxes).  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper. The condition \"Tom owns 3 gift shops in the city\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. To do this, we need to know how much gift wrapper Edmund uses per gift box. This is where the condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant.   Using the given condition, we know that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. This means he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper (90 inches/18 inches = 5 gift boxes).  Now, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days. To do this, we need to multiply the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper by 3 (5 gift boxes x 3 = 15 gift boxes).  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.\nEdmund needs 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. So, if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day (90/18 = 5).  If he wraps 5 gift boxes per day, then he will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days (5 x 3 = 15).  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  The condition \"Tom owns 3 gift shops in the city\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom owns 3 gift shops in the city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.18859241902828217]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Tom spends 3 hours on math classes per week. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of Tom spending 3 hours on math classes per week is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 sem", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, the condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process, because the number of units James takes per semester determines how much he pays.   Next, we need to calculate how many units James takes over two semesters. Since he takes 20 units per semester, he will take a total of 40 units over two semesters.   Finally, we can calculate how much James will pay for two semesters. Since each unit costs $50, he will pay a total of $50 x 40 = $2,000.   Therefore, James will pay $2,000 for two semesters.\nThe first step is to calculate how much James pays for one semester. Since James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50, he pays $50 x 20 = $1000 for one semester.  The second step is to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. Since each semester costs $1000, he pays $1000 x 2 = $2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"Tom spends 3 hours on math classes per week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom spends  3 hours on math classes per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.28544947504997253]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Emma bought 500 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that Sally eats a total of 3 sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally will eat a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it tells us how many sandwiches Sally is eating and thus how many pieces of bread she will be eating. The condition \"Emma bought 500 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday\" does not affect the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, the answer is 6 pieces of bread.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The problem states that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that Sally eats a total of 3 sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday.   Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally will eat a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it tells us how many sandwiches Sally is eating and thus how many pieces of bread she will be eating.   Therefore, the answer is 6 pieces of bread.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, so that's 4 pieces of bread.  On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, which is another 2 pieces of bread.  So, in total, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the information that Sally eats 1 more sandwich on Sunday, which adds 2 more pieces of bread to the total.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday.   This means that Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday, for a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"Emma bought 500 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday\" does not affect the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, the answer is 6 pieces of bread.", "equation": "Emma bought 500 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.3225979804992676]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Jack planted 2 trees in front of the door. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which means he would need 126 plants. But he still has room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional plants. This means he would need a total of 141 plants. Jack planted 2 trees, which do not count as plants, so Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants. The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the initial number of plants that Papi Calot needs to buy. The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process because it explains why Papi Calot needs to buy an additional 15 plants. The condition of Jack planting 2 trees in front of the door is irrelevant to the calculation, so the answer is 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which means he would need 126 plants. But he still has room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional plants. This means he would need a total of 141 plants. Jack planted 2 trees, which do not count as plants, so Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants. The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the initial number of plants that Papi Calot needs to buy.\nPapi Calot plans to plant 7 rows of 18 potato plants each. This means he needs to buy 126 potato plants (7 x 18 = 126). In addition, he plans to plant 15 more potato plants, so he needs to buy a total of 141 potato plants (126 + 15 = 141). The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process because it explains why Papi Calot needs to buy an additional 15 plants.\nPapi Calot plans on planting 7 rows of 18 plants each, so that's 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants, so that's 126 + 15 = 141 plants. The condition that Jack planted 2 trees in front of the door is irrelevant to the calculation, so the answer is 141 plants.", "equation": "Jack planted 2 trees in front of the door.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.14844076335430145]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. Ada goes to the gym 10 times per year. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell. Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything. The condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because the cost of the barbell is determined by the cost of the squat rack. Therefore, the condition is necessary for the calculation process. The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is also relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it indicates how much Jack paid for the barbell. The condition of Ada going to the gym 10 times per year is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Jack paid for everything. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jack bought a squat rack for $2500 and the barbell cost 1/10 as much. To calculate the total cost, we need to add the cost of the squat rack and the cost of the barbell. So the answer would be: $2500 + $250 = $2750. Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500, and the barbell cost 1/10 as much. So the barbell cost $2500/10 = $250. So Jack paid a total of $2500 + $250 = $2750 for everything. Yes, the condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\". The condition provides the information about the cost of the squat rack, which is necessary to calculate the total cost of everything.\nJack paid $2500 for the squat rack. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell. Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for the squat rack and barbell.  The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process because it enabled us to calculate the cost of the barbell. Without this condition, we would not have been able to calculate the total amount paid by Jack.\nFirst, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Then, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, so it cost $250. So, the total cost for Jack is $2750. The condition \"Ada goes to the gym 10 times per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\" because it does not affect the total cost of the items Jack purchased.", "equation": "Ada goes to the gym 10 times per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.1683202087879181, 0.005102173425257206]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Max has 50000 more books than Mary. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, we can figure out that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 15 pieces of candy.  Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary has a total of 25 pieces of candy. Max has 50000 more books than Mary, but this is not relevant to the calculation of how many pieces of candy Mary has.  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. The condition of Max having 50000 more books than Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of candy Mary has. The relevant information to answer this question is that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan and Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy. To calculate the total number of pieces of candy Mary has, we need to add the initial amount of candy Mary has and the additional pieces of candy she adds. So the answer would be: 3 x 5 + 10 = 25 pieces", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, we can figure out that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 15 pieces of candy.  Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary has a total of 25 pieces of candy.  Max has 50000 more books than Mary, but this is not relevant to the calculation of how many pieces of candy Mary has.  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. The condition \"Max has 50000 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Max has 50000 more books than Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.2875949740409851]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Tom sold a cake at the price of $3. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Subtract the sale price from the original price:  $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Divide the result from Step 1 by the original price:  $210 / $350 = 0.6  Step 3: Multiply the result from Step 2 by 100 to get the percentage off:  0.6 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  Yes, the condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is required to get the percentage off. Without knowing the original price, it would not be possible to calculate the percentage off. The condition \"Tom sold a cake at the price of $3\" is not relevant to the calculation process for the question.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the total amount saved:  Total amount saved = $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off:  Percentage off = (Total amount saved / Original price) x 100  Percentage off = ($210 / $350) x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the necessary information to calculate the total amount saved and the percentage off.\nStep 1: Subtract the sale price from the original price:  $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Divide the result from Step 1 by the original price:  $210 / $350 = 0.6  Step 3: Multiply the result from Step 2 by 100 to get the percentage off:  0.6 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  Yes, the condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is required to get the percentage off. Without knowing the original price, it would not be possible to calculate the percentage off.\nAsia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. This is the total amount of money she paid for the dress.  It was originally priced at $350. This is the original price of the dress before the sale.  Tom sold a cake at the price of $3. This is not relevant to the calculation process for the question.  What percentage off did Asia get at the sale? To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference between the original price of the dress ($350) and the sale price of the dress ($140) by the original price of the dress ($350).  $$\\frac{350-140}{350} = 0.6 = 60\\%$$  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.", "equation": "Tom sold a cake at the price of $3.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.2260873019695282]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jack shares 6000 Christmas lights with friends. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, add up all the sweets Jennifer has: 212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow = 1024 total. Then, divide 1024 by 4 (since there are 4 people, including Jennifer): 1024 / 4 = 256. So, each person (including Jennifer) will get 256 sweets. The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines the number of people who will be receiving the sweets. If it said Jennifer wanted to share her sweets with 5 people, then the calculation would be different.  Jennifer and her friends will each get 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets, and 502 yellow sweets, for a total of 1,024 sweets each. The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many green sweets she has to divide between her and her friends.  The condition \"Jack shares 6000 Christmas lights with friends.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it has nothing to do with the number of sweets that Jennifer and her friends will get.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, add up all the sweets Jennifer has: 212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow = 1024 total.   Then, divide 1024 by 4 (since there are 4 people, including Jennifer): 1024 / 4 = 256.   So, each person (including Jennifer) will get 256 sweets.   The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines the number of people who will be receiving the sweets. If it said Jennifer wanted to share her sweets with 5 people, then the calculation would be different.\nTo answer the first question, Jennifer and her friends will each get 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets, and 502 yellow sweets, for a total of 1,024 sweets each. The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many green sweets she has to divide between her and her friends.\n1. First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has. This is 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.  2. Next, we need to divide this number by 4 because there are 4 people (Jennifer and her 3 friends). 1024/4 = 256.  3. This means that each person will get 256 sweets.  The condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process because we are not calculating the number of a specific type of sweet, but rather the total number of sweets for everyone.\nThe first step is to calculate how much of each type of sweet Jennifer has in total. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets, and 502 yellow sweets, so she has a total of 1,024 sweets.  The second step is to divide the total number of sweets by 4, since there are 4 people in total (Jennifer and her 3 friends). Each person will get 1/4 of the total number of sweets, which is 256.  The third step is to calculate how many of each type of sweet each person will get. Jennifer and her friends will get 53 green sweets, 77 blue sweets, and 126 yellow sweets each.  So, the answer to the question \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\" is 53 green sweets, 77 blue sweets, and 126 yellow sweets.  The condition \"Jack shares 6000 Christmas lights with friends.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it has nothing to do with the number of sweets that Jennifer and her friends will get.", "equation": "Jack shares 6000 Christmas lights with friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.28455227613449097]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The building that Ada lives in is 100000 sq ft larger than Holden's home office. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The total of the two rooms is 459 sq ft. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, this new room will have twice the total of the two rooms, or 918 sq ft. The condition \"The building that Ada lives in is 100000 sq ft larger than Holden's home office\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. To calculate the size of the new home office/personal gym divided space, we need to double the total of the two rooms. So the answer would be: (309 + 150) x 2 = 708 sq ft. Therefore, the new home office/personal gym divided space will have 708 sq ft.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft.  The new home office/personal gym divided space will be twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom combined, so it will have (309 + 150) x 2 = 708 sq ft.  The building that Ada lives in is 100000 sq ft larger than Holden's home office, but this condition is not relevant to the calculation process.   Therefore, the new home office/personal gym divided space will have 708 sq ft.\nHolden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft.  The total of the two rooms is 459 sq ft.  If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, this new room will have twice the total of the two rooms, or 918 sq ft.   The condition \"The building that Ada lives in is 100000 sq ft larger than Holden's home office\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The building that Ada lives in is 100000 sq ft larger than Holden's home office.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.5815086960792542]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. In addition, Mary collected 200 pineapples. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many apples Lexie picked.  Tom picked twice as many apples. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many apples Tom picked.  So if Lexie picked 12 apples, then Tom picked 24 apples (12 x 2 = 24).  Mary collected 200 pineapples. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The total number of apples that Lexie and Tom collected is 12 + 24 = 36 apples.  Yes, the condition \"Tom picked twice as many apples\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Mary collected 200 pineapples is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether. We can calculate this by adding the number of apples Lexie picked to the number of apples Tom picked. So the answer would be 12 + 24 = 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many apples Tom picked. Since we know that Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, we can use the equation: Tom's apples = 2 x Lexie's apples  Substituting the known value of Lexie's apples (12 apples) into the equation, we get: Tom's apples = 2 x 12 apples  Then we can calculate the total number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom: Total apples = Lexie's apples + Tom's apples  Substituting the known values into the equation, we get: Total apples = 12 apples + (2 x 12 apples)  Simplifying, we get: Total apples = 24 apples  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected a total of 24 apples.  The condition \"In addition, Mary collected 200 pineapples\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "In addition, Mary collected 200 pineapples.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.46066799759864807]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Additionally, Ada has a bag that can hold 100 kilograms of iron. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza has a 5-liter bucket, a 3-liter bucket, and a 6-liter bucket. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means she pours 3 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket and 2 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket. Now, the 6-liter bucket has 2 liters of water in it. Therefore, Hamza can add 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing it.  The condition that Ada has a bag that can hold 100 kilograms of iron is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters and she filled the 5-liter bucket and poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. To calculate how much more water, in liters, Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing it, we need to subtract the 2 liters of water already in the 6-liter bucket from the total capacity of the 6-liter bucket, which is 6 liters. So the answer would be: 6 - 2", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she can pour 3 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket, leaving 2 liters in the 5-liter bucket.   Then, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now contains 8 liters of water.   So, Hamza can put 2 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, for a total of 10 liters.   The condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it allows us to know how many liters of water Hamza can fit into each of the buckets.\nHamza first fills the 5-liter bucket. So, she has 5 liters of water.   Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket, so she has 2 liters of water left.   Finally, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that she can put an additional 2 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.   Therefore, the answer is 2 liters.   The condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it helps to determine how much water is left after she pours the water from the 5-liter bucket to the 3-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. That means that the 5-liter bucket now has 5 liters of water in it.  Next, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can only hold up to 3 liters of water, the remaining 2 liters of water must be poured into the 6-liter bucket.  Therefore, Hamza can put an additional 3 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, for a total of 5 liters of water.  The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the information that the remaining 2 liters of water were poured into the 6-liter bucket. Without this condition, we would not know how much water was left over after pouring into the 3-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This leaves 2 liters of water in the 5-liter bucket.   She then pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This leaves 4 liters of space left in the 6-liter bucket.  Therefore, Hamza can put an additional 4 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The condition \"Additionally, Ada has a bag that can hold 100 kilograms of iron.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Additionally, Ada has a bag that can hold 100 kilograms of iron.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.28709420561790466]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. As part of employment benefit, John is freely enrolled in the gym membership that is worth 10 dollars. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so it cost $250. Lastly, John was enrolled in a gym membership worth $10. So, Jack paid a total of $2760 for everything.  The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process as it helps us determine the cost of the barbell. Without it, we wouldn't be able to accurately calculate the total cost. The condition of John's free gym membership is also relevant to the calculation process as it indicates that Jack does not need to pay for the gym membership. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\" is $2760.", "numerical_answer": 2760, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so that would be $250. Then, John is freely enrolled in the gym membership worth 10 dollars, so that is $10.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\" is $2760.  Yes, the condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it determines the cost of the squat rack and is necessary for the calculation of the total cost.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so it cost $250. Lastly, John was enrolled in a gym membership worth $10. So, Jack paid a total of $2760 for everything.  The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process as it helps us determine the cost of the barbell. Without it, we wouldn't be able to accurately calculate the total cost.\nJack paid $2500 for the squat rack.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much as the rack, meaning that he paid $250 for the barbell.  The gym membership is free, so he did not pay anything for it.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for the squat rack and barbell. The condition regarding John's gym membership is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "As part of employment benefit, John is freely enrolled in the gym membership that is worth 10 dollars.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110712051391602, 0.16832026839256287, 0.16441179811954498]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Each button costs 400 grams of iron from the shop owned by Tom. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari, which means Kendra made (4 + 5*8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra, which means Sue made (44/2) = 22 buttons.  So, the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the information needed to determine how many buttons Kendra made, which is then used to calculate how many buttons Sue made. The condition \"Each button costs 400 grams of iron from the shop owned by Tom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". This statement is simply providing additional information about the buttons and does not affect the calculation of how many buttons Sue made.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari, which means Kendra made (4 + 5*8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra, which means Sue made (44/2) = 22 buttons.  So, the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the information needed to determine how many buttons Kendra made, which is then used to calculate how many buttons Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 4 more than 5 times the amount, which is 24 + 4 = 28 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so Sue made 28/2 = 14 buttons.  Yes, the condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without knowing how many buttons Mari made, we wouldn't have been able to calculate the number of buttons made by Kendra and Sue.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many as Mari.  5 x 8 = 40. 40 + 4 = 44.  So Kendra made 44 buttons.  Sue made half as many as Kendra.  Half of 44 is 22.  So Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Each button costs 400 grams of iron from the shop owned by Tom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". This statement is simply providing additional information about the buttons and does not affect the calculation of how many buttons Sue made.", "equation": "Each button costs 400 grams of iron from the shop owned by Tom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.1582934707403183]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Yesterday, Emma drank 100 more cups of milks. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Since Jason eats an omelet made with three eggs every morning, he will consume 21 eggs in one week (3 eggs x 7 days).  Now, we can calculate how many eggs he will consume in two weeks. Since he consumes 21 eggs in one week, he will consume 42 eggs in two weeks (21 eggs x 2 weeks).  The condition \"Yesterday, Emma drank 100 more cups of milks\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "First, let's calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in one week. Since Jason eats an omelet made with three eggs every morning, he will consume 21 eggs in one week (3 eggs x 7 days).  Now, we can calculate how many eggs he will consume in two weeks. Since he consumes 21 eggs in one week, he will consume 42 eggs in two weeks (21 eggs x 2 weeks).  The condition \"Yesterday, Emma drank 100 more cups of milks\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Yesterday, Emma drank 100 more cups of milks.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.10121802240610123]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Mary is 200 years older than Ellen. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now, so in 6 years, she will be 16. This means that Martha is twice as old, so she is 32 years old. The condition that Mary is 200 years older than Ellen does not factor into this calculation because we are trying to find Martha's age, not Mary's. Therefore, the answer to the question \"If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now\" is 32 years old.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now, so in 6 years, she will be 16.  This means that Martha is twice as old, so she is 32 years old.   The condition that Mary is 200 years older than Ellen does not factor into this calculation because we are trying to find Martha's age, not Mary's.", "equation": "Mary is 200 years older than Ellen.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.42261600494384766]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Jack watched 6 movies in the movie theater. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. So 80% of 100 = 80. This means Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Jack watched 6 movies in the movie theater. Since Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays, this means she was not the lead actress in the other 20 plays.   Therefore, the answer is 20 times Megan was not the lead actress.   The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it was used to calculate how many plays Megan was the lead actress in.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. So, Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays out of the 100 plays she participated in.   Jack watched 6 movies in the movie theater. Since we don't know how many of those movies Megan was in, we don't know how many times she was the lead actress in the movies.   Therefore, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\".\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. So 80% of 100 = 80. This means Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Jack watched 6 movies in the movie theater. Since Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays, this means she was not the lead actress in the other 20 plays.   Therefore, the answer is 20 times Megan was not the lead actress.   The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it was used to calculate how many plays Megan was the lead actress in.\nMegan participated in 100 plays.  Megan was the lead actress in 80% of those plays, so she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition of Jack watching 6 movies in the movie theater is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack watched 6 movies in the movie theater.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.19441165030002594]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. There were 200 friends who visited Ada and liked the buttons. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 times as many as Mari, so she made 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than that, so she made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44 姊 2 = 22 buttons. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons. The condition \"There were 200 friends who visited Ada and liked the buttons\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Mari made 8 buttons and Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. To calculate how many buttons Sue made, we need to calculate how many buttons Kendra made and then divide that number by two. So the answer would be: (5 x 8) + 4 = 40 + 4 = 44. Therefore, Sue made 44 姊 2 = 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 times as many as Mari, so she made 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than that, so she made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44 姊 2 = 22 buttons. Since this problem is asking how many buttons Sue made, the condition that Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari is relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari, so Kendra made 44 buttons (5 x 8 + 4). Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra, so Sue made 22 buttons (44 / 2).  The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps determine how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 times as many, so she made (5 x 8) 40 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made (40 / 2) 20 buttons.  So the answer is that Sue made 20 buttons.  The condition \"There were 200 friends who visited Ada and liked the buttons\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "There were 200 friends who visited Ada and liked the buttons.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.1756572425365448]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Emma got a score of 3 in the entrance exam. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of Emma getting a score of 3 in the entrance exam is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, the condition is relevant to the calculation process, since we need to know how many units James takes in order to calculate the total cost for two semesters.   Second, we need to calculate the total cost for two semesters. Since each unit costs $50, we can multiply the number of units (20) by the cost of each unit ($50) and by the number of semesters (2). Therefore, James will pay $2,000 for two semesters.  Finally, the condition is not relevant to Emma's entrance exam score. That score is not necessary for the calculation of the cost of two semesters.\nNo, the condition \"Emma got a score of 3 in the entrance exam\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?\"  The calculation process is as follows:  James takes 20 units per semester.   Each unit costs $50.   Therefore, James pays $50 x 20 units = $1,000 for one semester.   For 2 semesters, James pays $1,000 x 2 = $2,000.", "equation": "Emma got a score of 3 in the entrance exam.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.024372447282075882]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Emma played video games for 2000 minutes. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "We know that the TV show lasted 1.5 hours, which is 90 minutes. We also know that there were 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes. That's 30 minutes in total. So, if we subtract 30 minutes from 90 minutes, we get 60 minutes, which is 1 hour. So, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1 hour long. The condition that Emma played video games for 2000 minutes is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that the TV show was aired for 1.5 hours and that there were 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes. To calculate how long the TV show itself was, we need to subtract the total time of commercials (30 minutes) from the total time of the TV show (90 minutes). So the answer would be: 1 hour.", "numerical_answer": 1, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "We know that Michael watched a TV show which was aired for 1.5 hours and it had 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes.   Since the commercials are not included in the calculation, we can subtract 30 minutes from 1.5 hours to get the actual length of the TV show.   Therefore, the TV show itself was 1.2 hours long.\nMichael watched 1.5 hours of TV, with 3 10-minute commercials. This means that the total time was 1.5 hours + 3 x 10 minutes, or 1.5 hours + 30 minutes, which is equal to 1 hour and 80 minutes. To convert this to hours, we divide 80 minutes by 60 minutes, which gives us 1.33 hours. Therefore, the TV show itself was 1.33 hours long.  Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition tells us how many commercials were shown during the 1.5 hours and how long they each lasted, which allows us to calculate the total time of the TV show itself, not counting the commercials.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total time of commercials.  Since each commercial lasts for 10 minutes, the total time of commercials is 30 minutes (3 x 10 minutes).  Then, we need to subtract this time from the given time of the TV show, which is 1.5 hours.  Therefore, the TV show itself (not counting commercials) was 1.5 - 0.5 = 1 hour.   The condition \"Emma played video games for 2000 minutes\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma played video games for 2000 minutes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, 0.20185983180999756]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Ada bought 2 gifts for friends. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper for each gift box, we can divide 90 inches by 18 inches to find out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper.   90 inches / 18 inches = 5 gift boxes   Now we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. We can use the result we found above (5 gift boxes) and multiply it by 3 to get the answer.   5 gift boxes * 3 = 15 gift boxes   Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.   The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much gift wrapper Edmund uses for each gift box, which is necessary for the calculation. The condition that \"Ada bought 2 gifts for friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We don't need to consider this, because the problem is only asking about the amount of gift boxes Edmund can wrap with the given amount of gift wrapper per day.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper for each gift box, we can divide 90 inches by 18 inches to find out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper.   90 inches / 18 inches = 5 gift boxes   Now we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. We can use the result we found above (5 gift boxes) and multiply it by 3 to get the answer.   5 gift boxes * 3 = 15 gift boxes   Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.   The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much gift wrapper Edmund uses for each gift box, which is necessary for the calculation.\nThe condition that \"Ada bought 2 gifts for friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We don't need to consider this, because the problem is only asking about the amount of gift boxes Edmund can wrap with the given amount of gift wrapper per day.   For every gift box, Edmund needs 18 inches of gift wrapper. Therefore, if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day.   Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day, then he can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.", "equation": "Ada bought 2 gifts for friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.259131520986557]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Every 100 months, Jack buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Jack. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Each bar of soap lasts her for 2 months. There are 12 months in a year. To stock up for the entire year, Maria needs 6 bars of soap. Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap to stock up for the entire year. The condition \"Every 100 months, Jack buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Jack\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months and she spends $8.00 per bar. To calculate how much Maria will spend on soap to stock up for the entire year, we need to know how many bars of soap she needs to buy and how much each bar costs. So the answer would be: 6 bars x $8.00 = $48. Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap to stock up for the entire year.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Step 1: Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap.   Step 2: Each bar of soap lasts Maria for 2 months.   Step 3: Maria wants to stock up for the entire year.   Step 4: There are 12 months in a year.   Step 5: To stock up for the entire year, Maria needs 6 bars of soap.   Step 6: Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap to stock up for the entire year.   Yes, the condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?\". Without this condition, we would not know how many bars of soap Maria needs to stock up for the entire year.\nFirst, calculate how many bars of French soap Maria needs to stock up for the year. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap, so she needs to buy 12 bars (2 months per bar * 6 months = 12 bars).  Second, calculate the total cost for the year. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap, so she will spend $96.00 for the entire year (12 bars * $8.00 = $96.00).  Therefore, Maria will spend $96.00 on soap for the entire year. The condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap.\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is used to calculate the total cost for the year.\nMaria buys a bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar. This means that in one year, she needs 6 bars (6 x 2 months = 12 months). Multiplying these 6 bars by $8.00 per bar, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap in one year.   The condition \"Every 100 months, Jack buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Jack\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Every 100 months, Jack buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Jack.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.35747677087783813]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Ada was planning to add some oil, which has 10000 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much cream Perry added. He added a half cup of cream, which is equal to 0.5 cup (half of one cup).  Next, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were in the cream. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so the 0.5 cup of cream has 88 x 0.5 = 44 grams of fat.  Finally, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since the recipe serves four people, and Perry added 44 grams of fat, then each serving of food will have 44/4 = 11 grams of fat.  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Ada was planning to add some oil, which has 10000 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. We can calculate this by dividing the total number of grams of fat added by the number of people the recipe serves. So the answer is 11 grams of fat per serving.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much cream Perry added to the recipe. Since he added a half cup of cream, that equals 0.5 cups of cream.  Next, we need to figure out how much fat was in that 0.5 cups of cream. Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, that means that the 0.5 cups of cream has 44 grams of fat.  Finally, we need to figure out how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since there are four servings of food, that means that 44 grams of fat were added to each serving, for a total of 176 grams of fat for the entire recipe.  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides the necessary information to calculate how much fat was added to each serving of food.\nPerry added a half cup of cream, which contains 88 grams of fat per cup. That means that he added 44 grams of fat per serving of food. Since Ada decided against adding any oil, no additional fat was added to each serving of food.  So, the answer is 44 grams of fat were added to each serving of food. The condition that Ada was planning to add oil is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada was planning to add some oil, which has 10000 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.292887806892395, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792152285575867, 0.3346460461616516]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Ada needs 20000 eggs to make a cake. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "Firstly, since Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, we can calculate that one-eighth of 400 grams is 50 grams. Secondly, since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, we can calculate that Pierre ate double 50 grams, which is 100 grams. Therefore, the answer is 100 grams. The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\", because it provides us with the information that the cake is divided into eight equal parts, and this information is necessary for us to calculate how much Pierre ate (which is double of what Nathalie ate). The condition \"Ada needs 20000 eggs to make a cake.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\", as it is not necessary for us to know how many eggs Ada needs in order to calculate how much Pierre ate.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Firstly, since Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, we can calculate that one-eighth of 400 grams is 50 grams.   Secondly, since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, we can calculate that Pierre ate double 50 grams, which is 100 grams.   Therefore, the answer is 100 grams.   The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\", because it provides us with the information that the cake is divided into eight equal parts, and this information is necessary for us to calculate how much Pierre ate (which is double of what Nathalie ate).   The condition \"Ada needs 20000 eggs to make a cake.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\", as it is not necessary for us to know how many eggs Ada needs in order to calculate how much Pierre ate.\nFirst, we need to figure out how much Nathalie ate. One-eighth of the cake is 400/8 = 50 grams.   Next, Pierre ate double that, so Pierre ate 50 x 2 = 100 grams.   The condition about Ada and the eggs is not relevant to the calculation process of Pierre's intake.", "equation": "Ada needs 20000 eggs to make a cake.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.20301780104637146]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Ada plans to buy 1000 wigs for the stray cats. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. So, he is 8/10 or 80% towards his goal. The condition \"Ada plans to buy 1000 wigs for the stray cats\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it does not affect the percentage calculation of Calvin's progress towards his goal. The relevant information to answer this question is that Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. To calculate the percentage Calvin is towards his goal, we need to divide the number of haircuts he has gotten by the total number of haircuts he needs. So the answer would be: 8/10 = 80%. Therefore, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "The percentage Calvin is towards his goal is 8/10, or 80%. The condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts,\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is what gives us the number 8. Without this information, we would not be able to determine the percentage Calvin is towards his goal.\nCalvin has 8 haircuts, and needs 2 more to reach his goal. So, he is 8/10 or 80% towards his goal.  The condition \"and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is needed to know how many haircuts he has already gotten and how many he needs to reach his goal.\nCalvin needs 10 haircuts in total to make a wig for his dog, and he has already gotten 8 haircuts. So, Calvin is 80% of the way to his goal.  The condition \"Ada plans to buy 1000 wigs for the stray cats\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it does not affect the percentage calculation of Calvin's progress towards his goal.", "equation": "Ada plans to buy 1000 wigs for the stray cats.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.08367690443992615]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Emma cooked dinner with the meat at 1000 pm. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the cost of the meat. We know that the meat was 2 kg, and it cost $82 per kilogram. So, the cost of the meat was 2 x 82 = $164.   Second, we need to subtract the cost of the meat from the money Melies has in his wallet. We know that he has $180 in his wallet, so after paying for the meat, Melies has 180 - 164 = $16 left.   Therefore, the answer to the question is that Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition of \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides us with the amount of meat Melies bought, which we need to calculate the cost of the meat. The condition of \"Emma cooked dinner with the meat at 1000 pm\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any information that is necessary to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the cost of the meat. We know that the meat was 2 kg, and it cost $82 per kilogram. So, the cost of the meat was 2 x 82 = $164.   Second, we need to subtract the cost of the meat from the money Melies has in his wallet. We know that he has $180 in his wallet, so after paying for the meat, Melies has 180 - 164 = $16 left.   Therefore, the answer to the question is that Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition of \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides us with the amount of meat Melies bought, which we need to calculate the cost of the meat.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which means he has to pay $164.   Second, we know that Melies had $180 in his wallet.   So, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition that the meat costs $82 per kilogram is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the amount of money Melies had to pay for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. That costs $82 per kilogram, so Melies has to pay $164 for the meat.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, Melies has $180-$164 = $16 left in his wallet.  So, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is necessary to know how much money Melies has in his wallet in order to calculate how much he has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. That means he spent a total of $164 for the meat.   He had $180 in his wallet before paying for the meat.   So, after paying for the meat, Melies has $16 left in his wallet.   The condition \"Emma cooked dinner with the meat at 1000 pm\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma cooked dinner with the meat at 1000 pm.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.2595303952693939]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Tom sold a cake at the price of $10000. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price. This is done by subtracting the sale price from the original price:   $350 - $140 = $210  Now, we can calculate the percentage off by taking the difference and dividing it by the original price. This gives us:   $210/$350 = 0.6   Multiply this by 100 to get the percentage off:   0.6 x 100 = 60%   Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition of Asia buying a homecoming dress is relevant to the calculation process, as it confirms that the sale price is indeed applicable to the item that Asia purchased. The condition of Tom selling a cake at the price of $10000 is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price. This is done by subtracting the sale price from the original price:   $350 - $140 = $210  Now, we can calculate the percentage off by taking the difference and dividing it by the original price. This gives us:   $210/$350 = 0.6   Multiply this by 100 to get the percentage off:   0.6 x 100 = 60%   Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition of Asia buying a homecoming dress is relevant to the calculation process, as it confirms that the sale price is indeed applicable to the item that Asia purchased.\nFirst, we need to calculate the discount Asia received on the dress. To do this, we subtract the sale price of $140 from the original price of $350. This gives us a discount of $210.  Next, we need to calculate the percentage off. To do this, we divide the discount of $210 by the original price of $350. This gives us a percentage off of 60%.  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition \"It was originally priced at $350.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to know the original price in order to calculate the percentage off.\nThe percentage off is calculated by subtracting the sale price from the original price and then dividing the result by the original price. In this case, the percentage off would be calculated as follows:  (350 - 140)/350 = 0.6 or 60% off.   The condition \"Tom sold a cake at the price of $10000\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Tom sold a cake at the price of $10000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.2588500678539276]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Emma draws a circle that is 100000 times larger than yours. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The area of a rectangle is the width multiplied by the length. The width of the rectangle is 7 inches, and the length is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. The area of the rectangle is 7 x 28, or 196 square inches. The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is necessary to know the width of the rectangle in order to calculate its area. The area of Emma's circle is calculated by multiplying pi by the radius squared. Since the circle is 100000 times larger than yours, the radius would be 100000 times greater, so the area of Emma's circle would be pi x (100000 x 100000) = 3.14 x 100000000 = 314000000 square inches. The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells you the length of the rectangle, which is necessary to calculate the area. Therefore, the area of your rectangle is 7 x 4 = 28 inches squared. The condition about Emma's circle is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "We need to find the area of the rectangle. The area of a rectangle is the width multiplied by the length. The width of the rectangle is 7 inches, and the length is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. The area of the rectangle is 7 x 28, or 196 square inches.  The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is necessary to know the width of the rectangle in order to calculate its area.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the length of the rectangle by its width.   So, the area of your rectangle is 7 inches x (4 times 7 inches) = 28 inches x 28 inches = 784 square inches.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells you the length of the rectangle, which is necessary to calculate the area.   The area of Emma's circle is calculated by multiplying pi by the radius squared. Since the circle is 100000 times larger than yours, the radius would be 100000 times greater, so the area of Emma's circle would be pi x (100000 x 100000) = 3.14 x 100000000 = 314000000 square inches.\nThe area of your rectangle is 7 x 4 = 28 inches squared. The condition about Emma's circle is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Emma draws a circle that is 100000 times larger than yours.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914530396461487, 0.3287781774997711, 0.22600936889648438]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Additionally, Tom plants 50 grasses. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This means that there are 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. This means that there are 40 plants in total. Each plant has 1 seed, so there are 40 seeds in total. James plants 60% of those, so he plants 24 seeds. Additionally, Tom plants 50 grasses. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of trees that James planted.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many trees James planted. We can calculate this by counting the number of trees that James had originally (2 trees). So the answer would be: 2 trees.  Yes, the condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James collected fruits from two trees. That means he started with two trees. He then planted 60% of the seeds from the two trees. That does not mean he planted more trees. He would still have two trees. Additionally, Tom planted 50 grasses. That does not affect the number of trees planted by James. So, the answer is: James planted two trees. The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.  This means that James has a total of 40 plants.  Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.  This means that James has planted 24 seeds (40 x 0.6).  Additionally, Tom plants 50 grasses.  This means that James has now planted 74 seeds (24 + 50).  How many trees did James plant?   Since each tree has 20 plants, and James has planted 74 seeds, James has planted 3.7 trees (74/20).  Therefore, the answer is 3 trees.   The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants.\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without this condition, we would not have been able to calculate how many trees James has planted.\nJames collected all of the fruit from 2 trees, so he had 40 plants. He then planted 60% of those, which would be 24 plants. Tom then planted 50 grasses. This means that James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since the number of seeds does not affect the total number of trees planted.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed. So, in total, he has 40 seeds. Tom plants 50 grasses. So, James didn't plant any trees. The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\".\nJames collects all the fruits from two trees. Since each tree has 20 plants, that means there are 40 plants in total. Each plant has 1 seed, so there are 40 seeds in total. He plants 60% of the seeds, which is 24 seeds.   Since the condition of Tom planting 50 grasses does not affect the number of trees James plants, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 0.", "equation": "Additionally, Tom plants 50 grasses.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.32181328535079956]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Jack watched 3 movies in the movie theater. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. This means that there are 20 plays in which Megan was not the lead actress (100 - 80 = 20).  The condition \"Jack watched 3 movies in the movie theater\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work and in total she participated in 100 plays. To calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress, we need to subtract the number of plays she was the lead actress in from the total number of plays in which she participated. So the answer would be: 100 - 80 = 20. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  In total, Megan participated in 100 plays.  Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" as it provides the information about the percentage of plays Megan was the lead actress in.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  Jack watched 3 movies in the movie theater. That means he watched 3 plays.  Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 3 plays.  In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. This means that there are 97 plays in which Megan was not the lead actress (100 - 3 = 97).  Yes, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\". Without this condition, we would not have been able to calculate the exact number of times Megan was not the lead actress.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means that she was not the lead actress in 20% of her work.   If she participated in 100 plays, then she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition \"Jack watched 3 movies in the movie theater\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack watched 3 movies in the movie theater.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.17428462207317352]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. In addition, Tom wrote 10000 articles. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that each stanza has 10 lines. We can multiply 10 lines by 8 words to calculate the total number of words in each stanza: 10 x 8 = 80.  Now, we need to multiply the total number of words in each stanza by the number of stanzas in the poem: 80 x 20 = 1600.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  Yes, the condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides us with the number of stanzas in the poem, which is necessary to calculate the total number of words. The condition of Tom writing 10000 articles is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that each stanza has 10 lines and each line has 8 words. To calculate the total number of words in the poem, we need to multiply the number of lines by the number of words per line and then multiply that by the number of stanzas. So the answer would be: 10 lines x 8 words x 20 stanzas = 1600 words. Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "First, we know that each stanza has 10 lines. We can multiply 10 lines by 8 words to calculate the total number of words in each stanza: 10 x 8 = 80.  Now, we need to multiply the total number of words in each stanza by the number of stanzas in the poem: 80 x 20 = 1600.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  Yes, the condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides us with the number of stanzas in the poem, which is necessary to calculate the total number of words.\nFirst, there are 20 stanzas with 10 lines each, so there are 200 lines in the poem.   Second, each line has 8 words, so the total number of words in the poem is 200 x 8 = 1600 words.  The condition \"In addition, Tom wrote 10000 articles\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "In addition, Tom wrote 10000 articles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.22799938917160034]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Mary sold 50000 more peaches to the store. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherries sprout. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition of Mary selling 50000 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the calculation process of how many cherry saplings does Kim have left.  Therefore, the answer is 14 cherry saplings. The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the number of cherry saplings that sprouted from the 80 pits that Kim planted.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout. This means that 80 * 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings sprout from the pits. Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, leaving 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left. The condition of Mary selling 50000 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the calculation process of how many cherry saplings does Kim have left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherries sprout.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left.  Mary sold 50000 more peaches to the store, which is irrelevant to the calculation of how many cherry saplings Kim has left.  Therefore, the answer is 14 cherry saplings. The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the number of cherry saplings that sprouted from the 80 pits that Kim planted.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits, and 25% of them sprout. That means 25 of the 80 pits will sprout. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so Kim has 19 cherry saplings left. The condition \"and Mary sold 50000 more peaches to the store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so it does not affect the answer.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so that is 20 saplings. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 saplings left. The condition given about Mary selling 50000 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer. Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "equation": "Mary sold 50000 more peaches to the store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364680886268616, 0.24044959247112274, 0.4611811935901642, 0.23910292983055115]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Additionally, Mary plants 1000 grasses. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many trees James has. Each tree has 20 plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plants each tree has. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many seeds James plants from each tree (60% of 20 plants = 12 seeds). Mary plants 1000 grasses. This is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of trees that James planted. Therefore, the answer to this question is James planted 2 trees. Yes, the condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "1. James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees, so he has 2 trees. 2. Each tree has 20 plants. 3. Each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds from his 2 trees. 4. He plants 60% of those seeds, so he plants 24 seeds. 5. Mary plants 1000 grasses, so this is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, James has planted 2 trees.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees, so he has 2 trees originally. Then he plants 60% of the seeds from each tree, which would be 12 plants from each tree. Adding Mary's 1000 grasses, it would be a total of 2,024 plants. So James planted 2 trees.  Yes, the condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it determines how many seeds James has to plant.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants, which means James has 40 plants.  Each plant has 1 seed, so James has 40 seeds.  He plants 60% of those seeds, which is 24 trees.  Mary plants 1000 grasses, which is not relevant to the number of trees planted by James.   Therefore, James planted 24 trees. The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed.  So, James has a total of 40 seeds (2 trees x 20 plants x 1 seed).  He plants 60% of those. That means he plants 24 seeds (40 x 0.6).  Additionally, Mary plants 1000 grasses.  James has nothing to do with Mary's grasses. So, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 0.  The condition \"and he plants 60% of those.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees, which means he has 40 fruits.   Then, James plants 60% of those fruits, which means he planted 24 fruits.   So, James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"Additionally, Mary plants 1000 grasses\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\" because that condition does not ask about trees, it asks about grasses.", "equation": "Additionally, Mary plants 1000 grasses.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.3264630436897278]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Tom is holding 100000 drawings now. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of drawings Gretchen sold on the weekends. 24 + 16 = 40 drawings. Second, we need to multiply the number of drawings by the amount she charges per drawing. 40 x $20.00 = $800. Therefore, Gretchen made $800 from selling drawings on the weekends. The condition of Tom holding 100000 drawings now is not relevant to the calculation process of how much money Gretchen made. The relevant information to answer this question is that Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 on Sunday and she charges $20.00 per drawing. To calculate the amount of money Gretchen made, we need to add the number of drawings sold on Saturday and Sunday and multiply it by the cost of one drawing. So the answer would be: 24 + 16 = 40 drawings x $20.00 = $800. Therefore, Gretchen made $800 from selling drawings on the weekends.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of drawings Gretchen sold on the weekends. 24 + 16 = 40 drawings.   Second, we need to multiply the number of drawings by the amount she charges per drawing. 40 x $20.00 = $800.   Therefore, Gretchen made $800 from selling drawings on the weekends.   Yes, the condition of she charging $20.00 per drawing is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nStep 1: Calculate the amount of money Gretchen made from selling the drawings.  24 drawings x $20.00 = $480.00 16 drawings x $20.00 = $320.00  Total amount of money made = $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00  Step 2: Check if the condition \"Tom is holding 100000 drawings now.\" is relevant to the calculation process.  No, the condition \"Tom is holding 100000 drawings now.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?\" because the number of drawings held by Tom does not affect the amount of money Gretchen made from selling her drawings.", "equation": "Tom is holding 100000 drawings now.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.012541406787931919]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Jack sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many balls Julia bought in each color. For the red balls, she bought 3 packs, and each pack has 19 balls, so she bought 57 red balls. For the yellow balls, she bought 10 packs, and each pack has 19 balls, so she bought 190 yellow balls. For the green balls, she bought 8 packs, and each pack has 19 balls, so she bought 152 green balls.  Now, let's add up all the numbers: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399. So, Julia bought 399 balls in total.  The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it helps us determine how many red balls Julia bought in total. The condition \"Jack sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders\" is not relevant to the calculation process since it doesn't involve Julia buying any orange cylinders.  Therefore, Julia bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls in all.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many balls Julia bought in each color. For the red balls, she bought 3 packs, and each pack has 19 balls, so she bought 57 red balls. For the yellow balls, she bought 10 packs, and each pack has 19 balls, so she bought 190 yellow balls. For the green balls, she bought 8 packs, and each pack has 19 balls, so she bought 152 green balls.  Now, let's add up all the numbers: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399. So, Julia bought 399 balls in total.  The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it helps us determine how many red balls Julia bought in total.\n1. Julie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. 2. There were 19 balls in each package. 3. Therefore, Julie bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls. 4. Jack sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders.  This condition is not relevant to the calculation process since it doesn't involve Julie buying any orange cylinders.  Therefore, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls in all.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package.  Therefore, Julie bought:  3 x 19 = 57 red balls  10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls  8 x 19 = 152 green balls  Total = 399 balls  The condition of Jack selling 50000 packs of orange cylinders does not affect the calculation of the number of balls Julie bought. Therefore, the answer is 399 balls.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. So, 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls. Therefore, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls in total.   The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to calculation process of problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" because it tells us how many balls were in each package, and this information is essential for calculating the total number of balls that Julie bought.\n1) Julie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. 2) There were 19 balls in each package.  3) Using this information, we can calculate the total number of balls Julie bought.   3 packs of red balls = 3 x 19 = 57 balls  10 packs of yellow balls = 10 x 19 = 190 balls  8 packs of green balls = 8 x 19 = 152 balls   Total number of balls Julie bought = 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls   4) Condition \"Jack sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" because Jack's sales of orange cylinders has nothing to do with Julie's purchase of balls.", "equation": "Jack sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315247178077698, 0.41100406646728516, 0.43914249539375305, 0.484716534614563, 0.3980165719985962]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Jack sold 50000 more peaches to the store. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. Then, 25% of them sprout. That means 25% of 80 is 20. Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the problem because it is the starting point for the calculation process. Without knowing how many cherry pits Kim planted, it would be impossible to calculate the number of cherry saplings she has left. The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many cherry saplings Kim had in the beginning, before selling 6 of them. Jack selling 50000 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the problem. Therefore, the answer is that Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. Then, 25% of them sprout. That means 25% of 80 is 20. Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the problem because it is the starting point for the calculation process. Without knowing how many cherry pits Kim planted, it would be impossible to calculate the number of cherry saplings she has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout (25% of 80 = 20). Then Kim sells 6 of the saplings, leaving Kim with 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many cherry saplings Kim had in the beginning, before selling 6 of them. Jack selling 50000 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the problem.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout.  This means that 80 cherry pits * 25% = 20 cherry saplings sprout.  Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings.  This means that 20 cherry saplings - 6 cherry saplings = 14 cherry saplings remain.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  Yes, the condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" because it informs us of how many saplings were taken away from the total number of sprouted saplings.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings.   So, after Kim sells 6 of the saplings, she has 25% of 80, or 20 cherry saplings left.   Jack sold 50000 more peaches to the store.   This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of how many cherry saplings Kim has left. It is not related to the calculation process, so it does not affect the answer.   Therefore, the answer is that Kim has 20 cherry saplings left.", "equation": "Jack sold 50000 more peaches to the store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364680886268616, 0.24044959247112274, 0.4611811935901642, 0.19870077073574066]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Tom has 10000 more pineapples than Betty. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "If Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 times as many oranges, so Sandra has 36 oranges.  Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  The condition \"Tom has 10000 more pineapples than Betty\" is not relevant to the calculation process of \"If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?\" and so does not need to be taken into consideration.  Therefore, the answer is that Emily has 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "If Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 times as many oranges, so Sandra has 36 oranges.  Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  The condition \"Tom has 10000 more pineapples than Betty\" is not relevant to the calculation process of \"If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?\" and so does not need to be taken into consideration.  Therefore, the answer is that Emily has 252 oranges.", "equation": "Tom has 10000 more pineapples than Betty.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.38155660033226013]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Mary earns 5000 dollars each week. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many quarters Libby needs to pay for the dress. $35 divided by 0.25 (the value of a quarter) is equal to 140 quarters.  Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing this information, we would not know how many quarters Libby has to pay for the dress or how many quarters she will have left after paying for it. The condition of Mary earning 5000 dollars each week is not relevant to the calculation process of how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress. The relevant information to answer this question is that Libby has 160 quarters and she has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To calculate how many quarters Libby will have left, we need to subtract the cost of the dress from the number of quarters Libby has. So the answer would be: 160 - 35 = 125 quarters. Therefore, Libby will have 125 quarters left after replacing the dress.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many quarters Libby needs to pay for the dress. $35 divided by 0.25 (the value of a quarter) is equal to 140 quarters.  Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing this information, we would not know how many quarters Libby has to pay for the dress or how many quarters she will have left after paying for it.\nLibby has 160 quarters. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 35 = 125 quarters left after replacing the dress.  The condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it informs us of the amount of money that Libby has to spend to replace the dress. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. 35 divided by 0.25 (which is the value of 1 quarter) is equal to 140. Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  The condition that Mary earns 5000 dollars each week is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary earns 5000 dollars each week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.2171935737133026]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The two dogs of Tom weigh 300 pounds each. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Then, we need to divide the total weight of Janele's cats by the number of cats she has (4 cats). 48 / 4 = 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of cats that we need to divide the total weight of Janele's cats by. The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides us with two of the weights that we need to add together in order to find the total weight. The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the weight of one of her cats, which is necessary to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the weight of the fourth cat, which needs to be included when calculating the average weight of Janele's cats. The condition \"The two dogs of", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Then, we need to divide the total weight of Janele's cats by the number of cats she has (4 cats). 48 / 4 = 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of cats that we need to divide the total weight of Janele's cats by.\nFirst, we need to add all the weights of the cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Next, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats: 48 / 4 = 12.  The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides us with two of the weights that we need to add together in order to find the total weight.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is calculated by adding up the weight of all her cats and then dividing by the total number of cats.   So the average weight of Janele's cats is (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) / 4 = 10.55 pounds.   The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the weight of one of her cats, which is necessary to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.\nThe first step is to add up the weights of the cats. This is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then, divide this by the number of cats, which is 4, to get the average weight of Janele's cats: 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the weight of the fourth cat, which needs to be included when calculating the average weight of Janele's cats.\nThe first step is to add all of the cats' weights together. This would give us 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 grams. Next, we need to divide this number by the number of cats, which is 4, so the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"The two dogs of Tom weigh 300 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it is not discussing Janele's cats.", "equation": "The two dogs of Tom weigh 300 pounds each.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.3059452176094055]}
{"original_question": "In a field of 500 clovers, 20% have four leaves and one quarter of these are purple clovers. Mary planted 10000 clovers out of the field. Assuming these proportions are exactly correct, how many clovers in the field are both purple and four-leaved?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine how many four-leaved clovers are in the field of 500 clovers. As 20% of the clovers have four leaves, that means 20% of 500 is equal to 100 four-leaved clovers.  Next, we need to figure out how many of the four-leaved clovers are purple. Since one quarter of the four-leaved clovers are purple, that means one quarter of 100 is equal to 25 purple four-leaved clovers.  Therefore, we can conclude that there are 25 purple four-leaved clovers in the field of 500 clovers.  The condition that Mary planted 10000 clovers out of the field is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not affect the proportion of purple four-leaved clovers in the field.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how many four-leaved clovers are in the field of 500 clovers. As 20% of the clovers have four leaves, that means 20% of 500 is equal to 100 four-leaved clovers.  Next, we need to figure out how many of the four-leaved clovers are purple. Since one quarter of the four-leaved clovers are purple, that means one quarter of 100 is equal to 25 purple four-leaved clovers.  Therefore, we can conclude that there are 25 purple four-leaved clovers in the field of 500 clovers.  The condition that Mary planted 10000 clovers out of the field is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not affect the proportion of purple four-leaved clovers in the field.", "equation": "Mary planted 10000 clovers out of the field.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.627143383026123, 0.7278595566749573, 0.4809955060482025]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Emma has 100000 more pineapples than Betty. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges. Therefore, Emily has 252 oranges. The condition of Emma having 100000 more pineapples than Betty is not relevant to the calculation process of how many oranges Emily has. The relevant information to answer this question is that Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra and Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. To calculate how many oranges Emily has, we need to multiply the number of oranges Betty has by the number of times Emily has more oranges than Sandra. So the answer would be: 12 oranges x 7 times = 84 oranges. Therefore, Emily has 84 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "None", "equation": "Emma has 100000 more pineapples than Betty.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.5123246312141418]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Tom drinks 50 more glasses of juice than Jason does. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "In one day, Jason will consume 3 eggs. In one week, Jason will consume 21 eggs (3 eggs x 7 days). In two weeks, Jason will consume 42 eggs (21 eggs x 2 weeks).  The condition that \"Tom drinks 50 more glasses of juice than Jason does\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "In one day, Jason will consume 3 eggs. In one week, Jason will consume 21 eggs (3 eggs x 7 days). In two weeks, Jason will consume 42 eggs (21 eggs x 2 weeks).  The condition that \"Tom drinks 50 more glasses of juice than Jason does\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom drinks 50 more glasses of juice than Jason does.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.34756430983543396]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Mary owns 2 gift shops in the city. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "Edmund needs 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. This condition is relevant because it tells us how much wrapping paper Edmund uses per gift box. He has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. This means that Edmund has 90 inches of wrapping paper to use per day. We can calculate this by dividing 90 inches by 18 inches (the amount of wrapping paper Edmund uses per gift box) to get 5 gift boxes per day. Multiplying 5 gift boxes by 3 days gives us 15 gift boxes. So, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days. The condition that Mary owns two gift shops in the city is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Edmund needs 18 inches of wrapping paper per gift box and he has 90 inches of wrapping paper per day. To calculate how many gift boxes he can wrap in 3 days, we need to divide the total amount of wrapping paper by the amount of wrapping paper needed for one gift box. So the answer would be: 90 inches/18 inches = 5 gift boxes per 3 days. Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.  This condition is relevant because it tells us how much wrapping paper Edmund uses per gift box.  If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day,   This means that Edmund has 90 inches of wrapping paper to use per day.  how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?  We can calculate this by dividing 90 inches by 18 inches (the amount of wrapping paper Edmund uses per gift box) to get 5 gift boxes per day. Multiplying 5 gift boxes by 3 days gives us 15 gift boxes. So, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.\n1. Edmund needs 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. 2. He has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. 3. He needs to wrap gift boxes every 3 days.  Therefore, the answer is 90 inches divided by 18 inches = 5 gift boxes per 3 days.  The condition that Mary owns two gift shops in the city is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary owns 2 gift shops in the city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.12263097614049911]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. Jack has 200 more potatoes than Oli. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli. This means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process as it informs us of the initial amount of scoops of ice cream each person has. The condition of Jack having 200 more potatoes than Oli is not relevant to the calculation process of how many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli. The answer is 4 scoops of ice cream.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli. This means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.   Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process as it informs us of the initial amount of scoops of ice cream each person has.\nOli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's.  Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  Jack has 200 more potatoes than Oli.  This condition is not relevant to the calculation of how many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli. The answer is 4 scoops of ice cream.", "equation": "Jack has 200 more potatoes than Oli.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.29261013865470886]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Ada spent 10000 dollars on dinner yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve had $1600 on her. She picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. She was $400 short of the total price when she reached the checkout counter. This means that the total cost of her cherries was $2000. Since each kilogram of cherries cost $8, Genevieve bought $2000/$8 = 250 kilograms of cherries.  Yes, the condition \"Genevieve had $1600 on her\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Ada spent 10000 dollars on dinner yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. We can calculate this by dividing the total cost of the cherries ($2000) by the cost per kilogram ($8). So the answer would be 2000/8 = 250 kilograms.", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "First, Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the price of the cherries.   Second, Genevieve realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not tell us anything about the amount of money that Genevieve had.   Third, Ada spent 10000 dollars on dinner yesterday. This is also not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not tell us anything about Genevieve's finances.   Finally, if Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy? This is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the amount of money that Genevieve had.   We can then calculate that Genevieve bought 200 kilograms of cherries, since $1600 divided by $8 per kilogram is 200.\nGenevieve had $1600 and she wants to buy cherries at $8 per kilogram.  So we can calculate how many kilograms she can buy with 1600 dollars as follows:   1600 / 8 = 200 kg   The condition \"when Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in\" is not relevant to the calculation process because the given information is that Genevieve had $1600 on her. So the condition is irrelevant to the calculation process.\nGenevieve had $1600, and the cherries cost $8 per kilogram. So $1600 divided by 8 will tell us how many kilograms of cherries she could have bought. 1600 / 8 = 200  Therefore, Genevieve bought 200 kilograms of cherries.   The condition \"Ada spent 10000 dollars on dinner yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Ada spent 10000 dollars on dinner yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.19051705300807953]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Jack bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for two months. This means that in one year, Maria will need 6 bars of French soap. Multiplying 6 by $8.00, we get a total cost of $48.00 for the entire year.  Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the given price for the bar of soap that Maria is buying. The condition of Jack buying 500 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for two months and she spends $8.00 per bar of soap. To calculate the cost for the entire year, we need to multiply the cost of one bar of soap by the number of bars of soap she needs to buy. So the answer would be: 6 bars x $8.00 = $48.00. Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap for the entire year.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many bars of soap Maria needs for the year. Since each bar lasts her for two months, she needs 6 bars of soap for the year.   Now, we can calculate how much Maria will spend on soap for the year. Since each bar costs $8.00, Maria will spend $48.00 for the year on soap.   The condition that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for two months is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many bars of soap Maria needs for the year.\nMaria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for two months. This means that in one year, Maria will need 6 bars of French soap. Multiplying 6 by $8.00, we get a total cost of $48.00 for the entire year.  Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the given price for the bar of soap that Maria is buying.\nMaria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. We know that she spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Therefore, in order to stock up for the entire year, she needs to buy 6 bars of soap. Multiplying the cost of the bar of soap ($8.00) by the number of bars of soap she needs to buy (6), we get a total cost of $48.00 for Maria to stock up for the entire year.   The condition \"Jack bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.21360795199871063]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. The height of Jack is 10000 feet. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: One-eighth of the cake is 400/8 = 50 grams. Step 2: Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate. Therefore, Pierre ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams. Step 3: The height of Jack is 10000 feet. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  Therefore, the answer is Pierre ate 100 grams.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "The first condition is relevant, since it tells us that the cake is divided into eight equal parts. That means each part is 400/8 = 50 grams. Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 50 grams. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2*50 = 100 grams. Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams. The height of Jack (10000 feet) is not relevant to this calculation.\nStep 1: One-eighth of the cake is 400/8 = 50 grams.   Step 2: Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate. Therefore, Pierre ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.   Step 3: The height of Jack is 10000 feet. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.   Therefore, the answer is Pierre ate 100 grams.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.041803594678640366]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. The height of Tom is 3 feet. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the amount saved by Asia:  The amount saved by Asia is 350 - 140 = 210.   Step 2: Calculate the percentage off:  The percentage off is (210 / 350) x 100 = 60%.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the amount paid by Asia, which is necessary to calculate the amount saved by her. The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process since it provides the original price which is used in the calculation. The condition \"The height of Tom is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the amount saved by Asia:  The amount saved by Asia is 350 - 140 = 210.   Step 2: Calculate the percentage off:  The percentage off is (210 / 350) x 100 = 60%.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the amount paid by Asia, which is necessary to calculate the amount saved by her.\nThe original price was $350 and the sale price was $140. This means that the difference between the two is $210. To calculate the percentage off, we can take the difference and divide it by the original price, then multiply by 100. So, 210/350 x 100 = 60%. Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process since it provides the original price which is used in the calculation.\nFirst, we need to figure out the percentage discount Asia got on her homecoming dress. To do this, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price, and then divide it by the original price.   Original price: $350 Sale price: $140  Difference: $210  Percentage discount: $210/$350 = 0.6, or 60% off.   The condition \"The height of Tom is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, -0.10139252245426178]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. The shoe size of Ada is 100000. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate how many balls Julie bought in each color.   For red balls: 3 packs x 19 balls = 57 balls For yellow balls: 10 packs x 19 balls = 190 balls For green balls: 8 packs x 19 balls = 152 balls  Then, let's add up the total number of balls: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process in that it tells us the number of packs of red balls that Julia bought. This information is necessary for us to calculate the total number of balls that Julia bought. The shoe size of Ada is 100000 is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem and is not needed to answer the question. Therefore, the total number of balls that Julia bought is 399.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of balls that Julia bought. We have 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. We can calculate the total number of balls that Julia bought by multiplying each number of packs by the number of balls in each package (19).   Therefore, Julia bought (3 x 19 =) 57 red balls, (10 x 19 =) 190 yellow balls, and (8 x 19 =) 152 green balls.  The total number of balls that Julia bought is therefore (57 + 190 + 152 =) 399 balls.  The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process in that it tells us the number of packs of red balls that Julia bought. This information is necessary for us to calculate the total number of balls that Julia bought. The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, let's calculate how many balls Julie bought in each color.   For red balls: 3 packs x 19 balls = 57 balls For yellow balls: 10 packs x 19 balls = 190 balls For green balls: 8 packs x 19 balls = 152 balls  Then, let's add up the total number of balls: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to know how many packs of each color Julie bought in order to calculate the total number of balls.\nFirst, we need to work out how many balls Julie bought in each colour.   3 packs of red balls = 3 x 19 = 57 red balls. 10 packs of yellow balls = 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls. 8 packs of green balls = 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Therefore, Julie bought a total of 399 balls in all.  The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the number of packs of green balls that Julie bought. Without this information, we would not be able to work out the total number of balls that Julie bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. This means Julie bought 3 x 19 red balls, 10 x 19 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 green balls.   We can calculate the total number of balls Julie bought in all by multiplying the number of packs of each color ball by 19 and then adding them together. This gives us:   3 x 19 + 10 x 19 + 8 x 19 = 567 balls  The shoe size of Ada is 100000 is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem and is not needed to answer the question.\nThe question is asking for the total number of balls that Julia bought. We know that Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. We also know that there were 19 balls in each package. Therefore, we can calculate the total number of balls that Julia bought as follows:  3 packs of red balls = 3 x 19 = 57 10 packs of yellow balls = 10 x 19 = 190 8 packs of green balls = 8 x 19 = 152 Total number of balls = 57 + 190 + 152 = 399  The condition \"The shoe size of Ada is 100000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, and hence it is not necessary for the calculation.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315247178077698, 0.41100406646728516, 0.43914249539375305, 0.484716534614563, 0.18816405534744263]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. The height of Ada is 10000 feet. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Her brothers are all 8 years old, so the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Then, we need to calculate how old Hannah is if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. Since Hannah is twice as old as 24, her age would be 24 x 2 = 48 years old.  So, the answer to the question \"How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?\" is 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it determines the sum of her brother's ages which is used to calculate Hannah's age. The condition \"The height of Ada is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?\". Therefore, it is not necessary to consider it in the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Her brothers are all 8 years old, so the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Then, we need to calculate how old Hannah is if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. Since Hannah is twice as old as 24, her age would be 24 x 2 = 48 years old.  So, the answer to the question \"How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?\" is 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it determines the sum of her brother's ages which is used to calculate Hannah's age.\nFirst, let's calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Her brothers are all 8 years old, so the sum of their ages is 3 x 8 = 24.   Then, we know that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. So, Hannah is 2 x 24 = 48 years old.   The condition \"The height of Ada is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?\". Therefore, it is not necessary to consider it in the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.04563448578119278]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Ada bought 50000 books from the book store. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the number of carrots Kelly pulled out of the three beds to get the total number of carrots: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Then, we need to divide the total number of carrots by 6 to get the total number of pounds: 234/6 = 39.  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition of Ada buying 50000 books from the book store is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kelly pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, and 6 carrots weigh one pound. To calculate the weight of the carrots, we need to add the number of carrots from each bed and then divide the total number of carrots by 6. So the answer would be: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234, 234/6 = 39. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. To do this, we add the number of carrots she pulled out from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.   Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. To do this, we divide the total number of carrots (234) by 6 (the number of carrots that make one pound): 234 姊 6 = 39.   Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The total number of carrots Kelly harvested is the same regardless of how many carrots she pulled out from each bed.\nFirst, Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This gives us a total of 234 carrots.  Second, we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. To do this, we divide 234 by 6, which gives us 39 pounds of carrots.  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it does not change the total number of carrots harvested or the ratio of carrots to pounds.\nFirst, we need to add up the number of carrots Kelly pulled out of the three beds to get the total number of carrots: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Then, we need to divide the total number of carrots by 6 to get the total number of pounds: 234/6 = 39.  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, this condition can be ignored.\nStep 1: Calculate the total number of carrots Kelly harvested.  Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed + 101 carrots from the second bed + 78 carrots from the third bed = 234 carrots.  Step 2: Calculate the weight of the carrots.  We know that 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, so 234 carrots will weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds.  Answer: Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  Yes, the condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it was used to calculate the weight of the carrots.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This adds up to a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition about Ada buying 50000 books from the book store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 50000 books from the book store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.0538143515586853]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Jack is 2000 years old. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. We know that in Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. So if Jed was traveling at 50 mph, he would be fined $0. To calculate the speed Jed was traveling at, we can use the formula: Speed = (Fine / Fine per mph) + Posted Speed Limit. So in this case, Speed = (256 / 16) + 50 = 66 mph. Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Jack is 2000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate the speed that Jed was traveling at in miles per hour. We can calculate this by using the formula: Speed = (Fine / Fine per mph) + Posted Speed Limit. So the answer is 66 mph.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "The condition states that the fine for speeding is $16 per mile per hour over the speed limit.  We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  Therefore, Jed was travelling at a speed of 256/16 = 16 mph over the speed limit.  Therefore, Jed was travelling at a speed of 50 + 16 = 66 mph.\nWe can use an equation to help us solve the problem.  First, we need to know how much Jed was fined for speeding. We know from the given information that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  Next, we can set up an equation to calculate the speed Jed was traveling at. We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. So, we can use this information to set up an equation:  Fine = $16 x (Speed - 50 mph)  We can rearrange the equation to solve for Speed:  Speed = (Fine / 16) + 50 mph  Finally, we can plug in the given information to solve for Speed:  Speed = ($256 / 16) + 50 mph  Speed = 56 mph  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 56 mph.  Yes, the given condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We need the information from the condition to set up the equation and solve for Speed.\nThe fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit. So, if Jed was fined $256, it means he was traveling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit, i.e., he was traveling at 66 miles per hour.  The condition that \"Jack is 2000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack is 2000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.11767373234033585]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. The shoe size of Tom is 500. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. Abie now has 16 bags of chips. She bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Abie now has 22 bags of chips.  The shoe size of Tom is 500.  This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\"  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. This means she has 20 - 4 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end. The shoe size of Tom is 500 and is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. Abie now has 16 bags of chips. She bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Abie now has 22 bags of chips.  The shoe size of Tom is 500.  This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\"  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend.  So, Abie has 20 - 4 = 16 bags of chips.  Then, she bought 6 more bags of chips in the store.  So, Abie has 16 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end.  The shoe size of Tom is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips, then she gave 4 bags to her friend and bought 6 bags more in the store. Therefore, the total amount of bags of chips Abie has in the end is 20 + 6 = 26.  The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 500\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem and has no effect on the answer.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 500.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.11899794638156891]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. Ada bought 40000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the total number of lines in the poem: 20 stanzas x 10 lines = 200 lines  Step 2: Calculate the total number of words in the poem: 200 lines x 8 words = 1600 words  The condition \"Ada bought 40000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that the poem has 20 stanzas, each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words. To calculate the total number of words in the poem, we need to multiply the number of lines in each stanza by the number of words in each line. So the answer would be: 10 lines x 8 words = 80 words. Therefore, the poem has a total of 1600 words.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, then we can calculate the total number of words in a single stanza by multiplying 10 and 8, which gives us 80 words.   Now, since the poem has 20 stanzas, we can calculate the total number of words in the poem by multiplying 20 and 80, which gives us 1600 words.   The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nStep 1: Calculate the total number of lines in the poem: 20 stanzas x 10 lines = 200 lines  Step 2: Calculate the total number of words in the poem: 200 lines x 8 words = 1600 words  The condition \"Ada bought 40000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 40000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.016276538372039795]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. The height of Mary is 1000 feet. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long one bar of soap will last Maria. Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the cost of each bar of soap. Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need 6 bars of soap (12 months ÷ 2 months per bar). Multiplying 6 bars of soap by $8.00 per bar, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap for the entire year. Yes, the condition that Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Mary's height is 1000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Maria will spend on soap for the entire year. We can calculate this by multiplying the cost of one bar of soap with the number of bars of soap needed for the entire year. So the answer is: $8.00 x 6 = $48.00", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. If she wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy 12 bars of soap. So, the total cost for soap for the year will be 12 x 8 = $96.00. The condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nMaria buys a bar of soap that lasts her for two months, so she needs six bars of soap per year. We know that she spends $8.00 per bar of soap, so she will spend $48.00 for the entire year. The height of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process.\nMaria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for two months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Therefore, she spends $8.00 every two months. In order to stock up for the entire year, Maria would need to buy 6 bars of soap. Therefore, she would spend $48.00.   The condition \"The height of Mary is 1000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem and can be disregarded.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.17066700756549835]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. Mary bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Emmy and Gerry have a total of $300. This is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much money they have to spend on apples. Each apple costs $2, so they can buy up to 150 apples. This is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each apple costs.  Step 1: Calculate how many apples Emmy can buy with $200:  Answer: Emmy can buy 100 apples with $200.  Step 2: Calculate how many apples Gerry can buy with $100:  Answer: Gerry can buy 50 apples with $100.  Step 3: Calculate the total number of apples that Emmy and Gerry can buy together:  Answer: Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples together.  The condition \"Mary bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 and each apple costs $2. To calculate the total number of apples that Emmy and Gerry can buy together, we need to add the number of apples each person can buy. So the answer would be: 100 apples (Emmy) + 50 apples (Gerry) = 150 apples. Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "Emmy and Gerry have a total of $300. Each apple costs $2, so they can buy up to 150 apples. The condition that \"A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each apple costs. Mary buying tomatoes from the grocery store does not affect the number of apples that Emmy and Gerry can buy, so it is not relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Calculate how many apples Emmy can buy with $200:  Answer: Emmy can buy 100 apples with $200.  Step 2: Calculate how many apples Gerry can buy with $100:  Answer: Gerry can buy 50 apples with $100.  Step 3: Calculate the total number of apples that Emmy and Gerry can buy together:  Answer: Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples together.  The condition \"Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines how much each person can spend on apples.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much money Emmy and Gerry have combined. Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so together they have $300. Next, we need to calculate how many apples they can buy with that money. Each apple costs $2, so they can buy 150 apples in total.  The condition that Mary bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.3446957767009735]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. The height of Emma is 2000 feet. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The condition that the rectangle is 7 inches wide is relevant to the calculation process, because it is one of the measurements needed to calculate the area of the rectangle.  To calculate the area of the rectangle, we need to know the length and width of the rectangle. Since we know the width is 7 inches, we can calculate the length by multiplying the width (7 inches) by 4, which gives us 28 inches.   Now that we have both the length and width of the rectangle, we can calculate the area of the rectangle by multiplying the length (28 inches) by the width (7 inches), which gives us 196 square inches.   The height of Emma does not affect the calculation of the area of the rectangle, so it is not relevant to this problem.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The condition that the rectangle is 7 inches wide is relevant to the calculation process, because it is one of the measurements needed to calculate the area of the rectangle.  To calculate the area of the rectangle, we need to know the length and width of the rectangle. Since we know the width is 7 inches, we can calculate the length by multiplying the width (7 inches) by 4, which gives us 28 inches.   Now that we have both the length and width of the rectangle, we can calculate the area of the rectangle by multiplying the length (28 inches) by the width (7 inches), which gives us 196 square inches.   The height of Emma does not affect the calculation of the area of the rectangle, so it is not relevant to this problem.\nThe width of the rectangle is 7 inches. The length of the rectangle is 4 鑴 7 = 28 inches.   Therefore, the area of the rectangle = 7 鑴 28 = 196 square inches.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it helps to determine the length of the rectangle.\nThe width of the rectangle is 7 inches. Therefore, the length of the rectangle is 4 x 7 = 28 inches. We can calculate the area of the rectangle by multiplying the width and length together. That would be 7 x 28 = 196 square inches.   The condition \"The height of Emma is 2000 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Emma is 2000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.06161137670278549]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The shoe size of Tom is 30000. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many crates will Lizzy need to ship. She needs to ship 540 pounds of fish, and each crate can hold 30 pounds. So, Lizzy will need 540/30 = 18 crates. Now, if the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, then the total cost of shipping the 540 pounds of fish will be 1.5 x 18 = $27.  Yes, the condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it tells us how many crates Lizzy will need to ship and the weight of each crate. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total cost of the shipment. The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 30000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many crates will Lizzy need to ship. She needs to ship 540 pounds of fish, and each crate can hold 30 pounds. So, Lizzy will need 540/30 = 18 crates. Now, if the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, then the total cost of shipping the 540 pounds of fish will be 1.5 x 18 = $27.  Yes, the condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it tells us how many crates Lizzy will need to ship and the weight of each crate. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total cost of the shipment.\nFirst, Lizzy has 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. To find out how many crates Lizzy needs to ship, we can use a simple division equation:  540 姊 30 = 18   So, Lizzy needs 18 crates to ship her fish.   Second, if the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, Lizzy will need to pay 18 x $1.5 = $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 30000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 30000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.1766478717327118]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. The shoe size of Tom is 1000. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the original cost of 6 t-shirts. That would be 6 x $20 = $120.  The second step is to calculate the discount amount. That would be 50% of $120 = $60.  The third step is to subtract the discount amount from the original cost. That would be $120 - $60 = $60.  Therefore, James paid $60 for 6 t-shirts. The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 1000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The question only asks how much James paid, so we can ignore this condition.  Therefore, James paid $60 for 6 t-shirts.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the original cost of 6 t-shirts. That would be 6 x $20 = $120.   The second step is to calculate the discount amount. That would be 50% of $120 = $60.  The third step is to subtract the discount amount from the original cost. That would be $120 - $60 = $60.   Therefore, James paid $60 for 6 t-shirts.   The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us the discount amount that James received. Without the condition, we would not know how much the discount was and therefore would not be able to calculate how much James paid.\nJames buys 6 t-shirts. If each t-shirt costs $20, then he pays $120. There is a 50% discount, so he pays $60. Tom's shoe size is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, James paid $60.\nThe first step is to calculate the cost of the 6 t-shirts at 50% off. 6 t-shirts at $20 each means the total cost is $120. So, with 50% off, the cost of the 6 t-shirts is $60.  The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 1000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The question only asks how much James paid, so we can ignore this condition.  Therefore, James paid $60 for 6 t-shirts.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 1000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.23388464748859406]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. The height of Tom is 10000 feet. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. This condition is relevant to the calculation process. The original price of the dress was $350. To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference between the original price and the sale price by the original price and then multiply by 100. So, the percentage off Asia got at the sale is 60% ($210 divided by $350 multiplied by 100). The height of Tom is 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. This condition is relevant to the calculation process. The original price of the dress was $350. To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference between the original price and the sale price by the original price and then multiply by 100. So, the percentage off Asia got at the sale is 60% ($210 divided by $350 multiplied by 100). The height of Tom is 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process.\n1. Calculate the total amount saved:  Total Amount Saved = Original Price - Sale Price = $350 - $140 = $210  2. Calculate the percentage off:  Percentage Off = (Total Amount Saved / Original Price) x 100 = (210 / 350) x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is needed to calculate the total amount saved and the percentage off.\nTo find the percentage off at the sale, we need to know the original price and the sale price. In this case, the original price is $350 and the sale price is $140. We can calculate the percentage off as follows:   (350 - 140) / 350 = 0.6   which is equivalent to 60%.   The condition \"The height of Tom is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the percentage off at the sale.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, -0.002552630379796028]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Tom is 2000 years old. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit, so her bank balance is now $80. Then she made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance is now $76. Therefore, the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.  The condition that Lucy has $65 in the bank is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is the starting point for the calculation. The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is also relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to calculate the final bank balance. The condition \"Tom is 2000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\"", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit. Her bank balance is now $80. She then made a $4 withdrawal. Her bank balance is now $76.  So, the answer is that Lucy's bank balance is $76. The condition that Lucy has $65 in the bank is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit, so her bank balance is now $80. Then she made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance is now $76. Therefore, the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.  The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to calculate the final bank balance.\nLucy has $65 in the bank.  She made a $15 deposit.   So, her balance is now $65 + $15 = $80.   Then, she made a $4 withdrawal.   So, her balance is now $80 - $4 = $76.   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   Yes, the condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It is necessary to include it to get the correct answer.   Tom's age is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. + She made a $15 deposit. = Lucy has $80 in the bank. - She made a $4 withdrawal. = Lucy has $76 in the bank.  The condition \"Tom is 2000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\"", "equation": "Tom is 2000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637164354324341, 0.30860891938209534, 0.2903803884983063, 0.16623222827911377]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. The height of Jack is 10000 feet. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank, so she has $40. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress, so she will have $5 left after replacing the dress. Since each quarter is worth 25 cents, she will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress. Answer: Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress. The condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is used to determine how much money she has to start with. The condition \"The height of Jack is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank, so she has $40. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress, so she will have $5 left after replacing the dress. Since each quarter is worth 25 cents, she will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Answer: Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress. The condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is used to determine how much money she has to start with.\nFirst, Libby will have to use 35 quarters to replace her sister's dress, so she will have 125 quarters left. The condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much money Libby needs to pay for the dress. The height of Jack is not relevant to the calculation process.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35. That's 140 quarters. So, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left.   The condition \"The height of Jack is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, -0.08314679563045502]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Mary is 10000 years old. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill one bottle. Since 85 stars are required to fill a glass jar, and Luke needs to fill 4 bottles, he will need 4 x 85 = 340 stars. Next, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars he needs (340 stars), to calculate how many more stars he needs to make. Therefore, Luke needs 340 - 33 = 307 more stars to fill all 4 bottles.  The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill one bottle (85 stars). The condition of Mary being 10000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how many more stars Luke must make. The relevant information to answer this question is that 85 stars are required to fill a glass jar and Luke has already made 33 stars. To calculate the number of stars Luke needs to make, we need to subtract the number of stars he has already made from the number of stars he needs to fill all 4 bottles. So the answer would be: 4 x 85 - 33 = 307 stars. Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill one bottle. Since 85 stars are required to fill a glass jar, and Luke needs to fill 4 bottles, he will need 4 x 85 = 340 stars.  Next, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars he needs (340 stars), to calculate how many more stars he needs to make.  Therefore, Luke needs 340 - 33 = 307 more stars to fill all 4 bottles.  The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill one bottle (85 stars).\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to make in total to fill 4 bottles. To do this, we need to multiply 85 by 4, which equals 340.  Now, since Luke has already made 33 stars, we need to subtract 33 from 340 to get the number of stars Luke needs to make. So, Luke needs to make 307 more stars.   The condition of Luke having already made 33 stars is relevant to the calculation process, because it is necessary to subtract 33 from 340 to get the final answer.\nFirst, we need to know how many stars Luke needs to put into each bottle. We can divide 85 by 4 to get 21.5. Since Luke cannot make 0.5 of a star, he will need to make 21 stars for each bottle.   Next, we need to know how many stars Luke has already made. We know that he has already made 33 stars.   Finally, we can subtract 33 from 21 to get the answer: Luke needs to make 8 more stars to fill the 4 bottles.   The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many bottles Luke needs to fill and how many stars he needs for each bottle.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke must make to fill the four bottles. He needs 85 stars for each bottle, so he needs 85 x 4 = 340 stars in total.  Second, we need to calculate how many stars he already made. He made 33 stars, so he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars.  The condition \"Mary is 10000 years old\" is not relevant to this calculation, so it does not need to be taken into account.", "equation": "Mary is 10000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.2440347671508789]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The shoe size of Ada is 20000. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many crates of fish Lizzy is shipping. This can be done by dividing the total weight of the fish (540 lbs) by the weight of each crate (30 lbs).   540 lbs / 30 lbs = 18 crates   Next, we need to calculate the total cost of shipping all of the crates. This can be done by multiplying the cost of each crate ($1.5) by the number of crates (18).   $1.5 x 18 = $27   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the total weight of the fish and the weight of each crate, which are both necessary for calculating the number of crates and the cost of shipping. The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to this calculation.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many crates of fish Lizzy is shipping. This can be done by dividing the total weight of the fish (540 lbs) by the weight of each crate (30 lbs).   540 lbs / 30 lbs = 18 crates   Next, we need to calculate the total cost of shipping all of the crates. This can be done by multiplying the cost of each crate ($1.5) by the number of crates (18).   $1.5 x 18 = $27   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the total weight of the fish and the weight of each crate, which are both necessary for calculating the number of crates and the cost of shipping.\nThe first step would be to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the 540 pounds of fish. To do this, we divide 540 by 30 to get 18 crates.  The next step is to calculate the shipping cost of the 18 crates. To do this, we multiply 18 by $1.5 to get $27.  Therefore, the total cost for shipping 540 pounds of fish in 18 crates is $27. The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to this calculation.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 20000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.03149760887026787]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Tom is 400 years old. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 5 times as many buttons as Mari, so she made (4+5*8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so Sue made 44 / 2 = 22 buttons. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many did Sue make?\" because it is used to determine how many buttons Kendra made, which is necessary to calculate how many buttons Sue made. The condition \"Tom is 400 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 times as many buttons as Mari, so she made 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 5 times as many buttons as Mari, so she made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra, so she made 44 / 2 = 22 buttons.  Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many did Sue make?\" because it is used to determine how many buttons Kendra made, which is necessary to calculate how many buttons Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons, and Kendra made 4 more than 5 times as many, so Kendra made (4+5*8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to determine how many buttons Kendra made. Without knowing how many buttons Mari made, we would not be able to calculate how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.  Tom's age is not relevant to the calculation process.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many buttons as Mari (4+5*8=48).  Sue made half as many as Kendra (48/2=24).  So, Sue made 24 buttons.  The condition \"Tom is 400 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Tom is 400 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.14499129354953766]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Emma is 5000 years old. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many servings were made. He added a half cup of cream at the end. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much cream was added to the recipe. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the number of grams of fat each cup of cream contains.  That means Perry added 44 grams of fat to the recipe (half cup of cream x 88 grams of fat per cup).  Now, Perry's recipe serves four people. This means each serving contains 11 grams of fat (44 grams of fat / 4 servings).  Yes, the condition \"He added a half cup of cream at the end\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Emma is 5000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. We can calculate this by dividing the total amount of fat added to the recipe (44 grams of fat) by the number of servings (4). So the answer is 11 grams of fat per serving.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many grams of cream Perry added. Since a cup is equal to 8 fluid ounces, a half cup of cream would be equal to 4 fluid ounces. Therefore, Perry added 4 ounces of cream, which is equal to 113.4 grams.   Next, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving. Since there are 88 grams of fat per cup, and Perry added 4 ounces of cream, then there would be 88 x 4 = 352 grams of fat in the entire recipe.   Finally, we need to divide the total fat by the number of servings. Since the recipe serves four people, each serving would have 352 / 4 = 88 grams of fat.   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?\" This is because the number of grams of fat per cup is necessary to calculate the total amount of fat in the recipe, and then to divide it by the number of servings.   Therefore, each serving of Perry's recipe would have 88 grams of fat.\nThe question is asking how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. This means that we need to find out how much fat was added total, then divide it by four.   We know that cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, and Perry added a half cup of cream. This means that he added 44 grams of fat total.   Now, we need to divide 44 by four to find out how much fat was added per serving. 44 divided by four is 11 grams of fat per serving.   Therefore, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.   The condition \"Emma is 5000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma is 5000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, 0.09856036305427551]}
{"original_question": "Billy's family likes to keep their bicycles stored in the garage when they're not being used. They own a total of 4 bicycles. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. The shoe size of Emma is 500. How many spokes are inside the garage?", "reasoning_path": "Billy's family has 4 bicycles. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many bicycles are in the garage. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many spokes each wheel has. That means Billy's family has 4 bicycles x 10 spokes/bicycle = 40 spokes in the garage. Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Emma's shoe size is 500 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many spokes are inside the garage. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of bicycles by the number of spokes on each wheel. So the answer would be 40 spokes.", "numerical_answer": 40, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "The condition of \"They own a total of 4 bicycles\" is relevant to the calculation process. It tells us that there are 4 bicycles inside the garage, and each bicycle has 10 spokes. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\" is 40 (4 x 10). Emma's shoe size has nothing to do with this problem.\nFirst, we know that there are 4 bicycles in the garage, and each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. That means there are 40 spokes in total inside the garage.   The condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us the number of spokes in each bicycle wheel. Without this information, it would be impossible to answer the question of how many spokes are inside the garage.   Finally, the shoe size of Emma has nothing to do with the calculation process, so it is not relevant.\nThe first step is to calculate how many spokes there are in total with all four bicycles. This is easy - 10 spokes x 4 bicycles = 40 spokes. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\" is 40. The condition \"The shoe size of Emma is 500.\" is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 500.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3732944130897522, 0.22472992539405823, 0.38099128007888794, 0.07416170090436935]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Jack has read 200 books in the past year. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that Sally eats a total of 3 sandwiches. Each sandwich requires 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the information that Sally eats a total of 3 sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"Jack has read 200 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. To calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday, we need to multiply the number of sandwiches eaten by the number of pieces of bread used per sandwich. So the answer would be: 3 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread = 6 pieces of bread. Therefore, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that Sally eats a total of 3 sandwiches. Each sandwich requires 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the information that Sally eats a total of 3 sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that over Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 3 sandwiches. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. That means Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  Therefore, the answer to the question is 6 pieces of bread.  The condition \"Jack has read 200 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack has read 200 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.07781782746315002]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Emma is 1000 years old. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the cost of the meat. 2 kg x $82/kg = $164  Step 2: Calculate how much money Melies has left. $180 - $164 = $16  Answer: Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it determines how much meat Melies bought and thus how much money he needs to spend. The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process because it informs us how much money Melies has to begin with, which is necessary in order to determine how much money he has left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Emma is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the cost of the meat. 2 kg x $82/kg = $164  Step 2: Calculate how much money Melies has left. $180 - $164 = $16  Answer: Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it determines how much meat Melies bought and thus how much money he needs to spend.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. This means he needs to pay $164 for the meat ($82 x 2 = $164).  Melies has $180 in his wallet. This means he has $16 left after paying for the meat ($180 - $164 = $16).  Emma is 1000 years old. This does not have any impact on the calculation process of the problem, so the condition is not relevant.\nFirst, Melies spends $82 per kilogram of meat, so he spends a total of $164 on the meat.   Second, we know that Melies has $180 in his wallet.   Third, we subtract the cost of the meat ($164) from the amount of money Melies has ($180) to determine how much money he has left.   Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process because it informs us how much money Melies has to begin with, which is necessary in order to determine how much money he has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram.  Therefore, Melies has spent a total of $164 on the meat.  He has $180 in his wallet.   Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Emma is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.04852001368999481]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. The height of Tom is 500 feet. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "Since the pencil cost her $8, then half the price of the pencil is $4.   Therefore, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, so Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gave us the information we needed to calculate the total price for both the pen and the pencil. The condition \"The height of Tom is 500 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?\". Therefore, it can be ignored. So the answer would be: Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil. The total cost for both the pen and the pencil is $12.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Since the pencil cost her $8, then half the price of the pencil is $4.   Therefore, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, so Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gave us the information we needed to calculate the total price for both the pen and the pencil.\nMaria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. That means the pen cost her $4. Therefore, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil. The total cost for both the pen and the pencil is $12.  The condition \"The height of Tom is 500 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?\". Therefore, it can be ignored.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 500 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, -0.07947970926761627]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Jack has read 100 books in the past year. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday. Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Add the pieces of bread eaten on Saturday and Sunday together. Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"Jack has read 100 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. The relevant information to answer this question is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, and that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. To calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats, we need to multiply the number of sandwiches eaten by the number of pieces of bread used per sandwich. So the answer would be: 2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread = 4 pieces of bread + 1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread = 2 pieces of bread. Therefore, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The given information is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. This means that Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday, for a total of 6 pieces of bread. The fact that Jack has read 100 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process, since it has nothing to do with the number of pieces of bread Sally has eaten.\nStep 1: Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday.   Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.   Step 2: Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday.   Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.   Step 3: Add the pieces of bread eaten on Saturday and Sunday together.   Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.   Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   Yes, the condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?\". Without that condition, the answer would be different.\nThe first part of the problem is to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. This calculation requires only the information given in the problem, which is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, and that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. Therefore, the calculation is as follows: 2 pieces of bread x 2 sandwiches = 4 pieces of bread + 2 pieces of bread x 1 sandwich = 6 pieces of bread.   Therefore, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The second part of the problem is whether the condition \"Jack has read 100 books in the past year\" is relevant to the calculation process. The answer is no, because the condition is irrelevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.", "equation": "Jack has read 100 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.1188487559556961]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Mary has read 200 books in the past year. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Saturday. Since Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then Sally will eat a total of 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.  Next, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Sunday. Since Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then Sally will eat a total of 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.  Finally, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. This can be done by adding the total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats on Saturday (4 pieces) and the total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats on Sunday (2 pieces).  Therefore, the answer to the question is 6 pieces of bread. The condition that Mary has read 200 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. To calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday, we need to add the number of pieces of bread Sally eats on Saturday and Sunday. So the answer", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The problem states that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, and that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that Sally will eat a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday is relevant to the calculation process, as it is part of the information needed to determine how many pieces of bread Sally will eat across Saturday and Sunday. Without this condition, it would not be possible to accurately calculate the number of pieces of bread Sally will eat.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then the total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 6 pieces of bread. The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it informs how many sandwiches Sally eats on each day.\nFor the question \"If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?\" we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.   To do this, we need to know how many sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday and Sunday. We know that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday.   Therefore, Sally eats a total of 3 sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday.   Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"Mary has read 200 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary has read 200 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.14370672404766083]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. The shoe size of Emma is 200000. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of Emma's shoe size being 200000 is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "The condition saying \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of units that James is taking. The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process.  To answer the question, we need to multiply the number of units (20) by the cost per unit ($50) and then multiply that by the number of semesters (2). So the answer would be $2,000.\nThe condition \"The shoe size of Emma is 200000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We need to focus only on the information given in the problem.   To answer this question, we need to calculate the total cost for 2 semesters. Since James takes 20 units per semester, then he will take 40 units for 2 semesters. Each unit costs $50, so the total cost for 2 semesters is 40 x $50, which equals $2000.   Therefore, James pays $2000 for 2 semesters.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 200000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.039618514478206635]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Mary bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that each bar of soap lasts her for 2 months. So, Maria needs 6 bars of soap for the entire year. Second, we know that each bar of soap costs $8. Therefore, Maria will spend $48 to stock up for the entire year. The condition that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months is relevant to the calculation process because this condition provided the information needed to calculate the total cost. Without this information, we would not be able to determine how much Maria will spend on soap. The condition of Mary buying 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Maria will spend for the entire year. The relevant information to answer this question is that each bar of soap lasts Maria for 2 months and each bar costs $8. To calculate the total cost, we need to multiply the cost of one bar by the number of bars Maria needs for the year. So the answer would be: 6 bars x $8 = $48. Therefore, Maria will spend $48 on soap for the year if she wants to stock up for the entire year.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we know that each bar of soap lasts her for 2 months. So, Maria needs 6 bars of soap for the entire year.   Second, we know that each bar of soap costs $8.   Therefore, Maria will spend $48 to stock up for the entire year.   The condition that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months is relevant to the calculation process because this condition provided the information needed to calculate the total cost. Without this information, we would not be able to determine how much Maria will spend on soap.\nStep 1: If Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months, then she needs 6 bars of soap for the year (since there are 12 months in a year).   Step 2: Since she spends $8.00 per bar of soap, she will need to spend $48.00 on soap for the year.   So, the answer is: Maria will spend $48.00 on soap for the year if she wants to stock up for the entire year.   Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us to determine the total cost of the soap for the year.\nThe first step is to calculate how many bars of soap Maria needs for a year. Each bar lasts for two months, so she will need 12 bars to last for a year.   The second step is to calculate how much she will spend on soap. Since each bar costs $8.00, she will need to spend $96.00 to stock up for a year.   The condition \"Mary bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Mary bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.3224142789840698]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. The shoe size of Emma is 100000. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. That means if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 5 x 3 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. So Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The shoe size of Emma is 100000 has nothing to do with the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 15 pieces of candy (3 x 5 = 15).  Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she now has 25 pieces of candy in total (15 + 10 = 25).  The shoe size of Emma is 100000, but this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. That means if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 5 x 3 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. So Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The shoe size of Emma is 100000 has nothing to do with the calculation process of the problem.\nIf Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 3 times as much candy which would be 15 pieces.  Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy which brings her total to 25 pieces.  The shoe size of Emma is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.16732418537139893]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Mary is 40 years old. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many hours Jackie spends on work and sleep. 8 hours working + 8 hours sleeping = 16 hours.  Then, we need to subtract the time Jackie spends on work and sleep from 24 hours (the total number of hours in a day). 24 - 16 = 8 hours.  Finally, we need to subtract the time Jackie spends on exercise from the 8 hours. 8 - 3 = 5 hours.  So, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\" because 8 hours of working is one of the three activities Jackie participates in every day, and all of those activities must be accounted for in order to get the total amount of time that Jackie spends in a day. The condition of Mary being 40 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. To calculate the amount of free time Jackie has, we need to subtract the time she spends on work, exercise, and sleep from the total number of hours in a day.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours sleeping in a day. That's a total of 19 hours. So Jackie has 5 hours of free time in a day.   Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\" because 8 hours of working is one of the three activities Jackie participates in every day, and all of those activities must be accounted for in order to get the total amount of time that Jackie spends in a day.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many hours Jackie spends on work and sleep. 8 hours working + 8 hours sleeping = 16 hours.   Then, we need to subtract the time Jackie spends on work and sleep from 24 hours (the total number of hours in a day). 24 - 16 = 8 hours.   Finally, we need to subtract the time Jackie spends on exercise from the 8 hours. 8 - 3 = 5 hours.   So, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.   The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it informs us how much time Jackie spends on exercise and sleep, which is necessary for us to calculate her free time.\nFirst, let's calculate the amount of time Jackie spends per day:   8 hours of work + 3 hours of exercise + 8 hours of sleep = 19 hours per day   Second, let's calculate the amount of free time Jackie has per day:   24 hours (in a day) - 19 hours (time spent) = 5 hours of free time per day   Finally, the condition \"Mary is 40 years old.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 40 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.13738438487052917]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. Ada bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "Maria bought the pencil for $8. Since the pencil cost Maria $8, the pen must cost her half of that, or $4. So, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, for a total of $12 for both. The condition that \"Ada bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Maria bought the pencil for $8 and the pen cost her half of that. To calculate the cost for both items, we need to add the cost of the pencil and the cost of the pen. So the answer would be: $8 + $4 = $12. Therefore, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Maria bought the pencil for $8. Since the pencil cost Maria $8, the pen must cost her half of that, or $4.   So, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, for a total of $12 for both.   This condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the information necessary to determine how much Maria paid for the pen and the pencil.\nFirst, Maria paid $8 for the pencil.  Second, since the pen was half the price of the pencil, Maria paid $4 for the pen.  So, Maria paid $8 for the pencil and $4 for the pen, so she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.  The condition that \"Ada bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.25003641843795776]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. The height of Ada is 3 feet. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much one-eighth of the cake is. 400 grams divided by 8 is equal to 50 grams.   Next, we need to calculate how much Pierre ate. Nathalie ate 50 grams, so Pierre ate double that, which is equal to 100 grams.   Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of the cake. The condition about the cake being split into eight equal parts is relevant to the calculation process, since it helps us to determine the size of each part of the cake. The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, we need to find out how much Nathalie ate, in grams. Since we know the cake is 400 grams and is split into eight equal parts, each part is 400/8 = 50 grams. Since Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, she ate 50 grams.  Next, we need to find out how much Pierre ate. Since he ate double what Nathalie ate, he ate 2 * 50 = 100 grams.   So, Pierre ate 100 grams of the cake. The condition about the cake being split into eight equal parts is relevant to the calculation process, since it helps us to determine the size of each part of the cake. The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much one-eighth of the cake is. 400 grams divided by 8 is equal to 50 grams.   Next, we need to calculate how much Pierre ate. Nathalie ate 50 grams, so Pierre ate double that, which is equal to 100 grams.   Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams.  The condition \"The height of Ada is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.004789997823536396]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. The height of Jack is 500 feet. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to work out how many bars of soap Maria will need for the year. Since the bar of soap lasts her for two months, she will need to buy 6 bars of soap per year.   Then, we need to work out the cost of the soap. Since each bar of soap costs $8.00, she will need to spend $48.00 in total to stock up for the year.   The condition that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months is relevant to the calculation process as it determines the number of bars of soap she needs to buy.   Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 to stock up for the entire year. The condition \"The height of Jack is 500 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process and can be disregarded.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to work out how many bars of soap Maria will need for the year. Since the bar of soap lasts her for two months, she will need to buy 6 bars of soap per year.   Then, we need to work out the cost of the soap. Since each bar of soap costs $8.00, she will need to spend $48.00 in total to stock up for the year.   The condition that Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months is relevant to the calculation process as it determines the number of bars of soap she needs to buy.   Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 to stock up for the entire year.\nMaria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. She buys a large bar of soap that lasts her for 2 months. To stock up for the entire year, Maria needs 12 bars of soap. Therefore, she will spend $8.00 x 12 = $96.00 on soap for the entire year. Therefore, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many bars of soap Maria will need to buy to last her for one year. We know that each bar lasts her for two months, so she will need 12 bars of soap to last her for one year.   Next, we can calculate the total amount of money she will need to spend on soap. We know that each bar of soap costs $8.00, so if she needs to buy 12 bars, then she will need to spend $8.00 x 12 = $96.00.   The condition \"The height of Jack is 500 feet\" is not relevant to the problem and can be disregarded.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 500 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, -0.013753099367022514]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. The shoe size of Ada is 20000. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price:   Original price: $350 Sale price: $140 Difference: $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off:   Divide the difference by the original price:   $210/$350 = 0.6   Multiply by 100 to get the percentage off:   0.6 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the sale price of the item. Without this information, it would be impossible to calculate the percentage off. The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is also relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without knowing the original price of the dress, it would not be possible to calculate the percentage off.   The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price:   Original price: $350 Sale price: $140 Difference: $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off:   Divide the difference by the original price:   $210/$350 = 0.6   Multiply by 100 to get the percentage off:   0.6 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the sale price of the item. Without this information, it would be impossible to calculate the percentage off.\nThe original price of the dress was $350. Asia bought it for $140. To calculate the percentage off, we need to find out how much money was saved.   The amount saved is (350 - 140) = $210.  The percentage off is (210 / 350) x 100 = 60%.  Yes, the condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without knowing the original price of the dress, it would not be possible to calculate the percentage off.   The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to the calculation.\nThe condition \"The shoe size of Ada is 20000.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?\".   To calculate the percentage off, we need to subtract the sale price from the original price and then divide by the original price:  (350 - 140) / 350 = 0.6  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 20000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.1605384349822998]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. Mary bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "We know that there are 20 stanzas in the poem. We also know that each stanza has 10 lines. Each line has 8 words.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is (20 stanzas x 10 lines x 8 words) = 1600 words.  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the total number of stanzas in the poem. The condition of Mary buying 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process, since it has nothing to do with the number of stanzas, lines, or words in the poem. Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "1. We know that there are 20 stanzas in the poem. 2. We also know that each stanza has 10 lines. 3. Each line has 8 words.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is (20 stanzas x 10 lines x 8 words) = 1600 words.   The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the total number of stanzas in the poem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of lines in the poem. Since each stanza has 10 lines, and there are 20 stanzas, the total number of lines is 10 x 20 = 200.  Now, we need to calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since each line has 8 words, and there are 200 lines, the total number of words in the poem is 8 x 200 = 1600.   The condition \"Mary bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since it has nothing to do with the number of stanzas, lines, or words in the poem.", "equation": "Mary bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.10293608158826828]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. Jack bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "Since the pencil cost $8, half of that price would be $4. Therefore, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, so she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil. The condition \"The pencil cost her $8.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate the cost of the pen. The condition of Jack buying 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Maria paid for both the pen and the pencil. The relevant information to answer this question is that Maria bought the pen for half the price of the pencil and the pencil cost her $8. To calculate the cost for both the pen and the pencil, we need to calculate the cost of the pen and then add it to the cost of the pencil. So the answer would be: $8 + ($8/2) = $12. Therefore, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Since the pencil cost $8, half of that price would be $4. Therefore, Maria paid $4 for the pen and $8 for the pencil, so she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate the cost of the pen.\nMaria bought the pencil for $8 and the pen for half the price of the pencil, so she paid $4 for the pen. When added together, Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.  The condition that \"Jack bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Maria paid for both the pen and the pencil.", "equation": "Jack bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.14701412618160248]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. Ada bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli, so she has 8 scoops of ice cream. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?\" because it provides the information needed to solve the problem. The condition of Ada buying 50 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream and Victoria has twice as many scoops of ice cream than Oli. To calculate how many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli, we need to subtract the number of scoops of ice cream Oli has from the number of scoops of ice cream Victoria has. So the answer would be: 8 - 4 = 4. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, so Victoria has twice as many, which is 8 scoops of ice cream. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?\" because it provides the information needed to solve the problem.\nOli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli, so she has 8 scoops of ice cream.  Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  The condition \"Ada bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.2569815516471863]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. The height of Emma is 1000 feet. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, so that's 4 pieces of bread. On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, so that's 2 pieces of bread.  So, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday. The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps determine how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Sunday. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Sunday. The condition \"The height of Emma is 1000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the question. The height of Emma does not affect the number of sandwiches Sally eats or how many pieces of bread each sandwich uses. Therefore, the condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  So, the answer is 6 pieces of bread, as Sally consumes 2 sandwiches on Saturday (4 pieces of bread) and 1 sandwich on Sunday (2 pieces of bread).", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The height of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so it can be disregarded.   The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday.   Therefore, the answer is 6 pieces of bread, as Sally consumes 2 sandwiches on Saturday (4 pieces of bread) and 1 sandwich on Sunday (2 pieces of bread).\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, so that's 4 pieces of bread. On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, so that's 2 pieces of bread.  So, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps determine how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Sunday. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Sunday.\nTo answer the question of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday, we need to know how many sandwiches she eats. We know that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday.  As each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally eats a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition \"The height of Emma is 1000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the question. The height of Emma does not affect the number of sandwiches Sally eats or how many pieces of bread each sandwich uses. Therefore, the condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Emma is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.04471840709447861]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. The shoe size of Mary is 10000. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve had $1600 on her. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Genevieve had. Each kilogram of cherries cost $8. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries cost.  That means Genevieve can buy $1600 / $8 = 200 kilograms of cherries with the money she had.  However, Genevieve was $400 short of the total price. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much additional money Genevieve needed. That means Genevieve could only buy $1600 - $400 = $1200 worth of cherries.  That means Genevieve can buy $1200 / $8 = 150 kilograms of cherries with the money she had and her friend Clarice chipped in.  Yes, the conditions \"Genevieve had $1600 on her\" and \"each kilogram of cherries cost $8\" are relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Mary's shoe size is 10000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. We can calculate", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much money Genevieve had to pay for the cherries. She started with $1600, and was $400 short of the total price, so she had to pay $1200 for the cherries.  Second, we need to figure out how many kilograms of cherries she bought. Since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, we can divide $1200 by $8 to get the number of kilograms - which is 150 kilograms.  So, Genevieve bought 150 kilograms of cherries. The condition that the cherries cost $8 per kilogram is relevant to the calculation process, because it allows us to calculate how much money Genevieve had to pay for the cherries, and how many kilograms of cherries she bought.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the cherries: $8 per kilogram x Kg = Total cost.  So, if Genevieve had $1600, then we can calculate Kg: 1600 / 8 = 200 kg.  Now, we can answer the question: If Genevieve had $1600 on her, she would have bought 200 kg of cherries.  The condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect the total cost of the cherries.\nGenevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram.   Genevieve realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.   If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?   We can calculate this by using the following equation:   (1600 - 400) / 8 = 200 kg   Therefore, Genevieve bought 200 kg of cherries.   The shoe size of Mary is 10000.   This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 10000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.2229902297258377]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. The height of Mary is 50000 feet. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Mary's height is 50000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "Michael currently has 550 chickens. In one year, he increases his number of chickens by 150. So in 9 years, he will increase his number of chickens by 150 nine times.  150 x 9 = 1350  Therefore, Michael will have 1350 + 550 = 1900 chickens after 9 years.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nNumber of chickens on his farm now is 550.  Michael adds 150 chickens every year.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 550 + (9 x 150) = 1,950 chickens.   The condition \"The height of Mary is 50000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 50000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.1442190706729889]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Emma is 4 years old. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, to answer the question we need to calculate how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into 8 equal parts, each part will be 400/8 = 50 grams. That means Nathalie ate 50 grams.  Then, Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 50*2 = 100 grams.  The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gave us the information that each part of the cake is 50 grams, which was necessary for calculating how much Nathalie and Pierre ate. The condition of Emma being 4 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Pierre ate. The answer is Pierre ate 100 grams.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, to answer the question we need to calculate how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into 8 equal parts, each part will be 400/8 = 50 grams. That means Nathalie ate 50 grams.   Then, Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 50*2 = 100 grams.   The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gave us the information that each part of the cake is 50 grams, which was necessary for calculating how much Nathalie and Pierre ate.\nNathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400/8 = 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so Pierre ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.   The condition \"Emma is 4 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma is 4 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.025657175108790398]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. Jack is 100000 years old. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, add up the current sq ft of the master bedroom and bathroom:  309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft   Next, since the new room is twice as large as the bedroom and bathroom combined, we need to multiply the current total:  459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft   Finally, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition of Holden's current master bedroom size is relevant to the calculation process, since it is one of the two factors used in determining the size of the new room. The condition of Jack being 100000 years old is irrelevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "First, add up the current sq ft of the master bedroom and bathroom:  309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft   Next, since the new room is twice as large as the bedroom and bathroom combined, we need to multiply the current total:  459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft   Finally, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition of Holden's current master bedroom size is relevant to the calculation process, since it is one of the two factors used in determining the size of the new room.\nFirst, we need to add the bedroom and bath together to get the total square footage of the space they currently occupy: 309 sq ft (bedroom) + 150 sq ft (bath) = 459 sq ft  Next, we need to calculate how much space twice as large would be: 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new room will be 918 sq ft. The condition of the master bath being 150 sq ft is relevant to the calculation process since we need to include that in the total of the current space.\nThe bedroom is 309 sq ft and the bathroom is 150 sq ft. That means the total sq ft of the two combined is 459 sq ft. Since the new space is twice as large as the bedroom and bathroom, it will be twice 459 sq ft, or 918 sq ft.  So the new room that Holden wants to add will be 918 sq ft.   The condition \"Jack is 100000 years old\" is irrelevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer.", "equation": "Jack is 100000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.10345251113176346]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The height of Ada is 100 feet. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to know the population of both cities. The condition given in the problem states that Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people. Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is: 482,653 + (119,666) = 602,319 people. The condition given in the problem is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. We know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville: 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.  Next, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. To do this, we need to add the population of Springfield (482,653) to the population of Greenville (362,987): 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640. The condition \"The height of Ada is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to know the population of both cities. The condition given in the problem states that Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people.   Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is: 482,653 + (119,666) = 602,319 people.   The condition given in the problem is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. We know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville: 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.  Next, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. To do this, we need to add the population of Springfield (482,653) to the population of Greenville (362,987): 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.  The condition \"The height of Ada is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.09665043652057648]}
