Based on my prior knowledge, I can analyze the relationship between the 'marital' feature and the task of whether the client subscribes to a term deposit.

To start the analysis, I would suggest comparing the distribution of the 'marital' feature for clients who subscribed to a term deposit (yes) and those who did not (no).

Here is the analysis and the resulting dictionary:

```json
{
    "no": ["married", "single", "divorced"],
    "yes": ["married", "single", "divorced"]
}
```

Based on this analysis, it seems that the marital status does not provide any specific discrimination power for determining whether a client subscribes to a term deposit. The values of the 'marital' feature are consistent across both the 'yes' and 'no' target classes.

However, it is important to note that this analysis is based on my prior knowledge, and further exploration of the dataset may reveal additional insights.