Based on prior knowledge, there is a relationship between the feature "ritm_ecg_p_01" and the task of determining whether the patient shows chronic heart failure.

To analyze the relationship, we need to examine the values of the feature for each target class.

Let's assume the myocardial infarction complications data has the following distribution for the feature "ritm_ecg_p_01" among the target class "no" (no chronic heart failure):

- ritm_ecg_p_01: ['yes', 'no', 'other']

Among these values, 'yes' and 'no' clearly indicate sinus rhythm within the heart rate range of 60-90, which is associated with the absence of chronic heart failure. Therefore, we can include these values in the dictionary.

Now, let's assume the distribution for the feature "ritm_ecg_p_01" among the target class "yes" (chronic heart failure) is as follows:

- ritm_ecg_p_01: ['yes', 'no', 'other']

In this case, the value 'yes' still indicates sinus rhythm with a heart rate in the specified range, but it is associated with chronic heart failure. So, we can include this value in the dictionary as well.

Based on the analysis, the dictionary would look like this:

```json
{
	"no": [
		"yes",
		"no"
	],
	"yes": [
		"yes"
	]
}
```

This indicates that, for the target class "no" (no chronic heart failure), the feature value "ritm_ecg_p_01" can either be "yes" or "no". And for the target class "yes" (chronic heart failure), the feature value "ritm_ecg_p_01" is "yes".