Can LLMs Understand Time Series Anomalies?

Zihao Zhou, Rose Yu

Keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs), Time Series Analysis, Anomaly Detection, Multimodal Learning

TL;DR: This study challenges common assumptions about Large Language Models' capabilities in time series anomaly detection.

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained popularity in time series forecasting, but their potential for anomaly detection remains largely unexplored. Our study investigates whether LLMs can understand and detect anomalies in time series data, focusing on zero-shot and few-shot scenarios. Inspired by conjectures about LLMs' behavior from time series forecasting research, we formulate key hypotheses about LLMs' capabilities in time series anomaly detection. We design and conduct principled experiments to test each of these hypotheses. Our investigation reveals several surprising findings about LLMs for time series: (1) LLMs understand time series better as *images* rather than as text, (2) LLMs do not demonstrate enhanced performance when prompted to engage in *explicit reasoning* about time series analysis. (3) Contrary to common beliefs, LLMs' understanding of time series *do not* stem from their repetition biases or arithmetic abilities. (4) LLMs' behaviors and performance in time series analysis *vary significantly* across different models. This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of contemporary LLM capabilities in time series anomaly detection. Our results suggest that while LLMs can understand trivial time series anomalies (we have no evidence that they can understand more subtle real-world anomalies), many common conjectures based on their reasoning capabilities do not hold. All synthetic dataset generators, final prompts, and evaluation scripts have been made available in https://github.com/rose-stl-lab/anomllm.

Primary Area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2025/AuthorGuide.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors’ identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 6123