Temperature is All You Need for Generalization in Langevin Dynamics and other Markov Processes

Published: 18 Sept 2025, Last Modified: 29 Oct 2025NeurIPS 2025 spotlightEveryoneRevisionsBibTeXCC BY 4.0
Keywords: Generalization, Langevin dynamics, deep learning
TL;DR: We derive simple generalization bounds for Markov training processes at any time during training, and then apply them to training with Langevin dynamics to improve existing bounds.
Abstract: We analyze the generalization gap (gap between the training and test errors) when training a potentially over-parametrized model using a Markovian stochastic training algorithm, initialized from some distribution $\theta_0 \sim p_0$. We focus on Langevin dynamics with a positive temperature $\beta^{-1}$, i.e. gradient descent on a training loss $L$ with infinitesimal step size, perturbed with $\beta^{-1}$-variances Gaussian noise, and lightly regularized or bounded. There, we bound the generalization gap, *at any time during training*, by $\sqrt{(\beta\mathbb{E} L (\theta_0) + \log(1/\delta))/N}$ with probability $1-\delta$ over the dataset, where $N$ is the sample size, and $\mathbb{E} L(\theta_0)=O(1)$ with standard initialization scaling. In contrast to previous guarantees, we have no dependence on either training time or reliance on mixing, nor a dependence on dimensionality, gradient norms, or any other properties of the loss or model. This guarantee follows from a general analysis of any Markov process-based training that has a Gibbs-style stationary distribution. The proof is surprisingly simple, once we observe that the marginal distribution divergence from initialization remains bounded, as implied by a generalized second law of thermodynamics.
Primary Area: Theory (e.g., control theory, learning theory, algorithmic game theory)
Submission Number: 17849
Loading