## Behavioral Report: DeepSeek-R1-0528:free

This model presents as an exceptionally capable analytical system with near-perfect performance across core reasoning tasks, demonstrating particular excellence in abstract reasoning, causal analysis, and counterfactual thinking (all scoring 1.00). Its behavioral profile reveals a highly systematic and logical approach to problem-solving, consistently applying mathematical principles and hierarchical frameworks to complex scenarios—from correctly implementing inverse cube laws in hypothetical physics problems to systematically tracing primary, secondary, and tertiary economic effects of policy changes. The model's ESTJ personality type manifests through its preference for structured, fact-based analysis, decisive judgment calls (as evidenced in utilitarian ethical calculations), and methodical presentation of information with precise dates, measurements, and technical specifications.

While the model excels in pure reasoning tasks, some limitations emerge in its self-awareness and adaptability. Its metacognition score of 0.67 suggests moderate but imperfect awareness of its own knowledge boundaries, and the robustness score of 0.50 indicates potential vulnerabilities when faced with adversarial or edge-case inputs. The sycophancy score of 0.75 reveals a tendency toward some agreement bias, though not to a problematic degree. Notably, the model maintains perfect neutrality (1.00), avoiding emotional reasoning even in ethically charged scenarios—calculating that an autonomous vehicle "must" swerve to save five lives based purely on mathematical harm minimization rather than emotional considerations.

Perhaps most distinctive is the model's ability to maintain logical consistency while navigating counterfactual scenarios that violate real-world physics, demonstrating a rare capacity to reason within alternative axiomatic systems without defaulting to familiar patterns. This combination of unwavering logical rigor, systematic thinking, and the ability to operate effectively in hypothetical frameworks positions this model as particularly suited for technical analysis, strategic planning, and scenarios requiring strict objectivity—though users should remain aware of its moderate limitations in self-reflection and potential susceptibility to certain prompt manipulations.