Counterfactuals As a Means for Evaluating Faithfulness of Attribution Methods in Autoregressive Language Models

Sepehr Kamahi, Yadollah Yaghoobzadeh

Track: Full paper

Keywords: Feature Importance, Explanation, Autoregressive Language Modeling

TL;DR: A technique for evaluating the faithfulness of feature importance methods

Abstract: Despite the widespread adoption of autoregressive language models, explainability evaluation research has predominantly focused on span infilling and masked language models. Evaluating the faithfulness of an explanation method—how accurately it explains the inner workings and decision-making of the model—is challenging because it is difficult to separate the model from its explanation. Most faithfulness evaluation techniques corrupt or remove input tokens deemed important by a particular attribution (feature importance) method and observe the resulting change in the model's output. However, for autoregressive language models, this approach creates out-of-distribution inputs due to their next-token prediction training objective. In this study, we propose a technique that leverages counterfactual generation to evaluate the faithfulness of attribution methods for autoregressive language models. Our technique generates fluent, in-distribution counterfactuals, making the evaluation protocol more reliable.

Submission Number: 81