Learning Ante-hoc Explanations for Molecular Graphs

28 Sept 2024 (modified: 05 Feb 2025)Submitted to ICLR 2025EveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: graph neural network, explainer, molecular graph, ante-hoc
Abstract: Explaining the decisions made by machine learning models for high-stakes applications is critical for transparency. This is particularly true in the case of models for graphs, where decisions depend on complex patterns combining structural and attribute data. We propose EAGER (Effective Ante-hoc Graph Explainer), a novel and flexible ante-hoc explainer designed to discover explanations for graph neural networks, with a focus on the chemical domain. As an ante-hoc model, EAGER inductively learn a graph predictive model and the associating explainer together. We employ a novel bilevel iterative training process based on optimizing the Information Bottleneck principle, effectively distilling the most useful substructures while discarding irrelevant details. As a result, EAGER can identify molecular substructures that contain the necessary and precise information needed for prediction. Our experiments on various molecular classification tasks show that EAGER explanations are better than existing post-hoc and ante-hoc approaches.
Primary Area: interpretability and explainable AI
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 12974
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview