Keywords: Whole Slide Image, Computational Pathology, Interpretable AI, Graph Representation Learning
TL;DR: Introduction of a graph-based framework for WSI classification that preserves tissue structures, enhances interpretability, and achieves strong diagnostic performance by replacing regular patches with adaptive, explainable graph representations.
Abstract: The histopathological analysis of whole-slide images (WSIs) is fundamental to cancer diagnosis but is a time-consuming and expert-driven process.
While deep learning methods show promising results, dominant patch-based methods artificially fragment tissue, ignore biological boundaries, and produce black-box predictions.
We overcome these limitations with a novel framework that transforms gigapixel WSIs into tissue-boundary aligned graph representations and is interpretable by design.
Our approach builds graph nodes from tissue regions that respect natural structures, not arbitrary grids.
We introduce an adaptive graph coarsening technique, guided by learned embeddings, to efficiently merge homogeneous regions while preserving diagnostically critical details in heterogeneous areas.
Each node is enriched with a compact, interpretable feature set capturing clinically-motivated priors.
A graph attention network then performs diagnosis on this compact representation.
We demonstrate strong performance on cancer staging and survival prediction, outperforming methods with similar data requirements.
Crucially, our data-efficient model (requiring $>300\times$ less training data) achieves results competitive with a massive foundation model, while offering full interpretability through feature attribution.
Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/aweers/pix2pathology
Primary Subject Area: Application: Histopathology
Secondary Subject Area: Interpretability and Explainable AI
Registration Requirement: Yes
Reproducibility: https://github.com/aweers/pix2pathology
Visa & Travel: No
Read CFP & Author Instructions: Yes
Originality Policy: Yes
Single-blind & Not Under Review Elsewhere: Yes
LLM Policy: Yes
Midl Latex Submission Checklist: Ensure no LaTeX errors during compilation., Replace NNN with your OpenReview submission ID., Includes \documentclass{midl}, \jmlryear{2026}, \jmlrworkshop, \jmlrvolume, \editors, and correct \bibliography command., Did not override options of the hyperref package., Did not use the times package., Use the correct spelling and format, avoid Unicode characters, and use LaTeX equivalents instead., Any math in the title and abstract must be enclosed within $...$., Did not override the bibliography style defined in midl.cls and did not use \begin{thebibliography} directly to insert references., Avoid using \scalebox; use \resizebox when needed., Included all necessary figures and removed *unused* files in the zip archive., Removed special formatting, visual annotations, and highlights used during rebuttal., All special characters in the paper and .bib file use LaTeX commands (e.g., \'e for é)., No separate supplementary PDF uploads., Acknowledgements, references, and appendix must start after the main content.
Latex Code: zip
Copyright Form: pdf
Submission Number: 94
Loading