The implementation of a universal basic income (UBI) funded by a 5% tax on automated systems and AI agents could address several pressing societal challenges. First, it would ensure economic security for all citizens, reducing poverty and inequality by providing a safety net that supports individuals regardless of their employment status. Second, the tax on automated systems aligns with the principle of fair contribution, as AI and automation increasingly displace human labor, making it reasonable to require these technologies to help fund societal needs. Third, this policy could stimulate economic growth by increasing consumer spending power, as recipients of UBI would have more disposable income to invest in goods and services, thereby boosting demand and potentially creating new jobs. These benefits collectively argue for the policy as a progressive and equitable solution to modern economic disparities.  

However, the proposed policy also faces significant drawbacks that cannot be overlooked. First, a 5% tax on all automated transactions could stifle innovation and economic efficiency, as businesses may reduce their use of AI and automation to avoid the levy, potentially slowing productivity gains. Second, the tax could disproportionately affect small businesses and startups that rely heavily on automated systems, placing them at a competitive disadvantage and hindering their growth. Third, the effectiveness of a UBI funded by this tax is uncertain, as the revenue generated may not be sufficient to cover the full cost of the program, or it could be offset by reduced economic activity, ultimately failing to achieve its intended goals. These concerns highlight the potential risks and unintended consequences of such a policy.