A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning

Fred Lu, Joseph Munoz, Maya Fuchs, Tyler LeBlond, Elliott V. Zaresky-Williams, Edward Raff, Francis Ferraro, Brian Testa

Keywords: differential privacy, privacy evaluation, private machine learning

TL;DR: We present the first framework to audit any differentially private machine learning procedure with strong results

Abstract: We present a framework to statistically audit the privacy guarantee conferred by a differentially private machine learner in practice. While previous works have taken steps toward evaluating privacy loss through poisoning attacks or membership inference, they have been tailored to specific models or have demonstrated low statistical power. Our work develops a general methodology to empirically evaluate the privacy of differentially private machine learning implementations, combining improved privacy search and verification methods with a toolkit of influence-based poisoning attacks. We demonstrate significantly improved auditing power over previous approaches on a variety of models including logistic regression, Naive Bayes, and random forest. Our method can be used to detect privacy violations due to implementation errors or misuse. When violations are not present, it can aid in understanding the amount of information that can be leaked from a given dataset, algorithm, and privacy specification.