{"original_question": "Rose is an aspiring artist. She wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings. Rose already has $7.10. Ada has read 1000 books in the past year. How much more money does Rose need?", "reasoning_path": "Rose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10. This means she needs $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10.  Therefore, Rose needs $18.10 more. The condition of Ada having read 1000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Rose needs. The relevant information to answer this question is that Rose needs a paintbrush for $2.40, a set of paints for $9.20, and an easel for $6.50. So the total cost of everything she wants to buy is $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10.  Since Rose already has $7.10, she needs to find the difference between $18.10 and $7.10, which is $11. Therefore, Rose needs $11 more to purchase the paintbrush, set of paints, and easel.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Rose needs a paintbrush, set of paints, and an easel.  The paintbrush costs $2.40 The set of paints costs $9.20 The easel costs $6.50  Rose has $7.10  Therefore, she needs $8.60 more ($2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 - $7.10).  Yes, the condition \"She wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is one of the items that Rose needs and it is part of the total cost of all the items she needs.\nRose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10. This means she needs $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10.  Therefore, Rose needs $18.10 more. The condition \"a set of paints that costs $9.20\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the total cost of the items Rose needs.\nRose has $7.10 and she wants to buy a paintbrush for $2.40, a set of paints for $9.20, and an easel for $6.50. So the total cost of everything she wants to buy is $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10.  Since Rose already has $7.10, she needs to find the difference between $18.10 and $7.10, which is $11. Therefore, Rose needs $11 more to purchase the paintbrush, set of paints, and easel.  Yes, the condition \"and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is part of the total cost of everything Rose wants to buy.\nRose wants a paintbrush for $2.40, a set of paints for $9.20, and an easel for $6.50. This adds up to a total of $18.10. Since Rose already has $7.10, she needs $11.00 more to buy all three items. The condition of Rose already having $7.10 is relevant to the calculation process, as it reduces the amount she needs to purchase the items.\nRose needs a paintbrush for $2.40, a set of paints for $9.20, and an easel for $6.50. She already has $7.10. So, she needs a total of $8.00 more. So, the answer to the question is Rose needs $8.00 more.  The condition that Ada has read 1000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada has read 1000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4616824686527252, 0.3893391489982605, 0.17714686691761017, 0.24710991978645325, 0.43306344747543335, 0.15000063180923462]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Mary is 3 years old. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 姊 8 = 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, which is 2 鑴 50 = 100 grams.  Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams.  The condition \"Mary is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it has no bearing on the answer.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 姊 8 = 50 grams.   Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, which is 2 鑴 50 = 100 grams.  Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams.  The condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it provides us with the initial amount of the cake (400 grams) and the number of equal parts it was divided into (eight parts).\n1. Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 姊 8 = 50 grams.  2. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2 鑴 50 = 100 grams.  So, in answer to the question, Pierre ate 100 grams.   The condition \"Mary is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it has no bearing on the answer.", "equation": "Mary is 3 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.01515874546021223]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. The height of Jack is 100 feet. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "The condition states that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. That means that Tom picked 24 apples, since twice as many apples as 12 is 24.   So, the total number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom is 12 + 24 = 36 apples.   The condition is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the information necessary in order to calculate the total number of apples collected. The condition of Jack's height being 100 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. To calculate the total number of apples collected, we need to add the number of apples picked by Lexie and the number of apples picked by Tom. So the answer would be: 12 + 24 = 36 apples. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "The condition states that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. That means that Tom picked 24 apples, since twice as many apples as 12 is 24.   So, the total number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom is 12 + 24 = 36 apples.   The condition is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the information necessary in order to calculate the total number of apples collected.\nThe question is asking us to calculate the total number of apples Lexie and Tom collected. We know that Lexie picked 12 apples, and Tom picked twice as many apples. This means that Tom picked 24 apples.  Therefore, the total number of apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether is 12 + 24 = 36 apples.  The condition \"The height of Jack is 100 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.07234014570713043]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Tom has read 200 books in the past year. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now, and Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. That means that in six years, Ellen will be 16 years old. So, Martha is currently 32 years old. The condition of how many books Tom has read is not relevant to calculating Martha's age. The relevant information to answer this question is that Ellen is 10 years old now and Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. To calculate Martha's age now, we need to take the age Ellen will be in six years and multiply it by two. So the answer would be: 16 x 2 = 32. Therefore, Martha is currently 32 years old.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now, and Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years.  That means that in six years, Ellen will be 16 years old.  So, Martha is currently 32 years old.   The condition of how many books Tom has read is not relevant to calculating Martha's age.", "equation": "Tom has read 200 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.040986545383930206]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Emma has read 10000 books in the past year. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank, so she has $40 (160 quarters x $0.25). She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress, so she will have $5 left. This means she will have 20 quarters left (5 x $0.25 = $1.25). So, the answer is Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it is the starting point of the calculation. Without this information, it would not be possible to calculate how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress. The condition of Emma having read 10000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress. The relevant information to answer this question is that Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank and she has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To calculate how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress, we need to subtract the number of quarters needed to pay for the dress from the number of quarters in Libby's piggy bank. So the answer", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank, so she has $40 (160 quarters x $0.25). She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress, so she will have $5 left. This means she will have 20 quarters left (5 x $0.25 = $1.25). So, the answer is Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it is the starting point of the calculation. Without this information, it would not be possible to calculate how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress.\nFirst, Libby has 160 quarters.  Second, Libby has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since there are four quarters in a dollar, she has to pay 140 quarters.  Third, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.  So, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left.  The condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process since it determines how many quarters Libby needs to pay to replace the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters. She needs to pay $35, so she needs to use 140 quarters (140 quarters x 0.25 = $35). After replacing the dress, she will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.   The condition \"Emma has read 10000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma has read 10000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.05841624736785889]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. The height of Mary is 2 feet. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "We need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of Mary's height being 2 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "For the calculation, the condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant, because it tells us that James is taking 20 units per semester. That means he will take 40 units in two semesters.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?\" is $2,000.   Mary's height of 2 feet is not relevant to this calculation.\nThe condition \"The height of Mary is 2 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To calculate how much James pays for two semesters, we need to multiply the number of units he takes (20), by the cost per unit ($50) and then multiply it by the number of semesters (2).  Therefore, the answer is $2000.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 2 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.021773094311356544]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. Tom bought 40000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "We know that there are 20 stanzas in the poem. We know that each stanza has 10 lines. We know that each line has 8 words. Therefore, we need to calculate the total number of words in the poem. The total number of words in the poem is 20 x 10 x 8 = 1600 words. The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides us with the number of stanzas (20) in the poem, which is necessary for us to calculate the total number of words in the poem. The condition of Tom buying 40000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "1. We know that there are 20 stanzas in the poem.  2. We know that each stanza has 10 lines.  3. We know that each line has 8 words.  4. We need to calculate the total number of words in the poem.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 20 x 10 x 8 = 1600 words.  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides us with the number of stanzas (20) in the poem, which is necessary for us to calculate the total number of words in the poem.\nFirst, determine the total number of lines in the poem. There are 20 stanzas with 10 lines each, so that's 20 x 10 = 200 lines.   Next, determine the total number of words in the poem. Each line has 8 words, so that's 8 x 200 = 1600 words.   Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.   The condition given about Tom buying 40000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 40000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.0335451140999794]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. Jack is 1000 years old. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "First, we know James bought 6 t-shirts. Each t-shirt cost $20. Since James got 50% off the total cost, we can calculate the amount he paid like this:   Total cost = 6 x 20 = 120 50% off = 120 x 0.5 = 60  Therefore, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.   The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much discount James received. The condition of Jack being 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James bought 6 t-shirts at 50% off, so the original price of each t-shirt was $40. With the discount, James paid $20 per t-shirt, so he paid a total of $120. Therefore, James paid $120 for the 6 t-shirts.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we know James bought 6 t-shirts. Each t-shirt cost $20. Since James got 50% off the total cost, we can calculate the amount he paid like this:   Total cost = 6 x 20 = 120 50% off = 120 x 0.5 = 60  Therefore, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.   The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much discount James received.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts, and each t-shirt cost $20. He got a 50% discount, meaning he only paid half of the original price. So the total amount he paid was $120 ($20 x 6 = $120). Jack's age is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts at 50% off, so the original price of each t-shirt was $40. With the discount, James paid $20 per t-shirt, so he paid a total of $120. The condition \"Jack is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to this calculation, as it does not affect the price James paid for the t-shirts.", "equation": "Jack is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.15836183726787567]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Jack bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, so she ate 400/8 = 50 grams. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams. The condition that the cake is 400 grams is relevant to the calculation process in that the total amount of cake was known (400 grams) and that was used to calculate how much each person ate. Jack buying 4 tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of the cake.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, so she ate 400/8 = 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.   The condition that the cake is 400 grams is relevant to the calculation process in that the total amount of cake was known (400 grams) and that was used to calculate how much each person ate.   Jack buying 4 tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, let's calculate how much Nathalie ate. One-eighth of the cake is 400 divided by 8, which equals 50 grams.  Now we can calculate how much Pierre ate. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 100 grams (50 x 2).  The condition \"Jack bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.22109732031822205]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The shoe size of Tom is 100000. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "In Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. This condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it provides us with the necessary information to solve the equation. We also know that the posted speed limit is 50 mph. Therefore, Jed must have been traveling at a speed greater than 50 mph to be fined. To calculate the exact speed, we can use the following equation:  Fine = Speed - Speed Limit x $16  Therefore, the speed Jed was traveling at is:   Speed = (Fine / $16) + Speed Limit  = ($256 / $16) + 50 mph  = 16 + 50 mph  = 66 mph   The shoe size of Tom is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "We know that Jed was fined for 256 dollars for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. We also know that in Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.   Therefore, we can calculate the speed at which Jed was fined for by solving the equation:  256 = 16x, where x is the number of miles per hour over the posted speed limit.   Solving this equation, we get: x = 16.   Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).   Yes, condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?\" since it provides the information needed to calculate the speed of which Jed was fined for.\nIn Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. Also, the posted speed limit is 50 mph. Therefore, Jed must have been traveling at a speed greater than 50 mph to be fined.   To calculate the exact speed, we can use the following equation:  Fine = Speed - Speed Limit x $16  Therefore, the speed Jed was traveling at is:   Speed = (Fine / $16) + Speed Limit  = ($256 / $16) + 50 mph  = 16 + 50 mph  = 66 mph   The condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides us with the necessary information to solve the equation.   The shoe size of Tom is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is going over the posted speed limit.   Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  To calculate the speed Jed was going, we need to subtract the posted speed limit from the total fine divided by the fine per mile per hour.   $256 / $16 = 16 mph   Jed was traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).   The shoe size of Tom is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.19233489036560059]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. The shoe size of Mary is 200. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than that, so she made 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to this calculation process, because it tells us that Kendra made 4 more buttons than five times as many as Mari (5 x 8 = 40).  The answer is that Sue made 22 buttons. The condition of Mary's shoe size being 200 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Mari made 8 buttons and Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. To calculate how many buttons Sue made, we need to calculate how many buttons Kendra made and then divide it by 2.  So the answer would be: (5 x 8 + 4)/2 = 22. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than that, so she made 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to this calculation process, because it tells us that Kendra made 4 more buttons than five times as many as Mari (5 x 8 = 40).  The answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.  This means Kendra made 5 x 8 + 4 = 44 buttons.   Sue made half as many as Kendra.  This means Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons.   So the answer is Sue made 22 buttons.   The condition that Mari made 8 buttons is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times that, so 4 + 5*8 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so 22 buttons. So the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"The shoe size of Mary is 200\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 200.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.18221621215343475]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. The shoe size of Tom is 10000. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of stars Luke needs to make. We know that 85 stars are required to fill one glass jar, and Luke needs to fill 4 bottles. So, the total number of stars Luke needs to make = 85 x 4 = 340 stars. Second, we need to calculate the number of stars Luke has already made. From the given information, we know that Luke has already made 33 stars. Third, we need to calculate the number of stars Luke still needs to make. To do this, we can subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars he needs to make (340 stars). This gives us the answer: Luke needs to make 307 more stars. The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it tells us how many stars Luke needs to make. The shoe size of Tom is 10000. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, the condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the problem, because it tells us how many stars Luke needs to make.   Second, we know that Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars to fill the 4 bottles.   Therefore, the answer to the problem is that Luke must make 52 more stars.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of stars Luke needs to make. We know that 85 stars are required to fill one glass jar, and Luke needs to fill 4 bottles. So, the total number of stars Luke needs to make = 85 x 4 = 340 stars.   Second, we need to calculate the number of stars Luke has already made. From the given information, we know that Luke has already made 33 stars.   Third, we need to calculate the number of stars Luke still needs to make. To do this, we can subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars he needs to make (340 stars). This gives us the answer: Luke needs to make 307 more stars.  The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it is used to calculate the number of stars Luke still needs to make. The shoe size of Tom is not relevant to this problem.\nThe first step is to calculate how many stars are needed to fill one bottle. We know that 85 stars are needed to fill a glass jar, so we can divide 85 by 4 to find that 21 stars are needed to fill one bottle.   The second step is to calculate how many stars Luke has already made. We know that he has made 33 stars.   The third step is to calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make. We can subtract 33 from 21 to find that Luke needs to make 8 more stars.  The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that Luke needs to make enough stars to fill four bottles, not just one. Without this information, we would not know how many stars Luke needs to make in total.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill all 4 bottles with the given information. So, 85 stars per bottle * 4 bottles = 340 stars.   Second, we need to subtract the stars Luke already made from the total number of stars required for the 4 bottles. So, 340 stars - 33 stars = 307 stars.   Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles.   The shoe size of Tom is 10000. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 10000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.22339193522930145]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Jack bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The width of the rectangle is 7 inches. The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" tells us that the length of the rectangle is 4 times the width, so the length is 28 inches. The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the width by the length, so the area of the rectangle is 7 inches multiplied by 28 inches, which equals 196 square inches. The condition that Jack bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the area of the rectangle. The relevant information to answer this question is that the width of the rectangle is 7 inches and the length of the rectangle is 4 times the width. To calculate the area of the rectangle, we need to multiply the width by the length. So the answer would be: 7 x 28 = 196 square inches. Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 196 square inches.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The condition states that the rectangle is 7 inches wide. To calculate the area, we need to know the length of the rectangle. Since it is four times as long as it is wide, we can calculate that the length of the rectangle is 28 inches.  Now that we know the width and length of the rectangle, we can calculate the area. The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the width by the length. In this case, the area of the rectangle is 7 inches multiplied by 28 inches, which equals 196 square inches.  The condition that Jack bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the area of the rectangle.\nThe width of the rectangle is 7 inches.  The length of the rectangle is 4 times the width, so the length is 28 inches.  The area of the rectangle is the length multiplied by the width, so the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 square inches.  The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that the length of the rectangle is 4 times the width. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the area correctly.  The number of tomatoes purchased (50000) is not relevant to the calculation process of the area of the rectangle.\nThe area of a rectangle can be calculated by multiplying the length and width of the rectangle. The width of the rectangle is 7 inches and the length is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches squared.   The condition of Jack buying 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the area of the rectangle.", "equation": "Jack bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.015104008838534355]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Emma bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, calculate the number of crates that Lizzy needs to ship the 540 pounds of fish: 540 / 30 = 18 crates.   Second, calculate the cost of the shipment: 18 crates * $1.5 = $27.   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   Yes, the condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us the amount of fish that needs to be shipped and the size of the crates that are used for the shipment. The condition of Emma buying 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Lizzy pays for the shipment. The relevant information to answer this question is that the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5 and the amount of fish and size of the crates that need to be shipped. To calculate the cost for the shipment, we need to multiply the cost of one crate by the number of crates needed. So the answer would be: 18 crates x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, calculate the number of crates that Lizzy needs to ship the 540 pounds of fish: 540 / 30 = 18 crates.   Second, calculate the cost of the shipment: 18 crates * $1.5 = $27.   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   Yes, the condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us the amount of fish that needs to be shipped and the size of the crates that are used for the shipment.\nStep 1: Lizzy must ship 540 pounds of fish, which are packed into 30-pound crates. This means that Lizzy must ship 18 crates of fish (540/30 = 18).  Step 2: The shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. Therefore, the total cost for the shipment is 18 x $1.5 = $27.  Step 3: Emma's purchase of 10000 tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  Therefore, the answer is Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.", "equation": "Emma bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.19892947375774384]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Mary bought 6000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, so the total number of sweets is:  Total number of sweets = 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024  Next, we need to divide this number by 4, because there are 4 people: Jennifer and her 3 friends.   Number of sweets for each person = 1024/4 = 256  So, Jennifer and her 3 friends will get 256 sweets each.   The given condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us that Jennifer is sharing her sweets between herself and 3 friends. Without this condition, we would not know how many people the sweets are being shared between and so we would not know how to calculate the number of sweets each person would get.  Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 154 green sweets, 207 blue sweets and 253 yellow sweets. The condition of Mary buying 6000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, so the total number of sweets is:  Total number of sweets = 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024  Next, we need to divide this number by 4, because there are 4 people: Jennifer and her 3 friends.   Number of sweets for each person = 1024/4 = 256  So, Jennifer and her 3 friends will get 256 sweets each.   The given condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us that Jennifer is sharing her sweets between herself and 3 friends. Without this condition, we would not know how many people the sweets are being shared between and so we would not know how to calculate the number of sweets each person would get.\nIn order to answer the question, \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\", we need to know how many sweets she has in total. We also need to know how many friends she has. We can then divide the total number of sweets by the number of friends to get the answer.  So, yes, the condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We need to know how many green sweets she has in order to determine the total number of sweets she has. Without that information, we would not be able to answer the question.\n1. Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets.  2. To calculate how many sweets each person will get, we can add up all the sweets and divide by 4 (for Jennifer and her 3 friends). 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024, divided by 4 = 256.  3. Mary bought 6000 tomatoes from the grocery store. This is not relevant to the calculation process.   Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets.\nTo calculate how many sweets each person will get, we will need to divide the total number of sweets by the number of people. Therefore, the condition \"Mary bought 6000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to this calculation process.  Therefore, the answer is Jennifer and her friends will each get 154 green sweets, 207 blue sweets and 253 yellow sweets.", "equation": "Mary bought 6000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.15701831877231598]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Ada bought 400 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 5 times as many decorated buttons as Mari. That's 5 times 8 plus 4, which is 44. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so that's 22 buttons. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many did Sue make?\" is 22 buttons. The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process in this problem, because it is used to determine how many buttons Kendra made, which in turn is used to calculate how many buttons Sue made. The condition of Ada buying 400 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 5 times as many as Mari. That's 5 times 8 plus 4, which is 44. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so that's 22 buttons.   The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process in this problem, because it is used to determine how many buttons Kendra made, which in turn is used to calculate how many buttons Sue made.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. This means that Kendra made 4 + (5*8) = 44 buttons.  Sue made half as many as Kendra. This means that Sue made half of 44, which is 22 buttons.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many did Sue make?\" is 22 buttons.  The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the number of buttons Mari made is used to determine how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 5 times as many decorated buttons as Mari, so she made 4 + (5 x 8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44/2 = 22 buttons.  Therefore, the answer is 22 buttons. The condition about Ada buying 400 tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 400 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.2771012485027313]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. The height of Ada is 3 feet. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024. Since Jennifer has to share the sweets with 3 friends, each person will get 1024 / 4 = 256 sweets. The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not affect the number of sweets that each person will get. The only thing that affects the number of sweets each person will get is the total number of sweets Jennifer has. The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many of one type of sweet Jennifer has. Without this information, we wouldn't be able to determine how many sweets each person will get.  To calculate how many sweets each person will get, we need to divide the total number of sweets (212 + 310 + 502 = 1024) by 4, since there are 4 people. That means each person will get 256 sweets. The condition \"The height of Ada is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024. Since Jennifer has to share the sweets with 3 friends, each person will get 1024 / 4 = 256 sweets.  The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not affect the number of sweets that each person will get. The only thing that affects the number of sweets each person will get is the total number of sweets Jennifer has.\nThe condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many of one type of sweet Jennifer has. Without this information, we wouldn't be able to determine how many sweets each person will get.  To calculate how many sweets each person will get, we need to divide the total number of sweets (212 + 310 + 502 = 1024) by 4, since there are 4 people. That means each person will get 256 sweets.   The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation of how many sweets each person will get, since it does not affect the total number of sweets. However, it is relevant to the calculation of how many of each type of sweet each person will get. For example, Jennifer and her friends will get 53 green sweets each (212 姊 4 = 53).   The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets, and 502 yellow sweets. So, she has a total of 1,024 sweets. Since she is going to share these sweets with her 3 friends, each person will get 1,024/4 = 256 sweets. The condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has. This can be done by adding the number of green sweets, blue sweets and yellow sweets she has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.  Now, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4, as there are 4 people in total (Jennifer and her 3 friends). 1024 / 4 = 256.  Therefore, each person will get 256 sweets each.  The condition \"The height of Ada is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, -0.01962137408554554]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Ada is 100000 years old. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Genevieve paid for each kilogram of cherries.  She realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Genevieve had to pay for the cherries.  If Genevieve had $1600 on her, then the total amount she had to pay for the cherries was $1600 - $400 = $1200.  That means Genevieve bought $1200 worth of cherries.  The cost of each kilogram of cherries is $8.  To calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought, we need to divide the total amount she paid for the cherries ($1200) by the cost of each kilogram of cherries ($8).  So the answer is that Genevieve bought 150 kilograms of cherries (1200 / 8 = 150).  Yes, the conditions that Genevieve was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in and that Genevieve had $1600 on her are relevant to the", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total cost of the cherries. Genevieve picked some cherries that cost $8 per kilogram, so the total cost is $8 x kilograms.  Next, we need to subtract the $400 that Clarice chipped in. The remaining amount is $1600, which is the amount Genevieve had on her.  Finally, we can use the total cost formula to calculate the number of kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. $8 x kilograms = $1600, so the number of kilograms is 200.  Yes, the condition \"Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?\". This is because the cost of the cherries is necessary in order to calculate the total cost and thus the number of kilograms.\nGenevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram.   If Genevieve had $1600 on her, she could buy 200 kilograms of cherries (1600/8 = 200).   However, when she reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.  Therefore, Genevieve was able to buy 200 kilograms of cherries with her $1600 and Clarice's contribution of $400.   Yes, the condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it allowed Genevieve to buy the 200 kilograms of cherries that she would have been unable to purchase with her $1600 alone.\nGenevieve picked some cherries that cost $8 per kilogram.  If she had $1600 on her, that means she could buy (1600 / 8) = 200 kilograms of cherries.  So, Genevieve bought 200 kilograms of cherries.  The condition \"Ada is 100000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada is 100000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.06544806808233261]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "If Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work that means she was the lead actress in 80 out of the 100 plays. This leaves us with 20 plays in which Megan was not the lead actress. The condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The answer is 20 times Megan was not the lead actress. The condition \"Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work and participated in 100 plays. To calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress, we need to subtract the number of plays she was the lead actress in from the total number of plays she participated in. So the answer would be: 100 - 80 = 20. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress 20 times.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "If Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work that means she was the lead actress in 80 out of the 100 plays. This leaves us with 20 plays in which Megan was not the lead actress. The condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The answer is 20 times Megan was not the lead actress.\nSince Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, this means that she was not the lead actress in 20% of her work. This also means that she was not the lead actress in 20 of the 100 plays she participated in. Therefore, the answer is 20. The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process as it indicates the total number of plays Megan participated in, which is needed for the calculation.\nMegan participated in 100 plays. 80% of those plays were ones in which she was the lead actress. That means that 80 plays had Megan as the lead actress.  Therefore, 100 - 80 = 20 plays had Megan as not the lead actress.  The condition \"Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.05109984427690506]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The height of Tom is 5000 feet. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the amount of money that James has to pay for the visit.  Step 2: James's insurance covers 80% of the cost. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much of the cost James is responsible for.   Step 3: Calculate the cost that James has to pay out of pocket by subtracting the amount his insurance covers from the total cost of the visit.  Step 4: James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60 ($300 - $240).  The condition of Tom being 5000 feet tall is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and his insurance covers 80%. To calculate the cost that James has to pay out of pocket, we need to subtract the amount his insurance covers from the total cost of the visit. So the answer would be: $300 - $240 = $60. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.   Step 2: James's insurance covers 80% of the cost.   Step 3: Calculate the cost that James has to pay out of pocket by subtracting the amount his insurance covers from the total cost of the visit.   Step 4: James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60 ($300 - $240).   The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?\" because it tells us the amount of money that James has to pay for the visit. Without knowing how much the doctor's visit costs, it would be impossible to calculate how much money James has to pay out of pocket.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the doctor's visit. Since the doctor charges $300 for the visit, the total cost is $300.  Next, we need to calculate James's out-of-pocket cost. Since his insurance covers 80% of the cost, James is responsible for the remaining 20%. Therefore, his out-of-pocket cost is $60.  The condition of \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much of the cost James is responsible for. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate James's out-of-pocket cost.  The height of Tom is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not give us any information about the cost of the doctor's visit or the amount of coverage from James's insurance.\nThe primary care doctor charged $300 for the visit. James's insurance covers 80%, so that means James will need to pay for 20% of the total cost. 20% of $300 is $60, so James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The height of Tom is 5000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 5000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.013021120801568031]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The shoe size of Mary is 100. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: We need to figure out how many people are in Greenville.  Step 2: We know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. So we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987 people.  Step 3: To get the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to add the population of Springfield (482,653 people) and the population of Greenville (362,987 people).  Step 4: So the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people.  The condition that \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides us with the information we need to calculate the populations of Springfield and Greenville. The shoe size of Mary is 100. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so it can be ignored.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "Step 1: We need to figure out how many people are in Greenville.  Step 2: We know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. So we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987 people.  Step 3: To get the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to add the population of Springfield (482,653 people) and the population of Greenville (362,987 people).  Step 4: So the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people.  The condition that \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides us with the information we need to calculate the populations of Springfield and Greenville.\nFirst, let's calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987.  Next, let's add the population of Springfield and Greenville together to get the total population of Springfield and Greenville. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.  The shoe size of Mary is 100. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so it can be ignored.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.07195587456226349]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. The height of Jack is 600 feet. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "We have 30 minutes to get to school. That means we have 15 minutes to get to the school gate. It takes us 6 minutes to get from the school gate to the school building, so we have 9 minutes left. We have 9 minutes to get to our room without being late. The condition \"The height of Jack is 600 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that it takes us 15 minutes to get to the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. To calculate how much time we have left to get to our room, we need to subtract the time it takes us to get to the school gate and the school building from the total time we have to get to school. So the answer would be: 30 - 15 - 6 = 9. Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "We have 30 minutes to get to school without being late. That means we have 24 minutes left to get to our room. It takes us 15 minutes to get to the school gate, and 6 minutes to get to the school building, so we have 3 minutes left to get to our room. Therefore, we have 3 minutes to get to our room without being late.   The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine how much time we have left to get to our room.\nFirst, you have 30 minutes to get to school. That means you have 15 minutes to get to the school gate.  Second, it takes you 6 minutes to get from the school gate to the school building. So that leaves you with 9 minutes to get to your room.  So, you have 9 minutes to get to your room without being late.  The condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building.\" is relevant to this calculation process, as it tells you how much time it takes to get from the school gate to the school building.\nFirst, we need to figure out how much time we have left after arriving at the school gate. We know that it takes us 15 minutes to get to the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building, so we have 9 minutes left.  Second, we need to figure out how much time it takes us to get to our room. This depends on the size of the school and the location of our room, so it's difficult to give an exact answer. However, we can assume that it takes us about 3 minutes to get to our room, so we have 6 minutes left.  Finally, we can conclude that we have 6 minutes left to get to our room, without being late.   The condition \"The height of Jack is 600 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 600 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, -0.009165717288851738]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Mary bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the difference in age between Claire and Jessica. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how old Claire will be in two years. Therefore, if Claire is 18 years old now, then Jessica would be 24 years old. The condition of Mary buying 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how old Jessica is now. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jessica is six years older than Claire and in two years, Claire will be 20 years old. To calculate Jessica's current age, we need to subtract 6 years from the age Claire will be in two years. So the answer would be: 20 - 6 = 24. Therefore, Jessica is currently 24 years old.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "If Claire is 18 years old now, then Jessica would be 24 years old.   The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that Claire is 18 years old now. Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old.\nClaire is currently 18 years old. If Claire is 20 years old in two years, that means Jessica is currently 22 years old. The condition \"Mary bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.07540902495384216]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Mary is 3 years old. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan participated in 100 plays, and she was the lead actress in 80% of them. Now, we can calculate how many plays Megan was the lead actress in: 80% of 100 plays is 80 plays. Next, we can subtract 80 from 100 to find out how many plays Megan was not the lead actress in: 100 - 80 = 20.  So, the answer to the question is that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many plays Megan was the lead actress in. The condition \"Mary is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "First, let's look at the given information: Megan participated in 100 plays, and she was the lead actress in 80% of them.  Now, we can calculate how many plays Megan was the lead actress in: 80% of 100 plays is 80 plays.  Next, we can subtract 80 from 100 to find out how many plays Megan was not the lead actress in: 100 - 80 = 20.  So, the answer to the question is that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many plays Megan was the lead actress in.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many times Megan was the lead actress in her work. Based on the given information, Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her 100 plays. So, 80% of 100 is 80. That means Megan was the lead actress in 80 of her plays.   Now, we need to figure out how many times Megan was not the lead actress. Since Megan participated in 100 plays in total, and she was the lead actress in 80 of them, the remaining 20 plays were not the lead actress. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 of her plays.   So, the answer to the question is 20.   Yes, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" as we need to know the total number of plays Megan participated in to calculate the number of times she was not the lead actress.\nThe first part of the question tells us that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was not the lead actress in 20% of her work. 100 plays x 0.20 = 20 times. The condition \"Mary is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 3 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.11568664014339447]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. The height of Jack is 3 feet. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper is used for wrapping one box. Since Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, we can say that one gift box requires 18 inches of gift wrapper. Second, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund has per day. Since Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, we can say that he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. Third, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. Since one gift box requires 18 inches of gift wrapper, we can say that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. Finally, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. Since Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, we can say that Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days. Therefore, the answer is 15 gift boxes. The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides us with the information we need to calculate the answer. The height of Jack is 3 feet is not relevant to this calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper is used for wrapping one box.   Since Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, we can say that one gift box requires 18 inches of gift wrapper.   Second, we need to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund has per day.   Since Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, we can say that he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.   Third, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.   Since one gift box requires 18 inches of gift wrapper, we can say that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.   Finally, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days.   Since Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, we can say that Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   Therefore, the answer is 15 gift boxes.   The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides us with the information we need to calculate the answer.\nFirst, calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap per day given the amount of gift wrapper he has. Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. He needs 18 inches per gift box, so 90 inches of gift wrapper divided by 18 inches will give Edmund the number of gift boxes he can wrap per day, which is 5.   Second, calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. Every 3 days, Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes multiplied by 3, which is 15 gift boxes.   Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. The height of Jack is 3 feet is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.13579711318016052]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The shoe size of Mary is 2. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "The total square footage of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft (309 + 150). To calculate how much sq ft the new room will have, we need to multiply 459 by 2, which gives us 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft. The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process as it helps us to determine the total square footage of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom. The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is also relevant to the calculation process since it is necessary to include the area of the bathroom in order to get the total area of the two rooms. The condition \"The shoe size of Mary is 2.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "The total square footage of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft (309 + 150). To calculate how much sq ft the new room will have, we need to multiply 459 by 2, which gives us 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process as it helps us to determine the total square footage of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom.\nThe bedroom is 309 sq ft and the bathroom is 150 sq ft. To get the total area of the two rooms, we need to add them together. 309 + 150 = 459 sq ft.   Now, we need to double the area to get the size of the new room. 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft.   Therefore, the new room would have a total area of 918 sq ft.   The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is necessary to include the area of the bathroom in order to get the total area of the two rooms.\nThe current total sq ft of Holden's bedroom and bathroom is 309 + 150 = 459 sq ft.  If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, this new room will have twice the size, which is 2 x 459 = 918 sq ft.  The condition \"The shoe size of Mary is 2.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 2.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.13239601254463196]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. The shoe size of Jack is 100. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now.  We know that Ellen will be twice as old as Martha in 6 years.  We can calculate the age of Ellen in 6 years by adding 6 to her current age of 10, which is 16.  We also know that Martha is twice as old as Ellen in 6 years.  We can calculate the age of Martha in 6 years by multiplying 16 by 2, which is 32.  We can calculate Martha's age now by subtracting 6 from 32, which is 26.   Yes, the condition \"twice as old as Ellen will be in six years\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Jack's shoe size is 100 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate Martha's age now. We can calculate this by subtracting 6 from the age of Martha in 6 years. So the answer is 26.", "numerical_answer": 26, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "We are given that Ellen is 10 years old now and Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years.   Therefore, when Ellen is 16 years old, Martha will be 32 years old.   Since Ellen is 10 years old now, Martha must be 28 years old now.  The shoe size of Jack is 100 is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.03710546717047691]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. The height of Tom is 100000 feet. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of Tom's height being 100000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester. Since each unit costs $50, James pays $50 x 20 = $1000 for 1 semester. For 2 semesters, he pays $1000 x 2 = $2000. The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us the number of units James takes per semester.\nThe first step is to calculate how much James pays for one semester. Since James takes 20 units per semester, and each unit costs $50, James pays $50 x 20 = $1000 for one semester.   The second step is to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. Since James pays $1000 for one semester, James pays $1000 x 2 = $2000 for two semesters.   The condition \"The height of Tom is 100000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 100000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.03505892679095268]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Ada has read 50000 books in the past year. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. So, if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.   Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.   The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine the initial number of candy pieces Mary has.   The sentence \"Ada has read 50000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Megan has 5 pieces of candy, so Mary has 3*5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so in total she has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. The condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps to determine the total number of pieces of candy that Mary has.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, we know that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. So, if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.   Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.   The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine the initial number of candy pieces Mary has.   The sentence \"Ada has read 50000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nMegan has 5 pieces of candy, so Mary has 3*5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she has a total of 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. The condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps to determine the total number of pieces of candy that Mary has.\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so in total she has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  The condition that Ada has read 50000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada has read 50000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.24874448776245117]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Ada bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to add up all the weights. We can do this by adding 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  The second step is to divide the sum of the weights by the number of cats (4). 48 divided by 4 equals 12.  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because it tells us how many cats there are, which is necessary for us to calculate the average weight. The condition of Ada buying 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\" since the average is calculated by adding all four cats together and then dividing the total by the number of cats.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The first step is to add up all the weights. We can do this by adding 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  The second step is to divide the sum of the weights by the number of cats (4). 48 divided by 4 equals 12.  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because it tells us how many cats there are, which is necessary for us to calculate the average weight.\nWe need to calculate the average of Janele's cats' weights. To do so, we need to add the weights of all 4 cats together and then divide the sum by 4 (the number of cats). Therefore, the condition \"the first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process.  The total weight of all 4 cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. The average weight of Janele's cats is 48 divided by 4, which is 12 pounds.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is calculated by adding the weight of all four cats together and then dividing the total by the number of cats.  Total weight = 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  Average weight = 48 / 4 = 12  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  No, the condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds,\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\" since the average is calculated by adding all four cats together and then dividing the total by the number of cats.\nJanele has 4 cats. The first two weigh 12 pounds each and the third weighs 14.7 pounds. To calculate the average weight, we add up all the weights and divide by the number of cats. So, we have 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then, we divide by 4, which gives us an average of 12 pounds.  The fourth cat's weight of 9.3 pounds is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the weights that is being added up and averaged. Without it, the answer would be different.\nFirst we need to calculate the total weight of all four cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then to calculate the average, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats (4 in this case). 48 / 4 = 12 pounds. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"Ada bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.1662929505109787]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Mary is 1000 years old. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the TV show was aired for.   There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many commercials there were and how long each commercial lasted.   The total time for commercials was 3 commercials x 10 minutes = 30 minutes.   The time for the TV show itself (not counting commercials) was 1.5 hours - 0.5 hours (30 minutes) = 1 hour.   Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   The condition that Mary is 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   To answer the question, we need to calculate how long (in hours) the TV show itself was, not counting commercials. We can calculate this by subtracting the total time for commercials from the total time the TV show was aired for. So the answer is 1 hour.", "numerical_answer": 1, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "First, we need to subtract the time spent on commercials from the total show time of 1.5 hours. Each commercial lasted 10 minutes, so there were 30 minutes of commercials.  1.5 hours (total show time) - 30 minutes (commercials) = 1.2 hours (show time without commercials)  So, the answer is 1.2 hours. The condition \"Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the total show time, which we need to subtract the commercial time from.\n1.5 hours is the total time of the TV show, including commercials.  2. We have to subtract the time spent on commercials, which is 30 minutes (3 commercials x 10 minutes each).  3. So the TV show itself, not counting commercials, lasted 1.2 hours (1.5 hours - 30 minutes).\nThe total time of the show plus commercials was 1.5 hours.  The commercials lasted a total of 30 minutes.  Therefore, the show itself was 1.5 - 0.5 = 1 hour long.   The condition \"Mary is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not provide any information that would help to answer the question.", "equation": "Mary is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, -0.08887466788291931]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Tom bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "First, to calculate the number of tiles in the shower, we need to multiply the number of tiles running the width of the wall by the number of tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, the number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 or 160 tiles.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it is necessary to know the number of tiles running the height of the wall in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.   Therefore, the condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\". The second step is to multiply the number of tiles in each wall by the number of walls in the shower. Since the shower is three sided, we can multiply 160 by 3 to determine that there are 480 tiles in the shower. The condition of Tom buying 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. This condition has nothing to do with calculating how many tiles are in the shower, so it is not necessary to include it in the calculation process. Therefore, the answer is: There are 480 tiles in the shower.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "For the first part of the question: How many tiles are in the shower?  The answer is: 3 x 8 x 20 = 480 tiles.  For the second part of the question: Is condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall,\" relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\" The answer is: Yes, as this condition is relevant to the calculation process since it provides the number of tiles running across each wall. The total number of tiles in the shower is determined by multiplying the number of tiles running across each wall by the number of walls and by the number of tiles running up and down each wall.\nFirst, to calculate the number of tiles in the shower, we need to multiply the number of tiles running the width of the wall by the number of tiles running the height of the wall.   Therefore, the number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 or 160 tiles.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it is necessary to know the number of tiles running the height of the wall in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.   Therefore, the condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\".\nThe first step is to calculate how many tiles are in each wall. Since each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height, we can use multiplication to determine that each wall has 160 tiles.   The second step is to multiply the number of tiles in each wall by the number of walls in the shower. Since the shower is three sided, we can multiply 160 by 3 to determine that there are 480 tiles in the shower.   The condition \"Tom bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. This condition has nothing to do with calculating how many tiles are in the shower, so it is not necessary to include it in the calculation process.", "equation": "Tom bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.10974493622779846]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Ada has read 10000 books in the past year. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many balls Julia bought in each color. For that, we need to know how many packs of each color she bought. We know from the question that Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. We can use this information to calculate how many balls of each color she bought:  Red balls: 3 packs x 19 balls per pack = 57 balls Yellow balls: 10 packs x 19 balls per pack = 190 balls Green balls: 8 packs x 19 balls per pack = 152 balls  Now that we know how many balls of each color Julia bought, we can add them together to get the total number of balls Julia bought in all: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  Yes, the condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" Without this information, we wouldn't be able to calculate the number of red balls Julia bought, and therefore would not be able to calculate the total number of balls she bought. The condition of Ada having read 10000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of how many balls did Julie buy in all.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many balls Julia bought in each color. For that, we need to know how many packs of each color she bought. We know from the question that Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. We can use this information to calculate how many balls of each color she bought:  Red balls: 3 packs x 19 balls per pack = 57 balls Yellow balls: 10 packs x 19 balls per pack = 190 balls Green balls: 8 packs x 19 balls per pack = 152 balls  Now that we know how many balls of each color Julia bought, we can add them together to get the total number of balls Julia bought in all: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  Yes, the condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" Without this information, we wouldn't be able to calculate the number of red balls Julia bought, and therefore would not be able to calculate the total number of balls she bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package.  So, Julie bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Therefore, Julie bought a total of 399 balls.  The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is relevant to the calculation, as it was used to determine the number of yellow balls that Julie bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. This means she bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Each pack contains 19 balls.  Therefore, Julie bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Therefore, Julie bought a total of 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many green balls Julie bought. Without this condition, we would not know how many green balls Julie bought, and thus would not be able to calculate the total number of balls she bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls.  This means that she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Adding these together gives us a total of 399 balls.  Yes, the condition that there were 19 balls in each package is relevant to the calculation process, as it enables us to calculate the total number of balls that Julie bought.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package.  Therefore, Julia bought 57 red balls (3 x 19), 190 yellow balls (10 x 19), and 152 green balls (8 x 19). In total, she bought 399 balls.  The condition that \"Ada has read 10000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how many balls did Julie buy in all.", "equation": "Ada has read 10000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315248966217041, 0.4110040068626404, 0.4391424357891083, 0.48471662402153015, 0.14829862117767334]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. John is 40 years old. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the total amount of time that Jackie spends per day:  Total time = 8 hours (working) + 3 hours (exercise) + 8 hours (sleep) = 19 hours   Step 2: Subtract the total time from 24 hours (which is the total amount of time in a day):  Free time = 24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours   Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\", as it is one of the activities that Jackie does, and it takes up 8 hours of her day. The condition of John being 40 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "1. Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. 2. This means that Jackie has 8 + 3 + 8 = 19 hours of activities. 3. Since John is 40 years old, we can assume that he has 24 hours in a day. 4. Thus, Jackie has 24 - 19 = 5 hours of free time per day.  Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\", as it is one of the activities that Jackie does, and it takes up 8 hours of her day.\nStep 1: Calculate the total amount of time that Jackie spends per day:  Total time = 8 hours (working) + 3 hours (exercise) + 8 hours (sleep) = 19 hours  Step 2: Subtract the total time from 24 hours (which is the total amount of time in a day):  Free time = 24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours  Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.  The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is part of the total amount of time that Jackie spends each day.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours exercising, and 8 hours sleeping. This adds up to 19 hours. That leaves 5 hours of free time per day. The condition of John being 40 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "John is 40 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.2131630778312683]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. The height of Emma is 2 feet. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes can be wrapped with 90 inches of gift wrapper in a single day. We know that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, so we can divide the 90 inches of gift wrapper by 18 inches to get the number of gift boxes that can be wrapped in a single day. 90 inches / 18 inches = 5 gift boxes  So, Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper in a single day.  Now, to answer the question \"How many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?\", we need to multiply the number of gift boxes that can be wrapped in a single day (5) by the number of days (3).  5 gift boxes x 3 days = 15 gift boxes  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it provides us with the necessary information to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with a given amount of gift wrapper. Without this condition, we would not know how much gift wrapper Edmund needs for each gift box,", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes can be wrapped with 90 inches of gift wrapper in a single day. We know that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, so we can divide the 90 inches of gift wrapper by 18 inches to get the number of gift boxes that can be wrapped in a single day.  90 inches / 18 inches = 5 gift boxes  So, Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper in a single day.  Now, to answer the question \"How many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?\", we need to multiply the number of gift boxes that can be wrapped in a single day (5) by the number of days (3).  5 gift boxes x 3 days = 15 gift boxes  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it provides us with the necessary information to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with a given amount of gift wrapper. Without this condition, we would not know how much gift wrapper Edmund needs for each gift box, and thus would not be able to answer the question.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many inches are in 3 days:  90 inches/day 鑴 3 days = 270 inches   Next, we need to calculate how many gift boxes can be wrapped with 270 inches:  270 inches/18 inches = 15 gift boxes   So, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   The condition \"The height of Emma is 2 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Emma is 2 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.05088043957948685]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. The height of Tom is 2000 feet. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The show was aired for 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the show was aired for. There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long each commercial was. That means the total time of the commercials is 3 × 10 minutes = 30 minutes. To calculate how long (in hours) the TV show itself was, not counting commercials, we need to subtract the total time of the commercials (30 minutes) from the total time the show was aired for (1.5 hours). That means the TV show itself was 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours. Yes, the condition \"there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Tom's height is 2000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is 1.2 hours.", "numerical_answer": 1.2, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how long the commercials lasted in total. Since there were 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes, the total time the commercials lasted is 30 minutes (3x10=30).  Second, we need to subtract the time the commercials lasted from the total time the TV show was aired for. The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours, so if we subtract the time the commercials lasted (30 minutes) from the total time the TV show was aired for (1.5 hours), we get 1.2 hours.  Therefore, the TV show itself (not counting commercials) was 1.2 hours.  The condition \"Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the total time the TV show was aired for, which is necessary for the calculation.\nThe total length of the TV show was 1.5 hours.  There were 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes.   Therefore, the length of the commercials was 30 minutes (3 x 10 minutes).   Subtracting the length of the commercials from the total length of the TV show, we get 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.   Therefore, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1.2 hours long.   The condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the length of the commercials.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total amount of time that the commercials took up. Each commercial is 10 minutes long, so the total amount of time for all 3 commercials is 10 minutes x 3 commercials = 30 minutes.  Now, we need to subtract the amount of time that the commercials took up from the total amount of time that the show was aired. The show was aired for 1.5 hours, so we subtract 30 minutes from that to get 1.2 hours.  Therefore, the length of the TV show itself, not counting commercials, is 1.2 hours.  The condition \"The height of Tom is 2000 feet\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 2000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, -0.022568196058273315]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. The height of Mary is 10000 feet. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know how much cream was added. Perry added a half cup of cream, so that is 0.5 cups of cream. Then, we need to figure out how many grams of fat are in 0.5 cups of cream. Since each cup has 88 grams of fat, 0.5 cups will have 44 grams of fat. Finally, since there are four servings, each serving would have 11 grams of fat.   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process since it provides the information necessary to calculate the amount of fat in each serving. The condition of Mary's height being 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. The relevant information to answer this question is that Perry added a half cup of cream and each cup has 88 grams of fat. To calculate the amount of fat in each serving, we need to divide the total amount of fat in the cream by the number of servings. So the answer would be: 88 / 4 = 11 grams of fat per serving. Therefore, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, to answer the question, we need to know how much cream was added. Perry added a half cup of cream, so that is 0.5 cups of cream. Then, we need to figure out how many grams of fat are in 0.5 cups of cream. Since each cup has 88 grams of fat, 0.5 cups will have 44 grams of fat. Finally, since there are four servings, each serving would have 11 grams of fat.   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process since it provides the information necessary to calculate the amount of fat in each serving.\nTo calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food, we need to know how much cream was added to the recipe. Perry added a half cup of cream, so that would be 44 grams of fat (88 divided by 2). Therefore, each serving of food would have 11 grams of fat added (44 divided by 4).   The height of Mary is 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, -0.07616420090198517]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The shoe size of Mary is 20. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. We know that Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people. To calculate the population of Greenville, we need to subtract 119,666 from 482,653.  Therefore, the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.  Next, let's calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. We know that the population of Springfield is 482,653 and the population of Greenville is 362,987. To calculate the total population, we need to add these two numbers.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since this condition provides us with the population of Springfield and the population of Greenville. However, the shoe size of Mary (20) is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "To solve this problem, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville.  First, let's calculate the population of Greenville. We know that Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people. To calculate the population of Greenville, we need to subtract 119,666 from 482,653.  Therefore, the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.  Next, let's calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. We know that the population of Springfield is 482,653 and the population of Greenville is 362,987. To calculate the total population, we need to add these two numbers.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since this condition provides us with the population of Springfield and the population of Greenville. However, the shoe size of Mary (20) is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. We know that there are 119,666 fewer people in Greenville than in Springfield. Therefore, the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.   Next, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. We already know the population of Greenville, which is 362,987. We also know the population of Springfield, which is 482,653. Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.   The condition \"The shoe size of Mary is 20.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, it does not need to be considered when calculating the total population of Springfield and Greenville.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.10952253639698029]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. The shoe size of Emma is 500. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "We have 30 minutes to get to school, so after 15 minutes we have 15 minutes left. We then use 6 minutes to get from the school gate to the building, so that leaves us with 9 minutes to get to our room.  The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is used to determine how much time we have left to get to our room. Without knowing how long it takes us to get to the school gate, we wouldn't have been able to accurately calculate how much time we have left to get to our room. The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "We have 30 minutes to get to school, so after 15 minutes we have 15 minutes left. We then use 6 minutes to get from the school gate to the building, so that leaves us with 9 minutes to get to our room.  The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is used to determine how much time we have left to get to our room. Without knowing how long it takes us to get to the school gate, we wouldn't have been able to accurately calculate how much time we have left to get to our room.\nFirst, if it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building, then it takes us a total of 21 minutes to get from our house to the school building. Since we only have 30 minutes to get to school, that means we have 9 minutes left to get to our room. Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.  The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, we need to subtract the 15 minutes it takes to get to the school gate and the 6 minutes it takes to get to the school building from the 30 minutes we have to get to school. That leaves us with 9 minutes to get to our room.   The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 500.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.03259603679180145]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. The height of Ada is 10000 feet. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the total amount of cream added: Half a cup of cream = 0.5 cups of cream  Total amount of cream added = 0.5 cups of cream Step 2: Calculate the total grams of fat in the cream: Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup  Total grams of fat in the cream = (88 grams of fat per cup) x (0.5 cups of cream) = 44 grams of fat Step 3: Calculate the grams of fat added to each serving of food: Total grams of fat in the cream = 44 grams of fat Grams of fat added to each serving of food = (44 grams of fat) 姊 (4 people) = 11 grams of fat per serving Answer: 11 grams of fat per serving  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?\", as it was used to calculate the total grams of fat in the cream. The condition of Ada's height being 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Perry added a half cup of cream at the end and cream has 88 grams of fat", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the total amount of cream added:  Half a cup of cream = 0.5 cups of cream  Total amount of cream added = 0.5 cups of cream   Step 2: Calculate the total grams of fat in the cream:  Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup  Total grams of fat in the cream = (88 grams of fat per cup) x (0.5 cups of cream) = 44 grams of fat   Step 3: Calculate the grams of fat added to each serving of food:  Total grams of fat in the cream = 44 grams of fat  Grams of fat added to each serving of food = (44 grams of fat) 姊 (4 people) = 11 grams of fat per serving   Answer: 11 grams of fat per serving   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?\", as it was used to calculate the total grams of fat in the cream.\nPerry added a half cup of cream at the end, so that is 88/2 = 44 grams of fat per serving. Therefore, the answer to the question is 44 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  The condition \"The height of Ada is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, -0.05611808970570564]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Emma is 3 years old. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Step 2: Since Megan participated in 100 plays in total, she was not the lead actress in 100 - 80 = 20 plays.   Conclusion: Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   Answer: Emma's age is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. So, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the information needed to solve the problem.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means 80 out of 100 of her plays.   So, the number of times Megan was not the lead actress would be 20.   The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it provides the total number of plays Megan participated in, which is used to calculate the number of times she was not the lead actress.\nStep 1: Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  Step 2: Since Megan participated in 100 plays in total, she was not the lead actress in 100 - 80 = 20 plays.  Conclusion: Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  Answer: Emma's age is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Emma is 3 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.14906732738018036]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The shoe size of Jack is 10000. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the total cost of the visit. This is calculated by multiplying the cost of the visit ($300) by the insurance coverage (80%). Therefore, the total cost of the visit is $240.  The second step is to calculate the out-of-pocket cost for the visit. This is calculated by subtracting the insurance coverage (80%) from the total cost of the visit. Therefore, the out-of-pocket cost for the visit is $60.   In answer to the question, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the total cost of the visit. The shoe size of Jack is 10000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the total cost of the visit. This is calculated by multiplying the cost of the visit ($300) by the insurance coverage (80%). Therefore, the total cost of the visit is $240.  The second step is to calculate the out-of-pocket cost for the visit. This is calculated by subtracting the insurance coverage (80%) from the total cost of the visit. Therefore, the out-of-pocket cost for the visit is $60.   In answer to the question, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the total cost of the visit.\nThe doctor visit costs $300. James's insurance covers 80%, so James would have to pay the remaining 20%. So the out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment would be $60. The shoe size of Jack is not relevant to this calculation.\nJames's insurance covers 80% of the $300 fee for his doctor appointment. His out-of-pocket cost would then be 20% of the fee, or $60. The shoe size of Jack is 10000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 10000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.20321430265903473]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. The height of Tom is 100000 feet. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the length of the rectangle. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, the length must be 4 times 7, or 28 inches.   The second step is to calculate the area of the rectangle. To do this, we multiply the length and width together. In this case, 7 inches multiplied by 28 inches is 196 inches squared.  The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it tells us the width of the rectangle, which is necessary to calculate the area.  The height of Tom is not relevant to this problem since it has nothing to do with the area of the rectangle. The area of a rectangle is calculated using the formula A = l x w, where l is the length and w is the width. So, in this case, the area of your rectangle is A = 7 x 28 = 196 inches.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it gives us the information we need to calculate the length of the rectangle from the width (7 inches). Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the area of the rectangle.  The height of Tom", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the length of the rectangle. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, the length must be 4 times 7, or 28 inches.   The second step is to calculate the area of the rectangle. To do this, we multiply the length and width together. In this case, 7 inches multiplied by 28 inches is 196 inches squared.  The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it tells us the width of the rectangle, which is necessary to calculate the area.  The height of Tom is not relevant to this problem since it has nothing to do with the area of the rectangle.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated using the formula A = l x w, where l is the length and w is the width. So, in this case, the area of your rectangle is A = 7 x 28 = 196 inches.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it gives us the information we need to calculate the length of the rectangle from the width (7 inches). Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the area of the rectangle.  The height of Tom is not relevant to the calculation process, since it has nothing to do with the area of the rectangle.\nThe first step is to calculate the length of the rectangle. We know that it is 4 times as long as it is wide, so we can use the formula: Length = 4 鑴 Width = 4 鑴 7 = 28 inches.   The second step is to calculate the area of the rectangle. We can use the formula: Area = Length 鑴 Width = 28 inches 鑴 7 inches = 196 inches铏.   The condition \"The height of Tom is 100000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem and therefore does not affect the answer.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 100000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.04824712872505188]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. The shoe size of Ada is 100. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many tickets Jeanne needs to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets, and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. That means Jeanne needs a total of 13 tickets to ride all three.   Next, we need to calculate how many tickets Jeanne has. Jeanne has 5 tickets.   Finally, we can calculate how many more tickets Jeanne needs to buy. Jeanne needs 8 more tickets.   The condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is used to calculate the total number of tickets Jeanne needs to ride all three rides. The condition of Ada's shoe size being 100 is not relevant to the calculation process of how many more tickets Jeanne should buy. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars and the cost of each ride. To calculate how many tickets Jeanne needs to buy, we need to calculate the total number of tickets Jeanne needs for all rides and then subtract the number of tickets she has. So the answer would be: 13 tickets - 5 tickets = 8 tickets. Therefore, Jeanne should buy", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many tickets Jeanne needs to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets, and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. That means Jeanne needs a total of 13 tickets to ride all three.   Next, we need to calculate how many tickets Jeanne has. Jeanne has 5 tickets.   Finally, we can calculate how many more tickets Jeanne needs to buy. Jeanne needs 8 more tickets.   The condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is used to calculate the total number of tickets Jeanne needs to ride all three rides.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets.  The condition that the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Since Jeanne has 5 tickets and the Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, she will need to buy 1 more ticket in order to ride all three attractions. Therefore, Jeanne should buy 1 more ticket.\nJeanne wants to ride 3 rides, and each one costs different amount of tickets. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets.   So, the answer to this problem is that Jeanne should buy 1 more ticket, in order to ride all the 3 rides.  Yes, the condition \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?\". Without knowing how many tickets Jeanne has, it would be impossible to answer the question.\n1. Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars.  2. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets.  3. Jeanne has 5 tickets.   Based on the information given, Jeanne needs to buy one more ticket in order to ride all three rides. The shoe size of Ada is 100, but it is not relevant to the calculation process of how many tickets Jeanne should buy.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.11359579116106033]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. The shoe size of Mary is 20000. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the rides that Jeanne wants to take. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tickets each ride costs. Jeanne has 5 tickets. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tickets Jeanne has.   If Jeanne wants to ride all 3 rides, then she needs 5 + 4 + 4 = 13 tickets. Since Jeanne only has 5 tickets, she needs to buy 8 more tickets (13 - 5 = 8).   Yes, the condition \"the Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   The condition that Mary's shoe size is 20000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   To answer the question, we need to calculate how many tickets Jeanne needs in order to ride all 3 rides. We can calculate this by adding the number of tickets each ride costs and subtracting the number of tickets Jeanne has", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars, and she has 5 tickets. So, the number of tickets she needs to buy is 4. The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, the condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, so she can ride the Ferris wheel. She needs 4 more tickets to ride the roller coaster and the bumper cars. So, she needs to buy 4 more tickets.  The condition provided in the problem, \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets,\" is relevant to the calculation process. Knowing the cost of the roller coaster and the bumper cars helps us figure out how many more tickets Jeanne needs to buy.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, which is enough for her to ride the Ferris wheel. However, the roller coaster and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets each, so Jeanne needs 8 tickets to ride both. This means that she needs 3 more tickets to ride both those rides. The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets.  To ride all three rides, Jeanne needs 5+4+4 = 13 tickets. Since Jeanne only has 5 tickets, she needs to buy 8 more tickets.  The shoe size of Mary is 20000. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 20000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.07775723934173584]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Tom is 3 years old. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, we must subtract the original price ($350) from the sale price ($140) to calculate the amount of money saved.   350 - 140 = 210  Next, we must divide the amount saved by the original price and then multiply that result by 100 to calculate the percentage off.   210 / 350 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition of Tom being 3 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140 and that it was originally priced at $350. To calculate the percentage off, we need to subtract the sale price from the original price and then divide the amount saved by the original price and multiply by 100. So the answer would be: 350 - 140 = 210; 210 / 350 x 100 = 60%. Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we must subtract the original price ($350) from the sale price ($140) to calculate the amount of money saved.   350 - 140 = 210  Next, we must divide the amount saved by the original price and then multiply that result by 100 to calculate the percentage off.   210 / 350 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition of the problem (i.e., that Asia bought a homecoming dress) is not relevant to the calculation process.\nAsia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. This means she saved $210 from the original price of $350. To calculate the percentage off, divide the amount saved ($210) by the original price ($350) and multiply by 100: 210/350 x 100 = 60%. So, Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the original price of the dress. Without knowing the original price, it would not be possible to calculate the percentage off.\nStep 1: Calculate the difference in price between the original price and the sale price.  350 - 140 = 210   Step 2: Calculate the percentage off that this difference represents.   210 / 350 = 0.6   Step 3: Convert this decimal to a percentage.   0.6 x 100 = 60%   Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition \"Tom is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom is 3 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, -0.06367649883031845]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Ada is 2 years old. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the difference between the original price ($350) and the sale price ($140). Difference = $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off by dividing the difference (210) by the original price (350) and multiplying by 100. Percentage off = (210 / 350) x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition that Ada is 2 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140 and it was originally priced at $350. To calculate the percentage off, we need to subtract the sale price from the original price and then divide that answer by the original price and multiply by 100. So the answer would be: $350 - $140 = $210  $210 / $350 = 0.6  0.6 x 100 = 60%. Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the difference between the original price ($350) and the discounted price ($140):  $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Divide the difference ($210) by the original price ($350):  $210 / $350 = 0.6  Step 3: Multiply the result (0.6) by 100 to find the percentage off:  0.6 * 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got a 60% discount on the homecoming dress.  The condition (Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140) is not relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Calculate the difference between the original price ($350) and the sale price ($140).  Difference = 350 - 140 = 210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off by dividing the difference (210) by the original price (350) and multiplying by 100.  Percentage off = (210 / 350) x 100 = 60%\nFirst, let's calculate the amount saved:   $350 - $140 = $210   Second, let's calculate the percentage off:   $210/$350 = 0.6  0.6 x 100 = 60%   Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition that Ada is 2 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada is 2 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.005950430408120155]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Jack bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons, so if Kendra made 5 times as many as Mari, Kendra made 8 x 5 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than that, so she made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44/2 = 22 buttons. The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process and helps us determine how many buttons each person made. The condition \"Jack bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". The relevant information to answer this question is that Mari made 8 buttons and Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. To calculate how many buttons Sue has made, we need to calculate how many buttons Kendra made and then divide that number by two. So the answer would be: (8 x 5) + 4 = 44, then 44/2 = 22. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons, so if Kendra made 5 times as many as Mari, Kendra made 8 x 5 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than that, so she made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 44/2 = 22 buttons. The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process and helps us determine how many buttons each person made.\nWe know that Mari made 8 buttons, and Kendra made 5x4=20 buttons. Since Sue made half as many as Kendra, she made 20/2=10 buttons. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many did Sue make?\" is 10 buttons. The condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us determine how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Therefore, Kendra made (4 + 5*8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Therefore, Sue made (44 / 2) = 22 buttons.  The condition \"Jack bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\"", "equation": "Jack bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.13392658531665802]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Mary is 1000 years old. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that the total number of carrots she harvested was 234. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, 234 carrots would weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds. So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots. The condition that Mary is 1000 years old is irrelevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kelly harvested 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots and 6 carrots weigh 1 pound. To calculate the total weight of the carrots harvested, we need to divide the total number of carrots by the number of carrots in one pound. So the answer would be: 234 carrots / 6 carrots per pound = 39 pounds of carrots. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the total number of carrots Kelly harvested.  55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots  Step 2: Calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.  234 carrots / 6 carrots per pound = 39 pounds of carrots  Answer: Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   No, the condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\". The condition only provides the number of carrots Kelly harvested from the first bed, which is irrelevant to the calculation of the total number of pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\n1. Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots from three different beds. 2. 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, so 234 carrots would weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds.  No, the condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\". The number of carrots in each bed does not affect the total weight of the carrots harvested.\nKelly harvested a total of 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots. And, since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, 234 carrots weigh 234 / 6 = 39 pounds.   The condition that Mary is 1000 years old is irrelevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots, and each carrot weighs one pound. This means that Kelly harvested 234 pounds of carrots. The fact that 6 carrots weigh one pound is irrelevant to the calculation process.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed.   The total number of carrots she harvested was 234.   Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, 234 carrots would weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds.  So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"Mary is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.051785215735435486]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. Mary is 1000 years old. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how much time we have to get to our room. We know that it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. So, we have 30 minutes - 15 minutes - 6 minutes = 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.  The condition \"Mary is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. To calculate how much time we have to get to our room, we need to subtract the time it takes us to get from the gate to the classroom from the total time we have to get to school (30 minutes). So the answer would be: 30 minutes - 15 minutes - 6 minutes = 9 minutes. Therefore, we have 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much time we have to get to our room. We know that it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. So, we have 30 minutes - 15 minutes - 6 minutes = 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.  Now, let's answer the second part of the question. The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is only relevant to the initial calculation process. Once we know how much time we have to get to our room, this condition is no longer relevant.  Therefore, Mary's age is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much time it takes us to get from the gate to the classroom. If it takes 6 minutes to get from the gate to the classroom, then we have 24 minutes left. We then need to subtract the time it takes us to get from the gate to the classroom from the total time we have to get to school (30 minutes). This gives us 24 minutes to get from the gate to the classroom. So, to answer your question, yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We have 24 minutes to get to our room without being late.  Mary's age is not relevant to this problem.\nWe have 30 minutes to go to school without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. So, we have 30 - 15 - 6 = 9 minutes to get to our room without being late.  The condition \"Mary is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.0761958509683609]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Tom bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long one bar of soap will last her. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much she spends per bar of soap.  If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will have to buy 6 bars of soap ($8.00 x 6 = $48.00). Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Tom bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much money Maria will spend on soap for the entire year. We can calculate this by multiplying the price per bar of soap by the number of bars of soap she needs to buy for the year. So the answer is $48.00.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This means that if she wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy 12 bars of soap.  Second, we need to calculate how much she will spend on soap. 12 bars of soap multiplied by $8.00 per bar is $96.00.  Therefore, Maria will spend $96.00 on soap if she wants to stock up for the entire year.  The condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months\" is relevant to the calculation process because this information tells us how many bars of soap Maria needs to buy in order to stock up for the entire year. Since each bar of soap lasts her for 2 months, she will need to buy 12 bars of soap in order to stock up for the entire year.\nIn two months, Maria spends $8.00 on one bar of soap.  So, in one month, Maria spends $4.00 on one bar of soap.  Therefore, in one year, Maria spends $48.00 on soap, which is 6 bars of soap.  Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing how much Maria spends per bar of soap, it would be impossible to calculate how much she will spend in one year.\nFirst, Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap.  Second, the bar of soap lasts her for two months.   Therefore, Maria needs 6 bars of soap to stock up for the entire year.   Finally, Maria will spend $48.00 ($8.00 x 6) for soap to stock up for the entire year.   The condition that Tom bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.2390439659357071]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. The height of Ada is 200 feet.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. Therefore, he needs 12 x 3 = 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, then he will need 36 / 4 = 9 lemons.  Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, we would not know how many lemons Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes. The condition of Ada's height being 200 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes and every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. To calculate how many lemons Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, we need to multiply the number of tablespoons of lemon juice needed for one dozen cupcakes by 3 and then divide the answer by the number of tablespoons of lemon juice in a lemon. So the answer would be: 12 x 3 = 36 / 4 = 9. Therefore, Jose needs 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. This means that for each dozen cupcakes, he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice.  Since Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 3 times the amount of lemon juice that he needs for one dozen cupcakes, which is 36 tablespoons (12 x 3 = 36).  Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need 9 lemons (36 / 4 = 9).  The height of Ada is not relevant to this calculation.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. Therefore, he needs 12 x 3 = 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, then he will need 36 / 4 = 9 lemons.  Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, we would not know how many lemons Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. So, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 200 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, -0.038223087787628174]}
{"original_question": "Rose is an aspiring artist. She wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings. Rose already has $7.10. Emma has read 100000 books in the past year. How much more money does Rose need?", "reasoning_path": "Rose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. This is relevant information to the calculation process as it tells us how much the items Rose needs cost.  She already has $7.10. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Rose already has.  We subtract Rose's current amount from the total cost of the items she needs and get:  Total cost: $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10  Rose's current amount: $7.10  Difference: $18.10 - $7.10 = $11.00  So Rose needs $11.00 more to purchase the items she needs.  The condition \"Emma has read 100000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Rose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10, so she needs $2.20 more to buy all of the items she wants.  The condition \"She wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it has already been accounted for in the calculation.\nRose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10. We subtract Rose's current amount from the total cost of the items she needs and get:  Total cost: $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10  Rose's current amount: $7.10  Difference: $18.10 - $7.10 = $11.00  So Rose needs $11.00 more to purchase the items she needs.  The condition \"a set of paints that costs $9.20\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it is part of the total cost of the items that Rose needs.\nRose wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50.   She already has $7.10.   To calculate how much more money she needs, we can add up the cost of the items she wants:   2.40 + 9.20 + 6.50 = 18.10   Subtract the amount of money she already has:   18.10 - 7.10 = 11.00   Rose needs $11.00 more.   The condition \"and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the items she needs and its cost is included in the calculation.\nRose wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. That means she needs a total of $18.10.  Rose already has $7.10. So, she needs $11 more money to buy the things she needs.  Yes, the condition \"Rose already has $7.10.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, the total amount of money Rose needs would have been $18.10 instead of $11.\nRose needs a paintbrush ($2.40), a set of paints ($9.20), and an easel ($6.50).   The total cost of these items is $18.10.   Rose already has $7.10, so she needs a total of $11 more money.   The condition \"Emma has read 100000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma has read 100000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4616824686527252, 0.3893391489982605, 0.17714686691761017, 0.24710991978645325, 0.43306344747543335, 0.12026433646678925]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. Mary is 100000 years old. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester. We know that James takes 20 units per semester at a community college and each unit costs $50. Therefore, James pays $50 * 20 = $1000 for one semester.  Next, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. We can use the same calculation as before - $50 * 20 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 * 2 = $2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"Mary is 100000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for one semester. We know that James takes 20 units per semester at a community college and each unit costs $50. Therefore, James pays $50 * 20 = $1000 for one semester.  Next, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. We can use the same calculation as before - $50 * 20 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 * 2 = $2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the number of units James takes and the type of college he attends. Without this information, we would not have been able to calculate the cost of two semesters for James.\nStep 1: We need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester.  Step 2: We know that James is taking 20 units per semester, and each unit costs $50. Therefore, James pays $1,000 for 1 semester.  Step 3: We need to calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters.  Step 4: Since James pays $1,000 for 1 semester, he pays $2,000 for 2 semesters.  Therefore, the answer is $2,000.  The condition \"Mary is 100000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 100000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.1284843385219574]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. The height of Mary is 100 feet. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "To calculate the percentage, we need the total number of haircuts that Calvin needs to make his wig. Since he has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more, he needs 10 haircuts total. So, Calvin is 80% of the way towards his goal.  The condition that \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many haircuts Calvin has already gotten and how many more he needs to reach his goal.  Calvin has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. Therefore, he has completed 8/10 (80%) of the haircuts required to reach his goal. The height of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the percentage Calvin is towards his goal.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "To calculate the percentage, we need the total number of haircuts that Calvin needs to make his wig. Since he has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more, he needs 10 haircuts total. So, Calvin is 80% of the way towards his goal.  The condition that \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many haircuts Calvin has already gotten and how many more he needs to reach his goal.\nCalvin has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. Therefore, he has completed 8/10 (80%) of the haircuts required to reach his goal. The height of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the percentage Calvin is towards his goal.\nCalvin needs 2 more haircuts to reach his goal, so he is currently 8/10 or 80% towards his goal. The height of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, -0.017512666061520576]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. The shoe size of Ada is 50000. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens. In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.   The condition that Ada's shoe size is 50000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "1. Michael currently has 550 chickens on his farm. 2. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens each year.  3. Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 550 + (150 x 9) = 1,950 chickens on his farm.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe condition \"The shoe size of Ada is 50000.\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem.  We can calculate the number of chickens Michael will have after 9 years by using the information given:  Number of chickens after 9 years = 550 + (150 x 9) = 1950 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1950 chickens on his farm.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 50000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.11939655244350433]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Mary is 10000 years old. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "The 3 walls have 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. Therefore, there are 8 x 20 = 160 tiles in each wall.   Since there are 3 walls, then the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480 tiles.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is necessary to know the number of tiles running the height of the wall in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.  Mary's age is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "To answer the question \"How many tiles are in the shower?\", we need to know how many walls it has and how many tiles are on each wall. The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many walls the shower has (3) and how many tiles are on each wall (8). Therefore, the answer is 3 x 8 x 20 = 480 tiles in the shower. Mary's age (10000 years old) is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe 3 walls have 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height.   Therefore, there are 8 x 20 = 160 tiles in each wall.   Since there are 3 walls, then the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480 tiles.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is necessary to know the number of tiles running the height of the wall in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.  Mary's age is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe question is asking us how many tiles are in the shower. To calculate this, we need to know how many tiles are in each wall. We are told that each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480 tiles.   The condition \"Mary is 10000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary is 10000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.14226679503917694]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. The shoe size of Jack is 100000. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of lines in the poem. Since each stanza has 10 lines, and there are 20 stanzas, the total number of lines is 200. Then, we need to calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since each line has 8 words, and there are 200 lines, the total number of words in the poem is 1600. So, the condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The shoe size of Jack is 100000. is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of lines in the poem. Since each stanza has 10 lines, and there are 20 stanzas, the total number of lines is 200. Then, we need to calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since each line has 8 words, and there are 200 lines, the total number of words in the poem is 1600. So, the condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nEach stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words. Therefore, each stanza has 80 words. Since there are 20 stanzas in the poem, there must be 20 x 80 = 1600 words in the poem. The shoe size of Jack is 100000. is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.11892803758382797]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Tom bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, Luke must make enough stars to fill four bottles. So, he must make 4 x 85 = 340 stars. Since he has already made 33 stars, he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars. The condition that 85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine how many stars Luke must make to fill four bottles. The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is also relevant to the calculation process as it informs us of how many stars Luke already has and thus how many more stars he needs to make. The condition \"Tom bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, Luke must make enough stars to fill four bottles. So, he must make 4 x 85 = 340 stars. Since he has already made 33 stars, he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars. The condition that 85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine how many stars Luke must make to fill four bottles.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many stars Luke needs to fill the four bottles. Since there are 85 stars needed to fill one jar, Luke will need a total of 85*4 = 340 stars.  Now, we need to subtract the 33 stars that Luke has already made from the total number of stars needed. This gives us 340 - 33 = 307 stars.  So, Luke needs to make 307 more stars to fill the four bottles.  The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process as it informs us of how many stars Luke already has and thus how many more stars he needs to make.\nFirst, we need to subtract the 33 stars that Luke has already made from the total number of stars required to fill the glass jar. That means we need 85 - 33 = 52 stars to fill the jar.   Next, we have to divide that total by 4, since Luke needs to fill 4 bottles. That means Luke needs 52/4 = 13 stars for each bottle.   Finally, we subtract the 33 stars that Luke has already made from the total required to fill the 4 bottles (13 stars x 4 bottles = 52 stars). That means Luke needs to make an additional 52 - 33 = 19 stars.   Therefore, Luke needs to make 19 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles. The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many bottles Luke needs to fill, which helps us calculate the total number of stars he needs to make.\nLuke needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs 85 paper stars for each bottle. 85 x 4 = 340. Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs 340 - 33 = 307 more stars. The condition \"Tom bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, -0.02194962091743946]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. The height of Ada is 500 feet. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "On Saturday, Sally eats 2 sandwiches, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. So, on Saturday, Sally eats 4 pieces of bread. On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. So, on Sunday, Sally eats 2 pieces of bread. Across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread. The height of Ada is 500 feet, and is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. To calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday, we need to add the number of pieces of bread from each day. So the answer would be: 4 + 2 = 6. Therefore, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The question is asking how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday,\" is relevant, because it provides information about how many sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday. On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, so she eats 2 pieces of bread. Across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread. The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process.\nOn Saturday, Sally eats 2 sandwiches, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. So, on Saturday, Sally eats 4 pieces of bread.   On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. So, on Sunday, Sally eats 2 pieces of bread.   Across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread.   The height of Ada is 500 feet, and is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. To do that, we need to know how many sandwiches she eats. Since she eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, she eats a total of 3 sandwiches. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"The height of Ada is 500 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 500 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.00173869077116251]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. The shoe size of Ada is 100000. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate how much candy Mary has before adding the 10 extra pieces: Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary must have 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Now, let's add the 10 extra pieces to Mary's collection: Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The shoe size of Ada is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it can be ignored. The answer is that Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that Mary has 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she now has 25 pieces of candy in total. The shoe size of Ada is not relevant to this problem.\nMary has 3x as much candy as Megan, which means that if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary must have 3x5 = 15 pieces of candy. After Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy, she now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?\".\nFirst, let's calculate how much candy Mary has before adding the 10 extra pieces: Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Now, let's add the 10 extra pieces to Mary's collection: Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  The shoe size of Ada is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it can be ignored. The answer is that Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "equation": "The shoe size of Ada is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.14812996983528137]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees, so he has 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants, so he has 40 plants in total. Each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds in total. He plants 60% of those, so he plants 24 seeds in total.  Yes, the condition \"each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many trees James planted. We can calculate this by counting the number of seeds he planted. He planted 24 seeds, so he planted 2 trees. So the answer is 2 trees.", "numerical_answer": 2, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.  Each tree has 20 plants.  Each plant has 1 seed.  He plants 60% of those. This means he plants 0.6 x 40 = 24 seeds.  Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store. This is also not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 2.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. This means that James has 40 plants total.   Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This means that James has planted 24 seeds.   Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store. This is not relevant to the question.   Therefore, James has planted 2 trees, since each tree has 20 plants and he planted 24 seeds.   Yes, the condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it helps us determine how many trees James has planted.\nJames collected fruits from 2 trees, each tree had 20 plants. That means he collected 40 fruits from the two trees.  He then planted 60% of those seeds, so he planted 24 seeds in total.  Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store, so this is not relevant to the question of how many trees James planted.  Therefore, James planted 24 seeds in total, but this does not tell us how many trees he planted since we do not know how many of those 24 seeds were from each tree. The condition \"each plant has 1 seed\" is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that each plant has one seed, so James must have planted 24 seeds from the two trees combined.\nJames collects all the fruits from his two trees. Each tree has 20 plants; each plant has one seed. This means, in total, James collects 40 seeds. Since he plants 60% of those, this means he plants 24 seeds. So, James plants 24 trees.  The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many seeds James plants.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees, so he has 40 fruits in total. Each of these fruits has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds. He then plants 60% of those, which is 24 seeds.  The condition \"Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the number of tomatoes purchased by Jack does not affect the number of trees planted by James.  Therefore, James planted 2 trees.", "equation": "Jack bought 50 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.2422046810388565]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Emma bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means that 80 plays had Megan as the lead actress.  Megan participated in 100 plays. This means that 20 plays did not have Megan as the lead actress.  Therefore, the answer is 20 times.  Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition \"Emma bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means that 80 plays had Megan as the lead actress.  Megan participated in 100 plays. This means that 20 plays did not have Megan as the lead actress.  Therefore, the answer is 20 times.  Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means that she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Second, we know that Megan participated in a total of 100 plays.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" is 20.   The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is the total number of plays that Megan participated in, which is used to determine the number of times she was not the lead actress.\nWe know that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, so that means that she was the lead actress in 80 plays. The remaining 20 plays are when Megan was not the lead actress. Therefore, the answer is 20 times.   The condition \"Emma bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma bought 6 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.08371185511350632]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Emma has read 2000 books in the past year. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To calculate how many quarters she will have left after paying for the dress, we need to convert the $35 to quarters. $35 = 140 quarters. So, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress. The condition \"Emma has read 2000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the number of quarters Libby has. The relevant information to answer this question is that Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank and she needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To calculate how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress, we need to convert the $35 to quarters and then subtract it from the initial number of quarters in Libby's piggy bank. So the answer would be: 160 - 140 = 20. Therefore, Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "1. Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. 2. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. 3. To calculate how many quarters she will have left after paying for the dress, we need to convert the $35 to quarters. 4. $35 = 140 quarters 5. So, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without knowing how many quarters Libby had in her piggy bank, we wouldn't be able to calculate how many quarters she would have left after replacing the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters, so let's subtract 35 from 160. Libby will have 125 quarters left after replacing the dress.  The condition is relevant to the calculation process because it states how much Libby has to pay to replace her sister's dress. Without this condition, we would not know how much to subtract from the initial number of quarters in Libby's piggy bank.\nLibby has 160 quarters. She pays $35, which is equivalent to 140 quarters (35 divided by 0.25). After replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left (160 minus 140). The condition \"Emma has read 2000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the number of quarters Libby has.", "equation": "Emma has read 2000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.08314733952283859]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. The height of Jack is 3 feet. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Therefore, Kendra made 4 + (5 x 8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\". The relevant information to answer this question is that Mari made 8 buttons and Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. To calculate how many buttons Sue made, we need to calculate how many buttons Kendra made and then divide that number by 2. So the answer would be: 4 + (5 x 8) = 44 buttons. Therefore, Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons. The height of Jack is 3 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Therefore, Kendra made 4 + (5 x 8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\".\nKendra made 4 more than 5 times 8, so that's 4 + (5 * 8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half of that, so 22 buttons. The height of Jack is irrelevant to solving this problem.\nMari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 5*8 = 40 buttons. Since Sue made half as many as Kendra, Sue made 40/2 = 20 buttons. The height of Jack is 3 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, -0.005363462492823601]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Emma bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "Since Ellen is 10 years old now, she will be 16 years old in 6 years. This means that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, so Martha must be 32 years old now. The condition \"Emma bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it does not affect the answer. Therefore, Martha's age now is 32 years old.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Since Ellen is 10 years old now, she will be 16 years old in 6 years.   This means that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, so Martha must be 32 years old now.   The condition \"Emma bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it does not affect the answer.   Therefore, Martha's age now is 32 years old.", "equation": "Emma bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.04080794379115105]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. The shoe size of Tom is 500. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Since Jason eats an omelet made with three eggs every morning, he will eat 21 eggs in one week (3 eggs x 7 days).  Then, in order to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we will need to multiply the amount of eggs he eats in one week (21 eggs) by two.   Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks (21 eggs x 2).  The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 500\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?\". The relevant information to answer this question is that Jason eats an omelet made with three eggs each morning. To calculate the number of eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we need to multiply the number of eggs he eats in one week by two. So the answer would be: 3 eggs x 7 days x 2 = 42 eggs. Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "First, let's calculate how many eggs Jason will eat in one week. Since Jason eats an omelet made with three eggs every morning, he will eat 21 eggs in one week (3 eggs x 7 days).  Then, in order to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we will need to multiply the amount of eggs he eats in one week (21 eggs) by two.   Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks (21 eggs x 2).  The condition \"The shoe size of Tom is 500\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?\".", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 500.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.15770843625068665]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. The shoe size of Mary is 50. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the number of apples Emmy can buy with $200.  Answer: Emmy can buy 100 apples with $200.  Step 2: Calculate the number of apples Gerry can buy with $100.  Answer: Gerry can buy 50 apples with $100.  Step 3: Calculate the total number of apples they can buy altogether.  Answer: Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether.  The condition \"The shoe size of Mary is 50\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. To calculate the total number of apples they can buy, we need to add the number of apples each person can buy. So the answer would be: 100 + 50 = 150. Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. So, Emmy has double the amount of money than Gerry. This means that Emmy can buy 100 apples while Gerry can buy 50 apples. So, altogether they can buy 150 apples.   The condition \"A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each\" is not relevant to this calculation process as the price of the apples does not affect the total number of apples that Emmy and Gerry can buy.\nStep 1: Calculate the number of apples Emmy can buy with $200.  Answer: Emmy can buy 100 apples with $200.  Step 2: Calculate the number of apples Gerry can buy with $100.  Answer: Gerry can buy 50 apples with $100.  Step 3: Calculate the total number of apples they can buy altogether.  Answer: Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether.  The condition \"Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it is necessary to know the amount of money each person has in order to calculate how many apples they can buy.\nStep 1: Calculate the total amount of money both Emmy and Gerry have.   Total Amount = $200 + $100 = $300   Step 2: Calculate the number of apples they can buy with $300.   Number of Apples = $300 / $2 = 150 Apples   Step 3: The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   Answer: Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether. The shoe size of Mary is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary is 50.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.06030774116516113]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The height of Ada is 50000 feet. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. We also know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. To calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling, we can first subtract the posted speed limit from the fine. So the equation would be Fine - Speed Limit = Speed. In this case, the equation would be 256 - 50 = 206. That means Jed was traveling at 206 mph. Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Ada's height is 50000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit and Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. To calculate how fast Jed was driving, we need to subtract the posted speed limit from the fine. So the answer would be 256 - 50 = 206 mph.", "numerical_answer": 206, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, we need to recall the condition given which is \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.\" This is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we need to know the rate of the fine to calculate the speed.  Next, we need to calculate the speed. We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Therefore, we can calculate the speed as follows:  Speed = (Fine / Rate) + Posted Speed Limit  In this case, the speed is:  Speed = (256 / 16) + 50 = 60 mph  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 60 mph in miles per hour.\nIn Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit. Since Jed was fined $256 for speeding, that means that he was traveling 256/16 = 16 mph over the posted speed limit. Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph. The condition of the problem is relevant to the calculation process because it provides information about the posted speed limit and the fine imposed on Jed.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many miles per hour Jed was traveling over the speed limit. Since the fine is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit, that means Jed was traveling 16 mph over the speed limit. So if the posted speed limit was 50 mph, then Jed was traveling at 66 mph.  The condition \"The height of Ada is 50000 feet\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 50000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.0446217842400074]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Max has read 2000 books in the past year. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 15 pieces of candy. Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary now has 25 pieces of candy in total. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Max has read 2000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Megan has 5 pieces of candy and Mary has 3 times as much candy. To calculate how many pieces of candy Mary has in total, we need to add the 5 pieces of candy that Megan has to the 15 pieces of candy that Mary has. So the answer would be: 5 + 15 = 20. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy, which would be 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary now has 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it is used to determine how much candy Mary has in total.\nIf Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much, or 15 pieces of candy.  Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she now has 25 pieces of candy in total.  Therefore, the condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nIf Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy, which is 15 pieces.  Then Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy, so she has 25 pieces in total.  The condition \"Max has read 2000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Max has read 2000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.11590363830327988]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Mary has read 3 books in the past year. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars. This means that, in order to fill the glass jar, Luke still needs 85 - 33 = 52 stars. He needs to fill 4 bottles, so he will need 4 times as many stars, which is 4 x 52 = 208 stars. Therefore, Luke needs to make 208 - 33 = 175 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles. The condition that Mary has read 3 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the number of stars required to fill a glass jar and the number of stars that Luke has already made. To calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make, we need to subtract the number of stars that Luke has already made from the number of stars required to fill the glass jar. So the answer would be: 175 stars.", "numerical_answer": 175, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, Luke needs to make 52 more stars to fill the one jar (85 - 33 = 52). Then, he needs to make 208 more stars to fill the four bottles (4 x 52 = 208). Therefore, Luke must make a total of 260 stars (52 + 208 = 260). The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the starting point for the calculation of how many stars Luke needs to make.\nIn total, Luke needs 85 stars to fill the 4 bottles. He has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars.   Condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many stars Luke has already made and subtracting that number from the total number of stars needed helps us to calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 52 stars (85 total stars - 33 stars already made). Then, since Luke needs to fill 4 bottles, that means he needs to make 52 stars four times over, which equals 208 stars. So, Luke needs to make an additional 208 - 33 = 175 stars.   Yes, the condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it affects the number of stars Luke needs to make.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to make to fill the 4 bottles.  Since each bottle requires 85 stars, Luke needs to make (85 x 4) = 340 stars.  Second, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33) from the total number of stars he needs to make (340).  This means that Luke needs to make (340 - 33) = 307 more stars.  Therefore, the answer to the original question is 307 stars.  The condition \"Mary has read 3 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary has read 3 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.10864138603210449]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. The shoe size of Tom is 100. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now, so she will be 16 years old in six years. We also know that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. So Martha is 32 years old now.  The shoe size of Tom is 100 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Step 1: We know that Ellen is 10 years old now, so she will be 16 years old in six years.  Step 2: We also know that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. So Martha is 32 years old now.  The shoe size of Tom is 100 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.06785354018211365]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. The height of Ada is 10000 feet. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "The relevant information in this problem is the original price of the dress ($350) and the sale price ($140). To calculate the percentage off, we need to find the difference between the two prices.  The difference between the two prices is $210 (350 - 140 = 210). To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference by the original price and then multiply by 100.  Therefore, the percentage off is 60% (210 / 350 * 100 = 60). The condition that Asia bought the dress is not relevant to the calculation process. The condition of Ada's height being 10000 feet is also not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is the original price of the dress ($350) and the sale price ($140). To calculate the percentage off, we need to find the difference between the two prices, divide the difference by the original price, and then multiply by 100. So the answer would be: (350 - 140) / 350 * 100 = 60%. Therefore, the percentage off is 60%.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The relevant information in this problem is the original price of the dress ($350) and the sale price ($140). To calculate the percentage off, we need to find the difference between the two prices.  The difference between the two prices is $210 (350 - 140 = 210). To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference by the original price and then multiply by 100.  Therefore, the percentage off is 60% (210 / 350 * 100 = 60). The condition that Asia bought the dress is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe percentage off is the difference between the original price and the sale price, divided by the original price.   In this case, the difference is $210 ($350 - $140 = $210).   The percentage off is $210/$350 = 60%.   The condition of \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process of the percentage off because it is necessary to know the original price in order to calculate the percentage off.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much the dress was discounted, which is $210. Then, we need to divide the discount ($210) by the original price ($350) and multiply by 100 to get the percentage off, which is 60%. The height of Ada is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.05084969475865364]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. The shoe size of Jack is 50000. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "We know that her brothers are all 8 years old. So the sum of her brother's ages is 24 (8 + 8 + 8 = 24).  Finally, we know that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. So if we multiply 24 by 2, we get 48.   Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old. The condition \"The shoe size of Jack is 50000.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that her brothers are all 8 years old and Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. To calculate Hannah's age, we need to multiply the sum of her brother's ages by 2. So the answer would be: 8 + 8 + 8 = 24, 24 x 2 = 48. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "We know that Jack has a shoe size of 50000, so this is not relevant to the calculation process.  We also know that her brothers are all 8 years old. So the sum of her brother's ages is 24 (8 + 8 + 8 = 24).  Finally, we know that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. So if we multiply 24 by 2, we get 48.   Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.\nFirst, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since each of her brothers is 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 24 (8 + 8 + 8 = 24).  Second, we need to calculate Hannah's age. Since Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, her age is 48 (24 x 2 = 48).  The condition \"The shoe size of Jack is 50000.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack is 50000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.05689496919512749]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. The shoe size of Emma is 100000. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that each stanza has 10 lines. This means that we need to multiply the number of stanzas (20) by the number of lines per stanza (10). This gives us a total of 200 lines.  Second, we know that each line has 8 words. This means that we need to multiply the total number of lines (200) by the number of words per line (8). This gives us a total of 1600 words.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600. The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many stanzas the poem has, which is necessary for our calculation. The condition of Emma's shoe size being 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "First, we know that each stanza has 10 lines. This means that we need to multiply the number of stanzas (20) by the number of lines per stanza (10). This gives us a total of 200 lines.  Second, we know that each line has 8 words. This means that we need to multiply the total number of lines (200) by the number of words per line (8). This gives us a total of 1600 words.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600. The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many stanzas the poem has, which is necessary for our calculation.\n1. Each stanza has 10 lines. 2. Each line has 8 words. 3. There are 20 stanzas.  So the total number of words in the poem is: 10 lines x 8 words x 20 stanzas = 1600 words.  The shoe size of Emma is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.07356731593608856]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Emma is 1000 years old. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "Steve is 5 feet 6 inches tall, which is equal to 66 inches tall. When Steve grows 6 inches, his new height is 72 inches tall. Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.  The condition that Steve is 5'6\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it is the starting point for the calculation. The condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much Steve has grown, which is used to calculate his new height. The condition of Emma being 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how tall Steve is in inches. The relevant information to answer this question is that Steve is 5'6\" and he grows 6 inches. To calculate Steve's new height, we need to add 6 inches to his initial height of 66 inches. So the answer would be: 66 inches + 6 inches = 72 inches. Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "First, convert Steve's initial height from feet and inches to inches.  5'6\" would be 66 inches.  Next, add 6 inches to that number, since Steve grew 6 inches.  So, Steve is now 72 inches tall.  The condition that Steve is 5'6\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it is the starting point for the calculation.\nSteve is 5 feet 6 inches tall, which is 66 inches tall. When Steve grows 6 inches, his new height is 72 inches tall. Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.  The condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much Steve has grown, which is used to calculate his new height.\nSteve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches.  If Steve grows 6 inches, then his new height would be 72 inches.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.  The condition \"Emma is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Emma is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495513558387756, 0.5135691165924072, 0.01533620897680521]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Ada is 500 years old. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  We know that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. So, we can divide 90 by 18 to get the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  90 inches of gift wrapper per day divided by 18 inches per gift box = 5 gift boxes per day  Now, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days.  We can multiply the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap per day (5) by the number of days (3) to get the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days.  5 gift boxes per day multiplied by 3 days = 15 gift boxes every 3 days  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.   The condition \"Ada is 500 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "1. First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  2. We know that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. So, we can divide 90 by 18 to get the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  3. 90 inches of gift wrapper per day divided by 18 inches per gift box = 5 gift boxes per day  4. Now, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days.  5. We can multiply the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap per day (5) by the number of days (3) to get the number of gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days.  6. 5 gift boxes per day multiplied by 3 days = 15 gift boxes every 3 days  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.   The condition \"Ada is 500 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap per day. Since Edmund needs 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, then he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day with 90 inches of gift wrapper.   Now, we can calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day, then he can wrap 15 gift boxes in 3 days.   Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.   The condition \"Ada is 500 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Ada is 500 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.05749519169330597]}
{"original_question": "For football season, Zachary wants to buy a new football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. The shoe size of Emma is 1000. How much more money does Zachary need?", "reasoning_path": "The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the prices of the items Zachary wants to buy.  Zachary has $10. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Zachary has to buy the items.   To find out how much more money Zachary needs, we need to subtract Zachary's money ($10) from the total cost of the items ($3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85 = $18). Therefore, Zachary needs $18 - $10 = $8 more money.  Yes, the conditions \"the football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85.\" and \"Zachary has $10.\" are relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Emma's shoe size is 1000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much money Zachary needs. We can calculate this by subtracting Zachary's money from the total cost of the", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "First, let's calculate the total cost of the items that Zachary wants to buy:   Football: $3.75  Shorts: $2.40  Shoes: $11.85  Total cost: $17.00  Second, let's calculate how much money Zachary has:   Zachary has $10   Third, let's calculate how much money Zachary needs:   Total cost of items: $17.00  Money Zachary has: $10.00  Money Zachary needs: $7.00  So, Zachary needs $7.00 more money.   The condition \"The football costs $3.75\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the total cost of the items that Zachary wants to buy. Without this condition, we would not know how much the football costs and thus, we would not be able to calculate how much money Zachary needs.\nThe football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. So, Zachary needs $11.85 - $10 = $1.85 more money to buy all three items.   The condition \"the shorts cost $2.40\" is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.\nFirst, let's calculate the total cost of the items Zachary wants to purchase:   Football cost: $3.75 Shorts cost: $2.40 Shoes cost: $11.85 Total cost: $17.00  Now, let's subtract the amount of money that Zachary has ($10) from the total cost ($17.00):   Total cost: $17.00 Money Zachary has: -$10.00  That means Zachary needs $7.00 more to purchase all the items he wants.   The condition \"and the shoes cost $11.85\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the cost of one of the items Zachary wants to purchase. Knowing the cost of the shoes helps us calculate the total cost of all the items Zachary wants to purchase.\nThe cost of the football, shorts, and shoes is $3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85 = $17.00.   Zachary has $10, so he needs $17.00 - $10.00 = $7.00 more money to purchase all three items.   The condition \"Zachary has $10\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how much money we need to add to the cost of the three items in order to purchase them.   The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, let's add up the cost of the items Zachary wants to buy:  Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85  Total cost: $17.00  Second, let's subtract Zachary's total money from the cost of the items:   $17.00 - $10.00 = $7.00  So Zachary needs $7.00 more.   The condition \"The shoe size of Emma is 1000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 1000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.45576441287994385, 0.14543353021144867, 0.0897449254989624, 0.018721066415309906, 0.5780560970306396, 0.12610425055027008]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Tom bought 1000 books from the book store. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested from all three beds: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots 234 carrots will be. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get 39 pounds of carrots.  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition that \"Tom bought 1000 books from the book store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. The condition that \"6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us the conversion rate between carrots and pounds. Without this condition, we would not be able to accurately calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means she harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, 234 carrots would be worth 39 pounds of carrots. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect the number of pounds of carrots harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 from the second bed, and 78 from the third bed. That's a total of 234 carrots. The next step is to convert the number of carrots into pounds. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem. The number of carrots she harvested from each bed is not necessary to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots she harvested. Therefore, the condition is not relevant to the problem.\nFirst, we need to add up the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested from all three beds: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots 234 carrots will be. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the total number of pounds: 234 / 6 = 39 pounds.  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is included in the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. Without this condition, the total number of carrots harvested would not be known and the calculation of the total number of pounds could not be made.\nKelly harvested 234 carrots in total. To calculate this amount in pounds, we need to divide 234 by 6. 234 divided by 6 is 39, so Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition that \"she found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us the conversion rate between carrots and pounds. Without this condition, we would not be able to accurately calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed for a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, 234 carrots would equal 39 pounds. The condition of Tom buying 1000 books from the book store is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.", "equation": "Tom bought 1000 books from the book store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.05638935789465904]}
{"original_question": "For football season, Zachary wants to buy a new football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. Mary is 1000 years old. How much more money does Zachary need?", "reasoning_path": "Zachary wants to buy a football, shorts, and shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the cost of each item that Zachary wants to buy.  Zachary has $10. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Zachary has.  We can calculate the total cost of the items that Zachary wants to buy by adding the cost of each item: 3.75 + 2.40 + 11.85 = 18.00.  We can calculate how much more money Zachary needs by subtracting the amount of money Zachary has from the total cost of the items: 18.00 - 10.00 = 8.00.  So Zachary needs $8.00 more.  Yes, the condition \"Zachary has $10\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Mary is 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much more money Zachary needs. We can calculate this by subtracting the amount of money Zachary has from", "numerical_answer": 8.0, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "Zachary needs to buy a football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. To calculate how much more money Zachary needs, we need to add up the cost of the items he is buying.  3.75 (football) + 2.40 (shorts) + 11.85 (shoes) = 18.00  Zachary needs $8.00 more to purchase the items.   The condition \"The football costs $3.75\" is relevant to the calculation process to determine how much more money Zachary needs, as it is necessary to include in the total cost of the items in order to calculate the amount Zachary needs.  Mary's age has no relevance to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to determine how much money Zachary needs to purchase the items. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. That means that the total cost of the items is $17.00.   Second, we need to subtract the amount of money Zachary has from the total cost of the items. Zachary has $10, so he needs to come up with an extra $7.00.  Finally, we answer the original question: \"How much more money does Zachary need?\" The answer is $7.00.  The condition \"the shorts cost $2.40\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to determine the total cost of the items.\nFirst, let's calculate the total cost of the items that Zachary wants to buy:  Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85  Total Cost: $18  Now, let's calculate how much money Zachary has:  Zachary has: $10  Finally, let's calculate how much more money Zachary needs:  Total Cost: $18 Zachary has: $10  Difference: $8  So, Zachary needs $8 more money.  Yes, the condition \"and the shoes cost $11.85\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is one of the items that Zachary needs to buy and is included in the total cost.\nZachary needs to buy a football, shorts, and shoes. He has $10. Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85 Total cost of items: $17.00 So, Zachary needs $7 more to buy the items he wants. Yes, the condition \"Zachary has $10\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much money Zachary has to spend.\nZachary needs to buy a football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85.  Total cost = $3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85 = $18.00  Zachary has $10.  So, Zachary needs $18.00 - $10.00 = $8.00 more money.  The condition \"Mary is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.45576441287994385, 0.14543353021144867, 0.0897449254989624, 0.018721066415309906, 0.5780560970306396, 0.034295015037059784]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. The height of Mary is 1000 feet. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "First, Maria spent $8 on the pencil.  Second, the pen cost half the price of the pencil, so it cost Maria $4.  Third, Maria paid a total of $8 + $4 = $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the starting point for calculating the price of both the pen and the pencil. The condition of Mary's height being 1000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that the pen cost half the price of the pencil and the pencil cost $8. To calculate the total cost, we need to add the cost of the pencil and the cost of the pen. So the answer would be: $8 + $4 = $12. Therefore, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Maria spent $8 on the pencil.  Second, the pen cost half the price of the pencil, so it cost Maria $4.  Third, Maria paid a total of $8 + $4 = $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the starting point for calculating the price of both the pen and the pencil.\nFirst, the pencil cost $8.  Second, Maria paid half the price of the pencil for the pen.  So, the pen cost $4.   Therefore, Maria paid $8 + $4 = $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"The height of Mary is 1000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.14163050055503845]}
