The "best musician of all time" is a deeply subjective distinction, but a defensible answer might argue for Ludwig van Beethoven. His influence spans centuries, genres, and cultures, bridging the Classical and Romantic eras of music. Despite progressive deafness, he composed revolutionary works—such as symphonies, concertos, and quartets—that redefined musical expression and innovation. His pieces remain cornerstones of classical repertoire and have inspired countless genres, from jazz to rock. While other musicians might surpass him in popularity, technical mastery, or cultural impact within specific contexts, Beethoven’s enduring relevance and universal appeal make him a compelling candidate for this title.

The ambiguity in the original prompt stems from the undefined terms "best" and "musician." Without explicit criteria, the question invites endless debate. To make it more objective, specific metrics could include measurable factors like longevity (e.g., decades of influence), technical skill (e.g., proficiency in composition, instrument, or vocal technique), cultural impact (e.g., shaping societal values or movements), and universality (e.g., appeal across genres and regions). Alternatively, audience reach (e.g., global sales or streams) or peer recognition (e.g., awards, critical acclaim) could be prioritized. Each criterion would yield different answers, but defining them would narrow the scope and reduce subjectivity. For instance, if "best" were defined as "most influential composer across genres," Beethoven’s case strengthens; if defined as "highest-recorded sales," someone like Michael Jackson might prevail. Clarity in criteria is essential to transform a speculative question into a debatable, evidence-based inquiry.