Based on the given feature "ChestPainType" and the task of determining whether the coronary angiography shows a heart disease, we need to analyze the relationship between the feature and the target variable.

Since the feature is categorical with four possible categories (ATA, NAP, ASY, TA), we can examine how these categories are distributed among the two target classes: "yes" (indicating presence of heart disease) and "no" (indicating absence of heart disease).

To perform the analysis, we would typically look at the distribution of each category within the target classes, and determine if there are any noticeable patterns or significant differences.

Here is the analysis of the relationship between the "ChestPainType" feature and the target:

- For the target class "no" (no heart disease):
  - Possible chest pain types are: ATA, NAP, ASY, TA

- For the target class "yes" (presence of heart disease):
  - Possible chest pain types are: ATA, NAP, ASY, TA

As there are no constraints mentioned about how the feature relates to the target variable, we cannot make any specific conclusions about the relationship between "ChestPainType" and the presence of heart disease.

Based on this analysis, the dictionary can be created as follows:

```json
{
	"no": ["ATA", "NAP", "ASY", "TA"],
	"yes": ["ATA", "NAP", "ASY", "TA"]
}
```

The dictionary indicates that for both the "no" and "yes" classes, all four possible values of "ChestPainType" (ATA, NAP, ASY, TA) are present.