Paragraph 1 (In favor):
Proponents argue that a universal basic income (UBI), funded by a tax on automated systems and AI transactions, would provide a crucial safety net for citizens in an increasingly automated economy, ensuring their basic needs are met regardless of employment status. Moreover, by implementing a UBI, the government could streamline the welfare system, potentially reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies and administrative costs, while also empowering recipients to make their own financial decisions. Additionally, proponents contend that a targeted tax on AI-driven transactions is a fair and sustainable funding mechanism, as it would raise revenue from companies benefiting most from automation, redistributing a portion of their gains to support the wider population affected by the changing job market.

Paragraph 2 (Against):
Opponents of the proposed policy argue that a universal basic income could be prohibitively expensive, potentially necessitating significant tax increases or cuts to other essential government services, and a tax limited to AI-driven transactions may not be sufficient to fund the program adequately. Critics also contend that a UBI could disincentivize work and reduce labor force participation, as some individuals may choose to rely on the guaranteed income rather than actively seeking employment, potentially exacerbating skills shortages and dampening economic productivity. Furthermore, opponents argue that a tax specifically targeting automated systems and AI agents could hinder technological progress and innovation, discouraging investment in efficiency-enhancing technologies that could ultimately benefit the economy and society more broadly if allowed to develop and deploy unencumbered.