Based on prior knowledge, we can analyze the relationship between the "lug_boot" feature and the task of rating the decision to buy a car.

In general, the size of the luggage boot may influence a person's perception of the car's utility and practicality. Let's consider possible relationships between the "lug_boot" feature and the target variable:

1. "unacceptable" rating: It is likely that cars with a small luggage boot might lead to an "unacceptable" rating since it may not provide enough space for users' needs. Therefore, we can expect that the possible values of "lug_boot" for a "unacceptable" rating could include "small".

2. "acceptable" rating: Cars with a medium-sized luggage boot may be perceived as "acceptable" since they offer a moderate level of space. Therefore, the possible values of "lug_boot" for an "acceptable" rating could include "med".

3. "very good" rating: Cars with a big luggage boot would likely receive a "very good" rating since they offer ample storage space. Therefore, the possible values of "lug_boot" for a "very good" rating could include "big".

4. "good" rating: Lastly, cars with either a medium-sized or a big luggage boot may be considered as "good" choices since they provide a decent amount of storage space. Therefore, the possible values of "lug_boot" for a "good" rating could include "med" and "big".

Based on these analyses, we can create the dictionary:

```json
{
	"unacceptable": ["small"],
	"acceptable": ["med"],
	"very good": ["big"],
	"good": ["med", "big"]
}
```

Please note that this analysis is based on general assumptions, and it may vary depending on the specific dataset or domain.