Chunking: Forgetting Matters in Continual Learning even without Changing Tasks

Thomas L Lee, Amos Storkey

Primary Area: transfer learning, meta learning, and lifelong learning

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Keywords: Continual Learning

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.

TL;DR: Continual Learning (CL) consist of two sub-problems, task-shift and seeing the data in chunks (chunking), while task-shift has be explored thoroughly chunking has not, which we do in this work, showing it is an important part of CL.

Abstract: Work on continual learning (CL) has largely focused on the problems arising from the dynamically-changing data distribution. However, CL can be decomposed into two sub-problems: (a) shifts in the data distribution, and (b) dealing with the fact that the data is split into chunks and so only a part of the data is available to be trained on at any point in time. In this work, we look at the latter sub-problem---the chunking of data---and note that previous analysis of chunking in the CL literature is sparse. We show that chunking is an important part of CL, accounting for around half of the performance drop from offline learning in our experiments. Furthermore, our results reveal that current CL algorithms do not address the chunking sub-problem, only performing as well as plain SGD training when there is no shift in the data distribution. We analyse why performance drops when learning occurs on chunks of data, and find that forgetting, which is often seen to be a problem due to distribution shift, still arises and is a significant problem. Motivated by an analysis of the linear case, we show that per-chunk weight averaging improves performance in the chunking setting and that this performance transfers to the full CL setting. Hence, we argue that work on chunking can help advance CL in general.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 1443