GUARD: A Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmark

Weiye Zhao, Rui Chen, Yifan Sun, Ruixuan Liu, Tianhao Wei, Feihan Li, Changliu Liu

Keywords: Safe Reinforcement Learning, Reinforcement Learning Benchmark, Safe Reinforcement Learning Algorithm, Customizable, Robotics

TL;DR: GUARD is a versatile safe RL benchmark, featuring a wide variety of robots, tasks, and safety constraint specifications, along with a comprehensive implementation of state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms.

Abstract:

Due to the trial-and-error nature, it is typically challenging to apply RL algorithms to safety-critical real-world applications, such as autonomous driving, human-robot interaction, robot manipulation, etc, where such errors are not tolerable.
Recently, safe RL (i.e., constrained RL) has emerged rapidly in the literature, in which the agents explore the environment while satisfying constraints. Due to the diversity of algorithms and tasks, it remains difficult to compare existing safe RL algorithms.
To fill that gap, we introduce GUARD, a Generalized Unified SAfe Reinforcement Learning Development Benchmark.
GUARD has several advantages compared to existing benchmarks. First, GUARD is a generalized benchmark with a wide variety of RL agents, tasks, and safety constraint specifications. Second, GUARD comprehensively covers state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms with self-contained implementations. Third, GUARD is highly customizable in tasks and algorithms. We present a comparison of state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms in various task settings using GUARD and establish baselines that future work can build on.

Primary Area: datasets and benchmarks

Code Of Ethics: I acknowledge that I and all co-authors of this work have read and commit to adhering to the ICLR Code of Ethics.

Submission Guidelines: I certify that this submission complies with the submission instructions as described on https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2024/AuthorGuide.

Anonymous Url: I certify that there is no URL (e.g., github page) that could be used to find authors' identity.

No Acknowledgement Section: I certify that there is no acknowledgement section in this submission for double blind review.

Submission Number: 8384