Keywords: kernel principal component analysis, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, high-dimensional statistics, convergence rate, interpolation space
Abstract: In this paper, we utilize the interpolation space norm to understand and fill the gaps in some recent works on the reconstruction error of the kernel PCA. After rigorously proving a simple but fundamental claim appeared in the kernel PCA literature, we provide upper bound and lower bound of the reconstruction error of the empirical kernel PCA with interpolation space norms under the assumption $(C)$, a condition which is taken for granted in the existing works. Furthermore, we show that the assumption $(C)$ holds in two most interesting settings ( the polynomial-eigenvalue decayed kernels in fixed dimension domain and the inner product kernel on large dimensional sphere $\mathbb S^{d-1}$ where $n\asymp d^{\gamma}$) and compare our bound with the existing results. This work not only fills the gaps appeared in literature, but also derives an explicit lower bound on the sample size to guarantee that the (optimal) reconstruction error is well approximated by the empirical reconstruction error. Finally, our results reveal that the RKHS norm is not a relevant error metric in the
large dimensional settings.
Primary Area: learning theory
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 5831
Loading