Deep Encoder, Shallow Decoder: Reevaluating Non-autoregressive Machine TranslationDownload PDF

Sep 28, 2020 (edited Mar 16, 2021)ICLR 2021 PosterReaders: Everyone
  • Keywords: Machine Translation, Sequence Modeling, Natural Language Processing
  • Abstract: Much recent effort has been invested in non-autoregressive neural machine translation, which appears to be an efficient alternative to state-of-the-art autoregressive machine translation on modern GPUs. In contrast to the latter, where generation is sequential, the former allows generation to be parallelized across target token positions. Some of the latest non-autoregressive models have achieved impressive translation quality-speed tradeoffs compared to autoregressive baselines. In this work, we reexamine this tradeoff and argue that autoregressive baselines can be substantially sped up without loss in accuracy. Specifically, we study autoregressive models with encoders and decoders of varied depths. Our extensive experiments show that given a sufficiently deep encoder, a single-layer autoregressive decoder can substantially outperform strong non-autoregressive models with comparable inference speed. We show that the speed disadvantage for autoregressive baselines compared to non-autoregressive methods has been overestimated in three aspects: suboptimal layer allocation, insufficient speed measurement, and lack of knowledge distillation. Our results establish a new protocol for future research toward fast, accurate machine translation. Our code is available at https://github.com/jungokasai/deep-shallow.
  • One-sentence Summary: We show that the speed disadvantage for autoregressive baselines to evaluate non-autoregressive machine translation is overestimated in three aspects: suboptimal layer allocation, insufficient speed measurement, and lack of knowledge distillation.
  • Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics
13 Replies

Loading