Based on prior knowledge, I can perform a thorough analysis of the relationship between the "checking_status" feature and the task of determining whether a person receives credit.

To analyze the relationship, I will examine the distribution of the "checking_status" feature for both the "yes" and "no" target classes.

Let's start by going through each target class and identifying the possible values of the "checking_status" feature associated with them:

For the target class "yes" (person receives credit):
- Possible values of the "checking_status" feature could be '<0', '0<=X<200', 'no checking', and '>=200'. 

For the target class "no" (person does not receive credit):
- Possible values of the "checking_status" feature could be '<0', '0<=X<200', 'no checking', and '>=200'. 

Now, proceeding to create the dictionary with the given format:

```json
{
	"yes": ["<0", "0<=X<200", "no checking", ">=200"],
	"no": ["<0", "0<=X<200", "no checking", ">=200"]
}
```

Based on the analysis, it seems that all possible values of the "checking_status" feature are present in both target classes. Therefore, the dictionary contains the full list of possible values for each target class.