Uncovering Bias in Building Damage Assessment from Satellite Imagery

Dennis Melamed, Cameron Johnson, Isaac D. Gerg, Chen Zhao, Russell Blue, Anthony Hoogs, Brian Clipp, Philip Morrone

Abstract: We identify a bias in a commonly used dataset for building damage detection, evaluate its effects on existing deep learning models, and devise mitigation strategies to overcome it. We find that the data contains significantly more groups of damaged buildings than single ones leading to skewed machine learning evaluations. Consequently, deep learning models heavily rely on surrounding context rather than individual building damage when classifying supporting our claim. Specifically, the dataset includes extraneous damage surrounding buildings such as debris, fallen trees, and other damaged buildings which results in deep neural networks overfitting to these features. We analyze the top-5 solutions of the xView2 challenge, which focuses on building damage classification using satellite imagery as provided by the xBD dataset. Our experiments reveal that these models struggle to accurately identify isolated damaged buildings, potentially causing oversights in critical disaster scenarios and delaying humanitarian aid. Finally, we devise a new augmentation strategy to reduce this bias in disaster datasets and show it improves real-world outcomes.