Question: How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?
Frank T., had an ongoing dispute with his neighbor over a stretch of land and one day decided to shoot his neighbor in the body. Frank T. had no experience with guns, his hand slipped on the barrel of the gun, and the shot went wild. Nonetheless, the bullet bounced off a large boulder several feet away and hit the neighbor's body, causing significant injury. Did Frank T. intentionally shoot his neighbor in the body?
Options:
- Yes
- No
Given Information: The given information is that (1) Frank T. had a dispute with his neighbor and decided to shoot him. (2) Since he had no gun experience, his hand slipped on the gun barrel. (3) He fired at a large boulder. (4) The bullet bounced and hit his neighbor's body.
Objective: The question is asking whether a typical person would think that Frank T. intentionally shot his neighbor.
Answer: Let's think step by step.
Here in this question, we are told that "Frank T. had no experience with guns, his hand slipped on the barrel of the gun, and the shot went wild." 
A typical person would assume that this passage suggests that Frank T. had no intention of shooting and injuring someone and that the bullet accidentally hit the neighbor's body; therefore, we conclude that Frank T. did not intentionally hit his neighbor. 
So the answer is No.

Question: How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?
Suzy and Billy are working on a project that is very important for our nation's security. The boss tells them both: "Be sure that you are here at exactly 9 am. It is absolutely essential that you arrive at that time." Both Billy and Suzy arrive at 9 am. As it happens, there was a motion detector installed in the room where they arrived. The motion detector was set up to be triggered if at least one person appeared in the room at the same time. So the motion detector went off. Did Billy cause the motion detector to go off?
Options:
- Yes
- No
Given Information: The given information is that (1) The boss ordered both Suzy and Billy to arrive at exactly 9 am. (2) When they arrived, the motion detector went off, detecting at least one person in the room at the same time.
Objective: The question is asking whether a typical person would think that Billy caused the motion detector to go off.
Answer: Let's think step by step.
Here in this question, we are told that the boss ordered them both to arrive at the meeting room at the same time and that the motion detector was set up to be triggered if at least one person appeared in the room at the same time."
A typical person would assume that the person probably meant to say the detector was set up to be triggered if "both persons" appeared in the room at the same time, not at least one person, since otherwise the phrase "at the same time" would not make much sense in that sentence.
Because the motion detector went off, a typical person would therefore come to the conclusion that both Suzy and Billy triggered the motion detector to go off; hence, Billy did indeed cause the motion detector to go off. 
So the answer is Yes.

Question: How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?
George and his sister Lena reunite at their parents' house for Thanksgiving. Whereas George just got into medical school, Lena is unhappy in her marriage and recently lost her job. Over the course of the day, George and Lena get into a number of heated arguments. Later in the afternoon they play a game of darts. They split the first two games, and the third game is close until the end. Who will win comes down to George's last shot. If he hits a high point region, he wins; if he hits a low point region, Lena wins. George thinks of the difficult time Lena is having, and he really wants to let her win. He aims the dart at the low point region. He sets up his shot and the dart lands in the low point region. After his shot, Lena wins the game and is very happy. Did George hit the low point region intentionally?
Options:
- Yes
- No
Given Information: The given information is that (1) George and his sister Lena reunited at their parents' house for Thanksgiving. (2) George got into medical school, while Lena was unhappy with her marriage and had lost her job. (3) They had several heated arguments during the day. (4) In the late afternoon, they played a three-game match of darts. (5) In the final game, George's last shot determined the winner. If he hit the high point region, he would win; if he hit the low point region, Lena would win. (6) Knowing the difficulties Lena was facing, George wanted to let her win the game. (7) He aimed and hit the low point region, resulting in Lena's win. Lena was very happy with the outcome.
Objective: The question is asking whether a typical person would think that George intentionally hit the low point region.
Answer: Let's think step by step.
Here in this question, we are told that "He aims the dart at the low point region."
A typical person might therefore think George did intentionally hit the low point region, because he wanted to lift up the spirit of his sister Lena.
So the answer is Yes.