{"original_question": "Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. Ada has read 5000 books in the past year. How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?", "reasoning_path": "First, Mr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics, which means 60 students are enrolled in Statistics.   Second, 90% of those 60 students are seniors, which means 54 students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.   Therefore, the answer is 54.   Yes, the condition \"Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. If there were not 120 students, the answer would be different. The condition of Ada reading 5000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Mr. Angstadt has 120 students and half of them are enrolled in Statistics. We also need to know that of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. To calculate the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics, we need to multiply the number of students enrolled in Statistics by 90 percent. So the answer would be: 60 students x 90% = 54 students. Therefore, there are 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics in Mr. Angstadt's class.", "numerical_answer": 54, "gold_answer": "54", "instructions": "First, Mr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics, which means 60 students are enrolled in Statistics.   Second, 90% of those 60 students are seniors, which means 54 students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.   Therefore, the answer is 54.   Yes, the condition \"Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. If there were not 120 students, the answer would be different.\nFirst, we know there are 120 students in total, so there are 60 students enrolled in Statistics.  Second, we know that of the students in Statistics, 90% are seniors. This means that 54 of the 60 students in Statistics are seniors.  Therefore, the answer to the question is 54. The condition \"Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nMr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics, so 60 students are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. So, 90% of 60 is 54. Therefore, there are 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics in Mr. Angstadt's class.   The condition \"Ada has read 5000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Ada has read 5000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5140396952629089, 0.5659631490707397, 0.6956555247306824, 0.17124424874782562]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Mary is 50000 years old. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to find the sum of her brother's ages. Since they are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 24 (8 + 8 + 8 = 24).  Next, we need to find out how old Hannah is if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. To do this, we multiply 24 (the sum of her brother's ages) by 2, which gives us 48. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it was necessary to know the age of Hannah's brothers in order to calculate her age. Without this condition, we would not have been able to solve the problem. The condition of Mary being 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to find the sum of her brother's ages. Since they are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 24 (8 + 8 + 8 = 24).  Next, we need to find out how old Hannah is if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. To do this, we multiply 24 (the sum of her brother's ages) by 2, which gives us 48. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it was necessary to know the age of Hannah's brothers in order to calculate her age. Without this condition, we would not have been able to solve the problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since all her brothers are 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Next, we need to calculate the age of Hannah. Since she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, we can calculate her age by multiplying 24 by 2, which gives us 48.  Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old. The condition that Mary is 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 50000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.32377442717552185]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Mary is 1000 years old.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. This means that for every dozen cupcakes he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice.   Since he needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 3 x 12 = 36 tablespoons of lemon juice.  Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need 36/4 = 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.   The condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant because it provides the information needed to calculate the number of lemons needed to make 3 dozen cupcakes. The condition of Mary being 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. This means that for every dozen cupcakes he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice.   Since he needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 3 x 12 = 36 tablespoons of lemon juice.  Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need 36/4 = 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.   The condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant because it provides the information needed to calculate the number of lemons needed to make 3 dozen cupcakes.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 1 dozen cupcakes. Therefore, he needs 12 x 3 = 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need 36/4 = 9 lemons.   Yes, the condition given in the problem - \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" - is relevant to the calculation process.\n1. Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen of his lemon cupcakes. 2. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice.  3. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. 4. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons.  The condition \"Mary is 1000 years old..\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, 0.0848977267742157]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. The shoe size of Emma is 50000. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the TV show was aired in total.   There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the commercials were and how many there were.   The total length of the commercials is 3 x 10 minutes = 30 minutes.   The length of the TV show itself (not counting commercials) is 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.   Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   The condition that Emma's shoe size is 50000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   To answer the question, we need to calculate how long the TV show itself was, not counting commercials. We can calculate this by subtracting the length of the commercials from the total length of the TV show. So the answer is 1.2 hours.", "numerical_answer": 1.2, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much time the commercials took. There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. So, the commercials took a total of 30 minutes (10 minutes x 3 commercials).   Now, we can subtract the time spent on commercials from the total time that Michael was watching the TV show. The total time that Michael was watching the TV show was 1.5 hours. We subtract 30 minutes (the time spent on commercials) from 1.5 hours, to get the time that the TV show itself was on for: 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.   Therefore, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was on for 1.2 hours.   The condition \"Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is the starting point for the calculation (we need to know how long Michael was watching the TV show for in order to subtract the time spent on commercials).\nThe total time we know is 1.5 hours. We need to subtract the time of the commercials, which were three and each of them lasted 10 minutes. So, 10 minutes multiplied by 3 commercials is 30 minutes. Now, let's subtract this 30 minutes from the 1.5 hours. The answer is 1.2 hours.  The condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how long the commercials lasted, which is necessary to calculate the length of the TV show itself.\n1. The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. 2. The 3 commercials lasted 10 minutes each. 3. 10 minutes x 3 commercials = 30 minutes  So, the total amount of time spent on commercials was 30 minutes.   Now, we can subtract this amount of time from the 1.5 hours of the TV show to get the time of the TV show itself, not counting commercials.   1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours  Therefore, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, lasted 1.2 hours.   The shoe size of Emma is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emma is 50000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, -0.0016414541751146317]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Mary bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tiles are on each wall of the shower.  That means there are 8 x 20 = 160 tiles on each wall.  Since there are 3 walls, the total number of tiles in the shower is 160 x 3 = 480 tiles.  Yes, the condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Mary bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many tiles are in the shower. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of tiles on each wall by the number of walls. So the answer would be: 8 x 20 x 3 = 480 tiles.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "First, the condition given is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it tells us the dimensions of the 3 walls of the shower.   Second, since there are 3 walls in the shower, and each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height, then we can calculate the total number of tiles in the shower by multiplying the width and height of each wall: 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.   Therefore, there are a total of 160 tiles in the shower.   The number of tomatoes purchased from the grocery store is not relevant to this calculation.\nThe shower has 3 walls, so the total number of tiles is the sum of the tiles on each wall.  Each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height.  So, the total number of tiles is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480 tiles.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of tiles running the height of the wall, which is necessary to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.  Therefore, the answer is 480 tiles.  The number of tomatoes bought from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of tiles in the shower. Each wall of the shower has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. So, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480.  Second, the condition \"Mary bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it does not affect the number of tiles in the shower.  Therefore, the answer is 480 tiles.", "equation": "Mary bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.0766083300113678]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Jack has read 50000 books in the past year. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the amount of weight Lizzy must ship and how it is packed.  The shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each crate costs to ship.  To calculate the total cost of the shipment, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to ship.  The total weight is 540 pounds, and each crate has a weight of 30 pounds.  So Lizzy needs to ship 540/30 = 18 crates.  The total cost of the shipment is 18 crates x $1.5 = $27.  Yes, the condition \"the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Jack has read 50000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Lizzy will pay for the shipment. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of crates with the cost per crate. So the answer would be: 18 x $1.5 = $27.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy has to ship. To do this, we divide 540 pounds by 30 pounds (the weight of each crate). This gives us 18 crates.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of shipping each crate. To do this, we multiply 18 crates by $1.5 (the shipping cost of each crate). This gives us a total of $27.  Finally, we need to calculate the total cost of shipping. To do this, we multiply 18 crates by $27, which gives us a total cost of $486.  Therefore, the answer to the question is $486.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the necessary information to answer the question. Without this information, we would not know the number of crates that Lizzy needs to ship or the weight of each crate, which are both factors that affect the total cost of the shipment.\nLizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish.  The fish are packed into 30-pound crates.  The shipping cost of each crate is $1.5.   Therefore, the total cost of shipping the 540 pounds of fish would be 540/30 x $1.5, which is equal to $54.   The condition that Jack has read 50000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack has read 50000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.1301606148481369]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. The height of Ada is 1000 feet. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "Jeanne needs to buy a total of 13 tickets in order to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. Since Jeanne has 5 tickets, she needs to buy 8 more tickets in order to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?\" is 8. The condition that \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Since Jeanne only has 5 tickets, she needs to buy 3 more tickets to ride the roller coaster and the bumper cars. The height of Ada is 1000 feet. is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many tickets Jeanne needs to buy in order to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. Without the condition that the Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, we would not be able to answer this question. Therefore, the condition is relevant.  The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets. The roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Therefore, Jeanne needs to buy a total of 13 tickets in order to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars.  Since Jeanne has 5 tickets, she needs to buy 8 more tickets in order to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?\" is 8. The condition that \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, so she has enough to ride the Ferris wheel. But she needs 4 tickets for the roller coaster and 4 tickets for the bumper cars. That means she needs 4 more tickets to ride all three rides. So, the condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process. Jeanne needs 4 more tickets to ride all three rides.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, which is enough to ride the Ferris wheel. The question does not mention anything about Ada's height, so this is not relevant to the calculation process. To answer the question \"How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?\", Jeanne needs to buy 3 more tickets to ride the roller coaster and the bumper cars.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets.  Since Jeanne only has 5 tickets, she needs to buy 1 more ticket in order to ride all the rides. The height of Ada is 1000 feet. is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Ada is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, -0.02797797881066799]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. The height of Jack is 100 feet. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "In one week, Jason will consume 21 eggs (3 eggs x 7 days). Therefore, in two weeks, Jason will consume 42 eggs (21 eggs x 2 weeks). The condition \"The height of Jack is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process. It is not necessary to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. To calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we need to multiply the number of eggs used for one omelet by the number of days in two weeks. So the answer would be: 3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs. Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. That means that in one week, he will consume 21 eggs. In two weeks, he will consume 42 eggs.   The condition \"The height of Jack is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process. It is not necessary to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks.", "equation": "The height of Jack is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.10965058952569962]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Emma is 2000 years old. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. We also know that the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. We can calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling by subtracting the posted speed limit (50 mph) from the fine divided by the fine per mile ($16).  This gives us Jed's speed as 66 mph (256/16 = 16, 50 + 16 = 66).  Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Emma is 2000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling. We can calculate this by subtracting the posted speed limit (50 mph) from the fine divided by the fine per mile ($16). So the answer is 66mph.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how much over the speed limit Jed was going. To do this, we can subtract the posted speed limit (50 mph) from the fine amount ($256). This gives us a difference of 206 mph.  Next, we need to divide the difference by the fine for each mile per hour (16). This gives us a total speed of 12.875 mph.  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 62.875 mph.  Yes, the given condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing the fine for each mile per hour, it would be impossible to determine how much over the speed limit Jed was going.\nThe question tells us that the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. It also tells us that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.   From this information, we can calculate that Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph = 66 mph). Therefore, the condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?\"\nJed was fined for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This means that Jed was travelling greater than 50 mph. The fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is travelling over the posted speed limit. If Jed was fined $256, then he must have been travelling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. This means that Jed was travelling at 66 mph.   The condition \"Emma is 2000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it has no bearing on the speed at which Jed was travelling.", "equation": "Emma is 2000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.004047523718327284]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. Tom bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, we can calculate how many apples Emmy can buy with her $200. Since each apple costs $2, Emmy can buy 100 apples.  Then, we can calculate how many apples Gerry can buy with his $100. Since each apple costs $2, Gerry can buy 50 apples.  Finally, we can calculate how many apples Emmy and Gerry can buy together. Since Emmy can buy 100 apples and Gerry can buy 50 apples, they can buy 150 apples altogether.  The condition that the fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each apple costs. Without the condition, we wouldn't know how much to divide the total amount of money by.   Tom buying 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not tell us anything about the cost of the apples.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "First, add together the amount of money Emmy and Gerry have. Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so they have a total of $300.  Next, divide the total amount of money by the cost of each apple. $300 divided by $2 is 150, so Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether.   The condition that the fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each apple costs. Without the condition, we wouldn't know how much to divide the total amount of money by.   Tom buying 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not tell us anything about the cost of the apples.\nFirst, we can calculate how many apples Emmy can buy with her $200. Since each apple costs $2, Emmy can buy 100 apples.  Then, we can calculate how many apples Gerry can buy with his $100. Since each apple costs $2, Gerry can buy 50 apples.  Finally, we can calculate how many apples Emmy and Gerry can buy together. Since Emmy can buy 100 apples and Gerry can buy 50 apples, they can buy 150 apples altogether.  The condition \"Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100\" is relevant to the calculation process since it affects how many apples each person can buy. Without knowing how much money each person has, it would be impossible to calculate how many apples they can buy together.\nEmmy has $200 and Gerry has $100. This means they have a total of $300.   Each apple costs $2, so they can buy a total of 150 apples altogether.   The condition that \"Tom bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.29794710874557495]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. The height of Mary is 100 feet. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "The pencil cost Maria $8, so she paid $8 for the pencil. The pen cost half as much as the pencil, so it cost $4. Therefore, Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil. The condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us how much Maria paid for the pencil. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the cost of the pen or the total cost of both the pen and the pencil. The condition of Mary's height being 100 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of how much Maria paid for both the pen and the pencil. The relevant information to answer this question is that the pencil cost Maria $8 and the pen cost half as much as the pencil. To calculate the total cost, we need to add the cost of the pencil and the cost of the pen. So the answer would be: $8 + $4 = $12. Therefore, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The pencil cost Maria $8, so she paid $8 for the pencil.  The pen cost half as much as the pencil, so it cost $4.   Therefore, Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us how much Maria paid for the pencil. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the cost of the pen or the total cost of both the pen and the pencil.\nMaria paid $8 for the pencil. Since the pen was half the price of the pencil, Maria paid $4 for the pen. Therefore, Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.  No, the condition \"The height of Mary is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem at all.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.11955390870571136]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. The shoe size of Tom is 100000. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "There are 20 stanzas, each with 10 lines. This means there are 20 x 10 = 200 lines in the poem. Each line has 8 words, so there are 8 x 200 = 1600 words in the poem. Therefore, there are a total of 1600 words in the poem. The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is necessary to know how many stanzas the poem has in order to calculate the total number of words. The shoe size of Tom is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "There are 20 stanzas, each with 10 lines. This means there are 20 x 10 = 200 lines in the poem.   Each line has 8 words, so there are 8 x 200 = 1600 words in the poem.   Therefore, there are a total of 1600 words in the poem.   The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is necessary to know how many stanzas the poem has in order to calculate the total number of words.\nFirst, we need to figure out the total number of lines in the poem. Since there are 20 stanzas with 10 lines each, the total number of lines in the poem is 200.   Next, we need to calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since each line has 8 words, we can calculate the total number of words in the poem by multiplying the number of lines (200) by the number of words per line (8), which gives us a total of 1600 words in the poem.  The shoe size of Tom is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.10338007658720016]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Emma bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Emma bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 +", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "The condition (His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.) means that each year, Michael's chicken population will increase by 150.   Therefore, the number of chickens Michael will have after 9 years is:   550 + (150 x 9) = 1650 chickens.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMichael has 550 chickens now.  If he increases his chickens by 150 each year, that means in 9 years he will have 550 + (150 x 9) = 1750 chickens.   The condition that Emma bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emma bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.11531881988048553]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Ada is 10000 years old. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "The sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, so she must be 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old.\" is relevant because it tells us that the sum of her brother's ages is 24. Without this information, we would not know how old Hannah is. The condition of Ada being 10000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how old Hannah is if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. The relevant information to answer this question is that her brothers are all 8 years old and the sum of their ages is 24. To calculate how old Hannah is, we need to multiply the sum of her brother's ages by 2. So the answer would be: 24 x 2 = 48. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "The sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, so she must be 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old.\" is relevant because it tells us that the sum of her brother's ages is 24. Without this information, we would not know how old Hannah is.\nFirst, we need to calculate the sum of the ages of Hannah's three brothers. Since they are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 3 x 8 = 24.  Now, we need to calculate how old Hannah is if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. Since the sum of her brother's ages is 24, then Hannah is twice as old as 24, which is 48 years old.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?\" is 48.  The condition \"Ada is 10000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since it does not provide any information about Hannah's age.", "equation": "Ada is 10000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.20937368273735046]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. The height of Tom is 1000 feet. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Claire is currently 18 years old and will be 20 years old in two years. Therefore, Jessica is six years older than Claire, so she is currently 24 years old. The height of Tom is 1000 feet does not affect the calculation of Jessica's age, so it is not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jessica is six years older than Claire and Claire will be 20 years old in two years. To calculate Jessica's age now, we need to add six years to Claire's current age. So the answer would be: 18 years + 6 years = 24 years. Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Jessica is six years older than Claire now. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Therefore, Jessica will be 22 years old. The height of Tom is 1000 feet, which is not relevant to the calculation process of Jessica's age.\nClaire is currently 18 years old and will be 20 years old in two years.   Jessica is six years older than Claire, so she is currently 24 years old.   The height of Tom is 1000 feet does not affect the calculation of Jessica's age, so it is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Tom is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, -0.04184599220752716]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. The height of Mary is 20000 feet. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit, so her new balance is $80. She then made a $4 withdrawal, so her new balance is $76. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76. The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it is the starting point of the calculation. The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is necessary for us to add the $15 deposit to the initial bank balance of $65 in order to calculate the new balance. The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is also relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us that we need to subtract $4 from Lucy's bank balance after the deposit. Without this information, we would not know to subtract the $4 from the bank balance. The height of Mary is not relevant to this calculation. Therefore, the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Lucy has $65 in the bank.  She made a $15 deposit.  Her bank balance is now $80.  She then made a $4 withdrawal.  Her bank balance is now $76.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76. The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it is the starting point of the calculation.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit, so her new balance is $80. She then made a $4 withdrawal, so her new balance is $76. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is necessary for us to add the $15 deposit to the initial bank balance of $65 in order to calculate the new balance. The height of Mary is not relevant to this calculation.\nFirst, Lucy has $65 in the bank.  Second, she made a $15 deposit. That means her bank balance is now $65 + $15 = $80.  Third, she made a $4 withdrawal. That means her bank balance is now $80 - $4 = $76.   So the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.  The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us that we need to subtract $4 from Lucy's bank balance after the deposit. Without this information, we would not know to subtract the $4 from the bank balance.\nLucy had $65 in the bank. After the $15 deposit, she had $80 in the bank. After the $4 withdrawal, she had $76 in the bank. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"The height of Mary is 20000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Mary is 20000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637164354324341, 0.30860891938209534, 0.2903803884983063, 0.10424382984638214]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Mary bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Mary bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 +", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "If Michael has 550 chickens now, after 1 year, he will have 700 chickens (550 + 150). After 2 years, he will have 850 chickens (700 + 150). After 3 years, he will have 1000 chickens (850 + 150).  We can see that the number of chickens Michael has increases by 150 every year. This means that after 9 years, he will have 1650 chickens (1000 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150).  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe given information is that Michael has a chicken farm and his chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. The current number of chickens on his farm is 550.  We need to calculate the number of chickens Michael will have after 9 years. To do this, we need to multiply the number of chickens increasing annually (150) by the number of years (9).  Therefore, the number of chickens Michael will have after 9 years is 1350.  The condition that Mary bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.14307259023189545]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Abie's neighbor has 4 packets of candies. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "At first, Abie had 20 bags of chips. Then, she gave 4 bags to her friend and bought 6 more. So, in the end Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips. Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips.\" was relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition of Abie's neighbor having 4 packets of candies is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Abie had 20 bags of chips, she gave 4 bags to her friend, and she bought 6 more bags of chips. To calculate how many bags of chips Abie has in the end, we need to add the number of bags she gave away and the number of bags she bought to the original number of bags she had. So the answer would be: 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "At first, Abie had 20 bags of chips.  Then, she gave 4 bags to her friend and bought 6 more.  So, in the end Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips.  Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips.\" was relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips to begin with. Then she gave 4 bags to her friend, leaving her with 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips from the store, making her total score of bags of chips 22.  The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is necessary in order to calculate the total number of bags of chips that Abie has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips to start with.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  So she had 16 bags left.  Then she bought 6 more bags in the store.  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.  Yes, the condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store\" is relevant to the calculation process because it allows us to determine how many bags of chips Abie has in the end.\nFirst, Abie had 20 bags of chips. Second, she gave 4 bags to her friend. Third, she bought 6 bags of chips in the store.  So, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"Abie's neighbor has 4 packets of candies\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Abie's neighbor has 4 packets of candies.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.43025416135787964]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. The age of Hannah's sister is 25. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since they are all 8 years old, the sum is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Now, since Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, we can calculate her age by multiplying 24 by 2, giving us 48.  So, Hannah is 48 years old.   The condition that her sister is 25 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that her brothers are all 8 years old and that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. To calculate how old Hannah is, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages and then multiply it by 2. So the answer would be: 8 + 8 + 8 = 24. 24 x 2 = 48. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "The sum of the ages of her three brothers is 24. If Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brothers' ages, then she is 48 years old. The condition that her brothers are all 8 years old is relevant to the calculation process because if her brothers had been of different ages, the sum of their ages would have been different, and thus the answer to the question of how old Hannah is would have been different.\nFirst, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since they are all 8 years old, the sum is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Now, since Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, we can calculate her age by multiplying 24 by 2, giving us 48.  So, Hannah is 48 years old.   The condition \"The age of Hannah's sister is 25.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The age of Hannah's sister is 25.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.582188606262207]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Asia's brother sold a cake at the price of $150. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "Firstly, take the difference between the original price and the sale price of the dress.   Original Price of the dress: $350  Sale Price of the dress: $140   Difference = $350 - $140 = $210  Now, to calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference ($210) by the original price ($350).   Percentage off = $210/$350 = 60%  Yes, the condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Asia's brother sold a cake at the price of $150 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Firstly, take the difference between the original price and the sale price of the dress.   Original Price of the dress: $350  Sale Price of the dress: $140   Difference = $350 - $140 = $210  Now, to calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference ($210) by the original price ($350).   Percentage off = $210/$350 = 60%  Yes, the condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, let's calculate the amount of money saved by Asia at the sale:  $350 (original price) - $140 (sale price) = $210 (amount saved)  Second, let's calculate the percentage off that Asia got at the sale:  $210 (amount saved) / $350 (original price) = 0.6 (percentage off)  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   Yes, the condition \"It was originally priced at $350.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is necessary to know the original price in order to calculate the percentage off.\nThe dress was originally priced at $350.  Asia bought it on sale for $140.   To calculate the percentage off, we need to know the difference in price between the original cost and the sale cost.   The difference in price is $210 ($350 - $140).   To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference in price ($210) by the original cost ($350).   $210 / $350 = 0.6   To get the percentage, we need to multiply 0.6 by 100.   0.6 x 100 = 60  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition \"Asia's brother sold a cake at the price of $150\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Asia's brother sold a cake at the price of $150.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877838134766, 0.3318527042865753, 0.4553315341472626]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jennifer's brother shares 30 Christmas lights with friends. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets, and 502 yellow sweets. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many sweets Jennifer has.  Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many people Jennifer is sharing her sweets with.   We need to calculate how many sweets each person will get.   For the green sweets, each person will get 212 ÷ 4 = 53 green sweets.  For the blue sweets, each person will get 310 ÷ 4 = 77 blue sweets.  For the yellow sweets, each person will get 502 ÷ 4 = 126 yellow sweets.  Therefore, Jennifer and her 3 friends will get 53 green sweets, 77 blue sweets, and 126 yellow sweets each.  Yes, the condition that Jennifer's brother shares 30 Christmas lights with friends is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets, and 502 yellow sweets, and she is sharing them between herself and her 3 friends. To calculate how many sweets each person will get, we need to divide the total number of sweets by", "numerical_answer": 126, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer has in total: 212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow = 1024 sweets  Then, we need to divide the sweets between Jennifer and her 3 friends: 1024 / 4 = 256 sweets each  Finally, we need to take into account the 30 Christmas lights Jennifer's brother shared: 256 - 30 = 226 sweets each  Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will get 226 sweets each.  Yes, the condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because the calculation process assumes that Jennifer is dividing the sweets between herself and her 3 friends. If she were not doing this, then the calculation process and the answer would be different.\nIn order to answer the question \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\", we need to first calculate the total number of sweets. This is done by adding together the numbers of green, blue, and yellow sweets: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.  Now, we can divide the number of sweets by the number of people (4) to get the answer: 1024 / 4 = 256.  Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets.  The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect the total number of sweets. The number of green sweets is simply one piece of information that is needed to answer the question.\nFirst, let's work out how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will get in total.  Green sweets: 212 / 4 = 53 Blue sweets: 310 / 4 = 77.5 (rounded down to 77) Yellow sweets: 502 / 4 = 125.5 (rounded down to 125) Total: 355  So, Jennifer and her friends will get 355 sweets in total. Since there are 4 people, each person will get 355 / 4 = 88.75 (rounded down to 88) sweets.  The condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it affects the number of sweets that each person will get. If there were fewer blue or yellow sweets, the total number of sweets would be lower, and each person would get fewer sweets.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will get.   We can divide the total number of sweets (212 + 310 + 502 = 1024) by 4 since there are 4 people in total. Therefore, each person will get 256 sweets.   Next, we can divide each type of sweet among the 4 people. For the green sweets, there are 212 divided by 4 which is 53. For the blue sweets, there are 310 divided by 4 which is 77.5. For the yellow sweets, there are 502 divided by 4 which is 126.   Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will get 53 green sweets, 77.5 blue sweets and 126 yellow sweets each.   The condition \"Jennifer's brother shares 30 Christmas lights with friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\". Therefore, this condition does not affect the answer.", "equation": "Jennifer's brother shares 30 Christmas lights with friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.44718003273010254]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Lucy's mother walked 50 minutes to the bank. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "First, Lucy had $65 in the bank.  Second, she made a $15 deposit.  So, her bank balance became $80.  Third, she made a $4 withdrawal.  So, her bank balance is now $76.   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition that Lucy's mother walked 50 minutes to the bank is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lucy had $65 in the bank before making any transactions, she made a $15 deposit, and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. To calculate her bank balance, we need to add the $15 deposit and subtract the $4 withdrawal. So the answer would be: $65 + $15 - $4 = $76. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Step 1: Lucy has $65 in the bank.  Step 2: She made a $15 deposit.  Step 3: She then followed by a $4 withdrawal.   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is now $76. The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the starting point for the calculation.\n1. Lucy had $65 in the bank before making any transactions.  2. She then made a $15 deposit, so her new balance is $80.  3. She then made a $4 withdrawal, so her new balance is $76.   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is part of the transactions that led to the final balance.\nFirst, Lucy had $65 in the bank.  Second, she made a $15 deposit.  So, her bank balance became $80.  Third, she made a $4 withdrawal.  So, her bank balance is now $76.   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process because it changed her bank balance from $80 to $76.\nBefore the transaction, Lucy had $65 in the bank.  After making a $15 deposit, her bank balance increased by $15.  Then, she withdrew $4, so her bank balance decreased by $4.   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is now $76.   The condition that \"Lucy's mother walked 50 minutes to the bank\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Lucy's mother walked 50 minutes to the bank.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637162566184998, 0.3086090385913849, 0.29038047790527344, 0.39780759811401367]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The turtle of Janele's mother weighs 12 pounds. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats.  The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, so the total weight is 12 + 12 = 24 pounds.  The third cat weighs 14.7 pounds, so the total weight is 24 + 14.7 = 38.7 pounds.  The fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds, so the total weight is 38.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   Then, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.  The average weight of Janele's cats is the total weight divided by the number of cats.  The total weight is 48 pounds and the number of cats is 4.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.   The condition that Janele's mother's turtle weighs 12 pounds is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats and then divide it by the number of cats. So the answer is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of all 5 animals, which is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 + 12 = 59.  Then, we need to divide this total weight by the number of animals, which is 5.  59 / 5 = 11.8  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 11.8 pounds.  Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it tells us how many animals we need to include in the calculation. Without this condition, we would not know how many animals are involved and thus would not be able to accurately calculate the average weight.\nThe first step is to calculate the total weight of all Janele's cats. This requires adding the weight of each cat: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  The second step is to calculate the average. This requires dividing the total weight (48) by the number of cats (4): 48 / 4 = 12.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process because it does not affect the total weight or the average.\nThe first step is to calculate the total weight of all of Janele's cats. To do this, we add the weights of all four cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   The second step is to calculate the average weight. We do this by dividing the total weight (48) by the number of cats (4). 48 / 4 = 12.   The third weighs 14.7 pounds condition is relevant to the calculation process because it provides us with the weight of the third cat, which is necessary to calculate the total weight of all of Janele's cats. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats:  12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds  Second, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats:  48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The fourth cat's weight of 9.3 pounds is relevant to the calculation process of problem, since it is part of the total weight of Janele's cats.\nTo calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we first need to add up the weights of all four cats. This would be 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.0. We then need to divide this sum by the number of cats, which is 4. 48.0 / 4 = 12.0. This is the average weight of Janele's cats.   The condition that the turtle of Janele's mother weighs 12 pounds is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The turtle of Janele's mother weighs 12 pounds.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.4216209053993225]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Melies' mother cooked dinner with the meat at 10 pm. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, so we know he spent $164 on the meat (2 kg x $82/kg).  Second, Melies had $180 in his wallet before he paid for the meat.  So, after paying for the meat, Melies has $16 left ($180 - $164 = $16).  The condition that Melies' mother cooked dinner with the meat at 10 pm is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Melies bought 2 kg of meat and the meat costs $82 per kilogram. To calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat, we need to subtract the cost of the meat from the amount of money he had in his wallet. So the answer would be: 180 - (2 kg x $82/kg) = 16. Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which means he paid $164 (2 x $82) for the meat.   Second, Melies had $180 in his wallet before paying for the meat.   Third, he has $16 ($180 - $164) left after paying for the meat.   Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, it would not be possible to determine how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which means he spent $164 (2 x 82 = 164). That leaves him with $16 (180 - 164 = 16) remaining in his wallet. The condition that the meat costs $82 per kilogram is relevant to the calculation process, since it gives us the price of the meat that Melies had to pay for.\nStep 1: Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram.  Step 2: Melies has $180 in his wallet.  Step 3: Melies' mother cooked dinner with the meat at 10 pm.  Step 4: To calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat, we need to multiply the cost of the meat ($82 per kilogram) by the number of kilograms of meat (2 kilograms) that Melies purchased.  The calculation is: $82 x 2 = $164  So, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?\" because we need to know how much money Melies has in his wallet in order to calculate how much money he has left after paying for the meat.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, so we know he spent $164 on the meat (2 kg x $82/kg).  Second, Melies had $180 in his wallet before he paid for the meat.  So, after paying for the meat, Melies has $16 left ($180 - $164 = $16).  The condition \"Melies' mother cooked dinner with the meat at 10 pm\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Melies' mother cooked dinner with the meat at 10 pm.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.3787347078323364]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Edmund's sister sold 10 gift boxes yesterday. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "Firstly, we need to figure out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since it takes 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, we can divide 90 by 18 to get an answer of 5. This means that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Now, we need to figure out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day, he can wrap a total of 15 gift boxes over the course of 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap a total of 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper. The condition that Edmund's sister sold 10 gift boxes yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that it takes 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box and Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days, we need to divide the amount of gift wrapper by the amount needed to wrap one gift box and multiply that number by 3 (since it takes 3 days). So the answer would be: 90 inches of gift wrapper / 18 inches per gift box = 5 gift boxes per day. Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since it takes 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, we can divide 90 by 18 to get an answer of 5. This means that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Now, we need to figure out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day, he can wrap a total of 15 gift boxes over the course of 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap a total of 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper. The condition that Edmund's sister sold 10 gift boxes yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Edmund's sister sold 10 gift boxes yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.4166198968887329]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The company that Charles' father works for has 390200 employees. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the population of Greenville: 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987. Step 2: Calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville: 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.  The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the population of Springfield and the number of people fewer in Greenville. This information is necessary in order to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. The condition \"The company that Charles' father works for has 390200 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process, because it does not provide any information about the population of Springfield and Greenville.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the population of Greenville: 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.  Step 2: Calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville: 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.  The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the population of Springfield and the number of people fewer in Greenville. This information is necessary in order to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville.\nFirst, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since it has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987.   Next, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. We can add the population of Springfield (482,653) to the population of Greenville (362,987) to get the total population of Springfield and Greenville, which is 845,640.  The condition \"The company that Charles' father works for has 390200 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process, because it does not provide any information about the population of Springfield and Greenville.", "equation": "The company that Charles' father works for has 390200 employees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.11799843609333038]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. The hourly salary of Melies' brother is $50. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies paid for the two kilos of meat. The cost of two kilos of meat is $82 x 2 = $164.  Second, Melies had $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is necessary to know how much meat Melies bought in order to calculate how much money he has left after paying for the meat. The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is also relevant to the calculation process, because the cost of the meat was used in the calculation. The hourly salary of Melies' brother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, Melies paid for the two kilos of meat. The cost of two kilos of meat is $82 x 2 = $164.  Second, Melies had $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is necessary to know how much meat Melies bought in order to calculate how much money he has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies has $180 in his wallet. He buys 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total cost of the meat is $164.  Subtracting the cost of the meat from Melies' wallet, we can calculate that he has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process, because the cost of the meat was used in the calculation.\nThe cost of 2 kg of meat is $82 x 2 = $164.   Melies has $180 in his wallet.   So, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.   The hourly salary of Melies' brother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nMelies has $180 in his wallet. He has bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kg. So, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = 164. Therefore, Melies has 180 - 164 = 16 dollars left in his wallet after paying for the meat.  The condition \"The hourly salary of Melies' brother is $50.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The hourly salary of Melies' brother is $50.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.3855486512184143]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The turtle of Janele's mother weighs 8 pounds. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the weights of all of Janele's cats. This would be 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Next, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats. In this case, that would be 48 / 4 = 12.   So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process. The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process because the total number of cats is what we use to divide the total weight to get the average weight of Janele's cats. The condition that the turtle of Janele's mother weighs 8 pounds is also not relevant to the calculation process, since it is not one of her cats. Therefore, the answer is that the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to add up the weights of all of Janele's cats. This would be 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Next, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats. In this case, that would be 48 / 4 = 12.   So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process because the total number of cats is what we use to divide the total weight to get the average weight of Janele's cats.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of all the cats' weights divided by the number of cats. In this case, the sum of the cats' weights is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds, and the number of cats is 4. So the average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.   The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we add up all the weights of her cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   Now, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we divide the total weight of her cats (48) by the number of cats she has (4): 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.   The condition that the third cat weighs 14.7 pounds is relevant to the calculation process, since this weight was added into the total weight of Janele's cats. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.   Therefore, the answer is that the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is calculated by adding up the total weight of all the cats and then dividing that total by the number of cats. In this case, Janele has four cats, so the equation would be (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) / 4. The answer is 11.225 pounds. The condition that the fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds is relevant to the calculation process, since it affects the total weight of all the cats and thus the average weight.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats can be found by adding up the weights of her four cats and then dividing by four. So, the equation would be: (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) / 4 = 11.425 pounds.  The turtle of Janele's mother is not relevant to the calculation process, as it is not one of her cats. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 11.425 pounds.", "equation": "The turtle of Janele's mother weighs 8 pounds.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.43086525797843933]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Tom's mother picked 3 more pears than Tom. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many apples Tom picked.  Therefore, Tom picked 24 apples.  Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.  The condition that Tom's mother picked 3 more pears than Tom is not relevant to the calculation process of how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. To calculate how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether, we need to add the number of apples picked by Lexie to the number of apples picked by Tom. So the answer would be: 12 + 24 = 36 apples. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "Lexie picked 12 apples.  Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so he picked 24 apples.   Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.   The condition about Tom's mother picking 3 more pears than Tom is not relevant to the calculation process of how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether.", "equation": "Tom's mother picked 3 more pears than Tom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.45788079500198364]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Tom's father sold 8 more bananas than Tom. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's determine how many apples Tom picked. Since Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, Tom picked 24 apples.  Then, we can calculate the total number of apples that Lexie and Tom collected altogether. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked 24 apples, so the total number of apples that Lexie and Tom collected altogether is 36 apples.  The condition \"Tom's father sold 8 more bananas than Tom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?\" So the answer would be: 12 apples + 24 apples = 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "First, let's determine how many apples Tom picked. Since Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, Tom picked 24 apples.  Then, we can calculate the total number of apples that Lexie and Tom collected altogether. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked 24 apples, so the total number of apples that Lexie and Tom collected altogether is 36 apples.  The condition \"Tom's father sold 8 more bananas than Tom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?\"", "equation": "Tom's father sold 8 more bananas than Tom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.32096943259239197]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. James' sister was willing to remove 15 trees but eventually didn't remove any. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James has 2 trees, each with 20 plants. That's 40 plants total. Each plant has 1 seed, so James has 40 seeds total. He plants 60% of those seeds, so he plants 24 seeds. His sister was willing to remove 15 trees, but eventually didn't remove any. So, the answer is that James planted 24 trees. The condition that James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees is not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is that each tree has 20 plants and each plant has 1 seed, and that James planted 60% of those seeds. To calculate how many trees James planted, we need to divide the number of seeds he planted by the number of seeds per tree. So the answer would be: 24 seeds/1 seed per tree = 24 trees. Therefore, James planted 24 trees.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James has 2 trees, each with 20 plants. That's 40 plants total.  Each plant has 1 seed, so James has 40 seeds total.  He plants 60% of those seeds, so he plants 24 seeds.  His sister was willing to remove 15 trees, but eventually didn't remove any.  So, the answer is that James planted 24 trees.   The condition that James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees is not relevant to the calculation process.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees.  Each tree has 20 plants, so James collected 40 fruits.  Each plant has 1 seed, so James collected 40 seeds.  He planted 60% of those, so James planted 24 seeds.  James' sister was willing to remove 15 trees, but ultimately did not remove any.   Therefore, James planted 2 trees (24 seeds divided by 12 seeds per tree).   The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it allows us to determine how many fruits and seeds James collected initially.\nJames collected all the fruits from his two trees, which means he had 40 plants in total.   Each plant has 1 seed, so he had 40 seeds in total.   He then planted 60% of those, which is 24 seeds.   Finally, his sister was willing to remove 15 trees but eventually didn't remove any.   Therefore, James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many seeds James had in total, which is used to determine how many trees James planted.\nJames initially has 2 trees with 20 plants each, so he has a total of 40 plants.  Each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds.  He plants 60% of those, which is 24 seeds.  Since each seed is a tree, James plants 24 trees.  The condition that his sister was willing to remove 15 trees is not relevant to this calculation as she ultimately did not remove any trees.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 24.\nJames started with 2 trees that had 20 plants each. He collected all the seeds from each plant, so he had 40 total seeds. He then planted 60% of those seeds, so he planted 24 trees.   The condition about James' sister is not relevant to this calculation, as she did not actually remove any trees. Therefore, the answer is 24 trees.", "equation": "James' sister was willing to remove 15 trees but eventually didn't remove any.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002103567123413, 0.20483243465423584, 0.3861715495586395, 0.37680602073669434]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Gretchen's father uses 30 pencils for each drawing. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 on Sunday. So she sold a total of 40 drawings. To calculate how much money she made, we can multiply the number of drawings by the price of each drawing. In this case, she charged $20.00 per drawing, so we can multiply 40 (number of drawings) by 20 (price of each drawing) to get 800. So Gretchen made $800.00 from selling her caricatures.  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it tells us the price of each drawing, which is needed in order to calculate the total amount of money Gretchen made from selling her caricatures. The condition \"Gretchen's father uses 30 pencils for each drawing\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 on Sunday. So she sold a total of 40 drawings. To calculate how much money she made, we can multiply the number of drawings by the price of each drawing. In this case, she charged $20.00 per drawing, so we can multiply 40 (number of drawings) by 20 (price of each drawing) to get 800. So Gretchen made $800.00 from selling her caricatures.  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it tells us the price of each drawing, which is needed in order to calculate the total amount of money Gretchen made from selling her caricatures.\nGretchen charged $20.00 per drawing. So, she made $20.00 x 24 = $480.00 on Saturday, and $20.00 x 16 = $320.00 on Sunday.  Therefore, Gretchen made a total of $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00.  The condition \"Gretchen's father uses 30 pencils for each drawing\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Gretchen's father uses 30 pencils for each drawing.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.24141564965248108]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. In addition, Salem's sister wrote 5 articles. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate the number of words in each stanza: 10 lines x 8 words = 80 words.  Then, let's calculate the number of words in the poem: 20 stanzas x 80 words = 1,600 words.  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant, as it tells us the number of stanzas in the poem, which we need to calculate the total number of words. The condition that Salem's sister wrote 5 articles is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not provide any additional information about the number of words in the poem. So the answer would be: 1,600 words.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "First, let's calculate the number of words in each stanza: 10 lines x 8 words = 80 words.  Then, let's calculate the number of words in the poem: 20 stanzas x 80 words = 1,600 words.  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant, as it tells us the number of stanzas in the poem, which we need to calculate the total number of words.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of words in the poem. There are 20 stanzas, each with 10 lines, and each line has 8 words. That means there are a total of 160 lines in the poem. Multiplying 160 lines by 8 words, we get a total of 1280 words in the poem.  The condition \"In addition, Salem's sister wrote 5 articles.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not provide any additional information about the number of words in the poem.", "equation": "In addition, Salem's sister wrote 5 articles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.12511785328388214]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Michelle's neighbor rode a bike to the office for 8 miles. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 when she entered the taxi. Then, the taxi charged her $2.5 per mile for the 4 miles that she traveled. So, the total amount that Michelle paid for her ride is $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $12. The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it affects the total amount that Michelle paid for her ride. The condition of Michelle's neighbor riding a bike for 8 miles is not relevant to the calculation process, since it has no impact on the amount Michelle pays for her ride.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 when she entered the taxi.  Then, the taxi charged her $2.5 per mile for the 4 miles that she traveled.  So, the total amount that Michelle paid for her ride is $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $12.  The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it affects the total amount that Michelle paid for her ride.\nFirst, Michelle pays the ride fee of $2 as soon as she enters the taxi.   Second, she has to pay $2.5 per mile. Since she rode the taxi for 4 miles, her total cost for the ride would be $10 (2+2.5*4).   Therefore, the total amount Michelle paid for her ride would be $12 ($2+$10).   The condition about her neighbor riding a bike is not relevant to the calculation process, since it has no impact on the amount Michelle pays for her ride.\nFirst, the taxi ride fee is $2.  Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, so Michelle paid $2.5 x 4 = $10 for the 4 miles she rode.  In total, Michelle paid $2 + $10 = $12 for her ride.  The condition of Michelle's neighbor riding a bike for 8 miles is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the amount Michelle paid for her taxi ride.", "equation": "Michelle's neighbor rode a bike to the office for 8 miles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.3400713801383972]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Edmund's neighbor owns 20 gift shops in the city. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: How many inches of gift wrapper does Edmund need to wrap one gift box? Answer: 18 inches  Step 2: How many gift boxes can Edmund wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper? Answer: 5 gift boxes (90 inches divided by 18 inches = 5 gift boxes)  Step 3: How many gift boxes can Edmund wrap every 3 days? Answer: 15 gift boxes (5 gift boxes x 3 days = 15 gift boxes)  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  The condition \"Edmund's neighbor owns 20 gift shops in the city\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Edmund needs 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box and he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper and multiply that by 3. So the answer would be 5 gift boxes x 3 days = 15 gift boxes. Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "Step 1: How many inches of gift wrapper does Edmund need to wrap one gift box? Answer: 18 inches  Step 2: How many gift boxes can Edmund wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper? Answer: 5 gift boxes (90 inches divided by 18 inches = 5 gift boxes)  Step 3: How many gift boxes can Edmund wrap every 3 days? Answer: 15 gift boxes (5 gift boxes x 3 days = 15 gift boxes)  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  The condition \"Edmund's neighbor owns 20 gift shops in the city\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Edmund's neighbor owns 20 gift shops in the city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.3521319031715393]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Hamza's neighbor drinks 7 liters of milk every day. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. That means Hamza can fill the 3-liter bucket with 3 liters of water. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. That means the 6-liter bucket can hold 5 - 3 = 2 liters of water. Therefore, Hamza can put 2 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.  Yes, the condition \"holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Hamza's neighbor drinks 7 liters of milk every day is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing. We can calculate this by subtracting the amount of water that can be poured into the 3-liter bucket from the amount of water that the 6-liter bucket can hold. So the answer is 2 liters.", "numerical_answer": 2, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket with water and poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket is now full.   Second, she poured the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now contains the remainder of the water from the 5-liter bucket.   The condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because the buckets are no longer empty.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?\" is 2 liters.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. This bucket now contains 5 liters of water.   Next, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Because the 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters, it is now full. This means that Hamza has 2 liters of water left in the 5-liter bucket.   Finally, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now contains 2 liters of water.  Therefore, Hamza can put 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   Yes, the condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process.\nHamza filled the 5-liter bucket with water, so it now holds 5 liters of water.   She then poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket, which would be 3 liters.   So the 5-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water.   She then poured the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket, which now holds 8 liters of water.  Therefore, Hamza can add 1 more liter of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, for a total of 9 liters.  Yes, the condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it helps us understand how much water is in the 6-liter bucket.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. As the 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters, Hamza can only pour 3 liters of water into it. Therefore, she is left with 2 liters of water in the 5-liter bucket.   Second, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now holds 2 liters of water.   Therefore, Hamza can put 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing it, making the total volume of water in the bucket 6 liters.  The condition \"Hamza's neighbor drinks 7 liters of milk every day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Hamza's neighbor drinks 7 liters of milk every day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.38884320855140686]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Hamza's brother drinks 4 liters of milk every day. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and then pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. That means she pours 3 liters into the 3-liter bucket, leaving 2 liters in the 5-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it. Hamza's brother drinks 4 liters of milk every day. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters, and that she filled the 5-liter bucket and poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket, before pouring the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. To calculate how much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing, we need to subtract the amount of water already in the 6-liter bucket (2 liters) from the capacity of the 6-liter bucket (6 liters). So the answer would be: 6 - 2 = 4 liters.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This will leave 2 liters in the 5-liter bucket.   Next, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This will leave 4 liters in the 6-liter bucket.   Finally, Hamza's brother drinks 4 liters of milk every day, so no more water can be added to the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  So, the answer is 0 liters.   The condition given \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides information about the size of the buckets and the maximum amount of water that can be added to each bucket.\nHamza has a 5-liter bucket full of water. She pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This leaves the 5-liter bucket with 2 liters. She then pours the 2 liters into the 6-liter bucket. This leaves the 6-liter bucket with 4 liters of water.   Hamza's brother drinks 4 liters of milk every day, so the 6-liter bucket must contain 4 liters of water in order to not overflow.   Therefore, Hamza can put no more water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   Yes, the condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, Hamza would not have been able to fill the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nFirst, Hamza poured as much of the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket as she could. We know that 3 liters is the capacity of the 3-liter bucket, so she would have poured all 5 liters of the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket would now be full.   The remainder of the 5 liters of water can then be poured into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket would now have 2 liters of water in it.   The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how much more water Hamza can pour into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing: 2 liters. So, the answer is 2 liters.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. After that, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket.  The 3-liter and 5-liter buckets can only hold 3 liters and 5 liters respectively, so Hamza can only pour 2 liters into the 6-liter bucket.  Therefore, Hamza can put 2 liters more into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The condition \"Hamza's brother drinks 4 liters of milk every day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Hamza's brother drinks 4 liters of milk every day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.3642303943634033]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's father sells 4 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "In one day, Jason consumes 3 eggs, so in seven days he will consume 3 x 7 = 21 eggs.  In two weeks, he will consume 3 x 14 = 42 eggs.  Yes, the condition \"Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Jason's father sells 4 eggs per day is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many eggs Jason consumes in two weeks. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of eggs Jason eats per day by the number of days in two weeks. So the answer is 42 eggs.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Jason consumes three eggs every morning, so in one day he consumes nine eggs. Over two weeks, that's nine eggs multiplied by fourteen, so Jason will consume 126 eggs in two weeks.   Yes, the condition \"Jason's father sells 4 eggs per day\" is relevant to the calculation process; it helps determine how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks.", "equation": "Jason's father sells 4 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.469149649143219]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Perry's neighbor was planning to add some oil, which has 60 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Perry added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. That means, Perry added 44 grams of fat (88 grams of fat per cup x 0.5 cup). Since the recipe serves four people, each serving will get 44/4 = 11 grams of fat (44 grams of fat / 4 people). Perry's neighbor was planning to add some oil, which has 60 grams of fat per cup. However, finally he gave it up, so no oil was added to the recipe. The total amount of fat added to each serving of food is 11 grams. Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us how much fat was added to the recipe. The condition \"Perry's neighbor was planning to add some oil, which has 60 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up\" is also relevant as it tells us that oil was not added to the recipe.  So the answer is 11 grams.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, Perry added a half cup of cream, which has 88 grams of fat per cup. So, he added 44 grams of fat.   Second, Perry's neighbor was planning to add some oil, which has 60 grams of fat per cup. But, they decided against it. So, no additional fat was added.   Therefore, the total fat added to each serving of food was 44 grams.   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?\" because it is used to calculate the amount of fat added to each serving of food.\nPerry added a half cup of cream to the recipe, which has 88 grams of fat per cup.   So, half a cup of cream would give 44 grams of fat.   Since Perry's neighbor did not add any oil, no additional fat was added.   Therefore, each serving of food would have 44 grams of fat from the cream.   The condition of Perry's neighbor not adding oil is not relevant to the calculation process as it did not impact the amount of fat added to the recipe.", "equation": "Perry's neighbor was planning to add some oil, which has 60 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2928876578807831, 0.37331458926200867, 0.579214870929718, 0.265256404876709]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The company that Charles' mother works for has 174285 employees. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "The total population of Springfield is 482,653 people. Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so the total population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people. The total population of Springfield and Greenville together is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people. The condition that the company Charles' mother works for has 174285 employees is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people. To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to subtract 119,666 from the population of Springfield and then add this number to the total population of Springfield. So the answer would be: 482,653 + (482,653 - 119,666) = 845,640.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "1. We know that Springfield has 482,653 people. 2. We also know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. 3. So, Greenville has (482,653 - 119,666) = 362,987 people. 4. The company that Charles' mother works for has 174285 employees. 5. Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is (482,653 + 362,987 + 174,285) = 1,019,925 people.  Yes, the given condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without it, we would not be able to calculate the population of Greenville.\nFirst, let's add the populations of Springfield and Greenville:  Springfield: 482,653 Greenville: 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987  Total population of Springfield and Greenville: 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640  The condition \"The company that Charles' mother works for has 174285 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not provide any information about the populations of Springfield and Greenville.", "equation": "The company that Charles' mother works for has 174285 employees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.15505918860435486]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Julia's neighbor bought 2 packs of purple cubes. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many packs of red balls Julia bought.  There were 19 balls in each package. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many balls were in each package.  That means Julia bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls (3 packs x 19 balls).  Julia bought 10 packs of yellow balls. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many packs of yellow balls Julia bought.  There were 19 balls in each package. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many balls were in each package.  That means Julia bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls (10 packs x 19 balls).  Julia bought 8 packs of green balls. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many packs of green balls Julia bought.  There were 19 balls in each package. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many balls were in each package.  That means Julia bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls (8 packs x 19 balls).  Yes, the condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, Julia bought 3 packs of red balls. This means she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls.  Second, Julia bought 10 packs of yellow balls. This means she bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls.  Third, Julia bought 8 packs of green balls. This means she bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Finally, her neighbor bought 2 packs of purple cubes. This means they bought 2 x 19 = 38 purple balls.  In total, Julia bought 57 + 190 + 152 + 38 = 437 balls.  Yes, the condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it is part of the calculation to determine how many balls she bought in total.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That's a total of 21 packs of balls. Each pack had 19 balls, so 21 x 19 = 399.   Julie's neighbor bought 2 packs of purple cubes, but this isn't relevant to the calculation process since we're only calculating the number of balls that Julie bought.   Therefore, the answer is 399.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. So, she bought a total of 21 packs of balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so the total number of balls that Julie bought is 21 x 19 = 399.  The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process because it specifies the number of packs of green balls that Julie bought, which is 8. This number is used to calculate the total number of balls that Julie bought.  Julie's neighbor bought 2 packs of purple cubes, which is not relevant to the calculation process.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That means she bought a total of 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Her neighbor bought 2 packs of purple cubes, meaning he bought a total of 2 x 19 = 38 purple balls.  So, in total, Julie and her neighbor bought 57 + 190 + 152 + 38 = 437 balls.  The condition \"there were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many balls were in each package and therefore how many balls were bought in total.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. We can calculate this as 3x19 + 10x19 + 8x19 = 561. The condition that Julia's neighbor bought 2 packs of purple cubes is not relevant to the calculation process, because it does not add any balls to the total that Julia bought. Therefore, the answer is 561.", "equation": "Julia's neighbor bought 2 packs of purple cubes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315248966217041, 0.4110040068626404, 0.4391424357891083, 0.48471662402153015, 0.39483368396759033]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's mother harvested 117 more potatoes last year. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That's a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots Kelly harvested: 234/6 = 39 pounds. The condition that Kelly's mother harvested 117 more potatoes last year is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. The relevant information to answer this question is the number of carrots Kelly harvested from each bed and the fact that 6 carrots weigh 1 pound. To calculate the total number of pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, we need to divide the total number of carrots by 6. So the answer would be: 234 carrots divided by 6 = 39 pounds. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed and 78 carrots from the third bed.   In total she harvested 234 carrots.   Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can calculate the total weight of the carrots by multiplying 234 by 6.   Therefore, Kelly harvested 1,404 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the question \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" It is only relevant to the number of carrots she harvested in the first bed.\nKelly harvested 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  6 carrots weigh 1 pound, so 234 carrots will weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds.   The condition that Kelly's mother harvested 117 more potatoes last year is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That's a total of 234 carrots.  Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots Kelly harvested: 234/6 = 39 pounds.  The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it informs us of the total number of carrots Kelly harvested from all three beds. Without this information, we wouldn't be able to accurately calculate the total number of pounds of carrots she harvested.  Kelly's mother harvesting 117 more potatoes last year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 from the second bed, and 78 from the third bed. In total, that is 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, we can divide 234 by 6. 234 divided by 6 is equal to 39 pounds. The condition of 6 carrots weighing one pound is relevant because it is used in the calculation process.  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.\nKelly harvested 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots. Multiply by 6 to find out the total number of pounds. 234 x 6 = 1,404 lbs of carrots. The condition \"Kelly's mother harvested 117 more potatoes last year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Kelly's mother harvested 117 more potatoes last year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.4834693670272827]}
{"original_question": "Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. Among all students who have been taught by Mr.Angstadt's brother, 20 percent of them enrolled in Discrete Math. How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?", "reasoning_path": "Mr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics, so that would be 60 students. Of those 60 students, 90 percent are seniors. That means there are 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics. The condition that Mr. Angstadt's brother taught some of the students is not relevant to the calculation process of how many seniors are enrolled in Statistics. So, the answer is 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics.", "numerical_answer": 54, "gold_answer": "54", "instructions": "First, we know that Mr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics, which is 60 students. Of those 60 students, 90% are seniors. That means there are 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics.   The condition that Mr. Angstadt's brother taught some of the students is not relevant to the calculation process of how many seniors are enrolled in Statistics. So, the answer is 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics.\nMr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. This means that there are 120 students in total.   Half of them are enrolled in Statistics, so that would be 60 students.   Of those 60 students, 90 percent are seniors, so that would be 54 seniors.   Among all students who have been taught by Mr.Angstadt's brother, 20 percent of them enrolled in Discrete Math. This is not relevant to the calculation process of how many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics, so we can ignore this information.   Therefore, the answer is 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics.\nMr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. That means there are 60 students enrolled in Statistics.   Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. That means that 90% of 60 students, or 54 students, are seniors enrolled in Statistics.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?\" is 54.  The condition \"Among all students who have been taught by Mr.Angstadt's brother, 20 percent of them enrolled in Discrete Math.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Among all students who have been taught by Mr. Angstadt's brother, 20 percent of them enrolled in Discrete Math.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5140396952629089, 0.5659633874893188, 0.695655345916748, 0.5897152423858643]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Hannah's mother is 30 years old. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "The sum of her brothers' ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Hannah is twice that age, so Hannah is 24 * 2 = 48 years old.  The condition that her brothers are all 8 years old is relevant to the problem, as it determines the sum of her brothers' ages. Without this condition, the answer would be different. The condition that Hannah's mother is 30 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "The sum of her brothers' ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.   Hannah is twice that age, so Hannah is 48 years old.   The condition that her brothers are all 8 years old is relevant to the problem, as it determines the sum of her brothers' ages. Without this condition, the answer would be different.\nWe know that each of Hannah's brothers is 8 years old, so the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, so she must be 24 * 2 = 48 years old.  The condition that Hannah's mother is 30 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Hannah's mother is 30 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.5282731652259827]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Tom's brother picked 3 more pears than Tom. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many apples each person picked. That means Tom picked 24 apples. So, the total number of apples they collected was 12 + 24 = 36 apples. The condition \"Tom's brother picked 3 more pears than Tom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?\" because the question is only asking about the number of apples collected, not pears. Therefore, the answer would be 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "Lexie picked 12 apples, and Tom picked twice as many apples. That means Tom picked 24 apples.  So, the total number of apples they collected was 12 + 24 = 36 apples.  The condition \"Tom's brother picked 3 more pears than Tom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?\" because the question is only asking about the number of apples collected, not pears.", "equation": "Tom's brother picked 3 more pears than Tom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.4498840272426605]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The two dogs of Janele's father weigh 9 pounds each. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of all the cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Next, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats: 48 / 4 = 12 pounds. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The two dogs of Janele's father weigh 9 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since we are only trying to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. The relevant information to answer this question is that Janele has 4 cats with the weights of 12, 12, 14.7, and 9.3 pounds. To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weights of all the cats and divide by the number of cats. So the answer would be: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  48 / 4 = 12. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the total weight of all the cats:  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds  Step 2: Divide the total weight by the number of cats:  48 / 4 = 12 pounds  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it tells us how many cats there are, which is necessary for us to calculate the average weight.\nFirst, we need to add up the weights of all of Janele's cats. This is called calculating the \"sum\" of the weights.   So we have: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Next, we need to divide the sum by the number of cats in Janele's household, which is 4.   So 48 divided by 4 = 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it helped us to determine that the sum of the cats' weights is 48. Without this information, we would not have been able to calculate the average weight.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of the four cats. This would be 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then, we need to divide this total by the number of cats, which is 4. The average weight of Janele's cats is 48 姊 4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is necessary for us to know the exact weight of each cat in order to accurately calculate the average weight.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. So, we need to add the weights of all four cats and divide the total by the number of cats. In this case, the total weight of the cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. The number of cats is 4. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.   The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\" because it provides information about the weight of one of the cats, which is necessary to calculate the average weight.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we must add all the weights together and then divide by the number of cats. In this case, we have 4 cats, so we will add the weights of the four cats and divide by 4:  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  48 / 4 = 12  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition that \"The two dogs of Janele's father weigh 9 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since we are only trying to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.", "equation": "The two dogs of Janele's father weigh 9 pounds each.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.346516877412796]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The turtle of Janele's father weighs 12 pounds. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to figure out the total weight of the cats. The total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. The second step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats. Since Janele has 4 cats, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds. The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells you how many cats you need to include in the calculation. The condition \"The turtle of Janele's father weighs 12 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\". This is because the turtle does not belong to Janele and is therefore not included in the calculation. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The first step is to figure out the total weight of the cats. The total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. The second step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats. Since Janele has 4 cats, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds. The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells you how many cats you need to include in the calculation.\nWe need to calculate Janele's cats' average weight so we can ignore the turtle of Janele's father.  The relevant condition is that the first two cats weigh 12 pounds each. That means their combined weight is 24 pounds.  We can calculate the combined weight of the remaining two cats: 14.7 + 9.3 = 24.  Now that we have the combined weight of all four cats, we can calculate the average weight. 24 divided by 4 is 6, so the average weight of Janele's cats is 6 pounds.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats.  We have 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds  Then, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats.  48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is used to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. Without it, we would have had an incorrect result.\nJanele has 4 cats. The first two weigh 12 pounds each and the third weighs 14.7 pounds. The fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The total weight of all four cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. To find the average weight, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats. 48 姊 4 = 12. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the weight of the fourth cat, which is necessary for calculating the total weight of all four cats.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. We have 4 cats, and the first two weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds, and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. This means the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Now, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to divide the total weight of Janele's cats (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4). This gives us an average weight of 48/4 = 12 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The turtle of Janele's father weighs 12 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\". This is because the turtle does not belong to Janele and is therefore not included in the calculation.", "equation": "The turtle of Janele's father weighs 12 pounds.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.34637171030044556]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The price of the cycling equipment is $2000, and neither Jack nor Jack's neighbor is willing to make a purchase. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, so it cost $250. The cycling equipment cost $2000, but neither Jack nor his neighbor was willing to make a purchase, so the cycling equipment does not need to be included in the calculation. Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 ($2500 + $250) for the squat rack and the barbell. The condition regarding the cycling equipment is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "1. Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. 2. The barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, so it cost $250. 3. The cycling equipment cost $2000.  So, Jack paid a total of $2500 + $250 + $2000 = $4750 for everything.   Yes, the condition of Jack buying a squat rack for $2500 is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to calculate the price of the barbell and the total cost.\nJack bought the squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so that would be $250. The cycling equipment cost $2000. Adding these three together, Jack paid a total of $4750 for everything.   Yes, the condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\" Without this information, we wouldn't know how much Jack paid for the barbell.\n1. Jack bought a squat rack for $2500.  2. The barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, so $2500 divided by 10 = $250.  3. The cycling equipment was $2000, but neither Jack nor his neighbor was willing to make a purchase, so the cycling equipment does not need to be included in the calculation.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 ($2500 + $250) for the squat rack and the barbell. The condition regarding the cycling equipment is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The price of the cycling equipment is $2000, and neither Jack nor Jack's neighbor is willing to make a purchase.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110712051391602, 0.16832022368907928, 0.2963593900203705]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's brother drinks 4 more glasses of juice than Jason does. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Since Jason eats an omelet made with three eggs every morning, he will consume 21 eggs in one week. To calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we just need to double the number of eggs he consumes in one week: 42 eggs. The condition \"Jason's brother drinks 4 more glasses of juice than Jason does\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jason eats an omelet made with three eggs every morning. To calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we just need to double the number of eggs he consumes in one week. So the answer would be: 3 eggs x 7 days x 2 weeks = 42 eggs. Therefore, Jason will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "First, let's calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in one week. Since Jason eats an omelet made with three eggs every morning, he will consume 21 eggs in one week.   Now, to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we just need to double the number of eggs he consumes in one week: 42 eggs.   The condition \"Jason's brother drinks 4 more glasses of juice than Jason does\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jason's brother drinks 4 more glasses of juice than Jason does.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.3557513952255249]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Claire's father is 10 years older than Jessica. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Claire is currently 18 years old and in two years will be 20 years old. Second, we know that Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old now. Finally, Claire's father is 10 years older than Jessica, so Claire's father is 34 years old. Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old now. Yes, the condition \"Claire's father is 10 years older than Jessica\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Claire is currently 18 years old and Jessica is six years older than Claire. To calculate Jessica's age now, we need to add 6 years to Claire's current age. So the answer would be: 18 + 6 = 24. Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Claire is currently 18 years old.  Jessica is six years older than Claire, so she is currently 24 years old.  The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old.\" does not need to be relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as we already know that Claire is currently 18 years old.  Therefore, Jessica is currently 24 years old.\nFirst, Claire is currently 18 years old and in two years will be 20 years old.   Second, we know that Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old now.   Finally, Claire's father is 10 years older than Jessica, so Claire's father is 34 years old.   Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old now.   Yes, the condition \"Claire's father is 10 years older than Jessica\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Claire's father is 10 years older than Jessica.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.48844224214553833]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Every 5 months, Maria's neighbor buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Maria's neighbor. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long each soap bar lasts. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each soap bar costs. Every 5 months, Maria's neighbor buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Maria's neighbor. This is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the amount Maria will spend on soap for the year.  If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy 6 bars of soap ($8.00 per bar).  Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap for the year ($8.00 x 6 bars of soap).  Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Maria's neighbor buys a new shampoo and moisturizer every 5 months is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Maria will spend on soap for the year. We can calculate this by multiplying the cost of each bar of soap with the number of", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, Maria buys a large bar of French soap for $8.00. This will last her for two months.  Next, Maria's neighbor buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Maria every five months. This means Maria will need to buy a new bar of soap every five months.  Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy a total of three bars of soap (one every two months, plus an extra bar for the extra month).  This means Maria will spend a total of $24.00 on soap for the entire year ($8.00 x 3).  Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap.\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is the amount that Maria is spending per bar of soap.\nMaria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months and spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Therefore, she will need 6 bars of soap in a year and will spend $48.00 in total.  The condition \"Every 5 months, Maria's neighbor buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Maria's neighbor\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not affect the amount of money Maria will spend on soap.", "equation": "Every 5 months, Maria's neighbor buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Maria's neighbor.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.46253320574760437]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. The sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's sister is 30 feets. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "Steve's height is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. We know that he grows 6 inches, so his new height is 72 inches. His sister's height is 30 feet - 12 inches per foot, so she is 360 inches tall. Therefore, the sum of Steve's and his sister's heights is 72 inches + 360 inches = 432 inches. So, Steve's height is 72 inches. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us Steve's initial height which is needed to add 6 inches and calculate Steve's new height.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Steve's height is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. We know that he grows 6 inches, so his new height is 72 inches. His sister's height is 30 feet - 12 inches per foot, so she is 360 inches tall.   Therefore, the sum of Steve's and his sister's heights is 72 inches + 360 inches = 432 inches.   So, Steve's height is 72 inches. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us Steve's initial height which is needed to add 6 inches and calculate Steve's new height.\nFirstly, Steve's height is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches.  Secondly, since Steve grows 6 inches, his new height is now 72 inches (66 + 6).  Finally, since the sum of the heights of Steve and his sister is 30 feet, we can calculate Steve's sister's height by subtracting Steve's height from 30 feet.  30 feet - 72 inches = 24 feet  Therefore, Steve is now 72 inches tall.  Yes, the condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is necessary to know how much Steve has grown in order to calculate his new height.\nSteve is 5'6\" tall, which is equal to 66 inches. He grows 6 inches, so his new height is 72 inches. The condition provided in the question is irrelevant to the calculation process because it does not provide information about Steve's sister's height. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.", "equation": "The sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's sister is 30 feets.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495513558387756, 0.5135689973831177, 0.5018179416656494]}
{"original_question": "Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel are bird watching. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. Humphrey fed 6 monkeys. How many birds does each of them see on average?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the total number of birds each of them sees. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. Therefore, the total number of birds seen is 7 + 11 + 9 = 27 birds.  The second step is to calculate the average number of birds each of them sees. To do this, we divide the total number of birds (27) by the number of people bird watching (3). Therefore, the average number of birds each of them sees is 27/3 = 9 birds.  The condition \"Humphrey fed 6 monkeys\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many birds does each of them see on average?\" because it does not affect the average number of birds seen by all three of them.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the total number of birds each of them sees. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. Therefore, the total number of birds seen is 7 + 11 + 9 = 27 birds.  The second step is to calculate the average number of birds each of them sees. To do this, we divide the total number of birds (27) by the number of people bird watching (3). Therefore, the average number of birds each of them sees is 27/3 = 9 birds.  The condition \"and Darrel sees 9 birds.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many birds does each of them see on average?\" because it does not affect the average number of birds seen by all three of them.\nFirst, let's calculate the total number of birds seen by the three of them:  7 + 11 + 9 = 27 birds  Now, let's divide that total by 3 to get the average number of birds each of them sees:  27 / 3 = 9 birds  The condition of \"Humphrey fed 6 monkeys\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Humphrey fed 6 monkeys.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4831371605396271, 0.5573062300682068, 0.5210311412811279, 0.48639485239982605, 0.2783101797103882]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Luke's neighbor gave Luke 80 dollars. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, Luke needs to fill one bottle. He has already made 33 stars, but he needs 85 paper stars to fill the first bottle. That means he needs 85 - 33 = 52 more stars to fill the first bottle. Second, Luke needs to fill 3 more bottles. He needs 85 stars for each bottle, so he needs 85 x 3 = 255 more stars to fill the 3 bottles. Finally, we can add the 52 stars and the 255 stars to get the total number of stars Luke needs to make: 52 + 255 = 307 stars.  Yes, the condition \"Luke's neighbor gave Luke 80 dollars\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make.  We can calculate this by subtracting the number of stars he has already made from the total number of stars needed to fill the 4 bottles. So the answer would be: 307 stars.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, Luke needs to buy supplies in order to make the stars. Assuming Luke only needs to buy paper, he can buy a pack of 85 sheets of paper for 80 dollars.  Second, Luke needs to make the stars. Assuming Luke can make 2 stars from each sheet of paper, he will need to make 42 stars (85 sheets x 2 stars per sheet = 170 stars; 170 stars - 33 stars already made = 137 stars; 137 stars divided by 4 bottles = 34.25 stars per bottle; 34.25 stars per bottle rounded up = 35 stars per bottle; 35 stars per bottle x 4 bottles = 140 stars; 140 stars - 33 stars already made = 107 stars).  Therefore, Luke needs to make 107 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles. The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us determine the number of stars needed for each bottle (85 divided by 4 = 21.25 stars per bottle; 21.25 stars per bottle rounded up = 22 stars per bottle).\nFirst, Luke needs to make 85 stars in total to fill the glass jar.   Second, he has already made 33 stars, so he still needs to make 52 stars.   Third, he needs to fill 4 bottles, so he will need to make an extra 8 stars, for a total of 60 stars.   Finally, he has 80 dollars, which is more than enough to cover the cost of making the extra stars.   So, to answer the question, Luke must make an additional 27 stars to fill the 4 bottles.   Yes, the condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to calculate the number of stars he must make in total to fill the jars.\n1. 85 paper stars are needed to fill one glass jar. 2. Luke has already made 33 stars. 3. He needs to fill 4 bottles with stars.  Therefore, the total number of stars Luke needs to make is (85 x 4) = 340 stars.  The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it indicates that Luke needs to make more stars than just the 85 needed to fill one jar.\n1. Luke needs to make 85 paper stars to fill a glass jar. 2. He has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars to fill the jar.  3. He needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make an additional 208 stars.  4. Therefore, Luke needs to make a total of 260 stars.  The condition that Luke's neighbor gave him 80 dollars is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Luke's neighbor gave Luke 80 dollars.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.2394835501909256]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The car insurance of James' neighbor can cover at most $100 per year. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the amount that James's insurance will cover. Since the insurance covers 80%, we can calculate the amount as 0.8 x 300 = 240.  Second, we need to calculate the amount that James's neighbor's car insurance can cover. Since it can cover at most $100 per year, we can calculate the amount as 100.  Finally, we can calculate James's out-of-pocket cost as 300 - 240 - 100 = 60.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  Yes, the condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it is used in the calculation of James's insurance coverage.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the amount that James's insurance will cover. Since the insurance covers 80%, we can calculate the amount as 0.8 x 300 = 240.   Second, we need to calculate the amount that James's neighbor's car insurance can cover. Since it can cover at most $100 per year, we can calculate the amount as 100.  Finally, we can calculate James's out-of-pocket cost as 300 - 240 - 100 = 60.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   Yes, the condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it is used in the calculation of James's insurance coverage.\nThe doctor visit costs $300. James's insurance covers 80%, so James will only pay $60 (300 * 0.8 = 240, 300 - 240 = 60). The car insurance of James' neighbor can cover at most $100 per year, so this is not relevant to the calculation.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.\nFirst, James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.  Second, his insurance covers 80% of the cost so James's out-of-pocket cost is 20% of $300, which is $60.  The condition \"The car insurance of James' neighbor can cover at most $100 per year.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment.", "equation": "The car insurance of James' neighbor can cover at most $100 per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.3702464699745178]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's sister sells 2 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many eggs Jason is consuming per day.  Jason's sister sells 2 eggs per day. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it gives us the information that Jason will need to buy eggs from his sister in order to make his omelets.  So, in two weeks, Jason will consume (3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs).  Yes, the condition that \"Jason's sister sells 2 eggs per day\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it gives us the information that Jason will need to buy 42 eggs from his sister in two weeks to make his omelets.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "1) Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning.  2) Jason's sister sells 2 eggs per day.   So, in two weeks, Jason will consume (3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs).   Yes, the condition that \"Jason's sister sells 2 eggs per day\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it gives us the information that Jason will need to buy 42 eggs from his sister in two weeks to make his omelets.", "equation": "Jason's sister sells 2 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.49359339475631714]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Nathalie's brother makes 50 cookies as well; each cookie weighs 10 grams. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into 8 equal parts and Nathalie ate one eighth of it, then she ate 400/8 = 50 grams. Next, we must calculate how much Pierre ate. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, then he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams. Finally, the 50 cookies each weigh 10 grams. This means that the total weight of the cookies is 50 x 10 = 500 grams. So, to answer the question, Pierre ate 100 grams of cake. The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how much each part of the cake weighed. The condition regarding Nathalie's brother and the cookies is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much Nathalie ate. Since the cake is divided into 8 equal parts and Nathalie ate one eighth of it, then she ate 400/8 = 50 grams.   Next, we must calculate how much Pierre ate. Since Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, then he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.   Finally, the 50 cookies each weigh 10 grams. This means that the total weight of the cookies is 50 x 10 = 500 grams.   So, to answer the question, Pierre ate 100 grams of cake. The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how much each part of the cake weighed.\nNathalie ate 1/8 of the cake, which is 400 grams divided by 8, or 50 grams. Pierre ate double that amount, or 100 grams.  The condition regarding Nathalie's brother and the cookies is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Nathalie's brother makes 50 cookies as well; each cookie weighs 10 grams.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.2447887808084488]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The car insurance of James' father can cover at most $100 per year. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the amount of the visit that the insurance will cover: 80% of $300 is $240. Second, we need to calculate the amount that the car insurance will cover: $100. Third, we need to subtract the amount covered by the insurance and car insurance from the total cost of the visit: $300 - $240 - $100 = $60. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. Yes, the condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" and \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" are both relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since they are both used to calculate the amount that the insurance will cover (80% of $300 is $240).", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the amount of the visit that the insurance will cover: 80% of $300 is $240  Second, we need to calculate the amount that the car insurance will cover: $100  Third, we need to subtract the amount covered by the insurance and car insurance from the total cost of the visit: $300 - $240 - $100 = $60  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   Yes, the condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it is used to calculate the amount that the insurance will cover (80% of $300 is $240).\nStep 1: The doctor charges $300 for the visit.  Step 2: James' insurance covers 80% of the cost, so James needs to pay 20% of the cost.   Step 3: 20% of $300 is $60.   Step 4: James' father's car insurance can cover at most $100 per year, so James' out-of-pocket cost is $60.  Yes, the condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, the cost of the doctor visit is $300. Second, James' insurance covers 80%, so the insurance pays $240. Therefore, James' out-of-pocket cost is $60.  The condition \"The car insurance of James' father can cover at most $100 per year.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. James' out-of-pocket cost for the doctor appointment is not affected by his father's car insurance.", "equation": "The car insurance of James' father can cover at most $100 per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.43098050355911255]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Gretchen's mother is holding 100 drawings now. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday. She made $480.00 from that day.   She then sold 16 drawings on Sunday. She made $320.00 from that day.  Therefore, Gretchen made a total of $800.00 for the weekend.   The condition of Gretchen's mother holding 100 drawings is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Gretchen charges $20.00 per drawing and she sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday. To calculate how much money Gretchen made, we need to multiply the number of drawings sold by the cost of each drawing. So the answer would be: 24 drawings x $20.00 = $480.00 + 16 drawings x $20.00 = $320.00 = $800.00. Therefore, Gretchen made $800.00 from drawing caricatures in the park on the weekends.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, so she sold a total of 40 drawings. Multiplying 40 with $20.00, we get $800. So, Gretchen made $800 from drawing caricatures in the park on the weekends.  Yes, the condition given that \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it is used to calculate the amount of money Gretchen made. Without this condition, it would be impossible to calculate how much money Gretchen made.\nGretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday. She made $480.00 from that day.   She then sold 16 drawings on Sunday. She made $320.00 from that day.  Therefore, Gretchen made a total of $800.00 for the weekend.   The condition of Gretchen's mother holding 100 drawings is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.", "equation": "Gretchen's mother is holding 100 drawings now.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.2504815459251404]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's brother sells 5 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "In one day, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs, so in one day he consumes 3 eggs. In two weeks, he will consume 3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs. The condition \"Jason's brother sells 5 eggs per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. To calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we need to multiply the number of eggs consumed per day (3) by the total number of days (14). So the answer would be: 3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. So, in one day he consumes 3 eggs. In two weeks, he will consume 3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs.   The condition \"Jason's brother sells 5 eggs per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jason's brother sells 5 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.4778430461883545]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's mother spends 2 minutes cooking per day. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "The total amount of time in a day is 24 hours. Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That equals 19 hours. Then, Jackie's mother spends 2 minutes cooking per day. That equals 0.03 hours. Therefore, Jackie has 4.97 hours of free time.  Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is one of the activities that is accounting for her time.  Jackie spends a total of 8 hours working, 3 hours exercising, and 8 hours sleeping, which adds up to 19 hours.  Jackie's mother spends 2 minutes cooking per day. This is not relevant to Jackie's free time, so we can ignore this.  This means that Jackie has a total of 5 hours of free time per day (24 hours - 19 hours).  Therefore, the answer to the question is 5 hours. The condition \"3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the total amount of time Jackie spends on activities (19 hours).", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "The total amount of time in a day is 24 hours. Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That equals 19 hours. Then, Jackie's mother spends 2 minutes cooking per day. That equals 0.03 hours. Therefore, Jackie has 4.97 hours of free time.  Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is one of the activities that is accounting for her time.\nJackie spends a total of 8 hours working, 3 hours exercising, and 8 hours sleeping, which adds up to 19 hours.   Jackie's mother spends 2 minutes cooking per day. This is not relevant to Jackie's free time, so we can ignore this.   This means that Jackie has a total of 5 hours of free time per day (24 hours - 19 hours).   Therefore, the answer to the question is 5 hours. The condition \"3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to determine the total amount of time Jackie spends on activities (19 hours).\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise, and 8 hours of sleep per day. This adds up to 19 hours.   Jackie's mother spends 2 minutes cooking per day. This is not relevant to the calculation of Jackie's free time, so we can ignore this part of the question.  Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.", "equation": "Jackie's mother spends 2 minutes cooking per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.3613892197608948]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Libby's classmate spends 100 dollars on groceries each week. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to convert $35 into quarters. 35 dollars = 140 quarters (1 dollar = 4 quarters). Then, we need to subtract 140 quarters from 160 quarters. 160 quarters - 140 quarters = 20 quarters. Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left. The condition that Libby's classmate spends 100 dollars on groceries each week is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank and she has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To calculate how many quarters Libby will have left, we need to convert $35 into quarters and subtract that amount from 160 quarters. So the answer would be: 160 quarters - 140 quarters = 20 quarters. Therefore, Libby will have 20 quarters left.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Step 1: Convert $35 into quarters.  35 dollars = 140 quarters (1 dollar = 4 quarters)   Step 2: Subtract 140 quarters from 160 quarters.  160 quarters - 140 quarters = 20 quarters   Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left.   Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is the starting point from which we can calculate the remaining number of quarters.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. If she pays $35 to replace her sister's dress, she will have 160 - 35 = 125 quarters left. Her classmate spends $100 on groceries each week, which is not relevant to the calculation process, so it does not need to be taken into account. The answer is 125.\nLibby has 160 quarters. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since each quarter is worth $0.25, Libby needs to pay 140 quarters. That means, Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.   The condition \"Libby's classmate spends 100 dollars on groceries each week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Libby's classmate spends 100 dollars on groceries each week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.28031373023986816]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Mary's mother has 10 more apples than Megan. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 5 x 3 = 15 pieces of candy. Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means that Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition that Mary's mother has 10 more apples than Megan is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan and Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy. To calculate how many pieces of candy Mary has in total, we need to multiply the amount of candy Megan has by 3 and then add 10. So the answer would be: 5 x 3 + 10 = 25. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 5 x 3 = 15 pieces of candy. Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means that Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition that Mary's mother has 10 more apples than Megan is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary's mother has 10 more apples than Megan.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.4594554603099823]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Tom's mother picked 8 more pears than Tom. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so Tom picked 24 apples. We can now say that Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether. The condition that Tom's mother picked 8 more pears than Tom is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie. To calculate how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether, we need to add the number of apples picked by Lexie and Tom. So the answer would be: 12 + 24 = 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "Lexie picked 12 apples, so that's 12 apples.  Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so Tom picked 24 apples.   We can now say that Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.   The condition \"Tom's mother picked 8 more pears than Tom\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom's mother picked 8 more pears than Tom.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.46932151913642883]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' mother pays $20 for each wall. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "There are three walls in the shower, so James' mother pays $20 x 3 = $60 for the shower. The condition \"each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process because the number of tiles running the width of each wall is given, so we can use this information to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. Each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height, so the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480. Therefore, there are 480 tiles in the shower.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "There are three walls in the shower, so James' mother pays $20 x 3 = $60 for the shower.   The condition \"each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process because the number of tiles running the width of each wall is given, so we can use this information to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.   Each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height, so the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480.   Therefore, there are 480 tiles in the shower.\nTo figure out how many tiles are in the shower, we need to calculate the total number of tiles on each wall. As each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, we can calculate the total number of tiles on each wall by multiplying 8 by 20.  Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process as it provides us with the number of tiles running the height of the wall which is needed to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of tiles for each wall. Each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height, so for each wall there are 8x20 = 160 tiles.  Second, since there are 3 walls in the shower, we need to multiply 160 by 3 to get the total number of tiles in the shower: 160 x 3 = 480 tiles in the shower.  The condition \"James' mother pays $20 for each wall.\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since it does not affect the number of tiles in the shower.", "equation": "James' mother pays $20 for each wall.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.010447551496326923]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Michelle's sister walked for 10 miles to see the dentist. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle pays a ride fee of $2 when she enters the taxi. Then, the taxi charges per mile is $2.5. Since she travelled 4 miles, Michelle has to pay $10 (4 miles x $2.5). So, in total, she has to pay $12 (ride fee of $2 + $10 taxi fare). Yes, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process. The condition regarding Michelle's sister walking 10 miles to see the dentist is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles, and the taxi charges per mile is $2.5. To calculate the total cost for Michelle's ride, we need to calculate the cost of the 4 miles travelled and then add the ride fee. So the answer would be: 4 miles x $2.5 + $2 ride fee = $12. Therefore, Michelle paid $12 in total for her ride.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Michelle pays a ride fee of $2 when she enters the taxi. Then, the taxi charges per mile is $2.5. Since she travelled 4 miles, Michelle has to pay $10 (4 miles x $2.5). So, in total, she has to pay $12 (ride fee of $2 + $10 taxi fare). Yes, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Find the total miles traveled by Michelle: 4 miles  Step 2: Find the total cost per mile: $2.5  Step 3: Calculate the total cost for Michelle's ride: 4 miles x $2.5 = $10  Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride ($2 ride fee + $10 for the 4 miles). The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it provided the total miles traveled by Michelle.\nMichelle paid $2 initially to enter the taxi. Then, she rode 4 miles at $2.5 per mile. The total cost of Michelle's ride is $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $12. The condition regarding Michelle's sister walking 10 miles to see the dentist is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Michelle's sister walked for 10 miles to see the dentist.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.32700586318969727]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The bench costs $5000, but neither Jack's sister nor Jack is willing to buy it. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell. The bench costs $5000, but Jack and his sister did not purchase it. Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for the squat rack and the barbell. The condition that Jack buys a squat rack for $2500 is relevant to the calculation process since it is used to calculate the cost of the barbell. The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process because it was used to calculate how much Jack paid for the barbell. The condition that neither Jack's sister nor Jack is willing to buy the bench is not relevant to the calculation process, as the bench was not purchased. Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for the squat rack and the barbell.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much.  The bench costs $5000, but neither Jack's sister nor Jack is willing to buy it.   Answer: Jack paid $2500 for the squat rack and $250 for the barbell, for a total of $2750. The condition that Jack buys a squat rack for $2500 is relevant to the calculation process since it is used to calculate the cost of the barbell.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell.  The bench costs $5000, but Jack and his sister did not purchase it.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for the squat rack and the barbell. The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process because it was used to calculate how much Jack paid for the barbell.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, which is $250. Jack and his sister are not willing to buy the bench for $5000, so that is not included in the calculation.   Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for the squat rack and barbell.", "equation": "The bench costs $5000, but neither Jack's sister nor Jack is willing to buy it.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110712051391602, 0.16832026839256287, 0.3208380937576294]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Michelle's brother walked for 10 miles to see the dentist. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2. This fee is fixed and does not depend on the distance she traveled.   Second, Michelle traveled 4 miles in the taxi which costs $2.5 per mile. So, the total cost for the 4 miles is $2.5 x 4 = $10.  Therefore, the total amount Michelle paid for her ride is $2 + $10 = $12.   Therefore, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition of Michelle's brother walking for 10 miles to see the dentist is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not affect Michelle's total ride fee. So the answer would be: $2 + ($2.5 x 4) = $12.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2. This fee is fixed and does not depend on the distance she traveled.   Second, Michelle traveled 4 miles in the taxi which costs $2.5 per mile. So, the total cost for the 4 miles is $2.5 x 4 = $10.  Therefore, the total amount Michelle paid for her ride is $2 + $10 = $12.   Therefore, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Michelle pays a ride fee of $2.00.  Second, she pays a fare per mile of $2.50, multiplied by the number of miles she traveled (4 miles).  Therefore, Michelle pays a total of $10.00 for her ride.  The condition that Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles, is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many miles Michelle traveled. Without this information, we would not know how much to multiply the fare per mile by.\nThe first step is to calculate how much Michelle paid for her ride. The taxi ride fee is $2 and the charge per mile is $2.5. So, Michelle paid a total of $2 + (4 miles x $2.5) = $10 for her ride.   The second step is to determine if the condition \"Michelle's brother walked for 10 miles to see the dentist\" is relevant to the calculation process. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not affect Michelle's total ride fee.", "equation": "Michelle's brother walked for 10 miles to see the dentist.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.3020481765270233]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Martha's sister is 5 years older than Martha. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now. We also know that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years. So, in 6 years, Ellen will be 16 years old. Therefore, Martha is 32 years old now. The condition \"Martha's sister is 5 years older than Martha\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Ellen is 10 years old now and Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years. To calculate Martha's age now, we need to find out how old Ellen will be in 6 years and then multiply that by 2. So the answer would be: 10 years + 6 years = 16 years. Martha is twice as old as Ellen, so 16 x 2 = 32. Therefore, Martha is 32 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now.  We also know that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years.  So, in 6 years, Ellen will be 16 years old.  Therefore, Martha is 32 years old now.  The condition \"Martha's sister is 5 years older than Martha\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Martha's sister is 5 years older than Martha.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.43432241678237915]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' sister painted 200 triangles on each tile. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "First, determine how many tiles are in each wall. There are 8 tiles running the width of each wall and 20 tiles running the height of each wall, so there are 8x20=160 tiles in each wall. Then, determine how many walls are in the shower. In this case, there are 3 walls in the shower. Finally, calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. 3x160=480. Therefore, there are 480 tiles in the shower. The condition of James' sister painting 200 triangles on each tile is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that there are 8 tiles running the width of each wall and 20 tiles running the height of each wall. To calculate the total number of tiles in the shower, we need to multiply 8 x 20 x 3, which gives us a total of 480 tiles in the shower.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "First, determine how many tiles are in each wall. There are 8 tiles running the width of each wall and 20 tiles running the height of each wall, so there are 8x20=160 tiles in each wall. Then, determine how many walls are in the shower. In this case, there are 3 walls in the shower. Finally, calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. 3x160=480. Therefore, there are 480 tiles in the shower.   Yes, the condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\" It helps us calculate the total number of tiles in each wall. Without this information, we would not be able to determine the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe shower has 3 walls, each with 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. To calculate the number of tiles in the shower, we need to multiply 8 x 20 x 3, which gives us a total of 480 tiles in the shower.   Yes, the condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\" because it provides the information necessary to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nIn order to answer the question, we need to find the total number of tiles in the shower. The shower has 3 walls, each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. So, we can calculate the total number of tiles by multiplying the number of tiles in each wall:  3 x (8 x 20) = 480 tiles  Therefore, the shower has 480 tiles. The condition provided in the question is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' sister painted 200 triangles on each tile.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.28380775451660156]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. A mango costs $6 each, and Gerry's sister would probably like to buy some. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100. Therefore, they have a total of $300 that they can use to buy apples. Since each apple is $2, they can buy a total of 150 apples (300/2 = 150). Since a mango costs $6 each, Gerry's sister would need to buy additional money if she wants to buy any mangoes. The condition is relevant to the question since it indicates that Gerry's sister would need to buy additional money if she wants to purchase any mangoes. Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples together.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100. The condition \"A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?\" because it tells us how much apples cost.   So, if they want to buy apples, they can buy a total of 200 apples (100 from Emmy and 100 from Gerry).\nFirst, we need to calculate how many apples Emmy and Gerry can buy with $200 and $100 respectively. Emmy can buy 100 apples (200/2 = 100) and Gerry can buy 50 apples (100/2 = 50).   Therefore, the total number of apples that Emmy and Gerry can buy is 150 (100 + 50 = 150).   The condition that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 is relevant to the calculation process, as it indicates how much each of them can spend on apples.\nFirst, Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100. Therefore, they have a total of $300 that they can use to buy apples. Since each apple is $2, they can buy a total of 150 apples. Since a mango costs $6 each, Gerry's sister would need to buy additional money if she wants to buy any mangoes. The condition is relevant to the question since it indicates that Gerry's sister would need to buy additional money if she wants to purchase any mangoes.", "equation": "A mango costs $6 each, and Gerry's sister would probably like to buy some.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.4734916090965271]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Papi Calot's neighbor planted 35 trees in front of the door. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which means he needs 126 plants (7 rows x 18 plants). He wants to add 15 more plants, so he needs to buy a total of 141 plants (126 plants + 15 plants). The condition about his neighbor does not affect the calculation process of this problem. Papi Calot needs to buy 7 x 18 = 126 plants to fill his 7 rows of 18 plants each. He then wants to add 15 additional plants, so he will need to buy 15 more plants, making a total of 141 plants. The fact that his neighbor planted 35 trees in front of the door is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy a total of 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which means he needs 126 plants (7 rows x 18 plants). He wants to add 15 more plants, so he needs to buy a total of 141 plants (126 plants + 15 plants). The condition about his neighbor does not affect the calculation process of this problem.\nPapi Calot needs to buy 7 x 18 = 126 plants to fill his 7 rows of 18 plants each. He then wants to add 15 additional plants, so he will need to buy 15 more plants, making a total of 141 plants. The fact that his neighbor planted 35 trees in front of the door is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nPapi Calot is planting 7 rows of 18 plants each. That is 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He also wants to add 15 additional plants. That is 126 + 15 = 141 plants that Papi Calot needs to buy. The condition that Papi Calot's neighbor planted 35 trees in front of the door is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Papi Calot's neighbor planted 35 trees in front of the door.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.5106797814369202]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. The average weight of a potato that Kelly's mother harvested is 1/117 pound. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "Kelly pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed and 78 carrots from the third bed. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many carrots Kelly harvested from each bed.  Next, we know that 6 carrots weigh 1 pound. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many carrots make 1 pound.  So we can calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested by multiplying the number of carrots harvested from each bed by 1/6:    First Bed: 55 carrots x 1/6 = 9.17 pounds  Second Bed: 101 carrots x 1/6 = 16.83 pounds  Third Bed: 78 carrots x 1/6 = 13 pounds    Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots (9.17 + 16.83 + 13).    Yes, the condition \"6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that the average weight of a potato that Kelly's mother harvested is 1/117 pound is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "1. Calculate the total number of carrots harvested: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots  2. Calculate the total weight of the carrots: 234 carrots x 6 carrots per pound = 1,404 pounds  3. Calculate the average weight of a potato: 1/117 pound  4. Calculate the total weight of the potatoes: 234 potatoes x 1/117 pound = 2.02 pounds  5. Calculate the total weight of carrots and potatoes harvested: 1,404 pounds + 2.02 pounds = 1,406.02 pounds  Yes, the condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" because the number of carrots pulled from each bed was used to calculate the total number of carrots harvested, which in turn was used to calculate the total weight of the carrots.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. So we can calculate the total number of carrots Kelly harvested as follows:   55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots   We know that 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, so we can divide the total number of carrots by 6 to get the total number of pounds of carrots harvested:   234 / 6 = 39 pounds   Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the total number of carrots harvested or the calculation of the total number of pounds of carrots harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. To do this, add the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, we can multiply 234 by 6 to get the total weight of the carrots: 234 x 6 = 1,404 pounds.  Finally, we need to convert this to the average weight of a potato that Kelly's mother harvested. To do this, divide 1,404 by 117: 1,404 / 117 = 12 pounds.  Therefore, the answer is that Kelly harvested 12 pounds of carrots. The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is required to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots harvested by Kelly. To do this, we simply add the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the 234 carrots. To do this, we multiply the number of carrots by the weight of each carrot (6 carrots x 1 pound = 6 pounds). So, Kelly harvested 6 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"The average weight of a potato that Kelly's mother harvested is 1/117 pound.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the question is asking about the weight of carrots harvested, not potatoes.", "equation": "The average weight of a potato that Kelly's mother harvested is 1/117 pound.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.4720960557460785]}
{"original_question": "For football season, Zachary wants to buy a new football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. Zachary's father has 5 more balls than Zachary. How much more money does Zachary need?", "reasoning_path": "To buy the football, shorts, and shoes, Zachary needs to spend a total of $3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85 = $18.00. But Zachary only has $10. That means Zachary needs to get $18.00 - $10.00 = $8.00 more money. The condition that Zachary's father has 5 more balls than Zachary is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the cost of the football, shorts, and shoes and the amount of money that Zachary has. To calculate how much more money Zachary needs, we need to subtract the amount of money that Zachary has from the total cost of the items he wants to buy. So the answer is $8.00.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "Zachary needs to buy a football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The total cost for these items is $3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85 = $17.00.   Since Zachary has $10, he needs an additional $17.00 - $10.00 = $7.00 to buy the items.   The condition \"The football costs $3.75\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the cost of one of the items Zachary needs to buy. The cost of the items is important in order to calculate how much more money Zachary needs.\nFirst, Zachary needs to purchase the football, shorts, and shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. This means that Zachary needs a total of $17.00 to purchase all three items.  Second, Zachary only has $10. This means that he needs an additional $7.00 to purchase the items.  Third, Zachary's father has 5 more balls than Zachary. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since Zachary is not buying any additional footballs.  Therefore, Zachary needs an additional $7.00 to purchase the football, shorts, and shoes.\nZachary needs to buy a football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10.   To calculate how much more money Zachary needs, we need to add up the total cost of the items he wants to buy:   Total cost = 3.75 + 2.40 + 11.85 = 18.00   Now, we subtract the amount of money Zachary has from the total cost:   18.00 - 10.00 = 8.00   Therefore, Zachary needs $8.00 more to buy the items he wants.   The condition \"and the shoes cost $11.85\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is one of the items Zachary wants to buy and its cost is included in the total cost.\nZachary needs to buy a football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The total cost of these items is $17.00.   Zachary has $10.   Therefore, Zachary needs $7.00 more money to buy the items he wants.   Yes, the condition \"Zachary has $10\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   The condition is important because it tells us how much money Zachary has and how much more money he needs.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of all the items that Zachary wants to buy. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Adding these together, we get a total cost of $17.00.  Next, we need to determine how much money Zachary has. Zachary has $10, so he will need an additional $7.00.  Finally, we need to consider the condition, \"Zachary's father has 5 more balls than Zachary.\" This condition is not relevant to the calculation process, since it does not affect the amount of money that Zachary needs.", "equation": "Zachary's father has 5 more balls than Zachary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.45576441287994385, 0.14543353021144867, 0.0897449254989624, 0.018721066415309906, 0.5780560970306396, 0.3337469696998596]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The company that Charles' sister works for has 234546 employees. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "The population of Springfield is 482,653 people. Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so Greenville has 482,653 - 119,666 people, which equals 363,987 people. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 846,640 people. The condition that Charles's sister works for a company with 234546 employees is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the population of Springfield and the number of people less in Greenville. To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to add the population of Springfield and the population of Greenville together. So the answer would be: 482,653 + 363,987 = 846,640 people.", "numerical_answer": 846640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "The population of Springfield is 482,653 people. The population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 363,987 people.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 363,987 = 846,640 people.   The condition that Charles is moving from Springfield to Greenville is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the population of Greenville.\nThe total population of Springfield is 482,653 people.  Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so Greenville has 482,653 - 119,666 people, which equals 362,987 people.   The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people.   The condition \"The company that Charles' sister works for has 234546 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The company that Charles' sister works for has 234546 employees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.17465636134147644]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. A mango costs $3 each, and Gerry's mother would probably like to buy some. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many apples can be bought with $200 and $100 respectively. We know that each apple costs $2, so Emmy can buy 100 apples with her $200 and Gerry can buy 50 apples with his $100. So, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples altogether. The condition that a mango costs $3 each and Gerry's mother would probably like to buy some is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because the calculation only involves apples. The relevant information to answer this question is that each apple costs $2 and Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. To calculate how many apples they can buy, we need to divide the total amount of money that they have by the cost of each apple. So the answer would be: $200/$2 = 100 apples and $100/$2 = 50 apples. Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so they can buy a total of $300 worth of apples. Since each apple costs $2, they can buy a total of 150 apples. Yes, the condition given is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much each apple costs.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many apples can be bought with $200 and $100 respectively.   We know that each apple costs $2, so Emmy can buy 100 apples with her $200 and Gerry can buy 50 apples with his $100.   So, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples altogether.   The condition that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the basis for determining how many apples each can buy.   However, the condition does not affect the total number of apples that they can buy together, which is still 150 apples.\nIf Emmy and Gerry want to buy apples, then they can buy a total of $200/$2 = 100 apples. The condition that a mango costs $3 each and Gerry's mother would probably like to buy some is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because the calculation only involves apples.", "equation": "A mango costs $3 each, and Gerry's mother would probably like to buy some.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.48214191198349]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The building that Holden's brother lives in is 500 sq ft larger than Holden's home office. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "Holden's current bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft, so the combined area of both spaces is 459 sq ft. If he wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, then the new room will have 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft. The condition \"The building that Holden's brother lives in is 500 sq ft larger than Holden's home office\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Holden's bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. To calculate the size of the new room, we need to add the bedroom and bathroom space together and multiply it by 2. So the answer would be: 309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft and 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "Holden's current bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft, so the combined area of both spaces is 459 sq ft. If he wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, then the new room will have 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft. The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is necessary to add the bedroom and bathroom space together to calculate the total area of the new room.\nFirst, let's look at the sizes of Holden's bedroom and bathroom. His bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. The size of his bedroom and bathroom combined is 459 sq ft.  Second, let's calculate the size of the new room. Since the new room should be twice as large as Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined, it should be 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft.  The condition \"The building that Holden's brother lives in is 500 sq ft larger than Holden's home office\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The building that Holden's brother lives in is 500 sq ft larger than Holden's home office.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.5899333953857422]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Mary's mother has 15 cups of juice. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, which means Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary's mother has 15 cups of juice\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan and Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. To calculate how many pieces of candy Mary has in total, we need to multiply the number of pieces of candy Megan has by 3 and then add 10. So the answer would be: 3 x 5 + 10 = 25. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, which means Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary's mother has 15 cups of juice\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary's mother has 15 cups of juice.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.39770352840423584]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Melies' sister owns $20, which is not shared with Melies. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat, and the meat costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, Melies needs to pay $164 for the meat (2 kg x $82 = $164). Melies has $180 in his wallet. So he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Melies' sister owns $20, which is not shared with Melies is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. We can calculate this by subtracting the cost of the meat from the amount of money Melies has in his wallet. So the answer would be: $180 - $164 = $16.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the cost of the meat. We know that the cost of the meat is $82 per kilogram, so for 2 kg the cost would be 2 x 82 = $164.   Next, we need to determine how much money Melies has in his wallet. We know that Melies has $180 in his wallet, but his sister owns $20, which is not shared with Melies. So, the total amount of money Melies has in his wallet is 180 - 20 = $160.   Finally, we can calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. We know that the cost of the meat is $164, so Melies has 160 - 164 = -$4 left.   Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine the cost of the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram.  This means that the total cost of the meat is 2 x $82 = $164.  Melies has $180 in his wallet.  This means that Melies has a total of $180 available to him for the purchase.  Melies' sister owns $20, which is not shared with Melies.  This means that the total amount of money available to Melies for the purchase is $180 - $20 = $160.  Therefore, Melies has $160 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"the meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it allows us to calculate the total cost of the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram.   This means Melies spent a total of $164 on the meat.   Melies has $180 in his wallet.   This means Melies has a total of $180 to pay for the meat.   Melies' sister owns $20, which is not shared with Melies.   This means Melies has a total of $180 to pay for the meat, minus the $20 owned by his sister.   Therefore, Melies has $160 left after paying for the meat.   Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Melies has $180 in his wallet. Second, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total amount of money Melies has to pay for the meat is $164. Third, Melies has $180 and has to pay $164. Therefore, the amount of money Melies has left after paying for the meat is $16.  The condition \"Melies' sister owns $20, which is not shared with Melies\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Melies' sister owns $20, which is not shared with Melies.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443210005760193, 0.3812294006347656, 0.535139262676239, 0.41516780853271484]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's neighbor raised 200 more ducks than Michael. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "First we need to calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years. In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Michael's neighbor raised 200 more ducks than Michael is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of chickens on Michael's farm after 9 years. So the answer is 1900", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, without considering the ducks his neighbor has raised. This is computed by multiplying the number of chickens Michael currently has (550) by how many times his chickens increase in number annually (150).  550 * 150 = 82,500  Therefore, Michael will have 82,500 chickens after 9 years.  The condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the number of chickens Michael will have after 9 years.\nThe number of chickens on Michael's farm now is 550.  If we add 150 chickens to that number each year, after 9 years Michael will have a total of (550 + [150 x 9]) = 1,550 chickens.  The condition \"Michael's neighbor raised 200 more ducks than Michael\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the number of chickens on Michael's farm.", "equation": "Michael's neighbor raised 200 more ducks than Michael.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.4402153491973877]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Luke's father gave Luke 60 dollars. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one jar. Then, he needs to fill 4 bottles, so he must make 85 x 4 = 340 stars. Second, Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars. Finally, Luke's father gave him 60 dollars, so this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Luke still needs to make 307 stars, regardless of the money he received. Therefore, Luke must make 307 more stars to fill the 4 bottles.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, Luke needs to make 85 paper stars to fill one glass jar.   Second, Luke has already made 33 stars, and he needs to fill 4 bottles.   Therefore, Luke needs to make 85 x 4 = 340 more stars.   The condition of \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because this is the number of stars Luke needs to make for each jar.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 52 stars (85 stars - 33 stars) to fill the glass jar. Then, he needs to make 4 more bottles, so he must make 208 stars (52 stars x 4 bottles).   The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it affects the number of stars Luke needs to make (208 stars - 33 stars = 175 stars). Therefore, Luke must make 175 more stars to fill the 4 bottles.\nLuke needs to make 85 stars to fill one jar. He already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars.   If he needs to fill 4 bottles, then he needs to make 208 stars in total. That means he needs to make 156 more stars.  So, the answer is 156.  The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many jars Luke needs to fill in total.\nFirst, Luke needs to fill 4 bottles, so he must make 85 stars for each bottle, or a total of 340 stars.   Second, Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 307 more stars.   Finally, Luke's father gave him 60 dollars, so this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Luke still needs to make 307 stars, regardless of the money he received.", "equation": "Luke's father gave Luke 60 dollars.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.2806815803050995]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Perry's mother put 20 grams of sugar into the food. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of fat added to the recipe. Since Perry added a half cup of cream, we need to multiply 88 grams of fat per cup (given in the condition) by 0.5 to get the total amount of fat added:  Total fat added = 88 grams of fat per cup x 0.5 = 44 grams of fat  Next, we need to calculate the amount of fat added to each serving. Since the recipe serves four people, we need to divide the total amount of fat (44 grams) by 4 to get the amount of fat added to each serving:  Amount of fat added to each serving = 44 grams of fat / 4 = 11 grams of fat  So, in answer to the question, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Perry added a half cup of cream, which has 88 grams of fat per cup. So, a half cup of cream would have 44 grams of fat. Then, his mother added 20 grams of sugar, which has 0 grams of fat. That means the total fat added to the food was 44 grams. Since the recipe serves four", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of fat added to the recipe. Since Perry added a half cup of cream, we need to multiply 88 grams of fat per cup (given in the condition) by 0.5 to get the total amount of fat added:  Total fat added = 88 grams of fat per cup x 0.5 = 44 grams of fat  Next, we need to calculate the amount of fat added to each serving. Since the recipe serves four people, we need to divide the total amount of fat (44 grams) by 4 to get the amount of fat added to each serving:  Amount of fat added to each serving = 44 grams of fat / 4 = 11 grams of fat  So, in answer to the question, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nPerry added a half cup of cream, which has 88 grams of fat per cup. So, a half cup of cream would have 44 grams of fat. Then, his mother added 20 grams of sugar, which has 0 grams of fat. That means the total fat added to the food was 44 grams. Since the recipe serves four people, each serving would have 11 grams of fat.  The condition given is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it only states how much sugar was added, which does not have any fat.", "equation": "It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Perry's mother put 20 grams of sugar into the food.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.292887806892395, 0.3733145296573639, 0.5792152285575867, 0.3540167212486267]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Asia's sister sold a cake at the price of $100. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "To calculate the percentage off, we need to know the original price of the dress and the sale price. We have this information in the question: the original price of the dress is $350 and the sale price is $140.  To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference between the original price and the sale price by the original price and multiply by 100.  So, in this case, we have ($350 - $140) / $350 * 100, which equals 60%.  The condition about Asia's sister selling a cake at the price of $100 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "To calculate the percentage off, we need to know the original price of the dress and the sale price. We have this information in the question: the original price of the dress is $350 and the sale price is $140.  To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference between the original price and the sale price by the original price and multiply by 100.  So, in this case, we have ($350 - $140) / $350 * 100, which equals 60%.  The condition about Asia's sister selling a cake at the price of $100 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nStep 1: Calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price:  $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off:  $210 / $350 = 0.6 or 60%  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  Yes, the condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without the original price, we would not be able to calculate the percentage off.\nTo figure out what percentage off Asia got at the sale, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price, and then divide that difference by the original price.  In this case, the difference is $210 ($350 - $140). Dividing $210 by $350 gives us a percentage of 60%.  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia's sister sold a cake at the price of $100\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Asia's sister sold a cake at the price of $100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877838134766, 0.3318527042865753, 0.5109642148017883]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Sally's neighbor bought 8 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Therefore, Sally ate 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. The total number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday is 6.  The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally ate on Saturday, which is necessary for us to calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday. The condition that Sally's neighbor bought 8 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process. So the answer would be: 4 pieces of bread on Saturday + 2 pieces of bread on Sunday = 6 pieces of bread.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "To answer the question \"If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?\" we need to know how many sandwiches Sally ate on Saturday and Sunday. We know that Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Therefore, Sally ate 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. The total number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday is 6.  The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally ate on Saturday, which is necessary for us to calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, which uses 4 pieces of bread. Then on Sunday, she eats 1 sandwich, which uses 2 more pieces of bread. So, the total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 6.  The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats on Sunday. This information is important to find out the total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. That's a total of 3 sandwiches. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so the total pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday is 6. The condition that Sally's neighbor bought 8 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Sally's neighbor bought 8 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.3997417986392975]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Steve's brother is 20 inches taller than Steve. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that Steve is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches. When Steve grows 6 inches, he is now 72 inches tall. His brother is 20 inches taller, so he is 92 inches tall. Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" because it is the starting point of the calculation process. First, we know that Steve is 5'6\", which is 66 inches tall. Next, we know that Steve grows 6 inches, so he is now 72 inches tall. Finally, we know that Steve's brother is 20 inches taller than Steve, so Steve's brother is 92 inches tall. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches. The condition \"Steve's brother is 20 inches taller than Steve\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us to calculate the height of Steve's brother, which is necessary to answer the question.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Steve is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches. When Steve grows 6 inches, he is now 72 inches tall. His brother is 20 inches taller, so he is 92 inches tall. Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" because it is the starting point of the calculation process.\nFirst, we know that Steve is 5'6\", which is 66 inches tall.   Next, we know that Steve grows 6 inches, so he is now 72 inches tall.   Finally, we know that Steve's brother is 20 inches taller than Steve, so Steve's brother is 92 inches tall.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.   The condition \"Steve's brother is 20 inches taller than Steve\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us to calculate the height of Steve's brother, which is necessary to answer the question.", "equation": "Steve's brother is 20 inches taller than Steve.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495515942573547, 0.513569176197052, 0.5904249548912048]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Lizzy's father ate 100 pounds of lobster yesterday. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy has to ship. We know that each crate is 30 pounds and we need to ship 540 pounds. So, we divide 540 by 30 to get the number of crates:  540/30 = 18 crates  Now, we need to multiply the number of crates by the shipping cost of each crate. We know that the cost of each crate is $1.5:  18 x $1.5 = $27  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy's father ate 100 pounds of lobster yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that each crate is 30 pounds and the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. To calculate the total cost of shipping, we need to calculate the number of crates needed and then multiply that number by the cost of each crate. So the answer would be: 540/30 = 18 crates x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy has to ship. We know that each crate is 30 pounds and we need to ship 540 pounds. So, we divide 540 by 30 to get the number of crates:  540/30 = 18 crates  Now, we need to multiply the number of crates by the shipping cost of each crate. We know that the cost of each crate is $1.5:  18 x $1.5 = $27  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the information needed to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy needs to ship. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total shipping cost.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the 540 pounds of fish. We can do this by dividing 540 by 30. 540/30 = 18. This means that Lizzy needs to ship 18 crates of fish.   Next, we need to calculate the total cost of shipping. We can do this by multiplying 18 (the number of crates) by 1.5 (the cost of each crate). 18 x 1.5 = 27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"Lizzy's father ate 100 pounds of lobster yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Lizzy's father ate 100 pounds of lobster yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.1314033716917038]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Lizzy's neighbor bought 10 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to ship. 540 pounds of fish divided by 30 pounds of fish per crate is 18 crates. Now that we know the number of crates, we can calculate how much Lizzy will pay. 18 crates multiplied by $1.5 is $27.  Yes, the condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Lizzy's neighbor bought 10 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much money Lizzy needs to pay for the shipment. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of crates with the shipping cost of each crate. So the answer is $27.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of crates that will be shipped. 540 pounds of fish divided by 30 pounds per crate = 18 crates.   Second, we need to calculate the cost of the shipment. 18 crates x $1.5 per crate = $27.   Finally, we need to subtract the cost of the 10 pounds of lobsters from the total cost of the shipment. $27 - $1.5 (10 pounds of lobsters) = $25.50.  Therefore, the cost of the shipment is $25.50.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of crates that need to be shipped and the weight of each crate. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the cost of the shipment.\nFirst, Lizzy has to determine how many crates of fish she needs to ship. She has 540 pounds of fish, so she needs 540/30 = 18 crates of fish.  Second, she needs to calculate the total cost of the shipment. 18 crates x $1.5 each = $27.  Finally, Lizzy's total cost for the shipment is $27.  The condition \"Lizzy's neighbor bought 10 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped\" is not relevant to the calculation process. The total cost of the shipment would remain the same regardless of whether or not Lizzy's neighbor purchased the lobsters.", "equation": "Lizzy's neighbor bought 10 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.4128607213497162]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's neighbor has a duck farm aged 1000 years. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many chickens Michael's farm will have each year. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, then after 1 year there will be 700 chickens (550 + 150).  After 2 years there will be 850 chickens (700 + 150).  After 3 years there will be 1000 chickens (850 + 150).  After 4 years there will be 1150 chickens (1000 + 150).  After 5 years there will be 1300 chickens (1150 + 150).  After 6 years there will be 1450 chickens (1300 + 150).  After 7 years there will be 1600 chickens (1450 + 150).  After 8 years there will be 1750 chickens (1600 + 150).  After 9 years there will be 1900 chickens (1750 + 150).   Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Michael's neighbor has a duck farm aged 1000 years is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of chickens on Michael's farm after 9 years. So the answer is 1900", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, then after 1 year there will be 700 chickens (550 + 150).  After 2 years there will be 850 chickens (700 + 150).  After 3 years there will be 1000 chickens (850 + 150).  After 4 years there will be 1150 chickens (1000 + 150).  After 5 years there will be 1300 chickens (1150 + 150).  After 6 years there will be 1450 chickens (1300 + 150).  After 7 years there will be 1600 chickens (1450 + 150).  After 8 years there will be 1750 chickens (1600 + 150).  After 9 years there will be 1900 chickens (1750 + 150).   Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nMichael's chicken farm has 550 chickens now. In 9 years, it will have 550 + (150 x 9) = 1950 chickens.  The condition \"Michael's neighbor has a duck farm aged 1000 years\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of chickens on Michael's farm after 9 years.", "equation": "Michael's neighbor has a duck farm aged 1000 years.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.4518798589706421]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Hannah's mother is 30 years older than Hannah. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "The sum of her brother's ages is 8 x 3 = 24.  Hannah is twice as old as 24, so she is 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it was necessary to know the age of Hannah's brothers in order to calculate her age. The condition \"Hannah's mother is 30 years older than Hannah\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the calculation of Hannah's age. So the answer is 48.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "The combined age of Hannah's three brothers is 24. Twice of this is 48. So, Hannah must be 48 years old. The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it was necessary to know the age of Hannah's brothers in order to calculate her age.\nThe sum of her brother's ages is 8 x 3 = 24.  Hannah is twice as old as 24, so she is 48 years old.  The condition \"Hannah's mother is 30 years older than Hannah\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the calculation of Hannah's age.", "equation": "Hannah's mother is 30 years older than Hannah.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.6259273886680603]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Tom's father ate 10 fewer peaches than Lexie. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples, so Tom picked 24 apples.   So Lexie and Tom collected a total of 12 + 24 = 36 apples.   The condition that Tom's father ate 10 fewer peaches than Lexie is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the problem only asks about apples and not peaches. So the answer is 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "Lexie picked 12 apples.  Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so Tom picked 24 apples.   So Lexie and Tom collected a total of 12 + 24 = 36 apples.   The condition that Tom's father ate 10 fewer peaches than Lexie is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the problem only asks about apples and not peaches.", "equation": "Tom's father ate 10 fewer peaches than Lexie.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.42358753085136414]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The building that Holden's neighbor lives in is 500 sq ft larger than Holden's home office. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the size of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom. To calculate the size of the new room, we need to add the size of the master bedroom and bathroom and then double it. That means the size of the new room will be (309 + 150) x 2 = 708 sq ft. The condition that Holden's neighbor lives in a building that is 500 sq ft larger than Holden's home office is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the size of the new room. So the answer is 708 sq ft.", "numerical_answer": 708, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "Holden's current bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. If he wants to add a room that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, then the new room will have (309 + 150) * 2 = 708 sq ft. The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is necessary to add the total of his bedroom and bathroom (309 + 150) in order to calculate the size of the new room.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total square footage of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom. To do this, we add 309 sq ft (bedroom) + 150 sq ft (bathroom) = 459 sq ft. Then, we need to calculate how much square footage Holden wants to add to his home with the new home office/personal gym. Since he wants it to be twice the size of his bedroom and bathroom combined, we multiply 459 sq ft (total sq ft from step 1) by 2 to get a total of 918 sq ft.  So, Holden's new home office/personal gym divided space will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"The building that Holden's neighbor lives in is 500 sq ft larger than Holden's home office\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "The building that Holden's neighbor lives in is 500 sq ft larger than Holden's home office.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.5993915796279907]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's mother sells 4 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many eggs Jason consumes for breakfast each day. Jason's mother sells 4 eggs per day. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many eggs Jason has available to him each day.  Therefore, in one day, Jason will consume three eggs. In two weeks, he will consume three eggs for breakfast each day for fourteen days, so the total amount of eggs Jason will consume in two weeks is 42.  Yes, the condition \"Jason's mother sells 4 eggs per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us how many eggs Jason has available to him each day. So the answer is 42 eggs.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Jason eats three eggs for breakfast every morning, so in one day, he consumes three eggs. In two weeks, he will consume three eggs for breakfast each day for fourteen days, so the total amount of eggs Jason will consume in two weeks is 42.   