Open-Vocabulary Customization from CLIP via Data-Free Knowledge Distillation
Keywords: Data-Free Learning, CLIP Model, Customization
TL;DR: Could we distill models from CLIP without data to meet customized tasks?
Abstract: Vision-language models such as CLIP have demonstrated strong zero-shot performance, but their considerable size and inefficient inference limit customizable deployment for users. While knowledge distillation is a solution, it still requires the original data, which is not always available due to copyrights and privacy concerns. For many users seeking open-vocabulary customization, Data-Free Knowledge Distillation (DFKD) emerges as a promising direction. Upon rethinking DFKD, we find that existing methods fail on CLIP due to their heavy reliance on BatchNorm layers, which are unexpectedly unusable in CLIP. Based on our findings, we adopt image-text matching to achieve DFKD for CLIP, enabling customization based on arbitrary class texts. This involves (i) inversing a surrogate dataset from CLIP based on text prompts; and (ii) distilling a student model from CLIP using the surrogate dataset. Specifically, we introduce style dictionary diversification to enhance the diversity of synthetic images. To prevent uncontrollable semantics introduced by diversification, we propose a class consistency maintaining strategy to ensure the consistency of synthetic images. Based on synthetic images with various styles, we further propose meta knowledge distillation to train the student model with good generalization ability. Moreover, we introduce a simple yet effective method to enable customization based on few example images. Comprehensive experiments showcase the superiority of our approach across twelve customized tasks, achieving a 9.33\% improvement compared to existing DFKD methods.
Primary Area: applications to computer vision, audio, language, and other modalities
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 2525
Loading