Based on prior knowledge, it is expected that the feature "persons" which represents the capacity in terms of persons to carry, would have a relationship with the task of rating the decision to buy a car.

Here is a possible analysis of the relationship between the feature "persons" and the task:

- Unacceptable: It is possible that the decision to buy a car is rated as unacceptable when the capacity to carry persons is limited. Therefore, it can be expected that the value of "persons" would be '2'.

- Acceptable: The decision to buy a car may be rated as acceptable when the capacity to carry persons is moderate. This implies that the value of "persons" could be '4'.

- Good: A rating of good may be given when the capacity to carry persons is high. This suggests that the value of "persons" could be 'more'.

- Very Good: A rating of very good might be given if the capacity to carry persons exceeds expectations. It is possible that the values of "persons" might include both '4' and 'more'.

Based on this analysis, here is the dictionary representing the relationship between the feature "persons" and the task of rating the decision to buy a car:

```json
{
	"unacceptable": ["2"],
	"acceptable": ["4"],
	"very good": ["4", "more"],
	"good": ["more"]
}
```