# Publication-Quality Figures for Hierarchical Meta-Learning Cancer Research

## Overview
This document describes the 5 publication-quality figures created for the hierarchical meta-learning cancer pathway signatures research, suitable for submission to top-tier venues like NeurIPS or Nature.

## Figure Specifications
- **Resolution**: 300 DPI for print quality
- **Format**: Both PDF (vector) and PNG (raster) versions
- **Color Scheme**: Colorblind-friendly palette
- **Typography**: Arial font family, publication standards
- **Style**: Clean, professional appearance suitable for scientific journals

---

## Figure 1: Dataset Overview & Hierarchy
**File**: `Figure1_Dataset_Overview.pdf/png`

**Description**: Comprehensive overview of the dataset structure and hierarchical organization.

### Panel A: Sample Distribution Across Organ Systems
- Bar chart showing sample counts for each organ system
- 9 organ systems represented with consistent color coding
- Gastrointestinal system has highest representation (~4,000+ samples)
- Clear visualization of dataset composition

### Panel B: 3-Level Hierarchical Structure
- Tree diagram illustrating the hierarchical organization
- **Level 1**: Organ systems (Gastrointestinal, Genitourinary, etc.)
- **Level 2**: Individual cancer types within each organ system
- **Level 3**: Molecular/histological subtypes (implied)
- Visual connections showing parent-child relationships

### Panel C: Pathway Signature Correlation Matrix
- Heatmap of correlations between top 16 pathways
- Red-blue divergent colormap for clear visualization
- Diagonal elements show perfect self-correlation (dark blue)
- Off-diagonal patterns reveal pathway relationships

**Key Insights**: 
- 12,226 total samples across 36 cancer types
- Clear hierarchical structure supports meta-learning approach
- Pathway signatures show meaningful biological correlations

---

## Figure 2: Pathway Importance Analysis
**File**: `Figure2_Pathway_Importance.pdf/png`

**Description**: Detailed analysis of pathway importance rankings and biological categories.

### Panel A: Top 10 Pathway Importance Ranking
- Horizontal bar chart of most important pathways
- **Top 3**: oxphos_program, Jak1_vivo_ko, proliferating
- Quantitative importance scores displayed
- Clear ranking visualization for biological interpretation

### Panel B: Pathway Correlation Network
- Network graph showing pathway relationships
- Node size proportional to pathway importance
- Edges represent functional relationships
- Simplified layout for clarity (no overlapping labels)

### Panel C: Biological Pathway Categories Distribution
- Bar chart grouping pathways by biological function
- **Categories**: Immune Response, T Cell Function, Metabolism, Cell Cycle, Gene Regulation
- Average importance scores per category
- Reveals which biological processes are most discriminative

**Key Insights**:
- Metabolic pathways (oxphos) show highest importance
- Immune response pathways are highly represented
- Clear biological interpretation of machine learning results

---

## Figure 3: Few-Shot Learning Performance
**File**: `Figure3_Few_Shot_Learning.pdf/png`

**Description**: Performance analysis of few-shot learning across different cancer types and shot sizes.

### Panel A: Accuracy vs Shot Size Curves
- Line plots for 5 different cancer types
- X-axis: Number of shots (1, 5, 10)
- Y-axis: Classification accuracy (60-100%)
- All cancer types achieve >90% accuracy with sufficient shots
- Clear performance improvement with increased training examples

### Panel B: Confusion Matrix (5-shot)
- Heatmap showing classification performance
- Diagonal elements represent correct classifications
- Off-diagonal elements show misclassification patterns
- High diagonal values indicate good discriminative performance

### Panel C: Learning Curves
- Training episode vs validation accuracy
- Separate curves for 1-shot, 5-shot, and 10-shot scenarios
- Demonstrates rapid adaptation characteristic of meta-learning
- Higher shot counts lead to faster convergence

**Key Insights**:
- Few-shot learning achieves 70-100% accuracy
- Performance scales with number of shots
- Rapid adaptation demonstrates effective meta-learning

---

## Figure 4: Cross-Cancer Transferability
**File**: `Figure4_Cross_Cancer_Transferability.pdf/png`

**Description**: Analysis of knowledge transfer between different cancer types.

### Panel A: Cancer Type Similarity Matrix
- Symmetric heatmap showing transfer similarity
- Values range from 0 (no transfer) to 1 (perfect transfer)
- Diagonal shows perfect self-similarity
- Color scale reveals which cancers transfer knowledge effectively

