Understanding Masked Autoencoders From a Local Contrastive Perspective
Keywords: Self-supervised Learning, Masked Image Modeling, Contrastive Learning
Abstract: Masked AutoEncoder (MAE) has revolutionized the field of self-supervised learning with its simple yet effective masking and reconstruction strategies. However, despite achieving state-of-the-art performance across various downstream vision tasks, the underlying mechanisms that drive MAE’s efficacy are less well-explored compared to the canonical contrastive learning paradigm. In this paper, we explore a new perspective to explain what truly contributes to the “rich hidden representations inside the MAE”. Firstly, concerning MAE’s generative pretraining pathway, with a unique encoder-decoder architecture to reconstruct images from aggressive masking, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the decoder’s behaviors. We empirically find that MAE’s decoder mainly learns local features with a limited receptive field, adhering to the well-known Locality Principle. Building upon this locality assumption, we propose a theoretical framework that reformulates the reconstruction-based MAE into a local region-level contrastive learning form for improved understanding. Furthermore, to substantiate the local contrastive nature of MAE, we introduce a Siamese architecture that combines the essence of MAE and contrastive learning without masking and explicit decoder, which sheds light on a unified and more flexible self-supervised learning framework.
Primary Area: unsupervised, self-supervised, semi-supervised, and supervised representation learning
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 3517
Loading