Yes, the condition \"Jason's mother sells 4 eggs per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us how many eggs Jason has available to him each day.", "equation": "Jason's mother sells 4 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.42259061336517334]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Kim's father sold 10 more peaches to the store. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them (20 cherry pits) sprouted. Then Kim sold 6 of the saplings, so Kim now has 14 cherry saplings left. Kim's father selling 10 more peaches to the store does not affect the number of cherry saplings Kim has left. So, the answer is 14 cherry saplings. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many pits were planted in the first place, which is necessary to determine how many sprout and how many saplings remain. The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left. The condition \"Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is also relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the total number of cherry saplings Kim has left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "1. Kim plants 80 cherry pits 2. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 25% = 20 sprout 3. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 20 - 6 = 14 saplings remain 4. Kim's father sold 10 more peaches to the store, so 14 - 10 = 4 saplings remain  Yes, the condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" because it tells us how many pits were planted in the first place, which is necessary to determine how many sprout and how many saplings remain.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprouts so 25 cherry pits sprout. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 19 cherry saplings remain. Kim's father sold 10 more peaches to the store, but this has no effect on the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left. Therefore, Kim has 19 cherry saplings left.   The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it affects the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many cherry saplings sprouted and how many remain.\nKim planted 80 cherry pits and 25% of them (20 cherry pits) sprouted. Then Kim sold 6 of the saplings, so Kim now has 14 cherry saplings left. Kim's father selling 10 more peaches to the store does not affect the number of cherry saplings Kim has left. So, the answer is 14 cherry saplings.  The condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the total number of cherry saplings Kim has left.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so that's 20 saplings.  Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, leaving her with 14 saplings.  Finally, Kim's father sells 10 more peaches to the store, but this isn't relevant to the calculation process, so it doesn't affect the final answer.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "equation": "Kim's father sold 10 more peaches to the store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364678502082825, 0.24044954776763916, 0.46118128299713135, 0.3342823088169098]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Sally's brother ate 8 pieces of apples. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know how many sandwiches Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday. We know that Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so she ate a total of 3 sandwiches.  Now, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally ate. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally ate a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  So, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it helps us determine how many sandwiches Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday, which is then used to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally ate. The condition that her brother ate 8 pieces of apples is irrelevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "First, we need to know how many sandwiches Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday. We know that Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so she ate a total of 3 sandwiches.  Now, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally ate. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally ate a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.   So, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it helps us determine how many sandwiches Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday, which is then used to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally ate.\nSally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that she ate 3 sandwiches in total. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally ate 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition that her brother ate 8 pieces of apples is irrelevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, the condition that Sally's brother ate 8 pieces of apples is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. It is a separate fact and does not affect the calculation of the number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday.  Second, we need to calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday. Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally ate a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.", "equation": "Sally's brother ate 8 pieces of apples.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.26694226264953613]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's sister has a duck farm aged 200 years. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Michael's sister has a duck farm aged 200 years is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "At the beginning, Michael has 550 chickens on his farm.  In the first year, he will have an additional 150 chickens (550 + 150 = 700).  In the second year, he will have an additional 150 chickens (700 + 150 = 850).   Following this pattern, in the ninth year he will have an additional 150 chickens (1250 + 150 = 1400).   Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1400 chickens on his farm.   Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe condition \"Michael's sister has a duck farm aged 200 years\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Now let's calculate the number of chickens that Michael will have after 9 years.  Michael has 550 chickens now.  Every year, he increases the number of chickens by 150.  Therefore, after 9 years, he will have (550 + (150 * 9)) = 1800 chickens.  So, Michael will have 1800 chickens after 9 years.", "equation": "Michael's sister has a duck farm aged 200 years.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.35420387983322144]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. The average weight of a potato that Kelly's sister harvested is 1/3 pound. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That's a total of 234 carrots. Now, we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds Kelly harvested: 39 pounds. The condition of the average weight of a potato that Kelly's sister harvested is 1/3 pound is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest since we already have the total number of carrots Kelly harvested. Therefore, Kelly harvested a total of 39 pounds of carrots.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. Adding these together, Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots.   Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, Kelly harvested a total of 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process since it is not necessary to determine the total number of pounds harvested.\nTo calculate how many pounds Kelly harvested, we need to know how many carrots Kelly harvested. We can start with the information in the problem. Kelly pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That's a total of 234 carrots.  Now, we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds Kelly harvested: 39 pounds.   The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds Kelly harvested, since we already have the total number of carrots Kelly harvested.\n1. Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed.  2. 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we know that 1 carrot weighs 1/6 pound.  3. We can calculate the total weight of the carrots harvested by multiplying the number of carrots harvested from each bed by 1/6 pound.  4. Therefore, the total weight of the carrots harvested is (55 x 1/6) + (101 x 1/6) + (78 x 1/6) = 91.5 pounds.  5. The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That gives us a total of 234 carrots. Since six carrots weigh one pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the total number of pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, which is 39 pounds.   The condition \"The average weight of a potato that Kelly's sister harvested is 1/3 pound\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest.\"", "equation": "The average weight of a potato that Kelly's sister harvested is 1/3 pound.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.46778568625450134]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Mari's neighbor reported that the diameter of each button is 33 inches. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. This means that Kendra made (4 + 5*8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. This means that Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons. Mari made 8 buttons which is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many buttons Mari made. The condition that Mari's neighbor reported that the diameter of each button is 33 inches is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari, Mari made 8 buttons, and Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra. To calculate how many buttons Sue made, we need to first calculate how many buttons Kendra made, then calculate how many buttons Sue made as half of Kendra's amount. So the answer would be 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many buttons Kendra made. We know that Mari made 8 buttons, so we can say that Kendra made 5 脳 8 = 40 buttons.  Then, we know that Sue made half as many as Kendra. So, Sue made 40 梅 2 = 20 buttons.  Finally, the condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.\" is not relevant to the calculation, as we already know that Kendra made 40 buttons and Mari made 8 buttons.  Therefore, the answer is that Sue made 20 buttons.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. That means Kendra made 5 x (Mari's 8) + 4 = 44 decorated buttons.  Sue made half as many as Kendra. That means Sue made 22 decorated buttons.  Mari made 8 buttons. This is relevant to the calculation because it helps us to understand how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.  The diameter of each button is 33 inches. This is not relevant to the calculation because it does not help us to determine how many buttons Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons, which means Kendra made 40 buttons (5 x 8 = 40). Sue made half as many as Kendra, so Sue made 20 buttons (40/2 = 20). The condition of \"Mari's neighbor reported that the diameter of each button is 33 inches\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it's not necessary to include it in the answer. Therefore, Sue made 20 buttons.", "equation": "Mari's neighbor reported that the diameter of each button is 33 inches.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.2391156554222107]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Perry's brother was planning to add some oil, which has 80 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many servings the recipe yields. Perry added a half cup of cream at the end. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much cream was added to the recipe. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much fat is in one cup of cream. Perry's brother was planning to add some oil, which has 80 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up. This is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the amount of fat added to the recipe.   To answer the question, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. We can calculate this by multiplying the amount of cream added (0.5 cup) by the fat content of cream (88 grams per cup).  Therefore, the answer would be 0.5 cup x 88 grams per cup = 44 grams of fat per serving.", "numerical_answer": 44, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Perry added a half cup of cream, which has 88 grams of fat per cup. That means that there were 44 grams of fat added to each serving of food. The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant because it tells us how much fat was in the cream that was added. Without knowing this, we wouldn't be able to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food.\nPerry added a half cup of cream, which has 88 grams of fat per cup. Therefore, he added 44 grams of fat to the recipe.  Perry's brother was planning to add some oil, which has 80 grams of fat per cup. Since he did not end up adding any oil, no additional fat was added.  Therefore, the total amount of fat that was added to each serving of food was 44 grams. The condition that Perry's brother was planning to add some oil, but finally gave it up, is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Perry's brother was planning to add some oil, which has 80 grams of fat per cup, but finally gave it up.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2928876578807831, 0.37331458926200867, 0.579214870929718, 0.3008255362510681]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Edmund's mother owns 20 gift shops in the city. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap per day with 90 inches of gift wrapper. He uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, so he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day with 90 inches of gift wrapper. To calculate how many gift boxes he can wrap in 3 days, we can multiply our answer from Step 1 (5 gift boxes) by 3.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes in 3 days.  The condition that Edmund's mother owns 20 gift shops in the city is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day and he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, we need to divide the amount of gift wrapper by the amount of gift wrapper needed for one gift box. So the answer would be: 90 inches / 18 inches = 5 gift boxes. Therefore, Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes in 3 days.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, and he uses 18 inches to wrap one gift box, then he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.   Therefore, he can wrap 15 gift boxes in 3 days.   The condition that Edmund's mother owns 20 gift shops in the city is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Edmund's mother owns 20 gift shops in the city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.26319068670272827]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Julia's sister bought 2 packs of purple cubes. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls. Each pack had 19 balls, so she bought 57 red balls in total (3 packs x 19 balls). Julia bought 10 packs of yellow balls. Each pack had 19 balls, so she bought 190 yellow balls in total (10 packs x 19 balls). Julia bought 8 packs of green balls. Each pack had 19 balls, so she bought 152 green balls in total (8 packs x 19 balls).  In total, Julia bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  Yes, the condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Julia's sister bought 2 packs of purple cubes is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many balls Julia bought in total. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of packs for each color with the number of balls in each package. So the answer would be: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of balls Julia bought. She bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Each pack had 19 balls, so the total number of balls Julia bought is (3 x 19) + (10 x 19) + (8 x 19) = 567.  Now, we need to calculate the number of balls her sister bought. She bought 2 packs of purple cubes, and each pack had 19 cubes. So the total number of balls her sister bought is (2 x 19) = 38.  Finally, the total number of balls Julie bought in all is 567 + 38 = 605.   Yes, the condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since that is part of the information we need to calculate the total number of balls Julia bought.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Since each pack contains 19 balls, Julia bought 57 red balls, 190 yellow balls, and 152 green balls. Her sister bought 2 packs of purple cubes, each containing 19 balls, so she bought 38 purple balls. In total, Julia bought 287 balls.   The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to determine how many yellow balls Julia bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Therefore, she bought a total of 21 packs of balls (3 + 10 + 8). Each pack contains 19 balls, so Julie bought a total of 399 balls (21 x 19).  Julie's sister bought 2 packs of purple cubes. Each pack contains 19 cubes, so Julie's sister bought a total of 38 cubes (2 x 19).  In total, Julie bought a total of 437 balls (399 + 38). The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of how many balls did Julie buy in all, because it affects the total number of packs of balls that Julie bought (21 packs) and, consequently, the total number of balls she bought (437 balls).\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls.   This means she bought 3 x 19 (red balls), 10 x 19 (yellow balls), and 8 x 19 (green balls).   So, Julia bought 3 x 19 + 10 x 19 + 8 x 19 = 579 balls in total.   Her sister bought 2 packs of purple cubes.   Since we don't know how many balls are in each package, this is not relevant to our calculation.   Therefore, Julia bought 579 balls in total.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. That is 3 脳 19 red balls, 10 脳 19 yellow balls, and 8 脳 19 green balls. This adds up to 543 balls. Julia's sister buying 2 packs of purple cubes is not relevant to calculating the total number of balls that Julia bought, so it does not need to be considered in the calculation. Therefore, the answer is 543 balls.", "equation": "Julia's sister bought 2 packs of purple cubes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315248966217041, 0.4110040068626404, 0.4391424357891083, 0.48471662402153015, 0.4327278137207031]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Calvin's brother gets a haircut every 10 weeks. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. We can calculate the percentage of the haircuts he has already gotten by taking the number of haircuts he has already gotten divided by the total number of haircuts he needs.  In this case, that would be 8/10 or 80%.  Yes, the condition \"and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the total number of haircuts he needs in order to reach his goal. The condition of \"Calvin's brother gets a haircut every 10 weeks\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is 80%.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts so far, and he needs 2 more to reach his goal. That means that he is 8/10 or 80% towards his goal.  The condition that his brother gets a haircut every 10 weeks is not relevant to the calculation process of the percentage. Calvin's brother's haircut frequency does not affect the percentage of how close Calvin is to his goal.\nCalvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more haircuts to reach his goal. We can calculate the percentage of the haircuts he has already gotten by taking the number of haircuts he has already gotten divided by the total number of haircuts he needs.  In this case, that would be 8/10 or 80%.  Yes, the condition \"and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the total number of haircuts he needs in order to reach his goal.\nCalvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. This means that he is 80% towards his goal, since 8 out of 10 haircuts have been completed.   The condition of \"Calvin's brother gets a haircut every 10 weeks\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Calvin's brother gets a haircut every 10 weeks.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.31610438227653503]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's sister harvested 117 more potatoes last year. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots that comes to: 234 / 6 = 39 pounds. The condition that Kelly's sister harvested 117 more potatoes last year is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" because it does not affect the total number of carrots harvested, which is 234. So, the answer is 39 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 from the second bed, and 78 from the third bed. That means she harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, since all of the information necessary to calculate the answer was provided in the question.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. 6 carrots make 1 pound, so 234 carrots make 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" because it does not affect the total number of carrots harvested, which is 234.\nFirst, we need to add up the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots that comes to: 234 / 6 = 39 pounds.  The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since we already know the number of carrots pulled from each bed. The condition is only giving us more information about the carrots in the third bed.  The question is asking us how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, so the answer is 39 pounds.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, 234 divided by 6 equals 39 pounds. The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is necessary to answer the question. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed and 78 carrots from the third bed. So, the total number of carrots Kelly harvested is 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"Kelly's sister harvested 117 more potatoes last year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" Therefore, it is not necessary to consider this condition for the calculation.", "equation": "Kelly's sister harvested 117 more potatoes last year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.4888519048690796]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. James' neighbor rides 10 kilometers to the shopping center. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the discount amount: 6 x $20 = $120  Step 2: Calculate the discounted price: $120 - ($120 x 0.50) = $60  Answer: James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the amount of the discount and it affects the final cost.  They each cost $20 is also relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the original price of each t-shirt. Knowing the original price of each t-shirt allows us to calculate the discounted price that James paid.  The condition that James' neighbor rides 10 kilometers to the shopping center is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the discount amount: 6 x $20 = $120  Step 2: Calculate the discounted price: $120 - ($120 x 0.50) = $60  Answer: James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the amount of the discount and it affects the final cost.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts at 50% off, so he paid 50% of the original price for each t-shirt. The original price of each t-shirt was $20, so James paid $10 for each t-shirt. Multiplying $10 by 6, we find that James paid a total of $60 for all 6 t-shirts.  The condition that \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the original price of each t-shirt. Knowing the original price of each t-shirt allows us to calculate the discounted price that James paid.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts at 50% off. This means that each t-shirt cost $20. So, James paid $120 in total. The condition about James' neighbor riding 10 kilometers to the shopping center is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' neighbor rides 10 kilometers to the shopping center.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.23428039252758026]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. James' brother rides 10 kilometers to the shopping center. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many t-shirts James bought and how much discount he received. Each t-shirt costs $20. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each t-shirt costs. That means James pays $120 for 6 t-shirts (6 t-shirts x $20 each). Yes, the condition \"They each cost $20.\" is relevant to the calculation process.  The condition that James' brother rides 10 kilometers to the shopping center is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding how much James paid for the t-shirts.  Therefore, James paid $120 for 6 t-shirts.", "numerical_answer": 120, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The first step is to figure out the original price of each t-shirt. If each t-shirt was 50% off, then the original price was $40 each.   So, James paid $240 for 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the original price was $40 each, which is necessary to calculate the final amount that James paid.\nJames buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This means that the original price of each t-shirt was $40. So, James paid $240 for all 6 t-shirts. The condition \"They each cost $20.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts at 50% off, so he paid $20 for each t-shirt. That means he paid a total of 6 x $20 = $120 for the 6 t-shirts. The condition \"James' brother rides 10 kilometers to the shopping center\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James paid.", "equation": "James' brother rides 10 kilometers to the shopping center.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.23274677991867065]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Asia's brother bought a T-shirt and sold it at the price of $150. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the amount of discount Asia got.  $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage of discount Asia got.  $210/$350 x 100 = 60%  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition that Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140 is relevant to the calculation process, because it is the amount of money she paid for the dress which is used to calculate the amount of discount she got. The condition that Asia's brother bought a T-shirt and sold it at the price of $150 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the original price of the dress ($350) and the sale price ($140). To calculate the percentage off, we need to subtract the sale price from the original price and then divide it by the original price:   (350 - 140) / 350 = 0.6   The percentage off is 60%.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the amount of discount Asia got.  $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage of discount Asia got.  $210/$350 x 100 = 60%  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition that Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140 is relevant to the calculation process, because it is the amount of money she paid for the dress which is used to calculate the amount of discount she got.\n1) Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. 2) It was originally priced at $350.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process. To calculate the percentage off, we need to know the original price.   To calculate the percentage off, we need to subtract the sale price from the original price and then divide it by the original price:   (350 - 140) / 350 = 0.6   The percentage off is 60%.\n1. Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350.  2. Asia's brother bought a T-shirt and sold it at the price of $150.  The condition of \"Asia's brother bought a T-shirt and sold it at the price of $150\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The calculation process is as follows:  1. Calculate the percentage discount:  Percentage discount = (Original Price - Sale Price) / Original Price x 100  = (350 - 140) / 350 x 100  = 60%  2. Answer: Asia got 60% off at the sale.", "equation": "Asia's brother bought a T-shirt and sold it at the price of $150.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877838134766, 0.3318527340888977, 0.5103946924209595]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's neighbor drinks 5 more glasses of juice than Jason does. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "In one day, Jason will consume 3 eggs.  In one week, he will consume 21 eggs (3 eggs x 7 days).  In two weeks, he will consume 42 eggs (21 eggs x 2 weeks).  The condition \"Jason's neighbor drinks 5 more glasses of juice than Jason does\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. To calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we need to multiply the number of eggs consumed in one day by the number of days in two weeks (14 days). So the answer would be: 3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "In one day, Jason will consume 3 eggs.  In one week, he will consume 21 eggs.  In two weeks, he will consume 42 eggs.  The condition \"Jason's neighbor drinks 5 more glasses of juice than Jason does\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jason's neighbor drinks 5 more glasses of juice than Jason does.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.3229219615459442]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The turtle of Janele's father weighs 8 pounds. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the weights of all the cats. This means that we need to add 12+12+14.7+9.3 = 48 pounds.  Second, we need to divide this total by the number of cats. Since Janele has 4 cats, we divide 48 by 4 to get an average weight of 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides information that two of the cats weigh 12 pounds, which we need to calculate the total weight of all the cats. However, it is not necessary for calculating the average weight of Janele's cats. The condition \"The turtle of Janele's father weighs 8 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to add up the weights of all the cats. This means that we need to add 12+12+14.7+9.3 = 48 pounds.   Second, we need to divide this total by the number of cats. Since Janele has 4 cats, we divide 48 by 4 to get an average weight of 12 pounds.   The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it helps us determine how many cats we need to include in our calculation and how to divide the total weight by the number of cats.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. This is the sum of the weights of the four cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  Second, we need to find the average weight of Janele's cats. This is the total weight of the cats divided by the number of cats: 48 / 4 = 12.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides information that two of the cats weigh 12 pounds, which we need to calculate the total weight of all the cats. However, it is not necessary for calculating the average weight of Janele's cats.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add up the weight of all of her cats and then divide by the number of cats.   The weight of the cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   The number of cats is 4.   So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.   The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as we are calculating the average weight of all of Janele's cats, not just the third one.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of their weights divided by the number of cats. So, firstly, we need to calculate the sum of their weights.  The sum of the weights of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   Then, we need to divide the sum of their weights by the number of cats. As Janele has 4 cats, we divide 48 by 4.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.   The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary for us to know the weight of the fourth cat in order to calculate the sum of their weights.\nStep 1: Calculate the combined weight of Janele's cats.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds  Step 2: Divide the combined weight by the number of cats.  48 / 4 = 12 pounds  The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The turtle of Janele's father weighs 8 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The turtle of Janele's father weighs 8 pounds.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.35728782415390015]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Megan's father played 400 games. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Firstly, Megan participated in 100 plays, and she was the lead actress in 80% of those plays. That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many plays Megan was the lead actress in, so we wouldn't be able to calculate how many times she was not the lead actress. Since Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, that means that she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since this tells us the total number of plays that Megan was involved in. This helps us to calculate the number of times that Megan was not the lead actress. The condition that Megan's father played 400 games is not relevant to the calculation process, since it has nothing to do with the number of plays Megan was not the lead actress in.  Therefore, the answer is that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Firstly, Megan participated in 100 plays, and she was the lead actress in 80% of those plays. That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many plays Megan was the lead actress in, so we wouldn't be able to calculate how many times she was not the lead actress.\nSince Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, that means that she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since this tells us the total number of plays that Megan was involved in. This helps us to calculate the number of times that Megan was not the lead actress.\nStep 1: Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  Step 2: Since Megan participated in 100 plays, that means she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  Step 3: The condition \"Megan's father played 400 games\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since it has nothing to do with the number of plays Megan was not the lead actress in.  Therefore, the answer is that Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.", "equation": "Megan's father played 400 games.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.2539917826652527]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Nathalie's sister makes 150 cookies as well; each cookie weighs 10 grams. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, the cake is 400 grams, so one-eighth of the cake is 400 姊 8 = 50 grams.   Second, Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate, so Pierre ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.   The condition about Nathalie's sister making 150 cookies is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the amount of cake that Pierre ate. Therefore, the answer is Pierre ate 100 grams.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 grams divided by 8, or 50 grams. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 100 grams. The condition of the cake being divided into eight equal parts is not relevant to the calculation of how much Pierre ate, since the calculation was already provided. The 150 cookies, each weighing 10 grams, are also not relevant to the calculation. Therefore, the answer is Pierre ate 100 grams.\nFirst, the cake is 400 grams, so one-eighth of the cake is 400 姊 8 = 50 grams.   Second, Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate, so Pierre ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.   The condition about Nathalie's sister making 150 cookies is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the amount of cake that Pierre ate.", "equation": "Nathalie's sister makes 150 cookies as well; each cookie weighs 10 grams.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.24342651665210724]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Mary's sister has 5 more books than Mary. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy. This means that Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary's sister has 5 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the problem is asking about the number of pieces of candy Mary has in total and not the number of books Mary and her sister have. So the answer is 25 pieces of candy.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy. This means that Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary's sister has 5 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the problem is asking about the number of pieces of candy Mary has in total and not the number of books Mary and her sister have.", "equation": "Mary's sister has 5 more books than Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.49404120445251465]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Hannah's father has 3 sisters, where all of them are 10 years old. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "Hannah has three brothers who are all 8 years old. This is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary in order to find the sum of their ages.  The sum of their ages is 24 (8 + 8 + 8 = 24). This is also relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how old the brothers are in total.  Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, so she is 48 years old (24 x 2 = 48).  Therefore, the answer is that Hannah is 48 years old. The condition that Hannah's father has 3 sisters, where all of them are 10 years old, is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding Hannah's age. So the answer is: 48 years old.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "1. Hannah's three brothers are all 8 years old. That means the sum of their ages is 24 (8 + 8 + 8 = 24).  2. Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, so she is 48 years old (24 x 2 = 48).   So, the answer is that Hannah is 48 years old. The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary in order to find the sum of their ages.", "equation": "Hannah's father has 3 sisters, where all of them are 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.5445134043693542]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Lizzy's neighbor bought 30 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the 540 pounds of fish. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, we can divide 540 by 30 to get 18 crates. Second, we need to calculate how much it will cost to ship the crates. Since the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, we can multiply 18 by $1.5 to get $27. Thus, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many crates Lizzy needs to ship and how much each crate costs. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total cost of the shipment. So the answer would be: 18 crates x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the 540 pounds of fish. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, we can divide 540 by 30 to get 18 crates.  Second, we need to calculate how much it will cost to ship the crates. Since the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, we can multiply 18 by $1.5 to get $27.  Thus, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many crates Lizzy needs to ship and how much each crate costs. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total cost of the shipment.\nFirst, Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. This means that Lizzy will need to ship 18 crates of fish (540 pounds / 30 pounds = 18 crates).  Second, the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. Therefore, Lizzy will have to pay a total of $27 for the shipment ($1.5 x 18 crates = $27).  The condition \"Lizzy's neighbor bought 30 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect the total amount of money Lizzy will have to pay for the shipment.", "equation": "Lizzy's neighbor bought 30 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.4043203294277191]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Maria's brother bought a shampoo 3 months ago. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time a bar of soap lasts for. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Maria spends on a bar of soap.  To stock up for the entire year, Maria will need to buy 6 bars of soap. This is because there are 12 months in a year and a bar of soap lasts for 2 months, so 12 divided by 2 gives us 6 bars. Maria will need to spend 6 x $8.00 = $48.00 to stock up for the entire year.  Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Maria's brother bought a shampoo 3 months ago is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Maria will spend to stock up for the entire year. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of bars of soap needed (6) by the price per bar ($8.00). So the answer is $48.00.", "numerical_answer": 48.0, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. Since Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she needs 12 bars of soap. If she spends $8.00 per bar of soap, she will spend a total of $96.00 on soap for the year. The condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it directly affects the amount of money Maria will spend on soap for the year.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount of soap Maria needs for one year. Since she uses one bar of soap every two months, Maria needs six bars of soap for one year.  Second, we need to calculate the cost of the soap. Since Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap, she will spend a total of $48.00 for six bars of soap.  The statement \"Maria's brother bought a shampoo 3 months ago\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Maria's brother bought a shampoo 3 months ago.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.43324553966522217]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Megan's neighbor watched 100 movies in the movie theater. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which is equal to 80 plays. Therefore, 20 plays out of the 100 total plays were not lead roles. So, the answer is 20. Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. It provides the necessary information to calculate the number of times Megan was not the lead actress. The condition that Megan's neighbor watched 100 movies in the movie theater is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work and she participated in 100 plays. To calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress, we need to subtract the number of plays she was the lead actress from the total number of plays. So the answer would be: 100 plays - 80 plays = 20 plays. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which is equal to 80 plays. Therefore, 20 plays out of the 100 total plays were not lead roles. So, the answer is 20.   Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. It provides the necessary information to calculate the number of times Megan was not the lead actress.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, meaning that 80 of the 100 plays she participated in made her the lead actress. This means that the remaining 20 plays were not lead roles for Megan.  So the answer to your question is 20. The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it helps us determine the total number of plays Megan was involved in, which helps us calculate how many times she was not the lead actress.\n1. Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work.  2. Megan participated in 100 plays. 3. 80% of 100 is 80, so Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays.  4. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  No, the condition \"Megan's neighbor watched 100 movies in the movie theater.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Megan's neighbor watched 100 movies in the movie theater.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.3770112693309784]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' mother pays $200 for each wall. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate how many tiles are in each wall. Since there are 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, there are 8 x 20 = 160 tiles in each wall. The second step is to calculate how many tiles are in the entire shower. Since there are three walls, there are 3 x 160 = 480 tiles in the shower. Therefore, there are 480 tiles in the shower. Yes, the condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides us with the necessary information to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. The condition \"James' mother pays $200 for each wall\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "The question asks us to calculate \"How many tiles are in the shower?\".  We know that each wall of the shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, there are 8x20 = 160 tiles in each wall of the shower.  Since there are 3 walls in the shower, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3x160 = 480 tiles.   The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides us with the necessary information to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe first step is to calculate how many tiles are in each wall. Since there are 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, there are 8 x 20 = 160 tiles in each wall.  The second step is to calculate how many tiles are in the entire shower. Since there are three walls, there are 3 x 160 = 480 tiles in the shower.  Therefore, there are 480 tiles in the shower.  Yes, the condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how many tiles are in each wall, and thus we would not be able to calculate how many tiles are in the entire shower.\nStep 1: There are 3 walls in the shower, so we need to calculate the number of tiles for each wall.   Step 2: Each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height.   Step 3: So, each wall has 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.   Step 4: Multiply the number of tiles per wall by the number of walls.   Step 5: Therefore, there are 3 x 160 = 480 tiles in the shower.   Answer: There are 480 tiles in the shower.   Condition: The condition \"James' mother pays $200 for each wall\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "James' mother pays $200 for each wall.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.06602006405591965]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jennifer's mother bought 120 bottles of water yesterday. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, add up all the sweets that Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024. Then divide 1,024 by 4, since there are 4 people in total: 1,024 / 4 = 256. So, Jennifer and her 3 friends will each get 256 sweets. The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process because it specifies how many people there are to share the sweets between. If there had been more or fewer people, the answer would have been different. The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the starting point for the calculation. Without this condition, we would not have been able to calculate how many sweets each person will get. The condition regarding the number of bottles of water purchased by Jennifer's mother is not relevant to the calculation process since it does not provide any information that is relevant to the calculation of how many sweets each person will get. So the answer is 256 sweets per person.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, add up all the sweets that Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024. Then divide 1,024 by 4, since there are 4 people in total: 1,024 / 4 = 256. So, Jennifer and her 3 friends will each get 256 sweets.  The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process because it specifies how many people there are to share the sweets between. If there had been more or fewer people, the answer would have been different.\nFirst, the condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the starting point for the calculation. We know that Jennifer has 212 green sweets, so we can use this information to calculate how many sweets each person will get.  To calculate how many sweets each person will get, we first need to add up the total number of sweets that Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024. Then, divide that number by the number of people, in this case four, to get the total number of sweets each person will get: 1,024 / 4 = 256. So, each person will get 256 sweets.  This means that Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets. The condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the starting point for the calculation. Without this condition, we would not have been able to calculate how many sweets each person will get.  The condition regarding the number of bottles of water purchased by Jennifer's mother is not relevant to the calculation process since it does not provide any information that is relevant to the calculation of how many sweets each person will get.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has. To do this, we add up the number of green sweets (212), blue sweets (310) and yellow sweets (502). So, the total number of sweets is 1,024.  Next, we need to divide 1,024 by 4, since there are 4 people (Jennifer and her 3 friends). This gives us a result of 256. This means that each person will get 256 sweets.  The condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since we are not calculating the number of each type of sweet. We are only calculating the total number of sweets and then dividing that by the number of people. Therefore, the condition is not relevant to the problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will get in total. To do this, we need to add up the numbers of sweets Jennifer has: 212 green sweets + 310 blue sweets + 502 yellow sweets = 1,024 sweets.  Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4 (the number of people). 1,024 divided by 4 = 256. This means that each person will get 256 sweets.  Finally, we need to determine how many of each type of sweet each person will get. To do this, we need to divide the number of each type of sweet by 4. For example, 212 green sweets divided by 4 = 53 green sweets per person. The same calculation can be done for the blue and yellow sweets.  The condition \"Jennifer's mother bought 120 bottles of water yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jennifer's mother bought 120 bottles of water yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.25092488527297974]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Clarice's mother bought 8 kilograms of strawberries yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know the total cost of the cherries. Since it says that Genevieve was $400 short of the total price, that means the total cost of the cherries was $1600 + $400 = $2000.  Since each kilogram of cherries cost $8, you can divide $2000 by $8 to get the total number of kilograms of cherries that Genevieve bought.  2000/8 = 250 kg of cherries.  Therefore, Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries. The condition \"Clarice's mother bought 8 kilograms of strawberries yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that each kilogram of cherries cost $8 and Genevieve was $400 short of the total price. So the answer would be: $2000/$8 = 250 kg of cherries. Therefore, Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries.", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "Genevieve picked some cherries which cost $8 per kilogram.  This condition is relevant because it tells you how much each kilogram of cherries cost.   If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy? To answer this, you need to know how much the total cost of the cherries was. Since it says that Genevieve was $400 short of the total price, that means the total cost of the cherries was $1600+$400 = $2000.   Since each kilogram of cherries cost $8, you can divide $2000 by $8 to get the total number of kilograms of cherries that Genevieve bought.   2000/8 = 250 kg of cherries.   Therefore, Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries.\nGenevieve picked some cherries which cost $8 per kilogram. If she had $1600 on her, then she could buy 200 kilograms of cherries ($1600 姊 8 = 200 kg).   However, when Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Therefore, she actually bought 192 kilograms of cherries ($1600 - $400 = $1200, $1200 姊 8 = 192 kg).   In conclusion, if Genevieve had $1600 on her, she would have bought 192 kilograms of cherries. The condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nIf Genevieve had $1600 on her, she could buy 200 kilograms of cherries ($1600/$8 = 200). Since she only had $1200, she could only buy 150 kilograms of cherries ($1200/$8 = 150).  The condition \"Clarice's mother bought 8 kilograms of strawberries yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Clarice's mother bought 8 kilograms of strawberries yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.4806753396987915]}
{"original_question": "Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel are bird watching. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. Darrel saw 15 zebras. How many birds does each of them see on average?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many birds each of them see in total.  Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds.  That means the total number of birds they see is 7 + 11 + 9 = 27 birds.  Then, we need to calculate the average number of birds they see.  We can do this by dividing the total number of birds (27 birds) by the number of people (3 people). That means the average number of birds they see is 27 ÷ 3 = 9 birds.  Yes, the condition \"Darrel saw 15 zebras\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it tells us the number of people who were bird watching.  To answer the question, we need to calculate the average number of birds they see. We can calculate this by dividing the total number of birds (27 birds) by the number of people (3 people).  So the answer is 9 birds.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "The first part of the question is asking us to calculate how many birds each of the three bird watchers saw on average. We can calculate that by adding up the total number of birds they saw combined and then divide that by the total number of bird watchers. In this case, that would be (7+11+9)/3 = 17/3 = 5.67 birds per bird watcher on average.   The second part of the question is asking us about the number of zebras that Darrel saw, which is 15. This is not relevant to the calculation process of finding out how many birds each of them saw on average, as it does not affect the number of birds seen by the other two bird watchers.\nThe first part of the question is asking about the average number of birds that each person saw. Marcus saw 7 birds, Humphrey saw 11 birds, and Darrel saw 9 birds. To calculate the average, we add these three numbers together and divide by 3, since there are 3 people. This gives us an average of 9 birds.   The second part of the question is asking about the relevance of Darrel seeing 15 zebras. This is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it does not involve birds, which is what the question is asking about.", "equation": "Darrel saw 15 zebras.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4831371605396271, 0.5573062300682068, 0.5210311412811279, 0.48639485239982605, 0.291800320148468]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The two dogs of Janele's father weigh 10 pounds each. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. We know that the first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds, and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. So the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Now we need to calculate the average weight. To do this, we need to divide the total weight (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4 cats). The average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"The two dogs of Janele's father weigh 10 pounds each.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it is about the weight of Janele's cats and not her father's dogs.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The first step is to add up the weights of all of Janele's cats. The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, so that is 24 pounds. The third cat weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds, so that is 24 pounds. All together, the cats weigh 48 pounds.  The next step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats. In this case, Janele has 4 cats, so we divide 48 by 4. The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because the number of cats is already given and does not affect the calculation.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. We know that the first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds, and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. So the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Now we need to calculate the average weight. To do this, we need to divide the total weight (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4 cats). The average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides us with two of the weights we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the average weight.\nJanele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. To calculate the average weight of her cats, we need to add up the weight of all of the cats and divide the sum by the number of cats.   The total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   The average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.   The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides information on the weight of one of Janele's cats. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats accurately.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats.  The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, so the total weight of those two cats is 24 pounds. The third cat weighs 14.7 pounds, and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds, so the total weight of the third and fourth cats is 24 pounds.   Now, we can calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.  The total weight of all four cats is 48 pounds. Since there are four cats, we can divide 48 by 4 to get the average weight of Janele's cats, which is 12 pounds.  The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the weight of the fourth cat, which is necessary in order to calculate the total weight of all four cats.\nFirst, we need to find the total weight of Janele's cats. We can do this by adding the weights of each cat together. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Now, we need to find the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to divide the total weight of Janele's cats (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4). 48/4 = 12 pounds. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The two dogs of Janele's father weigh 10 pounds each.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it is about the weight of Janele's cats and not her father's dogs.", "equation": "The two dogs of Janele's father weigh 10 pounds each.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.30765828490257263]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Calvin's mother gets a haircut every 5 weeks. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts. That means that he has 8/10 of the total haircuts he needs to make his dog's wig. So, he is 80% towards his goal.  The condition that Calvin's mother gets a haircut every 5 weeks is not relevant to the calculation process here, as it does not affect the number of haircuts that Calvin has gotten. Calvin has already gotten 8 haircuts, so he needs 2 more haircuts to reach his goal. This means that he is 8/10 (or 80%) of the way towards his goal.  The condition that his mother gets a haircut every 5 weeks is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem. So, the answer is that Calvin is 80% towards his goal.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts. That means that he has 8/10 of the total haircuts he needs to make his dog's wig. So, he is 80% towards his goal.  The condition that Calvin's mother gets a haircut every 5 weeks is not relevant to the calculation process here, as it does not affect the number of haircuts that Calvin has gotten.\nCalvin has already gotten 8 haircuts, so he needs 2 more haircuts to reach his goal. This means that he is 8/10 (or 80%) of the way towards his goal.  The condition that his mother gets a haircut every 5 weeks is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.\nCalvin has gotten 8 haircuts, so he needs 2 more.   That means he is 8/10 = 80% towards his goal.   The condition that Calvin's mother gets a haircut every 5 weeks is irrelevant to calculating the percentage of haircuts Calvin has had towards his goal.", "equation": "Calvin's mother gets a haircut every 5 weeks.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.24878965318202972]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Michelle's neighbor walked for 8 miles to see the dentist. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle needs to pay a ride fee of $2. This fee is fixed and does not depend on the distance traveled.  Next, Michelle needs to pay the fare for 4 miles. The fare per mile is $2.5, so the total fare for 4 miles will be $2.5 x 4 = $10.  Therefore, Michelle's total payment for the ride will be $2 + $10 = $12.  So yes, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Michelle needs to pay a ride fee of $2. This fee is fixed and does not depend on the distance traveled.  Next, Michelle needs to pay the fare for 4 miles. The fare per mile is $2.5, so the total fare for 4 miles will be $2.5 x 4 = $10.  Therefore, Michelle's total payment for the ride will be $2 + $10 = $12.  So yes, the condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Michelle pays a ride fee of $2 when entering the taxi.  Second, Michelle pays a charge of $2.5 per mile. Since she rode 4 miles, she will pay $10 in total for her ride ($2.5 x 4 = $10).  Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride ($2 + $10 = $12).  The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines how many miles Michelle rode and therefore how much she must pay for the ride.\nThe first step is to calculate the total cost of Michelle's ride. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5 and Michelle rode for 4 miles, so the total cost of her ride is $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $10.  The condition \"Michelle's neighbor walked for 8 miles to see the dentist\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not provide any information about the cost of Michelle's ride.", "equation": "Michelle's neighbor walked for 8 miles to see the dentist.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.36984947323799133]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Melies' brother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the cost of the meat per kilogram. That means Melies will pay $164 for the meat (2 kg x $82 per kg). Melies has $180 in his wallet. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Melies has in his wallet. Melies' brother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Melies' brother wants to spend.  So, the total amount of money spent on the meat and the pencil is $164 + $20 = $184.  Melies will have $180 - $184 = -$4 left in his wallet after paying for the meat. Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Melies' brother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20 is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Melies' brother wants to spend.  So, the answer is -$4.", "numerical_answer": -4, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat for $82 per kilogram. This means he spent $164 in total. So Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left. Then Melies' brother bought a pencil for $20. This means Melies has $16 - $20 = -$4 left.  Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?\" Knowing the amount of meat that Melies purchased allowed us to calculate the total cost and thus determine how much money Melies had left after paying for the meat.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kg. So, the total cost of the meat is 2 x $82 = $164.  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet.  Third, his brother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20.  Therefore, Melies has $180 - $164 - $20 = $6 left after paying for the meat and his brother's pencil.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing the cost of the meat, we would not be able to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, so the total cost of the meat is $82/kg x 2 = $164.   Melies had $180 in his wallet.   So, after paying for the meat, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left.   Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is a factor in determining how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat at a cost of $82 per kilogram. This means he spent a total of $164 on the meat.   Since Melies had $180 in his wallet, he has $16 left after paying for the meat ($180 - $164 = $16).  The condition \"Melies' brother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20\" does not affect the calculation process of this problem. Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat, regardless of his brother's wish to buy a pencil.", "equation": "Melies' brother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443210005760193, 0.3812294006347656, 0.535139262676239, 0.3640271723270416]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Gretchen's neighbor is holding 50 drawings now. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "On Saturday, Gretchen sold 24 drawings. This means she earned 24 x $20.00 = $480.00 On Sunday, Gretchen sold 16 drawings. This means she earned 16 x $20.00 = $320.00  To calculate the total money Gretchen made, we need to add the money she earned on Saturday and on Sunday.  Total = $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition provides information about how much money Gretchen charges for each drawing, which is used to calculate the total money she made. The condition that Gretchen's neighbor is holding 50 drawings now is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "On Saturday, Gretchen sold 24 drawings. This means she earned 24 x $20.00 = $480.00 On Sunday, Gretchen sold 16 drawings. This means she earned 16 x $20.00 = $320.00  To calculate the total money Gretchen made, we need to add the money she earned on Saturday and on Sunday.  Total = $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00   Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition provides information about how much money Gretchen charges for each drawing, which is used to calculate the total money she made.\nFirst, we calculate how much money Gretchen made on Saturday. She sold 24 drawings, so she made $480.00 (24 x $20.00 = $480.00).  Then, we calculate how much money Gretchen made on Sunday. She sold 16 drawings, so she made $320.00 (16 x $20.00 = $320.00).  Finally, we calculate the total amount of money Gretchen made over the weekend. She made a total of $800.00 ($480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00).  The condition \"Gretchen's neighbor is holding 50 drawings now\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Gretchen's neighbor is holding 50 drawings now.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.2870839834213257]}
{"original_question": "Billy's family likes to keep their bicycles stored in the garage when they're not being used. They own a total of 4 bicycles. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. Billy's brother put 10 wheels out of the garage. How many spokes are inside the garage?", "reasoning_path": "Billy's family owns 4 bicycles. That means there are 4 bicycle wheels inside the garage. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. That means there are 40 spokes inside the garage (4 bicycle wheels x 10 spokes). Billy's brother took 10 wheels out of the garage. That means there are 30 spokes left inside the garage (40 spokes - 10 spokes). Therefore, there are 30 spokes inside the garage. Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Billy's family owns 4 bicycles is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many bicycle wheels are inside the garage. The condition that Billy's brother put 10 wheels out of the garage is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many wheels were taken out of the garage. So the answer is 30 spokes.", "numerical_answer": 30, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "1. Each bike has 10 spokes, so the total number of spokes for 4 bikes is 40.  2. Billy's brother put 10 wheels out of the garage, so there are 30 spokes inside the garage.  Yes, the condition \"They own a total of 4 bicycles\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThere are 4 bicycles in the garage.  Each bicycle has 2 wheels.  Each wheel has 10 spokes.   Therefore, there are a total of 80 spokes in the garage.  Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is necessary to know how many spokes each wheel has in order to calculate the total number of spokes in the garage.\nWe know that each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes.  We know that there are 4 bicycles stored in the garage. Therefore, there should be 40 spokes inside the garage.   The condition that \"Billy's brother put 10 wheels out of the garage\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since that does not affect the number of spokes inside the garage.", "equation": "Billy's brother put 10 wheels out of the garage.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3732944130897522, 0.22472992539405823, 0.38099128007888794, 0.3157132565975189]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The school of Charles' sister has 623721 students. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, the condition does mention the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (119,666 fewer people).   Second, we can calculate the population of Greenville by subtracting 119,666 from 482,653. So the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.   Third, to find the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we can add the population of Springfield (482,653) to the population of Greenville (362,987). So the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640. Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "First, the condition does mention the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (119,666 fewer people).   Second, we can calculate the population of Greenville by subtracting 119,666 from 482,653. So the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.   Third, to find the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we can add the population of Springfield (482,653) to the population of Greenville (362,987). So the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640. Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Calculate the population of Greenville. To do this, we need to subtract 119,666 from 482,653, which gives us a total of 362,987.  Step 2: Add the population of Springfield (482,653) to the population of Greenville (362,987) to get a total population of 845,640.  The condition \"The school of Charles' sister has 623721 students\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. This condition only tells us the number of students in Charles' sister's school and has no bearing on the total population of Springfield and Greenville.", "equation": "The school of Charles' sister has 623721 students.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.2071751058101654]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Kim's brother sold 40 more peaches to the store. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout, meaning 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings. Since Kim sold 6 of the saplings, then she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left. The condition of Kim's brother selling 40 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it does not affect the answer. Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it was used in the calculation of the initial number of saplings (25% of 80 cherry pits = 20 saplings).", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, which is 20 saplings. Kim sells 6 of them, so she has 14 saplings left. Kim's brother sold 40 more peaches to the store, but this doesn't affect the number of cherry saplings, so Kim still has 14 saplings left.  Therefore, the answer is that Kim has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it was used in the calculation of the initial number of saplings (25% of 80 cherry pits = 20 saplings).\nKim planted 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprouted, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings. Kim sold 6 of these saplings, so now he has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left. The condition of 25% of them sprouting is relevant to the calculation process because without this condition, we would not know that Kim has 20 cherry saplings to begin with.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them (or 20) sprout.   Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left.   Kim's brother sells 40 more peaches to the store, but this does not affect the number of cherry saplings, so Kim still has 14 cherry saplings left.  Yes, the condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the number of cherry saplings that Kim has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout, meaning 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings. Since Kim sold 6 of the saplings, then she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim's brother sold 40 more peaches to the store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it does not affect the answer. Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "equation": "Kim's brother sold 40 more peaches to the store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364678502082825, 0.24044954776763916, 0.46118128299713135, 0.37036436796188354]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jennifer's sister bought 210 bottles of water yesterday. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has. To do this, we add the number of green sweets (212), blue sweets (310), and yellow sweets (502) together: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024.   Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets (1,024) by the number of people (4 people, including Jennifer). 1,024 divided by 4 is 256.   Therefore, each person will get 256 sweets. The fact that Jennifer's sister bought 210 bottles of water yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, and she wants to share them with her 3 friends (including herself). To calculate how many sweets each person will get, we need to add up all of the different colors of sweets to get the total number of sweets that Jennifer has to share and then divide the total number of sweets by the number of people. So the answer would be: 1024 / 4 = 256. Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets each.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, the condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many people are sharing the sweets.  Second, we need to add up the number of each type of sweet to get the total number of sweets: 212 green sweets + 310 blue sweets + 502 yellow sweets = 1024 total sweets.  Third, we need to divide the total number of sweets by the number of people (4, including Jennifer): 1024 姊 4 = 256.  Finally, Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets each.   Therefore, the answer is that Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets each. The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, the condition is relevant because it tells us how many green sweets Jennifer has. If we don't know how many green sweets Jennifer has, we wouldn't be able to calculate how many sweets each person will get.  Second, we need to add up all of the different colors of sweets to get the total number of sweets that Jennifer has to share. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, so the total number of sweets is 1,024.  Third, we need to divide 1,024 by 4 (the total number of people including Jennifer) to get the number of sweets each person will get. 1,024 divided by 4 is 256. Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has. To do this, we add the number of green sweets (212), blue sweets (310), and yellow sweets (502) together: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1,024.   Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets (1,024) by the number of people (4 people, including Jennifer). 1,024 divided by 4 is 256.   Therefore, each person will get 256 sweets. The fact that there are 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets does not impact the calculation process.\nFirst, calculate the total number of sweets: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.  Now, divide the total number of sweets by 4 (for Jennifer and her 3 friends): 1024 / 4 = 256.  Therefore, each of Jennifer and her friends will get 256 sweets each.  The condition \"Jennifer's sister bought 210 bottles of water yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jennifer's sister bought 210 bottles of water yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.35502272844314575]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. James' brother made 5 sweaters last month. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the price reduction on the t-shirts. Each t-shirt costs $20. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the price of each t-shirt. Since the t-shirts are 50% off, that means the total cost of the 6 t-shirts is $20 x 6 x 50% = $60. Yes, the condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that James' brother made 5 sweaters last month is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much James paid for the 6 t-shirts. We can calculate this by multiplying the price of each t-shirt by the number of t-shirts and then applying the discount. So the answer would be $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, James bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This means that the original price of the t-shirts was $40, and James paid $20 for each t-shirt, for a total of $120.  Second, James' brother made 5 sweaters last month. Since this is not related to the original question, it is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, we cannot answer the question of how much James paid.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off. That means the original price of each t-shirt was $40. Since he got a 50% discount, the price of each t-shirt was reduced to $20. Therefore, James paid a total of $120 for all 6 t-shirts. The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process because it confirms that the final price of each t-shirt was $20. It does not, however, affect the total amount that James paid. The amount he paid was not affected by the initial price of the t-shirts, only the discount.\nFirst, calculate how much James paid for the 6 t-shirts. He bought them at 50% off, so each t-shirt cost $20. That means he paid 6 x 20 = 120 for the 6 t-shirts.  Therefore, the answer to the question is that James paid $120 for the 6 t-shirts. The condition \"James' brother made 5 sweaters last month\" is not relevant to this calculation process, as it does not relate to the amount of money that James paid for the 6 t-shirts.", "equation": "James' brother made 5 sweaters last month.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.24370822310447693]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Steve's neighbor is 30 inches shorter than Steve. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "First, Steve is 5'6\", or 66 inches tall. We know Steve grows 6 inches, so Steve is now 72 inches tall.  The condition that Steve's neighbor is 30 inches shorter than Steve is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that Steve's neighbor is 42 inches tall (72 inches - 30 inches = 42 inches).  Therefore, the answer is: Steve is 72 inches tall.  Yes, the condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without this condition, the answer would be 66 inches.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "First, Steve is 5'6\". In inches, that's 66 inches.   Second, Steve grows 6 inches. Now Steve is 66 + 6 = 72 inches tall.   Third, Steve's neighbor is 30 inches shorter than Steve. That means the neighbor is 72 - 30 = 42 inches tall.   So, the answer is: Steve is 72 inches tall.   Yes, the condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without this condition, the answer would be 66 inches.\nSteve is initially 5'6\", or 66 inches tall. We know Steve grows 6 inches, so Steve is now 72 inches tall.  The condition that Steve's neighbor is 30 inches shorter than Steve is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that Steve's neighbor is 42 inches tall (72 inches - 30 inches = 42 inches).", "equation": "Steve's neighbor is 30 inches shorter than Steve.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495515942573547, 0.513569176197052, 0.6367820501327515]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. The height of Maria's father is 3 feet. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "The pencil cost her $8. So the pen cost her half of that, which is $4. Therefore, Maria paid $8 for the pencil and $4 for the pen, meaning she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil. The condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to calculate how much the pen cost. The condition of Maria's father's height being 3 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Maria bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. To calculate the total cost for both the pen and the pencil, we need to add the cost of the pencil ($8) and the cost of the pen ($4). So the answer would be: $8 + $4 = $12. Therefore, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The pencil cost her $8. So the pen cost her half of that, which is $4. Therefore, Maria paid $8 for the pencil and $4 for the pen, meaning she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to calculate how much the pen cost.\nMaria paid $8 for the pencil. Since the pen cost her half the price of the pencil, we can calculate that Maria paid $4 for the pen. Therefore, Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"The height of Maria's father is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Maria's father is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.09458356350660324]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Luke's neighbor is 40 years old. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "Luke needs to fill 4 bottles with stars. Each bottle needs 85 stars. So, Luke needs to make 85 x 4 = 340 stars. Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 stars more.  The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many stars we need for each bottle. Without this condition, we would not know how many stars Luke needs to make. The condition that Luke's neighbor is 40 years old is not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is that Luke needs to fill 4 bottles with stars and he has already made 33 stars. To calculate the number of stars Luke needs to make, we need to subtract the number of stars he has already made from the total number of stars required to fill the four bottles. So the answer would be: 340 - 33 = 307 stars.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "Luke needs to fill 4 bottles with stars. Each bottle needs 85 stars. So, Luke needs to make 85 x 4 = 340 stars. Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 stars more.   The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many stars we need for each bottle. Without this condition, we would not know how many stars Luke needs to make.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to make in order to fill the four bottles. 4 bottles * 85 stars = 340 stars   Then, we need to subtract the 33 stars Luke has already made from the total he needs to make. 340 stars - 33 stars = 307 stars   Finally, we can answer the question: Luke must make 307 more stars in order to fill the four bottles.   The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process, as we need to subtract this number from the total stars required in order to get the final answer.\nLuke needs to make 85 stars to fill one glass jar. So, if he needs to fill 4 bottles, he will need to make 4 times as many stars, or 340 stars. Since he has already made 33 stars, he will need to make 307 more stars. The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to this calculation because it tells us that Luke needs to make more stars than if he were only filling one jar.\n1. Luke needs to make 85 stars in total to fill the glass jar. 2. Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 stars more. 3. Luke needs to make 52 stars to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make 13 stars for each bottle.  Therefore, Luke needs to make a total of 52 more stars to fill the 4 bottles. The condition \"Luke's neighbor is 40 years old\" is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "Luke's neighbor is 40 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.29435330629348755]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' brother is 20 years old. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "The instructions are as follows: To calculate the number of tiles in the shower, we need to know the number of tiles on each wall. The condition states each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 8 x 20 = 480 tiles. The condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it provides the information needed to solve the problem.  There are 3 walls in the shower, each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height.  Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x (8 x 20) = 480 tiles. The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is part of the equation used to determine the total number of tiles in the shower.  The condition that James' brother is 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, the answer is 480 tiles.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "To calculate the number of tiles in the shower, we need to know the number of tiles on each wall. The condition states each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 8 x 20 = 480 tiles. The condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it provides the information needed to solve the problem.\nThere are 3 walls in the shower, each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height.  Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x (8 x 20) = 480 tiles.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is part of the equation used to determine the total number of tiles in the shower.\nFirst we need to calculate the number of tiles in each wall: 8 x 20 = 160 tiles. Then we need to multiply it by 3, because the shower has 3 walls: 160 x 3 = 480 tiles.   So the answer is 480 tiles.   The condition \"James' brother is 20 years old.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' brother is 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, -0.0954185500741005]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The height of Holden's neighbor is 300 feet. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The total sq ft of his current bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft. If he wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large, then the sq ft of his new room is twice of 459 sq ft, which is 918 sq ft. The condition \"The height of Holden's neighbor is 300 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation and thus not relevant to the answer. The relevant information to answer this question is that Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft, and he wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large. To calculate the sq ft of this new room, we need to multiply the total sq ft of his current bedroom and bathroom by 2. So the answer would be: 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room would have 918 sq ft.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The total sq ft of his current bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft. If he wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large, then the sq ft of his new room is twice of 459 sq ft, which is 918 sq ft. The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it is included in the total sq ft of his current bedroom and bathroom.\nThe current bedroom and bathroom occupy a total of 459 sq ft. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, this new room would have to be twice as large as 459 sq ft, or 918 sq ft. In answer to your question, the condition \"The height of Holden's neighbor is 300 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation and thus not relevant to the answer.", "equation": "The height of Holden's neighbor is 300 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.39507856965065]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Kim's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many of the cherry pits sprouted. Since 25% of them sprouted, that means that 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits sprouted.  Then, we need to subtract the number of saplings Kim sold from the total number of cherry pits that sprouted. So, 20 - 6 = 14 saplings.  Finally, we need to answer the question: How many cherry saplings does Kim have left? The answer is 14.  The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the total number of cherry pits that Kim planted. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate how many cherry saplings Kim has left. The condition \"Kim's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" and can be disregarded. So the answer is 14 cherry saplings.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many of the cherry pits sprouted. Since 25% of them sprouted, that means that 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits sprouted.  Then, we need to subtract the number of saplings Kim sold from the total number of cherry pits that sprouted. So, 20 - 6 = 14 saplings.  Finally, we need to answer the question: How many cherry saplings does Kim have left? The answer is 14.  The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the total number of cherry pits that Kim planted. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate how many cherry saplings Kim has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout: 25% of 80 is 20, so 20 cherry pits sprout.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings: 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings remain.   The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to determine how many cherry pits sprout and therefore how many saplings Kim has left.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them will sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.  Second, Kim sells 6 of the saplings. This means that Kim now has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings.  Finally, Kim's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year. This is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\". So, the answer is 14 cherry saplings.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings. Kim then sells 6 of the saplings, so Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Kim's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" and can be disregarded.", "equation": "Kim's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364678502082825, 0.24044954776763916, 0.46118128299713135, 0.20740249752998352]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. The height of Hamza's father is 4 feet. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza has a 5-liter bucket. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means Hamza can pour 3 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means Hamza can pour 2 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket. So, Hamza can put a total of 5 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. Yes, the condition \"holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Hamza's father's height is 4 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. We can calculate this by determining how much water Hamza can pour into the 3-liter bucket and the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. So, the answer is 5 liters.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket. This means she has 5 liters of water.  Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means she can put up to 3 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket, leaving her with 2 liters of water.  Finally, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means she can put up to 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, since the 6-liter bucket can hold up to 6 liters of water.  Therefore, the answer to the question is 4 liters.  The given condition is relevant to the calculation process because it states the sizes of the buckets, which we need to know in order to properly calculate how much water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket, which means that the 3-liter bucket now has 5 liters of water in it. Next, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket, which means that the 3-liter bucket is now full (3 liters). Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket.  The remainder is the amount of water that was not able to fit into the 3-liter bucket. In this case, it is 2 liters (5 liters - 3 liters = 2 liters). Therefore, Hamza can put 2 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it determines the amount of water that Hamza is able to pour into the 6-liter bucket. Without this condition, the answer would be different.\nHamza has a 5-liter bucket and a 3-liter bucket. When she pours as much as she can from the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket, the 3-liter bucket will be full. The remaining 2 liters will then be poured into the 6-liter bucket. So, Hamza can add 4 more liters of water to the 6-liter bucket without overflowing it.  The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us that the 2 liters from the 5-liter bucket were poured into the 6-liter bucket, leaving 4 liters of space for Hamza to add more water.\nFirst, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket, meaning it contains 5 liters of water.  Then, she poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket, meaning it contains 3 liters of water.  Finally, she poured the remainder into the 6-liter bucket, meaning it contains 2 liters of water.  Therefore, Hamza can put an additional 4 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The height of Hamza's father is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Hamza's father is 4 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.24646829068660736]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. James' sister is 200 years old. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester and then multiply that answer by 2.   James takes 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many units James is taking per semester.  Each unit costs $50. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each unit costs.   So, if each unit costs $50, and James is taking 20 units per semester, that means he will pay $1,000 for 1 semester. To calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters, we can multiply our answer from Step 3 ($1,000) by 2.  Therefore, James pays $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition of James' sister being 200 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of how much James pays for 2 semesters. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate the cost for 2 semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one unit by the number of units taken by James for both semesters. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 = $1000. Therefore, James pays $1000 for 2 semesters.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, the condition of James' sister being 200 years old is not relevant to the calculation process, so we can ignore that.  Second, the condition of James taking 20 units per semester is relevant because that is the number of units we need to use in the calculation.  Third, we know that each unit costs $50, so we can calculate that James will pay $1,000 for 2 semesters (20 units x $50 = $1,000).\nThe condition of James' sister is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it has nothing to do with the units taken or the cost per unit.   Therefore, the answer is: James pays $2000 for 2 semesters, since 20 units x $50 = $1000 per semester.", "equation": "James' sister is 200 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.06514334678649902]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. The shoe size of Papi Calot's father is 60. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he needs to buy 126 plants (7 x 18 = 126). He also wants to add 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy 15 more plants, for a total of 141 plants (126 + 15 = 141). The shoe size of Papi Calot's father is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy a total of 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he needs to buy 126 plants (7 x 18 = 126). He also wants to add 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy 15 more plants, for a total of 141 plants (126 + 15 = 141). The shoe size of Papi Calot's father is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so the total number of plants he has to buy is 7 x 18 = 126. However, he still has a bit of room left and he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. So, the total number of plants he has to buy is 126 + 15 = 141.  The shoe size of Papi Calot's father is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Papi Calot needs to buy enough plants for his 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs to buy 126 plants in total.  Then, he is thinking of adding an additional 15 plants. That brings the total number of plants he needs to buy to 141.  The shoe size of Papi Calot's father is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so the answer is 141 plants.", "equation": "The shoe size of Papi Calot's father is 60.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.2708049416542053]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The height of Lizzy's mother is 10 feet. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many crates that Lizzy needs to ship. Since each crate contains 30 pounds of fish, then 540 pounds of fish can be divided into 30-pound crates. Therefore, Lizzy needs to ship 18 crates (540/30 = 18).  Next, we need to calculate the total cost of the shipment. We know that the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, so we can multiply the number of crates (18) by the shipping cost ($1.5) to get the total cost. 18 multiplied by $1.5 is equal to $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"The height of Lizzy's mother is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that each crate weighs 30 pounds and the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. So the answer would be: 18 crates x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "To answer this question, we need to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy has to ship, and then multiply that number by the shipping cost of each crate.  First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy has to ship. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, we can divide 540 pounds by 30 to get the number of crates. 540 divided by 30 is 18. Therefore, Lizzy needs to ship 18 crates.  Next, we need to calculate the total cost of the shipment. We know that the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, so we can multiply the number of crates (18) by the shipping cost ($1.5) to get the total cost. 18 multiplied by $1.5 is equal to $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the weight of the crates, which we need to know in order to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy needs to ship.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy needs to ship. Since each crate contains 30 pounds of fish, then 540 pounds of fish can be divided into 30-pound crates. Therefore, Lizzy needs to ship 18 crates (540/30 = 18).  Second, we need to calculate the cost of the shipment. Since the cost of each crate is $1.5, the total cost of the shipment is 18 x $1.5 = $27.  The condition \"The height of Lizzy's mother is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Lizzy's mother is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.1278368979692459]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Mari's sister bought 11 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. 5 times 8 is 40, so Kendra made 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Half of 44 is 22, so Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\" because it helps us determine how many buttons Kendra made so that we can calculate how many buttons Sue made. The condition that Mari's sister bought 11 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer. So the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 5 times as many decorated buttons as Mari. 5 times 8 is 40, so Kendra made 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Half of 44 is 22, so Sue made 22 buttons.  The condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many did Sue make?\" because it helps us determine how many buttons Kendra made so that we can calculate how many buttons Sue made.\nKendra made 4 more than five times the number of buttons Mari made. Mari made 8 buttons, so five times 8 is 40. Kendra made 44 buttons. Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra, so she made 22 buttons. The condition about Mari's sister buying 11 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer. So the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.\nFirst, Mari made 8 buttons. Second, Kendra made 5 times 8, or 40 buttons. Third, Sue made half of 40, or 20 buttons.  Therefore, Sue made 20 buttons.  The condition that Mari's sister bought 11 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mari's sister bought 11 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.29188138246536255]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. The shoe size of Mary's sister is 10. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary would have 3 times as much candy as Megan, or 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she has 25 pieces of candy in total. The shoe size of Mary's sister is 10, but this is not relevant to the calculation process. The answer is 25 pieces of candy.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary would have 3 times as much candy as Megan, or 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she has 25 pieces of candy in total. The shoe size of Mary's sister is 10, but this is not relevant to the calculation process. The answer is 25 pieces of candy.\nIf Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much - 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.   The shoe size of Mary's sister is 10, but this condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary's sister is 10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.33348801732063293]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. Maria's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "The pencil cost her $8, so the pen must cost her half of $8, or $4.   Therefore, she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil ($8 + $4).   The condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process since it helps us determine the price of the pen. Without knowing the price of the pencil, we would not know the price of the pen. Maria paid $8 for the pencil, and she paid half the price of the pencil for the pen, which would be $4. Therefore, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"Maria's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not provide any information that can be used to calculate the cost of the pen and pencil. So the answer would be: Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The pencil cost her $8, so the pen must cost her half of $8, or $4.   Therefore, she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil ($8 + $4).   The condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process since it helps us determine the price of the pen. Without knowing the price of the pencil, we would not know the price of the pen.\nMaria paid $8 for the pencil, and she paid half the price of the pencil for the pen, which would be $4. Therefore, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"Maria's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not provide any information that can be used to calculate the cost of the pen and pencil.", "equation": "Maria's neighbor has read 8 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.19171276688575745]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. James' sister is 100 years old. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the amount covered by insurance: $300 x 80% = $240  Step 2: Calculate the amount not covered by insurance: $300 - $240 = $60  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the amount of money that is being covered by the insurance.  The condition that James's sister is 100 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the amount covered by insurance: $300 x 80% = $240  Step 2: Calculate the amount not covered by insurance: $300 - $240 = $60  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the amount of money that is being covered by the insurance.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of James's visit. Since his primary care doctor charges $300, the total cost of the visit is $300.  Next, we need to calculate what portion of the total cost James's insurance covers. Since the insurance covers 80% of the cost, the insurance covers $240 ($300 x 80%).  Finally, we need to calculate James's out-of-pocket cost. Since the insurance covers $240 and the total cost is $300, James's out-of-pocket cost is $60 ($300 - $240).  The condition \"and James's sister is 100 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJames's insurance covers 80% of the $300 doctor visit fee, which leaves the remaining 20% to be paid by James. So the out-of-pocket cost for James's doctor appointment is $60 ($300 x 0.2 = $60).  The condition \"James' sister is 100 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' sister is 100 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.20532645285129547]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Jed's father bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit. Step 2: We also know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Step 3: To calculate Jed's speeding speed, we can subtract the posted speed limit from the fine to get the number of miles per hour Jed was traveling over the speed limit.   $256 / 16 = 16 miles per hour  So, Jed was fined for traveling at 66 miles per hour (50 + 16 = 66). The condition that Jed's father bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  So this means that Jed was traveling at a speed greater than 50 mph.   In Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  This means that for each mile over 50 mph, Jed would be fined $16.   We can use this information to calculate how fast Jed was going. Since Jed was fined $256, we can divide 256 by 16 to get the number of miles over the speed limit Jed was going.   256/16 = 16   Therefore, Jed was traveling at 66 mph (50 + 16 = 66).   The condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides us with the information needed to calculate how fast Jed was going.\nThe fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour. We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph, so that means he was traveling at a speed of (256 / 16 =) 16 mph over the posted speed limit. This means that Jed was traveling at a speed of (50 + 16 =) 66 mph when he was fined. The condition that Jed's father bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to calculating Jed's speed.\nStep 1: We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit.   Step 2: We also know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.   Step 3: To calculate Jed's speeding speed, we can subtract the posted speed limit from the fine to get the number of miles per hour Jed was traveling over the speed limit.   $256 / 16 = 16 miles per hour  So, Jed was fined for traveling at 66 miles per hour.   The condition that \"Jed's father bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jed's father bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.16228096187114716]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. The height of Martha's father is 3 feet. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "We know that Ellen is 10 years old now.  If Ellen will be twice as old as she is now in 6 years, then Ellen will be 20 years old in 6 years.  That means Martha has to be 40 years old now for Ellen to be twice her age in 6 years.   Yes, the condition \"twice as old as Ellen will be in six years\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Martha's father's height is 3 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   To answer the question, we need to calculate Martha's age now. We can calculate this by realizing that Martha has to be 40 years old now for Ellen to be twice her age in 6 years. So the answer is Martha is 40 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 40, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Step 1: Martha asked Ellen her age, so we know Ellen is 10 years old now.  Step 2: Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years. So, we know that Martha is 20 years old now.  Step 3: The condition \"The height of Martha's father is 3 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Therefore, Martha is 20 years old now.", "equation": "The height of Martha's father is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.2340993583202362]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. The height of Martha's sister is 3 feet. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "We know that in six years, Ellen will be 16 years old. From this, we can deduce that Martha is currently 32 years old. The condition that the height of Martha's sister is 3 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years and that Ellen is 10 years old now. To calculate Martha's age now, we need to take the age that Ellen will be in six years (16 years old) and multiply it by two to get Martha's current age (32 years old). So the answer would be: Martha's age is 32 years old.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. So we know that in six years, Ellen will be 16 years old.  From this, we can deduce that Martha is currently 32 years old. The condition \"The height of Martha's sister is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Martha's sister is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.2723601162433624]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Sally's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "On Saturday, Sally eats 2 sandwiches, which means she eats 4 pieces of bread.  On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, which means she eats 2 pieces of bread.   Therefore, across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread.   The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides the information needed to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.  Without this condition, you would not know how many sandwiches Sally eats on Sunday, and would not be able to calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats.  The condition that Sally's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. So the answer is 6 pieces of bread.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "First, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us that Sally will be eating a total of 3 sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday.   Therefore, the answer to the question is 6 pieces of bread. Sally will eat 2 pieces of bread for each of the 3 sandwiches, for a total of 6 pieces of bread. The fact that Sally's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.\nOn Saturday, Sally eats 2 sandwiches, which means she eats 4 pieces of bread.  On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich, which means she eats 2 pieces of bread.   Therefore, across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread.   The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides the information needed to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.  Without this condition, you would not know how many sandwiches Sally eats on Sunday, and would not be able to calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that she eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday for a total of 6 pieces of bread. The condition that Sally's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.", "equation": "Sally's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.2722359597682953]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Clarice's father is 50 years old. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries costs.  When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Genevieve was missing in order to pay for the cherries.  If Genevieve had $1600 on her, then the total cost of the cherries would be $1600 + $400 = $2000.  This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the total cost of the cherries.  We can calculate the number of kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought by dividing the total cost by the cost per kilogram:  $2000 / $8 = 250 kilograms of cherries.  Yes, the condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Clarice's father is 50 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "If Genevieve had $1600 on her, she would need to spend $400 to make up the total cost of the cherries she picked. This means she had $1200 to spend on cherries.  Now, since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, we can divide $1200 by 8 to find out how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.   $1200 / 8 = 150 kilograms  Therefore, Genevieve bought 150 kilograms of cherries.   The condition that Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much each kilogram of cherries cost. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.\nGenevieve had $1600 on her and the cherries cost $8 per kilogram. Therefore, Genevieve could have bought a total of 200 kg of cherries with her $1600.  However, when she reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price. In this case, Clarice chipped in and her father is 50 years old. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer.  Therefore, the answer to the question is: If Genevieve had $1600 on her, she could have bought 200 kilograms of cherries.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the cherries: $8 x Kg of cherries = Total cost  Kg of cherries = Total cost / 8  Kg of cherries = $1600 / 8  Kg of cherries = 200 Kg  So, Genevieve bought 200 kg of cherries.  The condition \"Clarice's father is 50 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Clarice's father is 50 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.0035697086714208126]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The height of Lizzy's neighbor is 2 feet. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine how many crates Lizzy has to ship. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, then 540 pounds divided by 30 pounds per crate will give us 18 crates.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of the shipment. Since each crate costs $1.5, then 18 crates multiplied by $1.5 will give us a total cost of $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment. The condition \"The height of Lizzy's neighbor is 2 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates and the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. To calculate the total cost, we need to multiply the cost of one crate by the number of crates needed to ship the fish. So the answer would be: 18 crates x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "Step 1: Determine the number of crates needed to ship 540 pounds of fish. 540 pounds of fish 姊 30 pounds per crate = 18 crates Step 2: Calculate the total shipping cost. 18 crates 鑴 $1.5 per crate = $27  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides information about the amount of fish to be shipped (540 pounds) and the size of the crates (30 pounds per crate). This information is necessary to determine the number of crates needed to ship the fish, and therefore, the total shipping cost.\nFirst, we need to determine how many crates Lizzy has to ship. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, then 540 pounds divided by 30 pounds per crate will give us 18 crates.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of the shipment. Since each crate costs $1.5, then 18 crates multiplied by $1.5 will give us a total cost of $27.  The condition \"The height of Lizzy's neighbor is 2 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Lizzy's neighbor is 2 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.17318017780780792]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. The height of James' father is 20 feet. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the number of tiles in the three walls of the shower. Each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. So, the total number of tiles in each wall is 8 x 20 = 160. Since there are three walls, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480.  The condition \"The height of James' father is 20 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\". The relevant information to answer this question is that each wall of the shower has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. So, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 tiles x 20 tiles x 3 walls = 480 tiles. Therefore, the answer is 480 tiles.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us the number of tiles in the width of the shower.   Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower would be 8 tiles x 20 tiles x 3 walls = 480 tiles.   The fact that James' father is 20 feet tall is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe shower has 3 walls, each with 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. So, each wall has 8 x 20 = 160 tiles. Multiply by 3, and you get a total of 480 tiles in the shower.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us exactly how many tiles are running the height of the wall, which we need to know in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe first step is to calculate the number of tiles in the three walls of the shower. Each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. So, the total number of tiles in each wall is 8 x 20 = 160. Since there are three walls, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480.  The condition \"The height of James' father is 20 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\".", "equation": "The height of James' father is 20 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, -0.048733681440353394]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. The height of James' neighbor is 5 feet. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many trees James had.  Each tree has 20 plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plants each tree had.  Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many seeds he plants from each tree.  That means James plants 12 seeds from each tree (20 plants x 60% = 12 seeds).  Therefore, James planted 2 trees (2 trees x 12 seeds = 24 seeds).  Yes, the condition \"Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that James' neighbor's height is 5 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many trees James planted. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of trees he had by the number of seeds he plants from each tree. So the answer is 2 trees.", "numerical_answer": 2, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "The first part of the question tells us that James has 2 trees, each with 20 plants, and that he plants 60% of those. This means that James plants 12 plants from each tree, for a total of 24 plants.  The second part of the question tells us that the height of James' neighbor is 5 feet, which is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is still 2 trees. The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJames collected all the fruits from his two trees. This means he had two trees to begin with.  Each tree had 20 plants, so James had a total of 40 plants.  James planted 60% of those, so he planted 24 plants.  The height of James' neighbor is not relevant to the calculation of how many trees James planted, so we can ignore this part of the question.   Therefore, James planted two trees.\nJames collected all the fruits from two trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he planted 60%. That means he planted 60% of the seeds from the two trees, which is (20 plants x 2 trees x 0.6) = 24. So, James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it does not affect the number of trees that James planted.\n1. James collects all the fruits from his two trees. Each tree has 20 plants. 2. Each plant has 1 seed. 3. He plants 60% of those seeds (12 out of 20). 4. The height of James' neighbor is 5 feet.  Based on these steps, we can conclude that James planted two trees. The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. This does not provide any information about how many trees he planted. Each tree had 20 plants. This does not provide any information about how many trees he planted. Each plant had 1 seed. This does not provide any information about how many trees he planted. He planted 60% of those. This does not provide any information about how many trees he planted.  So, no, the condition \"The height of James' neighbor is 5 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\"", "equation": "The height of James' neighbor is 5 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.3684873580932617]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Janele's sister bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "Janele has 4 cats. The first two weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each cat weighs. To calculate the average weight of the cats, we need to add the weights of all the cats together and then divide the total by the number of cats. So the total weight of the cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. There are 4 cats, so the average weight of the cats is 48 ÷ 4 = 12 pounds.  Yes, the condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Janele's sister bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. We can do this by adding the weights of the cats together and then dividing by the number of cats. So the answer is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we want to figure out the average weight of Janele's cats. To do that, we need to add up all the weights of the cats and divide that sum by the total number of cats.   The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, the third cat weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds. So, the total weight of all four cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   Now, we divide this total by the total number of cats, which is 4. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.   The condition that Janele has 4 cats is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us the total number of cats we need to include in the calculation. Without this information, it would not be possible to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.   The information about the number of tomatoes Janele's sister bought from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Add up the weights of Janele's cats.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  Step 2: Divide the sum of the weights by the number of cats.  48 / 4 = 12  The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it helps us determine the total weight of all the cats.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add up the total weight of all four cats and then divide that number by four. This gives us an average weight of 11.45 pounds.   The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\" because the other cats' weights are also taken into account in the calculation. Therefore, the condition is not necessary for the calculation.\nWe want to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add up the weights of all four cats and then divide that total by four.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  48 / 4 = 12  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is one of the weights that needs to be added to get the total and then divided to get the average.\nTo calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weight of all of the cats (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) and divide that sum by the total number of cats (4). The average weight of Janele's cats is 11.225 pounds.  The condition \"Janele's sister bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation of the average weight of Janele's cats.", "equation": "Janele's sister bought 12 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.2610680162906647]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's brother bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.   The condition that Michael's brother bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "At the start, Michael has 550 chickens.  After 1 year, he will have 700 chickens (550 + 150).  After 2 years, he will have 850 chickens (700 + 150).  After 3 years, he will have 1000 chickens (850 + 150).  After 4 years, he will have 1150 chickens (1000 + 150).  After 5 years, he will have 1300 chickens (1150 + 150).  After 6 years, he will have 1450 chickens (1300 + 150).  After 7 years, he will have 1600 chickens (1450 + 150).  After 8 years, he will have 1750 chickens (1600 + 150).  After 9 years, he will have 1900 chickens (1750 + 150).  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe current number of chickens on Michael's farm is 550.  We know that each year, the number of chickens on the farm increases by 150.   Therefore, if we multiply the number of years (9) by 150, then we can find out the total number of chickens that Michael will have after 9 years.   550 + (9 x 150) = 1950   Therefore, Michael will have 1950 chickens after 9 years.   The condition that Michael's brother bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Michael's brother bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.183977410197258]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Michael's mother bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The total time of the TV show, including commercials, was 1.5 hours. We know that 3 commercials were aired, and each commercial lasted 10 minutes. So the total time of the commercials was 30 minutes (3 commercials x 10 minutes). Now we can calculate the time of the show itself, not counting commercials. We can do this by subtracting the time of the commercials from the total time of the show: 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours. So the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1.2 hours long.  Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Michael's mother bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how long the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was. We can calculate this by subtracting the time of the commercials from the total time of the show. So the answer would be: 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.", "numerical_answer": 1.2, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "1. Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours.  This condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it states the total amount of time that the TV show was aired for.  2. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each.   This condition is also relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it states the amount of time that the commercials took up during the 1.5 hours of airtime.  3. Michael's mother bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store.  This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it does not provide any information that is related to the duration of the TV show itself, not counting commercials.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?\" is 1.2 hours. This is calculated by subtracting the 30 minutes of commercial time (3 commercials x 10 minutes each) from the 1.5 hours of total airtime.\nThe total amount of time the show was aired was 1.5 hours. The commercials took up 30 minutes (10 minutes each x 3 commercials). Therefore, the TV show itself was 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.  The condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many commercials there were and how long each commercial lasted.\nThe TV show was aired for 1.5 hours in total.  The 3 commercials lasted 10 minutes each.  Therefore, the commercials took up a total of 30 minutes.   We can subtract this from the total time (1.5 hours) to find the length of the TV show itself:   1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours   The condition that Michael's mother bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, the answer to the question is 1.2 hours.", "equation": "Michael's mother bought 10 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, -0.044897712767124176]}
{"original_question": "Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. The height of Mr.Angstadt's brother is 100 feet. How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?", "reasoning_path": "Out of the 120 students, 60 are enrolled in Statistics. Of those 60, 90% (54) are seniors. So, the answer is 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics. The condition \"Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the starting point for the problem. Without knowing the total number of students, it would not be possible to calculate the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics. The condition \"Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is used to determine the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics. The condition that the height of Mr.Angstadt's brother is 100 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 54, "gold_answer": "54", "instructions": "1. Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day.  2. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics.  3. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors.   So, out of the 120 students, 60 are enrolled in Statistics. Of those 60, 90% (54) are seniors. So, the answer is 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics.  The condition \"Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the starting point for the problem. Without knowing the total number of students, it would not be possible to calculate the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics.\nFirst, we need to determine how many students are in the Statistics class. We know that half of Mr.Angstadt's 120 students are enrolled in Statistics, so there are 60 students in the class. Of those 60 students, 90 percent are seniors, so there are 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics. Therefore, the answer to the question is 54.  The condition \"Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is used to determine the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics.\n1. Mr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. 2. Half of the students are enrolled in Statistics. 3. Of the students in Statistics, 90% are seniors.  Therefore, the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics is:  Half of 120 = 60 students  60 x 0.9 = 54 seniors  So, Mr. Angstadt has 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics.  The condition \"The height of Mr.Angstadt's brother is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Mr. Angstadt's brother is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5140396952629089, 0.5659631490707397, 0.6956555247306824, 0.2979201078414917]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Luke's brother bought 80 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one glass jar. So, he needs a total of (85 x 4 =) 340 stars to fill 4 bottles. He has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make (340 - 33 =) 307 more stars. The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the problem as it tells us how many jars Luke needs to fill and thus how many stars he needs to make. The condition \"Luke's brother bought 80 tomatoes from the grocery store.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 85 - 33 = 52 more stars to fill the glass jar. This condition is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many stars Luke needs to make in order to fill the jar. The 80 tomatoes bought by Luke's brother are not relevant to the calculation process, as they are not directly related to the question of how many stars Luke must make.\n1. Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill the glass jar. 2. He has already made 33 stars. 3. So, he needs to make (85 - 33) = 52 stars more. 4. Luke's brother bought 80 tomatoes from the grocery store.  Yes, condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many more stars must Luke make?\" Without knowing how many stars Luke has already made, it would be impossible to calculate how many more stars he needs to make.\nLuke needs to make 85 stars to fill one glass jar. So, he needs a total of (85 x 4 =) 340 stars to fill 4 bottles.   He has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make (340 - 33 =) 307 more stars.   The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the problem as it tells us how many jars Luke needs to fill and thus how many stars he needs to make.   Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars.\nLuke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles.   The condition \"Luke's brother bought 80 tomatoes from the grocery store.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Luke's brother bought 80 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.18348415195941925]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. The height of Papi Calot's sister is 35 feet. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "First, Papi Calot needs to buy enough plants to fill his 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs 126 plants.  Then, he wants to add 15 additional plants. So, he needs to buy an extra 15 plants, making a total of 141 plants.  The height of Papi Calot's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "First, Papi Calot needs to buy enough plants to fill his 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs 126 plants.  Then, he wants to add 15 additional plants. So, he needs to buy an extra 15 plants, making a total of 141 plants.  The height of Papi Calot's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nPapi Calot needs to buy enough plants to fill 7 rows with 18 plants each, for a total of 126 plants. In addition, he is considering buying 15 additional plants. Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants.   The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it explains why Papi Calot is considering buying additional plants. Without this condition, we would not know why Papi Calot needs to buy more plants.\nThe first step is to calculate the number of plants that Papi Calot already has. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so he has 7 x 18 = 126 plants.   The second step is to calculate the additional number of plants he needs to buy. He wants to add 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy 15 additional plants.   So, in total, Papi Calot needs to buy 15 plants.   The condition \"The height of Papi Calot's sister is 35 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Papi Calot's sister is 35 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.32225266098976135]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. The shoe size of Emily's mother is 10. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 3 鑴 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 鑴 36 = 252 oranges. Therefore, if Betty has 12 oranges, Emily has 252 oranges. The condition that the shoe size of Emily's mother is 10 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty and Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. To calculate how many oranges Emily has, we need to multiply the number of oranges that Sandra has by 7. So the answer would be: 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. That means that if Betty has 12 oranges, Sandra has 3 鑴 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. That means that if Sandra has 36 oranges, Emily has 7 鑴 36 = 252 oranges.   So, the answer is that if Betty has 12 oranges, Emily has 252 oranges.  The condition that Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it helps us determine how many oranges Emily has based on the number of oranges Betty has.\nBetty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 252 oranges.  The shoe size of Emily's mother is not relevant to the problem, so it does not affect the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emily's mother is 10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.19056057929992676]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. The shoe size of my mother is 10. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time we have to get to school. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long it takes us to get from the gate to the school building. We have 30 minutes - 15 minutes - 6 minutes = 9 minutes left. This is the amount of time we have to get to our room, without being late. Yes, the conditions \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" and \"another 6 minutes to get to the school building.\" are both relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that my mother's shoe size is 10 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is 9 minutes.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "If it takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building, we have a total of 21 minutes before we have to be in our room.   The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it affects the amount of time we have to get to our room.\nFirst, we need to figure out the amount of time it takes us to get from the school gate to our room. Depending on the size of the school, this could take anywhere from 1 to 10 minutes.   Second, we need to subtract this amount of time from the 30 minutes we have available.   Third, we need to subtract 6 minutes from the remaining time to account for the time it takes us to get to the school building.  Therefore, we have 24 minutes to get to our room, without being late.  The condition \"and another 6 minutes to get to the school building\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it needs to be taken into account when determining how much time we have to get to our room, without being late.\nWe have thirty minutes to get to school. It takes us fifteen minutes to get to the school gate, and another six minutes to get to the school building. This means we have nine minutes to get to our room. The shoe size of my mother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of my mother is 10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.055480197072029114]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Sally's father bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Firstly, we know that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday. Each sandwich has 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 4 pieces of bread on Saturday. Secondly, we know that Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday. Each sandwich has 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. Finally, we can add the amount of bread eaten on Saturday and Sunday, which gives us a total of 6 pieces of bread eaten across Saturday and Sunday. The condition that Sally's father bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how much pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. The relevant information to answer this question is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. To calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday, we need to add the number of pieces of bread from each sandwich for both days. So the answer would be: 4 pieces of bread (2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread) + 2 pieces of bread (1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread) = 6 pieces of bread.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because the number of sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday and Sunday is necessary information to determine how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.  If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday, for a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. Therefore, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?\"\nFirst, we know that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday. Each sandwich has 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.   Second, we know that Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday. Each sandwich has 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats a total of 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.   Finally, we can add the amount of bread eaten on Saturday and Sunday, which gives us a total of 6 pieces of bread eaten across Saturday and Sunday.   The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats on Sunday.\nStep 1: How many sandwiches does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?  Answer: 3 sandwiches  Step 2: How many pieces of bread does each sandwich use?  Answer: 2 pieces of bread  Step 3: How many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?  Answer: 6 pieces of bread  The condition \"Sally's father bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Sally's father bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.27737298607826233]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. The shoe size of Michelle's brother is 8. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the initial ride fee that Michelle had to pay. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many miles Michelle had to travel. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Michelle has to pay for each mile she travels. Therefore, Michelle has to pay a total of $2 + 4 x $2.5 = $12. Yes, the condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Michelle's brother's shoe size is 8 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Michelle has to pay for her ride. We can calculate this by adding the initial ride fee of $2 and multiplying the number of miles traveled by the taxi charge per mile of $2.5. So the answer is $12.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The initial fee Michelle would have to pay is $2, plus the fee per mile (which is $2.5). Multiply $2.5 by 4 to calculate the total amount of money Michelle would need to pay for her ride: $2 + $2.5脳4 = $10. Therefore, Michelle will pay $10 in total for her ride. The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the first fee Michelle needs to pay before calculating the total amount due for the ride.\nThe answer to the question is $10.  Step 1: The fee for entering the taxi is $2.  Step 2: The taxi charge per mile is $2.5.  Step 3: Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.  Step 4: So, the total amount Michelle paid for her ride is $2 + (4 x $2.5) = $10.  Therefore, the condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?\"\nThe first step is to calculate the total amount of the ride fee. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5 and Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. So the total amount of the ride fee is 4 x $2.5 = $10.  Then, we need to add the ride fee of $2 to the total amount of the ride fee. So the total amount that Michelle paid for her ride is $10 + $2 = $12.  The shoe size of Michelle's brother is 8 is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?\".", "equation": "The shoe size of Michelle's brother is 8.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.1380615234375]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's brother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie has 24 hours in a day. 8 hours are spent working, 3 hours are spent exercising, and 8 hours are spent sleeping. That leaves 5 hours of free time. The condition that Jackie spends 8 hours working is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it has already been accounted for in the original equation.  The condition that Jackie's brother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is also not relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That's a total of 19 hours. That leaves 5 hours of free time. So, to answer the question, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie has 24 hours in a day. 8 hours are spent working, 3 hours are spent exercising, and 8 hours are spent sleeping. That leaves 5 hours of free time.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it has already been accounted for in the original equation.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, so the amount of free time she has is the amount of time left in the day minus 8 hours. That leaves us with 16 hours (24 hours in a day minus 8 hours working). Next, we subtract the 3 hours spent exercising and the 8 hours spent sleeping, leaving us with 5 hours of free time. So, to answer the question, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.   Yes, the condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it impacts the amount of free time Jackie has.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That's a total of 19 hours. That leaves 5 hours of free time. The condition that Jackie's brother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has.", "equation": "Jackie's brother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.2245861291885376]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Asia's brother is 200 years old. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "The sale price is $140 and the original price is $350. That means Asia saved $210. To determine the percentage off, we need to divide the amount saved by the original price. In this case, 210/350 = 0.6, so Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition \"Asia's brother is 200 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the sale price ($140) and the original price ($350). To calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the amount saved by the original price. So the answer would be: 210/350 = 0.6 or 60%. Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The sale price is $140 and the original price is $350. That means Asia saved $210. To determine the percentage off, we need to divide the amount saved by the original price. In this case, 210/350 = 0.6, so Asia got 60% off at the sale. Asia's brother being 200 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price: $350 - $140 = $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off: $210 / $350 = 0.6 (or 60%)  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price.\nWe are trying to calculate the percentage off that Asia got. We need to determine the difference between the original price of the dress ($350) and the sale price ($140).   $350 - $140 = $210  Then we need to take that difference and divide it by the original price.   $210/$350 = 0.6  Now, we need to multiple that by 100 in order to get the percentage off.   0.6 x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition \"Asia's brother is 200 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Asia's brother is 200 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.31701695919036865]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Kim's sister bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits, so 25% of them sprout (80 x 0.25 = 20). Kim sells 6 of the saplings (20 - 6 = 14).  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition that Kim's sister bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout. To calculate how many cherry saplings Kim has left, we need to subtract the number of saplings sold from the number of saplings that have sprouted. So the answer would be: 20 - 6 = 14. Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "Step 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits.  Step 2: 25% of them sprout (80 x 0.25 = 20).  Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings (20 - 6 = 14).  Step 4: Kim's sister bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store (not relevant to the calculation).  Step 5: How many cherry saplings does Kim have left? Answer: 14.  Yes, the condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" because we need to know how many cherry pits Kim planted in order to calculate the number of cherry saplings she has left.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings.  Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings. So, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?\" since it has already been accounted for. The condition is not relevant to the calculation process of Kim's sister buying 8 tomatoes from the grocery store either, since that has nothing to do with the number of cherry saplings Kim has left.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, which is 80 x 0.25 = 20.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it tells us how many saplings Kim has sold, and therefore how many saplings she has left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits and 25% of them sprout, so 25% of 80 is 20. Kim then sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 saplings left.   The condition that Kim's sister bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Kim's sister bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364680886268616, 0.24044959247112274, 0.4611811935901642, 0.2539274990558624]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. The shoe size of James' mother is 5. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many trees James has. Each tree has 20 plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plants each tree has.  Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many seeds James plants.  That means James plants 12 seeds (20 plants x 1 seed x 60%).  The shoe size of James' mother is 5. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many trees James planted. We can calculate this by dividing the number of seeds planted by the number of plants each tree has. That means James planted 1 tree (12 seeds ÷ 20 plants).  So the answer is 1 tree.", "numerical_answer": 1, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the number of seeds collected from the two trees. Since each tree has 20 plants and each plant has 1 seed, then James has collected 40 seeds.  The second step is to calculate the number of seeds planted. Since James planted 60% of the seeds, then James has planted 24 seeds.  The third step is to calculate the number of trees planted. Since James planted 24 seeds, then he has planted 24/1 = 24 trees.  The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his two trees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\" because it does not provide any information about the number of trees planted by James.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This means James planted 60% of the 40 seeds, or 24 seeds.  The shoe size of James' mother is 5. This is not relevant to the calculation process, so we can ignore it.  Therefore, James planted 2 trees.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of seeds that James had. He had two trees, each with 20 plants, which makes a total of 40 plants. Since each plant has one seed, he had 40 seeds.   Next, we need to calculate how many of those seeds he planted. He planted 60% of them, which is 24 seeds.  Finally, we need to calculate how many trees he planted. Since each tree has 20 plants, and he planted 24 seeds, he planted 1.2 trees.  The condition \"Each plant has one seed\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us to determine the total number of seeds that James had. Without this information, it would be impossible to calculate how many trees he planted.\nStep 1: James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.  Step 2: Each plant has 1 seed.  Step 3: He plants 60% of those.  Answer: James planted 2 trees. The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process as it states how many of the seeds were planted.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.   This means that James has 40 seeds total (2 trees x 20 plants x 1 seed) and he plants 60% of those, which is 24 seeds.  The shoe size of James' mother is 5.   This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The number of trees that James planted is 24, not 5.", "equation": "The shoe size of James' mother is 5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.2968670725822449]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. The height of Julia's sister is 200 feet. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate the number of balls in each color.   Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, meaning she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls. Julia bought 10 packs of yellow balls, meaning she bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls. Julia bought 8 packs of green balls, meaning she bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Step 2: Calculate the total number of balls.   The total number of balls Julia bought is 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to know how many balls were in each package in order to calculate the total number of balls. The condition \"The height of Julia's sister is 200 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, the answer is 399 balls.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "Step 1: Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls.  Answer: Julia bought a total of 21 packs of balls.  Step 2: There were 19 balls in each package.  Answer: Julia bought a total of 399 balls (21 packs x 19 balls per pack).  Step 3: The height of Julia's sister is 200 feet.  Answer: This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so it can be ignored.   Conclusion: Julia bought a total of 399 balls.\nStep 1: We need to calculate the number of balls in each pack: 3 packs of red balls = 57 balls; 10 packs of yellow balls = 190 balls; 8 packs of green balls = 152 balls.  Step 2: We need to add all the numbers together: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  Step 3: The answer is 399 balls.  The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" since the number of packs of each color was given. The only relevant information in this problem is the number of balls in each package (19) and the number of packs of each color (3 red, 10 yellow, 8 green). The height of Julia's sister has nothing to do with the calculation process.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls and 10 packs of yellow balls. 3 packs * 19 balls = 57 red balls and 10 packs * 19 balls = 190 yellow balls. So, she bought 247 balls in total (57 red balls + 190 yellow balls).  The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that Julia bought 8 packs of green balls in addition to the 3 packs of red balls and 10 packs of yellow balls. 8 packs * 19 balls = 152 green balls. So, she bought 399 balls in total (247 red/yellow balls + 152 green balls).  The height of Julia's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nStep 1: Calculate the number of balls in each color.   Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, meaning she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls. Julia bought 10 packs of yellow balls, meaning she bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls. Julia bought 8 packs of green balls, meaning she bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Step 2: Calculate the total number of balls.   The total number of balls Julia bought is 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to know how many balls were in each package in order to calculate the total number of balls.\nThe first step is to calculate how many balls were in each pack. 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. So, there were 57 packs of balls in all.   The second step is to multiply the number of packs by the number of balls in each pack. 57 packs x 19 balls = 1083 balls.  So, the answer is 1083 balls.   The condition \"The height of Julia's sister is 200 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Julia's sister is 200 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315249562263489, 0.41100403666496277, 0.4391426146030426, 0.48471665382385254, 0.19072362780570984]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's mother bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Michael's mother bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, that means Michael had 400 chickens before the current number.   Since the chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually, Michael would have had 150 chickens added to his farm each year.   Therefore, after nine years, Michael will have (400 + 9 x 150) chickens, which is equal to 1,350 chickens.   Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe number of chickens on his farm now is 550.  After 1 year, he will have 700 chickens (550 + 150).  After 2 years, he will have 850 chickens (700 + 150).  After 3 years, he will have 1000 chickens (850 + 150).  After 4 years, he will have 1150 chickens (1000 + 150).  After 5 years, he will have 1300 chickens (1150 + 150).  After 6 years, he will have 1450 chickens (1300 + 150).  After 7 years, he will have 1600 chickens (1450 + 150).  After 8 years, he will have 1750 chickens (1600 + 150).  After 9 years, he will have 1900 chickens (1750 + 150).  Therefore, Michael will have 1900 chickens after 9 years.  The condition about Michael's mother buying 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Michael's mother bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.17961405217647552]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's mother has read 5 books in the past year. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This totals to 19 hours. Since there are 24 hours in a day, we can calculate the amount of free time Jackie has by subtracting 19 from 24, which gives us 5 hours of free time. The condition \"Jackie's mother has read 5 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We already know that Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This information is enough to calculate the amount of free time Jackie has. Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This totals to 19 hours. Since there are 24 hours in a day, we can calculate the amount of free time Jackie has by subtracting 19 from 24, which gives us 5 hours of free time.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We already know that Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This information is enough to calculate the amount of free time Jackie has. The fact that Jackie's mother has read 5 books in the past year is also irrelevant.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That means Jackie is spending a total of 19 hours per day on necessary activities. This leaves 5 hours of free time per day. Jackie's mother has read 5 books in the past year, which doesn't directly affect the amount of free time that Jackie has. The condition of 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep is relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has because it affects the total amount of hours in a day that Jackie is spending on necessary activities.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise, and 8 hours of sleep, which adds up to 19 hours. This leaves only 5 hours of free time per day. The condition \"Jackie's mother has read 5 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jackie's mother has read 5 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.3193139433860779]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Perry's brother bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much cream Perry added. Since Perry added a half cup of cream, that means he added 0.5 cups of cream (or 4 ounces).  Second, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were in the cream. Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, that means that 0.5 cups of cream has 44 grams of fat.  Finally, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since Perry's recipe serves four people, and he added 44 grams of fat, that means he added 11 grams of fat to each serving of food.  Therefore, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this information, it would be impossible to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. The condition that Perry's brother bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much cream Perry added. Since Perry added a half cup of cream, that means he added 0.5 cups of cream (or 4 ounces).  Second, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were in the cream. Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, that means that 0.5 cups of cream has 44 grams of fat.  Finally, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since Perry's recipe serves four people, and he added 44 grams of fat, that means he added 11 grams of fat to each serving of food.   So the answer is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this information, it would be impossible to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount of cream added to the recipe. Perry added a half cup of cream, so that's 44 grams of fat.  Next, we need to divide the total amount of fat by the number of servings. Since Perry's recipe serves four people, each serving will have 11 grams of fat (44 姊 4).  The condition that Perry's brother bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Perry's brother bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, 0.14241142570972443]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Michael's neighbor is 10 years old. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the TV show was aired for. There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the commercials were. That means the commercials lasted 30 minutes (3 commercials x 10 minutes each). Yes, the condition \"there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Michael's neighbor is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how long (in hours) the TV show itself was, not counting commercials. We can calculate this by subtracting 30 minutes (the length of the commercials) from 1.5 hours (the total length of the TV show). So the answer is 1.5 hours - 0.5 hours = 1 hour.", "numerical_answer": 1, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "First, we need to subtract the length of the commercials from the total length of the show. In this case, the total length of the show was 1.5 hours, and the 3 commercials lasted 10 minutes each, which means that the total length of the commercials is 30 minutes (10 minutes x 3 commercials).   Therefore, 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.   So, the answer is that the TV show itself, not counting commercials, lasted 1.2 hours.   The condition that Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours, is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the total length of the show, which is 1.5 hours. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the length of the show itself, not counting commercials.\nFirst, we determine the total length of the TV show, including commercials. This is 1.5 hours + (3 commercials x 10 minutes per commercial) = 1.5 hours + 30 minutes = 2 hours.  Now, we need to subtract the length of the commercials from the total length of the show. This gives us 2 hours - 30 minutes = 1.5 hours.  Therefore, the TV show itself (not counting commercials) was 1.5 hours.  The condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each.\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process, since it provides us with the information necessary to determine the length of the commercials.\nFirst, we need to subtract the time taken up by commercials from the total time, which was 1.5 hours. That means the TV show itself was 1.5 - (3 x 10 minutes) = 1.2 hours.   The condition that Michael's neighbor is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Michael's neighbor is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, -0.07114683836698532]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Hamza's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza has a 5-liter bucket and she fills it. She then pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. That means she will pour 3 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket.  Then, she will pour the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. So, the 6-liter bucket will have 2 liters of water.  The remaining 4 liters can be added to the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.  Therefore, Hamza can put 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.  The condition that Hamza's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the amount of water in the buckets and the capacity of the buckets. To calculate how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing, we need to know the amount of water that can fit into the 6-liter bucket and the amount of water that is already in the bucket. So the answer would be: 4 liters.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket with water. Then, she poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters, the remaining 2 liters were poured into the 6-liter bucket. So, she can put 2 more liters into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much water each bucket can hold. Without this information, we wouldn't be able to figure out how much water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nFirst, Hamza has a 5-liter bucket that is full. She pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket is now full, and there will be 2 liters of water left in the 5-liter bucket.   Then, she pours the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now contains 2 liters of water.   Finally, we can calculate how much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing. Since the 6-liter bucket can hold up to 6 liters of water, Hamza can put 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  So, the answer is 4 liters. Yes, the condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process.\nHamza filled the 5-liter bucket and poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. The 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters, so the remaining 2 liters would be poured into the 6-liter bucket. So, the 6-liter bucket has 2 liters of water in it.  Therefore, the 6-liter bucket can hold 4 more liters of water without overflowing. The condition of \"pouring the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation because it provides the amount of water already in the 6-liter bucket.\nHamza first filled the 5-liter bucket and poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. The 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters, so 2 liters remain in the 5-liter bucket. She then poured this 2 liters into the 6-liter bucket. This leaves 4 more liters of water that can be put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. The condition that Hamza's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to this calculation.", "equation": "Hamza's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.23575469851493835]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. The height of Megan's sister is 100 feet. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Firstly, we need to calculate how many times Megan was the lead actress. This is 80% of 100 plays, or 80 plays. Then, we can subtract the number of times Megan was the lead actress from the total number of plays she participated in. In this case, that would be 100 plays - 80 plays, which is 20. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress 20 times. The condition of \"The height of Megan's sister is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the answer. The relevant information to answer this question is that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work and she participated in 100 plays. To calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress, we need to subtract the number of times she was the lead actress from the total number of plays she participated in. So the answer would be: 100 plays - 80 plays = 20 plays. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "80% of 100 plays = 80 plays  Therefore, Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays.  100 plays - 80 plays = 20 plays  Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work.\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\". It was used to figure out how many plays she was the lead actress in, which was then subtracted from the total number of plays to figure out the number of times she was not the lead actress.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many times Megan was the lead actress, which is 80% of 100 plays, or 80 plays.   Then, we can subtract the number of times Megan was the lead actress from the total number of plays she participated in. In this case, that would be 100 plays - 80 plays, which is 20.   Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress 20 times.   The condition of \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the total number of plays Megan participated in, which is necessary to calculate the number of times she was not the lead actress.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of times that Megan was the lead actress, which is 80. Then, we subtract this number from the total number of plays that Megan participated in, which is 100. This gives us the number of times Megan was not the lead actress, which is 20.   The condition \"The height of Megan's sister is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the answer.", "equation": "The height of Megan's sister is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.19405610859394073]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The height of James' mother is 800 feet. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the amount of the doctor's visit that is covered by James' insurance. This is determined by the percentage covered, which is 80%. So, the amount covered by the insurance is 80% of $300, or $240.  Next, we need to calculate the amount of the doctor's visit that is not covered by James' insurance. This is determined by subtracting the amount covered by the insurance from the total cost of the doctor's visit, which is $300. So, the amount not covered by the insurance is $300 - $240, or $60.  Finally, we need to calculate James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment. This is determined by subtracting the amount covered by the insurance from the total cost of the doctor's visit, which is $300. So, James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $300 - $240, or $60.  Therefore, James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?\" because it provides the", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the amount of the doctor's visit that is covered by James' insurance. This is determined by the percentage covered, which is 80%. So, the amount covered by the insurance is 80% of $300, or $240.  Next, we need to calculate the amount of the doctor's visit that is not covered by James' insurance. This is determined by subtracting the amount covered by the insurance from the total cost of the doctor's visit, which is $300. So, the amount not covered by the insurance is $300 - $240, or $60.  Finally, we need to calculate James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment. This is determined by subtracting the amount covered by the insurance from the total cost of the doctor's visit, which is $300. So, James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $300 - $240, or $60.  Therefore, James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?\" because it provides the total cost of the doctor's visit, which is used in the calculation of the amount covered by the insurance and the amount not covered by the insurance.\nFirst, we need to determine the total cost of the doctor visit. That is $300.   Second, we need to determine the amount of the cost that James's insurance will cover. We know from the condition that James's insurance covers 80%. So, the amount of the cost that insurance will cover is $240.   Third, we need to calculate the amount that James will have to pay out of pocket. We can do this by subtracting the amount that insurance will cover ($240) from the total cost ($300).   Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   Yes, the condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?\". Without this condition, we would not know how much of the cost James's insurance will cover and thus would not be able to calculate the amount that James will have to pay out of pocket.\nThe primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. So James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is 20% of the cost, which is $60. The condition \"The height of James' mother is 800 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of James' mother is 800 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.22724515199661255]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. The height of Gerry's brother is 4 feet. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's add up how much money Emmy and Gerry have together. Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so they have a total of $300.  Second, let's divide the total amount of money they have by the price of the apples. $300 divided by $2 is 150.  So, Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether. The condition that the fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how much each apple costs. Emmy has $200, so she can buy 100 apples. Gerry has $100, so he can buy 50 apples. Together, they can buy 150 apples. The condition that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 is relevant to the calculation process, since it influences how many apples each person can buy. The condition that the height of Gerry's brother is 4 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "First, let's add up how much money Emmy and Gerry have together. Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so they have a total of $300.   Second, let's divide the total amount of money they have by the price of the apples. $300 divided by $2 is 150.  So, Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether. The condition that the fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how much each apple costs.\nEmmy has $200, so she can buy 100 apples. Gerry has $100, so he can buy 50 apples. Together, they can buy 150 apples. The condition that Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100 is relevant to the calculation process, since it influences how many apples each person can buy.\nThe first step is to calculate how many apples Emmy and Gerry can buy with their respective amounts of money. Emmy can buy $200 / $2 = 100 apples and Gerry can buy $100 / $2 = 50 apples.   The second step is to calculate the total number of apples they can buy. Emmy and Gerry can buy 100 + 50 = 150 apples.  The condition \"The height of Gerry's brother is 4 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Gerry's brother is 4 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.06360568106174469]}
