Benchmarking Multimodal Variational Autoencoders: CdSprites+ Dataset and Toolkit

Gabriela Sejnova, Michal Vavrecka, Karla Stepanova

Keywords: variational autoencoders, multimodal generative models, multimodal datasets, benchmark toolkits

TL;DR: We propose a toolkit and a benchmark dataset for a systematic development, evaluation and comparison of multimodal variational autoencoders.

Abstract: Multimodal Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) have been the subject of intense research in the past years as they can integrate multiple modalities into a joint representation and can thus serve as a promising tool for both data classification and generation. Several approaches toward multimodal VAE learning have been proposed so far, their comparison and evaluation have however been rather inconsistent. One reason is that the models differ at the implementation level, another problem is that the datasets commonly used in these cases were not initially designed to evaluate multimodal generative models. This paper addresses both mentioned issues. First, we propose a toolkit for systematic multimodal VAE training and comparison. The toolkit currently comprises 4 existing multimodal VAEs and 6 commonly used benchmark datasets along with instructions on how to easily add a new model or a dataset. Second, we present a disentangled bimodal dataset designed to comprehensively evaluate the joint generation and cross-generation capabilities across multiple difficulty levels. We demonstrate the utility of our dataset by comparing the implemented state-of-the-art models.

Primary Area: datasets and benchmarks

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 5452