On Agnostic PAC Learning in the Small Error Regime

Julian Asilis, Mikael Møller Høgsgaard, Grigoris Velegkas

Keywords: PAC learning, statistical learning, agnostic learning, supervised learning

TL;DR: Improved sample complexity bounds for agnostic binary classification in the tau-based model!

Abstract:

Binary classification in the classic PAC model exhibits a curious phenomenon: Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) learners are suboptimal in the realizable case yet optimal in the agnostic case. Roughly speaking, this owes itself to the fact that non-realizable distributions $\\mathcal{D}$ are more difficult to learn than realizable distributions -- even when one discounts a learner's error by $\\mathrm{err}(h^\\ast_\\mathcal{D})$, i.e., the error of the best hypothesis in $\\mathcal{H}$. Thus, optimal agnostic learners are permitted to incur excess error on (easier-to-learn) distributions $\\mathcal{D}$ for which $\\tau = \\mathrm{err}(h^\\ast_\\mathcal{D})$ is small.

Recent work of Hanneke, Larsen, and Zhivotovskiy (FOCS '24) addresses this shortcoming by including $\\tau$ itself as a parameter in the agnostic error term. In this more fine-grained model, they demonstrate tightness of the error lower bound $\\tau + \\Omega \\left(\\sqrt{\\frac{\\tau (d + \\log(1 / \\delta))}{m}} + \\frac{d + \\log(1 / \\delta)}{m} \\right)$ in a regime where $\\tau > d/m$, and leave open the question of whether there may be a higher lower bound when $\\tau \\approx d/m$, with $d$ denoting $\\mathrm{VC}(\\mathcal{H})$.
In this work, we resolve this question by exhibiting a learner which achieves error $c \\cdot \\tau + O \\left(\\sqrt{\\frac{\\tau (d +
\\log(1 / \\delta))}{m}} + \\frac{d + \\log(1 / \\delta)}{m} \\right)$ for a constant $c \\leq 2.1$, matching the lower bound and demonstrating optimality when $\\tau =O( d/m)$. Further, our learner is computationally efficient and is based upon careful aggregations of ERM classifiers, making progress on two other questions of Hanneke, Larsen, and Zhivotovskiy (FOCS '24). We leave open the interesting question of whether our approach can be refined to lower the constant from 2.1 to 1, which would completely settle the complexity of agnostic learning.

Primary Area: Theory (e.g., control theory, learning theory, algorithmic game theory)

Submission Number: 8438