Reward Learning from Multiple Feedback Types

Yannick Metz, Andras Geiszl, Raphaël Baur, Mennatallah El-Assady

Keywords: Reinforcement Learning, RLHF, Machine Learning, Multi-Type Feedback

TL;DR: We present a simulation framework and reward model implementations for diverse feedback of multiple types, and show their effectiveness

Abstract:

Learning rewards from preference feedback has become an important tool in the alignment of agentic models. Preference-based feedback, often implemented as a binary comparison between multiple completions, is an established method to acquire large-scale human feedback. However, human feedback in other contexts is often much more diverse. Such diverse feedback can better support the goals of a human annotator, and the simultaneous use of multiple sources might be mutually informative for the learning process or carry type-dependent biases for the reward learning process.
Despite these potential benefits, learning from different feedback types has yet to be explored extensively.
In this paper, we bridge this gap by enabling experimentation and evaluating multi-type feedback in a wide set of environments. We present a process to generate high-quality simulated feedback of six different types. Then, we implement reward models and downstream RL training for all six feedback types.
Based on the simulated feedback, we investigate the use of types of feedback across five RL environments and compare them to pure preference-based baselines. We show empirically that diverse types of feedback can be utilized and lead to strong reward modeling performance. This work is the first strong indicator of the potential of multi-type feedback for RLHF.

Primary Area: reinforcement learning

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 12768