On the Feasibility of Fréchet Radiomic Distance–Constrained Adversarial Examples in Medical Imaging: Methods and Trade-offs

Published: 14 Feb 2026, Last Modified: 14 Mar 2026MIDL 2026 PosterEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Deep Learning, Radiomics, Adversarial Robustness
TL;DR: Constraining adversarial perturbations to preserve radiomic fidelity (FRD) sharply limits their effectiveness, revealing an intrinsic robustness boundary in medical imaging AI.
Abstract: Adversarial attacks expose critical vulnerabilities in medical imaging AI models; yet, most existing methods violate the textural and structural characteristics that define authentic medical images by disregarding the clinical and radiomic plausibility of the generated perturbations. In this study, we present the first systematic investigation in the \emph{existence and feasibility} of adversarial examples constrained by the Fréchet Radiomic Distance (FRD) a quantitative measure of radiomic similarity capturing textural, structural, and statistical coherence between images. We formulate a gradient-free, multi objective optimization framework based on Multi Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) operating in the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) domain. This framework jointly minimizes FRD and maximizes adversarial deviation, allowing a principled exploration of the trade off between radiomic fidelity and adversarial strength without requiring gradient access. Empirical evidence across multiple medical imaging models demonstrates that enforcing strong FRD constraints (FRD $\leq$ 0.05) dramatically reduces adversarial feasibility. Perturbations preserving radiomic fidelity consistently fail to achieve meaningful adversarial deviation, suggesting that radiomic realism imposes an intrinsic feasibility boundary on adversarial generation. These findings establish radiomic consistency as a fundamental constraint on adversarial vulnerability, offering theoretical and empirical insight toward the development of inherently robust and trustworthy medical imaging AI. Our code is publicly available here.
Primary Subject Area: Safe and Trustworthy Learning-assisted Solutions for Medical Imaging
Secondary Subject Area: Application: Dermatology
Registration Requirement: Yes
Reproducibility: https://github.com/MohamedAlaaAli/frd-constrained-attack
Visa & Travel: Yes
Read CFP & Author Instructions: Yes
Originality Policy: Yes
Single-blind & Not Under Review Elsewhere: Yes
LLM Policy: Yes
Midl Latex Submission Checklist: Ensure no LaTeX errors during compilation., Created a single midl26_NNN.zip file with midl26_NNN.tex, midl26_NNN.bib, all necessary figures and files., Includes \documentclass{midl}, \jmlryear{2026}, \jmlrworkshop, \jmlrvolume, \editors, and correct \bibliography command., Did not override options of the hyperref package, Did not use the times package., All authors and co-authors are correctly listed with proper spelling and avoid Unicode characters., Author and institution details are de-anonymized where needed. All author names, affiliations, and paper title are correctly spelled and capitalized in the biography section., References must use the .bib file. Did not override the bibliographystyle defined in midl.cls. Did not use \begin{thebibliography} directly to insert references., Tables and figures do not overflow margins; avoid using \scalebox; used \resizebox when needed., Included all necessary figures and removed *unused* files in the zip archive., Removed special formatting, visual annotations, and highlights used during rebuttal., All special characters in the paper and .bib file use LaTeX commands (e.g., \'e for é)., Appendices and supplementary material are included in the same PDF after references., Main paper does not exceed 12 pages; acknowledgements, references, and appendix start on page 13 or later.
Latex Code: zip
Copyright Form: pdf
Submission Number: 217
Loading