Pareto Prompt Optimization
Keywords: Large Language Model, Prompt Optimization, Multiobjective Optimization, Reinforcement Learning, DPO
Abstract: Natural language prompt optimization, or prompt engineering, has emerged as a powerful technique to unlock the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) for various tasks. While existing methods primarily focus on maximizing a single task-specific performance metric for LLM outputs, real-world applications often require considering trade-offs between multiple objectives. In this work, we address this limitation by proposing an effective technique for multi-objective prompt optimization for LLMs. Specifically, we propose **ParetoPrompt**, a reinforcement learning~(RL) method that leverages dominance relationships between prompts to derive a policy model for prompts optimization using preference-based loss functions. By leveraging multi-objective dominance relationships, ParetoPrompt enables efficient exploration of the entire Pareto front without the need for a predefined scalarization of multiple objectives. Our experimental results show that ParetoPrompt consistently outperforms existing algorithms that use specific objective values. ParetoPrompt also yields robust performances when the objective metrics differ between training and testing.
Primary Area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.
Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.
Reciprocal Reviewing: I understand the reciprocal reviewing requirement as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/CallForPapers. If none of the authors are registered as a reviewer, it may result in a desk rejection at the discretion of the program chairs. To request an exception, please complete this form at https://forms.gle/Huojr6VjkFxiQsUp6.
Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.
No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.
Submission Number: 5350
Loading