Keywords: RAG, EBM, Re-ranking, Medical QA, LLM
Abstract: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) holds a crucial role in clinical application.
Doctors can reduce diagnostic errors by integrating high-quality evidence.
Moreover, large language models (LLMs) based methods like RAG can make EBM tasks more efficient.
However, RAG applications retrieve irrelevant or conflicting evidence and struggle to validate. This will increase the risk of incorrect clinical decisions.
Therefore, inspired by the meta-analysis, we provide a new method to re-rank and filter the medical evidence.
We employ a hybrid re-ranking pipeline called Meta-RAG, which includes reliability analysis, heterogeneity analysis, and extrapolation analysis, inspired by the meta-analysis.
Meta-RAG can filter and re-rank medical evidence in a training-free manner to meet clinical needs.
For evaluation, We test META-RAG with three baselines on multiple datasets in open-domain and multiple-choice clinical QA tasks. The experimental results show there is a stable improvement on quality of evidence and answer accuracy across models of different types and sizes.
Meta-RAG also effectively enables RAG to extract more consistent and more patient-specific.
Paper Type: Long
Research Area: Clinical and Biomedical Applications
Research Area Keywords: Language Modeling; NLP Application; Question Answering
Contribution Types: NLP engineering experiment
Languages Studied: English
Submission Number: 2342
Loading