Keywords: Vocabulary Adaptation, Large Language Model, Efficient NLP
TL;DR: We propose a method to align and replace the vocabulary of large language models using only 10B tokens, and find it facilities deep knowledge transfer between models like token-level distillation.
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve great success across many general tasks, but the mismatch among different vocabularies hinders further applications like token-level distillation and inference with various models. To align the vocabularies of LLMs, we propose a simple yet effective method named **UnifyVocab** to replace the vocabulary of an LLM at a limited cost. A new vocabulary alignment method is devised first to align the source vocabulary to the target one. We then rearrange the corresponding parameters like embeddings, and progressively fine-tune the model. Experimental results on models across multiple parameter scales demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization of UnifyVocab, which costs as few as 10B tokens to recover 98.02\% performance of the vanilla models on average. We further find that unifying the vocabularies significantly facilitates the token-level distillation which remarkably boosts (+4.4\%) the model with only 235M tokens. Moreover, our method provides a better initialization of multilingual vocabulary for LLMs to adapt to new languages.
Primary Area: generative models
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 1726
Loading