Dynamics Within Latent Chain-of-Thought: An Empirical Study of Causal Structure

Published: 02 Mar 2026, Last Modified: 18 Mar 2026LIT Workshop @ ICLR 2026EveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Track: long paper (up to 10 pages)
Keywords: Latent Chain of Thought, Casual analysis
TL;DR: Latent reasoning is not just “more hidden steps.” Its causal structure is uneven, influence can skip across steps, and answer preference often appears before internal commitment stabilizes.
Abstract: Latent or continuous chain-of-thought methods replace explicit textual rationales with a number of internal latent steps, but these intermediate computations are difficult to evaluate beyond correlation-based probes. In this paper, we view latent chain-of-thought as a manipulable causal process in representation space by modeling latent steps as variables in a structural causal model (SCM) and analyzing their effects through step-wise $\mathrm{do}$-interventions. We study two representative paradigms (i.e., Coconut and CODI) on both mathematical and general reasoning tasks to investigate three key questions: (1) which steps are causally necessary for correctness and when answers become decidable early; (2) how does influence propagate across steps, and how does this structure compare to explicit CoT; and (3) do intermediate trajectories retain competing answer modes, and how does output-level commitment differ from representational commitment across steps. We find that latent-step budgets behave less like homogeneous extra depth and more like staged functionality with non-local routing, and we identify a persistent gap between early output bias and late representational commitment. These results motivate mode-conditional and stability-aware analyses---and corresponding training/decoding objectives---as more reliable tools for interpreting and improving latent reasoning systems.
Anonymization: This submission has been anonymized for double-blind review via the removal of identifying information such as names, affiliations, and identifying URLs.
Submission Number: 63
Loading