Based on prior knowledge, it is likely that the feature "native-country" is related to the target variable. The country of origin can have an impact on an individual's earning potential due to factors such as differences in job opportunities, average income levels, and the cost of living in different countries.

To analyze the relationship between the "native-country" feature and the target variable, we can examine the distribution of values for each class of the target variable.

Based on this analysis, we can create a dictionary as follows:

```json
{
	"no": ["United-States", "?", "Mexico", "Greece", "Hungary", "Ecuador", "Hong", "Holand-Netherlands"],  
	"yes": ["United-States", "?", "Mexico", "Philippines", "Germany", "Canada", "India", "England", "Puerto-Rico", "Cuba", "Iran", "Taiwan", "Italy", "South", "Poland", "China", "Japan", "Vietnam", "Columbia", "Dominican-Republic", "Guatemala", "Haiti", "El-Salvador", "Portugal", "Nicaragua", "Thailand", "Ireland", "Scotland", "Jamaica", "Laos", "Trinadad&Tobago", "Cambodia", "Yugoslavia", "Outlying-US(Guam-USVI-etc)", "Honduras", "Peru", "France"]
}
```

From the analysis, we can see that individuals from a wide range of countries appear in both classes. However, there are certain countries that have more representation in one class compared to the other.

It is important to note that there are some instances with missing data denoted by "?". While it is hard to predict the exact values for these instances, we can still include them in the analysis to provide a complete picture of the data.