Based on prior knowledge and understanding, I can analyze the relationship between the feature "checking_status" and the task of determining whether a person receives a credit or not.

From the description, the "checking_status" feature describes the status of an existing checking account. It has four categories: '<0', '0<=X<200', 'no checking', and '>=200'.

To analyze the relationship between this feature and the task, we can examine the distribution of checking_status values for the target classes "yes" (person receives a credit) and "no" (person does not receive a credit).

Here is the dictionary summarizing the analysis:

```json
{
	"yes": ["no checking"],  
    "no": ["<0", "0<=X<200", ">=200"] 
}
```

Explanation:
- For the "yes" target class (person receives a credit), the only relevant category of "checking_status" is "no checking". This suggests that people who do not have an existing checking account are more likely to receive a credit.
- For the "no" target class (person does not receive a credit), the relevant categories of "checking_status" are '<0', '0<=X<200', and '>=200'. This suggests that people with different ranges of existing checking account balances are less likely to receive a credit.

Based on this analysis, we can see that the feature "checking_status" is informative for predicting whether a person receives a credit or not.