QJL is 1-bit Compressive Sensing: An Equivalence and Its Consequences for KV Cache Compression in LLMs

Published: 01 Jun 2026, Last Modified: 10 Jun 2026AdaptFM PosterEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: KV cache compression, 1-bit compressive sensing, QJL, Johnson-Lindenstrauss, rate-distortion, effective rank, TurboQuant, LLM inference
TL;DR: QJL in TurboQuant is equivalent to 1-bit compressive sensing; this transfers CS reconstruction bounds, a matching lower bound, and a rate-distortion theorem to KV cache compression, validated with 53-74% NMSE gains on real LLMs.
Abstract: We establish a formal equivalence between the Quantized Johnson–Lindenstrauss (QJL) trans- form of the TurboQuant KV cache compression scheme and the classical 1-bit compressive sens- ing (1-bit CS) model of Boufounos and Bara- niuk (2008), which lets us import 1-bit CS theory into QJL analysis. From it we derive three new consequences. First, reconstruction guarantees for QJL side-channel estimates in terms of mea- surement count, dimension, and key geometry, with a matching m ≍log(n)/γ2 n lower bound via Le Cam/Fano (isotropic-keys model). Sec- ond, an analysis of TurboQuant as a two-stage operator—rotated scalar quantization composed with QJL—yielding a composition error iden- tity and a bit-allocation law that explains its de- ployed configuration. Third, a rate–distortion lower bound identifying the effective rank of the residual covariance as the diagnostic gov- erning multi-bit residual coding. Empirically, KL transform coding cuts residual-reconstruction NMSE by 53–74% over scalar quantization on concentrated-spectrum residuals, and a QJL 1- bit correction stacked on a learned low-rank pro- jection adds ≤0.4 perplexity points across six LLMs—confirming the composition bound end- to-end.
Email Sharing: We authorize the sharing of all author emails with Program Chairs.
Data Release: We authorize the release of our submission and author names to the public in the event of acceptance.
Submission Number: 25
Loading