UPTON: Preventing Authorship Leakage from Public Text Release via Data Poisoning
Submission Type: Regular Long Paper
Submission Track: Machine Learning for NLP
Submission Track 2: Human-Centered NLP
Keywords: Authorship Attribution
TL;DR: We develop a data poisoning framework for protecting users' authorship leakage on online media.
Abstract: Consider a scenario where an author (e.g., activist, whistle-blower) with many public writings wishes to write “anonymously" when attackers may have already built an authorship attribution (AA) model based off of public writings including those of the author. To enable her wish, we ask a question “can one make the publicly released writings, T , unattributable so that AA models trained on T cannot attribute its authorship well?" Toward this question, we present a novel solution, UPTON, that exploits black-box data poisoning methods to weaken the authorship features in training samples and make released texts unlearnable. It is different from previous obfuscation works (e.g., adversarial attacks that modify test samples or backdoor works that only change the model outputs when triggering words occur). Using four authorship datasets (IMDb10, IMDb64, Enron and WJO), we present empirical validation where UPTON successfully downgrades the accuracy of AA models to the impractical level (e.g., ∼ 35%) while keeping texts still readable (e.g., > 0.9 in BERTScore). UPTON remains effective to AA models that are already trained on available clean writings of authors.
Submission Number: 403
Loading