Keywords: Robust optimization, Robustness-accuracy tradeoff
Abstract: Robust optimization provides a principled and unified framework to model many problems in modern operations research and computer science applications, such as risk measures minimization and adversarially robust machine learning. To use a robust solution (e.g., to implement an investment portfolio or perform robust machine learning inference), the user has to a priori decide the trade-off between efficiency (nominal performance) and robustness (worst-case performance) of the solution by choosing the uncertainty level hyperparameters. In many applications, this amounts to solving the problem many times and comparing them, each from a different hyperparameter setting. This makes robust optimization practically cumbersome or even intractable. We present a novel procedure based on the proximal point method (PPM) to approximate many Pareto-efficient robust solutions using the PPM trajectory. Compared with the existing method with computation cost $N\times T_{\mathrm{RC}}$, the cost of our method is $T_{\mathrm{RC}} + (N-1)\times T_{\mathrm{\widetilde{PPM}}}$, where $N$ is the number of robust solutions to be generated, $T_{\mathrm{RC}}$ is the cost of solving a single robust optimization problem, and $T_{\mathrm{\widetilde{PPM}}}$ is cost of a single step of an approximate PPM. We prove exact PPM can produce exact Pareto efficient robust solutions for a class of robust linear optimization problems. For robust optimization problems with nonlinear and differentiable objective functions, compared with the existing method, our method equipped with first-order approximate PPMs is computationally cheaper and generates robust solutions with comparable performance.
Supplementary Material: zip
Primary Area: optimization
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 13062
Loading