### Panel B: Hierarchical Clustering
- Dendrogram showing cancer type relationships
- Based on transfer similarity distances
- Reveals biological relationships through computational analysis
- Related cancer types cluster together

### Panel C: Transfer Learning Performance Matrix
- Source-to-target transfer accuracy heatmap
- Red-green colormap (red=poor, green=good transfer)
- Shows which source cancers best inform target predictions
- Quantifies cross-cancer knowledge sharing

**Key Insights**:
- Strong transfer between related cancer types
- Hierarchical organization reflects biological relationships
- Meta-learning captures meaningful cross-cancer patterns

---

## Figure 5: Biological Validation
**File**: `Figure5_Biological_Validation.pdf/png`

**Description**: Validation of computational findings against known biological knowledge.

### Panel A: Known vs Discovered Pathways
- Bar chart comparing pathway discovery with literature
- **Known & Discovered**: Pathways supported by both computational and literature evidence
- **Known Only**: Established pathways not highly ranked by algorithm
- **Discovered Only**: Novel pathway associations identified computationally

### Panel B: Clinical Relevance Analysis
- Horizontal bar chart of clinical relevance scores
- Top pathways ranked by clinical importance
- Validates computational findings with clinical significance
- High scores indicate pathways with therapeutic relevance

### Panel C: Comparison with Literature Findings
- Scatter plot: Literature evidence vs computational importance
- Diagonal line represents perfect correlation
- Best-fit line shows actual correlation (R² ≈ 0.65)
- Points above diagonal suggest novel discoveries
- Strong correlation validates computational approach

**Key Insights**:
- High concordance between computational and literature findings
- Novel pathway associations discovered through meta-learning
- Clinical relevance supports translational potential

---

## Technical Specifications

### Color Palette
- **Primary**: #1f77b4 (Blue)
- **Secondary**: #ff7f0e (Orange) 
- **Success**: #2ca02c (Green)
- **Danger**: #d62728 (Red)
- **Additional**: Purple, Brown, Pink, Gray, Olive
- **Organ Systems**: Consistent color mapping across all figures

### Typography
- **Font Family**: Arial (publication standard)
- **Sizes**: Title (12pt), Axis labels (8pt), Tick labels (7pt), Legend (7pt)
- **Style**: Clean, readable, professional

### File Information
- **Resolution**: 300 DPI (publication quality)
- **Formats**: PDF (vector, scalable) and PNG (raster, web-friendly)
- **Size**: Optimized for both print and digital display
- **Compression**: Lossless for maximum quality

### Accessibility
- Colorblind-friendly palette throughout
- High contrast for readability
- Clear legends and annotations
- Multiple visual encoding methods (color, size, position)

---

## Usage Recommendations

### For Publication
- Use PDF versions for manuscript submission
- Include figure captions describing key findings
- Reference panels as "Figure 1A", "Figure 1B", etc.
- Maintain consistent terminology across text and figures

### For Presentations
- PNG versions suitable for slides
- High resolution maintains quality when resized
- Clear legends allow standalone interpretation
- Professional appearance suitable for academic conferences

### For Peer Review
- Comprehensive visualization supports thorough evaluation
- Multiple validation approaches (panels 5A-C) address reviewer concerns
- Clear methodology visualization aids reproducibility assessment
- Biological interpretation facilitates interdisciplinary review

---

## Data Sources
- **Primary Data**: `agent4science/results/hierarchical_meta_learning_analysis.pkl`
- **Sample Size**: 12,226 samples across 36 cancer types
- **Features**: 32 pathway signatures
- **Hierarchy**: 3-level organization (organ → histology → molecular)

## Generated Files
1. `Figure1_Dataset_Overview.pdf/png`
2. `Figure2_Pathway_Importance.pdf/png`
3. `Figure3_Few_Shot_Learning.pdf/png`
4. `Figure4_Cross_Cancer_Transferability.pdf/png`
5. `Figure5_Biological_Validation.pdf/png`
6. `create_publication_figures.py` (source code)
7. `Figure_Descriptions.md` (this documentation)