Based on prior knowledge and understanding of the problem, we can analyze the relationship between the "buying" feature and the rating of the decision to buy the car:

1. Unacceptable: It is more likely that the decision to buy the car would be rated as unacceptable if the buying price is high or very high. Therefore, the possible values of the "buying" feature for the target class "unacceptable" could be ['very high', 'high'].

2. Acceptable: The decision to buy the car could be rated as acceptable for a wider range of buying prices. Therefore, the possible values of the "buying" feature for the target class "acceptable" could be ['very high', 'high', 'medium', 'low'].

3. Very Good: The decision to buy the car is more likely to be rated as very good if the buying price is low. Therefore, the possible value of the "buying" feature for the target class "very good" could be ['low'].

4. Good: The decision to buy the car could be rated as good for a wider range of buying prices. Therefore, the possible values of the "buying" feature for the target class "good" could be ['very high', 'high', 'medium', 'low'].

Based on the above analysis, the dictionary representing the relationship between the "buying" feature and the rating of the decision to buy the car would be:

```json
{
	"unacceptable": ["very high", "high"],
	"acceptable": ["very high", "high", "medium", "low"],
	"very good": ["low"],
	"good": ["very high", "high", "medium", "low"]
}
```