Can Neural Networks Improve Classical Optimization of Inverse Problems?

17 Sept 2023 (modified: 25 Mar 2024)ICLR 2024 Conference Withdrawn SubmissionEveryoneRevisionsBibTeX
Keywords: Inverse problems, neural networks, iterative optimization, chaos, convergence
TL;DR: We show that a joint neural network training procedure can enhance the solution quality for general inverse problems without requiring domain knowledge.
Abstract: Finding the values of model parameters from data is an essential task in science. While iterative optimization algorithms like BFGS can find solutions to inverse problems with machine precision for simple problems, their reliance on local information limits their effectiveness for complex problems involving local minima, chaos, or zero-gradient regions. This study explores the potential for overcoming these limitations by jointly optimizing multiple examples. To achieve this, we employ neural networks to reparameterize the solution space and leverage the training procedure as an alternative to classical optimization. This approach is as versatile as traditional optimizers and does not require additional information about the inverse problems, meaning it can be added to existing general-purpose optimization libraries. We evaluate the effectiveness of this approach by comparing it to traditional optimization on various inverse problems involving complex physical systems, such as the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Our findings reveal significant improvements in the accuracy of the obtained solutions.
Supplementary Material: zip
Primary Area: optimization
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 946
Loading