Tailoring: encoding inductive biases by optimizing unsupervised objectives at prediction time

Ferran Alet, Maria Bauza Villalonga, Kenji Kawaguchi, Nurullah Giray Kuru, Tomas Perez, Leslie Pack Kaelbling

Keywords: meta-learning, inductive biases, self-supervised learning

TL;DR: We optimize unsupervised losses for the current input. By optimizing where we act, we bypass generalization gaps and can impose a wide variety of inductive biases.

Abstract: From CNNs to attention mechanisms, encoding inductive biases into neural networks has been a fruitful source of improvement in machine learning. Adding auxiliary losses to the main objective function is a general way of encoding biases that can help networks learn better representations. However, since auxiliary losses are minimized only on training data, they suffer from the same generalization gap as regular task losses. Moreover, by adding a term to the loss function, the model optimizes a different objective than the one we care about. In this work we address both problems: first, we take inspiration from transductive learning and note that after receiving an input but before making a prediction, we can fine-tune our networks on any unsupervised loss. We call this process tailoring, because we customize the model to each input to ensure our prediction satisfies the inductive bias. Second, we formulate meta-tailoring, a nested optimization similar to that in meta-learning, and train our models to perform well on the task objective after adapting them using an unsupervised loss. The advantages of tailoring and meta-tailoring are discussed theoretically and demonstrated empirically on a diverse set of examples.

Code Of Conduct: I certify that all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the NeurIPS Statement on Ethics, Fairness, Inclusivity, and Code of Conduct.

Code: https://www.lis.csail.mit.edu/tailoring

Community Implementations: [ 4 code implementations](https://www.catalyzex.com/paper/tailoring-encoding-inductive-biases-by/code)