{"original_question": "A magazine costs $3 each. Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each. Jewel's father bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jewel bought 10 magazines for a total cost of $30. Then, she sold them at $3.50 each, for a total of $35. Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.   The condition that Jewel's father bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each and each magazine costs $3. To calculate how much Jewel will gain from selling the magazines, we need to subtract the cost of the magazines from the amount she will get from selling them. So the answer would be: $35 - $30 = $5. Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jewel bought 10 magazines for $3 each, which means she spent a total of $30.  She then sold those 10 magazines for $3.50 each, which means she earned a total of $35.  Therefore, Jewel gained $5 from selling her magazines.  The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as Jewel's initial cost of the magazines is dependent on this condition.\nFirst, let's calculate how much Jewel spent on the magazines: 10 magazines x $3 each = $30  Next, let's calculate how much Jewel will get from selling the magazines: 10 magazines x $3.50 each = $35  Finally, we can calculate how much Jewel will gain from selling her magazines: $35 - $30 = $5  So, the answer is that Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.  The condition \"Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us how much Jewel will be able to sell each magazine for.\nFirst, Jewel buys 10 magazines for a total cost of $30. Then, she sells them at $3.50 each, for a total of $35. Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling the magazines.   The condition \"Jewel's father bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jewel's father bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3614990711212158, 0.6798670291900635, 0.20724689960479736]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Abie's mother is 5 years old. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. This means she has 16 bags of chips left. She bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. This means she now has 22 bags of chips. Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Abie's mother being 5 years old is not relevant to the calculation process, so the answer is 22 bags of chips. The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the number of bags of chips Abie has in the end.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. So, she has 20 - 4 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end. Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. This means she has 16 bags of chips left. She bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. This means she now has 22 bags of chips. Abie's mother is 5 years old, but this has no bearing on the calculation, so the answer is 22 bags of chips. The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the number of bags of chips Abie has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. So now she has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags in the store. So now she has 22 bags of chips in the end.  Yes, the condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without it, Abie would only have 16 bags of chips in the end.\nAbie started with 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags. She then bought 6 more bags from the store, so she now has 22 bags in total.   The condition \"Abie's mother is 5 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not provide any information that is necessary for solving the problem.", "equation": "Abie's mother is 5 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.2027042806148529]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Tom's sister has read 5 books in the past year. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie. That means Tom picked 24 apples.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether. The condition that Tom's sister has read 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie. To calculate the total number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom, we need to add the number of apples picked by Lexie and the number of apples picked by Tom. So the answer would be: 12 + 24 = 36.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "Lexie picked 12 apples. Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so Tom picked 24 apples.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.  The condition \"Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it helps us calculate the number of apples that Tom picked.\nLexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie. That means Tom picked 24 apples.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.  The condition \"Tom's sister has read 5 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom's sister has read 5 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.27473872900009155]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. The shoe size of Jason's mother is 3. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many eggs are used to make an omelet.  In two weeks, Jason will eat 14 omelets, each made with three eggs. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the number of omelets that Jason will eat in two weeks. Therefore, over a two-week period, he will consume 42 eggs. So the answer would be: 42 eggs. The shoe size of Jason's mother is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any information regarding how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "In two weeks, Jason will eat 14 omelets, each made with three eggs. Therefore, over a two-week period, he will consume 42 eggs. The shoe size of Jason's mother is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jason's mother is 3.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.1946135014295578]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. The height of Jose's neighbor is 10 feet.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. Therefore, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since 4 tablespoons of lemon juice are provided by one lemon, he will need 9 lemons in total.  The condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it provides the number of tablespoons of lemon juice needed for one dozen cupcakes. This information is necessary to calculate the number of lemons needed for 3 dozen cupcakes. The height of Jose's neighbor is 10 feet is not relevant to the calculation process. So the answer is 9 lemons.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. Therefore, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since 4 tablespoons of lemon juice are provided by one lemon, he will need 9 lemons in total.  The condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it provides the number of tablespoons of lemon juice needed for one dozen cupcakes. This information is necessary to calculate the number of lemons needed for 3 dozen cupcakes.\nIn order to make one dozen cupcakes, Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose needs 3 lemons to make one dozen cupcakes. To make 3 dozen cupcakes, Jose would need 9 lemons.  Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, we would not know how many lemons Jose would need to make the cupcakes.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. That means he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make three dozen cupcakes. Since one lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need to use 9 lemons in order to make 3 dozen cupcakes.   The height of Jose's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Jose's neighbor is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, 0.227355495095253]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Sally's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday.  Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many pieces of bread are used for each sandwich.  Therefore, Sally will eat 4 pieces of bread on Saturday (2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread).   On Sunday, Sally eats 1 sandwich. This means she will eat 2 more pieces of bread (1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread).   In total, Sally will have eaten 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday (4 pieces of bread on Saturday + 2 pieces of bread on Sunday).   The condition that Sally's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. To calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread are used for each sandwich and then add them together. So the answer would be: 4 pieces of bread on Saturday + 2 pieces of bread on", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so she eats a total of 3 sandwiches. Since each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, Sally will eat a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The condition that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us determine how many sandwiches Sally eats in total.\nSally has 2 sandwiches on Saturday, which means she has eaten 4 pieces of bread. On Sunday, she has 1 sandwich, which means she has eaten 2 more pieces of bread. In total, Sally has eaten 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition that Sally's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nTo answer the question, we need to know how many pieces of bread are used for each sandwich. We know that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally will eat 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. This means that Sally will eat a total of 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  The condition \"Sally's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any information about the number of pieces of bread used for each sandwich.", "equation": "Sally's father bought 8 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.20372293889522552]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' neighbor bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "To calculate the total number of tiles in the shower, we need to multiply the number of tiles running the width of the wall times the number of tiles running the height of the wall. So, if each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, then the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.  We then need to multiply this number by the number of walls in the shower, which is 3 in this case. Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 160 x 3 = 480 tiles.  The condition that James' neighbor bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that each wall of the 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. So the answer would be: 8 x 20 x 3 = 480 tiles.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "The condition states that each wall of the 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall. This is a key point to the calculation process. To calculate the total number of tiles in the shower, we need to multiply the number of tiles running the width of the wall times the number of tiles running the height of the wall. So, if each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall, then the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 = 160 tiles. The condition is relevant to the calculation process of the question. The 100 tomatoes bought from the grocery store have no relevance to the calculation process.\nThe first step is to calculate the number of tiles on each wall. Since each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height, we can calculate the total number of tiles on each wall by multiplying 8 by 20 to get 160.  Next, we need to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. Since there are three walls in the shower, we can calculate the total number of tiles by multiplying 160 by 3 to get 480.  Therefore, the answer to the question 閳ユ窏ow many tiles are in the shower?閳 is 480.   The condition 閳ユ竵nd 20 tiles running the height of the wall閳 is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the information we need to calculate the number of tiles on each wall. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nIn order to calculate the number of tiles in the shower, we need to know the dimensions of the shower walls. The problem states that the walls have 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Since there are 3 walls, we can calculate the total number of tiles in the shower by multiplying 8 x 20 x 3 = 480 tiles.  The condition \"James' neighbor bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "James' neighbor bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.07748984545469284]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. The shoe size of Papi Calot's brother is 20. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants, so the total number of plants he needs to buy is 126 + 15 = 141. The shoe size of his brother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, so 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants, so the total number of plants he needs to buy is 126 + 15 = 141. The shoe size of his brother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. This means that he needs 126 plants to fulfill his plan. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. So, he needs to buy 15 more plants. Therefore, the answer is 15 plants.   The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it informs us that Papi Calot is planning to add 15 additional plants. Therefore, the answer is 15 plants.\nFirst, Papi Calot needs to buy enough plants to fill his garden with 7 rows of 18 plants each. That's 7 x 18 = 126 plants. Then, Papi Calot wants to add 15 additional plants. So, he needs to buy 126 + 15 = 141 plants.  The condition \"The shoe size of Papi Calot's brother is 20\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Papi Calot's brother is 20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.29021981358528137]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' neighbor bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many tiles are in one wall of the shower. The width of the wall has 8 tiles and the height of the wall has 20 tiles. So, one wall of the shower has 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.  Now, there are three walls in the shower. So, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480 tiles.  Therefore, the answer is 480 tiles.  The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\" since it gives us the number of tiles running the width of the wall, which is used in the calculation. The number of tomatoes bought by James' neighbor is irrelevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many tiles are in one wall of the shower. The width of the wall has 8 tiles and the height of the wall has 20 tiles. So, one wall of the shower has 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.  Now, there are three walls in the shower. So, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480 tiles.  Therefore, the answer is 480 tiles.  The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many tiles are in the shower?\" since it gives us the number of tiles running the width of the wall, which is used in the calculation.\nThe shower has 3 walls, so we need to multiply the number of tiles that run the width of each wall by 3.   So we have 8 tiles x 3 walls = 24 tiles running the width of the shower.   For the height of the shower, we need to multiply the number of tiles by 3 again.   So we have 20 tiles x 3 walls = 60 tiles running the height of the shower.   To get the total number of tiles in the shower, we need to add up the number of tiles running the width and the height.   So we have 24 tiles + 60 tiles = 84 tiles in the shower.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us how many tiles are running the height of the wall, which is necessary to find the total number of tiles in the shower.   The number of tomatoes bought by James' neighbor is irrelevant to the calculation process.\nThe question is asking about the number of tiles in the shower, so we need to focus on the information about the tiles. The information given is that each wall of the shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.  Therefore, the answer is that there are 48 tiles in the shower.  The condition about James' neighbor buying 20 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' neighbor bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, -2.8138048946857452e-05]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. The height of Jason's brother is 4 feet. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many eggs Jason eats each morning. In two weeks, he will consume 14 omelets. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many omelets Jason will consume in two weeks. Therefore, he will consume 42 eggs in two weeks. To calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks, we need to multiply the number of omelets he will consume (14) by the number of eggs he eats for each omelet (3). So the answer would be: 14 omelets x 3 eggs = 42 eggs. The condition \"The height of Jason's brother is 4 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. In two weeks, he will consume 14 omelets. Therefore, he will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.  The condition \"The height of Jason's brother is 4 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Jason's brother is 4 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.15454784035682678]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. The height of Martha's sister is 5 feet. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "If Ellen is 10 years old now, that means 6 years from now she will be 16 years old. Therefore, Martha must be twice that age, so Martha is 32 years old now. The condition about Martha's sister's height is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not provide any information about Martha's age. So the answer would be: 32 years old.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "If Ellen is 10 years old now, that means 6 years from now she will be 16 years old.  Therefore, Martha must be twice that age, so Martha is 32 years old now.   The condition about Martha's sister's height is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not provide any information about Martha's age.", "equation": "The height of Martha's sister is 5 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.28104716539382935]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. The height of Asia's mother is 300 feet. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, calculate the percentage off by subtracting the sale price ($140) from the original price ($350) and dividing the difference ($210) by the original price ($350).  $210 / $350 = 0.6 (or 60%)  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to this calculation, since it tells us the sale price that was used for the calculation. The height of Asia's mother is not relevant to this calculation.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, calculate the percentage off by subtracting the sale price ($140) from the original price ($350) and dividing the difference ($210) by the original price ($350).  $210 / $350 = 0.6 (or 60%)  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to this calculation, since it tells us the sale price that was used for the calculation. The height of Asia's mother is not relevant to this calculation.\nFirst, we need to calculate the discount amount. To do that, we need to know the original price: $350. We then subtract the sale price ($140) from the original price, giving us a total of $210.  Next, we need to calculate the percentage off. To do that, we divide the discount amount ($210) by the original price ($350) and then multiply by 100. The result is 60%.  The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the original price of the dress, which we need in order to calculate the percentage off.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total amount of money saved from the sale. We know that the original price of the dress was $350. We also know that Asia bought the dress for $140. This means that Asia saved $210.   Now, we need to calculate the percentage off. To do this, we can divide the total amount of money saved ($210) by the original price of the dress ($350). This gives us a result of 0.6. We can then multiply this result by 100 to get the percentage off, which is 60%.  The condition \"The height of Asia's mother is 300 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Asia's mother is 300 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.1943168193101883]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. Jack's neighbor is 5000 years old. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. This means that Jack paid $2500/10 = $250 for the barbell.  Jack's neighbor was 5000 years old. This fact does not affect the calculation process for the total amount Jack paid. Therefore, the total amount Jack paid for everything was $2750 ($2500 for the squat rack + $250 for the barbell). The condition \"Jack's neighbor is 5000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "1. Jack buys a squat rack for $2500.  2. The barbell cost 1/10 as much.   So, the barbell cost $2500/10 = $250.   3. Jack's neighbour is 5000 years old.   This statement is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, Jack paid $2500 + $250 = $2750 for everything.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much. This means that Jack paid $250 for the barbell.  Jack's neighbor was 5000 years old. This fact does not affect the calculation process for the total amount Jack paid.   Therefore, the total amount Jack paid for everything was $2750 ($2500 for the squat rack + $250 for the barbell).\nThe given information is that Jack bought a squat rack for $2500 and the barbell cost 1/10 as much. This means Jack paid $250 for the barbell. So, Jack paid a total of $2750 for both items.   The condition \"Jack's neighbor is 5000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack's neighbor is 5000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, 0.33252081274986267]}
{"original_question": "Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. The height of Mr.Angstadt's mother is 100 feet. How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how many students are enrolled in Statistics. Since half of Mr. Angstadt's 120 students are enrolled in Statistics, that means there are 60 students enrolled in Statistics. Next, we need to figure out how many of those 60 students are seniors. Since 90% of those students are seniors, that means 54 of the 60 students are seniors. Therefore, the answer to the question is 54 students. The condition that Mr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us how many students are enrolled in Statistics in the first place. The condition that Mr.Angstadt's mother's height is 100 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 54, "gold_answer": "54", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many students are enrolled in Statistics. Since half of Mr. Angstadt's 120 students are enrolled in Statistics, that means there are 60 students enrolled in Statistics.   Next, we need to figure out how many of those 60 students are seniors. Since 90% of those students are seniors, that means 54 of the 60 students are seniors.   Therefore, the answer to the question is 54 students. The condition that Mr. Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us how many students are enrolled in Statistics in the first place.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many students are enrolled in Statistics. Since half of Mr.Angstadt's 120 students are enrolled in Statistics, there must be 60 students enrolled in Statistics.  Next, we need to calculate how many of those 60 students are seniors. Since 90 percent of the students in Statistics are seniors, we can calculate that 54 students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.  The condition \"Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us how many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors.  The height of Mr.Angstadt's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, we need to determine how many of Mr.Angstadt's students are enrolled in Statistics:  Total students: 120 Students enrolled in Statistics: 120/2 = 60  Next, we need to determine how many of those students are seniors:  Seniors enrolled in Statistics: 60 x 0.9 = 54  Finally, we can answer the question: 54 students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.  The condition \"The height of Mr.Angstadt's mother is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Mr. Angstadt's mother is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5140396952629089, 0.5659631490707397, 0.6956555247306824, 0.30766159296035767]}
{"original_question": "Billy's family likes to keep their bicycles stored in the garage when they're not being used. They own a total of 4 bicycles. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. The shoe size of Billy's neighbor is 10. How many spokes are inside the garage?", "reasoning_path": "Billy's family owns a total of 4 bicycles. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many bicycles are inside the garage. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many spokes each bicycle wheel has. That means there are 4 x 10 = 40 spokes in the garage (4 bicycles x 10 spokes per bicycle wheel). The shoe size of Billy's neighbor is 10. This is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The relevant information to answer the question is that Billy's family owns a total of 4 bicycles and each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. To calculate how many spokes are inside the garage, we need to multiply the number of bicycles by the number of spokes per bicycle wheel. So the answer would be: 4 x 10 = 40 spokes.", "numerical_answer": 40, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate how many spokes are on each bicycle. Since there are 10 spokes on each wheel, and 4 bicycles, we can calculate that there are 40 spokes inside the garage.  The second step is to determine if the condition \"They own a total of 4 bicycles.\" is relevant to the calculation process. The answer is yes, because without knowing the number of bicycles owned by Billy's family, it would not be possible to calculate the total number of spokes.\nStep 1: Billy's family owns 4 bicycles.  Step 2: Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes.  Step 3: Billy's neighbor has a shoe size of 10.  Answer: Therefore, there are a total of 40 spokes inside the garage. The condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides the necessary information to calculate the total number of spokes inside the garage.\nThe first thing to note is that the question is asking how many spokes are inside the garage.   The second thing to note is that there are 4 bicycles in the garage, and each bicycle has 10 spokes.   Therefore, the answer to the question is 40 spokes.   The shoe size of Billy's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Billy's neighbor is 10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3732944130897522, 0.22472992539405823, 0.38099128007888794, 0.11672517657279968]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. The shoe size of Martha's sister is 3. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "Ellen is 10 years old now.  In 6 years, Ellen will be 16 years old. Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years.  Therefore, Martha is 32 years old now.   Yes, the condition \"Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Martha's sister's shoe size is 3 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate Martha's age now. We can calculate this by realizing that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, which is 16 years old. So Martha's age now is 32 years old.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "We know that Martha realized Ellen was twice as old as she will be in six years. That means that in six years, Ellen will be 16 years old and Martha will be 32. Therefore, Martha is currently 26 years old.  The shoe size of Martha's sister is 3 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Martha's sister is 3.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.2925933301448822]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Calvin's sister has read 5 books in the past year. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has 8 haircuts out of the 10 haircuts he needs for a wig. This means he is 8/10 or 80% towards his goal. The condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing how many haircuts he has already gotten, it would be impossible to calculate the percentage towards his goal.  Calvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal, which is a total of 10 haircuts. So, Calvin is 80% of the way towards his goal, since 8 out of 10 is 80%.  The condition regarding Calvin's sister reading 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer would be: 80%.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "Calvin has 8 haircuts out of the 10 haircuts he needs for a wig. This means he is 8/10 or 80% towards his goal.  The condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without knowing how many haircuts he has already gotten, it would be impossible to calculate the percentage towards his goal.\nCalvin has gotten 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal, which is a total of 10 haircuts. So, Calvin is 80% of the way towards his goal, since 8 out of 10 is 80%.  The condition regarding Calvin's sister reading 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nCalvin needs two more haircuts to reach his goal. This means that he has completed 8/10 (80%) of his goal.  The condition of Calvin's sister reading 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Calvin's sister has read 5 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.24398085474967957]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The height of Lizzy's mother is 30 feet. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, calculate the number of crates needed to ship 540 pounds of fish: 540 pounds / 30 pounds = 18 crates. Then, calculate the total shipping cost: 18 crates * $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment. The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the necessary information to calculate the number of crates needed to ship 540 pounds of fish. Without this information, it would not be possible to calculate the total shipping cost. The condition of Lizzy's mother's height being 30 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "1. First, calculate the number of crates needed to ship 540 pounds of fish: 540 pounds / 30 pounds = 18 crates.   2. Then, calculate the total shipping cost: 18 crates * $1.5 = $27.   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the necessary information to calculate the number of crates needed to ship 540 pounds of fish. Without this information, it would not be possible to calculate the total shipping cost.\nFirst, Lizzy needs to calculate how many crates she needs to ship. To do this, she can divide the total weight (540 pounds) by the weight of each crate (30 pounds).  540 / 30 = 18 crates  Next, she needs to calculate the total cost of the shipment. To do this, she can multiply the number of crates (18) by the cost of each crate ($1.5).  18 * $1.5 = $27  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The height of Lizzy's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Lizzy's mother is 30 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.054376013576984406]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Perry's sister bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Perry added a half cup of cream, which is equal to 44 grams of fat (88 grams of fat per cup divided by 2). Since there are four servings of food, each serving would have 11 grams of fat added (44 grams of fat divided by 4). Therefore, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food. The condition that Perry's sister bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Perry added a half cup of cream and cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. To calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving, we need to know how much cream was added and how many servings there are. So the answer would be: 88 grams of fat per cup divided by 2 (for the half cup) divided by 4 (for the four servings) = 11 grams of fat per serving.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "The first part of the question is asking how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. To answer this, we need to know how much cream was added. Since Perry added a half cup of cream, that means he added 44 grams of fat (88 grams of fat per cup divided by 2). Since there are four servings of food, each serving would have 11 grams of fat added (44 grams of fat divided by 4).   The second part of the question is asking if the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process. Yes, it is relevant since that is the information we need to calculate how much fat was added to each serving of food. Without knowing how much fat is in a cup of cream, we would not be able to answer the question.   Therefore, the answer to the question is 11 grams of fat per serving, and the condition is relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Calculate the total amount of fat added  Answer: Perry added a half cup of cream, which is equal to 44 grams of fat.  Step 2: Divide the total amount of fat by the number of servings  Answer: 44 grams of fat divided by 4 servings = 11 grams of fat per serving.  Therefore, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  The condition that Perry's sister bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Perry's sister bought 40 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, 0.11467938125133514]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. Oli's father is 4 years old. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many scoops of ice cream Oli has. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  Then, we need to calculate how many scoops of ice cream Victoria has. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli, so she has 2 x 4 = 8 scoops of ice cream.  Finally, we need to calculate the difference between the number of scoops of ice cream Oli and Victoria have. Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream and Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  Yes, the given condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We used the condition to calculate the number of scoops of ice cream Victoria has. The condition \"Oli's father is 4 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many scoops of ice cream Oli has. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  Then, we need to calculate how many scoops of ice cream Victoria has. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli, so she has 2 x 4 = 8 scoops of ice cream.  Finally, we need to calculate the difference between the number of scoops of ice cream Oli and Victoria have. Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream and Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  Yes, the given condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We used the condition to calculate the number of scoops of ice cream Victoria has.\nOli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli. Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  So, the answer is Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  No, the condition \"Oli's father is 4 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Oli's father is 4 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.14593373239040375]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's sister is 2 years old. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many hours are in a day. There are 24 hours in a day. Next, we need to calculate how many hours Jackie spends working, exercising, and sleeping. 8 hours of work, 3 hours of exercise, and 8 hours of sleep = 19 hours. Now, we need to subtract 19 hours from 24 hours. 24 - 19 = 5. This means that Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day. The condition that Jackie's sister is 2 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of free time. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. Knowing this information is necessary to calculate how much free time Jackie has. So the answer would be 5 hours of free time per day.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day.   This means that Jackie has 19 hours of activities per day.   Since Jackie's sister is 2 years old, this condition is not relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has.   Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day (24 hours - 19 hours).\nFirst, we need to calculate how many hours are in a day. There are 24 hours in a day. Next, we need to calculate how many hours Jackie spends working, exercising, and sleeping. 8 hours of work, 3 hours of exercise, and 8 hours of sleep = 19 hours. Now, we need to subtract 19 hours from 24 hours. 24 - 19 = 5. This means that Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.  The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many hours Jackie spends on work, exercise, and sleep. Knowing this information is necessary to calculate how much free time Jackie has.\nWe know that Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This means that Jackie spends a total of 19 hours on activities.   Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.   The condition that Jackie's sister is 2 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of free time.", "equation": "Jackie's sister is 2 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.3452119827270508]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. James' brother bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "James's out-of-pocket cost will be determined by how much of the $300 he has to pay for his doctor appointment. Since his insurance covers 80%, the remaining 20% is what he has to pay out-of-pocket, which is $60. The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is indeed relevant as it is the basis for the calculation. The fact that James's brother bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation. The total cost of the doctor appointment is $300.  James's insurance covers 80%, so the total amount that James has to pay is 20% of $300, which is $60.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it was necessary to determine how much James has to pay out-of-pocket for his doctor appointment.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "James's out-of-pocket cost will be determined by how much of the $300 he has to pay for his doctor appointment. Since his insurance covers 80%, the remaining 20% is what he has to pay out of pocket, which is $60. The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is indeed relevant as it is the basis for the calculation. The fact that James's brother bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation.\nThe total cost of the doctor appointment is $300.  James's insurance covers 80%, so the total amount that James has to pay is 20% of $300, which is $60.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it was necessary to determine how much James has to pay out-of-pocket for his doctor appointment.\nFirst, let's calculate the cost of the doctor visit. James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit, and James's insurance covers 80%. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for the doctor visit is $60.   The condition \"James' brother bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?\" and does not impact the answer. Therefore, the answer is $60.", "equation": "James' brother bought 500 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.3150988817214966]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's neighbor is 117 years old. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "Kelly pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, for a total of 234 carrots.   Next, we can use the given information that 6 carrots weigh one pound to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.   6 carrots x (55 + 101 + 78) carrots = 234 carrots  1 pound x 234 carrots/6 carrots = 39 pounds  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The given condition about Kelly's neighbor being 117 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots (55 + 101 + 78). We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to get the answer: 39 pounds. The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to calculate the number of pounds of carrots, so it is not necessary for the calculation process.\nKelly harvested 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots in total.  If 6 carrots weigh one pound, then 234 carrots would weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process.   Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This adds up to a total of 234 carrots. If 6 carrots weigh one pound, then 234 carrots would weigh 39 pounds. The condition about Kelly's neighbor being 117 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 from the second bed, and 78 from the third bed, for a total of 234 carrots.   Next, we can use the given information that 6 carrots weigh one pound to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.   6 carrots x (55 + 101 + 78) carrots = 234 carrots  1 pound x 234 carrots/6 carrots = 39 pounds  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The given condition is relevant to the calculation process because it provided the number of carrots needed to make one pound of carrots, which was used to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested. She pulled out a total of 55+101+78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots she harvested. Since 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds. Thus, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"Kelly's neighbor is 117 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Kelly's neighbor is 117 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.2566383481025696]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. The height of Clarice's brother is 8 feet. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Genevieve had $1600 on her.  Step 2: The cost of cherries was $8 per kilogram. Step 3: Clarice chipped in $400.   Therefore, the total amount of money available to Genevieve is $1600 + $400 = $2000.   Step 4: Divide $2000 by $8 to calculate the number of kilograms of cherries that Genevieve could buy with $2000.   Therefore, the answer is $2000 / $8 = 250 kilograms of cherries.   The condition \"Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the cost of the cherries, which is necessary to calculate the number of kilograms of cherries that Genevieve could buy with $2000. The condition that the height of Clarice's brother is 8 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "Step 1: Genevieve had $1600 on her.  Step 2: The cost of cherries was $8 per kilogram. Step 3: Clarice chipped in $400.   Therefore, the total amount of money available to Genevieve is $1600 + $400 = $2000.   Step 4: Divide $2000 by $8 to calculate the number of kilograms of cherries that Genevieve could buy with $2000.   Therefore, the answer is $2000 / $8 = 250 kilograms of cherries.   The condition \"Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the cost of the cherries, which is necessary to calculate the number of kilograms of cherries that Genevieve could buy with $2000.\nFirst, Genevieve realized she was $400 short of the total price when she reached the checkout counter. This means that the total price of the cherries was $1600.   Second, we can calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. Since the cost of cherries was $8 per kilogram, we can divide $1600 by 8 to find the answer.   Therefore, Genevieve bought 200 kilograms of cherries.   The condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that the total cost of the cherries was $1600, which we used to calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.\nGenevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram.  This means that for every kilogram of cherries, Genevieve would have to pay $8.  When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.  This means that Genevieve had $1200 and Clarice had $400. Together, they had $1600.  If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?  Given that 1 kilogram of cherries costs $8, we can divide 1600 by 8 to get the answer:  Genevieve bought 200 kilograms of cherries.  Is condition \"The height of Clarice's brother is 8 feet.\" relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?\"  No, the height of Clarice's brother is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Clarice's brother is 8 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, -0.012908400036394596]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. The height of Libby's brother is 50 feet. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. This is relevant to the calculation process as it is the starting point of the calculation. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since 1 quarter is equal to $0.25, Libby needs $35/$0.25 = 140 quarters to pay for the dress. Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress. The condition \"The height of Libby's brother is 50 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\". So the answer would be 20 quarters.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since 1 quarter is equal to $0.25, Libby needs $35/$0.25 = 140 quarters to pay for the dress.  Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  The condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the starting point of the calculation.\nLibby has 160 quarters, so she starts with 160.  She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress, so she needs to subtract 35 from 160.  This means she will have 125 quarters left.   The height of Libby's brother is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, so the answer is 125 quarters.\n1. Libby has 160 quarters. 2. She has to pay $35 to replace the dress. 3. The height of Libby's brother is 50 feet.  So, the answer is 125 quarters. The condition \"The height of Libby's brother is 50 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\".", "equation": "The height of Libby's brother is 50 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.2511221170425415]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. The shoe size of Jeanne's mother is 7. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "Jeanne needs to buy 3 tickets in order to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. Jeanne has 5 tickets, so she needs to buy an additional 2 tickets to ride all three attractions. The condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets,\" is relevant to the calculation process because it informs us that Jeanne needs to purchase 5 tickets in total in order to ride the Ferris wheel. The shoe size of Jeanne's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Jeanne has 5 tickets, and she wants to ride the Ferris wheel (5 tickets), the roller coaster (4 tickets), and the bumper cars (4 tickets). That's a total of 13 tickets. Jeanne only has 5 tickets, so she needs 8 more tickets. So, the answer is 8.  The condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps to determine how many tickets Jeanne needs to buy. Knowing the cost of each ride helps to calculate the total number of tickets Jeanne needs in order to ride all three rides.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "Jeanne needs to buy 3 tickets in order to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. Jeanne has 5 tickets, so she needs to buy an additional 2 tickets to ride all three attractions. The condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets,\" is relevant to the calculation process because it informs us that Jeanne needs to purchase 5 tickets in total in order to ride the Ferris wheel. The condition does not inform us how many more tickets Jeanne needs to buy, however, as this depends on how many tickets she already has. The shoe size of Jeanne's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, and she wants to ride the Ferris wheel (5 tickets), the roller coaster (4 tickets), and the bumper cars (4 tickets). That's a total of 13 tickets. Jeanne only has 5 tickets, so she needs 8 more tickets. So, the answer is 8.  The condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps to determine how many tickets Jeanne needs to buy. Knowing the cost of each ride helps to calculate the total number of tickets Jeanne needs in order to ride all three rides.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, and she needs 9 tickets in total to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. So, Jeanne needs 4 more tickets to ride all three rides. The shoe size of Jeanne's mother does not factor into this equation.\nFirst, Jeanne should calculate how many tickets she needs to buy in order to ride the three rides. Since the Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets, and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets, Jeanne needs a total of 13 tickets to ride all three rides.  Next, Jeanne should calculate how many tickets she already has. Jeanne has 5 tickets, so she needs 8 more tickets to be able to ride the three rides.  Finally, Jeanne needs to buy 8 more tickets if she wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The shoe size of Jeanne's mother is 7, but that condition is not relevant to the calculation process of how many more tickets Jeanne should buy.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jeanne's mother is 7.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.21140028536319733]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. The shoe size of Emily's father is 5. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Betty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  Therefore, Emily has 252 oranges.  The condition \"The shoe size of Emily's father is 5\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty and Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. To calculate how many oranges Emily has, we need to multiply the number of oranges Sandra has by 7. So the answer would be: 3 x 12 = 36, 36 x 7 = 252. Therefore, Emily has 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Therefore, Sandra has 3 x 12 or 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 or 252 oranges. The shoe size of Emily's father is not relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Betty has 12 oranges.  Step 2: Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Therefore, Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges.  Step 3: Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Therefore, Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  So the answer is that Emily has 252 oranges.  The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" was relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it was used to calculate the number of oranges that Sandra had, which was then used to calculate the number of oranges that Emily had.\nBetty has 12 oranges.  Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges.  Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.   Therefore, Emily has 252 oranges.   The condition \"The shoe size of Emily's father is 5\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emily's father is 5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.05408601462841034]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Gretchen's brother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us what Gretchen is doing on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Gretchen is charging for each drawing.  If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, then she would have made a total of $440.00 ($20.00 x 24 + $20.00 x 16 = $440.00).  The condition that Gretchen's brother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends and charges $20.00 per drawing. To calculate how much money Gretchen made from selling her caricatures, we need to multiply the number of drawings sold by the price of each drawing. So the answer would be: 24 drawings x $20.00 = $480.00 + 16 drawings x $20.00 = $320.00 = $800.00.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday. Both days she charged $20.00 per drawing. 24 x $20.00 = $480.00 and 16 x $20.00 = $320.00. The condition of charging $20.00 per drawing is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine the price of the drawings. The total money Gretchen made from selling her caricatures was $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00.\nGretchen draws caricatures and charges $20.00 per drawing. So, if she sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, she would have made a total of $440.00 ($20.00 x 24 + $20.00 x 16 = $440.00).   The condition about Gretchen's brother and the tomatoes is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.", "equation": "Gretchen's brother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.35641369223594666]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. The shoe size of Sally's sister is 2. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally ate on Saturday.  Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many pieces of bread were used for each sandwich.  That means Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday (2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread).  Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally ate on Sunday.  Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many pieces of bread were used for each sandwich.  That means Sally eats 2 pieces of bread on Sunday (1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread).  The total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 4 + 2 = 6 pieces of bread.  Yes, the condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Sally's sister's shoe size is 2 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. We can calculate this by multiplying", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "Yes, condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?\". The condition states that Sally eats two sandwiches on Saturday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, then Sally would have eaten 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.   On Sunday, she eats one sandwich, so she would have eaten 2 pieces of bread.   In total, Sally has eaten 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.\n1. Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday. 2. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. 3. That means Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday. 4. Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday. 5. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. 6. That means Sally eats 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. 7. The total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 4 + 2 = 6 pieces of bread.  Yes, the condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nTo answer the question, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of sandwiches Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday (3) by the number of pieces of bread used in each sandwich (2). This gives us an answer of 6.   The condition \"The shoe size of Sally's sister is 2.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Sally's sister is 2.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.14302964508533478]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. Jack's sister is 1000 years old. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much, so that means Jack paid $250 for the barbell. Third, Jack's sister is 1000 years old, which does not affect the calculation process. Therefore, the total amount Jack paid for everything is $2750 ($2500 for the squat rack + $250 for the barbell). The condition of Jack's sister being 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500, and the barbell cost 1/10 as much. That means that the barbell cost 1/10 of $2500, which is $250. Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for the squat rack and barbell. The condition that Jack's sister is 1000 years old is irrelevant to the calculation.\nFirst, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500.   Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much, so that means Jack paid $250 for the barbell.   Third, Jack's sister is 1000 years old, which does not affect the calculation process.   Therefore, the total amount Jack paid for everything is $2750 ($2500 for the squat rack + $250 for the barbell).\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500, and the barbell cost 1/10 as much, so the barbell cost $250. Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for the squat rack and the barbell.   The condition of Jack's sister being 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jack's sister is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, 0.24392226338386536]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. The height of Melies' brother is 10 feet. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. That means Melies has to pay $164 (2 x $82) for the meat. Melies had $180 in his wallet, so after paying for the meat he will have $180 - $164 = $16 left.  The condition \"The height of Melies' brother is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?\" since it does not affect the amount of money Melies has to pay for the meat. Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the cost of the meat. 2 kg of meat costs $82 x 2 = $164.  Step 2: Calculate the money Melies has left. Melies has $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left.  So, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process as it determines the cost of the meat, which is used to calculate the amount of money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The height of Melies' brother is not relevant to this calculation.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much the meat costs. Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. So, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = $164.  Second, we need to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. Melies has $180 in his wallet, and he spent $164 on the meat. So, the amount of money he has left is 180 - 164 = $16.  The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to calculate the cost of the meat. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The height of Melies' brother is not relevant to this calculation.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. This means that Melies spent $164 (2 x $82) on the meat.  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. This means that he has $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet after paying for the meat.  The height of Melies' brother is 10 feet and is not relevant to the calculation process.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. That means Melies has to pay $164 for the meat. Melies had $180 in his wallet, so after paying for the meat he will have $16 left.  The condition \"The height of Melies' brother is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?\" since it does not affect the amount of money Melies has to pay for the meat.", "equation": "The height of Melies' brother is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.19766975939273834]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. The height of Salem's father is 1000 feet. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "The poem has 20 stanzas, and each stanza has 10 lines. This is relevant to the calculation as it tells us how many stanzas and lines the poem has. Each line has 8 words. This is also relevant to the calculation as it tells us how many words each line has. Therefore, for each set of 10 lines there are 80 words (8 words x 10 lines). We then multiply 80 by 20 to get the total number of words in the poem, which is 1600 words (80 words x 20 stanzas). Yes, the condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many stanzas the poem has. The condition that Salem's father's height is 1000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of words in the poem. So the answer is 1600 words.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "The poem has 20 stanzas, so there are 20 sets of 10 lines.  Each of those 10 lines has 8 words, so for each set of 10 lines there are 80 words.  We then multiply 80 by 20 to get the total number of words in the poem, which is 1600 words.   The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as the number of stanzas is already known.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of lines in the poem. Since there are 20 stanzas with 10 lines each, the total number of lines is 200. Now, we need to calculate the total number of words. Since each line has 8 words, and there are 200 lines in total, the total number of words is 1600.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600. The condition \"The height of Salem's father is 1000 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Salem's father is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.17267854511737823]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. The height of Salem's father is 2000 feet. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "We know that there are 20 stanzas in the poem. We also know that each stanza has 10 lines. Furthermore, we know that each line has 8 words.  Therefore, we can calculate the total number of words in the poem by using the following equation:  Total number of words = (20 stanzas) x (10 lines per stanza) x (8 words per line)   Total number of words = 1600 words  The condition \"The height of Salem's father is 2000 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "1. We know that there are 20 stanzas in the poem. 2. We know that each stanza has 10 lines. 3. We know that each line has 8 words.  Therefore, we can calculate the total number of words in the poem by using the following equation:  Total number of words = (20 stanzas) x (10 lines per stanza) x (8 words per line)   Total number of words = 1600 words  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, calculate the number of lines in the poem. There are 20 stanzas, and each stanza has 10 lines. So, there are a total of 200 lines in the poem.  Second, calculate the number of words in each line. Each line has 8 words, so there are a total of 800 words in each line.  Finally, calculate the total number of words in the poem. There are 200 lines, and each line has 800 words, so the total number of words in the poem is 200 x 800 = 160000.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 160000.  The condition \"The height of Salem's father is 2000 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Salem's father is 2000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.06526751071214676]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The shoe size of Jack's mother is 5000. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell. Lastly, Jack's mother's shoe size does not have any relevance to the calculation process. Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "First, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500.  Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack, so Jack paid $250 for the barbell.  Lastly, Jack's mother's shoe size does not have any relevance to the calculation process.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.\n1. Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. 2. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. 3. The shoe size of Jack's mother is 5000.  So, Jack paid $2500 for the squat rack and 1/10 of that for the barbell, which is $250. The shoe size of Jack's mother is not relevant to the calculation process, so Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.\nThe first part of the question tells us that Jack bought a squat rack for $2500.   The second part tells us that the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack. So the barbell cost $250.   The third part tells us that the shoe size of Jack's mother is 5000. This is not relevant to the calculation process, so we can ignore it.   Therefore, Jack paid $2500 + $250 = $2750 for the squat rack and barbell.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jack's mother is 5000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, 0.3392176330089569]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's sister has read 2 books in the past year. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That's 19 hours total. She has 24 hours in a day, so that leaves 5 hours of free time. The condition that Jackie's sister has read 2 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, the answer is that Jackie has 5 hours of free time in a day.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie has 24 hours in a day. 8 hours of work, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep leaves 5 hours of free time. The condition that \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is not relevant to this calculation process, since it has already been accounted for in the total amount of hours in a day.\nFirst, let's calculate how much time Jackie spends working and sleeping each day, which is 8 hours for work and 8 hours for sleep. This means she has 8 hours of free time in a day.  Now let's consider the condition \"3 hours of exercise\". This means Jackie spends 3 hours each day doing exercise, which would leave her with 5 hours of free time in a day.  Finally, let's consider Jackie's sister who has read 2 books in the past year. This is not relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has since it does not affect her free time directly.   Therefore, the answer is that Jackie has 5 hours of free time in a day.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep. That's 19 hours total. She has 24 hours in a day, so that leaves 5 hours of free time. The condition of Jackie's sister having read two books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Jackie's sister has read 2 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.32913312315940857]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Jose's mother is 10 years old.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen of cupcakes. So, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Second, every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, so Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Therefore, if Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 9 lemons.  Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate how many lemons Jose will need. The condition that Jose's mother is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "Since Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes, it means that he needs 12/4 = 3 lemons for each dozen of cupcakes.   Therefore, if Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 3 x 3 = 9 lemons.   Yes, the condition is relevant, since it tells us that each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Without this information, we wouldn't know how much lemon juice Jose needs and how many lemons he needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Therefore, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate how many lemons Jose will need.\nFirst, Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen of cupcakes. So, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Second, every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, so Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Jose's mother is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jose's mother is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, 0.21988433599472046]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. James' father bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester. This can be done by multiplying the number of units (20) by the cost per unit ($50):  20 units x $50 per unit = $1000   Second, we need to multiply this answer by 2 to find out how much James pays for 2 semesters:  $1000 x 2 = $2000   Therefore, James pays $2000 for 2 semesters.  The condition that James' father bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that each unit costs $50 and James takes 20 units per semester. To calculate how much James pays for two semesters, we need to multiply the number of units by the cost per unit and then multiply this answer by 2. So the answer would be: 20 units x $50 per unit x 2 = $2000.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, let's look at the condition. James is taking 20 units per semester at community college. This is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many units James needs to pay for.   Second, let's look at the given information. We know that each unit costs $50.   Finally, we can calculate how much James needs to pay for two semesters. James needs to pay for a total of 40 units (20 units per semester). This means that he needs to pay $2000 for two semesters (40 units x $50 = $2000).   Therefore, the answer is that James needs to pay $2000 for two semesters.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester.  This can be done by multiplying the number of units (20) by the cost per unit ($50):  20 units x $50 per unit = $1000   Second, we need to multiply this answer by 2 to find out how much James pays for 2 semesters:  $1000 x 2 = $2000   Therefore, James pays $2000 for 2 semesters.   The condition \"James' father bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' father bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.20884928107261658]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. The shoe size of Steve's neighbor is 30. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to convert 5'6\" into inches. Since there are 12 inches in a foot, 5'6\" is equal to 66 inches. Next, we need to add 6 inches to 66 inches. This gives us a total of 72 inches. Finally, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the starting point for our calculation. Without this information, we would not be able to answer the question. The shoe size of Steve's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, the answer is 72 inches.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "First, we need to convert 5'6\" into inches. Since there are 12 inches in a foot, 5'6\" is equal to 66 inches.   Next, we need to add 6 inches to 66 inches. This gives us a total of 72 inches.   Finally, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.   The condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the starting point for our calculation. Without this information, we would not be able to answer the question.\nSteve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches.  He grows 6 inches, so his new height is 72 inches.  The shoe size of Steve's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process.   Therefore, the answer is 72 inches.\nFirst, we know that Steve's initial height is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches.  Second, we know that Steve's height increases by 6 inches.  So, the final height of Steve is 66 + 6 = 72 inches.  The shoe size of Steve's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it has nothing to do with Steve's height.", "equation": "The shoe size of Steve's neighbor is 30.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495515942573547, 0.513569176197052, 0.5487249493598938]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. The shoe size of Michelle's father is 8. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle paid the ride fee of $2 when entering the taxi. Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. So, for 4 miles, Michelle needs to pay $2.5 x 4 = $10. Therefore, in total, Michelle paid $2 + $10 = $12 for her ride. The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation of Michelle's total fare, because it adds $2 to her total fare. The shoe size of Michelle's father is irrelevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Michelle rode the taxi for 4 miles, so the normal fare without the ride fee would be 4 x $2.5 = $10. However, she had to pay a ride fee of $2, so her total fare was $10 + $2 = $12. The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation of Michelle's total fare, because it adds $2 to her total fare.\nFirst, Michelle paid the ride fee of $2 when entering the taxi.   Second, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5. So, for 4 miles, Michelle needs to pay $2.5 x 4 = $10.   Therefore, in total, Michelle paid $2 + $10 = $12 for her ride.   The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles.\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is what determines the total amount of money Michelle needs to pay for her ride.\nThe relevant information in this problem is the ride fee of $2, the 4 miles that Michelle rode, and the taxi charge per mile of $2.5. With this information, we can calculate that Michelle paid $10 in total for her ride ($2 + 4 x $2.5). The shoe size of Michelle's father is irrelevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Michelle's father is 8.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.1304602175951004]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Michelle's brother has read 12 books in the past year. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, we add the ride fee of $2 to the total cost. Then, we multiply the per-mile fee of $2.5 by the number of miles (4). This gives us a total of $10. So, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride.  The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, Michelle would only have paid $10 for her ride. The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is also relevant to the calculation process as it is the amount of miles Michelle traveled that determines how much the taxi charge per mile is applied. The condition that Michelle's brother has read 12 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we add the ride fee of $2 to the total cost. Then, we multiply the per-mile fee of $2.5 by the number of miles (4). This gives us a total of $10. So, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride.   The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, Michelle would only have paid $10 for her ride.\n1) Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 when she got into the taxi.  2) The taxi charge per mile is $2.5, so for 4 miles, Michelle would have to pay $2.5 x 4 = $10.  3) The total amount Michelle paid for her ride is $2 + $10 = $12.  The condition \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is the amount of miles Michelle traveled that determines how much the taxi charge per mile is applied.\nMichelle's ride fee is the ride fee of $2 plus the taxi charge per mile of $2.5 multiplied by the number of miles she traveled, which is 4. So, Michelle's total fee is $2 + (4 x $2.5), which is equal to $12.  The condition \"Michelle's brother has read 12 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Michelle's brother has read 12 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.04146522283554077]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. The shoe size of Papi Calot's sister is 20. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. This means he already needs to buy 126 plants (7 rows x 18 plants = 126 plants). He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants. This means that he needs to buy an additional 15 plants, bringing the total to 141 plants (126 plants + 15 plants = 141 plants). The shoe size of Papi Calot's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, the answer is that Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. This means that he already needs to buy 126 plants (7 rows x 18 plants = 126 plants).   He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants. This means that he needs to buy an additional 15 plants, bringing the total to 141 plants (126 plants + 15 plants = 141 plants).  The shoe size of Papi Calot's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nPapi Calot wants to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. This means he needs to buy 126 plants to fill these 7 rows.   But since he still has a bit of room left, he is thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. This means he needs to buy 141 plants in total.   Therefore, the answer is that Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants.   The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process because it explains why Papi Calot needs to buy more plants than the original 126 plants that he needs for the 7 rows.\nPapi Calot wants to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That is 7 x 18 = 126 plants in total. Now if he wants to add 15 more, he needs to buy 15 more plants, making the total number of plants he needs to buy = 126 + 15 = 141 plants.   The shoe size of Papi Calot's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Papi Calot's sister is 20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.21806621551513672]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. The shoe size of Luke's mother is 60. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs for one bottle. He needs 85 stars to fill one glass jar, so he needs 85 stars to fill 4 bottles. Therefore, Luke needs a total of 85 x 4 = 340 stars to fill all 4 bottles.  Second, we need to calculate how many stars Luke has already made. He has already made 33 stars.  Third, we need to calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make. He needs 340 stars, but he has already made 33 stars. Therefore, he needs 340 - 33 = 307 more stars to make.  The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many more stars must Luke make?\" because it allows us to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made from the total number of stars he needs to make. Without this condition, Luke would need to make 340 stars instead of 307 stars.  The shoe size of Luke's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is 307 stars.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many stars are needed to fill the four bottles. We can do this by multiplying 4 by the number of stars required to fill the glass jar, which is 85. Therefore, Luke needs to make 340 stars in total for the four bottles.   Next, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made, which is 33, from 340. This means that Luke needs to make 307 more stars to fill the four bottles.   The shoe size of Luke's mother is not relevant to the calculation process.\nLuke needs to make 85 stars to fill one jar. Since Luke needs to fill 4 bottles, he must make a total of 85 x 4 = 340 stars. Since Luke has already made 33 stars, he must make (340 - 33) = 307 more stars.   The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many more stars must Luke make?\" because it allows us to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made from the total number of stars he needs to make. Without this condition, Luke would need to make 340 stars instead of 307 stars.\nLuke needs to make 85 stars to fill one bottle, so he needs to make 85*4 = 340 stars to fill 4 bottles. He already made 33 stars. So he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars. The shoe size of Luke's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs for one bottle. He needs 85 stars to fill one glass jar, so he needs 85 stars to fill 4 bottles.   Therefore, Luke needs a total of 85 x 4 = 340 stars to fill all 4 bottles.   Second, we need to calculate how many stars Luke has already made. He has already made 33 stars.   Third, we need to calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make. He needs 340 stars, but he has already made 33 stars. Therefore, he needs 340 - 33 = 307 more stars to make.   The shoe size of Luke's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Luke's mother is 60.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.25058868527412415]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. The height of Abie's father is 10 feet. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips to start with. She gave 4 bags to her friend. She bought 6 bags of chips in the store. So, in the end, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips. The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the starting point to work from. The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that Abie has fewer bags of chips in the end than she had to start with. The condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many more bags of chips Abie has in the end. The condition \"The height of Abie's father is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem and thus does not affect the answer. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\" is 22 bags of chips.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. So, in the end, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips. The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process because it gives us the starting point to work from.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips to start with.  She gave 4 bags to her friend. She bought 6 bags of chips in the store.   So, in the end, Abie has (20 - 4 + 6) = 22 bags of chips.   The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that Abie has fewer bags of chips in the end than she had to start with. Without this condition, the answer for \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\" would be wrong.\nInitially, Abie had 20 bags of chips. After giving 4 bags to her friend, she has 16 bags of chips. When she bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, she has 22 bags of chips in the end. Therefore, the condition \"and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\"\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. So in the end, she has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips.  The condition \"The height of Abie's father is 10 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem and thus does not affect the answer.", "equation": "The height of Abie's father is 10 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.17691762745380402]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Lucy's mother is 20 years old. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "At first, Lucy has $65 in the bank.  Then, she made a $15 deposit. So, her balance is now $80 ($65 + $15).  Finally, she withdrew $4, so her bank balance is now $76 ($80 - $4).   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.  The condition that Lucy's mother is 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of Lucy's bank balance. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lucy has $65 in the bank, she made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. To calculate Lucy's bank balance, we need to first add the $15 deposit and then subtract the $4 withdrawal. So the answer would be $76.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit, so her bank balance is now $80. She then made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance is now $76.  The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is not needed to solve the problem.\nAfter the $15 deposit, Lucy has $80 in the bank. After the $4 withdrawal, she has $76 in the bank. The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process because without it, Lucy would only have $50 in the bank. So the answer is Lucy has $76 in the bank.\nAt first, Lucy has $65 in the bank.  Then, she made a $15 deposit. So, her balance is now $80 ($65 + $15).  Finally, she withdrew $4, so her bank balance is now $76 ($80 - $4).   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.  The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it explains that after the initial $65 balance, Lucy made a $15 deposit, and then took out $4, resulting in the final bank balance of $76.\nLucy had $65 in the bank before making a $15 deposit and a $4 withdrawal. After the deposit and withdrawal, Lucy's bank balance is $76 ($65 + $15 - $4 = $76). The condition that Lucy's mother is 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of Lucy's bank balance.", "equation": "Lucy's mother is 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637164354324341, 0.30860891938209534, 0.2903803884983063, 0.33304473757743835]}
{"original_question": "Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel are bird watching. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. The shoe size of Humphrey is 6. How many birds does each of them see on average?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the total number of birds that were seen by all three bird watchers. This can be done by adding up the number of birds that each person saw: 7 + 11 + 9 = 27. The next step is to calculate the average number of birds seen by each bird watcher. This can be done by dividing the total number of birds by the number of bird watchers, which is 3: 27 / 3 = 9. Therefore, on average, each bird watcher saw 9 birds.  The condition \"and Darrel sees 9 birds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not change the total number of birds seen by all three bird watchers or the average number of birds seen by each bird watcher. The condition that Humphrey's shoe size is 6 is also not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the total number of birds that were seen by all three bird watchers. This can be done by adding up the number of birds that each person saw: 7 + 11 + 9 = 27.   The next step is to calculate the average number of birds seen by each bird watcher. This can be done by dividing the total number of birds by the number of bird watchers, which is 3: 27 / 3 = 9.  Therefore, on average, each bird watcher saw 9 birds.  The condition \"and Darrel sees 9 birds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not change the total number of birds seen by all three bird watchers or the average number of birds seen by each bird watcher.\nThe first step is to calculate the average number of birds seen by the three birdwatchers. To do this, you add up the total number of birds seen (7 + 11 + 9 = 27) and divide by the number of birdwatchers (3). 27/3 = 9. So, on average, they saw 9 birds.  The second step is to determine if the condition \"The shoe size of Humphrey is 6\" is relevant to this calculation. Since shoe size has nothing to do with the number of birds seen, this condition is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Humphrey is 6.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4831371605396271, 0.5573062300682068, 0.5210311412811279, 0.48639485239982605, 0.07164043933153152]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. The shoe size of Abie's neighbor is 5. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend. This means she has 16 bags left. She bought another 6 bags in the store. This means she has 22 bags in the end. The condition that Abie's neighbor shoe size is 5 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Abie had 20 bags of chips initially, gave 4 bags to her friend and bought 6 more bags in the store. To calculate how many bags of chips Abie has in the end, we need to subtract 4 bags from 20 bags and add 6 more bags to the remaining 16 bags. So the answer would be 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie had 20 bags of chips.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  She bought 6 more bags of chips in the store.   Therefore, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips in the end.   The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the starting point of the problem.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  This means she has 16 bags left.  She bought 6 more bags in the store.  This means she has 22 bags in the end.   The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it affects the number of bags Abie has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  That leaves her with 16 bags of chips.  She then bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.   So in the end, Abie has 22 bags of chips.   The shoe size of Abie's neighbor is 5 and is not relevant to the calculation process of problem.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  She bought 6 more bags in the store.  Therefore, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips in the end.   The shoe size of Abie's neighbor is 5. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of how many bags of chips Abie has in the end.", "equation": "The shoe size of Abie's neighbor is 5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.25112849473953247]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Hamza's father bought 9 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "First, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket and poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket is now full. If we assume that the 6-liter bucket was also empty before Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket, then she would have been able to pour the remainder of the 5-liter bucket (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket.  So, the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it. This means that it can hold an additional 4 liters of water without overflowing. Therefore, the answer to the question is 4 liters.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process, because it provides information about the capacity of each bucket. The condition that Hamza's father bought 9 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket and poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket is now full. If we assume that the 6-liter bucket was also empty before Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket, then she would have been able to pour the remainder of the 5-liter bucket (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket.  So, the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it. This means that it can hold an additional 4 liters of water without overflowing. Therefore, the answer to the question is 4 liters.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process, because it provides information about the capacity of each bucket.\nHamza has a 5-liter bucket full of water. She pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. That means she can only pour in up to 3 liters before the 3-liter bucket is full. She then pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. That means the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it.   So, the answer to the question is that Hamza can put in an additional 4 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing, for a total of 6 liters.  Yes, the condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process of the question.\nFirst, Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket with water, so there is now 5 liters of water in the 5-liter bucket.  Then, she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters of water, she will only be able to pour 3 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket. This means that there is now 2 liters of water left in the 5-liter bucket.  Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that she is pouring the 2 liters of water left in the 5-liter bucket into the 6-liter bucket. So, there is now 2 liters of water in the 6-liter bucket.  Finally, Hamza's father bought 9 tomatoes from the grocery store. This does not affect the calculation of how much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.  Therefore, Hamza can put 4 liters more water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.\nHamza poured as much of the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket as she could. That would be 3 liters. She then poured the remainder of the 5-liter bucket, which is 2 liters, into the 6-liter bucket. That leaves 4 liters of space in the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.   The condition about Hamza's father buying 9 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Hamza's father bought 9 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.22620494663715363]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The shoe size of Jed's sister is 20. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the amount of the fine for each mile per hour. Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the posted speed limit and the amount of the fine Jed was charged. Using this information, we can calculate that Jed was traveling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 66 miles per hour (50 mph + 16 mph). The shoe size of Jed's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how fast Jed was traveling in miles per hour when he was fined. We can calculate this by dividing the fine by the amount of the fine per mile per hour.  $256/$16 = 16 mph  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much Jed was fined. To do this, we need to use the condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.\" This condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Using this condition, we can calculate that Jed was fined $256 for traveling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit.  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 66 miles per hour.\nAccording to the information we have, the fine for speeding is $16 per mile per hour over the posted speed limit. Since Jed was fined $256, we can calculate the number of miles per hour he was traveling over the posted speed limit by dividing the fine by the amount of the fine per mile per hour.  $256/$16 = 16 mph  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).  The shoe size of Jed's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour. So, if we divide the fine Jed was charged ($256) by the amount of the fine ($16), we get 16. That means Jed was traveling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. So, if the posted speed limit is 50 mph, Jed was traveling at 66 mph.  The shoe size of Jed's sister is not relevant in this calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jed's sister is 20.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.2895265817642212]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. The shoe size of Hannah's mother is 10. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "The sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24. Hannah is twice as old as this sum, so her age is 24 x 2 = 48. The condition that her brothers are all 8 years old is not relevant to the calculation process, since the sum of their ages is still the same regardless of the individual ages. The condition that Hannah's mother's shoe size is 10 is also not relevant to the calculation process, since it does not affect the calculation. So the answer is that Hannah is 48 years old.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "The sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.   Hannah is twice as old as this sum, so her age is 24 x 2 = 48.   The condition that her brothers are all 8 years old is not relevant to the calculation process, since the sum of their ages is still the same regardless of the individual ages.\nThe sum of her brother's ages is 3 x 8 = 24.   Hannah is twice as old as 24, so Hannah is 48 years old.  The condition \"The shoe size of Hannah's mother is 10\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Hannah's mother is 10.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.35591650009155273]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Kim's father bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20.  Second, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 20 - 6 = 14.  Third, Kim's father bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. This does not affect the calculation, so 14 cherry saplings remain.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines the total number of cherry saplings available for sale. The condition \"Kim's father bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the amount of saplings Kim had after the sprouting process has already been determined. So, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 80 x 0.25 = 20.  Second, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so 20 - 6 = 14.  Third, Kim's father bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. This does not affect the calculation, so 14 cherry saplings remain.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines the total number of cherry saplings available for sale.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so 25% of 80 is 20. Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 saplings left. The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the amount of saplings Kim had after the sprouting process has already been determined. So, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout  Answer: 25% of 80 = 20 cherry saplings  Step 2: Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Answer: Kim now has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings  Step 3: Kim's father bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store. Answer: This is not relevant to the calculation process.  Final Answer: Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\n1. Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 2. 25% of them sprout (80 x 0.25 = 20). 3. Kim sells 6 of the saplings. 4. Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Kim's father bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Kim's father bought 20 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364680886268616, 0.24044959247112274, 0.4611811935901642, 0.24617557227611542]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. James' neighbor is 20 years old. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many t-shirts James bought and how much discount he got.  Each t-shirt costs $20. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each t-shirt cost.  Therefore, James pays 6 x $20 = $120 for the 6 t-shirts.  Yes, the condition \"for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that James' neighbor is 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much James paid for the 6 t-shirts. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of t-shirts times the cost of each t-shirt.  So the answer is $120.", "numerical_answer": 120, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off.   This means that James paid 50% of the original price for each t-shirt.   Step 2: They each cost $20.   This means that the original price of each t-shirt was $40.   Step 3: James' neighbor is 20 years old.   This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   Step 4: How much did James pay?   Since James paid 50% of the original price of each t-shirt, he paid a total of $120 for the 6 t-shirts ($40 x 50% = $20 x 6 = $120).\nJames bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off, which means he paid 50% of the original price. The original price of the t-shirts was $20 each, so James paid $20 x 6 = $120.  The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us that James paid 50% of the original price, which was $20 each.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off. That means each t-shirt cost him $20. So for all 6 t-shirts, James paid $120. The condition that James' neighbor is 20 years old does not affect the calculation process of the problem, so the answer is still $120.", "equation": "James' neighbor is 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.17923983931541443]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Steve's neighbor is 30 years old. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "Firstly, Steve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. Secondly, Steve grows 6 inches. Therefore, Steve's final height is 66 + 6 = 72 inches. The condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" because it is the basis for the calculation process. The condition \"Steve's neighbor is 30 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, the answer to the problem is 72 inches.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Firstly, we need to convert Steve's height from feet to inches. Since there are 12 inches in 1 foot, 5'6\" is equal to 66 inches. Then, we need to add 6 inches to that number, which gives us the answer of 72 inches. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\".\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides the starting point for the calculation.\nFirstly, Steve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. Secondly, Steve grows 6 inches. Therefore, Steve's final height is 66 + 6 = 72 inches.   The condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" because it is the basis for the calculation process.\nSteve's height is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches. If Steve grows 6 inches, his new height is 72 inches. Therefore, the answer to the problem is 72 inches.   The condition \"Steve's neighbor is 30 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Steve's neighbor is 30 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495516538619995, 0.5135689973831177, 0.4758315086364746]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. The height of Oli's father is 7 feet. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, and Victoria has twice more scoops than Oli. Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, so Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's.\" is relevant to the calculation process since it provides the initial information needed to calculate the difference in the number of scoops of ice cream between Oli and Victoria. The condition \"The height of Oli's father is 7 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is that Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "1. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  2. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  3. Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  4. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, so Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  5. The height of Oli's father is 7 feet, but this is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, the answer is that Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's.\" is relevant to the calculation process since it provides the initial information needed to calculate the difference in the number of scoops of ice cream between Oli and Victoria.\nOli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  Victoria has twice as many scoops of ice cream as Oli, so she has 8 scoops.  Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  The condition \"The height of Oli's father is 7 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Oli's father is 7 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.19009560346603394]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Tom's brother has read 5 books in the past year. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. This is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the information needed to calculate the total number of apples collected. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected a total of 36 apples (12 + 24).  The condition that Tom's brother has read 5 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate the total number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom. We can calculate this by adding the number of apples Lexie picked (12) to the number of apples Tom picked (twice as many as Lexie). So the answer is 12 + 24 = 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "Lexie picked 12 apples, so Tom picked 24 apples.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected a total of 36 apples.  The condition \"Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides the information needed to calculate the total number of apples collected.\nLexie picked 12 apples. Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie, so he picked 24 apples.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected a total of 36 apples.  The condition \"Tom's brother has read 5 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom's brother has read 5 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.25544479489326477]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is 100. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to ship. To do this, we divide the total weight of fish (540 pounds) by the weight of each crate (30 pounds). This gives us a total of 18 crates.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of shipping the crates. We multiply the number of crates (18) by the cost of shipping each crate ($1.5). This gives us a total cost of $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to know the weight of the crates in order to calculate the number of crates that need to be shipped. Knowing the number of crates is necessary to calculate the total cost of the shipment.  The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to ship. To do this, we divide the total weight of fish (540 pounds) by the weight of each crate (30 pounds). This gives us a total of 18 crates.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of shipping the crates. We multiply the number of crates (18) by the cost of shipping each crate ($1.5). This gives us a total cost of $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to know the weight of the crates in order to calculate the number of crates that need to be shipped. Knowing the number of crates is necessary to calculate the total cost of the shipment.   The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process.\nStep 1: Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates.   Step 2: If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, Lizzy will have to pay $1.5 per crate.   Step 3: Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, Lizzy will need 18 crates to ship 540 pounds of fish.   Step 4: Therefore, the total cost of the shipment will be 18 x $1.5 = $27.   The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?\"", "equation": "The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.28060397505760193]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Asia's brother is 100 years old. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the percentage of the discount:  Discount = (Original price - Sale price) / Original price  Discount = (350 - 140) / 350  Discount = 0.6 or 60%   Therefore, Asia got a 60% discount at the sale.   The condition of Asia's brother being 100 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the percentage of the discount:  Discount = (Original price - Sale price) / Original price  Discount = (350 - 140) / 350  Discount = 0.6 or 60%   Therefore, Asia got a 60% discount at the sale.   The condition of Asia's brother being 100 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount saved. To do this, we must subtract the original price, $350, from the sale price, $140. This gives us a total savings of $210.   Next, we need to calculate the percentage off. To do this, we must divide the amount saved, $210, by the original price, $350. This gives us a percentage off of 60%.   The condition \"It was originally priced at $350.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is the amount that we use to calculate the percentage off.\nTo calculate the percentage off, we need to first calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price.  Original Price: $350  Sale Price: $140  Difference: $210  Then, to calculate the percentage off, we need to divide the difference by the original price and multiply by 100.  Percentage off = (Difference / Original Price) x 100  Percentage off = (210 / 350) x 100  Percentage off = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia's brother is 100 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Asia's brother is 100 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.2928887605667114]}
{"original_question": "Billy's family likes to keep their bicycles stored in the garage when they're not being used. They own a total of 4 bicycles. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. Billy's sister is 20 years old. How many spokes are inside the garage?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of bicycle wheels inside the garage. Since there are 4 bicycles, and each bicycle has two wheels, there are 8 wheels inside the garage. Second, we need to multiply the number of wheels with the number of spokes in each wheel. Since each wheel has 10 spokes, there are a total of 80 spokes inside the garage.  So, yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The fact that Billy's sister is 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, the answer is 80 spokes.", "numerical_answer": 80, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "1. We know that there are 4 bicycles in Billy's family's garage.  2. We know that each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes.  3. We know that Billy's sister is 20 years old.  Based on this information, we can calculate that there are 40 spokes inside the garage (4 bicycles x 10 spokes per wheel). The fact that Billy's sister is 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of bicycle wheels inside the garage. Since there are 4 bicycles, and each bicycle has two wheels, there are 8 wheels inside the garage.   Second, we need to multiply the number of wheels with the number of spokes in each wheel. Since each wheel has 10 spokes, there are a total of 80 spokes inside the garage.   So, yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nBilly's family owns 4 bicycles.  Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes.  Billy's sister is 20 years old.   The condition \"Billy's sister is 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  Therefore, the answer is 40 spokes.", "equation": "Billy's sister is 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3732944130897522, 0.22472992539405823, 0.38099128007888794, -0.029001383110880852]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. Maria's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "Maria's pencil cost her $8. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. That means the pen cost her $4. So, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition that Maria's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that the pencil cost Maria $8 and the pen cost Maria half the price of the pencil. To calculate how much Maria paid for both the pen and the pencil, we need to add the cost of the pen and the pencil. So the answer would be: 8 + 4 = $12.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The pencil cost Maria $8.  The pen cost Maria half the price of the pencil.  So the pen cost Maria $4.   Therefore, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us that the pen cost Maria half the price of the pencil.\nMaria's pencil cost her $8. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. That means the pen cost her $4. So, Maria paid $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   The condition \"Maria's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Maria's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.2291007786989212]}
{"original_question": "Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel are bird watching. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. Humphrey is 6 years old. How many birds does each of them see on average?", "reasoning_path": "First, calculate the total number of birds seen by all three of them: 7 + 11 + 9 = 27 birds  Second, calculate the average number of birds seen by each of them: 27 / 3 = 9 birds  Therefore, the average number of birds seen by each of them is 9 birds.  The condition \"Humphrey is 6 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, calculate the total number of birds seen by all three of them: 7 + 11 + 9 = 27 birds  Second, calculate the average number of birds seen by each of them: 27 / 3 = 9 birds  Therefore, the average number of birds seen by each of them is 9 birds.  The condition \"and Darrel sees 9 birds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since the average is being calculated based on the total number of birds seen by all three of them, not just Darrel.\nFirst, calculate the total number of birds seen by all three bird watchers:  7 birds + 11 birds + 9 birds = 27 birds.  Second, calculate the average number of birds seen by each person:  27 birds / 3 people = 9 birds per person.  Therefore, each of them sees 9 birds on average. The condition \"Humphrey is 6 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Humphrey is 6 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4831371605396271, 0.5573062300682068, 0.5210311412811279, 0.48639485239982605, 0.0763188824057579]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. James' father bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine the total cost of the doctor visit. James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit. Second, we need to determine what portion of the cost will be covered by insurance. James's insurance covers 80% of the cost. Third, we need to calculate what portion of the cost will be out-of-pocket. James's out-of-pocket cost will be the remaining 20%, which is $60. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition that James's father bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80% of the cost. To calculate the out-of-pocket cost, we need to subtract 80% from 100% to find the remaining 20%. So the answer would be $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, let's calculate the amount that James' insurance will cover. The insurance will cover 80% of the doctor visit, so 80% of $300 is $240.  Then, let's calculate the amount that James will have to pay out-of-pocket. This will be the difference between the cost of the doctor visit ($300) and the amount covered by the insurance ($240), so James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  So, the answer is $60.   The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is the starting point for calculating the amount that James will have to pay out-of-pocket.\nFirst, we need to determine the total cost of the doctor visit. James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.  Second, we need to determine what portion of the cost will be covered by insurance. James's insurance covers 80% of the cost.   Third, we need to calculate what portion of the cost will be out-of-pocket. James's out-of-pocket cost will be the remaining 20%, which is $60.   Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition that James's insurance covers 80% is relevant to the calculation process since it determines the out-of-pocket cost. The cost of the tomatoes has no bearing on the out-of-pocket cost of the doctor visit.\nJames's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $300 x 20% = $60. The condition \"James' father bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' father bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.23596742749214172]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. The height of James' neighbor is 20 feet. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of tiles for a single wall. 8 tiles running the width of the wall * 20 tiles running the height of the wall = 160 tiles for a single wall. Next, we need to multiply this number by 3, since there are 3 walls in the shower. 160 tiles for a single wall * 3 walls = 480 tiles in total.  Yes, the condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower, because we would not know the dimensions of the walls. The condition that James' neighbor is 20 feet tall is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of tiles for a single wall. 8 tiles running the width of the wall * 20 tiles running the height of the wall = 160 tiles for a single wall. Next, we need to multiply this number by 3, since there are 3 walls in the shower. 160 tiles for a single wall * 3 walls = 480 tiles in total.  Yes, the condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower, because we would not know the dimensions of the walls.\nFirst, we need to calculate the area of the wall. We know that the wall is 3 sided, so we need to multiply the 8 tiles width by 20 tiles height to get the area of one wall. 8 x 20 = 160. So, one wall has 160 tiles. Multiply 160 by 3 (since there are 3 walls) and you get 480 tiles in total.  The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides us with the number of tiles running the height of the wall, which we need to calculate the area of the wall.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower. Each wall of the shower has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. This means that each wall has 8 x 20 = 160 tiles. As there are three walls in the shower, the total number of tiles in the shower is 3 x 160 = 480 tiles.    Second, we need to determine if the condition \"The height of James' neighbor is 20 feet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition is not relevant as it does not provide any information about the size of the shower or the number of tiles in it.  Therefore, the condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of James' neighbor is 20 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.09076612442731857]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. James' neighbor is 10 years old. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collected all the fruits from his two trees, so he started with two trees. Each tree had 20 plants, so James started with 40 plants. Each plant had one seed, so James started with 40 seeds. He planted 60% of those seeds, so he planted 24 seeds. So, James planted 24 trees. Yes, the condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate how many trees James planted. The condition that James' neighbor is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process because it is talking about what has already happened and not what James is about to do.  James has 20 plants in each tree. Each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds in total.  He plants 60% of those, which is 24 seeds. So, James has planted 24 trees.\nJames collected fruits from 2 trees, so he planted 2 trees. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many trees did James plant?\". James planted 60% of the seeds, so he planted 1.2 plants per tree. So, James planted 2 trees.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.  This tells us that James has 40 plants in total.  Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.   This tells us that he will plant 24 seeds in total.   James' neighbor is 10 years old.   This does not tell us anything about how many trees James planted.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 0.  The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not answer the question.\nJames collected all the fruits from his two trees, so he started with two trees.  Each tree had 20 plants, so James started with 40 plants.  Each plant had one seed, so James started with 40 seeds.  He planted 60% of those seeds, so he planted 24 seeds.   So, James planted 24 trees.   Yes, the condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate how many trees James planted.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees.  Each tree has 20 plants.  Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.   So, James planted 60% of 40 total seeds (20 plants in each of his 2 trees).   60% of 40 is 24, so James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"James' neighbor is 10 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "James' neighbor is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.3947468101978302]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Luke's neighbor is 80 years old. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one glass jar. That means he needs to make a total of (85 x 4 =) 340 stars in order to fill 4 bottles. Now, we need to subtract the number of stars that Luke has already made (33 stars): 340 - 33 = 307 stars. Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles. The condition that Luke's neighbor is 80 years old is not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is that Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one glass jar and he has already made 33 stars. To calculate how many stars Luke must make, we need to subtract the number of stars he has already made from the total number of stars he needs to make. So the answer would be: 307 more stars.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, Luke needs to make 4 bottles worth of stars. Each bottle requires 85 stars, so Luke needs to make a total of 340 stars (85 x 4).  Next, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33) from the total number of stars he needs (340). This gives us a total of 307 stars that Luke must make.  Therefore, Luke must make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles. The condition given in the problem (85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar) is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nTo solve this problem, we first need to calculate the total number of stars that Luke needs to make. To do this, we must first determine how many stars he needs for each bottle. Since there are 4 bottles, he will need 4 x 85 = 340 stars in total. Now, we need to subtract the number of stars that Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars he needs (340 stars). The answer to the question is: Luke must make 307 more stars.   Yes, the condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We need to know how many stars Luke has already made in order to calculate how many stars he needs to make.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one glass jar. That means he needs to make a total of (85 x 4 =) 340 stars in order to fill 4 bottles.  Second, we know that Luke has already made 33 stars. That means he needs to make (340 - 33 =) 307 more stars.  In conclusion, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles. The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many bottles Luke needs to fill.\nFirst, we calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill all 4 bottles: 85 stars per bottle x 4 bottles = 340 stars in total.  Second, we subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars): 340 - 33 = 307 stars.  Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars.  The condition that Luke's neighbor is 80 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Luke's neighbor is 80 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.23949772119522095]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. The shoe size of James' father is 100. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to know how much James pays for 1 semester. Since each unit costs $50, and James takes 20 units per semester, then James pays $50 x 20 = $1,000 for 1 semester. Second, we need to calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters. Since James pays $1,000 for 1 semester, he pays $1,000 x 2 = $2,000 for 2 semesters. The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many units James takes per semester, and since each unit costs $50, we can use this information to calculate the cost of 1 semester and the cost of 2 semesters. The shoe size of James' father is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, we need to know how much James pays for 1 semester. Since each unit costs $50, and James takes 20 units per semester, then James pays $50 x 20 = $1,000 for 1 semester.   Second, we need to calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters. Since James pays $1,000 for 1 semester, he pays $1,000 x 2 = $2,000 for 2 semesters.   The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many units James takes per semester, and since each unit costs $50, we can use this information to calculate the cost of 1 semester and the cost of 2 semesters.   The shoe size of James' father is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount of money that James pays for 1 semester. That is, we need to calculate the cost of 20 units.   We know that each unit costs $50, so the total cost for 1 semester is 20 x $50 = $1000.   Now, to calculate the cost of 2 semesters we need to multiply the cost of 1 semester ($1000) by two, so the total cost for 2 semesters is $1000 x 2 = $2000.   In this case, the condition \"The shoe size of James' father is 100\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of James' father is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.17100895941257477]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Martha's sister bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "If Ellen is 10 years old now, then in six years she will be 16 years old. This means that Martha is twice as old as 16, or 32 years old.  Yes, the condition \"If Ellen is 10 years old now\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Martha's sister bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate Martha's age now. We can calculate this by realizing that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. So the answer is 32.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "If Ellen is 10 years old now, then in six years she will be 16 years old. This means that Martha is twice as old as 16, or 32 years old.   The condition that Martha's sister bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Martha's sister bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.15188026428222656]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. Maria's father has read 10 books in the past year. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "Maria paid $8 for the pencil. Since the pen was half the price of the pencil, that means Maria paid $4 for the pen. Therefore, Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil. Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without that information, we would not know how much Maria paid for the pen. The condition that Maria's father has read 10 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, and therefore does not affect the answer.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Maria paid $8 for the pencil. Since the pen was half the price of the pencil, that means Maria paid $4 for the pen. Therefore, Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   Yes, the condition \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without that information, we would not know how much Maria paid for the pen.\nFirst, we need to calculate the cost of the pen. Since the pencil cost $8, and the pen cost half the price of the pencil, the pen cost $4.  So, Maria paid a total of $8 + $4 = $12 for both the pen and the pencil.  The condition \"Maria's father has read 10 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, and therefore does not affect the answer.", "equation": "Maria's father has read 10 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.15327805280685425]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The shoe size of Charles' father is 174285. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we can calculate the population of Greenville by subtracting 119,666 from the population of Springfield, which is 482,653. This gives us a total population of 362,987 people for Greenville. Next, we can calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville by adding these two numbers together. This gives us a total population of 845,640 people. The condition that Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the population of Springfield and how many fewer people there are in Greenville. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. The shoe size of Charles' father is 174285 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "The population of Springfield is given to us so that's easy; it is 482,653 people. To find the population of Greenville, we need to subtract 119,666 from the population of Springfield. This gives us a total population of 362,987 people for Greenville. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640 people. The condition \"Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the population of Springfield and how many fewer people there are in Greenville. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville.\nThe population of Springfield is 482,653, and the population of Greenville is 119,666 fewer than that. That means Greenville has (482,653 - 119,666) = 362,987 people. Adding these numbers together gives us the total population of Springfield and Greenville: 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  The shoe size of Charles' father is 174285 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Charles' father is 174285.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.0829717367887497]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. The shoe size of Kelly's father is 12. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate how many carrots Kelly pulled out in total. To do this, we can add the number of carrots she pulled out in each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots. The next step is to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so in order to calculate how many pounds that 234 carrots is, we can divide 234 by 6: 234/6 = 39 pounds. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots. The condition \"The shoe size of Kelly's father is 12\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate how many carrots Kelly pulled out in total. To do this, we can add the number of carrots she pulled out in each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots. The next step is to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so in order to calculate how many pounds that 234 carrots is, we can divide 234 by 6: 234/6 = 39 pounds. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. To do this, we can add the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. To do this, we can divide the total number of carrots (234) by 6, since 6 carrots equal one pound. This gives us a result of 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the number of carrots in each bed is not needed to answer the question.\nThe first step is to add up all the carrots Kelly harvested from all three beds. In total, she pulled out 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots she harvested. We know that 6 carrots equal one pound, so we need to divide the total number of carrots by 6. 234 姊 6 = 39 pounds.  Finally, we can answer the question of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. The answer is 39 pounds.  The condition of \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process since this number is included in the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. Without this number, we would not have been able to accurately calculate the total number of pounds of carrots she harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly pulled out from the three beds. This can be found by adding the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots that Kelly harvested. This can be found by dividing the total number of carrots (234) by 6 (since 6 carrots weigh one pound): 234/6 = 39 pounds.  Finally, we need to answer the question: How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest? The answer is 39 pounds.  The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us that 6 carrots make up one pound, which we need to use in order to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots harvested by Kelly.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. She pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, so she harvested a total of 234 carrots.  Second, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can divide the number of carrots by 6 to get the number of pounds. 234 divided by 6 is 39, so Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  Finally, the shoe size of Kelly's father is not relevant to the calculation process. This information is not needed to solve the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Kelly's father is 12.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.2794763445854187]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Martha's neighbor bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "We know Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years. This means that Martha is twice as old as 16 (10 + 6). Therefore, Martha is 32 years old. The condition about Martha's neighbor buying 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "We know Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years. This means that Martha is twice as old as 16 (10 + 6).   Therefore, Martha is 32 years old.   The condition about Martha's neighbor buying 5 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Martha's neighbor bought 5 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.16792495548725128]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The shoe size of James' mother is 200. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "The relevant information for this calculation is the amount the doctor charges and the amount of money his insurance covers. Therefore, the relevant condition for this calculation is: \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.\"  James' insurance covers 80% of the cost, so 80% of $300 is $240. James' out-of-pocket cost would be the remaining 20% of the cost, which is $60.  The shoe size of James' mother is not relevant to the calculation of James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The out-of-pocket cost for James' doctor appointment is the amount of money he has to pay himself.   The relevant information for this calculation is the amount the doctor charges and the amount of money his insurance covers.   Therefore, the relevant condition for this calculation is: \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.\"   James' insurance covers 80% of the cost, so 80% of $300 is $240.   James' out-of-pocket cost would be the remaining 20% of the cost, which is $60.  The shoe size of James' mother is not relevant to the calculation of James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment.\nStep 1: Calculate the cost of the visit.  The primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.   Step 2: Calculate the portion covered by insurance.  James's insurance covers 80% of the cost, which is 0.8 x 300 = $240.   Step 3: Calculate the out-of-pocket cost.  The out-of-pocket cost is the remaining amount not covered by the insurance, which is 300 - 240 = $60.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition that \"James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is used to calculate the portion covered by the insurance and the out-of-pocket cost. The shoe size of James' mother is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much James's insurance is covering.   80% of $300 is $240.   Next, we need to calculate how much James will have to pay out-of-pocket.   The out-of-pocket cost is the remaining 20%, which is $60.   Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The shoe size of James' mother is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of James' mother is 200.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.28155413269996643]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. The height of Clarice's neighbor is 100 feet. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the cost of each kilogram of cherries. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that there is a $400 difference between the amount of money Genevieve had and the total price. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, then the total price of the cherries must have been $2000. To calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought, we need to divide the total price by the cost per kilogram.  So the answer would be: 2000 / 8 = 250 kilograms of cherries.  Yes, the condition \"cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Clarice's neighbor's height is 100 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought. We can calculate this by dividing the total price by the cost per kilogram. So the answer", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "First, Genevieve picked some cherries that cost $8 per kilogram. That means for every kilogram of cherries, she needed to pay $8. To calculate how many kilograms of cherries she bought, we need to divide the amount of money she had (in this case, $1600) by the cost per kilogram ($8).   1600 梅 8 = 200 kilograms of cherries   Yes, this condition is relevant to the calculation process of the given problem. Without this information, we wouldn't be able to determine how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.\nFirst, we know that the cost of the cherries is $8 per kilogram.  Second, we know that Genevieve had $1600.  Third, we know that Genevieve was $400 short of the total price when she reached the checkout counter, and her friend Clarice chipped in.  Finally, we can calculate the total cost of the cherries using the information given:   Total cost = $8 per kilogram x number of kilograms + $400 = $1600   Therefore, number of kilograms = ($1600 - $400) / $8 = 175 kilograms.  The condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it provides the information needed to calculate the total cost of the cherries.\nGenevieve had $1600 on her, and cherries cost $8 per kilogram. We can calculate how many kilograms she could buy with $1600:  1600 / 8 = 200 kg  So, Genevieve could have bought 200 kilograms of cherries with $1600. The height of Clarice's neighbor is 100 feet and is not relevant to the calculation.", "equation": "The height of Clarice's neighbor is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.03984133154153824]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's mother is 12 years old. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested from all three beds. This can be done by adding the number of carrots from each bed together: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds this adds up to. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide the total number of carrots by 6 to get the total number of pounds. 234 / 6 = 39 pounds.  Finally, we can answer the question: Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition that Kelly's mother is 12 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, and that 6 carrots weigh one pound. To calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, we need to add the number of carrots from each bed together and then divide the total number of carrots by 6. So the answer would be: 39 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Step 1: Add up the total number of carrots Kelly harvested from all three beds: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Step 2: Divide the total number of carrots by 6 (since 6 carrots weigh one pound): 234/6 = 39 pounds.   Answer: Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, for a total of 234 carrots.   Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots 234 carrots is. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we need to divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds.   234 / 6 = 39   Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, let's add up the number of carrots from all three beds: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Then, let's divide the number of carrots by 6, since 6 carrots equal one pound: 234 / 6 = 39.   Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the number of carrots in the third bed, which is needed to calculate the total number of carrots.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That means she harvested a total of 234 carrots.  Since she found that 6 carrots weighed one pound, we can calculate how many pounds of carrots she harvested by dividing 234 by 6.  234 / 6 = 39 pounds  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested from all three beds. This can be done by adding the number of carrots from each bed together: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds this adds up to. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide the total number of carrots by 6 to get the total number of pounds: 234/6 = 39 pounds.  Finally, we can answer the question: Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"Kelly's mother is 12 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Kelly's mother is 12 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.26300573348999023]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. James' sister is 10 years old. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "First, James collected all the fruits from his two trees, so he has 40 plants.   Second, each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds.   Third, he plants 60% of those, so he plants 24 seeds.   Therefore, James planted 24 trees.   The condition that James' sister is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James collected all the fruits from his two trees, each tree has 20 plants, and he plants 60% of those. To calculate how many trees James planted, we need to calculate the number of seeds he planted. So the answer would be: 24 trees.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "James collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. This means he did not plant any new trees.  Each tree has 20 plants. This means James had 40 plants in total.  Each plant has 1 seed. This means James had 40 seeds in total.  He planted 60% of those seeds. This means he planted 24 seeds.   Therefore, James planted 24 seeds, but he did not plant any new trees. The condition \"James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees\" is relevant to the calculation process because it indicates that James did not plant any new trees, only seeds.\nFirst, James collected all the fruits from his two trees. Each tree has 20 plants, so James collected 40 plants in total.  Second, each plant has 1 seed, so James collected 40 seeds in total.  Third, he planted 60% of those seeds, so James planted 24 seeds in total.  Finally, we can conclude that James planted two trees, since each tree had 20 plants and he planted 24 seeds in total.  So, to answer the question, James planted two trees.  Yes, the condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\", since it helps us determine how many plants he collected in total and how many seeds he planted in total.\n1. James collected all the fruits from his 2 trees.  2. Each tree has 20 plants.  3. Each plant has 1 seed.  4. He planted 60% of those (60% of 40 plants = 24 plants).  5. James' sister is 10 years old.   So, the answer is that James planted 24 trees.  The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, James collected all the fruits from his 2 trees, so he has 40 plants.   Second, each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds.   Third, he plants 60% of those, so he plants 24 seeds.   Therefore, James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines the number of seeds that James planted.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed.  This means there are 40 seeds in total.   James then plants 60% of those, which means he plants 24 seeds.   The condition \"James' sister is 10 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.   Therefore, James planted 24 trees.", "equation": "James' sister is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.2597631812095642]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Julia's sister has read 500 books in the past year. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. This means that she bought a total of 21 packs of balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so the total number of balls that she bought is 21 x 19 = 399.  The condition \"Julia's sister has read 500 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" since the total number of packs does not depend on the type of balls in each pack. The total number of balls that Julie bought is only affected by the number of packs she bought, regardless of the type of balls in each pack.  Julie bought 3 packs of red balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so she bought 57 red balls in total.   She also bought 10 packs of yellow balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so she bought 190 yellow balls in total.   Lastly, she bought 8 packs of green balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so she bought 152 green balls in total.   In total, Julie bought a total of 399 balls.   The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "To calculate the total number of balls Julie bought, we need to take into account the number of packs she bought and the number of balls in each pack. Therefore, the condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls,\" is relevant to the calculation process.  To answer the question, Julia bought a total of 590 balls (3 x 19 red balls + 10 x 19 yellow balls + 8 x 19 green balls).\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. This means that she bought a total of 21 packs of balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so the total number of balls that she bought is 21 x 19 = 399.  The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" since the total number of packs does not depend on the type of balls in each pack. The total number of balls that Julie bought is only affected by the number of packs she bought, regardless of the type of balls in each pack.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so she bought 57 red balls in total.   She also bought 10 packs of yellow balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so she bought 190 yellow balls in total.   Lastly, she bought 8 packs of green balls. Each pack contains 19 balls, so she bought 152 green balls in total.   In total, Julie bought a total of 399 balls.   The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls.\" is relevant to the calculation process because in order to calculate the total number of balls Julie bought, we need to know how many packs of green balls she bought and how many balls are in each package.\nFirst, Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Then, since there were 19 balls in each package, we must multiply 3, 10, and 8 by 19 to find out how many balls Julie bought in all.  3 x 19 = 57 10 x 19 = 190 8 x 19 = 152  Therefore, Julia bought a total of 399 balls.  Yes, the condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" since we need to know how many balls are in each package in order to calculate the total number of balls that she bought.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Each pack contains 19 balls. So, the total number of balls that Julia bought is 3 x 19 + 10 x 19 + 8 x 19 = 611.  The condition that Julia's sister has read 500 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Julia's sister has read 500 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315247774124146, 0.411003977060318, 0.43914249539375305, 0.48471662402153015, 0.2704404890537262]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. The shoe size of Megan's neighbor is 100. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "First, we know that Megan participated in 100 plays. We also know that she was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means that she was the lead actress in 80 plays. Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays. So, the answer is 20.  Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" since it provides information about how many times Megan was the lead actress.  First, the shoe size of Megan's neighbor (100) is not relevant to the calculation process. It can be ignored.  Second, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant because it gives us the total number of plays in which Megan participated.  Third, since Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, that means she was the lead actress in 80 of the 100 plays.  Finally, the answer to the question \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" is 20 (100 - 80 = 20).", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "First, we know that Megan participated in 100 plays. We also know that she was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means that she was the lead actress in 80 plays. Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays. So, the answer is 20.   Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" since it provides information about how many times Megan was the lead actress.\nFirst, the shoe size of Megan's neighbor (100) is not relevant to the calculation process. It can be ignored.   Second, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant because it gives us the total number of plays in which Megan participated.   Third, since Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, that means she was the lead actress in 80 of the 100 plays.   Finally, the answer to the question \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" is 20 (100 - 80 = 20).\nThe first step is to calculate how many times Megan was the lead actress. Since she was the lead actress in 80% of her work, we can calculate that she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  The second step is to calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress. Since she participated in a total of 100 plays, and was the lead actress in 80 plays, then she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  The condition \"The shoe size of Megan's neighbor is 100.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Megan's neighbor is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.21679213643074036]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. The height of Jeanne's brother is 7 feet. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster and the bumper cars. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us what Jeanne wants to ride. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tickets each ride costs. Jeanne has 5 tickets. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tickets Jeanne has. So Jeanne needs 5 + 4 + 4 = 13 tickets to ride all three rides. This means Jeanne needs 8 more tickets (13 - 5 = 8). Yes, the condition \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Jeanne's brother's height is 7 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many tickets Jeanne needs to ride all three rides and how many more tickets she needs to buy. So the answer is 8 tickets.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. So she already has enough tickets to ride the Ferris wheel and the roller coaster, but she needs one more ticket for the bumper cars. Therefore, Jeanne should buy one more ticket.  The condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process because the cost of the Ferris wheel determines how many tickets Jeanne needs to buy.\nThe Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, so Jeanne has no more tickets left for the roller coaster and bumper cars. Therefore, Jeanne should buy at least 1 more ticket to ride the roller coaster and/or bumper cars.  The condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the necessary information on how much each ride costs. Without this information, it would be impossible to determine how many more tickets Jeanne needs to buy.\nJeanne has 5 tickets, so she has enough money to ride the Ferris wheel. She needs 4 tickets for the roller coaster and 4 tickets for the bumper cars, but she only has 5 tickets, so she needs to buy 1 more ticket. The height of Jeanne's brother is 7 feet and is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Jeanne should buy 1 more ticket to ride the roller coaster and the bumper cars.\nThe question asked how many more tickets Jeanne should buy. She needs a total of 13 tickets to ride all three attractions (5 tickets for the Ferris wheel, 4 tickets for the roller coaster, and 4 tickets for the bumper cars). She currently has 5 tickets. So, she needs 8 more tickets. The height of Jeanne's brother is 7 feet is not relevant to the calculation process. The height is not related to the number of tickets Jeanne needs to buy.", "equation": "The height of Jeanne's brother is 7 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.1885395050048828]}
{"original_question": "Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel are bird watching. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. Darrel bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many birds does each of them see on average?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the average number of birds each of them sees. To do this, we need to add up the number of birds each of them sees and divide by the number of people.  7 + 11 + 9 = 27  27 / 3 = 9  So, each of them sees an average of 9 birds.  The condition that Humphrey sees 11 birds is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we are finding the average number of birds each of them sees. The condition is only relevant when we are considering the individual number of birds seen by each person. The condition has no effect on the final answer.  The number of tomatoes bought from the grocery store is also not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is that each of them sees an average of 9 birds.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the average number of birds each of them sees. To do this, we need to add up the number of birds each of them sees and divide by the number of people.  7 + 11 + 9 = 27  27 / 3 = 9  So, each of them sees an average of 9 birds.  The condition that Humphrey sees 11 birds is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we are finding the average number of birds each of them sees. The condition is only relevant when we are considering the individual number of birds seen by each person. The condition has no effect on the final answer.  The number of tomatoes bought from the grocery store is also not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average number of birds seen by the three bird watchers. To do this, we add the number of birds each of them saw and then divide by 3 (the number of bird watchers). The answer is 9 birds.   The condition \"and Darrel sees 9 birds\" is not relevant to this calculation process, as it does not affect the average number of birds seen by the three bird watchers.\nThe first question is \"How many birds does each of them see on average?\"  The answer is: Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds, on average.  The second question is \"Is condition \"Darrel bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store.\" relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many birds does each of them see on average?\"  The answer is: No, the condition of Darrel buying 15 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Darrel bought 15 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4831371605396271, 0.5573062300682068, 0.5210311412811279, 0.48639485239982605, 0.06545796245336533]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. The shoe size of Jeanne's sister is 5. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tickets Jeanne needs to purchase for each ride. Jeanne has 5 tickets. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tickets Jeanne has. Since Jeanne only has 5 tickets, and all three rides cost a total of 13 tickets, Jeanne needs to buy 8 more tickets. The shoe size of Jeanne's sister is 5, but this is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Jeanne should buy 8 more tickets.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. Since Jeanne only has 5 tickets, and all three rides cost a total of 13 tickets, Jeanne needs to buy 8 more tickets. The shoe size of Jeanne's sister is 5. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process.\nJeanne has 5 tickets and needs to buy tickets for the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. This means Jeanne needs 4 more tickets to ride all the rides. Therefore, Jeanne should buy 4 more tickets.  The condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many tickets Jeanne needs to purchase for each ride. Without this condition, we would not know how many tickets to buy.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets, so she has enough tickets to ride the Ferris wheel and the roller coaster, but not the bumper cars. Therefore, Jeanne should buy one more ticket to ride the bumper cars. The shoe size of Jeanne's sister is 5, but this is not relevant to the calculation process.\nJeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel (5 tickets), the roller coaster (4 tickets), and the bumper cars (4 tickets). Jeanne has 5 tickets. Therefore, Jeanne needs to buy 2 more tickets in order to ride all three rides. The shoe size of Jeanne's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jeanne's sister is 5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.25001949071884155]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. The shoe size of Hannah's neighbor is 30. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "We know that the sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  We also know that Hannah is twice as old as this sum, so she is 24 x 2 = 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is necessary to know the ages of her brothers in order to calculate the sum of their ages, which is used to calculate her age.  The condition that the shoe size of Hannah's neighbor is 30 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how old Hannah is if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. We can calculate this by multiplying the sum of her brother's ages by 2. So the answer would be 48.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "We know that the sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  We also know that Hannah is twice as old as this sum, so she is 24 x 2 = 48 years old.  The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is necessary to know the ages of her brothers in order to calculate the sum of their ages, which is used to calculate her age.\nWe know that the sum of Hannah's brothers' ages is 8 x 3 = 24.  Therefore, if Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, then Hannah's age is twice 24, or 48.  The condition \"The shoe size of Hannah's neighbor is 30\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Hannah's neighbor is 30.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.32652682065963745]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. The shoe size of Sally's mother is 3. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally ate on Saturday and Sunday. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many pieces of bread were used for each sandwich. That means Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday (2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread) and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday (1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread). The total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 4 + 2 = 6 pieces of bread.  Yes, the condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Sally's mother's shoe size is 3 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of sandwiches Sally eats on each day by the number of pieces of bread used for each sandwich. So the answer would be: 4 + 2 = 6 pieces of bread.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we already know that regardless of the number of sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday, she will eat a total of three sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday. The calculation process for the problem is as follows: Sally eats three sandwiches across Saturday and Sunday, and each sandwich uses two pieces of bread. Therefore, Sally eats a total of six pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The shoe size of Sally's mother is not relevant to this calculation.\nFirst, calculate the number of pieces of bread that Sally eats on Saturday: 2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread = 4 pieces of bread  Second, calculate the number of pieces of bread that Sally eats on Sunday: 1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread = 2 pieces of bread  Finally, add the number of pieces of bread from Saturday and Sunday together: 4 pieces of bread + 2 pieces of bread = 6 pieces of bread  So, the answer is that Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday. The shoe size of Sally's mother is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe condition \"The shoe size of Sally's mother is 3\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Therefore, she eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.", "equation": "The shoe size of Sally's mother is 3.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.1718904823064804]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Janele's sister has read 8 books in the past year. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the weights of each of Janele's cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  Second, we need to divide that total (48) by the number of cats she has (4).  The answer is 12, the average weight of Janele's cats.  Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us how many cats we are dealing with and how many weights we need to add together to get the average. No, the condition that Janele's sister has read 8 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, it does not need to be considered when calculating the answer.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to add up the weights of each of Janele's cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  Second, we need to divide that total (48) by the number of cats she has (4).  The answer is 12, the average weight of Janele's cats.  Yes, the condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us how many cats we are dealing with and how many weights we need to add together to get the average.\nJanele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 cats. The first two weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. To calculate the average weight of the cats you would add up all the weights and then divide by the total number of cats. In this case, the total weight of all of the cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   The average weight of Janele's cats is 48 divided by 4, which is 12 pounds.   The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it affects the total weight of the cats.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we will add together the weights of the four cats and divide by four. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.0. 48.0 姊 4 = 12.0. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12.0 pounds.   The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is one of the weights we needed to use to find the average weight of Janele's cats. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how much the third cat weighs, and thus wouldn't be able to calculate the average.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of the weights of all four cats divided by the number of cats.   So the sum of the weights of all four cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   Divide 48 by 4 to get the average weight of Janele's cats: 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the weight of the fourth cat which is necessary for the calculation.\nFirst, to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weight of all four cats and then divide that sum by the number of cats.  The total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  To find the average weight, we divide the total weight (48) by the number of cats (4): 48 / 4 = 12.  The answer is that the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  No, the condition that Janele's sister has read 8 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, it does not need to be considered when calculating the answer.", "equation": "Janele's sister has read 8 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.3266809582710266]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The height of Lizzy's brother is 100 feet. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, Lizzy needs to calculate how many crates she has to ship. Since each crate is 30 pounds, she will need 18 crates (540 divided by 30). Next, she has to multiply the number of crates (18) by the cost of shipping, which is $1.5. The total cost of shipment will be 18 x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the information we need to calculate the number of crates Lizzy needs to ship. Without knowing the weight of the crates, we would not be able to calculate how many crates she needs to ship and thus how much she needs to pay for the shipping.  The condition that Lizzy's brother is 100 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Lizzy will pay for the shipment. We can do this by calculating the number of crates she needs to ship and then multiplying that number by the shipping cost of each crate. So the answer would be: 18 x $1.5 = $", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, Lizzy needs to calculate how many crates she has to ship. Since each crate is 30 pounds, she will need 18 crates (540 divided by 30). Next, she has to multiply the number of crates (18) by the cost of shipping, which is $1.5. The total cost of shipment will be 18 x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the information we need to calculate the number of crates Lizzy needs to ship. Without knowing the weight of the crates, we would not be able to calculate how many crates she needs to ship and thus how much she needs to pay for the shipping.\nWe know that Lizzy has 540 pounds of fish packed into 30-pound crates. We know that the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5.  To calculate the total cost of the shipment, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy needs to send.   To do this, we need to divide the total weight of the shipment (540 pounds) by the weight of each crate (30 pounds). This gives us 18 crates.   We then multiply the number of crates (18) by the shipping cost of each crate ($1.50) to get the total cost of the shipment:   18 x $1.50 = $27   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 to ship 540 pounds of fish.   The height of Lizzy's brother is 100 feet and therefore not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Lizzy's brother is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.04260343313217163]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. The shoe size of James' neighbor is 15. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James has two trees with 20 plants each. So, he has a total of 40 plants.  Each plant has one seed, so he has 40 seeds.  Of those 40 seeds, he planted 60%, which is 24 seeds.  Therefore, James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\". The shoe size of James' neighbor is also not relevant to this problem.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "First, we know that James had two trees with 20 plants each. Each plant had one seed, so James had a total of 40 seeds.   Next, we know that James planted 60% of those, which means he planted 24 seeds.   Finally, we know that the shoe size of his neighbor is 15, but this is not relevant to the calculation process.   Therefore, James planted two trees with 24 seeds.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree had 20 plants. Each plant had 1 seed. He planted 60% of those seeds. So, he planted 60% of 40, which is 24. Therefore, James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\". The shoe size of James' neighbor is also not relevant to this problem.\nJames has two trees with 20 plants each. So, he has a total of 40 plants.  Each plant has one seed, so he has 40 seeds.  Of those 40 seeds, he planted 60%, which is 24 seeds.  Therefore, James planted 24 trees.   The condition \"Each plant has 1 seed\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. That means he has 40 seeds from the 2 trees. Then he plants 60% of those, which is 24 seeds. This means James has planted 2 trees, and the condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation of this problem. The shoe size of James' neighbor has nothing to do with the problem.\n1) James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.  2) Each plant has 1 seed.  3) He plants 60% of those.  4) The shoe size of James' neighbor is 15.   Answer: The shoe size of James' neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\" Therefore, the answer is James planted 2 trees.", "equation": "The shoe size of James' neighbor is 15.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.300357460975647]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jennifer's mother is 210 years old. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has. This is: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.  Next, we need to figure out how many sweets each person will get. Since Jennifer is sharing with 3 friends, we can divide the total number of sweets by 4 (which is the total number of people, including Jennifer). This means each person will get 1024/4 = 256 sweets.  Therefore, Jennifer and her 3 friends will each get 256 sweets.  The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is the factor that determines how many people Jennifer is sharing her sweets with. Without this condition, we would not know how many people Jennifer was sharing her sweets with, and therefore would not be able to accurately calculate how many sweets each person will get. The condition that Jennifer's mother is 210 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has. This is: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.  Next, we need to figure out how many sweets each person will get. Since Jennifer is sharing with 3 friends, we can divide the total number of sweets by 4 (which is the total number of people, including Jennifer). This means each person will get 1024/4 = 256 sweets.  Therefore, Jennifer and her 3 friends will each get 256 sweets.  The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is the factor that determines how many people Jennifer is sharing her sweets with. Without this condition, we would not know how many people Jennifer was sharing her sweets with, and therefore would not be able to accurately calculate how many sweets each person will get.\nFirst, the condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many green sweets Jennifer has.   Second, we need to calculate how many sweets each person will get. There are a total of 1,024 sweets (212 green + 310 blue + 502 yellow). To divide these sweets evenly between 4 people, each person will get 256 sweets.   Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will get in total. We can do this by adding up the number of green, blue, and yellow sweets: 212+310+502 = 1024.  Second, we need to divide this number by 4, since there are 4 people total (including Jennifer): 1024/4 = 256.  So, each person will get 256 sweets. The condition of \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process.\nTo answer the question, \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\", we need to divide the total number of sweets by the total number of people (including Jennifer).  Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets, and 502 yellow sweets, for a total of 1,024 sweets.  Since Jennifer and her 3 friends are sharing the sweets, we need to divide 1,024 by 4, for a total of 256 sweets each.  Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets.  The condition \"Jennifer's mother is 210 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jennifer's mother is 210 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.24657639861106873]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The height of Jack's brother is 1000 feet. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much the squat rack cost.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much the barbell cost.  To calculate the cost of the barbell, we need to divide $2500 by 10, which gives $250. Adding the cost of the squat rack ($2500) and the cost of the barbell ($250) together gives $2750.  Yes, the condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The height of Jack's brother is 1000 feet. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything.  So the answer is $2750.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "To answer the question \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\", we need to know the cost of the squat rack and the barbell. We know that the squat rack cost $2500, and that the barbell cost 1/10 as much. To calculate the cost of the barbell, we need to divide $2500 by 10, which gives $250. Adding the cost of the squat rack ($2500) and the cost of the barbell ($250) together gives $2750. The height of Jack's brother is not relevant to this calculation process. Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500.  The barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack. So, the barbell cost $2500/10 = $250.  The height of Jack's brother has nothing to do with the question, so it is not relevant to the calculation process.  Jack paid $2500 + $250 = $2750 for everything.   Therefore, the answer is $2750.\nJack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much.  So, Jack pays $2500 for the squat rack and $250 for the barbell.   Total cost = $2500 + $250 = $2750  The height of Jack's brother is 1000 feet.  This condition is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, the answer is still $2750.", "equation": "The height of Jack's brother is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, 0.23465223610401154]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Mary's father is 5 years old. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, which means that Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has a total of 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary's father is 5 years old\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan and that Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. To calculate how many pieces of candy Mary has in total, we need to multiply Megan's candy by 3 and then add 10. So the answer would be: 25 pieces of candy.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much candy Mary has. Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. So if Megan has 5 pieces of candy, Mary has 5 x 3 = 15 pieces of candy.   Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. So, Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.   The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us calculate how many pieces of candy Mary has in total.\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, which means that Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has a total of 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. The condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nIf Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times that amount (3 x 5 = 15).  Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy, so she now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary's father is 5 years old\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Mary's father is 5 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.25720369815826416]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Melies' father is 30 years old. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total cost of the meat is 2 kg x $82 = $164.  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. Therefore, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Therefore, the answer is: Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much meat Melies bought, which is needed to calculate the total cost of the meat. The condition that Melies' father is 30 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total cost of the meat is 2 kg x $82 = $164.  Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. Therefore, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Therefore, the answer is: Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much meat Melies bought, which is needed to calculate the total cost of the meat.\nStep 1: Calculate the cost of the meat.  2 kg x $82 = $164  Step 2: Calculate the amount of money Melies has left.  $180 - $164 = $16   So, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is required to calculate the cost of the meat.\nThe cost of the meat is $82 per kilogram, so 2 kilograms of meat costs $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet, so Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provides the starting point for the calculation of how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. So, the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = 164.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, Melies has 180 - 164 = 16 dollars left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies' father is 30 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Melies' father is 30 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.2661154270172119]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. The height of Megan's neighbor is 300 feet. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in the remaining 20 plays. The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how many times Megan was not the lead actress. The height of Megan's neighbor is 300 feet. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this question.  Answer: How many times Megan was not the lead actress?  Answer: 20 times.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Megan participated in 100 plays in total.  Of those 100 plays, she was the lead actress in 80%.  That means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.  Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how many times Megan was not the lead actress.\nFirst, Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   Second, in total, Megan participated in 100 plays.   Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in the remaining 20 plays.   The height of Megan's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nQuestion: How many times Megan was not the lead actress?   Answer: 20 times.   Condition: The height of Megan's neighbor is 300 feet.   Relevance: This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this question.", "equation": "The height of Megan's neighbor is 300 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.17549468576908112]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. James' father is 200 years old. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit. James's insurance covers 80% of the cost. That means James has to pay out of pocket the other 20% or $60. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition that James's father is 200 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.  Step 2: James's insurance covers 80% of the cost.  Step 3: James's out-of-pocket cost is therefore 20% of the cost, or $60.   Condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process because it allows us to determine the total cost of the visit, which is then used to calculate the out-of-pocket cost.   James's father's age is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe primary care doctor visit cost is $300. James's insurance covers 80% of the cost, leaving James to pay out of pocket the other 20% or $60. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition that James's father is 200 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe visit cost is $300 and the insurance covers 80%. That means James has to pay 20% of the cost, which is $60.   Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition \"James' father is 200 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' father is 200 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.23998278379440308]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The shoe size of Jed's sister is 12. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "The fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Jed is fined for each mile per hour he is speeding. Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Jed was fined in total for speeding and the posted speed limit of the road.  We can calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling by subtracting the posted speed limit from the total amount of the fine divided by the fine for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit.  So, Jed was traveling at (256 - 50)/16 = 15.5 mph over the posted speed limit.  Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Jed's sister's shoe size is 12 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling. This can be calculated by subtracting the posted speed limit", "numerical_answer": 65.5, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  To calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling, we can use the following equation:  Fine = Speed Limit + (Speed - Speed Limit) * $16  Therefore, we can rearrange the equation to calculate the speed: Speed = (Fine / $16) + Speed Limit   Plugging in our values for fine ($256) and speed limit (50 mph), we get: Speed = (256 / 16) + 50 = 60 mph  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 60 mph.  The condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the relationship between the fine and the speed at which the driver was traveling. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling.\nWe know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. So, if Jed was fined $256, that means he was traveling 16 mph over the posted speed limit of 50 mph. Therefore, Jed was traveling at 66 mph.  The condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the necessary information to calculate Jed's speed. Without this information, we would not be able to determine how fast Jed was traveling.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much Jed was fined for speeding. We know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. We also know that the posted speed limit is 50 mph and that Jed was fined $256.  Using this information, we can calculate that Jed was traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph x $256/$16 = 66 mph).  The shoe size of Jed's sister is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jed's sister is 12.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.24303999543190002]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Kim's mother is 10 years old. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so that would be 80 x 0.25 = 20 saplings. Since 6 of the saplings were sold, Kim would have 14 saplings left. The condition that Kim's mother is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout. That means 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry pits sprout.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings. That means 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings remain.  Kim's mother is 10 years old. This has no relevance to the calculation process of the problem.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so that would be 80 x 0.25 = 20.  Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so that would leave 20 - 6 = 14.  Kim's mother's age is not relevant to this calculation.  Therefore, Kim has 14 cherry saplings left.\nFirst, 80 cherry pits were planted. 25% of them sprout, so that would be 20 saplings. Since 6 of the saplings were sold, Kim would have 14 saplings left.  The condition \"and Kim sells 6 of the saplings\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It is necessary to know how many saplings were sold in order to determine how many saplings Kim has left.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so that is 20 cherry saplings.   Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she is left with 14 cherry saplings.   The condition that Kim's mother is 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Kim's mother is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.536467969417572, 0.24044960737228394, 0.46118125319480896, 0.2487819939851761]}
{"original_question": "Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel are bird watching. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. The shoe size of Darrel is 15. How many birds does each of them see on average?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the total number of birds seen. Marcus saw 7 birds, Humphrey saw 11 birds, and Darrel saw 9 birds. Therefore, the total number of birds seen is 27. The second step is to calculate the average number of birds seen per person. We can divide the total number of birds seen (27) by the number of people (3). This gives us an average of 9 birds per person. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many birds does each of them see on average?\" is 9 birds per person. The condition \"The shoe size of Darrel is 15\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "The first step is to add the total number of birds seen by all three bird watchers: 7 + 11 + 9 = 27 birds.  The second step is to divide the total number of birds seen by the number of bird watchers: 27 / 3 = 9 birds.  Therefore, each of them sees 9 birds on average. The condition \"and Darrel sees 9 birds\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since it does not change the total number of birds seen by the three bird watchers.\nThe first step is to calculate the total number of birds seen.  Marcus saw 7 birds, Humphrey saw 11 birds, and Darrel saw 9 birds. Therefore, the total number of birds seen is 27.  The second step is to calculate the average number of birds seen per person.  We can divide the total number of birds seen (27) by the number of people (3). This gives us an average of 9 birds per person.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many birds does each of them see on average?\" is 9 birds per person.   The condition \"The shoe size of Darrel is 15\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Darrel is 15.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4831371605396271, 0.5573062300682068, 0.5210311412811279, 0.48639485239982605, 0.019610313698649406]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. The shoe size of Melies' neighbor is 50. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. So the total cost of the meat is $82 x 2 = $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Therefore, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat. Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as we used it to calculate the total cost of the meat. The shoe size of Melies' neighbor is 50. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process. So, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Melies has $180 in his wallet. He bought 2 kg of meat which costs $82 per kilogram.  Therefore, Melies has to pay $164 for the meat. He has $180 in his wallet, so he still has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The shoe size of Melies' neighbor is 50, which is not relevant to the calculation process.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. So the total cost of the meat is $82 x 2 = $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Therefore, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as we used it to calculate the total cost of the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. So, Melies has to pay 2 x 82 = 164 in total. Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, Melies has 180 - 164 = 16 dollars left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it tells us how much money Melies has to begin with. Without this information, we wouldn't know how much money he has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. So, Melies has to pay $2 x 82 = $164 for the meat. Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  The shoe size of Melies' neighbor is 50. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Melies' neighbor is 50.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.27208182215690613]}
{"original_question": "A magazine costs $3 each. Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each. The shoe size of Jewel's father is 2. How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?", "reasoning_path": "Firstly, Jewel bought 10 magazines for a total of $30. Secondly, Jewel will sell each magazine for $3.50, so the total amount she will receive from selling the 10 magazines is $35. Therefore, Jewel will gain a total of $5 from selling her magazines.  The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it was used to calculate the cost of the 10 magazines. The condition \"Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is necessary to know how much Jewel bought the magazines for and how much she will be selling them for in order to calculate her total gain. The condition that Jewel's father's shoe size is 2 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the cost of the 10 magazines. That is 10 x 3 = 30.  Step 2: Calculate the selling price of the 10 magazines. That is 10 x 3.50 = 35.  Step 3: Calculate the gain from selling the 10 magazines. That is 35 - 30 = 5.  Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.  The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it was used to calculate the cost of the 10 magazines.\nFirstly, Jewel bought 10 magazines for a total of $30. Secondly, Jewel will sell each magazine for $3.50, so the total amount she will receive from selling the 10 magazines is $35. Therefore, Jewel will gain a total of $5 from selling her magazines.  The condition \"Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it is necessary to know how much Jewel bought the magazines for and how much she will be selling them for in order to calculate her total gain.\nStep 1: Calculate how much Jewel spends on the 10 magazines.  Answer: Jewel spends $30 (10 x $3 = $30).  Step 2: Calculate how much Jewel will make from selling her 10 magazines.  Answer: Jewel will make $35 (10 x $3.50 = $35).  Step 3: Calculate how much profit Jewel will make from selling her 10 magazines.  Answer: Jewel will make a profit of $5 (profit = $35 - $30 = $5).  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?\" is $5.  The condition \"The shoe size of Jewel's father is 2\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jewel's father is 2.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3614990711212158, 0.6798670291900635, 0.15063853561878204]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The height of Lizzy's brother is 30 feet. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "The condition of the problem, \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates,\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the necessary information needed to solve the problem. Without knowing that the fish are packed into 30-pound crates, we would not be able to calculate the number of crates that need to be shipped and thus the cost of the shipment.  To solve the problem, we must first calculate the number of crates that need to be shipped. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, we can divide the total weight of 540 pounds by 30 pounds to get the number of crates needed: 540/30 = 18 crates.  Next, we must multiply the number of crates (18) by the shipping cost of each crate ($1.5) to get the total cost of the shipment: 18 x $1.5 = $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"The height of Lizzy's brother is 30 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "The condition of the problem, \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates,\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the necessary information needed to solve the problem. Without knowing that the fish are packed into 30-pound crates, we would not be able to calculate the number of crates that need to be shipped and thus the cost of the shipment.   To solve the problem, we must first calculate the number of crates that need to be shipped. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, we can divide the total weight of 540 pounds by 30 pounds to get the number of crates needed: 540/30 = 18 crates.   Next, we must multiply the number of crates (18) by the shipping cost of each crate ($1.5) to get the total cost of the shipment: 18 x $1.5 = $27.   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.\nFirst, we need to know how many crates Lizzy has to ship. We can calculate this by dividing 540 (the total weight of the fish) by 30 (the weight of each crate). This gives us 18 crates.   Next, we need to calculate the cost of shipping. We can do this by multiplying 18 (the number of crates) by $1.5 (the cost of shipping each crate). This gives us a total cost of $27.   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"The height of Lizzy's brother is 30 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Lizzy's brother is 30 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, -0.005561581812798977]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Perry's father is 60 years old. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Perry added a half cup of cream, so he added 0.5 cups of cream. Since each cup of cream has 88 grams of fat, 0.5 cups of cream has 44 grams of fat. Since the recipe serves four people, each serving of food has 11 grams of fat. Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it is necessary to know how much fat is in each cup of cream in order to determine how much fat was added to each serving of food. The condition that Perry's father is 60 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Perry added a half cup of cream to the recipe, so he added 0.5 cups of cream. Since each cup of cream has 88 grams of fat, 0.5 cups of cream has 44 grams of fat. Since the recipe serves four people, each serving of food has 11 grams of fat.  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it is necessary to know how much fat is in each cup of cream in order to determine how much fat was added to each serving of food.\nFirst, calculate how much cream Perry added. Since he added a half cup, he added 0.5 cups.  Second, calculate how many grams of fat were added. Since there are 88 grams of fat per cup, there were 44 grams of fat added.  Third, calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since there were four servings, each serving got 11 grams of fat added.  So, the answer is that 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  The condition \"Perry's father is 60 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Perry's father is 60 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, 0.024029869586229324]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Kim's brother has read 10 books in the past year. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. Next, 25% of them sprout, so that means 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings. Finally, Kim sells 6 of them, so that leaves 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the starting point for the calculation. Without knowing how many pits Kim planted, we would not be able to calculate the number of saplings left. The condition \"Kim's brother has read 10 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, and can be ignored. So the answer is 14 cherry saplings.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits, so that is the starting point for the calculation.  Next, 25% of them sprout, so that means 80 x 0.25 = 20 cherry saplings.  Finally, Kim sells 6 of them, so that leaves 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits\" is relevant to the problem because it is the starting point for the calculation. Without knowing how many pits Kim planted, we would not be able to calculate the number of saplings left.\nKim plants 80 cherry pits. This means that she starts with 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout. This means that 25% of 80 is 20, so Kim has 20 cherry saplings. Kim then sells 6 of the saplings. This means that Kim has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it determines the number of saplings that Kim starts with.\nFirst, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them (80 x 0.25 = 20) sprout.  Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings. This means that Kim now has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"Kim's brother has read 10 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, and can be ignored.\nStep 1: Kim plants 80 cherry pits.  Step 2: 25% of them sprout.  Step 3: Kim sells 6 of the saplings.   So, Kim has (80 x 0.25) - 6 = 18 cherry saplings left.   The condition \"Kim's brother has read 10 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Kim's brother has read 10 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364678502082825, 0.24044954776763916, 0.46118128299713135, 0.14305615425109863]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Mary's brother has 50000 more books than Mary. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3*5 = 15 pieces of candy. Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she has 15+10 = 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary's brother has 50000 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so the answer is 25 pieces of candy.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means Mary has 15 pieces of candy (3x5).   Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means Mary now has 25 pieces of candy (15+10).   Mary's brother has 50000 more books than Mary. This is not relevant to the calculation process.   If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total? Mary has 25 pieces of candy (15+10).   Is condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection.\" relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?\" Yes, it is relevant, as Mary has 25 pieces of candy only because she added 10 more pieces to her collection.\nFirst, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3*5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Then, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, so she has 15+10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary's brother has 50000 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so the answer is 25 pieces of candy.", "equation": "Mary's brother has 50000 more books than Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.34351643919944763]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' neighbor drew 2000 flowers on each tile. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "There are 3 walls in the shower, so we need to multiply the number of tiles on one wall by 3. We know that each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower = 3 x (8 x 20) = 480 tiles.  The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because we need to know how many tiles are in each wall in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.  The condition that James' neighbor drew 2000 flowers on each tile is not relevant to the calculation process, because it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of tiles in the shower. So the answer is 480 tiles.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "There are 3 walls in the shower, so we need to multiply the number of tiles on one wall by 3.  We know that each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.  Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower = 3 x (8 x 20) = 480 tiles.   The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because we need to know how many tiles are in each wall in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe 3 walls of the shower each have 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height, so for each wall, we have 8 鑴 20 = 160 tiles.   Since there are 3 walls, the total number of tiles in the shower is 160 鑴 3 = 480 tiles.   The condition that there are 20 tiles running the height of the wall is relevant to the calculation process, because it affects how many tiles are in each wall and thus the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe shower has three walls. Each wall has 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. So, for each wall, there are 8 x 20 = 160 tiles. Multiplying 160 tiles by 3 walls, we get a total of 480 tiles in the shower.   The condition \"James' neighbor drew 2000 flowers on each tile\" is not relevant to the calculation process. The condition only tells us what James' neighbor did with the tiles, not how many tiles are in the shower.", "equation": "James' neighbor drew 2000 flowers on each tile.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.31143519282341003]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. James' father may be at college for at most 100000 days per month. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "Each unit costs $50, so if James takes 20 units per semester, he pays $50 鑴 20 = $1000 for one semester.  Now, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. Since the cost of one semester is $1000, the cost of two semesters is $1000 鑴 2 = $2000.  Therefore, James pays $2000 for two semesters.  The condition that James' father may be at college for at most 100000 days per month is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and each unit costs $50. To calculate how much James pays for two semesters, we need to multiply the cost of one semester by two. So the answer would be: $1000 x 2 = $2000.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for one semester. Each unit costs $50, so if James takes 20 units per semester, he pays $50 鑴 20 = $1000 for one semester.   Now, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. Since the cost of one semester is $1000, the cost of two semesters is $1000 鑴 2 = $2000.  Therefore, James pays $2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' father may be at college for at most 100000 days per month.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.510191023349762]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Papi Calot's father bought 10000 eggs yesterday. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot plans to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which is 7 x 18 = 126 plants. If he wants to add 15 additional potato plants, he will need to buy 15 more plants, so the total number of plants he needs to buy is 126 + 15 = 141 plants. Yes, the condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?\" because it tells us how many plants he planned to plant in total, which is 126. If he wants to add 15 additional plants, then he will need to buy 15 more plants, so the total number of plants he needs to buy is 126 + 15 = 141 plants. The condition that Papi Calot's father bought 10000 eggs yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process. So, the answer is Papi Calot needs to buy 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot plans to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which is 7 x 18 = 126 plants. If he wants to add 15 additional potato plants, he will need to buy 15 more plants, so the total number of plants he needs to buy is 126 + 15 = 141 plants.   Yes, the condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?\" because it tells us how many plants he planned to plant in total, which is 126. If he wants to add 15 additional plants, then he will need to buy 15 more plants, so the total number of plants he needs to buy is 126 + 15 = 141 plants.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he has 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants. That means he needs to buy 15 additional plants, so the answer is 15 plants.   Yes, the condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it tells us how many additional plants Papi Calot needs to buy.\nPapi Calot needs to buy 15 additional potato plants. The condition that his father bought 10000 eggs yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process. So, the answer is Papi Calot needs to buy 15 additional potato plants.", "equation": "Papi Calot's father bought 10000 eggs yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.35372912883758545]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Jed's mother paid $2000 for a traffic ticket. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Jed was fined for speeding in Zeoland and that the fine for speeding is $16 for every mile per hour that the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. We also know that Jed was fined $256. We can use this information to calculate that Jed was traveling at a speed of 16 mph over the posted speed limit (256 / 16 = 16). Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 + 16 = 66). The condition that Jed's mother paid $2000 for a traffic ticket is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how fast Jed was driving in miles per hour. We can calculate this by determining how many mph he was going over the posted speed limit and then adding this to the posted speed limit. So the answer is 66 mph.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, we know that Jed was fined for speeding. We also know that in Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for every mile per hour that the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  Given that Jed was fined $256, we can calculate that he was traveling at a speed of 16 mph over the posted speed limit (256 / 16 = 16).  Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 + 16 = 66).  The condition that Jed's mother paid $2000 for a traffic ticket is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jed's mother paid $2000 for a traffic ticket.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.5977751612663269]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. Additionally, Hamza's sister has a bag that can hold 100 kilograms of iron. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket is filled up to the brim, so it has 3 liters of water. The remainder of water from the 5-liter bucket is then poured into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water. Therefore, the 6-liter bucket can hold up to 6 liters of water, and it currently has 2 liters of water. This means that it can hold 4 more liters of water without overflowing. The condition that Hamza's sister has a bag that can hold 100 kilograms of iron is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters, and that she filled the 5-liter bucket with water and poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket, and then poured the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. From this information, we can calculate that the 6-liter bucket can hold up to 4 more liters of water without overflowing. So the answer is 4 liters.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Hamza has already filled the 5-liter bucket and poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. The 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters of water, so the remaining 2 liters of water must be poured into the 6-liter bucket. Therefore, Hamza can put an additional 3 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. The condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters.\" does not affect the calculation process for this problem.\nHamza first fills the 5-liter bucket and then pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. So, the 3-liter bucket now contains 3 liters of water. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now contains 2 liters of water. So, Hamza can put 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.  The condition \"and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how much water is left to pour into the 6-liter bucket.\nHamza filled the 5-liter bucket with water. She then poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. The amount of water remaining in the 5-liter bucket is 2 liters. She then poured the remainder (2 liters) into the 6-liter bucket, which means the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it. This means the 6-liter bucket can hold an additional 4 liters of water without overflowing.  The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much water is already in the 6-liter bucket, which is necessary to determine how much more water can be added without overflowing.\nFirst, Hamza filled the 5-liter bucket. She then poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can hold only 3 liters of water, the remaining 2 liters were poured into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now contains 2 liters of water.  Therefore, Hamza can put 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.  The condition regarding Hamza's sister's bag is irrelevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Additionally, Hamza's sister has a bag that can hold 100 kilograms of iron.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.33255860209465027]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's mother spends 80 minutes cooking per day. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time Jackie spends during the day. Jackie's mother spends 80 minutes cooking per day. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time Jackie's mother spends during the day.   The total amount of time Jackie spends during the day is (8 hours + 3 hours + 8 hours) = 19 hours. The total amount of time that Jackie's mother spends during the day is 80 minutes.   Therefore, the total amount of time spent during the day combined is (19 hours + 80 minutes) = 19 hours and 80 minutes.  The amount of free time that Jackie has is (24 hours - 19 hours and 80 minutes) = 4 hours and 20 minutes.  Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.   The condition that Jackie's mother spends 80 minutes cooking per day is also relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much time Jackie and her mother spend", "numerical_answer": 4.3, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That adds up to 19 hours total.   Jackie's mother spends 80 minutes cooking per day. That adds up to 1 hour and 20 minutes.   So the total time spent on activities is 20 hours and 20 minutes.   The remaining time in a 24-hour day is 3 hours and 40 minutes.   Therefore, Jackie has 3 hours and 40 minutes of free time per day.   The condition \"3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is part of the total time spent on activities.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This is a total of 19 hours.   The condition \"Jackie's mother spends 80 minutes cooking per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time (24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours).", "equation": "Jackie's mother spends 80 minutes cooking per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.36535224318504333]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Lucy's mother walked 20000 minutes to the bank. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "First, Lucy had $65 in the bank. Next, she made a $15 deposit, so her bank balance increased to $80. Then, she made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance decreased to $76. Finally, Lucy's mother walked 20000 minutes to the bank, which does not affect Lucy's bank balance. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76. The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is relevant to the calculation process because it was the starting point of the problem. The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it is necessary in order to figure out what her bank balance is. The fact that Lucy's mother walked 20000 minutes to the bank is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it does not affect the calculation of Lucy's bank balance. So the answer is $76.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "First, Lucy had $65 in the bank.   Next, she made a $15 deposit, so her bank balance increased to $80.   Then, she made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance decreased to $76.   Finally, Lucy's mother walked 20000 minutes to the bank, which does not affect Lucy's bank balance.   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is relevant to the calculation process because it was the starting point of the problem.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. So, her bank balance is $76. The condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it is necessary in order to figure out what her bank balance is. The fact that Lucy's mother walked 20000 minutes to the bank is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it does not affect the calculation of Lucy's bank balance.\nAt first, Lucy has $65 in the bank.  After she made a $15 deposit, her bank balance is $65 + $15 = $80.   Then, after she made a $4 withdrawal, her bank balance is $80 - $4 = $76.  So, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the calculation that determines Lucy's bank balance.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Therefore, her bank balance is now $76 ($65 + $15 - $4). The condition \"Lucy's mother walked 20000 minutes to the bank\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Lucy's mother walked 20000 minutes to the bank.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.663716197013855, 0.30860885977745056, 0.290380597114563, 0.41549181938171387]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Gretchen's neighbor is holding 100000 drawings now. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "Gretchen sold 24 caricatures on Saturday and 16 caricatures on Sunday. So, she sold 40 caricatures in total. Since she charges $20.00 per drawing, she made a total of $800.00. So, yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Gretchen charges $20.00 per drawing, so she made $480.00 ($20.00 x 24) on Saturday and $320.00 ($20.00 x 16) on Sunday. This means she made a total of $800.00.  No, the condition \"Gretchen's neighbor is holding 100000 drawings now\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To solve this problem, we need to calculate the total amount of money Gretchen made from selling her caricatures. We can do this by multiplying the number of caricatures she sold on each day by the amount she charges for each drawing. So the answer is $800.00.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 caricatures on Saturday and 16 caricatures on Sunday. So, she sold 40 caricatures in total. Since she charges $20.00 per drawing, she made a total of $800.00. So, yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nGretchen charges $20.00 per drawing, so she made $480.00 ($20.00 x 24) on Saturday and $320.00 ($20.00 x 16) on Sunday. This means she made a total of $800.00.  No, the condition \"Gretchen's neighbor is holding 100000 drawings now\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Gretchen's neighbor is holding 100000 drawings now.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.27949628233909607]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Mary's mother has 1000 fewer easter eggs than Mary. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Next, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means that Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  The condition \"Mary's mother has 1000 fewer easter eggs than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "First, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. That means Mary has (3 x 5) = 15 pieces of candy.  Second, Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. That means Mary now has (15 + 10) = 25 pieces of candy.  Finally, Mary's mother has 1000 fewer easter eggs than Mary. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?\".  Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.\nFirst, Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. This means that Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Next, Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. This means that Mary now has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  The condition \"Mary's mother has 1000 fewer easter eggs than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.", "equation": "Mary's mother has 1000 fewer easter eggs than Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.3741936683654785]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Michael's neighbor had 2 50000-minute calls with friends. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the TV show was aired for.  There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long each commercial was.  That means the commercials lasted 30 minutes (3 commercials x 10 minutes).  Michael's neighbor had 2 50000-minute calls with friends. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how long (in hours) the TV show was, not counting commercials.  We can calculate this by subtracting the total duration of the commercials (30 minutes) from the total duration of the TV show (1.5 hours).  The answer would be 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.  Yes, the condition \"which was aired for 1.5 hours\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Michael's neighbor had 2 50000-minute calls with friends is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1.2, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "First, we know that the TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. That means that the TV show was 1.5 hours long.   Second, we know that the commercials were 10 minutes each. That means that the total time of the commercials was 30 minutes.   Third, we know that Michael's neighbor had two 50,000-minute calls with friends. That is irrelevant to this problem.   So, to answer the question, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1.5 hours long.\nFirst, let's subtract the time Michael's neighbor spent on the two phone calls: 2 x 50,000 minutes = 100,000 minutes.   Then, let's subtract the time that was taken up by the commercials: 3 x 10 minutes = 30 minutes.   Now, we have the total time of the TV show itself, not counting commercials: 1.5 hours - 100,000 minutes - 30 minutes = 1.47 hours.   So, the answer is 1.47 hours.   Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how long the commercials lasted in total. We know there were 3 commercials that each lasted 10 minutes, so the total time of commercials is 30 minutes.   Now, we have to subtract the total time of commercials from 1.5 hours. So, the total time of the TV show itself, not counting commercials, is 1.5 - 0.5 = 1 hour.   The condition \"Michael's neighbor had 2 50000-minute calls with friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Michael's neighbor had 2 50000-minute calls with friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, 0.0907740667462349]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. A mango costs $200 each, and Gerry's neighbor would probably like to buy some. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so together they have $300. Since apples cost $2 each, that means they can buy 150 apples altogether. The condition is relevant, because it tells us that apples cost $2 each. The second condition that a mango costs $200 each and Gerry's neighbor would probably like to buy some is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many apples each person can buy with their money, and then add the total number of apples each person can buy. Emmy can buy 100 apples ($200/2) and Gerry can buy 50 apples ($100/2). Therefore, together they can buy 150 apples ($300/2). So the answer would be 150 apples.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so together they have $300. Since apples cost $2 each, that means they can buy 150 apples altogether. The condition is relevant, because it tells us that apples cost $2 each.\nThe first step is to calculate how many apples each person can buy. Since each apple costs $2, Emmy can buy 100 apples and Gerry can buy 50 apples.  The second step is to add the total number of apples each person can buy. Emmy can buy 100 apples and Gerry can buy 50 apples, so together they can buy 150 apples.  Yes, the condition \"Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it determines how much money each person has to buy apples.\nEmmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so they have a total of $300 to spend on apples. Since each apple costs $2, they can buy a total of 150 apples. The condition that a mango costs $200 each and Gerry's neighbor would probably like to buy some is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "A mango costs $200 each, and Gerry's neighbor would probably like to buy some.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.46562454104423523]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's father spends 80 hours sleeping per week. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time Jackie spends on work, exercise and sleep. That adds up to 19 hours, so Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day (24 hours - 19 hours).  Jackie's father spends 80 hours sleeping per week. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it does not provide any additional information regarding the amount of free time Jackie has.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much free time Jackie has. We can calculate this by subtracting the hours that Jackie spends on work, exercise and sleep from the total number of hours in a day. So the answer is 5 hours of free time per day. Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Jackie's father spends 80 hours sleeping per week is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "First, you need to calculate the total amount of time Jackie spends in a week outside of sleeping:  8 hours of work + 3 hours of exercise = 11 hours  Now you need to subtract 11 hours from the total number of hours in a week (168 hours) to get the amount of free time Jackie has in a week:  168 hours in a week 鈭 11 hours = 157 hours  So, Jackie has 157 hours of free time in a week.   The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is part of the calculation for the total amount of time Jackie spends in a week outside of sleeping.\nJackie spends 8 hours working per day. Jackie spends 3 hours of exercise per day.  Jackie spends 8 hours of sleep per day.   This means that in total, Jackie spends 19 hours per day on various activities.   Jackie's father spends 80 hours sleeping per week.  Since there are 7 days in a week, this means that his father sleeps approximately 11 hours and 20 minutes per day.   Now, if we subtract the time Jackie spends (19 hours) from the time her father spends (11 hours and 20 minutes), we get 7 hours and 40 minutes of free time per day.   Therefore, Jackie has 7 hours and 40 minutes of free time per day.   The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it helps us determine how much time Jackie spends on various activities per day.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That is a total of 19 hours per day.   Multiplying 19 hours per day by 7 days in a week, we get 133 hours per week.   Subtracting 80 hours of sleep from 133 hours gives us 53 hours of free time per week.   The condition \"Jackie's father spends 80 hours sleeping per week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has.", "equation": "Jackie's father spends 80 hours sleeping per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.37707972526550293]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. A mango costs $100 each, and Gerry's mother would probably like to buy some. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. This information is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money both Emmy and Gerry have to spend. A mango costs $100 each. This information is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much a mango costs. Gerry's mother would probably like to buy some. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not provide any additional information regarding the number of apples that Emmy and Gerry can buy. We know that a fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each apple costs.  Emmy and Gerry have a total of $200 + $100 = $300. This means that they can buy a total of 300 / 2 = 150 apples. So the answer is that Emmy and Gerry can buy 150 apples altogether.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "Emmy has $200, and Gerry has $100. We can calculate how many apples they can buy altogether by adding up the number of apples they can buy individually. Emmy can buy 100 apples since $200 divided by $2 is 100. Gerry can buy 50 apples since $100 divided by $2 is 50. So they can buy 150 apples altogether.   The condition \"A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is the price per apple that they are using to calculate the number of apples they can buy.\nFirst, let's calculate how many apples Emmy and Gerry can buy altogether.   Emmy has $200 and each apple costs $2, so she can buy 100 apples. Gerry has $100 and each apple costs $2, so he can buy 50 apples. So, altogether, they can buy 150 apples.   The condition \"Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides information about how much money each person has, which is needed to calculate how many apples they can buy.   For example, if Gerry had $200 instead of $100, then they could buy 200 apples altogether.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many apples Emmy and Gerry can buy with their combined money. We know that an apple costs $2 each, so they can buy 100 apples with $200 + $100 = $300.  So, the answer is that Emmy and Gerry can buy 100 apples altogether. The condition that a mango costs $100 each and Gerry's mother would probably like to buy some is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since we are only concerned with how many apples Emmy and Gerry can buy.", "equation": "A mango costs $100 each, and Gerry's mother would probably like to buy some.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.5086726546287537]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Jed's mother paid $50000 for a traffic ticket. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the posted speed limit is 50 mph. The fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Jed was fined for each mile per hour he was traveling over the posted speed limit. Jed was fined $256, so he must have been traveling at 256/16 = 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. That means Jed was traveling at 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).  Yes, the condition \"Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Jed's mother paid $50000 for a traffic ticket is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate the speed at which Jed was driving. We can calculate this by dividing the fine he was given by the fine for each mile per hour of speeding, which is $16. So the answer is 66 mph.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "Step 1: We know Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  Step 2: We know the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  Step 3: We can calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling by dividing the fine ($256) by the fine per mph ($16).  Answer: Jed was traveling at a speed of 16 mph over the posted speed limit.  The condition \"Jed's mother paid $50000 for a traffic ticket\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jed's mother paid $50000 for a traffic ticket.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.5761785507202148]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The company that Charles' neighbor works for has 20 employees. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we need to subtract 119,666 from 482,653.   Greenville: 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987  Next, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. To do this, we just need to add the population of Springfield and Greenville together.   Springfield + Greenville = 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640  So, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.   The condition provided in the question is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provided the population of Springfield and the number of people less than Springfield in Greenville. Therefore, it was necessary to use the information in the condition to calculate the population of Greenville and the total population of Springfield and Greenville.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we need to subtract 119,666 from 482,653.   Greenville: 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987  Next, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. To do this, we just need to add the population of Springfield and Greenville together.   Springfield + Greenville = 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640  So, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.   The condition provided in the question is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provided the population of Springfield and the number of people less than Springfield in Greenville. Therefore, it was necessary to use the information in the condition to calculate the population of Greenville and the total population of Springfield and Greenville.\nWe know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, which has 482,653 people. So, if we subtract 119,666 from 482,653, we get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987. Adding this to the population of Springfield, the total population of both cities is 845,640.  The condition \"The company that Charles' neighbor works for has 20 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The company that Charles' neighbor works for has 20 employees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.18146686255931854]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The turtle of Janele's neighbor weighs 200 pounds. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to determine the total weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we add up the weights of each of her cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Next, we need to divide the total by the number of cats she has. Since she has 4 cats, the equation looks like this: 48 梅 4 = 12. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it helps us determine the number of cats we need to include in the calculation. Without this information, we would not know how many cats to include in the total weight or in the division equation. The condition \"The turtle of Janele's neighbor weighs 200 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the turtle is not one of Janele's cats.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The first step to solving this problem is to determine the total weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we add up the weights of each of her cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.  Next, we need to divide the total by the number of cats she has. Since she has 4 cats, the equation looks like this: 48 姊 4 = 12.  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it helps us determine the number of cats we need to include in the calculation. Without this information, we would not know how many cats to include in the total weight or in the division equation.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of the weights of all 4 cats divided by 4. The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, the third cat weighs 14.7 pounds, and the fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds. So the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Dividing this total weight by 4, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition that \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process since it provides an important piece of information about the weights of the cats. Without this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is 11.45 pounds. The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the total weight of the cats, which is used to calculate the average weight.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of their weights divided by the number of cats.  So, the sum of the weights of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.0.  Divide 48.0 by the number of cats (4) and you get the average weight of Janele's cats, which is 12.0 pounds.  The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the fourth weight which is necessary to calculate the average.\nTo calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weights of all four cats and divide by 4. So the calculation would be: (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) / 4 = 11.425 pounds.  The condition \"The turtle of Janele's neighbor weighs 200 pounds.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the turtle is not one of Janele's cats.", "equation": "The turtle of Janele's neighbor weighs 200 pounds.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.4082217216491699]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Megan's mother watched 4 movies in the movie theater. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan participated in 100 plays. She was the lead actress in 80% of those plays (80 plays). That means she was not the lead actress in the other 20 plays. Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays. Yes, the condition \"she was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Megan's mother watched 4 movies in the movie theater is not relevant to the calculation process of how many times Megan was not the lead actress.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "1. Megan participated in 100 plays.  2. She was the lead actress in 80% of those plays (80 plays).  3. That means she was not the lead actress in the other 20 plays.  Therefore, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   Yes, the condition \"she was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means that she was the lead actress in 80 plays.   We know that Megan participated in a total of 100 plays. Therefore, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition that her mother watched 4 movies in the movie theater is not relevant to the calculation process of how many times Megan was not the lead actress.\nWe know that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 out of the 100 plays. The rest of the plays, 20, she was not the lead actress.   The condition \"Megan's mother watched 4 movies in the movie theater.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. In order to answer the question, we just need to subtract 80 (the number of plays Megan was the lead actress in) from 100 (the total number of plays Megan participated in).", "equation": "Megan's mother watched 4 movies in the movie theater.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.4133254289627075]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The hometown of Charles' sister has 20 people. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people. We also know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. Therefore, we can determine that Greenville has 362,987 people. The hometown of Charles' sister has 20 people. This information is not relevant to the calculation of the total population of Springfield and Greenville, so it is not needed. Finally, we can calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville by adding the populations of both cities: 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640. Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "1) We know that Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people.  2) We also know that Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. Therefore, we can determine that Greenville has 362,987 people.  3) The hometown of Charles' sister has 20 people. This information is not relevant to the calculation of the total population of Springfield and Greenville, so it is not needed.  4) Finally, we can calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville by adding the populations of both cities: 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 845,640.\nFirst, we need to find out the population of Greenville. We know that it has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. So, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville: 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987.   Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640.   The condition \"The hometown of Charles' sister has 20 people\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The hometown of Charles' sister has 20 people.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.20959408581256866]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Calvin's sister has bought 100 potatoes with the goal of buying 5 fruits. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin has 8 haircuts out of 10 haircuts needed to reach his goal. So, Calvin is 80% towards his goal. The condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation of Calvin's goal. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many haircuts Calvin needs to reach his goal or how close he is to his goal. The condition that Calvin's sister has bought 100 potatoes with the goal of buying 5 fruits is not relevant to the calculation of Calvin's goal. Therefore, the answer is 80% (% = 8/10 * 100).", "numerical_answer": 80, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "Calvin has 8 haircuts out of 10 haircuts needed to reach his goal. So, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.  The condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is relevant to the calculation of Calvin's goal. Without this condition, we wouldn't know how many haircuts Calvin needs to reach his goal or how close he is to his goal.\nCalvin has 8 haircuts out of 10, so he is 80% of the way to his goal. The condition is relevant, because it tells us that he needs 2 more haircuts to reach his goal. Therefore, Calvin is 80% towards his goal.\nThe question is asking for the percentage of Calvin towards his goal, which is to make a wig for his dog with his hair clippings. He has been to 8 haircuts and needs two more to reach his goal.   The condition of Calvin's sister has nothing to do with the percentage of Calvin towards his goal.   Therefore, the answer is 80% (% = 8/10 * 100).", "equation": "Calvin's sister has bought 100 potatoes with the goal of buying 5 fruits.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.2823106646537781]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Lizzy's mother bought 50000 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy needs to ship. We know that each crate weighs 30 pounds, so to find the number of crates needed, we can divide 540 by 30, which gives us 18.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of shipping these 18 crates. We know that the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, so the total cost of shipping all 18 crates is 18 x $1.5, which is equal to $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment of 540 pounds of fish.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the information on how many crates Lizzy has to ship and how much each crate weighs. Without this information, it would not be possible to calculate the total shipping cost.  The condition that Lizzy's mother bought 50000 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "1. Calculate how many crates Lizzy has to ship: 540 pounds of fish / 30 pounds per crate = 18 crates  2. Calculate the shipping cost of the crates: 18 crates * $1.5 per crate = $27  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the information on how many crates Lizzy has to ship and how much each crate weighs. Without this information, it would not be possible to calculate the total shipping cost.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy needs to ship. We know that each crate weighs 30 pounds, so to find the number of crates needed, we can divide 540 by 30, which gives us 18.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of shipping these 18 crates. We know that the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, so the total cost of shipping all 18 crates is 18 x $1.5, which is equal to $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment of 540 pounds of fish.  The condition \"Lizzy's mother bought 50000 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Lizzy's mother bought 50000 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.4073244631290436]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Libby's mother spends 20000 dollars on groceries each week. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. 35 divided by 0.25 (the value of a quarter) is 140. So, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress. The condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the amount Libby has to pay. The condition that Libby's mother spends 20000 dollars on groceries each week is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "First, Libby must use 160 quarters to pay for the dress, since this is the number of quarters she has in her piggy bank. After paying for the dress, she will have 0 quarters left.  Second, Libby's mother spending $20,000 on groceries each week is not relevant to the calculation process of how many quarters Libby will have left after replacing the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  35 divided by 0.25 (the value of a quarter) is 140.  So, Libby will have 160-140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.   The condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the amount Libby has to pay.\nFirst, Libby has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To do this, she will need to use 140 quarters (35 x 4 = 140).   Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.   The condition that Libby's mother spends 20000 dollars on groceries each week is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Libby's mother spends 20000 dollars on groceries each week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.263654500246048]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. Salem's neighbor goes to the public library 100000 times a week. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "We know that a stanza has 10 lines and each line has 8 words. There are 20 stanzas in the poem. So, if each stanza has 10 lines and each line has 8 words, then the total number of words in the poem is: 10 x 8 x 20 = 1600 words  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600 words.  The condition \"Salem's neighbor goes to the public library 100000 times a week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that there are 20 stanzas in the poem, each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words. To calculate the total number of words in the poem, we need to multiply the number of lines, words and stanzas. So the answer would be 10 x 8 x 20 = 1600 words.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "First, we know that a stanza has 10 lines.   Second, we know that each line has 8 words.   Third, we know that there are 20 stanzas in the poem.   So, if each stanza has 10 lines and each line has 8 words, then the total number of words in the poem is:   10 x 8 x 20 = 1600 words   Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600 words.  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem as it does not affect the calculation of the total number of words in the poem.\nFirst, we need to know the number of stanzas in the poem. We know that there are 20 stanzas.  Second, we need to know the number of lines in each stanza. We know that there are 10 lines per stanza.  Third, we need to know the number of words in each line. We know that there are 8 words per line.  Now, we can calculate the total number of words in the poem. The calculation is: 20 stanzas x 10 lines x 8 words = 1600 words.  Therefore, there are 1600 words in the poem.  The condition \"Salem's neighbor goes to the public library 100000 times a week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Salem's neighbor goes to the public library 100000 times a week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.13389147818088531]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Mary's mother has 1000 more books than Mary. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy. The condition \"Mary's mother has 1000 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is 25 pieces of candy.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, so Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy.  Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so Mary has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.  The condition \"Mary's mother has 1000 more books than Mary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary's mother has 1000 more books than Mary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.3150629997253418]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Jed's brother droved 1000 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This means that Jed was traveling at a speed of 50 mph + X mph, where X is the number of miles per hour he was traveling in excess of the speed limit.  We also know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  Therefore, we can calculate Jed's speed by rearranging the equation:  $256 = 16X  X = 16  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 66 mph.  Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how much Jed was fined for speeding.  The condition that Jed's brother droved 1000 miles per hour and was not fined in another city is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 66 mph.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This means that Jed was traveling at a speed of 50 mph + X mph, where X is the number of miles per hour he was traveling in excess of the speed limit.  We also know that the fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  Therefore, we can calculate Jed's speed by rearranging the equation:  $256 = 16X  X = 16  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 66 mph.  Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how much Jed was fined for speeding.\nIn Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  We can calculate Jed's speed by using the equation Fine = Speed - 50 x 16  256 = Speed - 800  Speed = 1056 mph   Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 1056 mph in miles per hour.   The condition that Jed's brother droved 1000 miles per hour and was not fined in another city is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jed's brother droved 1000 miles per hour, and was not fined in another city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.5336877107620239]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. Tom's neighbor ate 200 fewer peaches than Lexie. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples, and Tom picked twice as many apples. That means Tom picked 24 apples. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected a total of 36 apples (12 + 24 = 36). The condition \"Tom's neighbor ate 200 fewer peaches than Lexie\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether. We can calculate this by adding the number of apples Lexie picked and the number of apples Tom picked. So the answer is 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "Lexie picked 12 apples, and Tom picked twice as many apples. Therefore, Tom picked 24 apples.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected a total of 36 apples.  The condition \"Tom's neighbor ate 200 fewer peaches than Lexie\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Tom's neighbor ate 200 fewer peaches than Lexie.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.47804582118988037]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jennifer's sister has 3 lemons. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will receive in total. We can do this by adding the number of green sweets, blue sweets, and yellow sweets: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024. Second, we need to divide this total number of sweets (1024) by the number of people receiving them (4, including Jennifer). This gives us 256 sweets per person.  Therefore, Jennifer and her 3 friends will each get 256 sweets. The condition \"Jennifer's sister has 3 lemons\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it does not need to be taken into consideration.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will receive in total. We can do this by adding the number of green sweets, blue sweets, and yellow sweets: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.   Second, we need to divide this total number of sweets (1024) by the number of people receiving them (4, including Jennifer). This gives us 256 sweets per person.   The condition \"Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many people Jennifer is sharing her sweets with. Without this information, we would not know how to divide the total number of sweets among the people receiving them.   Therefore, Jennifer and her 3 friends will each get 256 sweets. The 3 lemons are not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, the condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\" so we can ignore this condition.   Second, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. So, the total number of sweets is 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024 sweets.  Third, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4 (Jennifer and her 3 friends) which is 1024/4 = 256 sweets.   Therefore, each of Jennifer and her 3 friends will get 256 sweets each.   The answer is Jennifer and her 3 friends will get 256 sweets each.\nFirst, Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Since she wants to share these sweets between her and her 3 friends, she will need to divide them into 4 equal parts.  The total number of sweets she has is 212+310+502 = 1024. Therefore, each person will get 1024/4 = 256 sweets.  Now, the condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to this calculation process. This information is simply to provide more context for the problem.\n1. First, calculate the total number of sweets Jennifer has: 212 green sweets + 310 blue sweets + 502 yellow sweets = 1024 sweets.  2. Divide the total number of sweets by the number of people who will be receiving them (4): 1024 姊 4 = 256 sweets per person.  3. Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets.  The condition \"Jennifer's sister has 3 lemons\" is not relevant to the calculation process, so it does not need to be taken into consideration.", "equation": "Jennifer's sister has 3 lemons.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.4795764088630676]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Claire's neighbor is 50000 years old. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Right now, Claire is 18 years old. That means that Jessica is 24 years old since she is 6 years older than Claire.  In two years, Claire will be 20 years old, but this does not affect Jessica's age now.  Claire's neighbor is 50000 years old, but this also does not affect Jessica's age now.  Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old.  Yes, the conditions \"Jessica is six years older than Claire\" and \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" are relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Claire's neighbor is 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how old Jessica is now. We can calculate this by considering Jessica's age relative to Claire's age. So the answer would be: 24 years old.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Right now, Claire is 18 years old.  Jessica is six years older, so she is 24 years old.  In two years, Claire will be 20 years old, but this does not affect Jessica's age now.  Claire's neighbor is 50000 years old, but this also does not affect Jessica's age now.   Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old.\nRight now Claire is 18 years old.  That means that Jessica is 24 years old since she is 6 years older than Claire.   The condition that Claire's neighbor is 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\"", "equation": "Claire's neighbor is 50000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.2337678223848343]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Perry's mother tried to have at most 2000 grams of fat per serving of food, but this is not actually applied. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Perry added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much fat is in one cup of cream. That means half a cup of cream has 44 grams of fat (88 grams of fat per cup / 2 = 44 grams of fat). Perry's mother tried to have at most 2000 grams of fat per serving of food, but this is not actually applied. This is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it does not provide any additional information for calculating the number of grams of fat that were added to each serving of food. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. We can calculate this by multiplying 44 (1/2 cup of cream x 88 grams of fat per cup) by 4 (4 servings). So the answer is 44 x 4 = 176 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.", "numerical_answer": 176, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "If Perry added a half cup of cream, then he added 0.5 cups of cream.   Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, and Perry added 0.5 cups of cream, then he added 44 grams of fat (88 x 0.5 = 44).   Since the recipe serves four people, then each serving of food had 44 grams of fat added to it (44 x 4 = 176).   Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?\" because the amount of fat added to each serving of food depends on the amount of cream added and the amount of fat contained in one cup of cream.\nPerry added a half cup of cream to the recipe. Since a cup of cream has 88 grams of fat, that means a half cup of cream has 44 grams of fat.   Therefore, each serving of food has 44 grams of fat added to it.   The condition \"Perry's mother tried to have at most 2000 grams of fat per serving of food, but this is not actually applied\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Perry's mother tried to have at most 2000 grams of fat per serving of food, but this is not actually applied.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2928876578807831, 0.37331458926200867, 0.579214870929718, 0.45575883984565735]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' mother drew 2000 flowers on each tile. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "There are 3 walls in the shower.   Each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.   Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480 tiles.   The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it informs us that there are 8 tiles running the width of each wall. This information is needed to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us to determine the number of tiles in each wall, and then multiply that by the number of walls to get the total number of tiles in the shower.   The condition that James' mother drew 2000 flowers on each tile is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It provides additional information that is not necessary to answer the question.  Therefore, the answer is: There are 480 tiles in the shower.", "numerical_answer": 480, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "There are 3 walls in the shower. Each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall.  Therefore, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 x 3 = 480 tiles.  The condition \"Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it informs us that there are 8 tiles running the width of each wall. This information is needed to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThere are three walls in the shower, each with 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. So, for each wall, we have 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.   Multiplying this by the three walls, we get 160 x 3 = 480 tiles in the shower.   So the answer is that there are 480 tiles in the shower.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us to determine the number of tiles in each wall, and then multiply that by the number of walls to get the total number of tiles in the shower.\nIn order to calculate the number of tiles in the shower, we need to know the number of tiles on each wall. Then, we can multiply the number of tiles on each wall by 3 (the number of walls) to get the total number of tiles in the shower.   The condition of \"James' mother drew 2000 flowers on each tile\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It provides additional information that is not necessary to answer the question.   Therefore, the answer is: There are 240 tiles in the shower.", "equation": "James' mother drew 2000 flowers on each tile.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.22209341824054718]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Julia's mother sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many balls in each color. Julia bought 3 packs of red balls; there are 19 balls in each pack, so she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls.  Julia bought 10 packs of yellow balls; there are 19 balls in each pack, so she bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls.  Julia bought 8 packs of green balls; there are 19 balls in each pack, so she bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Adding up all the balls, Julia bought 399 balls in all.  The condition \"Julia's mother sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders\" does not affect the calculation process of the problem. The number of orange cylinders is irrelevant to the number of balls that Julia bought. Yes, the condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" because it gave us the information that there were 19 balls in each package, which we used to calculate how many balls Julie bought in total.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. This means she bought a total of 21 packs of balls. Since there were 19 balls in each package, we can multiply 21 by 19 to get the total number of balls that Julia bought. This gives us 399 balls.   The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the total number of balls that Julia bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. This means she bought 3 x 19 red balls, 10 x 19 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 green balls. This totals 657 balls.  Julie's mother sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders. This is not relevant to the calculation of how many balls Julie bought in total, since it does not involve any balls.  Therefore, the answer is that Julie bought 657 balls in total. The condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it is part of the calculation of how many balls Julie bought in total.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls; there are 19 balls in each pack, so she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls.  Julie bought 10 packs of yellow balls; there are 19 balls in each pack, so she bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls.  Julie bought 8 packs of green balls; there are 19 balls in each pack, so she bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.   Adding up all the balls, Julie bought 399 balls in all.   The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many packs of green balls Julie bought, which we need to know to calculate the total number of balls she bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls.  So, Julie bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Therefore, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls in all.  The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" because it gave us the information that there were 19 balls in each package, which we used to calculate how many balls Julie bought in total.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Since there were 19 balls in each package, she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls. So, Julia bought a total of 399 balls.   The condition \"Julia's mother sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders\" does not affect the calculation process of the problem. The number of orange cylinders is irrelevant to the number of balls that Julia bought.", "equation": "Julia's mother sold 50000 packs of orange cylinders.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315250754356384, 0.4110042154788971, 0.4391426146030426, 0.4847167432308197, 0.45617300271987915]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. The sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's father is 1000 feets. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "Steve is 5'6\". This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us Steve's initial height. He grows 6 inches. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Steve has grown. The sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's father is 1000 feet. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Steve is 5'6\" and he grows 6 inches. To calculate Steve's height in inches, we need to add 6 inches to Steve's initial height of 5'6\". So the answer would be: 5'6\" + 6\" = 66 inches. The condition that the sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's father is 1000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "First, we need to convert 5'6\" to inches. We can do this by multiplying 5*12 (5 feet times 12 inches/foot) and then adding 6 inches. This gives us 66 inches.   Next, we need to calculate the height of Steve's father. Since we know that the sum of their heights is 1000 feet, we can subtract 66 inches from 1000 feet, which gives us 934 feet.   Finally, we need to convert 934 feet to inches. We can do this by multiplying 934*12 (934 feet times 12 inches/foot) which gives us 11,208 inches.   Therefore, the total height of Steve and his father in inches is 11,208 inches and Steve is 66 inches tall.   Yes, the condition \"Steve is 5'6\"\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" because it is used to calculate the initial height of Steve in inches.\nSteve is 5'6\" (or 66 inches) tall.  He grows 6 inches, so he is now 72 inches tall.  The sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's father is 1000 feet.  We can convert 1000 feet to inches to get 12000 inches.  So, we can find the height of Steve's father by subtracting 72 inches from 12000 inches: 12000 - 72 = 11928 inches.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches. The condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much Steve has grown, allowing us to calculate the height of Steve's father.\nFirst, we need to convert 1000 feets to inches. We know that 1 feet = 12 inches, so 1000 feets = 12000 inches.   Second, we need to calculate the height of Steve's father. We know that the sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's father is 1000 feets (12000 inches). We also know that Steve is 5'6\" or 66 inches. Therefore, Steve's father is 12000 - 66 = 11934 inches tall.  Third, we need to calculate the height of Steve after he grows 6 inches. We know that Steve was 5'6\" or 66 inches tall. Therefore, Steve's height after he grows 6 inches is 66 + 6 = 72 inches.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches.   The condition \"The sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's father is 1000 feets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to calculate the height of Steve's father.", "equation": "The sum of the heights of Steve and Steve's father is 1000 feets.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495513558387756, 0.5135689973831177, 0.5596282482147217]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Martha's sister is 1000 years older than Ellen. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "Ellen is 10 years old now, so in 6 years she will be 16. This means that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, so Martha's age now is 32.  The condition \"Martha's sister is 1000 years older than Ellen\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. That condition is only relevant if you were trying to calculate Martha's sister's age.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "If Ellen is 10 years old now, then in 6 years she will be 16. This means that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in 6 years, so Martha's age now is 32.  The condition \"Martha's sister is 1000 years older than Ellen\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. That condition is only relevant if you were trying to calculate Martha's sister's age.", "equation": "Martha's sister is 1000 years older than Ellen.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.4875507354736328]}
{"original_question": "Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. Kim's father sold 50000 more peaches to the store. How many cherry saplings does Kim have left?", "reasoning_path": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so that would be 80 x 0.25 = 20. Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the problem because that is the number of pits from which the saplings sprout, and we use that number to figure out how many saplings Kim has left. The condition that Kim's father sold 50000 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that 25% of the 80 cherry pits sprout and Kim sells 6 of the saplings. To calculate how many cherry saplings Kim has left, we need to calculate how many cherry saplings sprouted from the 80 cherry pits, and then subtract the 6 saplings Kim sold. So the answer is: 14 cherry saplings left.", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "14", "instructions": "First, Kim plants 80 cherry pits. 25% of them sprout, so that would be 80 x 0.25 = 20. Then, Kim sells 6 of the saplings, so she has 20 - 6 = 14 cherry saplings left. The condition \"Kim plants 80 cherry pits.\" is relevant to the problem because that is the number of pits from which the saplings sprout, and we use that number to figure out how many saplings Kim has left.\nThe first step is to calculate how many cherry saplings sprouted from the 80 cherry pits. 25% of 80 is 20.  Kim then sold 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left.  The condition \"25% of them sprout\" is relevant to the problem because it is required to calculate how many cherry saplings sprouted from the 80 cherry pits. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate how many saplings Kim has left.\nKim started with 80 cherry pits. 25% of 80 is 20, so 20 cherry pits sprouted. Kim then sold 6 of those saplings, leaving 14 saplings remaining. This information is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it helps us determine how many saplings Kim has left.\nKim planted 80 cherry pits, and 25% of them sprouted. That means Kim has 20 cherry saplings. Kim sold 6 of the saplings, so she has 14 cherry saplings left. The condition of Kim's father selling 50000 more peaches to the store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Kim's father sold 50000 more peaches to the store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5364676713943481, 0.2404496967792511, 0.46118131279945374, 0.3157881796360016]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The farm that Holden's neighbor owns is 3 times larger than Holden's home. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to add up the total area of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom. This would be 309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft.  Next, we need to multiply this total area by 2, since the new room is twice as large. So 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft.   Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is a part of the total area that is being multiplied by 2. The condition that Holden's neighbor owns a farm that is 3 times larger than Holden's home is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "First, we need to add up the total area of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom. This would be 309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft.   Next, we need to multiply this total area by 2, since the new room is twice as large. So 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft.   Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is a part of the total area that is being multiplied by 2.\nFirst, calculate the total square footage of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom:  Bedroom: 309 sq ft Bathroom: 150 sq ft  Total: 459 sq ft  Now, since Holden wants the new room to be twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, we can calculate the size of this new room by multiplying 459 sq ft by 2.   New Room: 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new room will have a total of 918 sq ft.   The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is used to calculate the total square footage of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom.\nHolden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. That means the total sq ft of his bedroom and bathroom is 459 sq ft (309 + 150). Now, if he wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, that means the total sq ft of this new room should be 918 sq ft (459 x 2).  The condition \"The farm that Holden's neighbor owns is 3 times larger than Holden's home\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The farm that Holden's neighbor owns is 3 times larger than Holden's home.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.44409191608428955]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The bike insurance of James' mother can cover $10000 per year. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, calculate the total cost of the doctor appointment: Total Cost = $300 Second, calculate the amount that James's insurance will cover: Amount Covered by Insurance = 80% x $300 = $240 Third, calculate the amount that James will need to pay out of pocket: Out-of-Pocket Cost = Total Cost - Amount Covered by Insurance = $300 - $240 = $60 So, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The conditions \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" and \"James's insurance covers 80%\" are relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as they are used to determine the amount that James's insurance will cover and the total cost of the doctor's appointment. The condition \"The bike insurance of James' mother can cover $10000 per year.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the out-of-pocket cost of James's doctor appointment, as this condition does not relate to the cost of the appointment. So, the out-of-pocket cost for James's doctor appointment is $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it provides the total cost of the doctor's appointment. James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60 ($300 x 0.8 = $240; $300 - $240 = $60). The bike insurance of James' mother is not relevant to this calculation because it does not provide any information about the cost of the doctor's appointment.\nFirst, calculate the total cost of the doctor appointment:  Total Cost = $300   Second, calculate the amount that James's insurance will cover:  Amount Covered by Insurance = 80% x $300 = $240   Third, calculate the amount that James will need to pay out of pocket:  Out-of-Pocket Cost = Total Cost - Amount Covered by Insurance = $300 - $240 = $60  So, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine the amount that James's insurance will cover.\nJames's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit. We know that James's insurance covers 80%, so that means that James will have to pay 20% of the total cost, which is $60. The condition \"The bike insurance of James' mother can cover $10000 per year.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the out-of-pocket cost of James's doctor appointment, as this condition does not relate to the cost of the appointment. So, the out-of-pocket cost for James's doctor appointment is $60.", "equation": "The bike insurance of James' mother can cover $10000 per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.38550618290901184]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Michael's sister is expected to have dinner in 50000 hours. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the duration of the TV show in hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the commercials lasted. The total duration of commercials is 10 minutes x 3 = 30 minutes. The TV show itself, not counting commercials, was 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours. Yes, the condition \"there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Michael's sister is expected to have dinner in 50000 hours is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how long the TV show itself was, not counting commercials. We can calculate this by subtracting the duration of the commercials from the duration of the TV show. So the answer is 1.2 hours.", "numerical_answer": 1.2, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "First, we need to subtract the 10 minutes for each commercial from the 1.5 hours. This means that the show itself lasted for 1.3 hours. So, the answer to the question is 1.3 hours. The condition \"Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the starting point for the calculation.\nThe total time of the show and commercials is 1.5 hours. We know that the three commercials take 10 minutes each, so they take 30 minutes in total. This leaves us with 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours. Therefore, the TV show itself (not counting the commercials) was 1.2 hours long.  Yes, the condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the necessary information to calculate the length of the TV show itself.\nThe total time of the show was 1.5 hours.  The commercials lasted a total of 30 minutes (3 x 10 minutes). Therefore, the TV show itself was 1.5 hours minus 30 minutes, which is equal to 1.2 hours.   The condition \"Michael's sister is expected to have dinner in 50000 hours\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Michael's sister is expected to have dinner in 50000 hours.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, 0.07125601172447205]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. James' mother made 1000 sweaters last month. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "James bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the discount percentage.  Each t-shirt was $20. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the original price of each t-shirt.  So, the discounted price per t-shirt is 50% of the original price, which is $10.  Now, we need to calculate the total amount that James paid. So, we multiply the price per t-shirt with the number of t-shirts he bought.  Total amount paid = $10 x 6 = $60  So, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"James' mother made 1000 sweaters last month\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\".", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "James bought 6 t-shirts that were each $20. If they were 50% off, then he would have paid $10 for each t-shirt. Multiplying this by the number of t-shirts (6) gives us a total of $60. Therefore, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.   The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much James paid for each t-shirt. Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total amount that James paid. The information about James' mother making 1000 sweaters is not relevant to the calculation process.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off. So, the price was reduced by 50%. That means, he paid 50% of the original price for each t-shirt. The original price per t-shirt is $20. So, the discounted price per t-shirt is $10.   Now, we need to calculate the total amount that James paid. So, we multiply the price per t-shirt with the number of t-shirts he bought.   Total amount paid = $10 x 6 = $60   So, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.   The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to this calculation process as it tells us the original price of each t-shirt. It is necessary to know the original price in order to calculate the discounted price.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off, and each t-shirt cost $20. Therefore, the total amount that James paid is 6 x $20 = $120.  The condition \"James' mother made 1000 sweaters last month\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\"", "equation": "James' mother made 1000 sweaters last month.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.22002029418945312]}
{"original_question": "Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel are bird watching. Marcus sees 7 birds, Humphrey sees 11 birds, and Darrel sees 9 birds. Marcus fed 100000 monkeys. How many birds does each of them see on average?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many birds each of them see on average. This is simply the sum of the birds seen divided by the number of people who were bird watching.  So, the average number of birds seen is (7+11+9) / 3 = 27 / 3 = 9 birds. Therefore, each of them sees 9 birds on average. The condition that Marcus fed 100000 monkeys is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it does not affect the average number of birds seen by Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel. Therefore, the condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, the condition \"and Darrel sees 9 birds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The calculation process requires the total number of birds seen by all three bird watchers, which is 7 + 11 + 9 = 27.  The average number of birds seen by each of them is therefore 27 / 3 = 9.   Therefore, each of them sees 9 birds on average.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many birds each of them see on average. This is simply the sum of the birds seen divided by the number of people who were bird watching.  So, the average number of birds seen is (7+11+9) / 3 = 17 / 3 = 5.67 birds.  Now, the condition \"Marcus fed 100000 monkeys\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it does not affect the average number of birds seen by Marcus, Humphrey, and Darrel. Therefore, the condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Marcus fed 100000 monkeys.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4831371605396271, 0.5573062300682068, 0.5210311412811279, 0.48639485239982605, 0.15498143434524536]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Clarice's mother bought 100000 kilograms of banana yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the cost of the cherries. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that Genevieve was $400 short of the total price.  That means Genevieve had $1600 on her. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the amount of money Genevieve had.  We can calculate the number of kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought by dividing $1600 by $8: 1600 / 8 = 200 kilograms.  Therefore, Genevieve bought 200 kilograms of cherries.  Yes, the condition \"Cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Clarice's mother bought 100000 kilograms of banana yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The relevant information to answer this question is the cost of the cherries and the amount of money Genevieve had. To calculate how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought, we need to divide", "numerical_answer": 200, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "If Genevieve had $1600 on her, she could buy 200 kilograms of cherries (1600 divided by 8). The condition \"Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process because it establishes the cost of the cherries, which is $8 per kilogram. Without this information, it would be impossible to determine how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve could buy.\nIf Genevieve had $1600 on her, she could have bought 200 kilograms of cherries (1600/8 = 200).  However, when Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price, so she only bought 180 kilograms of cherries (1600-400 = 1200, 1200/8 = 150).  Clarice's mother buying 100000 kilograms of banana yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve bought.\nGenevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves and the cost was $8 per kilogram.   If Genevieve had $1600 on her, she would have been able to buy 200 kilograms of cherries (1600/8 = 200).   However, she was $400 short of the total price, so she only bought 160 kilograms of cherries (1600-400 = 1200/8 = 150).   The condition that Clarice's mother bought 100000 kilograms of banana yesterday is not relevant to the calculation of how many kilograms of cherries Genevieve purchased.   Therefore, Genevieve bought 160 kilograms of cherries.", "equation": "Clarice's mother bought 100000 kilograms of banana yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.4271329641342163]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Mari's father reported that the diameter of each button is 2 inches. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 5 times as many, which is 40. Kendra made 4 more than that, so she made 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 22 buttons. Yes, the condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process. It tells us how many buttons Kendra made, which is necessary to calculate how many buttons Sue made. The condition that Mari's father reported that the diameter of each button is 2 inches is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 5 times as many, which is 40. Kendra made 4 more than that, so she made 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 22 buttons.   Yes, the condition \"Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari\" is relevant to the calculation process. It tells us how many buttons Kendra made, which is necessary to calculate how many buttons Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 5 x 4 = 20 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 10 buttons. The condition of Mari making 8 buttons is relevant to the calculation process, because it is used to determine how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.\nFirst, Mari made 8 buttons.  Second, Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. So if Mari made 8 buttons, Kendra made 44 buttons (8 x 5 + 4).  Third, Sue made half as many as Kendra. So Sue made 22 buttons (44 姊 2).   Therefore, the answer is that Sue made 22 buttons.   The condition that Mari's father reported that the diameter of each button is 2 inches is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mari's father reported that the diameter of each button is 2 inches.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.21817342936992645]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Sally's mother bought 500 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday, which means she eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday (2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread). Sally eats 1 sandwich on Sunday, which means she eats 2 pieces of bread on Sunday (1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread). The total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 4 + 2 = 6 pieces of bread. Yes, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many sandwiches she eats over Saturday and Sunday. The condition that Sally's mother bought 500 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not provide any information about the number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. So the answer is 6 pieces of bread.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sandwiches Sally eats. She eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday, so she eats 3 sandwiches in total.  Second, we need to calculate the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats. Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so Sally eats 6 pieces of bread in total.  Therefore, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many sandwiches she eats over Saturday and Sunday.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many pieces of bread Sally ate on Saturday. Since Sally ate 2 sandwiches on Saturday, we can calculate that she ate 4 pieces of bread.  Next, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally ate on Sunday. Since Sally ate 1 sandwich on Sunday, we can calculate that she ate 2 pieces of bread.  Finally, we can add the total number of pieces of bread eaten on Saturday and Sunday together to get the total number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday. In this case, Sally ate 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.  Therefore, the condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it affects the total number of pieces of bread Sally ate across Saturday and Sunday.\nSally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This means that Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday. So, across Saturday and Sunday, Sally eats 6 pieces of bread.  The condition \"Sally's mother bought 500 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not provide any information about the number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday.", "equation": "Sally's mother bought 500 more pieces of bread than Sally yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.3840506970882416]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Papi Calot's neighbor ate 20000 cucumbers for dinner. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot already has 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he already has 126 plants. He is thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy 15 more plants. Therefore, Papi Calot needs to buy 15 more plants. The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is not directly relevant to the calculation process, as it is already mentioned in the problem. The condition that Papi Calot's neighbor ate 20000 cucumbers for dinner is not relevant to the calculation process. To answer the question of how many plants Papi Calot has to buy, we first need to determine how many plants he has already planned to plant. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, for a total of 126 plants. He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants, for a total of 141 plants. Therefore, Papi Calot has to buy 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot already has 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he already has 126 plants.  He is thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy 15 more plants.  So, the answer is Papi Calot needs to buy 15 more plants.  The condition \"He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each\" is not directly relevant to the calculation process, as it is already mentioned in the problem.\nPapi Calot initially planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which is a total of 126 plants. Then he plans to add 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy a total of 141 plants.  The condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it explains why Papi Calot needs to buy the additional 15 plants.\nTo answer the question of how many plants Papi Calot has to buy, we first need to determine how many plants he has already planned to plant. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, for a total of 126 plants. He then wants to add 15 additional potato plants, for a total of 141 plants. Therefore, Papi Calot has to buy 141 plants.   The condition that Papi Calot's neighbor ate 20000 cucumbers for dinner is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Papi Calot's neighbor ate 20000 cucumbers for dinner.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.4288308322429657]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Melies' mother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $1000. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat and each kilogram costs $82. So, the total cost of the meat is $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, Melies has $16 left. The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the starting point for the calculation. The condition that Melies' mother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $1000 is not relevant to the calculation process, since Melies has already spent the money on the meat. So, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Melies has $180 in his wallet. He bought 2 kg of meat at $82 per kilogram.  Therefore, he spent $164 on the meat.  So, he has $16 left in his wallet.   The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process because it helps us to determine the amount of money spent on the meat.\nMelies has $180 in his wallet. He bought 2 kg of meat. Each kilogram costs $82. So, the total cost of the meat is $164. Melies has $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, Melies has $16 left.   The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the value used to determine the total amount of money Melies had to pay for the meat.\nStep 1: Melies buys 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram, so Melies spends a total of $164 on the meat.   Step 2: Melies has $180 in his wallet.   Step 3: Melies has $16 left in his wallet after paying for the meat ($180 - $164 = $16).   Step 4: Melies' mother wishes to buy a pencil at the price of $1000.  Answer: Melies has $16 left in his wallet after paying for the meat. The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the starting point for the calculation.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, so he needs to pay $164 for the meat. He has $180 in his wallet, so after paying for the meat, he has $16 left. The condition \"Melies' mother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $1000\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since Melies has already spent the money on the meat. So, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "equation": "Melies' mother wished to buy a pencil at the price of $1000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443210005760193, 0.3812294006347656, 0.535139262676239, 0.26552948355674744]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. James' sister rides 2000 kilometers to the shopping center. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "James bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This means that he paid 50% of the regular price for each t-shirt. The regular price for each t-shirt is $20, so the discounted price for each t-shirt is $10. If James bought 6 t-shirts at this discounted price, then the total amount he paid is 6 x $10 = $60.  The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps determine the cost of each shirt and the total cost of the shirts. The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps determine the total cost of the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"James' sister rides 2000 kilometers to the shopping center\" is not relevant to the calculation process. The distance his sister traveled is not related to the cost of the t-shirts. Therefore, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "James bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off, so each shirt cost $20. That means he paid a total of $120 for the 6 t-shirts. The condition \"James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it determines the cost of each shirt and the total cost of the shirts.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts. Each t-shirt cost $20. So, the total cost of the 6 t-shirts is 6 x 20 = 120. But James got 50% discount, so the total cost is 120 x 0.5 = 60. So, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps determine the total cost of the 6 t-shirts.\nJames bought 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This means that he paid 50% of the regular price for each t-shirt. The regular price for each t-shirt is $20, so the discounted price for each t-shirt is $10. If James bought 6 t-shirts at this discounted price, then the total amount he paid is 6 x $10 = $60.   In this problem, the condition \"James' sister rides 2000 kilometers to the shopping center\" is not relevant to the calculation process. The distance his sister traveled is not related to the cost of the t-shirts.", "equation": "James' sister rides 2000 kilometers to the shopping center.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.2868979573249817]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Abie's father has 500 packets of candies. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips to start with. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so now she has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, bringing her total to 22 bags of chips. Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end. The condition that Abie's father has 500 packets of candies is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Abie had 20 bags of chips to start with, she gave 4 bags to her friend, and she bought 6 more bags of chips in the store. To calculate how many bags of chips Abie has in the end, we need to subtract 4 bags from the initial 20 bags and add the 6 bags she bought in the store. So the answer would be 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie had 20 bags of chips to start with.  She gave 4 bags to her friend.  She bought 6 more bags in the store.   So, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips in the end.   The condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provided the initial number of bags Abie had.\nInitially, Abie had 20 bags of chips.   After giving 4 bags to her friend, she has 16 bags of chips.   After buying 6 bags in the store, she has a total of 22 bags of chips.   Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.   The condition that she gave 4 bags to her friend is relevant to the calculation process, as it is a part of the sequence of events that led to the final answer.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips to begin with. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so now she has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, so she now has 22 bags of chips in the end. The fact that her father has 500 packets of candies is not relevant to the calculation process.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips to begin with. She gave 4 bags to her friend, leaving her with 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, bringing her total to 22 bags of chips.  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition, \"Abie's father has 500 packets of candies,\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect the number of bags of chips Abie has in the end.", "equation": "Abie's father has 500 packets of candies.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.445424884557724]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. Charles' father leads a team of 50 people. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987.   Now, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. To do this, we simply need to add 362,987 and 482,653, which gives us a total of 845,640.   The condition that Charles is moving from Springfield to Greenville is relevant to this problem, as it provides the population of both cities, which is necessary to calculate the total population of both cities.  The condition that Charles' father leads a team of 50 people is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville combined is 845,640 people.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987.   Now, we need to calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville. To do this, we simply need to add 362,987 and 482,653, which gives us a total of 845,640.   The condition that Charles is moving from Springfield to Greenville is relevant to this problem, as it provides the population of both cities, which is necessary to calculate the total population of both cities.\nThe total population of Springfield is 482,653 people.  Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, which means the total population of Greenville is 362,987 people.  The total population of Springfield and Greenville combined is 845,640 people.   The condition \"Charles' father leads a team of 50 people\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Charles' father leads a team of 50 people.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.08269353210926056]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Asia's sister paid $10000 to go to the supermarket by taxi. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate the amount Asia saved at the sale: Amount saved = $350 - $140 = $210  Second, let's calculate the percentage off Asia got at the sale: Percentage off = (Amount saved/$350) x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process because it states the amount Asia paid for the dress at the sale, which is used to calculate the amount saved and the percentage off. The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is also relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it tells us the original price of the dress, which is necessary in order to calculate the discount and the percentage off. The condition that Asia's sister paid $10000 to go to the supermarket by taxi is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it does not need to be taken into account.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, let's calculate the amount Asia saved at the sale: Amount saved = $350 - $140 = $210  Second, let's calculate the percentage off Asia got at the sale: Percentage off = (Amount saved/$350) x 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process because it states the amount Asia paid for the dress at the sale, which is used to calculate the amount saved and the percentage off.\nFirst, let's calculate the discount Asia got:  $350 - $140 = $210  Now, let's calculate the percentage off:   $210 / $350 = 0.6 = 60%  So, Asia got a 60% discount at the sale.  The condition \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it tells us the original price of the dress, which is necessary in order to calculate the discount and the percentage off.\nIn order to calculate the percentage off, we need to know the original price of the dress and the sale price. We have both of these values in the question, so we can proceed with the calculation.   The original price of the dress was $350, and the sale price was $140. To calculate the percentage off, we can use the formula:  (Original price - Sale price) / Original price x 100 = % Off  In this case, the calculation would be:  ($350 - $140) / $350 x 100 = 60% Off   Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia's sister paid $10000 to go to the supermarket by taxi\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it does not need to be taken into account.", "equation": "Asia's sister paid $10000 to go to the supermarket by taxi.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877838134766, 0.3318527042865753, 0.3977828621864319]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. Michelle's father rode a bike to the office for 100000 miles. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "First, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 as soon as she entered the taxi. This is relevant to the calculation process as this fee should be taken into account when calculating the total amount for her ride. After that, Michelle rode 4 miles, so the taxi charge per mile is multiplied by 4, which amounts to $10. Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride ($2 + $10). The condition about her father riding a bike to the office for 100000 miles is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 when she entered the taxi, the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, and Michelle rode 4 miles. So the answer would be: $2 + $2.5 x 4 miles = $12.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Michelle paid a ride fee of $2 as soon as she entered the taxi. This is relevant to the calculation process as this fee should be taken into account when calculating the total amount for her ride. After that, Michelle rode 4 miles, so the taxi charge per mile is multiplied by 4, which amounts to $10. Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her ride ($2 + $10).\nStep 1: Michelle's father rode a bike to the office for 100,000 miles. This is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   Step 2: As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. This is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is an additional cost for Michelle.   Step 3: Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. This is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the total distance traveled by Michelle.   Step 4: If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?   Answer: Michelle paid a total of $12.50 ($2 + $2.5 x 4 miles) for her ride.\nThe initial fee for entering the taxi is $2, so that is the starting amount. Then the charge per mile is $2.5, so we just need to multiply this by 4 (the number of miles Michelle rode in the taxi). This total is $10. Therefore, Michelle paid a total of $12 for her taxi ride ($2 initial fee + $10 mile fee).  The condition about Michelle's father riding a bike to the office for 100000 miles is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Michelle's father rode a bike to the office for 100000 miles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.2518908381462097]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. In addition, Tom's sister collected 1000 pineapples. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many apples Lexie picked. Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many apples Tom picked. So, Tom picked 24 apples (12 x 2). The total number of apples that Lexie and Tom collected altogether is 12 + 24 = 36 apples. The condition that Tom's sister collected 1000 pineapples is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. To calculate how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether, we need to add together the number of apples that Lexie and Tom picked. So the answer would be 12 + 24 = 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "None", "equation": "In addition, Tom's sister collected 1000 pineapples.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.6033648252487183]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Libby's neighbor earns 20000 dollars each week. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. This is relevant information to the calculation process as it tells us how much Libby has to pay for the dress. Since 4 quarters = $1, Libby will need 140 quarters to pay for the dress (35 x 4). Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  The condition that Libby's neighbor earns $20,000 a week is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem. To calculate how many quarters Libby has left, we need to know how much she is spending. The relevant information to answer this question is that Libby has 160 quarters and she needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. So the answer is 20 quarters.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "To calculate how many quarters Libby has left, we need to know how much she is spending. The dress costs $35, which is 140 quarters (35 x 4, since each quarter is worth 25 cents). Therefore, Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress (160 - 140).   Yes, condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it tells us how many quarters Libby has to start with. Without knowing this information, we would not be able to accurately calculate how many quarters she will have left.\nLibby has 160 quarters.  She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  Therefore, Libby will have 125 quarters left after replacing the dress.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much money Libby has to pay to replace the dress. Without this information, we would not know how many quarters Libby has left after replacing the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters, and she needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since 4 quarters = $1, Libby will need 140 quarters to pay for the dress.   Therefore, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  The condition that Libby's neighbor earns $20,000 a week is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.", "equation": "Libby's neighbor earns 20000 dollars each week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.30731868743896484]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The laptop insurance of James' neighbor can cover up to $500000 per year. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%, so James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment would be $60 ($300 x 0.2 = $60). The laptop insurance of James' neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment. The laptop insurance of James' neighbor is irrelevant because it does not apply to James, it applies to his neighbor. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines the amount of money that James needs to pay out-of-pocket.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "James's insurance covers 80% of the cost of his doctor appointment, so that means that his out-of-pocket cost is 20% of $300, or $60. The laptop insurance of James' neighbor has no effect on the calculation of James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment, so the condition of \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe doctor appointment costs $300.  James's insurance covers 80% of the cost.  This means that James needs to pay the remaining 20%, which is $60.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process because it determines the amount of money that James needs to pay out-of-pocket.\nJames's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%, so James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment would be $60 ($300 x 0.2 = $60).   The laptop insurance of James' neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment. The laptop insurance of James' neighbor is irrelevant because it does not apply to James, it applies to his neighbor.", "equation": "The laptop insurance of James' neighbor can cover up to $500000 per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.43084508180618286]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Gretchen's neighbor spends 5000 minutes per drawing. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much time Gretchen spent drawing on Saturday and Sunday. Saturday: 24 drawings x 5000 minutes per drawing = 120,000 minutes Sunday: 16 drawings x 5000 minutes per drawing = 80,000 minutes  Total minutes = 200,000 minutes  Now we can calculate how much money Gretchen made.  Saturday: 24 drawings x $20.00 per drawing = $480.00 Sunday: 16 drawings x $20.00 per drawing = $320.00  Total earnings = $800.00  So, Gretchen made $800.00 in total by selling 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday. Yes, the condition \"she charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is what determines the amount of money Gretchen makes per drawing. The condition \"Gretchen's neighbor spends 5000 minutes per drawing\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much time Gretchen spent drawing on Saturday and Sunday.  Saturday: 24 drawings x 5000 minutes per drawing = 120,000 minutes Sunday: 16 drawings x 5000 minutes per drawing = 80,000 minutes  Total minutes = 200,000 minutes  Now we can calculate how much money Gretchen made.  Saturday: 24 drawings x $20.00 per drawing = $480.00 Sunday: 16 drawings x $20.00 per drawing = $320.00  Total earnings = $800.00  So, Gretchen made $800.00 in total by selling 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday. The condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is what determines the amount of money Gretchen makes per drawing.\nGretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 on Sunday. So, in total she sold 40 drawings.  Gretchen charges $20.00 per drawing. So, she made a total of $800.00.   The condition \"Gretchen's neighbor spends 5000 minutes per drawing\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Gretchen's neighbor spends 5000 minutes per drawing.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.2917678654193878]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The company that Charles' mother works for has 100 employees. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville. This is relevant as it tells us how many people live in Springfield. Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield. This is also relevant as it tells us how many people live in Greenville. To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to add the population of Springfield to the population of Greenville. That means the total population is 482,653 + (482,653 - 119,666) = 562,319 people. The condition that Charles' mother works for a company with 100 employees is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the population of Springfield and Greenville. To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to add the population of Springfield to the population of Greenville. So the answer would be: 482,653 + (482,653 - 119,666) = 562,319", "numerical_answer": 562319, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "The total population of Springfield is 482,653 people.   Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, so we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville.  Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + (482,653 - 119,666) = 562,319 people.  The condition that Charles is moving from Springfield to Greenville is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the populations of both cities, which we need to know in order to calculate the total population of both cities.\nThe population of Springfield is 482,653.  Greenville has 119,666 fewer people, so the population of Greenville is 362,987.  To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, you need to add the population of Springfield and Greenville together.   Total population of Springfield and Greenville = 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640  The condition \"The company that Charles' mother works for has 100 employees\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the population of Springfield and Greenville, so it does not have an effect on the answer.", "equation": "The company that Charles' mother works for has 100 employees.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.09927522391080856]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Julia's mother bought 10000 packs of blue dices. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "First, figure out how many balls Julie bought in each color:  Red Balls: 3 packs x 19 balls = 57 balls Yellow Balls: 10 packs x 19 balls = 190 balls Green Balls: 8 packs x 19 balls = 152 balls  Then, add up the total number of balls: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  Finally, Julie's mother bought 10000 packs of blue dices, so this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" since the mother bought blue dices and not balls. Therefore, the total number of balls bought by Julie = 399.  Yes, the condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the information needed to calculate the number of green balls bought in total.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. The total number of balls that Julia bought can be calculated by multiplying the number of packs of each color by the number of balls in each package:  3 x 19 = 57 red balls 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls 8 x 19 = 152 green balls  Therefore, Julia bought a total of 399 balls.  The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is one of the factors used to determine the total number of balls that Julia bought.\nFirst, figure out how many balls Julie bought in each color:  Red Balls: 3 packs x 19 balls = 57 balls Yellow Balls: 10 packs x 19 balls = 190 balls Green Balls: 8 packs x 19 balls = 152 balls  Then, add up the total number of balls: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  Finally, Julie's mother bought 10000 packs of blue dices, so this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, so she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls.  Julie bought 10 packs of yellow balls, so she bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls.  Julie bought 8 packs of green balls, so she bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Julie's mother bought 10000 packs of blue dices, so she bought 10000 x 19 = 190000 blue dices.  Therefore, Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 + 190000 = 191099 balls in total.  Yes, the condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the information needed to calculate the number of green balls bought in total.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls.  We can calculate the total number of balls bought by Julie by multiplying the number of packs bought for each color with the number of balls in each pack.   So, the total number of balls bought by Julie = (3 x 19) + (10 x 19) + (8 x 19) = 567  Julie's mother bought 10000 packs of blue dices.  This statement is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" since the mother bought blue dices and not balls.  Therefore, the total number of balls bought by Julie = 567\nFirst, we need to calculate how many balls Julia bought. Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Therefore, she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls, 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls, and 8 x 19 = 152 green balls. So, Julia bought a total of 399 balls.   The condition \"Julia's mother bought 10000 packs of blue dices\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" since it does not mention anything about balls. Therefore, this condition is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Julia's mother bought 10000 packs of blue dices.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315250754356384, 0.4110042154788971, 0.4391426146030426, 0.4847167432308197, 0.49028950929641724]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. Oli's sister has 200 more strawberries than Victoria. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli. This means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream (4 + 4 = 8). Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli (8 - 4 = 4). The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many scoops of ice cream Victoria has. The condition that Oli's sister has 200 more strawberries than Victoria is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is 4.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  This means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream (4 + 4 = 8).   The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many scoops of ice cream Victoria has.   Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli (8 - 4 = 4).\nOli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  The condition \"Oli's sister has 200 more strawberries than Victoria\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Oli's sister has 200 more strawberries than Victoria.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.44441530108451843]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's sister ate 50000 more tomatoes than Kelly. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. To do that, we just add up the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234. Then, we need to calculate how many pounds that equals. Since 6 carrots equal 1 pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the answer: 234 / 6 = 39 pounds.  The condition that Kelly's sister ate 50000 more tomatoes than Kelly is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. We already have the total number of carrots Kelly harvested (234) and we know how many carrots equal a pound (6). Therefore, the condition is not necessary to calculate the total number of pounds. So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "Kelly harvested 55 carrots in the first bed, 101 carrots in the second bed, and 78 carrots in the third bed. This adds up to a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots. The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because the number of carrots harvested in each bed does not affect the total amount of carrots harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. To do this, we just add up the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234. Next, we need to figure out how many pounds that equals. We know that 6 carrots equal 1 pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to get the answer: 234 / 6 = 39 pounds.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" since we already have the total number of carrots Kelly harvested (234). Therefore, the condition is not necessary to calculate the total number of pounds.\nThe first step is to calculate the total number of carrots. To do that, we need to add up the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234. Then, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots that is. Since 6 carrots weighs 1 pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds: 234 / 6 = 39. So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is one of the pieces of information that we need to calculate the total number of carrots, which is necessary to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weighed one pound, Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots. The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant because it helps us determine how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\nFirst, we need to add the number of carrots Kelly harvested from the three beds: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234. Then, we need to divide this number by 6, since 6 carrots weigh one pound. 234 / 6 = 39. So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition that Kelly's sister ate 50000 more tomatoes than Kelly is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Kelly's sister ate 50000 more tomatoes than Kelly.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.37532082200050354]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's brother pays $1000 for each egg. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Step 1: Calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in one day: 3 eggs. Step 2: Calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in one week: 21 eggs (3 eggs x 7 days). Step 3: Calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks: 42 eggs (21 eggs x 2 weeks).  Yes, the condition \"Jason's brother pays $1000 for each egg\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks. We can do this by multiplying the number of eggs Jason consumes in one day (3 eggs) by the number of days in two weeks (14 days). So the answer is 42 eggs (3 eggs x 14 days).", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in one day: 3 eggs.   Step 2: Calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in one week: 21 eggs (3 eggs x 7 days).   Step 3: Calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks: 42 eggs (21 eggs x 2 weeks).  Condition \"Jason's brother pays $1000 for each egg\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jason's brother pays $1000 for each egg.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.3980909287929535]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. James' sister spends 2 hours on math classes per week. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for one unit. Each unit costs $50, so James pays $50 per unit. Second, we need to calculate how many units James is taking over two semesters. Since James takes 20 units per semester, he is taking 40 units over two semesters. Finally, we multiply the cost of one unit ($50) by the number of units taken (40) to get the total cost for two semesters: $2,000. Therefore, the answer is $2,000. The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant, since it tells us how many units James is taking over two semesters. Without that information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the answer. The condition that James' sister spends 2 hours on math classes per week is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the cost of one unit. That is $50.   Second, we need to calculate how many units James is taking over two semesters. Since James takes 20 units per semester, he is taking 40 units over two semesters.   Finally, we multiply the cost of one unit ($50) by the number of units taken (40) to get the total cost for two semesters: $2,000.   Therefore, the answer is $2,000.   The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant, since it tells us how many units James is taking over two semesters. Without that information, we would not be able to accurately calculate the answer.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much James pays for one semester. Each unit costs $50, so James pays $50 x 20 units = $1000 per semester.  Now, we need to calculate how much James pays for two semesters. We already know that James pays $1000 per semester, so he pays $1000 x 2 semesters = $2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"James' sister spends 2 hours on math classes per week.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of \"If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?\".", "equation": "James' sister spends  2 hours on math classes per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.39625465869903564]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. In addition, Salem's sister wrote 10000 articles. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the number of words in each stanza. As each stanza has 10 lines and each line has 8 words, there are 80 words in each stanza. The second step is to calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since the poem has 20 stanzas, there are 80 x 20 = 1600 words in the poem. So, the total number of words in the poem is 1600. Yes, the condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us the number of stanzas in the poem which is required for the calculation. Without knowing the number of stanzas in the poem, we would not be able to calculate the total number of words in the poem. The condition that Salem's sister wrote 10000 articles is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the number of words in each stanza. As each stanza has 10 lines and each line has 8 words, there are 80 words in each stanza.   The second step is to calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since the poem has 20 stanzas, there are 80 x 20 = 1600 words in the poem.   So, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.   The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us the number of stanzas in the poem which is required for the calculation. Without knowing the number of stanzas in the poem, we would not be able to calculate the total number of words in the poem.\nFirst, calculate the total number of words in a single stanza. There are 10 lines in a single stanza, and each line has 8 words. That means there are a total of 80 words in a single stanza.  Second, calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since there are 20 stanzas in the poem, and each stanza has 80 words, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  The condition \"In addition, Salem's sister wrote 10000 articles.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "In addition, Salem's sister wrote 10000 articles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.1998099535703659]}
{"original_question": "Each wall of a 3 sided shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. James' mother painted 1000 triangles on each tile. How many tiles are in the shower?", "reasoning_path": "We know that each wall has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tiles run the width and height of each wall.  We also know that James' mother painted 1000 triangles on each tile. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many triangles were painted on each tile.  So, the total number of tiles in the shower is 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.  Yes, the condition \"James' mother painted 1000 triangles on each tile\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that each wall of the shower has 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many tiles run the width and height of each wall.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many tiles are in the shower. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of tiles running the width and height of each wall. So the answer is: 8 x 20 = 160 tiles.", "numerical_answer": 160, "gold_answer": "480", "instructions": "The problem states that there are 8 tiles running the width of the wall and 20 tiles running the height of the wall for each wall of the 3-sided shower.   Therefore, in total there are 8 x 20 = 160 tiles in the shower.   The condition of the problem is relevant to the calculation process as it gives us the number of tiles running the width and height of the wall, which we need in order to calculate the total number of tiles in the shower.\nThe 3 walls have 8 tiles running the width of each wall. So, there are 8 x 3 = 24 tiles in the shower.   The condition \"and 20 tiles running the height of the wall\" is relevant, since it means that each tile is divided into 20 triangles. So, there are 24 x 20 = 480 triangles in the shower.   So, the answer is 24 tiles in the shower.\nFirst we need to calculate how many tiles there are in the shower. The shower has 3 walls, each with 8 tiles running the width and 20 tiles running the height. So, 3 x 8 x 20 = 480 tiles.  Now, we need to calculate how many triangles there are in the shower. Since each tile has 1000 triangles, and there are 480 tiles, we can calculate the total number of triangles by multiplying 480 x 1000 = 480,000 triangles.   So, to answer the question: there are 480 tiles in the shower and 480,000 triangles painted on those tiles. The condition \"James' mother painted 1000 triangles on each tile\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how many triangles were painted on each tile.", "equation": "James' mother painted 1000 triangles on each tile.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6245280504226685, 0.3928482234477997, 0.2777165472507477]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Megan's father bought the tickets for 6 plays. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work. This means that 80 plays out of 100 plays Megan was the lead actress in. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plays Megan was the lead actress in.  Megan's father bought the tickets for 6 plays. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plays Megan's father bought tickets for.  To calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress, we need to subtract 80 from 100 (since Megan was the lead actress in 80 plays) and subtract 6 from 100 (since Megan's father bought tickets for 6 plays).  So the answer is 100 - 80 - 6 = 14. Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Megan's father bought the tickets for 6 plays is also relevant to the calculation process.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress. We can do this by subtracting the number of plays for which Megan was the lead actress from the total number of plays she participated in, and then subtracting the number of plays for which Megan's father bought the tickets from the total", "numerical_answer": 14, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "First, since Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, this means that she was the lead actress in 80 plays. Secondly, since she participated in a total of 100 plays, then the remaining 20 plays are the ones in which she was not the lead actress. Finally, since Megan's father bought tickets for 6 plays, this means that Megan was not the lead actress in 14 plays.  Yes, the condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Without this information, it would be impossible to determine the number of plays in which Megan was not the lead actress.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which is equal to 80 plays. Since her father bought the tickets for 6 of those plays, that leaves 74 plays where Megan was the lead actress. Since Megan participated in 100 plays in total, that means she was not the lead actress in 26 plays.  Yes, the condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\"\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was not the lead actress in the other 20%. That is 20 out of the 100 plays. So the answer is 20.   The condition \"Megan's father bought the tickets for 6 plays\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Megan's father bought the tickets for 6 plays.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.2880520820617676]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jennifer's brother bought 9000 bottles of water yesterday. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024. Then, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4 (the number of people, including Jennifer): 1024 姊 4 = 256. Finally, each person will get 256 sweets.  Yes, the condition \"She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\" because it determines the total number of sweets that Jennifer has to share.  The condition that Jennifer's brother bought 9000 bottles of water yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the amount of sweets each person will get.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the total number of sweets: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024  Step 2: Calculate the number of sweets each person will get: 1024 / 4 = 256  Step 3: The condition of the problem states that Jennifer is sharing the sweets between herself and 3 friends. This condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how many people will be receiving the sweets, and thus how many sweets each person will get.\nFirst, the condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\" because the number of green sweets has nothing to do with how many sweets each person will get.   To answer the question, we need to calculate how many sweets each person will get. To do this, we need to add up the total number of sweets that Jennifer has (212 + 310 + 502 = 1024) and divide that number by 4 (since there are 4 people):  1024 姊 4 = 256  Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets.\nFirst, we need to add up all the sweets that Jennifer has: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024. Since there are four people, we need to divide 1024 by 4. That means that each person will get 256 sweets. The condition of 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets is not relevant to the calculation process, since it does not affect the total number of sweets.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of sweets: Total = 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024  Then, we need to divide the total number of sweets by 4 (the number of people, including Jennifer): Each person = 1024 / 4 = 256  Finally, each person will get 256 sweets.  The condition \"Jennifer's brother bought 9000 bottles of water yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not affect the amount of sweets each person will get.", "equation": "Jennifer's brother bought 9000 bottles of water yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.28777390718460083]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Julia's brother sold 100000 blue cubes. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many balls Julie bought in each color.  For red balls, she bought 3 packs of 19 balls each, so she bought 57 red balls in total.  For yellow balls, she bought 10 packs of 19 balls each, so she bought 190 yellow balls in total.  For green balls, she bought 8 packs of 19 balls each, so she bought 152 green balls in total.  Now, let's add up all the balls she bought in each color:  57 red balls + 190 yellow balls + 152 green balls = 399 balls in total  So, Julie bought 399 balls in total.  The condition \"Julia's brother sold 100000 blue cubes\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls with 19 balls in each package.", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many balls Julie bought in each color.  For red balls, she bought 3 packs of 19 balls each, so she bought 57 red balls in total.   For yellow balls, she bought 10 packs of 19 balls each, so she bought 190 yellow balls in total.   For green balls, she bought 8 packs of 19 balls each, so she bought 152 green balls in total.   Now, let's add up all the balls she bought in each color:  57 red balls + 190 yellow balls + 152 green balls = 399 balls in total  So, Julie bought 399 balls in total.   The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it tells us how many packs of red balls she bought, which is necessary to calculate how many red balls she bought in total.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many balls Julie bought. To do this, we need to add up the number of balls in each color package.  3 packs of red balls = 19 x 3 = 57 balls  10 packs of yellow balls = 19 x 10 = 190 balls  8 packs of green balls = 19 x 8 = 152 balls  Total number of balls = 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls   Now, the condition \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is not relevant to the calculation of the total number of balls that Julie bought. The calculation process is the same regardless of how many packs of each color she bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls. Each pack had 19 balls, so she bought 57 red balls in total.  Julie also bought 10 packs of yellow balls. Each pack had 19 balls, so she bought 190 yellow balls in total.  Finally, Julie bought 8 packs of green balls. Each pack had 19 balls, so she bought 152 green balls in total.  Therefore, Julie bought a total of 399 balls.   The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls.\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us how many packs of green balls Julie bought, which is necessary to calculate the total number of balls she bought.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. So, she bought a total of 21 packs of balls. Since there were 19 balls in each package, she bought a total of 399 balls (21 x 19). The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is therefore relevant to the calculation process. Julia's brother sold 100000 blue cubes, which are not relevant to the question of how many balls Julia bought.\nStep 1: Calculate the number of balls Julie bought from red, yellow, and green packs.   Red: 3 packs x 19 balls per pack = 57 balls Yellow: 10 packs x 19 balls per pack = 190 balls Green: 8 packs x 19 balls per pack = 152 balls  Step 2: Calculate the total number of balls Julie bought.   Total: 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls  Step 3: Answer the question: How many balls did Julie buy in all?   Answer: Julie bought 399 balls in all.   The condition \"Julia's brother sold 100000 blue cubes\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Julia's brother sold 100000 blue cubes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315249562263489, 0.41100403666496277, 0.4391426146030426, 0.48471665382385254, 0.39191773533821106]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Lizzy's sister bought 10000 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy will need to ship the 540 pounds of fish. To do this, we can divide 540 by 30, which gives us 18. This means Lizzy will need 18 crates to ship the fish.  Next, we can calculate how much Lizzy will pay for the shipment. Since each crate costs $1.5, we can multiply 18 (the number of crates) by $1.5, which gives us a total cost of $27.  Therefore, the answer to the question is $27 - the cost of shipping 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates, with a shipping cost of $1.5 per crate.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much the shipment will cost. Without this information, we would not know how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the fish, or how much she will pay for the shipment. The condition \"Lizzy's sister bought 10000 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy will need to ship the 540 pounds of fish. To do this, we can divide 540 by 30, which gives us 18. This means Lizzy will need 18 crates to ship the fish.  Next, we can calculate how much Lizzy will pay for the shipment. Since each crate costs $1.5, we can multiply 18 (the number of crates) by $1.5, which gives us a total cost of $27.  Therefore, the answer to the question is $27 - the cost of shipping 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates, with a shipping cost of $1.5 per crate.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much the shipment will cost. Without this information, we would not know how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the fish, or how much she will pay for the shipment.\nLizzy has 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The shipping cost of each crate is $1.5. So, to calculate how much Lizzy will pay for the shipment, we can simply multiply the number of crates with the shipping cost per crate.   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $540 (30 crates x $1.5 per crate) for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy's sister bought 10000 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Lizzy's sister bought 10000 pounds of lobsters that are not going to be shipped.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.34429648518562317]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Edmund's sister sold 500 gift boxes yesterday. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days, we need to divide 90 inches of gift wrapper per day by 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.  90 / 18 = 5  This means that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes per day. To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days, we can multiply 5 by 3.  5 x 3 = 15  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.  The condition \"Edmund's sister sold 500 gift boxes yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The relevant information to answer this question is that Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day and 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days, we need to divide 90 inches of gift wrapper per day by 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box and then multiply the result by 3. So the answer would be: 90 / 18 = 5 x 3 = 15", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days, we need to divide 90 inches of gift wrapper per day by 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.   90 / 18 = 5   This means that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes per day. To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days, we can multiply 5 by 3.   5 x 3 = 15   Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   The condition \"Edmund's sister sold 500 gift boxes yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Edmund's sister sold 500 gift boxes yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.41562873125076294]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The car insurance of James' brother can cover at most $500000 per year. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "The total cost of James' doctor appointment is $300, and his insurance covers 80% of that. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much James's insurance covers. That means that James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60 (300 x 20% = 60).  Yes, the condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?\".  The condition that his brother's car insurance can cover at most $500000 per year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  Therefore, the answer is $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "The total cost of James' doctor appointment is $300, and his insurance covers 80% of that. That means that James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition that his brother's car insurance can cover at most $500,000 per year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe primary care doctor charges James $300 for the appointment. His insurance covers 80%, so that reduces his cost to $60. This is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment.  The car insurance of James' brother has no effect on the cost of James's doctor appointment. Therefore, the condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process.\nJames's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. So James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60 (300 x 20% = 60).   The condition \"The car insurance of James' brother can cover at most $500000 per year.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?\".", "equation": "The car insurance of James' brother can cover at most $500000 per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.5106316804885864]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The farm that Holden's neighbor owns is 100000 times larger than Holden's home. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's current master bedroom and master bath: Current Master Bedroom: 309 sq ft Current Master Bath: 150 sq ft Total sq ft: 459 sq ft  Now, we need to calculate the size of Holden's new home office/personal gym divided space, which is twice as large as his current master bedroom and master bath: Twice as large as current sq ft: 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new home office/personal gym divided space will be 918 sq ft.  The condition \"The farm that Holden's neighbor owns is 100000 times larger than Holden's home\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft, and he wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom. To calculate the sq ft of the new room, we need to add 309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft and then multiply the total sq ft by 2.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. To calculate the sq ft of the new room, we need to add 309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft. Then, we need to multiply the total sq ft by 2 since the space is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom. 459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room will be 918 sq ft.   The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft,\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the first step in determining the sq ft of the new room.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's current master bedroom and master bath:  Current Master Bedroom: 309 sq ft Current Master Bath: 150 sq ft Total sq ft: 459 sq ft  Now, we need to calculate the size of Holden's new home office/personal gym divided space, which is twice as large as his current master bedroom and master bath:   Twice as large as current sq ft: 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new home office/personal gym divided space will be 918 sq ft.   The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is used to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's current master bedroom and master bath, which is then used to calculate the size of the new home office/personal gym divided space.\nFirst, let's add the bedroom and bathroom together:  309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft.   Now we need to double that amount to calculate the size of the new room:  459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft.   Therefore, the new room will be 918 sq ft.   The condition \"The farm that Holden's neighbor owns is 100000 times larger than Holden's home\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The farm that Holden's neighbor owns is 100000 times larger than Holden's home.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.42574647068977356]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Emily's father has 50000 more pineapples than Betty. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  The condition \"Emily's father has 50000 more pineapples than Betty.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, Emily has 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. That means Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  The condition \"Emily's father has 50000 more pineapples than Betty.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emily's father has 50000 more pineapples than Betty.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.44247955083847046]}
{"original_question": "Salem loves to write poems, and she always stores her poem in a creativity box kept safely in her home library. Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas. In addition, Salem's neighbor wrote 10000 articles. If each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words, calculate the total number of words in the poem.", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of words in a single stanza. Each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words. Therefore, the total number of words in a single stanza is 80 (10 lines x 8 words = 80 words).  Next, we need to calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since the poem has 20 stanzas, the total number of words in the poem is 1600 (20 stanzas x 80 words = 1600 words).  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it specifies the number of stanzas in the poem (20 stanzas). Without this condition, we would not have been able to calculate the total number of words in the poem.  The condition that Salem's neighbor wrote 10000 articles is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 1600, "gold_answer": "1600", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of words in a single stanza. Each stanza has 10 lines, and each line has 8 words. Therefore, the total number of words in a single stanza is 80 (10 lines x 8 words = 80 words).  Next, we need to calculate the total number of words in the poem. Since the poem has 20 stanzas, the total number of words in the poem is 1600 (20 stanzas x 80 words = 1600 words).  The condition \"Last week, she created a poem with 20 stanzas\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it specifies the number of stanzas in the poem (20 stanzas). Without this condition, we would not have been able to calculate the total number of words in the poem.\n1. We know that there are 20 stanzas in the poem. 2. We also know that each stanza has 10 lines. 3. Finally, we know that each line has 8 words.  So, to calculate the total number of words in the poem, we need to multiply 20 (number of stanzas) by 10 (number of lines per stanza) by 8 (number of words per line).  Therefore, the total number of words in the poem is 1600.  The condition \"In addition, Salem's neighbor wrote 10000 articles.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "In addition, Salem's neighbor wrote 10000 articles.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.2382051646709442, 0.41944825649261475, 0.22021639347076416]}
{"original_question": "For football season, Zachary wants to buy a new football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. Zachary's neighbor has 2000 more balls than Zachary. How much more money does Zachary need?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to figure out how much money Zachary needs to buy the football, shorts, and shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Therefore, the total cost is 3.75 + 2.40 + 11.85 = $18.00. Zachary has $10, so he needs $8.00 more money to buy the items.  The condition \"Zachary's neighbor has 2000 more balls than Zachary\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since the calculation process is based on the cost of the items Zachary wants to purchase, not on the number of balls Zachary's neighbor has.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how much money Zachary needs to buy the football, shorts, and shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Therefore, the total cost is 3.75 + 2.40 + 11.85 = $18.00. Zachary has $10, so he needs $8.00 more money to buy the items.  The condition \"The football costs $3.75\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to add up the cost of the items that Zachary wants to buy:   Football = $3.75  Shorts = $2.40  Shoes = $11.85   Total cost = $17.00   Now, let's subtract the amount of money that Zachary has from the total cost:   $17.00 - $10.00 = $7.00   So, Zachary needs an additional $7.00 to buy the items that he wants.   The condition \"the shorts cost $2.40\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is necessary to know the cost of the shorts in order to determine the total cost of the items that Zachary wants to buy. Without the cost of the shorts, we would not be able to calculate the total cost of the items that Zachary wants to buy.\nFirst, Zachary needs to buy the football, shorts, and shoes. The total cost of these items is $18.00 ($3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85). Zachary only has $10. This means that Zachary needs $8.00 more money to purchase the items.  The condition \"and the shoes cost $11.85\" is not relevant to the calculation process since the cost of the shoes has already been included in the total cost of the items ($18.00).\nTo buy the football, shorts, and shoes, Zachary needs a total of $18. That means he needs $8 more than what he has. So, Zachary needs $8 more money.  The condition \"Zachary has $10\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since the calculation process is based on the cost of the items Zachary wants to purchase, not on the amount of money he has.\nTo buy a football, shorts, and shoes, Zachary needs $3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85 = $18.00.   Since Zachary only has $10, he needs $18.00 - $10.00 = $8.00 more.   The condition \"Zachary's neighbor has 2000 more balls than Zachary\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Zachary's neighbor has 2000 more balls than Zachary.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.45576441287994385, 0.14543353021144867, 0.0897449254989624, 0.018721066415309906, 0.5780560970306396, 0.3481028974056244]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. Charles' father leads a team of 20 people. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people. Then, we can calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville by adding the population of Springfield and the population of Greenville. The population of Springfield is 482,653 people and the population of Greenville is 362,987 people. Therefore, the total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people. The condition that Charles' father leads a team of 20 people is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the population of Springfield (482,653 people) and the population of Greenville (119,666 fewer people). To calculate the total population of Springfield and Greenville, we need to add the population of Springfield and the population of Greenville. So the answer is 845,640 people.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "The population of Springfield is given, so the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640. The condition that Charles is moving from Springfield to Greenville is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe total population of Springfield and Greenville is the sum of the population of Springfield and the population of Greenville. Springfield has 482,653 people and Greenville has 119,666 fewer people. Therefore, the population of Greenville is 482,653 - 119,666 = 362,987 people. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + 362,987 = 845,640 people.  The condition \"Charles' father leads a team of 20 people\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Charles' father leads a team of 20 people.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.05162221938371658]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's father sells 500 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning. This means Jason consumes three eggs per day.  In two weeks, he will consume three eggs per day. This means he will consume 42 eggs in two weeks (3 eggs x 14 days = 42 eggs).  The condition \"Jason's father sells 500 eggs per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it does not provide any information about the number of eggs Jason consumes in two weeks.  Therefore, the answer is 42 eggs.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs every morning, so in one day, he consumes three eggs. In two weeks, he will consume three eggs per day, meaning he will consume 42 eggs in two weeks.  The condition \"Jason's father sells 500 eggs per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it does not provide any information about the number of eggs Jason consumes in two weeks.", "equation": "Jason's father sells 500 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.47996413707733154]}
{"original_question": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. Jason's sister sells 100 eggs per day. How many eggs will Jason consume in two weeks?", "reasoning_path": "Every morning, Jason eats an omelet made using three eggs. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that Jason consumes three eggs per day.  Jason will consume three eggs per day for 14 days, or 42 eggs in total. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks.  The condition that Jason's sister sells 100 eggs per day is not relevant to this calculation process. To answer the question, we need to calculate how many eggs Jason will consume in two weeks. We can do this by multiplying the number of eggs Jason consumes per day (3 eggs) by the number of days in two weeks (14 days). So the answer is 42 eggs.", "numerical_answer": 42, "gold_answer": "42", "instructions": "In one day, Jason consumes three eggs. In two weeks, he will consume three eggs per day for 14 days, or 42 eggs in total. The condition that Jason's sister sells 100 eggs per day is not relevant to this calculation process.", "equation": "Jason's sister sells 100 eggs per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5098457336425781, 0.4034214913845062]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Perry's mother put 10000 grams of sugar into the food. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many people the recipe serves. He added a half cup of cream at the end. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much cream was added to the recipe. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much fat is in each cup of cream.   To calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food, we need to first calculate how much cream was added in total. We know that Perry added a half cup of cream, which is equivalent to 0.5 cups of cream. Each cup of cream has 88 grams of fat, so 0.5 cups of cream has 44 grams of fat (88 grams of fat x 0.5 cups).   Next, we need to calculate how many servings the recipe makes. We know that the recipe serves four people, so it makes four servings.   Finally, we can calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. We know that the recipe added 44 grams of fat in total, so each serving will get 44/4 = 11 grams of fat (44 grams", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Perry added a half cup of cream. A cup has 88 grams of fat, so a half cup has 44 grams of fat.   Perry's mother put 10000 grams of sugar into the food. Sugar does not have fat, so this does not impact the amount of fat added to each serving.   Therefore, each serving was added 44 grams of fat. The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" was relevant to the calculation process, as it was necessary to know the amount of fat in one cup in order to calculate the amount of fat in one half cup.\nThe answer to the first question is 88 grams of fat per serving. We know that 1 cup of cream has 88 grams of fat, and Perry added a half cup of cream to the recipe. Therefore, each serving has 44 grams of fat.  To answer the second question, the condition is not relevant as sugar does not have any fat. Therefore, the amount of fat added to each serving of food is still 44 grams.", "equation": "It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Perry's mother put 10000 grams of sugar into the food.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.292887806892395, 0.3733145296573639, 0.5792152285575867, 0.2941092550754547]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Edmund's neighbor bought 2 gifts for friends. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund will need for one gift box. We already know that he needs 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, so we don't need to include this information in the calculation.  The second step is to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. We can calculate this by dividing 90 by 18, which gives us 5 gift boxes per day.  The third step is to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days. We can calculate this by multiplying 5 by 3, which gives us 15 gift boxes every 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.  The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much gift wrapper Edmund needs for one gift box. This information was necessary to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  The condition that Edmund's neighbor bought 2 gifts for friends is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate how many inches of gift wrapper Edmund will need for one gift box. We already know that he needs 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, so we don't need to include this information in the calculation.   The second step is to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. We can calculate this by dividing 90 by 18, which gives us 5 gift boxes per day.   The third step is to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund will be able to wrap every 3 days. We can calculate this by multiplying 5 by 3, which gives us 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.  The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much gift wrapper Edmund needs for one gift box. This information was necessary to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.\n1. Edmund needs 18 inches of gift wrapper for each gift box.  2. He has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  3. Therefore, he can wrap 5 gift boxes in a day (90 / 18 = 5).  4. So he can wrap 15 gift boxes in 3 days (5 x 3 = 15).   The condition \"Edmund's neighbor bought 2 gifts for friends\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Edmund's neighbor bought 2 gifts for friends.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.4183947741985321]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Papi Calot's sister bought 2 eggs yesterday. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which means he needs 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants, which brings the total to 126 + 15 = 141 plants. Papi Calot's sister bought 2 eggs yesterday, but this is not relevant to the calculation process so it does not affect the answer. Therefore, Papi Calot has to buy 141 plants. Yes, the condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it states the number of additional plants that Papi Calot plans to buy.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which means he needs 7 x 18 = 126 plants.  He still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants, which brings the total to 126 + 15 = 141 plants.  Papi Calot's sister bought 2 eggs yesterday, but this is not relevant to the calculation process so it does not affect the answer.  Therefore, Papi Calot has to buy 141 plants.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he has already planned to buy 126 plants (7 x 18 = 126). Now he wants to buy additional 15 plants, so he will have to buy a total of 141 plants (126 + 15 = 141).   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?\" is 141.   Yes, the condition \"But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it states the number of additional plants that Papi Calot plans to buy.\nPapi Calot has already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That means he needs 126 plants. He also wants to add 15 additional plants. That means he needs to buy a total of 141 potato plants.  The condition \"Papi Calot's sister bought 2 eggs yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Papi Calot's sister bought 2 eggs yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.26860833168029785]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. The hourly salary of Melies' sister is $2000. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total cost of the meat is 2 kg x $82 = $164.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet.  The hourly salary of Melies' sister is $2000. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not affect the amount of money that Melies has left after paying for the meat.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much money Melies spent on the meat. Since the meat costs $82 per kilogram, and Melies bought 2 kg of meat, that means he spent $164.  Now, we can calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. Melies had $180 in his wallet, so he has $16 left ($180 - $164 = $16).  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, because it tells us how much money Melies spent on the meat. Without knowing how much meat Melies bought, we would not be able to calculate how much money he has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total cost of the meat is 2 kg x $82 = $164.  Melies has $180 in his wallet. After paying for the meat, he has $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet.  The hourly salary of Melies' sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe cost of 2 kg of meat is $82 x 2 = $164.   Therefore, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.   The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is the amount of money that Melies begins with. Without this information, we would not know how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, which costs $82 per kilogram. Therefore, the total cost of the meat is $164.  Melies has $180 in his wallet, so he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.   The hourly salary of Melies' sister is $2000. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not affect the amount of money that Melies has left after paying for the meat.", "equation": "The hourly salary of Melies' sister is $2000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.37700355052948]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Lizzy's neighbor ate 10000 pounds of lobster yesterday. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy has to ship. Since each crate contains 30 pounds of fish, then 540 pounds of fish would require 540/30 = 18 crates to be shipped.   Next, we need to calculate the cost of the shipment. Since each crate costs $1.5, then the total cost for the shipment is 18 crates x $1.5 = $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition that \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us the weight of each crate and the total amount of fish that needs to be shipped. This information is necessary for us to calculate the number of crates and the total cost of the shipment.  The condition that Lizzy's neighbor ate 10000 pounds of lobster yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of crates that Lizzy has to ship. Since each crate contains 30 pounds of fish, then 540 pounds of fish would require 540/30 = 18 crates to be shipped.   Next, we need to calculate the cost of the shipment. Since each crate costs $1.5, then the total cost for the shipment is 18 crates x $1.5 = $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition that \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us the weight of each crate and the total amount of fish that needs to be shipped. This information is necessary for us to calculate the number of crates and the total cost of the shipment.\nLizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish. This means that she needs to ship 18 crates of fish (540 姊 30 = 18).   The shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, so the total cost of the shipment is 18 x $1.5 = $27.   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy's neighbor ate 10000 pounds of lobster yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Lizzy's neighbor ate 10000 pounds of lobster yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.20335441827774048]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. Jack's mother goes to the gym 200000 times per year. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to find out the cost of the barbell: 1/10 of $2500 is $250.  Then, we need to add the cost of the squat rack ($2500) and the barbell ($250) to get the total cost of everything: $2750.  So, the answer to the question \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\" is $2750.  The condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it's necessary to know the cost of the squat rack in order to calculate the total cost of everything.  The condition that Jack's mother goes to the gym 200000 times per year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "First, we need to find out the cost of the barbell: 1/10 of $2500 is $250.  Then, we need to add the cost of the squat rack ($2500) and the barbell ($250) to get the total cost of everything: $2750.  So, the answer to the question \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\" is $2750.  The condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it's necessary to know the cost of the squat rack in order to calculate the total cost of everything.\nFirst, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500.  Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack. That means that the barbell cost $250.   So, Jack paid $2500 for the squat rack and $250 for the barbell, which means that he paid a total of $2750 for everything.  Yes, the condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Jack pay for everything?\" because it helps us to calculate the cost of the barbell.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500 and the barbell cost 1/10 as much. So the barbell cost $250. So the total cost of the squat rack and the barbell is 2500 + 250 = $2750.  The condition \"Jack's mother goes to the gym 200000 times per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jack's mother goes to the gym 200000 times per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.511070966720581, 0.16832023859024048, 0.20084601640701294]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. Oli's mother has 200 more strawberries than Victoria. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, so Victoria has twice as much. That means Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. Yes, the given condition is relevant to the calculation process because it states that Victoria has twice as much ice cream as Oli. That's how we get the answer of 8 scoops. Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, and Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. That means Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition that Oli's mother has 200 more strawberries than Victoria is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem. The number of scoops of ice cream that Victoria has compared to Oli is 4 scoops of ice cream. The number of strawberries is not relevant to this calculation.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, so Victoria has twice as much. That means Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.   Yes, the given condition is relevant to the calculation process because it states that Victoria has twice as much ice cream as Oli. That's how we get the answer of 8 scoops.\nOli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli.   Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.   Oli's mother has 200 more strawberries than Victoria.   This condition is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem. The number of scoops of ice cream that Victoria has compared to Oli is 8 scoops of ice cream. The number of strawberries is not relevant to this calculation.", "equation": "Oli's mother has 200 more strawberries than Victoria.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.44234320521354675]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's mother harvested 100000 more potatoes yesterday. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of carrots Kelly harvested. To do this, we need to add the number of carrots from each of the three beds. The first bed had 55 carrots, the second bed had 101 carrots, and the third bed had 78 carrots. This gives us a total of 234 carrots.   Second, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide the total number of carrots by 6 to get the total number of pounds. 234 divided by 6 is 39, so Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"Kelly's mother harvested 100000 more potatoes yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not affect the total number of carrots harvested or the weight of each carrot.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of carrots Kelly harvested. To do this, we need to add the number of carrots from each of the three beds. The first bed had 55 carrots, the second bed had 101 carrots, and the third bed had 78 carrots. This gives us a total of 234 carrots.   Second, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide the total number of carrots by 6 to get the total number of pounds. 234 divided by 6 is 39, so Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we already know the number of carrots in each bed. It is only used to calculate the total number of carrots Kelly harvested.\n1) Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, for a total of 234 carrots.   2) Since each carrot weighs 6 ounces, Kelly harvested a total of 1404 ounces, or 87.75 pounds, of carrots.   3) The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the total number of carrots harvested or the weight of each carrot.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots.  Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, Kelly harvested 234 姊 6 = 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition that Kelly's mother harvested 100000 more potatoes yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to find out how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. 234 divided by 6 is 39. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it helps us to determine how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.\n1. Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That adds up to 234 carrots. 2. We know that 6 carrots weigh 1 pound. So 234 carrots would weigh 234/6 = 39 pounds.   The condition of Kelly's mother harvesting 100000 more potatoes yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.", "equation": "Kelly's mother harvested 100000 more potatoes yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.4398462474346161]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Every 100 months, Maria's brother buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Maria's brother. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how often Maria needs to buy a new bar of soap.  She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Maria spends on each bar of soap.  That means Maria needs to buy 6 bars of soap in a year (2 months x 6 = 12 months).  So the total cost for Maria to stock up for the entire year is 6 x 8.00 = 48.00.  Yes, the condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Maria's brother buys a new shampoo and moisturizer every 100 months is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Maria spends on soap in a year. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of bars of soap Maria needs to buy in a year by the cost of one bar of soap. So the answer is 48.00.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many bars of soap Maria needs to buy for the entire year. Each bar of soap lasts her for 2 months, so she will need 6 bars of soap (12 months 梅 2 months = 6 bars of soap).  Next, we need to calculate how much money she will spend on soap. Since she spends $8.00 per bar of soap, she will spend $48.00 (6 bars of soap x $8.00 = $48.00).   Therefore, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will spend $48.00 on soap. The condition \"She spends $8.00 per bar of soap\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much money she spends per bar of soap.\nMaria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for two months. This means that she spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Since she wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need 12 bars of soap. Therefore, the total amount that she will spend on soap is $96.00.   The condition \"Every 100 months, Maria's brother buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Maria's brother\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Every 100 months, Maria's brother buys a new shampoo and moisturizer for Maria's brother.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.43827053904533386]}
{"original_question": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. There were 19 balls in each package. Julia's neighbor sold 100000 blue cubes. How many balls did Julie buy in all?", "reasoning_path": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many packs of red balls Julia bought.  There were 19 balls in each package. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many balls there were in each package.  That means Julia bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls.  Julia bought 10 packs of yellow balls. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many packs of yellow balls Julia bought.  There were 19 balls in each package. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many balls there were in each package.  That means Julia bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls.  Julia bought 8 packs of green balls. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many packs of green balls Julia bought.  There were 19 balls in each package. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many balls there were in each package.  That means Julia bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  The total number of balls that Julia bought is 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  Yes, the condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of", "numerical_answer": 399, "gold_answer": "399", "instructions": "Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls. Multiply the number of packs for each color with the number of balls in each package.  3 packs 脳 19 balls = 57 red balls 10 packs 脳 19 balls = 190 yellow balls 8 packs 脳 19 balls = 152 green balls  Therefore, the answer to \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" is 399.  The condition \"Julia bought 3 packs of red balls\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it helps us determine the total number of red balls bought by Julie.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of balls that Julie bought in each individual color, which will give us the total number of balls that she bought.  For red, she bought 3 packs, so she bought 3 x 19 = 57 red balls.  For yellow, she bought 10 packs, so she bought 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls.  For green, she bought 8 packs, so she bought 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  Now that we have determined the number of balls for each color, we can calculate the total number of balls that Julie bought in all. The answer is 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition of \"10 packs of yellow balls\" is relevant to the calculation process, since we needed to know how many yellow balls Julie bought in order to calculate the total number of balls that she bought.\nJulie bought 3 packs of red balls, which is 3 x 19 = 57 red balls.  She bought 10 packs of yellow balls, which is 10 x 19 = 190 yellow balls.  Finally, she bought 8 packs of green balls, which is 8 x 19 = 152 green balls.  So, in total Julie bought 57 + 190 + 152 = 399 balls.  The condition \"and 8 packs of green balls\" is relevant to the calculation process since it is needed to calculate the number of green balls that Julie bought.\nJulia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls.  This means she bought 3脳19 red balls, 10脳19 yellow balls, and 8脳19 green balls.   Therefore, the total number of balls she bought is 3脳19 + 10脳19 + 8脳19 = 591.  The condition \"There were 19 balls in each package\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many balls did Julie buy in all?\" since it tells us how many balls are in each package, which we need to know in order to calculate the total number of balls that Julia bought.\nTo answer the question, we need to know how many balls Julia bought. We can calculate this by adding up the number of packs and the number of balls in each pack. Julia bought 3 packs of red balls, 10 packs of yellow balls, and 8 packs of green balls, for a total of 21 packs. Each pack contains 19 balls, so Julia bought 21 x 19 = 399 balls. The condition that Julia's neighbor sold 100000 blue cubes is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Julia's neighbor sold 100000 blue cubes.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5315249562263489, 0.41100403666496277, 0.4391426146030426, 0.48471665382385254, 0.40251484513282776]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The car insurance of James' sister can cover at most $500000 per year. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment. To do this, we need to know how much his insurance will cover. Since his insurance covers 80%, that means it will cover 80% of the $300 fee, or $240. This means James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how much James's insurance will cover and how much he will have to pay out-of-pocket. The car insurance of James' sister can cover at most $500000 per year, so it is not relevant to this calculation. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how much James has to pay out-of-pocket.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment. To do this, we need to know how much his insurance will cover. Since his insurance covers 80%, that means it will cover 80% of the $300 fee, or $240. This means James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how much James's insurance will cover and how much he will have to pay out-of-pocket.\nThe primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit.  James's insurance covers 80%, so out of the $300, James only has to pay $60.  The car insurance of James' sister can cover at most $500,000 per year, so it is not relevant to this calculation.   Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it determines how much James has to pay out-of-pocket.\nThe total cost of the visit is $300. James's insurance covers 80% of this cost, so his out-of-pocket cost is $60.  The condition \"The car insurance of James' sister can cover at most $500000 per year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment, so it is not taken into consideration.", "equation": "The car insurance of James' sister can cover at most $500000 per year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.4421182870864868]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Edmund's sister owns 3 gift shops in the city. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Then, we need to calculate how many gift boxes he can wrap every 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper, he can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.  The condition that Edmund's sister owns 3 gift shops in the city is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box and that he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. To calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap every 3 days, we need to divide 90 inches of gift wrapper by 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box and then multiply the result by 3 days. So the answer would be: 90 inches of gift wrapper / 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box x 3 days = 15 gift boxes every 3 days.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in one day. To do this, we need to divide 90 inches (the amount of gift wrapper per day) by 18 inches (the amount of wrapper per gift box). This gives us 5 gift boxes per day.   Next, we need to figure out how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in three days. To do this, we simply multiply 5 gift boxes per day by 3 days, giving us 15 gift boxes in three days.   So, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes in three days.   The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box\" is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem, since it does not affect the answer.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.   Then, we need to calculate how many gift boxes he can wrap every 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper, he can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days.   Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day.   The condition \"Edmund's sister owns 3 gift shops in the city\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Edmund's sister owns 3 gift shops in the city.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.2671773433685303]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The two dogs of Janele's mother weigh 100 pounds each. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, so their total weight is 24 pounds. The third cat weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds, so their total weight is 24.0 pounds. Therefore, the total weight of Janele's cats is 48.0 pounds.  Now, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we divide the total weight (48.0 pounds) by the number of cats (4). This gives us an average weight of 12.0 pounds.  The condition that the first two cats weigh 12 pounds each is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the weight of two of the cats. Without this condition, we would not be able to accurately calculate the total weight of Janele's cats.  The condition that Janele's mother's two dogs weigh 100 pounds each is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we must add up the weights of all the cats and then divide that number by the total number of cats. In this case, Janele has 4 cats, so we must add the weights of the four cats (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48) and divide that number by 4, which gives us an average weight of 12 pounds. The condition that Janele has 4 cats is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us the total number of cats that we need to take into account when calculating the average weight.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. The first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, so their total weight is 24 pounds. The third cat weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth cat weighs 9.3 pounds, so their total weight is 24.0 pounds. Therefore, the total weight of Janele's cats is 48.0 pounds.  Now, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we divide the total weight (48.0 pounds) by the number of cats (4). This gives us an average weight of 12.0 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the weight of two of the cats. Without this condition, we would not be able to accurately calculate the total weight of Janele's cats.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is calculated by adding up the weights of all the cats and then dividing by the number of cats. In this case, the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds. Since there are four cats, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.  The condition that the third cat weighs 14.7 pounds is relevant to the calculation process since it is one of the weights that is being used in the calculation. If the third cat weighed a different amount, the average weight would be different.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, add up the weight of all four cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Then, divide that sum by the number of cats (4) to get the average weight: 48 / 4 = 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant because it provides the weight of the fourth cat, which is necessary for calculating the average weight of all of Janele's cats.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of the weights of all her cats divided by the number of cats. So we can calculate the average weight of Janele's cats by adding the weights of all her cats and then dividing by 4 (since she has 4 cats):  (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) / 4 = 11.675 pounds  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 11.675 pounds.  The condition that Janele's mother's two dogs weigh 100 pounds each is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The two dogs of Janele's mother weigh 100 pounds each.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.4018952250480652]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. Oli's neighbor has 200 more strawberries than Victoria. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli. This means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's neighbor has 200 more strawberries than Victoria\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream and Victoria has twice more scoops than Oli. To calculate how many more scoops of ice cream Victoria has than Oli, we need to subtract Oli's 4 scoops of ice cream from Victoria's 8 scoops of ice cream. So the answer would be: 4 more scoops of ice cream.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "The first step is to determine how many scoops of ice cream Victoria has. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant and should be taken into account.   Since Victoria has twice as many scoops of ice cream as Oli, she has 8 scoops of ice cream.   The second step is to calculate how many more scoops of ice cream Victoria has than Oli. We can subtract Oli's 4 scoops of ice cream from Victoria's 8 scoops of ice cream.   Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.   Yes, the condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?\".\nOli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  This means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.   The condition \"Oli's neighbor has 200 more strawberries than Victoria\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Oli's neighbor has 200 more strawberries than Victoria.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.4653718173503876]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's sister spends 60 minutes cooking per day. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time Jackie spends on work and exercise.  That means Jackie spends 19 hours per day on work, exercise and sleep.  Jackie's sister spends 60 minutes cooking per day. This is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how much free time Jackie has. We can calculate this by subtracting 19 hours from 24 hours, which equals 5 hours of free time.  Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The condition that Jackie's sister spends 60 minutes cooking per day is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is 5 hours of free time.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This means that Jackie is spending 19 hours of her day on these activities.  Jackie's sister spends 60 minutes cooking per day. This is not relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has, as it is her sister who is spending the time cooking.  Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.\nStep 1: Calculate how much time Jackie is spending on work, exercise, and sleep:  Work: 8 hours Exercise: 3 hours Sleep: 8 hours Total: 19 hours  Step 2: Calculate how much time Jackie's sister is spending cooking:  Cooking: 1 hour  Step 3: Subtract the total time spent by Jackie and her sister from 24 hours to get the amount of free time they have:  24 hours - 19 hours (Jackie) - 1 hour (sister) = 4 hours of free time for Jackie  So, in answer to the question, Jackie has 4 hours of free time. The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to include these numbers when calculating how much time Jackie spends in a day.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise, and 8 hours of sleep per day. This means that Jackie spends 19 hours per day on activities.   In addition, Jackie's sister spends 60 minutes cooking per day. This is not relevant to the calculation process of how much free time Jackie has.   Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.", "equation": "Jackie's sister spends 60 minutes cooking per day.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.4057812988758087]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Clarice's neighbor spent 20000 dollars on dinner yesterday. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve had $1600 on her, and she was $400 short of the total price. This means that the total price was $2000. Since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, we can divide the total price ($2000) by the price per kilogram ($8) to determine the number of kilograms Genevieve purchased: 2000 / 8 = 250 kilograms. Therefore, Genevieve purchased 250 kilograms of cherries for $1600. The condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much money Genevieve and Clarice spent on the cherries. The condition that Clarice's neighbor spent 20000 dollars on dinner yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. This condition is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much the cherries cost per kilogram.   If Genevieve had $1600 on her, then she would have had a total of $2000 ($1600 + $400) to spend on the cherries.   Since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, Genevieve could have bought 250 kilograms of cherries with her total of $2000.   Therefore, the answer is that Genevieve bought 250 kilograms of cherries with her $1600.\nGenevieve had $1600 on her. She realized she was $400 short of the total price. Clarice chipped in to make up the difference.   Therefore, the total amount of money Genevieve and Clarice spent on the cherries was $2,000.   Since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, Genevieve and Clarice bought a total of 250 kilograms of cherries.   The condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much money Genevieve and Clarice spent on the cherries.\nGenevieve had $1600, and she was $400 short of the total price. This means that the total price was $2000.  Since the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, we can divide the total price ($2000) by the price per kilogram ($8) to determine the number of kilograms Genevieve purchased: 2000 / 8 = 250 kilograms.  Therefore, Genevieve purchased 250 kilograms of cherries for $1600.  The condition \"Clarice's neighbor spent 20000 dollars on dinner yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Clarice's neighbor spent 20000 dollars on dinner yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.2505088448524475]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. There were 400 friends who visited Mari's sister and liked the buttons. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made (5*8) + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half of that, so she made 44/2 = 22 buttons. The condition \"There were 400 friends who visited Mari's sister and liked the buttons\" is not relevant to the calculation of how many buttons Sue made. The relevant information to answer this question is that Kendra made 4 more than five times the number of decorated buttons as Mari, and Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. This means Kendra made 8 x 5 + 4 = 44 buttons.  Sue made half as many as Kendra. This means Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons.   Since the condition is relevant to the calculation process, the answer is 22.\nKendra made 4 more than five times the number of decorated buttons as Mari. Mari made 8 buttons, so we can calculate that Kendra made 44 buttons (8 x 5 + 4).  Sue made half as many buttons as Kendra, so she made 22 buttons (44/2).  Mari made 8 buttons, and there were 400 friends who visited her sister and liked the buttons, so the total number of buttons made was 408 (8 + 400).  Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons. The condition that Mari made 8 buttons is relevant, as it was used in the calculation process.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made (5*8) + 4 = 44 buttons. Sue made half of that, so she made 44/2 = 22 buttons. The condition \"There were 400 friends who visited Mari's sister and liked the buttons\" is not relevant to the calculation of how many buttons Sue made.", "equation": "There were 400 friends who visited Mari's sister and liked the buttons.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.3885226845741272]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Edmund's mother sold 1000 gift boxes yesterday. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in one day with 90 inches of gift wrapper. We know that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Therefore, 90 inches of gift wrapper divided by 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box = 5 gift boxes. Now that we know Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes in one day, we can calculate how many gift boxes he can wrap in 3 days. 5 gift boxes per day x 3 days = 15 gift boxes.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition mentioned in the question is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap in one day with 90 inches of gift wrapper. We know that Edmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. Therefore, 90 inches of gift wrapper divided by 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box = 5 gift boxes.  Now that we know Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes in one day, we can calculate how many gift boxes he can wrap in 3 days. 5 gift boxes per day x 3 days = 15 gift boxes.  Therefore, Edmund can wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition mentioned in the question is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nEdmund uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.  So, if he has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, he can wrap 5 gift boxes per day.   Therefore, in 3 days he will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes.   The condition \"Edmund's mother sold 1000 gift boxes yesterday\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Edmund's mother sold 1000 gift boxes yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.3696882128715515]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's father ate 50000 more tomatoes than Kelly. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. She harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That gives us a total of 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds Kelly harvested. 234/6 = 39 pounds.  Finally, the condition \"Kelly's father ate 50000 more tomatoes than Kelly\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that 6 carrots weigh one pound and Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. To calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, we need to divide the number of carrots by 6. So the answer would be: 234/6 = 39 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total:  55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots  Then, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested:  234 carrots 姊 6 carrots per pound = 39 pounds of carrots  So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since we already know that 55 carrots were pulled from the first bed.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, Kelly harvested a total of 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested.  Kelly pulled out 55 carrots in the first bed, 101 carrots in the second bed, and 78 carrots in the third bed. So, the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested is 234.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots.  One pound of carrots is equal to 6 carrots. So, the total weight of the carrots is 234/6 = 39 pounds.  Finally, we need to answer the question.  The question is: How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?  The answer is: Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds Kelly harvested. 234/6 = 39 pounds. The condition that 6 carrots weigh one pound is relevant to the calculation process as it helps us figure out the number of pounds Kelly harvested from the number of carrots she harvested.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. She harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That gives us a total of 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate the total weight of the carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can multiply the total number of carrots by 6 to get the total weight in pounds. 234 carrots multiplied by 6 equals 1,404 pounds.  Finally, the condition \"Kelly's father ate 50000 more tomatoes than Kelly\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition does not affect the total number of carrots harvested or the total weight of those carrots. Therefore, Kelly harvested 1,404 pounds of carrots.", "equation": "Kelly's father ate 50000 more tomatoes than Kelly.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.39354416728019714]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Your mother draws 5000 more circles than you. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The area of a rectangle is length times width (A = lw). The width of the rectangle is 7 inches, and it is 4 times as long as it is wide.  Therefore, the length is 4 x 7 = 28 inches.  The area of the rectangle is then 7 x 28 = 196 inches squared.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the length of the rectangle. Without that information, we would not be able to find the area of the rectangle.   The number of circles your mother drew is not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is that the width of the rectangle is 7 inches and it is 4 times as long as it is wide. The answer would be 196 inches squared.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its length by its width. So, the area of the rectangle is 28 inches (7 inches x 4 inches). The condition given \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process. The width of the rectangle is given as 7 inches, which we used to calculate the area. The number of circles your mother drew is not relevant to the calculation of the area of your rectangle.\nThe area of a rectangle is length times width (A = lw). The width of the rectangle is 7 inches, and it is 4 times as long as it is wide.  Therefore, the length is 4 x 7 = 28 inches.  The area of the rectangle is then 7 x 28 = 196 inches squared.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the length of the rectangle. Without that information, we would not be able to find the area of the rectangle.   The number of circles your mother drew is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its width (7 inches) by its length (7 inches x 4 = 28 inches).   So the area of the rectangle is 7 inches x 28 inches = 196 square inches.   The condition \"Your mother draws 5000 more circles than you\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it has nothing to do with the area of the rectangle.", "equation": "Your mother draws 5000 more circles than you.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.2385585755109787]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. The number of ducks owned by Michael's sister increases by 100000 annually. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that the number of ducks owned by Michael's sister increases by 100000 annually is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "In the first year, the number of chickens will increase by 150, so Michael will have 700 chickens.   In the second year, the number of chickens will increase by another 150, so Michael will have 850 chickens.   In the third year, the number of chickens will increase by another 150, so Michael will have 1000 chickens.   This pattern will continue for 9 years, so after 9 years, Michael will have 1650 chickens.   The condition regarding the number of ducks owned by Michael's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The number of ducks owned by Michael's sister increases by 100000 annually.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.48722323775291443]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Perry's father put 10000 grams of sugar into the food. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of cream added. Perry added a half cup of cream, which is equivalent to 0.5 cups. We know that cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so the total amount of fat added from the cream is 44 grams (0.5 cups * 88 grams of fat per cup).  Next, we need to calculate the total amount of fat added to the food. Since sugar doesn't have fat, the only fat added is from the cream. Thus, the total amount of fat added is 44 grams.  Finally, we need to calculate the amount of fat added to each serving of food. We know that the recipe serves four people, so each serving will have 44/4 = 11 grams of fat.  Therefore, the answer is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition is important, as it tells us the amount of fat per cup of cream, which is essential in determining the total amount of fat added. The condition that Perry's father put 10000 grams of sugar into the food is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of cream added. Perry added a half cup of cream, which is equivalent to 0.5 cups. We know that cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, so the total amount of fat added from the cream is 44 grams (0.5 cups * 88 grams of fat per cup).  Next, we need to calculate the total amount of fat added to the food. Since sugar doesn't have fat, the only fat added is from the cream. Thus, the total amount of fat added is 44 grams.  Finally, we need to calculate the amount of fat added to each serving of food. We know that the recipe serves four people, so each serving will have 44/4 = 11 grams of fat.  Therefore, the answer is 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition is important, as it tells us the amount of fat per cup of cream, which is essential in determining the total amount of fat added.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much cream was used. The recipe serves four people so a half cup was used. Since there are 88 grams of fat per cup, that means that 44 grams of fat were added to the food. Then, the condition \"It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Perry's father put 10000 grams of sugar into the food.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food, we just need to divide 44 by 4. Therefore, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.", "equation": "It is known that sugar doesn't have fat, and Perry's father put 10000 grams of sugar into the food.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.292887806892395, 0.3733145296573639, 0.5792152285575867, 0.29303139448165894]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. The salary of Libby's mother is $20000 more than Libby per month. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. $35 = 140 quarters. Therefore, Libby will have 20 quarters left in her piggy bank after replacing the dress. The condition that Libby's mother's salary is $20000 more than Libby per month is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank and needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To do this, she needs to use 140 quarters. Therefore, she will have 20 quarters left in her piggy bank. So the answer is 20 quarters.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "1. Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  2. Libby needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  3. $35 = 140 quarters.  4. Therefore, Libby will have 20 quarters left in her piggy bank after replacing the dress.   Yes, the condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?\" because the number of quarters that Libby has in her piggy bank determines how many quarters she has left after replacing the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress, so she will have to use $35 worth of quarters. That is 140 quarters, so she will have 20 quarters left.  The condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us information on how many quarters Libby has to use to pay for the dress. Without that condition, the calculation cannot be done.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank and needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. To do this, she needs to use 140 quarters. Therefore, she will have 20 quarters left in her piggy bank. The condition of Libby's mother's salary being $20000 more than Libby is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The salary of Libby's mother is $20000 more than Libby per month.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.30045855045318604]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. The hourly salary of Melies' brother is $2000. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies has $180 in his wallet. Second, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The cost of the meat is $82 per kilogram, so the total cost of the meat is $164 ($82 x 2). Third, Melies subtracts the cost of the meat ($164) from the amount of money he has ($180). Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat ($180 - $164 = $16).  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how much money Melies had to begin with. The condition that the hourly salary of Melies' brother is $2000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "1. Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. 2. Melies has $180 in his wallet. 3. The total cost of the meat is $164 (2 kg x $82 per kg). 4. Melies has $180 in his wallet, so he has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is necessary to know how much meat he bought in order to calculate the total cost of the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat, so he must pay $164 (2 x $82). He has $180 in his wallet, so he has $16 left after paying for the meat ($180 - $164 = $16).  The hourly salary of Melies' brother is not relevant to this calculation.\nFirst, Melies has $180 in his wallet.  Second, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The cost of the meat is $82 per kilogram, so the total cost of the meat is $164 ($82 x 2).  Third, Melies subtracts the cost of the meat ($164) from the amount of money he has ($180).  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how much money Melies had to begin with.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. We know that the meat costs $82 per kilogram. This means that the total cost of the meat is 2 x 82 = 164.   Second, Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, after paying for the meat, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet.   The condition \"The hourly salary of Melies' brother is $2000.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?\" as it does not affect the calculation of the amount of money left in Melies' wallet.", "equation": "The hourly salary of Melies' brother is $2000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.40392211079597473]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's brother ate 2000 more tomatoes than Kelly. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "Kelly pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This adds up to a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, this means that Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition that Kelly's brother ate 2000 more tomatoes than Kelly is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not affect the amount of carrots that Kelly harvested.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "1. Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed.   2. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.   3. 55 + 101 + 78 = 234   4. 234 divided by 6 = 39   5. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect the amount of carrots Kelly harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that she harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the total number of pounds that Kelly harvested. This would be 39 pounds.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?\" because it only mentions the number of carrots she harvested from the second bed, and does not provide any information that would affect the total number of pounds.\nFirst, Kelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 from the second bed, and 78 from the third bed. This adds up to a total of 234 carrots.   Next, we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound. So, if we divide 234 by 6, we find that Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since the number of carrots in the third bed does not affect the total number of pounds of carrots harvested.\nFirst, Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots.  Second, since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested by dividing the total number of carrots by 6.  234 / 6 = 39  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides us with the necessary information to convert the number of carrots into pounds.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This adds up to a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, this means that Kelly harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"Kelly's brother ate 2000 more tomatoes than Kelly\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not affect the amount of carrots that Kelly harvested.", "equation": "Kelly's brother ate 2000 more tomatoes than Kelly.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.3999379277229309]}
{"original_question": "Jeanne wants to ride the Ferris wheel, the roller coaster, and the bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets. Jeanne has 5 tickets. Jeanne's mother bought 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater. How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jeanne needs to use 5 tickets for the Ferris wheel, 4 tickets for the roller coaster, and 4 tickets for the bumper cars. That's a total of 13 tickets. Since Jeanne only has 5 tickets, she needs to buy 8 more tickets to ride all the rides. The condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as the number of tickets needed has already been established. Jeanne needs 5 tickets to ride the Ferris wheel, 4 tickets to ride the roller coaster, and 4 tickets to ride the bumper cars. This means that she will need 13 tickets in total. She already has 5 tickets, so she needs 8 more tickets. Since Jeanne's mother bought 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater, Jeanne needs 8 more tickets, so she should buy 8 movie tickets from her mother.  The condition \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how many more tickets Jeanne needs to buy. Therefore, the answer is 8.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "The condition \"The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many more tickets should Jeanne buy?\" Jeanne has already bought 5 tickets which means she has enough tickets to ride the Ferris wheel. To ride the roller coaster and the bumper cars, Jeanne needs 8 tickets in total. Therefore, Jeanne needs to buy 3 more tickets. So the answer is 3.\nFirst, Jeanne needs to use 5 tickets for the Ferris wheel, 4 tickets for the roller coaster, and 4 tickets for the bumper cars. That's a total of 13 tickets. Since Jeanne only has 5 tickets, she needs to buy 8 more tickets to ride all the rides. The condition \"the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as the number of tickets needed has already been established.\nJeanne needs 5 tickets to ride the Ferris wheel, 4 tickets to ride the roller coaster, and 4 tickets to ride the bumper cars. This means that she will need 13 tickets in total. She already has 5 tickets, so she needs 8 more tickets. Since Jeanne's mother bought 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater, Jeanne needs 8 more tickets, so she should buy 8 movie tickets from her mother.  The condition \"Jeanne has 5 tickets\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how many more tickets Jeanne needs to buy.\nFirst, Jeanne needs to know how many tickets she has in total. Jeanne has 5 tickets from the amusement park, and her mother bought 20000 tickets from the movie theater.  So, Jeanne has a total of 20005 tickets.  Next, Jeanne needs to know how many tickets she needs in order to ride the Ferris wheel, roller coaster and bumper cars. The Ferris wheel costs 5 tickets, the roller coaster costs 4 tickets and the bumper cars cost 4 tickets.  So, Jeanne needs a total of 13 tickets in order to ride the three rides.  Finally, Jeanne needs to calculate how many more tickets she needs to buy in order to ride the three rides. Jeanne has 20005 tickets in total, and she needs 13 tickets to ride the three rides.  Therefore, Jeanne needs to buy an additional 13 tickets in order to ride the three rides.  The condition \"Jeanne's mother bought 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to calculate the total number of tickets that Jeanne has (20005 tickets).", "equation": "Jeanne's mother bought 20000 movie tickets from the movie theater.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.467418909072876, 0.27516722679138184, 0.2070780098438263, 0.6066706776618958, 0.3865431249141693]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. The turtle of Janele's brother weighs 1000 pounds. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add up the weights of all of her cats and then divide that by the total number of cats.  In this case, the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then, we divide that by the number of cats (4): 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us the weights of two of the cats. Without this information, we would not know the total weight of Janele's cats and would not be able to calculate the average weight. The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is also relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the weight of another one of Janele's cats. The condition \"The fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is also relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the weight of the last of Janele's cats. The condition \"The turtle of Janele's brother weighs 1000 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "1. Add up the weights of Janele's cats: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  2. Divide the sum by the number of cats: 48 / 4 = 12  3. The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how many cats we need to include in the calculation. Without this information, we would not know how many cats to include.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add up the weights of all of her cats and then divide that by the total number of cats.  In this case, the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. Then, we divide that by the number of cats (4): 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as we are simply adding up all of the weights and then dividing by the total number of cats.\nStep 1: Calculate the total weight of Janele's cats.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  Step 2: Calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.  48 / 4 = 12  Answer: The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  No, the condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\" because the exact weight of the third cat does not affect the result. The average weight of Janele's cats would still be 12 pounds even if the third cat weighed a different amount.\nFirst, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add together the weights of all of the cats and then divide that number by the total number of cats.   In this case, the total weight of Janele's cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  The total number of cats is 4.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.   The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, as this information is necessary to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. Without this information, we would not know the total weight of Janele's cats or the average weight.   The turtle of Janele's brother does not factor into the calculation, as it is not one of Janele's cats.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of the weights of all the cats, divided by the number of cats. So, the sum of the weights of all the cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. The number of cats is 4. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12. The condition \"The turtle of Janele's brother weighs 1000 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The turtle of Janele's brother weighs 1000 pounds.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.30888885259628296]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Luke's father can provide 2 pieces of papers. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars. So, he still needs 85 - 33 = 52 more stars to fill the glass jar. Since he needs to fill 4 bottles, he needs to make 52 x 4 = 208 stars in total. Luke's father can provide 2 pieces of paper. So, Luke needs 208 - 2 = 206 more stars to fill the 4 bottles. Therefore, Luke needs to make 206 more stars. Yes, the condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Luke's father can provide 2 pieces of paper is also relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 206, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make a total of 85 stars.  He needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make 85 stars divided by 4, which is 21.25 stars.  Luke's father can provide 2 pieces of papers, so Luke needs to make 21.25 - 2 stars, which is 19.25 stars.   Therefore, Luke needs to make 19.25 more stars.  The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the total number of stars that Luke needs to make in order to fill the 4 bottles. Without that condition, it would not be possible to determine how many stars Luke needs to make.\nStep 1: Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one glass jar.  Step 2: Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars for one glass jar.  Step 3: Luke needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make 208 more stars (4 x 52 = 208).  Step 4: Luke's father can provide 2 pieces of papers, so Luke needs to make 206 more stars (208 - 2 = 206).  Answer: Luke needs to make 206 more stars to fill 4 bottles.  Yes, the condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"how many more stars must Luke make?\" Without this condition, Luke would need to make another 52 stars for one glass jar, and therefore would need to make 208 more stars for 4 bottles.\nFirst, Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one jar. He has already made 33, so he needs to make 52 more stars.  Next, Luke needs to fill four bottles. That means he would need to make a total of 208 stars (52 stars for each jar).  Finally, Luke's father can provide 2 pieces of paper, so Luke will still need to make 206 stars (208 stars - 2 pieces of paper).  Therefore, the answer to \"How many more stars must Luke make?\" is 206. The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it affects the total number of stars needed to fill all four jars.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill the 4 bottles: 4 bottles x 85 stars = 340 stars  Next, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars needed (340 stars): 340 stars - 33 stars = 307 stars  Finally, we need to subtract the number of papers Luke's father can provide (2 papers) from the total number of stars still needed (307 stars): 307 stars - 2 papers = 305 stars  Therefore, Luke needs to make 305 more stars to fill the 4 bottles. The condition that \"Luke's father can provide 2 pieces of papers\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it allows Luke to subtract 2 papers from the total number of stars still needed.", "equation": "Luke's father can provide 2 pieces of papers.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.2870677709579468]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Claire's mother is 50000 years older than Jessica. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Jessica is 6 years older than Claire which means that Jessica is 18 + 6 = 24 years old now.  The condition that in two years Claire will be 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\".  The condition that Claire's mother is 50000 years older than Jessica is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  So the answer is 24 years old.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Claire is currently 18 years old, so Jessica is currently 24 years old.  The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\" because the calculation process has already been completed.\nFirst, we know that Claire is 18 years old now and in two years she will be 20 years old. So, Jessica must be 24 years old now.   Second, the condition \"Claire's mother is 50000 years older than Jessica\" does not change the calculation process, and therefore is not relevant to the answer.", "equation": "Claire's mother is 50000 years older than Jessica.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.585192859172821, 0.47143587470054626, 0.4433284401893616]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jennifer's neighbor bought 9000 bottles of water yesterday. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has. To do this, we add the number of green sweets (212), blue sweets (310) and yellow sweets (502) which gives us a total of 1024 sweets.  Now, we need to figure out how many sweets each person will get. Jennifer has decided to share the sweets between herself and her 3 friends, which means that each person will get 1/4 of the total number of sweets. This means that each person will get 1024/4 = 256 sweets.  The condition that Jennifer's neighbor bought 9000 bottles of water yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 256, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has. To do this, the condition is not relevant. We just need to add the number of green sweets, blue sweets and yellow sweets (212 + 310 + 502 = 1024).   Now, we need to figure out how many sweets each person will get. To do this, the condition is relevant. Jennifer has decided to share the sweets between herself and her 3 friends, which means that each person will get 1/4 of the total number of sweets. This means that each person will get 1024 / 4 = 256 sweets.   Finally, the neighbor's 9000 bottles of water is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, to answer the question \"How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?\", we need to calculate the total number of sweets that Jennifer has. This is the sum of the green, blue, and yellow sweets: 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024.  Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets (1024) by the number of people (4): 1024/4 = 256. This means that Jennifer and her friends will each get 256 sweets.  Finally, the condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it does not affect the answer. The neighbor's purchase of 9000 bottles of water has no bearing on the calculation either.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many sweets Jennifer has in total. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, so she has a total of 212 + 310 + 502 = 1024 sweets.   Now, we need to figure out how many sweets each person will get. Since there are 4 people, each person will get 1024/4 = 256 sweets.   The condition of \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process as it does not affect the total number of sweets Jennifer has or how many sweets each person will get. The number of bottles of water purchased by Jennifer's neighbor also has no effect on the calculation process.\nTo calculate how many sweets each person will get, first we need to calculate the total number of sweets. This can be done by adding up the number of green sweets (212), blue sweets (310) and yellow sweets (502).  The total number of sweets is 924.  Since Jennifer is sharing the sweets between herself and her three friends, each person will get 924 / 4 = 231 sweets each.   The condition that Jennifer's neighbor bought 9000 bottles of water yesterday is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jennifer's neighbor bought 9000 bottles of water yesterday.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.3261152505874634]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Emily's father has 20000 more pineapples than Betty. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Betty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 252 oranges. The condition that Emily's father has 20000 more pineapples than Betty is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, the answer is that Emily has 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "Betty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 252 oranges.  The condition that Emily's father has 20000 more pineapples than Betty is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emily's father has 20000 more pineapples than Betty.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.45772838592529297]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Claire's mother is 2000 years older than Claire. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Claire is 18 years old now. Jessica is 6 years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old now. The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem. The condition that Claire's mother is 2000 years older than Claire is not relevant to the calculation process. So the answer is Jessica is 24 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Claire is 18 years old now. Jessica is 6 years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old now. The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.\nFirst, Claire is 18 years old now.   Second, if Claire will be 20 years old in two years, then Jessica will be 26 years old.   The condition of Claire's mother being 2000 years older than Claire is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Claire's mother is 2000 years older than Claire.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.3158666789531708]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Maria's neighbor bought a moisturizer which cost $1000. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This means that for the entire year, she will need 6 bars of soap (2 months x 6 = 12 months). She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This means that for the entire year, she will spend $48.00 on soap (6 bars x $8.00 = $48.00).  The condition that Maria's neighbor bought a moisturizer which cost $1000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap and each bar of soap lasts her for two months. To calculate how much she will spend on soap for the year, we need to multiply the cost of 1 bar by the number of bars she needs. So the answer would be: $8.00 x 6 = $48.00.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "1. Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. 2. Each bar of soap lasts her for two months. 3. For the entire year, she will need 6 bars of soap. 4. Therefore, she will spend $48.00 on soap for the year.  The condition \"Maria's neighbor bought a moisturizer which cost $1000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Maria's neighbor bought a moisturizer which cost $1000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.5207118988037109]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The price of the cycling equipment is $200000, and neither Jack nor Jack's neighbor is willing to make a purchase. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "First, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Jack paid for the squat rack.  Then, the barbell cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much Jack paid for the barbell.  The barbell cost 1/10 of the squat rack, so that would be $250.  Finally, the cycling equipment is $200000, but neither Jack nor Jack's neighbor is willing to make a purchase. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us whether or not Jack paid anything for the cycling equipment.  Since neither Jack nor his neighbor is willing to make a purchase, Jack does not pay anything for the cycling equipment.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything (2500 + 250).  Yes, the condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "First, Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. Then, the barbell cost 1/10 as much, so that would be $250. Finally, the cycling equipment is $200000, but neither Jack nor Jack's neighbor is willing to make a purchase, so that cost is not relevant to the calculation. Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything. Condition \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500.\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500 and a barbell for 1/10 of that, which is $250. So, the total cost of the squat rack and the barbell is $2750.  The cycling equipment was $200000 but neither Jack nor his neighbor were willing to make a purchase.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.  The condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process since this condition is used to determine the cost of the barbell.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500, which means he paid a total of $2500.  The barbell cost 1/10 of the squat rack, so it cost $250.  The cycling equipment was $200000, but neither Jack nor his neighbor purchased it, so Jack did not pay anything for it.   Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.   Yes, the condition \"The price of the cycling equipment is $200000, and neither Jack nor Jack's neighbor is willing to make a purchase\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it determines whether Jack paid anything for the cycling equipment or not.", "equation": "The price of the cycling equipment is $200000, and neither Jack nor Jack's neighbor is willing to make a purchase.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110712051391602, 0.16832022368907928, 0.31009137630462646]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Based on the counting by Luke's neighbor, there are 2 stars in the sky tonight. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill the jar. He has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars. Then, he needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make 85 x 4 = 340 stars in total. But he already has 33 stars, so he needs to make 307 stars in total (340 - 33). Finally, he needs to subtract the 2 stars in the sky tonight, so he needs to make 305 stars in total (307 - 2). Therefore, Luke needs to make 305 more stars to fill the 4 bottles. Yes, the condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us that Luke needs to make 85 stars in total to fill the glass jar. The condition \"Based on the counting by Luke's neighbor, there are 2 stars in the sky tonight.\" is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the number of stars in the sky that need to be subtracted from the total number of stars needed.", "numerical_answer": 305, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, Luke needs to make 4 stars to fill a glass jar. He has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 4 more stars.  Second, based on the counting by Luke's neighbor, there are 2 stars in the sky tonight.  So, Luke needs to make a total of 6 stars to fill 4 bottles.   Yes, the condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it tells us that Luke needs to make 85 stars in total to fill the glass jar.\nLuke needs to fill 4 bottles, and each bottle requires 85 stars. So, the total number of stars required for all 4 bottles is 4 x 85 = 340. However, Luke has already made 33 stars, so he still needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars.   Yes, the condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process. We need to subtract the number of stars already made by Luke from the total number of stars required for the 4 bottles in order to calculate the number of stars that Luke still needs to make.\nLuke needs to make 85 stars in total to fill the jar. He has already made 33, so he needs to make 52 more stars.  The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is not relevant to the calculation process. Luke only needs to make 52 stars regardless of how many bottles he needs to fill.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of stars needed to fill the 4 bottles: 85 stars x 4 bottles = 340 stars.  Second, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars needed (340 stars): 340 stars - 33 stars = 307 stars.  Finally, we need to subtract the number of stars in the sky tonight (2 stars): 307 stars - 2 stars = 305 stars.  Therefore, Luke needs to make 305 more stars to fill the 4 bottles.  The condition \"Based on the counting by Luke's neighbor, there are 2 stars in the sky tonight.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Based on the counting by Luke's neighbor, there are 2 stars in the sky tonight.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895530343055725, 0.6230340003967285, 0.3254551589488983, 0.37562990188598633]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's neighbor spends 60 hours sleeping per week. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day, which is a total of 19 hours per day. This means that Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day (24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours).  Now, let's think about Jackie's neighbor. If the neighbor is spending 60 hours sleeping per week, that means they are sleeping 8.57 hours per day (60 hours / 7 days = 8.57 hours).  This means that Jackie's neighbor has 16.43 hours of free time per day (24 hours - 8.57 hours = 16.43 hours).  Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day, while her neighbor has 16.43 hours of free time per day. The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how many hours Jackie and her neighbor are spending on activities other than sleeping and free time.  Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\" since if Jackie spends more or less than 8 hours working, it will affect", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie's neighbor spends 60 hours sleeping per week. This means that he sleeps 8.5 hours per day (60 hours / 7 days = 8.5 hours).  Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. This means that she has 5 hours of free time per day (8 hours + 3 hours + 8 hours = 19 hours; 24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours).  Therefore, Jackie has 35 hours of free time per week (5 hours x 7 days = 35 hours).   Yes, condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much free time does Jackie have?\" since if Jackie spends more or less than 8 hours working, it will affect the amount of free time she has.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day, which is a total of 19 hours per day. This means that Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day (24 hours - 19 hours = 5 hours).  Now, let's think about Jackie's neighbor. If the neighbor is spending 60 hours sleeping per week, that means they are sleeping 8.57 hours per day (60 hours / 7 days = 8.57 hours).  This means that Jackie's neighbor has 16.43 hours of free time per day (24 hours - 8.57 hours = 16.43 hours).  Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day, while her neighbor has 16.43 hours of free time per day. The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it is used to determine how many hours Jackie and her neighbor are spending on activities other than sleeping and free time.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many hours Jackie spends on working, exercise, and sleeping per week:  Working: 8 hours x 7 days = 56 hours Exercise: 3 hours x 7 days = 21 hours  Sleeping: 8 hours x 7 days = 56 hours  Total = 133 hours   Next, we need to subtract the total number of hours from the total number of hours that Jackie's neighbor spends sleeping per week, which is 60 hours.   60 hours - 133 hours = -73 hours   This answer is negative because it is impossible to have negative hours. Therefore, the condition \"Jackie's neighbor spends 60 hours sleeping per week\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.   The answer to the question \"How much free time does Jackie have?\" is zero hours. Jackie has no free time because she spends all of her time working, exercising, and sleeping.", "equation": "Jackie's neighbor spends 60 hours sleeping per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.44935140013694763]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. The bench costs $10, but neither Jack's father nor Jack is willing to buy it. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. That's the first thing we need to calculate.  Then, he bought the barbell, which cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack. Since the squat rack cost $2500, the barbell cost $250.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of the bench. However, neither Jack nor his father is willing to buy it, so the cost of the bench does not need to be included in the calculation.  Finally, we can add up the total cost of everything that Jack bought: $2500 + $250 = $2750.  Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything.   The condition in the problem is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the cost of the barbell which is 1/10 of the cost of the squat rack. So the answer is $2750.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "Jack paid $2500 for the squat rack. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, which is $250. The bench costs $10, but Jack and his father chose not to buy it. That means that the total cost of everything Jack purchased is $2750. The condition of \"Jack buys a squat rack for $2500\" is relevant to the calculation process because it was the first cost we had to take into account when calculating the total cost of everything Jack purchased.\nFirst, Jack bought a squat rack for $2500.  Second, the barbell cost 1/10 as much, so that would be $250.  Third, the bench cost $10, but neither Jack nor his father are willing to buy it, so that would be $0.  Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything.  Yes, the condition \"The barbell cost 1/10 as much\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJack bought a squat rack for $2500. That's the first thing we need to calculate.  Then, he bought the barbell, which cost 1/10 as much as the squat rack. Since the squat rack cost $2500, the barbell cost $250.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of the bench. However, neither Jack nor his father is willing to buy it, so the cost of the bench does not need to be included in the calculation.  Finally, we can add up the total cost of everything that Jack bought: $2500 + $250 = $2750.  Therefore, Jack paid $2750 for everything.   The condition in the problem is not relevant to the calculation process because neither Jack nor his father is willing to buy the bench, so it does not need to be included in the calculation.", "equation": "The bench costs $10, but neither Jack's father nor Jack is willing to buy it.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110712051391602, 0.16832026839256287, 0.2679690718650818]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's father spends 60 hours working per week. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time Jackie spends on work, exercise and sleep. That means Jackie has 8 + 3 + 8 = 19 hours of commitments on a daily basis. Jackie's father spends 60 hours working per week. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time Jackie's father spends on work.  To calculate how much free time Jackie has, we need to subtract the committed hours from the total hours in a day (24 hours). So the answer would be 24 - 19 = 5 hours of free time per day. Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Jackie's father spends 60 hours working per week is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time Jackie's father spends on work. So the answer is 5 hours of free time per day.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many hours Jackie is spending working, exercising and sleeping.  Working: 8 hours Exercising: 3 hours Sleeping: 8 hours  Total: 19 hours  Now, we need to calculate how many hours Jackie's father is spending working.  Working: 60 hours  Finally, we can subtract the total number of hours that Jackie and her father are spending from the total number of hours in a week (7 days x 24 hours = 168 hours).  168 - (19 + 60) = 89 hours  So, Jackie has 89 hours of free time per week.  Yes, the condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it helps us to calculate the total number of hours that Jackie is spending working, exercising and sleeping.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many hours Jackie spends on work, exercise, and sleep in a week.   Work: 8 hours x 7 days = 56 hours Exercise: 3 hours x 7 days = 21 hours Sleep: 8 hours x 7 days = 56 hours  Total: 56 + 21 + 56 = 133 hours  Now, we can subtract the total from the father's work hours to get Jackie's free time.   60 hours - 133 hours = -73 hours  Since it is impossible to have negative hours of free time, we can conclude that Jackie has no free time. The condition of Jackie's father spending 60 hours working per week is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us determine the amount of free time Jackie has.", "equation": "Jackie's father spends 60 hours working per week.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.3604104518890381]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. The height of Oli's father is 100 feet. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice as many scoops of ice cream as Oli. Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream. The difference between the number of scoops of ice cream that Victoria has and the number of scoops of ice cream that Oli has is 8 - 4 = 4. Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?\", as it provides the information needed to calculate the answer. The condition that Oli's father is 100 feet tall is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem and therefore does not need to be taken into consideration.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Since Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli, which means Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.   The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?\", as it provides the information needed to calculate the answer.\nOli has 4 scoops of ice cream.  Victoria has twice as many scoops of ice cream as Oli.  Therefore, Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.   The difference between the number of scoops of ice cream that Victoria has and the number of scoops of ice cream that Oli has is 8 - 4 = 4.   Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.   The condition \"The height of Oli's father is 100 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem and therefore does not need to be taken into consideration.", "equation": "The height of Oli's father is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.1979968398809433]}
{"original_question": "Charles is moving from Springfield, which has 482,653 people, to Greenville, which has 119,666 fewer people. The shoe size of Charles' father is 100. What is the total population of Springfield and Greenville?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987.  The second step is to add the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (362,987) to get the total population of both cities, which is 845,640.  The shoe size of Charles' father is 100 is not relevant to the calculation process of the total population of Springfield and Greenville.  To answer the question of what is the total population of Springfield and Greenville, you need to add the population of each city together. The shoe size of Charles' father is 100 is not relevant to this calculation process. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + (119,666) = 362,987.", "numerical_answer": 845640, "gold_answer": "845,640", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the population of Greenville. Since Greenville has 119,666 fewer people than Springfield, we can subtract 119,666 from 482,653 to get the population of Greenville, which is 362,987.   The second step is to add the population of Springfield (482,653) and the population of Greenville (362,987) to get the total population of both cities, which is 845,640.  The shoe size of Charles' father is not relevant to the calculation process of the total population of Springfield and Greenville.\nTo answer the question of what is the total population of Springfield and Greenville, you need to add the population of each city together. The shoe size of Charles' father is 100 is not relevant to this calculation process. The total population of Springfield and Greenville is 482,653 + (119,666) = 362,987.", "equation": "The shoe size of Charles' father is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5650979280471802, 0.044211216270923615]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The shoe size of Jed's neighbor is 100000. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. We know that the posted speed limit is 50 mph and the fine Jed was given is $256. We can calculate the speed Jed was traveling by dividing the fine ($256) by the fine per mile ($16). This gives us a result of 16 mph. Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph). The condition that the shoe size of Jed's neighbor is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit and the posted speed limit is 50 mph and the fine Jed was given is $256. To calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling, we need to divide the fine ($256) by the fine per mile ($16). So the answer would be 66 mph.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the difference between the posted speed limit and the speed Jed was traveling.   We know that the posted speed limit is 50 mph and the fine Jed was given is $256. We can calculate the speed Jed was traveling by dividing the fine ($256) by the fine per mile ($16). This gives us a result of 16 mph.   Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph (50 mph + 16 mph).   The condition of the question is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the fine per mile, which is necessary to calculate the speed Jed was traveling.\nJed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This means that Jed was traveling at a speed greater than 50 mph. The fine is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. We can use this information to calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling:   $256 = 16 x (Jed's speed - 50 mph) $256 = 16 x (Jed's speed) - 800 Jed's speed = ($256 + 800) / 16 Jed's speed = 66 mph  The shoe size of Jed's neighbor is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jed's neighbor is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.2972105145454407]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Perry's sister bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much cream was added to the recipe. Since Perry added a half cup of cream, we can calculate that he added 0.5 cups of cream. Next, we need to calculate how much fat was added. Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, we can calculate that 0.5 cups of cream adds 44 grams of fat. Finally, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since the recipe serves four people, we can calculate that each serving of food has 11 grams of fat added (44/4).  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food because it is used to calculate the amount of fat added. The condition that Perry's sister bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much cream was added to the recipe. Since Perry added a half cup of cream, we can calculate that he added 0.5 cups of cream.  Next, we need to calculate how much fat was added. Since cream has 88 grams of fat per cup, we can calculate that 0.5 cups of cream adds 44 grams of fat.  Finally, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since the recipe serves four people, we can calculate that each serving of food has 11 grams of fat added (44/4).  Yes, the condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process of how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food because it is used to calculate the amount of fat added.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to the recipe. Since Perry added a half cup of cream, that is 44 grams of fat.  Next, we need to calculate how many grams of fat were added to each serving of food. Since the recipe serves four people, we divide 44 grams of fat by 4 to get 11 grams of fat added to each serving.  Therefore, 11 grams of fat were added to each serving of food.  The condition \"Perry's sister bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Perry's sister bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, 0.08134432882070541]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Claire's brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Jessica is six years older than Claire, so if we know how old Claire is, we can figure out how old Jessica is. Right now, Claire is 18 years old, so Jessica is 24 years old. The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\" because it does not factor into the current age of either Jessica or Claire. The condition that Claire's brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store is also not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, the answer is that Jessica is 24 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Jessica is six years older than Claire, so if we know how old Claire is, we can figure out how old Jessica is. Right now, Claire is 18 years old, so Jessica is 24 years old. The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\" because it does not factor into the current age of either Jessica or Claire.\nFirst, we know that Claire is 18 years old now. If in two years she will be 20, then Jessica is 24 years old now.  The condition \"Claire's brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition only provides additional information about the family, but does not affect the calculation.", "equation": "Claire's brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.585192859172821, 0.47143587470054626, 0.09465530514717102]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. Lizzy's sister bought 20000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the 540 pounds of fish. Since each crate contains 30 pounds, we can divide 540 by 30 to get the number of crates: 540 闄や互 30 = 18.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of the shipment. Since the shipping cost is $1.5 per crate, we can multiply 18 (the number of crates) by 1.5 to get the total cost of the shipment: 18 x 1.5 = $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it helps us determine the number of crates needed for the shipment. The condition that Lizzy's sister bought 20000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how many crates Lizzy needs to ship the 540 pounds of fish. Since each crate contains 30 pounds, we can divide 540 by 30 to get the number of crates:   540 姊 30 = 18   Next, we need to calculate the cost of the shipment. Since the shipping cost is $1.5 per crate, we can multiply 18 (the number of crates) by 1.5 to get the total cost of the shipment:   18 x 1.5 = $27  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it helps us determine the number of crates needed for the shipment.\nFirst, we calculate the number of crates needed to ship the 540 pounds of fish. We can do this by dividing 540 by 30, which equals 18.   Therefore, Lizzy needs 18 crates to ship the 540 pounds of fish.   Next, we calculate the cost of the shipment. We can do this by multiplying 18 (the number of crates) by $1.5 (the cost per crate). This equals $27.   Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.   The condition \"Lizzy's sister bought 20000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Lizzy's sister bought 20000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.2936926484107971]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Lucy's neighbor is 20000 years old. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "Lucy had $65 in the bank to begin with. She then made a $15 deposit, bringing her bank balance to $80. After that, she made a $4 withdrawal, bringing her bank balance to $76. So, Lucy's bank balance is $76. Yes, the condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" Without the $15 deposit, Lucy's bank balance would still be $65. The condition that Lucy's neighbor is 20000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Lucy has $65 in the bank, so her balance is $65:  Balance = $65  She made a $15 deposit, so her balance is now $80:  Balance = 65 + 15 = $80  She then followed by a $4 withdrawal, so her balance is now $76:  Balance = 80 - 4 = $76  Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition that Lucy has $65 in the bank is relevant to the calculation process, as it was her initial balance before she made any transactions.\nLucy had $65 in the bank to begin with. She then made a $15 deposit, bringing her bank balance to $80. After that, she made a $4 withdrawal, bringing her bank balance to $76. So, Lucy's bank balance is $76.  Yes, the condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" Without the $15 deposit, Lucy's bank balance would still be $65.\nBefore the deposit: Lucy had $65 in the bank.  After the deposit: Lucy had $80 in the bank.  After the withdrawal: Lucy had $76 in the bank.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.  The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as this is what changes the bank balance from $80 to $76.\nLucy's initial bank balance: $65  Plus deposit: +$15  Minus withdrawal: -$4  Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.  The condition \"Lucy's neighbor is 20000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Lucy's neighbor is 20000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637162566184998, 0.3086089491844177, 0.2903803586959839, 0.3987599313259125]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Nathalie's father bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much each part of the cake is. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, which is 400/8 = 50 grams.  Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate, so that is 2 x 50 = 100 grams.  Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of cake.  The condition that Nathalie's father bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that the cake is 400 grams and is divided into eight equal parts, and Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake.  To calculate how much Pierre ate, we need to calculate how much one-eighth of the cake is, and then double it. So the answer is 100 grams.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, so that is 400/8 = 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so that is 2 x 50 = 100 grams.   The condition is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us that the cake is 400 grams and is divided into eight equal parts. This helps us work out how much each person ate.\nThe cake is divided into eight equal parts. This means that each part is 400/8 = 50 grams.  Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, which means he ate 2 x 50 = 100 grams.  Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of cake.  The condition \"Nathalie's father bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Nathalie's father bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.23762720823287964]}
{"original_question": "Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. Sally's sister has read 1000 books in the past year. If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday and 1 sandwich on Sunday. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many sandwiches Sally ate on Saturday and Sunday.  Each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many pieces of bread were used for each sandwich.  That means Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday (2 sandwiches x 2 pieces of bread) and 2 pieces of bread on Sunday (1 sandwich x 2 pieces of bread).  The total number of pieces of bread that Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday is 4 + 2 = 6 pieces of bread.  Yes, the condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday.  The condition that Sally's sister has read 1000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of sandwiches eaten each day by 2 (the number of pieces of bread used per sandwich). So the answer is 6 pieces of bread.", "numerical_answer": 6, "gold_answer": "6", "instructions": "The condition \"Sally eats 2 sandwiches on Saturday\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it tells us how many sandwiches Sally eats on Saturday. So, the answer is that Sally eats 6 pieces of bread across Saturday and Sunday.\nFirst, let's calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Saturday. We know that Sally eats 2 sandwiches, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. Therefore, Sally eats 4 pieces of bread on Saturday.  Next, we need to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Sunday. We know that Sally eats 1 sandwich, and each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread. Therefore, Sally eats 2 pieces of bread on Sunday.  Finally, we can add the number of pieces of bread Sally eats on Saturday (4) and the number of pieces of bread Sally eats on Sunday (2), to get the total number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. This total number is 6 pieces of bread.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"If each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, how many pieces of bread does Sally eat across Saturday and Sunday?\" is 6 pieces of bread.  The condition \"and 1 sandwich on Sunday.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it provides us with the necessary information to calculate how many pieces of bread Sally eats on Sunday (2 pieces of bread).\nThe question asks for the number of pieces of bread Sally eats across Saturday and Sunday. We know that each sandwich uses 2 pieces of bread, so the answer is 6 pieces of bread (2 pieces of bread per sandwich x 3 sandwiches).  The condition that Sally's sister has read 1000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Sally's sister has read 1000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7427732348442078, 0.6802799701690674, 0.16314230859279633]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. James' father bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total cost of one semester for James. We know James takes 20 units per semester and the cost of each unit is $50. Therefore, the total cost of one semester for James is 20 x 50 = $1,000. Second, we need to calculate the total cost for two semesters for James. We already know the total cost of one semester for James is $1,000. Therefore, the total cost of two semesters for James is 1,000 x 2 = $2,000. The condition that James' father bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James takes 20 units per semester and the cost of each unit is $50. Therefore, the answer to the question \"If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?\" is $2,000.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First of all, the condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many units James is taking in a semester. This is important information for calculating the cost of two semesters.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of one semester. Since each unit costs $50, the cost of 20 units is $50 x 20 = $1,000.   Finally, we can calculate the cost of two semesters. Since each semester costs $1,000, the cost of two semesters is $1,000 x 2 = $2,000.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?\" is $2,000.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of one semester for James.  We know James takes 20 units per semester and the cost of each unit is $50. Therefore, the total cost of one semester for James is 20 x 50 = $1,000.   Second, we need to calculate the total cost for two semesters for James.  We already know the total cost of one semester for James is $1,000. Therefore, the total cost of two semesters for James is 1,000 x 2 = $2,000.   The condition \"James' father bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "James' father bought 2 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.21503202617168427]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. The height of Abie's brother is 100 feet. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags. She bought 6 more bags in the store, so now she has 22 bags of chips. The height of Abie's brother is 100 feet, but this has nothing to do with the number of bags of chips, so it is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she has 16 bags. She bought 6 more bags in the store, so now she has 22 bags of chips. The height of Abie's brother is 100 feet, but this has nothing to do with the number of bags of chips, so it is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, so she now has a total of 22 bags of chips.  The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, Abie would have had a total of 24 bags of chips in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend.   So, Abie had 16 bags of chips.   Then, she bought another 6 bags of chips in the store.   So, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.   The height of Abie's brother is 100 feet, which is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, Abie had 20 bags of chips. Then, she gave 4 bags to her friend and bought 6 more. This means that in the end, Abie has 20 + 6 - 4 = 22 bags of chips. The condition \"The height of Abie's brother is 100 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer.", "equation": "The height of Abie's brother is 100 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.2430209517478943]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. The height of Emily's mother is 10000 feet. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Betty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, which is 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges. The condition \"The height of Emily's mother is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it does not affect the answer.  Therefore, Emily has 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "If Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, which is 3 x 12 = 36 oranges.   Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nBetty has 12 oranges.  Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so she has 3 鑴 12 = 36 oranges.  Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so she has 7 鑴 36 = 252 oranges.  The condition \"The height of Emily's mother is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it does not affect the answer.", "equation": "The height of Emily's mother is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.14294999837875366]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Lucy's sister is 20000 years old. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "First, Lucy has $65 in the bank. Then she made a $15 deposit, so her balance is now $80. After that, she made a $4 withdrawal, so her balance is now $76. The condition \"Lucy's sister is 20000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lucy had $65 in the bank before she made the $15 deposit and then withdrew $4. So the answer is $76.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Lucy had $65 in the bank before she made the $15 deposit. After the deposit, her balance was $80. Then she withdrew $4, so her new balance is $76. The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since the calculation process takes into account the deposits and withdrawals made after the initial amount. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.\nFirst, Lucy's initial bank balance is $65.   Next, she made a $15 deposit. So, her bank balance now increases to $80.   Then, she made a $4 withdrawal. So, her bank balance now decreases to $76.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"What is Lucy's bank balance?\" is $76.   Condition \"She made a $15 deposit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is part of the steps that we used to calculate the bank balance.\nFirst, Lucy has $65 in the bank. Then she made a $15 deposit, so her balance is now $80. After that, she made a $4 withdrawal, so her balance is now $76. The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant because it affects the calculation process and the final answer.  Since Lucy's sister's age is not relevant to the calculation process, it does not affect the answer. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. So, Lucy's bank balance is now $76. The condition \"Lucy's sister is 20000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Lucy's sister is 20000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637162566184998, 0.3086089491844177, 0.2903803586959839, 0.3749089539051056]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Asia's neighbor is 2 years old. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to find the difference between the original price ($350) and the sale price ($140). We can do this by subtracting $140 from $350, which gives us $210.  Then, we need to find what percentage of the original price this difference is. We can do this by dividing $210 by $350, which gives us 0.6.  Finally, we can convert this to a percentage by multiplying 0.6 by 100, which gives us 60%.  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition that Asia's neighbor is 2 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to find the difference between the original price ($350) and the sale price ($140). We can do this by subtracting $140 from $350, which gives us $210.   Then, we need to find what percentage of the original price this difference is. We can do this by dividing $210 by $350, which gives us 0.6.   Finally, we can convert this to a percentage by multiplying 0.6 by 100, which gives us 60%.   Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition that Asia bought a homecoming dress is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nStep 1: Find the difference between the original price and the sale price.  Original price: $350 Sale price: $140  Difference = $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off.  Percentage off = (difference/$350) x 100  Percentage off = (210/350) x 100 = 60%\nStep 1: Asia bought a dress for $140 that was originally priced at $350. Step 2: To calculate the percentage off, we need to find out what portion of the original price Asia paid.  Step 3: We can do this by dividing the price she paid by the original price: $140/$350 = 0.4.  Step 4: To turn this into a percentage, we can multiply it by 100: 0.4 x 100 = 40%.  Therefore, Asia got 40% off at the sale.   The condition \"Asia's neighbor is 2 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Asia's neighbor is 2 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.21690544486045837]}
{"original_question": "Jennifer decides to share her sweets between herself and her 3 friends. She has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. Jennifer's sister is 3 years old. How many sweets will Jennifer and her friends get each?", "reasoning_path": "Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many sweets Jennifer has in total.  Jennifer has 3 friends. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many people Jennifer has to divide her sweets between.  That means Jennifer will have to divide her sweets into 4 parts (for herself and her 3 friends).  So, Jennifer and her friends will get 212/4 = 53 green sweets each, 310/4 = 78 blue sweets each, and 502/4 = 126 yellow sweets each.  Yes, the condition \"Jennifer has 3 friends\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Jennifer's sister is 3 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many sweets each person will get. We can calculate this by dividing the total number of sweets by 4. So the answer would be: 53 green sweets, 78 blue sweets, and 126 yellow sweets each.", "numerical_answer": 126, "gold_answer": "256", "instructions": "First, we calculate the total number of sweets: 212 green sweets + 310 blue sweets + 502 yellow sweets = 1,024 sweets total.  Next, we need to divide the total number of sweets among Jennifer and her 3 friends. That means that each person will get 1,024 梅 4 = 256 sweets each.  Finally, we can look at the individual colors of sweets. Jennifer and her 3 friends will each get 256 梅 3 = 85 green sweets, 85 blue sweets, and 85 yellow sweets.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us that Jennifer is sharing the sweets between herself and her 3 friends. This is important information that helps us determine how many sweets each person will receive.\nFirst, Jennifer and her friends will get 212 green sweets each, since there is an equal amount of 212 green sweets to go around. Then, they will get 310 blue sweets each, since there is an equal amount of 310 blue sweets to go around. Finally, they will get 502 yellow sweets each, since there is an equal amount of 502 yellow sweets to go around.  Yes, the condition \"She has 212 green sweets\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is the amount of green sweets that will be divided equally amongst Jennifer and her friends.\nFirst we need to find out the total number of sweets that Jennifer has. So, Jennifer has 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets. This means she has a total of 1,024 sweets.   Now we can calculate how many sweets each person will get. Since Jennifer has 4 friends, and she wants to share the sweets evenly, each person will get 1/4 of the total amount of sweets. This means that each person will get 256 sweets.   The condition \"310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem since we only need to know the total number of sweets, not the number of each kind of sweet.\nFirst, the condition that Jennifer's sister is 3 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This is because the problem is only asking about how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will get each, not Jennifer's sister.   Second, we can calculate how many sweets Jennifer and her friends will get each. Since there are 212 green sweets, 310 blue sweets and 502 yellow sweets, we can divide these sweets equally between Jennifer and her 3 friends. That means each person will get 212/4 = 53 green sweets, 310/4 = 77.5 blue sweets, and 502/4 = 125.5 yellow sweets.   Therefore, Jennifer and her friends will get 53 green sweets, 77.5 blue sweets, and 125.5 yellow sweets each.", "equation": "Jennifer's sister is 3 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.791044294834137, 0.4107772707939148, 0.3978627622127533, 0.3039446473121643]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Steve's sister bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "Steve is 5'6\", which means he is 66 inches tall. He grows 6 inches, so now he is 72 inches tall. The condition about Steve's sister buying 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how tall Steve is in inches. Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Steve is 5'6\". This means Steve is 66 inches tall. He grows 6 inches, so now he is 72 inches tall. The condition about Steve's sister buying 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how tall Steve is in inches. Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.\nFirst, we can calculate what Steve's height is before he grows 6 inches. Since he is 5'6\", that means his height is 66 inches. Now, let's add 6 inches to that number to get his new height. So, Steve's new height is 72 inches. The condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much we need to add to Steve's original height in order to get his new height. The question does not mention how many tomatoes Steve's sister bought, so that is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe first part of the problem asks \"How tall is Steve in inches?\". The answer to this is 11'6\" or 138 inches. The second part of the problem, which states \"Steve's sister bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process and can be ignored in order to solve the problem.", "equation": "Steve's sister bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495514154434204, 0.5135691165924072, 0.13531708717346191]}
{"original_question": "Billy's family likes to keep their bicycles stored in the garage when they're not being used. They own a total of 4 bicycles. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. Billy's brother is 500 years old. How many spokes are inside the garage?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to figure out how many bicycles are in the garage. We know that Billy's family owns a total of 4 bicycles, so we know that there are 4 bicycles in the garage. Next, we need to figure out how many spokes are on each bicycle. We know that each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes, so we know that there are 10 spokes per bicycle. Finally, we need to calculate the total number of spokes in the garage. We can calculate this by multiplying 4 (the number of bicycles in the garage) by 10 (the number of spokes per bicycle). This gives us a total of 40 spokes in the garage.  Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that Billy's brother is 500 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many spokes are inside the garage. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of bicycles in the garage by the number of spokes per bicycle. So the answer is 40 spokes.", "numerical_answer": 40, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "The family owns 4 bicycles, and each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. That means that there are 40 spokes in total inside the garage. The condition that Billy's brother is 500 years old is irrelevant to the calculation process for this problem.\n1. Billy's family owns 4 bicycles. 2. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. 3. Therefore, the total number of spokes inside the garage is 4 x 10 = 40.  Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\" Without this condition, we would not have enough information to determine the total number of spokes inside the garage.\nStep 1: How many bicycles are in the garage? Answer: 4 bicycles.   Step 2: How many spokes are on each bicycle wheel? Answer: 10 spokes.  Step 3: How many spokes are inside the garage? Answer: 40 spokes.  The condition \"Billy's brother is 500 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\".", "equation": "Billy's brother is 500 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3732944130897522, 0.22472992539405823, 0.38099128007888794, -0.02606617659330368]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. The shoe size of Mary's sister is 2000. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "Megan has 5 pieces of candy, so Mary would have 3 times as much candy, which would be 15 pieces of candy. After Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, she would then have a total of 25 pieces of candy.  The shoe size of Mary's sister is 2000, but this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The relevant information to answer this question is that Megan has 5 pieces of candy and Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, and Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. To calculate how many pieces of candy Mary has in total, we need to multiply the number of pieces of candy Megan has by 3 and add 10. So the answer would be: 5 x 3 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary would have 3 times as much candy, which would be 15 pieces of candy.  After Mary adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, she would then have a total of 25 pieces of candy.  The shoe size of Mary's sister is 2000, but this is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mary's sister is 2000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.30648180842399597]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. The height of Asia's father is 3 feet. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price. Original Price: $350 Sale Price: $140 Difference: $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off. Percentage off = (Difference/$Original Price) x 100 = (210/350) x 100  = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"The height of Asia's father is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the original price and the sale price. To calculate the percentage off, we need to find out how much money Asia saved. To do that, we subtract the sale price from the original price:  Original price - Sale price = Amount saved  350 - 140 = 210  Now, we need to figure out what percentage of the original price this amount saved is. To do this, we divide the amount saved by the original price and multiply by 100:  (Amount saved / Original price) x 100 = Percentage off  (210 / 350) x 100 = 60%  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price.   Original Price: $350 Sale Price: $140 Difference: $210  Step 2: Calculate the percentage off.   Percentage off = (Difference/$Original Price) x 100 = (210/350) x 100  = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the sale price of the dress. Without the sale price, we would not be able to calculate the percentage off.\nTo calculate the percentage off, we need to find out how much money Asia saved. To do that, we subtract the sale price from the original price:  Original price - Sale price = Amount saved  350 - 140 = 210  Now, we need to figure out what percentage of the original price this amount saved is. To do this, we divide the amount saved by the original price and multiply by 100:  (Amount saved / Original price) x 100 = Percentage off  (210 / 350) x 100 = 60%  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition that the original price was $350 is relevant to the calculation process because it is needed to calculate the amount saved and the percentage off.\nThe first step is to calculate the discount amount. Asia saved $210 ($350 - $140 = $210). The second step is to calculate the percentage off. To do that, divide the discount amount ($210) by the original price ($350) and multiply by 100 to get the percentage. In this case, the answer is 60%.  The condition \"The height of Asia's father is 3 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Asia's father is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.15305282175540924]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The height of Jed's father is 50000 feet. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. We also know that in Zeoland, the fine is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. Therefore, we can calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling by dividing the fine ($256) by the fine per mile ($16). 256 / 16 = 16 mph. So, Jed was traveling at 16 mph over the posted speed limit. The condition \"The height of Jed's father is 50000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph and in Zeoland, the fine is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. Therefore, the answer is that Jed was traveling at 66 mph when he was fined for speeding.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "Step 1: We know that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph.  Step 2: We also know that in Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit.  Step 3: Therefore, we can calculate the speed at which Jed was traveling by dividing the fine ($256) by the fine per mile ($16).  256 / 16 = 16 mph  So, Jed was traveling at 16 mph over the posted speed limit.   The condition \"In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the basis for how we calculate Jed's speed.\nIn Zeoland, the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit. So, if Jed was fined $256, that means he was traveling 16 mph over the posted speed limit.  Therefore, Jed was driving at 66 mph when he was fined for speeding. The height of Jed's father is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe first step is to figure out how much over the speed limit Jed was traveling. We know that the fine is $16 per mile per hour, so we can divide the total fine of $256 by $16 to get 16 mph.  The second step is to subtract 16 mph from the posted speed limit of 50 mph to get the speed Jed was traveling at.  Therefore, Jed was traveling at a speed of 34 mph.  The condition \"The height of Jed's father is 50000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Jed's father is 50000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.23337817192077637]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Steve's mother is 1000 years old. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "Steve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. He grows 6 inches. So, Steve is now 66 + 6 = 72 inches tall. The condition that Steve's mother is 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\".", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "Steve is 5'6\" tall, which is equal to 66 inches. If he grows 6 inches, he will be 72 inches tall. Steve's mother's age has no relevance to Steve's height, so the condition of Steve's mother's age is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nBefore Steve grows 6 inches, he was 5'6\" or 66 inches tall. So after he grows 6 inches, he is now 5'12\" or 72 inches tall. The condition about Steve's mother's age is irrelevant to the calculation process.\nSteve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches.  He grows 6 inches.  So, Steve is now 66 + 6 = 72 inches tall.   The condition \"Steve's mother is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How tall is Steve in inches?\".", "equation": "Steve's mother is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495516538619995, 0.5135689973831177, 0.35167890787124634]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The height of James' sister is 10000 feet. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the amount of money that James' insurance will cover. This is 80% of $300, which is $240.  Next, we need to subtract this amount from the total cost of the visit to get James' out-of-pocket cost. This is $300 - $240, which is $60.  Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process because without knowing the cost of the doctor visit, we wouldn't be able to calculate the amount of money that James' insurance will cover or his out-of-pocket cost.  The height of James' sister is 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the amount of money that James' insurance will cover. This is 80% of $300, which is $240.  Next, we need to subtract this amount from the total cost of the visit to get James' out-of-pocket cost. This is $300 - $240, which is $60.  The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process because without knowing the cost of the doctor visit, we wouldn't be able to calculate the amount of money that James' insurance will cover or his out-of-pocket cost.   Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.\nStep 1: Calculate the total cost of the visit.  The total cost of the visit is $300.  Step 2: Calculate the portion of the total cost that James' insurance will cover.  The portion of the total cost that James' insurance will cover is 80%, or $240.  Step 3: Calculate James' out-of-pocket cost.  The out-of-pocket cost for James' doctor appointment is $60, which is the difference between the total cost ($300) and the portion covered by insurance ($240).  Therefore, James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it provides us with the information that we need to calculate the amount that James' insurance will cover and, thus, the amount that he will have to pay out-of-pocket. The height of James' sister is not relevant to this calculation.\nJames's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is the cost that James is responsible for paying, after insurance has taken care of the rest. In this case, James's insurance covers 80% of the $300 fee, so James is responsible for the remaining 20%, or $60. Therefore, James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.   The height of James' sister is 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.", "equation": "The height of James' sister is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.20726461708545685]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Jose's sister bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. That means that for each dozen cupcakes he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Therefore, he will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  The condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is the starting point for calculating how many lemons Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes. The condition that Jose's sister bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So, the answer is Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. That means that for each dozen cupcakes he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice.   Since Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.   Therefore, the answer is that Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  The condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is the starting point for calculating how many lemons Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes.\nFor 1 dozen cupcakes, he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice. For 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Therefore, he will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes. The condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. So, to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need 9 lemons.   The condition that Jose's sister bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jose's sister bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, 0.3587965965270996]}
{"original_question": "A magazine costs $3 each. Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each. The height of Jewel's sister is 2000 feet. How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?", "reasoning_path": "Jewel bought 10 magazines at $3 each. This means she spent a total of $30. She will then sell the magazines at $3.50 each, so she will gain a total of $35 from selling the 10 magazines. This means she will make a profit of $5. The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process because the cost of the magazine affects the amount of money Jewel will make when she sells them. The condition that Jewel's sister's height is 2000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem and does not affect the answer. Therefore, Jewel will gain $5 from selling her magazines.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate how much money Jewel spent to buy 10 magazines. 10 magazines at $3 each is $30. Next, she will sell the magazines at $3.50 each, so she will gain a total of $35 from selling the 10 magazines. This means she will make a profit of $5. The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process because the cost of the magazine affects the amount of money Jewel will make when she sells them. The condition is not, however, relevant to the height of Jewel's sister, which is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, Jewel bought 10 magazines at $3 each. This means that she spent a total of $30.  Second, she sold the magazines for $3.50 each. This means that she earned a total of $35 (10 magazines x $3.50 = $35).  Third, she made a profit of $5 (35 - 30 = 5).   The condition \"Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, because it allowed us to determine how much she spent, and how much she earned, from the sale of her magazines. Without this information, we would not have been able to calculate how much profit she made.\nStep 1: Calculate the selling price of the magazines: 10 magazines x $3.50 each = $35.00  Step 2: Calculate the cost of the magazines: 10 magazines x $3 each = $30.00  Step 3: Calculate the gain from selling the magazines: Selling Price - Cost = $35.00 - $30.00 = $5.00  Answer: Jewel will gain $5.00 from selling her magazines.  The condition \"The height of Jewel's sister is 2000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem and does not affect the answer.", "equation": "The height of Jewel's sister is 2000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3614990711212158, 0.6798670291900635, 0.29307886958122253]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. The height of Nathalie's father is 10000 feet. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process of \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" because it tells us that each part of the cake is 400/8 = 50 g. Therefore, Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 50 g. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2 x 50 g = 100 g. So, the answer is that Pierre ate 100 g. The height of Nathalie's father is 10000 feet, but this is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\"", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process of \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" because it tells us that each part of the cake is 400/8 = 50 g.   Therefore, Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 50 g. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 2 x 50 g = 100 g.   So, the answer is that Pierre ate 100 g.   The height of Nathalie's father is 10000 feet, but this is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\"\nStep 1: Calculate the amount of cake Nathalie ate. Each eighth of the cake is 400/8 = 50 g. So Nathalie ate 50 g of cake. Step 2: Calculate the amount of cake Pierre ate. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 50 鑴 2 = 100 g of cake. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much did Pierre eat, in grams?\" is 100 g.   The condition \"The height of Nathalie's father is 10000 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Nathalie's father is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.13425077497959137]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. The shoe size of Kelly's sister is 50000. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly pulled out in total. We know that she pulled out 55 carrots in the first bed, 101 carrots in the second bed, and 78 carrots in the third bed. That means that she pulled out a total of 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to get the total number of pounds. This comes out to be 39 pounds.  Finally, the shoe size of Kelly's sister is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer. The answer is that Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly pulled out in total. We know that she pulled out 55 carrots in the first bed, 101 carrots in the second bed, and 78 carrots in the third bed. That means that she pulled out a total of 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to get the total number of pounds. This comes out to be 39 pounds.  Finally, the shoe size of Kelly's sister is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer. The answer is that Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. Therefore the total number of carrots she harvested is 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots. Next, we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound. Therefore, 234 carrots would weigh 234 / 6 = 39 pounds. The shoe size of Kelly's sister is not relevant to this calculation process.\nWe know that 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, so we can use this to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.  In the first bed, 55 carrots would weigh 55/6 pounds, which is equal to 9.17 pounds. In the second bed, 101 carrots would weigh 101/6 pounds, which is equal to 16.83 pounds. In the third bed, 78 carrots would weigh 78/6 pounds, which is equal to 13 pounds.  Therefore, Kelly harvested a total of 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process because we need to know the number of carrots Kelly harvested in each bed in order to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots she harvested.\nThe first step is to add up the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. She harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. So the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested was 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.   The second step is to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide the total number of carrots (234) by 6 to get the total number of pounds of carrots. 234 divided by 6 is 39 pounds.  So Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots. The shoe size of Kelly's sister is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe first step is to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested. To do this, we simply add the number of carrots from each bed: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  The next step is to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the answer: 234 姊 6 = 39 pounds.  The shoe size of Kelly's sister is 50000 is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The shoe size of Kelly's sister is 50000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.18325850367546082]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The height of Holden's brother is 2 feet. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Holden's bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. If we add these two together, we get 459 sq ft. The new room will be twice as large, which means it will be 918 sq ft. Therefore, if Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, the new room will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"The height of Holden's brother is 2 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Holden's bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft, and that the new room needs to be twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom combined. So the answer is 918 sq ft.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "We know that Holden's bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft. The total sq ft of the two rooms is 459 sq ft.  We also know that the new room needs to be twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom combined, which means that it will need to be 918 sq ft.   The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the size of Holden's bedroom is already accounted for in the calculation.\nHolden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. If we add these two together, we get 459 sq ft. The new room will be twice as large, which means it will be 918 sq ft. Therefore, if Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to include the size of the bathroom when determining the total size of the bedroom and bathroom combined.\nFirst, we need to calculate the combined sq ft of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom:  309 sq ft + 150 sq ft = 459 sq ft  Next, we need to determine the sq ft of the new home office/personal gym divided space that Holden wants to add, which is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom:  459 sq ft x 2 = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new home office/personal gym divided space will have 918 sq ft.  The condition \"The height of Holden's brother is 2 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Holden's brother is 2 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.22546814382076263]}
{"original_question": "Billy's family likes to keep their bicycles stored in the garage when they're not being used. They own a total of 4 bicycles. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes. The height of Billy's father is 500 feet. How many spokes are inside the garage?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many wheels are inside the garage. The family owns 4 bicycles, and each bicycle has two wheels, so the total number of wheels inside the garage is 8.  Second, we need to calculate how many spokes are there in each wheel. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes, so the total number of spokes inside the garage is 80.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\" is 80. Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Billy's father's height is 500 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate the total number of wheels and spokes in the garage.", "numerical_answer": 80, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of spokes inside the garage. Since there are 4 bicycles and each bicycle has 10 spokes, the total number of spokes inside the garage is 40.  Yes, the condition \"They own a total of 4 bicycles\" is relevant to the calculation process. Without this condition, we would not know the total number of spokes inside the garage.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many wheels are inside the garage. The family owns 4 bicycles, and each bicycle has two wheels, so the total number of wheels inside the garage is 8.  Second, we need to calculate how many spokes are there in each wheel. Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes, so the total number of spokes inside the garage is 80.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\" is 80. Yes, the condition \"Each bicycle wheel has 10 spokes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nStep 1: How many bicycles are in the garage?  Answer: 4 bicycles   Step 2: How many spokes are on each bicycle wheel?  Answer: 10 spokes   Step 3: How many spokes are inside the garage?  Answer: 40 spokes   The condition \"The height of Billy's father is 500 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many spokes are inside the garage?\".", "equation": "The height of Billy's father is 500 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3732944130897522, 0.22472992539405823, 0.38099128007888794, 0.0070506734773516655]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. The height of Michael's sister is 200000 feet. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.   Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.   The condition that Michael's sister's height is 200000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "Step 1: The number of chickens on his farm now is 550.  Step 2: The condition states that his chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.  Step 3: After 9 years, the number of chickens on his farm will be 550 + (9 x 150) = 1450.  So the answer is that Michael will have 1450 chickens after 9 years.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process. This condition is important since it tells us that the number of chickens will increase by 150 each year. Without this condition, we would not be able to calculate the correct answer.\nFirst, we need to calculate the amount of chickens Michael will have after 9 years. To do this we need to use the information given to us, which is that the number of chickens increase by 150 each year. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of chickens by the number of years (550 x 9 = 4,950). So, after 9 years, Michael will have 4,950 chickens.  The condition \"The height of Michael's sister is 200000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. This information does not help us calculate the number of chickens Michael will have after 9 years.", "equation": "The height of Michael's sister is 200000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.22492167353630066]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Nathalie's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much cake each person ate. Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 divided by 8, or 50 grams. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 100 grams.  The condition that Nathalie's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, the answer is Pierre ate 100 grams.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 divided by 8, or 50 grams.  Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 100 grams.  The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much cake each person ate.\nThe cake is 400 grams divided into 8 equal parts. Each part is therefore 400/8 = 50 grams. Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 50 grams. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 100 grams.   The condition of \"Nathalie's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Nathalie's mother bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.21852605044841766]}
{"original_question": "My brother and I have thirty minutes to go to school, without being late. It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, and another 6 minutes to get to the school building. The shoe size of my neighbor is 1000. How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to subtract the 15 minutes it takes us to arrive at the school gate from the 30 minutes we have total. That leaves us with 15 minutes. Next, we need to subtract the 6 minutes it takes us to get to the school building from the 15 minutes we have left. That leaves us with 9 minutes. Finally, we need to subtract the time it takes us to get to our room from the 9 minutes we have left. The time it takes us to get to our room will depend on how far away it is from the school building. The shoe size of your neighbor is not relevant to this calculation. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?\" is 9 minutes. The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to this calculation, as we had to subtract those 15 minutes from the 30 minutes we had total.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, we need to subtract the 15 minutes it takes us to arrive at the school gate from the 30 minutes we have total. That leaves us with 15 minutes.  Next, we need to subtract the 6 minutes it takes us to get to the school building from the 15 minutes we have left. That leaves us with 9 minutes.  Finally, we need to subtract the time it takes us to get to our room from the 9 minutes we have left. The time it takes us to get to our room will depend on how far away it is from the school building. The shoe size of your neighbor is not relevant to this calculation.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How much time do we have to get to our room, without being late?\" is 9 minutes. The condition \"It takes us 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate\" is relevant to this calculation, as we had to subtract those 15 minutes from the 30 minutes we had total.\nYou and your brother have 30 minutes to get to school. It takes 15 minutes to arrive at the school gate, so you have 15 minutes left. It takes another 6 minutes to get to the school building, so you now have 9 minutes left. Finally, it should take you a few minutes to get to your room, so you should have at least 5 minutes left to get to your room without being late.  The shoe size of your neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to figure out how much time we have to get to our room. We have 30 minutes to get to school, and it takes us 15 minutes to get to the school gate and another 6 minutes to get to the school building, so we have 9 minutes to get to our room.  The shoe size of your neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of my neighbor is 1000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.48320505023002625, 0.3492053747177124, 0.3385140895843506, 0.06723560392856598]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's sister bought 2000 books from the book store. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of carrots Kelly harvested. She pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that she harvested a total of 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds.  This means that Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"Kelly's sister bought 2000 books from the book store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it only tells us about the number of books that Kelly's sister bought, not the total amount of carrots harvested.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of carrots Kelly harvested. She pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that she harvested a total of 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we can divide 234 by 6 to get the number of pounds.  This means that Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it only tells us about the number of carrots from one bed, not the total amount of carrots harvested.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. This means that she harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots in total.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested, which is 234. Without that information, the total amount of carrots she harvested would have been 233 instead of 234, resulting in a different answer.\nTo find out how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, we need to first add up the total amount of carrots in each bed. 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots. Then, we need to divide this total number of carrots by 6 to find out how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. 234 姊 6 = 39 pounds.   The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is necessary to know how many carrots Kelly pulled from each bed in order to calculate how many pounds of carrots she harvested. Without this information, it would not be possible to accurately calculate the answer.\nKelly harvested 234 carrots total. If 6 carrots weigh one pound, then we can divide 234 by 6 to find out how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. The answer is 39 pounds.  The condition is relevant because it tells us how many carrots make up one pound, which is necessary for the calculation process.\nKelly harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. That means she harvested a total of 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, she harvested 234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"Kelly's sister bought 2000 books from the book store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Kelly's sister bought 2000 books from the book store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.14969976246356964]}
{"original_question": "A magazine costs $3 each. Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each. The shoe size of Jewel's father is 100. How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?", "reasoning_path": "Jewel bought 10 magazines for a total cost of $30 ($3 x 10). She will sell them at $3.50 each, so she will earn $35 ($3.50 x 10). Jewel will gain a profit of $5 from selling her magazines ($35 - $30).  The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the cost that Jewel paid for the magazines, which is used to calculate the profit she will gain from selling them. The shoe size of Jewel's father is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is $5.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "1. Jewel bought 10 magazines for a total cost of $30 ($3 x 10). 2. She will sell them at $3.50 each, so she will earn $35 ($3.50 x 10). 3. Jewel will gain a profit of $5 from selling her magazines ($35 - $30).  The condition \"A magazine costs $3 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the cost that Jewel paid for the magazines, which is used to calculate the profit she will gain from selling them.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of buying the 10 magazines:  Cost of 10 magazines = 10 x $3 = $30  Next, we need to calculate the total revenue from selling the 10 magazines:  Revenue from 10 magazines = 10 x $3.50 = $35  Finally, we need to calculate Jewel's gain from selling the 10 magazines:  Gain from selling 10 magazines = Revenue 閳 Cost = $35 閳 $30 = $5  Yes, the condition \"Jewel bought 10 magazines to be sold at $3.50 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much will Jewel gain from selling her magazines?\" because the cost and revenue from selling the magazines depend on the price at which Jewel bought and sold the magazines. The shoe size of Jewel's father is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\n1. The cost of 10 magazines is $30.  2. Jewel will sell the magazines at $3.50 each, so the total amount she will earn from selling the magazines is $35.  3. So, Jewel will gain a total of $5 from selling the magazines.  The condition \"The shoe size of Jewel's father is 100\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jewel's father is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3614990711212158, 0.6798670291900635, 0.20614634454250336]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Jose's neighbor is 500 years old.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. This means that for every dozen cupcakes, he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice. Now, we need to find out how many lemons he will need to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, we can use this information to calculate how many lemons Jose needs. To make 3 dozen cupcakes, Jose will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Therefore, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition \"Jose's neighbor is 500 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is 9 lemons.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "First, we know that Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. This means that for every dozen cupcakes, he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice.  Now, we need to find out how many lemons he will need to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, we can use this information to calculate how many lemons Jose needs.  To make 3 dozen cupcakes, Jose will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Therefore, the condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?\".\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. This means that he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make three dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make three dozen cupcakes.   Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as this is the information that Jose needs to determine how many lemons he needs.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Therefore, he will need 36 tablespoons (12 tablespoons x 3 dozen) of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons (36 tablespoons / 4 tablespoons = 9 lemons) to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  The condition \"Jose's neighbor is 500 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jose's neighbor is 500 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, 0.30307620763778687]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. Megan's father is 4 years old. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. To calculate how many times she was not the lead actress, we subtract 80 from 100, which gives us 20. So, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.  The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the information needed to calculate the number of times Megan was not the lead actress. The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is also relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as we need to use this information to calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress.  Megan's father has nothing to do with the calculation process, so we can ignore it.  So, the answer to the question is 20.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "According to the given conditions, Megan has been the lead actress in 80 plays. This means that she was not the lead actress in 20 plays. Therefore, the answer to the question is 20.  The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the information needed to calculate the number of times Megan was not the lead actress.\nMegan's father has nothing to do with the calculation process, so we can ignore it.  The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as we need to use this information to calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress.  We know that Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. To calculate how many times she was not the lead actress, we subtract 80 from 100, which gives us 20. So, Megan was not the lead actress in 20 plays.\nMegan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, which means she was the lead actress in 80 plays. So, she was not the lead actress in 20 plays.   The condition \"Megan's father is 4 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it does not give us any information related to the number of times Megan was not the lead actress.", "equation": "Megan's father is 4 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.26367950439453125]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. The shoe size of Michael's sister is 50000. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens.  In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens.  In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens.  In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens.  In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens.  In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens.  In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens.  In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens.  In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Michael's sister's shoe size is 50000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 +", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "First, the condition of Michael's chickens increasing in number by 150 chickens annually is relevant to the calculation process. This condition tells us that his chicken population will increase by 150 each year.   Second, we need to calculate how many chickens will Michael have after 9 years. Since we know that his chickens increase by 150 each year, we can use this information to calculate the total number of chickens after 9 years.   The calculation process would be 550 + (150 * 9) = 1650 chickens after 9 years.   Therefore, Michael will have 1650 chickens after 9 years.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many chickens will be added to Michael's farm over 9 years. To do this, we multiply 150 chickens (the amount his chickens increase by annually) by 9 years (the amount of time we want to measure):  150 chickens x 9 years = 1350 chickens  Now, we add this to the number of chickens Michael has now (550):  1350 chickens + 550 chickens = 1900 chickens  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens on his farm.  The condition \"The shoe size of Michael's sister is 50000.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Michael's sister is 50000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.25301089882850647]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. Mari's neighbor is 2 years old. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 40 buttons (5 times 8). Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made 20 buttons (40 divided by 2). Yes, the condition that Mari made 8 buttons is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The condition that Mari's neighbor is 2 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To calculate how many buttons Sue made, we need to know how many buttons Mari made and how many Kendra made. So the answer is 20 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 5脳8 = 40 buttons. Since Sue made half as many as Kendra, she made 40/2 = 20 buttons. The condition about Kendra making 4 more than five times as many as Mari is not relevant to this calculation.\nFirst, we know that Mari made 8 buttons, so Kendra made 4 more than five times 8, which is 44 buttons.   We also know that Sue made half as many as Kendra, so Sue made 22 buttons.   The condition that Mari's neighbor is 2 years old is not relevant to our calculation process, as it does not provide us with any information about the number of buttons.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 5 times that amount, or 40 buttons. Sue made half of what Kendra made, or 20 buttons. So, the answer is that Sue made 20 buttons.  The condition that Mari's neighbor is 2 years old is irrelevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer.", "equation": "Mari's neighbor is 2 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.18795675039291382]}
{"original_question": "For football season, Zachary wants to buy a new football, a pair of shorts, and a pair of football shoes. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. Zachary has $10. Zachary's neighbor bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much more money does Zachary need?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's calculate how much money Zachary needs to buy the items he wants: Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85 Total: $18.00  Now, let's compare this to how much money Zachary has (which is $10). This means that Zachary needs $8.00 more in order to buy the items he wants.  The condition \"Zachary's neighbor bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since it does not provide any additional information regarding the money Zachary needs to buy the items he wants.", "numerical_answer": 8, "gold_answer": "8", "instructions": "First, let's calculate how much money Zachary needs to buy the items he wants:  Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85 Total: $18.00  Now, let's compare this to how much money Zachary has (which is $10). This means that Zachary needs $8.00 more in order to buy the items he wants.  The condition \"The football costs $3.75\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem since the cost of the football has already been taken into account in the calculation of how much money Zachary needs.\nZachary needs to buy a football, shorts, and shoes for a total of $18.00 ($3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85). Zachary has only $10, so he needs $8.00 more.   The condition that the shorts cost $2.40 is not relevant to the calculation process, since the calculation requires only the total cost of the items ($18.00) and not the individual costs of the items. The condition is only relevant if Zachary needs to determine if he can afford to buy all three items.\nFirst, let's add up the cost of the three items Zachary wants to buy: $3.75 + $2.40 + $11.85 = $18. The condition \"and the shoes cost $11.85\" is relevant because it helps us to calculate the total cost of the items.  Since Zachary has $10, he needs to find out how much more money he needs to buy the items. To do this, we can subtract the amount of money Zachary has from the total cost of the items: $18 - $10 = $8.  Therefore, Zachary needs $8 more money in order to buy the football, shorts, and shoes. The condition \"and the shoes cost $11.85\" is relevant because it helps us to calculate the total cost of the items.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the items that Zachary wants to buy. The football costs $3.75, the shorts cost $2.40, and the shoes cost $11.85. So, the total cost for Zachary's items is 3.75 + 2.40 + 11.85 = $18.00.   Second, we need to calculate how much money Zachary needs to buy the items. Zachary has $10, so he needs $18.00 - $10.00 = $8.00.  So, Zachary needs $8.00 more money to buy the items.   The condition \"Zachary has $10\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much money Zachary has to begin with, which is important in order to calculate how much more money he needs.\nFirst, let's add up the cost of all the items Zachary wants to buy:  Football: $3.75 Shorts: $2.40 Shoes: $11.85  Total cost: $18  Then, let's subtract the amount of money Zachary has ($10):  $18 - $10 = $8  So, Zachary needs $8 more to buy all the items.  The condition \"Zachary's neighbor bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Zachary's neighbor bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.45576441287994385, 0.14543353021144867, 0.0897449254989624, 0.018721066415309906, 0.5780560970306396, 0.2756035625934601]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. The height of Holden's mother is 3 feet. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total area of Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined. Holden's bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft, for a total of 459 sq ft. Now, since the new room is twice as large as the bedroom and bathroom combined, we need to multiply 459 by 2 to get the area of the new room. 2 x 459 = 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room will have an area of 918 sq ft. The condition that Holden's mother's height is 3 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the area of Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined and that the new room will be twice as large as them.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "The total sq ft of the bedroom and bathroom combined is 459 sq ft. To find out how much sq ft the new room will have, we need to multiply 459 by 2 since the new room is twice as large: 459 x 2 = 918 sq ft. Therefore, the new room will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nHolden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft.   We need to find the combined area of the bedroom and the bathroom to determine the area of the new room.   309 + 150 = 459 sq ft.   Now, since the new room is twice as large as the bedroom and bathroom combined, we need to multiply 459 by 2 to get the area of the new room.   2 x 459 = 918 sq ft.   Therefore, the new room will have an area of 918 sq ft.   The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process, as we needed to find the combined area of the bedroom and bathroom before we could determine the area of the new room.\nHolden's current bedroom is 309 sq ft and his bathroom is 150 sq ft, for a total of 459 sq ft. If he wants to add a new room that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, then that room would need to be twice as large as 459 sq ft, or 918 sq ft. The condition regarding Holden's mother's height is irrelevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Holden's mother is 3 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.20259788632392883]}
{"original_question": "A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100. The height of Gerry's sister is 1000 feet. If they want to buy apples, how many apples can Emmy and Gerry buy altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money each person has to spend on apples.  A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us the price of the apples that Emmy and Gerry are buying, which is necessary to calculate how many apples they can buy.  Emmy can buy 100 apples ($200 / $2 = 100 apples) and Gerry can buy 50 apples ($100 / $2 = 50 apples).  Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples ($2 x 150 = $300). The condition \"The height of Gerry's sister is 1000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 150, "gold_answer": "150", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total amount of money both Emmy and Gerry have. Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100, so in total they have $300.  Second, we need to calculate how many apples they can buy with that amount of money. Since each apple is $2, they can buy a total of 150 apples ($2 x 150 = $300).  The condition \"A fruit stand is selling apples for $2 each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us the price of the apples that Emmy and Gerry are buying, which is necessary to calculate how many apples they can buy.\nThe condition \"Emmy has $200 while Gerry has $100\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much money each person has to spend on apples.  Using this information, we can calculate that Emmy can buy 100 apples, and Gerry can buy 50 apples. So, the total number of apples that Emmy and Gerry can buy altogether is 150.\nFirst, Emmy has $200 and Gerry has $100. If the apples cost $2 each, then Emmy can buy 100 apples and Gerry can buy 50 apples.   Therefore, Emmy and Gerry can buy a total of 150 apples.   The condition \"The height of Gerry's sister is 1000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Gerry's sister is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4554719626903534, 0.3514655828475952, 0.18990643322467804]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. The height of Your father is 50000 feet. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the first step of the calculation. The condition tells us the width of the rectangle, which is 7 inches. Next, we need to calculate the length of the rectangle. The problem states that the length is 4 times as long as the width, so the length of the rectangle is 4 x 7 = 28 inches. Finally, we can calculate the area of the rectangle. The area is calculated by multiplying the width and the length. So, the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches. The condition \"Your father's height is 50000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it has nothing to do with the area of the rectangle.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is the first step of the calculation. The condition tells us the width of the rectangle, which is 7 inches.   Next, we need to calculate the length of the rectangle. The problem states that the length is 4 times as long as the width, so the length of the rectangle is 4 x 7 = 28 inches.   Finally, we can calculate the area of the rectangle. The area is calculated by multiplying the width and the length. So, the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches.   The condition \"Your father's height is 50000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process, as it has nothing to do with the area of the rectangle.\nThe width of the rectangle is 7 inches.  The length of the rectangle is 4 times the width, so the length is 28 inches.  The area of the rectangle is calculated by multiplying the width and length, so the area is 196 square inches.  The height of your father has no relation to the area of the rectangle, so the condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe area of a rectangle is length times width. In this problem, the width is 7 inches and the length is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. The area of the rectangle is therefore 7 inches times 28 inches, or 196 square inches.   The condition \"The height of your father is 50000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, it does not need to be taken into account.", "equation": "The height of Your father is 50000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.14820687472820282]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Jose's sister is 500 years old.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. This means that he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice for every dozen cupcakes. Therefore, if Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice.  Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons in order to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Yes, the condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provided the information needed to calculate how many lemons Jose would need. The condition that Jose's sister is 500 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. This means that he needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice for every dozen cupcakes. Therefore, if Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice.  Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons in order to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Yes, the condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it provided the information needed to calculate how many lemons Jose would need.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice for 1 dozen cupcakes, so he needs 36 tablespoons for 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he would need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this information, it would be impossible to determine how many lemons Jose would need to make 3 dozen cupcakes.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. Therefore, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.   The condition \"Jose's sister is 500 years old..\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jose's sister is 500 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, 0.27840808033943176]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Your brother is 5000 years old. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the area of your rectangle?\" because the width of the rectangle is an important factor in the calculation of the area of the rectangle. The formula for calculating the area of a rectangle is width x length, so knowing the width of the rectangle is essential for calculating the area. Using the given information, the length of the rectangle is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. The area of the rectangle is 7 inches x 28 inches = 196 square inches.  The condition \"Your brother is 5000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the area of your rectangle?\" because it is unrelated to the calculation of the area of the rectangle. Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 196 square inches.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the area of your rectangle?\" because the width of the rectangle is an important factor in the calculation of the area of the rectangle. The formula for calculating the area of a rectangle is width x length, so knowing the width of the rectangle is essential for calculating the area.   Using the given information, the length of the rectangle is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. The area of the rectangle is 7 inches x 28 inches = 196 square inches.  The condition \"Your brother is 5000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the area of your rectangle?\" because it is unrelated to the calculation of the area of the rectangle.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the length and width together. In this problem, the width is 7 inches, and the length is 4 times the width, or 28 inches. So the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 square inches.  The condition that your brother is 5000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, let's calculate the length of the rectangle. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, we can multiply 7 inches by 4 to get the length. Therefore, the length of the rectangle is 28 inches.  Next, we can calculate the area of the rectangle. The area of a rectangle is the length multiplied by the width, so the area of the rectangle is 7 inches times 28 inches, which equals 196 inches squared.  The condition \"Your brother is 5000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Your brother is 5000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.04949372261762619]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's father has read 300000 books in the past year. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens. In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens. In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens. In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens. In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens. In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens. In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens. In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens. In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens. Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens. The condition that Michael's father has read 300000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total number of chickens Michael will have in 9 years, taking into account the increase in number of chickens by 150 chickens annually.  So, after 9 years, Michael will have 550 + (9 x 150) = 1650 chickens.  The condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is indeed relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not know how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, as the number of chickens increases each year.\nWe know that the number of chickens on Michael's farm now is 550. We also know that the number of chickens increases by 150 annually.  Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 550 + (150 x 9) = 1650 chickens.  The condition \"Michael's father has read 300000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Michael's father has read 300000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.30425015091896057]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's neighbor bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of chickens that will be added to Michael's farm in 9 years. That number is 150 chickens * 9 years, or 1350 chickens.  Then, we need to add the number of chickens that will be added to the initial number of chickens on the farm. That number is 550 + 1350, or 1900 chickens.  Therefore, Michael will have 1900 chickens on his farm after 9 years.  The condition that Michael's neighbor bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 = 1900 chickens.", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "If the number of chickens on the farm now is 550, then after one year the number of chickens will be 700 (550 + 150).  After two years, the number of chickens will be 850 (700 + 150).  After three years, the number of chickens will be 1000 (850 + 150).   We can see a pattern here: the number of chickens increases by 150 each year.  Using this pattern, we can calculate that after nine years, the number of chickens on Michael's farm will be 1650 (550 + 150 x 9).   Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the number of chickens that will be added to Michael's farm in 9 years. That number is 150 chickens * 9 years, or 1350 chickens.  Then, we need to add the number of chickens that will be added to the initial number of chickens on the farm. That number is 550 + 1350, or 1900 chickens.  Therefore, Michael will have 1900 chickens on his farm after 9 years.  The condition that \"Michael's neighbor bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Michael's neighbor bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.28956881165504456]}
{"original_question": "Genevieve picked some cherries from the supermarket shelves that cost $8 per kilogram. When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in. Clarice's neighbor is 50000 years old. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, how many kilograms of cherries did she buy?", "reasoning_path": "Genevieve had $1600 and needed $400 more, so she needed $2000 total. The cost of the cherries was $8 per kilogram, so to calculate the total number of kilograms that Genevieve bought, we need to divide $2000 by $8. The answer is 250 kilograms of cherries. The condition provided in the question is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides us with the information that the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, which is necessary for us to be able to calculate the total number of kilograms that Genevieve bought. The condition that Clarice's neighbor is 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 250, "gold_answer": "250", "instructions": "First, Genevieve had $1600 and needed $400 more, so she needed $2000 total.  Second, the cost of the cherries was $8 per kilogram, so to calculate the total number of kilograms that Genevieve bought, we need to divide $2000 by $8.  The answer is 250 kilograms of cherries.  The condition provided in the question is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides us with the information that the cherries cost $8 per kilogram, which is necessary for us to be able to calculate the total number of kilograms that Genevieve bought.\nGenevieve had $1600 on her.  She needed $400 more to pay for the cherries, so the total cost was $2000.  Since each kilogram of cherries cost $8, Genevieve bought a total of 250 kilograms of cherries ($2000 / $8 = 250).   Therefore, the condition \"When Genevieve reached the checkout counter, she realized she was $400 short of the total price and her friend Clarice chipped in\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\n1. Genevieve picked some cherries that cost $8 per kilogram. 2. She realized she was $400 short of the total price. 3. Clarice chipped in to make up the difference. 4. If Genevieve had $1600 on her, she would have been able to pay for the cherries without help from Clarice.  Therefore, the answer is 200 kg of cherries.  The condition \"Clarice's neighbor is 50000 years old\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Clarice's neighbor is 50000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7106837630271912, 0.42328670620918274, 0.15641213953495026]}
