Rethinking LLM Bias Probing Using Lessons from the Social Sciences

Published: 05 Mar 2025, Last Modified: 14 Apr 2025BuildingTrustEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Track: Long Paper Track (up to 9 pages)
Keywords: bias probing, LLMs, EcoLevels, interdisciplinary, social bias, psychological theory
TL;DR: We describe actionable directions for systematizing LLM bias studies by connecting probes and the constructs they are intended to measure.
Abstract: The proliferation of LLM bias probes introduces three significant challenges: (1) we lack principled criteria for choosing appropriate probes, (2) we lack a system for reconciling conflicting results across probes, and (3) we lack formal frameworks for reasoning about when (and why) probe results will generalize to real user behavior. We address these challenges by systematizing LLM social bias probing using actionable insights from social sciences. We then introduce EcoLevels – a framework that helps (a) determine appropriate bias probes, (b) reconcile conflicting findings across probes, and (c) generate predictions about bias generalization. Overall, we ground our analysis in social science research because many LLM probes are direct applications of human probes, and these fields have faced similar challenges when studying social bias in humans. Based on our work, we argue that the next frontier of LLM bias probing can (and should) benefit from decades of social science research.
Submission Number: 86
Loading

OpenReview is a long-term project to advance science through improved peer review with legal nonprofit status. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the OpenReview Sponsors. © 2025 OpenReview