LLM Targeted Underperformance Disproportionately Impacts Vulnerable Users
Abstract: While state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on many tasks, there has been extensive research on undesirable model behavior such as hallucinations and bias. In this work, we investigate how the quality of LLM responses changes in terms of information accuracy, truthfulness, and refusals depending on three user traits: English proficiency, education level, and country of origin. We present extensive experimentation on three state-of-the-art LLMs and two different datasets targeting truthfulness and factuality. Our findings suggest that undesirable behaviors in state-of-the-art LLMs occur disproportionately more for users with lower English proficiency, of lower education status, and originating from outside the US, rendering these models unreliable sources of information towards their most vulnerable users.
Paper Type: Short
Research Area: Ethics, Bias, and Fairness
Research Area Keywords: model bias/fairness evaluation, ethical considerations in NLP applications
Contribution Types: Model analysis & interpretability
Languages Studied: English
Submission Number: 4218
Loading