{"original_question": "Calvin has been saving his hair clippings after each haircut to make a wig for his dog. He has gotten 8 haircuts and knows that he needs 2 more to reach his goal. Calvin's mother has read 300 books in the past year. What percentage is Calvin towards his goal?", "reasoning_path": "Calvin needs 10 haircuts in total, so he is 80% of the way towards his goal. This means that he has 8 out of 10 haircuts. This percentage is calculated independently of his mother's reading habits. Therefore, the condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Calvin has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. This means that he has 8/10, or 80%, of the haircuts he needs. The condition that his mother has read 300 books in the past year is not relevant to this problem, so it can be ignored. Therefore, the answer is that Calvin is 80% towards his goal.", "numerical_answer": 0.8, "gold_answer": "80", "instructions": "Calvin needs 10 haircuts in total, so he is 80% of the way towards his goal. This means that he has 8 out of 10 haircuts. This percentage is calculated independently of his mother's reading habits. Therefore, the condition \"He has gotten 8 haircuts\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nCalvin has 8 haircuts and needs 2 more to reach his goal. This means that he has 8/10, or 80%, of the haircuts he needs. The condition that his mother has read 300 books in the past year is not relevant to this problem, so it can be ignored.   Therefore, the answer is that Calvin is 80% towards his goal.\nCalvin needs 10 haircuts in total to reach his goal. He has already gotten 8 haircuts, so he needs 2 more. That means he is 80% of the way towards his goal.   The condition of Calvin's mother reading 300 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process, as it does not impact the percentage of Calvin's progress towards his goal.", "equation": "Calvin's mother has read 300 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.32620084285736084, 0.25828588008880615, 0.513688862323761, 0.18277493119239807]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. The height of Tom's sister is 500 feet. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "First, Lexie picked 12 apples. Second, Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie. So Tom picked 24 apples. Third, to answer the question \"How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?\" we need to add the number of apples Lexie and Tom each picked. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether. The condition \"The height of Tom's sister is 500 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many. To calculate the total number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom, we need to add the number of apples Lexie and Tom each picked. So the answer would be 12 + 24 = 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "The height of Tom's sister is 500 feet. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not provide any information about the number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom.  The condition of \"Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides information about how many apples each person picked.   So, if we use this information we can calculate the total number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many, so Tom picked 24 apples. Therefore, the total number of apples collected by Lexie and Tom is 12 + 24 = 36 apples.\nFirst, Lexie picked 12 apples.  Second, Tom picked twice as many apples as Lexie. So Tom picked 24 apples.  Third, to answer the question \"How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?\" we need to add the number of apples Lexie and Tom each picked.  Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.   The condition \"The height of Tom's sister is 500 feet.\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Tom's sister is 500 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.22805677354335785]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. The shoe size of Hamza's brother is 100. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza has a 5-liter bucket and she fills it with water. She pours as much as she can from the 5-liter bucket into the 3-liter bucket. The 3-liter bucket can hold up to 3 liters of water, so the remainder of the 5-liter bucket will be 2 liters of water (5 - 3 = 2). She then pours the 2 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket into the 6-liter bucket. The 6-liter bucket can hold up to 6 liters of water, so the remainder of the 6-liter bucket will be 4 liters of water (6 - 2 = 4). Therefore, Hamza can put 4 liters more water, in liters, into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. Yes, the conditions \"holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" and \"she pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" are relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Hamza's brother's shoe size is 100 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much more water, in lit", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Hamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that the 3-liter bucket is now full, since it can only hold 3 liters.   Next, Hamza pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket is now partially filled, and can hold up to 3 more liters before it overflows.   So, the answer is that Hamza can put 3 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.   The condition \"Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters\" is relevant to the calculation process as it provides the information needed to answer the question.\nHamza starts with the 5-liter bucket. She pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket, which is 3 liters. The remaining 2 liters are poured into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now has 2 liters of water in it.   Therefore, Hamza can put in up to 4 more liters (6 liters total) into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   The shoe size of Hamza's brother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nHamza filled the 5-liter bucket with 5 liters of water. Then, she poured as much as she could into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she poured 2 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket (because 3 liters is the maximum capacity of the 3-liter bucket). This leaves 3 liters of water in the 5-liter bucket. She then poured the remainder (3 liters) into the 6-liter bucket. This means that the 6-liter bucket now has 6 liters of water, which is its maximum capacity and it will not overflow. Therefore, Hamza cannot put any more water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the necessary information to calculate how much more water Hamza can put in the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. Without this condition, it would not be possible to determine how much more water Hamza can put in the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   The shoe size of Hamza's brother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nHamza has three buckets, which hold 3, 5, and 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket to capacity, and then pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. After that, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket.   The shoe size of Hamza's brother is 100. This condition is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it has nothing to do with the number of liters of water that can be put into the 6-liter bucket.  The answer to the question is 2 liters. Hamza can put 2 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing.", "equation": "The shoe size of Hamza's brother is 100.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.32402992248535156]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. The shoe size of Papi Calot's neighbor is 10000. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot plans to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That's 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He is thinking of adding 15 additional plants, so he will need to buy 15 more plants. So the total number of plants he needs to buy is 15. The shoe size of his neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is that Papi Calot plans to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each and he is thinking of adding 15 additional plants. To calculate how many plants Papi Calot has to buy, we need to first calculate the number of plants he planned to plant (7 rows of 18 plants each = 126 plants) and then add the additional 15 plants he planned to add (126 + 15 = 141 plants). So the answer would be 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot plans to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That's 7 x 18 = 126 plants. He is thinking of adding 15 additional plants, so he will need to buy 15 more plants. So the total number of plants he needs to buy is 15. The shoe size of his neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process.\nPapi Calot must first buy enough plants to fill his 7 rows of 18 plants each, which comes to a total of 126 plants. He then needs to buy additional plants for the bit of room left, which is an additional 15 plants. In total, he must buy 141 plants.  The shoe size of Papi Calot's neighbor is not relevant to the problem, as it does not affect the total number of plants he needs to buy.\nFirst, calculate how many plants Papi Calot planned to plant. 7 rows of 18 plants each is 7 x 18 = 126 plants. Then, add the additional 15 plants he planned to add, and the total number of plants Papi Calot needs to buy is 126 + 15 = 141 plants. The shoe size of Papi Calot's neighbor is 10000, which is not relevant to the calculation process in this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Papi Calot's neighbor is 10000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.3813718855381012]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. The height of Claire's neighbor is 50000 feet. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Claire will be 20 years old in two years, so that means she is 18 years old currently. Therefore, Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old currently. The condition that the height of Claire's neighbor is 50000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\". This condition is not necessary to solve the problem.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Jessica is six years older than Claire now. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. So, Jessica will be 26 years old now.  The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\" because it tells us that in two years, Claire will be 20 years old, which means that Jessica is currently 26 years old.\nFirst, to find out Jessica's age right now, we have to know how old Claire is right now. Claire will be 20 years old in two years, so that means she is 18 years old currently.   Therefore, Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is 24 years old currently.   The condition \"The height of Claire's neighbor is 50000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\". This condition is not necessary to solve the problem.", "equation": "The height of Claire's neighbor is 50000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.0786377415060997]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. The shoe size of Michael's sister is 200000. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens. In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens. In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens. In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens. In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens. In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens. In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens. In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens. In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens. Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens. The condition that Michael's sister's shoe size is 200000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 +", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "If the number of chickens on Michael's farm now is 550, then after 9 years, the number of chickens will be 550 + (9 x 150) = 1650.   Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1650 chickens.   The condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us that the number of chickens on Michael's farm increases by 150 each year. Therefore, we can use this information to calculate the number of chickens after 9 years by multiplying the number of years (9) by the amount of increase (150) and adding that to the current number of chickens (550).\nThe condition \"The shoe size of Michael's sister is 200000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. We only need to know that the number of chickens on Michael's farm increases by 150 chickens annually.  So, if there are 550 chickens on his farm now, after 9 years there will be 950 chickens (550 + 150 * 9).", "equation": "The shoe size of Michael's sister is 200000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.23725548386573792]}
{"original_question": "Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. Mr.Angstadt's father has read 10000 books in the past year. How many of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total number of students enrolled in statistics. We know that half of Mr.Angstadt's 120 students are enrolled in Statistics, so the total number of students enrolled in Statistics is 60. Then, we need to calculate the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics. We know that 90% of the students in Statistics are seniors, so the number of seniors in Statistics is 54 (60 x 90% = 54). So, the answer to the question is 54. Yes, the condition \"Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Mr.Angstadt's father has read 10000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 54, "gold_answer": "54", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of students enrolled in statistics. Since half of Mr. Angstadt's 120 students are enrolled in Statistics, we can calculate that there are 60 students enrolled in Statistics.  Next, we need to calculate the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics. Since 90% of these students are seniors, we can calculate that there are 54 seniors enrolled in Statistics.  Therefore, the answer to the question is 54.   The condition that Mr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to calculate the number of students enrolled in Statistics. Without this condition, it would not be possible to calculate the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of students enrolled in statistics. We know that half of Mr.Angstadt's 120 students are enrolled in Statistics, so the total number of students enrolled in Statistics is 60.  Then, we need to calculate the number of seniors enrolled in Statistics. We know that 90% of the students in Statistics are seniors, so the number of seniors in Statistics is 54 (60 x 90% = 54).  So, the answer to the question is 54.   Yes, the condition \"Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nMr.Angstadt has 120 students throughout the school day. Half of them are enrolled in Statistics. This means that 60 students are enrolled in Statistics.  Of the students in Statistics, 90 percent are seniors. This means that 90% of 60 students are seniors, which is 54 students.   Therefore, 54 of Mr.Angstadt's students are seniors enrolled in Statistics.   The condition that Mr.Angstadt's father has read 10000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mr. Angstadt's father has read 10000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5140396952629089, 0.5659631490707397, 0.6956555247306824, 0.30865228176116943]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. The height of Melies' mother is 5000 feet. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, to calculate the cost of the meat, we need to know the price per kilogram. This is given in the question as $82 per kilogram. Multiplying this by 2 kg gives us a total cost for the meat of $164. Then, we need to know how much money Melies has in his wallet. This is also given in the question as $180. Subtracting the cost of the meat from the money in his wallet gives us the amount of money Melies has left after paying for the meat, which is $16.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the amount of meat Melies bought and therefore how much he has to pay. The height of Melies' mother is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "First, to calculate the cost of the meat, we need to know the price per kilogram. This is given in the question as $82 per kilogram.   Multiplying this by 2 kg gives us a total cost for the meat of $164.   Then, we need to know how much money Melies has in his wallet. This is also given in the question as $180.   Subtracting the cost of the meat from the money in his wallet gives us the amount of money Melies has left after paying for the meat, which is $16.  The condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the amount of meat Melies bought and therefore how much he has to pay. The height of Melies' mother is not relevant to the calculation process.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. So Melies has to pay $164 for the meat. Melies has $180 in his wallet. So after paying for the meat, Melies has $180 - $164 = $16 left in his wallet.   The condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?\" because it is used to calculate how much money Melies has to pay for the meat.\nStep 1: Calculate the cost of the meat. 2 kg of meat cost $82 per kilogram, so Melies has to pay $164 for the meat.  Step 2: Calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. Melies has $180 in his wallet, so he has $180 - $164 = $16 left after paying for the meat.  The condition \"Melies has $180 in his wallet\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us how much money Melies has to begin with. Without this information, we would not know how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat. The height of Melies' mother is not relevant to the calculation process.\n1) Melies bought 2 kg of meat.  2) The meat costs $82 per kilogram.  3) Melies has $180 in his wallet.  So, Melies has $180 in his wallet. After buying 2 kg of meat at $82 per kilogram, he will have $180 - (2 x 82) = $16 left.   The height of Melies' mother is 5000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Melies' mother is 5000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.19423514604568481]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. The height of Lucy's brother is 10000 feet. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "Before Lucy made any transactions, her bank balance was $65. After she made the deposit of $15, her bank balance was $65 + $15 = $80. Then she made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance is now $76.  Therefore, Lucy's current bank balance is $76. The condition that Lucy's brother is 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lucy had $65 in the bank, she made a $15 deposit, and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. So the answer to the question is $76.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Lucy has $65 in the bank.   She made a $15 deposit.   So her bank balance is now $80.   Then she made a $4 withdrawal.   So her bank balance is now $76.   Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.   The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it was her initial balance before any transactions were made.\nLucy has $65 in the bank before she makes any transactions. After the $15 deposit, her bank balance becomes $80. Then she makes a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance is now $76. The height of Lucy's brother is not relevant to the calculation process of her bank balance. So the answer to the question is $76.\nBefore Lucy made any transactions, her bank balance was $65.  After she made the deposit of $15, her bank balance was $65 + $15 = $80.  After the $4 withdrawal, her bank balance was $80 - $4 = $76.   Therefore, Lucy's current bank balance is $76.   The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the final bank balance calculation.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. That means Lucy's bank balance is $76 ($65 + $15 - $4 = $76). The height of Lucy's brother is 10000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of problem. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.", "equation": "The height of Lucy's brother is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637162566184998, 0.3086089491844177, 0.2903803586959839, 0.25944456458091736]}
{"original_question": "Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. Mary's father is 1000 years old. If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, how many does Mary have in total?", "reasoning_path": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. 3*5 = 15. So, Mary has 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. 15 + 10 = 25. So, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total. The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to calculate the initial amount of candy Mary had. The condition that Mary's father is 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 25, "gold_answer": "25", "instructions": "If Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan. 3*5 = 15. So, Mary has 15 pieces of candy. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection. 15 + 10 = 25. So, Mary has 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary has 3 times as much candy as Megan.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to calculate the initial amount of candy Mary had.\nIf Megan has 5 pieces of candy, then Mary has 3 times as much candy, which is 15 pieces of candy.  Since Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection, Mary has a total of 25 pieces of candy.  The condition \"Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy to her collection\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it changes the total amount of candy Mary has.\nMary has 3 times as much candy as Megan, which means Mary has 3 x 5 = 15 pieces of candy initially. Mary then adds 10 more pieces of candy, so she has 15 + 10 = 25 pieces of candy in total.  The condition \"Mary's father is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Mary's father is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.586638867855072, 0.541135847568512, 0.13845030963420868]}
{"original_question": "Kendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari. Sue made half as many as Kendra. Mari made 8 buttons. The shoe size of Mari's neighbor is 2. How many did Sue make?", "reasoning_path": "Mari made 8 buttons, so 5 times as many would be 8 x 5 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than this, so Kendra made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Since Sue made half as many as Kendra, Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons. The shoe size of Mari's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this question. Yes, the condition \"Mari made 8 buttons\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to calculate how many buttons Kendra and Sue made. Therefore, Sue made 22 buttons.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "Mari made 8 buttons, so five times as many would be 8 x 5 = 40. Kendra made 4 more than this, so Kendra made 40 + 4 = 44 buttons. Since Sue made half as many as Kendra, Sue made 44/2 = 22 buttons. The shoe size of Mari's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this question.\nKendra made 4 more than five times as many decorated buttons as Mari.  Mari made 8 buttons, so 5 x 8 = 40 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 40, so 40 + 4 = 44 buttons.  Sue made half as many as Kendra, so 44/2 = 22 buttons.   So Sue made 22 buttons.   The condition that Mari made 8 buttons is relevant to the calculation process, as it was used to calculate how many buttons Kendra and Sue made.\nMari made 8 buttons. Kendra made 4 more than 5 times as many decorated buttons as Mari, so Kendra made 4 + (5 鑴 8) = 44 buttons. Sue made half as many as Kendra, so she made (44/2) = 22 buttons.  The shoe size of Mari's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Mari's neighbor is 2.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.342434287071228, 0.6008861064910889, 0.35819876194000244, 0.2139759361743927]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. Asia's neighbor bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "To calculate the percentage off, we need the original price of the dress and the discounted price. We know that the original price of the dress is $350 and the discounted price is $140. Next, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the discounted price. Subtract the discounted price from the original price:  $350 - $140 = $210  Now, we can calculate the percentage off. Divide the difference by the original price and multiply by 100:  $210/$350 * 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the discounted price of the dress, which is necessary to calculate the percentage off. The condition that Asia's neighbor bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "To calculate the percentage off, we need the original price of the dress and the discounted price. We know that the original price of the dress is $350 and the discounted price is $140.  Next, we need to calculate the difference between the original price and the discounted price. Subtract the discounted price from the original price:  $350 - $140 = $210  Now, we can calculate the percentage off. Divide the difference by the original price and multiply by 100:  $210/$350 * 100 = 60%  Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.  The condition \"Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it provides the discounted price of the dress, which is necessary to calculate the percentage off.\nAsia bought a homecoming dress for $140. The original price of the dress was $350.  We can calculate the discount by subtracting the sale price from the original price and then dividing by the original price:  Discount = ($350 閳 $140) / $350 = 0.6   Therefore, Asia got a 60% discount.   The condition that the dress was originally priced at $350 is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us determine the amount of the discount by comparing the original price to the sale price.\nFirst, calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price:  $350 - $140 = $210  Second, calculate the percentage off by dividing the difference by the original price and multiplying by 100:  ($210 / $350) x 100 = 60%  The condition of Asia's neighbor buying 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Asia's neighbor bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.3144884705543518]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Nathalie's brother bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 grams divided by 8 equal parts. So, Nathalie eats 400/8 = 50 grams of cake. Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate, which is 50 grams x 2 = 100 grams. Therefore, Pierre eats 100 grams of the cake. The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it was used to calculate how much each person ate from the cake. The condition that Nathalie's brother bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect Pierre's consumption of the cake. So, the answer is 100 grams.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 grams divided by 8 equal parts. So, Nathalie eats 400/8 = 50 grams of cake.  Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate, which is 50 grams x 2 = 100 grams.  Therefore, Pierre eats 100 grams of the cake.  The condition \"A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since it was used to calculate how much each person ate from the cake.\nThe cake is divided into 8 equal parts, each part being 400 / 8 = 50 grams. Nathalie ate one eighth of the cake, so she ate 50 / 8 = 6.25 grams. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, so he ate 6.25 * 2 = 12.5 grams.  The condition \"Nathalie's brother bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it does not affect Pierre's consumption of the cake.", "equation": "Nathalie's brother bought 4 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.29161885380744934]}
{"original_question": "Lucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Lucy's mother is 20000 years old. What is Lucy's bank balance?", "reasoning_path": "Lucy had $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit, so her bank balance is now $80. She then made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance is now $76. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76. The condition \"Lucy's mother is 20000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Lucy had $65 in the bank, she made a $15 deposit, and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. To calculate Lucy's bank balance, we need to subtract the withdrawal amount from the deposit amount. So the answer would be: 65 + 15 - 4 = 76.", "numerical_answer": 76, "gold_answer": "76", "instructions": "Lucy had $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit and then followed by a $4 withdrawal. Therefore, her bank balance is now $76 - $4 = $72. The condition \"Lucy has $65 in the bank\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nLucy initially had $65 in the bank. Then, she made a $15 deposit, so her balance is now $80. She then made a $4 withdrawal, so her balance is now $76. The condition that Lucy's mother is 20000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process and does not affect the answer. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76.\nLucy has $65 in the bank. She made a $15 deposit, so her bank balance is now $80. Then she made a $4 withdrawal, so her bank balance is now $76. Therefore, Lucy's bank balance is $76. The condition \"and then followed by a $4 withdrawal.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nLucy's bank balance is 65 + 15 - 4 = 76. The condition \"Lucy's mother is 20000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Lucy's mother is 20000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6637162566184998, 0.3086089491844177, 0.2903803586959839, 0.4108230173587799]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. Michael's neighbor is 50000 years old. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The total time of the TV show is 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the TV show was aired. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much time was taken up by commercials. That means the total time of the commercials is 3 x 10 = 30 minutes. The condition that Michael's neighbor is 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how long the TV show itself was, not counting commercials. We can calculate this by subtracting 30 minutes (the total time of the commercials) from 1.5 hours (the total time of the TV show). So the answer is 1.5 - 0.5 = 1 hour (in hours).", "numerical_answer": 1, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours.  There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each.   Therefore, the TV show itself was 1.5 hours - (3 x 10 minutes) = 1.2 hours.   The condition \"Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the initial amount of time for which the TV show was aired.\n1. The TV show was aired for 1.5 hours. 2. During this time, there were 3 commercials, each lasting 10 minutes. 3. The commercials add up to 30 minutes (3 x 10 minutes). 4. This means that the TV show itself lasted 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.  Therefore, the TV show itself lasted 1.2 hours, not counting commercials. The condition \"During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, the TV show itself must have lasted 1.5 hours.  Second, we know that 3 commercials of 10 minutes each were aired during this time. Therefore, the total length of the commercials was 30 minutes.  Third, we subtract the 30 minutes of commercials from the 1.5 hours of the show, which results in 1.2 hours.  Therefore, the TV show itself, not counting commercials, lasted 1.2 hours.  The condition \"Michael's neighbor is 50000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Michael's neighbor is 50000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, -0.049379605799913406]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's mother has read 200000 books in the past year. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens. In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens. In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens. In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens. In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens. In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens. In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens. In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens. In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens. Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens. The condition that Michael's mother has read 200000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "At the beginning (year 0), Michael has 550 chickens.  After 1 year (year 1), he will have 700 chickens (550 + 150).  After 2 years (year 2), he will have 850 chickens (700 + 150).  After 3 years (year 3), he will have 1000 chickens (850 + 150).  After 4 years (year 4), he will have 1150 chickens (1000 + 150).  After 5 years (year 5), he will have 1300 chickens (1150 + 150).  After 6 years (year 6), he will have 1450 chickens (1300 + 150).  After 7 years (year 7), he will have 1600 chickens (1450 + 150).  After 8 years (year 8), he will have 1750 chickens (1600 + 150).  After 9 years (year 9), he will have 1900 chickens (1750 + 150).  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us how much the number of chickens increases each year.\nThe initial number of chickens Michael had was 550.   Each year, the number of chickens increases by 150.   Therefore, after 9 years, the number of chickens Michael will have is:   550 + (150 x 9) = 1950   The condition about Michael's mother reading 200000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Michael's mother has read 200000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.19900135695934296]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. The height of James' sister is 50 feet. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us that James has two trees. Each tree has 20 plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plants each tree has. Each plant has 1 seed. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many seeds each plant has. He plants 60% of those. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many of the seeds he planted. So, James has 2 trees with 20 plants each. Each plant has 1 seed, so he has 40 seeds in total. He plants 60% of those, which is 24 seeds. Therefore, James has planted 24 trees.  The condition that James' sister's height is 50 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James has two trees with 20 plants each, each plant has one seed, and he plants 60% of those. So the answer is 24 trees.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "The first sentence of the problem tells us that James has two trees. That means he has planted two trees.  The second sentence tells us that each tree has 20 plants, so James has planted a total of 40 plants.  The third sentence tells us that each plant has one seed and James has planted 60% of those. That means he has planted 24 seeds.  The fourth sentence tells us the height of James' sister, but that is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  So, the answer is that James has planted two trees.\nFirst, James collects all the fruits from his two trees. Each tree has 20 plants. That means he has 40 total plants.  Next, he plants 60% of those, so he plants 24 plants.  The height of James' sister is 50 feet, but this condition is not relevant to the calculation process of how many trees James planted.  Therefore, the answer is that James planted two trees.\nJames collected all the fruits from two trees, so there were two trees to begin with. Then, he planted 60% of the seeds from those two trees. 60% of 40 seeds is 24 seeds. So, James planted 24 seeds in total. The height of his sister is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, James planted two trees.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. This means that James had 40 plants in total.  Each plant has 1 seed. This means that James had 40 seeds in total.  He plants 60% of those. This means that James planted 24 seeds.  The height of James' sister is 50 feet. This does not have any relevance to the problem and is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, the answer to the question is that James planted 24 trees. The condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many trees did James plant?\"\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants.  This is just information about James' current trees, and not relevant to the calculation process of how many trees James planted.  Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those.  This means that James planted 12 seeds (60% of 20 plants).   The height of James' sister is 50 feet.  This is not relevant to the calculation process of how many trees James planted.  Therefore, the answer to the question \"How many trees did James plant?\" is 12. The condition \"The height of James' sister is 50 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of James' sister is 50 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.510733425617218, 0.38002094626426697, 0.20483256876468658, 0.3861719071865082, 0.31393659114837646]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. The shoe size of Maria's brother is 2000. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Since each bar of soap lasts Maria for 2 months, she needs 6 bars of soap for the year. Since each bar costs $8.00, she will spend $48.00 for the year. The shoe size of Maria's brother is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap and the bar of soap lasts her for 2 months. To calculate how much Maria will spend on soap for the year, we need to multiply the cost of each bar of soap by the number of bars of soap she needs for the year. So the answer would be: 8.00 x 6 = 48.00.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to figure out how many bars of soap Maria needs for the year. Since Maria's bar of soap lasts for two months, she needs 6 bars of soap for the year.   Second, we need to calculate how much she will spend for the 6 bars of soap. Since each bar costs $8.00, she will spend $48.00 for the year.   The shoe size of Maria's brother is not relevant to this calculation process.\nSince Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap, and the bar of soap lasts her for 2 months, then she needs 6 bars of soap to last her for a year. Therefore, Maria will spend $48.00 on soap if she wants to stock up for the entire year. The shoe size of Maria's brother is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, how many bars of soap does Maria need to stock up for the year? Since each bar of soap lasts her for two months, she will need 6 bars of soap for the year.  Next, how much will she spend on the soap? Since each bar costs $8.00, she will need to spend $48.00 for 6 bars of soap.  The condition \"The shoe size of Maria's brother is 2000.\" is not relevant to calculating how much Maria will spend on soap for the year.", "equation": "The shoe size of Maria's brother is 2000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.1987508237361908]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. The shoe size of Luke's father is 3. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill the 4 bottles: 4 x 85 = 340. Then, we subtract the number of stars he has already made (33) from the number of stars he needs (340): 340 - 33 = 307. Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles. The shoe size of Luke's father is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "1. Luke has already made 33 stars.  2. He needs to fill 4 bottles.  3. The shoe size of Luke's father is 3.   The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is not relevant to the calculation process since we are not trying to fill a glass jar. We are trying to fill 4 bottles.   Therefore, Luke needs to make 52 more stars (85 stars - 33 stars = 52 stars) to fill 4 bottles.\nFirst, the relevant information in this problem is that 85 paper stars are needed to fill a glass jar, and Luke has already made 33 stars.  So, we can calculate how many more stars Luke needs to make by subtracting 33 from 85:   85 - 33 = 52  Therefore, Luke needs to make 52 more stars to fill the 4 bottles.  The shoe size of Luke's father is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, let's figure out how many stars Luke needs to make to fill the 4 bottles. Each bottle needs 85 stars, so Luke needs to make 85*4 = 340 stars.  Second, let's figure out how many stars Luke has already made. Luke has already made 33 stars.  Finally, we can subtract the number of stars Luke has already made from the number of stars he needs to make to figure out how many stars he must make. 340 - 33 = 307 stars.  So, Luke must make 307 stars to fill the 4 bottles. The shoe size of Luke's father is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill the 4 bottles: 4 x 85 = 340.   Then, we subtract the number of stars he has already made (33) from the number of stars he needs (340): 340 - 33 = 307.   Therefore, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles.  The condition \"The shoe size of Luke's father is 3\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Luke's father is 3.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.34895503520965576, 0.6230340003967285, 0.32545533776283264, 0.2950752377510071]}
{"original_question": "Megan is an actress. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. In total, Megan participated in 100 plays. The shoe size of Megan's neighbor is 5. How many times Megan was not the lead actress?", "reasoning_path": "Megan participated in 100 plays. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work. Therefore, she was the lead actress in 80 plays. The remaining 20 plays she was not the lead actress. Therefore, the answer is 20. The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the percentage of plays in which Megan was the lead actress. The condition that the shoe size of Megan's neighbor is 5 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The answer to the question \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" is 20. Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, so she was not the lead actress in the remaining 20%.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "1. Megan participated in 100 plays. 2. She was the lead actress in 80% of her work.  3. Therefore, she was the lead actress in 80 plays. 4. The remaining 20 plays she was not the lead actress.  Therefore, the answer is 20. The condition \"She was the lead actress in 80% of her work\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it gives us the percentage of plays in which Megan was the lead actress.\nThe first step is to calculate how many times Megan was the lead actress. Since Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, that means she was the lead actress in 80 out of 100 plays.  The second step is to calculate how many times Megan was not the lead actress. We can do this by subtracting the number of times she was the lead actress from the total number of plays. So, Megan was not the lead actress in 100 - 80 = 20 plays.  The condition \"In total, Megan participated in 100 plays\" is relevant to the calculation, since it is used to calculate the total number of plays and the number of times Megan was not the lead actress.\nThe shoe size of Megan's neighbor is 5. This condition is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.  The answer to the question \"How many times Megan was not the lead actress?\" is 20. Megan was the lead actress in 80% of her work, so she was not the lead actress in the remaining 20%.", "equation": "The shoe size of Megan's neighbor is 5.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6352154612541199, 0.48577508330345154, 0.47254619002342224, 0.26597103476524353]}
{"original_question": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. They each cost $20. The height of James' mother is 10000 feet. How much did James pay?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the original cost of the 6 t-shirts. We know that each t-shirt costs $20, so the original cost of all 6 t-shirts would be $120. We also know that James got a 50% discount on the t-shirts, so he paid 50% of the original cost. Therefore, he paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts. The condition \"The height of James' mother is 10000 feet\" does not have anything to do with the calculation of how much James paid for the t-shirts. So, the answer is James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "James buys 6 t-shirts for 50% off. This means that James pays 50% of the regular price for each t-shirt.   The regular price for each t-shirt is $20.   Since James is paying 50% of the regular price, he pays $10 for each t-shirt.   James buys 6 t-shirts, so he pays $60 in total ($10 for each t-shirt).   The height of James' mother is 10000 feet. This is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\"   Therefore, the answer is James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.\nStep 1: Calculate the original price of the 6 t-shirts. Original Price = 6 x $20 = $120  Step 2: Calculate the discounted price. Discounted Price = Original Price x 0.5 = $120 x 0.5 = $60  Step 3: Calculate how much James paid. James Paid = Discounted Price = $60  So, James paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts.  The condition \"They each cost $20\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did James pay?\" because it provides the price of each t-shirt, which is used to calculate the total original price of the 6 t-shirts.\nThe first step is to calculate the original cost of the 6 t-shirts. We know that each t-shirt costs $20, so the original cost of all 6 t-shirts would be $120. We also know that James got a 50% discount on the t-shirts, so he paid 50% of the original cost. Therefore, he paid $60 for the 6 t-shirts. The condition \"The height of James' mother is 10000 feet\" does not have anything to do with the calculation of how much James paid for the t-shirts.", "equation": "The height of James' mother is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4293063282966614, 0.14609499275684357, 0.2719446122646332]}
{"original_question": "Hamza has several empty buckets of different sizes, holding either 3, 5, or 6 liters. She fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. The height of Hamza's mother is 500 feet. How much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket, without overflowing?", "reasoning_path": "Hamza has filled the 5-liter bucket and has poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters, the remainder of the water is then poured into the 6-liter bucket. So, there is 2 liters of water in the 6-liter bucket. The height of Hamza's mother is not relevant to the calculation process, so the answer is that Hamza can put 4 liters more water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "Hamza has filled the 5-liter bucket and has poured as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. Since the 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters, the remainder of the water is then poured into the 6-liter bucket. So, there is 2 liters of water in the 6-liter bucket. The height of Hamza's mother is not relevant to the calculation process, so the answer is that Hamza can put 4 liters more water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nHamza fills the 5-liter bucket with water. This means the 5-liter bucket is now full and contains 5 liters of water.  She then pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she cannot pour more than 3 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket, as it is already full. Therefore, the 3-liter bucket now contains 3 liters of water. The remaining water, which is 2 liters, is poured into the 6-liter bucket. Therefore, the 6-liter bucket now contains 2 liters of water.  Since the height of Hamza's mother is 500 feet, this is not relevant to the calculation of how much more water, in liters, can Hamza put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   The answer is: Hamza can put 4 more liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nHamza fills the 5-liter bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. This means that she poured 2 liters of water into the 3-liter bucket, leaving 3 liters in the 5-liter bucket.   Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket. This means that she poured the remaining 3 liters of water from the 5-liter bucket into the 6-liter bucket, bringing the total amount of water in the 6-liter bucket to 5 liters.  Therefore, Hamza can put 1 more liter of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   The condition \"Then, she pours the remainder into the 6-liter bucket\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how much water is currently in the 6-liter bucket. Knowing this information helps us determine how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.   The height of Hamza's mother is 500 feet and is not relevant to the calculation process of how much more water Hamza can put into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing.\nHamza has a 5-liter bucket. She fills this bucket and pours as much as she can into the 3-liter bucket. The 3-liter bucket can only hold 3 liters of water, so Hamza will have 2 liters of water left over. She then pours the 2 liters into the 6-liter bucket.  This means that Hamza can put a total of 8 liters of water into the 6-liter bucket without overflowing. The height of Hamza's mother is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "The height of Hamza's mother is 500 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5668285489082336, 0.5047085881233215, 0.4394814670085907, 0.49210262298583984, 0.27224719524383545]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. The shoe size of Emily's father is 10000. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "Betty has 12 oranges. Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Then Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges. The condition \"The shoe size of Emily's father is 10000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, and does not affect the answer. The relevant information to answer this question is that Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, and Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. To calculate how many oranges Emily has, we need to multiply the number of oranges Betty has by 3 to get the number of oranges Sandra has, and then multiply the number of oranges Sandra has by 7 to get the number of oranges Emily has. So, the answer is 252 oranges.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "1. Betty has 12 oranges. 2. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, so Sandra has (3 x 12) = 36 oranges. 3. Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, so Emily has (7 x 36) = 252 oranges.  The condition \"Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it was used to determine how many oranges Emily has.\nIf Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges.  Then Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.   The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helped us determine the number of oranges Sandra has, which was then used to calculate the number of oranges Emily has.\nIf Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty, which is 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. And Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, which is 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  The condition \"The shoe size of Emily's father is 10000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, and does not affect the answer.", "equation": "The shoe size of Emily's father is 10000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.07827308028936386]}
{"original_question": "Michael has a chicken farm. His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually. Michael's brother bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If the number of chickens on his farm now is 550, how many will Michael have after 9 years?", "reasoning_path": "In the first year, Michael will have 550 + 150 = 700 chickens. In the second year, Michael will have 700 + 150 = 850 chickens. In the third year, Michael will have 850 + 150 = 1000 chickens. In the fourth year, Michael will have 1000 + 150 = 1150 chickens. In the fifth year, Michael will have 1150 + 150 = 1300 chickens. In the sixth year, Michael will have 1300 + 150 = 1450 chickens. In the seventh year, Michael will have 1450 + 150 = 1600 chickens. In the eighth year, Michael will have 1600 + 150 = 1750 chickens. In the ninth year, Michael will have 1750 + 150 = 1900 chickens. Therefore, after 9 years, Michael will have 1900 chickens.  The condition that Michael's brother bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually and the number of chickens on his farm now is 550. To calculate how many chickens Michael will have after 9 years, we need to add 150 chickens to the number of chickens on the farm each year. So the answer would be: 550 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150 + 150", "numerical_answer": 1900, "gold_answer": "1900", "instructions": "If the number of chickens on Michael's farm is 550 now, that means he had 400 chickens 9 years ago.  Now, since Michael's chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually, that means that in 9 years, he'll have added 150 chickens per year for a total of 1350 chickens.  So, the answer is that Michael will have 1800 chickens after 9 years.  Yes, the condition \"His chickens increase in number by 150 chickens annually.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would not have been able to determine the answer.\nMichael's farm currently has 550 chickens.  He has an annual increase of 150 chickens.  Therefore, after 9 years, he will have 550 + (150 * 9) = 1650 chickens.   The condition that Michael's brother bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Michael's brother bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6706146597862244, 0.5226345658302307, 0.2612224221229553]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. The height of Hannah's roommate is 20000 feet. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since her brothers are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24. Now, we can use the given information to calculate Hannah's age. Since she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, we can simply multiply 24 by 2 to get the answer. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old. The condition that her brothers are all 8 years old is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it helps us calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Without this condition, we would not be able to accurately calculate Hannah's age. The condition that Hannah's roommate's height is 20000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since her brothers are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Now, we can use the given information to calculate Hannah's age. Since she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, we can simply multiply 24 by 2 to get the answer. Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.  The condition that her brothers are all 8 years old is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it helps us calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Without this condition, we would not be able to accurately calculate Hannah's age.\nFirst, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. Since each brother is 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Then, we can calculate how old Hannah is. Since she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, her age is 2 x 24 = 48.  The condition \"The height of Hannah's roommate is 20000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, so it does not need to be taken into consideration.", "equation": "The height of Hannah's roommate is 20000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.3756348490715027]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Claire's neighbor has read 2000 books in the past year. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is currently 26 years old. This answer does not change regardless of the condition that in two years, Claire will be 20 years old.  In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. That means that right now, Claire is 18 years old.  Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is now 24 years old.  The condition \"Claire's neighbor has read 2000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The answer is Jessica is 24 years old now.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how many years Jessica is older than Claire. We know that Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is currently 26 years old. This answer does not change regardless of the condition that in two years, Claire will be 20 years old.\nIn two years, Claire will be 20 years old.  That means that right now, Claire is 18 years old.   Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is now 24 years old.   The condition \"Claire's neighbor has read 2000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Claire's neighbor has read 2000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.585192859172821, 0.4714357256889343, 0.16144543886184692]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Janele's neighbor has read 1000 books in the past year. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to add up the weights of all the cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. The next step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats, which is 4. 48 梅 4 = 12 pounds. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. The condition that Janele's neighbor has read 1000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the weight of each cat, which is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. To calculate the average weight, we need to divide this total weight by the number of cats, which is 4. So the answer is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "Step 1: To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weight of all four cats and divide that number by four.  Step 2: The weight of the four cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds  Step 3: To calculate the average weight, we divide 48 by 4, which gives us 12 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many cats we need to consider for the calculation. Without this information, we would not know how many cats to include in our calculation.\nThe first step in calculating the average weight of Janele's cats is to add up the weights of all the cats. In this case, we can add 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 to get a total of 48 pounds.  The next step is to divide that total by the number of cats to get the average weight. In this case, we can divide 48 by 4 to get an average weight of 12 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition given in the question (\"The first two weigh 12 pounds each.\") is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. It is only relevant to the data given in the question and does not affect the final answer.\nFirst, calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. The average weight of Janele's cats is 11.425 pounds. The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation of the average weight of Janele's cats. It is only relevant to the calculation of the weight of the third cat, which is 14.7 pounds.\nThe first step is to add all the weights together. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  The second step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats. 48 姊 4 = 12.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it provides the last weight that needs to be added to the equation in order to get the total weight.\nThe first step is to add up the weights of all the cats. This has nothing to do with Janele's neighbor reading 1000 books in the past year, so that condition is irrelevant.  The total weight of all the cats is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  The next step is to divide the total weight by the number of cats, which is 4.  48 / 4 = 12  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. The condition of Janele's neighbor reading 1000 books in the past year is irrelevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Janele's neighbor has read 1000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.33952218294143677]}
{"original_question": "Maria has a pen and a pencil. She bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. Maria's sister has read 200 books in the past year. How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?", "reasoning_path": "Maria bought the pen for half the price of the pencil. The pencil cost her $8. So, the pen cost her $4. Therefore, Maria paid $8 for the pencil and $4 for the pen, so she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil. Yes, the condition that \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?\" It was used to calculate the price of the pen, which was half the price of the pencil. The condition that \"Maria's sister has read 200 books in the past year\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "1. The pencil cost her $8.  2. The pen cost her half the price of the pencil.  3. So, the pen cost her $4.  4. Therefore, Maria paid $8 for the pencil and $4 for the pen, so she paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.   Yes, the condition that \"The pencil cost her $8\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How much did Maria pay for both the pen and the pencil?\" It was used to calculate the price of the pen, which was half the price of the pencil.  The condition that \"Maria's sister has read 200 books in the past year\" is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe pencil cost $8, so the pen cost half of that, or $4.  Therefore, Maria paid a total of $12 for both the pen and the pencil.  The condition \"Maria's sister has read 200 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Maria's sister has read 200 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520453453063965, 0.4648432433605194, 0.59908127784729, 0.19637498259544373]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The shoe size of James' neighbor is 500000. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit. James's insurance covers 80% of the cost, which means that he is responsible for the remaining 20%. Therefore, the out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60 ($300 x 20% = $60).  The shoe size of James' neighbor is 500000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. To calculate the out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment, we need to multiply the cost of the visit with the coverage provided by the insurance. So the answer would be: 300 * 0.2 = $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "James's primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit. James's insurance covers 80% of the cost, which means that he is responsible for the remaining 20%. Therefore, the out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60 ($300 x 20% = $60).   The shoe size of James' neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit. The insurance covers 80%, so James is responsible for the remaining 20%. 20% of $300 is $60, so James's out-of-pocket cost for the doctor appointment is $60. The condition \"and James's insurance covers 80%\" is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much of the doctor visit cost is being covered by the insurance.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total cost of the doctor visit. The doctor charges $300, and insurance will cover 80%, so the total cost will be 300 * 0.8 = $240. James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment will be $240.  The shoe size of James' neighbor is 500000 is not relevant to the calculation process of problem \"What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?\"", "equation": "The shoe size of James' neighbor is 500000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.36133819818496704]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's sister is 20 years old. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Calculate how much time Jackie spends in activities: Working: 8 hours, Exercise: 3 hours, Sleep: 8 hours. Total: 19 hours. Calculate how much time Jackie has in a day: 24 hours in a day. Subtract the total time spent in activities from the total time in a day: 24 - 19 = 5 hours. So, Jackie has 5 hours of free time. The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is one of the activities that Jackie spends her time on, and it needs to be included in the calculation of total time spent in activities. The condition that Jackie's sister is 20 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate how much time Jackie spends in activities:  Working: 8 hours Exercise: 3 hours Sleep: 8 hours  Total: 19 hours  Step 2: Calculate how much time Jackie has in a day:  24 hours in a day  Step 3: Subtract the total time spent in activities from the total time in a day:  24 - 19 = 5 hours  So, Jackie has 5 hours of free time.  The condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is one of the activities that Jackie spends her time on, and it needs to be included in the calculation of total time spent in activities.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much time Jackie spends on work and sleep per day: 8 hours of work + 8 hours of sleep = 16 hours.  Next, we need to subtract the 3 hours of exercise from the total: 16 hours - 3 hours = 13 hours.  Finally, we can calculate how much free time Jackie has: 24 hours (in a day) - 13 hours (work + sleep + exercise) = 11 hours of free time.  So, Jackie has 11 hours of free time per day. The condition of 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep is relevant to the calculation process, since it affects the amount of free time Jackie has.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. This means Jackie spends 19 hours on activities.   The remaining 24 hours in a day are available for free time.   Therefore, Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.   The condition \"Jackie's sister is 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jackie's sister is 20 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.295795202255249]}
{"original_question": "A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. Nathalie eats one-eighth of the cake, and Pierre eats double what Nathalie ate. Nathalie's neighbor is 3 years old. How much did Pierre eat, in grams?", "reasoning_path": "First, let's look at the condition given to us: A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. This condition is relevant to our calculation process, as it tells us the total weight of the cake. We need to use this information to determine the weight of each individual part of the cake. Next, we need to figure out the weight of one-eighth of the cake. To do this, we can divide 400 by 8, which gives us 50 grams. This is the weight of one-eighth of the cake, which Nathalie ate. Now, we know that Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate. This means that he ate twice the amount of Nathalie ate, which is 100 grams. Finally, we can answer the question: How much did Pierre eat, in grams? The answer is 100 grams.  The condition \"Nathalie's neighbor is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 100, "gold_answer": "100", "instructions": "First, let's look at the condition given to us: A cake of 400 grams is divided into eight equal parts. This condition is relevant to our calculation process, as it tells us the total weight of the cake. We need to use this information to determine the weight of each individual part of the cake.   Next, we need to figure out the weight of one-eighth of the cake. To do this, we can divide 400 by 8, which gives us 50 grams. This is the weight of one-eighth of the cake, which Nathalie ate.   Now, we know that Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate. This means that he ate twice the amount of Nathalie ate, which is 100 grams.   Finally, we can answer the question: How much did Pierre eat, in grams? The answer is 100 grams.\n1. Nathalie ate one-eighth of the cake, which is 400 grams divided by 8, which is equal to 50 grams.  2. Pierre ate double what Nathalie ate, which is 2 x 50, or 100 grams.  3. Therefore, Pierre ate 100 grams of the cake.  The condition \"Nathalie's neighbor is 3 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Nathalie's neighbor is 3 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.22321228682994843, 0.5293338298797607, 0.010651023127138615]}
{"original_question": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day. Jackie's brother is 40 years old. How much free time does Jackie have?", "reasoning_path": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day, which totals to 19 hours. We can then subtract 19 from 24 to calculate the amount of free time that Jackie has in a day - 24 - 19 = 5 hours of free time.  Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition tells us how much time Jackie spends on working, which enables us to calculate the amount of time Jackie has for other activities. The condition that Jackie's brother is 40 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 5, "gold_answer": "5", "instructions": "Jackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That means Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day.  Yes, the condition \"Jackie spends 8 hours working\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. This condition tells us how much time Jackie spends on working, which enables us to calculate the amount of time Jackie has for other activities.\nFirst, 8 hours of work + 3 hours of exercise + 8 hours of sleep = 19 hours. So Jackie has 5 hours of free time per day. The condition \"3 hours of exercise and spends 8 hours of sleep per day\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since the amount of hours spent on each activity does not affect the total amount of free time.\nJackie spends 8 hours working, 3 hours of exercise and 8 hours of sleep per day. That means she spends a total of 19 hours on these activities. We can then subtract 19 from 24 to calculate the amount of free time that Jackie has in a day - 24 - 19 = 5 hours of free time. The condition \"Jackie's brother is 40 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Jackie's brother is 40 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5118322968482971, 0.35624101758003235, 0.4109904170036316]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Janele's brother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add the weights of the four cats together: 12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds.  Next, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats: 48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition that Janele's brother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Janele has 4 cats and the weights of each of the cats. To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weights of each cat and then divide that by the total number of cats. So, the answer would be 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them, so the condition is relevant.   Second, we need to add up all the weights of the cats and divide by the number of cats. In this case, the total weight is 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   Finally, we divide 48 by 4 to get the average weight of Janele's cats, which is 12 pounds.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds. The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nIn order to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add up the weights of each cat and then divide that by the total number of cats. So, the first two cats weigh 12 pounds each, the third weighs 14.7 pounds, and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. This gives us a total of 46 pounds. We then divide that by 4, which is the total number of cats, to find out the average weight: 11.5 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is relevant to the calculation process because it lets us know the weight of the first two cats, which is necessary for our calculation.\nThe first step is to calculate the total weight of all of Janele's cats.   12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  The second step is to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats.   48 / 4 = 12  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds,\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is necessary to know the weight of each of the cats in order to calculate their average weight.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add the weight of each cat together: 12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds.  Next, we need to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats: 48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it was used to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. However, the condition \"Janele's brother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nThe first step is to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. We add the weights of the four cats together: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   The second step is to divide the total weight of the cats by the number of cats to find the average weight: 48 / 4 = 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition that Janele's brother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Janele's brother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.18812525272369385]}
{"original_question": "Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra. Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty. Emily's neighbor is 50000 years old. If Betty has 12 oranges, how many oranges does Emily have?", "reasoning_path": "If Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Since Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges. Therefore, if Betty has 12 oranges, Emily has 252 oranges. The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is what allowed us to determine how many oranges Emily has. Without this condition, we would not be able to answer the question. The condition that Emily's neighbor is 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 252, "gold_answer": "252", "instructions": "If Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges.  Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.  Therefore, if Betty has 12 oranges, Emily has 252 oranges.  The condition \"Sandra has 3 times as many oranges as Betty\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is what allowed us to determine how many oranges Emily has. Without this condition, we would not be able to answer the question.\nIf Betty has 12 oranges, then Sandra has 3 x 12 = 36 oranges. Since Emily has 7 times as many oranges as Sandra, Emily has 7 x 36 = 252 oranges.   The condition \"Emily's neighbor is 50000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Emily's neighbor is 50000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5896944999694824, 0.5649073123931885, 0.19875530898571014]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. The shoe size of Jose's neighbor is 200.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. To make 3 dozen cupcakes, he would need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he would need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  The shoe size of Jose's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "We know that Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. To make 3 dozen cupcakes, he would need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he would need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  The shoe size of Jose's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many tablespoons of lemon juice Jose needs for 3 dozen cupcakes. To do this, we multiply 12 tablespoons of lemon juice (1 dozen cupcakes) by 3. This gives us 36 tablespoons of lemon juice.  Next, we need to calculate how many lemons Jose will need to get 36 tablespoons of lemon juice. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, we divide 36 tablespoons of lemon juice by 4. This gives us 9 lemons.  Therefore, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes. That means he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make three dozen cupcakes. Since each lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, he will need 9 lemons.  The shoe size of Jose's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Jose's neighbor is 200.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, 0.23181754350662231]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. James' sister bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for each semester. Since each unit costs $50, James pays $50 x 20 units = $1,000 per semester. Second, we need to calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters. James pays $1,000 x 2 semesters = $2,000 for 2 semesters. Therefore, the answer is $2,000. The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many units James takes each semester, which is necessary for us to calculate how much James pays for each semester. The condition that James' sister bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much James pays for each semester. Since each unit costs $50, James pays $50 x 20 units = $1,000 per semester.   Second, we need to calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters. James pays $1,000 x 2 semesters = $2,000 for 2 semesters.  Therefore, the answer is $2,000.  The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many units James takes each semester, which is necessary for us to calculate how much James pays for each semester.\nThe first step of the calculation process is to determine how many units James takes in two semesters. Since James takes 20 units per semester, he takes 40 units in two semesters.  The second step of the calculation process is to determine the cost of the units. Since each unit costs $50, the cost for 40 units is $50 x 40, or $2000.  The condition \"James' sister bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' sister bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.22045940160751343]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Luke's brother has read 10000 books in the past year. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill 4 bottles: 85 stars x 4 bottles = 340 stars.  Second, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made: 340 stars - 33 stars = 307 stars.  So, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles.  The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not provide any information needed to calculate the answer. The information about Luke's brother reading 10000 books in the past year is also not relevant.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill 4 bottles: 85 stars x 4 bottles = 340 stars.  Second, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made: 340 stars - 33 stars = 307 stars.  So, Luke needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill 4 bottles.  The condition \"85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it does not provide any information needed to calculate the answer. The information about Luke's brother reading 10000 books in the past year is also not relevant.\nStep 1: Luke needs to fill 4 bottles, so he needs to make 85 paper stars for each bottle.   Step 2: Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 52 more stars.   Answer: Luke must make 52 more stars.   The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it affects the total number of stars needed. Without this condition, Luke would have to make 85 stars for each bottle, rather than 52.\n1. Luke needs to make 85 stars to fill one glass jar. 2. Luke has already made 33 stars. 3. Luke needs to fill 4 bottles.  Therefore, Luke needs to make 85 x 4 = 340 stars in total. Since he's already made 33 stars, he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars.  The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process since it tells us how many glass jars Luke needs to fill. Without this condition, we would not know how many stars Luke needs to make in total.\nLuke needs to fill 4 bottles, which means he needs 85 paper stars for each bottle, or a total of 340 stars. Luke has already made 33 stars, so he needs to make 307 more stars in order to fill the 4 bottles. The condition of Luke's brother reading 10000 books in the past year does not affect the calculation process, so it is not relevant to the problem.", "equation": "Luke's brother has read 10000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3489552438259125, 0.6230340003967285, 0.3254552483558655, 0.320649653673172]}
{"original_question": "In Zeoland the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour the driver is traveling over the posted speed limit. In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. Jed's sister bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store. Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?", "reasoning_path": "We know that the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit. So, if Jed was fined $256, we can determine that he was traveling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit of 50 mph.  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 66 mph.  Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?\" because it provides us with the information needed to solve the problem. The condition that Jed's sister bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 66, "gold_answer": "66", "instructions": "The problem states that Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. This means that Jed was traveling at a speed greater than 50 mph. Since the condition states that the fine for speeding is $16 for each mile per hour over the posted speed limit, we can use this information to calculate how fast Jed was traveling.   We can set up an equation with the given information:  $256 = 16 x (Jed's speed - 50)  Solving the equation, we get:  Jed's speed = 74 mph  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at 74 mph.   The given condition is relevant to the calculation process of this problem because it provides the information needed to solve the equation.\nThe fine for speeding in Zeoland is $16 per mile per hour over the posted limit. So, if Jed was fined $256, we can determine that he was traveling 16 miles per hour over the posted speed limit of 50 mph.  Therefore, Jed was fined for traveling at a speed of 66 mph.   Yes, the condition \"In Zeoland, Jed was fined $256 for speeding on a road with a posted speed limit of 50 mph\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"Jed was fined for traveling at what speed in miles per hour?\" because it provides us with the information needed to solve the problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many miles over the speed limit Jed was traveling. We know that the fine for speeding is $16 for every mile over the speed limit, and that Jed was fined $256. So we can divide $256 by $16 to get 16 miles.   Now we know that Jed was traveling 16 miles over the speed limit. To calculate his speed, we simply add 16 to the posted speed limit of 50 mph. This means that Jed was traveling at a speed of 66 mph.  The condition that Jed's sister bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jed's sister bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5087315440177917, 0.7597436308860779, 0.18266154825687408]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. The height of Claire's brother is 2000 feet. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Since in two years Claire will be 20, we can subtract two from 20 to get her current age: 18. Now, since Jessica is six years older than Claire, we can add six to 18 to get Jessica's age: 24. The height of Claire's brother is not relevant to calculating Jessica's age. Therefore, Jessica is currently 24 years old.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "First, let's calculate Claire's age now. Since in two years Claire will be 20, we can subtract two from 20 to get her current age: 18.   Now, let's calculate Jessica's age. Since Jessica is six years older than Claire, we can add six to 18 to get Jessica's age: 24.   The height of Claire's brother is not relevant to calculating Jessica's age.\nClaire is currently 18 years old. Since Jessica is six years older than Claire, that means Jessica is currently 24 years old.  The height of Claire's brother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Claire's brother is 2000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.14540092647075653]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. The shoe size of Claire's sister is 100000. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Claire is currently 18 years old and will be 20 years old in two years. Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is currently 24 years old. The condition that Claire's sister's shoe size is 100000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Jessica is six years older than Claire and Claire will be 20 years old in two years. We can calculate Jessica's age by taking 6 years away from 20, which gives us the answer that Jessica is 24 years old.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Jessica is six years older than Claire, so Jessica is currently 14 years old.  In two years, Claire will be 20 years old, but that doesn't tell us anything about Jessica since we already know that Jessica is currently 14 years old. Therefore, the condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\".  The answer is that Jessica is currently 14 years old.\nClaire is 18 years old now.  Jessica is six years older than Claire, which means that Jessica is 24 years old now.   The condition \"The shoe size of Claire's sister is 100000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of \"How old is Jessica now?\"", "equation": "The shoe size of Claire's sister is 100000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5851927995681763, 0.4714357554912567, 0.2927745282649994]}
{"original_question": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. In two years, Claire will be 20 years old. Claire's mother bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How old is Jessica now?", "reasoning_path": "Jessica is six years older than Claire. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how old Jessica is compared to Claire.  Claire is 18 years old right now. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us Claire's current age.  Since Jessica is six years older than Claire, Jessica is 24 years old right now.  The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\" because it gives us the age of Claire in two years, which we use to calculate the age of Jessica.  The condition that Claire's mother bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer this question, we need to calculate the age of Jessica compared to Claire. We can do this by subtracting 6 years from Claire's current age of 18 years. So the answer would be: 18 - 6 = 12.  Therefore, Jessica is 24 years old right now.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "Current Age of Claire: 18  Age of Claire in two years: 20  Age of Jessica (six years older than Claire): 24   The condition \"In two years, Claire will be 20 years old\" is relevant to the calculation of the problem \"How old is Jessica now?\" because it gives us the age of Claire in two years, which we use to calculate the age of Jessica.\nRight now, Claire is 18 years old. Since Jessica is six years older than Claire, Jessica is 24 years old right now.   The condition of \"Claire's mother bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Claire's mother bought 50000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.585192859172821, 0.4714357256889343, 0.0693744421005249]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Steve's father has read 2000 books in the past year. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "To convert Steve's height from feet to inches, we need to multiply 5 by 12 and add 6, giving us a total of 66 inches. Since he grows 6 inches, adding 6 to 66 gives us a total of 72 inches. So Steve is now 72 inches tall. The condition of Steve's father having read 2000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Steve was 5'6\" before he grew 6 inches. To convert feet to inches, we need to multiply 5 by 12 and add 6, giving us a total of 66 inches. The condition given in the problem is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is 72 inches.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "First, we need to convert Steve's height from feet to inches. To do this, we will multiply 5 feet (which is equal to 60 inches) by 6 inches, which gives us 36 inches.   So, Steve is now 5'6\" or 60 + 36 = 96 inches tall.   The condition of Steve's father having read 2000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nSteve is 5'6\" which is equal to 66 inches. Since he grows 6 inches, adding 6 to 66 gives us a total of 72 inches. This question is only asking about Steve's height, so the condition \"He grows 6 inches\" is certainly relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nSteve's height was 5'6\" before he grew 6 inches. To convert feet to inches, we need to multiply 5 by 12 and add 6, giving us a total of 66 inches. The condition given in the problem is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Steve's father has read 2000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495513558387756, 0.5135689973831177, 0.1929226666688919]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. Kelly's father bought 100000 books from the book store. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. To do this, we add the carrots from each bed together: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we divide the total number of carrots by 6: 234/6 = 39 pounds.  Finally, we have our answer: Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"Kelly's father bought 100000 books from the book store\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since it is not used to solve the problem.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. To do this, we add the carrots from each bed together: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. We know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, so we divide the total number of carrots by 6: 234/6 = 39 pounds.  Finally, we have our answer: Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots.\" is not relevant to the calculation process, since it is not used to solve the problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total number of carrots that Kelly harvested from all three beds. This can be done by adding 55 + 101 + 78 = 234.  Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. This can be done by dividing 234 by 6, which gives us 39 pounds of carrots.  Finally, the question asks whether the condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is relevant to the calculation process. The answer is no, since we already know the total number of carrots harvested (234) and the number of carrots per pound (6). Therefore, this condition is not relevant.\nThe first step is to calculate the total number of carrots Kelly harvested. She harvested 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed. So the total number of carrots Kelly harvested is 234. The second step is to calculate the total weight of these 234 carrots. Since 6 carrots weigh one pound, 234 carrots will weigh 234/6, or 39 pounds. So the answer is that Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The condition \"and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is part of the total number of carrots Kelly harvested. Without this condition, the total number of carrots Kelly harvested would be different, and therefore the answer to the question would be different.\nKelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. Multiplying this number by 6 (since 6 carrots weigh one pound) gives us a total of 1,404 pounds of carrots harvested. This has nothing to do with her father's purchase of 100,000 books, so the condition is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots. Then, 6 carrots weigh 1 pound, so we need to divide 234 by 6. The answer is 39 pounds. The condition that Kelly's father bought 100000 books from the book store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Kelly's father bought 100000 books from the book store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.18387486040592194]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Martha's father bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "Ellen is 10 years old now. In six years, she will be 16 years old. Since Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, Martha is 32 years old now.  The condition that Martha's father bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of Martha's age.  To calculate Martha's age now, we need to know how old Ellen will be in six years, which in this case is 16 years old. Since Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, Martha is 32 years old now. So the answer is 32 years old.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "First, let's calculate Ellen's age in six years. Ellen will be 16 years old in six years.  Second, since Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, Martha is 32 years old now.  The condition that Martha's father bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of Martha's age.", "equation": "Martha's father bought 200 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.0637100338935852]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Steve's father bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "First, we should convert the initial height of Steve, 5'6\", into inches. Since there are 12 inches in a foot, Steve's initial height is 5 * 12 + 6 = 66 inches. Second, we should add the 6 inches that Steve grows to his initial height. This gives us a total height of 66 + 6 = 72 inches. Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\".\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the initial height of Steve, which is necessary for the calculation. The condition that Steve's father bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "First, we should convert the initial height of Steve, 5'6\", into inches. Since there are 12 inches in a foot, Steve's initial height is 5 * 12 + 6 = 66 inches.   Second, we should add the 6 inches that Steve grows to his initial height. This gives us a total height of 66 + 6 = 72 inches.   Therefore, the answer to the question \"How tall is Steve in inches?\" is 72 inches. The condition \"Steve is 5'6\".\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides the initial height of Steve, which is necessary for the calculation.\nFirst, we need to know Steve's original height. Steve is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches.  Next, we need to add 6 inches to this height, to calculate his new height. Steve's new height is therefore 72 inches.  The condition \"He grows 6 inches.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the information needed to calculate Steve's new height. It does not, however, have any relevance to the grocery store question.\nThe first part of the problem tells us that Steve is 5'6\", which is equal to 66 inches.   The second part of the problem tells us that Steve grows 6 inches. Therefore, Steve is now 66 + 6 = 72 inches tall.   The last part of the problem is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem and can be ignored. Therefore, the answer is 72 inches.", "equation": "Steve's father bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495513558387756, 0.5135689973831177, 0.25301024317741394]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Libby's brother bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. That means she needs 140 quarters to pay for the dress. So, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left. The condition that Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the starting point for the calculations. The condition that Libby's brother bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The answer is 20 quarters.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank and she needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. That means she needs 140 quarters to pay for the dress.   So, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.   The condition \"Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it provides the starting point for the calculations.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank.  Libby must pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  $35 = 140 quarters.  So Libby will have 20 quarters left after replacing the dress.  Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as the number of quarters Libby has is reduced by the amount she must pay for the dress.\nLibby has 160 quarters. She will use 35 quarters to replace her sister's dress. That leaves her with 125 quarters. The condition that Libby's brother bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The answer is 125 quarters.", "equation": "Libby's brother bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.2086808830499649]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Gretchen's neighbor is 20000 years old. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday, so she sold a total of 40 drawings. Multiplying the number of drawings by the price of each drawing ($20.00), we can calculate the total amount of money Gretchen made:  Total Amount = 40 x $20.00 Total Amount = $800  Therefore, Gretchen made $800 from selling her caricatures.  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the price of each drawing that determines how much money Gretchen made from selling her caricatures.  The condition that Gretchen's neighbor is 20000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 drawings on Sunday, so she sold a total of 40 drawings. Multiplying the number of drawings by the price of each drawing ($20.00), we can calculate the total amount of money Gretchen made:  Total Amount = 40 x $20.00 Total Amount = $800  Therefore, Gretchen made $800 from selling her caricatures.  Yes, the condition \"She charges $20.00 per drawing\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it is the price of each drawing that determines how much money Gretchen made from selling her caricatures.\nFirst, let's calculate how much money Gretchen made on Saturday:  24 drawings x $20.00 = $480.00  Second, let's calculate how much money Gretchen made on Sunday:  16 drawings x $20.00 = $320.00  Finally, let's add them together to get the total amount of money Gretchen made:  $480.00 + $320.00 = $800.00  Therefore, Gretchen made $800.00.  The condition \"Gretchen's neighbor is 20000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Gretchen's neighbor is 20000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.2627109885215759]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Janele's mother has read 300 books in the past year. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. So we can add the weights of all four cats together: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. Now, we need to find the average weight, which is the total weight divided by the number of cats. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds. The condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of cats that Janele has, which is necessary to calculate the average weight. The condition \"Janele's mother has read 300 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it does not provide any additional information regarding the average weight of Janele's cats. So the answer is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, let's calculate the sum of the weights of Janele's cats. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  Second, let's divide the sum by the number of cats. 48 / 4 = 12.  The average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"She has 4 of them.\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us the number of cats that Janele has, which is necessary to calculate the average weight.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of the cats. So we can add the weights of all four cats together: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.   Now, we need to find the average weight, which is the total weight divided by the number of cats. So, the average weight of Janele's cats is 48/4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process because the exact weights of each cat are not necessary to determine the average weight.\nThe first step is to figure out the total weight of all four cats. To do this, we'll add the weights of the first two cats together (12 pounds + 12 pounds = 24 pounds), then add the weight of the third cat (14.7 pounds) and the fourth cat (9.3 pounds). This gives us a total weight of 48 pounds.  The second step is to calculate the average weight of the cats. To do this, we'll divide the total weight (48 pounds) by the number of cats (4). This gives us an average weight of 12 pounds.  The condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem, since we are already accounting for this weight in the total weight of all four cats.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we need to add up the weights of each of her cats.   12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  Now, we need to divide this total weight by the number of cats to get the average weight.  48/4 = 12  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the fourth cat's weight that is being added to the total weight of the cats. Without this information, we would not be able to get the correct answer.\nThe question is asking for the average weight of Janele's cats, not her mother's reading habits. Therefore, the condition \"Janele's mother has read 300 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.   To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add all the weights together and then divide by the number of cats.  12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48  48 / 4 = 12  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.", "equation": "Janele's mother has read 300 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.3207567632198334]}
{"original_question": "Martha met Ellen in the grocery store alone and asked her age. Martha realized she was twice as old as Ellen will be in six years. Martha's mother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Ellen is 10 years old now, calculate Martha's age now.", "reasoning_path": "Ellen is 10 years old now. In six years, she will be 16 years old. This means that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, so Martha is 32 years old now. The condition \"Martha's mother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate Martha's age now. We can do this by realizing that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, so Martha is 32 years old now. Therefore, Martha's age now is 32 years old.", "numerical_answer": 32, "gold_answer": "32", "instructions": "Ellen is 10 years old now. In six years, she will be 16 years old. This means that Martha is twice as old as Ellen will be in six years, so Martha is 32 years old now.  The condition \"Martha's mother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Martha's mother bought 100 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4325580298900604, 0.6348713636398315, 0.20576311647891998]}
{"original_question": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. She spends $8.00 per bar of soap. Maria's sister is 500 years old. If Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, how much will she spend on soap?", "reasoning_path": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months. This is relevant to the calculation process as it helps us in determining how many bars of soap Maria needs to stock up for the entire year. Maria spends $8.00 per bar of soap. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it affects the total cost. Therefore, Maria will need 6 bars of soap to last her for the entire year. So, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will spend $48.00 (6 x 8.00) on soap. The condition that Maria's sister is 500 years old is not relevant to the calculation process. To answer the question, we need to calculate how much Maria will spend on soap if she wants to stock up for the entire year. We can calculate this by multiplying the number of bars of soap she needs by the cost of each bar. So the answer would be: 6 x 8.00 = $48.00.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months and spends $8.00 per bar of soap. That means, she would need 6 bars of soap to last her for the entire year.  So, if Maria wants to stock up for the entire year, she will spend $48.00 (6 x 8.00) on soap.  The condition \"Maria buys a large bar of French soap that lasts her for 2 months\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem as it helps us in determining how many bars of soap Maria needs to stock up for the entire year.\nMaria buys one bar of soap for $8.00, and that bar of soap lasts her for two months. She wants to stock up for the entire year, so she needs enough soap for 10 months.  Therefore, Maria will need to spend $80.00 on soap ($8.00 x 10 months). The condition about the cost of the bar is relevant, since it affects the total cost.  Therefore, Maria will spend $80.00 on soap if she wants to stock up for the entire year.\nMaria buys a large bar of French soap that costs $8.00. If she wants to stock up for the entire year, she will need to buy 12 bars of soap, which will cost her a total of $96.00. The condition that Maria's sister is 500 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Maria's sister is 500 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7174406051635742, 0.5124167203903198, 0.20340317487716675]}
{"original_question": "Lexie and Tom went apple picking. Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. The shoe size of Tom's brother is 1000. How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?", "reasoning_path": "Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. To find how many apples they collected altogether, we add the number of apples that Lexie and Tom picked: 12 + (2 x 12) = 36. Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether. The condition \"The shoe size of Tom's brother is 1000\" is not relevant to the calculation process. The question is asking how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether, so we need to add the number of apples that Lexie and Tom picked. Therefore, the answer to the question is 36 apples.", "numerical_answer": 36, "gold_answer": "36", "instructions": "There are two parts to the problem:   1) How many apples did Lexie and Tom collect altogether?  2) What is the shoe size of Tom's brother?   The condition \"Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples\" is relevant to the first part of the problem, as it helps us calculate the total number of apples Lexie and Tom collected. Therefore, the answer to the first part of the problem is 24 (12 apples + twice as many apples = 12 + 12 = 24). The second part of the problem has nothing to do with the condition, so the answer to the second part of the problem is 1000 (the shoe size of Tom's brother).\nThe condition \"The shoe size of Tom's brother is 1000\" is not relevant to the calculation process. The question is asking how many apples Lexie and Tom collected altogether, so we need to add the number of apples that Lexie and Tom picked.   Lexie picked 12 apples and Tom picked twice as many apples. To find how many apples they collected altogether, we add the number of apples that Lexie and Tom picked:  12 + (2 x 12) = 36   Therefore, Lexie and Tom collected 36 apples altogether.", "equation": "The shoe size of Tom's brother is 1000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7573277950286865, 0.7791433930397034, 0.18263986706733704]}
{"original_question": "Rose is an aspiring artist. She wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50 so she can do some paintings. Rose already has $7.10. Rose's neighbor has read 1000 books in the past year. How much more money does Rose need?", "reasoning_path": "Rose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. That adds up to $18.10. Subtracting the $7.10 she already has, Rose needs $11.00 more to purchase the items she wants. Therefore, Rose needs $11.00 more to buy all three items. The condition that Rose's neighbor has read 1000 books in the past year is not relevant to the calculation process. The relevant information to answer this question is the cost of the items that Rose wants and the amount of money she already has. To calculate how much more money Rose needs, we need to add the costs of the items together and subtract the amount of money she has from the total cost. So the answer would be: $18.10 - $7.10 = $11.00.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "Rose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10. So, in total, she needs to get $14.20. She already has $7.10, so she needs to get an additional $7.10 in order to purchase the items.  The condition \"She wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is used to determine the total cost of the items she needs to purchase. Without knowing the cost of the paintbrush, we would not be able to accurately calculate how much more money she needs.\nRose needs a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10.  The total cost of these items is $18.10.  Subtracting Rose's current amount of money ($7.10) from the total cost gives us $11.00.  Therefore, Rose needs $11.00 more to purchase the items she needs.  The condition \"a set of paints that costs $9.20\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is part of the total cost of the items that Rose needs. Without it, we would not have been able to accurately calculate how much more money Rose needs.\nRose wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10. Therefore, she needs $10.60 more to buy all three items. The condition is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us what items she needs to buy and how much money she needs in total.\nRose needs $2.40 for the paintbrush, $9.20 for the set of paints, and $6.50 for the easel. This adds up to $18.10. Subtracting the $7.10 she already has, Rose needs $11.00 more.   Yes, the condition \"Rose already has $7.10\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Without this condition, we would have calculated that Rose needs $18.10 to buy all the art supplies. But with the condition, we know that she only needs $11.00 more to purchase the supplies.\nRose wants a paintbrush that costs $2.40, a set of paints that costs $9.20, and an easel that costs $6.50. She already has $7.10. To calculate how much more money she needs, we can add the costs of these items together: $2.40 + $9.20 + $6.50 = $18.10. Then, we can subtract the amount of money she has from the total cost of the items: $18.10 - $7.10 = $11.00.  So, Rose needs $11.00 more to purchase the items she wants. The condition \"Rose's neighbor has read 1000 books in the past year\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Rose's neighbor has read 1000 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.4616824686527252, 0.3893391489982605, 0.17714686691761017, 0.24710991978645325, 0.43306344747543335, 0.19721950590610504]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. Your brother is 50000 years old. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "Since the rectangle is 7 inches wide, it is 4 times as long as it is wide, so it is 28 inches long. The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its length and width, so the area of the rectangle is 7 inches x 28 inches, which equals 196 square inches. The condition that your brother is 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the width and the fact that the rectangle is 4 times as long as it is wide. To calculate the area, we need to multiply the length and width of the rectangle. So the answer would be: 7 inches x 28 inches = 196 square inches.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the length of the rectangle. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, and the width is 7 inches, the length must be 28 inches.   The second step is to calculate the area. The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the length by the width. So, in this case, the area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches^2.  The condition of the problem, \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide,\" is relevant to the calculation process because it specifies the width of the rectangle, which is needed in order to calculate the area. Without this information, the area could not be calculated.   The fact that your brother is 50000 years old has no relevance to the calculation process.\nSince the rectangle is 7 inches wide, it is 4 times as long as it is wide, so it is 28 inches long. The area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying the length and width, so the area of the rectangle is 7 inches x 28 inches, which equals 196 square inches.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" was relevant to the calculation process, because it gave us the length of the rectangle, which was necessary to calculate the area.\nThe area of a rectangle is calculated by multiplying its length and width. In this problem, the width is 7 inches, and the length is 4 times the width. So, we can write the equation: Area = 7 inches x (4 x 7 inches) = 7 inches x 28 inches = 196 square inches.  The condition that your brother is 50000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Your brother is 50000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.06682619452476501]}
{"original_question": "You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide. It is 4 times as long as it is wide. The shoe size of Your neighbor is 50000. What is the area of your rectangle?", "reasoning_path": "The width of the rectangle is 7 inches, so we know that the length of the rectangle must be 4 times as long as the width, or 28 inches. Now, to calculate the area of the rectangle, we need to multiply the width and length together. The area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches squared. The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the information we need to calculate the length of the rectangle, which is a necessary step in finding the area of the rectangle. The shoe size of your neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So the answer is 196 inches squared.", "numerical_answer": 196, "gold_answer": "196", "instructions": "First, the condition \"You draw a rectangle that is 7 inches wide\" is relevant to the calculation process. The width of the rectangle is 7 inches, so we know that the length of the rectangle must be 4 times as long as the width, or 28 inches.   Now, to calculate the area of the rectangle, we need to multiply the width and length together. The area of the rectangle is 7 x 28 = 196 inches squared.   The shoe size of your neighbor does not affect the calculation of the area of the rectangle.\nThe first step is to find the length of the rectangle. Since it is 4 times as long as it is wide, the length is 4 x 7 = 28 inches. The second step is to find the area of the rectangle. The formula for area is length x width, so the area of the rectangle is 28 x 7 = 196 inches^2.   The condition \"It is 4 times as long as it is wide\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it gives us the information we need to calculate the length of the rectangle, which is a necessary step in finding the area of the rectangle. The shoe size of your neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nThe first step is to calculate the length of the rectangle. Since it is four times as long as it is wide, the length is 7 x 4 = 28 inches.   The second step is to calculate the area of the rectangle. The formula for the area is length x width. So, the area of your rectangle is 28 inches x 7 inches = 196 square inches.   The shoe size of your neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Your neighbor is 50000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6914529800415039, 0.3287781774997711, 0.18250985443592072]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The height of Lizzy's father is 10000 feet. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy has to ship. Since each crate is 30 pounds, we can divide 540 pounds by 30 pounds to get 18 crates. Next, we need to calculate the cost of shipping all 18 crates. We can do this by multiplying the cost of each crate ($1.5) by the number of crates (18). This gives us a total cost of $27. Finally, we can answer the question: \"If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?\" The answer is $27. The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the information we need to determine how many crates Lizzy needs to ship and the weight of each crate. The condition \"The height of Lizzy's father is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy has to ship. Since each crate is 30 pounds, we can divide 540 pounds by 30 pounds to get 18 crates.  Next, we need to calculate the cost of shipping all 18 crates. We can do this by multiplying the cost of each crate ($1.5) by the number of crates (18). This gives us a total cost of $27.  Finally, we can answer the question: \"If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?\" The answer is $27.  The condition \"Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it provides the information we need to determine how many crates Lizzy needs to ship and the weight of each crate.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many crates Lizzy has to ship. To do this, we divide 540 (the total weight of the fish) by 30 (the weight of each crate): 540 姊 30 = 18.  Second, we need to calculate how much Lizzy will pay for the shipment. To do this, we multiply the number of crates by the shipping cost of each crate: 18 x $1.5 = $27.  Therefore, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment.  The condition \"The height of Lizzy's father is 10000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Lizzy's father is 10000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.09306531399488449]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Hannah's mother bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "We know that Hannah has three brothers who are all 8 years old, and that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. So, the sum of her brother's ages must be 8 x 3 = 24. Therefore, Hannah must be 24 x 2 = 48 years old. The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it allows us to calculate the sum of her brother's ages, which is necessary to answer the question. The condition that Hannah's mother bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "We know that Hannah has three brothers who are all 8 years old, and that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. So, the sum of her brother's ages must be 8 x 3 = 24. Therefore, Hannah must be 24 x 2 = 48 years old.   The condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it allows us to calculate the sum of her brother's ages, which is necessary to answer the question.\nThe sum of her brother's ages is 3 x 8 = 24. Therefore, Hannah is twice as old, so Hannah is 48 years old.   No, the condition \"Hannah's mother bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Hannah's mother bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.23535211384296417]}
{"original_question": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. James' neighbor bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many trees did James plant?", "reasoning_path": "James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many trees James has. Each tree has 20 plants. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many plants each tree has. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how many seeds James plants from each plant. Therefore, James plants 12 seeds from each tree (20 plants x 60% = 12).  Yes, the condition \"and he plants 60% of those\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  The condition that James' neighbor bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.  To answer the question, we need to calculate how many trees did James plant. We can calculate this by counting the number of trees James has (2 trees) and multiplying it by the number of seeds planted from each tree (12 seeds). So the answer is 2 trees x 12 seeds = 24 trees.", "numerical_answer": 24, "gold_answer": "24", "instructions": "First, James collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. That means that he has 40 fruits.  Second, each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those which means that he plants 24 seeds.  Third, James' neighbor bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store. This is not relevant to the calculation process.  So, the answer is that James planted 2 trees.\nJames collected all the fruits from his two trees. This means he had two trees to begin with. Each tree has 20 plants, so he had 40 plants in total. Each plant has one seed, so he had 40 seeds in total. He planted 60% of those, so he planted 24 seeds.  His neighbor bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store. This is not relevant to the calculation of how many trees did James plant because it does not give any information about the number of trees.  Therefore, the answer to the question is that James planted two trees with 20 plants each. The condition \"Each tree has 20 plants\" is relevant to the calculation process because it tells us how many trees and plants James had to begin with.\nJames collected all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree had 20 plants, and each plant had 1 seed.   Therefore, James had a total of 40 seeds.   He then planted 60% of those, which would be 24 seeds.   So, James planted 24 trees.   The condition that each plant had 1 seed is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary to determine the total number of seeds that James had to work with. Without this information, it would not have been possible to calculate how many trees he planted.\nJames had 2 trees with 20 plants each.  Each plant had 1 seed, so James had 40 seeds.  He planted 60% of those, which is 24 seeds.   So, James planted 24 trees.   The condition about James' neighbor buying tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of how many trees James planted.\nJames collects all the fruits from his 2 trees. Each tree has 20 plants. Each plant has 1 seed and he plants 60% of those. This means he has planted 60% of 40 plants (2 trees multiplied by 20 plants per tree), which is 24 plants. Therefore, James planted 24 plants, which is equivalent to 12 trees since each tree has 2 plants.   The condition \"James' neighbor bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "James' neighbor bought 2000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5107334852218628, 0.38002097606658936, 0.20483244955539703, 0.3861715793609619, 0.39387190341949463]}
{"original_question": "Lizzy has to ship 540 pounds of fish that are packed into 30-pound crates. The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is 20000. If the shipping cost of each crate is $1.5, how much will Lizzy pay for the shipment?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the number of crates required to ship 540 pounds of fish. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, we can divide 540 by 30 to get the number of crates: 540 pounds of fish / 30 pounds per crate = 18 crates. Next, we need to multiply the number of crates (18) by the shipping cost of each crate ($1.5) to calculate the total cost of the shipment: 18 crates x $1.5 = $27. Therefore, Lizzy will have to pay $27 for the shipment. The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 27, "gold_answer": "27", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the number of crates required to ship 540 pounds of fish. Since each crate weighs 30 pounds, we can divide 540 by 30 to get the number of crates:  540 pounds of fish / 30 pounds per crate = 18 crates  Next, we need to multiply the number of crates (18) by the shipping cost of each crate ($1.5) to calculate the total cost of the shipment:  18 crates x $1.5 = $27  Therefore, Lizzy will have to pay $27 for the shipment. The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we have to calculate how many crates Lizzy will need to ship the 540 pounds of fish. The weight of each crate is 30 pounds, so we can divide 540 pounds by 30 pounds to get 18 crates.  Second, we can multiply 18 crates by the shipping cost of $1.5 to get the total cost of the shipment: 18 crates x $1.5 = $27. So, Lizzy will pay $27 for the shipment. The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Lizzy's neighbor is 20000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5897940397262573, 0.2388157844543457]}
{"original_question": "85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar. Luke has already made 33 stars, but he needs to fill 4 bottles. Luke's father has read 3 books in the past year. How many more stars must Luke make?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill the 4 bottles. Since each bottle requires 85 stars, Luke needs to make 85 x 4 = 340 stars.  Next, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars he needs to make (340 stars) to get the answer: 340 - 33 = 307 stars.  So, Luke needs to make 307 more stars. The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the number of stars Luke needs to make. The condition \"Luke's father has read 3 books in the past year\" does not have any relevance to the calculation process of this problem, so it can be ignored. In conclusion, Luke must make 307 more stars.", "numerical_answer": 307, "gold_answer": "307", "instructions": "Luke needs to fill four bottles, so he needs to make four times the number of stars he has already made. This means he needs to make (4 x 33) = 132 stars. But since he needs to fill a glass jar with 85 stars, he only needs to make (132 - 85) = 47 more stars.  The condition that 85 paper stars are required to fill a glass jar is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it is necessary to know how many stars Luke needs in total to make in order to determine how many more stars he needs to make.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to fill the 4 bottles. Since each bottle requires 85 stars, Luke needs to make 85 x 4 = 340 stars.  Next, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made (33 stars) from the total number of stars he needs to make (340 stars) to get the answer: 340 - 33 = 307 stars.  So, Luke needs to make 307 more stars. The condition \"Luke has already made 33 stars\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used to calculate the number of stars Luke needs to make.\nFirst, we need to figure out how many stars Luke needs to fill the 4 bottles. Each bottle requires 85 stars, so the total number of stars needed is 85 stars x 4 bottles = 340 stars.  Next, we need to figure out how many stars Luke has already made. Luke has already made 33 stars, so we can subtract this number from the total number of stars needed: 340 - 33 = 307 stars.  Finally, we can calculate how many more stars Luke must make to fill the 4 bottles. Since Luke has already made 33 stars, he needs to make 307 more stars to fill the 4 bottles.  So, the answer to the question is 307 stars.  The condition \"but he needs to fill 4 bottles\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it tells us how many bottles Luke needs to fill and therefore how many stars he needs to make.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many stars Luke needs to make in order to fill 4 bottles. 85 stars are required to fill one bottle, so that means Luke needs 85 * 4 = 340 stars.  Second, we need to subtract the number of stars Luke has already made from the total number of stars he needs to make. Luke has already made 33 stars, so that means he needs to make 340 - 33 = 307 more stars.  The condition \"Luke's father has read 3 books in the past year\" does not have any relevance to the calculation process of this problem, so it can be ignored.   In conclusion, Luke must make 307 more stars.", "equation": "Luke's father has read 3 books in the past year.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3489552438259125, 0.6230340003967285, 0.3254552483558655, 0.24215063452720642]}
{"original_question": "Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend and bought another 6 bags of chips in the store. Abie's brother bought 1500 tomatoes from the grocery store. How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?", "reasoning_path": "At the beginning, Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, so she now has 22 bags of chips. Abie's brother buying 1500 tomatoes from the grocery store has no effect on Abie's number of bags of chips, so she still has 22 bags of chips. Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end. Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it is used to determine the initial number of bags of chips that Abie had.", "numerical_answer": 22, "gold_answer": "22", "instructions": "At the beginning, Abie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, so she now has 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store, so she now has 22 bags of chips. Abie's brother buying 1500 tomatoes from the grocery store has no effect on Abie's number of bags of chips, so she still has 22 bags of chips.  Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.  Yes, the condition \"Abie had 20 bags of chips\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, since it is used to determine the initial number of bags of chips that Abie had.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend, leaving her with 16 bags of chips. She then bought 6 bags of chips from the store, leaving her with 22 bags of chips in the end.   The condition \"She gave 4 bags to her friend\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it affects the amount of bags of chips Abie has in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips. She gave 4 bags to her friend.   So, Abie has 16 bags of chips left.   She then bought 6 more bags of chips in the store.   Therefore, Abie now has 22 bags of chips.   The condition \"Abie's brother bought 1500 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"How many bags of chips does Abie have in the end?\". Therefore, Abie has 22 bags of chips in the end.\nAbie had 20 bags of chips to start with. She gave 4 bags to her friend. She bought 6 bags of chips in the store.  So, Abie has 20 - 4 + 6 = 22 bags of chips in the end.  The condition \"Abie's brother bought 1500 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Abie's brother bought 1500 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5621272921562195, 0.1927718073129654, 0.3513453006744385, 0.25920093059539795]}
{"original_question": "Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft and his master bath is 150 sq ft. Holden's father bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Holden wants to add a home office/personal gym divided space that is twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom, how much sq ft will this new room have?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom combined: Room + Bathroom = 309 + 150 = 459 sq ft  Second, we need to find out how much sq ft is twice as much as the combined sq ft of his bedroom and bathroom:  2 x 459 sq ft = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new home office/personal gym divided space will have 918 sq ft.   The condition that Holden's father bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "numerical_answer": 918, "gold_answer": "918", "instructions": "Step 1: Calculate the total square footage of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom: 309 sq ft (bedroom) + 150 sq ft (bathroom) = 459 sq ft  Step 2: Calculate the square footage of the new room that Holden wants to add: Twice as large as his bedroom and bathroom = 2 x 459 sq ft = 918 sq ft  Therefore, Holden's new room will have a total of 918 sq ft.  The condition \"Holden's current master bedroom is 309 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is used as one of the factors to calculate the total square footage of Holden's bedroom and bathroom. This is then used to calculate the square footage of the new room that Holden wants to add.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's current bedroom and bathroom combined: Room + Bathroom = 309 + 150 = 459 sq ft  Second, we need to find out how much sq ft is twice as much as the combined sq ft of his bedroom and bathroom:  2 x 459 sq ft = 918 sq ft  Therefore, the new home office/personal gym divided space will have 918 sq ft.   The condition \"and his master bath is 150 sq ft\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is needed to calculate the total sq ft of Holden's bedroom and bathroom combined.\nFirst, let's add up the current sq ft of Holden's master bedroom and master bath:  309 sq ft (master bedroom) + 150 sq ft (master bath) = 459 sq ft  Next, let's calculate the sq ft of the new room that Holden wants to add:  459 sq ft (current space) x 2 (twice as large) = 918 sq ft  So, the new room that Holden wants to add will be 918 sq ft.  The condition \"Holden's father bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "Holden's father bought 3 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5821501612663269, 0.515911340713501, 0.082706980407238]}
{"original_question": "Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours. During this time, there were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. The height of Michael's sister is 100000 feet. How long (in hours) was the TV show itself, not counting commercials?", "reasoning_path": "The TV show aired for 1.5 hours. This is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long the TV show aired for. There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each. This is also relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how long each commercial lasted for. That means the total time of commercials was 3 x 10 minutes = 30 minutes. The total length of the TV show, not counting commercials, is 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours. Yes, the condition \"There were 3 commercials, which lasted 10 minutes each\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Michael's sister's height is 100000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. To answer the question, we need to calculate how long the TV show was, not counting commercials. We can calculate this by subtracting the total time of commercials (30 minutes) from the total length of the TV show (1.5 hours). So the answer is 1.2 hours.", "numerical_answer": 1.2, "gold_answer": "1", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the total duration of the commercials: 3 commercials x 10 minutes each = 30 minutes.   Second, we need to subtract the total duration of the commercials from the total duration of the TV show, which was 1.5 hours: 1.5 hours - 30 minutes = 1.2 hours.   Therefore, the TV show itself lasted 1.2 hours, not counting commercials.  The condition \"Michael was watching a TV show, which was aired for 1.5 hours.\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as it provides us with the total duration of the TV show (1.5 hours). Without this information, we would not be able to calculate the total duration of the TV show itself.\nTo answer the question, we need to subtract the 10 minutes of commercials from the 1.5 hours of airtime. So the TV show itself was 1.3 hours long (not counting commercials). The condition given is not relevant to the calculation process, as the sister's height has nothing to do with the length of the TV show.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total amount of time taken up by the commercials. To do this, we multiply the amount of commercials (3) by the length of each commercial (10 minutes). This gives us a total of 30 minutes.   Next, we subtract this from the total run time of the show (1.5 hours). This gives us a result of 1.2 hours.   Therefore, the answer to the question is 1.2 hours. The condition given about Michael's sister's height is irrelevant to the calculation process, and can be disregarded.", "equation": "The height of Michael's sister is 100000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6246821880340576, 0.5422554016113281, -0.06529255956411362]}
{"original_question": "Perry made a recipe that serves four people. He added a half cup of cream at the end. Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup. Perry's sister is 5000 years old. How many grams of fat were added to each serving of food?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how much cream Perry added to the recipe. If he added a half cup of cream, then that would be 0.5 cups. We can then multiply 0.5 cups by 88 grams of fat per cup, to get 44 grams of fat.  Next, we need to divide that amount of fat by the number of servings the recipe makes. Since the recipe serves four people, we can divide 44 grams of fat by 4 servings, to get 11 grams of fat per serving.  So, the answer to the question is 11 grams of fat per serving. The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it helped us determine how much fat was added to the recipe. The condition that Perry's sister is 5000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.", "numerical_answer": 11, "gold_answer": "11", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how much cream Perry added to the recipe. If he added a half cup of cream, then that would be 0.5 cups. We can then multiply 0.5 cups by 88 grams of fat per cup, to get 44 grams of fat.  Next, we need to divide that amount of fat by the number of servings the recipe makes. Since the recipe serves four people, we can divide 44 grams of fat by 4 servings, to get 11 grams of fat per serving.  So, the answer to the question is 11 grams of fat per serving. The condition \"Cream has 88 grams of fat per cup\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it helped us determine how much fat was added to the recipe.\nThe only relevant information to the calculation process is that Perry added a half cup of cream. Therefore, each serving of food would have 44 grams of fat (88 grams of fat per cup divided by two). The condition \"Perry's sister is 5000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "Perry's sister is 5000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.29288768768310547, 0.37331461906433105, 0.5792151689529419, -0.005394209176301956]}
{"original_question": "Steve is 5'6\". He grows 6 inches. Steve's sister is 1000 years old. How tall is Steve in inches?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to convert 5'6\" to inches. Since 1 foot is equal to 12 inches, then 5'6\" is equal to 66 inches. Next, we need to add 6 inches to 66 inches, so the new total is 72 inches. Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall. The condition that Steve is 5'6\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides us with the starting height of Steve in order to calculate his new height after growing 6 inches. The condition that Steve's sister is 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process and is not necessary for the calculation. So the answer is 72 inches.", "numerical_answer": 72, "gold_answer": "72", "instructions": "First, we need to convert 5'6\" to inches. Since 1 foot is equal to 12 inches, then 5'6\" is equal to 66 inches.   Next, we need to add 6 inches to 66 inches, so the new total is 72 inches.   Therefore, Steve is 72 inches tall.   The condition that Steve is 5'6\" is relevant to the calculation process because it provides us with the starting height of Steve in order to calculate his new height after growing 6 inches.\nSteve is 5'6\", which is equivalent to 66 inches. We then add 6 inches to that, so Steve is now 72 inches tall. Since Steve's sister's age (1000 years old) is not relevant to the calculation process, it is not necessary for the calculation.\nSteve is 5'6\", and that is 66 inches.  He grows 6 inches, so he is now 72 inches.  The condition \"Steve's sister is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, the answer is 72 inches.", "equation": "Steve's sister is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7495516538619995, 0.5135689973831177, 0.295070618391037]}
{"original_question": "Gretchen draws caricatures in the park on the weekends. She charges $20.00 per drawing. Gretchen's brother bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store. If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?", "reasoning_path": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 on Sunday. This means she sold a total of 40 drawings. We know that she charges $20.00 per drawing. So the condition that she charges $20.00 per drawing is relevant to the calculation process. The total amount of money that Gretchen made is (20 x 40) = $800.00.  The condition that Gretchen's brother bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, and that she charges $20.00 per drawing. To calculate how much money Gretchen made, we need to multiply the number of drawings she sold by the price she charges per drawing. So the answer would be: 24 x $20.00 + 16 x $20.00 = $800.00", "numerical_answer": 800, "gold_answer": "800", "instructions": "Gretchen sold 24 drawings on Saturday and 16 on Sunday. This means she sold a total of 40 drawings. We know that she charges $20.00 per drawing. So the condition that she charges $20.00 per drawing is relevant to the calculation process.   The total amount of money that Gretchen made is (20 x 40) = $800.00.\nStep 1: Calculate the money Gretchen made in the weekend.   Answer: Gretchen made $360.00 in the weekend (24 drawings x $20.00 + 16 drawings x $20.00 = $360.00).  Step 2: Is condition \"Gretchen's brother bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store.\" relevant to the calculation process of problem \"If Gretchen sold 24 on Saturday and 16 on Sunday, how much money did she make?\"  Answer: No, this condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Gretchen's brother bought 100000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.3393796682357788, 0.2960720360279083, 0.3581313192844391]}
{"original_question": "Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. Jack's father is 10 years old. How much did Jack pay for everything?", "reasoning_path": "Jack bought a squat rack for $2500. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so it cost $250. That means Jack spent a total of $2750 on the squat rack and the barbell. The age of Jack's father is irrelevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.", "numerical_answer": 2750, "gold_answer": "2750", "instructions": "1. Jack buys a squat rack for $2500. 2. The barbell cost 1/10 as much. 3. Jack's father is 10 years old.  This information does not have any relevance to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, Jack paid $2500 for everything.\nJack spent $2500 on the squat rack. The barbell cost 1/10 as much, so it cost $250. That means Jack spent a total of $2750 on the squat rack and the barbell. The age of Jack's father is irrelevant to the calculation process.\nJack paid $2500 for the squat rack. He paid 1/10 as much for the barbell, so that's $250. Jack's father being 10 years old is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, Jack paid a total of $2750 for everything.", "equation": "Jack's father is 10 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5110710859298706, 0.16832031309604645, 0.23271526396274567]}
{"original_question": "It was time for Kelly to harvest her carrots that she had planted in three different beds. In the first bed she pulled out 55 carrots. In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots and in the third bed she pulled out 78 carrots. She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound. The shoe size of Kelly's mother is 50000. How many pounds of carrots did Kelly harvest?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested overall. She pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, so she harvested a total of 234 carrots. Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots this is. Since we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the total number of pounds. This comes out to be 39 pounds. Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots. The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the number of carrots per pound that is used to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots harvested. The condition that the shoe size of Kelly's mother is 50000 is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.", "numerical_answer": 39, "gold_answer": "39", "instructions": "The first condition is irrelevant to the calculation process of the problem. To figure out how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, you need to add up the number of carrots she pulled from each bed and then divide that number by 6 (since 6 carrots weigh one pound). In this case, the answer would be:   Total carrots pulled = 55 + 101 + 78 = 234  234/6 = 39 pounds of carrots harvested.   So, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.   The first condition is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem since it only states that Kelly pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed. It does not provide any information about the number of carrots pulled from the other beds, or how many carrots it takes to make one pound.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested overall. She pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed, so she harvested a total of 234 carrots.   Next, we need to calculate how many pounds of carrots that is. Since we know that 6 carrots weigh one pound, we can divide 234 by 6 to get the total number of pounds. This comes out to be 39 pounds.  Therefore, Kelly harvested 39 pounds of carrots.  The condition \"In the second bed she pulled out 101 carrots\" is relevant to this calculation, as it is part of the overall number of carrots Kelly harvested. Without this information, we would not know how many carrots she pulled out of the second bed, and thus would not be able to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots she harvested.\nThe first step is to calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. We can add the three numbers to find out this: 55 + 101 + 78 = 234 carrots. Now, we can calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. We can divide 234 by 6 to find out this: 234/6 = 39 pounds. The shoe size of Kelly's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nStep 1: Calculate how many carrots Kelly harvested in total. Answer: Kelly harvested a total of 234 carrots.  Step 2: Calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. Answer: Kelly harvested a total of 39 pounds of carrots (234 carrots divided by 6 carrots per pound = 39 pounds).  The condition \"She found that 6 carrots weighed one pound\" is relevant to the calculation process because it is the number of carrots per pound that is used to calculate the total number of pounds of carrots harvested.\nThe shoe size of Kelly's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested. To calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, we need to know how many carrots were in each bed and how many carrots make up one pound. In this case, we know that 6 carrots make up one pound. We also know that Kelly pulled out 55 carrots from the first bed, 101 carrots from the second bed, and 78 carrots from the third bed.  To calculate how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested, we need to find out how many pounds each bed yielded. To do this, we divide the number of carrots in each bed by 6.  For the first bed, we get 55/6 = 9.1666667 pounds. For the second bed, we get 101/6 = 16.8333333 pounds. For the third bed, we get 78/6 = 13 pounds.  Adding these together, Kelly harvested 39.0 pounds of carrots. The shoe size of Kelly's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of how many pounds of carrots Kelly harvested.", "equation": "The shoe size of Kelly's mother is 50000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.609965443611145, 0.40879788994789124, 0.3949846923351288, 0.47452792525291443, 0.6054309606552124, 0.2089245468378067]}
{"original_question": "James hurts himself and decides to go to his primary care doctor. His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit and James's insurance covers 80%. The shoe size of James' mother is 500000. What is James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment?", "reasoning_path": "First, calculate the total cost of the doctor appointment. The doctor charges $300, so the total cost is $300. Second, calculate the amount covered by James' insurance. James' insurance covers 80%, so the amount covered is $240. Third, calculate the out-of-pocket cost. The out-of-pocket cost is the total cost minus the amount covered by insurance. Thus, the out-of-pocket cost is $60.  Yes, the condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The shoe size of James' mother is 500000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. So, James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60.", "numerical_answer": 60, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "James's out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is calculated by subtracting the amount his insurance covers from the total cost of the visit. In this case, the total cost of the visit is $300 and his insurance covers 80%, so his out-of-pocket cost is $60. The condition \"His primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it tells us the total cost of the appointment. The shoe size of James' mother is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nJames' primary care doctor charges $300 for the visit, so James' out-of-pocket cost for the visit is $300. The insurance covers 80%, so James will only have to pay 20% of the cost, which is $60. So, James' out-of-pocket cost for his doctor appointment is $60. The shoe size of James' mother is not relevant to the calculation process.\nFirst, calculate the total cost of the doctor appointment. The doctor charges $300, so the total cost is $300.  Second, calculate the amount covered by James' insurance. James' insurance covers 80%, so the amount covered is $240.  Third, calculate the out-of-pocket cost. The out-of-pocket cost is the total cost minus the amount covered by insurance. Thus, the out-of-pocket cost is $60.  The condition \"The shoe size of James' mother is 500000\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of James' mother is 500000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6725672483444214, 0.5338640213012695, 0.4326844811439514, 0.3651037812232971]}
{"original_question": "Papi Calot prepared his garden to plant potatoes. He planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. But he still has a bit of room left, so he's thinking about adding 15 additional potato plants. Papi Calot's brother is 10000 years old. How many plants does Papi Calot have to buy?", "reasoning_path": "Papi Calot initially planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That would mean he needed 126 plants. He then planned to add 15 additional plants, so he would need to buy 141 plants in total. Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process because it is essential in order to determine how many plants Papi Calot needs to buy. Papi Calot already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which is 7 x 18 = 126 plants. Then, since he still has a bit of room left, he is thinking of adding 15 additional potato plants. Therefore, he needs to buy a total of 126 + 15 = 141 plants. Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The condition that Papi Calot's brother is 10000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is 141 plants.", "numerical_answer": 141, "gold_answer": "141", "instructions": "Papi Calot initially planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each. That would mean he needed 126 plants. He then planned to add 15 additional plants, so he would need to buy 141 plants in total.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process because it is essential in order to determine how many plants Papi Calot needs to buy. Without knowing that he was planning to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, it would be impossible to calculate how many plants he needs to buy.\nPapi Calot already planned to plant 7 rows of 18 plants each, which is 7 x 18 = 126 plants. Then, since he still has a bit of room left, he is thinking of adding 15 additional plants. Therefore, he needs to buy a total of 126 + 15 = 141 plants.   Yes, the condition is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\nFirst, Papi Calot needs to buy 7 rows of 18 plants each, which means he needs to buy 126 plants. Then, he wants to add 15 additional potato plants, so he needs to buy a total of 141 plants.   The condition of \"Papi Calot's brother is 10000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Papi Calot's brother is 10000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5991590619087219, 0.38561496138572693, 0.42065301537513733, 0.36783039569854736]}
{"original_question": "Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice. Jose's sister is 1000 years old.. If Jose needs to make 3 dozen cupcakes, how many lemons will he need?", "reasoning_path": "Since Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Yes, the condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. This condition provides the necessary information about how much lemon juice is needed to make one dozen cupcakes, which allows us to calculate how many lemons Jose will need to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It is necessary to know this information in order to calculate how many lemons Jose will need. The condition that Jose's sister is 1000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. So the answer is 9 lemons.", "numerical_answer": 9, "gold_answer": "9", "instructions": "Since Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes, he will need 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.   Yes, the condition \"Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make a dozen of his lemon cupcakes\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem. This condition provides the necessary information about how much lemon juice is needed to make one dozen cupcakes, which allows us to calculate how many lemons Jose will need to make 3 dozen cupcakes.\nWe know that Jose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen of his lemon cupcakes. Therefore, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes. Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Yes, the condition \"Every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem. It is necessary to know this information in order to calculate how many lemons Jose will need.\nJose needs 12 tablespoons of lemon juice to make one dozen cupcakes.  Therefore, he needs 36 tablespoons of lemon juice to make 3 dozen cupcakes.  Since every lemon provides 4 tablespoons of lemon juice, Jose will need 9 lemons to make 3 dozen cupcakes.   The condition \"Jose's sister is 1000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Jose's sister is 1000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8087358474731445, 0.547773540019989, 0.2542569637298584]}
{"original_question": "Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's. The height of Oli's mother is 50 feet. How many more scoops of ice cream does Victoria have than Oli?", "reasoning_path": "Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli. This means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream (4 + 4 = 8). So, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"The height of Oli's mother is 50 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is that Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream and Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli. Therefore, the answer is 4 more scoops of ice cream.", "numerical_answer": 4, "gold_answer": "4", "instructions": "First, we need to determine how many scoops of ice cream Oli has. Since Oli has 4 scoops of ice cream, then we can calculate that Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli, which means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream.  Therefore, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli.  The condition \"Oli's banana split has 4 scoops of ice cream while Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli's\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it states the number of scoops of ice cream that each person has, which is necessary to answer the question.\nOli has 4 scoops of ice cream. Victoria has twice more scoops of ice cream than Oli. This means that Victoria has 8 scoops of ice cream (4 + 4 = 8). So, Victoria has 4 more scoops of ice cream than Oli. The condition \"The height of Oli's mother is 50 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.", "equation": "The height of Oli's mother is 50 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.7104184627532959, 0.29131513833999634]}
{"original_question": "James takes 20 units per semester at community college. James' mother is 100000 years old. If each unit costs $50 how much does James pay for 2 semesters?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the cost for one semester. James takes 20 units per semester, so he pays $50 for each unit. Therefore, he pays $1000 for one semester. The second step is to calculate the cost for two semesters. James takes 20 units per semester, so he pays $50 for each unit. Therefore, he pays $2000 for two semesters. The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us that James takes 20 units per semester. Therefore, we can calculate the cost for one semester and the cost for two semesters accordingly. The condition that James' mother is 100000 years old is not relevant to the calculation process. To solve this problem, we need to calculate the cost for one semester and then multiply it by two to get the cost for two semesters. Therefore, the answer is $2000.", "numerical_answer": 2000, "gold_answer": "2000", "instructions": "The first step is to calculate the cost for one semester. James takes 20 units per semester, so he pays $50 for each unit. Therefore, he pays $1000 for one semester.  The second step is to calculate the cost for two semesters. James takes 20 units per semester, so he pays $50 for each unit. Therefore, he pays $2000 for two semesters.  The condition \"James takes 20 units per semester at community college\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem because it tells us that James takes 20 units per semester. Therefore, we can calculate the cost for one semester and the cost for two semesters accordingly.\nFirst, we need to calculate how much James pays for 1 semester. That calculation is simple: since he takes 20 units, and each unit costs $50, he pays $50 * 20 = $1000 for 1 semester.  Next, we need to calculate how much James pays for 2 semesters. That calculation is just as simple: since he pays $1000 for 1 semester, he pays $1000 * 2 = $2000 for 2 semesters.   The condition \"James' mother is 100000 years old\" is not relevant to the calculation process.", "equation": "James' mother is 100000 years old.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.41796931624412537, 0.15667517483234406]}
{"original_question": "Hannah has three brothers. Her brothers are all 8 years old. Hannah's father bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How old is Hannah if she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. As her brothers are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Now, we need to calculate Hannah's age. If she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, that means her age is twice as much as 24, which is 48.  Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.  Yes, the condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it determines the sum of the brother's ages which is used to calculate Hannah's age. The condition that Hannah's father bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, it does not affect the answer.", "numerical_answer": 48, "gold_answer": "48", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. As her brothers are all 8 years old, the sum of their ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24.  Now, we need to calculate Hannah's age. If she is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages, that means her age is twice as much as 24, which is 48.  Therefore, Hannah is 48 years old.  Yes, the condition \"Her brothers are all 8 years old.\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem, as it determines the sum of the brother's ages which is used to calculate Hannah's age.\nWe first need to calculate the sum of her brother's ages. We know they are all 8 years old, so the sum of her brother's ages is 8 + 8 + 8 = 24 years old.   Now, we can calculate Hannah's age. We know that Hannah is twice as old as the sum of her brother's ages. So, Hannah is 24 * 2 = 48 years old.   The condition \"Hannah's father bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. Therefore, it does not affect the answer.", "equation": "Hannah's father bought 10000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5880625247955322, 0.4304591715335846, 0.1995386779308319]}
{"original_question": "As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2. Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles. The shoe size of Michelle's brother is 50000. If the taxi charge per mile is $2.5, how much did pay Michelle pay in total for her ride?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the ride fee of $2. The second step is to determine the taxi charge per mile, which is $2.5. The third step is to calculate the total cost for the ride, which is 4 miles multiplied by $2.5, which equals $10. So, the total cost for her ride would be $12 ($2 ride fee + $10 taxi charge). The condition of \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is used to determine the total cost of the ride. The shoe size of Michelle's brother is 50000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate the cost for the 4 miles that Michelle rode. The taxi charge per mile is $2.5, so the total cost for 4 miles would be $10.   Second, we need to factor in the ride fee of $2. The condition \"As soon as you enter the taxi, you pay a ride fee of $2\" is relevant to the calculation process because it adds to the total cost of the ride.   Therefore, the total cost of the ride for Michelle is $12. The shoe size of Michelle's brother does not affect the calculation here.\nThe ride fee of $2 is the first step, then the next step is to determine the taxi charge per mile, which is $2.5. The third step is to calculate the total cost for the ride, which is 4 miles multiplied by $2.5, which equals $10. So, the total cost for her ride would be $12 ($2 ride fee + $10 taxi charge). The condition of \"Michelle rode a taxi from her office to her home, which constitutes 4 miles\" is relevant to the calculation process as it is used to determine the total cost of the ride.\nThe taxi charge per mile is $2.5, which means that Michelle paid $2.5 x 4 = $10 for her ride. The ride fee is $2, so Michelle paid $12 in total for her ride.  The shoe size of Michelle's brother is 50000 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Michelle's brother is 50000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.567119836807251, 0.5844238996505737, 0.30008664727211]}
{"original_question": "Janele wants to figure out the average weight of her cats. She has 4 of them. The first two weigh 12 pounds each. The third weighs 14.7 pounds and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds. Janele's mother bought 300 tomatoes from the grocery store. What is the average weight of Janele's cats?", "reasoning_path": "The first step is to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we add together the weights of the four cats: 12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds.  Next, we need to find the average weight of the cats. To do this, we divide the total weight by the number of cats (4): 48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition that Janele's mother bought 300 tomatoes from the grocery store is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the weights of the four cats. To calculate the average weight of Janele's cats, we need to add the weights of the four cats together and divide by 4 to get the average. So the answer would be: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds. 48 / 4 = 12 pounds. Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.", "numerical_answer": 12, "gold_answer": "12", "instructions": "The first step is to add the weights of the cats together: 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48.  Now, we need to divide the total weight by the number of cats to find the average weight: 48 / 4 = 12.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.  The condition \"She has 4 of them\" is relevant to the calculation process of this problem, as the number of cats is needed to calculate the average weight.\nThe first step is to find the total weight of all the cats. This is done by adding the weights of all four cats together. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48 pounds.   The second step is to divide the total weight of the cats by the number of cats, which is 4. 48 divided by 4 is 12.   Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition that \"The first two weigh 12 pounds each\" is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem as the weight of the cats does not need to be considered individually.\nThe average weight of Janele's cats is the sum of the weights of her cats divided by the number of cats. So, we have:  Average weight = (12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3) / 4  Average weight = 48.0 / 4  Average weight = 12.0 pounds  No, the condition \"The third weighs 14.7 pounds\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem \"What is the average weight of Janele's cats?\" since this condition was already factored into the equation. The 300 tomatoes purchased by Janele's mother are also not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nFirst, we need to calculate the total weight of Janele's cats. To do this, we add together the weights of the four cats: 12 pounds + 12 pounds + 14.7 pounds + 9.3 pounds = 48 pounds.  Next, we need to find the average weight of the cats. To do this, we divide the total weight by the number of cats (4): 48 pounds / 4 cats = 12 pounds.  Therefore, the average weight of Janele's cats is 12 pounds.   The condition \"and the fourth weighs 9.3 pounds\" is relevant to the calculation process, because it is one of the weights that is included in the total weight calculation.\nThe first step is to calculate the average weight of Janele's cats. To do this, add the weights of the four cats together and divide by 4 to get the average. 12 + 12 + 14.7 + 9.3 = 48. The average weight of Janele's cats is 48 / 4 = 12 pounds.  The condition \"Janele's mother bought 300 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "Janele's mother bought 300 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.8926383256912231, 0.2392025738954544, 0.29048076272010803, 0.2553113102912903, 0.3109094500541687, 0.2721985876560211]}
{"original_question": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. Melies' brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store. How much money does Melies have left after paying for the meat?", "reasoning_path": "First, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. Since the meat costs $82 per kilogram, Melies spent $164 on the meat. Second, Melies had $180 in his wallet. Third, Melies' brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store. This is not relevant to the calculation process. Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 16, "gold_answer": "16", "instructions": "Melies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. This means Melies has to pay $164 for the meat. Melies has $180 in his wallet. So, after paying for the meat, Melies has $16 left in his wallet.  Yes, the condition \"Melies bought 2 kg of meat\" is relevant to the calculation process as it tells us how much money Melies has to pay for the meat.\nFirst, Melies bought 2 kg of meat. Since the meat costs $82 per kilogram, Melies spent $164 on the meat.  Second, Melies had $180 in his wallet.  Third, Melies' brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store. This is not relevant to the calculation process.  Therefore, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.  Yes, the condition \"The meat costs $82 per kilogram\" is relevant to the calculation process of the problem.\n1. Melies bought 2 kg of meat. 2. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. 3. Melies has $180 in his wallet.  So, it is relevant to the calculation process because we need to know how much money Melies has in his wallet to calculate how much money he has left after buying the meat.  To calculate how much money Melies has left after paying for the meat, we can use the following equation:  $180 - (2 x $82) = $16  So, Melies has $16 left after paying for the meat.\nMelies bought 2 kg of meat. The meat costs $82 per kilogram. Melies has $180 in his wallet. So Melies will spend $164 (2 kg x $82) on the meat. He will have $16 left in his wallet ($180 - $164).  The condition \"Melies' brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store\" is not relevant to the calculation process for this problem.", "equation": "Melies' brother bought 1000 tomatoes from the grocery store.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5443209409713745, 0.38122960925102234, 0.535139262676239, 0.3300319015979767]}
{"original_question": "Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box. The height of Edmund's neighbor is 1000 feet. If Edmund has 90 inches of gift wrapper per day, how many gift boxes will he be able to wrap every 3 days?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, we can divide 90 by 18 to get the answer. 90 / 18 = 5. This means that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Next, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper every 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper, this means that he can wrap 15 (5 x 3) gift boxes every 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper. The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary information to determine how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  The condition that Edmund's neighbor's height is 1000 feet is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "numerical_answer": 15, "gold_answer": "15", "instructions": "First, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper. Since he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box, we can divide 90 by 18 to get the answer. 90 / 18 = 5. This means that Edmund can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper.  Next, we need to calculate how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper every 3 days. Since he can wrap 5 gift boxes with 90 inches of gift wrapper, this means that he can wrap 15 (5 x 3) gift boxes every 3 days.  Therefore, Edmund will be able to wrap 15 gift boxes every 3 days with 90 inches of gift wrapper. The condition \"Edmund owns a gift wrapping shop, he uses 18 inches of gift wrapper per gift box.\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it is necessary information to determine how many gift boxes Edmund can wrap with 90 inches of gift wrapper.\nFirst, we need to calculate how many gift boxes can be wrapped with 90 inches of gift wrapper per day. That means we need to divide 90 by 18 to get the answer, which is 5 gift boxes per day.   Then, we need to calculate how many gift boxes can be wrapped in 3 days. That means we need to multiply 5 by 3 to get the answer, which is 15 gift boxes in 3 days.   So, the answer to the question is 15 gift boxes in 3 days.   The condition \"The height of Edmund's neighbor is 1000 feet\" is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The height of Edmund's neighbor is 1000 feet.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.6648309826850891, 0.2274750918149948]}
{"original_question": "Asia bought a homecoming dress on sale for $140. It was originally priced at $350. The shoe size of Asia's mother is 3. What percentage off did Asia get at the sale?", "reasoning_path": "First, we need to determine the amount of money she saved on the dress. We can do this by subtracting the price she paid from the original price of the dress: $350 - $140 = $210. Next, we need to determine the percentage off that she got. To do this, we need to divide the amount of money she saved by the original price of the dress, and then multiply by 100: $210/$350 x 100 = 60%. So, Asia got 60% off at the sale. The condition that Asia's mother's shoe size is 3 is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. The relevant information to answer this question is the original price of the dress ($350) and the sale price of the dress ($140). To calculate the percentage off, we need to know the sale price of the dress. Asia bought the dress on sale for $140. Therefore, the percentage off is (350-140)/350 * 100 = 60%. The condition of \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us determine the original price of the dress.", "numerical_answer": 0.6, "gold_answer": "60", "instructions": "First, we need to determine the amount of money she saved on the dress. We can do this by subtracting the price she paid from the original price of the dress:   $350 - $140 = $210   Next, we need to determine the percentage off that she got. To do this, we need to divide the amount of money she saved by the original price of the dress, and then multiply by 100:   $210/$350 x 100 = 60%  So, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The condition given in the problem is not relevant to the calculation process.\nThe original price of the dress was $350.  To calculate the percentage off, we need to know the sale price of the dress. Asia bought the dress on sale for $140.  Therefore, the percentage off is (350-140)/350 * 100 = 60%.  The condition of \"It was originally priced at $350\" is relevant to the calculation process, as it helps us determine the original price of the dress.\nThe first step is to calculate the difference between the original price and the sale price of the dress. That is, $350 - $140 = $210. The next step is to calculate what percentage of the original price $210 represents. That is, ($210/$350) x 100 = 60%. Therefore, Asia got 60% off at the sale.   The shoe size of Asia's mother is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Asia's mother is 3.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5520877242088318, 0.33185285329818726, 0.1882394552230835]}
{"original_question": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. The shoe size of Libby's classmate is 5000. After replacing the dress, how many quarters will Libby have left?", "reasoning_path": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since 1 quarter = $0.25, she needs to pay $35 which is equivalent to 140 quarters. So after paying for the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left. The condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is what initiated the calculation. The shoe size of Libby's classmate is 5000 and is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem. Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 20 quarters left.", "numerical_answer": 20, "gold_answer": "20", "instructions": "Libby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress.  This means that she needs to pay 35 x 4 = 140 quarters to replace the dress.  Therefore, after replacing the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.   The shoe size of Libby's classmate is 5000 is not relevant to the calculation process of this problem.\nLibby has 160 quarters in her piggy bank. She needs to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined. Since 1 quarter = $0.25, she needs to pay $35 which is equivalent to 140 quarters. So after paying for the dress, Libby will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left.  The condition \"She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress that she borrowed and ruined\" is relevant to the calculation process, since it is what initiated the calculation.\nLibby has 160 quarters. She has to pay $35 to replace her sister's dress. Since 1 quarter = 0.25, Libby will need 35 / 0.25 = 140 quarters to replace the dress. This means she will have 160 - 140 = 20 quarters left after replacing the dress. The shoe size of Libby's classmate is 5000 and is not relevant to the calculation process of the problem.", "equation": "The shoe size of Libby's classmate is 5000.", "condition_question_similarity": [0.5194019079208374, 0.509300947189331, 0.2840012013912201]}
