Statement: ngc 1796 has the largest apparent magnitude of 12.9 followed by ngc 1705 with 12.8

Input Table: dorado group

Step 1: f_select_row(*)
name type ra ( j2000 ) dec ( j2000 ) redshift (km / s ) apparent magnitude
ngc 2082 sab (rs + ) c 05h41 m51.1s degree18′04″ 1184 ± 6 12.6
ngc 1947 s0 - pec 05h26 m47.6s degree45′36″ 1100 ± 24 11.7
ngc 1796 (r) sb (r) dm : 05h02 m42.5s degree08′24″ 1014 ± 9 12.9
ngc 1688 sb (rs) dm 04h48 m23.8s degree48′01″ 1228 ± 6 12.6
ngc 1672 (r'_1: ) sb (r) bc sy2 04h45 m42.5s degree14′50″ 1331 ± 3 10.3
ic 2056 sab (r) b 04h16 m24.5s degree12′25″ 1133 ± 10 12.5
ngc 1559 sb (s) cd 04h17 m35.8s degree47′01″ 1304 ± 4 11.0
ngc 1543 (r) sb (l) 0 0 04h12 m43.2s degree44′17″ 1176 ± 7 11.5
ngc 1574 sa0 - 04h21 m58.8s degree58′29″ 1050 ± 25 11.4
ngc 1533 (l) sb (rs) 0 0 04h09 m51.8s degree07′06″ 790 ± 5 11.7
ngc 1546 sa0 + 04h14 m36.5s degree03′39″ 1284 ± 14 11.8
ngc 1553 sa (rl) 0 0 04h16 m10.5s degree46′49″ 1080 ± 11 10.3
ngc 1549 e0 1 04h15 m45.1s degree35′32″ 1220 ± 15 10.7
ngc 1566 (r'_1) sab (rs) bcsy1 04h20 m00.4s degree56′16″ 1504 ± 2 10.3
ngc 1617 (r') sab (rs) a 04h31 m39.5s degree36′08″ 1063 ± 21 11.4
ngc 1515 sab (s) bc 04h04 m02.7s degree06′00″ 1175 ± 7 12.1
ngc 1705 sa0 - pec 04h54 m13.5s degree21′40″ 633 ± 6 12.8
ngc 1596 sa0: sp 04h27 m38.1s degree01′40″ 1510 ± 8 12.1

Step 2: f_select_column(name, apparent magnitude)
name type ra ( j2000 ) dec ( j2000 ) redshift (km / s ) apparent magnitude
ngc 2082 sab (rs + ) c 05h41 m51.1s degree18′04″ 1184 ± 6 12.6
ngc 1947 s0 - pec 05h26 m47.6s degree45′36″ 1100 ± 24 11.7
ngc 1796 (r) sb (r) dm : 05h02 m42.5s degree08′24″ 1014 ± 9 12.9
ngc 1688 sb (rs) dm 04h48 m23.8s degree48′01″ 1228 ± 6 12.6
ngc 1672 (r'_1: ) sb (r) bc sy2 04h45 m42.5s degree14′50″ 1331 ± 3 10.3
ic 2056 sab (r) b 04h16 m24.5s degree12′25″ 1133 ± 10 12.5
ngc 1559 sb (s) cd 04h17 m35.8s degree47′01″ 1304 ± 4 11.0
ngc 1543 (r) sb (l) 0 0 04h12 m43.2s degree44′17″ 1176 ± 7 11.5
ngc 1574 sa0 - 04h21 m58.8s degree58′29″ 1050 ± 25 11.4
ngc 1533 (l) sb (rs) 0 0 04h09 m51.8s degree07′06″ 790 ± 5 11.7
ngc 1546 sa0 + 04h14 m36.5s degree03′39″ 1284 ± 14 11.8
ngc 1553 sa (rl) 0 0 04h16 m10.5s degree46′49″ 1080 ± 11 10.3
ngc 1549 e0 1 04h15 m45.1s degree35′32″ 1220 ± 15 10.7
ngc 1566 (r'_1) sab (rs) bcsy1 04h20 m00.4s degree56′16″ 1504 ± 2 10.3
ngc 1617 (r') sab (rs) a 04h31 m39.5s degree36′08″ 1063 ± 21 11.4
ngc 1515 sab (s) bc 04h04 m02.7s degree06′00″ 1175 ± 7 12.1
ngc 1705 sa0 - pec 04h54 m13.5s degree21′40″ 633 ± 6 12.8
ngc 1596 sa0: sp 04h27 m38.1s degree01′40″ 1510 ± 8 12.1

Step 3: f_sort_column(apparent magnitude)
name apparent magnitude
ngc 2082 12.6
ngc 1947 11.7
ngc 1796 12.9
ngc 1688 12.6
ngc 1672 10.3
ic 2056 12.5
ngc 1559 11.0
ngc 1543 11.5
ngc 1574 11.4
ngc 1533 11.7
ngc 1546 11.8
ngc 1553 10.3
ngc 1549 10.7
ngc 1566 10.3
ngc 1617 11.4
ngc 1515 12.1
ngc 1705 12.8
ngc 1596 12.1

Step 4: simple_query()
name apparent magnitude
ngc 1796 12.9
ngc 1705 12.8
ngc 2082 12.6
ngc 1688 12.6
ic 2056 12.5
ngc 1515 12.1
ngc 1596 12.1
ngc 1546 11.8
ngc 1947 11.7
ngc 1533 11.7
ngc 1543 11.5
ngc 1574 11.4
ngc 1617 11.4
ngc 1559 11.0
ngc 1549 10.7
ngc 1672 10.3
ngc 1553 10.3
ngc 1566 10.3

Prompting LLM for the final answer... >>>


Prediction: YES