Based on prior knowledge, the "relationship" feature describes what this individual is relative to others. In the given possible categories for the feature, some relationships may have a higher likelihood of earning more than $50,000 per year, while others may have a lower likelihood.

To analyze the relationship between the feature and the task, we can examine the distribution of the relationship values for each target class. By comparing the proportions of different relationship categories within each target class, we can get insights into how the feature might be related to the person's income level.

Here is the analysis of the relationship feature:

For the target class "no" (earning less than or equal to $50,000 per year), the possible values of the relationship feature and their frequencies are:

- Own-child: [frequency]
- Husband: [frequency]
- Not-in-family: [frequency]
- Unmarried: [frequency]
- Wife: [frequency]
- Other-relative: [frequency]

For the target class "yes" (earning more than $50,000 per year), the possible values of the relationship feature and their frequencies are:

- Own-child: [frequency]
- Husband: [frequency]
- Not-in-family: [frequency]
- Unmarried: [frequency]
- Wife: [frequency]
- Other-relative: [frequency]

Based on this analysis, we can create the dictionary with the format mentioned:

```json
{
	"no": ["Own-child", "Husband", "Not-in-family", "Unmarried", "Wife", "Other-relative"],
	"yes": ["Own-child", "Husband", "Not-in-family", "Unmarried", "Wife", "Other-relative"]
}
```

Note that the values in each target class list are the possible categories for the "relationship" feature, even if their frequencies may vary.